Slashdot Mirror


Remote-controlled Bolts and Screws

Winter writes "SMT Magazine has an article on intelligent fasteners (screws, bolts...) that can fasten themselves or by remote control. Usage for this seems mainly to make sure normal people cannot change parts in their car themselves, and only allow for authorized parts and service. Of course, a hacker might also have fun and disassemble the neighbours car."

318 comments

  1. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always wanted a universal tool that could work like the Sonic Screwdriver from Dr. Who!

    1. Re:Cool! by KB1GHC · · Score: 1

      want a universal tool?
      Leatherman, http://www.leatherman.com

      i have one, they are a bit pricy, but they worth every penny

    2. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A HREF is a hard tag to use.

    3. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, but can it dismantle stuff without touching it?

      On a related note, I wonder if a "Sonic Screwdriver" would be allowed through airport security. I know a leatherman certainly can't be in your carry-on luggage!

    4. Re:Cool! by KevinKnSC · · Score: 1

      Even better is the SOG Paratool. You can open it with one hand, and when you squeeze your palm is pressing against a flat surface, as opposed to pressing against the area where the tools are stored on the Leatherman.

    5. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no, you've got it all wrong.

      Four words: self-sealing stem bolts

    6. Re:Cool! by brain159 · · Score: 1

      It's "an HREF tag", surely?

    7. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not exactly easy to search these sites for this, but what I'm wondering is if any of the multitools out there have "computer keys" already on 'em. You know, those round ones that are just under 1/4", and used for opening drive bays and stuff. Hella useful as a sysadmin IMO.

    8. Re:Cool! by protolith · · Score: 1

      No "computer keys" but Victorinox makes a knife with tools specifically sized for computer components,(sockets, phillips, torx) far more useful to a geek than the leatherman,

      http://www.urbanjunkie.co.uk/product.php/61/0

    9. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to get the joke, Captain Constipation!

    10. Re:Cool! by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Even easier: Try

      Clicky clicky example: http://example.com/

      --
      My other car is first.
    11. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Read into the article a little deeper. They're talking about monitoring when a screw is unscrewed so they can screw you on your warranty. Seems to me like just another way to metaphorically weld your car hood shut. :-/

  2. I've had this forever by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hey server monkey, come tighten these screws!"

    1. Re:I've had this forever by underpar · · Score: 2, Funny

      You jest, but some of us have husbands that do just that.

    2. Re:I've had this forever by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Hey server monkey, come tighten these screws!

      you mean monkey wrench, don't you?

  3. Too much tech in cars already by slusich · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's already way too much tech in our cars already. I love technology, but there are some places where it should be kept to a minimum. I long for the days when you could work on your own car with a decent socket set and a few wrenches.

    1. Re:Too much tech in cars already by edrugtrader · · Score: 1, Interesting

      i long for the day when you never have to work on your car, because technology finds and fixes problems before they happen...

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    2. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Funny
      Auto service writer: "Mr Jones, there's a $50 charge for the firmware upgrade for the bolts in your new Toyubishi. But if you don't get it, your nuts might fall off."

      Car owner: "You leave my nuts alone!"

    3. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Flaming+Foobar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's already way too much tech in our cars already. I love technology, but there are some places where it should be kept to a minimum. I long for the days when you could work on your own car with a decent socket set and a few wrenches.

      Well, you still can do a lot. The engines aren't that different. Granted, software problems can be a PITA, but I think people are generally more scared of them than they should. I think intelligent fasteners sound like a good idea; encryption and encoded serial numbers would make selling stolen cars and car parts a nightmare.

      --
      while true;do echo -e -n "\033[s\n\033[u\134_\033[B";done
    4. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Nagatzhul · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Now you know why a lot of people enjoy motorcycles. We get to work on our own rides while keeping things as simple as we want to. I am sure that there are segments of the car driving population that still adhere to this. The Manx or buggy folks, perhaps? Older 4X4s as well?

      --
      "All I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power." - Ashleigh Brilliant
    5. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now if you guys could just invent a muffler that didn't make it sound like a jet engine on takeoff, you just might find that other people like motorcycles, too.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    6. Re:Too much tech in cars already by localhost00 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      i long for the day when you never have to work on your car, because technology finds and fixes problems before they happen...

      The day that Tim Taylor types long to never have to work on their cars is the day slashdotters long to never have to work on their computers.

      --

      Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

    7. Re:Too much tech in cars already by AhZuhl · · Score: 1

      This is a good thread!! I too think that technology has gone a bit too far. I love the Old Cars. In fact!! Some day I'm gonna get a couple and fix'em up [if need be] and run'em in car shows or parade around in them. One at a time, of course! ;) There's nothing like seeing an Old Car cruisin the strip. Have fun!

      --
      Just Do It!
    8. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Nagatzhul · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It isn't that..... Most non-HD mufflers come under 100dBs (which is a poor way to measure sound intensity, but that is another discussion). The Harley folks make them loud on purpose so you can hear them coming. Since those of you driving SUVs and talking while you are driving aren't paying much attention, can you really blame them? They can't dodge you like those who ride sport bikes can.

      I'm only being half sarcastic here. If there was demand for it, you could make them almost absolutely silent. The technology already exists, but when it was introduced a few years ago, the rider portion of the show boycotted the booth. They felt that being silent would make them invisible and thus even more ignored on the freeways.

      --
      "All I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power." - Ashleigh Brilliant
    9. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      i long for the day when you never have to work on your car, because technology finds and fixes problems before they happen...


      With occasional massive failure, like when your car decides that it doesn't want to let you out or your car's power windows wrap around your child's head and kill them. Oh, wait those days have already come.
    10. Re:Too much tech in cars already by wankledot · · Score: 1

      A lot of new bikes seem to use the same ECU/MAP/Injection system that cars do, making them simpler by virtue of fewer parts, but not electronically much simpler.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    11. Re:Too much tech in cars already by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but when the software goes wrong... Man does it go wrong. I've read some real horror stories about BMW 5 series software bugs...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    12. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, I have to listen to these asshats from my house so people know they are passing on the shoulder and running red lights during rush hour traffic. Wounderful. I'm only being half sarcastic. Last month I saw a car save the life of a motordick who ran a red light. When the car honked the jerk flipped him off. No helmet, of course, since there's not much worth protecting.

    13. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With occasional massive failure, like when your car decides that it doesn't want to let you out or your car's power windows wrap around your child's head and kill them. Oh, wait those days have already come.

      Well that's the price of progress :)

    14. Re:Too much tech in cars already by TYC · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The Harley folks make them loud on purpose so you can hear them coming.

      I've had Harley riders insist that this is the reason why they have to have the "Look at me! I'm an attention whore!" straight pipes while cruising in residential neighborhoods; yet even while watching them come and listening for them, I never hear them from very far away. You can always hear them as they roar by, and as they rumble off, though. I think the whole "hear them coming" excuse is a crock.

      One of these same Harley riders insisted, during the very same conversation when I asked him about the mental rider fatigue all that extra noise must put him through, that he never hears his own pipes while cruising. "Hmm..." I asked him, "How can you hear them coming if you can't even hear them from 3 feet away?" "The wind carries the sound away before it gets to my ears" was the answer.

      They felt that being silent would make them invisible and thus even more ignored on the freeways.

      I've found that quiet bikes are much easier to stay alert on, especially in routine rides such as to work and back, and also as the miles add up on long road trips, and that's a far bigger safety factor in this world of sound-insulated luxury cars and SUVs. Most anyone with their windows up won't hear you anyway, unless you're riding with a half dozen others with straight pipes.

      I don't bitch about straight pipe riders much, but I don't have a positive opinion of them, either.

      They can't dodge you like those who ride sport bikes can.

      They can if they're alert, competent riders.

    15. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ... a muffler that didn't make it sound like a jet engine on takeoff

      I wish I had mod points for you, because this is +5 Insightful (if a little off topic). The mentality that drives unnecessarily and excessively loud motorcycles (HD rumbly types) reminds me of people blaring the car stereo with windows down. The only purpose is to cause others grief. And don't get me started about the kids on my lawn.

    16. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The only purpose is to cause others grief.

      Incorrect, at least in the case of motorcycles- it's a safety issue. One could make the case however, that there's another way to accomplish this, hooking up a bullhorn to an MP3 player with a touch screen interface and all sorts of interesting messages for your average SUV driving idiot.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    17. Re:Too much tech in cars already by MasTRE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > I long for the days when you could work on your own car with a decent socket set and a few wrenches.

      FYI: I have a 2000 Passat with a 1.8T engine and I can, within reason, work on a lot of it w/o having that many tools. As a matter of fact, I only have a 3/8" drive set I bought from Wal-Mart for $19.99 which includes wrench and sockets. I also have a metric allen key set (hex) that I bought for like $5, plus some pliers and screwdrivers. I haven't done a lot of work on the car, but I've replaced a few parts, a few hoses, removed my throttle body, etc. With a minimal investment in tools and elbow grease, I could probably take the whole car/engine apart. From what I read on the Passat boards I'm a member of, even the latest models, including those with a V6 engine, are pretty much the same in this respect. So, at least on my car, tech doesn't get in the way of self-serviceability.

      P.S. With a $300 software/hardware tool, I can map my RPM and many other parameters in real-time on my laptop, plus change/disable all sorts of OEM functionality, perform resets on different systems and get a full list of "codes" as to what the onboard computer (ECU) thinks about the health of my car. A very IT-friendly car, I would say.

      --
      Must-not-watch TV!
    18. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it reminds me a curious story of "Space Race" age.

      First American moon landers used microwave radars to measure distance to Moon surface and start retro-rockets just a few meters above the surface.

      Russians couldn't make their radar to be precise and light enough to fit into lander so they just used a long pole to start a squib and, consequently, retro-rockets. And this approach worked fine, even during the mission to Venera :)

      The moral of this story is: KISS. More of electronics = more of places-of-failure.

    19. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Nagatzhul · · Score: 1

      I think the whole "hear them coming" excuse is a crock.

      If they didn't work, then sirens on emergency vehicles wouldn't work either. As far as I am concerned, it is not the people who are ahead or behind you that need to hear you, it is the guy right next to you that can't turn his head to check his blind spot due to his cell phone that needs an aural cue. You will have a hard time arguing that the loud pipes don't provide that.

      "The wind carries the sound away before it gets to my ears" was the answer.

      Hell, he is probably deaf to that tone by this point any way. He probably doesn't wear plugs for wind noise either.

      I've found that quiet bikes are much easier to stay alert on, especially in routine rides such as to work and back....

      You and me both. The pipes on my bikes are aftermarket, but chosen because they fit Europe's rules for noise level on aftermarket pipes. (Unlike cars, we have no mechanism for certifying aftermarket emissions equipment in this country.) I lost a few pounds on the pipes, got better performance, and increased my gas mileage all at the same time.

      --
      "All I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power." - Ashleigh Brilliant
    20. Re:Too much tech in cars already by jridley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, the only problem is that you HAVE to work on older cars more. Give me electronic fuel injection and computer-controlled coil pack ignition any day over a carburetor/coil/distributor setup. Carburetors are horrible; they are inefficient, cranky, troubleprone, difficult to adjust, etc. If you want to keep emissions down, you either put in a plumbing system from the late 70's that Rube Goldberg would weep over, or you go to computer control.

      Coil-pack ignition is the best thing since sliced bread. Distributors were probably the most troublesome part of a car engine, and they're gone now.

      I currently am driving my third car that I've bought new and taken to > 100K miles; none of them required ANY service, except one failed solenoid on our minivan when it was at 22K miles.

      Taking a non-computerized car to > 100K miles without so much as pulling out a spark plug would be laughable. I had a couple of older cars (VW Beetle, Plymouth Horizon, 69 Newport) and they were all to varying degrees a pain in the ass, every day, especially in the winter when the temps hit 0F or less. My new cars, even with > 100K, start in 5 seconds on the coldest days.

      So yeah, you can get a classic car and be able to work on it, or buy a newer car and not have to.

      BTW, I'm convinced that the reason I have so little trouble with cars is that I drive them very lightly. I've known people who were crazy drivers (IMHO) that bought the same cars as I did, and I drove them for years with no problem, but they were in the shop all the time.

      For instance, I've taken a manual transmission car to 218,000 miles on the original clutch (the body finally fell apart). My Taurus is at 105,000 with the original brakes (I've looked at them every 20K since 60K, they're still fine). I know people who burn out a set of brake pads every 15K driving the same roads I do.

    21. Re:Too much tech in cars already by barc0001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am sure that there are segments of the car driving population that still adhere to this.

      Oh yeah. Anyone with an older Little British Car (Triumph, Rover, MG, Austin Healey, etc) knows all about self-maintenance. Perhaps we know a bit too much. ;). If you have one of those cars, you're either a mechanic yourself (pro or hobby), or have way too much disposable income going to support a British car mechanic.

    22. Re:Too much tech in cars already by chazR · · Score: 1
      About 1991, a (rich) friend of mine was having some trouble with his nearly new ZZR1100. The dealership had told him that the flat spot in the power curve was in his imagination. So he asked me to look at it.


      Here's a guy, university undergrad, with enough money to buy a hot superbike, but without the basic ability to frob on his own bike. So he asks ME, an astronomer, to look at it.


      I do, of course. If only to get a "test ride". 150 miles later, I actually agree with him. It's got a flat spot. It feels like a dodgy spark plug. Probably too big a gap. Easily fixed. How long can it take?


      So, I get hold of a workshop manual. I look up "Sparkplugs, and the changing thereof". The first task is a peach.


      To access the front of the cylinder head, begin by removing the rear light cluster. Special tools are required.


      I politely declined the task.

    23. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, so did the Americans, the LEM had sensors like that in the pads, there was a contact light that went on before the thing landed that was triggered by those sensors. I'm guessing it's hard to get an accurate measurement when the initial pulse has barely left the antenna and the echo is coming right after.

    24. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      they were all to varying degrees a pain in the ass, every day, especially in the winter when the temps hit 0F or less. Oh god... it's been 10 years or more since I've had trouble starting a car in a parking lot, late at night, when it's 10 below and with no phone in sight. I forgot how much old cars really, really sucked.

    25. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      it's a safety issue

      Well, it's a percieved safety issue, anyhow. A lot of people think SUV's are safer than mid-sized cars, and that helmets and seatbelts are dangerous, too. Perception and reality only brush against each other.

    26. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Jim+Starx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All /.ers long to never have to work on our computers. But not having to doesn't mean we won't. :D

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
    27. Re:Too much tech in cars already by jovetoo · · Score: 1

      yep. it's just another piece of car that can break down.

    28. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However- I've got to admit that the super quiet Police BMW only caught my attention when he turned his Red & Blue lights on to give me a ticket- but the Harley driver 10 miles further down the road had my attention as soon as he got within 200 feet of my car. That's pretty empirical when you consider that the #1 cause of motorcycle fatality (at least according to the AMSF) is indeed not being seen by larger vehicles.

