Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Why So Hard Landing Interviews In Seattle Versus SoCal?

An anonymous reader writes "I have been trying to make the move to the Seattle, WA area. I liked the weather, the nature, the scenery and the tech environment. However, for whatever reason it seems like interviews are hard to come by. As a MS Stack software developer in LA, I barely had to do anything and recruiters always come knocking, either via LinkedIn or from past connections. Not to mention in general I got phone interviews for easily .8 of the positions I applied for. I wanted to finally make the move and fulfill a live long dream to live in Seattle. So I have been applying for positions in the greater Seattle, WA (King County) area. So far the ratio of positions applied to phone interviews is a dismal .1. Which is terrible considering the economy was much worse when I was actively looking for job in LA. Something isn't right because I am still getting offers for interviews here in SoCal, but not much from where I really wanted to be. What could I be doing wrong? Why such a contrast? Is the IT market in Seattle in poor shape? Or may be I just lack the proper connections in a new area? Am I just being screened out immediately for not being local? Or is it the prevalence of bigger corporations vs. smaller startups? And frankly as nice as the city is I can't move unless there's a healthy IT market to thrive by. I hope someone can point me in the right direction."

506 comments

  1. I live in the Puget Sound area by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You seriously like the weather up here? Have you been here anytime other than July - September?

    I know a LOT of people that moved here after visiting in the summer... they don't realize what the weather is like most of the time.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by x0ra · · Score: 1

      I don't really know about Seattle, but I moved from Montreal, Qc to Vancouver, BC about a month ago. I was told winter would be nothing but rain and not so cold temperature (I love the cold). But I've been pretty surprised so far. Not much rain, and for the past week, it's been warmer in Montreal than here.n

    2. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Funny

      You seriously like the weather up here? Have you been here anytime other than July - September?

      I know a LOT of people that moved here after visiting in the summer... they don't realize what the weather is like most of the time.

      Maybe they're goth. Then the weather is perfect with just enough sun in the year to begin to bitch about it after your vitamin D level begin to build back up.

    3. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've been in Vancouver for almost 20 years, this weather is an anomaly. We shouldn't have seen the sun since October.

    4. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I don't really know about Seattle, but I moved from Montreal, Qc to Vancouver, BC about a month ago. I was told winter would be nothing but rain and not so cold temperature (I love the cold). But I've been pretty surprised so far. Not much rain, and for the past week, it's been warmer in Montreal than here.n

      Seems to be a recent feature starting about ten years ago. Before that, the winter was a constant drizzle that a light jacket was sufficient enough for. Now we are actually getting rain instead of spit and drizzle with clear skies in between (which, without the overcast to hold in the heat, lets the temperature drop another ten or twenty degrees).

    5. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by SteveFoerster · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's why they won't hire him -- they know he's insane.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    6. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by depressedrobot · · Score: 1

      or if you grew up here you can love it. I know I do.

    7. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't? o.0

    8. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Hatta · · Score: 1

      How much snow do you get from Septermber - June?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in Vancouver for 32 years. I can tell you this cold snap isn't normal. It's mostly rain from mid October to about June and can get quite depressing. There's a reason why most grunge artists were from the Pacific Northwest... you often don't see the sun for weeks at a time.

    10. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      I was in Seattle the first weekend of May this year. I got sunburned.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    11. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Seattle and would welcome the snow, if in exchange I got more sunny days. It's the endless dark cloudy days of winter that get me down. Seattle doesn't get much rain, but it is near the bottom of the list of American cities when it comes to sunny days in a year. It's dreary here.

    12. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by cusco · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Michigan. It never gets as cold here in the winter or as hot in the summer as Michigan, the spring is beautiful without melting snowbanks creating lakes of mud, and we actually have FEWER days without seeing the sun here than we did there. I do miss autumn once in a while, which is beautiful in Michigan, but since generally the snow there starts in October I am quite content to do without it.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    13. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto with Austin. Except here, people come for SXSW in March and think the weather is great. Little do they suspect that July-September can be a bit "warm".

    14. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      You don't? o.0

      Actually, I do. But I'm weird - I don't mind grey skies and drizzle, that being the tradeoff for a couple months of green, sunny mid-70s days in the summer.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    15. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by weffey · · Score: 1

      I recently left Seattle after 4 years, and I hail from Ottawa. I remember about 10 years ago Seattle/Vancouver had something like 60 days of overcast weather-- highest suicide rates that year. I really didn't think the weather was affecting me significantly until I moved to Salt Lake City. Almost immediately my energy level went up, I was sleeping better, my focus was through the roof. Now I know it's also situational (going from a cube farm to start up as well as a change in my personal life), but under no circumstance am I moving back to Seattle.

    16. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Nyder · · Score: 1

      You seriously like the weather up here? Have you been here anytime other than July - September?

      I know a LOT of people that moved here after visiting in the summer... they don't realize what the weather is like most of the time.

      I lived here my whole life (40+ years), the weather is great, year around. Don't like rain? You do when you realize it cleans up the smell of homeless peoples urine from the alleys downtown. Ya, spend time during the nice non rainy days and you'll wish it was raining every day.

      Plus weed is legal here.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    17. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much snow do you get from Septermber - June?

      Ah spoken like a person that doesn't know what 7 straight months of nearly constant drizzle does to one's soul. I grew up in snow, drove in it, worked in it, lived in it. It's far preferable to Portland and Seattle weather. Not to mention if either city actually does get snow everything shuts down because no one has equipment to deal with it and driving is exceptionally treacherous.

      Granted there are individuals who seem to do fine in this climate, they are rare, and tend to work out like mad. If you're not the type that will consistently go running in 40 degrees and raining, you won't be one of them.

    18. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      I've been in Vancouver for my 46 years. I've never seen weather as good as what we're having now...

    19. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      You must be from the west side of the state, or up north. In Detroit we got snow before January, but typically only flurries, and even if it stuck within a couple days it melted. This is because the wind blows west, and we're just East of Lake Erie. Snow from that lake blows onto Ontario/New York State. Snow from Lake Michigan has an entire state to fall on before it gets to Detroit. And there's a lot of Michigan for it to fall on. It's the biggest state East of the Mississippi if you include water area, and second only to Georgia in land area.

