Slashdot Mirror


Vacuum-Controlled Elevator Developed

Aenox writes "Vacuum Elevators of Florida have released a one-man elevator system that easily slots into buildings. It has gone on sale in the U.S. for around $20,000 and uses only electricity to power vaccum-inducing suction turbines that can lift 204Kg several floors up. They claim it provides a smooth ride but from the video it looks like it could use some oil."

313 comments

  1. Failsafes by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But O'Connor adds that a series of mechanical breaks will activate should there be a sudden loss of pressure, to prevent the capsule falling.

    I'm glad to see this because this was my first thought on watching the video. I can imagine all sorts of overly dramatic Hollywood type scenarios...... Cut the power to the building.....drama ensues. Or, a couple of well placed bullets into the side of the plexiglas causing a sudden implosion and dramatic falling of the lift. Also, one would want to ensure there are no leaks from the capsule to the inside of the lift tube. That sort of thing could play havoc on your eardrums, sinuses and eustachian tubes. Ask anyone who has been in a plane when they open a cargo door before completely equalizing the pressure in the cabin...... Wow, talk about uncomfortable.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Failsafes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The only thing to wonder about is, are these "failsafes" activated electronically anyway? In which case a powerfailure will lead to...

    2. Re:Failsafes by LurkerXXX · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. They are the same type purely mechanical types used in your standard elevator. If the cable breaks on a normal elevator, they also need to have some means of preventing you from plummeting to your death. The same systems are in use. Engineers thought long long ago about power failures during emergencies. You aren't the first to think about it.

    3. Re:Failsafes by Tarcastil · · Score: 1

      Why would cutting power cause the the elevator to fall? The elevator would be poorly engineered if cutting the power equalizes the pressure.

    4. Re:Failsafes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, I didn't know that.

    5. Re:Failsafes by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

      But O'Connor adds that a series of mechanical breaks will activate

      Oh shit, that sounds dangerous. I was hoping that it would brake.

    6. Re:Failsafes by BWJones · · Score: 1

      In fact, as I remember it, one of the first safety elevators was demonstrated at a World's fair (don't remember which one). The demo was the inventor cutting the rope that held the elevator up to the shock and amazement of the crowd.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    7. Re:Failsafes by uberdave · · Score: 1
      The tube-shaped transporter carries a person upwards at a steady speed of 15 centimetres per second using turbines to suck air out of a pressurised chamber above the passenger capsule. The capsule is lowered when the pressure in the upper section is returned to normal.
      The passenger capsule is lowered by turning off the vacuum turbine and allowing normal air pressure to return to the upper section of the tube. Thus, if the power fails, the passenger capsule will simply travel to the bottom floor in a normal fashion.
    8. Re:Failsafes by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      In fact, as I remember it, one of the first safety elevators was demonstrated at a World's fair (don't remember which one). The demo was the inventor cutting the rope that held the elevator up to the shock and amazement of the crowd.

      Elisha Otis, at the 1853-54 World's Fair. Interesting history of the safety elevator here.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:Failsafes by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      Ask anyone who has been in a plane when they open a cargo door before completely equalizing the pressure in the cabin......

      Usually there aren't too many survivors after such an event, so I doubt anyone here has actually had the opportunity to ask such a question.

      It's like asking someone what a successful suicide feels like.

    10. Re:Failsafes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the plane is still pressurized. The difference is not that great.

    11. Re:Failsafes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is referring to cargo planes and the like. This sort of thing happens occaisonally in the military when performing in air drops of cargo and such. Opening the cargo doors in flight is very common. It also happens at really high altitudes with Special Forces insertions.

    12. Re:Failsafes by Jodka · · Score: 0, Troll

      By the way, Elisha Otis, inventer of the safety elevator, died in an elevator accident.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    13. Re:Failsafes by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      By the way, Elisha Otis, inventer of the safety elevator, died in an elevator accident.

      No he didn't. He died of diptheria during an epidemic in 1861.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Failsafes by pmazer · · Score: 1

      That's not actually true. All they would need is a one way valve on those fans and then a couple more one way valves to open to let air back into the top when it wants to go down.

    15. Re:Failsafes by drsquare · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, whilst in an elevator, which was having an accident. He decided to end the pain by cutting off the electricity to the building, which caused the elevator to immediately plummet to the ground, killing everyone inside, including Otis. He killed some innocent people, but the pain of dying by diptheria is so long and horrible, it was his only option.

    16. Re:Failsafes by uberdave · · Score: 1

      There are dozens of ways to do it. They could use a diverter valve, or a solenoid valve, or...

    17. Re:Failsafes by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, depressurisation events are fairly common, as incidents go, and very survivable. United Airlines flight 811 suffered one of the worst when the front righthand cargo door opened in flight due to faulty wiring and none functional safety devices on it, at 23,000ft. The resulting depressurisation blew out most of the right hand side of the cabin before the wing and ejected a number of passengers. The aircraft landed safely. Funnily enough, this was the fourth instance of this happening, and Boeing hadnt even looked at the problem.

    18. Re:Failsafes by hankaholic · · Score: 1
      No. They are the same type purely mechanical types used in your standard elevator. If the cable breaks on a normal elevator, they also need to have some means of preventing you from plummeting to your death. The same systems are in use. Engineers thought long long ago about power failures during emergencies. You aren't the first to think about it.
      ...except that the "purely mechanical" safety in a typical elevator depends on cable tension to keep the brakes from activating. When cable tension is lost, the brakes are no longer held back. Thus, if the cable is cut or snaps, the brakes are pressed into action by springs who are now free to expand.

      However, you assert that this same mechanism is used in a system which has no cable to provide tension in the first place. Can you explain how this works?
      --
      Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
    19. Re:Failsafes by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      The passenger capsule is lowered by turning off the vacuum turbine and allowing normal air pressure to return to the upper section of the tube. Thus, if the power fails, the passenger capsule will simply travel to the bottom floor in a normal fashion.

      But this doesn't mean that cutting the electric power will "turn off" the vacuum. It just means that the vacuum won't increase. If the system is well designed and air tight, nothing will happen. If the system isn't completely air tight, then air will leak into the vacuum and the capsule will slowly lower itself (barring any mechanical brakes kicking in).

      I horizontail version could be fun as well, specially if you where to pressurize the opposite side to the vacuum. ;-)

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    20. Re:Failsafes by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1, Troll

      Usually there aren't too many survivors after such an event, so I doubt anyone here has actually had the opportunity to ask such a question.


      So...when the plane has just landed and pulled up to the gate...and someone opens a cargo door before the cabin has been adjusted...you're saying the plane will explode or something? Must be an airbus...

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    21. Re:Failsafes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the way, you are wrong, and fucking stupid, and you fucking fail it.

    22. Re:Failsafes by wft_rtfa · · Score: 1

      Vacuum-powered elevators: When you really hate taking the stairs.

      --
      :-] :0 :-> :-| :->
    23. Re:Failsafes by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      There are several different mechanical brake types used in elevators. Some use no cables, others use a separate cable which is dedicated only to the braking system, and is in no way related or dependent on tension from the lifting cables.

      Here's a quick googled link for just one of the systems that uses an independent cable system: http://www.msha.gov/S&HINFO/TECHRPT/HOIST/PAPER5.H TM. That's just one type, there are several others.

    24. Re:Failsafes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you wouldn't fall to your death, but instead be trapped in a clear, 18" wide plexiglass tube ten feet off the ground. Great.

    25. Re:Failsafes by FLEB · · Score: 1

      But O'Connor adds that a series of mechanical breaks will activate should there be a sudden loss of pressure...

      At least they're honest.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    26. Re:Failsafes by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The survivability would be related to the fact that the explosions tend to happen on the way up or down; as opposed to while at cruising altitude.

      You don't live if you have explosive decomp at 40K feet. If there is a slow drop to ambient, maybe -- like a cargo door cracking open but not flying off. You will, however, pass out VERY quickly, so it isn't like you will care for long ;~)

      But hey! If you manage to get your ox mask and stay concious, the pure O2 will help pacify you anyway! Good to go either way ;~)

      When the Comets [square window planes] blew up they usually didn't find much in the way of large pieces... of anything. True, that was the entire airplane unzipping... but being near a door that goes missing in a modern airliner would be similar.

    27. Re:Failsafes by Jodka · · Score: 1

      Looks like you are correct.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    28. Re:Failsafes by khrtt · · Score: 1

      -1, Citing TFA :-)

    29. Re:Failsafes by uberdave · · Score: 1

      If it is airtight, then you have a problem. The passengers would be sealed in the capsule. Any safety system on this type of elevator MUST bring the car to an exit point in a timely manner or the passengers will suffocate.

    30. Re:Failsafes by khrtt · · Score: 1

      So, compared to the normal elevator, this thing has a pump at the top instead of a winch, and a pressure-tight seal in the tube. Nothing else is really different.

      Where, again, does the cost benefit come from? Are there any other reasons not to use a regular winch?

    31. Re:Failsafes by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      If it is airtight, then you have a problem. The passengers would be sealed in the capsule. Any safety system on this type of elevator MUST bring the car to an exit point in a timely manner or the passengers will suffocate.

      Excellent! This will be great for parties.

      Now, if the system is air tight and holds the vacuum well, but the capsule isn't, then.... oh dear, you could turn somebody inside out!

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    32. Re:Failsafes by jangobongo · · Score: 1

      I don't think that the ejected passengers thought that this situation was very survivable...