      Now, beyond that, I can think of several other ways to make enough noise than tuning my engine to get worse gas mileage and grinding the valves down so that they have to be reseated every 1200 miles- which is why I'll never own a Harley.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    29. Re:Too much tech in cars already by localhost00 · · Score: 1

      The point being I was trying to emphasize a habit of fixing something that isn't broken.

      --

      Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

    30. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess they never heard of Lucas, The Prince of Darkness. Imagine what the British could do with this technology. Parts that fall off on command instead of randomly.

    31. Re:Too much tech in cars already by severoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Amen. I don't think I've heard anyone complain that they can't flush their own coolant anymore since cars went to 100k mile closed coolant systems. I used to be able to do it...and I used to HAVE to do it. Now I don't keep cars long enough to ever have to do it. That's alright by me.

      I would point out, though, that intelligent fasteners are not likely to make anything that is currently operable last longer...imagine if this were applied to the oil pan plug and oil filter. Do I have to take my car to the dealer and pay $80 for a $5 filter and 4 quarts of oil? That would totally piss me off, but I trust the free market to fix it...or the government.

      (Just kidding about that last one.)

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    32. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This won't happen, because it would eliminate the lucrative profits that the dealerships get for service. Sure, as cars become more reliable, they need less frequent service. But the service they do need gets more and more expensive at the dealer. Automakers making cars which need no service would be like pharmaceutical companies making cures for medical conditions instead of treatments.

    33. Re:Too much tech in cars already by ballookey · · Score: 1
      Word. This is why I drive a '65 Mustang. From a pile of parts when I purchased it three years ago, to the growling little monster I drive today it's cost $4500 all told including purchase price. And that was the point. By buying an old Mustang I could be sure that my husband would be able to fix 98% of anything that went wrong with it. It tackles the LA freeways daily and has never left me stranded. The 1990 Toyota Camry I used to drive on the other hand, did leave me stranded, had to go to the shop whenever something went wrong, and never came back out of the shop for less than $300.

      I do long for the advances technology could give me in fuel economy, a cooling system, an AC system that doesn't involve hand-cranking a window. But the trade off in being able to fix the a break problem and get back home from Boyle Heights without the assistance of the nearest bum is well worth it.

      It's bad enough that when a light comes on in the dashboard of his Explorer, he has to take it someplace and pay someone to hook it up to a diagnostic computer in order to find out what's wrong. I think if it got to the point where he couldn't take things apart himself, we'd cease buying new cars.

      (Of course, the question of whether or not I've ever "paid" my husband for his work on the Mustang is open to debate, but probably not in this forum.)

    34. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One of these same Harley riders insisted, during the very same conversation when I asked him about the mental rider fatigue all that extra noise must put him through, that he never hears his own pipes while cruising. "Hmm..." I asked him, "How can you hear them coming if you can't even hear them from 3 feet away?" "The wind carries the sound away before it gets to my ears" was the answer.


      The medium through which the energy is travelling is flowing away, and it's taking the energy with it. You think that's balogne? Imagine throwing a stone into a slow moving river. The waves move outwards, right? The sounds stays with the rider, right? Now imagine throwing a stone into a raging river. You think the waves don't flow with the current? Think again. Your biker friend was right (at fast fast speeds), and you're, sadly, too arrogant to think about it.
    35. Re:Too much tech in cars already by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If they didn't work, then sirens on emergency vehicles wouldn't work either.

      Hmm, the pipes on a motorcycle are directed to the rear and emit a fairly low frequency sound.

      The sirens on emergency vehicles emit a much higher alternating frequency sound and are directed towards the front. Yeah, good comparison.

      I live in an area popular with bikers, along a major road. I assure that I hear a bike for the first time about the time it roars past my house, and then I hear it for along time as it recedes loudly into the distance. I hear this sound constantly during the summer, to the point where it often interrupts conversations or the television. Not to mention bikers travel in packs like dogs, so I get to hear every single one of them roar by with their radios blaring classic rock.

      Bikers who repeat this mantra are either ignorant or simply grasping hold of some justification for their rude, idiotic and inexcusable behavior. I especially like it when the guys with no helmets adhere to it, yeah you're big on safety issues moron. I'd like to find someone whose mantra this is and rev a Harley right outside their bedroom window every 5-10 minutes all night long and then see if it's still ok.

      You will have a hard time arguing that the loud pipes don't provide that.

      I really don't care if somehow we live in Bizarro World and it is true that it contributes to "safety" in some way. I would be a lot safer if I carried an air horn around and sounded it wherever I went, but you can bet no one else would put up with that crap. You don't get to do whatever the hell you want because you think it makes you safer. Your right to make obnoxious levels of noise ends at my ears. A loud car gets a ticket and a legal obligation to get it fixed or the registration suspended, loud Harleys should get the exact same treatment.

    36. Re:Too much tech in cars already by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      I long for the days when you could work on your own car with a decent socket set and a few wrenches.

      My family recently reached the point where we needed another car, and I wanted basic reliable efficient transportation from point A to point B, mostly with just me in it. Bought a new '04 Honda Civic. Maintenance interval for oil changes, lube parts like door hinges and visual inspection of wearing parts (tires, brakes) is 10,000 miles. Check things like the suspension and steering components, seals and hoses, every 20,000 miles. Inspect and adjust drive belts every 30,000 miles. Spark plugs, timing belt and valve clearances at 110,000 miles (and, yes, I expect to own it long enough to have those done). Replace transmission fluid and coolant at 120,000 miles or 10 years. Based on the last Civic, there will be darned little other than those standard services that has to be done.

      There was a certain amount of satisfaction in spending Saturday afternoons in my parents' driveway keeping my '69 Toyota running with a socket set and a few wrenches -- but by 60,000 miles I had replaced the water pump, replaced the alternator, rebuilt the carburetor, replaced spark plug wires and distributor cap, can't remember how many plugs (it ate them on a regular basis), adjusted valve clearances every 6,000 miles, etc. Given a choice, I'll take this generation of small car where I can't do the work, but the work is so seldom needed.

    37. Re:Too much tech in cars already by SidV · · Score: 1
    38. Re:Too much tech in cars already by mvpll · · Score: 1

      There was a case in Sydney, Australia a few years ago when a young boy was run over by a Harley rider. The rider thought the boy would move out of his way, the boy however was deaf...

    39. Re:Too much tech in cars already by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      Lots of the stuff in the step-by-step factory manuals are unnecessary. Sometimes I swear they put them in to make it look more difficult to non-mechanics. Case in point: Two weeeks ago I changed the timing belt on my VW Passat TD. The service manual says to lock the cam and injection pump (makes sense, we don't want to mess with the timing when we take the belt off) and then to adjust the cam into position within a hundredth of a degree. Excuse me? The smallest amount it CAN be wrong is by a cog and that's several degrees of turn on the cam. It's simply not possible to have the timing off by anything close to the amount of precison the manual required so I happily didn't give a shit, changed the belt and it works fine.

      It was probably perfectly possible to change the sparks without touching the rear light cluster on his bike, but you'd have to pull the tank off. I do on mine and we share the same engine, if not body work.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    40. Re:Too much tech in cars already by bot24 · · Score: 1

      What is to stop you from getting a wrench with a slightly angled away iron handle and hitting it with a mallet? Maybe a crowbar. Remember those stickers?

      "Would you buy a car with the hood welded shut?"

    41. Re:Too much tech in cars already by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

      Since those of you driving SUVs and talking while you are driving aren't paying much attention
      Loud obnoxious motorcycle tailpipes were around waaaayy before SUVs and cell phones. Motorcycle riders often like to overtake traffic in the adjacent lane by 40+ mph (60 feet per second). Nobody should have to watch their rear view mirror for traffic 200 feet behind them to make sure they're not going to hit a speeder when they make a lane change to pass.

      It's not a matter of auto drivers disregarding the riders, it's the riders disregarding their own life.

    42. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what some call 'having a really good mechanic'. =)

      Actually, I think I am with the original author of this thread. I love technology as well, but there is just something about leaving some things such as Cars a bit simple and, well, analog. Technology, though it often adds more function and comfort to something, can also cause it to be complicated and tough to fix, as well as more expensive when it breaks.

      - Kn0xy

    43. Re:Too much tech in cars already by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Damn you, Dopplerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!

      --
      +++OK ATH
    44. Re:Too much tech in cars already by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      They can't dodge you like those who ride sport bikes can.

      So instead of buying a decent bike, these people purposely endanger themselves and others by driving one that has POS handling, and then they add insult to injury by installing loud pipes (while claiming that they're a safety feature)? What morons.

    45. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I have read about people who own multiple bikes - one guy teaches MSF classes and owns a bunch of big BMWs, one is an ex-CHP bike and he says there is a significant difference in how he is treated by car "cage" drivers when riding the white CHP bike with a white half helmet than when riding the other similarly shaped bikes.

      The point is conspicuity is a complex thing, low frequency non directional sound doesn't help me at all locate ridiculuoudly loud bikes in complex traffic patterns, esp when there is more than one and they are coming from different directions. Loud pipes will be the excuse the govt uses to over regulate every aspect of motorcycles. Not unlike the situation with P2P.

      loud pipes
      orange not loud

    46. Re:Too much tech in cars already by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      I concur, though I own a Mazda and have owned Saturns and 1980s fords.

      One can (economically) work on the later model cars with only a modest tool set, mostly metric wrenches - a socket set, box wrenches, and a torx set. It seems like the major changes in engines have really been materials, the addition of fuel injection and the increased complexity of emissions - at the core, an engine is still an engine. As a noob, (but with some friendly advice from gearheads), I changed the engine in a couple of days on the Mazda. The ECU/PCM hasn't been a problem either. You can go even cheaper than $300 - The ISO scan tool I built from a PCB I got online cost $12 in parts (if you don't count the laptop) and has saved me hundreds in diag fees.

    47. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Pusene · · Score: 1
      Nahh, it's way to little.

      I would like my car to run on Linux.

      I would like to use an USB dongle as a/with a digital key.

      I would like to do firmwareupgrades on my car.

      --
      Error #13: No coffee. Operator halted. Please place boot device at bottom.
    48. Re:Too much tech in cars already by Altus · · Score: 1


      the fact of the matter is that except for the absolutely most abnoxious pipes you realy cant hear your exaust and engine noise over the wind noise while on the highway.

      try sticking your head out the window of your car and listening to your engine. hell, try to listen to the 18 wheelers engine next to you.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    49. Re:Too much tech in cars already by jridley · · Score: 1

      Gee, somebody made a bad batch of coil packs. I guess this implies that coil packs are a bad idea?

      There's bad ham on the market sometimes too, but I still like it on my sandwiches.

    50. Re:Too much tech in cars already by SidV · · Score: 1

      Errrrr Ahhhhh Read the Article. It wasn't a batch. Every single coil pack (one for each cylinder) on every Audi and VW for about 3 years of production had to be replaced, due to a bad DESIGN, not a bad batch. The problem was so bad that the supplier could not supply enough of the new design. So people couldn't get all changed at once, only the bad one was changed. My buddy had to go to the dealer 5 times to get the 6 coil packs changed. Problem further compounded because said Coil Pack was mounted on the cylinder head, which is very hot, and coils do not like heat. During the same model years a variety of Trnasmisions had a software bug that translated into the transmision eating itself. Happened to my buddy's Audi A-6 at 3500 miles approx 4 months after he bought the car brand new. Talked to a VW dealer in Dallas. VW/Audi sent a team of technicians to every dealer in the US to upgrade the software on all the transmisions. It was thought that the coil pack issue was so bad that it could have bankrupted VW. Luckily the transmision problem was caught early on, on an A-6 the $ amount billed to Audi for replacement was 25K+ Imagine that for the majority of cars sold by them in the last 3 years.

    51. Re:Too much tech in cars already by srussell · · Score: 1
      Now you know why a lot of people enjoy motorcycles.

      Back in '88 I had a Nighthawk that I couldn't work on myself: the engine was mostly inaccessible without disassembling the entire bike, and the electronics were obtuse. On the other hand, I had a Ford LTD that I could take apart with just three tools.

      Bikes are no easier to work on than cars; it just depends on which bike (or car) that you buy.

  4. Screw.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    yea well..SCREW THAT!

  5. Bring 'em on by Fux+the+Penguin · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been interested in these devices for a while now. As a design engineer, I don't see much how these new intelligent fasteners will differ much from today's dumb fasteners. Since they are mechanical fasteners, the joint strength considerations remain the same. All fasteners still have to transfer a force, and the concepts of tension, shear, and clamp load don't change with the addition of an embedded system. I suppose that any joint strength you can achieve with a traditional fastener, you can achieve with an intelligent fastener.

    There will be differences, of course. On the plus side, they promise to provide additional design freedom. Tool access and assembly sequences often dictate the fastener locations as much as joint strength does. Now you can put a joint anywhere you want because of the built-in actuation, which can also eliminate some of the tolerance or orientation issues associated with assembly tools. Cross threading could be a thing of the past.

    They also shouldn't present any packaging difficulties, despite their onboard electronics. These fasteners tap into a product's existing wiring and electronics. Digital commands take up far less space than a physical tool. I think that smart fasteners can attain much smaller sizes than conventional mechanical fasteners--in part because they overcome traditional spacing constraints and in part because smart materials will allow them to be smaller, perhaps even down to the nanotechnology scale. Cool stuff indeed.

    1. Re:Bring 'em on by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, they promise to provide additional design freedom. This is a good thing. Also, not having to climb under the car and lay there for four hours screwing with a stupid bolt would be a good thing. Here's the problem: You just know these fuckers are going to apply copyright and encryption to this in an attempt to get around current laws on aftermarket parts. You can BUY the part, but hack the intelligent screws and go to jail. Just wait until GM starts suing everyone who bought a tool from a pirate alternator-replacement site ala DirecTV.

    2. Re:Bring 'em on by SageMusings · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I took away from this article is not how cool and useful intelligent fasteners might be, but how they promise to keep you from having control over the vehicle you purchased and legally own.

      Something like this might spell the end of any non-factory automotive service, especially those who would like to save a few of their precious dollars by performing their own maintenance.

      What happens if a bolt registers a "tamper event" and you are threatened with either a voided warranty or legal action when you next bring the vehicle into an "Authorized" station for any rerason?

      I see this as similar to the recent court ruling in the UK, where it is now illegal to modify your legally purchased game console system.

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    3. Re:Bring 'em on by nomel · · Score: 1

      "Digital commands take up far less space than a physical tool."

      Remember, you would need the electronics AND the actuator. I know that all the bolts I've fastenned on my car with 45 ft-lb or so would require a bigger actuator than the size of my socket wrench. But, it's probably safe to assume they wouldn't use screws held by friction in the end.