      In the long term it's probably got better weather then most of the rest of the country, because global warming will take the edge off bitter Midwestern winters, while making fresh water lakes much more valuable. Freshwater rivers will be a mixed blessing, because high heat means high evaporation means half the time you're dying of drought, and the other half drowning (the water that evaporated will have to go somewhere). OTOH with all that rain Puget Sound isn't going to die of nd flooding is a lot more manageable when the water can just run straight into the ocean.

    20. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by asavage · · Score: 2

      This has been the nicest Fall by far I have ever seen in the 8 years I have lived in Vancouver. Usually November has rain almost every day.

    21. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      Agree with parent. I have lived in Bellevue, King County for a few years. It's lousy weather except for July - September.

    22. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find it's excellent weather except for July - September.

    23. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: Some people LIKE clouds and rain.

      No, they aren't all goth.

    24. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      I've lived here for several years and like the weather. It doesn't rain as hard as New York. I just wish I got a bit more snow.

    25. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Bitch bitch bitch. I went to High School in Ithaca NY. The sources I can find that have data for both cities put them pretty close. BestPlaces says Seattle has 152 sunny days, and Ithaca has 154 sunny days. HomeFacts says Seattle has 56 clear days, and Ithaca has 53 clear days. They're pretty comparable, but Ithaca has a lot more snow. I think I'd handle Seattle's climate fine.

      I remember a math teacher once stopping class to bring our attention to a patch of blue sky that had temporarily appeared. I don't think people were particularly depressed.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    26. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cod liver oil provides vitamin d...no need to rely on the sun.

    27. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by forevermore · · Score: 1

      Funny. I grew up spending time between the hottest and driest deserts in the world. When my family ended up moving to the Seattle area, I rejoiced at the weather. I'll happily take a little drizzle over 120F summers or "undetectable" levels of total annual rainfall. A year of school in Chicago which went from sweltering humid heat in the summer/fall to near-zero freezing temps in the winter confirmed for me that Seattle has great weather.

      --
      Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    28. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

      Never mind the weather, LA is supposed to be ripe for a 7.0 earthquake. In Seattle, it's a 10.0, and the city is half sunken already.

    29. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Frankly, the weather in Puget Sound is much better than the locals make it out to be. I've been living here for 3 years, and have gotten way more sunshine than July-September.

    30. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      I live in Minneapolis and this morning, the temp was -6F. Winter starts in 2 weeks.

    31. Re:I live in the Puget Sound area by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I just make due with fortified milk in my lattes every morning.

    32. Re: I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spent 13 years in Puget Sound. Tech market there sucked. Moved back to CA, have more work than I can handle and need to look at hiring a co-worker to cover it all.

      Then there is the weather in the Pacific Northwet. It's horrible. The 40 days a year the sun comes out its Amazing. The remainder of the time I just wanted to drive my car off one of toll bridge. It's been shown that Vitamin D deficiencies cause a measurable drop in IQ as well. Frankly, that explains a lot about Microsoft, Amazon and Starsux. Being away now for 2 years, I just have to shake my head and ask, "WTF are thise people thinking"?

      Do yourself a favor OP, if you'er dead set on WA, go East of the Cascades. It will be cold but at least there is sun, good beer, space and a lot fewer douchey Seattle hipsters.

    33. Re: I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL 152 sunny days? Not a chance! I don't think I saw that many total in the 10+ years I lived there! Don't discount the gray skies, I found it a soul crusher, and my ancestry is Norwegian!

    34. Re: I live in the Puget Sound area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just used to the stench in Seattle. As someone that lived outside the city, every time I had to there, the reek of vomit and urine in the streets was enough to make me gag. Enjoy your vomit moss, brother!

  2. Market Saturation by multimediavt · · Score: 5, Informative

    MS Stack software developer

    I am just taking a stab in the dark here as I don't really know, but maybe there are a lot of "MS Stack software" developers in the home of MS. If they got a ton of them already in town why import more?

    1. Re:Market Saturation by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      MS Stack software developer

      I am just taking a stab in the dark here as I don't really know, but maybe there are a lot of "MS Stack software" developers in the home of MS. If they got a ton of them already in town why import more?

      Good point. It'd be like applying for a job as a surf instructor at Venice Beach. Or being a hipster in San Francisco. "Hey, if we're supposed to be new and different, how come we're all dressed identically?"

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Market Saturation by ampmouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am just taking a stab in the dark here as I don't really know, but maybe there are a lot of "MS Stack software" developers in the home of MS. If they got a ton of them already in town why import more?

      Absolutely correct. I work in Seattle on FreeBSD, and there are plenty of places looking for employees (Amazon, F5, Isilon, etc.) with a Linux/BSD background. If you want to work on the "MS Stack" you are more or less going to be looking for a job a Microsoft. The market here is completely saturated with Microsoft employees who are looking for a change of pace. They actually do have 6 years of experience developing on frameworks Microsoft released 5 years ago.

    3. Re:Market Saturation by mark_reh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe the British would say that applying for a MS IT position in Seattle is like "carrying coals to Newcastle"...

    4. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can also confirm this to be true. Friends of mine that are highly specialized into Microsoft tend to work there and often have a hard time if they decide to leave. We have a major glut of people with Microsoft experience, given that the company is down the street, so you're competing directly with people who can say "I've done it at and for Microsoft". From what I hear from my friends that have worked there, it's also not uncommon to want to leave after you get a taste, which doesn't help you either.

      The Linux/BSD folks up here can find a new job pretty much whenever they like.

    5. Re:Market Saturation by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      MS Stack software developer

      I am just taking a stab in the dark here as I don't really know, but maybe there are a lot of "MS Stack software" developers in the home of MS. If they got a ton of them already in town why import more?

      I think this is part of it but I don't really think that the Seattle job market every really recovered from the .bust era. There were so many unemployed tech people in the early 2000's that hiring managers were literally getting thousands of applicants in just a few days for any job they posted. Things were just about to get better when the 2008 housing crisis put a stop on new hires and cost lots of people their jobs. In the last five years, I've seen people move away because the job market was so saturated that they couldn't get a job because nobody is hiring and everybody is keeping the job they have. Meanwhile, any job that is getting posted is probably just for legal/technical reasons and already has a person slotted for it that already works for the company or is a friend of somebody that does.

