The first question refers to the fact that the French tend to "hate" the Americans a good deal (not something that is hidden) in return Americans have made it a classic to look down upon the French. Generally this involves a multitude of comments from which one is expected to infer that the most manly French men are effeminite in the extreme and are cowards. So, whenever France is mentioned big fights break out where the honor and dignity of the French are trashed.
Second question: a physicist is un physicien nucléaire in most cases. So, does it not seem odd that physicists were doing STATISTICS?
Finally the last comment follows from the following train of thought: Pork -> Sausage:: French Painters like eating sausage.:: "Les peintres Francais aiment la saucisse."
I assume you can follow this. Si tu veux plus de clarifications dis le moi. -Un Americo-Belge a un Francais;)
Wow, damn... I was curious about this article, so I clicked on the slashdot link to see the comments to read what people had to say, and there were absolutely no comments. I was shocked.
It was as if a million packets missed the slashdot server and expired their TTL
Bwahaha... lol the quote that/. is currently displaying to me at the bottom of this page is:
The best things in life go on sale sooner or later. Oh shit... now I'm suddenly worried about what I can expect in the future of this plac[Bill Received: $20 per character after the first 240 current total: $20 for #1 character]
Bwahaha... lol the quote that/. is currently displaying to me at the bottom of this page is: <i>The best things in life go on sale sooner or later.</i>
Oh shit... now I'm suddenly worried about what I can expect in the future of this plac<b>[Bill Received: $20 per character after the first 240 current total: $20 for #1 character]</b>
Wait, are you saying that you have a thumb drive with less than 10 megs free space? because I've tried sending large attachments to people and on the various services I use the max I've been able to push through was always under 10megs... In some cases it used to be 2, but now the limit I've found for hotmail, yahoo, and my university net is 10. (note I tested this awhile back)
Besides that all... I've seen random prohibitions on sending.exe... never really stopped me just zip it... then send...
Oh, I did it again. I should stop posting when running on the least amount of sleep I've had in my life...
I keep saying dynamic cast but what I mean to say are why static cast? I understand the need for casting in and of itself... I do it a good deal ~every program I write now in college?...
We implemented a database in one of my programming classes this semester and we were void * casting all over the place between our different record types... All that was neccessary was to make sure we allocated memory properly and were casting the right database to the right record type.
I'm gonna go sleep now. Sorry for bugging you.
Holy shit... lol you are very right... my brain is frazzled from all my finals... havent slept enough... I should have at least realized why the statement I made seemed way too complicated for the action I wanted. Especially since I'm casting a unsigned long to struct which is obviously not correct... Plus there is that assign by value on structs that gets itchy FINALLY there is the lack of precision... wouldn't the problem have been the fact that it was an unsigned long being used Anyways? the fact that this assignment would propagate the error by 1 more bit of resolution loss is irrelevant since the unsigned long could never address 64bits anyways unless there was a special compiler...
I still don't get the reason for dynamic cast though... assuming I had done the pointer casting "correctly"
you want to enlighten me as I am a student aspiring programmer... what exactly is wrong with that cast assuming that the pointer... wait... scratch the preceding there there... um ok tell me if you don't mind how to properly do what he was trying to do(1) how what he typed works on 32bit(2) and why it won't work on 64bit(3)
um is it because ints are 32bits that this is flawed?
also wouldn't he need to do:
struct device_info foo=*((struct device_info*)&a_ulDeviceHandle);
in C-Style casts (or am I being overly-repetitively-redundantly respecifying things)? and how while I'm asking questions about casting, would you mind also explaining why someone wants to dynamic cast, if they know exactly what a variable must be when passed to it? IE the variable is mine and only mine, why dynamic cast since its "trusted"...
I know this is pretty fundamental, and its going to be taught in one of my classes in the fall, but I figured I might as well ask.
I'm still trying to be convinced on why exactly I should sign this petition... It may be a personal eqotistical thought, but I choose not to go along with the flow for every motion that comes around... I like being convinced and I'm not right now. If you throw your support in for anything that comes your way, doesn't it devalue your vote?
For the last elections for example, sadly the only thing I was convinced about was that Bush should not win. I voted Kerry because bush was worse, but I was not and am not convinced he was a good alternative, just that he was less bad.
lmao. the poster has been online too long... I believe what he was looking for was a pole mounted sensor...
Its funny how what you do everyday becomes evidenced in the misspellings you cause.
Go with that where you will.
dude I would rather have it scare the shit out of us, get us off our asses and then realize that some dumbshit forgot to convert from degrees to radians or vice versa... it would get us off our asses... AND no loss of life.
Because realistically I don't expect I'll be personally prepared with a bunker by then so I'll be as vulnerable as an aborigine when it hits for all the strength and structure our society currently has.
The first question refers to the fact that the French tend to "hate" the Americans a good deal (not something that is hidden) in return Americans have made it a classic to look down upon the French. Generally this involves a multitude of comments from which one is expected to infer that the most manly French men are effeminite in the extreme and are cowards. So, whenever France is mentioned big fights break out where the honor and dignity of the French are trashed.
:: French Painters like eating sausage. :: "Les peintres Francais aiment la saucisse."
;)
Second question: a physicist is un physicien nucléaire in most cases. So, does it not seem odd that physicists were doing STATISTICS?
