Slashdot Mirror


Rotating Solar-Powered Skyscraper

PieEye writes "Wired is pointing out a recent Gear Factor blog entry that highlights a new skyscraper in the works which will be solar-powered, and what's more will rotate with the sun. From the article: 'The completed tower will offer 200 expensive apartments for people who want to spend lots of money to screw up their circadian rhythm. Singh said they want to build many more such towers, with one for every time zone.'"

267 comments

  1. Great by afaik_ianal · · Score: 5, Informative

    So now I can get home from work an hour early and can catch my neighbour's wife having an affair.

    But seriously: How exactly is a rotating building meant to mess up one's circadian rhythm? Does the blogger think this building is rigged up to do a lap of the Earth each day? It's spinning on the spot!

    Finally, why link to a crappy blog entry complete with typos and irrelevant BS, when you could link directly to the article?

    1. Re:Great by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Funny
      So now I can get home from work an hour early and can catch my neighbour's wife having an affair.
      No need to leave your desk. If your workplace is like mine, they probably have a deal with some internet company which regularly sends me photos of my nextdoor neighbour and her antics per email. Don't know the name of the company, but I think it's foreign or something because most of the other words they write in those emails look like gibberish to me.
  2. solar apartments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How enlightening.

  3. Perpetual Shadow by maglor_83 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Give me an apartment in perpetual shadow. No more glare on the TV!

    1. Re:Perpetual Shadow by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gimme an apartment on the opposite side. I'll grow teh pot, and go smoke it with you while playing video games on your giant flatscreen HDTV

    2. Re:Perpetual Shadow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Give me an apartment in perpetual shadow. No more glare on the TV!


      How about curtains?

    3. Re:Perpetual Shadow by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Perpetual shadow is going to be on the North or South side of the building. Depending on your hemisphere.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    4. Re:Perpetual Shadow by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Is marijuana worth enough to make it profitable to run a grow-op in one of these (and use the proceeds to pay the rent)?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Perpetual Shadow by Surt · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.californiareport.org/domains/california report/
      http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/ 2003482836_marijuana18.html

      Yes.

      With a lowball estimate of $1600/pound, presumably you'd need only grow something like 5 pounds per month to cover your rent and utilities and whatnot.

      The problem of course, is that if the windows are see-through for maximum sunlight, you have issues with the police/neighbors being able to notice.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    6. Re:Perpetual Shadow by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mostly asked as a joke, but thanks anyway!

      The problem of course, is that if the windows are see-through for maximum sunlight, you have issues with the police/neighbors being able to notice.

      Only police in a helicopter, if you're on one of the upper floors.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Perpetual Shadow by Mawbid · · Score: 1
      So you'd think, but the article says the building will revolve once per 7 days.

      It seems to me that a week is not a good period either. Who's going to want to live on weekends-dark section?

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
    8. Re:Perpetual Shadow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you get a search warrant for a place that doesnt stop moving?

    9. Re:Perpetual Shadow by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      The problem of course, is that if the windows are see-through for maximum sunlight, you have issues with the police/neighbors being able to notice.

      Don't worry, the neighbors will notice the smell well before that.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    10. Re:Perpetual Shadow by SAN1701 · · Score: 1

      It's called basement. It's usually pretty inexpensive.

    11. Re:Perpetual Shadow by Kuscheltier · · Score: 1

      Well, if you are lucky and plant the grows faster than is healthy for you, a single one can produce about 5-10 kilos within two years.
      Such an amount would even get you to prison if it were tobacco (taxes). Certainly not safe for personal use^^

    12. Re:Perpetual Shadow by x2A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Who's going to want to live on weekends-dark section?"

      Sounds good to me, after a long party and not getting to bed until early hours of the... afternoon, the sun can be damn annoying :-)

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    13. Re:Perpetual Shadow by 3rd_Floo · · Score: 1

      De basement can make it very inexpensive over time!

    14. Re:Perpetual Shadow by mspohr · · Score: 1

      News item yesterday estimated that the total value of the marijuana crop in the USA was more than corn and wheat combined... about $30 billion. It's a major industry. California's share (having a good climate for agriculture) is $13 billion.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    15. Re:Perpetual Shadow by silentounce · · Score: 1

      This should solve the pricing argument. If anyone knows, it's probably NORML.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    16. Re:Perpetual Shadow by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1

      Using the address?

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
    17. Re:Perpetual Shadow by Dabido · · Score: 1

      'Only police in a helicopter, if you're on one of the upper floors.'

      Or Spiderman, or the A-Team ... :-)

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  4. for cheapskates only by Schlemphfer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Rotating skyscapers, for the sake of capturing more sunlight, is so plebian and low-tech. The truly rich build skyscrapers that revolve around the earth, so they're constantly in sunlight.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:for cheapskates only by Duhavid · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thats called a satellite.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    2. Re:for cheapskates only by bahstid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I get the feeling that you are going to be the first of a long line of people missing the point, so I thought I'd jump in here... As I understand it, the tower doesn't rotate in order to get more sunlight; it rotates because rotating a building is a cool thing to do. Constantly changing views and all that...

      The solar power part is a way to do this without condeming the tennants to a lifetime of mad energy bills.

    3. Re:for cheapskates only by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Heh... you kid, but Kim Stanley Robinson already wrote about that in his Mars trilogy. The last book also contains catgirl sex.

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    4. Re:for cheapskates only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The truly rich build skyscrapers that revolve around the earth, so they're constantly in sunlight. No, the truly rich build skyscrapers such that Earth revolves around them.
    5. Re:for cheapskates only by Burdell · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Hah, the TRULY rich build a building with sufficient mass such that the Earth revolves around the building!

    6. Re:for cheapskates only by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Funny
      Hah, the TRULY rich build a building with sufficient mass such that the Earth revolves around the building!


      Eh. This wouldn't be entirely necessary, as the elite classes of the world are already under the impression that the earth revolves around them.
      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    7. Re:for cheapskates only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the truly rich build skyscrapers such that Earth revolves around them. You mean, like in Soviet Russia?
    8. Re:for cheapskates only by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, the truly rich build skyscrapers such that Earth revolves around them.

      The truely rich would never even conceive of that, since the universe already does.

      KFG

    9. Re:for cheapskates only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last book also contains catgirl sex.

      Now I finally have a reason to read those books.

    10. Re:for cheapskates only by banuk · · Score: 1

      oh like the republic of cowboy neal

    11. Re:for cheapskates only by Grave · · Score: 1

      No, the truly rich make the Sun revolve around their skyscraper.

    12. Re:for cheapskates only by Khmer+Luge · · Score: 0

      The truly rich I've noticed lately are the ones who build skyscrapers intended for the Sun to revolve around.

    13. Re:for cheapskates only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which it actually does, since people in general are incredibly impressed with people that win or inherit fame and/or fortune.

    14. Re:for cheapskates only by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
      The truly rich build skyscrapers that revolve around the earth, so they're constantly in sunlight.

      I have skyscrapper, that stays on north pole or south pole, depending upon where sunlight is. For that you do not need skyscrappers that revolve around the earth.

    15. Re:for cheapskates only by Sigg3.net · · Score: 0

      This opens up for new and previously unheard of possibilities in terms of peeping.

    16. Re:for cheapskates only by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      It's the Meliocentric model.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    17. Re:for cheapskates only by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1
      it rotates because rotating a building is a cool thing to do.

      I dunno. A whirling dervish spins around a lot too, but most of what he sees is other whirling dervishes.

      s/whirling dervish/skyscrapers

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    18. Re:for cheapskates only by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1
      The solar power part is a way to do this without condeming the tennants to a lifetime of mad energy bills.

      Actually, according to the link provided in the article (I'll have to give up my Slashdot license for that one: reading TFA^2!), the energy used to turn the building is rather small:
      ... rotating an 80,000 tonne tower through 360 degrees over a seven day period ... state of the art bearing systems at several points in the tower will allow a power plant to rotate the base of the tower at 5mm per second using only 21 electic kettles' worth of solar power.

      Wow, a new unit of measurement! So new, apparently, that Google hasn't added it: no conversion factor for 21 electric kettles in watts or 21 electric kettles in joules. Cutting edge tech, I love it!
      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    19. Re:for cheapskates only by smithmc · · Score: 1

        The solar power part is a way to do this without condeming the tennants to a lifetime of mad energy bills.

      Well, the article says that the rotation will only require the power of "20 electric kettles" or something (how many Libraries of Congress is that?) and I'd presume the people living in this building will be insanely wealthy, so...

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    20. Re:for cheapskates only by lleffler · · Score: 1

      They are using wireless water and sewer technology. Don't you know anything...

    21. Re:for cheapskates only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The solar power part is a way to do this without condeming the tennants to a lifetime of mad energy bills.

      Not really. Using a mix of standard and journalism units, assume 1 kW per electric kettle x 21 kettles/tower and $0.15/kW-hr. Thus, the combined per day cost of electricity among all the residents of the tower is $75 for this feature. Less than a $1 a day to have your tower spin. Although yes, the point of the spin is so you can say you live in a spinning tower. Of course, the brilliant tenants who are willing to pay through the nose for a room in said spinning tower might be reluctant to actually cook anything with own kettles for fear of slowing down the rotation and causing the local Starbucks to fall out of its towercentric orbit.

