What about the mode and the median? They can only be values where there is a data point.
More importantly, everything you said has absolutely no bearing on the male/female strength thing. You're a chump for even bringing it up. What if this torus somehow represented strength (no idea how it would) if you had one for women centred on (0,0,0) and one for men centred on (1,1,1) the averages would still show the average strength difference between men and women, so the fact that there are no points near the average value has no relevance whatsoever in this situation.
A butler shanking someone? No likely, butlers learn class and decorum at butler school, they are experts at etiquette. He would clearly use a sterling silver letter knife when he slashes your face during the dead of night.
The government will stop you, by sending the police to smash your face with their rifle butts. This is perfectly acceptable, because you are a terrorist.
It may use steam, but as it's not made of brass nor is it powered by coal or lamp oil, I say, it's not steam punk enough. It didn't even say users need to wear goggles, big brass goggles.
it is sustainable, because it can be sustained, that's what sustainable means. It may fuck up the environment, but sustainable does not mean it is environmentally friendly, it means it will not run out. If the sun spat out pieces of coal that fell onto the earth like rain, then burning coal would be sustainable, it would still be bad for the environment, but it would be still sustainable. Rewnewable, means that the resource is renewed, in this case hte resourse is water which is higher than sea level, and it is renewed, even if I kill a thousand tigers, destroy a dozen farms and poison a hundred babies collecting that water to generate power, more water will fall, renewing the water I used. Hence Renewable. You need to stop munching your muesli and take a remedial reading class yourself.
fish spawning, methane and changes to the micro climate don't effect the dam's ability to generate electricity, so it is still renewable energy. Renewable != earth loving hippy compatible.
Actually, it's to distinguish it from Russia now. The original joke just said Russia, it was only after the collapse of the USSR that it changed.
There's not really much worry about people think the jokes are about Tsarist Russia is there?
(After writing this bit, it bacame clear to me that subconciously, I envision 1st Dude to be Brian Griffin, and 2nd Dude to be Stewie.)
1st Dude: "In Russia overheating reactor shuts down YOU."
2nd Dude: "Oh yea, thats funny, I get it, cos like, they just used uranium for yellow pottery glave back in Tsarist times right? Thats funny. No wait, Don't get that, that makes no sense"
1st Dude: "No, like I mean the Soviet era, like Chernobyl blowing up"
2nd Dude: "oh right, like why didn't you say"
1nd Dude: "I dunno, I figured it was obvious"
2nd Dude: "wasn't umm wasn't Chernobyl in the Ukraine"
1st Dude: "What am I like, a geography teacher now?"
2nd Dude: "that's like pretty poor taste man, a lot of people died"
2nd Dude: "That's not really funny at all"
1st Dude: "In Soviet Russia, taste poors YOU! heh heh"
2nd Dude: "that one wasn't even a sentence"
I fail to see how the/. crowd can cry so foul of this given the way you all react when there's a report of a GPL violation. it's no different. just because you dislike the copyright holder, doesn't mean they are wrong.
There is a difference, we all complain when people actually violate GPL, not when people 'enable' violation. Every time someone distributes some GPL'd code, they potentially enable a violation, because the person the distribute it to may use it in a project and not release that source code.
That's not the capitalist way at all. The capitalist way is: exploit everyone to their limit for your own personal gain. The poor are only given enough money so they can continue to work like slaves in factories for the rich.
If you were to make a capitalist-like system, the dumb kids would work as servants to the smart kids, fetching them books and carrying thier bags, while only getting enough education to read the spines of books they had fetch to the smart kids.
The smart kids would get smarter, while the dumb kids get dumber.
Sadly for you your reasoning is completely flawed, because railways were not initially designed to carry people, they were made to carry coal, the fact is that standard gauge was set by George Stephenson, who set it so his rolling stock would be same size as rolling stock from horse drawn wagonways, which were the same size as normal wagons, which were set according to the size or a horse, and how much it can pull.
