Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: It's World Backup Day; How Do You Back Up?

MrSeb writes "Today is World Backup Day! The premise is that you back up your computers on March 31, so that you're not an April Fool if your hard drive crashes tomorrow. How do Slashdot users back up? RAID? Multiple RAIDs? If you're in LA, on a fault line, do you keep a redundant copy of your data in another geographic region?"

304 comments

  1. RAID is not a backup solution by M1FCJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Simple. Redundancy backup.

    1. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who needs RAID? My hard drive is so large that I just backup my files in a different directory :P

      (Note: this is a joke, but sadly, many actually follow this "strategy")

    2. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      As long as it is not the only strategy, it's actually a good one: It's easy enough to perform it very frequently, protects you against most user mistakes (accidentally overwriting an important file, for example), and allows quick access to the backup.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

      Simple. Redundancy backup.

      Agreed a 100%. Here is my backup setup:

      First, my computer setup:
      1. I have a home server that doubles as a NAS on the basement. It has a RAID-5 array for redundancy.
      2. I have various other computers, including my own, my SO's and one server at a hosting company.
      3. Documents usually sit on my NAS.
      4. Documents for which I need an offline access (of sharing with my SO) sit in a Dropbox.
      5. Dropbox is also installed on my home server.

      My backup plan:
      1. My wife and myself have a "button" on our laptops to run the backup to the NAS. I need to make that fully automatic but for now it's manual.
      2. I have an old eee-pc in the attic with a 2TB USB drive attached to it. Every day at 1AM is starts scanning all the stuff I want to backup (that includes documents, music, pics, install directory of my servers - web and mail, svn, etc.) from all online computers (that is my home server / NAS and my server hosted). It backs it up incrementally on my 2TB drive. I keep a version for every day for 30 days, then a version every month for 20 month.
      3. at 4AM a script runs that copy incrementally the content of the latest backup to a friend of mine which provides me with an SSH access to a 1TB partition. He lives nearby.
      4. My friend has an SSH access to my home server and has a 1TB dedicated partition on my RAID-5 array.

    4. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blah blah blah. RAID is a not backup. Get off your high horse and learn the uses RAID in backup solutions.

    5. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yeah and it's better than nothing - quite often the conventional hard drives don't fail catastrophically. So the backups on the same drive might still be accessible. Don't count on this though.

      --
    6. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by davester666 · · Score: 2

      That sounds really complicated.

      I just put my car in reverse and look over my shoulder to make sure I don't hit anything.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, provided you're sane about permissions on the backup directories, that provides one of the purposes of backups -- protection against deliberate or accidental deletion of data which is later needed.

      The other purpose, equipment failure, is easily addressed with a RAID10 (or, to a lesser degree, RAID5 or 6) array protecting you from HD failure, and if it's a software RAID, from controller failure (since non-RAID controllers are interchangable).

      So if you, as I do, have a script set up using rsync to make incremental backups with hardlinks (takes the space of an incremental backup, but all unchanged files are hardlinked from the previous version, thus each YYYY.MM.DD.nn directory contains a complete snapshot) a few times a day, stashing them on that multi-TB RAID for media, you do in fact have one local backup. A good plan will include some means of getting a copy offsite, or at the very least outside the tower case, so don't stop there, but it is a backup.

      (In my case, I'm sloppy -- I have a set of scripts predating the RAID backup system still running to rsync a specific set of important files (any files under /etc/ not matching the stock version, some specific files and directories from my home directory) to my VPS, but this is much less inclusive than the backup script; obviously I should really get this fixed...

    8. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by IANAAC · · Score: 2
      Sounds like you like playing the role of sysadmin.

      For what it's worth, Crashplan can handle a good deal of what you want to do without any hassle. Won't cost you anything either, other than the download/install time.

    9. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by allo · · Score: 1

      for "oops i deleted the file" or "oops, i replaced some paragraph of text with a dumber version when i was drunk" this is quite useful backup. Easy to do, easy to recover. Only hard to remember and not automated. But this can be automated as well ...

        but then its going to be something more advanced, as rsync ./ /backups/$(date +%Y-%m-%d)/ anyway. so you got from stupid backup solution to inventing something good.

      of course it still does not cover drive failure.

    10. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by allo · · Score: 1

      rsync with hardlinks is nice to make backup, but bad to manage it. Try deleting a old backup-set of about 20 GB "normal" files.
      with copy/hardlinks it takes a lot of time, with systems using archives (like difftar from duplicity) you just delete a small amount of files and you're having free space for more backups, again.

      on the other hand you do not need to decide "full or incremental". every backup is a full one, so you do not delete one backupset and have a lot of useless incremental ones left.

    11. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by PNutts · · Score: 1

      I use RAID 0 so my backups are FAST!

    12. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by PNutts · · Score: 1

      Agreed and not sure why you posted AC. Anyway, substitute "another hard drive" for RAID and the light comes on. A backup is a copy. As long as you understand the limitations it can be quick and dirty protection.

    13. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My manager tells me I use the cloud

    14. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a RAID setup, you have at least two drives. Use them separately instead of in a single RG and backup one drive to the other in any number of ways you feel comfortable with.

      RAID is only for availability and potentially higher I/O. Never for a backup.

    15. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      have a script set up using rsync to make incremental backups with hardlinks

      Take a look at rdiff-backup. It easier to manage.

    16. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Relayman · · Score: 1

      Could both your house and your friend's house be hit by one or two tornadoes from the same storm? Then you need offsite backup further away.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    17. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      USB hard drives are damned cheap and Win 7 has a backup software built in and that is as simple as "clicky clicky, next next next" so there really isn't much excuse for not having backups anymore. All I have to do is tell my customers "If this PC was to disappear tomorrow, poof, with ALL the stuff that was on it, would you lose anything you couldn't replace?" to get them to see how much stuff they have on their PCs they really care about.

      I tell them to use a defense in depth which is really quite easy to do, use USB HDDs for their basic backups with DVDs and the cloud used for those things like pictures that are really important to them with the DVDs stored somewhere offsite like a family member or friend's place. Hell DVDs are so cheap this kind of backup costs practically nothing and there are plenty of places they can upload and store small things like pictures for free.

      A perfect example of how well this works is a customer who had a fire last year, even though his house and the PC in it were burnt to the ground because he took my advice and was swapping USB HDDs once a week with his dad so they would both have offsite backups he only lost 4 days worth of stuff and even that didn't include anything important as he had gotten into the habit of uploading photos when he downloaded them onto his PC. He simply came by the shop with the USB HDD from his dad's, told me what happened, and in less than 4 hours we had him back to exactly how he was before on a new PC, with all his stuff back in its place and nothing he cared about lost.

      So PLEASE stress how important multiple forms of backups are to your friends and relatives, as there is nothing more heartbreaking than to tell some girl those pictures of her dead mother are most likely gone forever because her laptop got trashed and she didn't have backups.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    18. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by nut · · Score: 1

      !/bin/sh
      # Time Machine equivalent for Linux. This backs up the local root filesystem.

      # Set variables
      LABEL=HardDriveLabel
      MOUNT=/media/${LABEL}
      BKPDIR=${MOUNT}/backup/laptop
      CURRENT=${BKPDIR}/current
      DEVICE=/dev/disk/by-label/${LABEL}
      EXCLUDES=${BKPDIR}/excludes.txt
      LOG=${BKPDIR}/rsync.log
      NEWDIR=${BKPDIR}/$(date "+%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S")
      OPTS="-aqx"
      UMOUNT=

      SOURCES=/

      die () {
          # If we mounted the disk, unmount it again
          if [ ${UMOUNT} ] ; then
              pumount ${DEVICE}
          fi
          exit $1
      }

      # Is the backup disk plugged in
      if [ ! -e ${DEVICE} ]; then
          exit 1
      fi

      # Is the backup disk mounted
      if ! grep -q ${MOUNT} /proc/mounts ; then
          pmount ${DEVICE} ${LABEL}
          UMOUNT=1
          # Give the disk time to sort itself out
          sleep 3
      fi

      if ! grep -q ${MOUNT} /proc/mounts ; then
          # Still not mounted, give up.
          die 1
      fi

      # Make sure the backup directory is there
      mkdir -p ${BKPDIR}

      if [ ! -d ${BKPDIR} ] ; then
          # mkdir failed, give up
          die 1
      fi

      # Set extra options
      if [ -f ${EXCLUDES} ] ; then
          OPTS="${OPTS} --exclude-from=${EXCLUDES}"
      fi

      if [ -h ${CURRENT} ] ; then
          OPTS="${OPTS} --link-dest=${CURRENT}"
      fi

      if [ ${LOG} ] ; then
          OPTS="${OPTS} --log-file=${LOG}"
      fi

      # Perform the backup
      rsync ${OPTS} ${SOURCES} ${NEWDIR}

      # Did we create a new backup
      if [ ! -d ${NEWDIR} ] ; then
          die 1
      fi

      # Now update the current soft link
      if [ -h ${CURRENT} ] ; then
          rm -f ${CURRENT}
      fi
      ln -s ${NEWDIR} ${CURRENT}

      die $?

      --
      Never trust a man in a blue trench coat, Never drive a car when you're dead
    19. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by nut · · Score: 1

      And use anacron or cron to run it

      --
      Never trust a man in a blue trench coat, Never drive a car when you're dead
    20. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by stackOVFL · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I use by backup camera sometimes too. Quite convenient really.

    21. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I know someone who keeps backups on a separate hard drive in the same machine.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    22. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Larryish · · Score: 1

      "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it."
      -- Linus Torvalds

    23. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      rdiff-backup is slow.

      All of these kinds of ideas are good, but they all implode dramatically when you're dealing with a tens of thousands of files, and hundreds of gigs of whatever. They just take too long to run - and, in many ways, are an awkward layer over the top of something which needs to be handled transparently and continuously.

    24. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      No tornadoes in France ;-)

      Actually, we live about 30km apart, so yes, I should find something a bit further away.

    25. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you like playing the role of sysadmin.

      Who else is going to play that role at home? Crashplan?

      More to the point, I like to know where my data is and how it flows. I found that it's the best way to recover from a crash. Not saying Crashplan is bad or anything, but $6/month for something that will "maybe" have my data whenever I need it is too much for me.

    26. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You seem to not have followed the thread. The discussion has long went away from RAID to just having two copies of the files on different places on the same hard disk. Only the title still has "RAID" in it because no one bothered to change it.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    27. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Not saying Crashplan is bad or anything, but $6/month for something that will "maybe" have my data whenever I need it is too much for me.

      Crashplan is free for most of what you want to do, such as back up to a NAS, a friends computer or other local disk drives, as well as scheduling. And it's got a decent, comprehensible GUI that takes seconds to get through. That was my point, not that you should be paying any company anything to handle backups.

      I'm just a fan - I don't use Crashplan for its paid services, but the software itself is solid and useful for the home user. And I can say first hand that restores work with the software.

    28. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by edjs · · Score: 1

      I figure if the home and offsite backups (15km away) are taken out in the same event, my data is the least of my worries, assuming I'm still alive to worry.

    29. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      The thing is I need remote backup and backup from servers - linux servers - where a GUI is non existent. All in all, it could fill some gap in my regular backup.

      Thanks for the tip.

    30. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs RAID? My hard drive is so large that I just backup my files in a different directory :P

      (Note: this is a joke, but sadly, many actually follow this "strategy")

      PFF (pretty fucking funny)

    31. Re:RAID is not a backup solution by muckracer · · Score: 1

      > there is nothing more heartbreaking than to tell some girl those
      > pictures of her dead mother are most likely gone forever because
      > her laptop got trashed and she didn't have backups.

      1. Console sad girl over lost pictures
      2. ??
      3. PROFIT!!

  2. If it's not off site it's not a backup ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a raid.

    1. Re:If it's not off site it's not a backup ! by asdf7890 · · Score: 2

      While we are sharing mantras: if it isn't tested it isn't a backup, its an aspiration.

  3. I use... by kikito · · Score: 1

    The backup gem( https://github.com/meskyanichi/backup ) + an dedicated server + some cron processes.

    1. Re:I use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Amateur. I take polaroids of my platters and store them in a safe deposit box.

    2. Re:I use... by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's nothing. You should see my butterfly collection...

  4. Back up solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I back up my important questions by submitting them to Slashdot. If I ever need to find my question about backups again, it's right here on the front page EVERY DAMNED DAY.

  5. Time Machine by anethema · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apple hate aside, time machine is an amazingly excellent backup system.

    It backs up to a Netgear Readynas configured in RAID 5. Hourly, daily, weekly backups. I've never lost anything thanks to this great system.

    In linux I try to approximate this with BackupPC.

    http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

    It is really an excellent piece of software, though no where near as refined of course. You pretty much only get daily backups though since the kernel in linux does not track filesystem changes so hourly backups would be very prohibitive.

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    1. Re:Time Machine by Ash-Fox · · Score: 4, Informative

      You pretty much only get daily backups though since the kernel in linux does not track filesystem changes so hourly backups would be very prohibitive.

      inotify(7)

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Time Machine by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll second this. I use Time Machine too. I don't have any fancy NAS box for it (due to budget mostly) - I just use an external firewire disk right now, and it has been used once due to a full internal drive failure (restoring the iMac back to the state it was in an hour before the failure) as well as the occasional single file recovery.

      Most back up systems work well for full system recovery - Time Machine is not unique there - but it's the single file recovery tool that really makes it shine. It's very simple and intuitive to use.

      It is totally "hands off" though - you have to trust that it actually is doing what you tell it to, beyond the menu item that gives you a summary of what it's up to (total being backed up at that moment, last backup time etc). It doesn't have a "show me a list of files backed up at x time" feature without the use of third party tools, so people who really want peace of mind may find that annoying.

    3. Re:Time Machine by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      I've never lost anything thanks to this great system.

      The real question is have you ever actually needed it?

      I can say "I never drove my car into a volcano thanks to my awesome GPS!" but if I was never in danger of driving my car into lava, it would be a pretty pointless statement.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    4. Re:Time Machine by sensationull · · Score: 1

      Windows has had Volume Shadow Copy since XP which does the same kind of thing, it just does not have a flashy interface.

    5. Re:Time Machine by digitallife · · Score: 4, Informative

      This.
      I have (and still do) use all sorts of various systems for backups both at home and at work, and Time Machine is by far the best. Completely invisible, automatic and smart. You can turn off your computer mid-backup and it just continues when you turn it back on. It is so much better than the alternatives, I'm surprised how little limelight it gets.

      Perhaps just as important as the backups: it has a great UI to access said backups! One click gives access to a file at any date in the past you want.

    6. Re:Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pretty much only get daily backups though since the kernel in linux does not track filesystem changes so hourly backups would be very prohibitive.

      inotify(7)

      inotify only lets you add a watch for a single directory. Watching an entire tree, or even the whole file-system, can be done but is quite painful to do at the application layer. It is useful for a program to watch its own private directory of configuration files (for example), but not so useful for a "tell me everything that changed in the file-system in the last hour" case. The application has to manage watches as directories are added, deleted, or moved around. There are only a finite number of watches available, so it may not even be possible to watch the whole file-system without mucking around with max_user_watches.