      The solar panels are just a feel good move, although perhaps they've fit in enough to account for a noteworthy portion (>1%) of the tower's electrical consumption.

      If they really wanted to be cool, they'd make a complex of such towers that function as a giant Antikythera mechanism.

  5. One for every timezone, eh? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am sure downtown Nome, Alaska would absolutely LOVE a 50 story skyscraper next to the General Store.

    1. Re:One for every timezone, eh? by Torvaun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but just think. It wouldn't need to rotate. And for a more serious question, do the solar panels actually provide enough power to do this, or are they just going for the gimmick?

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    2. Re:One for every timezone, eh? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. I think a "city" with enough of a sense of humor to name itself after a typo would get a giggle out of a 50 foot skyscraper that rotates to follow the sun; where right now the Sun can't quite make it up by noon and rushes to be down again before four.

      KFG

  6. I am the only one ... by goodtim · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... who thinks that building is ugly as hell?

    --
    "Flee at once, all is discovered."
    1. Re:I am the only one ... by ricree · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come on, this is Slashdot. You're the only one who's even read the article.

    2. Re:I am the only one ... by daeg · · Score: 1

      Was it the phallic shape or the piss color that turned you off more?

      I think for maximum effect they should build two miniature Epcots at the base.

    3. Re:I am the only one ... by reset_button · · Score: 1
      Was it the phallic shape or the piss color that turned you off more?
      Put down your deposit today and get a free brown Zune!
    4. Re:I am the only one ... by MrAnnoyanceToYou · · Score: 3, Funny

      I read Slashdot for the pictures. And that's a picture of one ugly building.

    5. Re:I am the only one ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another Dubai monstrosity to make you want to claw your eyes out..

      Dubai is also building a snow globe where you can own a villa in perpetual snow, except for when the power is out then you're living in a sauna. But the funniest thing was they wanted the globe base to be on a tilted rotating disk so that you could always ski downhill and never have to stop and get on a lift. Then someone pointed out that the magnets needed to drive this sucker would wipe any electrical device within the globe (and probably around it).

      he he he, them crazy Arabs. An even CRAZIER idea would be to ask them to drop the price of oil so you can eat this week. OH! they'll laugh and they'll laugh and laugh...

      For those of you who think the rent will be too high in this sucker, come and look at the rents in Dubai now! But thats ok, Dubai will soon be a ghost town then rents will be really small.

      I wonder how many Indian labourers will die on this new project...

    6. Re:I am the only one ... by Ozan · · Score: 1
      I am the only one who thinks that building is ugly as hell?


      This apparently is one trait of arab (and other) cultures. Buildings are not designed to express their owner's taste or sense of aesthetics or efficiency, they are designed to express their owner's power, financial or political.
  7. Energy cost? by Kamineko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With any luck, the power generated by this scheme will almost offset the energy cost of the rotation...

    1. Re:Energy cost? by afaik_ianal · · Score: 3, Informative
      That's the point. It is meant to rotate on the energy it captures. It's not meant to be a particularly "green" solution - they're just trying not to be completely anti-green.

      FTFA:

      Project engineers say the Dh400 million Time Residences tower in the City of Arabia master development will turn through 360 degrees, its rotation mechanism driven by stored solar energy.
    2. Re:Energy cost? by xeus4200 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with what I believe Kamineko is hinting at... First of all, if the rotation of a skyscraper can be powered simply by the light it collects, then bravo. Skyscrapers have a LOT of mass that needs to be moved, and the idea of the skyscraper is to cram as much into as small a space as possible. So, to pack that much structure into such a small space, and use that space's received solar energy to move it is quite an engineering feat. Of course, using the energy to say... power most of the skyscraper would rate a higher achievement in my book than a silly rotational table.

    3. Re:Energy cost? by aduthie · · Score: 1

      The original article (not the blog linked to by Slashdot) states that "state of the art bearing systems at several points in the tower will allow a power plant to rotate the base of the tower at 5mm per second using only 21 electic kettles' worth of solar power."

      I don't have an electric tea kettle handy to measure, but I don't see this as a huge waste of energy, especially when its collecting its own energy.

      And for reference, if 5mm/second is at the outer edge of the tower, and 5mm/second is only one rotation per day, then the tower is about 138 meters in diameter. (If it really only rotates once a week like the original article says... Then something doesn't add up.)

    4. Re:Energy cost? by Pingla · · Score: 1

      When first looking at the article one would think the energy captured/generated would be used for something useful. But it is just a total waste, only potentially leading to dizziness! How about providing the tenants with a portion of 'free' energy instead?

    5. Re:Energy cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of conservation of angular momentum no energy (actually power) is needed to keep a skyscraper spinning. You only need to combat friction (which can be pretty low with a good bearing system).

    6. Re:Energy cost? by afaik_ianal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since they're probably paying for this with the west's propensity to guzzle oil, I don't think it's for us to tell them how to use or where to get their energy.

      If we were all driving around in solar powered cars, I doubt the concept would even be considered.

    7. Re:Energy cost? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Because it's not what you say that matters, but who you are!

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
  8. wait a sec... by David_Shultz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't you hate that time of day when the sun is shining right into your apartment/living room, and putting glare on your monitor/tv? Isn't this going to be a problem for those apartments facing the sun (and turning along with it)?

    1. Re:wait a sec... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read the article, you'll find it completes a rotation in a week, not a single day. As such, the building does not track the sun, and no part of it will be in this situation.

    2. Re:wait a sec... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Don't you hate that time of day when the sun is shining right into your apartment/living room, and putting glare on your monitor/tv? Isn't this going to be a problem for those apartments facing the sun (and turning along with it)?

      Yes, yes... curtains are so analog.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:wait a sec... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      If I were gonna live in a fancy rotating building, I'd want electrochromic windows!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:wait a sec... by David_Shultz · · Score: 1

      I guess I read it wrong. That's a much better system.

  9. Clearly... by Duncan3 · · Score: 0

    ... your SUV is using too much oil, stop driving.

    The oil barons have obviously run out of ways to spend your money.

    Good grief. And this isn't even a wild idea compared to what they have already built.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:Clearly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should know that oil revenue accounts for only 6% of Dubai's GDP.

    2. Re:Clearly... by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      But oil is who is buying these insane places.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    3. Re:Clearly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol very true... u could drive one of these http://www.aboutmyplanet.com/environment/solar-diy -car-kit :)

  10. Sense of Direction More Likely to be Affected by DumbSwede · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suspect that people working in this building day after day may find their sense of direction diminished in local surroundings. I once lived in a trailer that had to be moved. The 90 degree change in orientation grossly affected my navigation sense for months.

    1. Re:Sense of Direction More Likely to be Affected by SinGunner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i once noted that changing the direction i sleep in bed caused a bit of trouble with my sense of direction. since then, i've changed about once a month and i no longer have any problems. i think the problem is that we get too used to everything being the same all the time. it's not like it's built in to you have to always sleep in the same place/direction every night of your life.

    2. Re:Sense of Direction More Likely to be Affected by chris_eineke · · Score: 5, Funny
      The 90 degree change in orientation grossly affected my navigation sense for months.
      Lesson learned: don't park your trailer upright.
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    3. Re:Sense of Direction More Likely to be Affected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      The 90 degree change in orientation grossly affected my navigation sense for months.

      I'm not surprised. I rotated some bottles of vodka 90 degrees from the vertical last night, and I still don't have my sense of direction back.

  11. And the point is? by necro81 · · Score: 1

    Building a rotating tower is neat and all - reminds me of those roundiround restaurants that seemed so cool in the 70s and 80s - but wouldn't all that effort be better spent on:

    * Building a more energy efficient living complex that uses various technologies to reduce resource consumption,
    * Building a real solar farm (the vertical walls of a tower aren't well suited to solar collection, especially in Dubai),
    * Creating affordable living space without an "It's solar! Far out, man!" premium?

    1. Re:And the point is? by camperdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm... Perhaps the next generation of these towers will be wind powered, like those roadside signs that turn in the wind. Why bother with one rotation per day when you could get several dozen per minute in a stiff breeze.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:And the point is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Several dozen per minute is ... at least once every 2.5 seconds. If the radius of the building is, say, 20 m, then that's an acceleration of 136 m/s^2, or about 14g. I think my furniture (and everything else) would start migrating to the outer walls in pretty short order.

    3. Re:And the point is? by maglor_83 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is Dubai. They don't seem to need a point there.

    4. Re:And the point is? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I think their efforts could be better spent fixing this.

      Really, all that tourism money, and they can't hire someone to make them look good on Wikipedia?

      If you don't like the message, get into an edit war with the messenger.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    5. Re:And the point is? by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      And by then, your circadian rhythmns would be really fucked.

    6. Re:And the point is? by Cerium · · Score: 1

      As would your face from being flung into the wall at 3Gs.

