Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Pinpoint Brain's Sarcasm Sensor

LibertarianWackJob writes "Researchers have found the section of the human brain that is responsible for understanding sarcasm. " I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful.

472 comments

  1. Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    My brain is obviously not equipped to handle this story.

    1. Re:Error by swordfishBob · · Score: 2, Funny

      +1 funny/sarcasm point to whoever called that "informative"

      --
      -- All your bass are below two Hz
    2. Re:Error by DigitumDei · · Score: 1

      "But some brain-damaged people can't comprehend sarcasm" So over half the world is brain damaged?

    3. Re:Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA does NOT constitute half the world, they only use half the world's energy.

    4. Re:Error by Grab · · Score: 1

      Nah, just the American part...

      To be fair, the American ex-military people I've met really do irony in a big way. I guess you have to... And geeks seem to be more into it than most. Try irony on your typical shop staff though and watch the glazed look appear in their eyes ("like, did he really *mean* that?")

      Grab.

  2. Problems by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful.

    Not really, this one will be modded as funny. Oh wait.. you were being sarcastic.

    1. Re:Problems by garcia · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not really, this one will be modded as funny. Oh wait.. you were being sarcastic.

      Oh wow, that was the funniest comment I have ever read on Slashdot!

    2. Re:Problems by Gabrill · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Narf! Oh Brain, you're so silly! Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    3. Re:Problems by MarkRose · · Score: 0

      Not really, this one will be modded as funny. Oh wait.. you were being sarcastic.

      Oh wow, that was the funniest comment I have ever read on Slashdot!

      No way, yours was by far funnier! LOL!

      --
      Be relentless!
    4. Re:Problems by normal_guy · · Score: 1

      There aren't nearly enough layers of sarcasm here.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    5. Re:Problems by datadriven · · Score: 1

      My god, we're stuck in a recursive loop!!

      When did this confirm I'm not a script shit start?

    6. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had left the "Oh wait"-part out the results would have been more interesting..

    7. Re:Problems by Retric · · Score: 1

      I agree, and I would like to thank you for adding more.

    8. Re:Problems by erlenic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it started today. I know it wasn't on last night.

      You might not have seen it, but earlier today a script was copying comments from stories and posting them in the wrong story. I saw one story that had comments from three other stories in it. It confused the hell out of me. At first I thought people were replying to someone's sig, so I turned them back on and checked. Then I thought maybe there was a bug in the code that was causing it. Overall, it was rather annoying, but kind of funny. I'd give the idiot that did a point for being creative.

    9. Re:Problems by At0miC · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Here comes that cannonball guy. He's cool."
      "Are you being sarcastic, dude?"
      "I don't even know anymore."

    10. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i confirm that I am not a script

    11. Re:Problems by datadriven · · Score: 1

      I actually saw one of my own comments while modding another story.

      More off-topic than usual.

    12. Re:Problems by Rei · · Score: 1

      At least you're refraining from adding more.

      --
      I believe Bird-Person can arrange that.
    13. Re:Problems by snubber1 · · Score: 1

      Oh really! that is quite interesting. (this is a test)

      --
      I don't really mind double posts on //..
    14. Re:Problems by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      If you had left the "Oh wait"-part out the results would have been more interesting..

      If there is one thing /. needs more of, it is posts that use the phrase "oh wait".
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    15. Re:Problems by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could sue the script writer for copyright infringement. If you used ROT-26 encoding you could even claim DMCA infringement.

      I've never seen a computer tell a human they failed a turing test:

      Wrong image text, try again
      You failed to confirm you are a human. Please double-check the 7-letter image and make sure you typed in what it says.

    16. Re:Problems by Veccio · · Score: 1

      Oh! Oh! I'm sorry, my irony sensor was on red alert.

    17. Re:Problems by Fortran+IV · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Oh, irony! Oh, no, no, we don't get that here. See, uh, people ski topless here while smoking dope, so irony's not really a high priority. We haven't had any irony here since about, uh, '83 when I was the only practitioner of it, and I stopped because I was tired of being stared at." C.D. Bales, Roxanne

      --
      I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
    18. Re:Problems by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      But where are we going to find steamed yak on this side of town?

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    19. Re:Problems by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The more interesting question is, how were these comments rated?

    20. Re:Problems by peacefinder · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Maybe the_mad_poster (or someone else reading that JE) dropped the big one.

      I can't imagine what they hope to accomplish, but I guess it got noticed. [shrug]

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    21. Re:Problems by Cobralisk · · Score: 1

      Well, there goes posting drunk! Those letters are hard to read.

      --
      Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
    22. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Count me out on this one. I never could write poetry.

    23. Re:Problems by erlenic · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the originals, but the copies were all anonymous, and a few were getting downmodded as offtopic. Most were unmodded though, I'm guessing that most mods also thought it was a bug in the code so they didn't waste their mod points on it.

    24. Re:Problems by TheWormThatFlies · · Score: 1

      And he would have got away with it too, if he had included some kind of filter which only picked flames about US politics, complaints about Slashdot groupthink and allegations that the parent poster has no girlfriend and lives in his parents' basement. :)

    25. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really! that is quite interesting. (this is a test)

      What else do you find interesting?

  3. Hot News Item by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0

    HOLLYWOOD, May 23 2005 (Rueters) -- Coming hot on the heels of her smash hit single, My Give A Damn's Busted, Jo De Messina has announced a new record entitled My Sarcasm Sensor's Busted. When questioned about the possibility of this song being seen as repetitive, Ms. Messina had this to say,

    "Whereas my previous song was targetted at those who like edgy country, my new song will be targetted at geeks like those found on Slashdot. Since the old song was probably never heard by these young individuals, I'm confident that we'll have record breaking sales!"

    Ms. Messina has said that the record will target a May 24th release date, with hopes that it will catch Slashdotters before the story goes off the front page.

    1. Re:Hot News Item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much effort...and not the least bit funny.

    2. Re:Hot News Item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah well, it was worth a shot. :-)

    3. Re:Hot News Item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it wasn't. :-)

  4. Wow by Winckle · · Score: 5, Funny

    What a really useful discovery.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How else will they be able to treat the millions who are sarcastically challenged? Pfizer will make billions!

    2. Re:Wow by Rei · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Good, because Pfizer really needs the money. Our laws are highly biased toward protecting the consumer over the producer. It's making it hard for multinational conglomerates to thrive in America.

      --
      I believe Bird-Person can arrange that.
    3. Re:Wow by StressGuy · · Score: 1

      What a witty and not-to-obvious reply :)

      --
      A goal is a dream with a deadline
    4. Re:Wow by dmaduram · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, parent's post is pretty insightful -- if you encounter a person with a prefrontal cortex lesion , the *last* thing you'll notice about their condition is their inability to understand sarcasm.

      From Fix's High-Yield Neuroanatomy: "Destruction of the anterior two-thirds of the frontal lobe convexity results in deficits in concentration, orientation, abstracting ability, judgment, and problem-solving ability. Other frontal lobe deficits include loss of initiative, inappropriate behavior, release of sucking and grasping reflexes, gait apraxia, sphincteric incontinence . . . and inappropriate social behavior (e.g., use of obscene language, urinating in public)"

      I volunteered in a psych ward during undergrad, and people with prefrontal cortex lesions are among the most difficult patients to interact with on a daily basis.

    5. Re:Wow by softends · · Score: 1

      No

    6. Re:Wow by Winckle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not really, I was just going for a cheap laugh. (or am I being sarcastic now?)

    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sarcasm detector explodes*

    8. Re:Wow by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sarcastic Guy: Ooh, a fat sarcastic Star Trek fan, you must be a devil with the ladies!

    9. Re:Wow by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      Actually, parent's post is pretty insightful -- if you encounter a person with a prefrontal cortex lesion , the *last* thing you'll notice about their condition is their inability to understand sarcasm.

      But it's not a complete suprise that the area thought responsible is in the pre-frontal cortex.
      Now if someone had discovered this in the occipital lobe, that really would have been a discovery!

      Oh good. Now they will be adding jokes to the standard neuro exam:

      "Two medical students walk into a bar...."

    10. Re:Wow by abirdman · · Score: 1

      I don't know what happened to the moderators, but I laughed kind of explosively at your post. Maybe after the mods RTFA they'll get their heads together... or maybe they're stuck in the recursive sarcasm and they just have to finish the loop...

      I don't know... but right on with helping out the pharmaceutical companies. Golly, they're hobbled by all the gubmit regulations and restrictions. They don't have all the money yet! Sheesh. Now, where's my prozac and prilosec?

      --
      Everything I've ever learned the hard way was based on a statistically invalid sample.
    11. Re:Wow by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
      ... deficits in concentration, orientation, abstracting ability, judgment, and problem-solving ability.
      You're describing most of our politicians.
      Other frontal lobe deficits include loss of initiative, inappropriate behavior, release of sucking and grasping reflexes, gait apraxia, sphincteric incontinence . . . and inappropriate social behavior (e.g., use of obscene language, urinating in public)"
      Yea, I voted for that guy....
      ... people with prefrontal cortex lesions are among the most difficult patients to interact with on a daily basis.
      Wow. Three up & three down. You're awesome, dude.
      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    12. Re:Wow by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      In other news tonight, comedian Dennis Miller applied to medical school, vowing to fight pre-frontal cortex damage wherever he finds it.

    13. Re:Wow by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 1


      We don't tolerate ' inappropriate social behavior (e.g., use of obscene language, urinating in public) from trolls so why should we tolerate it from mental patients ?

      Hell! I have no idea if I'm being sarcastic, trolling or insightful.

  5. Wow! Just... wow! by ABaumann · · Score: 0, Troll

    No, really! What'd you waste all of that research money on?

    1. Re:Wow! Just... wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What'd you waste all of that research money on?

      Sex research :)

  6. I believe it. by saskboy · · Score: 1

    No really, I do believe it, I wasn't being sarcastic.

    "it's true -- many of you don't go a day without dishing out several doses of sarcasm. But some brain-damaged people can't comprehend sarcasm, and Israeli researchers think it's because a specific brain region has gone dark."

    I also found that my friend from Iran had difficulty detecting sarcasm, but he's not brain damaged, it just comes from having Persian as a first language.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:I believe it. by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 4, Funny

      But some brain-damaged people can't comprehend sarcasm...

      I keep telling the people who don't get my sarcasm that they're obviously brain damaged, but they don't get that, either.

      Which, perhaps, explains all those posts that get modded "Off topic".

    2. Re:I believe it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But some brain-damaged people can't comprehend sarcasm...

      We call them mods

    3. Re:I believe it. by Seehund · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can trust mainstream media such as Forbes (and Slashduh) to be brain-damaged as well.

      "But some brain-damaged people can't comprehend sarcasm, and Israeli researchers think it's because a specific brain region has gone dark. [...]
      "People with prefrontal brain damage suffer from difficulties in understanding other people's mental states, and they lack empathy," said study co-author Simone Shamay-Tsoory, a researcher at the University of Haifa. "


      DUH!

      We've known this at least since Phineas Gage's unfortunate accident with a tamping iron in 1848.

      Given that we're talking about work by Shamay-Tsoory, a quick PubMed search says that the identified area is probably somewhere in the right ventromedial prefrontal lobe. That it can be identified by testing e.g. comprehension of sarcasm naturally gets twisted by Forbes/Slashduh, so now it looks like we've got a special Sarcasm Organ.

      "Breaking news: Them science guys find out that our breathing is handled by large saccular organs in the thoracic cavity. They're calling 'em "lungs" in medical mumbo-jumbo."

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    4. Re:I believe it. by Scruffeh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Understanding sarcasm is pretty interesting actually. I know people who have Phds but can not detect sarcasm at all. One of these guys is a lecturer of mine, obviously very bright in an academic way but anything vaguely sarcastic goes straight over his head. Interestingly, he also barely has a sense of humour either. I wonder what if anything makes the sarcasm part of the brain develop more or less. Would be very interesting to find out.

      Also, people with asperger's syndrome have a similar problem with taking the literal meaning of things. Human brains are very strange and complicated indeed

    5. Re:I believe it. by CustSerAssassin · · Score: 1

      It's apart of the degree...in psychology it's known as aversive conditioning. The Grad students and doctoral students do so much B.S. (not bachelor of science) work to get those degrees and put with so many off the wall professors that its like a kid who eats broccoli, throws up, and never likes broccoli again. After sarcasm, followed by long hours of hard work and a bad grade, sarcasm becomes an aversion.

      --
      Sniper's Motto: One shot, One kill- If you run, you'll only die tired.
    6. Re:I believe it. by Scruffeh · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I agree with that actually. I'm not sure it's a case of being adverse to sarcasm though. I know people that hate sarcasm with a passion, they do understand what is being meant as much as anyone else though.

      I'm also not convinced that postgrads and phd students do that much BS work to be honest. I'm not speaking from experience (I'm a first year undergraduate) but if I end up going further then it would be in a subject that interests me greatly, I would enjoy furthering my knowledge. I don't think phd students really get bad grades either to be honest, they are doing phds because they have shown to be some of the best of the crop of postgraduates.