      An API like gimme_filesystem_changes_since_i_last_checked() is the kind of thing needed for an sane incremental backup program. I suspect Time Machine would do something like this (don't know for sure, since I'm a Linux guy...)

    7. Re:Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time Machine is amazing - the easiest restore I have ever done. Using it with Apple's Time Capsule, though is not so amazing. It works great until around month 18 when the thing finally overheats for the last time and burns out. "Server-grade storage" with really poor thermal design.

    8. Re:Time Machine by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2

      Watching an entire tree, or even the whole file-system, can be done but is quite painful to do at the application layer.

      Having read arguments on the Linux Kernel mailinglist, it was believed it was no more painful than doing it directly in the kernel. This really isn't that big of an issue like people are making it out to be.

      The application has to manage watches as directories are added, deleted, or moved around.

      We have so many examples of libraries in Linux doing things like this, this isn't exactly unusual or necessarily unwanted. Just take a look at GNU libc's kernel interfaces.

      There are only a finite number of watches available, so it may not even be possible to watch the whole file-system without mucking around with max_user_watches.

      That's just a configuration issue at the end of the day. It's not really that big of a deal to make an option to change it from within the application it self. Again, this isn't really a problem.

      I speak from experience when it comes to inotify usage, I haven't experienced any issues with inotify with Crashplan+, which was on some rather large filesystems.

      If I made such a fuss about every little road block I ran into on operating systems, like how Windows handles huge I/O tasks by blocking most other I/O until it was finished and just gave up immediately on making something more usable/workable. I would never have built decent software for any platform.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    9. Re:Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did. My hard drive died, I used the time machine to restore it to a new computer. It worked.

    10. Re:Time Machine by swillden · · Score: 2

      An API like gimme_filesystem_changes_since_i_last_checked() is the kind of thing needed for an sane incremental backup program. I suspect Time Machine would do something like this (don't know for sure, since I'm a Linux guy...)

      The Darwin kernel API for this is pretty nice. It doesn't track individual file changes, but instead just notifies of changes to directory contents. The notifications are sent to fseventsd, which consolidates multiple changes to the same directory that happen in a short period of time, then logs each directory that changed. Apps (like TimeMachine) can then ask which directories saw changes during arbitrary time intervals. It's then on the app to figure out which files changed and in what way, so it doesn't provide as much information as inotify, but by providing less granular information OS X can provide more complete data without consuming massive system resources.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    11. Re:Time Machine by japa · · Score: 4, Informative
      Back In Time is a simple backup tool for Linux inspired from “flyback project” and “TimeVault”. The backup is done by taking snapshots of a specified set of directories.

      I use it with external USB drive and it has saved my butt couple of times. Cases where I thought the focus is in certain nautilus window, then doing Shift-delete + enter in very quick fashion and fraction of a second later realizing there was another nautilus window with focus on some directory which is now nuked... As this is just a frontend to rsync and uses hard links, there is the advantage of the backed up files being available even without the backup program as normal files within the directory structure on the backup media.

    12. Re:Time Machine by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      Watching a directory tree or mount point is possible with the new fanotify API. You define a mark -- from the looks of it, basically a pattern against which events are matched.

      https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-kernel-70/fanotify-howto-recursive-mark-directory-changes-918231/
      https://lwn.net/Articles/360955/
      https://lwn.net/Articles/339253/

      This wasn't possible with inotify for an arbitrarily large number of files -- anyone who tried will remember inotify has to recursively scan and registers all files first.

      gimme_filesystem_changes_since_i_last_checked() isn't done because that would require the kernel to keep a list that may grow arbitrarily.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    13. Re:Time Machine by smash · · Score: 1

      Time machine works fine. I've migrated machines with it, re-installed and restored from it, and retrieved old copies of files from months ago from it.

      Time machine is one of THE features of OS X that linux peeps should be copying the shit out of, rather than trying to do some cheap rip off of Aqua as the next UI flavour of the month.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    14. Re:Time Machine by smash · · Score: 1

      Except it kinda doesn't work anywhere near as well, and doesn't automatically snapshot to a different location.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    15. Re:Time Machine by PNutts · · Score: 1

      Like the others, it worked for me, too. Dumb question unless you ask it for every solution posted here.

    16. Re:Time Machine by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      It's great until you really need it:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2745715&cid=39468827

    17. Re:Time Machine by PNutts · · Score: 1

      Paragon and Shadowprotect use MS VSS for hot backups (and unlike Acronis don't monkey with Windows' drivers). They also convert their backups into virtual images for, well, anything you would use a VM for. With Virtualbox on my kid's Mac I load Windows so they can play their old games. Probably time for Bootcamp.

    18. Re:Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, from a user-POV, Time Machine is excellent.

      However, 'under the hood' it's pretty hacky. No incremental backups, and uses some giant symlink farm which must have been devised by some insane Unix-beard guy.

    19. Re:Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I made such a fuss about every little road block I ran into on operating systems, like how Windows handles huge I/O tasks by blocking most other I/O until it was finished and just gave up immediately on making something more usable/workable. I would never have built decent software for any platform.

      NTFS has had change journaling since Windows 2000, so in the context of filesystem backups I don't think you want to go there. And I'll just look the other way and pretend to forget about VSS interfaces to be nice.

      Can we man up and admit Linux is very weak when it comes to backup services, and not turn this into a pissing match between it and whichever OS you hate at the moment? For one thing, when you defend Linux with "but Windows does..." all the Time Machine users are pointing and laughing at you.

    20. Re:Time Machine by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      Yeah. TimeMachine is awesome. And nowadays most NAS and other storage solutions support it.

      It's only saved me from my own stupidity so far. I haven't had catastrophic hardware failure that required a recovery yet. but my previous backup strategies on Windows and Linux were too cumbersome and thus often didn't happen regularly. I have lost things due to that in the past.

      TimeMachine is one of the main reasons I use Macs for work.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    21. Re:Time Machine by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      But Linux is not "very weak when it comes to backup services." Linux has the most reliable, featureful backup software available, period.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    22. Re:Time Machine by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Time Machine has plenty of known bugs relating to failed restores, silent data corruption, etc. Just google up some comments on Slashdot and you'll see what I mean. I sure wouldn't trust it as my only backup solution.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    23. Re:Time Machine by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      I've heard of some nasty Time Machine restore and silent data corruption bugs.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    24. Re:Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kernel in linux does not track filesystem changes

      Linux IS the kernel. And Linux is A MONOLITHIC kernel, what means Linux is an whole OPERATING SYSTEM.

      There is no "kernel in Linux" or "Kernel of Linux".

    25. Re:Time Machine by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Can we man up and admit Linux is very weak when it comes to backup services

      What's wrong with Crashplan+ on Linux?

      and not turn this into a pissing match between it and whichever OS you hate at the moment?

      It's nothing about that, it's called giving an example.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    26. Re:Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please check man page for tmutil command: http://www.manpagez.com/man/8/tmutil/

      In particular, the tmutil compare function will allow you to check on a variety of statistics between each backup / snapshot that time machine makes

    27. Re:Time Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That which smash sayeth...just migrated four different faculty members laptops to either newer ones or replacement drives with their TM volumes. I've used my own a bunch of times to go back to an earlier version of a file or to recover something "Oh I don't need that anymore"that I trashed a month ago.

      You might be able to replicate the backup part with rsync..

    28. Re:Time Machine by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Windows has had Volume Shadow Copy since XP which does the same kind of thing, it just does not have a flashy interface.

      Volume shadow copy is neither a disaster recovery backup or redundancy since it resides on the same volume so if you have a hard drive failure you have no backup. Time machine actually "requires" an external drive or NAS device like Time Capsule so if your hard drive fails then your backup does not go with it and you don't have to remove your drive to restore to another machine should your machine have a bad motherboard.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    29. Re:Time Machine by anethema · · Score: 2

      I actually find full system recovery another place where TM kicks ass.

      Put in your disk, wipe the drive make a new partition, and install by 'restoring from time machine'

      It will make you system how it was from the minute that backup was made, almost as if nothing changed.

      As mentioned, the tmutil command line utility is great for finding out exactly what is in each backup, what changed(added and removed), what kind of size diff there is between two backups, etc.

      You can also incorperate an old sparsebundle into your current backup sparsebundle using tmutil.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    30. Re:Time Machine by tgv · · Score: 1

      I have not been fond of all these 300+ new features that every new release of OSX brings, because most of them are of the type "you can now show the mail boxes on the other side of the window", but TimeMachine is one of those that really helps the user. I've been using it since it came out, made my father do it too, and it's been bliss. And yes, I have restored files, directories and used it for transfer to new computers.

      My wife on the other hand has an Asus or Acer laptop (it starts with an A, is all I know) with Windows, and it has a backup daemon that just crashes. I mean: backup software that crashes?

      Time Machine: best personal backup system ever.

    31. Re:Time Machine by quantumphaze · · Score: 1

      I used that and it was quite good. I stopped when I started using my new(old) desktop instead of my laptop and used Unison for syncing the two. I probably should get back to using it as syncing two machines is not a backup.

    32. Re:Time Machine by smash · · Score: 1

      Neither of which are bundled with the OS.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    33. Re:Time Machine by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I'm finding TM hard to love. A few tens of GB internal and ~1TB on a FireWire unit attached to an MBP, backing up over AFP to a 3TB disk in a Mac Pro. Set it up from scratch, it runs a full, then apparent occasional incrementals, then a couple of weeks later it tries to copy over the whole 1TB volume again, then complains partway through claiming that the backup volume is full, yet there's ~1.4TB free on it. 1) There's no reason it should be copying the whole 1TB again when it already has it on disk. TM is supposed to be clever with multiple links to files etc., so I thought it would, as Symantec NBU (spit!) calls it, run incrementals forever and "synthesize" fulls. 2) Reality and what it claims re available space on the volume disagree

  6. How Do You Back Up? by mooingyak · · Score: 5, Funny

    With a loud beeping noise.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    1. Re:How Do You Back Up? by alex67500 · · Score: 1

      You, Sir, deserve a medal!

    2. Re:How Do You Back Up? by c4tp · · Score: 1

      Moonwalk. But you need to restore the backup from when it was cool.

  7. Begging the Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, really, this begs the question. Do you back up? (Captcha is "paranoia". Are you trying to tell me something, Slashdot?)

    1. Re:Begging the Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, really, this begs the question."

      No! It _raises_ the question, you moron.

  8. RAID by Ash-Fox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How do Slashdot users back up? RAID?

    Can we moderate this article flamebait?

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    1. Re:RAID by Elbart · · Score: 1

      Not under this management, no.

    2. Re:RAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word you're looking for is 'troll.'

    3. Re:RAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those who know really need to point this out.

      RAID IS NOT A BACKUP!!!!!!!!!!!

      Poor fools will be so sad when a virus wipes out their files and they try to load from the other half of the mirror to find that their files are also wiped out there.

      Yes, I work tech support.

  9. Multiple routes by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 2

    I currently sync my files across three computers, each of which does a time machine backup. The files are also backed up via Jungledisk to Amazon S3. Occasionally I do full-disk images of things.

    Files that would be inconvenient to lose, but which are not irreplaceable, are stored on a Drobo (redundant drive enclosure). This includes, for instance, my music library which could be reripped from CD.

    1. Re:Multiple routes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Über nerdy. Perfect for Slashdot.

    2. Re:Multiple routes by safetyinnumbers · · Score: 1

      My process is similar. Rsync from laptops to low-power nettop (or unison for files I like to have synced across machines). I use the -backup option so that old files get archived, not deleted.

      From there, the files are copied to external drives and also to S3 using the standard ubuntu backup, dejadup (so cloud backups are encrypted at my end).

      The main negatives of my system are that much of the process is still manual and it requires some setup, especially due to encryption. And I don't verify it enough.

  10. rdiff-backup and duplicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    rdiff-backup over ssh to a trusted server in a different country.
    duplicity (rdiff-backup's encrypted brother) if the server is not trusted.

    Both are network friendly (use rsync algorithm) and support incremental backup by default.

    1. Re:rdiff-backup and duplicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amateur.

      I do complete backups over ssh4096 to 256 trusted servers in alpha centauri every microsecond.

  11. Poorly. by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 2

    Between 3 active computers I use, there's enough redundancy since they're rarely in the same place. SpiderOak manages absolutely, completely vital stuff (currently my thesis drafts).

    But there's no real, constructive and useful pattern to it yet. The problem is less backups and more change management. Keeping copy-on-write sane on Windows is difficult, and migrating my servers XFS partition to ZFS is problematic since I need just tons of storage to do it which I presently can't afford.

    The issue is far less "backups" and more "making them meaningful". Backing up is useless if I overwrite the media with the important changes, or it takes forever to dissect a working copy of the data.

    1. Re:Poorly. by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      I recommend CrashPlan. Even if you don't use their paid server subscription, the software is free and good for local backups or backing up to friends' systems.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  12. cron job by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 4, Funny

    My weekly backups: something like:

    0 0 * * 0 /home/me/backup.sh

    #### backup.sh #####
    cp -r home/me/* /dev/null

    I haven't missed a backup yet :-)

    1. Re:cron job by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Goes pretty quick too...

      I use (software) RAID-1 for my /home directory, just reinstall the OS and apps. If my raid totally dies I guess I'm mostly screwed, but truly important stuff like tax returns I keep a copy on a different box (also w/ RAID /home) and a paper copy in a fire resistant safe.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:cron job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do use a cron job for backup, but use 'sync' to an external hard drive every hour and on shutdown. Once a month I make a copy of everything important onto DDS tape.

    3. Re:cron job by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Funny

      My weekly backups: something like:
      0 0 * * 0 /home/me/backup.sh

      #### backup.sh #####
      cp -r home/me/* /dev/null

      You should make a restore.sh script to match this. Then test it...

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    4. Re:cron job by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Haha. I worked on a cluster that pxe booted off the head node once. Would have been great to add it to the pxe script: 40 servers all installing linux and cluster software then /dev/null it all :-). I don't understand the systems go down for ~20min come up and then crash :-)

    5. Re:cron job by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I use (software) RAID-1 for my /home directory, just reinstall the OS and apps

      What do you need RAID for at home? Would it matter if your home computer was down for a few hours?

      RAID is not for backups, it provides continuous operation if a hard drive goes down. I really doubt that many many home computers need this.

      Since you already have 2 hard drives, a much better use for the second is to remove it from the RAID set, put it in an external enclosure and use it for backups. In an external enclosure, it can be removed from the system, perhaps even cycled offsite.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:cron job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, RAID provides redundancy for the event of a drive failure. that includes all the data that you would want to backup plus all the OS files and settings, program installs, etc. that you wouldn't normally backup. For most people, to completely rebuild a system and reinstall all their applications and then restore their files from the last backup takes longer that "a few hours". Plus RAID is nearly instantaneous for new data where a backup (or even a snapshot) is only point in time.

      RAID and backups very complimentary, RAID provides the short-term protection and convenience and backups provide the long-term protection.

    7. Re:cron job by crazyvas · · Score: 1

      Dude, I hate to break this to you, but there's a huge problem with your backup script. It won't backup any of the dot files in your home directory. What you really want to be doing is:

      #### backup.sh #####
      cp -r home/me /dev/null

      Phew. Aren't you glad I caught that for you or what.