    7. Re:And the point is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you could just live on the walls and the extra force pushing you against the wall over what you get from gravity would just build up your strength to super-human levels, which would be nice. ;)

    8. Re:And the point is? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      And by then, your circadian rhythmns would be really fucked.

            So would your cardiac rythm. But look on the bright side, at least you'll achieve thermodynamic equilibrium.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:And the point is? by E++99 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps the next generation of these towers will be wind powered, like those roadside signs that turn in the wind. Why bother with one rotation per day when you could get several dozen per minute in a stiff breeze.

      Build this sucker atop a nuclear generator, and you could probably get 2,500 RPM.
  12. Moving Buildings by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 0

    This will make them a little harder to hit at least. Maybe in the future these buildings will be able to dodge things

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
  13. Pfft. by Somatic · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had like 50 of those in Sim City 2000, /yawn.

    --
    My script don't crash! She crashes, you crashed her!
  14. All I asked for was a... by zifn4b · · Score: 2, Funny

    frickin' rotating, solar-powered skyscraper, okay?

    --
    We'll make great pets
  15. It actually rotates 360 deg over 7 days by MushMouth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whoever wrote the blurb, didn't bother to read the original article. This doesn't rotate to keep certain apartments in the sun, it rotates to allow all apartments to have the same view, albeit on different days.

    1. Re:It actually rotates 360 deg over 7 days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh... This is really great for people that have satellite dish! How do they handle the water pipes, sewage, phone lines and electrical wirings?

    2. Re:It actually rotates 360 deg over 7 days by aduthie · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, that would make it a lot tougher for "observers to use the building as a fully functioning time piece" using those "12 o'clock markings on the ground and the podium."

      The blurb and the original article are a bit spotty, unfortunately. One quote suggests the tower will move at 5mm/second, which means it almost certainly turns 360 degrees per day, just like a 24-hour timepiece's hour hand. (Although I suppose it could turn twice per day...)

    3. Re:It actually rotates 360 deg over 7 days by Nutty_Irishman · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction. 360 degrees over 7 days means that there are still apartments with premium views on premium days. Getting stuck with a wall view on a Saturday/Sunday with a nice view of the river on Monday and Tuesday is like having it sunny all week and always raining on the weekends. Perhaps if they made it 360 degrees every 6 days then everyone could experience different views on different days and eliminate the issue of premium view apartments.

    4. Re:It actually rotates 360 deg over 7 days by Nutty_Irishman · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the other hand, that would make it a lot tougher for "observers to use the building as a fully functioning time piece" using those "12 o'clock markings on the ground and the podium." The blurb and the original article are a bit spotty, unfortunately. One quote suggests the tower will move at 5mm/second, which means it almost certainly turns 360 degrees per day, just like a 24-hour timepiece's hour hand. (Although I suppose it could turn twice per day...) I had to go digging to find out what is correct. The 5mm per second makes sense on a per day basis(140x140 meter footprint vs. 1000x1000 meter footprint), but this article seems to suggest a per week basis: http://news.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=1773 432006

      Twenty small electric engines will turn the building a few degrees each hour. Which would be on a week basis. They also mention specifically that it will be on a week basis in this article as well (something that was said in the previous article). Perhaps the engineer (who was quoted for both the 5mm per second and few degrees each hour), should go back and recheck his calculations...
    5. Re:It actually rotates 360 deg over 7 days by LABarr · · Score: 1

      Here is a thought: I am assuming that this building, when built, will rotate in a clockwise direction. If you really wanna mess with the minds of people living in this building, "screwing up thier circadian rhythms" as the article points out, suddenly make the building rotate counter-clockwise! Evil looking grin inserted here...

    6. Re:It actually rotates 360 deg over 7 days by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      360 degrees over 7 days means that there are still apartments with premium views on premium days.

            You, sir, are forgetting about the leap years!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:It actually rotates 360 deg over 7 days by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Whoever wrote the blurb, didn't bother to read the original article.
      I think that's pretty much a given with slashdot editors these days.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  16. What about the beds? by dino213b · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For all the people who care about which way their heads, feet, et al face during sleep, will they now be in a spiritual predicament? In other words, will they also need to get rotating beds that would counteract the rotation of the building?

    1. Re:What about the beds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What's worse: Dubai is an Islamic state and therefore most inhabitants will be Muslims. As a good Muslim you have to pray facing towards Mecca, which will be in a different direction all the time...
      Let's see if the architects thought of solving that problem.

    2. Re:What about the beds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


      Above each bed (rotating sign):

                  ^
                  |
                  |
              MECCA

    3. Re:What about the beds? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Dubai is an Islamic state and therefore most inhabitants will be Muslims. As a good Muslim you have to pray facing towards Mecca, which will be in a different direction all the time...

      Malaysian hotel rooms always have an arrow (usually on the ceiling) for this purpose. Given the technical goals of this project I am sure they will have something like an LED matrix display pointing to the current direction of Mecca. Maybe the tower will also be programmed to pause during prayers?

      My wife is Malaysian and she keeps having to convince me not to turn the arrows around during our holidays overseas.

    4. Re:What about the beds? by Lunar_Lamp · · Score: 1

      I'm not a Muslim, but I also realise that at the speed this tower is rotating their "aim" at Mecca cannot be more seriously affected than the inherent inaccuracy of pointing precisely toward Mecca usually. Also, why use an LED matrix display? Surely a compass would work just nicely?

    5. Re:What about the beds? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      Also, why use an LED matrix display? Surely a compass would work just nicely?

      If you keep making sensible suggestions like that the rotating tower will never get built. Its just gadgetry for its own sake. Show how clever they are and all that.

    6. Re:What about the beds? by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      their "aim" at Mecca cannot be more seriously affected than the inherent inaccuracy of pointing precisely toward Mecca usually.

            Hmm, that brings to mind the following question - what is the acceptable error when aiming prayers at Mecca? +/- 2 degrees? 5 degrees? 10? And what happens if the "aim" is off? The prayers work? Or fail to work? Or the praying party instantly has a spot reserved in Hell? Is the effectiveness of the prayer or punishment directly proportional to the degree of error? Will praying 180 degrees away from Mecca cause the opposite of the prayer to happen? I propose some research to attempt to quantify this matter once and for all. In order not to single out the Muslim faith, I'd also like to look into the exact amount of "Hail Mary's" required to achieve a given result ;)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:What about the beds? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1
      For all the people who care about which way their heads, feet, et al face during sleep, will they now be in a spiritual predicament? In other words, will they also need to get rotating beds that would counteract the rotation of the building?

      It's just one building. Nobody's forcing these spiritual people (note that I used a PC term instead of "wahoos") to sleep in it.

      - RG>

      (Needless to say, I am not using my Karma bonus for this post)
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    8. Re:What about the beds? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Um, buy a compass?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:What about the beds? by E++99 · · Score: 1
      Hmm, that brings to mind the following question - what is the acceptable error when aiming prayers at Mecca? +/- 2 degrees? 5 degrees? 10? And what happens if the "aim" is off? The prayers work? Or fail to work? Or the praying party instantly has a spot reserved in Hell? Is the effectiveness of the prayer or punishment directly proportional to the degree of error? Will praying 180 degrees away from Mecca cause the opposite of the prayer to happen?


      IANAM, (i am not a muslim) but they pray towards Mecca to give respect to the revelations that were given to Muhammad there. (As opposed to, say, emitting ions in an electric field eminating from Mecca.) IOW, the intention of pointing towards Mecca is what matters.
  17. Where the Sun Don't Shine by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    If they just rigged the building with light pipes, it wouldn't have to rotate to keep "facing" the Sun.

    What an incredible waste of energy to rotate the building, in the name of solar power.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Where the Sun Don't Shine by dangitman · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they just rigged the building with light pipes, it wouldn't have to rotate to keep "facing" the Sun.

      That wouldn't solve the problem of people wanting to have access to the "best view" out of their window.

      What an incredible waste of energy to rotate the building, in the name of solar power.

      It's not being done in the name of solar power. It's being done in the name of property values, and having a trendy apartment with good views.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:Where the Sun Don't Shine by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's being done with the purpose of property sales, from a trendy apartment with good views and unique publicity. It's being reported in the name of solar power.

      Well, you're right that it's not being done by the developers in the name of solar power. It's being done in the name of "time": the building is named the "Times Residences", and all the quotes from the developers are in terms of time, not the Sun per se. In fact, it rotates 360' over 7 days, which makes its rotation related to the Sun, but not by any connection to solar power. The solar angle comes in because the relatively slow rotation rate can be powered by what they measure in "kettles", which I suppose is a joint British/Dubaian unit of power consumption.

      The difference in priority between the news and the salespeople really tells us a lot about their different audiences.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  18. Services? by redphive · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to stop and think how things such as TV, Telephone, power, water and sewer are 'plumbed' into each suite. That would have to be an interesting problem to solve.

    1. Re:Services? by DogsBollocks · · Score: 1

      Wait until you sign up for satellite TV.