    7. Re:I believe it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you being sarcasitic or just plain ignorant?

    8. Re:I believe it. by Spectre_03 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a truly aspiring prodigy for a PhD in BS...or was that a BS in PhD?

      I get them so mixed up.

      Those who can, Do...Those who can't, get PhD's in BS and Teach...

      /sarcasm

      Anyone notice the corrolation between botox usually being used near the frontal lobe and this article? Coincidence? The evidence points to Not...

    9. Re:I believe it. by nwf · · Score: 1

      But some brain-damaged people can't comprehend sarcasm... We call them mods But I'll bet none of the folks who modded your post up thought it included them.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    10. Re:I believe it. by Boju! · · Score: 1

      Finally, a scientific study confirms what we were all suspecting: Germans are all brain damaged.

  7. American researchers by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Report being unable to confirm the discovery of the region in American subjects.

    Man, I'm on *fire* today!

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:American researchers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I'm on *fire* today!

      Wishful thinking.

    2. Re:American researchers by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly not, careful observers would note that both our elections and our candidates for elections are clearly the product of great sarcasm.

      "Yes, put JUNIOR up there, he'd be a GREAT president!"

      "Hey, what the country will vote for is a Massachusetts democrat, Dukakis did great after all!".

      The problem is that such comments are taken literally by the bodies responsible for choosing candidates. I think perhaps our political parties are brain damaged, but then I'm being redundant.

    3. Re:American researchers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is sarcasm? This!

    4. Re:American researchers by mizhi · · Score: 1

      One can only pray.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    5. Re:American researchers by endofoctober · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Man, I'm on *fire* today!"

      ...and that would be tragic, now wouldn't it.

      --
      - Jack
    6. Re:American researchers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, look... a 4-digit bigot. Don't see too many of those these days.

    7. Re:American researchers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...Report being unable to confirm the discovery of the region in American subjects..."

      or indeed any other regions :)

    8. Re:American researchers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not wishful thinking... GP meant it literally.

    9. Re:American researchers by koick · · Score: 1

      Huh? I'd say, that that part of the brain in German's must be replaced by, oh, say automobile engineering.

  8. Yeah right.. by brilinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful.

    He cannot be serious.

  9. Yeah, by 2names · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sure they have...

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  10. Of course by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course a study with around 25 brain damaged people watching movies is a perfect reason to make phrenological claims.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    1. Re:Of course by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Of course a study with around 25 brain damaged people watching movies is a perfect reason to make phrenological claims.

      Do I detect a hint of sarcasm in that voice? *smiles*

      --
      Be relentless!
    2. Re:Of course by davidfree · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, thats a hint of minty freshness!

      --
      --Imagine every Thursday shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers.
    3. Re:Of course by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      I don't know, since there is no way to detect sarcasm without an MRI.

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    4. Re:Of course by UWC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Ignoring your perfect example of text-based sarcasm at work there, the study seemed to go a little beyond phrenological conjecture. The study indicated that those with damage to an area of the brain associated with empathy had trouble distinguising between the intents of identically phrased statements, one of which had a literal implication, the other sarcastic.

      A personal query for any neuroscientists reading: The article uses "prefrontal area" and "prefrontal lobe", and a portion of the article paraphrased from a Stanford professor's assertion that the findings are not surprising mention "the brain's cortex". I've personally read bits about the "prefrontal cortex" and its importance in higher level thinking, planning, and so on. As the only thing approaching a brain anatomy class I've had focused only on visual pathways, I wonder if I should assume that these terms are used interchangeably in the article, whether or not it's technically correct to do so. Regardless, the article mentions damage to "the ventromedial area" being the most strongly associated with the lack ot sarcasm detection. Of course, even "ventromedial" is named based on location.

    5. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, no, the brain damaged people are the guests *in* the shows, not the ones watching the shows.

      Sorry, no sarcasm this time.

    6. Re:Of course by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      A more convincing case could be made by studying people without brain damage in an fMRI scanner.

    7. Re:Of course by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      You're watching Springer again....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  11. Researchers Pinpoint Brain's Sarcasm Sensor by perp · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, sure, like THAT will be useful.

    --
    There are two kinds of sysadmins: paranoids and losers. I'm both kinds.
  12. Insightful? by mbbac · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I disagree with CmdrTaco. I think the comments on this story will be very sarcastic.

    --

    mbbac

    1. Re:Insightful? by DickBreath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe he meant the comments would be incredibly inciteful?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    2. Re:Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just too subtle for most of the mods around here.

    3. Re:Insightful? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      That's definitely a great compliment. Thanks.

      --

      mbbac

  13. obg Simpsons quote by Savatte · · Score: 5, Funny

    "ooohh, a sarcasm detector. That's REALLY useful" - Comic Book Guy

    1. Re:obg Simpsons quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tough break pal. usually simpsons quotes are modded up, regardless of the context. Hell, if I had mod points, I'd mod you up strictly for citing your sources.

    2. Re:obg Simpsons quote by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      Oh man, that capitalized "really", really helped in catching the sarcasm in the quote, I almost took it on its face value. thanks

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
  14. Bah by Bozzio · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful.

    Aren't they all?

    --
    I just pooped your party.
  15. Insightful by ndansmith · · Score: 0
    I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful.

    My sarcasm sensor is flaring up.

    1. Re:Insightful by davidfree · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some of the best sarcasm is that which occurs between advanced practitioners of the art.

      They drop the sarcasm into the conversation with just a delicate touch, so smooth that that it may slip past the other who for a split seconds toys in his mind as to whether that is a genuine emotion, then it clicks.

      Anyone from the UK, who watches 'Have I Got News For You' will know that show to be a sarcasm frenzy, and Paul Merton is one of the most vicious paranas in the water.

      A real genius of the art

      --
      --Imagine every Thursday shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers.
  16. and ... by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I'm sure that editorial comments on this article will be informative.

    --
    Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
    1. Re:and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but nowhere near as good as the editorial on the dupes next week.

  17. Erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if.

  18. Slashdot is awesome! by guyfromindia · · Score: 2, Funny

    For those WITHOUT damage to the prefrontal area , it really is! *grin*

    1. Re:Slashdot is awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!!!! Had to think about this comment for a couple of seconds!

  19. +1 by Ibanez · · Score: 3, Funny

    To my respect level for CmdrTaco. Quite the funny comment.

    1. Re:+1 by madprof · · Score: 2, Funny

      This MUST be sarcasm!

  20. This is... by caudron · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...definately stuff that matters. :-|

    --
    -Tom
    1. Re:This is... by softends · · Score: 1

      Stories like this are why I come to Slashdot.

    2. Re:This is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...definately stuff that matters.

      And while we're on the subject, I'd like to compliment you on your spelling.

  21. are they certain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These same people have been talking about humor as if it was a brand of ice cream.

  22. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Christian fundamentalists have been found to have a much higher incidence of prefrontal brain damage....

    1. Re:In other news... by elkyle · · Score: 1

      Only on /. would this be consideit deserves.

      Wait, it could quite possibly happen on Kuro5hin as well...

    2. Re:In other news... by forlornhope · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      In other news, ALL fundamentalists have been found to have a much higher incidence of prefruntal brain damage. This includes liberal fundamentalists found prevalently on slashdot.

      --
      "We Don't Need No Truthless Heros!" - Project 86
    3. Re:In other news... by elkyle · · Score: 1

      Wow. Something screwed up in that comment...that first sentence should have read:

      "Only on /. would this be considered "Insightful" instead of the "Funny" it deserves."

      Odd...

    4. Re:In other news... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Law enforcement officers too...

    5. Re:In other news... by d474 · · Score: 1

      You know, that same thing happened to me at a totally different website last night. I always proofread my comments, so after I clicked 'ok', it totally cutoff like a dozen characters.

      Must be a glitch in the Matrix, usually happens when they change something.

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  23. A sacrasm detector? by Rothron+the+Wise · · Score: 1, Redundant

    That's a REAL useful invention!

    --
    A witty .sig proves nothing
    1. Re:A sacrasm detector? by ProfaneBaby · · Score: 1

      It's available on the shelf next to the belt-mounted gay-dar.

      --
      Video Phone Blogs send video messages straight to the web.
  24. Uh huh, sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whaaaateevvver.

  25. It's a trick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is the experiment. The researchers are monitoring the brain activity of /.ers on reading the article and subsequent replies.

  26. Finally! by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny
    Now everyone else in my life can get a sarcasm transplant so they will quit looking at me funny all the time.

    In fact, once all the sarcastically deficient have been identified, we will need to lobby to get the sarcastic brain chunk added to the list of donor organs so that everyone can have the opportunity to lead a normal sarcastic life. Be an organ donor, only you can give the gift of sarcasm.

    1. Re:Finally! by joshv · · Score: 1

      Are you British? Often times the British confuse bad jokes with saracasm and assume that because we aren't laughing that the American sense of humor lacks subtlety. No - we get it. It's just not funny.

    2. Re:Finally! by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heh I have that problem too. The thing I don't get about the article is the connection of sarcasm to empathy. I mean I'm a very sarcastic person, and sometimes I unknowingly hurt someones feelings with it. If sarcasm required lots of empathy, I should be able to tell when I've crossed the line, right?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Finally! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could come up with a prothesis. I heard that they were already working on analysing the visual cortex, and had a pre-beta of the retina.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If sarcasm required lots of empathy, I should be able to tell when I've crossed the line, right?

      No, it's the empathy that makes you care when you realize you've done it.

    5. Re:Finally! by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

      Nah - just have them put down. Anyone who can't appreciate good sarcasm doesn't really have a reason to live, do they?

      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  27. Something's gone awry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The page you requested could not be found.

    Great article.

  28. yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that's a really useful article.

  29. Zonk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's the best slashdot editor in the universe!

  30. Obligatory CBG by mwigmani · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A sarcasm sensor? Oh, that's a REAL useful brain function.

  31. oblig simpsons by 42Penguins · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Oh, a sarcasm detector. That sounds REALLY useful.

  32. Obligatory simpsons quote by elcheesmo · · Score: 1, Funny

    Lyndsey Nagle: Do I detect a note of sarcasm?
    Frink: (with sarcasm detector) Are you kidding me? This baby is right off the charts, mm-hai.
    Comic Book Guy: A sarcasm detector, that's a real useful invention.
    (Sarcasm detector explodes)

    1. Re:Obligatory simpsons quote by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 1

      This shouldn't be modded redundant, as the previous post butchered this quote mercilessly.

    2. Re:Obligatory simpsons quote by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 1

      Well, upon further review, at least one of the previous attempts at this quote failed...mod on!

  33. I didn't know... by Skiron · · Score: 1

    ... that it was lost? Google I suppose came to the rescue?

  34. sarcasm by khrtt · · Score: 1

    Are replacement implants going to be available any time soon?

    1. Re:sarcasm by erlenic · · Score: 1
      Perhaps it's learned, but closely related to another trait, so it shows up in the same place.

      My capcha was jmarxdy. I think Slashdot is trying to brainwash me into communism.

    2. Re:sarcasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My capcha was jmarxdy. I think Slashdot is trying to brainwash me into communism.

      You're paranoid; it's completely random.

      Mine is "votedem". See? Completely random.

    3. Re:sarcasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought understanding sarcasm was a learned response.

      So is reading, but I suspect it makes use of particular areas of the brain.

  35. Sarchasm by poppageek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.

    1. Re:Sarchasm by vmcto · · Score: 1

      Owww...

      Lemon zinger gren tea is really not pleasant when shooting out of my nose...

    2. Re:Sarchasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "sarcastic wit" = oxymoron

    3. Re:Sarchasm by pinchhazard · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, I've never heard that one before.

      --
      Do you love freedom??? Do you love freedom!!! DO YOU LOVE FREEDOM!!!!!!!!
    4. Re:Sarchasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My what a funny pun!

    5. Re:Sarchasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sargasm: ...Never mind. I'm not going to go there.

  36. Obligatory quote. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupidest. Research. Ever.

  37. I'll probably be modded down for this... by hamfactorial · · Score: 0

    I, for one, would like to welcome our new sardonic comment posting overlords.

    --
    Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future? Holy shit!
  38. Lesions, that's it! by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

    The researchers think lesions in several parts of the brain can contribute to an inability to understand sarcasm. But, they wrote, this particular area is important because it draws on your innate recognition of the emotions of other people -- empathy -- and past experiences to comprehend a speaker's intentions.

    So everone who wants to read Slashdot should get checked out with an MRI. Lesions automatically disqualify membership. Although AC posts will be grandfathered.

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
  39. Full text in case of Slashdot effect by Webs+101 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Like that ever happens....

    Researchers Pinpoint Brain's Sarcasm Sensor
    By Randy Dotinga
    HealthDay Reporter

    MONDAY, May 23 (HealthDay News) -- Oh yeah, right!

    No, it's true -- many of you don't go a day without dishing out several doses of sarcasm. But some brain-damaged people can't comprehend sarcasm, and Israeli researchers think it's because a specific brain region has gone dark.

