Slashdot Mirror


User: Kalriath

Kalriath's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,654
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,654

  1. Re:This is M$ double speak for "Finding Free Sofwa on Microsoft Unveils Open Source Exploit Finder · · Score: 1

    I don't think you can lay the "twitterism" on too thick. He's pretty "thick" as it is (and I am not referring to his intelligence, merely that I don't think you can get any more twitter-like than he is)

  2. Re:This is M$ double speak for "Finding Free Sofwa on Microsoft Unveils Open Source Exploit Finder · · Score: 1

    You know, that argument has always annoyed me.

    You say that because you've never seen a virus or trojan on your PC, it's just because you didn't detect it.

    Why does this particular perspective only apply to Windows? Why is it never said that if you've never seen a virus or trojan on Linux that it's because you never detected it?

    (Actually, quite amusingly, the comment below me says exactly that. Go him or her!)

  3. Re:This is M$ double speak for "Finding Free Sofwa on Microsoft Unveils Open Source Exploit Finder · · Score: 1

    No, it's twitter. He always does that.

    You probably wont believe this, but he posts anonymously because Anonymous Coward has a starting score (0) higher than all of his 15-20 other Slashdot accounts.

    Personally, I strongly disagree with the whole FLOSS vs Commercial debate (I also disagree with describing FLOSS as "free", but that's another story and mostly related to my pedantic usage of proper English). If something that's "free-libre" happens to do the job you want it for better than commercial alternatives, do it. If something commercial is better, use that.

    Why don't the zealots just let us use whatever the fuck we want? I happen to like Windows. I also like Mac OS. Hell, I even like Linux. Of course, because I said I happen to like Windows, people like twitter would have you believe that I am paid by Microsoft. Hell, I wish I were - they'd pay more than my real employer.

  4. Re:Open Source?! Wait for it... on Microsoft Unveils Open Source Exploit Finder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Microsoft really wanted to release source in a way that is useful for the community, then they would be compatible with the GPL or would simply use the unmodified GPL.

    Oh bullshit. Something doesn't have to be GPL to be useful for the community - take FreeBSD for instance. Demons, GPL zealots are as bad as Apple zealots!

  5. Re:Good Old days on Universal Remote's Days Are Numbered · · Score: 1

    You know, they still make phones for luddites. Try looking.

  6. Re:Harmony remotes on Universal Remote's Days Are Numbered · · Score: 2, Informative

    It would suck, because the IR port on a standard "smartphone" is just too weak and focused. The Harmony Remote works because it's equipped with the equivalent of IR "blasters" - it fires extremely powerful IR bursts in every direction that remotely resembles "in front of the remote".

  7. Re:QuestHelper on Blizzard Asserts Rights Over Independent Add-Ons · · Score: 1

    Oh I'm well aware of that... but the antics of the Three Big Addon Sites are pretty sleazy anyway - the chances of getting them to remove your stuff based on their past performance is near impossible.

  8. Re:Three Words on Blizzard Asserts Rights Over Independent Add-Ons · · Score: 1

    One word: irrelevant.

  9. Re:Don't like it on Blizzard Asserts Rights Over Independent Add-Ons · · Score: 1

    You can't remove your content from those sites - they have a bad habit of occasionally looking around to find new addons and adding them to your site themselves. If you complain about it, then screw you.

  10. Re:QuestHelper on Blizzard Asserts Rights Over Independent Add-Ons · · Score: 1

    So DMCA Curse Gaming to remove your stuff ;)

  11. Re:This is rediculous on Blizzard Asserts Rights Over Independent Add-Ons · · Score: 2, Informative

    You know, I don't think they'll be putting ads in World of Warcraft any time soon. The games on the Battle.net platform which they don't field a monthly subscription from (Starcraft II, etc) are the candidates for this.

  12. Re:Misdirection on Ballmer Scorns Apple As a $500 Logo · · Score: 1

    Uh, Dude? EULAs were tested in court, and upheld.

    Thanks Blizzard.

  13. Re:Hardly surprising... on Ballmer Scorns Apple As a $500 Logo · · Score: 1

    Actually, Vista and later are able to support EFI already. I'm not sure whether XP or Vista was the first to support the new GUID Partition Tables as well which are slowly replacing MBRs.

  14. Re:It seems ironic... on Ballmer Scorns Apple As a $500 Logo · · Score: 1

    Yes, but HP does that too, really (Touchsmart, I'm looking at you...)

  15. Re:It seems ironic... on Ballmer Scorns Apple As a $500 Logo · · Score: 1

    Actually, Apple has a bad habit of giving you ... you guessed it ... Apple labels with every purchase of anything. Technically, any PC can be Apple labelled just using the stickers they keep giving you.

  16. Re:Expect more such affiliate based scams on Major Rogue Anti-Virus Program Shut Down · · Score: 1

    You mean DirectI the large perfectly legitimate domain name registrar? I think you'll find they're as much a scam as Enom or Godaddy.

    Actually, make that less. Enom and Godaddy don't exactly have pristine reputations.

  17. Re:Is anyone surprised? on Taxpayers Fund AIG Lawsuit Against US · · Score: 1

    From what I read in our local papers, they expect the states will apply a ... say, 10% gross tax on that as well.

    That reduces the bonus to... $0, I think.

  18. Re:Is anyone surprised? on Taxpayers Fund AIG Lawsuit Against US · · Score: 1

    Now, personally, I think this sends the right message - which is if you screw with the federal government, they will in turn, screw you
    far worse.

    You know that if that's the message it sends, then by definition this law is being used to single out a group of individuals right? I don't agree with them getting bonuses, but I certainly don't agree with the government throwing laws, checks and balances to the wind to penalise them for it.

  19. Re:not all that bad on Sony Charges Publishers For DLC Bandwidth Usage · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sounds like Dreamhost or some other equally terrifying overseller.

    You do realise that your host hasn't actually got capacity to deliver you 2.5 terabytes right? If you actually managed to transfer that, they'd mysteriously find some way to terminate your account, because they count on you buying "2.5 terabytes" and using 250 megabytes. If everyone actually used 2.5 terabytes, the host would be bankrupted by the end of month invoice from their upstream provider.

  20. Re:Interesting on Look Out, Firefox 3 — IE8 Is Back On Top For Now · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I meant that you don't need Firebug because the built in tools serve the need quite well, not that you don't need Firebug because you don't need it.

    And you are definitely correct that the barrier to entry is higher - the COM development necessary to scrounge together an IE addin is quite immense, while I imagine XPCOM is much easier.

  21. Re:Total War? on TomTom Sues Microsoft For Patent Infringement · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, Halliburton has the patent on patent trolling.

  22. Re:What the fuck? on Recovery.gov Not Very Transparent · · Score: 1

    Nope. Most web hosts will block that using OPEN_BASEDIR restrictions. You simply can't count on being able to access files outside the web root.

  23. Re:Wait, does this thing browse the internet still on Look Out, Firefox 3 — IE8 Is Back On Top For Now · · Score: 1

    Actually, Windiz Update hasn't had a new update added to it since November 2007, and probably never will again.

  24. Re:64-bit versions much larger on Look Out, Firefox 3 — IE8 Is Back On Top For Now · · Score: 1

    No, it's because the 64 bit version has to install the 32 bit version as well. Possibly in case you get sick of all your browser plugins not working because they're 32 bit.

  25. Re:Download broken on Look Out, Firefox 3 — IE8 Is Back On Top For Now · · Score: 1

    The 64 bit installer installs the 32 bit version as well. Don't ask.

    I assume the reason it wont let you install just the 32 bit version is because that will result in you having a version of Trident that the 64 bit components on your system can't use.