Its only an issue when you detain someone you can't prove is a thief. Then they can sue you or possibly bring criminal charges for unlawful detainment.
If Guthrie was willing to sell his rights -- and no one could get 'em otherwise -- then that's the end of his involvement.
Actually Guthrie is dead so whatever rights he might or might not have to the music would have reverted to his heirs, whoever they were possibly people chosen by the state if he died without a will.
So Guthrie might never have sold the rights to this song - but they could have been sold to whomever brought the suit - and this is possibly or even probably against the artist's (Guthrie's) intent - by the heirs either in the will or appointed by the state because the artist, Guthrie, wasn't clear enough (legally) that he was releasing these songs to the public domain.
not well, since theyve given the huge loopholes for corporate taxpayers who are no longer in danger of paying taxes on their huge profits - hence profits are huge now - rather than turning into dividends and investment.
Someone needs to clue industry in that the best way for them to get access to all of Hollywood's content is to revert the copyright terms to the original term of 14 years with one renewal effective retroactively.
It would hardly affect the software industry where the life cycles are so short, but would open up a ton of yummy content for them to promote the sale of software, hardware, and service products.
Its probably (although probably almost impossible to pass) easier than getting a fair deal out of the music/film/media industry (see Apple where the music industry allows them a small sliver of change which is almost enough to keep their service running).
Except the taxes on them aren't necessarily to just collect revenue, but to provide an incentive to actually invest their profits - as opposed to hiding them in a tax shelter and sitting on the money.
Not sure how they can claim a recountable paper trail, "would do nothing to ensure greater trust in vote tabulations".
I wonder if they'd let me take control of their personal finances without a paper record - because the paper record would do nothing to ensure greater trust in the financial calculations.
actually it says it completely extinguishes the IR (and UV, but that isn't really relevant here) but I'd still concede if you hit it with a CO2 laser it'd probably let some in in a few seconds. *grin*
You looked in the wrong places:> here's multiple variations of mounted sharp cutoff IR filters virtually extinguishing above 780nm and still transmitting 80-90% in optical, they are optical quality and pre-mounted on threaded mounts - Edmunds
A bit pricey, but not outrageous, about half of your price for most.
Though there will be some transmission obviously so if you up the brightness enough you might be able to swamp the camera.
No idea what the characteristics of the Tiffen Hot Mirror filter is though, can't find specs for it anywhere.
Is there some reason someone couldnt simply use an IR filter (a hot mirror filter) on the camera to prevent most of the problem generated by an IR flood?
Not that I'm saying that movie companies arent just trying to create public fear by making a few loud examples.
The American Association of People With Disabilities wants to promote non-verified voting for people with disabilities then let them be the only ones to use them and everyone else can have verified e-voting.
If they don't feel verification is necessary for anyone, then why would they feel deprived if their members can't verify their vote by reading the paper its printed on.
The problem is when the protection measures interfere with legitamate uses of the bought product - which leads to customers not buying the product anymore or joining the copyright infringing set.
This lesson was learned once in the 80s-90s in the software arena when some good programs lost market due to overzealous 'protection' rendering their product much less desirable than more or less equivalent. In this case the more or less equivalent will be independant artists/labels releasing their music without the additional DRM hassle.
Bzzt -- "All that says is that if someone were tracking the RFID built into my clothes it would currently tell them that somebody just passed by with Doc Marten's, Old Navy jeans, and a button up shirt from who knows where."
No actually since each tag is unique (unlike a UPC which all are the same on identical items) it would tell somebody that somebody with your particular Doc Martins (DOCMARTINS-Unit#937298437291), Old Navy jeans (OLDNAVY-Unit#182374892ZAS), and a shirt with a tag returning unique ID#RT2928344KA13 has just walked through the scanner.
Probability indicates this profile is John Anderton to a 99.99% threshold - its been over 3 months since Mr. Anderton has purchased toothpase from the store - Play toothpaste ad on wall for Mr. Anderton.
only if they use them to defraud people - using them to try to argue their point is their right, just as its everyone elses right to tell them their numbers are a complete farce and they have their heads up their arse.
Well they have the right to use whatever misleading numbers they want. However, 'our' representatives should be questioning the data they are brought and not just swallowing it hook, line and sinker - but I bet a fat campaign contribution makes it go down a bit easier.
I think they're trying to change that title to fully employed burger process control manufacturing engineers, to make it look like theres still some manufacturing left in the US.
Slashdot Mirror
Also plenty of locations you can't even get close to fitting a drill head containing said bit (or a different bit) anyway.
Not necessarilly illegal, but the store will likely/can ask you to leave, and you must leave at that point or possibly face charges of tresspass.
Its only an issue when you detain someone you can't prove is a thief. Then they can sue you or possibly bring criminal charges for unlawful detainment.
If Guthrie was willing to sell his rights -- and no one could get 'em otherwise -- then that's the end of his involvement.