      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    33. Re:Failsafes by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Only the top rim of the passenger chamber has to be airtight. The bottom section of the tube can (and will, presumably) be at room pressure, and there is no reason to not have vents in the bottom of the passenger chamber.

    34. Re:Failsafes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there any other reasons not to use a regular winch?

      "Louie, you and Sammy the Wrench go visit this guy Khrtt. He's lookin like one of them pro-winchers."

      -Big Tony
      Vaccum Pump Fitters Union - Local 138

    35. Re:Failsafes by uberdave · · Score: 1

      True. I hadn't thought of that.

      Now, if I could suck back my previous comment...

    36. Re:Failsafes by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      You would be trapped in a clear, 18" wide,AIRTIGHT, plexiglass tube ten feet off the ground

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    37. Re:Failsafes by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      No way! Why didn't they all just jump at the last possible moment and save themselves?

  2. Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Does NewScientist.com have editors?

    Call me picky, but if you're doing a professional publication, there are some standards you ought to uphold.

    But O'Connor adds that a series of mechanical breaks will activate should there be a sudden loss of pressure, to prevent the capsule falling.

    Well. this certainly doesn't sound promising. I would think that in the event of a sudden loss of pressure, the elevator would 'break' quite satisfactorily on its own, without the need for additional mechanical help.

    The elevator costs between $20,000 and £22,000.

    That's actually quite a large price range, once you figure out the exchange rate.

    Clearly someone over at NewScientist.com is asleep at the switch. The sad fact is that this is nothing new....even sadder is the fact that this sort of thing is now acceptable, even in professional publications.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

      But O'Connor adds that a series of mechanical breaks will activate should there be a sudden loss of pressure, to prevent the capsule falling.

      This statement is actually correct. In the event of a sudden loss of pressure mechanical arms break some of the passengers limbs and jam them into the sides of the elevator to prevent the elevator from falling, so technically they are mechanical break brakes.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Androk · · Score: 1

      I heard instead of editors they are going to get moderators to let them know when they make a misteak :)

      Androk

    3. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by backslashdot · · Score: 1, Troll

      Don't be such an anal prick. It's not like they reported falsehoods or lies, which is a far bigger problem than one or typographical errors in an article.

      I suppose what, you do everything 100% accurately? Give people a fucking break and start your own magazine that will be profitable and stand up to your anal standards.

    4. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1
      Clearly someone over at NewScientist.com is asleep at the switch.

      I wasn't sleeping! I was drunk!

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    5. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really do love your bold words, don't you?

    6. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1, Offtopic



      Not as much as I love my bold italic words.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    7. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're just graduates of public schools that taught "phonetic" spelling.

    8. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny


      ...which is a far bigger problem than one or typographical errors in an article.

      "one or typographical errors"? *sigh*

      Your post proves my point more eloquently than I ever could. Thank you.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    9. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Looks like somebody didn't know about the Slashdot editor exchange program.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    10. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Does it? Think about it .. Tell me that there are people of reasonable IQ who would read that sentence and not know what I was saying.

      Personally, I rather an article has factuality over some anal compliance with grammar. You personally may prefer grammatically correct lies over truths that contain a couple of spelling mistaeks [sic]. As long as the facts aren't muddled .. why are typografikal issues a major concern? I don't get it. Aren't there other things in the world for someone like you to be concerned about?

      Let me ask you this, what is it that you do? I mean, give some credibility as to why people should follow your advice. Are you the owner of a successful magazine or journal? Editor of the new york times? Who exactly are you "Trip Master Monkey"? And why should we listen to you..

    11. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Scientology's Applied Scholastics

    12. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the New Scientist in particular, but grammar is important so you can tell what the article is saying. Presenting precise technical information doesn't work without precise language. With incorrect grammar, an article can become ambiguous.

      --
      What keeps me going is my inertia.
    13. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the he/she won't add a correction to that possible fact error about the "brakes/breaks", yet he's going to bitch about NewScientist.

    14. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful



      Does it?


      Well, yes...we've established that.


      Tell me that there are people of reasonable IQ who would read that sentence and not know what I was saying.


      Spelling and grammar rules exist so that people don't have to guess the meaning of a particular sentence. We have standards for a reason.


      Personally, I rather an article has factuality over some anal compliance with grammar.


      Personally, I wonder why you feel the two must be mutually exclusive.


      You personally may prefer grammatically correct lies over truths that contain a couple of spelling mistaeks [sic].


      My my, that's a mighty fine straw man you're building over there...just don't try to hang my name on him.
      Just for the record, you were the one who introduced the (non)issue of factual accuracy into this conversation. Nowhere have I ever said that grammatical correctness is preferable to factual accuracy, and for you to attempt to insinuate that I did is disingenuous.

      .. why are typografikal issues a major concern?


      OK...now you're just being childish.

      I don't get it.

      Yes...you're making that painfully clear.


      Aren't there other things in the world for someone like you to be concerned about?

      Yes, but unlike you, I apparently have this preternatural ability to be concerned about multiple issues at once.


      Let me ask you this, what is it that you do?


      I'm a network administrator...not that my current employment is pertinent to this discussion...

      I mean, give some credibility as to why people should follow your advice.

      Because it's not *my* advice...it's the elementary rules of spelling, punctuation, and grammar. It's not like I'm somehow privy to the mysterious dark secrets of the English language...these rules are available to anyone who cares to pick up a textbook. Any highschool English teacher who read that article would have found the same errors I did.

      Who exactly are you "Trip Master Monkey"?

      Actually, if you would bother to read my previous posts, you would see that it's 'TripMaster Monkey', but perhaps I'm being *too* picky now... ^_^

      And why should we listen to you..

      Starting a sentence with a conjunction, question without a question mark, and two periods. I think you just answered your own question.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    15. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

      I think you mean boldy emphasized.

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    16. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by The+Lion+of+Comarre · · Score: 2

      Give people a fucking break and start your own magazine that will be profitable and stand up to your anal standards.

      Surely you meant to type:
      Give people a fucking brake and start your own magazine that will be profitable and stand up to your anal standards.

    17. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But O'Connor adds that a series of mechanical breaks will activate should there be a sudden loss of pressure, to prevent the capsule falling."

      I'm thinking that may be wrong too. Wouldn't it be a sudden increase in pressure that would cause problems in a vacuum-driven system?

    18. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      I realize that I'm stomping on your joke, but how is "breaks" phonetic spelling? If they were going to do that, wouldn't they spell it brayks?

      More likely, they are simply graduates of the "pick something off the spell checker's menu" school.

    19. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by mdfst13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Personally, I rather an article has factuality"

      However, the article does not. Mixing British Pounds and US Dollars as it does is a *factual* mistake. It presumably meant to say twenty to twenty-two of one currency or the other. What they actually said was something like $15,000 off at one end or the other.

      Yes, factual issues are more important than typographical issues. However, typos are easier to catch than errors. There is no reason not to make the minimal effort to catch the typos. You will catch some number of errors along the way (e.g. the incorrect currency symbol). Further, the minimal effort needed to find typos is still needed if you want to find errors, as you need to find where statements regarding facts are being made.

      Another way of saying this is "If your realtor adds a 0 to the end of your house price, that is a typo. Would you then pay it as typos are unimportant?"

    20. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Face it, the world is not full of people who speak english as their primary language.

      We don't need more lazy asses slaughtering the language and confusing the hell out of other people who are just learning it.

    21. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      No no no.

      These are mechanical breaks -- periods where operation is interrupted; like a coffee break or lunch break. Basically, when there is a sudden loss of pressure, the elevator takes a break, just like I would do if there was a disaster about to occur that might be blamed on me if I were around.

    22. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by nietsch · · Score: 2

      So what is your point exactly? That you tripmaster monkey are very good at using words that show us how smart you are?

      Or that your standards are better that that of New Scientist? So what? Why do you need to complain about that here on /.? Wouldn't you be better of writing to NS instead?

      Or is it maybe you felt you needed to show of your 'sophisticated' language skills? (at the expense of NS) If you want admiration, you'd do better by doing something constructive, something positive. Please?

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    23. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      You do mean strongly emphasized , right?

    24. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by The+Green+Skeleton · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see now, its like in HHGTTG, the breaking limbs will cause the occupants to forget that they are falling, and they will be saved! Genious!

    25. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by fdobbie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does NewScientist.com have editors?

      If this upsets you, why are you reading Slashdot?!

    26. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by BigBlackDog · · Score: 1

      I wasn't sure about the meaning of preternatural, but Google is my friend.

      The first definition returned begins: Beyond of different from what is natural

      How pertinent.

      --
      /* This comment may not be thread-safe */
    27. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by m50d · · Score: 1

      It could still be factually accurate. In fact, it almost certainly does cost between $20000 and £22000, since both numbers in either currencty would be within that range.

      --
      I am trolling
    28. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1
      I'm just guessing since I don't know much about vacuum systems like this, but decreasing the above pressure while increasing the pressure below would cause the elevator to go up. Similar to the way hydrolics work, except here you're using air pressure rather than water pressure. If there was a sudden loss in pressure below such that it dropped below the above pressure, the elevator would move down. If it was sudden and dramatic.... the elevator would move downward suddenly and dramatically.

      Wow, reading back now I'm not sure if that is going to make it any more clear. :P

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    29. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Jay+L · · Score: 1

      Then the advertising is misleading. They say that, unlike a standard mechanical elevator, you don't need a mechanical room, headhouse, hoistway, etc. They say nothing about a break room.