    6. Re:Market Saturation by rnswebx · · Score: 1

      I agree with this as well. I work in the Seattle area as a linux professional and there is little difficulty in finding companies interested in my skillset. As others have said, there are huge numbers of MS folks here, which likely makes the market for MS stack developers very competitive.

    7. Re:Market Saturation by hawguy · · Score: 1

      MS Stack software developer

      I am just taking a stab in the dark here as I don't really know, but maybe there are a lot of "MS Stack software" developers in the home of MS. If they got a ton of them already in town why import more?

      I think that's true - I was looking for a job in Seattle for a while, and had no trouble getting interviews as a Linux infrastructure manager, but the offers were low -- 20 - 30% lower pay than I was making in the SF Bay area. The pay difference was more than a years worth of house payments on my bay area house, so it wasn't worth the move.

    8. Re:Market Saturation by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1

      I am just taking a stab in the dark here as I don't really know, but maybe there are a lot of "MS Stack software" developers in the home of MS. If they got a ton of them already in town why import more?

      Or it could just be numbers, as in population.

      Seattle: 650k
      Los Angeles: 3.9M

    9. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was contacted by a recruiter for Amazon, for a job in Seattle, and I live in the Toronto, Canada area. I think MS is a bigger part of the problem than you'd think.

    10. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Being British, I would say you are correct, sir!!

    11. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're dressing like a stereotypical hipster ironically.

    12. Re:Market Saturation by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      I believe the British would say that applying for a MS IT position in Seattle is like "carrying coals to Newcastle"...

      Touché

    13. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Particularly from La La land.

    14. Re:Market Saturation by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Or it could just be numbers, as in population.

      Seattle: 650k

      Los Angeles: 3.9M

      Good point. Maybe he's trying to get away from the very long commutes they have in Southern California?

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    15. Re:Market Saturation by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Then he's looking in the wrong place.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    16. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. It'd be like applying for a job as a surf instructor at Venice Beach. Or being a hipster in San Francisco.

      Woah, is being a hipster a paid job in SF? I'm moving there!

    17. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was contacted by a recruiter for Amazon, for a job in Seattle, and I live in the Toronto, Canada area. I think MS is a bigger part of the problem than you'd think.

      Amazon is known, locally at least, to be a pretty lousy place to work for. I'd wager that is why Amazon has to look far and wide for talent. MS isn't much better though.

    18. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot more jobs as a surf instructor at Venice Beach than in Albuquerque. Just sayin'...

    19. Re: Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. Word on the street is there is actually a deficit of skilled local hires, hence my recent 3000-mile relocation to WA.

    20. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it happens, there is a Newcastle just outside Seattle that, yes, was originally a coal mining town... :)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcastle,_Washington

    21. Re:Market Saturation by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      I managed to move to Seattle about 2 years ago after "casually" trying for about 10 years. Was in the DC metro area, which was "home" but that I had been desperately trying to escape for something new.

      I finally ended up changing my address in monster.com to the Seattle Public Library in an attempt to get monster to honor my location preferences. I still got most of my recruiter calls and emails from DC, SoCal, and various "flyover" states, and I still do today. I figure those are simply places hurting for techs because techs don't want to live there.

      Believe everything you hear and read about the culture in Seattle. They're the nicest, most polite, least jaywalking people you'll ever meet. And they probably don't want you here, particularly if you're from California. They work hard. They play hard. They have an internal energy that keeps them warm from within, and drives them through the long, cold, wet, dark seasonal affective disorder (SAD) season.

      I took a pay cut and self-relocated my family across the country. I also don't get nearly unlimited overtime like with my federal contracting gig. I bought a bike, then another, and a set of cross-country skis for the family. We get a lot of use out of our annual state and national park passes all year round.

      There's a huge cottage industry of tech contracting firms (Volt was extremely nice, Insight Global was more "just business" but had a lot of contacts in industry). All of the people who do real work for MS and others are mostly contractors, just like everywhere else. A lot of contractors at MS would work for 1 year and then take 3 months off to avoid getting paid real benefits like healthcare and vacation. I live in Redmond by work downtown Seattle, which is good, since rush hour traffic actually is worse to/from the MS campus.

      I figure we'd hang out here for about a decade or so until the kids go to college, making sure to hit most of the trails and mountains and islands on our ever-growing list of PNW things to do, then probably take a big fat offer with relocation for somewhere else. This has been something of a working vacation for us, but it certainly isn't for everyone.

    22. Re:Market Saturation by mattack2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even if it was more than a year's worth of house payments, couldn't it theoretically still be a win _if_ the cost of living in Seattle is _even lower_? I'm not saying it necessarily is, I just mean theoretically.

    23. Re:Market Saturation by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but it might be easier to get a gig in Corpus Christi.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    24. Re:Market Saturation by pspahn · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the Boeing effect might be at play here as well. We've seen, time and again, how off-shoring to China has killed the job market in small towns. With an employer as large as Boeing, I don't think Seattle would be immune to the same effects.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    25. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're the nicest, most polite, least jaywalking people you'll ever meet.

      Completely and absolutely wrong on all counts in my experience. Maybe if you are talking about the people that moved there but still the nice ones are few and far between.

    26. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Washington doesn't have a 10% state income tax, for starters.

    27. Re:Market Saturation by jcr · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right. With all the MS employees looking to jump ship, I can't see why anyone who wants to hire a Windoze developer would spring for a ticket to interview a candidate from a different city.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    28. Re:Market Saturation by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      I was contacted by a recruiter for Amazon, for a job in Seattle, and I live in the Toronto, Canada area. I think MS is a bigger part of the problem than you'd think.

      Amazon is known, locally at least, to be a pretty lousy place to work for. I'd wager that is why Amazon has to look far and wide for talent. MS isn't much better though.

      Yep. From what I have heard from friends that work there is current average length of employment at Amazon runs about 18 months till you leave or are let go. Makes a nice place to build a resume (if you can put up with it) but not a career.

    29. Re:Market Saturation by Spiked_Three · · Score: 1

      Mixed feelings. I too followed a similar past, moved from Washington, DC to sticks of Tennessee. Got sick and moved to Seattle because healthcare is so poor in Tennessee.

