In any space game this unusual object would certainly be an important artifact.
In reality it would still be quite interesting to analyse its composition.
Only if quarks could exist in a state of lower energy than inside a proton. I don't think such a state exists, so the answer is no.
What is possible is matter-antimatter annihilation. So if we found a cheap source of antiprotons...
The European grid companies have no reason to give this out of hands. They can buy their batteries and inverters elsewhere.
And grid storage is discussed since before the start of mass funding of renewable energy about 20 years ago. It wasn't worthwhile yet to build plants just for that, neither hydro (which was cheaper in the past at least) nor batteries. If Tesla found a way to make it work they will probably happily implement it themselves.
I don't know why the ones who write the article talk about some kind of secret network.
These stories are on Russia today and Sputnik since weeks. These are known Russian state websites.
The White helmets are portrayed as the ones who fabricated the proof for the chemical attacks. I don't know if anyone has a proof of what is true or not.
Yes, I think they deliberately did not make it clear that we are at the most harmless point, because this is bad for research funding. That's why I felt I need to state that.
This might be related to the development of civilisation though. Stable conditions allowed the number of humans to increase further and further, leading to where we are today.
Where?
It says we are in the middle of the cycle. The is 400000 years. The last peak was 200000 years ago. A cycle is the period in which it repeats, so the next maximum is 400000 years after the last. So we are hlf way between two maxima. So we are at a minimum, assuming that the cycle is roughly symetric.
This law could still be rubbish even with much better batteries. German car manufacturers are asking that the laws should rather regulate total carbon footprint or the efficiency of the whole progress, instead of enforcing which technology is chosen. Other ways can be more efficient than electric cars.
... the statement that the author's computer is still vulnerable to Meltdown. It is quite negative regarding Intel's performance in solving this and says improvement is necessary.
It's just that I had extensive discussions in Germany years ago, where everyone agreed that Wifi on cars is a security risk,especially since these systems are rarely patched. And the conclusion was that it is not an issue because of the CAN bus separation, although there were some issues with that found and fixed. This was before this topic even came up here.
Of course there have been holes in the CAM bus separation of cars before, but they can't just assume that there is one. The entertainment system is not assumed to be safe, the CAN bus separation is. These guys have not achieved anything that is not planned for.
The access of the infotainment system to other parts of the car is very restricted. It is absolutely not unexpected that someone breaks into the infotainment system, but they should not get further from there. These researchers have not even tried, so this article is just sensational.
The brake system is pretty well secured from the infotainment system, exactly because infotaintment systems are often not 100% secure.
They could have tried to go after the brake system, but I doubt they would have been successful.
I don't think we could recognize different waveforms at 22kHz. From how I think the ear works I would say it does a Fourier transform and recognizes the frequencies of the elementary sine waves, but I could be wrong.
It's a bit difficult to find the old news now. But to me it was always obvious that North Korea just feels threatened. And by that I don't say that the US out south Korea is the aggressor. Both sides felt threatened by each other and responded with threats.
Maybe the US really never announced plans of a first strike. But for sure such plans were made and discussed, and only North Korea's options of revenge saved it. https://nypost.com/2017/12/21/...
The Korean war was never officially over, you know? There were large military exercises every year with South Korea. Such exercises can easily be used to cover preparations for an actual invasion, North Korea never knew if an invasion was coming or not.
Bush declared North Korea a part of the axis of evil, together with Iran and Iraq. Iraq was already invaded, Iran is encircled and fought with in proxy wars.
Sanctions similar to the ones imposed on North Korea are also a tool to weaken a country and make it ready for an invasion.
And you can look up yourself all the times a US president has spoken out all kinds of threats on the country. Is this a serious question or are you just gathering information for an article it something?
I think you all misjudge the situation. Kim WAS scared. The US constantly threatened to attack, he also knew about plans of a cruise missile strike on his palace. He and his regime needed the nuclear weapons to make sure that they survive.
What had happened is 1. Trump said he wants to talk and wants peace. And 2. Russia claims that Syria shot down 70% of the cruise missiles fired on Syria in the last strike, even all of the missiles fired at several airports. was done with the systems upgraded by North Korea, the same systems they have there.
Slashdot Mirror
In any space game this unusual object would certainly be an important artifact.
In reality it would still be quite interesting to analyse its composition.
Most likely you don't know that this is a pretty strong statement in research.
Visionaries such as James Cameron, who wrote the Terminator movie script?
Makes you wonder if they can really make sure that it is not the wrong person requesting all that data.
