That's not reasonably self-explanatory for many people. For those who just want to edit family photos, they're not going to set a keyboard shortcut and press it every time they want the windows up. For the professional editors, they're not going to get that far into the OS. They'll want to edit pictures, and that's all.
I thought that GIMPshop contained the "de-weirdifier" or something like that. It's supposed to make all the windows belong to one MDI window, much like how Photoshop does it. IMO, it's easier to use that way, so you don't have windows scattered about the screen and taskbar.
I'm wondering why the summary refers to him as Japanese. Why the hell does it matter? I bet if he were from the United States it wouldn't say anything about his nationality.
I always wondered about the braille keys on drive-up ATMs. I suppose some people blind people have gas and brake pedals with braille on them, and listen for the honking of cars to avoid them. Then when they get there they magically read the screen's text which tells you what buttons to push for whatever transaction by feeling the electricity in the screen. You'd think they'd just get a non-blind person to do it for them.
I can't think of anything on which I disagree with you there.
My belief is that art is not something that money should be made off of. Art is a form of expression or talent. Artists claim that in order to make their art, they need money. You don't need money to express yourself. You don't need to get money for expressing yourself. While making art can be your profession, it should not be your source of income. Artists should have real jobs that contribute something. While entertaining people is somewhat contributing something, it is definately not worth the millions of dollars that they receive.
Some of what I said might not reflect exactly what I feel because I have trouble putting ideas like that into words. Take it with a grain of salt or whatever.
Is your zip code 12345?
I can't mod you up. :( I would, though.
That's not reasonably self-explanatory for many people. For those who just want to edit family photos, they're not going to set a keyboard shortcut and press it every time they want the windows up. For the professional editors, they're not going to get that far into the OS. They'll want to edit pictures, and that's all.
I thought that GIMPshop contained the "de-weirdifier" or something like that. It's supposed to make all the windows belong to one MDI window, much like how Photoshop does it. IMO, it's easier to use that way, so you don't have windows scattered about the screen and taskbar.
I want to go to Bulgaria now...
I don't see how the hell you changed the subject to China. Nigeria is nowhere near China.
ACHOO
I'm really starting to hate acronyms.
I'd mod you up had I had mod points.
Judging from the amount of dupes, I would say that this is correct.
For some reason I had a déjà vu while reading your post. I have no idea what you're talking about, though.
Damn, that's the funniest pun I've ever heard.
Well it looks like Slashdot cannot handle a superscript two, so forget about that.
E=MC2 can be interpreted very differently than the actual equation, E=mc. I realize you're trying to be funny, but yeah...
1.5 is not a major update. 1.5 is a minor update. 2.0 would be a major update. It goes major.minor.
I do not want to know how people use mice for cunnilingus. Damn computer fetishes.
I'm wondering why the summary refers to him as Japanese. Why the hell does it matter? I bet if he were from the United States it wouldn't say anything about his nationality.
I'd mod you up but I'm posting here about modding you up instead.
I'm using a Razer Boomslang right now. It's a really good mouse for gaming, but I definately need a new mouse pad. This one messes up the sensitivity.
I need a keyboard too... One that recognizes multiple key presses. Currently I can't move forward and right at the same time or something.
I always wondered about the braille keys on drive-up ATMs. I suppose some people blind people have gas and brake pedals with braille on them, and listen for the honking of cars to avoid them. Then when they get there they magically read the screen's text which tells you what buttons to push for whatever transaction by feeling the electricity in the screen. You'd think they'd just get a non-blind person to do it for them.
That's what I mean. Making logos or designs and such isn't expressing yourself. That's not art. In fact, that's what I do.
I can't think of anything on which I disagree with you there.
My belief is that art is not something that money should be made off of. Art is a form of expression or talent. Artists claim that in order to make their art, they need money. You don't need money to express yourself. You don't need to get money for expressing yourself. While making art can be your profession, it should not be your source of income. Artists should have real jobs that contribute something. While entertaining people is somewhat contributing something, it is definately not worth the millions of dollars that they receive.
Some of what I said might not reflect exactly what I feel because I have trouble putting ideas like that into words. Take it with a grain of salt or whatever.
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html #GPLOutput
The website you view would be the output from the program, not the actual program. Nevertheless this seems like a grey area...
If I hadn't have read 1984 a while ago, I wouldn't have seen the reference there.
Your post would be funny if it were not coming true. Unfortunately it seems like that's where we're heading.
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/08/fill-in-bla nks.html
I'm much more interested in that. I've always wanted that feature.
That's the only way it would make sense...