It worked for Ankh-Morpork. After the creation of the thieves guild, there were a significant reduction of illegal thefts, and thievery was essentially controlled.
This would be akin to a speeding guild. I'd see a significant reduction of illegal speeding, and speeding to be generally controlled.
Deterrence so that people don't go unlock the gate again after they herd all the cows back in. Else what's the point of any other punishment in existence?
No one said that their new definition of "terrorism" has to any way resemble "terrorism". Nor do they have to use the actual words, only the intent. Before terrorism, we had "Protect the children" (and after that we'd still have that unless something solves that). And before that, we had "Stop the Commies". With the rise of China, we may well see this coming into play again.
It's a never-ending cycle, they just need an excuse, any excuse will do.
Why should there be a peacekeeper? Let it go FREE!
If a country wants to censor their own internet, so be it. But one country censoring the internet shouldn't affect the internet between two other countries.
Maybe it's just me, but if you're using copper lines, you're hopelessly outdated and deserve to be kicked out of the market, like horse carriages and floppy disks.
For some types of disasters yes.
Try doing the same when it's several hundred meters underground, or any other number of situations where you can't get people in due to safety or situational reasons.
The whole point of this is to micromanage troops. Sure, you can control large numbers of units efficiently using that, but can you control a trio of SCVs to heal each other, another 4 to poke a group of irritating zergling, swap roles to make sure all of them receive no casualties, and initiate an SCV rush on a zerg base?
(well, unless you're korean)
Then the preamble failed in it's job. The preamble is (supposedly) the non-lawyer-speak of the rest of the agreement, the rest of the agreement enforces the preamble in it's implied definition, while dealing with legal issues.
Other than sitting, standing, walking, and laying down, I can't really think of what else to do. Given 12 hours sleep and 3 hours sitting, that still leaves me with 9 hours of whatever. I can't really imagine why I'd need to stand or walk for more than 4 hours...
Maybe I'll just go and lie down some more. That's still ok, right?
Not to mention there's always the fail-safe physical method.
Working as intended. It's a feature.
It worked for Ankh-Morpork. After the creation of the thieves guild, there were a significant reduction of illegal thefts, and thievery was essentially controlled.
This would be akin to a speeding guild. I'd see a significant reduction of illegal speeding, and speeding to be generally controlled.
Is there any reason, if people will SILL live in California despite anything you can dig out?
Deterrence so that people don't go unlock the gate again after they herd all the cows back in. Else what's the point of any other punishment in existence?
No one said that their new definition of "terrorism" has to any way resemble "terrorism". Nor do they have to use the actual words, only the intent. Before terrorism, we had "Protect the children" (and after that we'd still have that unless something solves that). And before that, we had "Stop the Commies". With the rise of China, we may well see this coming into play again.
It's a never-ending cycle, they just need an excuse, any excuse will do.
False, they'll just define something else as terrorism.
Need more nukes.
Why should there be a peacekeeper? Let it go FREE!
If a country wants to censor their own internet, so be it. But one country censoring the internet shouldn't affect the internet between two other countries.
(like Minority Report?)
The obvious solution would be to have the government do the wiring, just as they build roads.
Yes, but that's a separate problem which "matching speeds" or "network neutrality" doesn't solve. That's a problem with "monopoly", plain and simple.
Maybe it's just me, but if you're using copper lines, you're hopelessly outdated and deserve to be kicked out of the market, like horse carriages and floppy disks.
Pushdo, botnet. A network barely alive. Gentlemen, we can rebuild him. We have the technology.
Or in other words; if you can't kill it off in one strike, it's just going to evolve into a better, stronger botnet..
Are you by any chance, a doctor?
For some types of disasters yes. Try doing the same when it's several hundred meters underground, or any other number of situations where you can't get people in due to safety or situational reasons.
The whole point of this is to micromanage troops. Sure, you can control large numbers of units efficiently using that, but can you control a trio of SCVs to heal each other, another 4 to poke a group of irritating zergling, swap roles to make sure all of them receive no casualties, and initiate an SCV rush on a zerg base? (well, unless you're korean)
Then the preamble failed in it's job. The preamble is (supposedly) the non-lawyer-speak of the rest of the agreement, the rest of the agreement enforces the preamble in it's implied definition, while dealing with legal issues.
That's that the preamble is for.
Yes, I mean something along the lines of copyfraud. More notably, how can I defend a work against copyfraud, what sort of evidence do I need?
Get a Samsung Galaxy instead; they're like ipads, except using Android and has phone capabilities!
Other than sitting, standing, walking, and laying down, I can't really think of what else to do. Given 12 hours sleep and 3 hours sitting, that still leaves me with 9 hours of whatever. I can't really imagine why I'd need to stand or walk for more than 4 hours... Maybe I'll just go and lie down some more. That's still ok, right?
Isn't free usage by implication non-commercial, and vice versa?
Seriously, the first time you hear a joke is much more effective then subsequent times. So how would you be able to find jokes then?
How exactly do you put something into public domain legally, such that you can legally protect them to be in public domain? Really, serious question.