Slashdot Mirror


Ray Gun Puts Voices Inside Your Head

Sportsqs writes "The Sierra Nevada Corporation claimed this week that it is ready to begin production on the MEDUSA, a damned scary ray gun that uses the 'microwave audio effect' to implant sounds and perhaps even specific messages inside people's heads."

517 comments

  1. Ha! See! I told you! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    There you guys sit, all laughing at me at pointing and jeering at my Tinfoil Hat 3000(tm), but look who's sitting pretty now! Ha! Fsckers!

  2. Since 1986... by Illbay · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...I've had the voice of Reagan inside my head.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:Since 1986... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that's where it went!

    2. Re:Since 1986... by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reagan? Wasn't that the name of the possessed girl in The Exorcist?

      Thanks to these microwave guns, you no longer need to be schitzophrenic to hear voices. There have been a lot of tinfoil hat jokes (of course) in the comments, but it appears that if you're going to be part of a political demonstration from now on, a tinfoil hat may be necessary to keep the Secret Police out of your head.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Since 1986... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      This could be used selectively. Put voices in the person's head, causing the target to see a psychiatrist, who prescribes medication for the schizophrenia. Keep the voices going, leading to higher prescriptions. Eventually, the person won't be able to take it anymore, and will find a high-enough bridge to leap from.

      Just to be humane, though, the voices should stop the instant the feet leave the surface, giving the target a few seconds of peace right before the end.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    4. Re:Since 1986... by gnick · · Score: 1

      ...a tinfoil hat may be necessary to keep the Secret Police out of your head.

      But what do I do about the Dream Police!?!

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    5. Re:Since 1986... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Once the Dream Police are gone, you need to worry about the lunatic on the grass!

      "There's someone in my head and it's not me..."

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Since 1986... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      "The Dork Side of the Moon", an account of the lunar eclipse last February, inclucing a home invasion and attempted murder. And reefer.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    7. Re:Since 1986... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone needs to find out who's been using one of these on a "certain" president for the last 7 1/2 yrs and tell them to "SHUT THE DAMN THING OFF".

    8. Re:Since 1986... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning - Most of McGrew's journals are at least borderline NSFW... And never tagged.

    9. Re:Since 1986... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      One is, as its title is NSFW but you're right, I really should start putting G, PG13, R, and X on them. The one linked has violence and vulgarity. I can only think of one or two that would rate an R or an NC-17.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    10. Re:Since 1986... by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    11. Re:Since 1986... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... a tinfoil hat may be necessary to keep the Secret Police out of your head.

      Especially if you-re wearing a t-shirt that says, "Nine out of the ten voices in my head told me to stay home and clean my guns today".

  3. A New Age by The+Crooked+Elf · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is surely the dawn of a new age for conspiracy theories, second only to that of the advent of recorded media (with all of those damned subconscious messages).

    --
    "Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule."
    1. Re:A New Age by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      Where's the Rhennius machine to go through?

      Can you hear me, Ded?

  4. Buy from Sierra Nevada Corporation by coren2000 · · Score: 1

    *ZAPP*

    "You will buy more products from Sierra Nevada Corporation"
     
    /me drooling... "I will buy more products from Sierra Nevada Corporation"

    1. Re:Buy from Sierra Nevada Corporation by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I think Sierra Nevada and all is well.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Buy from Sierra Nevada Corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a stupid idea. Now if you'll excuse me, I've got to visit the Brain Slug planet and walk around without wearing a helmet...

  5. Sierra Nevada? by gabeman-o · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder how many Pale Ales you have to drink to get the same effect.

    1. Re:Sierra Nevada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I get a research grant to study that?

    2. Re:Sierra Nevada? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      Drinking those delicious green Sierra Nevada pale ales will probably have the opposite effect, That's why so many nutjobs self-medicate. waking up hung over is not very fun but at least the voices will shut up for awhile.

    3. Re:Sierra Nevada? by halivar · · Score: 1

      Sierra Nevada? Pfft. Rogue for the win. The hangover just serves to remind you what a great time you had last night

    4. Re:Sierra Nevada? by pintpusher · · Score: 1

      Drink unfiltered beer. The extra B vitamins seem to prevent the hangover. At least in my copious studies...

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
    5. Re:Sierra Nevada? by halivar · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The best beer leaves sediment at the bottom of the glass.

    6. Re:Sierra Nevada? by icebrain · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The best beer leaves sediment at the bottom of the glass.

      The beer should be opaque as well.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    7. Re:Sierra Nevada? by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      I understand (from a bartender, so it must be true) that hangovers are caused by alcohol's tendency to dehydrate tissues, including the brain. I drink lots of water between alcoholic drinks to combat this and it seems to work.

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
    8. Re:Sierra Nevada? by pintpusher · · Score: 1

      I find, with beer being mostly water, that I don't need nearly so much water if I drink good quality, generally unfiltered, beer. But yes, copious water after a whiskey binge is a requirement...

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
  6. Total recall by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

    Will they finally be able to sell vacation to other planets and just "implant" the souvenir of this trip in my head? Exciting!

  7. That's Ironic by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that they should name it Medusa, a villain who was defeated by reflecting it's magic back at it...

    1. Re:That's Ironic by electrosoccertux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, this time she's not sentient.

      This goes just too far. If there were ever to be a law against free speech, this would be it, because I don't want to listen to what this thing has to say. I value silence. That ear plugs wouldn't work against this thing...

    2. Re:That's Ironic by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio, MEDUSA

      The horror of american acronym addiction strikes again.
      Or should that be American Acronym Addiction?

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    3. Re:That's Ironic by Underfunded · · Score: 1

      That is insensitive! Just because she was fugly does not mean she was a villain!

    4. Re:That's Ironic by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If there were ever to be a law against free speech, this would be it, because I don't want to listen to what this thing has to say. I value silence.

      You already have this. The right to free speech is NOT the right to be heard by everyone, despite what a lot of people think.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    5. Re:That's Ironic by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      I'm a proud member of a group dedicated to fighting excessive acronym usage - we're the AAAAAAAAAA (the Australasian And American Association Against Any And All Acronym Abuse).

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    6. Re:That's Ironic by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Your right (and everyone else's) to free speech does NOT include the inside of MY skull. If I'm ever assaulted with this device (and assault is all it can be considered as microwaves are dangerous) I will sue/litigate/attack in self defense. Call me Luddite if you wish, but if you own one of these devices and use it on myself or my family I will destroy it in self defense. The inside of my skull is STRICTLY private property. Trespassers will be shot, survivors shot again. I really don't care if you were aiming at someone nearby to me and I picked up a little extra, I am claiming self defense and shooting back. period. you. have. been. warned.

    7. Re:That's Ironic by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I'm a proud member of a group dedicated to fighting excessive acronym usage - we're the AAAAAAAAAA (the Australasian And American Association Against Any And All Acronym Abuse).

      Well at least it's not a goddamn TLA. I really hate TLA's.

    8. Re:That's Ironic by tzot · · Score: 1

      I'm a proud member of a group dedicated to fighting excessive acronym usage - we're the AAAAAAAAAA (the Australasian And American Association Against Any And All Acronym Abuse).

      Well at least it's not a goddamn TLA. I really hate TLA's.

      Um. It *is* a TLA. Just count the letters.

      You have exactly 10 minutes to reply and suggest that *you* knew that already and *I* missed your joke :)

      --
      I speak England very best
    9. Re:That's Ironic by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Technically, she wasn't sentient when Perseus used her head in King Polydectes' court either. [/Pedantry]

    10. Re:That's Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The earplugs... they do nothing!

    11. Re:That's Ironic by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Ah, the "He was putting voices in my head, so I had to shoot him" defence. I hear that works real well if follow up by screaming "Remember Ruby Ridge! The Constitution prohibits taxes! Randy Weaver! Randy Weaver!"

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    12. Re:That's Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so you know, Mr. Internet Tough Guy, I'm not scared. Nor is anyone else.

    13. Re:That's Ironic by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Actually, Medusa in ancient greek mythology was made so hideous by the goddess Athena that people who looked upon her would turn to stone. Perseus Killed Medusa with sword whilst looking at her though a reflection in his shield as not to be turned to stone. Perseus then used Medusa's head as a weapon.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medusa

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    14. Re:That's Ironic by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Nice catch :) I didn't even think of that until you responded. I mean, what are the odds?

    15. Re:That's Ironic by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the warning. If I ever meet someone called zappepcs I'll be sure to keep that in mind.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  8. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of course a tinfoil hat will be no defence since your head will burst into flames.

  9. They obviously didn't consider.. by AlterRNow · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. the fact it wouldn't affect people who already hear voices.

    --
    The disappearing pencil trick. Let me show you it.
    1. Re:They obviously didn't consider.. by Toutatis · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the contrary, those people will be able to do some thinking while the old voices in his head talk with the new ones.

    2. Re:They obviously didn't consider.. by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have schzioaffective disorder, I've learned how to be like John Forbes Nash and create a reality filter to tune things out like voices and hallucinations by ignoring them.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    3. Re:They obviously didn't consider.. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Wow. That actually sounds pretty awesome. I didn't know you could mount that kind of defense against something that happens in your brain.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:They obviously didn't consider.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there, done that insane thing. The following scenario would unfold:

      *Buy our superwax*

      Me: WTF?

      *It's the best there is.*

      Me: AURGHGHGHG!! Goddamnit I thought you guys were gone.

      *We garountee it 100%*

      Me: Wait a minute. Usually they tell me to kill things, not buy superwax. Hrm, that article on slashdot, that cone shaped thing, it's pointing at me.

      *It's the best stuff around*

      Me: And as I get closer, it gets louder. HRMMM...

      The real voices in my head :
      *There can be, ONLY, ONE, KILL KILL KILL!

      ME: EURRRRAAAAGGGHHHH!!!!! DEATH TO THEE FOUL WRECHED THING!

      --5 minutes later and a lot of broke electronics.

      *Me: Yes sir, the voices in my head told me to kill the Medusa-phone because it was interfering with my ability to listen to them. No Sir, I do not have a history of mental illness, it might be a Medusa-phone related thing, however. I can't be sure, honestly I've never heard voices before till today and I don't really know one way or another if they originated from me or the phone, but not the phone is gone, and I'm not hearing anything, I'm pretty sure it was the phone.

      *Cop gives me a weird look before arresting me.

      *At the inevitable trial I go for momentary insanity induced by hearing voices and not knowing what to think. The judge lets me go and bans the use of the medua phone. I get assraped by a corporate attorney months later.

    5. Re:They obviously didn't consider.. by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      It comes from my background as a programmer. I learned how to reprogram my brain to filter out things in the same way a program filters things out. If I didn't, I wouldn't even be able to function well enough to write a complete sentence. My brain has thought bursts of several thoughts at the same time and runs too fast (like it is overclocked), which can be an advantage or disadvantage.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  10. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Funny

    There you guys sit, all laughing at me at pointing and jeering at my Tinfoil Hat 3000(tm), but look who's sitting pretty now! Ha! Fsckers!

    You won't be sitting pretty when you shiny new hat starts to spark and arc like a fork in the microwave!

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  11. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by omeomi · · Score: 1

    This sounds kind of scary and kind of cool. If somebody offered to give me a demo, I'm not sure weather I would recoil in horror at the thought of microwave radiation being directed at my head, or jump at the opportunity to hear it...

  12. Is this the same... by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

    technology as the /. article a few months ago? I seem to remember a govt prototype or some such device that was trying to do the same thing. In any case, I hope this spurs the development of professionally made tin foil hats. The crude home-made variety aren't going to cut it anymore.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Is this the same... by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      That would be this story. You need to register for the article though. Bummer.

    2. Re:Is this the same... by Y+Ddraig+Goch · · Score: 1

      Time to upgrade to stainless steel mixing bowls.

      --
      Meddle thou not in the affairs of Dragons, for thou art crunchy and with most anything.
    3. Re:Is this the same... by cain · · Score: 1

      You'd trust someone else to make your tin-foil hat? What are you - crazy? TRUST NO ONE

    4. Re:Is this the same... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      You'd trust someone else to make your tin-foil hat? What are you - crazy? TRUST NO ONE

      Not even cain (14472), which means you might want to TRUST SOMEONE or EVERYONE. But flip a coin to decide, because if you're only supposed to trust someone, you might not be in the set of people you're supposed to trust.

    5. Re:Is this the same... by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

      In any case, I hope this spurs the development of professionally made tin foil hats.

      (AP) Sierra Nevada Corporation announces PERSEUS Personal Microwave Barrier

      The Sierra Nevada Corporation, manufacturer of the MEDUSA auditory message broadcast system, which has been widely adopted by the advertising industry and by secret government mind control agencies all over the world, today announced the PERSEUS Personal Microwave Barrier, a professional-grade, cranially fitted, message blocking system. "We recognize that certain members of the public may occasionally be discomfited by hearing voices in their heads. To serve this market segment we are releasing the first in a line of personal barrier products, which will block 100% of incoming messages." said spokesman Sucha Wanker.

      Wanker went on, "We recognize that the sudden onset of unwanted or unexpected messages could conceivable inconvenience people in certain professions, such as window washers, emergency workers, and tightrope walkers. We hope that the PERSEUS will help to further minimize the already low number of incidents involving these sensitive areas."

      Prospective purchasers are cautioned that all PERSEUS units can be remotely disabled by authorized public safety personnel to ensure the receipt of important government broadcasts and/or Sierra Nevada offers for unit upgrades, and that tampering with the unit is prohibited by law.

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  13. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by omeomi · · Score: 1

    s/weather/whether/g

  14. Equality by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's like curing Schizophrenia the backwards way!

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:Equality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    2. Re:Equality by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing, really. Imagine being able to drown out auditory input that can't be ignored and gets garbled up by the mind. While I find this idea potentially dangerous (who knows that the long term affects could be) if refined it could have much more potential than just war and advertising.

  15. The Sierra Nevada Corporation? by rpillala · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they working out of Black Mesa?

    --
    When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    1. Re:The Sierra Nevada Corporation? by superid · · Score: 4, Funny

      that was a joke,
      ha ha
      fat chance

    2. Re:The Sierra Nevada Corporation? by Dmala · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I had just gotten that song out of my head. Who needs fancy microwave audio guns when a simple earworm is far more effective?

    3. Re:The Sierra Nevada Corporation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Craigslist ad:

      Volunteer Workers needed in the Sierra Nevada region, please e-mail glados@aperturescience.org

      Must love cake (and really, who doesn't?)

    4. Re:The Sierra Nevada Corporation? by azzuth · · Score: 1

      is the cake a lie again, cause i'm tired of all the cake-fibbing...

  16. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was going to make fun of you, but then my new friend Roger told me not to.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  17. Whatever by Bwana+Geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Pfft. Call me when they implement a 'microwave digital surround effect' on this thing. Then I'll be impressed.

    1. Re:Whatever by Bat+Country · · Score: 1

      I'd have to say if the sound fidelity is any good, they already would have one, assuming two things:

      1. They knew where on your head they were hitting you
      2. They had a decent surround sound processor

      It'd work the same way surround sound ear buds work: by tricking your brain using echo timing into believing the sound is arriving at your ears from a particular angle.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
  18. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by The+Crooked+Elf · · Score: 1

    I speculate a tin-foil hat will do you little good against this "microwave audio" device. According to TFA, all standard forms of defense against auditory input are nonfunctional, since the device transmits audio directly into your skull, bypassing your ear altogether.

    --
    "Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule."
  19. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by __aardcx5948 · · Score: 1

    Ha! Fsckers!

    What? Checking my filesystem has suddendly become "nerdy"? Why I oughta...

  20. So will the 2.0 version use Gamma Radiation? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Funny

    In my day they only had ads on TV and radio. And in magazines and movies and ball games and on buses and milk cartons and written in the sky. But not in dreams, no-siree!

    1. Re:So will the 2.0 version use Gamma Radiation? by hellfish006 · · Score: 1

      took way too long for someone to say this. Kudos to you!

  21. Interesting. by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    Anybody have any idea what division of SNC is working on this? Once upon a time I used to work for those guys..

    1. Re:Interesting. by mustafap · · Score: 1

      >Anybody have any idea what division of SNC is working on this?

      Yea, it's the "Weapons of Mass Subjugation" Division.

      I heard profits are up.

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    2. Re:Interesting. by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

      Could be worse -- they could be building actual lethal weapons. At least this thing has a chance of not being lethal. Whether or not I'd've had a problem with working on this project or not is a question I'm not sure I can answer now, though..

  22. I AM laughing at you! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/

    Conclusion
    The helmets amplify frequency bands that coincide with those allocated to the US government between 1.2 Ghz and 1.4 Ghz. According to the FCC, These bands are supposedly reserved for ''radio location'' (ie, GPS), and other communications with satellites (see, for example, [3]). The 2.6 Ghz band coincides with mobile phone technology. Though not affiliated by government, these bands are at the hands of multinational corporations.

    It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC. We hope this report will encourage the paranoid community to develop improved helmet designs to avoid falling prey to these shortcomings.

    Ha Ha!

    /Nelson

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:I AM laughing at you! by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been saying this all along. Tinfoil hats,and Faraday cage like devices in general, can't be relied upon unless they're grounded.

      In many cases, you'll get significant attenuation without grounding, as in the case of foil shields for protecting passport RFIDs, but grounding, even imperfect grounding, would improve shielding tremendously.