    30. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by thebudgie · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, I liked you better when you were promoting enlightened discussion... ;-)

    31. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the record, TripMaster, I'm with you. Anyone that is unable to take the tiny bit of extra effort to ensure that they are using the words they think they are, and that they are spelled correctly, isn't worth listening to.

      And you would think a (supposedly) professional publication such as New Scientist would at least ensure that each article was reviewed (and corrected, if need be) by an editor with the appropriate skills, assuming the authors were lacking thereof.

    32. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "It could still be factually accurate. In fact, it almost certainly does cost between $20000 and £22000, since both numbers in either currencty would be within that range."

      Yes, the statement was true. However, it did not have the meaning intended (which was to limit the range to 2000 of one currency unit or the other).

    33. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Anyone that is unable to take the tiny bit of extra effort to ensure that they are using the words they think they are, and that they are spelled correctly, isn't worth listening to.

      Does this lack of listening extend to people for whom english is a third language ? (not that I think that's a valid excuse for the editor at New Scientist)

      It's just a *tiny* bit annoying when Americans (mostly, the English are more aware that there are other languages/nationalities trough living in Europe) insist that everyone should be able to write impeccable english. Often while themselves being unable to communicate on a basic level in any language other than english.

    34. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1
      Does this lack of listening extend to people for whom english is a third language ?


      I would have to say that no, it doesnt. If I can tell that the author/speaker is not a native english speaker, then even while I grit my teeth at misworded phrases, I withhold any associated negative response.

      But yes, as you note, that is surely no excuse for an editor of a (presumably) professional publiscation.
    35. Re:Editor desperately needed at NewScientist.com by Eivind · · Score: 1
      If I can tell that the author/speaker is not a native english speaker, then even while I grit my teeth at misworded phrases, I withhold any associated negative response.

      I suppose this means that I should take it as a sort of compliment when Americans start critisizing my spelling; one possible interpretation would be that it is close enough that I'm not immediately recognizable as "foreigner".

  3. Not too expensive... by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    The elevator costs between $20,000 and £22,000.
    Sweet. My new Prius gets between 812448 RPH and 48 MPG. I think I've saved enough on gas to get one of these...

    1. Re:Not too expensive... by Ta+Pere+* · · Score: 1

      Is that american or British gallons?

    2. Re:Not too expensive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RPH?

    3. Re:Not too expensive... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Rods Per Hogshead, obviously. Duh.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:Not too expensive... by Surt · · Score: 1

      And any reasonable person would use RTTH not RPH.
      http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/GuidePageServ let/showid-146/epid-1406/

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:Not too expensive... by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 1

      There's a difference?! Let me guess, it's divisible by liters by a factor of ten?

    6. Re:Not too expensive... by Ta+Pere+* · · Score: 0

      British gallons are 4,.5 litres and American ones are 3.8 litres (off the top of my head but I'm too lazy to even open a new tab and check on google)

  4. Vacuum Elevators? by Agret · · Score: 5, Funny

    Futurama here we come!

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:Vacuum Elevators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahhahahhaha@futurama reference.

      You get it guys? He made a joke about Futurama and it's soooooo FUNNY CAUSE IT'S REPEATED. /sarcasm

    2. Re:Vacuum Elevators? by rapidweather · · Score: 1
      My bank uses a vacuum drive-thru conveyer to whisk your deposit to the teller through a pipe.


      At first, they had a sign on it saying "No Coins!" as the thing got stuck when too much weight was placed in the container.

      Now, the changed the sign to "Ask Teller before sending coins."

      Apparently, if you have a bunch of rare coins, she will want to discuss your deposit over dinner, before allowing you to send them through the tube.

    3. Re:Vacuum Elevators? by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think Robert A. Heinlien's 'Stranger in a Strange Land' has prior art on this. They have something called a 'bounce tube,' which is replacing elevators for single person transport.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    4. Re:Vacuum Elevators? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      My impression of the bounce tubes was that it used an antigravity device for propulsion, not air flow.

    5. Re:Vacuum Elevators? by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      That does sound like a better answer. It would also explain why it had to be kept to a narrow tube, thus making single person transport the only option. If it was some sort of beam, you would need to restrict the area, to focus the effects more easily.

      Of course, The Man from Mars and his Water Brothers had a much more effective means of transport.

      I wish I could wipe spaghetti off my face like that.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

  5. Ah mah gawd by TupperTrenine · · Score: 0, Troll

    30kbps...25...20... We are witnessing the dreaded /. effect, ladies and gentlemen! Quite a sight indeed! If you look far off into the west, you can see the mushroom clouds from the server hosting the file...

  6. developed by microsoft? by munehiro · · Score: 1, Funny

    it really sucks :)

    --
    -- "If A equals success, then the formula is A=X+Y+Z. X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut." - Einstein
    1. Re:developed by microsoft? by JRIsidore · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it was developed by Microsoft it would probably not suck. ;)

      --
      :w!q
    2. Re:developed by microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how this is a troll.

      Probably a Microsoft astroturfer using their modpoints.

    3. Re:developed by microsoft? by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 1

      Something sucking when it's supposed to suck doesn't actually suck. What sucks is if your product that is supposed to suck doesn't.
      Got it? ;)

      --
      The following statement is true
      The preceding statement is false
    4. Re:developed by microsoft? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      I had a fantastic Microsoft vacuum cleaner once. It didn't suck at all!

    5. Re:developed by microsoft? by Skraut · · Score: 1

      Exactly...

      --
      Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
  7. This technology was first used... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate factory. The design will have to be scaled up to allow occasional use by gluttonous Germans.

    1. Re:This technology was first used... by atomm1024 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Aha, so there's prior art? Then I guess we won't see them succeed at patenting it, if they try.

      I've heard that many an inventor has been foiled by prior art in fantasy movies. I move that we declare fantasy movies illegal, in order to protect intellectual property. Fantasy/scifi movies are like pirating the future!

      --
      Signature.
  8. Can it pick up a bowling ball? by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 1

    Cause I have an ol' ball and chain that would be interested. She'd also be interested if the said elevator can clean stains and grill up a smarmy husband like a rotisserie.

  9. It's like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    the world's largest penis pump. Good grief, I can't believe I just said that.

    1. Re:It's like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..It's the other kind of /. effect, it makes otherwise smart people say dumb things.

    2. Re:It's like... by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      I can. :)

    3. Re:It's like... by magefile · · Score: 2, Funny

      I swear, it's not mine - that sort of thing just isn't my bag, baby!

    4. Re:It's like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading through ALL your posts Mr. Anonymous Coward, I'm really not surprised by anything you might say anymore.

  10. The future makes me shiver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Mr. Johnson : WHere are the annual reports, Rick ?
    Rick : I think Richard Harrelson has them.
    Mr. Johnson : Get Richard in here NOW !

    Zoooooooof - plop

  11. /.ing by cnettel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah, let's post a 3.2 MB video link directly from the blurb...

    1. Re:/.ing by UCFFool · · Score: 3, Informative

      Elevator1.mpeg
      Courtesy of mirrordot.org.

      --
      "The more pity, that fools may not speak wisely what wise men do foolishly" - Touchstone,Shakespeare's "As You Like It"
    2. Re:/.ing by Aenox · · Score: 1

      Why else would add the post?

    3. Re:/.ing by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      It was enough to slashdot the server. Welcome to the world of facts, Ta Mere...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    4. Re:/.ing by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Look 14 seconds into the film - is that a marble bust in the middle of the picture back against the wall - and the head is tilted back? If this doesn't have Batman written all over it, I don't know what does. All they need now is to put a pole in the middle so you can slide down.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  12. One simple question. by tapo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why?

    --
    "Joy is contagious," he said, peering into the microscope.
  13. Something I noticed by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems there's no shield between the occupant and the sides of the stationary tube.

    If that is true there could be risks if stuff (like clothing) gets caught at the wrong places... Not very high I suppose - it's just like using an escalator - if you careless/stupid enough to get something caught you better hope it rips rather than you rip...

    --
    1. Re:Something I noticed by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Given that I couldn't figure out how one could by seriously injured by an escalator, short of some mechanical failure or manufacturing defect, I tried to find some information on escalator accidents via google. E.g. - news reports, personal accounts, etc.

      Pretty much all I found was a bunch of ambulance chasers looking for suckers to goad into frivolous lawsuits.

      I do not think it is a significant concern.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    2. Re:Something I noticed by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yah. Given the thing can only lift 200kg, it might be embarassing if you manage to kill or seriously hurt yourself with it...

      --
    3. Re:Something I noticed by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not the modern kind of elevators with solid doors, but there have been cases where little kids have had an arm pulled off by the old fashioned cage elevators. These elevators sometimes have trellis type doors, or windows that kids like to stick their arms through. The "Bladerunner" movie might have a better example.

      Apart for being safer, the modern doors do offer some interesting opportunites for the artist

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Something I noticed by Suncrazyjxi · · Score: 1

      Dear Madposter, Since this seems to be the only way to get in touch with you, how bout you f'n call me.

    5. Re:Something I noticed by jonin · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Houston TX about a year ago a Doctor (St Joseph's Hospital) was killed when he tried to catch a elevator when the doors were closing. He became stuck in the doors and the elevator started going up. It ended up severing a good part of his head off.

      This was a modern designed elevator. Accidents can happen, although rare, it is something to consider.