In fact, if you design a railway specifically for people, you will find wider gauges to be better. The Great Western Railway was designed by Isambard Kingdom Brunel specifically for the comfort of his passengers, and used a massive 7 foot gauge, in order to make the ride smoother and faster. Russia and the British Raj both selected broad gauge railways because they has improved stability and were more practical design than standard gauge.
Standard gauge is anachronistic, it only won out because of the prevalence of Stephenson's designs, if the worlds railways were built from scratch today, a much wider gauge would be probably be used. As a geek you ought to know that a lot of standards are set not by common sense, but because the big fish said so, Stephenson was the big fish, and he set railway gauges to the same size as road carts because it was cheaper to use wagonway rolling stock. So, the Shuttles SRB's are the size they aree because Stephenson was a cheapskate. Also, because he was successful, and because the north won the US civil war.
You know what else they should teach in schools? Not trying to be clever when you know fuck all about something.
well, the supposed little narrative in that urban legend is a load of crap, but the fact that the standard railway gauge in the US and UK is derived from a standard cart axle size is basicly true.
you would look more like a big chunky dolphin, which most of the time sharks will avoid confrontation with. That's not to say that sharks are scared of dolphins, they usually win in a fight, but a dolphin would put up a much bigger fight than most fish, and usually get away, so as far as the shark is concerned, it's just too much hassle to eat a healthy dolphin. A shark is far more likely to go for you if you are splashing about in flippers, as you would appear more like an injured animal to him.
Slashdot Mirror
I think you have mistaken 'too much' for 'not enough'. You can never have too much tentacle rape.
What about the mode and the median? They can only be values where there is a data point. More importantly, everything you said has absolutely no bearing on the male/female strength thing. You're a chump for even bringing it up. What if this torus somehow represented strength (no idea how it would) if you had one for women centred on (0,0,0) and one for men centred on (1,1,1) the averages would still show the average strength difference between men and women, so the fact that there are no points near the average value has no relevance whatsoever in this situation.
A butler shanking someone? No likely, butlers learn class and decorum at butler school, they are experts at etiquette. He would clearly use a sterling silver letter knife when he slashes your face during the dead of night.
hhhmmm, with the rise of moobs, I think that may make an average of 1.5 breasts by now.
The government will stop you, by sending the police to smash your face with their rifle butts. This is perfectly acceptable, because you are a terrorist.
It may use steam, but as it's not made of brass nor is it powered by coal or lamp oil, I say, it's not steam punk enough. It didn't even say users need to wear goggles, big brass goggles.
loads of people do business with dwarfs, the dwarfs however always get the short end of the stick.
is that, research about his penis, or his research paper is written on his penis?
so, you have no brain? No juicy juicy brain?
it is sustainable, because it can be sustained, that's what sustainable means. It may fuck up the environment, but sustainable does not mean it is environmentally friendly, it means it will not run out. If the sun spat out pieces of coal that fell onto the earth like rain, then burning coal would be sustainable, it would still be bad for the environment, but it would be still sustainable. Rewnewable, means that the resource is renewed, in this case hte resourse is water which is higher than sea level, and it is renewed, even if I kill a thousand tigers, destroy a dozen farms and poison a hundred babies collecting that water to generate power, more water will fall, renewing the water I used. Hence Renewable.
You need to stop munching your muesli and take a remedial reading class yourself.
I'm pretty certain the usual usage of 'Soviet Russia' on Slashdot refers to Russia, 'when they were all a bunch of commies'
fish spawning, methane and changes to the micro climate don't effect the dam's ability to generate electricity, so it is still renewable energy.
Renewable != earth loving hippy compatible.
Actually, it's to distinguish it from Russia now. The original joke just said Russia, it was only after the collapse of the USSR that it changed.
There's not really much worry about people think the jokes are about Tsarist Russia is there?