    2. Re:Services? by topham · · Score: 1


      Water: pumps in the building would draw water from a circular tank (rotating or not, doesn't matter). The water supply to the tank would be non-rotating while the pipes drawing water from the tank would either rotate through the water, or the tank itself could rotate. Typical large building has water pumped to the roof, and larger buildings would have multiple tanks for water at various different levels. (You can't easily pump water directly to the top floor of a tall building, the pumps would burst from the pressure.

      Similar for sewage.

      Electricity could be supplied in a similar fashion, and as for phone, cable, network, etc, thats easier than either water of electricity: wireless. Use a microwave link between a non-rotating base and the rotating portion of the building.

    3. Re:Services? by redphive · · Score: 1

      I kind of got the impression the whole building is rotating, perhaps that is just not the case. Wireless would be a pain in the ass if even feasible.

    4. Re:Services? by jigyasubalak · · Score: 1

      I would think that there is core in the building that doesn't rotate.
      Once that is in place I don't see much problem with the use of extra
      length flexible conduits and making the building rotate in the reverse
      way alternately.

      --
      The best planning can be done after the project completes.
    5. Re:Services? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      making the building rotate in the reverseway alternately.

      TFA:

      The Time Residences tower, a solar powered skyscraper that will use the electricity thus generated to rotate through 360 degrees.

      So maybe it does only go to 360, then back.

    6. Re:Services? by eeek77 · · Score: 1

      The restaurant atop the Space Needle in Seattle rotates 360 deg, but the building stays in place. Granted, this wouldn't require near the utilities as a bldg full of apartments. Now they've dreamed the dream, I'd love to see how it will actually work.

    7. Re:Services? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1
      I have to stop and think how things such as TV, Telephone, power, water and sewer are 'plumbed' into each suite. That would have to be an interesting problem to solve.

      Communications, as the other person mentioned, could easily be covered by wireless.

      A reasonably simple solution for electricity would be to have two rings of copper (one for ground), and use brushes to carry the connection as the building rotates.

      Potentially, you could use a similar solution for sewer, using a circular troph (yeah, it grosses me out too). Water would be a bit more difficult because it has to be pressurized, although you could run water through a non-rotating core to the top, and use a similar method as above, get your water pressure old school--via gravity.

      I think elevators would be more interesting: "On Monday to Thursday, turn left after exiting the elevators, on Friday to Sunday, turn right"
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    8. Re:Services? by jafac · · Score: 1

      I have to stop and think how things such as TV, Telephone, power, water and sewer are 'plumbed' into each suite. That would have to be an interesting problem to solve.

      No plumbing.

      The well and the outhouse are on the ground floor, outside.
      But each apartment WILL have its own bucket so their servants can go fetch water.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  19. Rotisserie Residency ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Will renters expect to lose fat and develop a lovely golden tan?

  20. Following the Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Quoth the actual news article: "... rotating an 80,000 tonne tower through 360 degrees over a seven day period ..." How exactly does this translate to having apartments following the sun?

    1. Re:Following the Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoth the actual news article: "... rotating an 80,000 tonne tower through 360 degrees over a seven day period ..." How exactly does this translate to having apartments following the sun?

      It follows the sun very slowly.

  21. Interstructure by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope it rotates only 180 degrees (or less) then rotates back. Rigging plumbing, sewage, power, cable, phone, etc for full 360 degree rotation will be tricky.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Interstructure by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You could build it in sections stacked on top of each other, with each section able to rotate ±30 degrees or so, then (since the bottom section would be fixed), each next higher section would have a greater cumulative maximum angle. This could then be an extra added benefit to the more expensive upper units, because they'd have more variety in the view.

      Of course, the other thing you could do is just put all the mechanical stuff in a non-rotating center column, which would make a heck of a lot more sense anyway because you've got to have at least one set of stairs for the fire escape, and putting that in the rotating part seems pretty stupid...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Interstructure by blincoln · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rigging plumbing, sewage, power, cable, phone, etc for full 360 degree rotation will be tricky.

      Anything electrical is easy. Just use a bunch of ring-shaped conductors around the axis of rotation.

      I imagine liquid wouldn't be *that* much harder. Have the input water come in at the top of the building and the sewage come out the bottom, with one big pipe connector on each end that runs through the axis of rotation. Because the water is only going one way (down), you don't need a perfect seal, just that the bottom connector be wider than the top one.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:Interstructure by Surt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see much of a need for a seal at all: run all your plumbing down hill in a pipe that extends into a gap in the central column, have that gap slope downhill into collector tubes. I guess you might need to flush that once in a while.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Interstructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine liquid wouldn't be *that* much harder. Have the input water come in at the top of the building and the sewage come out the bottom, with one big pipe connector on each end that runs through the axis of rotation. Because the water is only going one way (down), you don't need a perfect seal, just that the bottom connector be wider than the top one.

      So you build a little stationary tower next to the building to supply water from the top? It could work. Sealing the connections will not be significantly more difficult than sealing the shaft of a pump: packing (with a lantern seal for the sewage line).

      Unfortunately, most buildings have more than one piping connection (for example, a seperate connection for firefighting water, clean water, cooling water, dirty water from sinks or showers, and sewage water, ventillation, etc.). In this case you would need to have breakable connections that reseal, a complex engineered ring or partial ring connection, or a periodic unwinding process.

      I really like this idea for the building because I can imagine an earthquake spinning it up to 60 Hz. That would be fun!

    5. Re:Interstructure by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Rigging plumbing, sewage, power, cable, phone, etc for full 360 degree rotation will be tricky.

      Anything electrical is easy. Just use a bunch of ring-shaped conductors around the axis of rotation.

      Simple in concept - tricky in execution. Take, for example, the three phase mains power - the three rings have to be far enough apart to avoid sparking. The brushes and rings are subject to wear and sensitive to contamination.... Nor do these rings work real well for RF (read cable) frequency transmission.
       
       
      I don't see much of a need for a seal at all: run all your plumbing down hill in a pipe that extends into a gap in the central column, have that gap slope downhill into collector tubes. I guess you might need to flush that once in a while.

      Without a seal you are going to have all manner of noxious scents emerging - the water seal at the bottom of the toilet and under the bath are there for a reason.
    6. Re:Interstructure by ookabooka · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope it rotates only 180 degrees (or less) then rotates back. Rigging plumbing, sewage, power, cable, phone, etc for full 360 degree rotation will be tricky.

      Why not just go wireless? It's the wave of the future ya know.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    7. Re:Interstructure by nnkx00 · · Score: 1

      It will actually rotate a full 360 degress, not 180 and back, over the course of 7 days, at a rate of 5mm a second.

    8. Re:Interstructure by psxman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wireless sewage? I believe that's called a diaper.

    9. Re:Interstructure by jcr · · Score: 1

      Anything electrical is easy. Just use a bunch of ring-shaped conductors around the axis of rotation.

      Or just induction couplings. No contacts needed.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    10. Re:Interstructure by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Or just induction couplings. No contacts needed.

      Induction coupling is your solution to supplying electricity to a tower block?

      Do you have any idea how inefficient that is?

      (Of course not, you're an ex-apple engineer, efficiency is irrelevant to you).

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    11. Re:Interstructure by stinkytoe · · Score: 1

      Simple in concept - tricky in execution. Take, for example, the three phase mains power - the three rings have to be far enough apart to avoid sparking. The brushes and rings are subject to wear and sensitive to contamination.... Nor do these rings work real well for RF (read cable) frequency transmission. I was thinking the same thing when i read that, it's got to be a maintenance nightmare. Not to mention that the bearings needed to spin such a large weight as an entire building must be huge! Nevermind the motors that drive the thing. Even if they last 100 years, what happens when they do eventually fail?
      Come to think of it though, anyone have info on how those large rotating restaurants (ala the space needle, that q-tip looking thing in dallas, etc...) do it?
    12. Re:Interstructure by Vengeance · · Score: 1

      Sheesh.

      Why wouldn't you just have your own generators, incorporated into the rotating mass of the building?

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    13. Re:Interstructure by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

      Have we forgotten that it's supposed to be solar powered?

    14. Re:Interstructure by Vengeance · · Score: 1

      Solar generators are still generators :-P

      Seriously, though. This is /., and the facts and situation put forth in TFA have little to do with the conversation that develops.

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    15. Re:Interstructure by SnapShot · · Score: 1

      I'm not a mechanical engineer, but I'm having a difficult time wrapping my mind around the connection required to hook up that sewer connection in the immovable center column to the bathroom in the rotating apartment section.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    16. Re:Interstructure by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the bearings needed to spin such a large weight as an entire building must be huge! Nevermind the motors that drive the thing.

      Actually, the motor does not have to be all that big at all. The motor in a typical revolving restaurant is only in the 1-2 HP range, like you'd find on a table saw. Revolving restaurants typically turn once per hour. The revolving building is going to be turning once every seven days. In seven days the restaurant would turn 168 times. So, by adjusting the gearbox, the typical 1-2 hp motor could turn a building 168 times the size of a typical revolving restaurant.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    17. Re:Interstructure by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I read an article somebody else linked to about the first rotating building (this isn't the first; it's just the first one that's solar-powered), which said that all the plumbing was in the non-rotating center portion. In other words, your living room would rotate but your kitchen and bath would not -- which makes a lot of sense, but requires that each unit take up a whole floor (because you wouldn't want to be rotating past somebody else's bathroom).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:Interstructure by jcr · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how inefficient that is?

