I'll bet they've got the terrorist video from Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back in there somewhere...
Jay: I am the master of the C.L.I.T.! Remember this fucking face, whenever you see C.L.I.T. you'll see this fucking face. I make that shit WORK! It does whatever the fuck I tell it to. No one rules the C.L.I.T like me. Not this little fuck, none of you little fucks out there. I AM THE C.L.I.T. COMMANDER! Remember that, commander of all C.L.I.T.s! When it comes down to business, this is what I do. I pinch it like this. Ooooh you little fuck. Then I rub my nose with it...
My company uses Confluence as an internal wiki for project and technical documentation. It's a piece of cake to create groups and assign fine-tuned privileges with regards to viewing, editing, commenting and destroying. I agree that an organisation with actual classified data is going to make damn sure the system they use can accommodate multiple clearance levels and 'need-to-know' groups.
I know you're being funny, but I kind of like the idea of a parsable legal coding language. Employ a decent supercomputer to recompile the lot every time something gets changed and notify us of contradictions, divide-by-zero errors and broken dependencies.
...his mentor the Landgraf Wilhelm of Hesse-Kassel asked whether there was an animal faster than a deer. Tycho replied, writing that there were none, but he could send his tame elk. When Wilhelm replied he would accept one in exchange for a horse, Tycho replied with the sad news that the elk had just died on a visit to entertain a nobleman at Landskrona. Apparently during dinner the elk had drunk a lot of beer, fallen down the stairs, and died.
Is it worth considering that arms were drastically less advanced at the time the Bill was written?
Compare 18th century firearms to, for example, an AA-12 shotgun (admittedly not legally available to civilians) which is automatic, almost recoilless and can take 32-round magazines of fin-stabilised mini-grenade rounds. That's a huge difference in the destructive power that a single person can wield as they see fit.
I've neither handled, nor witnessed the use of, a functional firearm in my life, and don't consider myself qualified to opine one way or the other, just throwing this out there to see if anyone more informed or closer to the issue wants to weigh in.
//misses Photoshop//not enough to even dual-boot, though You may already know this, but Photoshop 6.0 thru CS2 are all Platinum-rated for Wine. They should run pretty much perfectly.
A few days ago, I saw someone use the phrase "begs for the question," which nicely sidesteps the logical fallacy definition whilst keeping the desired meaning of the oft-misused "begs the question."
Panels on the roof/hood for trickle-charging, mains adaptors for specially equipped parking spots, regenerative braking, quick-charge stations that will become even quicker if/when ultracapacitors become a viable option, there are plenty of options to keep you rolling. The infrastructure is pretty much there already, it's just a case of building demand - soon as there are enough of these on the road, an entire new industry is going to centred around keeping them there.
I have an endless store of engineering trivia, others have an endless supply of pop culture trivia. It's not good, bad, or otherwise. Which of you would be more likely to end up on the B-Ark?
If it produces a stable black hole, then yes, along with the rest of the planet.
In the incredibly unlikely event that that does happen, I can only hope that one of the scientists' last words are "Hey, check this out!"
Of course women like dressing/painting up as farm animals. Anyone who's seen Fucking Filthy Fuckpigs knows that =)
Beautiful =)
I'll bet they've got the terrorist video from Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back in there somewhere...
Jay: I am the master of the C.L.I.T.! Remember this fucking face, whenever you see C.L.I.T. you'll see this fucking face. I make that shit WORK! It does whatever the fuck I tell it to. No one rules the C.L.I.T like me. Not this little fuck, none of you little fucks out there. I AM THE C.L.I.T. COMMANDER! Remember that, commander of all C.L.I.T.s! When it comes down to business, this is what I do. I pinch it like this. Ooooh you little fuck. Then I rub my nose with it...
My company uses Confluence as an internal wiki for project and technical documentation. It's a piece of cake to create groups and assign fine-tuned privileges with regards to viewing, editing, commenting and destroying. I agree that an organisation with actual classified data is going to make damn sure the system they use can accommodate multiple clearance levels and 'need-to-know' groups.
Well we know that's not true, there are still kittens left.
I know you're being funny, but I kind of like the idea of a parsable legal coding language. Employ a decent supercomputer to recompile the lot every time something gets changed and notify us of contradictions, divide-by-zero errors and broken dependencies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tycho_Brahe#Tycho.27s_elk_and_dwarf
...his mentor the Landgraf Wilhelm of Hesse-Kassel asked whether there was an animal faster than a deer. Tycho replied, writing that there were none, but he could send his tame elk. When Wilhelm replied he would accept one in exchange for a horse, Tycho replied with the sad news that the elk had just died on a visit to entertain a nobleman at Landskrona. Apparently during dinner the elk had drunk a lot of beer, fallen down the stairs, and died.Is it worth considering that arms were drastically less advanced at the time the Bill was written?
Compare 18th century firearms to, for example, an AA-12 shotgun (admittedly not legally available to civilians) which is automatic, almost recoilless and can take 32-round magazines of fin-stabilised mini-grenade rounds. That's a huge difference in the destructive power that a single person can wield as they see fit.
I've neither handled, nor witnessed the use of, a functional firearm in my life, and don't consider myself qualified to opine one way or the other, just throwing this out there to see if anyone more informed or closer to the issue wants to weigh in.
That's just great, corporate Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome.
(oblig. "That explains Vista" joke.)
Roger that, Thompson. Golf Tango Foxtrot, Over.
Have you seen Kevin Mitnick's business card?
I'd pay Gene Ray $750k to take a web design course.
That would be a DivaCup(TM). To each their own...
If I was pinned down by sniper fire, I'd probably core dump too.
I asked it a question I got in a trivia contest - what countries have four-letter names? (There are 10, and google's first link is to a list of 'em)
Powerset's first response? "Fuck."
Funny, that was my response too, but at least I got 5 or 6 of them first...
+1 Funny, good call!
Come on, mods.
ThunderCats movie, scheduled for 2010 release. At least it still looks like it'll be CG, not live action.
A few days ago, I saw someone use the phrase "begs for the question," which nicely sidesteps the logical fallacy definition whilst keeping the desired meaning of the oft-misused "begs the question."
Panels on the roof/hood for trickle-charging, mains adaptors for specially equipped parking spots, regenerative braking, quick-charge stations that will become even quicker if/when ultracapacitors become a viable option, there are plenty of options to keep you rolling. The infrastructure is pretty much there already, it's just a case of building demand - soon as there are enough of these on the road, an entire new industry is going to centred around keeping them there.
I spent around US$75 each on Microsoft Ergo 4000's for home and work when I first started getting RSI, they're worth every cent.
Most deserved +5 I've seen this week. Good work!
If it produces a stable black hole, then yes, along with the rest of the planet. In the incredibly unlikely event that that does happen, I can only hope that one of the scientists' last words are "Hey, check this out!"
Kalahari is probably what the GP was after. Good luck finding any clouds there.