Your argument really sound like the anti waxers "I cannot get vaccinated since... I cannot"
No, it doesn't. He specifically said: there's a lot of proprietary software that many companies use that is only available on Windows.
Yes, the Windows zealot will reply to this post saying that it is true, he is really stuck.
At the end of the day it is just effort you have to put, you have a choice - Apparently easy choice now and windows spyware and viruses - Harder choice now but no spyware (stay away from NSA sponsored systemd) and viruses
Freedom, such a nice thing when you have it.
No, in his case, the choice is:
- Run Windows and be vigilant about malware but still be able to function as a business - Run Linux on the desktop and go out of business because he cannot use the tools he needs
I've been working in IT for nearly twenty years and am a big Linux geek (I even helped introduce Linux on the server side at a previous employer), but make no mistake: with maybe one exception, every company I worked for had mission-critical software that was only available on Windows and to this day does not have a Linux equivalent.
Back when DOOM II first came out, I had gotten my first "modern" computer, and I was between semesters at college. As I had my computer at home, I had no one at school to play against. Fortunately, a couple of my best friends still lived in the neighborhood, so late at night we would connect our computers via modem to play deathmatch with monsters.
(The atmosphere in my bedroom at the time was awesome, too. I would have headphones on, and all the lights would be out except for my bedside lamp, which had this odd plastic orange lampshade. Thus, my room would be filled with this dull orange light...)
Anyway, deathmatch with monsters was fun because not only did we have each other to beat on, we could also take out the level's monsters if they were getting in our way or if we wanted a challenge. What made it even more fun was that if you had multiple players on a level, the game would alter the monsters in the room to match the challenge. In one level ("O of Destruction", if I remember correctly), I remember spawning in, hearing "ker-THWOMP ker-THWOMP ker-THWOMP", and thinking, "That sounds like a Cyberdemon. Nah, couldn't be, there isn't one in this level." I turned a corner, and right after my character was turned to paste by three rockets, said, "Holy shit there IS a Cyberdemon!"
To this day I'm not sure who had the higher kill count that day: us or the Cyberdemon. I DO know we had to call a temporary truce so we could take out the Cyberdemon...;-)
However, the main universal exception to this rule involves discussions between an inmate and his attorney (just as in this case). Courts have even held that while even legal mail can be searched, it has to be done in the prisoner's presence and they can only glance at the actual correspondence itself.
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
The history to be learned from this case is that of Star Wars Galaxies. At one point, SOE insisted on making a massive gameplay change called the "New Game Experience", which completely changed the way the game worked. After the beta NDA was lifted, it was revealed that almost everyone who tried it were practically begging SOE not to implement it. The majority of players, upon learning of it, voiced the same concerns. SOE responded saying the changes were necessary.
After it launched, they lost the majority of their players practically overnight.
Learn from that, Dice, and don't let the same thing happen to you.
I'm not sure why anyone would be surprised. This is the same company that paid for a stolen iPhone prototype and published a breakdown of its contents before Apple had even announced the device.
... I got as far as "Slashdot contributor Bennett Haselton", remembered the absolutely inane and laughably incorrect drivel he wrote regarding the protections of the Fifth Amendment, and clicked "Close Tab"?
(Yes, I know, I'm back posting. I only came back to post that and ask that we be warned next time there's a Haselton post so we know it should be skipped.)
If enough people do this, then maybe people will remember why the fuck laws exist at all, and why the legal authorities have rules to follow as well.
It's become a not-uncommon occurrence for criminals to dress up and pose as police when doing home invasions. That still hasn't stopped police from performing no-knock warrant raids, nor has it stopped them from prosecuting citizens who defend themselves (even if the police hit the wrong house or the warrant was based on bad information).
At one place I worked, the marketing director had arrived at work, but had forgotten her alarm code. So, she typed in "123456". The system seemingly disarmed, and she went to her office.