  13. ZFS Raidz2 with RSYNC off site on long range wifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All in the subject!

  14. Crashplan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a local repository and also subscribe to crashplan central.

    It's brainless and easy.

    1. Re:Crashplan by hirschma · · Score: 1

      Another vote for Crashplan. I have the family plan. It's Linux friendly. There are no data limits. It's fairly cheap for what it is (I think that I can backup all of the computers in my "family" for $200 for two years).

      But it isn't enough.

      My semi-paranoid backup plan (and yes, I know that RAID is not backup):

      • Windows machines boot from soft-mirrored drives
      • They also back up to a Linux server w/ RAID 5 via Macrium Reflect
      • Most files are stored on a another Linux server, RAID 5
      • The main server rsyncs its contents to a "hidden" RAID 5 once a night. Gives a 24 hour window to retrieve accidentally deleted files locally
      • All Windows and Linux boxes constantly backup to the cloud via Crashplan (but not the Macrium backup files - too large).

      Sadly, Crashplan's worst problem is that it can't keep up with my FIOS speeds. It tops out at about 1-2MB/s, while FIOS allows up to 5MB/s up speeds. If it could, I'd even backup the Macrium image files.

      I had a bad Windows disaster and lost a bunch of data two years ago. It was a BIOS bug, I think - Windows 7 suddenly thought I had a new drive geometry, and it blue-screened and started to automatically try to "fix" things upon reboot. I'm surprised that no one has shit all over them for this "user-friendly" design decision.

      And it turns out that the precautions I had in place at the time ALL FAILED. The mirror (Intel fakeraid) had silently failed a while before (probably because of the crap BIOS) - not that it would have probably made a difference. The previous backup software had silently failed a while before. I wasn't using cloud backup. And the drives in my file server started to fail one after another at the same time.

      It took two sleepless weeks to get most (but not all) of my data back.

      Lesson: have several layers of backup and redundancy. And CHECK that everything is working as intended periodically, or you'll find that all of your condoms have broken.

  15. Dropbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any data that's actually valuable is in my Dropbox - so it's "backed up" on 2 of my computers, a work(university) computer and on their "cloud" systems as well.
    It's free and protects in almost all disaster scenarios, such as the house burning down, all my computers getting stolen, etc.

    All that doesn't fit in Dropbox is just something produced by others. If a disaster strikes and some a music album or computer game that I bought is not recoverable anymore, I'll have no moral regrets in getting a backup copy that some pirate has put online.

  16. Depends by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    For our personal computers, we use Time Machine - but manually triggered.

    For the media server, I've got a second disk and a once-a-day cron job.

    Offsite... well, okay we're not really there yet. So we're covered in case of hard drive failure, but not a catastrophic fire.

    (I am assuming this question is about home, not about work)

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Depends by allo · · Score: 1

      i think a off-dropbox copy is important. imagine something going wrong on the dropbox-server and pushing files full of garbage to both of your computers. now your two copies are as fucked as the copy on the dropbox-servers.

  17. shell script by Ken_g6 · · Score: 2

    I basically use this shell script once a week:


    drive=/backup/drive
    bpaths=/some/paths /to/backup
    for d in $bpaths ; do
            dout=`echo $d|sed -e "s/^.*\///"`
            echo Backing up $d as $dout
            ionice -c3 rm -f "$drive/bkup/$dout.*z"
            ionice -c3 tar -c "$d" | gzip -c | ionice -c3 openssl aes-256-cbc -salt -out "$drive/bkup/$dout.tgz.aes" -pass pass:"WouldntYouLikeToKnow"
    done

    I then copy the data to my USB drive on my keychain if it's plugged in. (Hence the encryption.) I also have a scheduled task on my laptop to copy the data from my desktop the next day.

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    1. Re:shell script by Ken_g6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just noticed I needed quotes around the bpaths variable assignment. Furthermore, my backup script has been broken since January!

      Thanks, Slashdot, for making my look at my script!

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    2. Re:shell script by nightfire-unique · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just a suggestion; you shouldn't delete any backups prior to writing (and possibly verifying) your new backup. Imagine what would happen if your disks failed during your backup. It's more likely than you think; it's a period of intense I/O. I've personally had it happen during raid reconstruction.

      You might consider timestamping your backups, and deleting all but the most recent 3 after a successful backup.

      Something like:

      /bin/ls -1tr "$drive/*.tgz.aes" | head -n -3 | xargs rm "{}" \;

      .. should clean up them nicely.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    3. Re:shell script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a suggestion; you shouldn't delete any backups prior to writing (and possibly verifying) your new backup. Imagine what would happen if your disks failed during your backup. It's more likely than you think; it's a period of intense I/O. I've personally had it happen during raid reconstruction.

      You might consider timestamping your backups, and deleting all but the most recent 3 after a successful backup.

      Something like:

      /bin/ls -1tr "$drive/*.tgz.aes" | head -n -3 | xargs rm "{}" \;

      .. should clean up them nicely.

      NO.

      Sorry, I take offense to that even being called a backup. That is a single copy. This is called replication, and I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that they are going to a remote system. This falls into the same boat as calling RAID "backup".
      Backups are point in time copies. They need to be browsable and accessible, and at first glance these don't fit that criteria either.

    4. Re:shell script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Twice I have had MS backups fail during backups.
      2. Now use a commercial back up by Paragon.
      3. Full image every month, weekly increment during month.
      4. paragon works with both my Lixux and MS boxes.
      5. I have only had to restore old MS XP box. I trust it will work on MS 7 box.
      No way I know to try an 'image restore' without killing original hard disc. Any Help?

  18. Suspenders AND belt by Mister+Mudge · · Score: 2

    My house is full of Macs, so I use Time Machine for on-site backup - each machine has its own Time Machine drive dedicated to it. Each machine also runs nightly image backups using SuperDuper onto yet other drives dedicated to that purpose.

    All info is also backed up offsite. I use CrashPlan Pro, which backs up over the net to their servers somewhere in the American Midwest (Milwaukee?) - in the event of a fire or a giant sinkhole opening up under my house, I can get the full contents of all my computers shipped to me within a few days on external hard drives.

    --
    Mudge

    In theory, theory and practice are the same.
    In practice, they're not.

    1. Re:Suspenders AND belt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Time Machine attached to the several Airport Express routers I have scattered about, they're great for diffs and lost files but clunky for bare metal restores which are useful when one of Apple's 'updates' acts up.

      I use SuperDuper for those. On my laptop which has an SSD and a 1 TB spinning rust drive, I use SuperDuper to clone a copy of the OS X drive to a partition - if the SSD hoses itself, I can instantly boot off the other drive. Pretty snazzy, I think.

    2. Re:Suspenders AND belt by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      I've got several Macbooks and found that having TimeMachine across WiFi to a NAS (with RAID) means that the backups happen much more regularly, as the Macbooks are often used roaming. All modern NAS solutions support TimeMachine AFAIK, but I know at least the QNAP stuff does as that's what I use. Then you only need the NAS to have a cron job running (most use some form of embedded Linux), to move stuff off-site. Me and a friend rsync to each other although it's not ideal for TM backups you can have it set up to run in the middle of the night or when you're at work and it gives an additional measure.

      But I haven't had a any catastrophic failure since I started to use TM, so except for getting back the occasional file, I haven't had to rely on it. Especially the off site thing I do with that friend, but that would only be needed in the case my house burns down, or my NAS gets stolen or something like that. The thing with backups is that they secure against things that you hope will never happen.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  19. External Hard Drives by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

    With two copies for redundancy. Don't use cloud solutions because I don't trust them. Well, unless you count mailing shit to myself and using Gmail as a cloud backup solution, anyway.

    1. Re:External Hard Drives by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      NAS with TimeMachine support on the home network and WiFi and RAID 1 disks and an rsync script to a remote location. Once configured it's completely painless and doesn't even require you to plug anything in or sit at a certain location, so it's ideal for laptops.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  20. Let the government back up for you by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Encrypt any important data that you don't want to lose, and keep it close to crazy terrorist rants in plain text files. With all the government snooping going on, in the interests of our security, the government will secretly make backup copies of it for you. Their experts will try to decrypt it, and be baffled by the message hidden in your wedding video.

    In case of a disk crash, just ask the government politely to give you a backup copy of your data. They will kindly oblige.

    Probably.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Let the government back up for you by tgv · · Score: 1

      I'm fresh out of mod points, but I'd given you 5 double-plus-insightful!

  21. Backups are for the weak ! by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Live on the edge guys...

    When you boot up in the morning and it takes a little longer than usual, the heart beats a little faster and you think "OMG is the machine going to fail? My data will be gone". Or perhaps there's an electrical storm to liven your day up - "If that thunder gets any closer I might have to shut down the PC, but if lightning hits then everything's toast !".

    These scenarios, and many others, all get the blood pumping in fear. If the computer /does/ boot or you /don't/ get toasted by bolts of electricity then the sense of relief is wonderful !

    Try it - it's fun ;-)

    --
    while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();
    1. Re:Backups are for the weak ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a good day to die. I say no backups for you.

  22. External Enclosures by SrLnclt · · Score: 1

    For personal machines, imaging to an external USB/Firewire HDD is the only way to go. Drives are so large and cheap these days, I've got several of them in a rotation. Using blank optical disks, tape, etc.these days for personal use is just silly. Occasionally use some free online storage or other removable media for small amounts of important things I may be working on at any given point in time.

    At the office (small business) someone setup the server for the cloud using Carbonite before I got there. Probably a good idea to have off site storage for business. I may get them an external enclosure to backup occasionally for more redundancy and quicker recovery time if they loose everything.

  23. CrashPlan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great offsite backup:
    http://www.crashplan.com/

    For a couple dollars a month it's a great deal.

  24. Why backup anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can always download new and better porn from the internet. Everything else of importance can fit on a CDROM.

  25. BackupPC & CrashPlan+ for teh win by JayAEU · · Score: 1

    I use a combination of BackupPC and CrashPlan+ Family Unlimited to keep the data on all my systems safe. Works like a charm.

  26. Tahoe LAFS by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use a secure distributed grid. The software is an open source tool, Tahoe LAFS (http://tahoe-lafs.org). The grid is composed of ~15 servers contributed by different people all over the world. There are a half dozen servers in various locations in the US, about the same number in Europe, and the remainder in Russia and the Ukraine.

    My files are AES256-encrypted on my machine, split into 13 pieces using Solomon-Reed coding, any five of which are sufficient to reconstruct my files, and then those 13 pieces are distributed to the servers in the grid. I run daily backups, but since uploads to the grid are idempotent, only the changed or new files are stored. I also run a bi-weekly "repair" operation which checks all of my files (all versions, from all backup runs) to see if any of their pieces are lost. If so, it reconstructs the missing pieces and deploys them to servers in the grid. The individual servers in the grid are fairly reliable, but problems do happen, so repair is important.

    I get about 100 KBps net upload rate, so this isn't a good solution for backing up terabytes, and the occasional "surge" in my data generation (usually caused by a day of heavy photo-taking) often causes my "daily" backup to take a few days to run, but all in all it works very well.

    Should my server ever die, I only need two pieces of information to get all of my data back: The grid "introducer" URL, which will allow me to set up a new node connected to the grid, and my root "dircap", which is a ~100-byte string containing the identifier and decryption key for the root directory of my archive. That directory contains the decryption keys for the files and directories it references.

    Since this grid is all volunteer-based, the only cost to me for this backup solution is the hardware and bandwidth I provide to my grid (I provide 1 TB of disk and grid usage consumes a fairly small fraction of my Comcast connection), plus the time I spend administering my server and checking to see that my backup and repair processes are running. Oh, and I also contribute (a little) to the Tahoe LAFS project, but that's due to interest, not a requirement.

    I'm very, very happy with this solution.

    BTW, the grid could use another 20 nodes or so, if anyone is interested. There's a fair amount of trust required of new members to the grid, though, so it might take us a while to vet new members. The trust is required not because other members of the grid might have access to files that are not their own, but we need to verify that new members will behave appropriately -- providing their fair share of storage and bandwidth, and not consuming too much.

    Anyone interested should check out the grid's policies and philosophy at: http://bigpig.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome. If all of that looks good, join the mailing list, introduce yourself and we'll consider allowing you to join the grid.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    1. Re:Tahoe LAFS by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      That sounds awesome, thanks for sharing it. I didn't see a quick explanation on the wiki: what are the minimum bandwidth and storage contributions?

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    2. Re:Tahoe LAFS by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Well, looks like it's not suitable for home users at all. :(

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    3. Re:Tahoe LAFS by swillden · · Score: 1

      Well, looks like it's not suitable for home users at all. :(

      I use it at home :-)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Tahoe LAFS by swillden · · Score: 1

      That sounds awesome, thanks for sharing it. I didn't see a quick explanation on the wiki: what are the minimum bandwidth and storage contributions?

      Minimum storage is 500 GB, maximum is 1 TB. We don't have any stated bandwidth requirements, but you should probably have at least 5-6 Mbps downstream and (more importantly) 1-2 Mbps upstream. We'd prefer higher, obviously.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:Tahoe LAFS by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Well, as a home user, I don't see how I can "commit to maintaining at least 95% uptime year after year." I mean, really, they want a multi-year commitment? I could see some sysadmin with a 150mb Internet connection and a bunch of servers, but I'm just a guy with a few computers and DSL. I don't know what my connection or systems will be like in a few years. I just want to share a few gigs of disk and a few kilobytes of bandwidth to backup some data.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    6. Re:Tahoe LAFS by swillden · · Score: 1

      95% uptime isn't that much, really. You can have almost three weeks per year of downtime and still meet it. The number was chosen specifically to be feasible for home systems, but high enough to make it clear that we want always-on systems. Systems that are must less reliable than 95% just aren't very useful. In practice, most of our home-based nodes have availability on the order of 99%, and the co-located nodes are considerably higher -- some have never been down since they joined the grid ~2 years ago.

      As for sharing a "few gigs"... if that's your goal then our grid isn't for you. It's intended for relatively high-volume backups -- a few hundred gigs, rather than a few gigs. If all you need to back up is a few gigs, there are a lot of very inexpensive and highly reliable network-based options out there. However, if you like the Tahoe approach, you're always free to find or build your own community-based grid with people who have similar needs to yours.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    7. Re:Tahoe LAFS by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      I understand that your needs are different. I think there might be a lot of people interested in a group oriented more toward numbers like 50 GB, 80% uptime, >384kbps upstream. With enough nodes in a system like that, the lower upstream bandwidth might not matter as much--it could be almost like BitTorrent, in that many slow downloads add up to a high effective speed. You might think that bandwidth number is too low, but I don't want to use up 50% of my upstream 100% of the time.

      I do have several offsite network backup solutions in use, but I like the idea of a community-based, FOSS solution. Is Tahoe a feasible possibility for numbers like these? How many nodes can it scale to? I'm imagining, basically, two-way BitTorrent for backups.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    8. Re:Tahoe LAFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks Swillden! I will check it out! it may add to further redundancy to my backups in cae my server goes, and my thumb disks too..

    9. Re:Tahoe LAFS by swillden · · Score: 1

      I understand that your needs are different. I think there might be a lot of people interested in a group oriented more toward numbers like 50 GB, 80% uptime, >384kbps upstream.

