That lot is just audio engineering. It's nothing that is really uniquely provided by the big name record labels. Having said that, you could probably hire a studio to do the recording sessions. I just checked out the Abbey Road website, and it doesn't say anything in the Terms & Conditions [PDF warning] about having be signed to EMI to make a studio booking.
and were able to drive straight through without ever stopping or breaking the speed limit. Not quite sure how your Japanese king cab mini pickup is capable of averaging 90 mph while not breaking speed limits...
Once you clear a certain size, you can't have every decision cross your CEO's desk or they'll get nothing done. I would have though that the CEO is responsible for publishing and implementing corporate policy. This seems to be somewhat related to a corporate policy issue. Confusing your customer base with apparently conflicting business values can't be good for the business in the longer term.
it should be possible for the people to override the government on that specific issue immediately, rather than waiting for another election in several years and voting them out entirely. That's called lobbying...
Sure, computers may be more reliable than people, but people reliant on computers (or calculators) are incapacitated when they don't have their mental prosthetics.
Bullshit. You can see just as much, if not more, through correctly aligned mirrors as looking directly out the windows. More so if you have convex mirrors. Looking out of the side and rear windows (or opening the doors, as some old farts do), is for pansies with no spatial awareness.
Trip Chowdhry of Global Equity Research said he expects a counterbid from SAP, which he said needs BEA to survive. 'If they don't get BEA, probably in two years SAP will be on the block to sell itself, So if Oracle buys BEA, does that set the scene for Oracle/BEA to buy SAP in two year's time?
Does this mean companies need to become an international monopoly in order to survive? My mind boggles at all the corporate takeovers, M&As etc.
Taxes and rebates aren't worth a damn. The only way to resolve the carbon emissions issue is to cap the production of carbon based fuels, allowing increased production only where demonstrated sequestration technologies are concurrently implemented.
The whole Kyoto protocol and emissions trading stuff is fluff and nonsense. Ultimately that system (and any other emissions trading system) relies on the government to set the emissions cap (which can easily be fudged).
It is worth noting that the entire premise of John Howard's claim that Australia will meet it's Kyoto targets (without ratification, notably) is based on 'offsets' due to reduction in the rate of land clearing (when measured against some projected forecasts). Nothing concrete has been done.
'Clean coal', widely touted as the panacea (along with nuclear) is probably decades off widespread implementation. Notably 'clean coal' does not include any form of CO2 sequestration, unlike it's extended technology, carbon capture and storage. CCS is even further off into the future. Unfortunately, the general public has been mislead into believing that 'clean coal' is a greenhouse gas solution, which it is not. They are also misled into believing implementation of these technologies is imminent. Nuclear fusion has had more development that either of these.
As I say, it's all fluff, aimed at lulling the public into accepting status quo.
But all major definitions of God by mainstream religions are logically inconsistent... I don't think the major monotheistic religion definition of God [substitute name of ultimate deity] are inconsistent, as by definition they are the all seeing, omnipotent creater of life, the universe etc.
Having said that, the issue is that God, in fact, is a defined being (which is what I believe is the main purpose of the biblical book Genesis - defining the power of God and His relationship with the creation). So God (or gods) can be as much or as little as you want it to be.
Slashdot Mirror
#REF!
That lot is just audio engineering. It's nothing that is really uniquely provided by the big name record labels. Having said that, you could probably hire a studio to do the recording sessions. I just checked out the Abbey Road website, and it doesn't say anything in the Terms & Conditions [PDF warning] about having be signed to EMI to make a studio booking.
A couple of generatiosn will fix that...
That's a bit lame
Sure, computers may be more reliable than people, but people reliant on computers (or calculators) are incapacitated when they don't have their mental prosthetics.
Bullshit. You can see just as much, if not more, through correctly aligned mirrors as looking directly out the windows. More so if you have convex mirrors. Looking out of the side and rear windows (or opening the doors, as some old farts do), is for pansies with no spatial awareness.
So unremarkable, that you had to leave a remark, eh?
No. You are special.
Meh? I never read those employee training videos.
Does this mean companies need to become an international monopoly in order to survive? My mind boggles at all the corporate takeovers, M&As etc.
Only if the three rights average greater than 60
Taxes and rebates aren't worth a damn. The only way to resolve the carbon emissions issue is to cap the production of carbon based fuels, allowing increased production only where demonstrated sequestration technologies are concurrently implemented.
The whole Kyoto protocol and emissions trading stuff is fluff and nonsense. Ultimately that system (and any other emissions trading system) relies on the government to set the emissions cap (which can easily be fudged).
It is worth noting that the entire premise of John Howard's claim that Australia will meet it's Kyoto targets (without ratification, notably) is based on 'offsets' due to reduction in the rate of land clearing (when measured against some projected forecasts). Nothing concrete has been done.
'Clean coal', widely touted as the panacea (along with nuclear) is probably decades off widespread implementation. Notably 'clean coal' does not include any form of CO2 sequestration, unlike it's extended technology, carbon capture and storage. CCS is even further off into the future. Unfortunately, the general public has been mislead into believing that 'clean coal' is a greenhouse gas solution, which it is not. They are also misled into believing implementation of these technologies is imminent. Nuclear fusion has had more development that either of these.
As I say, it's all fluff, aimed at lulling the public into accepting status quo.
...a wombat is smallish four legged burrowing marsipual which eats bush, roots and leaves. There, corrected that for you.In Australia, the political parties lie, and 733t h4xorz get to tell the truth...
Having said that, the issue is that God, in fact, is a defined being (which is what I believe is the main purpose of the biblical book Genesis - defining the power of God and His relationship with the creation). So God (or gods) can be as much or as little as you want it to be.
Since Jesus apparently had other siblings, why do people still refer to his mother as virgin?
Exactly. They can figure out the interface, but most really don't understand the underlying technology.
It's Allhu Akbar, you imposter.
(A idiomatic translation of which is embossed/printed on all US currency)
Scrotum sacks? How many scrotums (scroti?) do you have if you need a sack for them?