Only if quarks could exist in a state of lower energy than inside a proton. I don't think such a state exists, so the answer is no. ...
What is possible is matter-antimatter annihilation. So if we found a cheap source of antiprotons
Really? I read about lithium producers saying that Tesla is not the biggest consumer in the market, they just bark the loudest
The European grid companies have no reason to give this out of hands. They can buy their batteries and inverters elsewhere.
And grid storage is discussed since before the start of mass funding of renewable energy about 20 years ago. It wasn't worthwhile yet to build plants just for that, neither hydro (which was cheaper in the past at least) nor batteries. If Tesla found a way to make it work they will probably happily implement it themselves.
I don't know why the ones who write the article talk about some kind of secret network.
These stories are on Russia today and Sputnik since weeks. These are known Russian state websites.
The White helmets are portrayed as the ones who fabricated the proof for the chemical attacks. I don't know if anyone has a proof of what is true or not.
Yes, I think they deliberately did not make it clear that we are at the most harmless point, because this is bad for research funding. That's why I felt I need to state that.
This might be related to the development of civilisation though. Stable conditions allowed the number of humans to increase further and further, leading to where we are today.
Where?
It says we are in the middle of the cycle. The is 400000 years. The last peak was 200000 years ago. A cycle is the period in which it repeats, so the next maximum is 400000 years after the last. So we are hlf way between two maxima. So we are at a minimum, assuming that the cycle is roughly symetric.
If we are right in the middle between two points of maximum seasonal differences it must be the point of minimum differences.
This law could still be rubbish even with much better batteries. German car manufacturers are asking that the laws should rather regulate total carbon footprint or the efficiency of the whole progress, instead of enforcing which technology is chosen. Other ways can be more efficient than electric cars.
... the statement that the author's computer is still vulnerable to Meltdown. It is quite negative regarding Intel's performance in solving this and says improvement is necessary.
Hahaha, but the other additives don't ring the buzzword alarms, so they don't make it into the press.
It's just that I had extensive discussions in Germany years ago, where everyone agreed that Wifi on cars is a security risk,especially since these systems are rarely patched. And the conclusion was that it is not an issue because of the CAN bus separation, although there were some issues with that found and fixed. This was before this topic even came up here.
Who placed that goal post?
Of course there have been holes in the CAM bus separation of cars before, but they can't just assume that there is one. The entertainment system is not assumed to be safe, the CAN bus separation is. These guys have not achieved anything that is not planned for.
The access of the infotainment system to other parts of the car is very restricted. It is absolutely not unexpected that someone breaks into the infotainment system, but they should not get further from there. These researchers have not even tried, so this article is just sensational.
So the headline is sensational rubbish btw.
The brake system is pretty well secured from the infotainment system, exactly because infotaintment systems are often not 100% secure.
They could have tried to go after the brake system, but I doubt they would have been successful.
I don't think we could recognize different waveforms at 22kHz. From how I think the ear works I would say it does a Fourier transform and recognizes the frequencies of the elementary sine waves, but I could be wrong.
This was also on the news:
http://m.scmp.com/news/asia/ea...
It's a bit difficult to find the old news now. But to me it was always obvious that North Korea just feels threatened. And by that I don't say that the US out south Korea is the aggressor. Both sides felt threatened by each other and responded with threats.
Maybe the US really never announced plans of a first strike. But for sure such plans were made and discussed, and only North Korea's options of revenge saved it.
https://nypost.com/2017/12/21/...
The Korean war was never officially over, you know? There were large military exercises every year with South Korea. Such exercises can easily be used to cover preparations for an actual invasion, North Korea never knew if an invasion was coming or not.
Bush declared North Korea a part of the axis of evil, together with Iran and Iraq. Iraq was already invaded, Iran is encircled and fought with in proxy wars.
Sanctions similar to the ones imposed on North Korea are also a tool to weaken a country and make it ready for an invasion.
And you can look up yourself all the times a US president has spoken out all kinds of threats on the country. Is this a serious question or are you just gathering information for an article it something?
I think you all misjudge the situation. Kim WAS scared. The US constantly threatened to attack, he also knew about plans of a cruise missile strike on his palace. He and his regime needed the nuclear weapons to make sure that they survive.
What had happened is 1. Trump said he wants to talk and wants peace. And 2. Russia claims that Syria shot down 70% of the cruise missiles fired on Syria in the last strike, even all of the missiles fired at several airports. was done with the systems upgraded by North Korea, the same systems they have there.