      The issue with 80% uptime is that it makes the odds of a node being available both when you store your share and when you retrieve your share a little on the low side. Not that it isn't doable, but it means you need to plan for a lot more redundancy -- and hence a lot more expansion. The Reed-Solomon coding scheme allows you to break files into N shares, any K of which are required to reconstruct the data and in the process your file size increases by a factor of N/K. You could set N to, say, 10, and K to 1 and that would effectively be the same as uploading a copy of your file to each of 10 servers -- great redundancy, but if you're only providing 50 GB to the grid, then you can only store 5 GB in the grid, because of expansion.

      I have enough data to back up that I don't want expansion factors greater more than about 2, and I also want a strong guarantee that my file will still be available later. Specifically, I want to be able to recover my file with 99.9999% probability (one in a million chance of loss). To achieve that, based on the current size of the VG2 (volunteer grid 2) grid, I need at least 93% uptime for all nodes. As the grid grows that can actually be lowered. In fact with 100 nodes, I could use N=100, K=50 and achieve six-nines reliability for my files with 71% node uptime -- but I'd still rather keep the uptimes high and be able to lower my expansion factor (N=100, K=81 provides 99.9999% reliability with only 23% expansion, assuming 95% node uptime).

      With enough nodes in a system like that, the lower upstream bandwidth might not matter as much--it could be almost like BitTorrent, in that many slow downloads add up to a high effective speed.

      In theory, yes. In practice, a bug in the current implementation means that Tahoe doesn't achieve that. Though that bug could be fixed.

      You might think that bandwidth number is too low, but I don't want to use up 50% of my upstream 100% of the time.

      In practice people don't really notice a problem with Tahoe consuming a great deal of their bandwidth. That might be different in a large grid, though. To date the only grids much larger than 20 nodes that have been deployed (AFAIK) have been in data centers with very high bandwidth between nodes.

      I do have several offsite network backup solutions in use, but I like the idea of a community-based, FOSS solution. Is Tahoe a feasible possibility for numbers like these? How many nodes can it scale to? I'm imagining, basically, two-way BitTorrent for backups.

      The biggest deployment to date has been around 200 nodes. That was the allmydata.com commercial backup system (which developed Tahoe). Their system failed due to scaling problems, but not because Tahoe couldn't handle it. The reason they failed was because they hadn't fully worked out the reliability math, which led to reliability problems, and (even more) because they were unable to keep up with the increasing storage demands of their customers. The latter part of that is a typical startup funding issue and not very interesting. The former part is more interesting.

      They were using N=10, K=3 which on paper seems to offer crazy high reliability -- eight nines, assuming 95% uptime (which is about what they had -- they bought cheap hardware). However, with the 10 shares of any given file randomly distributed across 200 servers, this led to the probability of any two files being available at a given moment being effectively independent. This meant that the probability that some file was unavailable for any given user was not nearly as high, and virtually guaranteed that at any given time there were a number of users who couldn't access some of their files.

      What made this worse was the fact that

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  27. ZFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ugh.. Apple's Time Machine is complete crap, totally inefficient.

    ZFS is where it's at.

    1. Re:ZFS by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed it is not as efficient as it could be. However, using it is only slightly more complicated than "buy a usb hard drive and plug into computer"

      An efficient, totally ideal process that no one actually bothers to use because it's either too complicated, or because it isn't actually licensed for your platform or whatever, is no backup system at all.

      Also, ZFS is a filesystem that can be set up to preserve version information. It's not a backup while it's on the same disk....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:ZFS by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I use both. Time Machine back up to a deduplicated RAID-Z volume. When Time Machine backs up a file (e.g. a VM disk image or an 8MB stripe from a sparse image) with only a few small changes, the decuplication kicks in and means it only takes up a couple of blocks.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:ZFS by allo · · Score: 1

      as zfs can do raid, it might be a backup-solution. but then your backup cannot protect you from zfs-errors. which might be important, when some zfs-bug which fucks all your data is triggered. Never trust a single technique for live system AND backup system.

    4. Re:ZFS by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      It's not a backup while it's on the same disk, but a backup without version information is very close to useless anyway - unless you're positive you'll catch problems between now and the last backup, you need version information - and that part is the slow clumsy bit which makes most of these problems complicated.

      ZFS is very nice in that regard, because if the filesystem is holding version information for you, transparently (and - by virtue of the layer, very efficiently - since it literally only stores changed blocks) then you can backup by just doing a "zfs send" and boom - you've got all your version information and the complete filesystem ready to go.

      Trying to do this with other things becomes very annoying very quickly - for example, I do want to keep at least 1 backup of my music collection, and if it got completely scrambled I might not notice it for a while...but if I change ID3 information, then rsync and other solutions will store a full extra copy of the track. How many should I store? How do I prevent "track scrambled" if I only store 1 copy, then update ID3 info later?

  28. Backup Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hasn't this been covered ad nauseam? Not to troll or anything but it seems like a third of all Ask Slashdot questions are backup questions, and the responses to these cover close to all the special cases.

    1. Re:Backup Questions by PPH · · Score: 1

      We figured most people have lost track of the original thread by now. So this is a backup.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Backup Questions by Teun · · Score: 1
      Maybe, but since then a flood in Thailand caused a shortage of large HD's and the price of a fifty pounds box of used floppies has dramatically crashed.

      So my question is what limit has WinZip for splitting large files over many disks?

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  29. Screw that by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I am far more interested in World IPv6 day. We need to get moving over to that.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  30. My daddy thought me good! by santax · · Score: 1
  31. Multiple places by LilWolf · · Score: 1

    Each of my computers has a dedicated external hard drive where I push backups on a regular basis. I have one external hard drive stashed away at my parents where I make an backup of my laptop every time I visit them. My laptop pretty much has all of my important data so it serves its purpose. All the hard drives involved in this are encrypted of course.

    On top of that my most important text documents(not necessarily important in the way of having personal information, but a lot of work put into) are backed up to Ubuntu One as well as Wuala.

    Given how infrequently a lot of my data changes, I find the backups adequate.

  32. Thumbdrive by tomhath · · Score: 2

    Think through what you're backing up and why. For most people a thumbdrive should be sufficient for personal data; software can be reinstalled as needed. If you have more data than will fit on a thumbdrive you need to look at what's important.

    Really large volumes of data almost always are static; usually music, eBooks, or video which can just be backed up once on a DVD and put away. No need to keep copying that stuff over and over.

    Backing up software projects is another issue. A remote versioning site is best. Working in Java you'll need all the space you can afford; for a language like Python an old floppy drive is sufficient.

    1. Re:Thumbdrive by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      This doesn't really make a lot of sense. No, you don't need to copy your music all the time, but when you add three albums what do you do? Mark them as new and then burn just those three to a DVD and put it somewhere?

      No, of course not. You need to sync all your important data, which can easily include hundreds of gigs of pictures, music, video, and documents, to somewhere else. For most people an external hard drive they keep at the office and bring home once every couple of weeks is entirely sufficient. Supplement with keeping smaller important stuff on Dropbox or a thumb drive for real-time cloud backups.

      I recommend to most people a dual strategy. Backup to one location at home (I use Windows Home Server for this) and also back up to a remote location. A 2 TB drive at home plus CrashPlan is a good 2-pronged approach.

    2. Re:Thumbdrive by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      My photos and video of my family take up roughly 1TB at present. "Backed up once on a DVD" would need to be repeated 220+ times.

  33. Photographic backups by davidwr · · Score: 1

    You joke, but photography can be used to back up anything where the data can be seen under normal light.

    If you get really up-close, phonographic records and optical media fit the bill. Paper records (think: Microfilm copies), film, and on-film movie soundtracks also fit the bill.

    I've even heard of a way to make the bits on 1960s-era magnetic tape visible under certain wavelengths of light.

    As for making a "photographic image backup" of my magnetic disks or solid-state disks, well, if it can be done at all, it's probably destructive and definitely inefficient.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Photographic backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I'm old enough (and in the engineering field) to have actually USED Magnaflux. Back in the day, when most of /. was in on the floor screaming for mommy, we used this on tape (and occassionly disk) to check for missing gaps (or tracks). Great fun to play with. Originally it was kinda distructive, since you could wipe the fluid off but it left a residue, but now they have non-destructive toys for this. Oh I miss those pre-1MB disk and tape drives. NOT. :)

  34. Automated backup of NAS by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All of our important files (even the kids' files) are on the server. It backs itself up automatically 3 times per week to external USB drives. I rotate the USB backup drives every few weeks. So we need do nothing special today, as the backup works fine.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Automated backup of NAS by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hello Kitty USB flash drives.

      Drop a bunch in the parking lot.

      Use Google to get the data in a couple of days. Latency is a bit low, but hell, it's a backup.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Automated backup of NAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens if your house burns down?

  35. RAID 5 + external hard drive by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 1

    I use just a three-level hierarchy:

    1. Photos and documents are on my RAID-5 array (4 × 1 TB Hitachi enterprise drives) in my desktop, backed up occasionally (every month or so) to a Toshiba 1 TB eSATA external drive sitting on my desk

    2. Music, movies, TV shows, are on the RAID-5 array, not backed up

    3. Windows and programs are on my 80 GB SSD, not backed up.

    So I'm not protected at all against my house burning down, but this has worked for me for the past 10 years. (For my old system, which ran 2003–2010, it was a WD Raptor, not an SSD. And the RAID 5 was 4 × 200 GB.)

    --

    Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

  36. Areca by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    I really like Areca Backup. It has a fairly straightforward GUI and you can easily back up groups of files to different backup locations or media. If you run a differential or incremental backup, the GUI presents a "logical view" of that backup against the last full backup or series of backups. Now, if only I could find some easy way to tag and organize 20,000 mp3s...

  37. More important by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    World backup day? How about world test your restore day? All the backups in the world don't mean anything unless you test your restores and know your data.

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
    1. Re:More important by pclminion · · Score: 2

      So, how does a home user test the restore? Seems like chicken-and-egg. To test the restore I need to wipe the drive. To wipe the drive I better have a working backup. To know I've got a working backup I need to... test the restore?

    2. Re:More important by TheLink · · Score: 1

      No, all you have to do is buy another drive and restore it on to that drive.

      If your time and data is valuable enough, the cost of another drive is not a big deal even post thailand flood.

      --
    3. Re:More important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah you just run "zfs scrub ...".

    4. Re:More important by swalve · · Score: 1

      World Test Your Restore Day was two days prior, and the day after that was World Oh Fuck My Backups That I've Been Bragging About on Slashdot Don't Work Day.

    5. Re:More important by pclminion · · Score: 1

      No, all you have to do is buy another drive and restore it on to that drive.

      So, all I have to do is open my computer, swap my main disk out, try the restore, then swap it back? That's not exactly a low-risk operation for an average person. I ask again, what's the solution for the home user? The solution should not involve performing surgery on my computer.

  38. The Tao of Backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Killthre... I mean The Tao of Backup

    1. Re:The Tao of Backup by allo · · Score: 1

      this site is astroturfing. just look at the links mentioned in the articles ... they want to sell their product.

      the rest of it is useful, but i would not link them anymore because of the spam for their products.

  39. My backup schedule by rikkards · · Score: 1

    Mon, wed Fri: Ghost Backup of OS and C: drive to a separate drive
    Tue, Thu: filecopy of all required files (Pics, mp3s, important data to same separate drive
    Daily scheduled task that runs and will mirror said separate drive to another drive that is mounted as Y:. This drive is stored at work and is fully encrypted using truecrypt. Usually bring it home on Mondays but if I forget, it will automatically run any other day

  40. rsnapshot by Wagoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    rsnapshot seems to work pretty well for incremental rsync'd backups for me. It uses symlinks to maintain the older snapshots, to save on total filesystem usage. It can do rsync over ssh for backing up remote servers/pushing local vital data to a safe remote location.

    Local backup server uses Linux software RAID for good measure (5x1TB RAID 5 + 10x2TB RAID 6).

    1. Re:rsnapshot by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      I think you mean hard links.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    2. Re:rsnapshot by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 1

      What is your rebuild time like on the 10x2TB? I have a 4x1TB RAID5 array and the rebuild time is getting a bit long. With current drive capacities, my original motivation for going to RAID5 is no longer valid, so I'm thinking about splitting the data onto two 2x2TB RAID1 arrays instead.

    3. Re:rsnapshot by Wagoo · · Score: 1

      It takes about 20 hours for the machine to rebuild the whole array, this is with WD/Seagate "green" (ie ~5400rpm) drives. Sadly you can't enable TLER on these newer ones. I was planning on growing the raid 6 to 15 drives.. but I may end up making another 10 drive array instead and retiring the raid 5.

    4. Re:rsnapshot by Wagoo · · Score: 1

      That's the fellas.

  41. RDiff local, fireproof lockbox in other building by isopropanol · · Score: 1

    I do rdiff-backup of plain files and cp --sparse=always of iSCSI shares and VM images to internal SATA drives in an eSATA cradle. Those drives are stored in a fire and waterproof lockbox in our detached workshop. Given our high ground location (flooding is very unlikely, so is landslides, no underground mines and low sinkhole probability ), anything bad enough to destroy the computers in the house and render the contents of the lockbox unuseable probably is bad enough that I don't care about the data.

    At work most of our customers have their heads in the sand... It's like pulling teeth trying to convince them to at least use a USB drive.

    Oh yeah, one of those iSCSI shares is a time machine backup... which can be copied to physical disk if a baremetal recovery is required.

  42. Don't forget restore, is just as important. by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Backup is only half the problem. Restore is the other half. And indeed that's where I've usually had the most problems. The third problem is validating the restore. You always worry that you are either going to overwrite something on the restore target or miss something on the restore source and end up in an inconsistent state.

    Time machine is revolutionary because it is so simple and seems to be almost flawless. I've had lots of backup systems over the years including dump 0 but everyone has been plagued with issues that arose when things were off normal. I've cobbled all sorts of things like rsync and cpio but the only thing that comes close to working as flawlessly as time machine is a NetApp.

    At work where I can control the remote servers securley on a closed network I am able to use time machine for a remote backup. But at home I don't have a remote server I can target for the remote backup.

    TO do a remote bakcup at home I use Crashplan. I looked a lot of competitors like Mosy but settled on crashplan for two killer reasons. The giant problem with all these commercial backups is that while the incremental backups are simple over the net, the restore of a whole hard disk cannot be done over the net. You have to pay them to burn DVDs and send them to you. ANd that assumes you know what time period you want to recover.

      UNlike all the other methods crashplan lets you pick a buddy who runs crash plan and then you can back up your disks to each others computer. If you need to to a massive restore you just drive over to your buddy's house and pick up the drive, bring it home, and restore locally. This also solves the problem of the first dump being too large to send over the net as well. You do it locally then drop the drive off to your buddy.

    Brilliant!! plus with crash plan you pay for the app once not monthly.

    I've used it for years now and it works very well and it very easy to set up. All your files are encrypted so buddies can't read each other's drives.

