Slashdot Mirror


User: Kagura

Kagura's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,473
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,473

  1. Re:Tux? on The Geekiest Animals in History · · Score: 1

    What have you done to Butters?!

  2. Re:What part of on Government Has a Right to Read Your Email? · · Score: 1

    No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in the Public Domain don't you understand?
    Like it or not, the Internet was built by the Federal Government- and it very much is the public domain.


    Like it or not, free speech was established by the Federal Government- (sic) and it very much is the public domain. Watch what you say in public and private, because you wouldn't even have that liberty if it weren't for the Federal Government.

  3. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. on Rotating Solar-Powered Skyscraper · · Score: 1

    You show thanks to somebody who gives you insight into a world you will never know with THAT response? Don't be so rude, just because it's the internet and the other person is just one of millions.

  4. Re:wii weather on Wii Weather Channel Up, Browser Coming · · Score: 1

    Only if you're superman.

  5. Re:Slashdot got a green light? on World's Largest Wind Farm Gets Green Light · · Score: 1, Funny

    Won't somebody please think of the birds!

  6. Re:Yeah .. hilarious on BBC Uses Skype Links In Murder Hunt · · Score: 1

    Exactly. There's no reason to kill hookers anyway, because most of them are already dead inside.

  7. Re:Or translated into "Reality" instead of "Spin" on White House Clamps Down On USGS Publishing · · Score: 1

    That's strange, my spin meter just went through the roof after I ran your post through it! Maybe I need to recalibrate it again... :)

  8. Re:Game Theory on The Many and Varied Games We Play · · Score: 1

    Funny that you don't mention Eve Online. I think some posters may disagree with me, but many more will agree that it is a worthwhile MMORPG.

  9. Re:Are we along a question? on New Mars Discoveries · · Score: 1

    the size of the galaxy is irrelevant, we've only "listened to" a sphere 200 light years in diameter

    Actually, we've only been transmitting a sphere 200 light years in diameter, but we've been receiving a sphere that is, as-the-photon-flies, 13.7-times-two light years in diameter, at various points in the history of the universe. (This page about the Observable Universe talks about some values for the diameter of the universe, but it is irrelevant whether my use of 200 light years and the size of the universe are exactly correct.)

  10. Re:Are we along a question? on New Mars Discoveries · · Score: 1

    The wikipedia article on the Fermi Paradox is an interesting read, and talks exactly about what I can't as elequently put.

    There are some other great, related pages on space exploration and some possibilities that apparently should have arisen in the time that the Milky Way and complex elements existed:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann_probe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bracewell_probe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_colonization

  11. Re:Are we along a question? on New Mars Discoveries · · Score: 1

    That's exactly the point. If life is so relatively prevalent, where is it and why haven't we gained any evidence?

  12. Re:Are we along a question? on New Mars Discoveries · · Score: 1

    The galaxy is only 100,000 light years wide, and has existed for billions of years. We've only been listening for 100 years, but where are they? Why haven't we been found? Why haven't we found them?

    Deep down, I also believe there are other intelligent lifeforms in the universe. But if they're really so prevalent in the billions of stars that make up the Milky Way, why don't we have any proof?

  13. Re:Batshit Insane on Bruce Sterling's Final Prediction · · Score: 1

    If you guys laughed at the grandparent's post, I think you ought to give it a +1 Underrated or a +1 Insightful to boost his karma, instead of marking it +1 Funny. He doesn't deserve the crappy moderation that's been put on him for that post.

  14. No need for DARPA on DARPA Challenge Prize Money Restored · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just hit the cruise control, and go to sleep! It's a less expensive, and a whole lot more fun!

  15. Re:correct me if I'm wrong... on 'Killer' Network Card Actually Reduces Latency · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow, Baxtered! You must really feel strongly about this product to have registered today and made this your very first post!

    What a load of BS. Be on the look-out for people pushing their stupid marketing into Slashdot's comment system. Unfortunately, with such a large userbase, it's nothing new here at the good ol' /.