    The region, according to the researchers, handles the task of detecting hidden meaning, a crucial component of sarcasm. If that part of the brain is out of commission, the irony doesn't come through, the scientists report in the May issue of Neuropsychology.

    "People with prefrontal brain damage suffer from difficulties in understanding other people's mental states, and they lack empathy," said study co-author Simone Shamay-Tsoory, a researcher at the University of Haifa. "Therefore, they can't understand what the speaker really is talking about, and get only the literal meaning."

    The findings, Shamay-Tsoory said, could help rehabilitation centers do a better job of helping brain-damaged patients adjust to the world and understand other people.

    In their study, Shamay-Tsoory and her colleagues first enrolled 58 subjects -- 25 participants with prefrontal-lobe damage, 17 who were healthy and 16 who had damage to the posterior lobe of the brain.

    Then they tested each person by exposing them to several "neutral" and sarcastic comments recorded by actors as part of a story. This "sarcasm meter" was designed to gauge how well the subjects could comprehend the unique kind of irony that is sarcasm.

    For example, actors read phrases such as "don't work too hard" in both a neutral sense (meaning "you're a hard worker") and a sarcastic sense (meaning "you're a real slacker"). Each comment came in proper context as part of a story about, say, a worker who's sleeping or a worker who's grinding away at his job.

    All the subjects understood the sarcasm except for those with damage to the prefrontal area, which is above the eye sockets and behind the forehead. And among those, people with damage to a specific area known as the ventromedial area had the most trouble deciphering sarcasm.

    The researchers think lesions in several parts of the brain can contribute to an inability to understand sarcasm. But, they wrote, this particular area is important because it draws on your innate recognition of the emotions of other people -- empathy -- and past experiences to comprehend a speaker's intentions.

    Brian Knutson, an assistant professor of neuroscience at Stanford University, said the findings make sense because the brain's cortex handles a variety of sophisticated tasks, and sarcasm could be on the list.

    The findings also reflect a growing interest in how emotion is processed by the brain. "Emotion has not been a popular topic in science for a long time," because it's difficult to measure, he said, but things are changing.

    --

    "Even for Slashdot, that was a very obscure reference!" - Anonymous Coward

    1. Re:Full text in case of Slashdot effect by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Thanks. We all know how Slashdotters ALWAYS read the articles.

      Man, can we have smarmy sarcasm mode every day?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Full text in case of Slashdot effect by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

      How very informative!

    3. Re:Full text in case of Slashdot effect by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Forbes are truly grateful to you for saving them from from a slashdotting. I hope you mirror articles from the BBC and NYT too. Wouldn't want to hurt their servers.

    4. Re:Full text in case of Slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, can we have smarmy sarcasm mode every day?

      Uh... don't we?

    5. Re:Full text in case of Slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the subjects understood the sarcasm except for those with damage to the prefrontal area, which is above the eye sockets and behind the forehead.

      As opposed to the area of the brain that is above the eye sockets and in front of the forehead?

  40. Comic book guy might have something to say on this by acid_andy · · Score: 0

    "This baby's off the scale!".

    "Sarcasm detector, oh that's a REALLY useful invention!"

    BOOM!

    --
    Your ad here.
  41. This goes hand-in-hand with... by yotto · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists also located the area of the brain responsibile for gullibility, and they now have a procedure to remove that section of your brain.

    1. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by DynamoJoe · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that they can put it back in the dictionary?

      --
      bah.
    2. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by yotto · · Score: 1

      They took gullible out of the dictionary!?

      Seriously, though, have you ever made a sarcastic comment to a gullible person? Good times. Good times.

    3. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Really?

    4. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Where do I sign up? I've got loads of dough around just waiting for the right elective surgery.

    5. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by MarkGriz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, though, have you ever made a sarcastic comment to a gullible person?

      Have you ever posted on Slashdot, and been moderated OFFTOPIC?

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    6. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "Scientists also located the area of the brain responsibile for gullibility, and they now have a procedure to remove that section of your brain."

      Now would be a good time to divest oneself of shares in advertising companies...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    7. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by 3770 · · Score: 1


      If I could I'd mod this both funny and insightful.

      --
      The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
    8. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by ZackSchil · · Score: 1

      Hint: The moderation on the parent comment makes its obvious joke funny.

    9. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I can't believe it, but you are right: gullible

    10. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Wow!

    11. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Scientists also located the area of the brain responsibile for gullibility, and they now have a procedure to remove that section of your brain.
      Nah, would be much more useful to swap them round.
    12. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by pionzypher · · Score: 1

      So you're saying a complete lobotomy for my manager would actually help?

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
    13. Re:This goes hand-in-hand with... by allanc · · Score: 1

      Oh no you don't. I'm not falling for that one a third time!

  42. Obligatory by V_drive · · Score: 5, Funny

    CBG: Oh yeah, everyone's real happy then.
    Lyndsey Nagle: Do I detect a note of sarcasm?
    Frink: (With sarcasm detector) Are you kidding? This baby is off
    the charts mm-hai.
    CBG: A sarcasm detector, that's a real useful invention.
    (Sarcasm detector explodes)

    --
    char *mySig;
    1. Re:Obligatory by robfoo · · Score: 1

      Thanks to all the dozen or so people that have posted this.
      It gets funnier every time!

      (this post may or may not have included sarcasm)

  43. Asperger's as well? by Amoeba · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The researchers think lesions in several parts of the brain can contribute to an inability to understand sarcasm. But, they wrote, this particular area is important because it draws on your innate recognition of the emotions of other people -- empathy -- and past experiences to comprehend a speaker's intentions.

    Wouldn't this also be applicable to people with Asperger's Syndrome? If this research is correct then sarcasm must be especially difficult for Aspergerians (is that even a word?)

    Note to self: When Bram Cohen asks how you are doing, do not reply "I so great you should kill me now so I can die happy."

    --
    Do not taunt Happy-Fun Ball
    1. Re:Asperger's as well? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0

      Many Aspergers people enjoy verbal games, so I think the answer is 'no'

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    2. Re:Asperger's as well? by Spectre · · Score: 4, Informative

      A family member has been diagnosed with mild autism (Asperger's is a specific diagnosis within the broad spectrum of autism) and I can say that this member of my family completely misses any sarcastic comment that hasn't been specifically pointed out as being non-literal in an earlier conversation.

      So yes, I'd say the research might very well apply to Asperger's in some way or another.

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    3. Re:Asperger's as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, sarcasm is difficult for autistic people (which includes aspies), but they can learn to recognize it cognitively.

    4. Re:Asperger's as well? by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. On a serious, non-sarcastic note:

      I once had a roommate for a whopping 3 months who probably had this Asperger's Syndrome I think. I took him on as a roommate knowing he was pretty eccentric, but didn't understand just how difficult it would end up being to live with this person. Mind you, he was a very nice guy in his mid-20's like me, but he had very few social skills. I would want to go hang out with my buddies or go on a date and he would invariably ask me EVERY TIME I was going out if he could come along. Sorry pal, but you would definitely kill my mojo if I was seen at the bars I'm going to with you.

      One time me and a half-dozen friends were all sitting in a circle playing with our friend's new golden retriever puppy that was only 8 weeks old. It was all hyper and didn't control it's limbs well yet so it was fun watching him roll around and stuff. My roommate just sat and stared with a crooked smile on his face. He didn't "get" it I guess.

      He also, of course, did NOT respond to sarcasm. I think he just kept quiet to mask what he knew was odd about himself, but trust me it could be strange trying to talk to him; especially when you're very upset and laying on the sarcasm and verbal attack and he's not even responding to your emotional state.

      Interestingly, he now has his Masters in Civil Engineering and has a good job working for a city in Indiana planning roads, zoning, etc. So while his social skills were seriously lacking, he was still a contributing member of society as much as any of the rest of us. (In a purely economical sense of course) He was also very knowledgeable, even if apparently "unwise" at times due to his social inabilities.

    5. Re:Asperger's as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh... he said "ass-burgers." Huh huh...

    6. Re:Asperger's as well? by Alcimedes · · Score: 1

      So the guy with severely lacking social skills fit right in with a bunch of Engineers? Didn't see that coming.

    7. Re:Asperger's as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aspergers is a disorder that is usually asociated with people who miss social cues, fail to understand underlieing meanings, and develop patterns that they adhere to strichtly. They also get upset easily when they do not get their way. Often people with auspergers are also clumsy which adds to their troubles and makes them perfect targets for bullies in school. Your roomate sounds a lot like mine, whom I have long suspected of having auspergers! it can be a hassle to live with such people and it is important to realize that they do not mean to be rude, and mostly want to fit in but dont know how. One other charecteristic that is associated with auspergers is high very intelligence so it makes sense that your roomate did very well for himself.

  44. Sarcasm by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful.
    Does my ventromedial area detect a bit of sarcasm there? No really, tell me. I can't tell.

  45. Yeah... by CypherXero · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I really care about my brain's sarcasm sensor...

  46. THE LIGHT! by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    ...some brain-damaged people can't comprehend sarcasm

    w00t! I SEE THE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL! So much has been explained to my fragile little mind...

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  47. Mass experimentation by Serbitar · · Score: 1

    Im sure this article is just a mass experiment in which the phychologists are attempting to determine who's "Sarchasm sensor" triggers upon reading the article

  48. Also in the news... by LithiumX · · Score: 2, Funny

    And quickly following today's findings, it has now been verified that the Sarcasm Cortex has only been detected in male subjects so far. It is not yet clear if female subjects possess this neural hardware, though most researchers don't hold out a great deal of hope on the matter.

    Being anatomically associated with what is loosely referred to in scientific circles as "The Grunt Lobe", the recently identified cortical area believed to allow males to translate short gutteral sounds into complex syntactical commentary, these are potential examples of male neurological development.

    --
    Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
    1. Re:Also in the news... by Salvo · · Score: 1

      Women have to compensate for the lack of the Sarcasm Cortex, using Simple Logic.

      When she asks "Does My Bum Look Big In These?"
      and you reply "Oh Yeah, It's Huge! We're going to need a forklift to get you out of the shop!", she doesn't immediately recognise Sarcasm, and has to use Logic to determine that what you said was offensive, but humorous, and probably Sarcastic. She will pause for a few seconds before responding.

      In cases of extreme stress, (like shopping in expensive stores) she may not be able to apply simple logic to sarcastic comments, and you'll end up with a Brassiere stand where your head used to be.

    2. Re:Also in the news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused... aren't females also renownd for being devoid of logic also?

    3. Re:Also in the news... by TheWormThatFlies · · Score: 1

      My god! These are the missing pieces to understanding half the human race that I've been searching for all my life! I just knew that behind those apparently random monosyllables and non-sequitur quips lay a complex web of intelligent discourse!

      Say, is there some kind of "Elementary Man-Speak for Women" textbook I could pick up? (Please respond using plain language and really long words about feelings, or I may have trouble empathizing with what you're trying to communicate.)

  49. Sarcasm - Americans just dont get it! by davidfree · · Score: 1

    Im presuming that wasnt found in one of our Yankee buddies. Ask any Brit, Americans just dont get sarcasm. Thats why our comedians just dont do well over there that often. The only sarcastic show thats broken through really is The Office, and 99.9% of Americans havent even seen it Dont worry, im popping over there soon, and im sure ill get some bemused looks if I say "You guys got Mcdonalds over here?"

    --
    --Imagine every Thursday shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers.
    1. Re:Sarcasm - Americans just dont get it! by gg3po · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you were to ask me the aforementioned "Mickey Dee's" question, I would "get" that you are making an attempt at sarcasm. I just wouldn't consider it clever sarcasm. It would therefore not be funny. I would simply walk away, mildly disturbed by the fact that people with such an underdeveloped sense of humor are allowed to freely wander about. :-)

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Sarcasm - Americans just dont get it! by davidfree · · Score: 1

      you can take this sarcasm thing too far you know.

      --
      --Imagine every Thursday shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers.
    3. Re:Sarcasm - Americans just dont get it! by spicate · · Score: 1

      Has it occurred to you that we don't pick up on your sarcasm because we're not used to your funny-sounding accent?

  50. Speaking of which by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sarcasm-detecting portion of my brain nearly short-circuited when I noticed the Forbes website refers to the ad that unexpectedly pops up when you click on the link to the story as a "welcome screen"

  51. May resolve questions about Betelgeusian anatomy by Erbo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Perhaps this is the reason why they don't have sarcasm on Betelgeuse (according to The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy); their brains lack the sensor to detect it. (In Mostly Harmless, Ford has to ask Arthur, "This is that thing you call sarcasm, isn't it?")

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  52. But when will they pinpoint... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But when will they pinpoint Pinky's sarcasm sensor?

    Narf!

  53. life... by point3 · · Score: 1
    "People with prefrontal brain damage suffer from difficulties in understanding other people's mental states, and they lack empathy,"

    With a robotic tone:

    "You think you've got problems! Life...don't talk to me about life..."

  54. Thank God I had that lobotomy... by goldspider · · Score: 1

    ...otherwise I might have thought that the submitter's editorial was funny.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  55. Unfortunately by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    this particular region of the brain is shown to be under-developed in most US citizens.