Actually Guthrie is dead so whatever rights he might or might not have to the music would have reverted to his heirs, whoever they were possibly people chosen by the state if he died without a will.
So Guthrie might never have sold the rights to this song - but they could have been sold to whomever brought the suit - and this is possibly or even probably against the artist's (Guthrie's) intent - by the heirs either in the will or appointed by the state because the artist, Guthrie, wasn't clear enough (legally) that he was releasing these songs to the public domain.
not well, since theyve given the huge loopholes for corporate taxpayers who are no longer in danger of paying taxes on their huge profits - hence profits are huge now - rather than turning into dividends and investment.
Someone needs to clue industry in that the best way for them to get access to all of Hollywood's content is to revert the copyright terms to the original term of 14 years with one renewal effective retroactively.
It would hardly affect the software industry where the life cycles are so short, but would open up a ton of yummy content for them to promote the sale of software, hardware, and service products.
Its probably (although probably almost impossible to pass) easier than getting a fair deal out of the music/film/media industry (see Apple where the music industry allows them a small sliver of change which is almost enough to keep their service running).
Except the taxes on them aren't necessarily to just collect revenue, but to provide an incentive to actually invest their profits - as opposed to hiding them in a tax shelter and sitting on the money.
nah aristocrats can take their private jet and not be bothered by that pesky airport security check crap.
All it does is create another hole in an already hopelessly systemically flawed system.
like Ohio where the Diebold CEO is "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."
Not sure how they can claim a recountable paper trail, "would do nothing to ensure greater trust in vote tabulations".
I wonder if they'd let me take control of their personal finances without a paper record - because the paper record would do nothing to ensure greater trust in the financial calculations.
actually it says it completely extinguishes the IR (and UV, but that isn't really relevant here) but I'd still concede if you hit it with a CO2 laser it'd probably let some in in a few seconds. *grin*
You looked in the wrong places :> here's multiple variations of mounted sharp cutoff IR filters virtually extinguishing above 780nm and still transmitting 80-90% in optical, they are optical quality and pre-mounted on threaded mounts - Edmunds
A bit pricey, but not outrageous, about half of your price for most.
Though there will be some transmission obviously so if you up the brightness enough you might be able to swamp the camera.
No idea what the characteristics of the Tiffen Hot Mirror filter is though, can't find specs for it anywhere.
Is there some reason someone couldnt simply use an IR filter (a hot mirror filter) on the camera to prevent most of the problem generated by an IR flood?
Not that I'm saying that movie companies arent just trying to create public fear by making a few loud examples.
Thats what I was saying since the original poster suggested it was being left at the top.
I hope english is a secondary language for you.
heh if you use water as shielding you can't exactly leave it at the top :)
Though you could bring down some wastewater for treatment on the surface.
The American Association of People With Disabilities wants to promote non-verified voting for people with disabilities then let them be the only ones to use them and everyone else can have verified e-voting.
If they don't feel verification is necessary for anyone, then why would they feel deprived if their members can't verify their vote by reading the paper its printed on.
The problem is when the protection measures interfere with legitamate uses of the bought product - which leads to customers not buying the product anymore or joining the copyright infringing set.
This lesson was learned once in the 80s-90s in the software arena when some good programs lost market due to overzealous 'protection' rendering their product much less desirable than more or less equivalent. In this case the more or less equivalent will be independant artists/labels releasing their music without the additional DRM hassle.
Bzzt -- "All that says is that if someone were tracking the RFID built into my clothes it would currently tell them that somebody just passed by with Doc Marten's, Old Navy jeans, and a button up shirt from who knows where."
No actually since each tag is unique (unlike a UPC which all are the same on identical items) it would tell somebody that somebody with your particular Doc Martins (DOCMARTINS-Unit#937298437291), Old Navy jeans (OLDNAVY-Unit#182374892ZAS), and a shirt with a tag returning unique ID#RT2928344KA13 has just walked through the scanner.
Probability indicates this profile is John Anderton to a 99.99% threshold - its been over 3 months since Mr. Anderton has purchased toothpase from the store - Play toothpaste ad on wall for Mr. Anderton.
only if they use them to defraud people - using them to try to argue their point is their right, just as its everyone elses right to tell them their numbers are a complete farce and they have their heads up their arse.
Well they have the right to use whatever misleading numbers they want. However, 'our' representatives should be questioning the data they are brought and not just swallowing it hook, line and sinker - but I bet a fat campaign contribution makes it go down a bit easier.
hmm im still getting unable to establish link to server errors on just that video - strange.
I think they're trying to change that title to fully employed burger process control manufacturing engineers, to make it look like theres still some manufacturing left in the US.
Looks like they took it down yet again. Too bad one of the best segments Corrdry has done.
It is on Comedy Central its just hidden a bit (and in Real format)-- Daily Show: Corddry - Email Trouble