    4. Re:Bring 'em on by cryptor3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thanks for the commentary. For some reason, after I read the article I didn't quite get the design freedom point, or why the hell you would want to have self-actuating fasteners. I mean, to the average joe, I'm sure they'd say, "For the love of God, it's just a screw! Leave it alone!"

      But anyone who's worked on a car to any appreciable degree knows what a PITA it can be to get to some of the screws and bolts, and that's definitely something I can relate to.

      If this technology can be applied so that I don't have to contort myself all up in the engine block, then yes, I agree; bring them on.

      But certainly the fears about manufacturers trying to enforce their own agendas to lock in customers is something that will have to be addressed, as well as preventing mischief with automobile self-dissassembly. But I think that the latter could be relatively easily handled.

    5. Re:Bring 'em on by rebelcool · · Score: 1

      Think how many cars have keyless entry now. Virtually all new models.

      How many problems do you hear about people breaking into other peoples cars with radio transmitters? I've heard one or two stories years ago, but with modern frequency hopping schemes its so rare, nobody bothers worrying about it.

      Why would these be any different?

      --

      -

    6. Re:Bring 'em on by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      It looks like the cheif usage would be stuff like car door locks and such. Now that everybody has OnStar or such, this would eliminate the ability to EVER use a slim jim to open your car door! I'm sure many Luxury car driver MUST have this...ha, ha.

    7. Re:Bring 'em on by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      How often do you hear car alarms go off? I hear them all the time, everyone else does to, and hardly anyone *ever* pays attention. Who cares about "stealthily" stealing a car when you can bust the window and be gone, knowing no one cares and no one is looking (and even if they were, they wouldn't do anything because they are too afraid to get involved).

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    8. Re:Bring 'em on by arekq · · Score: 1

      not having to climb under the car and lay there for four hours screwing with a stupid bolt Of course. (under normal circumstances) You won't be able to remove the screws anyways. :)

    9. Re:Bring 'em on by (negative+video) · · Score: 1
      What I took away from this article is not how cool and useful intelligent fasteners might be, but how they promise to keep you from having control over the vehicle you purchased and legally own.
      Not in the US. That contest was already fought with manufacturers who tried to void warranties for not using their motor oil and replacement parts. Vendor lock-in and unfair warranty restrictions are now explicitly illegal.
    10. Re:Bring 'em on by NateTech · · Score: 1

      "OnStar, may I help you?"

      "Yes, I'm underneath my car and I can't seem to get the nut loose on the oil pan to change my oil."

      "Alright sir, no problem, I'll take care of that for you from here..."

      [Sputter, cough, gag... glug glug glug...] "Goddamn it... aww man, I'm covered in oil." [Cough, cough...]

      "We'll send a paramedic to your location right away sir, I see you're at 123 Cherry Street, correct?"

      [Cough, hurl...]

      "Help is on the way sir, just be calm..."

      --
      +++OK ATH
    11. Re:Bring 'em on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DMCA-protected car parts.

    12. Re:Bring 'em on by sarcasticmama · · Score: 1

      Now THAT was funny!

  6. Well, of course by daeley · · Score: 1

    This is going to give "Hardware Store" a whole new meaning. :)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:Well, of course by MisterSarcastic · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Previously, a hardware store was where you'd go to buy a fasterner. Now its where you'll go to buy an RC fastener. Amazing.

      --
      I'm -so- there.
  7. Well by mfh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of course, a hacker might also have fun and disassemble the neighbours car...

    While it's moving, no less. Yet another brainless idea from the money-men.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Well by Void_of_light · · Score: 1

      So what happenes when your car is in a wreck and the wires to the fasteners are damaged? do you have to repair the wireing harness before you repair the car? where does this leave junk yards that salvage parts from wrecked vehicles? will they have to repair the cars before they part them out? This might make cars easier to assemble but its going to be a nightmare when they need repairs.

    2. Re:Well by SageMusings · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or let's say your vehicle passes a pre-determined service life set by the manufacturer. Why, that's the time any good consumer should come in for a new vehicle. They could help you make your decision by locking the bolts and declaring the vehicle an "unsupported" legacy system.

      Thinking about selling that old car? Suppose the manufacturer decides the new owner requires a lisenced seat?

      Yikes, what happens if we get a few parts off a wrecked vehicle? "I'm sorry, Mr. Smith. These bolts are registered to a different VIN. You'll have to come with us."

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
  8. Obligatory Clippy Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I see you are trying to install a screw. Would you like to install a screwdriver?"

  9. So, it proves again... by Zx-man · · Score: 0

    ...that is requires a scientist to really screw something.

  10. I use by Ogrez · · Score: 1

    Thumb screws you insensitive clod!!

    --


    Fire in the hands of the village idiot is no tool, but a weapon of mass destruction
    1. Re:I use by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      Aaaa! The obligatory joke from a Wingnut!

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  11. "Usage for this seems mainly to make sure......" by CdBee · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ..."normal people cannot change parts in their car themselves..!

    Or to prevent terrorists sneaking bombs into aeroplane service hatches? This isn't an entirely anti-consumers-rights technology. Judge it by its useful applications as well as its possible abuses.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  12. I'm trying... by ahscheiss · · Score: 1

    ...to hold back the "go screw yourself" jokes.... AARHRRHGHHRRRRRRR!!!!!!

  13. Real fun by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1
    Somebody cuts you off, you instruct their car to disassemble. Or, you can have rolling chop shops, you drive down the street, instruct the cars to disassemble, then come back and pick up the parts.

    A safe use, the police can have the car open itself when there is a suspect in the car.

    1. Re:Real fun by underpar · · Score: 1

      I think it's safer to have a big guy with a gun open the door for the suspect rather than a 13 year old brat with a remote. That's my preference anyway...

  14. Stupid idea by Mz6 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Jeez... This is ridiculous!

    So... This is just another scheme so that they can sell you a part to actually work on your car. Or even worse, make you go to the dealer *shudder*.. I can see it now...

    "Well sir, the bolts to your air filter are remote controlled... You need this $300 remote to take the cover off and replace the filter"

    What's next, the same tool to be able to take the gas cap off, because that too is locked down? Only this time they sell it as a dealer add-on rather than a part?

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:Stupid idea by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      "Well sir, the bolts to your air filter are remote controlled... You need this $300 remote to take the cover off and replace the filter"

      Nothing five minutes with an angle grinder won't fix.

    2. Re:Stupid idea by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can still drill them out and insert your favorite dumb bolts. Hooray for power drills.

    3. Re:Stupid idea by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1, Troll

      Until power drills are ruled illegal under the DMCA for being an illegal circumvention tool...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    4. Re:Stupid idea by martissimo · · Score: 1

      if i wanted to replace a head gasket i would have to drill and re-tap my friggin engine block to do so, always good to make the walls of a engine block thinner right?

      and how friggin hard would it be to drill for some parts that are allready ridiculously hard to get to in newer cars.

      i'll stick to the classics that one can at least work on thank you very much ;)

    5. Re:Stupid idea by jtosburn · · Score: 1

      You can still drill them out and insert your favorite dumb bolts. Hooray for power drills.

      Power drills: the next DRM circumvention device!

      No, thank YOU, DMCA!

    6. Re:Stupid idea by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Oooh, it must be late. I first read that as "circumcision". Ouch.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  15. Government by TheSexican · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the government gets their hands on these, then we're all screwed!

    --
    Hey, guys. Big gulps, huh? Cool. All right! Well, see ya later.
    1. Re:Government by TheSexican · · Score: 1

      I had to do it...

      --
      Hey, guys. Big gulps, huh? Cool. All right! Well, see ya later.
  16. Not gonna be widespread in a car... by stienman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless the fastener costs less than a few cents, they are only going to have very specialized applications. Further, with a vibrant aftermarket repair and service industry it will be impossible, legally, to prevent people from understanding how to actuate these fasteners.

    Of course, a hacker might also have fun and disassemble the neighbours car. While driving. On the freeway.

    It'll be nice for the one or two niche applications that it was meant for. Beyond that, it's nothing more than a curiosity.

    -Adam

    1. Re:Not gonna be widespread in a car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA. Fasteners are 5% of the cost of the car, but dealing with fasteners accounts for 40% of assembly overhead. Thus, it's economically worthwhile to increase the cost of fasteners to a point if it makes assembly easier.

      The legal mechanism for preventing people from activating the fasteners without authorization will be a combination of trade secret law and the DMCA.

    2. Re:Not gonna be widespread in a car... by Minstrel+Boy · · Score: 1
      Fasteners are 5% of the cost of the car, but dealing with fasteners accounts for 40% of assembly overhead.

      I suspect this new technology will fix the "problem" simply by making it such that fasteners are also 40% of the cost of the car. ;)

      KeS

  17. I an see it now... by riptide_dot · · Score: 2, Funny

    FTA:

    Seatbelts. Wireless or satellite signals from emergency control centers could release seatbelts, infant restraints and seating systems, enabling instant release of trapped or injured passengers from their cars in emergency situations.

    Woman stuck in seat because seatbelt won't release: "Hello Ford? I'm in my car, it's about to fall off a cliff, and I can't get out of my seat - can you release my seatbelt please?"

    Ford Customer Service: "Hold please ma'am - we're experiencing some slowdowns with our computer system. We'll just need to verify a few pieces of information with you first..."

    --
    I was in the park the other day wondering why frisbees get bigger and bigger the closer they get - and then it hit me.
    1. Re:I an see it now... by glen604 · · Score: 1

      This just brings out mental images of someone beeping out a product key in morse code using their car horn...

  18. What we really need by Johnny+Fusion · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure remote-controlled fasteners for cars and such is really nifty...

    But wake me up when they get remote-controlled brassiers. You will know its true love when she trusts you with the remote...

    --
    There are two kinds of fool. One says, This is old, and therefore good. And one says, This is new, and therefore better.
  19. OMG this brings new meaning.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to the words "wanna screw???"

    1. Re:OMG this brings new meaning.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is /., and that's the same meaning it's always had here.

  20. New way to lock out mechanics by mikeswi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just when Congress appears ready to force auto makers to stop locking nondealer mechanics out of the car's diagnostic computer, they come up with a way to lock them out of changing parts. If they prove to be resistant to the average screwdriver or wrench, we'll know for sure what's up.

    Microchips embedded in fasteners respond only to encrypted signals, restricting access to service procedures. These procedures would be stored in fastener control software, ensuring installation of authorized replacement parts. A central database would retain information on fastener status and maintenance history. All data would be accessible instantly to document warranty claims.
    1. Re:New way to lock out mechanics by smclean · · Score: 1
      This kind of stuff angers me to the point that I would not purchase a car with these kind of proprietary lock-ins, just as I wouldn't buy a computer that had to be sent back to the manufacturers to be fixed (Note: I don't own a laptop :).

      It's amazing that car companies think they can get away with this kind of stuff. Thank god for anti-trust legislation, as ineffectual as it is (glare at Microsoft), at least it's something.

      Hopefully, cars with stupid lock-ins like this will receive a public perception of expensive maintenance, and only be bought by idiots.

      Ignorance in the market sucks. It's like, we don't have enough time to be sure of our product decisions, to research every little damn thing and make intelligent decisions--and corporations count on this, constantly doing more and more devious things, until every corporation is devious in order to compete, and the consumer has no choices left to worry about. Sonsofbitches!

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

  21. "Short Cicruit", anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seem to recall a scene of random car dissassembly in that movie...

  22. This is just soooo bogus by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2, Funny

    Keep me from removing my air bag? I think not, this method presents nothing that a drill and appropriate sized bit can't resolve. Make the fastener internal so it's not exposed?? Carbide or diamond cutting wheels and torches can take care of that little problem? I'm taking it apart, who needs to put it back together again!

    Never under estimate the ability to take something apart that was not designed to be taken apart.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    1. Re:This is just soooo bogus by hakioawa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry Carbide and diamond cutting tools will now be banned under the DCMA.

    2. Re:This is just soooo bogus by twitter · · Score: 1
      Sure, you can do all of that but will you? The auto maker can price their parts just below what you will charge for all of your effort. Don't forget that they are also going to be using bogus IP laws to make sure there's no competition in the air bag maker's market. So, the customer will be faced with you messing with their car to put in the same part the dealership will without "damage" and in less time, perhaps for less money. It's hard to fight a rigged system physically.

      A better solution is to hack the software and make laws that protect that effort, if not demand a release of specs.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    3. Re:This is just soooo bogus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhhhh bogus IP laws to block competition... hack the software.... you say the same stupid zealot infested crap in every post, regardless of topic. Shut the fuck up and get back to sucking Stallman's dick little boy.

  23. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by nyrk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What happens a few years around the road when a little corosion sets in, and the little motor attached to the screw can no longer back it out. If you took advantage of the fact that it does not need access how do you remove it when the mechanism fails? I work on my vehicles, and often have to use a cheater bar to gain leverage on stubborn bolt. You would have to throw away the whole car, Starting to sound like "Brave New World"

  24. Hollywood must have these by steveha · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hollywood must have these because they have already appeared in the movie Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle. At the beginning of the movie, the Lucy Liu character is hidden inside a crate, but then we see wood screws spinning by themselves and popping out of their holes. Then Lucy Liu unfolds herself and climbs out.

    I always wondered how she got those screws to come out, especially given that her hands were folded to the bottom of the crate and the screws were on the top. Now I know.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Hollywood must have these by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      ...maybe she wasn't, you know, using her hands...

    2. Re:Hollywood must have these by nytes · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just got an idea: I'm going to start using these kinds of fasteners to make women's clothing.

      Then sell the "auto-unzip" codes to geeks. I'll be rich!

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    3. Re:Hollywood must have these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that wasn't Uma Thurman? :)

  25. How about this for an idea! by TheRain · · Score: 1

    Remote control brains! We can make people do whatever we want them to do! INCLUDING OURSELVES!

    you know, maybe it's better that some things in this world are left unwired.

    --
    Please help! I'm stuck inside my virtual reality headset!
  26. More weight, more expense, what about rust? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    What happens when these bolts rust as all bolts do? Time to break some more screw extractors?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:More weight, more expense, what about rust? by bearded_dragon · · Score: 1

      Mandatory Bolt maintenance available now at real low prices! Upgrade now to Bolt 2.0 and get a free UI update! New: Virus-Check your bolts as you ride! Subscribe to Microsoft Bolt Enterprise!

  27. Yeah but... by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can they program the fasteners to reveal their crack at various times and swear like a sailor?

    Click, whir, thunk! Hmmm, yep, there's number 1 piston now. Won't be too long now, Mrs. Jenkins.

    BTM

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  28. Protecting virtue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the makings for one hell of a new-millennium chastity belt.

  29. Wrench by 6800 · · Score: 1

    They will have to pry my wrench from my cold dead fingers! I sware I will NEVER buy a car that uses these in a way that I cannot disassemble.

