Shouldn't the people who polluted the river bear some of the blame?
But of course, someone made fucking boatloads of money back in the day. That is untouchable. But boy, the victims of that activity, why they're stupid and deserve what they get!
I think in the future we should just declare large corporations and wealthy people to be gods, and gratefully drink the urine as a demonstration of how they deserve absolute, permanent and infinite immunity from their wrongdoing. Indeed, we should make it an executable offence to even suggest that a large corporate interest ever did anything wrong. People should have their organs cut out for daring to attack commercial interests, and, of course, all environmentalists should be burned alive. America is for the super rich, and everyone else can go get fucked.
What is even more amazing is that her rivals are such a pack of unadulterated morons that they won't even take a cursory look at her dismal time overseeing HP's most severe decline.
You are, I trust familiar with her dismal record at HP, which left the company and tatters. How anyone thinks this moron is fit to run a lemon aid stand, let alone a company or country, is beyond me.
It does demonstrate just how detached from what any given company does your average CEO is.
And you believe your first world life is somehow immune? What happens in the next half century as the North American rainbelt shifts northward into Canada, aquifers that are keeping parts of the Midwest arable becoming toxic from salt or disappear outright?
There seems the bizarre idea that only the developing world is badly at risk if the wrong choice is made. Considering that vast swathes of the First World's population live near sea level, I'd say no one is immune.
Care to cite where global temperatures were 3 to 7 degrees warmer during the Medieval WArming Period. Go on, I openly challenge you. Provide a citation.
Except this isn't "nature", this is due directly to massive barfing out of carbon through the use of fossil fuels.
Why are your type so opposed to ending the use of fossil fuels? It's almost as if you've decided that fucking over future generations is a perfectly reasonable thing to do, because you're too selfish to absorb some of that cost now.
Because the only thing that ever counts is your freedom. Other peoples' freedom from being shot, well fuck them, they're not as important as little ol' you.
All that counts is that data should be cherry picked. US anti-gun control advocates, like cigarette companies, AGW pseudo-skeptics and a whole host of other pseudo-scientific types don't want science. They simply want a big book that says "Nothing Can Challenge My Beliefs".
The universe doesn't give a fuck about your psuedo-skepticism. CO2 traps solar energy. Period. That isn't even the least bit controversial. That you're too stupid and infantile, and frankly just plain cowardly, to admit that vomiting hundreds of millions of years worth of sequestered carbon into the atmosphere in the space of three centuries is irrelevant to the effects of such actions. You can hide your head in the sand, imagine that it's a grand conspiracy, but it's irrelevant. The laws of nature don't give a fuck about you, your ideology, your shortsightedness or stupidity. The universe doesn't owe you or the global economy even the tiniest favor.
Because allowing warming to continue until rain belts are seriously altered isn't going to lead to mass starvation, wars, migrations, and yes, lots of fucking death.
CO2 traps energy in the lower atmosphere, and it interacts with seawater to alter the ocean's pH levels. The more we puke out, the worse both these things get. This isn't even controversial, no matter how many Koch talking points you spew. Using fossil fuels is just plain bad for everyone.
Then how do you explain the jaw dropping stupidity of these people? Have they all suffered some sort of collective head trauma? Is there some chemical in the water supply? Because, let's face it, these people are simpering morons.
I disagree. Manos is probably the very best MST3K episode ever made, precisely because Manos was not only an outrageously bad film, but a rather disturbing film as well.
The laws of nature don't give a flying fuck about Congress or what the average American thinks. What Congress or American citizens think about AGW is utterly fucking irrelevant. The universe does not care about your pathetic political ideology, and the fact that you think it does shows what a fucking moron you truly are.
These are accounted for as background sources. You are a fucking moron.
Re:Meanwhile, still no global warming in last 19yr
on
Paris Climate Deal Adopted
·
· Score: 1, Flamebait
No the data does not show that. This is nothing more than a lie by evil men and adopted by simpering retards like you. The data shows the exact opposite, and the fact that the only cites you can produce are immoral and evil denier sites and that champion of Christopher Booker's vile pseudoscience shows you to either be a waste of oxygen and pathetic halfwit, or a monster .
Oh fucking jesus. If we move to alternatives and create more carbon sinks, we'll largely stop CO2 emissions. Quit trying to shove your personal obsession into the mix.
So, they plan to combine two competing companies into one and then divide into three non-competing companies and they expect this to satisfy regulators? Are the regulators that corrupt?
If I was in charge, the moment a senior level of a police or security service made such an utterance in public, he'd immediately fired and permanently blacklisted.
Slashdot Mirror
So where did the carcinogens come from?
I suppose you're next going to assert that trihalomethanes are coming from springwater...
How much does being a sociopathic shill pay these days?
And once again we see how apologist for corporate excess want to blame everyone but the companies themselves.