    1. Re:Unfortunately by BrK · · Score: 1

      Did someone swap the "S" and "K" keys on your keyboard?

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Unfortunately by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      no.

  56. Yay for progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one am really glad univerities are working on this. Afterall, understanding the nuero science of sarcasm is so much more beneficial to human existance than curing cancer.

    I also like the new capcha's on the /. comment form, slashdot is so much more fun entering these things, especially for people using screenreaders. Way to go.

    1. Re:Yay for progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wanted to try the capcha.

    2. Re:Yay for progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Good init?
      random letters - if you are visually impaired, please email us at pater@slashdot.org
      I hear crapflooders tend to have very poor eye-sight
    3. Re:Yay for progress by zerbot · · Score: 1

      Get yourself an account. No capcha's for me.

    4. Re:Yay for progress by erlenic · · Score: 1

      That's odd, cause I'm getting them with my account. Maybe it's based on karma level or something, mine's only "positive" right now. What's yours.

    5. Re:Yay for progress by zerbot · · Score: 1

      Might also be based on your IP. Owell.

  57. What about the double sarcasm sensor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    my brother and a buddy used to be so sarcastic, it turned normal for them. Then they started saying things in a non-sarcastic way, and it was really funny to them. They called it double sarcasm.

    er, I guess ya had to be there.

  58. Wow! by Jadsky · · Score: 1

    Amazingly, you were the only one to think of that joke.

  59. Only North Koreans understand saraasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only North Koreans will see the sarcasm in this reply.

  60. Kids in the Hall by prockcore · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dave: Oh no, you're not bothering me, Derek, far from it. There's nothing I would rather do than just stand here and chat with you. You know, really get to know you?

    Kevin: Look, I don't think there's any need to be sarcastic.

    Dave: Oh, I'm not being sarcastic! Nooo! This is just a little speech impediment. I can't help it.

    1. Re:Kids in the Hall by Webs+101 · · Score: 1

      Boy, they made a GOOD movie....

      --

      "Even for Slashdot, that was a very obscure reference!" - Anonymous Coward

    2. Re:Kids in the Hall by ilikeitraw · · Score: 0

      hahahaha... one of the best skits ever.

      "I'm soooooo lonely"

    3. Re:Kids in the Hall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Boy, they made a GOOD movie....

      Thank God... I thought they'd only done that idiotic Brain Candy movie. What's the name of the other, better movie you're talkin about?

  61. WOW! by pbaer · · Score: 1

    Oh wow they found our sarcasm gland! This is sooo amazing and useful!
    PS: Ashely Simpson= best singer ever!

    --
    There are 11 types of people, those who know unary and those who don't.
  62. Not yet, I guess... by PalmMP3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful."

    Am I the only one who finds it amusing that so far, not a single comment has been moderated "Insightful"?

    --
    Laughter is the best medicine, but in certain situations the Heimlich maneuver may be more appropriate.
    1. Re:Not yet, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who finds it amusing that so far, not a single comment has been moderated "Insightful"?

      You insightful karma whore!

    2. Re:Not yet, I guess... by davidfree · · Score: 1

      Stop being sarcastic...

      --
      --Imagine every Thursday shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers.
    3. Re:Not yet, I guess... by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Ohh, but see, yours is. Look at the text in brackets right to your post's title! ;-P

    4. Re:Not yet, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it amusing that your post was insightful.

    5. Re:Not yet, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, thats a really astute observation.

    6. Re:Not yet, I guess... by alexhs · · Score: 1

      Moderators are confused. They are not able to find that "sarcastic" mod point.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    7. Re:Not yet, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just wait until the meta-moderaotrs get a hold of these mods :)

    8. Re:Not yet, I guess... by trime · · Score: 1

      How incredibly ironic.

    9. Re:Not yet, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cmdr taco was being sarcastic

    10. Re:Not yet, I guess... by Zcipher · · Score: 5, Funny

      Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, THAT'S a good moderation.

    11. Re:Not yet, I guess... by indros13 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Help, circular moderation!

      Post is modded insightful which makes it funny which makes it no longer insightful which makes it considerably less funny...

      *eyes cross*

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    12. Re:Not yet, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or you are missing a very specific and newly identified portion of your brain...

    13. Re:Not yet, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, all the other retards that don't get sarcasm find it amusing too.

    14. Re:Not yet, I guess... by calculadoru · · Score: 1

      so far, not a single comment has been moderated "Insightful"?

      Well, except for yours. Now that's ironic, innit?

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
    15. Re:Not yet, I guess... by PalmMP3 · · Score: 1

      Yup! Especially since I expected to be modded "Funny". Oh well, I guess it's better for the karma this way, anyway...

      --
      Laughter is the best medicine, but in certain situations the Heimlich maneuver may be more appropriate.
  63. Homer by giantmike · · Score: 1

    "Oh look at me !!! I'm making people happy! I'm the magical man from happy land, with a gumdrop house on lollipop lane! Oh by the way, I was being sarcastic."

    1. Re:Homer by acid_andy · · Score: 0

      Well, duh!!

      --
      Your ad here.
  64. Possible Applications... Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be interested to see how this is applied towards the treatment of Asperger's Syndrome, and other conditions that affect social interaction.

    I had a lab partner once who had Aspy's, and snarky comments constantly went over his head. Maybe people with it can be helped to get the joke?

  65. of course not by endx7 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful.

    But they won't be redundant, because you know nobody will try to make the same stupid joke twice.

  66. From a Libertarian Whack Job No Less by ultimabaka · · Score: 1

    Maybe he was just being sarcastic and hoping people wouldn't notice it?

    *twitch* Oh wait...

  67. O'Reilly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this why Bill O'Reilly's head is so massive? -this is a script!

  68. Actually could be useful by awhelan · · Score: 1

    I remember reading an interview with Bram Cohen, (on a blog linked to from slashdot) that focused on his form of autism. It talked about how one of the major effects was an inability to recognize sarcasm. Now that this part of the brain has been located, perhaps more research could show if it is affected by autism, and if anything can be done to treat it.

  69. I for one.... by Jambon · · Score: 1

    ...find this discover of great use. I have always wondered about this "sarcasm" thing. People saying one thing while meaning the exact opposite always puzzled me. Why would you want to do that? Do you like intentionally confusing all us simpletons? I feel that with the discovery of this there should be a movement to treat this awful condition. Sarcasm is a condition that is harmful to others. It should be treated with proper medication and psychiatric therapy. Please join in the effort to combat this menace to society!

  70. For Douglas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been named the Marvin center of the brain and is thought to be the size of a planet.

  71. non-American Culture by rtconner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, seriously though.. what of different cultures besides American Culture? When I went to China we were told not to use sarcasm to the people we interacted with. It was not a part of their culture and sense of humor to be sarcastic, and therefore they would not understand our sarcasm at all.

    --
    023AD01("Child", "Evil");
    1. Re:non-American Culture by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      that would make them even more sensitive to sarcasm, right? :P

      valid point, nonetheless. but i'm pretty sure neuroscientists/psychologists try to create controlled conditions in their experiments, and therefore wouldn't mix American and Chinese subjects in such a study.

    2. Re:non-American Culture by ShakaUVM · · Score: 5, Funny

      I went to China and they caught sarcasm just fine.

      Probably just told you that just so you didn't commit a cultural faux-pas.

      Oh, hmm, this topic is on sarcasm, so anything I write will automatically be interpreted backwards But wait, that means that your post meant that actually the Chinese got sarcasm just fine, which means I don't need to post this....

      Oh hell, I'm submitting it anyway.

    3. Re:non-American Culture by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      They get sarcasm fine. The problem is more sarcasm in a second, non-native language. Its hard to capture sarcasm in languages you aren't fluent in, just like it can be hard to do so in speach.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:non-American Culture by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Bleh. I means to say just like it can be hard to do so in text. Obviously the writing section of my brain is not working today.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    5. Re:non-American Culture by Y2 · · Score: 1
      I went to China and they caught sarcasm just fine.

      Only Nixon could go to China.

      --
      "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
    6. Re:non-American Culture by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought it was Indian workers (or just any workers from "diverse cultural backgrounds")?

      http://www.thiederman.com/articles_detail.php?id=7 2

      Minimize jokes and sarcasm around people of diverse cultural backgrounds.
      Lightness in a relationship is one thing, a joke which is apt to be misunderstood is another. Most humor is specific to the culture that it comes from. Jokes told, for example, by the Japanese are apt to be nonsensical to an American even if he or she does speak the language. Although humor is a universal human trait, the specifics of what makes things funny vary from culture to culture. Because of this, jokes, and sarcasm in particular, might be taken literally or can offend someone who does not "get" the joke.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    7. Re:non-American Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to China and they caught sarcasm just fine.
      Yeah, but were you throwing underhand?

    8. Re:non-American Culture by cahiha · · Score: 1

      Avoiding sarcasm is sound advice in any culture--the risk of being misunderstood or offending someone is just too high. Even in the US, sarcasm probably backfires more often than not.

    9. Re:non-American Culture by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2, Funny

      Being married to a Chinese woman I assure you this is not true. Sarcasm is alive and well in China. Your instructions about use of sarcasm may have been given for your own best interests, but not because the concept does not exist.

      If you're spending your time trying to understand what someone is saying you sometimes don't also catch the queue that he's being sarcastic. Similarly, at least speaking chinese, you have to be careful with how you change your inflections. "Our" sarcasm, which usually relies on emphasizing or changing the inflection of certain words may indeed not translate. However they seem to get along just fine.

      I believe my wife in fact communicated to her mother last night she was pregnant with three twins and was doing her best to produce them on time for her mothers birthday. None of these things are in any way true, or frankly I'd shoot myself. Somehow her mother picked up on the joke and commenced with the usual nagging.

    10. Re:non-American Culture by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      Only in Soviet Russia.

      Wait a minute...

    11. Re:non-American Culture by PGC · · Score: 1

      A country lacking sarcasm ... that would be Japan. Definitly.

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    12. Re:non-American Culture by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Humor != Esprit, for example :)

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    13. Re:non-American Culture by geekboy642 · · Score: 1

      A sample Chinese joke:
      A boy is reading his homework assignment for class, which was to write a journal article.
      "When I left my home this morning, I saw a pile of dog shit near the stairs, and I was startled."
      (the words for to be startled are identical in sound to the words for to eat a pound of something).
      "You ate dog shit?"
      "Ha ha ha ha!"

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    14. Re:non-American Culture by gauauu · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm currently living in china, and most of the sarcasm I use isn't understood by my coworkers. Things like "wow, that work looks like fun"....my coworkers seriously reply "no....it's work..why would it be fun?"

    15. Re:non-American Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The reverse happened to me in Taiwan, talking to a taxi driver in Chinese (which I'm a very poor speaker of):

      Me: Do you know where Ding Tai Fung is?
      Cabbie: No.
      Me: OK. [leaving]
      Cabbie: Get in the car! Everyone knows where Ding Tai Fung is!

    16. Re:non-American Culture by SleepyShamus · · Score: 0

      I worked for 2 years in Switzerland, and all stereotypes aside, most of the people I worked with had a good sense of humour. That said, I could NOT for the life of me get them to catch on to (funny) sarcastic comments. I had to explain myself every time I tried, and we all know it makes a joke funnier when you have to explain it.

    17. Re:non-American Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should watch some Japanese comedy.

    18. Re:non-American Culture by JCWDenton · · Score: 1

      The fact that the mod didn't get that Asian joke just proves jokes stop being funny at the border.

      People with asparagus syndrome apparently have greater mentail ability... maybe there is a correlation between professors and no sense of humor?

    19. Re:non-American Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was that last word?

    20. Re:non-American Culture by nigel_atkinson · · Score: 1

      > People with asparagus syndrome apparently have greater mentail ability...

      I am pretty sure that people with asparagus syndrome have green pointy heads and taste good with hollandaise sauce...

    21. Re:non-American Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the post that specific humor doesn't cross borders; I find jokes about eating dog shit quite funny. I just needed the context as I do not speak the language.

  72. This is the First Step Towards Curing Sarchasm by nganju · · Score: 1


    Sarchasm - The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient who doesn't get it.

    Finally, a cure in sight...

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
  73. HTML Sarcasm by Ecko7889 · · Score: 0



    Wonder what the visual representation of this would be in HTML.....

    --
    $sig$
    1. Re:HTML Sarcasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It would dance around the page, shimmering like a mirage, beautifully rendered in fucking bold cursive textual splendour by every layout engine under the sun.

      .

      .

      .

      Yet in lynx it would just be a different color.

    2. Re:HTML Sarcasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      It depends on your locale.

      en_uk:

      sarcasm { display: inline; }
      en_us:
      sarcasm {
      display: block;
      font-size: 200%;
      font-weight: bold;
      font-style: italic;
      color: #000088;
      background-color: #FFFF00;
      border: 2px solid red;
      }
      sarcasm:before {
      content: "Note: the following is sarcasm.";
      }
      sarcasm:after {
      content: "Note: the preceding was sarcasm.";
      }
    3. Re:HTML Sarcasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh.. it's nowonder I never believe anything that the UK have to say

  74. cultural gap by Kortec · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i wonder how they account for sarcasam missed from cultural differences. a friend of mine did some time in africa with the peace corps, and remembers all of the american humor based on sarcasam just deadpanning; maybe this sector is only developed through cultural trends?