    6. Re:Something I noticed by khrtt · · Score: 1

      I heard of an escalator accident in 1982 in Moscow, Russia, when an escalator maimed and killed about 40 people. The transmission that connected the motor to the stairs broked and disconnected, and brakes failed, causing 100 people on the escalator to slide down within a few seconds. The only English-language internet reference that I found is

      http://www.basedn.freeserve.co.uk/miscellany.htm

      I know of this from an indirect witness account (i.e. someone who knows someone who seen it). There were several brakes/safeties in that escalator, all of which happily failed. If you can read Russian, google for aviamotornaya station, 1982.

    7. Re:Something I noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is why you never stick any part of your anatomy into the doors.

      By all means use your breifcase, never use your head!

    8. Re:Something I noticed by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did a search for this accident and found many articles relating to Hitoshi Nikaidoh. Apparently, there are 30 deaths and 17,100 injuries each year.

      There is a detailed explanation at snopes.com. The exact cause was a miswired controller stud which bypassed the safety features.

      Other hospital accidents have been caused by the elevator cabs falling by several feet while a gurney was being pushed in or out.

      According to an elevator expert, most of these accidents are caused by infrequent maintenance.

      From now on, I'll take the stairs.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    9. Re:Something I noticed by Bloater · · Score: 1

      If there is something for your clothing to catch on, I seriously soubt there will be an airtight seal to make the elevator move. You need really smooth edges to get an airtight seal.

    10. Re:Something I noticed by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Shee-it... That is not supposed to be able to happen, _ever_. If the doors are not closed the elevator _must_NEVER_ be able to move. There should be like tons of safeguards.

      I wonder how all that stuff failed... Poor guy. And the other people in the lift...

      --
    11. Re:Something I noticed by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      Well, imagine if it was really cold out, and there was this kid saying I dare you to lick the wall...

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
  14. Dangerous, to say the least by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 1, Interesting
    What happens if the seal is lost on the top portion? There should be positive pressure on the bottom side of the elevator so that if either the top or the bottom seal is lost, you don't go plummetting, especially on the 4-floor version. It's hard to say from the article if that's maybe how it works in practice... it doesn't specify.

    All the pneumatic pumps I've used are maddeningly noisy. I hope this one's an exception.

    1. Re:Dangerous, to say the least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A counteracting force on the bottom would be stupid... if the seal on the top is lost, you'd still go careening to your death... just up instead of down.

    2. Re:Dangerous, to say the least by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      What happens if the seal is lost on the top portion?

      Exactly the same thing that happens in a standard elevator if the cable breaks. Purely mechanical brakes are activated if the elevator moves downward at too fast of a rate.

    3. Re:Dangerous, to say the least by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      According to the article, the pump is at the top so presumably the bottom is simply vented.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  15. Is it bagless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it bagless? Cos I wouldn't want it to run out of suction...

    To be honest.. I think someone should invent a lift that sucks the fart smells out before the next person gets in..

  16. For Us Americans... by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... 204 Kg = ~450 lbs

    --
    I think I think, therefore I think I am.
    1. Re:For Us Americans... by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then it isn't for us Americans, now is it? It may be able to move Brits or Canadians around, but certainly not us.

    2. Re:For Us Americans... by DennisZeMenace · · Score: 1

      Yup, clearly not enough for this market...

      DZM

    3. Re:For Us Americans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      450 lbs

      well that rules out the American market

      also elevators are supposed to employ a 2:1 safety ratio, do USA elevator manufacturers have to re-calculate their people counts due to the obesity epidemic ?

    4. Re:For Us Americans... by sytxr · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      You really must mean
      For Us imperialistic Americans ... ... 204 Kg = ~450 lbs
    5. Re:For Us Americans... by Xarius · · Score: 2, Funny

      So that's, what? 2 passengers in America?

      --
      C17H21NO4
    6. Re:For Us Americans... by maharg · · Score: 1

      another fail safe, in that people too heavy would not be able to squeeze in the tube ;o)

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    7. Re:For Us Americans... by CockblockTheVote · · Score: 1

      you've never been to america.

    8. Re:For Us Americans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, guess I have to wait for version 2.0...

    9. Re:For Us Americans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like one

    10. Re:For Us Americans... by Cadallin · · Score: 3, Funny

      2?! HA! Try one american, bucko, and the pneumatic pumps will be straining the whole lift.

    11. Re:For Us Americans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a glandular problem!

    12. Re:For Us Americans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh, I'M gonna go around posting obivous imperial to metric conversions and see how long I can suck the Kharma God's dick....

    13. Re:For Us Americans... by psycho8me · · Score: 0

      Nope, lbs and kg are incomparable. kg is a unit of mass and lbs is a unit of force.

    14. Re:For Us Americans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my, an Americans are fat joke.

      Slashdot just defeated humor.

    15. Re:For Us Americans... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      So that's what, 2 passengers anywhere, except frickin Etheopia. Yes.

  17. *yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  18. Re:(OT) Request: Help From Moderators by julesh · · Score: 0

    What do you mean by page-widening? I've looked at the top two posts on your list and neither causes anything unusual to happen on my browser (firefox 1.0) until I've made the window so small the standard slashdot header doesn't fit correctly. What's the problem with these posts exactly (other than the offtopic/trollish content)?

  19. Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    There are only 96 people in the US that it can actually lift....

    oops make that 74, McDonalds are doing an all you can eat special today.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >oops make that 74, McDonalds are doing an all you can eat special today.

      Make it 76, two tourists made it through Washington DC airport without being anal probed and sent back.

    2. Re:Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lolol i get it americans are fat lol

    3. Re:Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by fbartho · · Score: 2, Funny

      kids are people too. if your mom somehow gave birth to you at >450lbs I'd shoot myself rather than face the monstrosity ;) :)

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    4. Re:Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you are right, the size of my penis alone is too much for this elevator. No wonder the population of europe is declining and women from europe flock to america, because their men cannot begin to please them...

    5. Re:Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      There are only 96 people in the US that it can actually lift....

      That's what overclocking is for,

    6. Re:Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHOOT HIM! SHOOT HIM!!

      Er, thats a her...

      *vaporlocks*

      SHOOT HER! SHOOT HER!!

    7. Re:Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Somewhere on the internet, a new porn site is born....

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    8. Re:Unfortunately at 204kg load capacity by Surt · · Score: 1

      In all fairness to McDonalds, they are cutting back on portion sizes, while BK is now heavily advertising their enormous breakfast sandwich with 1k calories, and more than your daily supply of fat, salt, and cholestorol by 8am.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  20. Re:(OT) Request: Help From Moderators by Council · · Score: 1

    OP is repeated troll. Those aren't comments on stories.

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  21. 204Kg? Rules out some markets by otisg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Use your imagination... sad, but true.

    --
    Simpy
  22. The Elderly and Disabled by mekkab · · Score: 4, Informative

    Laziness and status aside;

    The real answer is for the Elderly and the disabled. IF you check out That Home Site you'll find a lot of interest in residential elevators. If it isn't feasible to buy a single level house, an elevator allows you full access to your entire abode.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:The Elderly and Disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, but what value does vacuum-elevator technology bring to the table compared with cables and pulleys and shit? This whole thing sounds like a solution in search of a problem (or a patent application in search of a market.)

    2. Re:The Elderly and Disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mechanical simplicity (reliability) & lower manufacturing cost

    3. Re:The Elderly and Disabled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The real answer is for the Elderly and the disabled.


      Yeah, but... too bad it's too small for a wheelchair, judging from TFVideo.

  23. trolltalk alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These links point to the slashdot barfbag "trolltalk." Naturally it's full of trolls. Don't waste your mod points there. Mod parent down instead.

  24. use the stairs fatty ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


    amazing the amount of work people will do in order to avoid physical exercise

    is it any wonder that the current generation are expected to die before their parents

    1. Re:use the stairs fatty ! by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because people who use walkers love running up and down the stairs.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:use the stairs fatty ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Mabye they wouldn't need walkers if the lazy bitches would exercise just a little...

    3. Re:use the stairs fatty ! by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      I use walkers and I hate stairs, I prefer to have my imperial stormtroopers carry me on a royal litter when encountering stairs as we rampage across the galaxy.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
  25. Re:firefox??? by artificialj · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I think that the slashdot posted link already used up all the site's bandwidth.

  26. Videos not /.-ed (yet) by gentoo1337 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Working videos (for now) here:
    http://www.vacuumelevators.com/video.htm

  27. Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like their servers could use some oil, too.

  28. Re:(OT) Request: Help From Moderators by Troll+Patrol · · Score: 0

    You stopped one post too soon--check out the third link.

  29. ENGADGET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't mention Engadget on /.! We hates the engadgets!

    Everyone knows that if Engadget is the mortal enemy of /. and the only way to settle our differences is to meet on the field of nerd honor with dueling keyboards at dawn.

    1. Re:ENGADGET! by baadger · · Score: 1

      Yeah but engadget has more ads.

    2. Re:ENGADGET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meet on the field of nerd honor with dueling keyboards at dawn.

      Yep, that's essentially the difference. While the Slashdot crowd is still stuck with their keyboards, the Engadget crowd's moved on to cellphones, handhelds, and embedded gizmos.

  30. Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "looks like it could use some oil."

    Look like thier server could use some oil.

  31. Re:firefox??? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    I'm going to take a guess and say because Firefox isn't a media player. It's a standard mpeg, played fine in Winamp after launching the link from firefox.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  32. Huh? Wha? by Skudd · · Score: 2, Funny

    An elevator that is sucked up a tube... I can feel my ears popping just thinking about it.