      About the same as a transformer.

      you're an ex-apple engineer, efficiency is irrelevant to you

      Dude, what is your fucking problem? Did Steve jobs steal your girlfriend or something?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    19. Re:Interstructure by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      It will actually rotate a full 360 degress, not 180 and back, over the course of 7 days, at a rate of 5mm a second.

      5 mm / second * 604800 seconds = 3024 m circumference = 963 m diameter

      This building is going to be nearly a full kilometre in the diagonal??

    20. Re:Interstructure by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Nah, they could go completely retro and turn their balcony into a "poop deck" and do it over the side. Bonus points if the wind knocks it into your neighbors!

      Man, this building is gonna rock!

    21. Re:Interstructure by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      I hope it rotates only 180 degrees (or less) then rotates back. Rigging plumbing, sewage, power, cable, phone, etc for full 360 degree rotation will be tricky. Those problems have been solved already. At least on a smaller scale (single unit dwelling).
    22. Re:Interstructure by jcr · · Score: 0, Troll

      , I'd consider growing up a little

      Good advice, you should take it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    23. Re:Interstructure by hurfy · · Score: 1

      I hope none of those rich people are heavy drinkers.

      Having the bathroom to the left of the bedroom on mondays and on the right on thursdays could cause some accidents......

      hehe, get up for a midnight snack and the kitchen is in the other direction as last night.

      Hmm, i'll pass i like to have my rooms where i left em :)

      Ok, since we solved the plumbing can you run my electrical for me now?

    24. Re:Interstructure by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The Rotating House(TM) rotates a full 360 around a central core of plumbing and electricals.

      It sounds like the plumbing doesn't turn. This is entirely possible in a single unit dwelling. You can't do that for a 200 unit building, unless you want to have common washroom and kitchen facilities on each floor.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    25. Re:Interstructure by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Ok, since we solved the plumbing can you run my electrical for me now?

      Electrical is easy: just use the same principle as track lighting.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    26. Re:Interstructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hope none of those rich people are heavy drinkers.


      Whyever not? They could enjoy a brand new drinking game: throw down shots until the room stops spinning.
    27. Re:Interstructure by jcr · · Score: 0, Troll

      I guess the best I can do is continue to help you out

      You have never helped me in any way. Fuck off already.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    28. Re:Interstructure by jcr · · Score: 1

      It seems to be the fate of those who try to help others

      How would you know?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    29. Re:Interstructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "About the same as a transformer."

      Would you be happy with transformer efficiency to supply power to a Skyscraper?

      Power bills 10 -> 15% higher for no good reason would not please tenants.

    30. Re:Interstructure by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      would you know?

      Of course I would know!

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    31. Re:Interstructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's the 21st century, we've had rotating joints for ages. Just put all necessary rotating joints below the building, at the center. If your rent is already fracking huge, you can add yearly service costs to replace the worn-out rotating joints.

    32. Re:Interstructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10% to 15% higher? I dont have time for even a back of a serviet calculation, but I'd say an inductive coupling on that scale would result in 20% - 80% loss.

    33. Re:Interstructure by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      The Rotating House(TM) rotates a full 360 around a central core of plumbing and electricals.
       
      It sounds like the plumbing doesn't turn. This is entirely possible in a single unit dwelling. You can't do that for a 200 unit building, unless you want to have common washroom and kitchen facilities on each floor. Guess again.
      Now, you may wonder (because everyone does): How do you get plumbing and electricity -- pipes and wires -- into a rotating house? Al designed a swivel in the middle of the house, so the plumbing and electricity rotate, too.

      Different rotating house, but I'd bet the principals are the same. Besides, if the plumbing didn't rotate, that would necessitate your kitchen, bath and laundry facilities wouldn't rotate either. That wouldn't be much of a rotating house.

      Once the plumbing and electricity are within the main structure, it would be a simple matter to break them out to the individual units (as would be done in a conventional multi-unit housing structure).
    34. Re:Interstructure by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't explain how they do it. Nor does it necessarily scale to apartment building.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    35. Re:Interstructure by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's patented. Find the patent, and that will tell you how it's done. As for scaling, I certainly don't see why it wouldn't. Judging from the article, it (or something like it) does.

  22. Sponsored by the local cable TV franchise by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess directional antennas will have to rotate in the opposite direction.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Sponsored by the local cable TV franchise by Fanther · · Score: 1

      I guess directional antennas will have to rotate in the opposite direction. Or just fixed to the non-rotating central part...
      --
      Friskr - Multi Search
  23. rotating building by jcd1982 · · Score: 2, Funny

    fools and their money are quickly parted!

    1. Re:rotating building by morboIV · · Score: 1

      Fools and their money are slowly rotated?

    2. Re:rotating building by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Fools and their money are slowly rotated?

            Nahh, only the fools are rotated. The money is safely deposited in the real estate company's accounts.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  24. OH GOD, IT'S AWFUL!!! (ze goggles, zey do nothing) by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    Seriously, that was my first thought. It's the most hideous building I've ever seen. Whoever designed the exterior needs to be crucified. I'm just glad to be living on a different content, with no intention of setting foot anywhere within eyeshot of that appalling monstrosity...

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  25. latitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dubai is at 25 degrees north. So for much of the year the sun will passing overhead, rather than 'around' the building. Wouldn't a rotating building make more sense at higher latitudes?

  26. Nice View by mulhollandj · · Score: 1

    I have a really nice view every Tuesday.

    1. Re:Nice View by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

      Hey, that goes with "cheap Tuesday" for pizza. Puts a new "spin" on the Eagle Boys ad.

      --
      -- All your bass are below two Hz
  27. Suite Vollard - completed in 2001 by rednaxel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Suite Vollard was the first rotating tower of the world, however it's not solar powered. Here's some facts (excerpts from the link):

    - This building is the only one of its kind in the world, as each of the 11 apartments can rotate 360.
    - Each apartment can spin individually in any direction. One rotation takes a full hour.
    - The facades are composed of double sheets of glass, in different colors (blue, gold, and silver) on different floors. This gives a spectacular effect as the floors turn in different directions.
    - The apartment rings rotate around a static core used for building services, utilities, and all areas which require plumbing.
    - Suite Vollard was a case study for more than 30 companies in Brazil and one from Germany.
    - Each apartment was sold for approximately R$ 400,000.00 ($US 300,000.00).
    - The first two floors of the building are an Executive Center.
    --
    If you can read this, thank an english teacher.
  28. It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by santiago · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I could see devout Muslims having difficulty orienting themselves correctly at prayer time, particularly given that the times change each day, so it's not in a constant direction relative to your apartment at each appointed period.

  29. one for every time zone by Joebert · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think the important question is, will they turn in the oppisite direction on either side of the earth ?

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  30. holy dumbness... by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine how it could possibly be cheaper to put less solar panels on a skyscraper and make it rotate than to just coat the entire outside with more solar panels. It takes A LOT of power to rotate a building...in fact, I bet it'd take all the energy collected from the solar panels all day to rotate it. Ugh, some engineers are so stupid it's just scary.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:holy dumbness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some posters are so stupid it's just scary.

      There, corrected that for you.

      The rotating bit isn't to catch the sun, it's a feature for the people living in it.

      It just happen to use solar energy to power the rotation, that's it.

    2. Re:holy dumbness... by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      oops, looks like you got a typo there too. It should read "some article summarizers are so stupid it's just scary" I'm surprised there's no undefited acronyms in it.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    3. Re:holy dumbness... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      It takes A LOT of power to rotate a building...

            IANACE (I am not a civil engineer), but if it's done right I think it takes a lot less power than you think. You're not fighting gravity, after all - you're in a whole different plane. Ever tried pushing a 50 ton boat away from a dock with - yes, both hands?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  31. Duh... Backroom ;) by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    Don't you hate that time of day when the sun is shining right into your apartment/living room, and putting glare on your monitor/tv? Isn't this going to be a problem for those apartments facing the sun (and turning along with it)?

    Just put the TV and computer in the back room. It'll permanently be in shade.

  32. Counting skills? by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

    Singh said they want to build many more such towers, with one for every time zone.

    So why not just say they plan on building 24 more towers, instead of "many more"?

    1. Re:Counting skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, that would be 23 more towers, as there is already one of 24 in existence

    2. Re:Counting skills? by swillden · · Score: 1

      actually, that would be 23 more towers, as there is already one of 24 in existence

      I don't know the precise number, but there are more than 24 time zones, because not all time zones are full-hour offsets.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Counting skills? by DrBdan · · Score: 1

      The full article actually says...

      Singh said the company plans to build 23 more rotating towers in each of the world's time zones with finance provided by investors linked to the company.

      So Singh didn't ever say "many more" though I'm not sure why he wouldn't research the number of time zones before making statements to the media.

  33. Epilog: by kfg · · Score: 1

    . . .a giggle out of a 50 foot skyscraper . . .

    Come to think of it, I'd get a bit of a giggle out of a 50 foot "skyscraper" myself.