    --
    "My heart is in the work." - Andrew Carnegie
    1. Re:cultural gap by kraut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or maybe his jokes just weren't funny?

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    2. Re:cultural gap by Jakeypants · · Score: 1

      No, I bet his jokes were real funny.

  75. The Asian factor by merc · · Score: 1

    I had read (in a book on Asian culture) that sarcasm is one of the least understood Western idioms by Asian cultures. I discovered after marrying an Asian woman that, to a degree this is true--but also that after exposed to this for a while it is

    My 2.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
    1. Re:The Asian factor by James_Lavin · · Score: 1

      I know nothing about the prevalence of sarcasm in China/Asia (though I suspect you're on to something because people tend to be more polite to one another--at least superficially/literally--in Asia), but my wife of ten years grew up in China and said to me minutes ago that her sarcasm muscles have grown much stronger during our ten years of marriage. She then tossed several choice remarks in my direction, to flex her new muscles I suppose.

      --James

  76. You're all insensitive clods! by Alsee · · Score: 1

    I am dain bramaged!

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:You're all insensitive clods! by N1ghtFalcon · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry if I didn't understand what you were trying to say, but I think what you meant to write is "I am brain damaged!", not "I am dain bramaged!"

      No worries though, just use the Preview button the next time, ok? :)

  77. Yeah. by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

    *pffft* I'm so sure.

  78. Sarcasm? by Gargamell · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they took the entire idea of brain damaged people trying to understand sarcasm and replayed it as a scene for a large portion of brain damaged people, if they would find it funny? As horrible as it is, it just points out that some things are obviously not funny to people, when the sarcasm has to do with them! I think i would be mostly curious to hear about the details of what was considered the scenes for measuring sarcasm comprehension, and then redistributing it to different cultures, as well as to different professions in particular! 2 cents ~tim

    1. Re:Sarcasm? by d474 · · Score: 1

      You can stop ducking now. No, really! Raise your FRIGGIN' HEAD!!!

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  79. Programming Applications by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 0

    I assume that once we better understand how the brain detects sarcasm, we can better model it through programming, and perhaps enhance human-machine interaction.

    Still, C-3PO didn't really need to know what was sarcastic or not....

  80. damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's my chance to be sarcastic AND on-topic, & I can't think of anything to say.

  81. Insightful by lheal · · Score: 1
    "I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful."

    So a week later they called again and told me the cheque had bounced and said... I had to see... Doug.
    Well, I was terrified. Everyone was terrified of Doug. I've seen grown men pull their own heads off rather than see Doug. Even Dinsdale was frightened of Doug. He used...
    sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor, bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  82. This is just a little speech impediment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'm so lonely.

    This must be the other part of the brian they forgot to instal into Korean girls.

    No, I'm not bitter.

  83. May prove to be useful... by N1ghtFalcon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I did enjoy about 20 different versions of what the comic book guy says, I'd like to point out that if we understand how human brain interprets the meaning could have some significant impacts on the way humans communicate with computers.

    It seems to me that today's computer is no different then someone who isn't able to understand the hidden meaning, but takes everything literally. If be learn of how exactly the human brain takes in the information and goes that extra step to figure out what was meant as opposed to what was said, it will go a long way towards completely transforming how humans interact with computers. You look at all the Star Trek series and you don't see people telling the computer how to do something, you see people telling the computer what to do. Something that we so far haven't achieved (to that scale at the very least), but it may be worth striving for.

    Just my two cents...

  84. Further Proof by nate+nice · · Score: 0

    This is further proof that women are not good at math/science and have no place in these fields. Since analytical skills, like problem solving, come from your frontal lobes, it should be obvious women have absolutely no ability to do this. I mean, have you ever seen a women understand sarcasm? Anything my old man found funny my mother thought was just mean. Just about every women I've come across is like this. They simply do not have the capacitance to solve math problems or understand sarcasm, except for in extremely rare cases. This new discovery should remind women of their place in the world, and that place is cleaning the bathroom and satisfying in the bedroom. Leave the problem solving and sarcasm to us men, all-right lil' ladies?

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:Further Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find your ideas interesting, and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    2. Re:Further Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for our less gifted readers:
      Yes this was an attempt at sarcasm!

    3. Re:Further Proof by LibertarianWackJob · · Score: 1

      is that our "less gifted" readers or "brain damaged"?

      --
      What? ®
    4. Re:Further Proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, the cardinal word here was "attempt".

      You see, the OP perpetrated attempted sarcasm.
      sarcasm => subject of tread.
      attempted => it failed.
      perpetrated => a verb often used to describe criminal behaviour.

      What I do on the other hand, is sarcasm with intend. Just as criminal, but subtly different.

  85. Hyuk hyuk. by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

    My brain is obviously not equipped to handle this story.

    You brain is obviously not equipped to be funny. You should take this stuff to the ametuer stand-up circuit; you'll have less time to post on Slashdot.

    Wow. I feel like I just exercised my brain! Who knew being so vicious was so healthy? I'm not being a jerk; I'm exercising! Thanks, researchers!

    1. Re:Hyuk hyuk. by AVIDJockey · · Score: 5, Funny

      In addition to humor, grammar and spelling are obviously your forte.

    2. Re:Hyuk hyuk. by AVIDJockey · · Score: 3, Funny

      oops... me = pot

      *redirects sarcasm at self*

    3. Re:Hyuk hyuk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar AND spelling are obviously your FORTES.

    4. Re:Hyuk hyuk. by soloport · · Score: 1

      *redirects sarcasm at self*

      3. 2. 1. ...head aspode.

    5. Re:Hyuk hyuk. by Spectre_03 · · Score: 0

      or was that head assplode?

      *Thinking to self*: That should do for my karma whoring for the day...

      Oh shit...how you supposed to karma whore with topics like this?

      *Doctor's reply*: Botox helps.

    6. Re:Hyuk hyuk. by Placido · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's forté.

      define: forte

      What you're forgetting is that forte (pronounced for-tay) is actually a french word meaning 'strength' and the e on the end should actually be an é

      I've just realised that I might be an anal retentive.

      I also think that humour can be spelt either humor or humour.... with the latter naturally being more appropriate for a comment about the british.

      --

      Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
      Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
    7. Re:Hyuk hyuk. by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      This asks for a new moderation category:
      modded +1 irony

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    8. Re:Hyuk hyuk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Forté" is not a French word. "Fort" is French for strong, "forte" (without accent, and with a silent "e") if French for strong (feminin), and "forte" (not written "forté" but pronounced in a similar way) is Italian for strong (or loud). Whatever the language, there should be no "é" written there.

    9. Re:Hyuk hyuk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our two fortes are grammar and spelling... and ruthless efficiency....

  86. My prefrontal-lobe must be all right... by nightskier · · Score: 1

    Because I appreciate the sarcastic message in the add above: "Now I can do dynamic web development quicker and easier than before... MS Visual Studio"

  87. OT: 27% off Tiger??? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    27% off Tiger? Is that from the front end or the back end? I ask because I need both ends.

    Sometimes I need head, sometimes I need tail, and sometimes I want more. On the other hand, sometimes less is more, or is that the other way around?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  88. Better Article by awhelan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was reading this article on the BBC website when it hit slashdot... would have posted it sooner but apparently I don't pass the turing test.

  89. Sarcasm is a form of empathy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it depends on one cocksucker bastard to live in the shoes of another cocksucker bastard to get the joke. I never knew I was so empathic.

    1. Re:Sarcasm is a form of empathy! by Cuntish+Sun+Executiv · · Score: 1

      You write like a salty yogurt taster.

      --
      Solaris 10: The most advanced operating system on the planet.
  90. What part misidentifies irony? by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1

    When they can isolate the part of the brain that causes people to misindentify bad luck, coincidence, and poetic justice as irony, we'll have made a major step towards an educated and enlightened society.

    --
    "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    1. Re:What part misidentifies irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it ironic, don't ya think?!

    2. Re:What part misidentifies irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AIN'T IT IRONIC MUTHA FUCKA

  91. OK, now... by m50d · · Score: 0, Troll

    can you make sure people missing this region can't moderate? I've got one too many troll mods for sarcastic comments.

    --
    I am trolling
    1. Re:OK, now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've got one too many troll mods for sarcastic comments.

      Not any more.

  92. What to Name It? by Michael_Burton · · Score: 4, Funny

    The brain area in question should be called the medulla obnoxiosa. In honor of me.

    --
    When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
    1. Re:What to Name It? by doombob · · Score: 2

      I am Jack's medulla obnoxiosa I regulate Jack's ability to correctly process sarcastic statements and respond accordingly.

    2. Re:What to Name It? by drxray · · Score: 1

      great comment!

      --
      Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
    3. Re:What to Name It? by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 1

      Professor Frink: This sarcasm detector is off the charts! CBG: Ooh, that's a _real_ useful invention. Professor Frink: Uh oh! (sarcasm detector blows up)
      They Saved Lisa's Brain

      --
      Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
  93. Stop the Madness! by JasonFleischer · · Score: 2, Informative

    OK, I'm going to rain on the sarcasm parade. Just to point out that damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex is not just about sarcasm (thank you very much). Damage to this area is known to impair a wide range of things like decision making skills and social abilities. It's NOT like the authors are claiming this is the one place that sarcasm lives in the brain, or that this is all that bit of brain does. We now return you to your regularly scheduled /. banter.

    1. Re:Stop the Madness! by davidfree · · Score: 1

      Trust me, there are a lot of people with crap decision making skills and social abilities, that have no damage to their head-top.

      If your reading this post your probably one of them. Get out more and meet some girls.

      --
      --Imagine every Thursday shoes exploded if you tied them the usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers.
    2. Re:Stop the Madness! by GaryOlson · · Score: 1
      .... impair a wide range of things like decision making skills and social abilities...

      An obvious requirement for succeeding in management. Now you know why your manager has no sense of humor.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    3. Re:Stop the Madness! by coyote_oww · · Score: 1
      Trust me, there are a lot of people with crap decision making skills and social abilities, that have no damage to their head-top.

      If your reading this post your probably one of them. Get out more and meet some girls.

      It took less time for me to read it than for you to write it, so what does that say about you?

      err, uh-oh...

  94. Yet another reason why by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  95. not that shocking by koekepeer · · Score: 1

    the idea that people with damage in the prefrontal cortex have difficulties dealing with "hidden meaning" in words is hardly a new one.

    damage to the prefrontal lobe can even cause sociopathy, to give an extreme example.

  96. Very Intriguing by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    The difficult thing about sarcasm is that it doesn't translate well to irony (the written form). Most of us now communicate much of the time with text and irony is a subtle art that is not as easily mastered as sarcasm (which any teenager can master).

    I think it would be cool if the WC3 could develop a sarcasm tag. (I think it would be tons more useful than the blink tag). This would help us create a way to translate our sarcasm.

    I propose that it looks like italics except that it slants the other way (to the left). Of course, a special font class might need to be developed, but I am sure the on-line community would use it thoroughly.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    1. Re:Very Intriguing by catdevnull · · Score: 1

      oops...typo: that's W3C.

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  97. Dude, 10 minutes too late! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Slashdot is about 10 minutes too late. My sarcasm is all spent on other /.'s.

    I've no more sarcasm to give you.

  98. It's stories like this... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    ... that make Slashdot my favorite source of straight lines... er, I mean my favorite source of tech news.

    But this article is a little behind. Not only have scientists found the part of the brain responsible for understanding sarcasm, but they've also found the part of the brain that makes some people believe that every trait is localized to a part of the brain. Not surprisingly, it's just centimeters away from the part of the brain researchers believe makes certain people think that every human trait is localized to a specific gene.

    Damage to the latter two parts of the brain are loosely correlated with an inability to get research grants and strongly correlated with an inability to get your research published in prestigious scientific journals like Forbes magazine.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  99. I swear by manifoldronin · · Score: 1

    I came up with my sig long before this story.

    --
    Tyranny isn't the worst enemy of a democracy. Cynicism is.
  100. Re:American researchers = nice oxymoron :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you call a funny American comedian?
    A tourist!

  101. Oblig Simp by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    A sarcasm detector? Oh that's useful.

    -Colin

  102. Congradulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On behalf of the rest of the world, let me be the first in congradulating you on your discovery of understanding sarcasm. Your next research project? ... understanding when not to answer rhetorical questions.