Finally the last comment follows from the following train of thought: Pork -> Sausage
I assume you can follow this.
Si tu veux plus de clarifications dis le moi.
-Un Americo-Belge a un Francais
Wow, damn... I was curious about this article, so I clicked on the slashdot link to see the comments to read what people had to say, and there were absolutely no comments. I was shocked.
It was as if a million packets missed the slashdot server and expired their TTL
-1 redundant; -1 offtopic;
"Its funny because its true..."
kids are people too. if your mom somehow gave birth to you at >450lbs I'd shoot myself rather than face the monstrosity ;) :)
I assume of course that you're kidding when you suggest that this might actually improve your security...
holy shit... lol... so how exactly did you hear about slashdot early enough to have an id of 18?
Ok, you're the second person I've seen reply with their slashdot username...
New_Here was the other... it was a messed up kind of deja-vu
rotfl.
Bwahaha... lol the quote that /. is currently displaying to me at the bottom of this page is:
The best things in life go on sale sooner or later.
Oh shit... now I'm suddenly worried about what I can expect in the future of this plac[Bill Received: $20 per character after the first 240 current total: $20 for #1 character]
Bwahaha... lol the quote that /. is currently displaying to me at the bottom of this page is:
<i>The best things in life go on sale sooner or later.</i>
Oh shit... now I'm suddenly worried about what I can expect in the future of this plac<b>[Bill Received: $20 per character after the first 240 current total: $20 for #1 character]</b>
Wait, are you saying that you have a thumb drive with less than 10 megs free space? because I've tried sending large attachments to people and on the various services I use the max I've been able to push through was always under 10megs... In some cases it used to be 2, but now the limit I've found for hotmail, yahoo, and my university net is 10. (note I tested this awhile back)
.exe ... never really stopped me just zip it... then send...
Besides that all... I've seen random prohibitions on sending
yeah... That is what I was initially asking ... the first poster mentioned "old, C-Style casts" and thus "new C++ cast" is static_cast(yo)
Apparently its either not a big enough connection or ...
Damn, I'm stumped.
Oh, I did it again. I should stop posting when running on the least amount of sleep I've had in my life... I keep saying dynamic cast but what I mean to say are why static cast? I understand the need for casting in and of itself... I do it a good deal ~every program I write now in college?... We implemented a database in one of my programming classes this semester and we were void * casting all over the place between our different record types... All that was neccessary was to make sure we allocated memory properly and were casting the right database to the right record type. I'm gonna go sleep now. Sorry for bugging you.
Holy shit... lol you are very right... my brain is frazzled from all my finals... havent slept enough... I should have at least realized why the statement I made seemed way too complicated for the action I wanted. Especially since I'm casting a unsigned long to struct which is obviously not correct... Plus there is that assign by value on structs that gets itchy FINALLY there is the lack of precision... wouldn't the problem have been the fact that it was an unsigned long being used Anyways? the fact that this assignment would propagate the error by 1 more bit of resolution loss is irrelevant since the unsigned long could never address 64bits anyways unless there was a special compiler...
I still don't get the reason for dynamic cast though... assuming I had done the pointer casting "correctly"
you want to enlighten me as I am a student aspiring programmer... what exactly is wrong with that cast assuming that the pointer ... wait... scratch the preceding there there... um ok tell me if you don't mind how to properly do what he was trying to do(1) how what he typed works on 32bit(2) and why it won't work on 64bit(3)
um is it because ints are 32bits that this is flawed?
also wouldn't he need to do:
struct device_info foo=*((struct device_info*)&a_ulDeviceHandle);
in C-Style casts (or am I being overly-repetitively-redundantly respecifying things)? and how while I'm asking questions about casting, would you mind also explaining why someone wants to dynamic cast, if they know exactly what a variable must be when passed to it? IE the variable is mine and only mine, why dynamic cast since its "trusted"...
I know this is pretty fundamental, and its going to be taught in one of my classes in the fall, but I figured I might as well ask.
heh.
I'm still trying to be convinced on why exactly I should sign this petition... It may be a personal eqotistical thought, but I choose not to go along with the flow for every motion that comes around... I like being convinced and I'm not right now. If you throw your support in for anything that comes your way, doesn't it devalue your vote? For the last elections for example, sadly the only thing I was convinced about was that Bush should not win. I voted Kerry because bush was worse, but I was not and am not convinced he was a good alternative, just that he was less bad.
I don't believe this. I'll believe it when I see it... it seems too farfectched to be true.
lmao. the poster has been online too long... I believe what he was looking for was a pole mounted sensor... Its funny how what you do everyday becomes evidenced in the misspellings you cause. Go with that where you will.
dude I would rather have it scare the shit out of us, get us off our asses and then realize that some dumbshit forgot to convert from degrees to radians or vice versa... it would get us off our asses... AND no loss of life. Because realistically I don't expect I'll be personally prepared with a bunker by then so I'll be as vulnerable as an aborigine when it hits for all the strength and structure our society currently has.
yahoo games. :)
If you're not kidding I'd seriously like a link... Though the rubber bit seems a tad humorous
You trust credit card verification not to be credit card theft?
Fuck Cock Shit Balls Bitch. Now I've protected you from using the free trucker wifi to connect to slashdot. You're welcome. :)