    The only flaw with crashplan is that it runs in java so you have this instance of java running 24/7 and not to put to fine a point on it: java sucks. I don't know if it is crashplan or other things that run in the JAVA VM but over the week it bloats up to 600MB to 800MB. THe workaround solution is to kill the java VM every few days. Empirically crashplan is robust enough to survive this and restart. But that's a really awful solution.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Don't forget restore, is just as important. by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      CrashPlan is nice (although they haven't fixed an inotify regression for months now, so I'm stuck doing full rescans several times a day). Java is awful, though, you're right. I've never had it used as much memory as you mentioned, but it's usually 200-400 MB. I have it niced and ioniced down as far as possible. If I need to restart it, a simple $(sudo /etc/init.d/crashplan restart) takes care of it--no need to kill the JVM.

      The other killer feature of CrashPlan is, if you subscribe to the + service, you have unlimited backup space. You never need to worry about running out of space or having to delete old backups to make room.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    2. Re:Don't forget restore, is just as important. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run CrashPlan on a Mac (10.6) too, and use it to back up remotely to CrashPlan+ (their online service), as well as an external drive I own. I use this in addition to Time Machine (I'm paranoid, and don't like how Time Machine backup schedules/clean up cannot be customized). While it does seem to use about 500 - 600 MB of memory, this number seems to stay constant, and there is very little CPU usage, if any.

      I've never noticed any slow downs due to CrashPlan, even after weeks of uptime, and on days when there are 10s or 100s of GB of new data to process.

  43. Backups - and It's also Earth Hour .. Day. by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

    It's also the day of Earth Hour - a day on which, for one hour, people around the world turn off the lights.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Hour
    I wonder how many here personally partake.

    -----

    As for backing up goes, I'll just re-paste here what I said in a recent other Ask Slashdot question:

    It's not really 'managing' my data.. it's a storage/backup solution. The difference is that if I 'managed' my data, I wouldn't have tens of thousands of digital camera photos in a bunch of folders with meaningless names, but just a few that are actually worth saving to me. It's not that I'm saving all the others for future generations either, I just don't have the energy to go through so many photos and delete all but the best (the very best I've already shared anyway).

    But if it's just storage/backup...
    1. Every write made to the main HDD is mirrored via a mirroring RAID setup. Pure mirroring, I don't want to deal with RAID levels that use parity/etc. that may save some space but are a PITA to rebuild (and must be rebuilt - a simple mirrored HDD mounts just fine when taken out of the RAID).

    2. Files are written to a versioning filesystem, so that if I delete something that I later regret, I can get an older version back (presuming things didn't run out of space and it had to be overwritten with new data).

    3. Files saved to a specific area are further synced with a cloud storage solution. These are basically files that I need to be able to access from any location at any time (short of the cloud hoster folding/etc.) asap in case of an emergency. There's very few files that qualify, so bandwidth and monthly caps aren't an issue. I did upload about half a GiB worth initially, though.

    4. Every night the computer does a differential backup to an external, also mirrored, HDD, over the network. This is a set that is in a completely different area of the house, so if I manage to trip and splash water all over everything here, the others are fine.

    5. Every 2 weeks (used to be weekly) I bring one of the HDDs in the mirroring set in the other room to an off-site location (basically a storage locker). From that off-site location I bring back another HDD and put that into the RAID, and force an update of that HDD from the other one.

    So -if- one of my main HDDs dies, there's always the other one. If they both manage to die at the same time, I've still got a daily backup in another room. If that dies, that has another one. If those both die, I still have a 2-weekly backup in an offsite location. If that one's dead as well (what are the odds??), then all my most important stuff is also in the cloud. If that cloud storage solution goes belly-up at the same time and data can't be retrieved? Well, I'm screwed. But life does go on - people whose houses burn down often don't have such a rigorous backup method in place, and they pick up again as well.

    That said...
    6. Of very important photos, I've got prints (a Kodak booth does better than your home inkjet) or even negatives (the better photography stores can point you in the right direction for that). Of very important documents, I've got print-outs (laserjet). Of very important video? Nothing. Of very important (music) recordings? Also nothing. I have no such 'very important' of the latter two - but I think you get the idea: I would have gotten those transferred to film and/or tape. The reason is that those can easily be seen by human eyes or played back for human interpretation - digital data not so much.

    1. Re:Backups - and It's also Earth Hour .. Day. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's the day where you switch off electricity to save power while your computer is busy overwriting the old backup with the new one. ;-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Backups - and It's also Earth Hour .. Day. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Overwriting your only backup to make a newer backup is a sin ;).

      --
    3. Re:Backups - and It's also Earth Hour .. Day. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      So is switching off your power while your computer is heavily operating on disk.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Backups - and It's also Earth Hour .. Day. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      That's often a good test of a database server ( both the software and hardware).

      If someone pulls the plug and whatever was supposedly committed (e.g. the DB server tells a client over the network that stuff is committed ) turns out to not actually be committed to disk when power comes back up then the server is not fit for many critical database tasks. You may have to reconfigure or change/update the software/hardware.

      For stuff like Facebook/Twitter that sort of data loss scenario doesn't matter - people grumble that their post doesn't show up, they post it again.

      --
  44. Backing up as we speak by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 1

    My solution is mirroring data from the computer to a NAS with RAID, then a harddrive I take offsite with all the impossible/hard to replace data.

    Ironically a Harddrive in my NAS died two days ago, so I have had to do a rebuild and as a result bought a new external hard drive that is big enough for all the data, even the easy to replace data. So currently my NAS, which rebuilt the array successfully is copying all of its data to a new external harddrive.

  45. Free Backups! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Chinese espionage hackers do it all for us free. They copy our stuff over to their side. It's as off-site as you can get.

    1. Re:Free Backups! by russotto · · Score: 1

      Chinese espionage hackers do it all for us free. They copy our stuff over to their side. It's as off-site as you can get.

      The NSA has a copy of everything too, but in either case the problem is the same: restoring the data. Unless you know someone in Chinese intelligence?

      (IIRC, such a clandestine "backup" was used in an early episode of "JAG" -- a recording of a transmission had been erased, but NSA had separately recorded it, and the cute blonde lawyer called in a favor with Ollie North to get a copy. This piece of trivia, alas, will never be useful, not even as an answer on Jeopardy)

  46. RSync/SSHFS/EncFS by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    For laptops, I use a scheduled rsync to a central server mounted using sshfs. For offsite, an rsync to an EncFS filesystem on a portable drive. If bandwidth limits ever get reasonable, I'll switch to using DropBox or SpiderOak, but the bandwidth limitations remove that as a solution for all but important data.

    1. Re:RSync/SSHFS/EncFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, you do realize that rsync can run over SSH and is in fact designed for remote synchronization? It is MUCH more efficient to do something like: "rsync /source/dir server:/target/dir" than it is to do "rsync /src/dir /target/dir" where target dir is a remotely mounted filesystem!

    2. Re:RSync/SSHFS/EncFS by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Yes I do ... meant ssh, and thanks.

  47. Datasette by burni2 · · Score: 1

    Datasette, compact cassette .. works great, never lost a program.

  48. I use dropbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just put all my stuff there. Rest, like music, movies, e-book and adult films I can just re-download

  49. I use vitalEsafe's shadowSafe BDR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use vitalEsafe's shadowSafe (http://vitalesafe.com/new/backups) product. Local AND offsite block-level (not file level) complete machine point-in-time backups. Uses Microsoft Volume Shadowing Services, so you can make "hot" backups (backups while running) of MS SQL, MS Exchage, MS SharePoint, Oracle, Pervasive databases. If I have a catastrophic failure, they will ship my backups to me on external drive. Backups can be restored to bare metal (no operating system required) and can be restored to different hardware. 200GB restore to empty machine takes approximately 1.5 hours. vitalEsafe supplies external backup hardware, all software, remote/onsite installation, secure offsite storage, and daily monitoring of my backups. It isn't cheap, but it is a very comprehensive product that covers all the bases.

    Full disclosure: I'm the CTO for vitalEsafe so I designed and very much believe in our product.

  50. How I backup by chr1st1anSoldier · · Score: 1

    I put the car in reverse, check my mirrors, then floor it.

  51. AMANDA and Windows Backup by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 2

    I have two systems I use.

    For my servers, I use AMANDA with encrypted virtual tapes to do nightly backups. Shortly after the backups run, cron calls a shell script in order to copy the virtual tapes to an offsite location via rsync.

    For my desktop PC, I don't need to back up as often, so I do a weekly backup via Windows Backup to a TrueCrypt volume on an external hard drive. When it's not being used to back up my PC, I keep the external hard drive at my office. I figure if something happens where both my office and home are destroyed, then at that moment I've got bigger problems to worry about than my data. :-)

    Just my $.02...

    1. Re:AMANDA and Windows Backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. AMANDA is extremely powerful and an advanced backup solution. Its a bit of a pain to configure but almost invisible once completed. It just sits there, quietly, doing its job day after day. And if it occationally needs to be fed, it emails you. AMANDA is, by far, one of the most under used and over looked advanced open source solutions available.

  52. Weekly local backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Duplicity to do incremental encrypted backups to an old computer that I only keep around for this purpose once a week, or more often if I have data that I really don't want to lose before next saturday. I'm planning to get a second backup disk to keep at a friends house and sync with my local backup once a month or so, but I think I'll wait with that until disk prices are sane again.

  53. Rolling 11's fwiw.. by SuperCharlie · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to throw out a decent rotation system I used for making backups when I had some pretty important data to keep track of.. it works with 11 sets and goes like this.. you get 11 sets of whatever..tapes, drives, thumbs..your media... you label them mon, tue, wed, thu, fri1, fri2, fri3, month1, month2, month3, month4 (we didnt do weekends.) The rotation is pretty obvious..and allows you to go back any day this week, any friday of the month and any month for 4 months. We did this so we could roll back far enough to be sure if we started copying corrupt files or whatever we could have a good clean point to recover from. You can of course add sat and sun and plop months on the end for longer times.. but we never needed to roll back farther than 4 months.

  54. mozy by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    very little is worth backing up. That which is gets uploaded.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  55. GoodSync by fongaboo · · Score: 1

    I cannot praise this versatile little free* program more. I have given up on personal RAID. I can't afford RAID 5, which is the only RAID I might feel assurance from. I started playing with the original consumer Promise cards and dealt with the headaches. Even the Medea RAID 5 units I used at work became a hassle. I learned the hard way not to trust these plug-and-play RAID 1 units offered by LaCie and the like. I had one where the controller circuitry failed, but both internal drives (and ostensibly the data on them) were intact... But they were housed in an proprietary format, so I had no way to get the data off even if i pulled the drives out. I sent it back to LaCie and even though they noted that it was just the controller they replaced, they still nicely formatted the volume, destroying all data. I have since taken too keeping two physical drives of the same size in separate enclosures and have them incrementally update one to the other nightly. The app I use to do this is GoodSync (Win/Mac). It's really low-profile/low-overhead and very configurable. My nightly updates are just a simple A->B incremental job. But I also have a job that connects to my colo server via SFTP as a midpoint, effectively allowing me to run my own Dropbox-style file locker. For this it has the ability to handshake with the server whenever any file changes in the specified local folder. I then run the client on multiple machines. Additionally it has ability to work with commercial cloud services, such as Azure and Amazon, but I haven't tried those. *There is a pay-version, but I haven't found anything yet that I couldn't do with the free version.

  56. backups and backups of backups by ballyhoo · · Score: 1

    zfs or hardware raid on all servers. bacula for all MS windows systems and all servers which are switched on most of the time. Apple Time Capsules for all the macs. regular backups of all phones. auto-sync of all address-book and calendar info over icloud.

    as you ask, why yes, i have lost data in the past due to lack of backups. ain't gonna happen again.

    -bh

  57. Crashplan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Crashplan, my home computers backup to a external hooked to a netbook in the the basement, the netbook backups music and media to my desktop.. The critical data, like photos and client work also gets backed up to a bare sata drive in a dock that I take to my office on a weekly basis. So even if my house gets toasted or flooded at least I am no missing much. I wanted to use crashplan's cloud service, but it would take forever to get all my data offsite.

  58. Back up system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an old (Athlon 900MHz) spare computer which boots each night at 3pm and grabs the data to a mirrored LVM volume. Once it's done it waits another 15min then shuts down. Munin tracks the SMART values and alerts me if a disc is failing. The system itself supports 6 SATA-drives that are easily swappable.

  59. time machine + rsync = win win by v1 · · Score: 1

    I've been using rsync to back up 1/2 dozen machines here for some time now. Great for both local and remote (internet) backups. My mom's imac is 300 miles away. She has a little 500gb firewire drive locally backing up with time machine, which gives her instant recovery as well as application-spicific recalls (get that email back or that address book card back easily for example) as well as versions. Then a custom made cronjob to rsync to my server here runs nightly for offsite in case of fire/theft/etc. That's really the best of both worlds there, highly recommended. No recurring costs.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  60. I just don't backup by Gorobei · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who cares about what happened 5 years ago?

    When did you last look at that porn clip you downloaded in 2002? How many emails do you really need to keep for more than a month? Would Battlezone 2 even run anymore if you tried it?

    When did you last get audited by the IRS? Screw that, my accountant should have copies anyway, and most info was electronically reported anyway.

    Between the cloud, my iPhone, 4 synced home boxes, a drop box for some important stuff, Google, I can recover anything non-trivial.

    1. Re:I just don't backup by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Between the cloud, my iPhone, 4 synced home boxes, a drop box for some important stuff, Google, I can recover anything non-trivial.

      So then, yes, you do backup. You just don't realize it :)

  61. Reverse by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

    I back up by putting my car in reverse. Or by walking backwards. Duh.

  62. Time Machine - it just works by derfla8 · · Score: 1

    Time Machine to a 4 TB drive on my main computer. For my wife's machine and my laptops, Time Machine to a 2TB Time Capsule. Haters can hate, it just works.

  63. 3 layers by headhot · · Score: 1

    Rsync to a local Drobo with Drobo RAID, a Local fiber channel array with RAID 5, and to a remote NAS with RAID 5, every night.

  64. Non Sequitur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For my employers: There's a DFS off site copy. There's a nightly Rsync copy to a standby system. Then the nightly tape job runs. And, I'm in the process of shoehorning a nightly Acronis imaging into the mix.

    At home: Three PCs no backups. And, I just suffered a hard drive failure and total loss on one of them... Perhaps I should setup the NAS I've been contemplating for the past few years.

  65. For Linux - Back in Time by tangent3 · · Score: 1

    It's like the Linux version of Flyback or Timevault.

    http://backintime.le-web.org/

  66. Multiple HDs w/Limited Data by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    For a single computer only, it can be fairly inexpensive with 2-3 TB HDs.

    1) Clone the entire working drive once every one - two weeks, so I can go back to a working OS if the OS is corrupted as that takes a day to reinstall all OS, Apps & Utilities and migrate data back. Hence, this is a recovery point for the entire HD on the time period one picks.

    With cheap 2-3 TB hard drives, one could actually clone the HD every day for a lot of people & then overwrite such that you had a complete 2 weeks of cloned HD contents that continually gets overwritten.

    2) Then, daily backups of changed files to a 2-3TB HD that gets swapped with a HD kept in a different location.

  67. My system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I back up everything about once every 2 month to a RAID external drive. I also keep extra copies of really important stuff on a flash drive, REALLY important stuff (as in I couldn't function without (so mostly video game save files...)) are backed up AGAIN in a hidden folder on a computer at a family members house. Also about every 2 years or so I back up everything again, wipe my computers built in drive, and replace it, and then put everything back.