      Obviously, you should run a wire from your tinfoil hat to a conductive grounding strip attached to the heel of your shoe. Then you replace your floors with carbon impregnated panels, and for the final touch connect them to a six foot copper rod driven into the earth.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:I AM laughing at you! by gnick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Obviously, you should run a wire from your tinfoil hat to a conductive grounding strip attached to the heel of your shoe.

      Actually, the devices I've used connect to the toe of your shoe, not the heel - Both heels are often lifted while walking. And you need to be sure that you run wires to both feet instead of just one. Also, unless you have a conductive floor (we did when we were using these, but for a very different purpose), spikes are more effective than strips. But you need to plan for the terrain. 1/4" spikes are fine for walking (and very effective for grounding) in damp vegetation or earth but may impede your progress on asphalt. In that case, you'll need very shallow spikes and will just have to accept limited grounding unless you're willing to run a very long cable to a copper rod.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:I AM laughing at you! by flahwho · · Score: 1

      I ran out of tin foil. I suppose I'll have to use plastic wrap.

    4. Re:I AM laughing at you! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you should run a wire from your tinfoil hat to a conductive grounding strip attached to the heel of your shoe. Then you replace your floors with carbon impregnated panels, and for the final touch connect them to a six foot copper rod driven into the earth.

      Couldn't you just shield your entire house, so you wouldn't need to wear a helmet while inside ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:I AM laughing at you! by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you should run a wire from your tinfoil hat to a conductive grounding strip attached to the heel of your shoe.

      Actually, the devices I've used connect to the toe of your shoe, not the heel - Both heels are often lifted while walking. And you need to be sure that you run wires to both feet instead of just one. Also, unless you have a conductive floor (we did when we were using these, but for a very different purpose), spikes are more effective than strips. But you need to plan for the terrain. 1/4" spikes are fine for walking (and very effective for grounding) in damp vegetation or earth but may impede your progress on asphalt. In that case, you'll need very shallow spikes and will just have to accept limited grounding unless you're willing to run a very long cable to a copper rod.

      I am ready to sue my golf course. they had me replace my metal spikes with rubber ones, and now I know why!!!

      --
      "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    6. Re:I AM laughing at you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could a large capacitance help? Instead of grounding out, build a filter.

  23. Where did the development $ come from? by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this one of DARPA's toys?

    1. Re:Where did the development $ come from? by rilister · · Score: 2, Informative

      'Where did the development $ come from?' ... as usual, it came from you and me.

      (no, really - from http://www.sncorp.com/about/ataglance.shtml
      "SNC (The Sierra Nevada Corporation) is a Privately Held Corporation and is considered the Top Woman Owned Federal Contractor in the US based upon the capabilities and resources to deliver high-technology systems and integration programs at the $1 Billion level")

      -still, I like their beer...

      --
      'This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it' - Eeyore
  24. And we wonder why people are paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Look at me, I can't even post under my username anymore.

    1. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by b4upoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Paranoia is serious. I lost a best friend of many years to paranoia when he became so convinced that the government was out to get him that he hung himself. This very week my brother in law attempted suicide due to his hallucinations that involve his believing that the FBI is invading his mind. He is now being held under the Baker Act for 72 hours. Just maybe a different prescription might quiet his hallucinations. Paranoia can and does frequently cause murders where the sufferer becomes so convinced that someone is out to do him harm that he strikes first as a desperate act of supposed self defense.
              Believe it or not mental illness means nothing in Florida. If you are so crazy that you think Santa Clause is an FBI agent out to kill you and you strike out that does not meet the standard for legal insanity here. The idea that you feel it is right to preserve your own life will be taken as proof that you have a knowledge of right and wrong, Society is sick.

    2. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Santa is not after me, or that he is not in the FBI, Cause if he is not FBI what is he?

    3. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by neuromancer23 · · Score: 1

      >> Believe it or not mental illness means nothing in Florida.

      How do you think Jeb Bush made governor?

    4. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by TechForensics · · Score: 1

      Florida uses the M'Naghten Rule for determination of insanity. The question is whether "the party accused was laboring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong". Contrast this with the Model Penal Code definition, in use in other states: that one lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the criminality of his actions, or to conform his behavior with the requirements of law. Both of these beat the pants off the "Policeman at the Elbow" definition, which holds you not guilty by reason of insanity if you would not have been able to restrain your act even with a policeman at your elbow.

      There is not much doubt that the Model Penal Code rule is the most circumspect and modern. Florida, in using M'Naghten, is not necessarily a throwback state, however. If you intended to kill Santa Claus, should you have known that that was wrong? After all, isn't he a mythical figure whom bullets would leave unharmed?

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    5. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by dr_canak · · Score: 5, Informative

      Everything in your post is informative, up to the statement that "paranoia can and does *frequenttly* cause murders..." I work in mental health, and have had experience with the circumstances you describe. However, there are 1000's of more paranoid folks who don't go on to commit homicide/suicide than those who do. Just a quick google turned up this:

      http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/318/7193/1225

      which estimates roughly 8% of homicide perpetrators having contact with the mental health profession, but that certainly doesn't equate to them all being paranoid, or even having a true psychiatric diagnosis.

      http://www.psychlaws.org/BriefingPapers/BP11.htm

      puts the a conservative estimate around 9%-15%, but again this is all mental illness, not just mental illnesses that involve paranoid ideation which is certainly less,

      And finally here:

      http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/355/20/2064

      cites a study showing an approximately 5% prevalence rate of schizophrenia amongst persons convicted of homicide. Now I understand this is orders of magnitude higher than the general population, and there is certainly an increased risk of self-inflected injury or homicide as compared to folks who don't have a history of schizophrenia. But the fact still remains that the overwhelming majority of folks with a psychiatric illness, including paranoid schizophrenia are not at risk for perpetrating violence against themselves or others.

      Not necessarily disagreeing with your post, per se. Just pointing out the other side of the equation as there is a common misconception that those with mental illness are a risk to themselves and others.

      thx,
      jeff

    6. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever consider that you may be causing this paranoia, I mean you do seem to be the common link to both of these people.

    7. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by matria · · Score: 1
    8. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by mypalmike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you are so crazy that you think Santa Clause is an FBI agent out to kill you and you strike out that does not meet the standard for legal insanity here.

      That's OK with me. Sorry if it seems callous, but a mentally ill murderer is still a murderer. Criminal law serves to protect the public. It sucks to have mental illness and to be locked up, but it sucks more to get stabbed to death on a subway train.

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    9. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      For it to be murder and not something else, it has to be intentional. Some people can be "compelled" by their illness. The insanity defense is saying that what you did was not under your control (no "malice aforethought"). You can always try someone for recklessness or manslaughter, being legally insane doesn't remove responsibility for what happened. But murder requires that you know what you're doing and intended to do it.

    10. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by nikolajsheller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Murder is murder, but if mentally ill people received actual help, instead indifference, from society and the heath care system, some murders and/or suicides might be avoided.
      Wouldn't the money be better spent treating people prior to problems cropping instead of keeping them locked up afterwards?
      A criminal justice system is not designed to help sick people.

    11. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for posting.
      The mentally Ill have it bad enough as it is without being falsely labeled with a propensity toward violence.

    12. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Society is sick.

      Nah, just Florida.

    13. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Believe it or not mental illness means nothing in Florida. If you are so crazy that you think Santa Clause is an FBI agent out to kill you and you strike out that does not meet the standard for legal insanity here."

      Makes sense to me. I always thought there was something wrong with American's heads. That explains a lot of the problems of this world.....

    14. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by Twisted64 · · Score: 1

      The idea that you feel it is right to preserve your own life will be taken as proof that you have a knowledge of right and wrong...

      Interesting - sounds like a bit of Catch-22. If you haven't read the book, it is set in Italy during WW2. All the bomber crews want to go home, but the easiest way out is to plead insanity. You also have to request to be sent home, but doing so implies sanity, nullifying your eligibility. Great book.

      --
      Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
    15. Re:And we wonder why people are paranoid? by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      As someone who has spent time in psychiatric institutions, I agree wholeheartedly - the majority of schizophrenics I met were (in the immortal words of Douglas Adams) 'mostly harmless', and generally very interesting and stimulating company.

      Yes, schizophrenia combined with paranoid ideation can cause confusion, frustration and violence - I have seen that first hand, and the loss of control is quite frightening.

      But the majority of schizophrenics, despite elements of paranoia, manage to work their way through life without harming others.

      Oh, and I was a patient, not a staff member :o)

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  25. That explains it. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microwave audio effect? That explains why I keep hearing "90% power... white rice... sensor cook" over and over again.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:That explains it. by mrslacker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Never mind the voice that's telling me to visit a house that's about to be filled with popcorn. Just think, they could have avoided the effort of the implant, and used microwaves for both.

    2. Re:That explains it. by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think there's a similar effect that explains the "whooshing" sound you hear when you watch shooting stars.

      For years, scientists have believed that the sound was a figment of human imagination, even though many people would swear to hearing it. The problem is that the meteors are miles and miles overhead, but the sound is heard simultaneously. Now I've personally heard the whoosh of a bolide during a the massive meteor shower, and I'd be prepared to swear it was simultaneous with the flash of the meteor trail, even though I know that sound could not travel that fast, even if it were a mere few thousand feet.

      It's even more psychologically convincing because the sound isn't really a "whoosh"; it's not what you'd expect. It's more like the sound of slurping the last bit of milkshake with a straw, listened to through a long PVC pipe.

      I read a few years ago that physicists found an accoustic effect created by the low frequency electrmagnetic energy working on water droplets of a certain size. This would make sense because when I did hear the "whoosh", I was lying on my back on the dewy grass. I've also read that wireframe glasses can account for the simultaneous sound.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:That explains it. by jaminJay · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've never thought of that. Although I know to look for a plane well ahead of where I hear it, and I've seen a fighter jet go from slow and low overhead to fast and distance well before hearing the noise, I heard a strange, loud crackling noise and looked up while a meteorite was burning up. The sound source appeared to be directly from the object with no apparent lag and I did not think odd of it at the time. Now, I do.

      --
      Leela: "Is all the work done by children?" Alien: "No, not the whipping."
    4. Re:That explains it. by quitte · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      How could this get modded interesting? I'm pretty sure this is supposed to be funny.

    5. Re:That explains it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Ping!*

    6. Re:That explains it. by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      I read a few years ago that physicists found an accoustic effect created by the low frequency electrmagnetic energy working on water droplets of a certain size. This would make sense because when I did hear the "whoosh", I was lying on my back on the dewy grass. I've also read that wireframe glasses can account for the simultaneous sound.

      They're wrong... The sound is caused by LSD!

  26. Actually by Junta · · Score: 1

    In this case wouldn't your new friend encourage you to think of a tinfoil hat as ludicrous? I mean, after all, what is in your friend's best interests...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Actually by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahhh! You sound just like Jake!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  27. Getting laid more by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Toot with this i can now insert the message "Sleep with me" in the heads of attractive women everywhere!!!

    Denise Richards & the olsen twins here I come..

    1. Re:Getting laid more by kalirion · · Score: 4, Funny

      Toot with this i can now insert the message "Sleep with me" in the heads of attractive women everywhere!!!

      Denise Richards & the olsen twins here I come..

      Ok, now I'm confused.

    2. Re:Getting laid more by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      muh they are sisters.. hmmm sister sandwich..

    3. Re:Getting laid more by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Olsen Twins!? That's alarming...

    4. Re:Getting laid more by I+cant+believe+its+n · · Score: 1

      Gives new meaning to the phrase "already spoken for".

      --
      She made the willows dance
    5. Re:Getting laid more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toot with this i can now insert the message "Sleep with me" in the heads of attractive women everywhere!!!

      That should really confuse the shit out of them when they look around and all they see is you.

    6. Re:Getting laid more by PCMeister · · Score: 1

      I'm confused as well.. by the GP's choice in women.

      You should only get close to Denise Richards if you have a good attorney to protect yourself from her after the fact. As for the Olsen twins, a big glass crack pipe and some protein shakes would do just fine to get things going!

  28. scary. by apodyopsis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    remote torture anybody?

    imagine playing Cliff Richard to you victim incessantly. unable to sleep. unable to get away from it. all you need is somebody to point this thing at his head.

    imagine doing it at just enough of a low level so he is not aware of it.

    imagine jururs being threatened at long range. imagine blackmail from a distance.

    what if an unverifiable, untraceable voice announces in your ear "rob the bank or I shoot your wife", what would you do?

    this is damn scary, where is my magneto helmet?

    1. Re:scary. by Eudial · · Score: 4, Interesting

      imagine playing Cliff Richard to you victim incessantly. unable to sleep. unable to get away from it. all you need is somebody to point this thing at his head.

      Imagine the rick rolling possibilities. We're in for a world of pain if these things become available on the internet.

      On a more serious note, engineering and scientific work ethics? Does that at all exist anymore? I can't imagine anyone willingly developing a technology with so many malevolent uses. Didn't we learn anything from the Manhattan project?

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    2. Re:scary. by kalirion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Could a microwave gun really hit a single head out of a crowd?

    3. Re:scary. by pxc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      what if an unverifiable, untraceable voice announces in your ear "rob the bank or I shoot your wife", what would you do?

      Don't react. If they believe they can't contact you, then they'll try something else to get whatever they want out of you before killing your wife. It will at least give you some awareness of the situation and probably buy your wife some more time.

    4. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good points, and perhaps its use should be banned. However, as some very interesting technologies develop over the next century, we have to be careful to avoid technophobia. We can occasionally ban certain uses of certain technology, but we should NEVER ban research (except in very extreme circumstances).

    5. Re:scary. by apodyopsis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just thought of a few more - a tinnitus emulator - playing a barking dog at a cat to freak it - play a common mobile phone noise at a crowd, see who reaches for their pocket - or more disturbing, play the sound of a woman screaming - play a dog barking at a horse race to fix the finals really I think we are scratching the surface here, this is one deeply unethical product. who can think of some more?

    6. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if an unverifiable, untraceable voice announces in your ear "rob the bank or I shoot your wife", what would you do?

      I'd do what I always do:

      Lithium, Prozac, bottled water,
      Valium, Haldol, piece of pie!

      Works every time.

    7. Re:scary. by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      what if an unverifiable, untraceable voice announces in your ear "rob the bank or I shoot your wife", what would you do?

      this is damn scary, where is my magneto helmet?

      So someone is about to shoot your wife, and you're looking for a helmet? You set your priorities right, sir :)

      Let's be serious for a moment: you can send threats via prepaid cellphone just as well, and you can torture a prisoner with conventional speakers, also just as well.

      It's a fancy new device, but I don't see apocalypse coming :)

    8. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when slashdotters have wifes? Has the world changed recently?

    9. Re:scary. by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's not a one time thing. Part of the problem with Schizophrenics is not necessarily that they hear voices, but that these voices are shouting obscenities, insults, and general gutter talk 24/7. Lots of people hear voices, check out any New Age conference. You will meet all kinds of people that 'talk' with 'Angels' or 'Helping Spirits'. Those people hear good, positive messages from their voices. "Don't worry, everything will be okay" "God is Love" "It will all work out for the best" etc. etc.

      So you hear a voice one time that tells you to rob a bank. Big deal -- ignore it. But now you hear a voice that is constantly telling you that you're no good, you're a failure, kill yourself, everybody hates you secretly, etc. etc. That would drive you insane in a few days.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    10. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the government must be hard up as its staging bank robberies by its citizens to what.. balance the budget?

      Are they aware how much they've spent and robbing a few or even thousands) of banks won't make a dent?

    11. Re:scary. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      How about a religious president hearing a voice saying: "This is God, you should invade Iran".

      --
    12. Re:scary. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Don't react. If they believe they can't contact you, then they'll try something else to get whatever they want out of you before killing your wife. It will at least give you some awareness of the situation and probably buy your wife some more time.

      There is a very cool korean movie that deals with a similar question - if your child is kidnapped, what happens if you refuse to answer the ransom call? It's part comedy and party tragedy (a combo the koreans have mastered). It's called A Cruel Attendance.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    13. Re:scary. by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I'd say that was a "bad" voice. :)

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    14. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Could a microwave gun really hit a single head out of a crowd?

      It wouldn't be a gun, but a parabolic dish. A quick Google search on such dishes shows the main beam spread is 40 arc seconds, so you could get most of your energy onto a 40 cm head from 1 km away, but heads near the path would catch much radiation as well.

    15. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But now you hear a voice that is constantly telling you that you're no good, you're a failure, kill yourself, everybody hates you secretly, etc. etc. That would drive you insane in a few days.

      Why'd you have to bring my dead father into this!?

    16. Re:scary. by pxc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That sounds very interesting; thanks for the tip! I'll ask one of my friends with Netflix to see if he can grab it for me. If I like it, when school starts up I'll recommend it to our Film Club.

    17. Re:scary. by tzot · · Score: 1

      what if an unverifiable, untraceable voice announces in your ear "rob the bank or I shoot your wife", what would you do?

      I would make sure that they know exactly who my wife is, in order to save innocent bystanders.

      --
      I speak England very best
    18. Re:scary. by totallydude · · Score: 1

      "rob the bank or I shoot your wife" is a threat exactly how?

    19. Re:scary. by ViperOrel · · Score: 1

      More importantly, how would you ever know that the voice was real and not just your imagination. The flaw in the program here is that anyone hearing a voice in their head would think it was their own imagination and need further proof that it was intentional anyway. Voice: In 2 minutes your phone will ring. Might as well have delivered the message by phone. Although I suppose that after initial contact you could use this technology to maintain contact. I also expect that the sound would involve a very painful sensation, and that would probably tip you off to its verasity...???

