I think the equivalent of an SAE addressed to the manufacturer/vendor of the item. If you want to manufacture the stuff for profit, you should have to bear responsibility for managing the resulting waste streams. How better than to force the waste stream back to the original manufacturer?
If everybody had this attitude, then it would end up as a continuous volley of telephone tennis. You may choose to ring back when it suits yourself, but by that time, it may not be convenient for the original caller to accept your call.
The US might have got rid of cows, but LNG production/use has nowhere near fully ramped up. I'd suspect that there will be significant methane emissions from LNG production/liquifaction/regassification.
Car tyres are used in cement clinker manufacuture. At a plant I did some work at, they have a conveyor that drops whole tyres into the top end of the rotary clinker kiln. The steel belts and beads in the tyres contribute to the iron requirements of the clinker, and of course the rubber is burned for fuel value.
Maybe that could be some screenplay to that effect on Neigbours, Home and Away or whatever crappy teen riddled soap airs in the US.
It'd add some tension to the drama.
I call BS on this comment. Sure you can sell your OSS. You just have to be the best provider of appropriate updates/features, so that any attempt at forking your project is met with failure, or at worst, limited market share.
Just don't overprice your new product/releases/features to the point which would encourage forkers to compete.
Well, all I can say is that's just the a result of the current administration. You know; weak references, spinlocks, indirections, budget overflows, coroutine operations and all. Aside from that, I should remind you that you have to paticipate in democracy. To all you apathetic websurfers out there: If you don't bother clicking, then you shouldn't complain about the sites you end up with...
No real reason why the whole caboose couldn't be sealed and placed under vacuum? It doesn't have to be an extreme (-95kPag) vacuum to be worthwhile, either.
Slashdot Mirror
Are you saying you have patent rights to elephant prophylactics?
I think the equivalent of an SAE addressed to the manufacturer/vendor of the item. If you want to manufacture the stuff for profit, you should have to bear responsibility for managing the resulting waste streams. How better than to force the waste stream back to the original manufacturer?
If everybody had this attitude, then it would end up as a continuous volley of telephone tennis. You may choose to ring back when it suits yourself, but by that time, it may not be convenient for the original caller to accept your call.
Aynayda Pizaqvick and Malexa Kriest [please contact the airport information desk]
I would have though Lara Croft was more 1's and 0's than Paris Hilton.
Is RLS related to morning wood?
The US might have got rid of cows, but LNG production/use has nowhere near fully ramped up. I'd suspect that there will be significant methane emissions from LNG production/liquifaction/regassification.
I'm not looking forward to point 7, where the whole population has to learn to play oversized violins...
Car tyres are used in cement clinker manufacuture. At a plant I did some work at, they have a conveyor that drops whole tyres into the top end of the rotary clinker kiln. The steel belts and beads in the tyres contribute to the iron requirements of the clinker, and of course the rubber is burned for fuel value.
Maybe that could be some screenplay to that effect on Neigbours, Home and Away or whatever crappy teen riddled soap airs in the US. It'd add some tension to the drama.
Mod third paragraph up! +5 Common Sense
5. ????
6. Profit!!
Perhaps you would like to provide some references of the disaster to which you allude.
mod parent up!
A beep? You spring chicken! I always heard a "ding"...
deb http://terrorism.debian.org/ stable/documentation main contrib non-free
You might think Rummy is a closet transvestite, but I don't see why you would want to get all smoochie.
itsatrap
I call BS on this comment. Sure you can sell your OSS. You just have to be the best provider of appropriate updates/features, so that any attempt at forking your project is met with failure, or at worst, limited market share.
Just don't overprice your new product/releases/features to the point which would encourage forkers to compete.
That's no different to http://www.defenselink.mil/
Well, all I can say is that's just the a result of the current administration. You know; weak references, spinlocks, indirections, budget overflows, coroutine operations and all. Aside from that, I should remind you that you have to paticipate in democracy. To all you apathetic websurfers out there: If you don't bother clicking, then you shouldn't complain about the sites you end up with...
You unshould have to use *emphasis* with newspeak.
No real reason why the whole caboose couldn't be sealed and placed under vacuum? It doesn't have to be an extreme (-95kPag) vacuum to be worthwhile, either.
The first thing I'd do is to break off pin 23 from the IDE socket.
OMG! Some NASA bogan has been doing "circle work" with the rover!