    Although, perhaps in Nome that would be.

    This is my brain on gluten. It is not a pretty sight; although it can be amusing.

    KFG

    1. Re:Epilog: by peepleperson · · Score: 1

      I think that is known as the Stonehenge Scale Error.

    2. Re:Epilog: by kfg · · Score: 1

      And to think I did not take the job with the NASA subcontractor (I would have been working on the development of expolding titanium bolts, so it was a tough call; I mean, how cool is that? I would have had to move to Daytona Beach though, and I hate Florida. As I sit here decades later in upstate NY looking at the first snow of the year flying it occurs to me I may have made a mistake).

      Seems to me I would have fit right in.

      In the Feynman "Lost Lectures" recording there's an ammusing passage where he becomes totally confused for a minute or so, by his own diagram.

      Turns out he drew an arrow backwards.

      Everyone drops a sign, inverts things, uses the wrong units now and again. The trick is to catch it before you launch the rocket or build the library.

      KFG

  34. Where to start? by martyb · · Score: 2, Informative
    From: original article
    Dubai's Kulkarni QS will manage the project, while the task of rotating an 80,000 tonne tower through 360 degrees over a seven day period has been handed to Nick Cooper, managing director of Bennett Associates, the British engineer who designed the drill machine that bored the English Channel Tunnel.

    Cooper said state of the art bearing systems at several points in the tower will allow a power plant to rotate the base of the tower at 5mm per second using only 21 electic kettles' worth of solar power.

    1. Since it will take a full week for a complete revolution, that means that a given view indicates both the day of week AND the time of day. Think of enjoying the view at your neighbor's home and getting all confused as to what day/time it is. :O

    2. This will make for an interesting exercise in real estate law. Said apartment, starting at the central elevator shaft on the 50th floor and heading 100 feet due east, no, wait. That's east-north-east. Man, this is going to take FOREVER! But seriously, has anyone seen a property deed for something like this?

    3. "only 21 electic kettles"
      electic
      eclectic
      electric

      (insert witty comment here about tea parties and electic electric kettle selection. :^)

    4. Note to other posters: I have heard of rotating restaurants and/or observation decks - this is not an utterly new concept. So, getting the utilities (water, sewer, electric, etc.) to the residents is a matter of scaling past solutions.

    5. Lastly: I admire their interest in getting something as immense as a WHOLE SKYSCRAPER to rotate, continuously, for years on end. I just hope they'll be able to get their hands on a good supply of lubricant. <grin>

    1. Re:Where to start? by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      I saw something recently that was a rotating condominium, where each floor rotated on its own... The building was round, and all the utilities were in a stationary center "circle". As far as the legal aspect of it, each condominium was 1 floor. The condominium, though, could be rotated to any position the tenant desired, at any time. Saw it on Daily Planet a week or two ago.

    2. Re:Where to start? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      I just hope they'll be able to get their hands on a good supply of lubricant.

      That was my thought when the issue of sewage disposal came up. Smelly, but very slippery.

    3. Re:Where to start? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Note to other posters: I have heard of rotating restaurants and/or observation decks - this is not an utterly new concept. So, getting the utilities (water, sewer, electric, etc.) to the residents is a matter of scaling past solutions.

      Every rotating restaurant and/or observation deck which I've visited only has electricity on the rotating part, everything else is on the stationary part. AFAIK - there is nothing to scale.
  35. The Pit by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Working at the UofT they have a research department (administrative not scientific) which contains about 60-80 people, they have no windows of any kind, not even any windows to other rooms which have windows.

    It's the most horrible place I ever worked... imagine clocks on EVERY single wall and flat surface ever desk, every screen... And you still lose time, you think hours have passed and minutes have you think minutes passed and hours have.

    Everyone seems sleepy all the time. Horrible.

    Maybe they can put web cafe's on that side of the building?

    1. Re:The Pit by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like "Brazil" or another dystopian place.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  36. Re:It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by twoes00 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They actually make prayer-rugs that have compasses (with Mecca marked) on them.

  37. Premium Prices for Premium Views by The+Monster · · Score: 1
    then everyone could experience different views on different days and eliminate the issue of premium view apartments.
    And why would they want to eliminate the ability to charge premium prices for premium views?
    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    1. Re:Premium Prices for Premium Views by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      then everyone could experience different views on different days and eliminate the issue of premium view apartments.

      And why would they want to eliminate the ability to charge premium prices for premium views?

      Don't be silly, they'll charge everybody premium prices for the premium views.

    2. Re:Premium Prices for Premium Views by khallow · · Score: 1

      I agree with the grandparent. Everyone will get to pay a premium just for being in a rotating building. But why give up the opportunity to get someone to pay an even higher premium? Doesn't make sense.

  38. Wow... That takes huge balls. by Captain+Entendre · · Score: 1

    Or maybe they use roller bearings?

    1. Re:Wow... That takes huge balls. by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

      Or a giant cog/gear with polished bearing surfaces on either side, like the kind used to rotate cranes, but a whole hell of a lot bigger.

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  39. yikes by exspecto · · Score: 1, Funny

    I would hate the brief moments of panic that occurred when I walked out of my door and thought my car was towed/stolen because it was no longer in the direction I thought it would be.

  40. Didn't Buckminster Fuller already design that by GeorgeVW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In 1927? The original Dymaxion 4D tower was designed to be a 200 story rotating apartment tower, if memory serves. Geez, they're only 80 years behind the times.

  41. Circadian Rythms..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    How would this screw up circadian rythms, since no matter where you are facing, there is always a day and night time? Unless you are in space, or on a point where you can always see the sun, there will always be a night and day, with the obvious exceptions of the poles. For a tower to affect circadian rythms to a point where they are minimally affected, for any region relative to the normal day/night scheduled for that particular region, it would have to be EXTREMELY tall, and thus, EXTREMELY massive. .....just a thought.....

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  42. This is the second one in Dubai by Animats · · Score: 2

    This is the second rotating tower in Dubai. The first one has a 5 story stack of rotating penthouses, which rotate independently. At the top is a single "villa", which also rotates. It also has a car lift and three parking spaces.

    Dubai is having an insane skyscraper boom. 205 high rise buildings completed, 333 under construction. (Los Angeles: 465 completed, 11 under construction.) Not because of space constraints. There's plenty of open desert nearby. It's ego, enthusiasm, and money.

    1. Re:This is the second one in Dubai by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      It's ego, enthusiasm, and money.
      Not to mention short-sightedness, irresponsibility, and greed

  43. Oblig #462 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our dizzy landlords

  44. Re:It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by bky1701 · · Score: 1

    Isn't it kind of hard to do that when Mecca isn't a magnetic pole? It could be one way or another depending on where you are... I guess they would have to have asian and westen ones...

  45. Fairness Reception. by bronney · · Score: 1

    Apart from the comments on "glare" upstairs, anyone notice the CRT monitors picture will actually shift with changing orientations? Ever had that annoy the hell out of you when there's one corner on the CRT you can never get it perfectly aligned? Try rotating it 90 degrees. Ever listen to the radio? Noticed that sometimes there's better reception if you move around in the house? What about cell phones? Despair no more! We've invented this rotating residential so instead of you moving to get better reception, everyone gets better reception once every rotation! It's all fair! Come live in this fair place. The Sinusoid of Pleasure(TM)

  46. motors by dheera · · Score: 1

    i'd be seriously interested in knowing what sort of motors would power that.

    1. Re:motors by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      i'd be seriously interested in knowing what sort of motors would power that.

      Probably nothing very exciting. The average commuter train would need to apply more torque. Gearing would be the interesting bit. I am thinking of something like a circular worm gear with very fine pitch.

    2. Re:motors by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I'm seriously more interested in what happens when "state of the art bearings"inevitably wear out.Do they jack up the building to replace them? Do they groan and squeal as they die?Do they take out the surface they sit on as they die? Do they declare it"the will of Allah" and let it die?
              Moving parts die! No escaping that.You might make them last for a while,but ,physics takes over somewhere.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  47. Re:It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by khallow · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, looks like there's a market for prayer rugs with built in GPS. Who'd have thought that?

  48. Compass... by msimm · · Score: 1

    Or perhaps it simply wouldn't be suited for them. But I'm sure if there was a good reason to use this there are good solutions we could come up with.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Compass... by smithmc · · Score: 1

        Or perhaps it simply wouldn't be suited for them.

      Well, considering the building is in Dubai, I think they're probably going to make sure that Muslims can live there...

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  49. Re:It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because a compas would never be able to find out the correct direction.

  50. Mordor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anybody noticed how the top part of the rotating building:

    http://archive.gulfnews.com/images/06/11/29/30_bs_ tower_4.jpg

    has the same shape as the top part of Sauron's tower, Barad-dur?

    http://uk.games-workshop.com/mordor/mordorhome/ima ges/mordor-sideimage.jpg

    Something fishy's going on here...