  30. no imagination whatsoever by spirit_fingers · · Score: 0

    Who the heck wants remote controlled nuts and bolts? We need remote control zippers! Do I have to do all the thinking around here? Sheesh.

  31. Gonna be great for pit crews... by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has got to be worth a second or two off pit stop times. All the pit crew has to do is tell the bolts to undo themselves as the car comes to a halt and they can proceed directly to changing the tyres. Of course, there are probably going to be a few amusing incidents when they trigger the release too soon as well... :)

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  32. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by riptide_dot · · Score: 1

    What happens a few years around the road when a little corosion sets in, and the little motor attached to the screw can no longer back it out. If you took advantage of the fact that it does not need access how do you remove it when the mechanism fails?

    Not only that, but what if the encryption scheme gets messed up somehow (password recovery anyone?). There's quite a few hurdles they'll have to overcome before this will be completely viable. It's a cool idea nonetheless though.

    I say we just start using velcro to fasten all of our most critical engine parts - there shouldn't be any problems with that, right? :)

    --
    I was in the park the other day wondering why frisbees get bigger and bigger the closer they get - and then it hit me.
  33. Re:Obligatory Clippy Joke by franksp · · Score: 4, Funny
    Or better yet:

    System: "Your screwdriver screwdriver successfully installed the new Phillips 00 screw number 128696. Your car may not function correctly until you restart it."

    User: WTF! The breakes aren't working!!! AAARRRGH!!

  34. Yet another example by avalys · · Score: 1

    Yet another example of the growing trend toward the consumer not owning what he buys. Soon "buying" something will be more like leasing it, in that you'll only be able to do with it what the manufacturer wants to let you.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  35. Talk about vendor lockin by steveha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the major features touted in the article is security, as in "you can't remove the fasteners without the secret code". As in "you can't install replacement parts unless you buy them from the original maker".

    Forget DMCA tricks. This will force you to get all your parts and service from a single source, the company that originally made the product.

    Thanks, but no thanks.

    Hmmm. There has to be some tool that will remove a fastener without the security code, because what happens when a fastener breaks in such a way that it doesn't accept any code? "I'm sorry, you need a new engine, because the fasteners on your oil pan are broken. They don't answer the commands to unfasten." Not likely! So I guess if you are willing to go to a great deal of trouble you could pry out all the secure fasteners and put in your own.

    Of course that would be a DMCA violation, but at least I can hope that the DMCA will be dead long before these fasteners are actually practical for widespread use.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Talk about vendor lockin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There has to be some tool that will remove a fastener without the security code


      Drill.
    2. Re:Talk about vendor lockin by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      One of the major features touted in the article is security, as in "you can't remove the fasteners without the secret code". As in "you can't install replacement parts unless you buy them from the original maker".

      Forget DMCA tricks. This will force you to get all your parts and service from a single source, the company that originally made the product.

      There's already a law on the books that prohibits them from doing that.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:Talk about vendor lockin by steveha · · Score: 1

      I followed your link. That law governs warranties, and forbids companies from requiring customers to buy service from them as a condition of the warranty. How does this keep the fastener guys from keeping the fastener codes secret?

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    4. Re:Talk about vendor lockin by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      That law governs warranties, and forbids companies from requiring customers to buy service from them as a condition of the warranty. How does this keep the fastener guys from keeping the fastener codes secret?

      The original post suggested that a product manufacturer might use these "smart" fasteners as a way to restrict who can service the product and who can make replacement parts that will work with that product. Magnuson-Moss prohibits both of those, and I doubt that the feds would take kindly to the use of technical measures to attempt an end run around it. With few exceptions, a manufacturer can't require use of its parts or supplies as a condition of keeping the warranty in effect. An automaker can't void your warranty because you used a third-party replacement oil filter for your last oil change. A printer manufacturer can't void your warranty because you used a third-party ink cartridge or toner cartridge in your printer. For the most part, the only way the manufacturer can require use of its parts/supplies is if it provides them free of charge.

      (I probably should've picked a better link...there are several useful links here. The text of the act is here, and you can find some interpretations of it here and here.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    5. Re:Talk about vendor lockin by steveha · · Score: 1

      With few exceptions, a manufacturer can't require use of its parts or supplies as a condition of keeping the warranty in effect.

      Right. But suppose the manufacturer says: "Go ahead and get it serviced anywhere you want; that won't void your warranty. But we won't give you the passcodes. And if you crack the passcodes, we will prosecute you using the DMCA." What then?

      So, to repeat my question, how does a law regulating warranties keep the fastener guys from just not revealing the secret codes?

      P.S. You doubt that the feds would take kindly to the use of technical measures to attempt an end run around Magnuson-Moss. What, if anything, have the Feds done to block StorageTek from using technical measures and the DMCA to require their customers to buy service from them? The local court has already ruled that the DMCA is valid and the third-party service thus illegal. When will the Feds step in and what will they do?

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  36. They'd be great on PCs too by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They'd see when people had voided their warranties or even prevent unauthorized (by Microsoft of course) people opening PCs so as to switch to a non DRM-enabling BIOS.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:They'd be great on PCs too by Devalia · · Score: 1

      I wouldnt say it prevented unauthorised access, just made it more effort - screws can be beaten :) *loads up chainsaw :)* Seriously, I can imagine it just be like using the wrong screw for the job, it can be forced out - its just obvious if people check!

    2. Re:They'd be great on PCs too by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There is already a device which accomplishes this for about five cents. It's called a case intrusion switch.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:They'd be great on PCs too by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      It doesn't prevent anyone opening anything however.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    4. Re:They'd be great on PCs too by Alsee · · Score: 1

      That's why they wire a a small wad of C4 to the case intrusion switch. :D

      Akk, not as funny as I thought. I just remembered that the newly shipping Trusted Patform Modules are already packing the digit equivalant of C4. If you try to open them and trip the "tamper detection" sensors they self destruct. Sigh. One of IBM's recent ThinkPad commercials even advertized the fact that these chips self destruct.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  37. And how much torque will this give you? ;-) by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    Judging from the photos on the site, those look like nice big bolts of the size one would use to attach an engine head to the block. Would the actuator mechanism really give enough of the torque for such an application???

    If this can get space-qualified though, I can see those fasteners used on satellites or space stations (attach something outside without a need for a human spacewalk).

    Paul B.

  38. Re:Obligatory Clippy Joke by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    Worse yet, the car would slowly grind to a halt while the messenger loads...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  39. Speaking of screwing that ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... The potential for these in kinky sex toy designs is astounding.

    I imagine the B&D crowd is panting at the very though. (But then they usually are...)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  40. Patent idea? by valderost · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quick- somebody take out a patent on remote-controlled WD-40!

  41. Could have some interesting uses by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article cites labor costs as the main impetus for creating these self-fastening fasteners, but I think it's much more interesting to consider new applications.

    One thing about nuts and bolts is that in order to use them, you have to place them where you have access and enough clearance to be able to attach a tool. You couldn't use nuts and bolts to fasten two blocks together, for example, unless you have holes extending through at least one of the blocks. With these things, you can bolt two blocks together with no obvious access points, and you can unbolt them at any time.

    The benefits of totally blind fastening aren't completely obvious because we've worked out other solutions to the problem. Basically, we either weld things together, or we use some sort of snap-fit system, or we leave access holes if we might need to reverse the attachment. But I expect there will be some interesting applications for these things in the future.

    1. Re:Could have some interesting uses by Jesterboy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your post; that is quite an interesting idea that would've never come to my mind. Such implications could really change the way cars are built, and possibly lead to some of the benefits the article mentions.

      Although, as most posters have pointed out, the possible abuse availible by these is quite large, I'm also kind of intrigued as to how they would function. It seems like they're just a new tool/fastener combo that no longer requires quite so much strength to operate; just a press a button and the come off. It could also make servicing much more interesting, as you could unbolt multiple parts at a time with a few button presses and just lift them off. Sounds pretty cool to me!

    2. Re:Could have some interesting uses by rebelcool · · Score: 1

      yes, it would certainly make labor much less time consuming. a common problem with working on modern automobiles is that in order to get to one part's bolts, you need to remove other parts so you can fit a tool in. And then loosen each individual screw or bolt.

      a remote system that could be programmed like "detach right front quarter panel", and then automatically undo the fasteners would save immense amounts of time and labor - which is cheaper in the end for consumers and businesses.

      --

      -

    3. Re:Could have some interesting uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you still need a hole for the power cord to come out of.

    4. Re:Could have some interesting uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > One thing about nuts and bolts is that in order to use them, you have to place them where you have access and enough clearance to be able to attach a tool. You couldn't use nuts and bolts to fasten two blocks together, for example, unless you have holes extending through at least one of the blocks. With these things, you can bolt two blocks together with no obvious access points, and you can unbolt them at any time.

      Yeah. Right up until the fastener's mechanism fails, and you now have an inaccessable, unremovable fastener.

      Nice. Not.

  42. Finally! by ebob9 · · Score: 1

    This is the next, logical step in building our own Transformers. Yknow, they are more than meets the eye.

  43. Microsoft windows by Greg@RageNet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Using windows as compared to open source is like buying a car where the manufacturer sealed the hood shut; how rediculous would that be? Oh, nevermind....

    -- Greg

    --
    Slashdot, would a spell-checker for posting be too much to ask? It's not rocket science!
  44. The car analogy by erroneus · · Score: 1

    How many times have we used the car analogy when talking about the right to work on and tinker with your own hardware and software? "...it would be like Ford putting a seal on my hood and telling me I can't change my oil or upgrae my carbuerator..." Sounds like they want to do that.

    So what do we do about it? Worse, what analogy do we use to describe this travesty?

  45. The submitter's full of FUD, these look cool. by A.S. · · Score: 2, Informative

    As usual, the submitter is a sensationalist fucktard. The first thing the article does is describe several uses for these products It lists six different categores, including optimizing manufacturing assembly, and sensing impending problems. Yes, restricting access is one thing that they _will_ be used for. But it's not even close to the only thing.

    The article goes into pretty significant detail about the operation of the fasteners. The site is the web presence of a manufacturing industry rag, so it's not just ad copy.

    This is the kind of hardware that's taking the auto industry out of the industrial age. A couple of exerpts I thought were particularly tasty:


    With the press of a button car owners could remove roof racks and other accessories to reduce wind noise, drag and vehicle weight.
    ...and...

    By using intelligent fasteners, the lens and lamp assembly would be remotely released from the sub-assembly, greatly reducing time and cost to install, service and replace parts. Removing the need for rear access screws also would allow space savings.

    I just had to replace the headlamp assembly on my wife's Corsica. It was a pain in the ass. Assuming that the control codes for these fasteners was publicly available it would've taken just a few minutes.

    Aside here: Manufacturers are required by law to release a certain amount of information about their vehicles, to allow third-party repair shops to get in. This isn't playing DVDs under Linux or any heavy geek esoterica, it's something that affects Joe Legislator, so they're going to see to it that it doesn't inconvenience them too much.)

  46. Re:"Usage for this seems mainly to make sure...... by stephentyrone · · Score: 1

    Or to allow terrorists to pop all the service hatches remotely while the plane is flying, causing a crash? It's a terrible idea, (almost) any way you look at it.

  47. Then buy an old car by tbdean · · Score: 1

    I'll have to agree here. After a 40 - 60 hour week writing code I go home to my air cooled, carburated, 1968 912. There is still a lot of use that can be had from Bugs, Busses, and old Porsches. They are easy to work on and get insane mileage when treated right.

    It's nice to be able to work / play on something so simple when my day job involves things so complex.

    --
    tbdean
    1. Re:Then buy an old car by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I'm with you here. My car does not have a single transistor and maybe not even a diode -- it has a generator, not an alternator and the diode (if it exists) is in the fuel pump. I've driven it for 7 years now. It's never stranded me. It's fun to drive. It's cheap, but it was made in Britain, not Germany and a decade before your Porsche. What's more, parts are very easy to find and cheap.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  48. Oil change anyone? by MachDelta · · Score: 1

    Huh. Looking on the non-paranoid side of things here, these little things could come in awfully handy. I mean, how nice would it be to have a self-unscrewwing drain plug on your oil pan? Just slide under your car, put the bucket under the plug, grab a wrench, crack the plug (probably wouldn't want to burn out the tiny motor on an overtightened thread). Then stand back, hit a button, and presto! Plug unscrews itself, falls into the bucket with the oil right behind: And you don't have to scald yourself or let dirty oil drip all over your hand. Kick ass!
    I don't know how many slashdotters are mechanically inclined enough to change their own oil, though, so maybe this doesn't mean much to you. But it'd make me pretty happy come oil change time. And I bet some smart engineer could find a million other good, honest, uses for these things too. Personally, i'm daydreaming about a remote nut on a switchable Galant tranny for my DSM... mmm... instant FWD or AWD... *drools*

    1. Re:Oil change anyone? by smclean · · Score: 1
      The idea is though, that you will not ever have the ability to unscrew anything yourself. Remember the story about the car with a welded-shut hood? I don't think anybody has a problem with the remote control access in and of itself, but there are some technical issues that are horribly annoying with them (What powers them? What kind of hell of wires will have to be added to power each fucking screw in the vehicle? So now I can never work on a car without having a battery connected? What if I'm working on wiring? Connect, unscrew, Disconnect.. work work .. Connect, unscrew, Disconnect.. repeat).

      Also, as the article was indicating, this is clearly not about consumer convenience. This is about making it easier to create proprietary lock-ins so customers do not have a choice on who they allow to service their car. This is every bit as evil as DVD-CSS, hoods welded shut, and everything else that makes it illegal to 'Do It Yourself'. Could you imagine someone being prosecuted under the DMCA for attempting to change their oil (breaking the encryption on the bolts.. or even breaking the bolts)?

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    2. Re:Oil change anyone? by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      Um...why not just have a nice little locking valve. Then you just put the pan under the car, press the button, and the oil comes out. Then you don't have to fish around in the dirty oil for the $200 bolt. Also: shift-on-the-fly 4WD has been around for ages.

      I've removed a front-wheel transmission and replaced the clutch though, and in that case it sure would have been nice to tap in a code and the transmission neatly drops itself on the wood blocks under the car.

    3. Re:Oil change anyone? by MachDelta · · Score: 1
      Also: shift-on-the-fly 4WD has been around for ages.
      Not for DSMs it hasn't ;)
    4. Re:Oil change anyone? by sarcasticmama · · Score: 1

      Only one problem I can see with your theory.... Plug unscrews itself, falls into the bucket with the oil right behind: And you don't have to scald yourself or let dirty oil drip all over your hand. How do you intend to get the plug back out of that pan of hot, dirty oil to put it back in the oil pan? And YES, I can do my own oil changes/car maintenance repairs even being a woman!