    20. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - a tinnitus emulator

      Unethical?

      That would be evil.

    21. Re:scary. by mrbobjoe · · Score: 1

      remote torture anybody?

      The first thing this reminded me of was Childhood's End, by Arthur C. Clarke. A suggestion made by the alien power:

      "Suppose, for example, that one of your nations, led by some fanatical ruler, tried to revolt against me. The highly inefficient answer to such a threat would involve some billions of horsepower in the shape of atomic bombs. If I used enough bombs, the solution would be complete and final. It would also, as I remarked, be inefficient--even if it possessed no other defects."

      "And the efficient solution?"

      "That requires about as much power as a smaller radio transmitter--and rather similar skills to operate it. For it's the application of the power, not its amount, that matters. How long do you think Hitler's career as dictator of Germany would have lasted, if wherever he went a voice was talking quietly in his ear? Or if a steady musical note, loud enough to drown out all other sounds and to prevent sleep, filled his brain night and day? Nothing brutal, you appreciate. Yet, in the final analysis, just as irresistible as a tritium bomb."

    22. Re:scary. by Wylfing · · Score: 1

      what if an unverifiable, untraceable voice announces in your ear "rob the bank or I shoot your wife", what would you do?

      Is this a trick question?

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    23. Re:scary. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I don't think it has had a US release. Might not ever get one, many asian flicks never do. Does netflix carry non-region 1 releases?

      I see it is on ebay - it also has an alternate english name (also common for korean movies) "Educating Kidnappers." If you go looking for a foreign copy, watch out for VCD editions. VCDs are very popular in asia, but picture quality is about that of VHS and may not play in your DVD player. Also gotta watch out for the whole region encoding thing, although the $4.99 copy on ebay claims to be region free - it may or may not be a bootleg, you can't tell based on region coding alone.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    24. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talented isn't she? What shall I have her do next? Jump out the window? Drown herself?

      Scores of witches and wizards have claimed that they only do did you-know-whose bidding under the influence of the imperious curse. But here's the rub, how do we sort out the liars?

    25. Re:scary. by rrkap · · Score: 1

      On a more serious note, engineering and scientific work ethics? Does that at all exist anymore? I can't imagine anyone willingly developing a technology with so many malevolent uses. Didn't we learn anything from the Manhattan project?

      We learned that you can get a bunch of scientists together to make a big ass bomb. Sounds like a good deal for the person paying for it.

      --
      I like my beverages with warning labels!
    26. Re:scary. by ne0n · · Score: 1

      Forget Cliff Richard, beam some Hoff into the American public. The song "Hot Shot City" is particularly good.

      --
      $ :(){ :|:& };:
    27. Re:scary. by Bat+Country · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, I can only think of dozens of malevolent uses for this and no positive uses!

      Heh. Let's see:

      • Causing accidents on the freeway by sending huge bursts of high amplitude noise at drivers
      • Physically jamming communications to a person during a vital period (think robberies or assassinations) by filling their head with a loud buzz.
      • Stalkers using this to victimize the objects of their obsessions from a safe distance
      • Interrupting important business meetings your competitors are having with foreign investors.
      • Harassing police officers nearly undetectably.
      • Cheating on tests. (ha)
      • Disrupting peaceful protests and political rallies with plausible deniability. (not necessarily the government, a conflicting interest group properly funded could do the same)
      • Harassing public figures. (does the Popemobile need a Faraday cage?)

      In fact, I'm hard-pressed to come up with a single positive use for the technology that can't be done easier and better with a less invasive technology like a sound cannon.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
    28. Re:scary. by xiando · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do not need to imagine. The Norwegian government did this to me 2005-2006. I had to flee to Sweden. Norway is part of the NATO alliance and they do not accept that citizens talk about NATOs false-flag operations. And do not expect "magneto helmet" to help you. This technology is only a small extremely horrible part of the torture program they target "bad" citizens with. If you are targeted with this then your only real choice is to get your passport, find a country which is not in a deep military alliance with your government, get enough cash to get there and get out. Just go.

    29. Re:scary. by jamesh · · Score: 1

      this is one deeply unethical product.

      The product is not unethical, although some of it's uses could be, but that is also true of the kitchen knife. This is a common source of hypocrisy on slashdot. It would be like saying that p2p software is unethical because it allows users to easily distribute products that they didn't pay for.

    30. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imagine playing Cliff Richard to you victim incessantly. unable to sleep. unable to get away from it. all you need is somebody to point this thing at his head.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ4j-MBnLQo

    31. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a more serious note, engineering and scientific work ethics? Does that at all exist anymore? I can't imagine anyone willingly developing a technology with so many malevolent uses.

      It is like the malware writers and others who develop harmful stuff, apparently without troubling their conscience too much.

      If it can be done, somewhere out there there's going to be someone who is willing do it.

    32. Re:scary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computers started out the size of large rooms. Now, several advances of technology later, they are small enough to easily hide on your person. Imagine portable, handheld MEDUSAs.

  29. From TFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MEDUSA is useless against a raging pack of schizophrenics.

    Hurray! finally something positive about having schizophrenia!

  30. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by neokushan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course, that's the REAL purpose of this weapon - something to use against all the tinfoil hats out there!

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  31. Obligatory Futurama by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Buy Lightspeed Briefs!

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:Obligatory Futurama by xgr3gx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Warning ... Objects in mirror may be more attractive than they appear.

      --
      Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
  32. As long as tehy are not allowed by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

    for politicians to use on campaigns...
    I'd have to murder them putting campaign thoughts in my head..

  33. One step away from the Jedi Mind Trick by Kawolski · · Score: 1

    This didn't start out as a secret government weapon but just another innovative invention that boils down to a new clever way to get laid.

  34. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by snowraver1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somethings telling me to "Move along, there's nothing to see here".

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  35. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by JustKidding · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "all standard forms of defence against auditory input" probably means anything in or covering your ears. The tinfoil hat only blocks electromagnetic waves, which is what they are supposedly using.

    The tinfoil hat might actually be one of the few ways you can block this without any special materials or equipment.

    If they see someone with a tinfoil hat, they'll probably just yell at him.

  36. but what about better hats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can make the tinfoil hats to defeat these guns...uhw wait..no we can't...voices say so...the voices...they won't stop...no no no, stop them...must...not...resist...ARRGGGGG

  37. These are not the droids you are looking for. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...These are not the droids we're looking for."

    You weak minded fool! He's got a Jedi mind gun!"

  38. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "sure I'll hear that demo. . ."

    "Were no strangers to love
    You know the rules and so do i
    A full commitments what Im thinking of
    You wouldnt get this from any other guy

    I just wanna tell you how Im feeling
    Gotta make you understand

    never gonna give you up
    Never gonna let you down
    Never gonna run around and desert you
    Never gonna make you cry
    Never gonna say goodbye
    Never gonna tell a lie and hurt you"

    "AHHH make it stop!!!!!"

  39. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's more scary than cool.

    The article at NewScientist says:

    MEDUSA involves a microwave auditory effect "loud" enough to cause discomfort or even incapacitation. Sadovnik says that normal audio safety limits do not apply since the sound does not enter through the eardrums.

    Also from NewScientist, a member of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of Illinois in Chicago who has also worked on the technique has commented that while feasible, attaining the necessary volume might involve power levels that could cause neural damage.

  40. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There you guys sit, all laughing at me at pointing and jeering at my Tinfoil Hat 3000(tm), but look who's sitting pretty now! Ha! Fsckers!

    You won't be sitting pretty when you shiny new hat starts to spark and arc like a fork in the microwave!

    You hate fireworks or something? I mean, come on! Fireworks going off on somebody's head. That's pure comedy gold man.

  41. slashed! by s4ck · · Score: 1
    there you go.

    what if thousands of concurrent microwave audio signal would beamed a person... would it "slashdot" it/him/her?

    crazy...

    1. Re:slashed! by Helix666 · · Score: 0

      I believe the correct term is "cook".

      --
      Oh, the irony... "Anonymous Coward: If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear!"
  42. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Hojima · · Score: 0

    Two myths I want to debunk right off the bat.
    1) Subliminal messages don't work. It's a sham that a psychologist made with fake data that scared the crap out of politicians so that a law was implemented quickly and people fear it to this day (though I still do fear spammers using this, as they have no morals).
    2) Microwaves refer to a certain spectrum of electromagnetic radiation. Your cellphone uses them, but the spectrum that your microwave uses happens to cause water molecules to resonate. These microwaves are of a different spectrum, and while they can be deadly, they are not the same.

  43. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by b4upoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps we can beam an entire education into the minds of young people. Think about it. Roughly half of America's young people reach the age of 18 at being virtually retarded these days. Beaming voices into peoples' heads might be a highly useful tool.
                It also might be used to teach people what Islam really is in places like Iraq where an entire religion has been subverted and perverted into a really nasty mess. Teaching real Islam to the public might cure this problem.

  44. At last! by OmgTEHMATRICKS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like we finally have a real use for all those tin foil hats.

  45. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    The system works by way of microwave pulses absorbed by your head. An aluminum foil hat would be quite effective against it.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  46. What would happen... by YellowMatterCustard · · Score: 1

    if they cranked the thing WAY up? Death ray anyone? (Sorry, can't RTFA, slashdotted.)

    --
    This is not hatred. This is retribution. This is not revenge. This is justice.
  47. Oh god by Lord+MuffloN · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Never. Ever. let any kind of ad or marketing branch get a hold of this, never. ever.

  48. The sound gets in your brain... by bonkeydcow · · Score: 1

    just like this liquid gets into this egg. Fishful of dollars

  49. YOU DO NOT WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH MY DAUGHTER by digitalextremist · · Score: 1

    Hey! What? W

    --
    //de ~ 9cimi
  50. One step closer to Futurama by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fry: So you're telling me they broadcast commercials into people's dreams?

    Leela: Of course.

    Fry: But how is that possible?

    Professor Farnsworth: It's very simple. The ad gets into your brain just like this liquid gets into this egg. [Holds up an egg and injects it with liquid from a syringe until the egg explodes.]

    Although, in reality, it's not liquid, but gamma radiation.

    Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 21st century?

    Fry: Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:One step closer to Futurama by sm62704 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Futurama lifted that almost word for word from Isaac Asimov's Dreaming is a Private Thing.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:One step closer to Futurama by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      You should also point out:

      Romeo and Juliet is just a redone Italian poem.

      Oh, and MS-DOS was based off of 86-DOS.
      Oh, and Edison didn't make the first lightbulb.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    3. Re:One step closer to Futurama by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, but completely offtopic. If the topic or a comment quotes Romeo and Juliet, I just might point that out.

      The difference, of course, is that it's unlikely that Shakespeare read the Italian poem, but very likely that Futurama's writers have read Dreaming Is A Private Thing (the story is a commentary about writers). It's even likely that the Asimov reference was put there on purpose; that would be my assumption and I would applaud Futurama's writers for it if so.

      No karma bonus checked

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  51. This has been around for a while by stoob0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Friend of mine told me about this in 2005. The intel guys have had this for a few years.

  52. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) Subliminal messages don't work. It's a sham that a psychologist made with fake data,,,

    That's right! It's nothing but a load of rich creamery butter!

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  53. VALIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    VALIS

    1. Re:VALIS by rs232 · · Score: 1

      How many people here get that reference? Valis a prime example that you shouldn't write while you're out of your mind on drugs. Reading the PKD Reader in one sitting is a truly disturbing experience ..

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
  54. Great, this is all we need... by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

    and it should be outlawed immediately!

    WTF are they thinking? Police ticket people for talking on their cell phones they are holding up to their heads. And, I know it is distracting, I was almost hit, twice, crossing a street, light with me, in the cross walk, by two people holding a cell phone to their heads, gabbing away, not paying attention to what the hell was going on with traffic, lights, etc.

    All we need now is someone getting messages and other crap beamed into their heads while they are driving, operating heavy equipment, etc. and horrid accidents to follow. This crazy world has just got a bit more crazy.

  55. Scary Thought... by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine the kind of hurt we'd be in for as a society with a technology such as this?

    Try to imagine a mega church having one of these things.

    Everyone's sitting in the pews, the Reverend is off spouting something or other about a great evil when all of a sudden "This is the Lord your God, the Reverend is my agent on this earth. For he knows, as I do, what is most evil. As my children, you will do whatever he commands in the fight against the darkness."

    "True" believers can already be a touch over zealous, imagine how much worse it would be with the "word of god" rolling through their heads!

    1. Re:Scary Thought... by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My Name Is Earl did this in the episode "Made a Lady Think I Was God". Roseanne Barr played a mean nasty woman who wore hearing aids, and Earl found out that her hearing aids picked up his walkie-talkies.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:Scary Thought... by gothzilla · · Score: 1

      You've got it backwards. It would only be harmful if it was secret. Once everyone knows this exists, the people who believe God talks to them will no longer be able to say it really is God, and any "preacher" who claims that God is talking directly to him will no longer have any credibility.
      It will put personal faith back into religion if anything.

  56. Be great for parents of teenagers... by grassy_knoll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Heck, combine it with some prerecorded messages and parents will snap these up "for the children".

    Top sellers could be:

    • clean your room
    • take the trash out
    • study more

    All with constant repetition which only ends when the desired action is performed.

    ... yes it's a joke. I hope.

    1. Re:Be great for parents of teenagers... by Theoboley · · Score: 0

      And as a result, it works as a contraceptive too, rendering teenage males sterile for the rest of their lives.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    2. Re:Be great for parents of teenagers... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      I wonder if in the experimental phase they tried it with phrases like "Invade Iraq." That would explain a lot.

    3. Re:Be great for parents of teenagers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, I'm glad I'm a Beta, those Alphas are so stuck up, I wouldn't want to be one of them. And the Deltas, what icky colors their clothes are, I'm sure glad I'm not a Delta. Yep, a Beta is the best thing to be.

    4. Re:Be great for parents of teenagers... by Coraon · · Score: 1

      or how about: "You will cooperate with the state for the good of the state and your own survival" over and over again. This technologies application are just plain not good. Theres only one I can see and thats helping deaf people hear by using a microphone and then beaming the sound into their brain, but this is a long way off.

      --
      -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
    5. Re:Be great for parents of teenagers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or "Get out of the left lane, you slow-ass moron!!"

    6. Re:Be great for parents of teenagers... by Drantin · · Score: 1

      I want a Teaching Robot to teach me foreign languages while I sleep...

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    7. Re:Be great for parents of teenagers... by wattrlz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's: " I'm so glad I'm a Beta. Alpha children wear grey. They work much harder than we do, because they're so frightfully clever. I'm really awfully glad I'm a Beta, because I don't work so hard. And then we are much better than the Gammas and Deltas.They all wear green, and Delta children wear khaki. Oh no, I don't want to play with Delta children. And Epsilons are still worse. They're too stupid to be able to read or write. Besides, they wear black, which is such a beastly colour..."

    8. Re:Be great for parents of teenagers... by ad0n · · Score: 0
      great in theory until the interface gets hacked by the local bully:

      • give me your lunch money

      • take me to your dealer

      • wedgie yourself
  57. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Q-Hack! · · Score: 4, Informative

    TFA doesn't give much in technical details, but as I understand it, they are using the human skull as a heterodyne circuit. Basically mixing two microwave signals inside the skull to create audio.
       

    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
  58. Just what we need by damburger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another way for marketing wankstains to pollute our heads with their psychologically manipulate garbage. Hopefully the powers that be will see the strong public interest argument in not using this to beam 'important messages' into peoples heads.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  59. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm, I thought of the Islamist tack as well, but I had a different approach. Let's use their zealotry against them.

    We'll see how motivated they are to blow themselves up when Allah himself tells them that suicide bombing is a deal breaker on the whole eternal paradise thing.

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  60. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) Subliminal messages don't work. It's a sham that a psychologist made with fake data that scared the crap out of politicians so that a law was implemented quickly and people fear it to this day (though I still do fear spammers using this, as they have no morals).

    So... Why exactly do you fear it if it doesn't work?

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
  61. What's Next? by hyades1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, I can deal with the fact that the Tinfoil Hat people have been right all along. Fine. I apologize for some of the unkind things I've said about them.

    But dammit, I'm NOT going to start being nice to all the Moonbats, People Who Live In Their Parents' Basements, Loons, Head Cases, Half-wits, Technophobes, Technophiles, UFO Abductees, Conspiracy Nuts, Jerks, Berks and Wanna-be Captain Kirks just because, like a broken clock, they might manage to be right twice a day.

    I mean it!

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  62. Sierra Nevada by StuffMaster · · Score: 1, Funny

    This explains why I like their beer so much. They're using mind control!

  63. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    That sounds like Brain-Wash speak to me...!

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  64. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I saw this last week in New Scientist. You're jumping to some very flase conclusions. It has nothing to do with subliminal messages. From the linked article:

    The device - dubbed MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) - exploits the microwave audio effect, in which short microwave pulses rapidly heat tissue, causing a shockwave inside the skull that can be detected by the ears. A series of pulses can be transmitted to produce recognisable sounds.
    <snip>
    MEDUSA involves a microwave auditory effect "loud" enough to cause discomfort or even incapacitation. Sadovnik says that normal audio safety limits do not apply since the sound does not enter through the eardrums.

    "The repel effect is a combination of loudness and the irritation factor," he says. "You can't block it out."

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  65. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Beam me up Scotty).