  51. I've always wanted to say this... by scdeimos · · Score: 1
    From the original article:
    Cooper said state of the art bearing systems at several points in the tower will allow a power plant to rotate the base of the tower at 5mm per second using only 21 electic kettles' worth of solar power.
    Now there's a building with balls!
  52. Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by Khyber · · Score: 1, Insightful

    At a *USUAL* 1600 a pound??? (I've dealt, shaddup,) that's for regular stuff. Most fresh stuff is easily confused for "dro" or "dank" because it's fresher and tastes (to them) better. your 1600 is in reality my 3-4 G's a P. My answer is *HELL YES,* not just yes, even though you said "lowball estimate." I'd have to ask if you really knew what a lowball estimate was in the drug game (try $500 a pound, pal,) Two pounds to maybe three will net you a cool (if homegrown, considering energy costs, nutritional costs, and time spent) an easy $2,000 a pound if you sell it right, PER WEEK. (this assumes a Sea of Green operation, assuming as well awesome strains like big bud.) That's (assume best situation, 3 p's sold per week @ 2,000,) six grand a week, 24 grand a month, over a quarter million per year.

    Your answer, without any apparent personal experience, is somewhat laughable. Most real dealers get far more than 1,600 per pound. No offense, but you're definitely not "in da game."

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I can see you've got personal experience.... from the way you rant and are unable to write coherently. In fact, I got a headache after reading the first couple of sentences. And you completely missed the point - the poster you replied to didn't attempt to show he were "in da game" as you put it, but only to give a conservative estimate to show it was feasible. And people says pot doesn't do you any harm... I might have believed that, if it hadn't been for the fact that every single person I know who admits to smoking it with any regularity are about as incoherent as you.

    2. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by x2A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know plenty of people who smoke it who are perfectly coherent, and plenty of people who don't who aren't. Weed doesn't make people stupid, but it can be another thing that can help create complacency in ignorance as that post seemed to demonstrate. But dude, your statements on "smoking pot" demonstrate ignorance on your part. Just because something can be involved in causing harm doesn't mean that it's the cause of the harm, rather than just the tool the person decides to use to achieve what they wanna be anyway.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    3. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by Vengeance · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sometimes the coherent ones are smart enough to keep quiet about it, in this paranoid society.

      And that's all I have to say on this topic.

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    4. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by indifferent+children · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, the GP forgot the all-important: IANAMG disclaimer.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    5. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the regular smokers I know have definitely dulled their wits and are absolutely irritable when they haven't partaken in 8 hours. It's the recreational smokers, the ones who smoke only on the weekends, that don't seem changed by it. Like they say, "everything in moderation." I can't speak for it though, as I've never touched the stuff. I just can't get past the whole smoking part of it. That, and it's not worth my top secret clearance.

    6. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      Weed doesn't make people stupid... But it certainly reinforces the level of stupidity the person had before starting. And here is Foamy's thoughts on the matter: "Drugs in your head" http://www.illwillpress.com/vault.html, bottom left corner area.
      --
      Bearded Dragon
    7. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by 42nnn · · Score: 1

      500 a pound you are getting ripped off, for the dankest chron here you get it for 200-300 bucks max, you my friend are getting ripped off, and for mersh think 150 at the most for a pound

    8. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by Surt · · Score: 1

      Feel free to read my linked source material, that's why it was there, duh.
      You have to think nationwide, not just whatever city you're in.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    9. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by smithmc · · Score: 2, Insightful

        Your answer, without any apparent personal experience, is somewhat laughable

      No, but your spouting off in a public forum about your illegal drug activities is somewhat laughable. As if dealing drugs, even if (as far as I'm concerned) it ought to be legal, is something to get arrogant and uptight about.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    10. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by Kagura · · Score: 1

      You show thanks to somebody who gives you insight into a world you will never know with THAT response? Don't be so rude, just because it's the internet and the other person is just one of millions.

    11. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      My talking about activities was in the PAST tense, not the present tense. I learned my lesson with 50 weeks of boot camp prison, and 5 years probation, TYVM. Not good to assume and incorrectly point out somethign that isn't happening now, but what happened in the past. "I've DEALT"

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Where do you live? If not the USA - do a currency conversion. If you're in the USA - you must be smoking some dirt. Anywhere else I've been and experienced, the prices remain fairly consistent with quality, from big city to small ass hometown (Plano, Texas)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re:Sorry - you're a bit new, I assume. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a jerk.

  53. Re:Great, Feng Shui by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't know about the Circadian Rythm but I know it would really screw up my Feng Shui.. Unless the rooms counter-rotated...

  54. Theme park apparments? by Overkill+Nbuta · · Score: 1

    Why not just make it spin like really fast like gravatron style at the carnivals at set points in the week. Give a little excitement to all those people. And that folks is the reason i shouldnt be left incharge of the speed control of this building.

  55. Nice View? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tuesday? Wouldn't it then be more accurate to say you have a Nice Vista? :-P

    (Ok everyone, you may slap me now...)

  56. Too much money by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I hope the people of Dubai enjoy the outlandish riches that the geographic lottery and the world's insatiable reliance on fossil fuels has given them.

    Eventually (sooner, I hope), things will change, we will shift from an world oil economy, and the people of Dubai will have to go back to working for a living. And with only .7% arable land, I hope they're putting up some canned goods because even with butter on it sand tastes like shit.

    Before oil was discovered in Dubai about what, 35 years ago?, they were herding camels and trading rugs. The rusted hulks of Bentleys and Rolls are going to look funny sitting up on blocks in front of tents.

    But at least they're smart enough to realize solar energy is the way to spin their skyscraper.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Too much money by rujholla · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that they have also the ideal location for solar power. Whats to stop them (once technology permits) from harvesting that and selling solar energy as they do now fossil energy.

    2. Re:Too much money by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Dubai has very little oil actually. They did build the main container port for the Middle East and benefit from tourism (not in small part due to the oil wealth from the surrounding nations) but their direct benefits from oil have been minor.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    3. Re:Too much money by smithmc · · Score: 2, Informative

        Before oil was discovered in Dubai about what, 35 years ago?, they were herding camels and trading rugs.

      Dubai is not an oil-rich place; only 6% of its GDP comes from oil. Dubai is rich because of the Jebel Ali Free Trade Zone.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    4. Re:Too much money by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      exactly what I said: "herding camels and trading rugs"

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  57. 39 timezones by splutty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are about 39 time zones instead of 24 (as popularly believed). This is due to fractional hour offsets and zones with offsets larger than 12 hours near the International Date Line. Some micronations may use offsets that are not recognized by all authorities.

    (That's from the wikipedia on timezones)

    --
    Coz eternity my friend, is a long *ing time.
    1. Re:39 timezones by silentounce · · Score: 1

      And eleven in the Soviet Union. That's ridiculous. It's not even funny.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    2. Re:39 timezones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what I'm saying is.....eleven.

  58. Re:It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

    Maybe their sky wizard will give them special dispensation.

  59. The world *does* revolve round the rich. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative

    For example, the Federal Reserve is made up of a bunch of private banks. These banks create money out of nothing and loan it to the US government at currently 5.25% interest rate. The government spends the money and then taxes the people to eventually pay it back. The US citizens are taxed to pay money to a bunch of private banks interest on money which they created out of nothing. Essentially the whole of the US population is working for the member (privately owned) banks of the Federal Reserve.

    Guess who owns the private banks which own the Federal Reserve?

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:The world *does* revolve round the rich. by magarity · · Score: 1

      I live in Denver, so my 'local' Fed bank is the one in Kansas City. According to its annual report, $10 million was paid in dividends to the member banks while $572 million was paid to the Treasury as interest (You've got the bit about who pays who interest backwards in your rant). http://www.kansascityfed.org/publicat/annreprt/200 5/2005AR.pdf (see page 49, statement of income)

      As for who are the members, any bank that calls itself 'National Bank of...' is a FR member. Also, most banks that call themselves 'State Bank of [state name]' or 'First/Second/Nth Bank of [state name]' are members. They usually have stickers on the door next to the 'FDIC Member' stickers. Search your bank's website or ask the local branch manager. It's not the big nasty secret you seem to think it is.

  60. Glasgow Tower by OoberMick · · Score: 1

    There is a rotating tower in Glasgow http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasgow_Tower. From day one it had problems with the bearings (not surprisingly), how is this building any different?

  61. cables by dredson · · Score: 1

    That will be interesting when the first rotation tears out the telephone and cable tv wiring. :)

  62. Coaxial Sewer and Fresh Water! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I'm so there.

  63. Great party pad by Joebert · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude: *groan*, I got a serious hangover, what day is it ?
    Other Dude: uhhhhhhh, *peeks out window* it's Waffle House day.
    Dude: Fuck, it's Sunday already ?!

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  64. Re:It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    Come on, silly!

    Everybody knows that rich people aren't devoutly religious!

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  65. WTF, Informative?!? Don't get taken byt his BS by spun · · Score: 1

    Dude, this line of reasoning comes straight from militia freaks in Oregon who want to steal your money. I had a friend in Hawaii who was scammed by these guys. I tried to tell him that it was all bullshit, even showing him books about the Fed that contradicted what these asshole scammers said, but of course that was all just propaganda. Poor guy lost thousands to the scammers and thousands more to the IRS.