  33. Dear Cowboyneal by pikine · · Score: 1

    Next time when you post link to a video, can you point it to Coral Cache instead? It makes the link available to more readers and makes the webmaster there happier.

    --
    I once had a signature.
  34. These people are missing the main market. by BrianH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The primary market for residential elevators is for the elderly and wheelchair bound. From what I can see, this elevator isn't stable or safe enough for a frail elderly person, and it isn't large enough to fit a wheelchair or scooter.

    So the only market for this thing is going to be for rich people who'd rather blow money on a toy than take the stairs. While I'm sure there's a market for that, it's not going to be a big one.

    --

    There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    1. Re:These people are missing the main market. by untouchable · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was thinking the exact same thing. This thing would be killer at museums and other open floors. It seems portable enough to just rent one or two to install in cases of increased traffic at certain venues.

      --
      As Seen On TV's? Come back!!!
    2. Re:These people are missing the main market. by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1

      You know, there are people who have knee and joint issues that this thing would be an absolute boon too. Stairs can also be killer on many people with back problems.

    3. Re:These people are missing the main market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, all those people selling luxury goods at inflated prices to a small market, what are they thinking? get your asses to china and start cranking out the widgets for the masses like any good capitalist should

      and on a related note, which do you think it's harder to do? compete with massive companies that produce common and highly useful goods or in a niche where you're one of only a handful of small producers in the world, each of which has distinctive if similar products?

      don't fall into the trap of thinking that you have to dominate a market to be successful

    4. Re:These people are missing the main market. by gtkuhn · · Score: 1

      I think I agree that this is just a toy for the rich. Air pressure doesn't seem as effective as hydraulic elevators for small heights.

    5. Re:These people are missing the main market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of the expression "one step at a time"?! Stop being so friggin short-sighted. Sheesh!

    6. Re:These people are missing the main market. by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're absolutely correct. One of the major trends right now in urban housing is for a developer to buy up a small section of older 1-story homes in a decent part of a downtown area, then knock those homes down and replace them with 4-story townhomes. Most of these townhomes are ~2,500 sq. ft. affairs, but the number of stairs has got to affect their ability to sell.

      During my time working for astructured wiring subcontractor, I saw several of these places setup with small elevators, but the numbers I usually heard tossed about were in the $80,000 to $100,000 range. A $20,000 elevator would definitely have a market not just at a personal level, but with many of those developers willing to make it a standard feature in order to differentiate themselves from their competitors.

    7. Re:These people are missing the main market. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      So the only market for this thing is going to be for rich people who'd rather blow money on a toy than take the stairs.
      A $20k price tag combined with simple installation and easy maintenance brings this "toy" well within reach of the fairly well-off, not just the rich. Hell... I could afford one if I really wanted to (and if my apartment had more than 1 floor).
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    8. Re:These people are missing the main market. by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you read the article, you would've read that they're working on a wheelchair verson of the elevator.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    9. Re:These people are missing the main market. by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

      The problem with hydraulic elevators is that they require a hole for the jack that goes to a depth equal to the height of the lift. This would be difficult to retrofit into most buildings, and too expensive as well.

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    10. Re:These people are missing the main market. by Jay+L · · Score: 1

      One of the major trends right now in urban housing is for a developer to buy up a small section of older 1-story homes in a decent part of a downtown area, then knock those homes down and replace them with 4-story townhomes. Most of these townhomes are ~2,500 sq. ft. affairs, but the number of stairs has got to affect their ability to sell.

      I was actually considering an elevator as I'm moving from a 2-story suburban house to a 5-story city rowhouse with high ceilings. In Boston, rowhouses are usually only 20 feet wide, and just Really Tall. And running up the stairs for five stories is just not that appealing, even when I'm in good shape.

      The problem seems to be that most residential elevators are designed for disability access, not stair-replacement. I clocked myself walking up stairs at about 90 feet per minute; residential elevators seem to operate about 10-20fpm, or 30 for this pneumatic one. That doesn't count dwell time. I'm too impatient for that. I need a teleporter, or a bat pole.

    11. Re:These people are missing the main market. by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Actually, there was an article in the Wall Street Journal about a week ago mentioning elevators, including this design, as an increasing trend.

      People are getting older and richer, both of which increase demand for things like this. I think it would be a fun toy myself.

      D

  35. Re:firefox??? by oscartheduck · · Score: 0

    That's why this post above yours linked to the mirrodot mirror of the video.

    --
    How to use coral cache: http://slashdot.org.nyud.net:8090/~oscartheduck
  36. Video mirror by sucker_muts · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Dependency hell? => /bin/there/done/that
    1. Re:Video mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, Miss Kharma Whore...

  37. Loudness of suction pumps? by LuckyStarr · · Score: 1

    I reckon the intent putting classical music in the video is to distract customers of the sound of the pumps? Found it nowhere on their page.

    I certainly do not want a 120dB monster of an elevator in my home/business/whatever.

    --
    Meme of the day: I browse "Disable Sigs: Checked". So should you.
    1. Re:Loudness of suction pumps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The website claims 87dB. They then reference a decibel comparison chart (http://www.lhh.org/noise/decibel.htm). Did you know that a baby crying, a leafblower and a car horn are all at 110dB?

    2. Re:Loudness of suction pumps? by LuckyStarr · · Score: 1

      No, didn't know. Thanks for the info though. :-)

      --
      Meme of the day: I browse "Disable Sigs: Checked". So should you.
  38. A tweak here and there... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    And you gets a turbolift!

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:A tweak here and there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A turbolift uses magnetic technology (theoretically)

      I think magnetic technology has a bigger future in elevators than vacuum based tech. It is whisper quiet, and it allows for side to side motion as well. Of course, power loss is a big deal...... :)

  39. MOD PARENT DOWN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half arsed attempt at a troll - check the links, they go to a valid discussion.

  40. My Uncle made an elevator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    for my Grandmother whose mobility was starting to wane. It was powered by water pressure (from a regular tap (faucet)) on the way up with a valve controlling the water release for a smooth ride down. I have always wondered how it was able to provide enough lift (it still puzzles me today). Regular water pressure? I must take my camera next time I venture there. He's a metal-worker by trade (specifically I'm not sure) so the quality of the structure is first class.

    1. Re:My Uncle made an elevator by bluGill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Simple physics. Your water pressure it between 20 and 60psi. (Anything higher will break hoses) City water is generally on the high end because cities have to reach the upper floors of houses on top of hills, and regulators are a lot each to install and maintain than pumps. Well water is often on the low end because you set it for what you need.

      20 psi means that if you have a tube with a piston with one square inch of surface area, the piston will hold up 20lbs. A little math and you can find how big a piston you need to lift the weight (Not mass, we care about fighting gravity) you are concerned about. Now just place the piston in a tube long enough, and apply water. It will lift your elevator.

      The hard part is making this without digging a hold DOWN 2 stories to place your tube in. There are many solutions to this, they are left as an exercise for the reader.

    2. Re:My Uncle made an elevator by EarthlingN · · Score: 1

      Or add a booster (pump) to increase the water's supply pressure.

      I'd run mine with the mechanical output of a tap-driven hydraulic-motor. Obvious, right?

    3. Re:My Uncle made an elevator by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Obvious, but wrong. A hydraulic piston done right leaves no failure mode that results in the elevator plunging to the bottom of the shaft (accelerating at 9.8m/s^2 all the way down). Cables break, which is the typical thing you would use if you have a motor. When a pipe breaks the whole thing sinks, but not any faster than a normal decent.

      There is a reason that hydraulic elevators have less safety regulations than electric, they are inherently safer. (however they are also inherently slow) I would be happy to ride in a home built hydraulic elevator. I would not ride in a homemade electric elevator unless I was confident the builder put in the right safeties.

      Then too, an electric motor is much easier to work with than your hydraulic motor. Even if you have a stream next to your elevator that you can use to power the motor for free (in which case you should be using the stream to run a generator all the time)

  41. I don't get it ... by Lemurmania · · Score: 4, Interesting

    SOmething's really odd here -- the people who would most need this are folks who are in wheelchairs. And yet the tube is clearly too narrow for any sort of handicapped person. Why invent a freaking elevator for the people who don't need one? Do they have a handicapped version? Looking at the size of the capsule, I doubt a person with arm braces could fit in there. It seems really cruel to make an easy-to-install elevator that won't fit the people who need it.

    1. Re:I don't get it ... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Did you RTFA? Right in there they say they're developing a 4-floor version and a wheelchair-capable version.

    2. Re:I don't get it ... by Animats · · Score: 1
      It's easy to make and install only because the cylinder sections fit through a standard doorway. If the cylinder is made big enough for a wheelchair, the sections become too big to get into most houses.

      They're planning a larger version, but it will usually be installed in new houses during construction.

      Residential elevators have been around for years, but they require more on-premises assembly and customization.

  42. Hm... by TrevorB · · Score: 2, Funny

    They claim it provides a smooth ride but from the video it looks like it could use some oil

    Hmm I guess this elevator really sucks then...

    Thanks, I'm here until Wednesday, try the veal!

  43. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's gone from suck to blow!

  44. Ouch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the elevator works better than there servers.

    "Service Unavailable"

  45. Directly linking the video by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1

    is a bad idea because it is already Slashed. Perhaps submitters should reward those who actually read the article by not including the video in the description. Not to whore, but here is the mirrordot mirror of the video. It is pretty slow moving, but the ride looks really smooth.