  103. Re:obg slashdot quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  104. Call Guiness by datadriven · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This story is going to get a record number of comments

  105. Sarcasm Meter, and next up by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    comes the bullshit meter.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  106. obligatory Kids in the Hall sketch by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny
    [the character of SARCASTIC GUY is read in a voice that it just absolutely dripping with sarcasm in everything he says]

    DEREK: Great party, huh? I actually don't know anyone at the party, actually, I'm kinda new to the neighborhood, actually, but my friend Chris said "come to the party, I'll introduce you around, you'll know everybody by the time you leave the party." Chris knows everybody, and soon I'll know everybody! 'Course, Chris didn't show up. So I guess I gotta mingle. So here I am mingling! 'Course, mingling really isn't my game, I'm not really a mingler, per se, I was actually in the corner alone mingling - that means I'm not talking to anyone, actually. I saw you over here, I said "there's a guy by himself, why not go over here, I'll mingle with this guy, this guy looks like a mingler," so hi, I'm Derek, pleased to meet you.

    SARCASTIC GUY: Well it certainly is a pleasure to meet YOU, Derek.

    DEREK: ...I'm sorry if I bothered you.

    SARCASTIC GUY: Oh no, you're not bothering me, Derek, far from it. There's nothing I would rather do than just stand here and chat with you! Y'know - really get to know you?

    DEREK: Look, I don't think there's any need to be sarcastic.

    SARCASTIC GUY: Oh, I'm not being sarcastic! NOOOO! This is just a little speech impediment. I can't help it!

    DEREK: Okay, I've obviously said or done something wrong to upset you, I'm just gonna apologize and be on my way.

    SARCASTIC GUY: No, no, no, please stay. It's true. I've talked this way all my life. It's made things very difficult for me.

    DEREK: Yeah! Right!

    SARCASTIC GUY: Hey! Where ya goin'? Come back! I really wanna be your friend. I'm so lonely.

    1. Re:obligatory Kids in the Hall sketch by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      Rock. Kids in the Hall is great stuff.

      I am crushing your head!

    2. Re:obligatory Kids in the Hall sketch by foldedspace · · Score: 1

      That was my favorite sketch from that show. We need much more sarcasm in comedy. Of course, I am a product of the 1980s (the Gen X sarcasm culture pinnacle). Like, Duh!

      I also liked the sketch with Dave Foley (store keeper who can't speak English, but can explain that he can't speak English in perfect English) and Scott Thompson (a guy that just wants to buy some shoes).

    3. Re:obligatory Kids in the Hall sketch by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Actually, I knew a guy from Bradford, UK, who really was like that. Every single word dripped the utmost sarcasm.

    4. Re:obligatory Kids in the Hall sketch by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 1

      The funniest part of the Dave Foley sketch is how bloody TRUE it is -- I spent just enough time in Germany to be able to say, perfectly accented it would seem, 'I don't speak very good German, may I speak English?'

      INSTANT rush of incomprhensible German. And then me back: Ahh! Mein deutsch ist schlecht! Auf englisch bitte?

      Let that be a lesson -- if you need to say 'I don't speak 'x' very well, do you speak my language' always use improper grammer ;~)

    5. Re:obligatory Kids in the Hall sketch by jhsiao · · Score: 1
      Obligatory Family Guy quote:

      Brian: Hola! Um...me, me llamo es Brian. Ahh, uh, um lets see, uh, nosotros queremos ir con ustedes.

      Mexican: Hey that was pretty good. But actually when you said, "Me llamo es Brian," you don't need the "es." Just, "Me llamo Brian."

      Brian: Oh, you speak English.

      Mexican: No just that first speech and this one explaining it.

      Brian: You...you're kidding right?

      Mexican: Que?

    6. Re:obligatory Kids in the Hall sketch by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Yes, so true.

      And "I don't speak [language]" in English works even better.

  107. Oh, great. by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    Now that it's been revealed as having a physical origin, comedy clubs will probably be required to provide special accommodation and parking for the humor-impaired.

  108. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's irony, not sarcasm.

  109. sarcasm by dokhebi · · Score: 1

    I always thought understanding sarcasm was a learned response.

    Just my $0.02 worth.

  110. What is it...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this "sarcasm", of which you speak...???

  111. but seriously folks... by dick+johnson · · Score: 5, Informative
    Far be it from me to not take a cheap shot at this story...

    But this research does serve a useful purpose in Autism/asperger syndrome.

    Folks with asperger syndrome commonly have an inability to detect sarcasm and read facial, social cues.

    >>By definition, those with AS have a normal IQ and many individuals (although not all), exhibit exceptional skill or talent in a specific area. Because of their high degree of functionality and their naiveté, those with AS are often viewed as eccentric or odd and can easily become victims of teasing and bullying. While language development seems, on the surface, normal, individuals with AS often have deficits in pragmatics and prosody. Vocabularies may be extraordinarily rich and some children sound like "little professors." However, persons with AS can be extremely literal and have difficulty using language in a social context. Read full definition here

    --
    - dj
    1. Re:but seriously folks... by orion41us · · Score: 2, Funny

      "By definition, those with AS have a normal IQ and many individuals (although not all), exhibit exceptional skill or talent in a specific area. Because of their high degree of functionality and their naiveté, those with AS are often viewed as eccentric or odd and can easily become victims of teasing and bullying. While language development seems, on the surface, normal, individuals with AS often have deficits in pragmatics and prosody. Vocabularies may be extraordinarily rich and some children sound like "little professors." However, persons with AS can be extremely literal and have difficulty using language in a social context. Read full definition here"

      --Dude: you just described 97% of people on /.

    2. Re:but seriously folks... by Inside_Joke · · Score: 1

      plus or minus 3%.

      --
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that you're an idiot!
    3. Re:but seriously folks... by spankey51 · · Score: 0, Troll

      For those of you who don't know what Aspherger Syndrome is, http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Asp erger's_Syndrome Is a good Wiki article to help you out.

      --
      -ubuntu others as you would have others ubuntu you.
    4. Re:but seriously folks... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's a made up "disease" to medicalize personality traits that they want to beat out of society, i.e. it's a device to make non-nerds feel better about themselves.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:but seriously folks... by dick+johnson · · Score: 1

      I think you can say this only because you've never met someone who actually has the disease.

      It always amazes me how cruel and simplistic people can be when an idea they don't like surfaces.

      Nothing is black and white. Would you claim autism doesn't exist? If not, then why can't someone suffer from what some have called a mild form of autism?

      --
      - dj
    6. Re:but seriously folks... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Sure, mild autism can exist. When 76% of kuro5hin says they have Aspergers, the diagnostic criteria are WAY too broad.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:but seriously folks... by dick+johnson · · Score: 1

      Where exactly do you get your statistics?

      Do you know anyone who has been diagnosed with AS?

      If not, how can you claim such a number?

      In any event, I'd love to see a publication where someone claims 76 percent of the population has AS.

      --
      - dj
    8. Re:but seriously folks... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It was a poll on kuro5hin.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:but seriously folks... by dick+johnson · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right?

      A web poll is your source for your statistics?

      Well, that would explain your misunderstanding of the disease.

      --
      - dj
    10. Re:but seriously folks... by dick+johnson · · Score: 1

      I should have added that there is a reason Doctors and pyschiatrists are required to spend years and years in medical school.

      Just because someone reads a simple summary of the disease and sees themselves in that summary, it doesn't mean they actually have the disease.

      Actually, such people may have a medical condiation known as hypochondrism.

      Just because a majority of these hypochondriacs see themselves in that summary, doesn't mean the disease itself doesn't exist. (or in your words is a 'made up' disease.)

      --
      - dj
    11. Re:but seriously folks... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I said it was a web poll all along.

      You must not understand how kids get diagnosed with mental disorders. Their parents say they have it, and the doctor goes along with it. Who is the doctor to say the kid doesn't have the symptoms? The parent is around the kid a whole lot more.

      So you can see how a "disorder" that have diagnostic criteria so broad that 76% of the people polled (yes, in an unscientific web poll) say they have it, can cause a huge damage to society, and can represent a major threat to the geek/nerd way of life.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:but seriously folks... by dick+johnson · · Score: 1

      Actually, I do know a little something about how kids get diagnosed. The norm isn't even close to what you discribe.

      --
      - dj
  112. Behind the forehead? by kkovach · · Score: 0

    "All the subjects understood the sarcasm except for those with damage to the prefrontal area, which is above the eye sockets and behind the forehead."

    As opposed to the part of my brain in front of my forehead?

    - Kevin

    --
    The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
  113. You mean the ones who go on a murderous rampage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    over a bogus story about the Quran being flushed down the toilet?

  114. Re:Sarchastity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sarchastity: The gulf between a slashdot poster and members of the opposite sex.

  115. Brain areas explained by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

    Just to translate some of the neuro-lingo in the article:

    The article did a good job of describing where the prefrontal cortex is: it is the very front of your frontal lobes (like the author said, just behind your forehead).

    ventromedial area: Ventro - down; medial - middle.

    So, this is damage to the area (near the split between the two hemipsheres - the interhemipheric fissure) at the bottom of the front part of the frontal lobes. (Was that confusing enough?)

    This area is easily damaged in any head trauma situations so there are going to be a lot of people with damage to this area of the brain. I guess I'm going to have to get a new sense of humor.

    1. Re:Brain areas explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... the bottom of the front part of the frontal lobes.

      But I've prodded that area with my finger thousands of times without any damage.

  116. Aspberger by 3770 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was an interview with Bram Cohen a little while back. It talked a lot about Aspbergers syndrome which is similar to autism.

    One of the problems the afflicted have is that they don't understand the sarcams of a sentence such as when the teacher asks "did the dog eat your homework". This was a literal example from that article.

    So, I wonder what this discovery will mean for people with autism and Aspbergers?

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  117. Aha!! by jdehnert · · Score: 2, Funny

    And my wife was always saying I was missing a part of my brain!!

    In your FACE honey!!

    --
    Eschew Obfuscation
  118. This just in by TLouden · · Score: 2, Funny

    researchers have located a crucial difference between men and women. It has to do with the size of one particular area of the brain...

    --
    -Tim Louden
  119. Re:Philippinos apparently lack... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

    And your comment is evidence that all sci.math readers are racist morons. Not to stereotype or anything.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  120. Re:Comic book guy might have something to say on t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the first person to make THAT joke.

  121. Egads by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    They've found me. I knew it would happen eventually. Time for me to make the decent down into the spleen of every human earth creature.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  122. hehe by Deternal · · Score: 1

    I guess they checked on european and one american first to see which spot the american had that was black - sorry, but you americans too often don't get it when europeans make sarcastic remarks.

    PS: WTF is up with the code thingy - if you are not logged in I could understand it, but for when you are logged in?!?

  123. Oh they really should test the UK police. by salparadyse · · Score: 1

    They must have super developed sarcasm lobes/glands/whatever it is you call bits of brain.

  124. Researchers Pinpoint Brain's Sarcasm Sensor by was698002 · · Score: 1

    This isn't exactly a medical breakthrough. The pre-frontal area has long been known to control higher functions - judgement, abstraction - of which sarcasm is a subset. The interpretation of proverbs is a standard test for its being intact. Unfortunately, this system succumbs to toxic influences before the motor system so that anoxic pilots fly into mountains and drunk drivers crash cars.

  125. Great Article by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

    The article itself had the best sarcastic comment in it at the end.

    To learn more about how the brain works, visit www.howstuffworks.com.

  126. FINALLY! by My_$0.02 · · Score: 1

    me and my wife can actually communicate!!

  127. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's not being sarcastic!!

  128. Re:This explains humorless religious fanatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, cause we all know it's Catholics that are religious fanatics, not those other Christian denomonations.

  129. Presenting a Cure for the Humor Impared by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    We now know what part of the brain processes for this. All we need is an appropriate pill or stem cell based treatment engineered just for you.

    Of course, we'll need a cure for those blessed with a double dose of the appropriate gene or mutation. This will have an interesting effect on politics. Advertising on TV, spam, and other venues could be entertaining..

    Are you humor impaired? Do you need a bigger laugh muscle? Get help today!

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Presenting a Cure for the Humor Impared by BLAMM! · · Score: 1

      Yes, we now know what part of the brain handles sarcasm...
      All the subjects understood the sarcasm except for those with damage to the prefrontal area, which is above the eye sockets and behind the forehead.

      As opposed to above the eyes and *in front* of the forehead. I wonder what part of the brain that is?

    2. Re:Presenting a Cure for the Humor Impared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to above the eyes and *in front* of the forehead. I wonder what part of the brain that is?

      The only one most people seem to be using.

  130. finally we get e-sarcasm! by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    Think about it... the ability to wire in a sarcasm trigger to our brains, letting people truly indicate the grade of smartassedness they intended their communique to have. This is a GREAT discovery.

    1. Re:finally we get e-sarcasm! by elmo13 · · Score: 1

      I made this ages ago: http://spran.co.uk/d/sarcasm

  131. Next thing you know... by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know, scientists will be telling us they found the part of the brain responsible for intelligence! Or is there such a thing?

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

  132. What *Insightful* research.... by psychgeek · · Score: 1

    Yeah right, we didn't know the VENTROMEDIAL PRE-FRONTAL CORTEX could have something to do with the subtleties of how we perceive social interactions. I mean really, good work re-confirming results, but this is news????? Of course, given the sterling track record and sound scientific knowledge that most journalists posess, it is likely that the article is a comprehensive and accurate summary we can draw such a conclusion from.... NOT!