    The backup drive has another bonus, I never delete my backups from it (I've heard that can cause drives to go bad faster) so if I ever want to check an old version of a file, I can just find the month I want and open it.

    The chances of me losing anything are almost zero.

  68. bup + ssh by puhuri · · Score: 1

    Earlier I used backup2l to first make local backup and then rsync to server. The only problem was it was wasting disk space on each host, specially laptops.

    Recently I moved to bup, provides more efficient backups with very small local storage. Now I have in every laptop, desktop and my email server (all running either Debian or Ubuntu) in /etc/cron.daily/bup-backup:

    #!/bin/sh
    echo Backup starting at $(hostname) $(date)
    bup index -u /var/mail /home /var/lib/mysql
    bup save -r backups.example.com: -n $(hostname) /var/mail /home /var/lib/mysql
    echo Backup ending at $(hostname) $(date)

    Because I do not want remote root logins on my file server at home, there is a need for small tweak in /root/.ssh/config:

    Host backup.example.com
    User bupups
    Compression yes
    HostName filesrv.example.com

    Now as each system backups to the same bup archive, deduplication is taken care automagically.

    Each month I rsync /home/bupups to external USB drive that is stored in different place in case of fire or other mishap it will be protected. At some point I've considered installing a low-power server at my father-on-law place for automated off-site backups; will keep the off-line copy in any case.

    Of course, I do not much care about taking backups from movies, music - expect maybe some kids love; but they are already on some USB drive to entertain them while travelling...

    1. Re:bup + ssh by puhuri · · Score: 1

      And of course forgot configuration at server end; in /home/bupups/.ssh/authorized_keys there is a line for each host:

      command="BUP_DEBUG=0 BUP_FORCE_TTY=3 bup server",no-port-forwarding,no-agent-forwarding,no-X11-forwarding,no-pty ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC...

  69. To a time capsule and external drive. by DynamoJoe · · Score: 1

    The machines needing backup do so wirelessly to a Time Capsule whenver they're connected. I also do a full image to an external hard drive every once in a while (I lie to myself and say it's biweekly but it's really more like bi-whenever-I-remember-it). Even with the recent increase in HD prices there's no real excuse to not have backups.

    --
    bah.
  70. DD Backup - Fastest Recovery in Town by c_oflynn · · Score: 2

    My backup for a multi-boot laptop that other solutions (e.g.: running from one OS) don't seem to work for:

    1) Buy a second copy of your main hard-drive + USB Interface (SATA enclosure)
    2) Boot Linux on computer using CD
    3) Use dd to mirror entire HD to external HD. Run before you go to bed, setup to shutdown when done. Save stdout/stderr somewhere like a USB flash drive.
    4) Wakeup to a backup.

    The advantage of this is when your hard drive fails, recovery is about 60 seconds away. Swap out one hard drive and you are done. Or you can recover specific files by just using the backup HD like a normal external HD, since everything is just under normal filesystems. If you'll be on business for a while take your second hard-drive with you (try to store somewhere it won't get stolen with laptop).

    I actually keep two mirrors, partially because of travel and wanting to have one backup with me. This also makes sure that if your computer fails half-way through doing the mirror due to a power surge it doesn't fry your original + mirror. Keep one at a friends house or similar.

    1. Re:DD Backup - Fastest Recovery in Town by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      [quote]My backup for a multi-boot laptop that other solutions (e.g.: running from one OS) don't seem to work for:[/quote] How's about the solution of setting up the laptop in a more sensible way? Eg., run one OS, forget the partition / boot loader nightmares, dig through the couch cushions to get $40 for a copy of VMware Fusion and run the other OS's in a VM. Various but occasional operations on x64 server service processors effectively require an MS OS and MSIE, and a VM running XP works beautifully for this purpose.

  71. Hard Disk then into the Microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Into the Microwave in case of an EMP from the Sun? The Faraday cage will protect the drives.... :)

  72. When I lose a hard drive by khelms · · Score: 1

    I BACK UP and start over.

  73. NAS box. by TechieRefugee · · Score: 1

    Easy, and doesn't need much maintenance.

  74. btrfs RAID 10 and time machine by static0verdrive · · Score: 1

    My Ubuntu 12.04 server is btrfs using the built-in RAID 10 features (I have 7.2 TB usable on four 2TB drives thanks to compression too!) and I use time machine for the macs. My windows machine is Pro so I'm able to backup to a network drive, with a samba share running on the ubuntu server that I mount as a drive letter in windows. It's been fantastic overall for all machines including for the odd restore.

    I'd like to get time machine going to the ubuntu server as well but so far I'm just using external usb drives for the macs.

    --
    ========
    77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
  75. Daily on-site and cross-site backups by Snowhare · · Score: 1

    I use a system of rsync over ssh to do both onsite and offsite backups daily with a rotating system of hardlinked trees that give me seven days of daily backups, 5 weeks of weekly backups, 3 months of monthly backups, 6 months of quarterly backups and 1 year of semi-annual backups with each location doing both local backups and remote backups for the other site (which are 40 miles apart).

  76. Oh, God by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    The premise is that you back up your computers on March 31, so that you're not an April Fool if your hard drive crashes tomorrow.

    Thanks for reminding me to stay away tomorrow.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  77. Windows Home Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love it. Never have to worry about backups. It's saved me so much pain when hard drives go belly up.

  78. Paper tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the ideal medium for long-term storage. Durable (hundreds of years), reading technology is easy to develop from scratch if needed.
    The only problem is storing the 2100 km of tape a full backup generates.

  79. git by godrik · · Score: 1

    Everything worth being backed up I am working on is pushed to a git repository. The git repositories are synchronized manually (but pretty much after each important update) across about 5 machines in 3 physical locations (home, work, computing center). Though they are in the same city.

    I don't think I will lose anything important anytime soon. Or if I do, I think I'll have more important concerns...

    1. Re:git by togofspookware · · Score: 1

      No mod points today, but this.

      For collections of large files that Git doesn't handle so efficiently (my photo and music collections), I use a custom git-like system (https://github.com/TOGoS/ContentCouch).

      --
      Duct tape, XML, democracy: Not doing the job? Use more.
    2. Re:git by godrik · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link I'll have a look. I do not have so much photos or music and I do not update them very frequently. So git was suitable for me. I am using git in repository with logs of experiments (I am a computer scientist) and the expensive operations are when I delete logs from an outdate experiment to swap them with a new one (git allows me to have the old logs if I need them later linked with the codes that generated them). The problem is that gigabytes of files need to be written to disk when going from one branch to the other one.

      But I can see it won't work on a larger scale (and we frequently have slashdoters talking about their terabyte large personal file collection).

  80. IP Backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's In-Person backup.

    Ok, in is a bit of an exageration, but I back up my (important) data on a USB stick I carry around all the time. Two, redundant, in fact. If anything happens to them (both), the I probably won't care since that same thing will have happened to me.

  81. my own dropbox in the cloud by roubles · · Score: 1

    I use windows live sync to synchronize one main folder (to rule them all) across all my machines. Then, from one of the machines, I periodically dump that folder onto a NAS. On the NAS I have a script running that does snapshot backups (like time machine) of that folder. Losing data from an accidental delete is far more likely than a hard drive crashing.

    The only disadvantage is that the machine that dumps to my NAS has to be at home on my local LAN.

    I am thinking of trying out Synology's DSM 4.0: http://www.synology.com/dsm/index.php?lang=enu

    If it claims to do what they say it does, it should be like my own dropbox in the cloud. Then I can sync my one main folder across all my machines and my NAS. This eliminates the need for windows live sync - and I don't have to be at home to dump data to the NAS. I can also setup a script to make periodic snapshots of the folder. The only issue is currently the synology only has windows clients - and all my machines are macs... so I am still waiting to pull the trigger.

  82. use dropbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    use dropbox

  83. Simple. I insert the key and push in the clutch by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Then I turn the key and crank the engine. Since the transmission is already in reverse, I simply apply gas, and suddenly release the clutch. That said, I try to avoid back ups as much as possible, because the hard drive seems to cause crashes more often than not. (Mod me+1 Flamebait)

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  84. I use Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I put a special unique string in every document. If I ever lose a document, I can Google it back from the hackers.

  85. Three Locations, Two Countries by trydk · · Score: 1

    I have some years ago emigrated and live abroad, which has given me an opportunity to use servers in three different locations in two countries. At home, at my brother's and at a friend's.

    My Linux servers back up automatically with a homebrew Time Machine-like functionality based on rsync. It consists of a script and a configuration file with information of what files and directories to backup/not backup. The structure is fairly simple and has worked well for a very long time now.

    The mail servers back up any mail in the mail directories to each other, but overwrites/deletes as needed instead of the TM-type functionality.

    The family Windows machine is backed up manually with an rsync-based BAT-file whenever I feel like it (which is rather often) to one of the local servers which propagates the backup through the TM script to one of the overseas servers, which again propagates it to the other overseas server.

    All in all it seems to be sufficiently redundant (three copies of all relevant data in less than three hours) and sufficiently dispersed more than 600 miles between the farthest points and no sites closer than about 200 miles.

    Obviously, I reciprocate the service for my brother and my friend.

  86. With rsync and faubackup by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    For years now, I've been making all of my backups with a script I wrote that uses rsync and faubackup, the latter being a disk-based backup solution. All important data is backed up on a daily basis, locally and to other servers across the Internet. All partitions involved (source and target) are on RAID1 or RAID5 arrays (by itself, RAID is not a backup solution, but does increase the reliability of the storage medium). The only way I've ever lost any data with this system is when I forget to add a source to the backup script.

  87. The Lazy Backup Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A combination of Dropbox and Time Machine. I rotate the Time Machine drive about once a quarter keeping the second out of the house, so even if the house burns down I lose at most 3 months of heavy assets (movies, photos, etc.). Dropbox provides the nice side benefit of meaning I won't lose access to current working files needed for day-to-day things.

    Most of the heavy assets can be easily replaced with the exception of family photos/video, but those will probably still be available on the original device or in iCloud's photostream, so those 3 months are relatively low risk.

  88. time machine.... by smash · · Score: 1

    ... plus raid.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  89. Two copies by subreality · · Score: 1

    #1: rsync -aihxv --inplace --delete root@some-host:/ /backups/@some-host
    btrfs subvolume snapshot /backups/@some-host /backups/@some-host-`date %F--%T`
    btrfs subvolume delete /backups/@some-host-(date and time from some cycles ago)

    (repeat for all hosts)

    #2: Crashplan.com

  90. Re:RDiff local, fireproof lockbox in other buildin by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    I quit using rdiff-backup when I discovered that all my backups had been failing for a while because rdiff-backup did not like a filename (I think it was very long) and, instead of skipping the file and continuing (or even handling the odd filename), it had been hanging at that point. I consider that a giant FAIL for a backup system.

    rdiff-backup wasn't doing anything that I could not do with rsync and some scripting anyway, so, what's the point?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  91. Hard drives and online by MpVpRb · · Score: 1

    Two drives in the computer. Several times a day, copy changed files from one to the other using a .bat file and xcopy.

    Mozy online backup, twice a day.

    One removable drive. Several times a month, copy changed files to it using a .bat file and xcopy..then take it out and put it on the shelf.

  92. Robocopy by C0L0PH0N · · Score: 1

    I use the built in Windows "Robocopy.exe" feature via a CMD file to backup the files on my Windows computers. Robocopy used this way can be scheduled, and is extraordinarily fast. It pulls files seamlessly through my local area network, so I backup my desktop, my laptop and my partner's laptop all onto one large external hard drive via the network. I have it set to skip files that have the same timedate stamp, so after the first copy process, it runs in under a minute. The thing I like most about using robocopy is that I end up with the same exact set of files and folders on my external hard drive as on my working computers. This makes the backup or restore process very transparent and easy to use for even beginners, though I am fairly expert. I do have it set so that if I delete a file on my working computer, the backup remains on the external hard drive. I've used this since XP days, and was thrilled to find robocopy built into Vista and Windows 7. To learn how to use it, just search for "robocopy".

  93. RAIC, rsync and ln by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    At home, I use RAIC: "Redundant Array of Inexpensive Computers" :)

    Okay, okay...that's really only *part* of the backup strategy. I also use a Time Machine with mine and my wife's Macs; my Linux machines used to backup to a separate hard drive using tar and gzip, but I haven't set that up again since we moved into our new house a year ago.

    At work, we use a combination of rsync and ln, like so:
    Backup Server Side:
    #!/bin/bash
    for CLIENT in `ls /backups/`
    do
    rm -Rf /backups/${CLIENT}/yesterday
    ln /backups/${CLIENT}/today /backups/${CLIENT}/yesterday
    done

    Backup Client Side:
    #!/bin/bash
    EXCLUDES="/dev /proc etc., etc.,etc"
    HOSTNAME=`uname -n`
    rsync -av --exclude ${EXCLUDES} / rsync://${BACKUP_SERVER}/${HOSTNAME}/today/

    DIsclaimer: this is more pseudocode than actual code. We actually keep 90 days of backups at work, and dump the last day of the month to an external hard drive which is stored off-site, so it's a bit more complicated than I've suggested above. However, you should be able to get the general idea from what I've posted.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  94. piles of dvd's by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    luckily there isnt really THAT much that needs to be archived, everything else just gets shuffled to the NAS

  95. Not on my Calendar :( by imscarr · · Score: 1

    It must be time to get a new calendar! :)

    $ calendar
    Mar 31 Rene Descartes born, 1596, mathematician & philosopher
    Mar 31 Eckert-Mauchly Computer Corp. founded, Phila, 1946
    Mar 31 Automated Retroactive Minimal Moderation (ARMM) released, 1993
    Mar 31 National Day in Malta
    Mar 31 Joseph Haydn is born in Rohrau, Austria, 1732
    Mar 31 N'oubliez pas les Benjamin !
    Mar 31 Bonne fÃte aux Benjamine !
    Mar 31 Ã la saint Benjamin,
            Le mauvais temps prend fin.
    Mar 31 Erstes Gesetz zur Gleichschaltung der LÃnder, 1933
    Mar 31 Joseph Haydn in Rohrau geboren, 1732
    Mar 31 ÃrpÃd
    Mar 31 Ð"ÐнÑOE ÐоÑÑÐÐÑÐоРÐÐÐоÐÐÑÑfÑÑ
    Mar 31 King Nangklao Memorial Day (àà±à(TM)à--ààà£àà¥àààzà£ààsàà--àààà"àààzà£àà(TM)à±ààààà¥àààààààààààà±à) in Thailand

    --
    Like the beaver, it's just Dam one thing after another
  96. How do you back up? by msobkow · · Score: 1

    I start the car. I move the shift lever to "R". I scream "Beep, beep, beep!" and stomp on the accelerator until the tires smoke....

    :P

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  97. 2 types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Timemachine to drive on Airport Extreme.
    And all important documents, pictures and home videos I have on my qnap NAS which backs up everything to elephantdrive where I have a 250gb account.
    I only have a 20/2 adsl line so the first backup took a month or something like that at 100KB/s.