Very shortly after, the police arrived. What she didn't know was that criminals trying that code first was so common that the alarm company dispatched police immediately when it was used, figuring that someone using it was trying to break in. Needless to say she was more than a little upset after everything was straightened out...;-)
IMHO, the most important reason is the one Professor Duane gave regarding what weight the statements have in court. Anything you say can and will be used against you, but nothing you say can be used for you. Anything you say in your defense would be ruled as hearsay and as such inadmissable.
So, on a personal level, at the very best nothing happens to you and at the very worst you admit to a crime (and maybe not even the one you're being questioned about!) and get hauled off to jail. On a societal level, at the very best you MIGHT give some information that is useful but at the very worst (and probably more likely) an innocent individual faces charges for a crime he didn't commit.
That's why I would never agree to police questioning without an attorney.
On mature reflection, I think it should be fair to point out that a big theme of Steven Moffat's run on Doctor Who is the fact that the "badass boasts" you complain about are a bad thing, to the point where the Big Bads of both seasons 5 and 6 ended up being alliances of races afraid of the Doctor and his ever-increasing ego. In series 7 he calms down considerably, to the point where he tries to keep a low profile whenever possible.
First, I was annoyed that The Doctor is portrayed as somewhat all-powerful for no reason at all. He can threaten his enemies and make appeals with no credentials whatsoever. I kind of understand that scenes where he says that "the Earth is protected" by him are perhaps awe-inspiring to a 50's born nerd who has watched all of the previous 200 episodes, but I really don't get why the aliens he is currently facing won't just incinerate him on the spot. To an outside observer, it simply seems like a lame would-be superhero saving the day by just boasting about it. This is actually repeated twice during the first three episodes.
To be fair, that would be like asking why an old retiring captain would be the one sent to meet with Earth's most persistent enemy for peace talks. (Aka, Star Trek VI.) There's been enough backstory to show that Kirk is Starfleet's most successful and well-known captain, plus sending a well-known enemy of the Klingons to peace talks shows a certain symbolism.
It's the same way with Doctor Who. Even simply counting the televised appearances, he's been around for so long that his exploits have become legend, and anyone reading up on them quickly learns not to underestimate him. It's even well-established that the most feared, genocidal, and intelligent race in the universe is so afraid of him that they only purposely seek confrontation in dire emergencies. Essentially, while it may seem like badass boasts, almost every time I've seen him do it it's A) to someone who knows him already, or B) to someone who has access to information that lets them know he is not to be trifled with.
In short, in the series, it's taken for granted that if it were that easy to just incinerate him on the spot, it would have happened long ago. He's just usually too lucky and clever to let it happen for the most part.;-)
For my servers, I use AMANDA with encrypted virtual tapes to do nightly backups. Shortly after the backups run, cron calls a shell script in order to copy the virtual tapes to an offsite location via rsync.
For my desktop PC, I don't need to back up as often, so I do a weekly backup via Windows Backup to a TrueCrypt volume on an external hard drive. When it's not being used to back up my PC, I keep the external hard drive at my office. I figure if something happens where both my office and home are destroyed, then at that moment I've got bigger problems to worry about than my data.:-)
During my time at my last job (several years), we had several laptops stolen. Most were recovered using LoJack.
The only two off the top of my head that weren't recovered were one that was taken out of the country and were as such outside LoJack's ability to recover, and another that was never recovered because the people responsible claimed they never had it. (Which was complete BS, as LoJack had gotten screenshots of the laptop in use, specifically when the son who was using it was logged into his Facebook and university web accounts...)
It gets worse when you consider that (if I recall correctly), the patent was held by Creative Labs, and they waited until a month or two before the game was to be released to inform id of the patent. They essentially blackmailed id into putting EAX-specific features to avoid a lawsuit and delay the game's release.
I think you hit the nail on the head. There was a story on CNN the day before the price increase where analysts were predicting that Netflix's streaming content license fees were going to go from $180 million in 2010 to $1.98 billion in 2012.