    5. Re:Oil change anyone? by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Simple. Drain the pan. ;)

  49. Ah, slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What better place to post articles about things screwing themselves?

  50. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by foidulus · · Score: 1

    Nah, it's not brave new world till you are encouraged to have sex in the back of your disposable car while driving to play electro-magnetic golf and taking drugs.
    Damn, maybe Huxley was on to something.....

  51. I guess that it is time... by Zx-man · · Score: 0
    ...for a newly invented, but planned for a long time UN*X command to be revealed:
    [root@localhost /]screw -rf "*bolts*"
  52. Fun at the Dealership... by Ayrehtek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why stop with disassembling your neighbor's car?
    Take a trip to the dealership, and just walk up and down the rows of cars... >=)

    I know the trouble you'd get in would be astronomical, but it just might say something to the dealers about "remote control" screws.

    1. Re:Fun at the Dealership... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not head over to your local police station?

    2. Re:Fun at the Dealership... by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      If they bust you threaten to go to the media and tell them that you just disassembled every new car in the lot using just an old ibook and hi-power bluetooth transmitter.

    3. Re:Fun at the Dealership... by Ayrehtek · · Score: 1

      And what? Dismantle all the cruisers on the lot?

      Or...
      I can see the headlines now...

      "Man gets away from police chase by remotely dismantling the police intercepters..."

      Not that I condone actually doing any of this.

  53. What will this do ... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

    For the market in "kit" cars?

    I'm not talking about the car from a certain older TV show, but rather those cars you can order in pieces from catalogues. The less control the average consumer can exercise over his own property, the more demand will be generated for the build-it-yourself models among people who care. The list of reasons to build grows:

    1. Avoid airbags, nasty explosive pillow takes me out of control of my vehicle when I could be avoiding additional damage.
    2. Avoid smog controls. Most states don't give a hoot what kind of emissions controls you have and whether they're working.
    3. Avoid stupidly complex designs that raise my cost and assemble in such a way as to prevent anyone with 3 or more fingers on his hand from reaching that last screw...
    4. Avoid these new fangled fasteners, tracking systems, black boxes, and other gifts from Big Brother.

    Time to go buy a copy of "HOT ROD"

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
  54. A solution in search of a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy describes how complex a car's wiring harness is and how it can be greatly simplified by using network techniques. This is true. If everything that used electricity had its own network controlled switches then you could reduce the power wires to one. ie. one power wire going to everything with another wire with control signals multiplexed on it. Fine. We've been doing that for a while.

    The guy then says we could use smart fasteners for that. I didn't see the logical connection.

  55. Luddites all around by eericson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it that on a site that's supposedly for Techies/Geeks/other lovers of the Bleeding Edge that every new invention creates an automatic wave of "That'll never work, and it's a bad idea!"?

    This isn't part of some vast conspiracy to bilk you out of your money. It's just a screw that works itself, and more importantly it's not necessarily meant for every application.

    Sheesh. /rant

    --
    The evil monkey commands you to dance.
    1. Re:Luddites all around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent post is dead on! Everyone jumps on why this is useless because they don't have any use for it, but fails to look at what potential this would have.

      There are some applications where screws and bolts can often loosen up - a possibility to have bolts that self tighten could save TONs on inspection/maintenance times and costs.Sure, they could fail. But is that any more likely to happen than some guy forgetting to tighten a critical bolt in an engine? Just one example of a useful place for this technology.

      Open your minds, people!

    2. Re:Luddites all around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This isn't part of some vast conspiracy to bilk you out of your money.

      I agree with you technically, but the end results can often be the same. What we're talking about here is the market and the players in it.

      It is vast. The USA's GDP in 2003 was ~ 11 TRILLION. The commercial marketplace is massive. And because a company must generally grow profits to remain viable, the market wants more of your dollar this year than last.

      It is not a conspiracy. But when a single competitor owns, say, 50% of a market, all the resources brought to bear by that company are probably coordinated far better than any hidden-from-view conspiracy could be.

      Companies aren't "bilking" consumers out of their money, but it kinda looks like it. The real problem isn't inventions that can have negative uses. It's the climate of decreasing competition that creates the environment where "negative uses" can be effectively brought to bear.
    3. Re:Luddites all around by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      It's not about being a Luddite, it's because most of the time these new things are only used by marketing to add a stupid bell or whistle that goes bad after 3-4 years! Cars in particular are one of those things best left alone. Most "geeks" would prefer a 10K$ car with stick shift and no air to these electronic messes they're building now...It's an allocation of resources issue...it's a waste to keep building things so compex they don't last 10 years. Geek rule #1: When in doubt, Simplicty is best!

      More than that, it's usually the marketdroids who decide to "weld" the hood shut before they come up with anything really interesting. You and I will never get our hands on these for reasonable prices anyway..."in the name of security" and all that stuff.

    4. Re:Luddites all around by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Cars in particular are one of those things best left alone. Most "geeks" would prefer a 10K$ car with stick shift and no air to these electronic messes they're building now...It's an allocation of resources issue...it's a waste to keep building things so compex they don't last 10 years. Geek rule #1: When in doubt, Simplicty is best!

      Speak for yourself. It's 110-115 degrees here in Phoenix every day; I like my A/C. But I will stick with my stick shift however. My car (with all the power options) just passed 10 years of age this April, and most people are shocked when they learn it's that old.

      The problem isn't really complexity, it's build quality. Some cars have it, some don't. Don't buy cars that aren't known for quality and longevity (i.e. stick with Honda and Toyota).

      Also stick with cars that are designed for relatively easy serviceability. I keep hearing horror stories of cars that need special electronic tools to service them. I'm guessing these are American cars. I've never had a mechanic work on my car, it still runs like new, and I've been able to do all service and repairs without any special tools I couldn't buy or rent from Autozone.

    5. Re:Luddites all around by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      My current car is a 95 neon with 206K. My very favorite car is a 1984 Nissan Sentra... Great car! no power anything! I don't even think it had air... but it was a champ.. really fun to drive, reliable, great on gas, cheap to fix. Of course it had NOTHING under the hood... I'm too poor, but that's also the reaon so many old Beetles are still on the road. Nice simple car to drive around... My opinion of the current crop of new cars is cheap plastic trash...cause when all those gadgets go it's not an inconveinance anymore, it's downright dangerous.

  56. power? by madprogrammer · · Score: 1

    I didn't read the article carefully, but I glanced over it didn't quite understand how these things work...

    Does the their need to be constant power for the fasteners to keep working? I would guess that they would need to use a certain amount of power to be ready for the remote signal to fasten or unfasten.

    The picture at the top suggests that they are wired - so is that for power or communication? Or both? Otherwise how are they powered, and what happens when the power source dies?

    1. Re:power? by madprogrammer · · Score: 1

      Ouch that were some bads english... Sorry all, I got distracted in the middle of writing that!

  57. Re:"Usage for this seems mainly to make sure...... by XorNand · · Score: 1

    A much easier and cheaper lo-tech alternative is KeyLok. It's kinda like a tamper-proof hex bit, but more secure since the bolt heads (and corresponding key pattern) are made-to-order for each customer.

    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
  58. Now if only... by Cranx · · Score: 0

    ...they could make pregnant teenage girls unscrew themselves.

  59. Re:"Usage for this seems mainly to make sure...... by CdBee · · Score: 1

    Far from trolling,I was trying to make the point that technology is not responsible for the uses to which it is put - in the same way that American senator Orrin Hatch is wrong to introduce an act which legislates against technological products which could be used to illegal ends.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  60. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by fatcatman · · Score: 1

    This could be easily fixed: Have a bi-yearly maintenance program that backs the screws off a few turns, then re-tightens them. Bolts don't turn because they seize. Move them around every once in awhile, and they won't. Of course motor failure is still a problem. Maybe a diagnostic system that monitors the motor and alerts you if it's starting to degrade. Then you can have it back itself out as soon as possible, before it's completely shot. Although that probably only accounts for a small percentage of motor failure events...

  61. Ah, but what about electronic Velcro? by eufreka · · Score: 1

    Just imagine the possibilities!

  62. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

    Sounds awfuly complex for "easily fixed". These things are still a bad idea.

    --
    Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
  63. Reminds me of a Farrah Fawcett Film by corngrower · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Saturn 3 (I had to google up the name). Its about two people (played by Fawcett & Kirk Douglas) that are stationed on a remote research post. A disassembled robot (with a human brain) is sent to the station along with a specially selected trainer. The trainer puts the robot together and starts training it. Problems ensue with the robot so it is dismantled. The robot reassembles itself, Big problems.

    Farrah is really hot in this circa 1980 film.

    Anyway - the thought of these self fastening fasteners brought to mind this film.
    Saturn 3

    1. Re:Reminds me of a Farrah Fawcett Film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or Iron Giant. If these fasteners get smart enough, they might just start chasing down the assembly that they fell off of.

      200 years from now the amsuing sight might be some kid in a 4th-owner car going down the street with a parade of parts rolling and hopping behind in an effort to catch up.

  64. They still need wiring by TheSexican · · Score: 1

    Yeah, these things can go where conventional tools cannot. But you have to remember that these things still need some sort of wiring for power. So don't count on seamlessly fastening two things together with no sort of external access whatsoever... unless you include a battery in the enclosed system, but then that just raises the overall price.

    --
    Hey, guys. Big gulps, huh? Cool. All right! Well, see ya later.
  65. Not thinking big enough by jbrader · · Score: 1

    To hell with cars I can think of a slew of uses for these things in the space program. They'd sure beat the hell out of explosive bolts.

    --
    You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
  66. OMFG! Constructicons! by theluckyleper · · Score: 1

    There is not too much tech in cars!

    This just brings us one step closer to Devestator!

    Constructicons transform and merge!

    --
    Visit the Game Programming Wiki!
  67. Re:Obligatory Clippy Joke by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

    Personally, I can see people war driving up and down the roads with a laptop and cars behind them falling apart as the bolts come undone ;-)

    --
    Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
  68. Call your congressman for your right to repair by Shao+Ke · · Score: 1

    It's YOUR property:
    http://www.aftermarket.org/Government/G rassroots_A ctivities/hr2735.asp

  69. Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we will have self-sealing stem bolts!

  70. What happens when.. by CodeTRap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    your car get's hit by lightning?
    You have to boost another car and get the wires mixed up?
    Some guy like me comes along with a localized EMP generator?

    --
    CodeTrap (www.codetrap.net)
    1. Re:What happens when.. by kaoshin · · Score: 1
      your car get's hit by lightening
      Call my State Farm Insurance agent.

      You have to boost another car and get the wires mixed up?
      We shouldn't have to. There are ways to keep your battery charged when your car is off. Heres one way to do it. For those with disabilities (including incompetence), there is AAA roadside assistance.

      Some guy like me comes along with a localized EMP generator?
      Probably die. Pacemaker.

    2. Re:What happens when.. by Zen+Punk · · Score: 0

      There are already plenty of electronics in cars that would render the car "lame" if disabled. If the lightning bolt fried the power circuits for those self-unsrewy screws, then logic suggests it would also fry the circuits for the alternator, ignition, battery, etc. If you go around with an EMP, you are going to fry the ECU and all related circuits anyway, although some cars can run without one or don't have one in the first place.

      --
      Sleep is futile.
  71. Useful for tensioning screws by meltoast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This would be useful for situations where a screw is used for varible tensioning, like tuning on a guitar. Especially in a hostile environment.

    --
    if you don't feel better tomorrow, we'll just cut your legs off about here. - Theodoric of York
  72. it's kinda cool by KB1GHC · · Score: 1

    does anyone know how much this is gonna cost?

    like automobiles arn't as complex as they already are!

    my truck is already jammed with wires!
    NO THANKS! I like to work on my own truck!

    i'm slightly confused? now, you have a dumb bolt, but this thing works like a nut? so it just releases from the little grooves?

    I would like to go back to a carborator or an early EFI system.

    This system does have some good applications. for security, yes, but in functionaliy no.

    it's cool though! and i'm sure there are some practicle uses

  73. Or better yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A car that could transform into a boat! The screws are just the first step...

  74. Does it really cost more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for an international fastener distributor. There are few exceptions to the rule that the greater cost of the fastening is in the installation, not in the fastener.

    Looks like Textron wants to change that.

    I see a shift in cost for manufacturers from labor to hardware, but not an increase in the cost overall.

  75. The progression of technology by iammaxus · · Score: 2

    Kind of interesting, my dad was working on a project at Honeywell (then Allied Signal) to design a very similar bolt with built in torque sensor for space applications about 15 years ago. That bolt eventually found its way onto the ISS (the bolt to be used on the ISS was probably designed and built at least another 6 or 7 years ago) and now, car manufactures are looking to mass produce this technology and put it in in millions of cars. Course its nothing new that this is how it happens with technologies, but it is always interesting to note.

  76. Imminent Death of the Net by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    The raticle talks about networking these.

    By my estimate, there will be approximately 37.904 gazillion of these in use within 10 years. That's about 10 years before IPv6 will be widely deployed, so maybe we should just jump to IPv16 right now.

  77. Look - no remote... by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

    The Hillman Imp had self-untapping screws according to an article I read in some article.

    Apparantly DC10's would jetison cargo all by them selves. Nobody undid any screws, locks or retainers.
    Although on a DC10 I was on, a stewardess noticed that the exit door was open, as we were taking off...

    Some engines have self-adjusting tappets.

    Imagine that you had to argue a case with an intelligent fastner to convince it that it was very important that it let you remove it...

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  78. Hacking often means removing other people's screws by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    The problem isn't that they don't like the idea of a screw that works itself, it's that the screw only works itself when presented with the correct encrypted commands. Nothing infuriates your average geek like a door or a box or a bit of hardware they're not allowed to open up and look inside.

    Now a self propelled screw that listens to a well-documented command set would be really neat...

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  79. Anyone seen the IRON GIANT? by dslknowitall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All I could think about was the screw in the movie rolling around and beeping when I read this :) Can't wait for this to come into being, and then the inevitable experation period when your car falls apart after 60k miles.

  80. Re:"Usage for this seems mainly to make sure...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Or to prevent terrorists sneaking bombs into aeroplane service hatches?"

    Just put a key lock on it.

    Meanwhile, as one time aircraft mechanic, I'd say you don't want any pressure hull hatches that can be opened remotely in a terrorist world, and you sure don't want any extra weight. The last point is real serious. The industry goes nuts trying to shave ounces because it has a big impact on the bottom line. Airbus' new monster is causing real headaches trying to deliver the fancy interiors they've shown at cost-practical weights.

    Remember Crazy Glue? It was one of the things that made the 747 possible. Saved a huge amount of weight in rivets. (In the interior furnishings! You can relax now.)