      I'm torn on the wussification factor. In a way, I appreciate the gentler kinder spirit, and in other ways I feel like people here would rather kill themselves than stand up for something they believe in.

      And those gay MS surface commercials? (not to offend gays, but it is the best fitting description) Well that is how people really are here. Its like a big Glee episode.You know, guys wearing girls pants, etc. There was some of that in other places, but it is the norm here. Guys care about their hairstyle. Again, not trying to bash feminine men, I actually prefer gay friends, even though I'm pretty much classic non-gay redneck.

      But there is a phrase, 'Seattle freeze', look it up on google. It is accurate. "hello, how are you? I hope you have a wonderful day, just please do it somewhere else"

      --
      slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
    30. Re:Market Saturation by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Well, probably depends on the context in which you meet them. I pretty much always lose courtesy competitions at doors and traffic intersections. They supposedly have a reputation for being awesomely passive-aggressive, but I have yet to hit any examples anecdotally. But I'm from Thailand, which is even more passive-aggressive by any account, so maybe I'm just oblivious to it by now. I know I certainly notice how rude people are in person and in traffic whenever I travel back East now.... what you mean I have to force my way into this merge lane?

      Also: http://www.today.com/news/ohio-most-foul-mouthed-state-washington-least-report-says-2D11691625

    31. Re:Market Saturation by gabereiser · · Score: 1

      I was going to point out the "MS Stack" problem myself. Seattle is not the place for MS developers because outside of Microsoft, no one uses them. I've gotten interviews with Amazon and it's all Java/Linux/Unix work. Leave the dark side and join us in the light, you'll not only get paid more, but you'll enjoy more opportunities as well. - Former MS Stack Developer

    32. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I'm in Seattle, trying like hell to hire DevOps + devs with a Unix/Linux/BSD background. There aren't enough of those to go around. Windows resumes are a dime a dozen.

    33. Re:Market Saturation by gabereiser · · Score: 1

      +1 to this as it happened to me and I live in Florida!

    34. Re:Market Saturation by disappear · · Score: 2

      I was going to point out the "MS Stack" problem myself. Seattle is not the place for MS developers because outside of Microsoft, no one uses them. I've gotten interviews with Amazon and it's all Java/Linux/Unix work.

      That's all I'm hiring for in Seattle, minus the Java. Linux/Unix, devs, DevOps... and I'm competing quite a bit for top talent.

    35. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep being an "MS Stack" developer is only marginally more talented than a 5 year old who is 2 weeks into learning Python. Plus the 5 year old works for less. :)

    36. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in Seattle as a Java dev and we're actually starting to hire business people and paying to *train them* in Java because there's apparently not that many good Java devs in the area who have any business sense (a terrible idea, IMHO, but not mine). We have a good company, but we don't hire for skill-sets so much as what people are capable of and how dedicated they'll be to the company, a practice that more companies could learn from.

      On the other hand, I've never been able to get a call back from some of the more 'elite' places like Amazon, F5 and several others, while it hasn't been an issue getting an interview in general. Even if it's a shitty, high-pressure environment without a lot of job security, it seems people will still compete more to work for a name that looks great on their resume, and Seattle, which was at around the center of the dot-com boom, seems to have a lot of these 'elite' types of organizations and it's crawling with exceptionally smart & motivated developers.

    37. Re:Market Saturation by Darby · · Score: 1

      I understand you have your commitments, but if you didn't, would it have been worthwhile given the difference in cost of living?

    38. Re:Market Saturation by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I understand you have your commitments, but if you didn't, would it have been worthwhile given the difference in cost of living?

      Not according to the spreadsheet my wife and I made - we looked at our monthly spends on everything - car (including gas and insurance), public transportation, food, housing, income tax, dining out - everything we could think of.

      And staying in the SF Bay area still made more financial sense than a 25% pay cut. Especially after receiving a couple 10%+ bonuses since then that I likely would not have received in any of the Seattle area jobs.

    39. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you work on MS stack, you're pretty much disposable anywhere you go. If you want the edge in Seattle, you're going to need Rails, PHP, Golang, or {shudder} ASP Classic.

    40. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but if you can find a surf instructor job in Albuquerque, you'll have a much more stable income...the waves are far more predictable.

    41. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I interviewed for Microsoft with Java as my best language, it didn't hurt me. After spending a few years there, I interviewed for Amazon as a C# developer. It didn't hurt me either. Several years later (and jumping back to Microsoft again), now I'm interviewing for Google. These companies don't care at all about what languages you know.

      The common thread for me though: I had friends refer me at each of the companies. And for the latter two, I had the big name companies on my resume. Make friends, hit up randoms on linked in, whatever it takes. Referrals are the number one most important thing. Don't quote me on these numbers, but basically one out of 20 resumes submitted online get selected for a phone screen. From that point roughly one out of 5-10 gets an offer. Being referred basically gets you past the first step and possibly the second.

    42. Re:Market Saturation by cps42 · · Score: 1

      I think that's true - I was looking for a job in Seattle for a while, and had no trouble getting interviews as a Linux infrastructure manager, but the offers were low -- 20 - 30% lower pay than I was making in the SF Bay area. The pay difference was more than a years worth of house payments on my bay area house, so it wasn't worth the move.

      If you're trying to pay for a San Francisco or New York house on a salary anywhere else, you aren't moving. Seattle salaries account for the fact that housing prices are 25-30% lower in urban Seattle / Bellevue / Redmond than in San Francisco, and the surrounding communities are significantly lower than that.

      Per one of several cost-of-living comparison sites you can google for:
      Rent Prices in San Francisco, CA are 71.43% higher than in Seattle, WA
      Restaurant Prices in San Francisco, CA are 6.31% higher than in Seattle, WA
      Groceries Prices in San Francisco, CA are 3.62% higher than in Seattle, WA
      Local Purchasing Power in San Francisco, CA is 10.27% lower than in Seattle, WA

    43. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo!

    44. Re:Market Saturation by xerandin · · Score: 0

      It's the sneetches all over again.

    45. Re:Market Saturation by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      When you made that calculation, did you figure for the difference in state income tax? WA has none. CA's high bracket is over 10%.

    46. Re:Market Saturation by snadrus · · Score: 1

      I can vouch for that. I got some algorithm questions in Seattle & developed a new best solution (It wasn't a known solution before). Did I get the job? Nope.