  98. retail redundant backups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty simple, in a retail environment each night we run a script to copy our database to 3-4 other computers on site. Each morning the first person in the store copies the previous night's backup to usb and drops it in a fireproof safe in the storeroom. The usb drives get recycled twice a week at which point I take a copy off site on my usb. We have multiple stores which all run the same server software and have at least one spare machine that can act as server at each site if their server goes down, one spare machine at my home and one at the owner's home. The owner also takes an external backup whenever he's in any of the stores. Isn't redundancy nice? :)

  99. Raid is not backup!!!! by rew · · Score: 1

    > How do Slashdot users back up? RAID?
    I work at a data-recovery company. RAID does not replace backups!

    There are a bunch of things that could happen.
    1) disk drive dies.
    2) Power supply dies and fries all drives in the machine.
    3) building goes up in flames.
    4) City is wiped from the face of the earth.

    A raid protects against a type-1 mishap. The broken powersupply fries all disks in the raid at once. You could use an external USB drive to protect against that. You need to store the USB drive or other backups off-site to protect against number 3. You need the off-site backups far away to protect against the big world-shattering disasters.
    I'm protected up to level 3: I have off-site, same-city backups (on raid systems of my main data which lives on a raid system).

    1. Re:Raid is not backup!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got trolled!

  100. Backup plan by chrisgeleven · · Score: 1

    My backup setup is pretty simple. An Apple Time Capsule for hourly local backups that I can access right away, and Backblaze for off-site backups in the event of theft, fire, etc. I never have to worry about backups anymore.

  101. Local External Backup and Cloud Based Backup by archer24 · · Score: 1

    For local backup I run Macrium Reflect to create daily snapshots that are stored on an external hard drive. Older images are deleted as space is required. Great if some files should accidentally get deleted to be able to go back 60 days or so to retrieve them.

    For my "fire proof" offsite backup up of important files such as family photos and documents I use BackBlaze which allows unlimited storage (although I only use about 20 GB). Their service also allows you to recover files that have been deleted up to 30 days ago and your backups can be encrypted with a private key for privacy.

    Storage is much more affordable than recovery.

    1. Re:Local External Backup and Cloud Based Backup by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Was expecting somebody to mention BackBlaze. If you store all your household precious data on one computer's share and back it up with BackBlaze at $4 a month, that's going to be cheaper than any other answer on here. Those guys are brutally efficient. If you google "Backblaze box" you'll see how they manage to turn a profit at those rates and it's amazing - and they give the design away too.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  102. I use BackupPC by Loopy · · Score: 1

    http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

    Fry's (and other places, I'm sure) has shoebox PCs running low-power CPUs for about what you pay for a good external USB drive. Pick up a big drive and some RAM for it, install LAMP and BackupPC and then have it backup your other computers on your home LAN. Nice thing is that it has deduplication and uses rsync, so there are clients that work on Win, Mac and Linux.

    1. Re:I use BackupPC by trolman · · Score: 1

      I also use BackupPC for about 300 desktops and servers. Mostly just desktops. It has made me look good several times over the past seven years. At most sites we back up the entire drive, windows folder and all. The servers get disk-disk-tape with a full tape archive every weekend. Databases and critical files with robocopy. Tape with IBM TL2000 LTO tape libraries. Tapes go off site. Disk-Disk is at least one building away. I could spend an hour explaining the various home and work backups that I have in use right now but don't have the time. So will just toss in my 'me to' for BackupPC.

    2. Re:I use BackupPC by symbolset · · Score: 1

      OK, that was neat. It's in the repository so you just type backuppc in the software center on Ubuntu and it's up and running in about one minute. Never installed a backup server that easily before.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  103. How do I backup ? by BlindRobin · · Score: 1

    Simple, I push the clutch in, shift into reverse, let the clutch out whilst simultaneously and judiciously applying pressure to the accelerator. If I,m not in the car just stepping backwards seems to do the trick. ...or did I miss something?

  104. I don't have that many really important files. by Soluzar · · Score: 1

    What I need to keep can fit on a decent sized USB stick or Micro SD card. For added redundancy, I can keep a copy of the most important items online, on another PC in my house, or in someone else's house. The vast majority of files on my computer can be replaced, should the worst happen.

  105. Bay-mountable hard drives on laptops make it easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ThinkPad T61p here.

    Main OS drive is a 60GB SSD.

    CD/DVD Bay has a 500GB SATA drive in it. Automated daily backups to that from the main drive.

    Any 'data I can lose' such as music purchases and Steam game installs (some stuff I special-case back to the SSD, along with the main Steam install itself) is stored on the 500GB drive along with scratch-data and my paging file to avoid wearing out the SSD as much.

    Swap the 500GB drive periodically if you want 'offsite' backups to boot.

  106. backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I join the republican party and then I am backed up to the 1950s. LOL

    I go to work and then take one step forward and two steps back, then I'm backed up, lol.

    All my data is in the clouds and I pray I can remember my passwords :)

  107. rdiff-backup by Balinares · · Score: 2

    I'm surprised rdiff-backup hasn't been mentioned yet. It's a very nice piece of software, does incremental backups, and is easy to automate.

    --

    -- B.
    This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
    1. Re:rdiff-backup by Skapare · · Score: 1

      I tried that. It might well work for some people. But I found it hard to administer. OTOH, it's foundation, rsync, is an excellent way to do backups (with my own script I wrote that does things the way I find to be easier).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  108. Time Machine at home by Quila · · Score: 1

    There's nothing easier. And if you remember that the goal isn't to make backups, but to have successful restores, there's nothing that works better and easier in restoring a desktop or laptop.

    Net App snap mirror plus tape backup for servers at work. Time Machine useless there.

    1. Re:Time Machine at home by Skapare · · Score: 1

      How long does it take to restore 2TB of data stored on TAPES that are affordable for SOHO and consumer users, counting at least 2 sets of tapes for proper backup rotation?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  109. spare HDD and CF cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don`t have a huge amount of data, so I just grabbed a spare 320GB HDD, USB-to-IDE/SATA adaptor, and power supply, and copied everything on my laptop to it. On a more frequent basis, I also copy important files to CF cards. I still have files from the `90s from my first PC and from floppy disks prior to that. Whenever I replace a drive (or the whole computer) I copy everything to the new unit and usually keep the old one around also. Only once I had a drive hardware failure, but was still able to get most of the files before it died completely (and had another machine with redundant stuff on it). And there was one time I had file system corruption in a desktop machine (I think it was related to a failing power supply) and had to restore the whole drive from the backup.

  110. RAID + bacula by Trevin · · Score: 2

    I have been using RAID for many years — RAID-1 at work as I only have two drives and don't need much storage space, and RAID-5 at home. A couple of years ago when I upgraded my computer at work, I downloaded at least three different backup systems to try out. The goals were simplicity of use, keeping historical versions of files, and relatively low storage space.

    After setting up bacula, I never bothered with the other backup applications.

    I found bacula to be highly flexible, adapted very well to the set of many virtual machines I use, and is the easiest to maintain. I just set it up once (or after any major re-partitioning) with a specific list of files and directories to back up or exclude, then practically forget about it. It's saved my files a number of times already from accidental deletion or overwriting, and I used it once for a full restore at home after upgrading my computer including a new RAID array.

    At work my excess hard drive space is enough to store all my full and incremental backups locally, but I also have it back up critical files to a corporate NFS server. At home I use LTO-4 tapes, which provide plenty of backup storage for over 2 terabytes of data; and whenever it runs a full backup I take the used tapes off-site for extra security.

  111. rsync by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

    I have a cronjob running rsync to my server every night. It runs at 20h (8pm) every day which is when I expect the pc to be on and online the most often.
    Since it runs every day I don't really care if a give day's run fails because the PC was off, or I had no internet connection.

    It runs off of a shell script, so I can run it manually whenever I want to make sure that new data is backed up properly (like when I make significant changes to my thesis, or when I take the laptop somewhere with me).

    The problem is pure rsync isn't really backup, it's more like mirrorring.
    I like it because this means that the files on the server are exactly like the files on my PC, so I can access them directly. But if for some reason my files become corrupted and I don't notice it, the backup won't help me.

    The other problem is that the server lives in my apartment. In case of a fire, or more likey, a commet hitting my home, it's possible to lose my pc and server simultaneously.
    The backups are actually done to a small external hard drive. At least in some of those cases, it might be possible to grab the drive and run for it, but I'm still looking at a possibility to start doing the backups remotely.

  112. rsync FTW! by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... with 2 extra hard drives for each one to be backed up. And if you get the external type and one of those drive bay devices that lets you plug externals in, your backup is ready to use immediately (no need to wait days for your stack of DVDs or DATs to be restored, or hours to copy from USB).

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:rsync FTW! by ShoulderOfOrion · · Score: 1

      This. I always buy three identical hard drives and two enclosures. Partition them the same way. Make them all bootable. One stays off-site, the other is plugged in regularly, rsync'd and then unplugged. The drives are rotated every few weeks. It's easy enough to occasionally boot from the backups to verify they work.

      Important stuff is kept in a VCS repository and pushed regularly to a server which is also kept off-site. This server also gets the 3-disk backup treatment.

  113. Simple, ugly, but it works by pswPhD · · Score: 1

    I am almost afraid to put this, but

    cp -r /home/$USER /media/$EXT_hard_drive/backup$date

    It takes a while, but I haven't got round to figuring out how to use rsync yet.

    1. Re:Simple, ugly, but it works by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      $ rsync -avP --delete /home/$USER /media/$EXT_hard_drive/backup/$USER

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  114. BackupPC by amginenigma · · Score: 0

    I'm using this in an enterprise level environment, over 100 servers in 24 different locations backing up just over 2500 Winderz desktops. The only feature I find missing in this environment is the lack of a 'single pane of glass' to manage it all. Granted I don't think it was intended to be an enterprise solution, however for the cost and what it does it's simply amazing.

  115. Don't use RAID 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to google the raid 5 hole. Unless you have an NVRAM card, your raid 5 system is just asking for trouble.

    1. Re:Don't use RAID 5 by Wagoo · · Score: 1

      Cheers for the heads-up. I don't think I'd use raid 5 in a newer array. No battery backed cache, just a UPS. Having said that it's been trouble free for 4 years so far.

  116. Large Electromagnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So my understanding is that hard drives use magnetism and they gradually lose their data due to the weakening of the field if stored for a long time. So I figure I can just boost the storage time by attaching all of my backup drives to a large electromagnet. So in a few years when everybody's drives are failing mine will in pristine condition. I'd advise anybody else who wants to save their data do the same thing, it is the only way to be sure.

  117. Wrote my own backup system (64-bit) in Delphi XE2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Base classes, properties, functions, & procedures I used were from the TZipFile class from the RunTime library functions in System.zip.pas unit:

    ---

    class function IsValid(ZipFileName: string): Boolean;

    procedure Open(ZipFileName: string {or TStream}; OpenMode: TZipMode);

    class procedure ZipDirectoryContents(ZipFileName: string; Path: string);

    procedure Add(has Compression params here to vary level that are overloaded);

    class procedure ExtractZipFile(ZipFileName: string; Path: string);

    procedure Extract({has overloads that are doable here});

    ---

    * They all work to do the job for me here for a streaming backup, for about a year now, in a fairly simple program I wrote up for it, which runs every Sunday here on its own scheduler (simple clocktick = 1 week has gone by test on timer)...

    However - the nicest part is, when I need to make it different? Since I wrote the code up, I can change it, as needed, whenever I wish...

    (That's the best part of "growing your own code" really, AND, sticking to std. file formats (like .zip, which I use in "maximum compression" settings, bit slower, but resulting files are tinier too)).

    APK

    P.S.=> It makes data copies from my data disk & then a full volume (of my main OS + Programs drive), across 4 other disks (each has a redundant copy).

    All disks used are Western Digital Velociraptor SATA II drives (150gb-300gb) @ 10,000 rpm 16mb buffers on each, & all run from a Promise Ex-8350 SATA II 128mb ECC RAM Caching Controller running on the PCI-Express x16 bus (very fast)... apk

  118. Cheaply. by Bieeanda · · Score: 1
    I've got several terabytes of space across my assorted drives, but I only back up a gig or two of data. Of that, 80% is plaintext e-mail archives, and the rest is personal documents, stories, old essays and papers, and things that I absolutely can't replace.

    For actual backup, I use an old freebie Mozy account. I don't recommend them these days-- apparently there's better for the money if you look. I've tried Spideroak, but christ almighty their client runs like puke under Windows.

  119. External drive in my safety deposit box by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

    I have a small wallet sized external drive that I keep in my safety deposit at the bank. Every couple of months, I go to the bank and switch it with my other external drive which has a more recent backup. Then I take the other external drive home. By having two external drives, I can avoid having to make an extra trip back to the bank, each time.

    I also have a slightly larger sized external drive that I keep at home for doing more frequent backups. The other smaller wallet sized external drive in my safety deposit box, is my off site backup. There is always the slight chance that the external drive at home could be lost through a burglary or fire. I use a total of three different external drives for doing the regular backups on my home computer.

    On my Linux desktop computer at home, I use the rsync command to regularly update the backups on each of my three external drives.

    Another off site option that I have considered, is keeping an encrypted backup on an external drive at a nearby older relatives house.

  120. New software: Obnam by gottabeme · · Score: 2

    I'm very excited (about backup software?) about this new backup program from an old buddy of Linus Torvalds':

    http://liw.fi/obnam/

    It seems like it will be the most featureful, forward-thinking backup software, ever: deduplication across multiple clients, compression, and strong encryption for untrusted storage. He's very keen on unit tests, too, and it has good verify and restore functions. I'm already using it for some things. GPL, of course, so no proprietary lock-in, ever.

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    1. Re:New software: Obnam by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      GPL, of course, so no proprietary lock-in, ever.

      Riiiight, because GPL is a magic wand that ensures that the code and all the external dependencies run and will always run on every platform I need. An increasing percentage of stuff these days only builds and runs on @#$#! Linux systems. Smells like "proprietary lock-in" to me.

  121. rsnapshot on ext4 on LUKS on iSCSI on RAID @ servr by dogganos · · Score: 1

    I have a dedicated remote server which (among other things) exports via iSCSI a partition on a RAID 5.
    On each of the backup-ed PCs/servers a cron script connects to the iSCSI target, open the LUKS volume on the target, and mounts the FS. Then the backup-ed PC/server runs rsnapshot to create a snapshot of its current status. So I can retrieve anything from any of the backuped servers/PCs as it was at anytime. Plus, I don't have to trust anyone on the remote server site because everything leaves the backuped servers/PCs encrypted. Works like a charm!

  122. offsite by cratermoon · · Score: 1

    The specifics of the tools and such I use aren't important to me. What is important is that weekly I push a duplicate full backup to my VPS instance, which lives in a hosting facility in another state. Should my home, or my entire city, fall to some disaster that wipes out everything in my study (and I survive) I will still be able to get to my backup using standard tools that have been around since the dawn of the internet. It might not be terribly convenient, certainly nothing like an actual restore, but the contents will be there, accessible.

  123. Ctrl-F by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I back up by putting my car in reverse. Or by walking backwards.

    Thanks for that.

    A word to the fellow wise(-asses): it's easier to do a quick search and confirm that you're not the only one with a fast comeback than type the whole thing, submit, and THEN find out.