    --
    I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
  46. Only electricity? by conteXXt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    news flash:

    elevators don't run on guinea pig droppings. All modern elevators (excepting perhaps the Space Elevator) run on ONLY electricty.

    Did I miss something here?

    --
    The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    1. Re:Only electricity? by bkubi · · Score: 0

      Down under, they use diesel engines for the mining.

    2. Re:Only electricity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you did. Most elevators use a rather complicated set of hydraulic pumps (electrically driven) to do their deed. They are smelly, dirty, and high maintenance.

  47. One question... by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1

    What happens if you open the door when the elevator is not on that floor? It looks like it would open right up. If that is the case, what would happen if you opened the door, and by accident dropped something into the tube? Would it get sucked up by the fan and blow out the system? Do the doors lock when the capsule isn't on that floor? (sorry for two posts in two minutes; my friend and I just got to discussing this sweet contraption)

    --
    I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
    1. Re:One question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If the cab was below your floor, you couldn't open the door, think about it.

      Anyway, if you poke around the main vendor's site, you will find that the doors have magnetic locks to prevent opening when the elevator isn't on that floor.

    2. Re:One question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be a lot more concerned if I had just entered at the upper floor, and someone opened the door on the lower floor...

      Think about it.

  48. CowboyNEAL is a THIEF!!! :) by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He stole my story I tried to post yesterday, and I had a better tag line too:

    2005-05-06 18:01:29 Elevator from Futurama! (Hardware,Technology) (rejected)

    and a better description.

    This elevator comes in 2 modes: 2 floor mode and a 3 floor mode. It is easy to install, you only need to make a round hole in the floor/ceiling and put the round tube-shaft through it. It works by pumping the air out of the tube from the top (a pump generates 87dBA of noise,) and since the pressure underneath the cabin stays the same, the cabin goes up.

    Safety is guaranteed by a mechanical lock that stops the cabin dead in case if pressure under the cabin becomes weaker than the pressure from above. On the other hand if electricity cut off from the pump, the cabin wouldn't get stuck between the floors, it would slide down slowly due to slow pressure venting.

    There is a clever cabin ventilation scheme...

    anyway, this thing looks a lot like the mode of transportation used in Futurama and my last sentence was:

    Now I wish someone came up with an american favorite Suicide Booth, then my day would be complete.

    1. Re:CowboyNEAL is a THIEF!!! :) by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      Ok, fine, so it was posted by Neal from Aenox. But my story was still better!! Better I tell you!

    2. Re:CowboyNEAL is a THIEF!!! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post was in earlier, and it is more descriptive, but it doesn't read like an article summary. Sorry to disappoint... Too much detail, not enough *wow* factor.

      Anyhow, all the decent stories get rejected - I keep trying to post a few about some very interesting software patent lawsuits (trading technologies), and they get continually rejected, and we get drinky puppy go go and 'people have elbows!' instead.

      I'm looking forward to tomorrows article - apparently, a 2 year old in nebraska has discovered that grass is green and sky is blue!

  49. Does this remind anyone else... by djeaux · · Score: 1

    ... of those things at the bank drive-up window that suck your money away?

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    1. Re:Does this remind anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Fees and taxes? I'm sorry, I have no idea how you can corrolate a tax with a device to transport a person.

  50. bullets not a problem by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Bullets won't be much a problem. The glass in this thing is the same thing they make bullet proof glass out of. Maybe not as thick, but it should still be enough. Even if not, this stuff won't shatter like glass, so the leak won't be as sudden.

  51. And for the British... by BluhDeBluh · · Score: 1

    ~32 stone

  52. Elevator by ksaville00 · · Score: 1

    I think this is a pretty neat idea, but how much would a regular elevator install cost. That could actually take multiple people and lots of stuff..

    1. Re:Elevator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a 3 story building between $200,000-$300,000, the low end for new builings and the high end for retrofiting old buildtings.

      Many downtowns in Massachusetts are dead on the vine even though New Urbanism is the hot thing. The reason? State law mandates that if you do improvements to a building that increases the value of 25% then you have to make it "accessible" for the wheelchair nazis. So if you try to rehab your old flophouse apartments downtown to up the rent by $300 plan on spending 3x the rehab amount on elevators. Smart huh?

  53. Dear pikine by Stiletto · · Score: 1


    Dear pikine,

    We editors no longer even care about Slashdot, much less some other site we link to. So shut up and buy a subscription.

    Love,
    Cowboyneal

  54. Re:firefox??? by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Tristan, you're not going to get any usable help here, unless you give us usable information. Are you getting an error message of some sort?

    Initially, I had trouble as well. I was getting a page that said "SERVICE UNAVAILABLE". It was not a problem on my machine, however. There were so many people trying to see the same video that the server could not keep up (Google for "slashdot effect"). I tried the mirror link that was posted elsewhere, and it worked fine. I am running Firefox on a Fedora core 3 machine and I am using mplayer to view the file. It works, no problems.

  55. It isn't for me by bluGill · · Score: 1

    I use the stairs. I even use the stairs when a hotel puts me on the 8Th floor.[1]

    This is for some friends and relatives who can't take stairs. Have you seen what MS does to people? Ever see a 40 year old who cannot walk? It isn't pretty. Then there are general old people who can walk, but need help on stairs. I want an elevator in my house for them. Too bad this model isn't big enough for a wheelchair.

    [1]If I can find ones that you can enter without setting off the fire alarm anyway. Back in school it was not an excused absence from your finals if you were trapped in an elevator for the test, as some of my fellow students discovered (rated capacity was 12 people, and there were 15. This was a 12 dorm). No I no longer take an elevator that is close to full.

    1. Re:It isn't for me by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      When I first read the sentence, "Have you seen what MS does to people?", I thought, "JESUS H. CHRIST, how in the HELL does Microsoft get brought into an ELEVATOR DISCUSSION?!"

      It wasn't until I thought about it for a second that I realized you meant Multiple Sclerosis. Oops.

    2. Re:It isn't for me by bluGill · · Score: 1

      I would have spelled it out, but I have no hope of coming up with a spelling close enough that my spell checker can find the right one. MS is well recognized as the name in general. Only on slashdot does MS commonly have a different meaning, so you can be excused for being wrong at first.

      Though I'm getting more an more anal all the time about spelling Microsoft out when that is what I mean. For example it isn't Windows, or MS windows it is Microsoft Windows.

    3. Re:It isn't for me by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Multiple Sclerosis?

      MSWLogo (one of the OSS implementations of Logo - it's short for Microsoft Windows Logo) has dialogs all over the place saying "MS doesn't just stand for Microsoft - fund Multiple Sclerosis research".

  56. well that sounds... by jayloden · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...like it would really suck.

  57. A good problem by awaspaas · · Score: 1

    This is a great physics problem. What maximum pressure (in atm) must the vacuum chamber above have in order to lift a 200-lb man and a 200-lb elevator capsule? Assume 1 atm below, and a tube with 1 m diameter. Let's compare answers.

    1. Re:A good problem by over_exposed · · Score: 1

      My concern was what happens when someone steps off the elevator? Wouldn't the capsule shoot upwards a bit because of the sudden change in weight?

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    2. Re:A good problem by awaspaas · · Score: 1

      I think it said it's mechanically locked into place when the door opens.

  58. now you can know what it's like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to be one of those canisters at the drive-in for your local bank... slurp, woosh, thonk!

  59. Speaking of power; "only electricty?" by Zancarius · · Score: 1

    ...and uses only electricity to power vaccum inducing suction turbines

    Not to be picky with regard to the article summary, but what the hell else did they think it was going to be powered with? Hamster wheels?

    Imagine that! It uses only electricity! Our former model tried the hamster wheel approach, connected directly to the suction turbines. But this one is new and improved!

    Sheesh...

    --
    He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
    1. Re:Speaking of power; "only electricty?" by Hungus · · Score: 1

      It could be a natural gas or steam powered turbine... yeah or a really big hamster wheel.

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    2. Re:Speaking of power; "only electricty?" by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      It could have been Microsoft powered ... because MS sucks pretty hard.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    3. Re:Speaking of power; "only electricty?" by Hungus · · Score: 1

      But it has already been shown that MS vacuums don't suck they blow

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    4. Re:Speaking of power; "only electricty?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what the hell else did they think it was going to be powered with?

      "Surrrveyyy says!:"
      • #3 Your sister!
      • #2 Divine Brown!
      • #1 Yo mama!
      All excellent sources of suction.
  60. Re:204Kg? Rules out some markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably the market most likely to buy an elevator for their home.

  61. OT: McDonalds' health food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At a health fair in Canada, McDonalds was giving away samples of their new "healthy" fruit salad. The salad consisted of sliced apple and grapes, not too bad, but the sauce and the sprinkle-on walnuts were saturated with sugar! I finally realized what makes Americans so fat: everything they eat must be loaded with either sugar or oils, including their fruit and veggies.

  62. Poor Design by fluffy99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While still a clever design, this is a giant step backwards because it does not provide positive position control. Vacumn just provides a force, not a means of controlling position. From the video it looked like he had to tweak the elevator position before he could open the door.

    As for opening the door above the car while it's running, remember there is a vacumn holding the door shut with at least a few hundred lbf.

    1. Re:Poor Design by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Interesting death trap.

      Disable the vacuum pump, open the door and put a small 1 inch cube of metal on the top of the person-chute.

      Person cant get out, and suffocates. Ouch.