  16. Is it just me... on Even The Blind Get Deja Vu · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...or have I seen this article before?

  17. Re:Don't fly. on DHS Passenger Scoring Almost Certainly Illegal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The previous post was likely posted AC because the actual poster doesn't actually refuse to travel by plane. Rather, he hopes to convey a message that there are people that think this way, because he is not strong enough to send such a message himself.

  18. Re:It has to be said on Pyramid Stones Were Poured, Not Quarried · · Score: 1

    What if they poured the concrete on the ground, and then carried it up the side of the Pyramids? Didn't think about that possibility, did you?

  19. Re:I'm embarassed to ask, but-- on Stephen Hawking Receives Copley Medal · · Score: 2, Insightful
  20. Re:The Good Kind of Sanctions on US Bans Sales of iPods To North Korea · · Score: 1

    "gigawatt" is actually pronounced "jiggawatt". At least, that was its pronunciation before its term rose into common speech. I'm so informative!

    *And that's not to be confused with "Jigga, what?" I'm so clever!

  21. Re:Is it safe? Is it easy? on Newt Gingrich Says Free Speech May Be Forfeit · · Score: 1

    I like to think that, job bless, one out of four just keeps on tickin'!

  22. Re:Don't be silly on Army Game Proves U.S. Can't Lose · · Score: 1

    If you think I'm joking, U.S. citizens would demand this happen. I know I would get on the bombs and ride them down yelling "YEEEHAAA!". My friends would be shooting Coke machines. And my wife would play both the president and the mad scientist.

    Ahaha! This is a very funny line... at least mark him "underrated" to offset his karma against anybody who thinks his statement is a silly troll. :)

  23. Re:Ask Slashdot: I am a spineless wimp on How Do Developers Handle Moral Dilemmas? · · Score: 1

    Rather than killing innocent families in an effort to kill a small number of people our government says are bad, you are helping limit the casualties as much as possible through extremely accurate missiles. This means less explosives are required to effectively kill the bad guys(tm) as opposed to dumb bombs and dumb missiles. Make no mistake, our government will continue to try to kill the people it deems bad. The work you do goes towards lowering the threshold of acceptable collateral deaths, which is good for the residents of those nations we invade.

    This is message is a little frank, and is as politically neutral as my subjective mind could make it. Make no mistake, you are saving lives that would otherwise needlessly be destroyed, and helping the image of your country a little at the same time through those lives you save.

  24. Re:Think outside the xbox. on The Last Games You'd Play? · · Score: 1

    Learning Go takes 15 minutes. Mastering it takes far longer than one's lifetime. Visit this interactive site to learn Go if you are interested. A great place to play at is Kiseido Go Server, known for its great software and friendly userbase. Click "Play Go Now" to open up an external applet through your browser, or navigate through the site to download and install the client on your computer.

  25. Re:Think outside the xbox. on The Last Games You'd Play? · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's part of the road to mastery. Actually learning how to play the game is very easy. Here is an interactive site for learning Go that everybody who has come into contact with swears by.

    All you need to do to get better in Go is to play more games. A large part of its allure is that playing more games increases your strength, starting from the very first game you play right up until you've played for 60 or 70 years straight. You always get stronger at Go with each passing game, and even this generation's top professionals are much stronger than last generation's.

    (To respond to the two examples the parent gave above: As far as learning when regions are alive and dead, you should learn as part of your initial instruction into the rules exactly what makes a group alive or dead. A group with at least two 'eyes' is alive. Although you will know that definition, it takes a reasonable number of games for that to be internalized, as do many of its other niceties.

    And as far as knowing when the game is over, that is something else that takes time to fully grasp. Within two months of playing, you will probably be able to say for certain, without any outside help, when the game is over. Of course that statement is a bit simplified, as lower-ranked players will miss certain plays that could gain them some points in the end-game, but the point is that true beginners often feel like they do not know when the game should be ended, whereas somebody who has play for one to two months semi-regularly would have a very good idea when to end it.)