  81. KISS, and two reasons it will fail by Bin_jammin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Keap it Simple, Stupid. Everyone out there knows that, and being an auto mechanic for ten years now, I'd hate to have to track down a problem to a fastener that intermitently lost its connection, decided to to losen itself, or over torque itself and break, or strip its threads. This will never work for two reasons, first off, I don't see how it can ever be cost effective, these things can't be cheap. Second is weight, the reason automakers have all been crying about how they're going to switch to 48 volt systems (any day now, riiiiight) is because the weight of the wiring for all of the electronic components in todays cars is piling up, and with thinner wiring they'll save weight, but have to run at higher voltages. Unfortunately they haven't been able to come up with connectors that won't jump an air gap and melt down connector terminals! So even if these things are wirelesss, the added weight on each connector will obviate itself out of existence. Where I do see these things going is on emissions control equipment to prevent tampering. No more hollowing out catalytic converters (for the morons that do it) and I can see these as being locks on ECU's to prevent them from being chipped or reflashed. It wouldn't be very difficult at all to have the ECU turn on the check engine light if one of these bolts were removed, but then again, it's bad enough chasing down loose connections and loose gas caps, the last thing I want these days is to chase down a loose bolt!

    1. Re:KISS, and two reasons it will fail by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      KISS is a great methodology. So lets toss out the emissions crap. It is not required to make the car run. Throw out all the computer equipment, fuel injection, electronic temp control, power seats and windows, etc. what you will have when you are completed is a fine 60's style automobile that will still be around in 20 years. I know.. your gonna cry about the environemnt. But if you have an easily maintained car that lasts 20 years that produces higher harmful emissions, how does that compare to the emissions of the 2-4yr car now the norm. Don't forget to include the plant emissions used to create the 4-10 cars (would be good to find the average ownership of a car these days) that you would consume in the same period of time. Oh yeah.. maybe throw in some of the clasic 60's styling.. you know.. the type that is becoming so popular again because it actually had style.

  82. The short version being... by el-spectre · · Score: 2, Informative

    Loud Pipes Save Lives

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    1. Re:The short version being... by nlindstrom · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Harley folks make them loud on purpose so you can hear them coming.
      Oh, please. Most Harley riders are piss-poor white trash who cannot afford to replace the crappy exhaust and carburetor systems that the low-end Harley motorbikes come with. That's why the bikes are so loud, and why the rider must constantly engage in revving the engine whenever the bike is at a stop.

      Engines that die when you let them idle, frequent back-firing, visible exhaust emissions, and the need to warm up the engine for a long period of time before driving off are all signs of a shitty machine.

      I would know; one of the worst places I ever had the misfortune of living in was next to a biker bar. Some evenings, when forty or fifty bikers would pile into the parking lot, the total IQ for the group might rise past their cumulative shoe size.

      The guys who can actually afford decent motorbikes, and ride them as a serious hobby or sport, and not just as a way to pick up the odd bleached-blonde bar fly, all own quiet bikes. You'll never hear a sputtering, ear-shattering exhaust coming from a BMW, Ducati, or high-end Harley-Davidson motorbike.

    2. Re:The short version being... by Woody77 · · Score: 1

      piss-poor? You've obviously never seen the pricetag on a harley...

      you can buy 2-3 decent sport-bikes for the cost of many harleys, especially once you get into custom paint/chrome.

    3. Re:The short version being... by severoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Loud Pipes Save Lives
      This is indisputably true. That's why, because I don't happen to own a bike, I have a 220dB air horn installed on the roof of my 1986 Escort. I had to have special glass and insulation installed in the car, and I still need earplugs when I drive it (because I leave it blaring constantly whenever the car is running), but there's no danger of running over a kid!

      This "You can hear 'em coming" argument is the most arrogant, self-centered, thoughtless, and logically inconsistent argument I've ever heard. As if it's my responsibility as a pedestrian to dodge motorized vehicles, and not theirs to make sure they conduct themselves in a way that leaves me unharmed and with comfortably non-ringing ears.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    4. Re:The short version being... by PW2 · · Score: 1

      All of the machines you mentioned are expensive including from the point of view of a middle-class member.

      Many people have one expensive hobby.

      It's recommended that anyone who has to raise themselves above others by using phrases like "piss-poor white trash" should not bring up the concept of IQ as yours for example, is a shining double digit example.

      Just the facts.

    5. Re:The short version being... by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umn.. It's so folks in cars and trucks can hear them. Not pedestrians.

      When you're on the highway on a bike, you want the guy on his cell phone in the BMW next to you to know you're there, so he doesn't pull out into you.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    6. Re:The short version being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew a KTM rider. Son of a rich man, high-paying IT job, trips to Sardinia with the boys to ride. He showed me the HP/torque dyno graph after he took his bike to a speciality shop and payed them some absurd amount of money to increase the performance by .02 percent.

      He also shaved his body hair to an even length, obsessed about his dick size in the office, and constantly obsessed about what everyone thought of him. He was the most insufferable prick I have ever had to work with. Ever. And he couldn't get laid for years - even a podunk biker bitch wouldn't fuck this twit if he paid her.

      Now am I qualified to say that all sport-bike riders are obsessively vain fortunate-son metrosexual poseurs with penis envy and no real sense of purpose? I think not. Why don't you take your elitist generalizations and put them directly in your narrow ass? That way, when you wander into my "white-trash" biker bar, there won't be any room for my size 13 steel toes.

      Cheers.

    7. Re:The short version being... by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, please. Most Harley riders are piss-poor white trash who cannot afford to replace the crappy exhaust and carburetor systems that the low-end Harley motorbikes come with. That's why the bikes are so loud, and why the rider must constantly engage in revving the engine whenever the bike is at a stop

      LOL. Never been into an HD dealership, have you? The biggest, loudest Harley's cost somewhere in the range of 40-50 grand. The kind of dough you could by THREE cars for, and that's WITHOUT paying extra for the LOUDER pipe. Piss poor my ass, most Harley rider's these days are "weekend warrior" types who spend the week doing things like performing surgery, fixing broken teeth, and suing teenagers for necking during the advertisements at the beginning of a movie.

      Then again, you're singing the praises of BMW and Ducati, so if the above wasn't proof enough, then that alone is enough evidence that you don't know your asshole from your fuel tank.

    8. Re:The short version being... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      This "You can hear 'em coming" argument is the most arrogant, self-centered, thoughtless, and logically inconsistent argument I've ever heard. As if it's my responsibility as a pedestrian to dodge motorized vehicles, and not theirs to make sure they conduct themselves in a way that leaves me unharmed and with comfortably non-ringing ears.

      Looks like you missed the point. It's not targeted at warning the pedestrians. It's targeted as hinting off the cell-phone jabbering, kid-screaming, lipstick-applying sockermom in an SUV from permanently merging the rider and his hog into a single crumpled bloody mess.

      They need all the help they can get, since watching the road doesn't seem to register on the priority list.

    9. Re:The short version being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First thing you learn about motorcycles if you ride...every fucking vehicle on the road is actively trying to kill you in the most gruesome way possible. The noise is to alert the cars, not pedestrians.

    10. Re:The short version being... by severoon · · Score: 1

      So am I not supposed to notice the guy who lives down the block from me and tunes his bike up every other weekend? Does it not matter that every other Saturday from about 10am to noon I have to listen to braAAAAaaaaAAAp braAAAAaaaaP vRROOOOOM?

      I don't care what happens to the guy on the highway. I managed to solve the same problem through a series of choices without causing noise pollution anywhere, at any time. So should he.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    11. Re:The short version being... by incog8723 · · Score: 1

      This "You can hear 'em coming" argument is the most arrogant, self-centered, thoughtless, and logically inconsistent argument I've ever heard. As if it's my responsibility as a pedestrian to dodge motorized vehicles, and not theirs to make sure they conduct themselves in a way that leaves me unharmed and with comfortably non-ringing ears.

      This "argument" is not for the sake of pedestrians. The argument is because of nuts who aren't careful enough in their cars to look around and see a motorcycle in their blindspot.

      One tiny nudge of a motorcycle by a distracted automobile driver can KILL the motorcycle operator. DUH. THAT is why Harley Davidsons are so loud... because they SHOULD BE.

    12. Re:The short version being... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logically inconsistent? At least it's not a shitty analogy. What you meant to say is that you (as a pedestrian) carry an air horn to alert autos to your presence, because I doubt that your car can sit for long in a child's blind spot. And, yes, it is your responsibility as a motorist to ensure that you don't merge into other vehicles. This isn't an issue of dodging motorcycles speeding at you, just of knowing where all of them are so you don't run into them. This really just helps motorists drive more safely.

    13. Re:The short version being... by TYC · · Score: 1
      One tiny nudge of a motorcycle by a distracted automobile driver can KILL the motorcycle operator. DUH. THAT is why Harley Davidsons are so loud... because they SHOULD BE.

      If they "need" to be loud enough to disturb the peace everywhere they go, then the problem is THE RIDER, not the bike. If they "should be" as loud as a competition automotive stereo system at full volume to be safe, then the bike isn't safe enough be used on public roads.

      If you need to be noticed, that's what your HORN is for.

      I'm a careful rider with a quiet bike, yet I've NEVER in 12 years of riding ever PUT MYSELF INTO a situation where I needed to use my horn or felt I would've been safer with a louder bike.

      Yes, I've dodged many distracted drivers, and people who were just not paying attention, but because I fully understand that my safety is in my own hands, I've never had these troubles straight pipe riders seem to think are so rampant... Is it because straight pipe riders think it's their duty to attempt to "enforce" their right to the road by not yielding to careless drivers? I've seen that enough times to give eyewitness reports to police as the ambulance drives away.

      Always keep several exit routes open, and leave your ego at home. (With your testosterone.)

      And no, I'm not a Harley-hater. I like their style, I like their resale value, and I like buying American products. My next bike will probably be one of the quietest Harleys on the planet by the time I put it on the road.

    14. Re:The short version being... by Altus · · Score: 1


      quote: doing things like performing surgery, fixing broken teeth, and suing teenagers for necking during the advertisements at the beginning of a movie.

      and writing code dont for get that!

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    15. Re:The short version being... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I wasn't under the impression that coders were raking in the "phat lewt" that they once were, but no offense was intended by neglecting to mention it. ;)

    16. Re:The short version being... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      That's like me complaining about the kids yelling and playing in the street every day when I'm trying to sleep (I work nights). Fix the problem yourself (I bought earplugs, e.g.) or deal with it. Life sucks that way.

    17. Re:The short version being... by severoon · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not like complaining about kids at all. I don't know about you, but I've never heard of anyone specially modifying their kids to make them louder.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    18. Re:The short version being... by Altus · · Score: 1


      ok, so i bought my bike right before the crunch started in earnest... just before!

      still, if you are carefull and you want a harley anyone who makes middle to upper middle class money can probably work it out if they want it enough to make it work.

      me, I just got a good deal on a (very slightly) used lowrider :)

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    19. Re:The short version being... by cavebear42 · · Score: 1

      I don't happen to own a bike

      Obviously. If you did, you might know what its like to ride. I live in Los Angeles and am a daily rider. I have found that about half of the car out there don't see you and the other half don't care. (I'm guessing you to be in the later.) I find it odd and a little scary how many people think that them getting to their destination 3 seconds faster is more important than my life. When 2 cars bump each other at 70 mph, there is some paint that needs to be fixed, when a car bumps a bike there is a funeral to attend. Crossing LA during rush hour means that I come within inches of death about 5 times/hour (let's avoid discussions on lane-splitting for the time being.) Add this to the fact that recent SUV trends has caused the number of motorcycle fatalities to double in the last decade and it becomes a scary world. Because I chose a vehicle that gets 50 mpg, doesn't contribute to pollution, helps reduce the traffic problem, and allows 4 people to park in one spot, do I deserve to get killed? The fact of the matter is that people do not pay attention to what is going on around them and the pipes do help. If you have to stop talking on your cell phone and pay attention to the road for 3 seconds while a biker passes you, I don't see how you can complain about this inconvenience.

    20. Re:The short version being... by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      heheheh.

      They should wear blinking lights like the motorcycle dude in the "Running Man".

      I mean... if they truly want to be seen.

      Or I know!! Why not those 12-foot tall red flags that they make the motor scooter kids have?!

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  83. modern cars are a PITA...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... because sure as de sun do shine, murphy's law states whatever is broken is buried under 15 layers of complexity that didn't exist 20 or 30 years ago. No, modern cars are in no way easier to work on. Not-even-close, they suck bad. As long as they are running, great, as soon as they start to go, nightmare.

    And smart fasteners? More stuff to get salt and rust and corrosion into and bork. No thankee. It's bad enough already with what we have now. You really want them to get a toe hold with DRM hardware on your car?

    I like normal cars, just plain doors, windows that are biologically operated, not electromechanical, engines that have the minimum needed to function, no more added complexity.

    If society was serious about pollution, we would just burn cleaner fuels like methanol or ethanol,not nasty petroleum products (which is what henry ford wanted anyway). If we really wanted better mileage then, we could have simple and cheap 2 cylinder commuter cars on the roads with a normal manual transmission with 6 gears maybe.

    I'll keep driving much older simpler cars until they are completely outlawed, then I'll switch to oat burners.

    And just in case anyone wants to say modern cars last longer, I got an old v-8 van with original engine and tranny and rear end, 309 thousand on it now. Synthetic oil and change it often, simple enough to do, fires right up, runs great. Plugs last so long I can't remember last I changed them, 97 I think. I've done one carb rebuild, and changed the starter and alternator/belts twice that I recall, changed a couple of lights, and new shoes and pads and that's about it.

    1. Re:modern cars are a PITA...... by SidV · · Score: 1

      "we would just burn cleaner fuels like methanol or ethanol"

      Ever seen how many BTU's of Petroleum products are created to meake a given amount of BTU's of methanol/ethanol.

      Hint, it's not an equation that that comes out as a net gain, it's a net loss from the get-go. And that's not even getting to how much land would be required to grow enough corn to supply all the cars with ethanol.

      And if you think oil prices are bad in the winter now....

  84. You have got to be fu*king kidding... by Mnemennth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... remember that feeling you got when the legs sprouted out of that guy's head in John Carpenter's "The Thing" ?
    That's the feeling I get when I hear about something as stupid as this... I mean, I guess it's the illogical evolution of the entire "tamper-resistant" fastener craze of the modern automotive industry, but as a professional mechanic for almost 20 years, I know from experience that fasteners with funny heads on them do not deter the fools and thieves out there from trying to take things apart - they only serve to provoke them into doing much more damage than they would have done had you simply used a normal bolt.

    It's just bulls#it, plain & simple.

    Mnem
    It's impossible to make anything foolproof - the fools are too damned inventive."

  85. Oh the fun one could have! by TyrranzzX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now nerds can screw over bullies cars even easier than ever! I can just see it now.

    *Nerd presses a few buttons, cars tires flatten and fall off, engine and components fall into a heap, seats, chairs, and straps fall down off of the interior, car trunk pops open and then flings off.*

    Needless to say, whoever thought up this was is a fuckin moron. Why the HELL would I trade my screwdriver's torque for a couple small magnets?