  66. Oblig. Videodrome by ins0m · · Score: 1

    Long live the new flesh!

    --
    Never attribute to Hanlon that which can be adequately attributed to Heinlein.
  67. Election time by slackoon · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think it's a little convenient that this technology is coming out right at Election time?

    1. Re:Election time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How insane is this..
      Freakin worry period if u ask me..
      I guess one shud wonder, y now?? Election benefits?? Hmmmmm..
      We don't want something like a Zimbawe happening, just on a more advanced scale..

  68. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Troed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Two myths I want to debunk right off the bat.

    Great! I love to see myths debunked.

    the spectrum that your microwave uses happens to cause water molecules to resonate. These microwaves are of a different spectrum, and while they can be deadly, they are not the same.

    ... unfortunately, that's one of them. The 2.4GHz spectrum was not chosen because water molecules somehow resonate better - and there's no real difference between 2.4GHz and various mobile frequencies around 1.8-1.9GHz with that in mind.

    http://www.answers.com/topic/microwave-1?cat=technology

  69. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    s/omeomi/jerk/g

  70. Hypersonic Sound by Jizzbug · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These sound like HSS speakers, which use ultrasonic carrier waves to demodulate sound when the frequencies come into contact with flesh and bone.

    http://www.atcsd.com/site/

    And friend of mine has a couple of these speakers. We recently used them at an art opening to beam the music of the primes into people's heads (playing the digital root of each prime number through a hexatonic scale, rests in the music were created by the occurrence of the primes in the digital-roots matrix we used to develop our own unique prime number sieve).

    --

    -=/\- Jizzbug -/\=-
  71. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I give you... TinFoil Hat V.2!

    This + this = WIN!

    N.B. Links are JPEGs.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  72. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Theoboley · · Score: 0

    lol the rick roll ray gun. To be included on Metal Gear via Metal Gear solid 5. (insert link to dubious rick roll/metal gear solid 5 preview link here)

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  73. iPOD accessory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a great way to share your iTunes collection with friends - a close proximity version...

    Is Dolby or Prologic supported? ;)

  74. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by nospam007 · · Score: 0, Troll

    > Teaching real Islam to the public might cure this problem.

    Actually teaching Atheism is the only cure.

  75. Here's another report from a more reputable source by frostilicus2 · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Nothing sucks like a Vax, nothing blows like a PowerMac G4
  76. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by gnick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1) Subliminal messages don't work. It's a sham that a psychologist made with fake data that scared the crap out of politicians so that a law was implemented quickly and people fear it to this day (though I still do fear spammers using this, as they have no morals).

    So... Why exactly do you fear it if it doesn't work?

    Because audible spam in my head would be even worse than the e-mailed spam in my in-box or the visible spam on billboards (and bus stops, sides of buildings/cars, etc.)

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  77. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

    Who are you calling Fscker? I've never checked a file system in my life!

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  78. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by dugjohnson · · Score: 1

    1) That's what they want you to think.  Probably <subliminal>Subliminal messages don't work</subliminal> makes the whole <subliminal>Subliminal messages don't work</subliminal> process more effective if they <subliminal>Subliminal messages don't work</subliminal> sneak under your personal radar.

    --
    My brain is overly lubricated
  79. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People should be able to believe whatever the hell they want to believe as long as they don't try to force it on others. If they don't believe in evolution, fine, it's their right -- but they shouldn't be allowed to practice biological science.

  80. VALIS by The+Tomer · · Score: 1

    They already have this thing. They have been testing it since the 70's on science fiction authors.

  81. how is this .. ? by rs232 · · Score: 1

    How is this going to protect us from Al-Qaeda again Oh, it's not, it's designed to protect them from their own people.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  82. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see enormous benefits in this technology.

    1. Listening to music as loud as you want while not forcing it on others
    2. Rocking out to the loudest concert in history without anyone outside the venue hearing a whisper of it (on second thought, the RIAA might require this, so maybe it's not so good)
    3. Throwing a gigantic party with great tunes while letting the geezer next door -- who never listens to anything harder than Captain and Tennille -- get his beauty sleep

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  83. Scaring birds away by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    FTFA: "Sadovnik says the technology could have non-military applications. Birds seem to be highly sensitive to microwave audio, he says, so it might be used to scare away unwanted flocks."

    If it'll get the damn Canada geese out of my parking lot, I'm all for it.

  84. Been there, done that? by meburke · · Score: 1

    What's so special about this? The advertising agencies have been controlling your thoughts for years! They've even got it so that the subjects will voluntarily submit to acquiring new thoughts, unfiltered, and largely unaware.

    And then, there was the girlfriend I had who could put the right thoughts in my head just by flashing certain parts of her anatomy...

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  85. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by ag3ntugly · · Score: 0

    Uh yeah, I'll be lining the inside of every hat I have with some good ol foil now!

    --
    i have a roll of electrical tape.
  86. Mystery Solved by LazloToth · · Score: 0

    Scary in some ways, perhaps, but at least it explains the Obama phenomenon.

    Sorry, I couldn't resist. : )

    Next thing you know, people will . . . will . . . maybe I will . . . I WILL vote for Obama. Yes, I WILL vote for Obama . . . .

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
    1. Re:Mystery Solved by Bearpaw · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see you've managed to jam the signal that's been transmitting for the last 8 years. Welcome back!

  87. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Roughly half of America's young people reach the age of 18 at being virtually retarded these days.
    Do you realize that's what older people thought of you when you were 18?
    It also might be used to teach people what Islam really is in places like Iraq where an entire religion has been subverted and perverted into a really nasty mess. Teaching real Islam to the public might cure this problem.
    Yeah, why do we have to burn books when we can toast thoughts! And why not whisper to your skull who you should vote for, when you are about to do it? I really hope you are joking.

  88. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    We'll see how motivated they are to blow themselves up when Allah himself tells them that suicide bombing is a deal breaker on the whole eternal paradise thing.

    Brilliant! I hereby nominate you for the position of Head Messiah at the newly founded Ministry of Godly Voices.

  89. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    attaining the necessary volume might involve power levels that could cause neural damage.

    Yeah, that'll stop this from widespread use.

    Like how they banned Tasers, because attaining the necessary pain might involve power levels that could cause cardiac arrhythmia.

    Oh, wait, no they don't... All those people died of "excited delerium", not Taser-induced arrhythmia. Slip o' the tongue there, don't sue me bro...

  90. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by chaoticgeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Something tells me these are not the droids I'm looking for...

    --
    hello
  91. Re:Blocking by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are we reaching Alternate Universe X-Men territory?

    Magneto is now the good guy & Professor X is evil?

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  92. SIRIUS GAMMA by flahwho · · Score: 1

    As if the internet and other forms of mass media weren't enough.
    I bet the first large scale use of this will contain some sort of forced advertising, and it won't be subliminal, it will be blatant, assuredly annoying and just might make you sign up for that monthly subscription to SIRIUS GAMMA.
    - wait... streaming radio in my head? That might actually be cool.

  93. ghosts? by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 1

    Coupled with a simple hologram projector hidden in someone's house, you can make them believe that ghosts and demons haunt them all throughout the night!

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    1. Re:ghosts? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And I would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for those meddling kids.

  94. Psi Corps by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    "Control!"

  95. Perhaps this would help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about an x-ray mirror?

    http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/news/xray_mirror.html

  96. First message sent (Real Genius homage) by mandark1967 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ken! This is Jesus. Stop touching yourself!

    --
    Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    1. Re:First message sent (Real Genius homage) by BadMrMojo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was Kent but yeah. Exactly where my mind was going with it, too.

      "Look, it was hot and I was hungry..."

    2. Re:First message sent (Real Genius homage) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What about that time I found you naked with a bowl of jello? This is true."

      FYI, Real Genius movie quotes. I also thought of this when I read the article.
      However, the voice Kent heard involved a transciever, which they stuck in his braces. Transcievers are transmitters & recievers (a two way radio). That part of the movie was funny, but unrealistic. Like the laser at the very end being visible, among other things.

      "And stop playing with yourself" was the last thing they said to Kent in the scene. He responded, "It is jesus."

  97. Re: Cliff Rolling! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    "It sounds a little absurd - I was born to spread the word;
    The music hits my soul - I was born to Rock & Ro-oo-lll..."

    Except posting Youtube links might be mean now given Viacom's little game.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  98. I know what I would do with it... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

    I'd hit someone with Banana Phone... quietly at first.. then ever louder and louder.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
    1. Re:I know what I would do with it... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... and once you have achieved a certain level of torment, slowly crossfade into Badger Badger.,,

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  99. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by digitig · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because audible spam in my head would be even worse than the e-mailed spam in my in-box or the visible spam on billboards (and bus stops, sides of buildings/cars, etc.)

    Nah -- the voices already in my head will be able to shout it down...

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  100. *dons tinfoil hat* by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    Seriously though, as someone suffering life in the UK I wonder how long until this kind of thing is used to control the population. We already have talking CCTV cameras...

  101. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Brigadier · · Score: 5, Funny

      80,000 ACDC fans screaming "....TNT, I'm Dynamite...." out of tune ..... nothing peaceful about that....

  102. Ray Gun + Mind-Reading Sensors = Telepathy? by Erez.Hadad · · Score: 1

    Outside the hysteria, how about combining the MEDUSA technology with the mind-reading sensors previously discussed here in /. to come up with:
    1. a telepathic transceiver? Imagine a completely silent communication system..
    2. maybe we can project images/sounds/feeling? How cool can that be? The ultimate Movie/RPG experience? THE drug killer?
    The possibilities are endless..

    1. Re:Ray Gun + Mind-Reading Sensors = Telepathy? by azzuth · · Score: 1

      Until you are chatting up the hottie next to you in your calc class as the professor walks through the ray, hears your number and you calling him sexy and start stalking you leading to months and months of unsolicited night time thought implantations and weird dreams about naked calculus and old men...

  103. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by PenguinBob · · Score: 1

    1. Listening to music as loud as you want while not forcing it on others

    And not damaging your eardrums.

  104. Add tag by Skeet112 · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that microwaving people's brains should go under the "what-could-possibly-go-wrong" tag for obvious reasons.

  105. Alternatively..... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Mmmmm evil Talia Winters...

  106. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by mhall119 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The tinfoil hat might actually be one of the few ways you can block this without any special materials or equipment.

    Half a Faraday cage is as good as none.

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  107. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Funny

    i agree and the wonderful folks at sierra nevada deserve more grant money

    i agree and the wonderful folks at sierra nevada deserve more grant money

    i agree and the wonderful folks at sierra nevada deserve more grant money

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  108. So what... by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

    If I talk to you it put voices in your head as well. And by the way, where is the "inputdev" tag?

    --
    Here be signatures
  109. Serious Application: Use in noisy environments by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Yes you can get lots of jokes from this idea, but what about serious applications like using it for communications in noisy environments? I would think that this concept would be ideal on the battlefield where you don't want to impair the listener's hearing, but make sure they get the message just the same.

    myke

  110. 419 Scams from the dead by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

    I can see it now: "I am Idi Amin Dada. Before I died I secreted money that is needed for my descendants. If you help me, you can keep $20M."

  111. Bummer by CODiNE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a deaf guy it saddens me when tech like this is used for military purposes and it's consumer uses are not considered.

    Remember the thing where you put the transmitter on your tongue and you can hear bypassing the ears? I'd like to try one of those. But rather than look like a drooling idiot I'd love to get my hands on one of these babies. Just strap it on a hearing aid and skip the ears entirely. Way better than a cochlear implant, non-invasive and perfect sound. Nice.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Bummer by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      It's ok until you've had it on for a few hours. You start getting wisps of smoke coming from your ears.

    2. Re:Bummer by rabiddeity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately it looks like this will only work if your inner ear is undamaged and functioning properly. I had major hearing loss in one ear from an injury a few years ago, and one of the tests they did was acoustically coupling a small vibrating pad to the base of my skull to determine whether the injury was in the middle or inner ear. If your cochlea are already damaged to the point that you need a cochlear implant (direct neural stimulation) then you'd be able to _feel_ your skull vibrating but you will hear nothing -- a very odd sensation indeed.

      Of course I shudder at the thought of what microwave radiation would do to the electrodes in your cochlear implant. It might literally induce a current through your brain. At the low end it would destroy the tissues connected to the electrodes. At the high end it might induce a seizure or kill you. I hope to hell it's well shielded.

    3. Re:Bummer by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've heard of people with cochlear implants getting burned from things like defibrillators. That's another one of those things they don't tell you about when they try to convince a parent to give their kid a cochlear.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  112. This Article is brought to you by: by AkaKaryuu · · Score: 1

    Light Speed Briefs ...and contributions by readers like you.

  113. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tasers are a great example of why you can't trust your end user.

    A Taser was designed to replace a gun. "Instead of shooting someone, you can INSTEAD tase them to incapacitate them."

    Once they got into the hands of the end users, the got into usage creep. "Fighting is hard work. I'll use the taser." "Arguing takes effort. Taser." "Talking meh taser."

    Now they're used for when you owe the bus driver a dollar.

    (Despite what the article states, they have said in radio interviews that they use the tasers for non-compliance, including non-payment of fares.)

    They're being overused as a compliance tool instead of their intended purpose, which was to prevent acute lead poisoning.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  114. Good use possible by sustik · · Score: 1

    Many here will emphasize the dangers of this device. But there is a good (legitimate?) use for it.

    In the hands of a few selected intelligent individuals who deeply care about our human society (like myself and others approved by me) this device can finally bring the all so wanted changes in politics. Just point this to some high ranking officials' melon in the government and no more lies and bullshit! Finally, the inside voice in their head will not be motivated by greed and power hunger (masked as voice from their dog), but instead it will be the true voice of the desire to improve the society they sworn to serve.

  115. Use for the Deaf. by Infinite+Wave · · Score: 1

    Would this allow someone who is deaf to hear?

    1. Re:Use for the Deaf. by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most likely no, as this device makes the skull vibrate, which is then picked up by the inner ear. If their ears don't work at all, this won't solve anything.

    2. Re:Use for the Deaf. by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's one of the things that the guy selling the thing (in TFA) mentioned, actually.

      My understanding:
      This device creates vibrations in the target by rapidly heating and cooling it. Since these vibrations are in the tissue (especially bone) of your head, they reach your inner ear (cochlea) directly. So, they could help with certain kinds of deafness: namely, deafness caused by mechanical damage to the outer ear, but which leaves the nerves in the inner ear intact.

      However, it seems you should be able to achieve exactly the same thing by sending acoustic waves through the skull by other means. In particular, all you need is a small speaker in direct contact with your head. That's exactly what certain existing hearing aids do. (See the Wikipedia article on Bone conduction for more.)

      Hence, my opinion is that this microwave device really doesn't have any good uses which are not more easily and safely achieved by other means.

  116. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah!! Get rid of all these taser and microwave weapons. Bring back good old night sticks, trunchons, jack boots, and guns. It's a lot easier to prove that victims were hurt by those weapons than by tasers or microwaves. Or their own decisions to resist arrest or not leave buildings.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  117. Sorry... by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1

    ... I already have a intra-cranial provider with exclusive broadcast rights. If anyone starts using this techonology to insert messages that aren't approved by that provider, they will be opening themselves up to lawsuits. Maybe I should put a sticker on my ass warning them about this. Now if they are willing to pay for some broadcast rights, maybe we can talk.

    --

    (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

    1. Re:Sorry... by icastel · · Score: 1

      So, the placement of the sticker you speak of indicates where your intra-cranial device is located?

      --
      coldsphere.org -- Just like a regular sphere, only colder
  118. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by PRMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, that sure worked for Stalin and Mao Tse Tung. They never committed any atrocities at all.

    The reality is that there are a few nutballs out there in every religion, including atheism.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  119. Gee thanks by Ticklemonster · · Score: 0

    I finally get my neighbor to cut my grass and trim the hedges and you all blow my cover....

    --
    Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
  120. Just wait. by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 1

    Don't worry,
    As soon as the RIAA hears about this the funding for the project will be sucked dry.

    --
    Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
  121. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by somersault · · Score: 1

    I guess that's another one of those things to blame on the weather-man

    --
    which is totally what she said
  122. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha! Fsckers!

    I'm insulted you would dare call me a file system checker!

  123. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by tzot · · Score: 1

    There you guys sit, all laughing at me at pointing and jeering at my Tinfoil Hat 3000(tm), but look who's sitting pretty now! Ha! Fsckers!

    That's it. A tinfoil hat covered with corn beads will work as a protector / detector system.

    --
    I speak England very best
  124. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Hojima · · Score: 1

    I'm not jumping to false conclusions, I was informing people that subliminal messages is a myth before they start posting about it.

  125. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The opportunities for Rickrolling are now endless!

  126. get out of my head by g4b · · Score: 1
  127. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by WinPimp2K · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hmm...

    Now avoiding TFA like the plague, it occurs to me that "shockwaves" within the skull able to cause hydrostatic pressure loads comparable to 120+ decibels (is that loud enough for ya?) hitting your eardrums might just damage something other than eardrums.

    But lets not even think about the fine possibilities such as massive damage on the cellular level - just consider the overpressures that could be set up within blood vessels. It will be interesting to see if there is any increase in "massive cerebral hemorrage" as a cause of death going forward.

    Or an increase in the wearing of hats by the political class anytinme they give a speech :)

     

    --

    You either believe in rational thought or you don't
  128. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by general+scruff · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its only scary if you're hearing Barbara Streisand.