  133. slashdot is a really great forum by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    and you are all so intelligent....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:slashdot is a really great forum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment was posted using a government funded wireless connection on a computer bought off of my monthly welfare check. I don't acutally work, I get an unemployment check too.

      Are you proud of me?

  134. region of sarcasm found..... finally ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's about time.

    Now, is there a medication for those who don't understand sarcasm (which obviously means those who don't understand sarcasm are brain damaged...)?

    Like, so we all can enjoy these ROI calculations published by that major software vendor (vendor, not creator, keep that in mind). I heard coolaid might help too.... understanding sarcasm (i.e. these ROI calculations that show how expensive Linux really is). Is this what I think this is about? Are there lobe prosthetics available? (like, coolaid implants....?)

  135. failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I say when sarcasm fails to be detected as such, it's usually the speaker's fault. Why? Becuase the thought process going through the listener's head in an instant is something like this:
    1 - Hmmm - that statement seemed like a really dumb thing to say, in direct contradiction of reality.
    2 - I wonder why this person would say something so at odds with the truth?
    3 - It could be because he literally believes it and is just dumb or delusional, or it could be because he knows better and is trying to make a joke.
    4 - If I respect the speaker's intelligence, then I realize it's not serious, and thus a joke.
    5 - If I do not respect the speaker's intelligence, then I still think he seriously meant the dumb thing he said.

    So the problem is that if I fail to see sarcasm, it's because I don't have reason to respect the speaker's intelligence.

    This is why sarcasm doesn't work online, by the way - the speaker is a stranger to you and so you don't know he's smart enough not to believe something dumb, and so step 4 up above doesn't trigger.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    1. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      That would explain why most people think I'm dumb.

      That's awesome!

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      This is why sarcasm doesn't work online, by the way - the speaker is a stranger to you and so you don't know he's smart enough not to believe something dumb, and so step 4 up above doesn't trigger.

      And that would especially explain why sarcasm doesn't work well on slashdot.

      Hey, come on.. don't mod me down. I was being sarcastic--I swear!

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    3. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why sarcasm doesn't work online, by the way - the speaker is a stranger to you and so you don't know he's smart enough not to believe something dumb, and so step 4 up above doesn't trigger.

      I think it has more to do with the lack of tone of voice. When someone is being sarcastic, they usually modulate their tone of voice. It's this exaggerated ephasis and change in tone that tips you off that the person is not being literal. Text all looks the same, so you don't get those tonal clues. There's highlighting and italics (see most posts this article) but unless you know they are supposed to be read sarcasticly, they can be hard to interpret.

      That said, there is also deadpan sarcasm. (Think Colonel Peacock on "Are you being served".) In those cases, I think your process is probably correct. We know C.P. is not dumb, so when he says something foolish, he's doing so to make the recipient of the comment appear to be an imbicile.

      Either way, it's the speakers fault for not making it clear. (It's *always* the speakers' fault for not being understood correctly by their intended audience.)

    4. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      This is why sarcasm doesn't work online, by the way - the speaker is a stranger to you and so you don't know he's smart enough not to believe something dumb, and so step 4 up above doesn't trigger.

      Sorry to burst your theory, but I don't know the level of intelligence of any slashdotter, and I laugh at sarcastic remarks here constantly. It has nothing to do with whether or not you know or care about someone's intelligence, only whether or not they are (a) able to convey sarcasm properly, and/or (b) you are ready to receive it.

      When sarcasm fails online, it is because sarcasm is often missed in print. Either the person writing the sarcastic remark has to write well, or the person reading the sarcastic remark has to be in a "sarcastic frame of mind."

      Contrast this to sarcasm spoken aloud, where the inflection, tone of voice, pauses in deliverance, etc. help frame the remark as being sarcastic.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    5. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by peachpuff · · Score: 1
      "So the problem is that if I fail to see sarcasm, it's because I don't have reason to respect the speaker's intelligence."

      Of course. Why would anyone think that the person who doesn't understand is the dumb one?

      --
      -- . . ramblin' . . .
    6. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarcasm is not a joke, son. Ironic, eh?

    7. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes it actually goes like this:
      1 - Hmmm - that statement seemed like a really dumb thing to say, in direct contradiction of reality.
      2 - The speaker is relatively intelligent, why would he say such a thing?
      3 - Who do I trust? The speaker, who I know isn't dumb and is usually right, or my common sense?
      4 - My common sense is usually wrong, and I know that so I will believe the speaker despite the absurdity of his claim.

    8. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by teidou · · Score: 1

      So the problem is that if I fail to see sarcasm, it's because I don't have reason to respect the speaker's intelligence.

      Good point - this may be why sarcasm that can work so well in personal conversations fails when addressing larger groups.

      But your assessment seems to imply that sarcasm is an indirect way of fishing for compliments.

      I think there's another important component: my decisions to use sarcasm in conversation frequently follow an assessment of the recipient's ability to appreciate it.

      In that context, sarcasm may be percieved as a validation of the recipient's intelligence.

      teidou

      No, this post isn't meant to be ironic.

    9. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >where the inflection, tone of voice, pauses in deliverance, etc. help frame the remark as being sarcastic.

      No, sorry, that's sarcasm for dummies, also known as sneering 101. By the way, are you American?

    10. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >No, this post isn't meant to be ironic.

      Don't worry.

    11. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by superflippy · · Score: 1

      So the problem is that if I fail to see sarcasm, it's because I don't have reason to respect the speaker's intelligence.

      This is a pretty good explanation for something I've observed in my own life. I'll occasionally meet total strangers who will answer an honest question of mine ("Is this the way to the auditorium?") with what I guess is an attempt at sarcasm ("Sorry, the auditorium is flooded and the lecture's been canceled."). I'm only guessing that it's attempted sarcasm because these statements are always said with a wink and guffaw implied, like the guy expects me to giggle and flirt with him because he's SO FUNNY.

      But he's not funny, he's unhelpful, so I pretend to take him literally ("Oh, that's too bad." *Turns around and walks away*) and he says he was just kidding and gives me the information I was asking for in the first place. Then I'll say, "Sorry, I don't have a sense of humor in the morning/afternoon/evening."

      I keep running into variations on Trying To Be Funny Guy, often enough that I've sometimes wondered if my sense of humor really is deficient. But now I prefer to believe what Dunbar says: it's not me, it's them.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    12. Re:failed sarcasm = speaker's fault, not listener by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      No, it's becuase there really do exist actual dumb people. People dumb enough to say something that sounds sarcastic, but they really meant it. I have trouble detecting sarcasm of fundamentalists for this reason. Sarcasm doesn't look ant sillier than the real thing, when the real thing includes such stuff as Jack Chick (www.chick.com).

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  136. Please tell me... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    ...you've not heard of Janeane Garofalo or Daria.

    Side note: Damn, that "confirm you're not a script" thingy was put on quick. I too hate stupid offtopic-script bastards.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    1. Re:Please tell me... by LithiumX · · Score: 1

      ...you've not heard of Janeane Garofalo or Daria.

      I think you're confusing "sarcasm" with "bitterness".

      --
      Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
  137. Actual Location... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is right next to the brain area responsible for alerting you when *not* to fart whenever you have diarrhea.

  138. Sarcasm? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    From the summay:
    I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful.

    Oh, really?

    *DUCKS*

  139. It's dripping... by glenebob · · Score: 1

    That entire article just drips, doesn't it?

  140. This superb research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a lot of yada-yada.
    The concept of having a certain part in the brain responsible for identifying sarcasm is ridiculus.

    A sarcastic remark is simply a false statement that draws its humor from the reason it's false.

    A normal brain encountering a statement, any statement, will evaluate its accuracy using logic and relevant knowledge. Here's a sarcastic remark sample taken from another comment: "What a really useful discovery". Reading this statement will make you think - is that really a useful discovery? Realizing it totally isn't allows you to grasp the sarcasm in this statement.

    So if you're looking for the part in the brain responsible for indentifying sarcasm, try the logic unit.
    Of course, it's quite possible that in the researchers' case it works quite differently, because this research indicates the absense of their logical unit.

  141. Re:Philippinos apparently lack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And your comment is evidence that all sci.math readers are racist morons.

    His statement might be true without having anything to do with race. It's more likely to be a simple matter of culture. Consider the typical white American, descended from racially identical Europeans, yet completely unable to recognize sarcasm, parody, self-deprecating humor, etc. without a flashing neon sign to point it out.

  142. Sarcasm trips up Google's ad-server by DanceBee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a nut even the collective mind of Google has been unable to crack: Machine recognition of sarcasm.

    Take a look at the Huh? Corp site, and notice the counterpoint between the devilishly satirical site content and the dead-serious Google ads.

    One cannot underestimate the serious menace posed to contextual ad networks by the unregulated use of sarcasm by ad-network partner sites.

    As soon as I finish typing up this comment I plan to file for a provisional patent on "An Automated Method of Determining Sarcasm Content by Using a Naive Baysian Classifier Trained on Slashdot Comments."

    1. Re:Sarcasm trips up Google's ad-server by Dharma's+Dad · · Score: 1
      ...and the dead-serious Google ads.

      OR, maybe those are all just put there because they appear sarcastic in that context =]

      QUICK, to the hospital for a brain scan!

    2. Re:Sarcasm trips up Google's ad-server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wavelets will give better result than Naive-Bayes. Singular Value Decomposition is also not a bad idea if you can live with the space-time complexity.

    3. Re:Sarcasm trips up Google's ad-server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm completely sold on Huh?Corp. I heard they use Macs also --- I bow to their eKnowledge. I am not worthy.

    4. Re:Sarcasm trips up Google's ad-server by Jakeypants · · Score: 1

      As soon as I finish typing up this comment I plan to file for a provisional patent on "An Automated Method of Determining Sarcasm Content by Using a Naive Baysian Classifier Trained on Slashdot Comments."

      Wow, that's a really great idea.

  143. Re:You mean the ones who go on a murderous rampage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quiet, you. There's no elephant in the room.

  144. "A sarcasm detector... by CultFigure · · Score: 1

    now, that's really useful!"
    --Comic book guy, Simpsons

  145. Holy crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you can give someone a sarcasm-ectomy!

  146. Is the reverse true by manganese4 · · Score: 1

    Do people with the brain damage have trouble making sarcastic comments or do they simply give literal statements all the time?

    --
    I make my face look like this and concerned words come out.
  147. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Often times the British confuse bad jokes with saracasm and assume that because we aren't laughing that the American sense of humor lacks subtlety.

    BRILLIANT parody of a guy who doesn't have a sense of humor, and doesn't know it.

  148. wait for it ... by Rev.LoveJoy · · Score: 1
    They'll get better once editors post a dupe of this article...

    -- RLJ

  149. In a related note... by Servo · · Score: 1

    Researchers have named the center of the brain responsible for sarcasm detection the "Slashdot region". Often confused with the "Troll region" which is reponsible for detecting morons.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  150. People with brain damage... by dourk · · Score: 1

    ...don't get jokes. Astounding.

    --
    Wake up.
  151. Effect on gullibility by kevlar · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this also means that people deficient in this area are considered gullible. I for one have suffered from gullibility my whole life. So much so that I think I qualify as being 'socially retarded'.

    The ironic thing is that I'm not even being sarcastic here...

  152. isnt that by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

    what the tag is for?

    --
    By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
  153. Me tooo!!1!one!! by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    I participate in Slashdot forums because all the moderators love me; so much, they put the muslim Burka moderation on all my posts; My thoughts must put to print must be art, because all of you are obviously not worthy to see them.

    --
    without prejudice
  154. Re:Philippinos apparently lack... by gzunk · · Score: 1

    OK, you say a statement ("proved Fermat's Last Theorem") which in context ("He claimed to have") you give the impression that you think it's false,
    then you tie an additional statement ("he also believes that 0.999 recurring is less than 1") which implies that you believe that the second statement is false.

    Now I don't get this. 0.999 recurring IS less than 1. It never reaches 1. As the number of digits goes to infinity it approaches 1, but it never gets there. It is always less than 1.

  155. sarcasm detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, if we could only have a Beowul...[schmack!]

  156. redundancy detection by happyclam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What we need now is scientists to figure out why it is that so many /. posters post exactly the same thing... and they all get modded up to +5 funny. Although it is really funny to read "A scarcasm detector! Now that's REAL useful!" twenty-three times.

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    1. Re:redundancy detection by robfoo · · Score: 1

      Ah crap. I just posted along similar lines, further up the page.
      Now I'm redundant, too.

      And I don't actually think a sarcasm detector would be all that useful, when you think about it.

  157. Sarcasm by Mozk · · Score: 1

    Finding the sarcasm detector, yeah that's REAL helpful.

    --
    No existe.
  158. "the protest of people who are weak" by CheeseTroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was a pretty sarcastic kid until I read that line in "A Separate Peace." It really made me stop and realize that while sarcasm is great for an occasional bit of humor, but it's a sad excuse for saying something worthwhile.

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  159. old news by Muhammar · · Score: 1

    Anyone who worked for a large corporation can tell you just that: People with lobotomy are not funny.

    (Some of them are scary, too. When you hear "de-emphasize, bottleneck, go-nogo and cutting-edge" you run: it means that some zombies got "outside the box" and are looking for victims to infect.)