In that case, if I was to start with a Ninth Doctor episode, I'd probably start with "Dalek". While "The Empty Child"/"The Doctor Dances" is a better story and has a much creepier premise, "Dalek" establishes the Daleks of the new series, reveals the basis of what happened between the old series and the new series...... and most importantly, shows just WHY the Daleks are so feared in the Whoniverse when the common conception from non-Who fans was that they were oversized dustbins with a screeching voice that couldn't handle stairs.
Several still do exist, actually. In fact, the first three serials (including "The Daleks") are available in a box set called "The Beginning".
My only advice, though, is to remember two things: 1) "The Daleks" is rather slow and is best watched over multiple nights, and 2) the Doctor is not a very nice person in his first incarnation. It took a while for him to lose his arrogance and low regard for other people.
I had been considering that question, myself, and then decided that if I were to introduce someone to the show, I'd do so with a new series episode, and one that would give the newbie an idea of why kids used to watch the show from behind the sofa.
Actually, MKvDCU aimed for a hard T rating from the get-go, thanks to a decree from DC Comics.
The game sold decently but it wasn't as big as this new MK. I put it down to two reasons: 1) it didn't have much outside the short story mode and arcade modes, and 2) the fans didn't really buy into the crossover. It didn't help that plans for DLC (Quan Chi and Harley Quinn as playable characters) were scrapped by Midway's bankruptcy.
Slashdot Mirror
Your argument really sound like the anti waxers "I cannot get vaccinated since... I cannot"
No, it doesn't. He specifically said: there's a lot of proprietary software that many companies use that is only available on Windows.
Yes, the Windows zealot will reply to this post saying that it is true, he is really stuck.
At the end of the day it is just effort you have to put, you have a choice
- Apparently easy choice now and windows spyware and viruses
- Harder choice now but no spyware (stay away from NSA sponsored systemd) and viruses
Freedom, such a nice thing when you have it.
No, in his case, the choice is:
- Run Windows and be vigilant about malware but still be able to function as a business
- Run Linux on the desktop and go out of business because he cannot use the tools he needs
I've been working in IT for nearly twenty years and am a big Linux geek (I even helped introduce Linux on the server side at a previous employer), but make no mistake: with maybe one exception, every company I worked for had mission-critical software that was only available on Windows and to this day does not have a Linux equivalent.
Just my $.02...
Back when DOOM II first came out, I had gotten my first "modern" computer, and I was between semesters at college. As I had my computer at home, I had no one at school to play against. Fortunately, a couple of my best friends still lived in the neighborhood, so late at night we would connect our computers via modem to play deathmatch with monsters.
(The atmosphere in my bedroom at the time was awesome, too. I would have headphones on, and all the lights would be out except for my bedside lamp, which had this odd plastic orange lampshade. Thus, my room would be filled with this dull orange light...)
Anyway, deathmatch with monsters was fun because not only did we have each other to beat on, we could also take out the level's monsters if they were getting in our way or if we wanted a challenge. What made it even more fun was that if you had multiple players on a level, the game would alter the monsters in the room to match the challenge. In one level ("O of Destruction", if I remember correctly), I remember spawning in, hearing "ker-THWOMP ker-THWOMP ker-THWOMP", and thinking, "That sounds like a Cyberdemon. Nah, couldn't be, there isn't one in this level." I turned a corner, and right after my character was turned to paste by three rockets, said, "Holy shit there IS a Cyberdemon!"
To this day I'm not sure who had the higher kill count that day: us or the Cyberdemon. I DO know we had to call a temporary truce so we could take out the Cyberdemon... ;-)
However, the main universal exception to this rule involves discussions between an inmate and his attorney (just as in this case). Courts have even held that while even legal mail can be searched, it has to be done in the prisoner's presence and they can only glance at the actual correspondence itself.