    --
    As a rule, I never trust dark brown ketchup.
  129. This will go great with their beer! by jlf278 · · Score: 1

    Sierra Nevada then announced this was only the first of many new products destined to supplement use of their alcoholic beverages. They are now field testing a prototype code-named 'vomitron.'

  130. A new weapon for Fox News... by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    I can see it now: NewsCorp will buy the patents for this device, and modify the gun so it can shoot stuff inside out heads out of our TV speakers! Now Fox News doesn't even have to be a biased right-wing network to brainwash us!

  131. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew it! I am not crazy for hearing voices in my head telling me I am God. Now fess up, who stole the ray gun?

  132. I think the (tinfoil hat) joke is on us this time. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are all kinds of quips about tinfoil hats and paranoia to be made on this one. Trouble is, think about what that means. We are living a tinfoil hatter's paranoid fantasy, it just happens to all be true.

    Massive wiretapping? Check.
    Ubiquitous surveillance? Check.
    Substantial expansion of state power? Check.
    Secret prisons and disappearances? Check.
    Directed energy weapons (both pain and sound)? Check.
    Classified laws? Check.
    Mercenaries who answer to no law?? Check.

    Seriously. They still have some really wacky ones about reptoids and masons and things; but much of conspiracy lore is so common that it doesn't even make the front pages anymore. The joke is on us.

  133. Son of Sam's dog had one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had always wondered how the dog could do that.

    1. Re:Son of Sam's dog had one of these by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the Son of Sam's dog was The Devil, if I recall correctly. So he didn't need such a device.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:Son of Sam's dog had one of these by planetoid · · Score: 1

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUDcSeUvkOw

      --
      Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  134. inputdev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    inputdev seems a fitting tag

  135. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by nunofgs · · Score: 0

    Headphones?

  136. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

    Is it even possible to be out of tune to AC/DC? I thought that was the point.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  137. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) Subliminal messages don't work. It's a sham that a psychologist made with fake data that scared the crap out of politicians so that a law was implemented quickly and people fear it to this day (though I still do fear spammers using this, as they have no morals).

    Yeah, I can account to this. Back in when I was in a course in psychology we did a blind study and on sublidrinkminal messduffages to influbeerence a taste test. One side we would set it up with out a subliminals being piped in in the music and one with. The resdrinkults were wimorethin 2% of eaduffch other. We beerconcluded that subliminal messages where bullshit.

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  138. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "1. Listening to music as loud as you want while not forcing it on others"

    Yea, Maybe they can install it in iPods one day. I think earbuds would be a good name for it.

  139. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I hear voices"... "and they want me to kill you"...

  140. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by svank · · Score: 5, Funny

    A strainer and a 404 Not Found? I guess the gun can't put voices in your head if it can't find your head, but I'm wondering how this could be practically implemented.

  141. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Teaching real Islam to the public might cure this problem.

    What is this "real Islam" of which you speak, and can it be taught to Muslims?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  142. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by No-Cool-Nickname · · Score: 5, Funny

    Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 20th century? Fry: Well, sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines and movies and at ball games and on buses and milk cartons and T-shirts and written in the sky. But not in dreams. No, sir-ee!

  143. Desire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I WANT ONE

  144. It works well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm pretty sure they've been testing this on my ex-wife!

  145. Microwaves don't fry brain cells... people do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this different than any other audio? A person could build powerful speakers that transmit sound waves that would be capable of killing a person.

    If we all became accustomed to sensing the sounds that this device creates then we could just remove ourselves from the situation that created them.

    In some ways this could be a very cool technology. Imagine a concert where the sounds are transmitted with this device?

    I think this technology has been presented as a weapon. I imagine some people were freaked out about sending voices over speakers or really loud sounds doing damage to buildings...

    Microwaves don't fry brain cells, people do.

  146. Suddenly I.... by SlashdotCrackPot · · Score: 1
    Bought stock in a company that God told me was a sure bet, though I never bought stock before.

    Also, three of the newest Sony BMG albums, though I have never heard of any of the bands before today and haven't bought an album in a decade.

    Fake Viagra at a bulk discount, though I have no erectile problems and for some reason I was talking to myself in a Russian sounding accent -weird-

    This was all going pretty weird until suddenly I snapped out of it after I told myself to shove it when I suggested to myself that I needed to buy a copy of Vista, install it, and let automatic updates run, UAC run unedited, and buy a copy of the new Office to boot!!

    I obviously needed to seek professional help, so I will talk to you guys after I go to these self healing seminars at this time share I was telling myself about (they even have a raffle!)

    Just you wait my friend until this is used for advertising purposes. The really scary part is if they could possibly replicate your own voice, would you be able to tell the difference of cognitive thought process and somebody injecting your own voice into your thoughts? This also is VERY VERY dangerous when talking religious fanatics of any type, to be able to play "The Voice of God" just not cool (but could win wars....)

  147. true potential by paulpach · · Score: 1

    It took me all of 30 seconds to realize the full potential for this technology

  148. After all this time...... by Hurricane+Floyd · · Score: 1

    .... the nuts with the tin foil hats no longer look so crazy anymore.

  149. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by camperslo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually you've got the right idea with a tin foil hat. But since the signals may not be coming from the sky, the foil should wrap around as much of your head as possible. Looking through a metal screen or metal full of tiny holes should be effective in blocking signals approaching your face. The holes just have to be small relative to the wavelength of the signal. That should sound familiar since that's what's done in the windows in doors of microwave ovens.

    Since the microwaves are in very short pulses the average power level apparently isn't high enough to cook you.
    If the only effect is to hear something, it could be ineffective if one knows to simply ignore it.

    How's this for an awful thought? .... send auditory spam to people via these microwaves...

    I can see it now, crowds holding up shields to bounce signals back at their attackers

  150. Aha! That explains those voices in Lost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they also looking into clicking smokey monster thingies?

  151. Brain Damge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's someone in my head but it'd not me

  152. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what you are going on about, but I could sure go for a beer right now.

  153. yeah, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and getting grilled at the same time.
    wonderful

  154. no problem here. by swschrad · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Voices are strong, they drown out all other sounds.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  155. Welcome Conjoiners by IrquiM · · Score: 1

    This, together with the device that translates subvocal sounds, I for one welcome the Coinjoiners

    --
    This is blinging
  156. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by damirl · · Score: 1

    all three of your points are the same, focusing audio on a specific spot without interrupting anyone else. There is already a much safer way of doing this(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_from_ultrasound) without mixing any microwaves inside your scull.

  157. Re:I think the (tinfoil hat) joke is on us this ti by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    So very true.
    The most effective way to silence those who mention such things is not to debate them, but to mock them as nuts and ignore them.

  158. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by camperslo · · Score: 1

    But lets not even think about the fine possibilities such as massive damage on the cellular level - just consider the overpressures that could be set up within blood vessels. It will be interesting to see if there is any increase in "massive cerebral hemorrage" as a cause of death going forward.

    Kinda makes ya wonder who they tested this on, doesn't it?

  159. It would make a great weapon by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    in the war against terror.

    You can use it to beam rap music into the heads of Islamic Terrorists so they disarm and surrender in order to have it turned off.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  160. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by ZeroNullVoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    But you see, we actually use the TinFoil as a receptor, antenna, and resonator. Your head and brain are just the storage medium.

    We can target people without the metal hat's just fine, but we can target people with them faster and at greater distances.

    In fact, we have had between an 84.6% and 97.5325333333% success rate with people wearing foil helmets. The success rate depends on the type of metal used in the foil and the weave designs.

    In people without metal hats, we found that we get about an 89% success rate on average.

    So yes, the metal hat's do prevent us some, but the problem is, with the unsuccessful it is not that the message does not get through, it is that death is a side effect and thus is defined as a failure during our tests.

    We tested over 10 million diverse humans, and found that the only people to survive with 100% success rate were those that were born with both sets of sexual organs. But we consider them useless statistics anyway since they are unable to reproduce.

    Another interesting side effect is we have the ability to also define genetic memories of the voices. That way every spawn from the target is also a victim.

    We thank you for reading the FAQ of BrainTrain International Corp.

  161. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

    All I can imagine is Jiffy Pop. If the microwaves don't make your head explode, the Jiffy Pop will. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiffy_Pop

    Layne

  162. The Dream Police by why-is-it · · Score: 1

    But what do I do about the Dream Police!?!

    Cheap Trick - The Dream Police

    The dream police, they live inside of my head.
    The dream police, they come to me in my bed.
    The dream police, theyre coming to arrest me, oh no.

    You know that talk is cheap, and those rumors aint nice.
    And when I fall asleep I dont think Ill survive the night, the night.

    cause theyre waiting for me.
    Theyre looking for me.
    Evry single night theyre driving me insane.
    Those men inside my brain.

    The dream police, they live inside of my head.
    (live inside of my head.)
    The dream police, they come to me in my bed.
    (come to me in my bed.)
    The dream police, theyre coming to arrest me, oh no.

    Well, I cant tell lies, cause theyre listening to me.
    And when I fall asleep, bet theyre spying on me tonight, tonight.

    cause theyre waiting for me.
    Theyre looking for me.
    Evry single night theyre driving me insane.
    Those men inside my brain.

    I try to sleep, theyre wide awake, they wont leave me alone.
    They dont get paid to take vacations, or let me alone.
    They spy on me, I try to hide, they wont let me alone.
    They persecute me, theyre the judge and jury all in one.

    cause theyre waiting for me.
    Theyre looking for me.
    Evry single night theyre driving me insane.
    Those men inside my brain.

    The dream police, they live inside of my head.
    The dream police, they come to me in my bed.
    The dream police, theyre coming to arrest me.

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  163. You joke, but... by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...up until recently, generations of police officers learned how to use physical force to gain compliance. And generally speaking they knew how to do it with minimal force and maximal compliance -- a friend who is a 2nd generation police officer had his father demonstrate some of the techniques, and it was fairly amazing how well he could hurt me without actually "hurting" me (ie, leaving lasting marks, breaking bones, bruising, etc.)

    The gripe my friend the cop has is that with all the touchy-feely policing (and the expensive court payouts) they have, you really can't gain compliance through physical force the way you used to be able to, so they are largely left with their guns and their tasers. And since the tasers aren't lethal, they're somehow considered "OK" to use for any problem solving short of killing someone.

    I think they should start allowing the police to carry saps and clubs again as well as teach them physical force and stop letting them use a taser as a universal problem solver.

    1. Re:You joke, but... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I think it was meant as "tongue in cheek" (aka "not really a joke... except maybe").

      All those supposedly non lethal weapons which happen to be way too often are "feel good" solutions to a problem that will not go away anyway.

      A guy that doesn't speak the language in an airport ? Taze him. A guy acting up in a political meeting ? Taze him. Any problem ? Taze it. And again.
      Talk ? What's that ?

      But Chief, why should we talk ? We have Tazers ! Sure, we overuse them. But think of the children. And some of those people could be terrorists !

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:You joke, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they should start allowing the police to carry saps and clubs again

      Most police carry a club. It's called a Maglite®.

    3. Re:You joke, but... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      Amen to that - as someone whose partner (all 5' 2" of her) was pepper sprayed by the police after freaking out at them, a simple thumb lock would have been far less aggravating and wouldn't have required paramedics.

      Personally, I can restrain without (too much) physical harm, and do use such techniques when confronted with violence, combined with talking the situation down calmly and quietly.

      Oh, and if anyone tases me - I've had 50KV across my chest before, just for a laugh. It didn't bother me in the slightest, and didn't incapacitate me (I was administering the shock).

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    4. Re:You joke, but... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      It was sarcasm ...

      I'm fucking sick and tired of people who see the police as gestapo instead of people trying to keep YOU safe or to keep some sense of civility. Taz me bro guy?? What an ass, I would have loved to seen 10 cops piled on top of him, handcuffed, then carried out by hand. He deserved far more physical violence and greater risk of injury than being tazed.

      As soon as someone crosses the line, i.e. refuses to leave a building when security or a cop tells them to, walks out into the street with a knive and won't drop it, etc., they run the risk of having physical force applied to them. Better to leave and seek other legal or civil actions in my opinion.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    5. Re:You joke, but... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Except the tazers make for an easy way out when just talking would solve many such situations.

      As soon as someone crosses the line, i.e. refuses to leave a building when security or a cop tells them to, walks out into the street with a knive and won't drop it, etc., they run the risk of having physical force applied to them.

      Physical force should be the last issue, not the default just because it's easier. That's what the Gestapo you refer to used to do (and many people around here actually got to meet them).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    6. Re:You joke, but... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      Yep ... let's talk the rude 'Don't Taz me bro boy' to death. That's the way. Let's all stand around and give him his 10, 20, or 60 minutes of fame, hold everyone up no matter however long he wanted to 'make his point'. Or the 'I'm going to stand outside holding a knive forever and keep the police busy so they can't do anything else' guy.

      Bullshit. I'm tired of all these just plain rude people who think their point of view is so important that they have the right to interrupt anyone, anywhere to make a point.

      They should have asked Taz me nicely once, not so nicely twice, then carried his ass out anyway they could. Oh wait ... they did. Bravo!!! Let's see him go down again. He got just what he deserved for interrupting what had been a courteous Q&A just so he could 'make his point'. He's lucky they had Tasers instead of pulling out their nightsticks.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  164. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by 117 · · Score: 1
  165. Ferengi & Picard by nathan.fulton · · Score: 1

    Now, if Picard comes back in time to us, we can trick him into attacking the Enterprise with the Stargazer using the Picard Maneuver.

  166. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Rary · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A Taser was designed to replace a gun.

    Although I agree with your overall point that Tasers are seriously overused, your initial premise is incorrect.

    Tasers were never intended to be used as a replacement for a gun. They are an additional non-lethal weapon to use alongside the baton and pepper spray.

    Unfortunately, politicians and even the police themselves use the "Tasers replace guns" myth to win people over to the idea. After all, who wouldn't prefer to see a Taser used instead of a gun?

    But that's not what happens. When the situation calls for a gun to be used, then the officer will use their gun. Period. They will never consider using the Taser instead, and they were never expected to. This is why the number of incidents involving police using their guns has not decreased since Tasers were introduced. Nor was it expected to.

    The problem is that Tasers seem really harmless. You press a button, and the guy falls to the floor. Shortly thereafter, he gets up and he's apparently fine. So, hey, why not use it even in cases where the use of a baton or pepper spray would cause mass outrage?

    And that's exactly what's happening now.

    --

    "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  167. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by TerranFury · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sadovnik says that normal audio safety limits do not apply since the sound does not enter through the eardrums.

    Such bullshit!
    (Directed at Sadovnik, not you, Digital).

    Hearing loss usually has nothing to do with mechanical damage to the eardrum or ear; rather, it's almost always due to the fact that loud noises cause the cilia in your cochlea to get ripped out (and they do not grow back). This microwave thing is still exciting your cochlea, so it's doing the same damn thing. The only difference is that the vibrations originate within your head, whose tissue is rapidly being heated and cooled by the microwaves. But your cilia don't give a damn about where the vibrations come from.

    Ugh.

  168. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by neomunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, and as an aside, don't you just love how when you read a report on any Taser incident, the police never mention the LAW, it's always about POLICY. Think about that, they are concerned with POLICY over LAW, something you would expect from a for-profit industry trying to maximize gains, but from a government agency specifically designed to uphold the LAW?

    I know, some people are going to say that they follow policy which is more strict than the law, to which I call bullshit. If -I- were to taser you for noncompliance, I go to jail, because of my lack of a State Authorized shiny piece of tin on my chest. It's really that simple, just because you're a cop, doesn't mean you can break the law, the only instances of special treatment allowed by law are those bits that are actually CODIFIED into the law, anything else is abusing your position (that position being that it's far less likely to be arrested). I highly doubt that there are laws allowing you to physically harm someone who is not breaking any laws, but it seems that many police officers mistakenly think that whatever they tell you to do IS law.

  169. Good news, everyone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that anything like reverse fossilization?

  170. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by sconeu · · Score: 1

    Well, then, you need to listen to Robert Smith of The Cure (maybe with Leonard Maltin and Sidney Poitier helping him).

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  171. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by _KiTA_ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I saw this last week in New Scientist. You're jumping to some very flase conclusions. It has nothing to do with subliminal messages. From the linked article:

    The device - dubbed MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) - exploits the microwave audio effect, in which short microwave pulses rapidly heat tissue, causing a shockwave inside the skull that can be detected by the ears. A series of pulses can be transmitted to produce recognisable sounds.
    <snip>
    MEDUSA involves a microwave auditory effect "loud" enough to cause discomfort or even incapacitation. Sadovnik says that normal audio safety limits do not apply since the sound does not enter through the eardrums.

    "The repel effect is a combination of loudness and the irritation factor," he says. "You can't block it out."

    Am I the only one who finds it very, very scary that the "It's not torture if WE do it" Bush Administration(*) is working on technology that could be used to torture people and leave absolutely no physical evidence behind, ever?

    This and the pain gun have me very, very scared for the future of our liberties.

    *: To say nothing about the "It's not illegal if WE say it's not" and "You don't have the right to a free trial if WE don't say you do" and "We don't have to give up evidence unless WE want to" crap the retard king has pulled since his daddy's friends put him in power.