  124. Again?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many fucking times is this question going to be posted?

  125. April 1 is on a Sunday this year. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just leave the computer switched off until Monday and use Sunday to do something useful.

    Problem solved!

    Apart from that, I have my normal backup routines anyway, why do something special for one day in the year? Granted there's the usual socially irresponsible bastards who think effing about is so funny, but as I said, I'll be switched off on Sunday.

    Have a nice day!

  126. rsync scripty goodness by doodleboy · · Score: 1

    I haven't bothered with offsite backups. I don't need to because I live in Florida and it's not like we ever get hurricanes or anything like that.

    I have a 3ware raid card in my 10.04 box with 4 drives in raid 5, as well as an eSATA drive. I export a TB of the RAID array and a TB from the iSCSI drive via iSCSI to two 2k8 servers running in Virtualbox VMs. In the Windows VMs, DFS mirrors the data to the two mountpoints. I export those shares to a Z: drive which maps on login. I set up the free MicrosoftSyncToys powertool to mirror the local My Documents directories to the Z: drive. When SyncToy is run, and the data is backed up in two places.

    I have another esata drive which mirrors my home partition every night. This is slightly complicated because I have a couple dozen virtual machines that could be running (it's usually less than 10), so what I wanted was a way to pause any VMs that might be running, back everything up, then unpause. Here's the script I wrote to do that.

    #!/bin/bash
    #
    # nightly_backup: Script to pause any virtual machines that are running,
    # do an rsync backup, then unpause the virtual machines. Set the SRCE
    # and DEST variables below, as well as the USER variable. Script assumes
    # that $DEST is a separate partition. If this is not the case for you,
    # comment out the line _mount_check below.
    #
    # Sample cron entry:
    # 30 04 * * * /usr/local/bin/nightly_backup &>>/var/log/nightly_backup.log
    #
    # Sample /etc/logrotate.d/nightly_backup file
    # /var/log/nightly_backup.log {
    # monthly
    # missingok
    # rotate 4
    # compress
    # }
    #
    # --exclude-from file syntax:
    # Copy directory but not its contents:
    # + Cache/
    # - **/Cache/**
    #
    # Do not copy (file or directory)
    # - .gvfs
    #
    # $Id: nightly_backup,v 1.1 2011/12/03 19:23:15 doodleboy Exp kevin $

    PATH=/bin:/usr/bin
    USER=doodleboy
    SRCE=/home
    DEST=/archive
    ARGS="-aHS --delete --stats --exclude-from=/usr/local/bin/rsync_exclude"

    # Function to pause or resume running virtual machines
    _pause-resume() {
    ARG=$1
    VMS=$(su - $USER -c "vboxmanage --nologo list runningvms")
    if [ -n "$VMS" ]; then
    printf "$VMS\n" | while read VM; do
    VM=${VM%% \{*}
    printf "Running $ARG on $VM...\n"
    su - $USER -c "vboxmanage --nologo controlvm $VM $ARG"
    done
    else
    printf "No VMs are running.\n"
    fi
    }

    # Abort backup if $DEST partition is not mounted
    _mount_check() {
    if mount | grep -w "$DEST" &>/dev/null; then
    printf "$DEST is mounted. Proceeding with backup.\n"
    else
    printf "$DEST is not mounted. Aborting backup.\n"
    printf "*** $(date): Aborting nightly backup ***\n\n"
    exit 1
    fi
    }

    # Start banner
    printf "*** $(date): Starting nightly backup ***\n"

    # Make sure $DEST is mounted
    # Comment out _mount_check if $DEST is not a partition
    _mount_check

    # Pause virtual machines
    _pause-resume pause

    # Flush pending writes
    sync
    sleep 3

    #

  127. Windows Home Server 2011 by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 2

    WHS works a lot like Time Machine (I suppose). All our machines are backed up automatically every day to a server (in another building). And most importantly, the restore works and is surprisingly fast! I've had two machines go belly up and didn't loose any data.

    --
    Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
  128. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SVN of course! (Or not.)

  129. BackupPC + RAID + eSATA offsite HDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In our home of 4 notebook computers, one HTPC and one general-use server, we back them all up using BackupPC. All Linux here -- BackupPC takes extra work for Windows. BackupPC initiates backups with the 'clients' on its own, according to the backup schedule configured in the web-based interface. It uses rsync for efficient network transfer and disk de-duplication for efficient storage (1.4TB of history in 123GB, currently). Backups on the notebooks run in the background while they are in use, and no one seems to notice when backups are running (at least I never hear any complaints).

    The server running BackupPC uses linux md RAID 10 with 7.2k RPM SATA drives. Once per week the BackupPC server image is copied to one of several eSATA external HDs. Each HD is stored in its own fire resistant case, but a major shortcoming right now is that the external drives don't rotate to an off-site location. eSATA is a big win -- I regularly see transfer rates in excess of 70 MBps. And BackupPC has a simple web interface so the home users can recover their own files whenever they want.

    We've used this setup for about 7 years or so. Its fast, reliable, mostly invisible, and the admin effort is hardly more than plugging and unplugging eSATA drives on a weekly basis. I don't know how many times we've recovered files -- it's so easy no one has to ask me how to do it. I used it to do a 'forklift' upgrade of the HTPC hardware a while back and the recovery went quickly and smoothly.

  130. House Divided by bughunter · · Score: 1

    Me (casual user: hobby coding; amateur art; web; email; games; home finances; TB's of digital media): I backup weekly using Time Machine to a NAS disk I keep on our wireless network. Very Important files (like my personal finances and other important data) I encrypt and backup onto two thumbdrives: one on my keychain and one I keep at the office. (This data amounts to only a few hundred kB.) The digital media goes on to an external USB RAID array and really I don't care about losing most of it. The utmost favorite stuff is replicated on several drives, but can still probably be downloaded again if somehow it all gets lost.

    My Wife (business user: business finances; customer communications; business docs; contact lists): Backs up only when I nag her into it, or do it for her, amounting to maybe twice a year and inevitably to a standalone USB portable hard drive using the built-in WinXP backup utility. When her PC crashes, or fails to boot, my first question is "When did you backup last?" -- this is always answered with "Whenever you did it last," and guess who gets stuck with trying to recover the data from her failed HD? The only restores that have ever worked for her have been me mounting the failed hard drive to an OS X machine and copying the pertinent data.

    It really peeves me that the default backup options for WinXP SP2 are so fucking completely useless for restore as to be a total fucking waste of time.

    Yes she needs a new computer, but no she claims she cannot afford one (despite me telling her that the cost of replacing her laptop before it fails is miniscule compared to the cost of replacing it after the old one fails and loses her data). I'm not buying her one because I need a new one myself but at least mine degrades gracefully. She's not a dummy, just a typical business user who has no interest in or time for thinking through the details and intricacies of data management, not to mention failure modes and recovery scenarios. For these kinds of people it needs to be made automatic, idiotproof, and restore robust. Not an easy task.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
    1. Re:House Divided by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Agree with XP backup. It is hopeless and wastes HD space.
      Son and daughter have lost all their files because they don't back up. They're learning though!
      Otherwise, I use Cobian http://www.cobiansoft.com/ which is a nice, cheap (free) solution with networking and ftp as well as your standard usb and internal drives. Recommended.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    2. Re:House Divided by Xoron101 · · Score: 1

      I use Cobian as well, backing up to a Truecrypt volume on an external hard drive. Every month or so, I swap my current backup drive with the drive I store off site (at my desk at work).

      Being encrypted, I 'm not too worried if it walks at work, and the data isn't my most current copy. And if my primary backup and off site backup are both destroyed by the same event, then I've likely got MUCH BIGGER problems to worry about than my old tax returns and photos.

    3. Re:House Divided by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. I'll be downloading it... and donating if it works out.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
  131. Version control - Boar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Boar, it's a version control system for large binary files, like photos and videos. I then maintain a number of clones of my boar repository on external HDDs which I keep outside my home. When people lose data, it's usually due to user error, and that's why version control is essential. Check out Boar at http://code.google.com/p/boar/

  132. Re:ZFS Raidz2 with RSYNC off site on long range wi by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    RAIDZ3 you insensitive clod! My pr0n is important!

  133. I back it up, back it up, back it up.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Cause my daddy taught me good.

  134. Pogoplug ftw! by CharmElCheikh · · Score: 1

    I have a 500 GB USB HDD plugged to a pogoplug at home, and have put another one pogoplug+hdd at a friend's house. I backup my macbook pro using arsync over aftp, my linux boxes using rsync over ssh, and my wife copies files from her win7 manually (she only has punctually a few stuff she wants to save) using windows shares because i added samba to my pogoplug (it's a linux and they give you root access). Then, the pogoplug software automagically mirrors my home's pogoplug to the one at my friend's. So there you have local daily backups and automatic off-site backups for 300$ (100$ for 2 pogoplugs, 200$ for these HDDs when i bought them; you'd get one TB each now i guess). And I can access my files using a web interface from anywhere, and give web links to any file i want for friends to download stuff. Cheap, convenient, multiplatform, reliable, you have total control. What else?

    --
    My /. user ID is probably higher than yours
  135. Re:RDiff local, fireproof lockbox in other buildin by gottabeme · · Score: 1

    Well, the point is that it stores diffs of files for incremental backups, rather than backing up the entire file whenever part of it changes. And it keeps old diffs. rsync is fine if you only care about the latest version of the file--but then you aren't protected against human error like truncation or deletion that goes unnoticed for a while. I almost lost my GPG key that way--thankfully I had an old DVD backup using a 7zip file.

    I hope you reported the bug. Ones like that may be rarely encountered, and so may go unnoticed until they hurt someone.

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
  136. Rsync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I set up cron on my laptop to run rsync hourly to sync files from /home, /root, and /etc to an external 1 TB USB drive (when my laptop is docked, since the drive is connected to the docking station). When I finally get the backups on the USB drive to be encrypted then I'll buy another USB drive, and occasionally swap them and throw the alternate in the trunk of my car for a cheap offsite-storage solution.

  137. Cloud-based Service by lancesnyder · · Score: 0

    The company I work for, which is a leader in information security based products, has a lot of road warriors; me being one of them. We use a service called Crash Plan Pro - http://www.crashplan.com/business/ Crash Plan Pro essentially provides you with onsite and off-site backup with a secure cloud storage feature. Basically, for us road warriors, we have a client that is configured to backup certain directories on a certain frequency. It's pretty awesome; we never have to worry about losing data. My laptop does a backup of my C:\users\USERNAME directory about every 15 minutes; only the files that have changed, not a full backup every 15 minutes. At home, I have a Buffalo Linkstation 1TB NAS configured with RAID 1 (disk mirroring). It's an awesome home solution. I've had the NAS since 2008 and I've only had to replace 1 hard drive, which was a cost of 50 bucks off Amazon. Replacing the Serial ATA drive took about 5 minutes and then the RAID rebuild took about an hour. It has FTP and web services that allow you to access your data from anywhere.

  138. Time machine by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

    I have successfully used time machine backups on my external 2Tb FW800 drive to migrate over from a MBP to my iMac.

    Time machine gives me backup and redundancy in case something in a file becomes corrupt or I accidentally delete something. Versions in Lion gives me even greater granularity allowing me to revert to a previous revision of a file in programs that support that feature.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  139. Carved by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Carved in stone, like the Egyptians did.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  140. rsync --backup FTW by Trogre · · Score: 1

    A shell script calling rsync with the --backup option is excellent for having a full up-to-date backup with daily historical changes in separate folders. Then a second script to backup to tape once a month.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  141. I, for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... hit F8 in MC while moving data to a machine with automatic backup.

    Thankfully, I used ext4so it was impossible, for me, to recover any of it.

  142. rsync or robocopy+vshadow by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Linux machines rsync to an encrypted & normally unmounted backup drive on the home server, that one backs up to an encrypted external drive.

    Windows gaming machine backs up to an external drive using vshadow and robocopy.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  143. LTO2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who bought an LTO2 drive from ebay to use? I have an external USB drive as my data drive, and just tar it to tape. I keep the tapes at work. The main problems are that I still need more than one tape to backup, and need a scsi card.

  144. Flash implant by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If i die, my data goes too, but it wont matter then, will it?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  145. artistic backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpdiXspBALg

  146. SuperDuper [Re:Time Machine] by TheProspector · · Score: 1

    SuperDuper gives you a bootable clone - no need to reauthorize applications -- it's better for doing an entire system restore than TimeMachine. Actually, they complement each other. http://www.shirt-pocket.com/

  147. Re:RDiff local, fireproof lockbox in other buildin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of folks who say they are using rsync are probably doing what I do in a scripted form:

    rsync --linkdest /dest/prev/. /srcdir/. server:/dest/next/.

    In other words, we're creating whole snapshots which hard-link share all the common files between multiple snapshots. This has the advantages of full backups (being able to read from any snapshot as a normal file tree), incremental backups (having less space usage for common cases of files not changing very often), and rsync differential transfer (being able to send only parts of files over the network when they do change). It doesn't, however, store an incremental representation of the files, so there is more space usage if you have very big files that change a little at a time.

    What's interesting is that you can use almost the identical scripted solution but using a copy-on-write filesystem on the backup server, and then you get incremental storage too. You use "--inplace" instead of "--linkdest", but you also issue a snapshot command on the server to remember the previous state of the tree before rsync starts modifying the files again.

  148. Raid + Cloud = Convienence + Peace of Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I store my media collection and documents on a local Raid 0 (Mirrored Hard Drives) and also backup my documents in the cloud using Mozy Pro. I've also duplicated the bulk of my media collection to an offsite location (Family Member's House/External Hard Drive). I keep this updated incrementally with an FTP process.

    The strategy is that the Raid provides convenience against a single drive failure that I can manage at my computer's location. Mozy provides "set it and forget it" daily backups of my crucial documents and the offsite backup is a disaster recovery plan.

  149. Priorities by stair69 · · Score: 1

    To me it all comes down to categorising the data. Some things need backing up daily, others weekly, monthly, annually and others once and never again. Also some things never need backing up. My first step with backup is to categorise the data when it is stored, then use the right backup strategy. If you don't sort the data properly you end up wasting money backing up stuff that isn't important, and may even miss things that are important. My servers are based at home, close to the desktop/laptop machines, so though I have RAID for important data, everything is vulnerable to fire/flood/theft etc... However, I do have a co-located server based 300 miles away to run several websites I look after. When I looked for the hosting provider I factored in the price for extra storage, and then ordered the server with a fair chunk of extra space than I will ever need for the web servers. I now use the colocated server as a rsync destination - no private data (in case it is compromised), but it makes me feel better that me and my family survive a house fire, the family pictures will too.

  150. SDLT tapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We run hand-me-down SDLT tape drives from work (new media from ebay), full backups monthly, differentials weekly, incremental daily. Heck of a lot more robust than USB drives; the tapes are exchanged with a family member across town every week (we take their USB drives, they take our tapes, and they also hold a spare SDLT drive, controller, cable, and emergency restore media kit for us)

    However so far in 20+ years of operation (starting out with DAT backup drives) we have not had a single failure requiring restore (only drives in RAID or mirror sets) so outside of testing, we haven't needed them.