Jail Mail from Attorney Must Be Opened in Inmate’s Presence, 7th Circuit Says
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
The history to be learned from this case is that of Star Wars Galaxies. At one point, SOE insisted on making a massive gameplay change called the "New Game Experience", which completely changed the way the game worked. After the beta NDA was lifted, it was revealed that almost everyone who tried it were practically begging SOE not to implement it. The majority of players, upon learning of it, voiced the same concerns. SOE responded saying the changes were necessary.
After it launched, they lost the majority of their players practically overnight.
Learn from that, Dice, and don't let the same thing happen to you.
I'm not sure why anyone would be surprised. This is the same company that paid for a stolen iPhone prototype and published a breakdown of its contents before Apple had even announced the device.
... I got as far as "Slashdot contributor Bennett Haselton", remembered the absolutely inane and laughably incorrect drivel he wrote regarding the protections of the Fifth Amendment, and clicked "Close Tab"?
(Yes, I know, I'm back posting. I only came back to post that and ask that we be warned next time there's a Haselton post so we know it should be skipped.)
If enough people do this, then maybe people will remember why the fuck laws exist at all, and why the legal authorities have rules to follow as well.
It's become a not-uncommon occurrence for criminals to dress up and pose as police when doing home invasions. That still hasn't stopped police from performing no-knock warrant raids, nor has it stopped them from prosecuting citizens who defend themselves (even if the police hit the wrong house or the warrant was based on bad information).
There was also an actual duress code that looked realistic that employees could use in case of a situation you describe. :-)
At one place I worked, the marketing director had arrived at work, but had forgotten her alarm code. So, she typed in "123456". The system seemingly disarmed, and she went to her office.
Very shortly after, the police arrived. What she didn't know was that criminals trying that code first was so common that the alarm company dispatched police immediately when it was used, figuring that someone using it was trying to break in. Needless to say she was more than a little upset after everything was straightened out... ;-)
IMHO, the most important reason is the one Professor Duane gave regarding what weight the statements have in court. Anything you say can and will be used against you, but nothing you say can be used for you. Anything you say in your defense would be ruled as hearsay and as such inadmissable.
So, on a personal level, at the very best nothing happens to you and at the very worst you admit to a crime (and maybe not even the one you're being questioned about!) and get hauled off to jail. On a societal level, at the very best you MIGHT give some information that is useful but at the very worst (and probably more likely) an innocent individual faces charges for a crime he didn't commit.
That's why I would never agree to police questioning without an attorney.
On mature reflection, I think it should be fair to point out that a big theme of Steven Moffat's run on Doctor Who is the fact that the "badass boasts" you complain about are a bad thing, to the point where the Big Bads of both seasons 5 and 6 ended up being alliances of races afraid of the Doctor and his ever-increasing ego. In series 7 he calms down considerably, to the point where he tries to keep a low profile whenever possible.
First, I was annoyed that The Doctor is portrayed as somewhat all-powerful for no reason at all. He can threaten his enemies and make appeals with no credentials whatsoever. I kind of understand that scenes where he says that "the Earth is protected" by him are perhaps awe-inspiring to a 50's born nerd who has watched all of the previous 200 episodes, but I really don't get why the aliens he is currently facing won't just incinerate him on the spot. To an outside observer, it simply seems like a lame would-be superhero saving the day by just boasting about it. This is actually repeated twice during the first three episodes.
To be fair, that would be like asking why an old retiring captain would be the one sent to meet with Earth's most persistent enemy for peace talks. (Aka, Star Trek VI.) There's been enough backstory to show that Kirk is Starfleet's most successful and well-known captain, plus sending a well-known enemy of the Klingons to peace talks shows a certain symbolism.