  172. Is this really microwave (e.g. electromagnetic)? by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    This sounds an aweful lot like something I saw on the Discovery channel, on the FutureWeapons show, but I don't think the device I saw discussed was based on electromagnetic beams, but rather just a highly-directional sonic beam. Sort of an 'audio-laser', which was basically produced by using a specially designed speaker that doesn't radiate an extremely wide cone like conventional speakers. It had two modes - one was just an annoying noise, used to try to disperse crowds or non-lethal takedown of armed enemies, the other mode was basically a conventional speaker, where you could use it to send propaganda, psy ops, or even point-to-point communications between different military groups (although, I would assume normally they would just use radio for that, but I suppose there could be situations where something like this could be useful if you want to maintain radio silence, but easier to setup and use than an optical laser (which would require extremely precise targetting on a remote sensor, and would be prone to some interference from atmospheric disturbances/smoke/fog/etc).

              Unfortunately, the article is extremely skimpy on any actual details, so it's hard to evaluate what this technology really does. But, even from what is available from the article, this doesn't sound like a device which would be practical for uses like advertising, since you have to target it at individuals, or small groups. Advertising is, largely, a broadcast endeavor - you want it to reach as many people as cheaply as possible, not just one or a small group of people (unless, maybe, you are advertising to the very rich, where one sale is worth millions of dollars or more, or VIPs at large corporations, where again, a single sale might be worth multi-millions of dollars).

  173. NOT INSANE by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 1

    - and you thought they were kidding.

    Not Insane:

    http://www.firesigntheatre.com/albums/ni2.mp3

    A drug companies wet dream come true. Truly, not insane

    --
    ~hylas
  174. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by orielbean · · Score: 1

    If you ever listen to the Dropkick Murphys cover an AC/DC tune, their awful tuneless bass player / now lead singer does an amazing job of ruining any happy memories you used to have of AC/DC.

  175. There here by xxboxers · · Score: 1

    I already hear things in my head. It's not so bad, really.

  176. This explains a lot... by Zarf · · Score: 1

    ... it really does. Mainly because the joke: in Soviet Russia you put voices in the Ray Gun... makes no sense. In Soviet Russia this gun works the same way.

    --
    [signature]
  177. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by cain · · Score: 1

    Atheism is not a religion. Religion requires faith and absence of faith is not faith. Insistence on evidence is the inverse of faith.

  178. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by pha7boy · · Score: 2, Funny

    So we'll change "Don't tase me Bro" to "Don't Microwave my head bro?" -- Not sure I like the ring to that.

    --
    -- All this knowledge is giving me a raging brainer.
  179. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who could have known Scanners would be so prescient?

  180. Phones for Complete Audio Recordings by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I really want phone UIs, security and battery life to finally support complete audio recordings of my entire life. It's got all kinds of uses, especially when some idiot tells me something, then denies they said it a few minutes later, or when they deny I told them something. With that kind of record, I could play back anything suspicious I "heard" to someone else. It would be a lot harder to get us both to "hear" something that wasn't actually audible, but rather projected as rays into our heads. Especially once we'd moved to a different place later on.

    I'd also like a complete video record. Maybe eventually a complete electromagnetic record of the space I move through. And, if these rays catch on, some extra parallax antennas to determine the direction whatever signal came from.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  181. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    omeomi was correcting himself, not somebody else...

  182. Insightful?! by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

    Um, personality cults are not atheistic.

    Try going to Pyongyang and telling people that Kim Jong Il isn't a living God. You'll come home in a box.

  183. I've been hearing this music... by Syphonius · · Score: 1

    "There must be some way out of here," said the joker to the thief...

    Catchy tune.

  184. Ronald Ray Gun by bugeaterr · · Score: 1

    In the 80's a Ronald Ray Gun destroyed the Soviet Union without firing a shot.

  185. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by XJHardware · · Score: 1

    Hyu gots dot right schweethot!

    --
    The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.
  186. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by mikeasu · · Score: 1

    Interesting thought - IF you could use this technology to "listen" to music, but since you're bypassing the eardrums - forget not disturbing others - listen as loud as you want without hearing damage?

  187. Using this for communication? by mi · · Score: 1

    Can this be used for transferring information over significant distances without the recipient having any special receiving device — other than their own scull?

    Would not it be terrific — to be able to communicate (even if only one way) securely and over a distance greater than than practical with simple sound-waves?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  188. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by griffman99h · · Score: 2, Funny

    And here is the real reason subliminal messages are not used. While in fact you feel the need to drink duff beer right now. because of a mistimed cadence within the GP that same beer will now taste alot like cow manure.

  189. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about earphones?

  190. It's a conspiracy, and Google's in on it... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    I seemed to recall some Usenet messages eons ago from a guy who seemed to really be a tinfoil hat paranoid, and that's where I first became familiar with the idea. I don't think the guy referred to his use of tinfoil as a "hat" though, but he did talk about wrapping tinfoil around his head to ward off some kind of thought-control beams being directed at him by nefarious government agencies. So, I Googled for tinfoil head in the advanced groups search so that I could restrict to only older messages, and ended up with NO HITS AT ALL. Using the default date range of 1981-present, there were 16K some hits, or at least were, at one point. But I just tried that again and got 4 hits. "tinfoil hat" is pulling up only 9 hits from 1981-present. Looks like a coverup is in the works here people...

    1. Re:It's a conspiracy, and Google's in on it... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.com/search?q=nntp+retention

      It could be that nobody wants to keep posts around from the 80s on live hosts. You might find them in some kind of archive?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:It's a conspiracy, and Google's in on it... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      If that's true, it's relatively new-- Google had taken over the old Deja News archive and had included it in its groups search-- and some of my first posts from around 1983 had been in there whenever I checked. Now the earliest I can find of any postings of mine are from about 1996--- guess Google's runnin' a little short of disk space. On the other hand, I can't imagine that the 1983-1996 Usenet archive is nearly as big as, say 2000's was, so I'm not sure what's up with it. I search for "Rich Rosen," one of the largest posters in the early days and got only one hit... It's a real crime, I tell ya, what is this world comin' to. The Ministry of Truth is alive and well I guess...

      You darn kids get off my lawn...

  191. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Atheism is not a religion.

  192. It's All About Alcohol and Getting Laid by frozenfoxy · · Score: 1

    I think Sierra Nevada and all is well.

    Beer that gets into your head before it gets into your stomach. Because we're that damn good. Sierra Nevada.

  193. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

    ... could be used to torture people and leave absolutely no physical evidence behind, ever?

    I wonder, would it be any worse torture or any less detectable than, say, blasting regular noise into a prisoner's cell at high volume?

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
  194. Yup by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing about this...
    ...or did I?

  195. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by bckrispi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Also, there is a *big* difference between seeing someone simply going limp after being tazed, and seeing someone getting beaten down with a billy-club. These situations play out very differently when broadcast on the 6:00 news.

    --
    Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  196. They got the name wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something that mentally forces me to do things that I don't want to? That's not called MEDUSA that's called my mom.

  197. This dream brought to you by... by cybereal · · Score: 1

    This dream brought you by LIGHTSPEED BRIEFS!

    --
    I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
  198. scary? by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like headphones without the headphones... !scary.

    1. Re:scary? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      it's not scary until you realize they're going to start using it in public places to bombard you with a steady stream of "war is peace" messages.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    2. Re:scary? by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      Even if they did - would it be any different then blasting propoganda through speakers?

    3. Re:scary? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      undoubtedly, some of the morons in this world would take it as the voice of god.

      even though it's probably the voice of that guy from CSI: Miami

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    4. Re:scary? by icastel · · Score: 1

      How's the truth scary? Didn't dub already tell us that "when we're talking about war, we're really talking about peace"?

      --
      coldsphere.org -- Just like a regular sphere, only colder
  199. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by chill · · Score: 1

    You're confusing Duff with Miller Lite.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  200. crap - advertising you cant turn off by johnrpenner · · Score: 2, Funny

    just what we need - advertising with no volume control,
    and no way to turn it off. :-P

    1. Re:crap - advertising you cant turn off by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Oh there's a way to turn it off... but it's a bit more destructive than it could be. Also, wear something you don't mind stains on.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  201. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by rworne · · Score: 1

    We tested over 10 million diverse humans, and found that the only people to survive with 100% success rate were those that were born with both sets of sexual organs. But we consider them useless statistics anyway since they are unable to reproduce.

    Oh great. After a generation or two the earth will literally become a 4chan image board.

    Thanks for that disturbing thought.

    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  202. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We beerconcluded that subliminal messages where bullshit.

    It looks like you've got a typing problem. There's an "h" in the word "were". Anyway, I think I'll go drink some duff.

  203. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Goaway · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, nobody's laughing at you. That's just me with my ray gun putting laughing voices in your head.

  204. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by wattrlz · · Score: 1

    With any luck they would average out. That's got to be the funniest mental picture I've seen all day, though. Thank you, sir.

  205. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by rbochan · · Score: 1

    Foil-lined goalie masks for everyone!

    --
    ...Rob
    The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
  206. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up you have no friends.

  207. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    Meh. Everyone knows that 87% of statistics can be made to prove anything, 50% of the time.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  208. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by martinQblank · · Score: 1

    I would prefer they didn't practice biological reproduction. I know, they could use immaculate conception!

  209. A.D.D. by Thirdsin · · Score: 1

    Suddenly ADHD seems less bothersome...

    --
    No words of wisedom here.
  210. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    That's not Spam dude, that's schizophrenia.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  211. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by rrkap · · Score: 1

    The tinfoil hat might actually be one of the few ways you can block this without any special materials or equipment.

    Half a Faraday cage is as good as none.

    Which is why I plan to start marketing tinfoil bodysuits.

    --
    I like my beverages with warning labels!
  212. All is not lost by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

    It shouldn't be too hard to defeat this without resorting to a tinfoil hat.

    With radio and audio/pressure waves being used, you can effectively cancel out either or both to mitigate the effects, though I would imagine that locally blocking the incident RF near your body would probably be easier.

    Small radio transceiver on your body, preferably near your head, picks up the RF they use to create the pressure waves and transmits a smiliar signal 180deg out of phase.

    --
    Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    1. Re:All is not lost by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Why defeat it ?
      You could buy a certain brand of gum, or a certain flavour, which would signal to or absorb microwave transmissions of a certain frequency. Taste what you hear. Take a pill for The Daily Show. The *IAA would love that. VOIS (voice over inner skull). What if you could trigger visions or the eyes ? Whole new HID.

  213. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Voice of America 2.0

  214. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by ZeroNullVoid · · Score: 1

    of course, but that statistic only occurs 27% of the time in real life situations.

    Only in theory can 77% of all bullshit not be on /.

    The other 33% of the time you can think of how a monkey would shave it's pet zebra.

    But anyway we should stop this branch of statistics as it is just bullshit to manipulate people anyway, at least 90% of the time.

  215. Woody Norris' HSS speakers can already do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure the voice isn't "in" your head, but it's close. Here's a link to NY Times article from 2003. http://www.woodynorris.com/Articles/NewYorkTimesMagazine.htm As mentioned the same technology is used by DoD and other folks like Norwegian Cruise Lines. http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,385048,00.html Arrrgh!!! Me EARS!!!!

  216. would that be... by hitmark · · Score: 1
    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  217. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by slew · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I call BS on your analysis of the uses of this technology.

    Surprisingly a wonderfully innovative technology to accomplish all of your benefits already exists. They're called headphones. My guess is that they don't use them because of some other reason. I wonder what that is...

    Maybe it's that a large number of the people that listen to their music at parties, concerts, and through car audio systems actually *want* others to hear their music. When played loudly, it's just basically, a childish/immature behavior to impose/force their taste in music upon others (neighbors, etc)...

    That headphone technology won't work for you... Why not?

  218. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by mhall119 · · Score: 1

    Then I guess I should go patent anti-chaffing pads for tinfoil bodysuits. And invest in deodorant stocks.

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  219. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2) Microwaves refer to a certain spectrum of electromagnetic radiation. Your cellphone uses them, but the spectrum that your microwave uses happens to cause water molecules to resonate. These microwaves are of a different spectrum, and while they can be deadly, they are not the same.

    Microwaves are radio signals between 300 MHz and 300 Ghz, which includes all cell phone signals and WiFi. Microwave ovens operate at 2.45 GHz, which is smack in the middle of the 2.4 GHz ISM band used for 802.11b/g WiFi, Bluetooth, cordless phones, etc, but operate at kilowatt levels versus the 100 milliwatt or so levels used for WiFi, so you're not going to be able to cook your Hot Pocket on your iPhone in any sort of reasonable time....

    The heating effect has nothing to do with the resonant frequency of water (20 GHz or so for water vapor). 2.45 GHz is used because it's a worldwide ISM band, making it simpler to certify an intentional radiator like a microwave oven.

  220. Re:What's Next? THAT DOG DOES HUNT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My parents don't have a basement, so I live in the spare room. Listen to E. Howard Hunt's deathbed confession via his son Saint John Hunt. Don't bother to get back to me, instructions for origami headwear are all over the Net. Oh, and read recent stories about Hunt Oil as well as past ones. (That Hunt's no relation to Howard.)

  221. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's that a large number of the people that listen to their music at parties, concerts, and through car audio systems actually *want* others to hear their music. When played loudly, it's just basically, a childish/immature behavior to impose/force their taste in music upon others (neighbors, etc)...

    Did somebody have to spend a childhood in their moms basement while the neighbors threw a party that they weren't invited to? Yes I think so.

    --
    I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
  222. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

    Headphones still leak sound. Even earbuds do -- I have a colleague that listens to music using earbuds, and I can hear the buzz of it two cubicles away. When at the mall, some people walk by with earphones or earbuds, and I can make out what they're listening to.

    In any case, I was being facetious. Part of the experience of being at a party or a concert is not just hearing the music, but feeling it as well.

    I'm one who prefers a quiet environment, but I'm know people want to have their fun once in a while, and I don't mind as long as they're courteous about it. I had a neighbor about three years ago who came by and told me about four or five days in advance that he was going to have a sizable party at his place, and that the music was going to be loud. He asked that if it got too loud to please come by and let him know so he could turn it down, but he would also be happy if we came by and joined in. When the party night came around, we didn't go over, but we could barely hear it. They knocked the noise down to something only barely audible outside their own place right at midnight. Definitely a class act overall.

    Back to the original point, sometimes annoying the Captain and Tennille guy is fun. :)

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  223. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by TriezGamer · · Score: 1

    I don't know -- it could be argued that the atheist has faith that nothing exists unless we can prove it.

  224. Banana Phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ring ring ring ring ring ring ring banana phone!

    Seems like the logical first song to use.

  225. GREAT! A WHOLE NEW MEDIUM OF ADVERTISING by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 0

    I'm scared.

  226. Commonly used for covert torture in Norway by xiando · · Score: 1

    I was covertly tortured using this technology in Norway because I refused to shut up about NATOs many false-flag terror operations. I got enough of it after half a year and fled to Sweden. It was hard to give up my whole life, my friends, my family, everything - but it was worth it to have this gruesome torture stop. The "Ray Gun" mentioned in the article is new. The technology is old and it has been used for covert torture within the NATO allience for too many years.

  227. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    though I still do fear spammers using this, as they have no morals

    "Hmmm, why did I buy Vista? I thought I didn't want Vista."
           

  228. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

    Hey, we were supposed to wait until September before publishing that ! Didn't you get the memo ?

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  229. Ray Gun? by trongey · · Score: 1

    Is he related to Peter Gun? Oh, wait, that was Gunn with two "n"s, so I guess not. Well anyway it sounds like he must have those psychotic powers or something. I hope he doesn't put weird thoughts in my head. I have enough of those already.

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  230. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Atheism is not a religion. Religion requires faith and absence of faith is not faith. Insistence on evidence is the inverse of faith.

    You appear to have atheism confused with agnosticism. Agnostics are the ones who neither believe nor disbelieve in divine being(s) because of the lack of evidence, while atheists believe that there are no divine beings with no more evidence than believers in any other religion have. In other words, atheists base their beliefs on faith, not evidence, since there is no accepted evidence that either proves or disproves the existence of divine beings.

  231. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by KatchooNJ · · Score: 1

    Nooooo!!! 404 Not Found?!! Now I will never know what the missing component is!!! I'm doomed! :(

    --
    "Never give up, for that is just the time and place when the tide will change." -Harriet Beecher Stowe ^_^
  232. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And let's not forget that if there are no pressure waves, you can't damage your eardrums! So how about the intracranial equivalent of a 200dB concert? Anyone?

  233. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

    They're being overused as a compliance tool instead of their intended purpose, which was to prevent acute lead poisoning.

    With the added bonus of :
    "I didn't mean to kill him, I just used the Tazer (wink wink)".

    "Oh, all right then"

    And can you even pinpoint a "taze" (sic) to an individual unit ?

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  234. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, now I want a Faraday fedora. Much more stylish than the tinfoil chapeau...

  235. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    So, when's this going to be in the iphone ?
    How much more bandwidth than bluetooth can we get ?

  236. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Not really. Agnostic says that the truth is unknowable and thus don't take a position. Atheist comes in two group , the strong and weak one. One of them says there is no proof of existence of god and there cannot be. The other says , until you bring proof of existence of God, I won't believe in it just as I don't believe in pink flying unicorn or whatever mythological object, NO FAITH in non-existence is involved here, just plain skepticism of unfalsifiable things. You are using the first definition whereas the GP was using the other one. Both exists. And Atheism is INDEED no religion, just like not-collecting-stamp is not a hobby.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  237. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by bpjk · · Score: 1

    No, there isn't. There's an "h" in the word "where", not in the word "were".