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    47. Re:Market Saturation by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      The Linux/BSD folks up here can find a new job pretty much whenever they like.

      I'm having a different experience. Most of the jobs seem to be on the east side of the lake, and are either junior or demand substantial swdev experience.

    48. Re:Market Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and MS tends to demand highly skilled people and then stick them in scut jobs. There are a lot of ex-Softies rattling around looking for work. The high costs here mean that most app development gets offshored and the MSFT stack people who are here are working for the Beast.

  3. The reason by symes · · Score: 1

    I wanted to finally make the move and fulfill a live long dream to live in Seattle

    Get a Seattle address - not living local (if living local is a requirement) can be a disincentive. This is my experience as someone who recruits from time to time.

  4. Weather intolerance risk? by ddt · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm hip-shooting, but it could be that as an LA resident, you're experiencing some prejudice. They go months in Seattle with nothing but gray skies and/or rain, and you have to remain productive. The lack of interest could be due to the perceived risk that you might not be able to hack the gloomy weather.

    I'm in the same boat, btw. I live in Santa Monica, and I love the weather here. I would prefer to live amoungst Washingtonians if for no other reason than higher quality conversation, but I know I couldn't handle the Seattle weather for long.

    1. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I agree with the parent. There are a ton of people who move to Seattle & Portland from California & discrimination is very common. As someone who had to travel to Portland several times a month for 3 years+ you hear "local side" of this story. This is very real.

      So here are my suggestions:

      1) Make yourself look like a local as much as possible,

      2) See if you come up with a decent back story such as you are moving from Portland to Seattle. State the are too many people from California moving in. The prejudice will work in your favor rather than against you.

    2. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Uloi · · Score: 1

      It's not just the weather. It's the lack of sun light period. Sure the sun stays up till 10pm in the summer. That doesn't at all make up for it going down at 3pm in the winter. http://www.sunrisesunset.com/

    3. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thats before you even get to the Seattle women. I hope you like pale skin and armpit hair.

      Does that mean they don't shave between their legs?!

      If so, I am SOOOOO there! I can't stand this shaved pussy craze - it's look like a child and some women complain of chafing.

    4. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Texas, and I'm not even american or live in america. Never even been to Texas :)

    5. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm hip-shooting, but it could be that as an LA resident, you're experiencing some prejudice. They go months in Seattle with nothing but gray skies and/or rain, and you have to remain productive. The lack of interest could be due to the perceived risk that you might not be able to hack the gloomy weather.

      I'm in the same boat, btw. I live in Santa Monica, and I love the weather here. I would prefer to live amoungst Washingtonians if for no other reason than higher quality conversation, but I know I couldn't handle the Seattle weather for long.

      Santa Monica? You don't have to go all the way to Washington for good conversation. Just go down to Manhattan Beach and the average IQ jumps by 30 points. Less spray on tan too.

    7. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Richard Hammond?

    8. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when you use the word "pale", that does have negative connotations. The term "fair skin", referring to light-colored skin, has traditionally referred to people who weren't forced to work outside, generally indicating a higher social class. Hence why, in Snow White, the phrase "Who is the fairest of them all?" is referring to light skin as desirable.
      I have to wonder how much the desire for darker skin originated from the Beach Boys, and perhaps especially their song of California Girls.

    9. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by CurryCamel · · Score: 1

      Hip-shooting indeed... And you managed to get it wrong by 180 degrees.

      When you got summer only 3 months a years, YOU DON'T WASTE THEM HACKING. You hang out, drink beer and ogle at the girls in short skirts. Hacking is done indoors. Which means rain and cold and dark (hey, no sunlight glares in the screens!) are perfect conditions. I'm not ashamed to admit, that there can be several days in July that I don't even turn on my computer. And this includes tablets as well as phones.

      Incidentally, this explains why "the rest of the world" sneers at Silicon Valley - where it is summer all the time. Which by logic induction proves they never work there (hard, at least). And they still have the audacity, like OP, to brag about ".8 returns on job applications". This prejudice, I'd wager, is the real crux of OP's problems. OP, take a hint. A .1 return on applications is freaking awesome! Stop crying over it, and welcome to the real world.

      Who modded parent up? Californians?

    10. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by St.Creed · · Score: 2

      The desire for darker skin grew with the onset of the industrial revolution. factory workers didn't see much light so everybody had fair skin - and vitamine D deficiency as well. Remember rachitis - the "English disease"? Combine that with the growth of tourism in the sixties as people became more affluent, and they wanted to look not like a downtrodden factory worker, but as someone who could afford to move to a warmer climate during the summer. That took serious money back then.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    11. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amongst?? are you British or just pretending to be?

    12. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by zidium · · Score: 3, Informative

      Man, Texas ain't half that bad!

      I work in Houston, make ~$100,000, don't pay any state income taxes, have a 7% sales tax rate in my city, and a $800 two bedroom apartment 15 minutes from work. I doubt I could have all that in very many other states.

      Oh, and we have sun like 230 days a year (compared to Seattle's ~100), and it's never really cold (it snows maybe once every 7 years).

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    13. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, everyone had fair skin for Euro-centric amounts of "everyone"

      Fucking racists...

    14. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be quite a bit more interesting with a citation where I could look up more information.

    15. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might be a little confused about the geography of California...

    16. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Yup. As much as you might claim to not mind the weather, unless there is something on your resume that you actually HAVE long-term experience with similar weather, you're in for a rough time.

      I know in the past, managers at the location I live in (Southern Tier of New York State) have a strong preference to see that the applicant has spent at least 2-3 winters in the area or an area with similar weather. (e.g. grew up in the area, worked for an extended period of time in the area, or went to a school in upstate New York such as Cornell, Binghamton, RIT, Clarkson, etc.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    17. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1, Informative

      Slashdot is a Western website. "Industrial Revolution" generally refers to the West. Get over it. Hell, this is an article debating the merits of California vs. Seattle!

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    18. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      In the industrial revolution in the UK there weren't actually many workers with dark skin working in the factories. So for most factory workers, it literally was "everybody" who had fair skin. It wasn't until much later that migrants entered the UK and other European countries. Funny enough, that also had a link with the growth of tourism, because both depended on cheap(er) mass travel.