(After writing this bit, it bacame clear to me that subconciously, I envision 1st Dude to be Brian Griffin, and 2nd Dude to be Stewie.)
1st Dude: "In Russia overheating reactor shuts down YOU."
2nd Dude: "Oh yea, thats funny, I get it, cos like, they just used uranium for yellow pottery glave back in Tsarist times right? Thats funny. No wait, Don't get that, that makes no sense"
1st Dude: "No, like I mean the Soviet era, like Chernobyl blowing up"
2nd Dude: "oh right, like why didn't you say"
1nd Dude: "I dunno, I figured it was obvious"
2nd Dude: "wasn't umm wasn't Chernobyl in the Ukraine"
1st Dude: "What am I like, a geography teacher now?"
2nd Dude: "that's like pretty poor taste man, a lot of people died"
2nd Dude: "That's not really funny at all"
1st Dude: "In Soviet Russia, taste poors YOU! heh heh"
2nd Dude: "that one wasn't even a sentence"
There is a difference, we all complain when people actually violate GPL, not when people 'enable' violation. Every time someone distributes some GPL'd code, they potentially enable a violation, because the person the distribute it to may use it in a project and not release that source code.
That's not the capitalist way at all. The capitalist way is: exploit everyone to their limit for your own personal gain.
The poor are only given enough money so they can continue to work like slaves in factories for the rich.
If you were to make a capitalist-like system, the dumb kids would work as servants to the smart kids, fetching them books and carrying thier bags, while only getting enough education to read the spines of books they had fetch to the smart kids.
The smart kids would get smarter, while the dumb kids get dumber.
Sadly for you your reasoning is completely flawed, because railways were not initially designed to carry people, they were made to carry coal, the fact is that standard gauge was set by George Stephenson, who set it so his rolling stock would be same size as rolling stock from horse drawn wagonways, which were the same size as normal wagons, which were set according to the size or a horse, and how much it can pull.
In fact, if you design a railway specifically for people, you will find wider gauges to be better. The Great Western Railway was designed by Isambard Kingdom Brunel specifically for the comfort of his passengers, and used a massive 7 foot gauge, in order to make the ride smoother and faster. Russia and the British Raj both selected broad gauge railways because they has improved stability and were more practical design than standard gauge.
Standard gauge is anachronistic, it only won out because of the prevalence of Stephenson's designs, if the worlds railways were built from scratch today, a much wider gauge would be probably be used. As a geek you ought to know that a lot of standards are set not by common sense, but because the big fish said so, Stephenson was the big fish, and he set railway gauges to the same size as road carts because it was cheaper to use wagonway rolling stock. So, the Shuttles SRB's are the size they aree because Stephenson was a cheapskate. Also, because he was successful, and because the north won the US civil war.
You know what else they should teach in schools? Not trying to be clever when you know fuck all about something.
One! Two! Three! Four! I declare a Thumb War!
do you think the theory of evolution is correct?
Initial test indicates they are not safe for driving if there are pedestrians carrying cans of Mountain Dew.
well, the supposed little narrative in that urban legend is a load of crap, but the fact that the standard railway gauge in the US and UK is derived from a standard cart axle size is basicly true.
that may be true, but you conveniently forgot to mention your habit of stamping on successful stand up comedians didn't you.
anti-bacteria? Like bacteria that are made from antimatter so when they touch regular bacteria they annihilate each other?
Well, he would have backed it up instead of just parroting it out, but he's over thirty.
yea, Vista is an F-22, but Linux is a bunch of crazy Arabs with rocket launchers hiding in caves.
you would look more like a big chunky dolphin, which most of the time sharks will avoid confrontation with. That's not to say that sharks are scared of dolphins, they usually win in a fight, but a dolphin would put up a much bigger fight than most fish, and usually get away, so as far as the shark is concerned, it's just too much hassle to eat a healthy dolphin. A shark is far more likely to go for you if you are splashing about in flippers, as you would appear more like an injured animal to him.