  238. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Winckle · · Score: 1

    The missing component is Love. =)

  239. Obligatory Reference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We ALL have those dreams, Fry. But you don't see any of US running out to purchase name-brand merchandise at low, low prices..."

  240. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > If -I- were to taser you for noncompliance, I go to jail, because of
    > my lack of a State Authorized shiny piece of tin on my chest.

    One definition of 'government' is that it is the entity which claims a monopoly on the 'legitimate' use of force. Something to keep in mind when considering giving it additional authority, especially if the task can possibly be done by a private entity.

    But thankfully our form of government (US) doesn't give a monopoly on teh use of force to the State. You CAN tase a bro if he is attempting to use force against you and in most jurisdictions (i.e those that are lawless) you will not be punished. The 2nd Amendment was recently affirmed to protect an individual right to the possession, bearing and yes the lawful use thereof. Our government gets it's powers from We the People and thus in theory doesn't any powers we didn't have to give it and we kept a generous portion.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  241. An another report citing Pentagon reports by SubComdTaco · · Score: 1

    Newly declassified Pentagon report, February 2008, Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weapons , obtained under the Freedom of Information Act http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/02/report-nonletha.html "The "Voice of God" device, which creates voices in people's heads. As the report notes, "Application of the microwave hearing technology could facilitate a private message transmission. It may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a person not aware of the technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the sense of hearing, it could be psychologically devastating if one suddenly heard 'voices within one's head.'"

  242. Everyone's Out to Get You! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Fun Gizmodo Fact: The MEDUSA is useless against a raging pack of schizophrenics.

    Fortunately they're too paranoid to assemble.

  243. Well maybe I _was_ merely hallucinating but... by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    I've never seen a UFO, ghosts, nor even heard voices in my head -- except for one time 14 years ago:

    After a stint doing politics, testifying before Congress, and successfully getting a law put on the books (PL101-611) forcing NASA to procure launch services from the private sector, I had gotten interested in the tax system as a source of market failures in high technology investment and, as a consequence, was researching some fringe ideas related to the income tax. So I ordered the two volume book "The Law That Never Was" by Bill Benson via mail. Literallyl, the very I sat down to read the book, I heard, quietly but quite distinctly a female voice say just the 3 words: "It's too late."

    It was quite an experience, unique in my life.

    When I mentioned it to a friend who was somewhat well connected politically, he said that he had heard of microwave devices that could project sounds into people's heads, and that this seemed like a good candidate for such a use.

    I don't know, but it sure was spooky -- and keep in mind it was a one time event some time ago. I had done work for secret government projects in secured facilities with electromagnetic shielding but it was always with the understanding that there were ways of gathering data both passively and actively from within such facilities via microwaves as well as other frequencies. It really never occurred to me there might be some further purposes to such shielding. Now I'm not so sure. You have to wonder how many of the neocons are literally hearing "the voice of God"...

  244. Tinfoil is so tacky... by kent_eh · · Score: 2, Funny

    wearable Faraday cages are the new fashion statement.

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  245. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 1

    Let me put it a different way. I am an atheist. I believe that there are no divine beings, and that humans and the universe that we live in were not created by any sort of divine being, intelligence, etc. This is not just an absence of belief in divinity; it is a belief in the absence of divinity.

    You may debate whether my atheism is a religion or not, but it is certainly based on faith. Faith is the strong belief in something without proof. I believe in the lack of divinity without any hint of doubt, even though there is no evidence that even suggests that my belief is correct, let alone supports or proves it.

    I accept that scientific theories such as the theory of evolution make sense to me, yet these theories don't support my atheistic beliefs at all, since they have nothing to say either in support of or in opposition to the existence of divinity. My acceptance of scientific theories is not based on faith, because I demand proof in order to accept a scientific theory, and will discard the theory if and when convincing evidence shows up that refutes it.

    However, my atheism is a matter of faith, since I believe it with absolute conviction, in the complete absence of supporting evidence, and without welcoming reasoned debate that I could be mistaken on that matter. If this is not faith, then what is? I find myself unable to imagine any blinder faith than this.

    What was TFA about, again? :-)

  246. Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally we can destroy the terrorists by sending sounds of farting into their very heads, killing them in laughter.

  247. Sounds like a pretty cool hearing Aid by anexkahn · · Score: 1

    well, at least after they miniaturize it.

    --
    Curious about Storage and Virtualization? Check out
  248. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    > but they shouldn't be allowed to practice biological science.

    Why? Just general religious bigotry on your part or is there some reasoning behind your proposed ban? Granted there are some areas of biological research where they might have some trouble but the field is pretty big. And a lot of so called 'evolution deniers' are in various grey areas. For example, if someone believes that species change over time but that the heap big skyfather is who kickstarted life instead of spontanious random genesis they can probably do 99.9% of what is currently done in biology with zero problems.

    Sounds like you just want to supress any disenting views from your chosen religion. And yes secular humanism IS a religion in that it attempts to provide an all encompasing Theory to explain Life, the Universe and Everything complete with a moral code, which is why I'm an agnostic.

    I suspect science might eventually explain the universe but it damned sure isn't close today. Science, logic and pure reason are currently poor tools to develop a moral code from, just as an example. Science is good at describing the universe, or the What part. Answering Why, not so good. And since pretty much by definition any attempt to ask about the universe pre big bang isn't science it is a poor tool to ask some of the really big questions of.... at least as we currently understand physics.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  249. IN the future by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

    We all be wearing shielded motorcycle helmets outside with light limiting glasses(new toy lasers) walking in shielded full-body suits,living in shielded homes.
    Its just like one of the Gibson novels seeping into reality.

  250. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

    "With or without religion you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion." -- Dr. Steven Weinberg

  251. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1
    from TFA:

    "The pulses create a shockwave inside the skull that's detected by the ears, and basically makes you think you're going balls-to-the-wall batshit insane."

    I still do not see how my wife would detect a difference.

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
  252. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

    I thought "taser" was just another name for "cattle prod". :)

  253. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2

    I see enormous benefits in this technology.

    1. Listening to music as loud as you want while not forcing it on others

    You can count on two things: microwaves generating "cranial audio illusions" of the same magnitude of a loud rock show will be deadly, and the frequency range will be limited, nowhere near 20-20k Hz.

    A rock show will have upwards of 30,000W of power driving speakers of the highest efficiency available. So imagine sticking your head into about 40 microwave ovens at once. It's ok, they're not tuned to the water-boiling frequency. You'll be just fine. Promise.

    Knock on your head, that's probably the lowest note that can be produced, and not much more than maybe two octaves above that. Beyond that range the sounds either can't be produced or cannot pass through the grey matter. For lower tones you'd have to resonate the ribcage, but I expect ribs don't reflect microwaves nearly as well as the skull. For higher sounds you'd have to target the inner ear itself very precisely. Unless the target is wearing custom earrings for a guidance system to follow, you're s.o.l.

    2. Rocking out to the loudest concert in history without anyone outside the venue hearing a whisper of it (on second thought, the RIAA might require this, so maybe it's not so good)

    If sound waves were created inside someone of the magnitude of a loud rock show, it would be very audible to others. When you "feel the bass" it's up around 127dB and literally making your ribcage resonate. Believe me, you need much more power to drive a room full of people compared to an empty one, and that's a two-way street - a crowd full of resonating ribcages would radiate no less than a sound system. If >127dB were produced inside you your ribcage would essentially be a passive subwoofer, possibly resulting in the much-heralded "brown note".

    3. Throwing a gigantic party with great tunes while letting the geezer next door -- who never listens to anything harder than Captain and Tennille -- get his beauty sleep

    You and your guests would be discovered dead by your much irritated geezer neighbor. And let's not overlook how loud they would have to shout at each other to be heard over the music.

    Also it's unlikely that the effect could be produced from omnidirectional microwave emitters. It has to be a pair of directional emitters, like two lasers and not a light bulb. The effect is called a "resultant". Hit two adjacent high keys on a piano and you'll hear a lower note underneath, the result of constructive modular interference. No one emitter can produce resultants, and the relative distance between the target and the emitters would have to be exactly equal.

    I wonder how many people I just got to hit themselves in the head...

    --

    War as we knew it was obsolete
    Nothing could beat complete denial
    - Emily Haines
  254. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by gadget+junkie · · Score: 1

    1) Subliminal messages don't work. It's a sham that a psychologist made with fake data that scared the crap out of politicians so that a law was implemented quickly and people fear it to this day (though I still do fear spammers using this, as they have no morals).

    So... Why exactly do you fear it if it doesn't work?

    Because audible spam in my head would be even worse than the e-mailed spam in my in-box or the visible spam on billboards (and bus stops, sides of buildings/cars, etc.)

    I do not know why, but reading all this makes me want to buy some cheap Viagra.

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
  255. if the internet gets their hands on this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we would face the ultimate unstoppable rickrolling!

  256. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

    ... could be used to torture people and leave absolutely no physical evidence behind, ever?

    I wonder, would it be any worse torture or any less detectable than, say, blasting regular noise into a prisoner's cell at high volume?

    From the article, it sounds like it -- whereas your body has devices in place to stop extremely loud noises (up to and including self-destructing your eardrums if needed), it has no safeguards in play for a voice like this being blasted from inside your head.

    Indeed, from above:


    MEDUSA involves a microwave auditory effect "loud" enough to cause discomfort or even incapacitation. Sadovnik says that normal audio safety limits do not apply since the sound does not enter through the eardrums.

    "The repel effect is a combination of loudness and the irritation factor," he says. "You can't block it out."

    So in other words, this is a sound gun that you can't block out, is 4+ TIMES louder than a rocket engine, and causes "disorientation" and "incapacitation".

    Sure, the idea is that they'll play this at a crowd (no more WTO Protests in OUR Amerika) and the crowd will have to disperse.

    But what if they just do this to some poor non-Person like the illegal detainees at Guantanamo? Lock someone in a room, turn on this device (or that pain gun that supposedly feels like your skin is melting off) and come back in 2-3 days.

    By then, they'll be willing to do ANYTHING to get it to stop. And best of all, no nasty evidence to even have to cover up. Bonus!

  257. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by azzuth · · Score: 1

    This deserves more discussion. I wonder if anyone out there with more time (aka not at work) has looked into if and on whom they even tested this device. It has many many many applications and no matter the results it will most likely be heavily utilized. But I would love to talk to some of the test subjects in 10 years and see what the long term affects might be.

  258. Who will be the first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, who'll be the first to transmit "Do not believe this voice in your head. Or else!"

  259. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Actually, agnosticism comes in two flavors, as well: Weak agnosticism says that we merely don't have any compelling arguments and strong agnosticism says that there can be no compelling arguments. Weak agnosticism and weak atheism are very similar and there's only a very slight difference between a sceptic weak agnostic and a weak atheist.

    It's not as easy as saying "all X believe/don't believe". Some atheists believe, some don't. Same goes for agnostics.

    And then you have ignosticism, an agnosticism derivate which postulates that the question whether God exists doesn't matter at all. Ignosticism has an opinion ("it doesn't matter"), but it doesn't neccessarily have a belief - uness you count "it doesn't matter" as a belief, in which case it does.

    Actually, it does in all cases.

    In the end it all comes down to whether someone makes an assumption without having hard data to back it up. Everyone falls under this - even weak agnostics can't claim without assumption that there is no proof unless they have evaluated every proof so far and ignostics can't claim without assumption that it doesn't matter because it could matter.

    Everyone believes. As soon as you make an assumption, that's a belief. Since we don't have definitive, widely accepted proof in this area so far, everyone operate on nothing but belief, even the guys who say they don't care about the topic. Arguing over whether one believes or not is pointless and so is being offended by the notion.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  260. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Randomly · · Score: 1

    Let's recap, so that's: invisible (1), silent (2), mind reading (3) with ray guns that make you hear voices.

    George Orwell was an optimist.

    1.
    http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/20/researchers-develop-metamaterial-with-negative-refractive-index/
    2.
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080109104244.htm
    3.
    http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1172900547;fp;16;fpid;1

  261. A defense by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Terry: How did you know you weren't hearing voices?
    Bruce: Well, for one, I'm not psychotic.
    Terry: Well, I hope your other answer's more convincing.
    Bruce: Second, the voice kept calling me, "Bruce". That's not what I call myself.
    Terry: Oh? What do you call yourself?
    [Bruce gives Terry a long stare]
    Terry: [in realization] Oh! You would. [changing voice] But remember, that's my name now.
    Bruce: Tell my subconscious that.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  262. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by azzuth · · Score: 1

    Would a fairaday cage hat work as well?

  263. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 1

    No, that's the Fifth Element. The missing component is obviously an Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator. Thankfully, the Acme corporation has a large supply.

  264. Scary uses by Pluszak · · Score: 1

    Think about it, there is no way to proove it was ever used. If you point it at someone driving a car and use it at max volume there will be an acident. If you point it at a politician making a speech itll ruin they reputation...We are just doomed.

  265. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by neomunk · · Score: 1

    I agree with everything you said IN THEORY, however it's been my experience that things don't work out that way in PRACTICE. I have nothing but (quite a bit of) personal circumstantial evidence to back up my beliefs though.

  266. That's Odd by PPH · · Score: 1

    All I can hear is:

    "Heeeeer'es Johnny!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  267. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha!

    I'll have my tinfoil hat and earplugs!

    Beat that fascist government!

    Soldier: "Hey you in the tinfoil hat! Out the way! There's a runaway train coming!"

    Me: "Ha! Fascist soldier scum, you cant influence m-"...SPLAT!

  268. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    If you ever listen to the Dropkick Murphys cover an AC/DC tune, their awful tuneless bass player / now lead singer does an amazing job of ruining any happy memories you used to have of AC/DC.

    No, Celine Dion's cover of you shook me all night long is a crime against humanity add this to the microwave brain zapper to force people to listen it and you have a genuine weapon of mass disparagement.

    Cleanse me!!!!!!!

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  269. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by slig · · Score: 1

    Actually, the strainer isn't a half bad idea, as long as the size of the holes is smaller than the wavelength of the microwave and you could cover the whole head with it. Might not be for fashion conscious types, but it beats a hemorrhaged brain.

  270. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    2. Rocking out to the loudest concert in history without anyone outside the venue hearing a whisper of it (on second thought, the RIAA might require this, so maybe it's not so good)

    Followed by a dead-black spaceship plummeting into a nearby sun.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  271. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

    Two words: Jiffy POP.

  272. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by chgros · · Score: 1

    How do you turn EM waves into audio waves by heterodyning though? (besides the fact that you'd have to decrease the frequency by at least 10^4, which would require a lot of precision)

  273. Start the rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear M$ is going to acquire it.

  274. Huh? by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    You mean I'll have MORE voices in my head?

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  275. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by couchslug · · Score: 2, Funny

    4. Telling Westboro Baptist Church members that God doesn't hate fags, She hate _them_.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  276. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4. Getting brain cancer

  277. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    At long last slashdotters will actually have a chance (albeit small) of getting laid by using this device. Just aim it at a hot chick, put suggestions in her head, and go for it. Of course, you'll still have to be able to perform with a live human female.

  278. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but FAIL, do your research.

    The medusa tech does 1 thing and only 1 thing and that's send audio signals on a microwave signal so that headphones do no protect your ears from the signal.

    But protection is ez and already exists. A microwave silence stream for headphones has already been developed so this makes it completely useless in military applications execpt in areas that can't afford the equipment to cancel it out.

    2nd, it has no effect on people who are deaf.

  279. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by jackchance · · Score: 1

    Of course a tinfoil hat will be no defence since your head will burst into flames.

    mod parent up! informative!

    --
    1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
  280. Don't Most Slashdotters.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...already hear voices in their head?

  281. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Quicksilver_Johny · · Score: 1

    Now avoiding TFA like the plague, it occurs to me that "shockwaves" within the skull able to cause hydrostatic pressure loads comparable to 120+ decibels (is that loud enough for ya?) hitting your eardrums might just damage something other than eardrums.

    But lets not even think about the fine possibilities such as massive damage on the cellular level - just consider the overpressures that could be set up within blood vessels. It will be interesting to see if there is any increase in "massive cerebral hemorrage" as a cause of death going forward.

    TFA actually has something on this:
    James Lin of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of Illinois in Chicago says that MEDUSA is feasible in principle. He has carried out his own work on the technique, and was even approached by the music industry about using microwave audio to enhance sound systems, he told New Scientist. "But is it going to be possible at the power levels necessary?" he asks. Previous microwave audio tests involved very "quiet" sounds that were hard to hear, a high-power system would mean much more powerful â" and potentially hazardous â" shockwaves. "I would worry about what other health effects it is having," says Lin. "You might see neural damage."

  282. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Twigmon · · Score: 1

    Missing link is:

    http://lh4.ggpht.com/_8jRnvFw6hrI/SD1L9bexl6I/AAAAAAAAAcM/w1LRSuAxkoQ/cap%20NEW%20(12).jpg

    + instead of %20 was used - google didn't understand. Just for everyone's information - the '+' character as a replacement for 'space' is not standard url encoding. The replacement is only useful to servers that understand it.

  283. the applications are unlimited by synaesthetico · · Score: 1

    Would this be the first crowd control device to have both "stun" and "kill" settings?

  284. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by ZeroNullVoid · · Score: 1

    Crap, I forgot. I guess I may become the next testie.

  285. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by mjwx · · Score: 1

    You know that Stalin was a Christian and Mao was Confucian.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of Atheist bashing. As has been said before, Atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby (PS I'm a stamp not-collector as well).