      It's a classic case of people absorbing the ideas of the rulers.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    19. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a noteworthy paradigm in Asian countries where you often see workers wearing long sleeves and splints to protect their finger nails in outdoor jobs. In those cultures, fair skin is a mark of someone who works indoors and is thus affluent. In American culture, a dark tan is associated with someone who enjoys comparable affluence due to having an occupation that affords them leisure time.

    20. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rickets

    21. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by St.Creed · · Score: 1
      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    22. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Birkenstocks.

    23. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Hacking is never a waste.

      " Hacking is done indoors. "
      Wow. I'll keep that in mid next time i'm twiddling bits at the parks. Golly, CurryCamel said it' done indoors, I guess I should go indoors then herp derp.

      "A .1 return on applications is freaking awesome!"
      ten you must suck at resume building. During the tech burst, my interview rate was 12.89%; which was shocking low for me.

      Well, I have to go to the pub here a Portland to drink beer, and do some hacking with my friends, loser.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats before you even get to the Seattle women. I hope you like pale skin and armpit hair.

      Or Asians.

    25. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      Man, Texas ain't half that bad!

      I work in Houston, make ~$100,000, don't pay any state income taxes, have a 7% sales tax rate in my city, and a $800 two bedroom apartment 15 minutes from work. I doubt I could have all that in very many other states.

      Oh, and we have sun like 230 days a year (compared to Seattle's ~100), and it's never really cold (it snows maybe once every 7 years).

      15 minutes to work in Houston? So you live next door?

    26. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Umm, it was in the 50s today. It ain't freaking summer all the time. (I am still wearing shorts, however.)

    27. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do! I do!

    28. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Cammi · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not. Some people actually like hygiene ...

    29. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not. Some people actually like hygiene ...

      If that's what you honestly think then it's not the hair that's the problem.

    30. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by PNutts · · Score: 1

      Well, when you use the word "pale", that does have negative connotations.

      That's why he used the word "pale".

    31. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Texas, and I'm not even american or live in america. Never even been to Texas :)

      You love Texas because you've never been there. Don't go if you want to continue loving it.

    32. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by anagama · · Score: 1

      And thick wooly socks.

      I'm not being snide -- it's very comfy -- love it.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    33. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by anagama · · Score: 1

      It never sets as early as 3 pm. Even today, it didn't set till after 4, but that just means more time to enjoy a hot milky drink, like cocoa or a latte, while sitting by a stove or fireplace.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    34. Re:Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is you air conditioning bill? Not last month, when it gets, hot, you, like in March.
      Just wondering.

    35. Re: Weather intolerance risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Lancashire in England count were if it is grey and rainny that's classed as summer.
      .

  5. Percentages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm guessing using decimal notation is throwing them. Check your resume and make sure it doesn't say that you give an effort ratio of 1.2

    1. Re:Percentages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That. Decimal notation is a douchebag way to write percentages, unless you're a math professor. It's one more keystroke to write it in the common form -- maybe employers just think you're lazy.

    2. Re:Percentages by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 1

      This, lol. I would mod you funny by have no points today, sorry :)

      G.

    3. Re:Percentages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, anyone with any serious scientific, engineering, or mathematical background would use 0.8, not .8. Seeing something like that would immediately flag you as an amateur in my mind.

  6. Who wants to live in LA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a bit surprised to hear the job market is tough in Seattle; it's a nice place to live and there are a LOT of smart people working in IT out there.

    The Pacific NW, in general, is a place that people move to. No one has a life long dream of moving to LA unless they want to be in show business.

  7. It's you. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    You're from California. That's the problem.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:It's you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An anonymous reader writes: "I have been trying to make the move to the Seattle

      this could also be an issue too. They don't know who he is to send him an offer!

      (posting as AC for counter-obvious reasons)

    2. Re:It's you. by Uloi · · Score: 2

      Actually this really is true. There is a general dislike of people from Cal. They blame people moving in from Cal for the outrageous cost of housing. And they think of people from Cal as being slackers.

    3. Re:It's you. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      You're from California. That's the problem.

      He's right.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:It's you. by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's probably it.

      To clarify further, they don't want you because you're in all likelyhood a Republican or libertarian or some sort of a conservative-leaning person. Lots of people are fleeing from California these days, but they're mostly right-leaning people fed up with liberal gov't policies of high taxes, high regulation, high debt, etc. We have awesome weather here, great ethnic cuisine, multicultural diversity, surf and ski on the same day. Nobody in their right mind would leave here unless they disagreed with the politics, it's a liberal's paradise.

    5. Re:It's you. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Actually, the technical term is 'Californication'. I think it's illegal in Oregon.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:It's you. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Actually this really is true. There is a general dislike of people from Cal. They blame people moving in from Cal for the outrageous cost of housing. And they think of people from Cal as being slackers.

      Same thing in Portland, Oregon. I experienced a little hostility when I first moved here from California. It helped that I married a local (so I'm an Oregonian by marriage now) and that I refer to myself as a refugee, not a transplant. It also helps to learn the local politics and culture. (In Oregon, "bottle bill == good, sales tax == bad".) For instance, I'm pretty sure that in Seattle the rule is "friends don't let friends drink at Starbucks", which is considered "the Coors of coffee". You're supposed to drink lots of coffee, purchased exclusively from privately owned carts. (Extra points if they roast their own beans.)

      And never ever EVER try to clean up Chief Seattle, no matter how green he gets.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    7. Re:It's you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only Organic Free-Range Californians in Portland please. Those caged in LA need not apply.

    8. Re:It's you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, Republicans are universally disliked, but don't be too sure about libertarians. There is a very strong group of the "Socially Liberal, Fiscal Conservative" libertarians in Seattle. Pot, Same Sex Marriage, and Firearms are all legal, hence a libertarian's paradise. In a liberal's paradise only the first two would be legal.

    9. Re:It's you. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Dunno about Seattle precisely, but it seemed like the people fleeing California to Oregon were looking for affordable housing in a place where they could also hold down a high tech job, and the tendency is towards liberal, because there are so many of them in California that it skews the results. I'm told that California immigrants can't understand why we're so hostile towards sales tax, for instance. Instead of blending into the culture here (as I tried to do) they instead try to force their environment to be just like home, not recognizing the irony of this. (Yeah, it's just like California, except it rains a lot. Bonus.)