      --
  63. Nice troll by rbarreira · · Score: 1

    Nice troll... now go out and catch some fresh air :)

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  64. Hey. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard they suck. pun pun

  65. WTFV RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    if you watched the video you would see this isnt marketed towards the handicapped but to rich/dumb office execs, if you look at the tube you would of seen there isnt enough room to open a newspaper never mind walkers/wheelchairs

    but then again this is slashdot where people comment first before thinking about what they are actually saying (much like the current USA president (perhaps its a culture thing))

    1. Re:WTFV RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if YOU RTFA'd, you'd have read that part that a version to support wheelchairs is in the works.

      but then again this is slashdot where people comment first before thinking about what they are actually saying (much like the current USA president (perhaps its a culture thing))

      well, since you don't seem to be an American, and you seem to have committed the very offence you ripped on another and my entire country for, I guess we can rule out it being a cultural thing. Maybe it's just the fact that we have stupid people among us, and that some of them only see other peoples stupidity?

  66. Mod parent up by enosys · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that link. There are more videos there, downloads are fast, and the videos seem smoother than the one linked from the story.

  67. Did nobody RTFA? by Inominate · · Score: 1

    Two- or three-floor versions are currently available, and the company is now developing a four-floor system and another that can accommodate a wheelchair.

    Wheelchair support coming in a future patch!

  68. Why vacuum instead of pressure? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    Why do they use a vacuum instead of pressure? I can imagine that due to the round shape it is better to have a higher outside pressure instead of a low one (to distribute the force), but this should not be a technological problem (use stronger glass, reinforce...). Creating a vacuum sounds more difficult to me than creating pressure. On top of this, pressure can lift any load, while vacuum is restricted to the atmospheric pressure times the surface area of the floor.

    1. Re:Why vacuum instead of pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think that "creating vacuum" and "creating presure" are physically distinct? You'd use the same air compressor and the same tube to lift the same pod using the same pnemunatic pressure. It's just a stinking sign change.

      Second, having a vaccum system make door design much, much easier -- doors open out and can't be opened while the tube is in operation due to the enormous air pressure pushing the door closed.

      Finally, consider the inherent safety of the vaccum-based design. If any failure occurs, the only force we have to worry about is gravity -- there's no other stored energy -- so the only safety system we need is brakes. If I shoot you up the tube with high-pressure air, how do I ensure that you don't hit the top when a sudden wind gust reduces the pressure at the top of the tube? When I go to service the thing, how do I know that the system is discharged -- with a positive pressure system I need a valve or a door that opens into my tube space (meaning that the base of the elevator must be below floor level). With a negative-pressure system I just need a door that opens out.

    2. Re:Why vacuum instead of pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that marketing will always go for the cheaper solution.

      Make that the cheapest solution, actually.

  69. It lifts only 204Kg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That must be a conspiracy to force us poor overweight computer geeks to take the stairs!

  70. Does vacuum seem an odd choice? by lazlo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would seem to me that there's a limit to the amount of vacuum you can get above an elevator, but no limit in the pressure you could generate below it. I mean, if the elevator is 4 feet across, then the absolute theoretical limit of wieght that could be pulled up by suction (assuming standard sea-level pressure) would be...

    interesting. Google can't parse:

    (pi * ((inches in 1 foot * 2)^2) * psi in 1 atm) / lbs in 1 ton

    but substituting in values, you get:

    (pi * ((12 * 2)^2) * 14.6959488) / 2000 = 13.2965812

    OK. I guess that's not so very strange after all. In a 4 foot wide elevator, you can lift 13 tons with a hard vacuum above it. Damn. 15psi sure does add up quick.

    --
    Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?
    1. Re:Does vacuum seem an odd choice? by Bishop · · Score: 1

      There are over advantages to createing pressure below the elevator. It is easy to crate higher a higher pressure then create a vacuum. It would be possible to store up pressure that could be used for several lifts. For example a 4 foot wide cicular elevator lifted 10 feet (about one floor) would displace about 120 cubic feet. A large scuba tank stores 120 cuft of air (at 1 atm) compressed to 2700psi (185 bar). Much larger (non-scuba) air tanks with a 5000psi (345bar) working pressure are readily available, and could power many trips without the use of a loud turbine. Vacumm by contrast can't be as easily stored. I would also think that it would be easier to control the pressure under the elevator when lifting and lowering. It should be easy to gently raise and lower the pressure allowing for soft accelerations.

      The only downside to generating pressure is that the tube would have to be stronger. The doors would be a little tricky. With vacuum you can make simple self sealing doors. I am guessing this is the reason vacuum was used. It is probably easier to build.

      Personally I would prefer a simple cable lift.

    2. Re:Does vacuum seem an odd choice? by lazlo · · Score: 1

      Actually, for the types of applications they're talking about, I think I'd prefer a hydraulic elevator. I'm guessing that there must be some sort of advantage to this vacuum system or else there'd be no market for it (although, there's little evidence that there actually is a market for it). Maybe there is some value to this system. Perhaps it's cheaper. Perhaps it's better in some way that I haven't yet discerned. Or, perhaps the investors in this company are just idiots. Whatever. I don't personally see the allure. And I 100% agree with the statements about being able to store overpressure in a tank. You can store vacuum in a tank, but the highest pressure differential you can possibly get is 15psi. So you'd need a really significantly larger tank to store the vacuum in.

      --
      Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?
    3. Re:Does vacuum seem an odd choice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You apparently need the assistace of a sick, twisted sense of humor. Vacuum is fail-safe. If it fails, you slowly sink or at most crash 20 feet down. 2500 psi catastrophically failing would make you a short term comet.

      Also it is easier to smoothly pull than to smoothly push. Try it with a pencil eraser.

    4. Re:Does vacuum seem an odd choice? by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      simple Hydraulic Elevators require a piston. 4 story elevator == 4 story piston. That means a 4 floor deep hole in the ground under your elevator. Not very easy to install.

    5. Re:Does vacuum seem an odd choice? by kd5ujz · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could store any noisy equipment inside the vacume, and take care of all the noise problems.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  71. Suffocation by gay358 · · Score: 1

    I wonder what happends if that elevator stucks for some reason with a person inside it. Will he have anough air to breath while waiting for somebody to let him out? And wouldn't it be easier to build a similar regular elevator (without counterweight if dimension of that elevator must remain small), but with more common technology and without need of air tightneds..

    1. Re:Suffocation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it will not have enough air to breath.

      It would have *lots* of air to breathe, though, if you think about it.

  72. Re:Failsafes - image links, etc by loraksus · · Score: 3, Informative

    A rather low resolution image is
    Here
    Probably a better example is Aloha Airlines flight 243, which looked a whole shitload worse.
    Check out the picture on page 2
    Only one fatality, which is kind of amazing if you look at the pictures (flight attendant blown out).

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  73. Space elevator problem solved!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    big-ass long plexiglass tube opened at top: sucked into space!!!

    I'll have to patent this idea before SCO does...

  74. Where's the video... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    No video. Now that sucks...

  75. Axphyxiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would not take long to use up all of the oxygen in that little cylinder. I hope there's good passive ventilation when it gets stuck.

  76. You cant dig down in florida! by apg88 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This company is from florida. As someone else stated before, a piston elevator would need a hole as deep as the elevator is high. When you are in florida, if you dig down, water comes out. This elevator is good for homes that cant dig for a pneumatic piston and cant have a huge pulley system to pull the elevator. They'll probably use it for two floor hotel suites and things like that.

    1. Re:You cant dig down in florida! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Erm... maybe im stating the obvious but.. a cable??

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:You cant dig down in florida! by Seigen · · Score: 1

      Hydraulic cylinders often come in 2 or 3 stages, so that you have one cylinder inside another inside another. Basically you get 3x the extension for a given length of cylinder. The max lift should be based on the cross sectional area of the smallest tube afaik. So I'd imagine for a 3 story elevator you would have to dig a little more than one story down. I suspect the pump, reservior, and the rest could all be set below the elevator. Assume you need to lift 1000# in total then Force = pressure * area = pressure * pi * r^2. Assume you limit the hydraulics to a reasonable 2500psi... 1000/ (2500*3.14) = r^2 r=.35 d=.714 You probably want a thicker cylinder to prevent warping though so assume 2 inches in diameter for the smallest part then you get 318psi required. For that matter if you let the cylinder size expand to be the size of the elevator (like the article), the pressure required continues to drop until it is quite small. Unfortunately, your going to require a lot more volume of whatever your using to move it..

  77. Is anyone else disappointed... by pintpusher · · Score: 1

    by how slow this thing is? The one at the bank really rips along, and for the money, I want a FUN ride!

    --
    man, I feel like mold.
  78. Hopefully the elevator is stronger than webserver by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    I hope that the elevator is engineered better than their web server.

    They're missing out on a lot of customers right now that are trying to research these things.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  79. Re:204Kg? Rules out some markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like a one-man elevator: anyone ruled out by the weight limit wouldn't fit in the thing anyways...

  80. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as I don't have any mod points right now.

  81. It happens. by raehl · · Score: 1

    I was at a mall once where a girl got a foot mangled. It's why the things have emergency stop buttons.

    Basically, there are two major points of failure: between the side of each stair and the escalator wall, and more likely, at the end of the escalator where the stair slides under the floor.

    It's possible for loose clothing (low hanging pant, shoe lace, etc) to get caught between the stair and housing, and pull in a limb. Another problem is small children who sit on th escalator and get things like drawstrings caught.