    Oh, and whilst were being childish, Mao is the Thai word for drunk.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  286. MindGuard by jaminJay · · Score: 1

    So, I guess we'll need an updated version of MindGuard then?

    --
    Leela: "Is all the work done by children?" Alien: "No, not the whipping."
  287. Every day, in every way... by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

    The world is becoming more and more like a Philip K. Dick novel.

    --
    MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  288. Test Subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reported being able to hear Dennis Leary's "Voices in my head" at a distance of 3 kilometers...

  289. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they see someone with a tinfoil hat, they'll probably just yell at him.

    Exactly! Stay beneath the radar (literally) by buying my tinfoil-lined hoodie. (pat. applied for)

  290. Ray Guhn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would put something else all over your head (if you are a girl)

  291. I want one on wide spread! by Geminii · · Score: 1

    There's a couple of political and religious rallies that need attendin'.

  292. If I recall... by thornharp · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a follow-on to the Neurophone, a gadget invented by Pat Flanagan back in the 1970s to let deaf persons hear by inducing signals via RF that the brain interpreted as sound. One of the odd features of this approach was that the inducer could be placed elsewhere than on the head and the 'sound' would still be heard.

  293. familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't the Val Kilmer flick "Real Genius" have a plot line like this?

  294. Firefly, anyone? by Xenoflargactian · · Score: 1

    Remember the sonic weapon from Firefly?

    Two by two, hands of blue. Two by two, hands of blue.

  295. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Jerry · · Score: 1

    Remove the +(12) from near the end and you see a NYY baseball cap

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  296. Re:Ha! See! I told you! [LEAD POISONING] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  297. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No doubt. I wonder at which pressures brain tissue begins cavitation...

  298. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DRINK MORE DUFF BEER!!! :O

  299. Sierra Nevada special powers by valhallaprime · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always have used Sierra Nevada to REMOVE the voices in my head. Better yet, it comes in different styles, and the headache and confusion are time-delayed in their version of the product by at least 8 hours.

    Increasing the dosage slightly makes you impervious to the voices OUTSIDE your head as well. Comes in handy when others want to "abort the mission".

    Amazingly, increasing your dosage even more actually renders you completely INVISIBLE. Might be a slight shimmer like predator, because others with Sierra Nevada Invisiblility can still occasionally find you, especially if you owe them money.

    Unfortunately, when you try to bring any of your newfound powers near a car or other vehicle, motorized or not, dangerous wormholes can be created, warping you right into nearby objects with startling unpredictablility. DO NOT ATTEMPT. That whole "great power, great responsibility" thing.

    I wonder what a Military-Grade/Weaponized version of the holiday Celebration Ale would do....

  300. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are not the droids you're looking for.

  301. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

    I don't know what to think about the moderation on this one. My post was meant to be funny, but you seem to have captured my humorous intentions better than I did. Either way, I accept your nomination and will immediately begin my search for qualified voice actors.

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  302. So you belong to category 1 by aepervius · · Score: 1

    you actively believe t5here is no god. You have faith there is no god. I don't believe actively there is no god. I am saying I am waiting for falsification/evidence of its existence, until then I put it in the same category as pink flying unicorn, ice breathing dragons, santa claus. In other word my atheism is not based on faith at all. Thus the argument that atheism is based on faith is a false over generalization (and the argument it is a religion is even wronger). QED.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  303. Behind The Curve(s) by DynaSoar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...a damned scary ray gun that uses the 'microwave audio effect' to implant sounds and perhaps even specific messages inside people's heads."

    A little late to be crying "damned scary" wolf. The effects was proven about 25 years ago.

    Yes, specific messages. In the original research the test was to beam spoken numbers (one at a time, 1 through 20) at the subject and have them guess which number it was. Results were 80% to 100% correct.

    It's not subliminal in the denotation of 'below the level of conscious awareness'. The perception is that of a "heard" sound.

    I'm surprised it took this long for someone to come out with this. The original works was, after all, done on commercially technology of the time.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  304. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by aproposofwhat · · Score: 2, Funny

    audible spam in my head

    Damn you - I won't be able to get those bloody Vikings out of my mind for days now!

    --
    One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  305. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
    ASCII rickroll?

    .

    Priceless :o)

    --
    One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  306. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

    He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy!

    --
    One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  307. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1

    That would accomplish what? By what physical mechanism would microwave energy be converted into sound waves?
    The parent is talking out of his (admittedly venerable) ass, which he more or less admits. The technology works exactly like your microwave oven. It rapidly heats an object using rf energy, in this case a skull, not a baked potato. The only thing that's changed is the power is cycled so that the cyclical heating causes pressure waves. It's the subtle difference in received energy and timing of the rf bursts that makes the difference between boiled brains and auditory hallucinations.

    --
    Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
  308. Impressive Magic-with-a-C acts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mentalists(/Stage Magicians) such as Derren Brown have been using this style of device for a while to create some very impressive "mind reading" tricks. Eg. "You read my mind" and someone off-stage puts 'the idea' in 'your' head; or "I'll read your mind" where an accomplice procures the required information and aims the "weapon" at /my/ head to pass on the information.

    Dick Sutphen also talks about the Neurophone (amongst other things) in his article "The battle for your mind" [PD document] ...It's interesting to follow the development of the Neurophone beyond Dick's paper.

  309. Re:Ha! See! I told you! [LEAD POISONING] by spazdor · · Score: 1

    I lol'd.

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
  310. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 1

    Ever tried headbanging with headphones?

    --
    Ni.
  311. Re:I think the (tinfoil hat) joke is on us this ti by F'Nok · · Score: 1

    "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Ghandi

    Let's hope he was right!

  312. Hearing by mqduck · · Score: 1

    the sound bypasses the eardrums and emanates from within the skull

    I'm not quite sure what that means, but does it mean (certain) deaf people will be able to hear these microwaves?

    --
    Property is theft.
  313. magicians by d4m4$74 · · Score: 1

    This would be great for magic, or to be more precise, mentalism

    wouldn't it be great that if the magican says "I'm sending you a word" and you actually hear one

  314. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Kamineko · · Score: 1
  315. Ring ring ..... by know1 · · Score: 1

    bananaphone

  316. Impossible ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    And then, there was the girlfriend I had who could put the right thoughts in my head just by flashing certain parts of her anatomy...

    Impossible! You must be new here ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  317. High treason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the love of god, am I the only one horribly scared of this? The thought of being mentally raped and subjected to all kinds of noise inside my head is deeply disturbing... The inventors and anyone involved in the realization of this project have committed horrible acts of treason against the human race. It's your god damned government, yanks. Do something about it!

  318. Oh Sure! by jjohn · · Score: 1

    It's a ray gun that's putting voicing in your head. A ray run from a shadowy military operation. Because the government wants you to have voices in your head.

    Riiight.

  319. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    What -- you think we have the right to peaceably assemble? Serves them right if they do...

    Oh yeah - that 1st Amendment thingy...well we can just repeal that through executive order, like all the rest.

    HHOS

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  320. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and tinfoil hats have been shown to actually attenuate certain frequencies. It is essentially a floating (non grounded) antenna.

    On the other hand, to make an effective full body Faraday cage, you would need to ensure that it is grounded (via soles of boots, and/or metal fringes on pants touching ground). Given the size of the wavelengths involved, you wouldn't have much mobility in such a suit (picture yourself wrapped head to toe in aluminum mesh screen - like the kind on your screen door).

    A better solution might be to build a jammer that neutralizes these waves by generating a wave on the same frequencies out of phase. Of course, if you get it wrong you'll just reinforce the signal and your head will explode...but that's the price you pay to sleep peacefully at night.

  321. Slashdotters eat pie. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    I've heard of this kind of thing before. Sadly, they like to pick on people who are already a little border-line and odd. --Thee swarming piranha muggles who get an ego-high from tormenting those who don't quite fit socially can always be counted on to do the dirty work of the Powers That Be by making sure people who dare step outside the draconian social boundaries as established in Jr. High by the popular kids, are punished and ostracized for speaking out. I find it astonishing; so many of the people who visit Slashdot have themselves been similarly treated in this way precisely because they are geeks. They should damned-well know better. --But I've seen it so many times before and I'm sure I'll see it again.

    --One of the more poignant episodes which crystallized this repeating pattern into my archetypal reference on this whole behavior type was the day I remember demanding of a room mate why he was tormenting a kid who had made an honest mistake, and his reply was, without a trace of irony, "Well, I was punished all through school, so now it's my turn."

    I could have slugged him for being yet another predictable ape incapable of rising above his reptile-brain response behavior as any self-respecting human should always strive to do, but I was too flabbergasted to even close my hanging lower jaw at the time.

    I hope everybody will take a moment to read through some of the comments made by certain social cowards, around here with regard to one of your older posts on this same subject. --That is, before the technology in question was officially made 'real' by this current article. . . (News flash, people! It's been around since the cold war. Please, please do some research; all this knowledge is easily and publicly available to anybody with half an ounce of human curiosity.)

    People who have been hurt should stand up rather jump at the chance to pass on the misery.

    -FL

  322. Tin Foil Hats/Kevlar Vests by gsgiles · · Score: 0

    You are right on the money with the tin foil hat! However you might want to put it under a scully cap, run it all the way down to your shoulder, make the breathing holes point down. Also put on a pair of welding goggles since they will have a high metal content or glasses made from leaded crystal. Don't wear a paper dress the spark the hat gives off could ignite it. You may also want to put a kevlar vest on with a nice aluminum foil covering so the tasers will not work either. No amount of legislation will make Gauss's law go away.

  323. I was reading about the subliminal use of. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    a rudimentary technology built on similar principles. --The reference is gone, gone, gone, (one of the reasons I was disappointed when the Internet Archive had to abandon it's development of its non-linear search feature, "Recall"), but there was once this cool story about an Australian university student who as part of his lab research discovered the following. . .

    Morse code-like binary impulses transferred through the skin using low-level electrical pulses which were undetectable by the subject on the conscious layer, were nonetheless able to be interpreted by the subconscious. --This is after hypnosis was used to teach the subject how to interpret the binary code. After that point, test volunteers could be given very specific instructions which they would actually follow to the letter without realizing that the motivation to act had not come as a result of their own thinking. They thought they were acting on their own ideas! Stunning. According to the lead researcher, (before his website vanished), he got freaked out when other strange things started to surface with his subjects which his experiments should not have had anything to do with, so he aborted the whole experiment.

    Now I don't know what to make of that, (which is why I'd love to review the story and perhaps contact the guy to find out what the actual scoop was), but the ideas all certainly sound like they can easily exist within the realm of the possible. How many of your ideas and impulses in life are really your own? It just reinforces the importance, as the Buddhists suggest, to practice 'mindfulness'. Question yourself and your actions all the time and make sure they pass your own filters of rational behavior. Beware of strong impulses which don't make sense; think through them carefully before acting on faith that just because it feels good and right that it must necessarily be good and right. I think we've all learned how bad it can be to hit, "Submit" before reviewing.

    -FL

  324. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

    Saying your eardrums can "self-destruct" as a protective mechanism seems a bit like saying your body will self-destruct to protect you from the pain of being caught in an explosion ... but I think I get your point. Still, I don't think the ray gun would be different. If you perceive sound, it is due to the bones in your inner ear vibrating. The big difference from "normal" sound is that you can't stop it by covering your ears, because the vibrations are starting in your skull (maybe you *could* stop it by covering your whole head with something). I would think that it could cause hearing loss, just like an external noise.

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
  325. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I concur

    I concur

    I concur

  326. 21st century? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    I think you mean 20th.. he was frozen just at midnight on new years of 2000 and wouldn't know anything about the 21st century...

    if you copied that from some place, I sense plot hole.

  327. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    Mmmm ... Coca Cola ...

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  328. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Cruise_WD · · Score: 1

    "Insistence on evidence is the inverse of faith."

    No, its the inverse of naivity. Faith has been abused by religion for so long, it now has these unfortunate definitions, but the Bible itself defines faith as "...the /assured/ expectation of things hoped for, the /evident demonstration/ of realities, though not beheld." (Heb 11:1).

    Faith is based on assurance, evidence and demonstration. It is very akin to trust - you don't trust someone for no reason (hopefully) - you trust them because they have proved over time that there is reason to trust that person.

    If someone has no reason for their "faith", that is no faith. That's just gullible.

    --
    [ cruise / casual-tempest.net / xenogamous.com / transference.org / quantam sufficit ]
  329. Sounds kind of like.... by preznick555 · · Score: 1
  330. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by mikael · · Score: 1

    7Hz-8Hz is the resonant frequency of an adult human skull.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  331. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

    Looks like there aren't enough Girl Genius fans on here to mod you up. And here's me without mod points...

  332. Florida is full of crazy by jeephistorian · · Score: 1

    Well, your post makes me think that Florida is just full of crazy. I mean, really, what are the odds that you will have a friend who is paranoid and a brother is has the same paranoia? That means one of two things: 1. You are living in a mental hospital or 2. You work for the government and they don't "know" it!

    --
    Huh?
  333. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'm afraid to go to any protests...

  334. This is nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The effect has been known since 1962 and was experimented with by both sides of the cold war. However, the research was discontinued when they realized shooting microwaves into peoples sculls is quite dangerous (who would have thought?). However, with the ethic standards of the modern USA, inducing madness in enemies while frying their brains will be just be the next cool toy in the vast arsenal of the American army. Opression, war and torture is the name of the game. I hope the nice folks of Sierra Nevada Corporation sleep soundly at night. And silently.

    Read more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect

  335. Brzzz by Undertone · · Score: 1

    Wonder if it'd be possible to nullify it with some nuclear-powered sound dampening headphones...

  336. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 150 slashdot freaks!

    Is that because you write things like the word salad above?

    Do you actually understand all the often-seen clauses you've stuck together, or are you just repeating them? To me it looks a lot like you're doing the latter.

    As an example, your last paragraph comprises several clichés ("... What part. Answering Why..."), offers up an unsupportable assertion ("poor tools"), and misses out on qc-gr work on Boundary Conditions (of which the BB is one). The scientific method is simply an approach to rigourously testing wild ass guesses and (in physics) rejecting those that are inconsistent with what we can observe of nature. This does not at all preclude applicability to wild ass guesses about things which are only indirectly visible to us, and there are plenty of cosmologies involving physical interactions between our Hubble Volume and others. Some of those will share our initial boundary condition (our big bang) while others may have other initial boundary conditions, or might share one or both boundary conditions in the reverse sense (starting at our "Big Rip"/"Big Empty", ending at our Big Bang). These hypotheses can be examined with the scientific method when they predict things we can look for in our sky (or in labs), and so are amenable to the scientific method, contrary to your assertion.

    I think your understanding is weak (or poorly elucidated) with respect to whether there is a line between "what" and "why", and (if there is one) how it can be moved around through reductionist and (statistical) emergentist physicalism (or perhaps biological naturalism), and the rigourous testing thereof.

    The "Demarcation Problem" is mainly a way of being civil to people who don't want their beliefs tested rigourously and systematically, including the many scientists (past and present) who have held beliefs that might not survive systematic testing. Civility, however, should not be considered endorsement, and should not require false agnosticism particularly in the face of minuscule probabilities that in standard empirical testing would be considered essentially zero.

    Actual agnosticism is best addressed through systematic testing. If you have a hypothesis that X exists (for any value of X, including things like souls or gods) then the scientific method should help you structure a set of experiments which would let you observe and repeatedly measure X, if X exists beyond an increasingly low probability. At some point, when chasing down physical hypotheses, scientists will give up and say the probability of X existing is essentially zero, since the nonzero part of the probability does not admit a single observable effects within the scale of the Hubble Volume. Before that point, agnosticism is real; after that point, agnosticism is false.

    Many experimentalists have looked for evidence of supernatural "X"es of various types, none have been able to produce repeatable evidence. If such evidence of above-chance X became known (and became repeatable) it would be extremely hard to suppress, particularly since "believers" in "X"es like to publish more widely than academic journals.

    So, perhaps as an agnostic, you might convince yourself it is your moral duty to make yourself less agnostic, by clearly demonstrating the existence of things about which you are agnostic, or clearly demonstrating a further reduction in probability of their existence. I think that would be cool. I shall urge agnostics to consider that approach.

    Sounds like you just want to supress any disenting views from your chosen religion [...] which is why I'm an agnostic.

    That's hard to read as anything other than proselytizing.

  337. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that if you were a really power-hungry atheist, you may pretend to be of a given religion if it would serve your purpose of winning the hearts and minds of the people. Who would know the difference?

    --
    I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
  338. Excalibur! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Looks like Merlin's fashion choice was ahead of its time! (no pun intended)

  339. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by mjwx · · Score: 1

    power-hungry atheist, you may pretend to be of a given religion if it would serve your purpose of winning the hearts and minds of the people.

    Pretty much describes all religious political leaders.

    Stalin wasn't a religious leader, he was raised a Christian in Georgia (now part of southern Russia) by his violent father. That stayed with him for all his life even though he never used religion as part of his leadership (why would he need to, he had Bolshevik rhetoric to rely on).

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  340. Another use? by Codex_of_Wisdom · · Score: 1

    Another use would be message transfer. Who needs a radio on the battlefield when your commander can beam orders into your head? (Just hope he/she has it turned down).

  341. Re:Ha! See! I told you! by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    I'm glad at least that there are a few of us! :D

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  342. The Anubis Gates... by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    Ever read The Anubis Gates? I did years ago, and reading now about grounding through the heel to protect against these modern magics suddenly gives me shivers of deja vu...

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."