      The problem with awesome weather is that everyone wants to live there. Traffic here is an order of magnitude better than the major metropolitan areas down there, despite the constant rain and occasional ice storms.

      I will agree with you on food with caveats -- the Mexican, Cuban and Indian food in California is much better than in the PNW. (Boy, do I miss Gaylord and Jose's in Palo Alto.) But we have better seafood.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    10. Re:It's you. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      As a native son of native sons, let me underscore this. Keep the bastards out!

      Signed, Emmett Watson

      P.S. If you really want to understand Seattle, you better start watching reruns of Almost Live.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    11. Re:It's you. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Sure, Republicans are universally disliked, but don't be too sure about libertarians. There is a very strong group of the "Socially Liberal, Fiscal Conservative" libertarians in Seattle. Pot, Same Sex Marriage, and Firearms are all legal, hence a libertarian's paradise. In a liberal's paradise only the first two would be legal.

      And then, only until the government decided otherwise.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    12. Re:It's you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have the same issue in Austin. There are two types of Californians coming in. The first are the people who have been in CA before the East Coast flooded it, then there are the "plastic people".

      The "plastic people" are the annoying ones. Texas has no income tax, so they want it. They can't make it in LA or the Bay Area, so they bring their problems here and expect Texans to handle their ways (hint... the guy with the pickup drives on roads with ruts in them that will eat your Prius's axles for lunch and drink the juice of the oil pan for a chaser... yelling at him as being not environmentally conscious at the pump isn't a good idea.)

      Of course, they vote in council members who have little to no interest in city planning other than rezoning residential areas into high density condo areas. No traffic or road planning is done... just *poof*... a four story building appears with tons of tenants and a once quiet road now is jammed. Of course this is endemic citywide -- the last major traffic improvement (other than a toll road or converting free highways into toll roads) was done in 1995.

      Of course, the homeless people from CA love Austin. Even the people from Santa Cruz notice how bad Austin is in with this respect... and if you have been to SC or Telegraph Avenue, that is saying a lot.

    13. Re:It's you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Keister is that you? You're my hero!

      So we are having a party for you down in Kent, I really hope you can make it! Come alone.

    14. Re:It's you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's called democracy, and progressives and liberals are pretty much into democracy. For that matter, so are conservatives and republicans.

      That's really the defining characteristic of libertarianism--anti-democratic. And it's why _some_ libertarians have a soft spot for dictators.

      Note that I'm being value neutral here. But we should all be honest about the distinctions. (I'm an anarchist, which is also kind of anti-democratic in its own way, whether because some anarchists prefer consensus politics, or because they prefer hard-core libertarian politics.)

    15. Re:It's you. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I misplaced all my caps and my wife's hair isn't big enough. Besides which, I have a hard time digging the music scene down there.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    16. Re:It's you. by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Please, I spend time in Seattle, and there isn't any good coffee their at all, just pretension. In Portland the pretension at least comes with good coffee.

      Please the general Portland populace is stomach turning anti-science.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:It's you. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I thought the coffee at the Monorail cart was pretty good, for whatever that's worth. I agree about the pretension, though.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    18. Re:It's you. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that in Seattle the rule is "friends don't let friends drink at Starbucks"

      Ironic, since it was founded and is based in Seattle.

    19. Re:It's you. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      it's a liberal's paradise.

      exactly what amazing liberal freedoms do you posses that the rest of the country is lacking? marijuana? everyone will have that in a few years.

      if you are referring to the people, step outside your little 'hood on capital hill or the U district or wherever. the 'burbs and outlying areas of WA are filled with hicks and hillbillies. pretty much like any modern city.

      We have awesome weather

      you don't have awesome weather. you have 3 months of decent weather and the rest of the year it's cloudy, dark, and drizzling. you have 58 clear days. where i live, we have 300+.

      better than a lot of places though. at least it's rare to get appreciable snowfall and it rarely gets below 20 or the winter.

      multicultural diversity

      like any other metropolitan area.

      surf and ski on the same day

      well, it's a 4 hour drive from snoqualmie summit to the ocean and that's the best you are going to do. in that day, you'll spend at least 8 hours driving, probably much more unless you happen to live at either of those locations. definitely more if there's actually snow in the mountains.

      on that day you went skiing, it's going to be 45 and windy at the beach, and the water will be about the same. can't wait to build that sand castle! if it's warm at the ocean (oh wait, it's NEVER warm at the ocean in WA), there's certainly not going to be any snow in the mountains.

      if all that's not enough, the seattle area is in the top 10 worst commutes in the nation, and it only has token mass transit (aside from buses). the monorail doesn't count you know.

    20. Re:It's you. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that in Seattle the rule is "friends don't let friends drink at Starbucks"

      Ironic, since it was founded and is based in Seattle.

      Yes, I'm aware of that. I'm just telling you what I was told when I did a contract up there. That Starbucks is considered generic, passe, the Coors of coffee, and real seattleites go to little coffee stands that nobody has heard of. Personally, I think it might be a hipster thing, and hipsters in the rest of the country just haven't twigged yet that standing in a Starbucks describing a ridiculously complicated drink in a whiny nasal voice has become passe.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    21. Re:It's you. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to play with words, really, but it's also a democracy until it's not. It used to be that our leaders govern with the permission of the governed. There seems to be a shift occurring to a situation where they don't need our permission anymore.

      I think you misunderstand what a libertarian is. It's not about whether one believes in free elections or not. I'm not at all sure where that came from. If a classic liberal is socially liberal and fiscally liberal, and a classic conservative is both socially and fiscally conservative, a libertarian wants to see government be socially liberal and fiscally conservative. I would argue that being socially liberal would necessitate being fiscally conservative, because reducing a person's discretionary income by tax and fee diminishes their choices. (Which is why some libertarians speak of "economic freedom" on that axis, instead of "fiscal conservatism".) But that's just me. Fascism (dictators) operate at the other end of the spectrum, about as far away from libertarianism as you can get and stay on the same plane.