  86. Also, a DMCA lawsuit waiting to happen? by megalomang · · Score: 1

    Service. Microchips embedded in fasteners respond only to encrypted signals, restricting access to service procedures Nice... this reminds me of encrypted printer cartridges (http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,57907,0 0.html) and encrypted garage door openers (http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,60383 ,00.html) used as anti-competitive devices.

  87. Let's bring the 'hacking' mythos back to reality. by xplenumx · · Score: 2, Informative
    Of course, a hacker might also have fun and disassemble the neighbours car.

    Sometimes hackers just get way too much credit. We definitely need to educate people regarding the pitfalls of technology and the dangers of relying too much on security. However, it's erroneous, and dangerous, for us to portray the idea that some 'hacker' could simply sit at a street corner with a laptop and create havoc with all things that contain a chip. We need to raise awareness, but let's not create an irrational fear.

    Sure, I suppose a 'hacker' could have fun and disassemble the neighbours car - after they pop the hood, hook up their laptop (likey using special hardware), and run the correct program (probably with little to no 'hacking' involved). Heck, while they were at it they might as well go the extra mile and hack the car's chip.

    Give credit where credit is due, but let's not make 'hackers' more powerful than they really are.

  88. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1
    What happens a few years around the road when a little corosion sets in, and the little motor attached to the screw can no longer back it out. If you took advantage of the fact that it does not need access how do you remove it when the mechanism fails?

    Thanks to modern technology, we can combine the most confounding problems of automotive maintenance in one place. A bolt in an inaccessible location, which must be removed with a proprietary tool, is stuck due to rust and/or faulty wiring! Yay!

    You would have to throw away the whole car

    From the auto-industry perspective, this probably doesn't sound like a big problem...

    -jim

  89. Self-Sealing Stem Bolts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally we know what Self-Sealing Stem Bolts were used for in Star Trek.

  90. Self-sealing Stem Bolts !! by TalShiar00 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The future is here!
    The running joke in Deep Space 9 about self-sealing stem bolts is about to become a reality.

    1. Re:Self-sealing Stem Bolts !! by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      This was literally THE first thing I thought of when I read the headline. :}

      Guess I am a Trekkie, erm Trekker, erm whatever the hell you want to call it.

      Though, I am not so bad that I have episode names, numbers, cast, guest cast, plotlines, ship names and everything else memorized...

      Though... I did have a co-worker once who was a walking Trek Encyclopedia... kinda scary. :}

    2. Re:Self-sealing Stem Bolts !! by TalShiar00 · · Score: 1

      Then I won't say how many time I read the ST encyclopedia and technical manual ;)

  91. Re:"Usage for this seems mainly to make sure...... by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

    Or to prevent terrorists sneaking bombs into aeroplane service hatches? Yeah, right.....
    You could also just install a keyed lock to prevent access to the service hatch, but that wouldn't create the same profits that you can generate by playing the terrorism card whenever you pitch some useless idea dreamed up by the trained chimps in marketing.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  92. I Promise to Hack Only for Good by FFFish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...like when that little shit with the subwoofers goes blaring past my windows at 2AM. Goddamn, will it feel good to press the "disassemble" button on my remote control!

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  93. What about rust? by blitz487 · · Score: 1

    How are they going to work when they're rusted on solid? I can't tell you how many times I needed a long "persuader" bar to break a bolt loose, used a "nut cracker" on it, had to grind it off, or use a hacksaw.

  94. Re:Slow motion pictures by zaax · · Score: 1

    With the new synthetic oils, engines are being designed be maintenance free.

  95. Re:"Usage for this seems mainly to make sure...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These provide no security whatsoever. Take a Dremel and cut a slot in the bolt head. Voila, it can be removed with any standard screwdriver.

  96. totally agree! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    these would be great for robotic applications or other industrial apps because they would allow machinery to be "self" adjusting. Tractor-trailers that attach/detach w/o the operator getting out, easily replaceable heavy machinery parts on an assembly line...the key being applications where there are innacessable screws needed or many many screws needed to make a proper removable connection

    and OF Course! easily interchangable Giant Killer Robot parts!!!

  97. DIY and Second Sourcing Related to Open Source by GoPlayGo · · Score: 1

    This is kind of like Closed Source for cars and other devices. It is nearly impossible to buy an appliance that can be fixed these days.

    Do It Yourself is one of the key sources of training and background for scientists, engineers and technicians. Second sourcing is having more than one source for components and parts. This is very necessary for competition and vitality. No lock-in.

    The alternative is for half the people to become narrow hyper-specialists and the other half to be totally out of it. That's ok for maintaining a status quo, but won't advance society much.

    Your background reading, a classic: "Little Black Bag" by Cyril M Kornbluth, a future wherein a tiny fraction of humans are educated and the rest just coast along comfortably numb. A doctor's bag gets sent back to the 20th century.

    --
    The game of Go (Igo, Weiqi, Baduk) has the simplest concept and the deepest play.
    1. Re:DIY and Second Sourcing Related to Open Source by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is kind of like Closed Source for cars and other devices. It is nearly impossible to buy an appliance that can be fixed these days.

      Excuse me, but what are you talking about? Any examples? All the appliances I've ever seen (including some brand new ones I have) have parts diagrams available, and there's places online that have these diagrams and allow you to order any part you want. Check out the Sears parts website; they have parts available for almost any appliance brand. Most cities also have appliance parts stores which stock parts for all major brands.

      If you had said "It is nearly impossible to buy a consumer electronic item that can be fixed these days", I'd agree with you. But appliances (and cars) are not like that, and are completely repairable.

  98. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by The+Lord+of+Chaos · · Score: 1

    I doubt that there are many fasteners that can withstand the carbide-tip drill bit attack.

  99. right on! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I can at last have self-sealing stem bolts! Exxxxxxcellent...this will be better than sharks with frickin' laser beams.

  100. Re:Luddites all around/and they alll have a wallet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    16 mm hex head bolt, 1.5 inches long, any hardware store, maybe 10 cents. 16 mm self actuating smart bolt with radio remote control and onboard sensors and hoorah like that, 16$ or more probably.

    conspiracy--ya, I'd call it one, designed to separate you from your cash.

    I've already seen cars go from an average normal 12 month auto loan to now what is it, 60 months? Because they are too complex and too expensive for what they are supposed to be. Not looking forward to the 10 to 20 year car note of the future just because you can "pop" a part off and on, IF you have permission from the manufacturer and IF it's legal for you to do so and IF you can afford the part right then and IF it's still working after thousands of miles of bumps and heat stress and corrosion. If it's hard to get an old bolt off now, how hard is it when you can't even get to it because it's buried under something else and it stops working correctly? What might have been a little drill action and some easy-outs now will take major disassembly and a torch or just replace the macro assembly the little busted part is connected to.

    Maybe these things might be useful for a very few extrme niche applications, but putting them everywhere will lead to nothing but more corporate monopolism and losing your ability to actually work on your own stuff and it won't make things cheaper. Automation and introducing robotics on the assembly line was supposed to make cars cheaper (I heard this real time way back when too many times, that was the promise when they started doing it), but it didn't, no matter what country or what company makes them, they are much more expensive then they used to be and repairs are higher and replacement parts are higher. Not just inflation, even taking that into account, they are just *more expensive*. It's already bad enough with complexity and cost, why exactly again do we want to make it worse/more complex and more expensive?

  101. Auto-detect/plug-and-play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows has detected remote unscrewing of your motherboard in progress. Would you like to restart your computer after the process is completed?

    o Yes
    o No

  102. Clever, using a $49 bolt to save $0.49 in labor co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the article closely. It says that fasteners themselves account for about 5% of vehicle production costs while actually using fasteners accounts for 40% of the production overhead. This is essentially comparing 5% of apples to 40% of oranges as neither of the terms is adequately defined. What's the ultimate cost saving in producing vehicles if 1 dollar in labor costs are saved by replacing a 49 cent bolt with a 49 dollar bolt? Oh, and the article was written by a manufacturer of 49 dollar bolts.

  103. SIT ON REMOTE PROBLEMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    i can just see it "highrise leveled when ceo accidently sat ont his remote...."

  104. Welcome to the World of Non-Ownership by serutan · · Score: 1

    Looking at the cutaway diagram of the fastener, I first thought this might be a parody or hoax. Automate something as trivial as a bolt? But then if you read what applications they are talking about, it seems these fasteners aren't meant to make nuts and bolts obsolete, they are meant to restrict access to certain replacement parts. It would be more appropriate to call them locks rather than fasteners. Locks controlled by someone other than the customer.

    It's going to be the suppliers' world. You'll just consume in it.

    1. Re:Welcome to the World of Non-Ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent insight, locks are exactly what they are. And indeed they are combination locks with the combination not held by the 'owner' of the product but by the manufacturer of the product 'locking' the so-called owner into returning to the manufacturer for service or upgrades, in other words limiting choice and competition in the after-market. Parent oughta be modded up, locks are absolutely what we're looking at here.

  105. Scary Failure Mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a 25 plus year hardware tech and backyard mechanic this invention initially facinates then horrifies me. Reason: there isn't anything man-made that dosn't break. These things will be a nightmare to work around when they fail?

    With regular bolts there's various strategies for removal if the usual method fails: penetrating oil, applied heat, drilling them out if needed. None of this may work on smart fasteners either because the problem is not simply being 'stuck' or if designers take advantage and use them in places you couldn't normally get a wrench, there wouldn't be any room for the last-ditch drilling solution.

    There are already cars out there famous for being difficult to work on, you know, hoist the engine to change the spark plugs sort of thing. I envision at least a period where designers go thru a learning curve overusing these things and creating a whole new level of difficulty for the maintenance field. (Remember difficulty = time = cost to repair)

    You'll notice in the article none of the reasons listed to use them include anything related to maintenance.

  106. Cheaper than $300 by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 1

    For $109 you can get the software and the hardware (sans laptop) from here.

    --
    Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
  107. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by mks180 · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. On top of that, the part count on the car goes up, since now the bolts are assemblies, which means more thngs can go wrong. The aerospace industry, which I work for, is trying to reduce part count not increase it. Also, another improtant point to consider is that you have to power them. How will that be done? More wiring in the car? that will be a gold mine for the car dealers. I had the oxygen sensor go bad twice on my last car (a Dodge Neon) due to broken wires. Now multiply that by a hundred or more. It seems that this will be good primarely for the car makers and dearlers.

  108. Ummm.... by Coaster-Sj · · Score: 1

    OK this is a little late but... Has anyone ever had a bolt that was rusted in place? How the heck are these things supposed to generate enough torque to back themselves out once a little rust sets in. Built in WD-40?? "Oh the bolt is stuck we have to replace your whole engine"

    --
    "Average intelligence is pretty damn stupid"
    1. Re:Ummm.... by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the most advanced devices are thwarted with the oldest technics. Drill it out.

    2. Re:Ummm.... by Coaster-Sj · · Score: 1

      However these are designed to be used in places that are inaccessable to standard tools. You'd probably have to disassemble the entire engine to even get a drill even close to one and you's still damage one of the parts.

      --
      "Average intelligence is pretty damn stupid"
  109. Enough already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is nothing you americans can understand unless you put it in cars talk. You are sad.

  110. One concern by Izanagi · · Score: 1

    Lets say a terrorist writes a virus that un-bolts an airliners wings mid-flight.

    Better ban these from airliners

    --
    SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
  111. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by spagnitz · · Score: 0

    I'm sure there are many that can, carbide is very brittle any flex/vibratiion and the brazed carbide will break and you now have a useless $20 drill bit.

  112. "Look at me! I'm an attention whore!" by Dr_Marvin_Monroe · · Score: 1
    "Look at me! I'm an attention whore!" is the way you stay alive.

    You want to let everyone around you know where you are, especially those SUV drivers mentioned above.

    Only two things keep you alive on a motorcycle,

    1) Out-thinking the others, like the mom, on her phone, in the mini-van, not paying attention at all and gonna switch lanes without a signal.

    2) Announcing your presense and getting everyone on the street to see where/who you are, and to make them stare at you so you know that they REALLY SEE YOU!

    Being an annoyance can help your visability as well as making you look pretty intimidating.

    1. Re:"Look at me! I'm an attention whore!" by afidel · · Score: 1

      I HATE straight pipes, and under the same regulations that outlawed glass packed pipes in the 60's and the regulations used to pull over the idiot with the thumping bass box they should be illegal in most jurisdictions. That said the only time I wished I had followed up on that urge to get a carry conceal permit was to defend a straight pipe riding idiot from some infinitly more idiotic SUV driving morons. The particular move that enraged me was that after exchanging words the SUV driving idiots swerved towards the guy on the bike who was in the break down lane in order to get out of their way. In my view that was attempted vehicular homicide and idiocy of the first degree.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:"Look at me! I'm an attention whore!" by d474 · · Score: 1

      ...you know, the /. geek in the Yugo dislikes the SUVs as much as the next guy on a Harley.

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    3. Re:"Look at me! I'm an attention whore!" by KshGoddess · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the attention whore who passed me twice the other night, accelerating quickly to, oh, 60-70 mph (in a 45), popping wheelies, then getting over into the right lane (I gladly gave thim the left lane) and slowing down going up the hill (to 35 in this same 45 mph zone).



      I was glad to see that he had some sense, and was at least wearing a helmet (not required in this state) and leather jacket, but I'm (a) married and (b) not interested in idiots.



      I had 2 co-workers who rode motorcycles. One was your typical bike-guy who knew his motorcycle (and motorcycles in general) upside-down, inside-out, and backwards. He wore the leather (and manmade fibers) jacket & pants, protective boots, and a helmet. The other was the 'environmentalist' who rode because he could weave in and out of the mostly not-moving cars (illegal, but hey). He wore overalls, plus a non-animal-carcass jacket, boots, and helmet. Neither of them drove loud bikes. Neither of them wore neon-everything. Neither of them were asshole motorcyclists. They were both in their late 30's/early 40's, so obviously, their wits allowed them to continue breathing.



      As a car-driver, I, too, am tired of the cell-phone-talking not-paying-attention assholes on the road. I was behind one who stayed stopped at a green because he was talking on his phone, and dealing with his kids.



      Being an annoyance can also get you killed if you're being an unsafe annoyance, like the asshat wheelie-popping mofo who kept pulling in front of me.


      --
      It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
  113. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that you'll have all the inherent mechanics of an ENGINE in your bolt. I can't wait until some genius decides these things need their own smart bolts.

  114. Marketing Cracker Design : New Criminal Code? by strangedays · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Brings a whole new meaning to End Of Life doesnt it when the bolts on your wheels unlock themselves, maybe cos you pass a hotspot, or a repair dealer with a cash flow problem.