    But don't take my word on it, how about the Consumer Product Safety Commission?

  82. Did they plan this out? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    It seems like a really pointless bit of technology - i can understand that its main use is for places where you don't want to dig a shaft for a pneumatic lift and maybe don't have room for a motor on top and a counter weight, but this is just over the top! Ok so it has emergency breaks should the pressure fail, but cable lifts have always had very simple, very reliable locking mechanisms. If the door on an upper level is opened or its seal fails for some reason, the lift won't work. Seals like that don't last for ever. If the glass/plastic is broken for some reason you'll get a possibly hazardous implosion and if the roof of the cabin was to fail the person inside would suffer from explosive decompression. A simple motor and pulley is surely much more reliable and easier to maintain than a full scale vacume pump system? and as for control - well it didnt exactly look precise from that video, im not sure why the sucked-out air from the top was not fed into the bottom to make it a little more stable (it says the bottom is at atmospheric pressure, i guess it would mean building the tube to withstand low and high pressure. Making this lift any bigger (for more than 2 people) would seem like a big challenge, as would extending its range, so you have to ask the question: why would a lift company invest in a technology that was inherently restricted to a few floors and a couple of people (and barely a wheelchair)?? Why not take a cable lift and try and fit the whole package into something similar to this - they could keep the tube and have a fully circular counter-weight, which would look pretty cool. This technology doesn't seem to make sense unless you have a discount on turbines and plastic tubing, and clients who want to send non-wheelchair bound people up 2 floors one at a time...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Did they plan this out? by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do'h just realised if there was low pressure above and high pressure below, the passenger wouldn't be able to breath. Also, didn't lifts with hand doors die in the 50's? fitting a sliding door to that sucker doesn't sound like an easy task. So again, why the fuck would anyone want this?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  83. What advantages over simple design? by johansalk · · Score: 1

    I guess that's the main question.

    1. Re:What advantages over simple design? by andywww · · Score: 1

      A mechanical elevator is NOT a simple design. With counterweights, pulleys, electric motors, pneumatics... its a b**ch to maintain, costwise. If you know someone who owns a building, they'll probably tell you that an elevator is a massive headache that they could do without (if it wasn't required to fulfill Federal disabilities law). This is a simpler, cheaper, and more elegant solution by comparison- I imagine it wouldn't be hard to scale it up to fit a wheelchair, or cargo.

  84. hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet this thing really sucks...

    Was it me?>! Did i say it first?!

  85. your own medicine... by booyabazooka · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Starting a sentence with a conjunction, question without a question mark, and two periods.

    ... Using a sentence fragment.

    I agree with you, in this particular case. Although no one particularly cares about grammatical rules, which really are flexible, the article is just wrong. Breaks are very different from brakes, and dollars are not pounds. This isn't a small spelling/grammar issue, it's factual inaccuracy.

    1. Re:your own medicine... by booyabazooka · · Score: 1

      And I apologize for my comma splice, although I hope you'll understand my meaning anyway.

    2. Re:your own medicine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You either get it all right or STFU about anyone else. SIEG HEIL TO PROPER GRAMMAR!

  86. Re:firefox??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, fair is fair ...

    I didn't give you all the facts.

    When I tried to open the link in firefox i did get a service unavaible message, but if I used the magic "open in IE" plug in _on_the_same_link_, there was no problem at all to view the movie.

    Tristan.

  87. MOD PARENT UP by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the torrent

  88. Home page for more photos and videos... by antdude · · Score: 1

    It is here. Obviously, /. killed the server.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  89. It would be better if... by SpaceyWilly · · Score: 1

    ...you just stepped in and it sucked you up a floor, rather than having to stand in a casule. That would be impossible, but way cooler.

  90. Re:Good God.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I happen to talk to elevator techs all the time. About 3 catastrophic things have to happen at the exact same time for an elevator to fall: All 4 cables have to break, the emergency cable has to break, the brakes have to break, the emergency brakes have to break.

    The company I work for is currently getting sued because somebody said they fell 2 floors. This can't happen. The cables were still attached to the counterweight so they would have pulled the elevator up through the roof in case of motor and brake failure. You can't fall, you can only crash through the roof like Willy fucking Wonka. The judge just threw his complaint out.

  91. Re:Failsafes - image links, etc by jmichaelg · · Score: 1
    What's left of the Aloha Airlines plane is stored at Mojave Airport where Scaled Composites is sited. It's a boneyard for planes and to pass the time while we waited for the second SpaceShipOne flight, we were scoping out the various planes that were parked across the runway. It was tucked away next to a 747 so you either had to be very sharp eyed or had to look for it to spot it. The entire plane was there, it wasn't chopped into chunks.

    Now the question is, who had the cajones to fly the plane from Hawaii to Mojave? Safely landing the plane after the roof peeled off is one thing. It's quite another to get into an airplane whose fuselage has partially peeled away and fly it several thousand miles. Especially if most of the flight is over water. That took big brass ones in my book.

  92. Possible correction by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    The article the grandparent references states that the plane was dismantled in Hawaii. Looking at the plane on the Mojave tarmac from about 1/2 a mile away, the plane looked intact - wings, fuselage etc. Perhaps someone who has seen the plane closer than that could comment.

    1. Re:Possible correction by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      There was a dramatisation of Fligth 243 filmed but as far as I know never shown, funnily enough it was filmed at Mojave. Guess you saw the dumped plane used for the ground scenes. Ever wondered how they moved the aircraft from Hawaii to Mojave intact otherwise?

    2. Re:Possible correction by loraksus · · Score: 1

      I'd guess they just blew up a similar plane / cut into the fuselage for the movie. Either that or broke it up to fit into shipping containers and shipped it. It might of have just been cheaper to use one of the other planes in the boneyard.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    3. Re:Possible correction by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      That was my point :) They took a 'dead' aircraft, painted it and damaged it on site for filming. For example, Lost used a L-1011 aircraft for the wreckage but the plane in the story was a 777, and they thought noone would notice the difference :)

  93. Aaaaaaaaah by Solokron · · Score: 1

    So much for the top exit door. Pfffffffffffffoooomp!

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  94. Let me see if I have this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are marketing an elevator with a max lift capacity of 450lbs that is too narrow for wheelchairs or someone holding a largee package, a baby or a pet, and that has a maximum lift of 32 feet if installed at sea level.
    What an absolutly useless device!

    1. Re:Let me see if I have this straight by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      How did you arrive at 32 feet? I believe you're confusing this with sucking up a column water (ie a water pump at the top of the piping). Scroll up a few posts and you'll see someone posted the relavent equations to calculate max lift which is really just pressure differential x area.

  95. elevator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or does that elevator resemble a bonge?

  96. Not handicapped accessible and other problems by whitis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This elevator looks too small to accomodate a wheel chair. So, the only people who can use it are those who don't need it.

    For the price of this elevator, you could install a full size elevator. I have used one elevator that I am told cost $30,000 to install and that included boring a vertical shaft and horizontal tunnel through the side of a mountain. For considerably less cost, you could build a single person elevator.

    They claim that the elevator saves energy because it uses gravity on the descent. What they don't tell you is that it uses more than twice as much energy on the way up as a similarly sized elevator using the conventional counterweight design. A counterweight elevator only has to raise the weight of the occupants since the weight of the car is balanced out by the counterweight. Indeed, the counterweight might be as much as the weight of the car plus maximum occupancy load, in which case the elevator needs to use power to lower the car and only needs to release the brakes and overcome friction to raise. Futher, the inefficency of the vacuum pump could be considerable.

    A hydraulic elevator of the size shown could also have been constructed using a cable or chain over a piston that travels half the distance as the elevator car (same design as used on many forklifts). This would be simpler, more reliable, and avoid the dynamic load problem described below. The design could be as compact and "portable" as the vacuum elevator.

    Vacuum induced lift is a constant force rather than constant displacement technology. This is a very serious problem. When you step off the car, you can expect it to spring upwards. They probably hide this serious problem by making an elevator that can only serve two floors. At the top floor, you drive into a hard stop. At the bottom floor, you do not allow the door to open until the vacuum cylinder is fully vented. On a multifloor design, you could have a mechanical lock that engages before the door opens but then when the lock released there would be a sudden jolt if the passenger was not the same weight as the previous passenger (if any).

    The large seals required and the fact that they must operate past doorways (unlike a hydraulic lift) will lead to significant maintenence problems.

    This product looks to be pure gimmick. The technology used and other aspects of the design are totally inappropriate to the task.

  97. telescopic cylinders by Bishop · · Score: 1

    No problem: telescopic cylinders to the rescue.

    1. Re:telescopic cylinders by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      You just increased the cost of production by a factor of 2, at least. Do you have any idea how expensive the telescoping cylinder in, for example, a cable truck boom is? And that is just for ~20 feet extension. 4 floors would require double that.

    2. Re:telescopic cylinders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, somehow, they're installed in my (4-floor) office building. Funny, that.

  98. Re:firefox??? by xbmodder · · Score: 1

    hey.
    In the windows version of firefox: firefox displays the file as a text. A windows glitch :). It calls the operating system to determine what program it should use to open the file. None returns. It b0rks

  99. Fat Ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the low tech solution: get off you fat ass and take the stairs?

  100. old news by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 1

    This is old news. My checks and deposit slips use this same sort of elevator all the time. Just be sure to ask the homeowner before sending coin.

  101. 204kg? by ajft · · Score: 1

    204kg, that's.... hmmm, about one american isn't it?