It's the same way with Doctor Who. Even simply counting the televised appearances, he's been around for so long that his exploits have become legend, and anyone reading up on them quickly learns not to underestimate him. It's even well-established that the most feared, genocidal, and intelligent race in the universe is so afraid of him that they only purposely seek confrontation in dire emergencies. Essentially, while it may seem like badass boasts, almost every time I've seen him do it it's A) to someone who knows him already, or B) to someone who has access to information that lets them know he is not to be trifled with.
In short, in the series, it's taken for granted that if it were that easy to just incinerate him on the spot, it would have happened long ago. He's just usually too lucky and clever to let it happen for the most part. ;-)
If it had been a space shuttle instead of an airplane, I would have thought someone was a fan of a particular Decepticon...
Well, they can at least prevent them from being sold to minors.
The U.S. Supreme Court would disagree with you.
That wasn't a joke. That was a prophecy.
Then I explain that I think those questions are irrelevant, and that I'm not just against gay marriage, I'm against marriage.
Why not say that in the first place instead of being an asshole and starting arguments by making yourself sound like a homophobe?
Citations provided:
Ron Paul's Hypocrisy on Earmarks, Pork-Barrel Spending
Ron Paul, Big-Government Libertarian
I have two systems I use.
For my servers, I use AMANDA with encrypted virtual tapes to do nightly backups. Shortly after the backups run, cron calls a shell script in order to copy the virtual tapes to an offsite location via rsync.
For my desktop PC, I don't need to back up as often, so I do a weekly backup via Windows Backup to a TrueCrypt volume on an external hard drive. When it's not being used to back up my PC, I keep the external hard drive at my office. I figure if something happens where both my office and home are destroyed, then at that moment I've got bigger problems to worry about than my data. :-)
Just my $.02...
During my time at my last job (several years), we had several laptops stolen. Most were recovered using LoJack.
The only two off the top of my head that weren't recovered were one that was taken out of the country and were as such outside LoJack's ability to recover, and another that was never recovered because the people responsible claimed they never had it. (Which was complete BS, as LoJack had gotten screenshots of the laptop in use, specifically when the son who was using it was logged into his Facebook and university web accounts...)
Just my $.02...
It gets worse when you consider that (if I recall correctly), the patent was held by Creative Labs, and they waited until a month or two before the game was to be released to inform id of the patent. They essentially blackmailed id into putting EAX-specific features to avoid a lawsuit and delay the game's release.
I think you hit the nail on the head. There was a story on CNN the day before the price increase where analysts were predicting that Netflix's streaming content license fees were going to go from $180 million in 2010 to $1.98 billion in 2012.
http://money.cnn.com/2011/07/08/technology/netflix_starz_contract/index.htm
In that case, if I was to start with a Ninth Doctor episode, I'd probably start with "Dalek". While "The Empty Child"/"The Doctor Dances" is a better story and has a much creepier premise, "Dalek" establishes the Daleks of the new series, reveals the basis of what happened between the old series and the new series... ... and most importantly, shows just WHY the Daleks are so feared in the Whoniverse when the common conception from non-Who fans was that they were oversized dustbins with a screeching voice that couldn't handle stairs.
Several still do exist, actually. In fact, the first three serials (including "The Daleks") are available in a box set called "The Beginning".
My only advice, though, is to remember two things: 1) "The Daleks" is rather slow and is best watched over multiple nights, and 2) the Doctor is not a very nice person in his first incarnation. It took a while for him to lose his arrogance and low regard for other people.
I had been considering that question, myself, and then decided that if I were to introduce someone to the show, I'd do so with a new series episode, and one that would give the newbie an idea of why kids used to watch the show from behind the sofa.
One word: "Blink."
Actually, MKvDCU aimed for a hard T rating from the get-go, thanks to a decree from DC Comics.
The game sold decently but it wasn't as big as this new MK. I put it down to two reasons: 1) it didn't have much outside the short story mode and arcade modes, and 2) the fans didn't really buy into the crossover. It didn't help that plans for DLC (Quan Chi and Harley Quinn as playable characters) were scrapped by Midway's bankruptcy.