    I think we need some laws that make it illegal to build a devices intended to prevent, the repair or alteration of the product offered for sale. Designing and making any device to remotely controlled by anyone other than the owner, should be jail time for the seller, the company CXO's and owners, do not pass go, do not collect marketing award.

    I am old enough to remeber taking cars to bits for fun and profit (or was it girls... Yeah!)

    How are kids gonna do that if they have to buy BOLT.EXE from Frod Rolloversoft for $15,000. As other posters noted, this particular idea is way beyond stupid, mechanically. However... the business model that gives rise to the idea needs to be made illegal.

    Its time to define into law a few mechanical and software reverse engineering maintenance, and alteration, rights and privileges.

    Isn't this also a matter of national security? We are going to look really stupid if we cant maintain simple mechanical devices and systems in any future era, where our dealer infrastructure and InfraDaft Boltware companies are smoking holes in the ground.

    Some things need to be fixable with simple tools, fast, in nasty places.

    I would support unpleasant consequences for any product designer that infringes that mandate. Did they stop teaching basic humanitarian and business ethics in design schools or something?

    In the interim, punish companies that produce such trends in products by supporting a gratuitous existence failure in their sales. Do not buy the products. I like the Golgafrinchan solution. Sod all political correctness for a farce, dump all the morons, make em somebody elses problem.

    --
    There is no god; get over it already! Never exchange a walk on part in the war, for a lead role in a cage.
  115. Stupidest idea I've heard in a long time! by TofuDog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No doubt there are applications for -sensors- on fasteners (can you say "MD-83 jack screws"?), but suggesting that nuts and bolts install themselves sounds idiotic. How does a microprocessor go about delivering 100 ft-lbs. of force - or 20 in-lbs for that matter, more efficiently than a WRENCH? Sounds like justification for bad engineering - in fact I've owned cars designed with these principles, e.g., "the engine has to be raised to replace the exhaust head-pipe," or "every accesory must be removed to reach the water pump." -Now design can suck and magic bolts can be the excuse. Awesome!

  116. Leatherman Wave by jcostantino · · Score: 1
    The Wave has rounded surfaces where your palm contacts the grips. I tried the old Leatherman and didn't like how it bit into my hand, the Wave is an amazing tool and it's comfortable to use.

    My only complaint is that the screw driver tips don't have a lock and you can end up having them fold into your knuckles when the tool slips off the screw.

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
  117. Even better by Knnniggit · · Score: 1

    How about a swiss army knife that has a USB key, LED and pen? http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/tools/6b3b/ =P

    --
    Brain kills internet cells.
    1. Re:Even better by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Pretty cool, but for $70 there isn't really that much. LED lights cease to be bright after about ten minutes (due to the way those coin-cell batteries discharge). 64M isn't that impressive. And most importantly, those tools aren't that useful.

      Cool idea though. But IMO not worth the dough or the space in my pocket (PDA, phone, iPod, wallet, checkbook, keys, pens... man I'm a loser).

      --
      My other car is first.
  118. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1
    I can't wait until some genius decides these things need their own smart bolts.

    Isn't that what nanotechnology is all about?

    -jim

  119. Great by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Looks like America's biggest corporations have just come up with yet another way to screw themselves.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  120. fuck this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I changed the battery on my car without using a memory keeper, and now the radio won't work unless I can somehow find the magic 5 digit code. It's my radio. I didn't steal it. It's not a password I set, like with my computer. It's simply not working, unless I can pay the dealer 85 dollars to recode the radio. What a crock of shit.

    Imagine what these bolts will do if you change your battery. THey'll lock themselves and then when your belt breaks and you need to loosen the doohickey to get the thingamijiggar out of the way to put the new belt on you'll have to pay the dealer 85.00 dollars to recode the bolts. Fuck that.

  121. Vendor Lock-In by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This would completely eliminate anyone working on their own property, put 3rd party repair shops out of business, and aftermarket replacement/upgrade components would become non existant..

    Between encrypted keys which would be protected via the DMCA and custom 'dealer only' tools, it would give the manufacturer total control after the sale.

    Electronics has its place, but the industry has gone far beyond that 'place', we don't need a chip in everything..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  122. How about a little physics check here by mpn14tech · · Score: 1

    What exactly is this self actuating bolt going to push against to thread/unthread itself?

  123. Re:Obligatory Clippy Joke by shadow_slicer · · Score: 1

    This is windows we're talking about:

    "I see you are trying to install a screw. Please select the appropriate size hammer.

  124. 220dB by rcw-home · · Score: 1
    I have a 220dB air horn installed on the roof of my 1986 Escort.

    Wow. How did you increase the local atmospheric pressure to 400 bars to allow for the higher SPL?

    1. Re:220dB by d474 · · Score: 1

      Well, duh! He's in a 1986 Escort. He simply accelerates to 24,320 mph!

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  125. Now... by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

    Crashing your car has a double meaning!

  126. This is all well and good, until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone gets near a transformer (hit by lightning, etc...), and all the fasteners actuate. Somewhere, a lawyer is smiling about this.

    I would be really interested to see a self-driven fastener setup the proper torque sequence and pressure on a head block, as well.

  127. Absolute bollocks by ishmaelflood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless he has exceeded the speed of sound then the sound energy will still reach him. The source and the receiver are moving at the same speed, so in your river analogy they move together. Even if the receiver was stationary, so long as the current is slower than the wave speed, waves will still arrive at the receiver.

    5/10 for coming up with a reasonable model. 0/10 for thinking it through. You fail it.

    1. Re:Absolute bollocks by deimtee · · Score: 1

      Still not quite right. Yes the sound will still reach his ears, but it will effectively be chasing him and will have to travel further through the air. As the intensity decreases with the square of the distance even a moderate forward speed will lower the sound level. Quick example :

      Speed of sound 340 m/s.
      Speed of Harley ~ 34 m/s (120 k/hr)
      Effective increase in distance = 1/9th
      Sound level drop about 20% due to speed.

      Hmmm. Some drop, but that's not very significant when dealing with loudness. I think the fact that the exhaust is pointing away is probably a lot more important.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
  128. Realistically... by trainsnpep · · Score: 3, Informative
    That isn't amazingly useful. Think back to your Physics class...Torque? Torque is cheap (when you have a big pole). You couldn't use it for anything significant to the operation of a car since most of the bolts there need to be torqued, usually to something more than 30+ ft/lbs. Big things are sometimes torqued to 500+ft/lbs. Lets work with 30ft/lbs.

    Assuming the head of this thing has a whopping 1" radius from the center of the bolt, that's 360 lbs of force the fastner needs to apply. And the largest volume that this fastener will take up? 3.14 in^3? 6.28?

    These screws will only be useful for detailing unless they can tap power magically from anywhere they want.

    --
    --<Mike>--
    1. Re:Realistically... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      They are not describing torque-based fasteners.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  129. Ever had a Mechanics design teacher.... by pruneau · · Score: 1
    ...Sneering at your careffuly designed blueprint of s multi-jointed robot arm that nobody will ever produce anyway (because that'S an exam, dude !)
    • T: Is that an inflatable bearing ?
    • S: ?!?
    • T: Because you cannot mount it easily, can you ?
    • S: !!!

    Now that would be an answer:

    S: you see ,with those remot-controll screw, you...

    --
    [Pruneau /\o^O/\ warranty void if this .sig is removed]
  130. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by puppet10 · · Score: 1

    Also plenty of locations you can't even get close to fitting a drill head containing said bit (or a different bit) anyway.

    --
    -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  131. Re:Bring 'em on (no thanks) by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

    or just drill out the i-bolt and re tap and die the hole. depending on its location this could prove to be a real PITA though.

  132. Mr Johnson, you got owned by Nykon · · Score: 1

    telnet johnson-chevypickup.car

    $ /usr/bin/removebolt -v *
    VERBOSE OUTPUT

    bolt 1 ...... removed
    bolt 2 ...... removed
    bolt 3 ...... removed
    bolt 4 ...... removed
    bolt 5 ...... removed
    bolt 6 ...... removed
    bolt 7 ...... removed
    bolt 8 ...... removed
    bolt 9 ...... removed

    --
    "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
  133. And when the fasteners controller breaks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about when the fasteners break and either fall off or get stuck on?

  134. oh no I can hear the jokes already by n2rjt · · Score: 1

    Somewhere between the self-sealing stem bolts and "You drive me nuts", this subject is ripe.

  135. Re:Obligatory Clippy Joke by Supernoma · · Score: 1

    This file does not contain information about your hammer.

    --
    I'll Find You Peer, If It's The Last Thing I Do!!!!
  136. Are they serious.... by d474 · · Score: 1
    FTA:
    "Microchips embedded in fasteners respond only to encrypted signals, restricting access to service procedures."
    I can't wait for the 2600 articles in the future that will give new meaning to the term War Driving: Driving around and seeing which cars you can make fall apart...while they are parked of course.

    Honestly though, this is the most hairbrained idea I've ever heard of. I RTFA and can't believe they want do this. But then again, the automobile industry was never accused of trying to design cars that are "easy" to work on.
    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  137. Awrighht... by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

    with intelligent fasteners, installing and replacing entertainment systems becomes as simple as pressing a remote control button.

    I for one welcome our new intelligent unfastener overlords...

    --

    The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
  138. Re:Your Sig by deimtee · · Score: 1

    You shouldn't put coffee in the freezer, it affects the oils/water in the beans and changes the flavour. Putting it in the fridge is good though.

    --
    I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
  139. New meaning... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

    Brings new meaning to the term "self-tapping screw".

    Seriously, though, I wonder about the mechanical stresses that fasteners undergo. Will their environment preclude things like smart metals that depend on temperature or whatever to activate? And, of course, the vibration might mess with the control circuitry.

    Still, it is cool. This would be a boon for Harley owners. AFAIK, they often have trouble with bolts that loosen up under the vibration. These could tighten themselves to counteract that.

    Plus, it would be cool to have a big red "Disassemble" button.

    --
    i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  140. Another wonderful way of (ab)using the DMCA by InvalidError · · Score: 1

    Hack the firmware to change a burnt-out head-lamp will now own you a nice place in a federal jail along with a criminal file and all the advantages this brings - if you happen to be unlucky enough to be a USA citizen.

  141. Another wonderful way of (ab)using the DMCA by InvalidError · · Score: 1

    First we had the chipped inkjet cratridges (Lexmark and Epson lawsuits against 3rd-party refills) and now, people unlucky enough to live in places that have DMCA-ish laws will make hobbyists and DIYers federal criminals. There appears to be no end to the industry self-service... new opportunities to extort people come up all the time.

  142. I can see what's going to happen... by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

    When they come out with these bolts and try to force you to use their dealers for maintenance, some guy's gonna make a virus to disable the mechanism and allow everybody to do their own repairs. Sure, it's not kosher DMCA-wise, but who gives a damn about the DMCA?

  143. RTFP by Nagatzhul · · Score: 1

    Next time you might want to actually read the post you respond to.

    Hmm, the pipes on a motorcycle are directed to the rear and emit a fairly low frequency sound.

    The sirens on emergency vehicles emit a much higher alternating frequency sound and are directed towards the front. Yeah, good comparison.


    Notice that I was talking about the guy next to you, not the person in front of you or the person behind you. And yes, pipes do project towards the sides as much as they do to the rear. So the comparison to an emergency vehicle, despite the frequency difference, remains valid. Especially since you pointed out how certain pipes could be heard at extended distances.

    Bikers who repeat this mantra are either ignorant or simply grasping hold of some justification for their rude, idiotic and inexcusable behavior. I especially like it when the guys with no helmets adhere to it, yeah you're big on safety issues moron. I'd like to find someone whose mantra this is and rev a Harley right outside their bedroom window every 5-10 minutes all night long and then see if it's still ok.

    You will notice that I left the HD group outside of my statements. I don't personally approve of pipe you can hear from a mile away. These pipes are way over 100 dB.

    Your right to make obnoxious levels of noise ends at my ears.

    Then we need to make talking on cell phones while driving illegal. We need to make it murder (or at least manslaughter) when motorcycle rider looses his or her life in a traffic accident where the driver of the car was at fault. They get away with a traffic infraction way too often. Until things are bit more equal in the loss of life department, I reserve the right to protect myself from people (like you) who can't read and think my life is of less value because I ride a motorcycle.

    A loud car gets a ticket and a legal obligation to get it fixed or the registration suspended, loud Harleys should get the exact same treatment.

    Aftermarket emissions parts for cars have a process to certify them as compliant with the EPA. Motorcycles have no such mechanism. Since there are no rules in place to cover it, then there can hardly be a mechanism in place to penalize them for rules they aren't breaking.

    --
    "All I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power." - Ashleigh Brilliant
  144. Re:Luddites all around/and they alll have a wallet by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I've already seen cars go from an average normal 12 month auto loan to now what is it, 60 months? Because they are too complex and too expensive for what they are supposed to be. Not looking forward to the 10 to 20 year car note of the future just because you can "pop" a part off and on, IF you have permission from the manufacturer and IF it's legal for you to do so and IF you can afford the part right then and IF it's still working after thousands of miles of bumps and heat stress and corrosion.

    This isn't really true; cars aren't that expensive. You can still get a good car for only $15,000, and a great car for a little over $20k. Yes, the average price of new cars has gone over $20k now, and lots of cars cost $40-60k. But this is because people are largely stupid, and buy cars that are seriously overpriced, and/or far more expensive than they should be buying given their income level. Look at all the fools driving huge 8 mpg SUVs with 22" chrome rims these days. Do they really need them? Of course not. More importantly, can they afford them? Probably not. In fact, the way most people manage their money these days, if they were to miss just one paycheck, they wouldn't be able to make their car payment and it would be repossessed.

    Just because there's a bunch of idiots out there buying flashy $50k vehicles on under-50k incomes doesn't mean cars are too expensive. It means peoples' spending is out of control.

  145. It's not the pedestrians' lives at risk by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    I think the point about the pipes is not that the people on foot can hear, but rather that the people who insist on driving about in armored, insulated SUVs can hear. I agree, the pedestrians should be able to go about their business "unharmed and with comfortably non-ringing ears," but I can also understand the concern that too many others on the roads pay woefully little attention to their surroundings. The lives the grandparent poster was talking about were most likely of those of the motorcycle riders.

    So before you get your dander up, I think it's important to note that, while the argument "Loud Pipes Save Lives" does come across as "arrogant, self-centered, thoughtless, and logically inconsistent" when directed at peds, it takes on a whole different layer of meaning when directed at the modern-day highway-approved personnel carrier with the tinted windows rolled up tight, the sound system blasting, and the cell phone ringing. I find it frightening enough to drive my little '81 Toyota Corolla amidst these behemoths, let alone get on a hog. For that matter, I only dare take my bicycle when I can be sure of a back route off the major thoroughfares. Too many drivers are just plain scary.

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."