You can disagree all you want but my statement is correct. It's also correct in regards to the meaningless noise characteristics you call "race".
The difference between two unique individual humans who are not siblings or parent/child is greater than the difference between the statistical median or mean of women and the statistical median or mean of men.
It doesn't matter if you don't like it, it's a fact.
That was under good conditions. It is a good idea but not very practical.
Didn't say they weren't without flaws. The best GPS tags are placed, not shot. Shooting them is not needed when it's a recent model car - those have tracking in them already. Also license plate trackers and other ident software on most major urban arterials and most freeways.
sorry, but I actually do know that. I used to work in Biochem as a research assistant and am a data manager in alzheimer's disease research in the department of medicine.
No, that's what we said with malaria. With malaria we had no drugs for 40 years AND no effective programs. Some of us worked on malarial drugs, some of us worked on the other parts.
With antibiotics the MAIN problem is overuse of antibiotics. This creates the resistant strains and makes any drug discovery mostly a waste of time.
Yes it's gone up quite a bit - the last two years have seen a sharp jump in undergrad female engineers. Just look at pics from our last two engineering days. They should still be online.
Actually, I think some of the "sterotypically male" STEM fields here at the UW have more women than men in them - both at the undergrad and graduate level.
2014 is coming whether 2000 wants it to come or not. Adapt or die.
Which is why we have so many top ranked women going into STEM fields here at the UW. People who want to become engineers or work in genetics want to do that.
Putting artificial barriers in their way by saying "women should not be engineers or do science" is the wrong message.
The problem when discussing gender differences is that there is no stereotypical male or stereotypical female.
The difference in genetic makeup between the average male and the average female is LESS than the difference between one individual and another individual.
Trying to create more "gender ghettos" is the wrong response. Here at the UW there are many women engineers and scientists, and not in the fields old fogies think they "should" be in.
We are all individuals. How we use what we have differs, but that doesn't make it "better".
It's like a study on Mergers and Aquisitions reported today saying boards with only one female member were less likely to do a merger than boards with all male members - the problem is that mergers are usually a bad idea for shareholder value in the first place.
Or it could just be numbers, as in population.
Seattle: 650k
Los Angeles: 3.9M
Good point. Maybe he's trying to get away from the very long commutes they have in Southern California?
he was asking about Seattle. I was trying to be informative - overdressing for interviews here is a no-no
or gain superpowers.
someone has to fight the giant mutant seagulls
but recently there have been lots of Giant Mutant Seagulls cropping up in all the traffic video cameras in Seattle recently. ... maybe they're hungry?
You're from California. That's the problem.
He's right.
Sorry, but we have lots of highly-educated people here already.
Stay where you are.
Oh, and stop overdressing - you just look awkward.
As someone going for a PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering, my basic response to Mr. El-Zein is ...
Sod off.
Now stop thinking that the world needs to fix the Middle East or care about your "problems".
Oil is over. Nobody cares about you anymore.
All your rights are free, but you're not permitted to have either Rights or Freedoms.
Now, here's a spoon.
We were spying on you since at least the early 80s.
We just never told you.
Nothing changed.
Depends on the state or "district" and the legal structure.
In Washington State, yes, but you can't track GPS or other info without a warrant anyway, so if you don't have one, you're not going to do this.
If a terrorist or near a border there are other exceptions, and a lot of the "dark" networks they say are turned off get turned on when needed.
You must live in a crowded part of the country - here there are only so many exits people can take - fairly easy to not chase people without risk.
So total bullshit. Got it. Cites or go home.
See one of the other responses which did have access to such catalogs.
Get a job.
You can disagree all you want but my statement is correct. It's also correct in regards to the meaningless noise characteristics you call "race".
The difference between two unique individual humans who are not siblings or parent/child is greater than the difference between the statistical median or mean of women and the statistical median or mean of men.
It doesn't matter if you don't like it, it's a fact.
That was under good conditions. It is a good idea but not very practical.
Didn't say they weren't without flaws. The best GPS tags are placed, not shot. Shooting them is not needed when it's a recent model car - those have tracking in them already. Also license plate trackers and other ident software on most major urban arterials and most freeways.
You're confusing many things - training, better helmets, better equipment - with biology.
I stand by my correct statement.
sorry, but I actually do know that. I used to work in Biochem as a research assistant and am a data manager in alzheimer's disease research in the department of medicine.
Facts are facts.
No, that's what we said with malaria. With malaria we had no drugs for 40 years AND no effective programs. Some of us worked on malarial drugs, some of us worked on the other parts.
With antibiotics the MAIN problem is overuse of antibiotics. This creates the resistant strains and makes any drug discovery mostly a waste of time.
I did not say that. I'm just saying what I'm saying.
Stop trying to turn my words into something that backs up your personal choices.
Yes it's gone up quite a bit - the last two years have seen a sharp jump in undergrad female engineers. Just look at pics from our last two engineering days. They should still be online.
I can't help that you're not supposed to be able to browse things only government LEO forces are supposed to browse.
Actually, I think some of the "sterotypically male" STEM fields here at the UW have more women than men in them - both at the undergrad and graduate level.
2014 is coming whether 2000 wants it to come or not. Adapt or die.
Which is why we have so many top ranked women going into STEM fields here at the UW. People who want to become engineers or work in genetics want to do that.
Putting artificial barriers in their way by saying "women should not be engineers or do science" is the wrong message.
The problem when discussing gender differences is that there is no stereotypical male or stereotypical female.
The difference in genetic makeup between the average male and the average female is LESS than the difference between one individual and another individual.
Trying to create more "gender ghettos" is the wrong response. Here at the UW there are many women engineers and scientists, and not in the fields old fogies think they "should" be in.
We are all individuals. How we use what we have differs, but that doesn't make it "better".
It's like a study on Mergers and Aquisitions reported today saying boards with only one female member were less likely to do a merger than boards with all male members - the problem is that mergers are usually a bad idea for shareholder value in the first place.
there are launch devices. you can find them in any LEO product catalog.
Exactly. Why bother chasing when it's easier to trace them (a limpet GPS tracker works fine) and set up roadblocks?