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  160. Norman, Co-ordinate by tekrat · · Score: 4, Funny

    If everything you say is insightful and you are saying you are insightful, then you are funny, but if everything you say is insightful, then you are being funny, but insightful... help help, Norman, Co-ordinate!!!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  161. males don't get welfare in America by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    unless they have small children; then they get a little. So blow it out your ass, moron....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  162. Re:Philippinos apparently lack... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
    x=0.9999...
    So 10x = 9.9999....
    So 10x-x=9
    So x = 1

    The sequence 0.9, 0.99, 0.999 never reaches 1. You're quite right to say that. But the definition of 'recurring' says that 0.999... recurring isn't any of the numbers in the sequence but the limit. And the limit is 1, even though the sequence never gets there.

    The idea with limits is that the limit is the number that your sequence gets arbitrarily close to. Not reaches, but gets arbitrarily close to. That sequence gets as close as you like to 1. Choose a closeness and I'll find a number of the form 0.999...999 (finite # of 9's) that is closer. So by definition 1 is the limit. I'm glossing over some details here of course. Margins not being big enough 'n' all that...

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  163. Brain damaged? by Luthair · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, were you one of the subjects?

  164. Is there a perl module.. by Pleb'a.nz · · Score: 1

    to handle sarcasm ?

  165. Hmm... by Luthair · · Score: 1

    maybe it was me.

  166. sarcasm in other languages by illuminatedwax · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sarcasm is more than just a function in the brain - some languages use it very little, if at all. The Japanese, for instance, almost NEVER use sarcasm. I have a friend who taught English there that tried to teach his students sarcasm - and it really failed because some of the students just didn't understand it.

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    1. Re:sarcasm in other languages by MochaMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm... I live in Japan, and my primary language at home is Japanese. I'm not sure why your friend would have missed this, but the Japanese use both sarcasm and irony in their humour. Could be that in an English class they're speaking a language they're unfamiliar with and less likely to make funny comments. In a classroom environment it might be that students are apt to take their teachers literally far more than their friends.

      I suspect most people are also less likely to use sarcasm with someone they're not good friends with, as it's usually intended as a humorous jab at a dumb idea, and people usually tend not to point these kinds of things out to people they aren't good friends with.

      Anyway, I suspect if your friend had brought a keg of beer to class and his students relaxed a bit, he'd have seen some sarcasm.

    2. Re:sarcasm in other languages by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1

      I should also point out that they were middle-school students. I would also tend to believe that certain very basic forms of sarcasm are very obvious and quite universal, but the fact is that British people tend to use more sarcasm than their American counterparts.

      Also, it wasn't that the students never said anything funny, they apparently (according to the story) didn't quite seem to understand the concept. He had sat them down and developed a lesson where they practiced using sarcasm, and apparently many of them didn't get the lesson. Now, perhaps he's just a bad teacher, or maybe it just isn't as prevalent among Japanese.

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    3. Re:sarcasm in other languages by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      Now, perhaps he's just a bad teacher, or maybe it just isn't as prevalent among Japanese.

      You never know, but both I and my Japanese friends use sarcasm amongst ourselves constantly. Of course, I'm ignoring that perhaps, as a rather sarcastic Canadian, they picked this nasty habit up from me...

      That said, I'll leave you with some Rick Mercer.

    4. Re:sarcasm in other languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rick Mercer

      omfg, I almost died: Mattresses on sale this week!.

  167. Re:This explains humorless religious fanatics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, those nutty Protestant Christians... Always flying planes into buildings and stabbing Dutch filmmakers who criticize the way they treat women...

  168. ~ the online sarcasm character by AltRN82 · · Score: 1

    So many people complain that e-mail or im messages can not communicate the intent of certain messages. The most important in my circle of friends was sarcasm so I came up with a solution. Much like emoting actions with * I created ~ for sarcasm.

    So if you wanted to say "Nice idea" sarcastically just say ~Nice idea~

    I offer this up as a possible solution to solve our electronic sarcasm communications problem.

    Let the ~ comments to this post fly!

    1. Re:~ the online sarcasm character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ~Wow. That is a great idea.~

  169. Wowsa! Now we have a tool for identifying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a specific cause of that terrible affliction suffered by the humorless. This puts the medical profession in a position to label folks with yet another handicap and gives the drug companies another target in their neverending quest to fix everything for a few bucks.

    Get ready for the tax increases...

  170. Re:Philippinos apparently lack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As every kid should know, 0,(9)=1, just as 0,(3)=1/3. We're talking about infinite number of digits, not just approaching infinity.

    Proof one:
    x=0,(9)
    10x=9,(9)
    9x=9
    x=1

    Proof two:
    a(x)=9*0.1^x for natural x (a(x) is a geometric sequence).
    0.(9)=(sum a(x) for x=1 to inf)
    As we all know,
    (sum a*b^x for x=1 to n)=(a*b) (1-b^n)/(1-b)
    So,
    (sum a(x) for x=1 to inf)=lim n->inf (0.9 (1-0.1^n)/(1-0.1))=0.9 / 0.9=1

    Unless you were just joking...

  171. $ find /dev -empty brain by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    oops...

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  172. Sure they did. by atomicthumbs · · Score: 1

    RIGHT.

    --
    http://pinopsida.com
  173. A most excellent story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Slashdot for broadening my mind with this excellent story. I can really see it takes hard work to cull Google News for such intelligent stories as this one. Must have taken forever.

  174. Brain damaged people in a theater? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Of course a study with around 25 brain damaged people watching movies is a perfect reason to make phrenological claims.

    In other news, Star Wars Episode III opens in theaters. But I'm sure the timing is coincidental.

    Sadly, I'm not sure if the above was sarcasm, having lost the ability to distinguish after witnessing Hayden Christensen's acting.

    1. Re:Brain damaged people in a theater? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Tere was acting in Episode III?

      I think I must have seen a different movie.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Brain damaged people in a theater? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      Tere was acting in Episode III? I think I must have seen a different movie.

      Thank $DEITY if you did.

    3. Re:Brain damaged people in a theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank who?

    4. Re:Brain damaged people in a theater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not acting as such.

  175. Much better quote... by Skater · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lyndsey Nagle: Do I detect a note of sarcasm?

    Frink: (With sarcasm detector) Are you kidding? This baby is off the charts mm-hai.

    CBG: A sarcasm detector, that's a _real_ useful invention.

    (Sarcasm detector explodes)

    http://www.snpp.com/guides/cbg.file.html#6

  176. Fantastic! by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

    We have already been able to use eye surgery to get rid of glasses for a long time and soon we will finally also be able to get rid of the Sarcasm detectors with a bit brain surgery.

    --
    My other account has a 3-digit UID.
  177. That mod was an idiot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the guy you're replying too, that's exactly the type of response I was hoping for. LOL. Excellent. Hope I find that mods arse in meta...

  178. Bonestorm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This new familiarity with sarcasm doesn't change anything. Ninety-nine cents is still the rental price.

  179. Whatta trol!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    give the man a hand! He is the *lifeblood* of slashdot, working tirelessly for YOU.

  180. I'm usually very sarcastic.... by borgheron · · Score: 1

    However, I'm oddly at a loss for words given all of these wonderfully insightful postings. ;)

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  181. Proving That Not All Brains Have This Circuitry by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    "I'm sure the comments on this story will be incredibly insightful."

    This circuitry must be right next to the part of the brain that governs the ability to get a date.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  182. So do why do all posters to slashdot ... by quax · · Score: 1

    ... <SARCASM> have this particular disorder so that you have to metatag anything approaching humor </SARCASM>?

    1. Re: So do why do all posters to slashdot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, regardless of your metatags, I don't think that was funny.

  183. Another brilliant breakthrough for neurology. by Hosiah · · Score: 1

    Your tax dollars hard at work.

  184. "Pinpoint"? As if... by zbik · · Score: 1
    the brain's cortex handles a variety of sophisticated tasks, and sarcasm could be on the list.

    Great, so it's "pinpointed" to that whole area which "handles a variety of sophisticated tasks." It's somewhere, anywhere in the prefrontal brain, with a possible correlation to the "ventromedial" region -- which itself is involved in everything from feeling full after a meal to female copulatory behavior. Gee, Mr. Wizard, you've nailed this one right on the head. You really got sarcasm's home phone number. Obviously our work here is done. We know ever so much more about this sarcasm phenomenon than before. Thank you Neuroscience and God bless Slashdot.

  185. Forte by craXORjack · · Score: 1

    I trust, Sir, that your mastery of English grammar is surpassed only by your proficiency at phonetics.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  186. RFC- sarcasm recognition protocol by hairyface · · Score: 2, Funny

    I suggest we institute a sarcasm recognition protocol for the sarcasm-challenged amongst us. During non-elctronic communication this could be a sharp slap in the face. To avoid confusion in situations where a slap in the face would have been natural anyway, we insist that in such situations, the slap be followed by a kick in the bollocks. To avoid confusion in situations where a kick in the bollocks, preceeded by a slap in the face would have been natural, anyway, we suggest that this specific procedure be avoided, except in communications with a sarcasm-challenged person. During electronic communications, if the speaker suspects a sarcasm-challenged listener, he can either verbally shout, "SLAP, BALL-KICK" followed by his sarcastic communication, followed by "FINISH SLAP AND FINISH BALL-KICK", or in written messages substitue a written version. To avoid situations where it would have been natural to write/shout the above in a non-sarcastic context, we suggest that communications which require the use of these words in a non-sarcastic context be avoided. In the unlikely event that any females read slashdot, and find this protocol sexist, all occurrences of "bollocks" above can be replaced by "groin". Likewise, "ball-kick" can be replaced with "groin-kick".

  187. Enjoyment != Talent by vector_prime · · Score: 1

    Speaking as someone with Asperger's, sarcasm is often very difficult. Word games (rhymes, alliteration, etc.) allow us to play with the intricacies and quirks of a complex system, the English Language. Sarcasm, though, relies largely on verbal and behavioral cues and, as such, is really just about as difficult for us to pick up in conversation as they are for the average person to notice in written text. It's fun, when you get it, and easy enough to use, but it flies over my head as often as not.

  188. this explains a lot by dwntwnboi · · Score: 1

    yeah, i've had a brain injury in the prefrontal region of my brain from a near-drowning accident as a kid... i thought i just "didn't get it". very frustrating not always being able to tell when people are beign serious or not(there's not always enough contextual clues to be certain), i must say, but if there's an actual reason i don't get it as easily (i do get it eventually, but it's more difficult than for most, it seems), then that answers that.

    kinda sucks, though.

  189. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  190. Did anyone else read it as... by enginuitor · · Score: 1

    Scientists pimp out Brian's sardine scanner?

    ...Nobody?
    Well, it was worth a shot...

  191. For those of you who didn't get it... by tgv · · Score: 1

    The researchers did not find the part of the brain responsible for detecting sarcasm, and I'm not being sarcastic. What they did (claim to) find is that some part of the brain (roughly speaking the upper part from right above your eyes until the nearly the center of your skull) is needed to detect sarcasm. There might be some "methodological" issues with their study (if even one of their patients did get some of the sarcasm, the indicated area is obviously not uniquely responsible, not all types of brain damage can be compared, "pre-frontal" is quite a big area, etc.), but the main point to understand is that they did not find a sarcasm center.

    For a simple analogy, think what would happen if you compared the lights on cars with damage somewhere in the engine compartment and cars that are undamaged. You will find that the lights of the damaged cars are more often broken than those of the undamaged cars. But that does not mean the main function of the engine compartment is lighting, it is just related and perhaps necessary.

  192. Not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fits

    http://www.nichtlustig.de/toondb/050512.html

    (unfortunatly not in english)

  193. Sher! Right; by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    Oh I'm so sure that they have found it. No really I am.

    Isn't it located near David Bedeals house?

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  194. I'm not sarcassssssstic !!! by Arthur+B. · · Score: 0

    This is hoow I taaalk.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  195. Does this mean... by iLuke · · Score: 1

    Finally, we can explain CmdrTaco's existance!

    --

    ---
    Luke
    Luke Wertz Website

  196. Are you ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, parent's post is pretty insightful -- if you encounter a person with a prefrontal cortex lesion , the *last* thing you'll notice about their condition is their inability to understand sarcasm.

    Are you Implying that Americans are brain damaged or something ? Don't know you know Americans are renowned around world for their mastery of sarcasm.

    inappropriate social behavior (e.g., use of obscene language, urinating in public)

    and people with prefrontal cortex lesions are among the most difficult patients to interact with on a daily basis.

    So dont!

  197. The lowest form of wit by Bazzalisk · · Score: 1

    A section of the brain which is clearly overdeveloped amongst the English and underdeveloped amongst Americans. I mean it's not like ever second thing I say is sarcastic.

    --
    James P. Barrett
  198. How much faster... by TheKnave · · Score: 1

    would they have found this if they hadn't been testing yanks?!?! ;p

  199. How's this for sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice to meet you.

  200. Easy to find by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    Why, it's right next to the bullshit sensor :)

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!