It's fucking Michigan. Do you seriously think the Flint River has those levels of lead as a natural effect?
Shouldn't the people who polluted the river bear some of the blame?
But of course, someone made fucking boatloads of money back in the day. That is untouchable. But boy, the victims of that activity, why they're stupid and deserve what they get!
I think in the future we should just declare large corporations and wealthy people to be gods, and gratefully drink the urine as a demonstration of how they deserve absolute, permanent and infinite immunity from their wrongdoing. Indeed, we should make it an executable offence to even suggest that a large corporate interest ever did anything wrong. People should have their organs cut out for daring to attack commercial interests, and, of course, all environmentalists should be burned alive. America is for the super rich, and everyone else can go get fucked.
What is even more amazing is that her rivals are such a pack of unadulterated morons that they won't even take a cursory look at her dismal time overseeing HP's most severe decline.
You are, I trust familiar with her dismal record at HP, which left the company and tatters. How anyone thinks this moron is fit to run a lemon aid stand, let alone a company or country, is beyond me.
It does demonstrate just how detached from what any given company does your average CEO is.
And you believe your first world life is somehow immune? What happens in the next half century as the North American rainbelt shifts northward into Canada, aquifers that are keeping parts of the Midwest arable becoming toxic from salt or disappear outright?
There seems the bizarre idea that only the developing world is badly at risk if the wrong choice is made. Considering that vast swathes of the First World's population live near sea level, I'd say no one is immune.
Care to cite where global temperatures were 3 to 7 degrees warmer during the Medieval WArming Period. Go on, I openly challenge you. Provide a citation.
Except this isn't "nature", this is due directly to massive barfing out of carbon through the use of fossil fuels.
Why are your type so opposed to ending the use of fossil fuels? It's almost as if you've decided that fucking over future generations is a perfectly reasonable thing to do, because you're too selfish to absorb some of that cost now.
Because the only thing that ever counts is your freedom. Other peoples' freedom from being shot, well fuck them, they're not as important as little ol' you.
All that counts is that data should be cherry picked. US anti-gun control advocates, like cigarette companies, AGW pseudo-skeptics and a whole host of other pseudo-scientific types don't want science. They simply want a big book that says "Nothing Can Challenge My Beliefs".
The universe doesn't give a fuck about your psuedo-skepticism. CO2 traps solar energy. Period. That isn't even the least bit controversial. That you're too stupid and infantile, and frankly just plain cowardly, to admit that vomiting hundreds of millions of years worth of sequestered carbon into the atmosphere in the space of three centuries is irrelevant to the effects of such actions. You can hide your head in the sand, imagine that it's a grand conspiracy, but it's irrelevant. The laws of nature don't give a fuck about you, your ideology, your shortsightedness or stupidity. The universe doesn't owe you or the global economy even the tiniest favor.
Because allowing warming to continue until rain belts are seriously altered isn't going to lead to mass starvation, wars, migrations, and yes, lots of fucking death.
CO2 traps energy in the lower atmosphere, and it interacts with seawater to alter the ocean's pH levels. The more we puke out, the worse both these things get. This isn't even controversial, no matter how many Koch talking points you spew. Using fossil fuels is just plain bad for everyone.
Then how do you explain the jaw dropping stupidity of these people? Have they all suffered some sort of collective head trauma? Is there some chemical in the water supply? Because, let's face it, these people are simpering morons.
I disagree. Manos is probably the very best MST3K episode ever made, precisely because Manos was not only an outrageously bad film, but a rather disturbing film as well.
It's sad that I agree that those who accept science will be outbred by fucking morons like yourself.
The laws of nature don't give a flying fuck about Congress or what the average American thinks. What Congress or American citizens think about AGW is utterly fucking irrelevant. The universe does not care about your pathetic political ideology, and the fact that you think it does shows what a fucking moron you truly are.
Do you think the procession of the Moon has a significant effect on warming? ARe you a fucking retard as well?
These are accounted for as background sources. You are a fucking moron.
No the data does not show that. This is nothing more than a lie by evil men and adopted by simpering retards like you. The data shows the exact opposite, and the fact that the only cites you can produce are immoral and evil denier sites and that champion of Christopher Booker's vile pseudoscience shows you to either be a waste of oxygen and pathetic halfwit, or a monster .
Oh fucking jesus. If we move to alternatives and create more carbon sinks, we'll largely stop CO2 emissions. Quit trying to shove your personal obsession into the mix.
So, they plan to combine two competing companies into one and then divide into three non-competing companies and they expect this to satisfy regulators? Are the regulators that corrupt?
That's a rhetorical question, right?
Not to worry. The problem is being solved by Gigster. Soon you'll be working for a couple of bucks an hour, you know, because "sharing".
If I was in charge, the moment a senior level of a police or security service made such an utterance in public, he'd immediately fired and permanently blacklisted.