    If you want to believe this crap, go ahead, I won't try to talk you out of it. But here's some links so you can find out more for yourself:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_reserve_bank
    http://www.frbsf.org/publications/federalreserve/f edinbrief/index.html
    http://money.howstuffworks.com/fed.htm

    And to provide some balance, here's more from the scammers themselves (please take with a HUGE grain of salt):
    http://www.fdrs.org/banking_history.html

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  66. Re:It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're absolutely right.

    Obviously, this project must be stopped NOW before it offends our Muslim friends.

    Will we NEVER learn? Or will we continue in our culturally insensitive ways until it is the death of us?

  67. Perverse Units by E++99 · · Score: 1
    Cooper said state of the art bearing systems at several points in the tower will allow a power plant to rotate the base of the tower at 5mm per second using only 21 electic kettles' worth of solar power.


    Oh, thanks Cooper, that's so helpful. Nothing gets across a rate of rotational velocity like milimeters per second!!! And "electric kettles"??? WTF, that's not even a unit, you arse!!!

    BTW, the "points" you're looking for "in the tower"... for placing your bearing systems... to allow the base of the tower to rotate... those would be directly under the base of the tower. You didn't seem too clear on this point, and it's a rather crucial detail.
  68. Re:It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by E++99 · · Score: 1

    Well, since the building is a functional timepiece, you could have a seperate prayer rug for each prayer time, and then arrange them so that each rug was correctly oriented for its time. But, I think (I could be wrong), that most Gulf-state muslims go to a mosque to pray.

  69. Phase Response Curve by Bat+Country · · Score: 1
    For people who live in highrises, the day either ends or begins a hell of a lot earlier or later than for most people, as you seldom have a window on more than one side of your block. An apartment in this place apparently will get the first rays of sunrise and the last touch of sunlight at sunset. Due to the proximity of Dubai to the tropics, the days are extremely long there, 10:34 being the minimum this winter and 13:42 being the maximum this last summerhttp://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/astron omy.html?n=7761http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclo ck/astronomy.html?n=776&month=6&year=2006&obj=sun& afl=-11&day=12. Circadian rhythms are tied very strongly to sunlight exposure. According to Wikipedia:

    "Starting about two hours before bedtime, exposure to bright light will delay the circadian phase, causing later wake-up time and later sleep onset." See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_response_curvep hase response curve So if you're at home winding down from a long day doing whatever filthy rich people in Dubai do, and your building is shining the last rays of daylight into your building, chances are it's delayed your sleep cycle by a couple of hours. Now take into account the fact that you've been waking up earlier because you've been catching rays... I imagine the effect would rather be like sleeping outside without shelter much of the time.
    --
    The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
  70. Re:It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Isn't it kind of hard to do that when Mecca isn't a magnetic pole?

    [sigh] The building rotates; it doesn't move. Therefore, if you know which way North is, finding the direction to Mecca is a trivial exercise. (It's slightly south of due West.) Or you could get one of these.

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  71. The Fed by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    Ignorance can be depressing, especially when five minutes on Wikipedia's article on the Federal Reserve has the potential to change your entire worldview.

    The Fed isn't just a bunch of private banks scamming the government. It's composed of:

    1. A board of governors, appointed by the president
    2. The Federal Open Market Committee
    3. The aforementioned 12 private banks
    4. The small, local banks that actually own the aforementioned 12 private banks

    Bank's don't "create money from nothing." The way it usually works is simple:

    1. Banks take deposits. Savings, checking accounts, etc. Besides providing a better place to store money than a mattress, they entice people to give them their money by paying them interest on the money they give the bank the privilege of holding - think a 3% bribe on whatever you let the bank hold on to.
    2. Banks loan a portion of their deposits. They'll give someone a small, federally regulated portion of their deposits in exachange for a larger interest rate (call it 6%). They give you 3% for your money, but they take a part of it and loan it for 6%. This is only a problem if everyone tries to withdraw all their money at once - think the Great Depression and "It's a Wonderful Life" - except that now the FDIC takes care of that.

    Providing funds to people who need it (small businesses, governments that like deficit spending) is a legitimate service. In the meantime, they pay their depositors (you with the savings account) interest for use of their money. People who need money get loans, and the savings account guy gets something for nothing. Win-win.

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
  72. Feel sorry for the guys on the other side by c_woolley · · Score: 1

    Unless the building is one appartment thick, I feel for the poor saps on the dark side...No sun ever.

  73. I don't question your assertati.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    But out of curiosity I read: "Dubai is unusual in that its population is comprised mainly of expatriates". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubai#Demographics Interesting.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  74. Some people have some wierd ideas about this by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Informative
    1) The building does NOT keep one side at the sun all the time.

    It rotates a little bit all the time, giving everyone a changing view. The solar powered bit is on the ROOF, not the side.

    2) The amount of power needed to rotate the building, assuming it is round, is fairly low. You are just paying for the friction, which unless you are a fool, is almost all on the ground floor, where it meets the non-rotating base. There is no 'core' that does not rotate, - that would just create more problems, starting with increased friction.

    3) New York City (and many other major cities) has several buildings with a rotating top floor that does this already. They usually contain restaurants, complete with full water and electricity.

    4) Electrical hookups are simple. They work fine on a brush contact, again only on the BOTTOM floor.

    5) Sewer hookups are also simple. In the bottom floor, there is a large pipe. Beneath the pipe is a gigantic inverse ring, that funnels to a pipe. It does not matter that most of the time the inverse ring is open, stuff falls down into it.

    6) The only problem is the water intake, to get water to the building. This can most easily be done in the center of the building, with a pipe connection that is water tight, but low friction seal, allowing rotation. The problem factor is keeping friction down, not the water tight + allowing rotation.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Some people have some wierd ideas about this by 2short · · Score: 1


      I've been in several rotating restraunts and observation decks. All had a non-rotating 'core' containing everything that used water/sewer/gas, elevators, and stairs. I'm sure it might be possible to put all that in a rotating section, but my experience suggests that in the past engineers who have actually needed to do it have concluded it's much easier to do a non-rotating core.

    2. Re:Some people have some wierd ideas about this by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      For a single floor, a non-rotating core makes sense. It minimizes friction surface, and eliminates complications. Also, you can put all the water and hookups in the core, negating the need for the funnel/low friction water tight seal.

      For a whole building that is rotating, it is a different thing. Then, you need to deliver and retrieve water to the entire building, not simply the core. Also, the additional surface area goes from being negligble to significant.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    3. Re:Some people have some wierd ideas about this by 2short · · Score: 2, Informative



      Well, again, the one existing "whole building" rotator I've heard about actually had an outside theat rotated around a non-rotating core. Each floor was a single apartment whose kitchen, bathroom, and access to the elevator/stairs were in the non-rotating middle. Do you know of a building where the whole thing actually roatates, or are you speculating?
      I'm just curious; not trying to run down speculating. My own speculation is that a sufficiently reliable rotating water hookup is harder than you think. Friction, of course, is a matter of not just surface area, but the force (weight) between those surfaces. I expect higher-than-bottom-level connections would either make little difference, or actually help.

  75. Re:It's 2:37 PM. Which way is Mecca? by Politburo · · Score: 1
  76. Wouldn't it cost less... by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it cost less to just put solar cells on the East, South, and West faces of the building, rather than rotate the entire building?

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  77. This is in dubai.... by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

    I read this head line and I thought this building has to be in Dubai and sure enough...

    I've spent quite a lot of time there in the past couple of years. This project doesn't really surprise me at all.

    It fits right in along side their project to build a business park filled with water that has more canals than Venice and Amsterdam put together, which coincidentally will contain the tallest building in the world the burj tower until they build the next tower to eclipse it that will be one kilometer tall. It also fits right along side a single hotel complex in the middle of the desert with 25,000 hotel rooms, more than all of Los Vegas put together, or their in-door ski park, or their three palm projects and the world artificial island projects and the list goes on and on...

    I guarentee you that this building will not rotate entirely (or probably at all) off energy collected in solar cells. The energy required to rotate a skyscraper would be enourmous, I would think you'd be lucky to rotate a building once a decade off the energy collected through solar cells mounted on it.

    It's just a gimmick.

    In the UAE there are two main industries, property development and oil (in that order). This is just a gimmick to try and draw attention and investor dollars, there are so many mind bogglingly crazy projects in Dubai it really takes quite an effort to come up with something that stands out. By Dubai standards this is quite a moderate effort.

  78. Don't need a satellite... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...an SR-71 ("Blackbird") can do that quite easily. In fact I think their trans-atlantic flight record was well under half the time you'd need.

    Unfortunately, running your building on Jet8 fuel and streamlining it enough could be a bit frustrating.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:Don't need a satellite... by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      And the aerial refueling will be loads of fun. :-)

      As far as streamlining, with enough thrust, anything
      will fly. It could be a status symbol, kinda like
      Hummers and the like. :-)

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  79. The residents will be.. by m0rphin3 · · Score: 1

    first against the wall when the revolution comes

    --
    for great justice
  80. Neat by d_54321 · · Score: 1

    This is an neat idea. It'll be interesting to see if it ever gets off the ground.