Yes, for example she could have used the name of the star she always looks up to, its all about finding something total irrelevant but just relevant enough to remember it.
Well count me in too, but not just because of Matt but more because of the way things went in FBSD5. Not that this means that it 5 is bad, it's more like not my choice of doing things.
They have full experience in the complete spectrum of this matter although the balance is a bit thin on the creative side. So I think they make a perfect judge perhaps not the most unbiased but who cares about that anyway, just go with the current-flow.
That means that you don't get it, the media is the way of transportation of the content. Sharing media is not the bad thing recieving and/or sharing _illegal_ _content_ is.
I can see that this is indeed a difficult topic for you, defining the meaning of words in a sentence.
Kids getting at our school at an age between 11 & 13. In the first 2 years the competence levels is getting equalized, this includes computer training because most of them don't know how to make _good_ use of the word, spreadsheet and presentation application. And even more don't know how to search the Internet so they can get something usefull back. And the most don't know how to use the OS in an effective way.
BTW, It is not only XP they getting to see, our school believes that the real world is composed of many different things so the best we can learn them is that there is something common on all os'es wether that is XP, OSX, Linux, BSD or Solaris (these OS'es are all availible at my school although XP is used the most). Our task is to prepare the kids for the future and my believe is that computers and especially open-source has a future and so does my management believe that, ergo, the school uses open-source to prepare the kids for their future.
Be sure it it is indeed a viable alternative, it doesn't need to be better as long as it is good enough for that situation.
I work as an administrator/application manager at high school, the point you have to consider when trying to switch is: Documentation, some teachers probably need to adapt their lessons, are they motivated for that and do they have the experience to make a change for them self?
Why should teachers be motivated to switch? Because it is a moral obligation for non-profit organizations to use product that are more suitable for the common good and not just profitable for a monopoly.
Education should be accessible to all layers of society, even the ones that don't have the money to buy "big bucks office". So by using open source they aren't forced to use illegal software just to be able to get educated.
So xml, rtf & txt is also closed? Of course word-ml is closed thats why they can export to other formats. Sure you lose the markup but if you have not solved that issue you better get a cluestick.
It was a design choice to build in the gui in the kernel and to integrate the window manager that close that there is no real abstraction. Just as that it is a choice to not do it.
But that choice didn't prevend them from becoming this big, so perhaps it wasn't that wrong after all.
IMHO monopoly, patents, non-free available information about a specification is the dead to a public acceptable standard. Without the above the best of breed will prevail and become "de facto standard".
Just a pity that when a company has the monopolicy on their market they only risk market share when using "good" standards, capitalism is good for starting up an economy however sometimes it is better to do some thing "socially" it's for the common good.
The arguments given in the article are inadequate IMHO, they are just as and mostly more applicable to closed source software. The key argument for open source vs closed source is: The source is available, you can support/develop it by your own or hire in support/development/warranty, now try that with closed source. All disadvantages for open source are at least applicable for closed source, closed source has no real advantage on open source.
Slashdot Mirror
As long as they stay away from the bad news engine it will be ok
There is clearly a coi but MS is that big, that it probably work out just fine, just as VS linux support, MacOSX Office etc. etc.
Yes, for example she could have used the name of the star she always looks up to, its all about finding something total irrelevant but just relevant enough to remember it.
put in context and yes you can
What? Like a secret question that is secret?
Yes sure it is.
Well count me in too, but not just because of Matt but more because of the way things went in FBSD5.
Not that this means that it 5 is bad, it's more like not my choice of doing things.
They have full experience in the complete spectrum of this matter although the balance is a bit thin on the creative side. So I think they make a perfect judge perhaps not the most unbiased but who cares about that anyway, just go with the current-flow.
ROM ... Read Only Memory?
and terminal service is not windows?
For the educational software that only runs on win32?
That means that you don't get it, the media is the way of transportation of the content. Sharing media is not the bad thing recieving and/or sharing _illegal_ _content_ is.
I can see that this is indeed a difficult topic for you, defining the meaning of words in a sentence.
Please repeat after me: The media is not the content en should be judge accordingly.
Don't worry I'll probably will repeat it till we all get it (end of time I guess).
You could go for a Mac mini or if thats to less power go for the Power Mac. Don't really understand your complaint btw.
Kids getting at our school at an age between 11 & 13.
In the first 2 years the competence levels is getting equalized, this includes computer training because most of them don't know how to make _good_ use of the word, spreadsheet and presentation application. And even more don't know how to search the Internet so they can get something usefull back. And the most don't know how to use the OS in an effective way.
BTW, It is not only XP they getting to see, our school believes that the real world is composed of many different things so the best we can learn them is that there is something common on all os'es wether that is XP, OSX, Linux, BSD or Solaris (these OS'es are all availible at my school although XP is used the most). Our task is to prepare the kids for the future and my believe is that computers and especially open-source has a future and so does my management believe that, ergo, the school uses open-source to prepare the kids for their future.
Be sure it it is indeed a viable alternative, it doesn't need to be better as long as it is good enough for that situation.
I work as an administrator/application manager at high school, the point you have to consider when trying to switch is:
Documentation, some teachers probably need to adapt their lessons, are they motivated for that and do they have the experience to make a change for them self?
Why should teachers be motivated to switch? Because it is a moral obligation for non-profit organizations to use product that are more suitable for the common good and not just profitable for a monopoly.
Education should be accessible to all layers of society, even the ones that don't have the money to buy "big bucks office".
So by using open source they aren't forced to use illegal software just to be able to get educated.
So xml, rtf & txt is also closed?
Of course word-ml is closed thats why they can export to other formats. Sure you lose the markup but if you have not solved that issue you better get a cluestick.
according to multiple religions/believes... yes you are
It was a design choice to build in the gui in the kernel and to integrate the window manager that close that there is no real abstraction.
Just as that it is a choice to not do it.
But that choice didn't prevend them from becoming this big, so perhaps it wasn't that wrong after all.
BTW my favourite is xfce4.
"The idea that non-free information is automatically bad is sophomoric."
Thats perhaps the reason why I didn't say it is bad, not even suggestion it.
IMHO monopoly, patents, non-free available information about a specification is the dead to a public acceptable standard.
Without the above the best of breed will prevail and become "de facto standard".
Just a pity that when a company has the monopolicy on their market they only risk market share when using "good" standards, capitalism is good for starting up an economy however sometimes it is better to do some thing "socially" it's for the common good.
Perhaps using a keyboard you can clean the "normal" way would help:& lastcatid=119&step=4
http://www.icintracom.com/merchant.ihtml?pid=4564
Now don't say that they couldn't have thought of it too (I mean that, don't say it).
The arguments given in the article are inadequate IMHO, they are just as and mostly more applicable to closed source software.
The key argument for open source vs closed source is: The source is available, you can support/develop it by your own or hire in support/development/warranty, now try that with closed source.
All disadvantages for open source are at least applicable for closed source, closed source has no real advantage on open source.
You already have it, located between your right and left ear if I am not mistaken, mileage may vary though.
binary bleeps, like music in my ear ....