      Some libertarians are true anarchists. Libertarianism is a journey, not a destination, and person A may get off the bus at an earlier point than person B, and say ok, I believe in less government involvement in our lives, but not *that* much less. It's hard to get true libertarians to agree on anything, (they're roughly evenly split on abortion, for instance) but they generally agree that we should have more liberties and less government spending than wherever we are now. How much more or less and what form that takes makes for lively debates. Keep in mind that any position can be made to look stupid by taking it to extremes (reducto ad absurdum). There are extremists in any party, but as a whole, people tend towards reasonableness. I personally know an anarchist whom I would not fear to have as a roommate. They don't all throw bombs and try to destroy public works. (Generally only the ones who make the news.)

      Oddly enough, although classic libertarians have something in common with classic Democrats (socially liberal), and something in common with classic Republicans, (fiscally conservative) you'd think the Big Two would find common ground with libertarians. Instead, libertarians tend to be hated equally by both major parties. The misconceptions (libertarians have a soft spot for dictators? Really?) are truly baffling sometimes.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    22. Re:It's you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well that is ok, because we had a "hunting accident" in mind for you.

      Back on topic with this story, The Almost Live Guide to Living in Seattle should be required viewing before moving here. Possibly with something like this as a citizenship quiz.
      And just in case it wasn't clear, this is what everyone thinks of Californians.

  8. Up North. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just don't seem to like the Californians.
    Majorly different mindset up there.

  9. Change your name to a foreign name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For obvious reasons, change your name and you will be guaranteed lots of interviews.

    1. Re:Change your name to a foreign name by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Funny

      Absolutely. There's a very low probablility that I'd ever hire someone named "Anonymous Reader".

    2. Re:Change your name to a foreign name by themushroom · · Score: 2

      But as for "Mujib Gandaharik", he goes to the top of the list.

    3. Re:Change your name to a foreign name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This! The technical part of most of the companies I've worked for in Seattle were run by Indians that would only hire Indians if they are able to. My last name is Lee so it sounds like it could be Asian even though it is British. I changed my resume to just my initials to hide my common American first and middle name, and I got many more phone interviews. What really helps in the phone screen is to add in a few archaic phrases like maths, do the needful, passing out (graduating), discuss about (can we discuss about the job?), years back (that project was two years back rather than two years ago), or say "do one thing" then mention several things. That will land you an interview in the Seattle area.

      But seriously, the five of the last seven start-ups I worked for in Seattle required sixty or more hours per week. Most of them refused to hire white employees because so many refused to work past 7pm or every weekend. That's why it's so hard to even get a phone interview in Seattle if you have an American name.

    4. Re:Change your name to a foreign name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop oppressing me!

      PS my last name is Coward.

    5. Re:Change your name to a foreign name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "maths" is not archaic, merely correct.
      The subject is called "mathematics".
      You cannot abbreviate a plural to a singular, so "math" makes no sense.
      If you had 5 hippopotamuses, you wouldn't describe them as "5 hippo" would you?

      Fucking Yanks.

    6. Re:Change your name to a foreign name by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Five sheep are, though, "five sheep" :p "Maths" I think of as a British-y thing; the only person I recall having heard speak that was from Ireland.

    7. Re:Change your name to a foreign name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, "maths" is probably more correct than "math" - There is more than one study...

  10. Can you look at the job postings ? by parallel_prankster · · Score: 2

    I suggest look at the job postings of Amazon, MS and others and see what areas they most desire. I am a CS/ECE grad and in Raleigh and almost once a month I have someone from MS or Amazon ping me about a position. I know for a fact both Amazon and MS love CS programmers, algorithms, distributed computing etc. If those or other similar buzzwords are present in your resume on linkedin or elsewhere, you will get an email soon.

    1. Re:Can you look at the job postings ? by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      Do not try to land the job with your mind, that is impossible.
      To land the job you must realize the truth: There is no job.

      MS and other tech companies are lobbying for more H1B visa employees. In order to employ H1B visa workers they must demonstrate that they looked for local talent, but could not find any. They put out an ad in the paper, and then instruct their HR to find or invent any reason they can to not grant the position to any local workers, no matter how trivial. Then, they cry out that they need more STEM field college students meanwhile not employing very many locally thus making sure their theater of demand only exists overseas. Finally, they employ lower paid H1B workers, while driving down the acceptable pay through artificial scarcity of applicants, and continued unemployment. This allows them to get governments to agree with allocating more H1B employees, despite high local unemployment rates, and to allow more outsourcing with no additional tax / trade tariffs.

      Hey Joe, Now you know, and knowing is half the battle.

    2. Re:Can you look at the job postings ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Driving down pay? You do know their starting salaries are around 90K for BS in CS/SE students right out of college? My summer internship pay was above 80K a year. The national average is still around 40K.

  11. MaryJane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do know Marijuana is legal there correct? Not that it makes anyone a flake or something; just saying...

    1. Re:MaryJane by RevSpaminator · · Score: 1

      Really? Oh no! We'll all be turned into godless communists who are in league with the Bolshevik Martian invaders. Soon we will force everyone to wear their underpants on their heads!

    2. Re:MaryJane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Soon we will force everyone to wear their underpants on their heads

      Wait I thought you already did. Oh no that's San Fransisco.

    3. Re:MaryJane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In defense of San Franciscans, the underpants may end up on our heads, but they don't start there.

      Hmm...good times!

  12. Re:Speakee Engrish? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

    See exhibits (a), (b).

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  13. I feel your pain by Uloi · · Score: 2

    It's kind of different out here. Back in Detroit for interviews, I was normally put in front of a computer and asked to write code. Pretty practical, and I did well. For whatever reason, out here everyone loves the whiteboard, run though a binary tree on a whiteboard, wtf does that have to do what what you are actually going to be doing? Nothing, but Google, Amazon and MS all have you do it, so everyone else copies it. Hard to put you on the spot like that over the phone. Also your timing isn't the best, right before X-mas holidays. PS Why doesn't slashdot like paragraphs?

    1. Re:I feel your pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a guy who hasn't even started his professional career in 10 years of graduating from a #1 school, I know the pain of getting an interview anywhere. I sent out thousands of resumes, talked to hundreds of headhunters, but I only had about 7 interviews in 10 years! I even spend most my time at home programming software trying to start a business, so I know how to do software engineering. I'm beginning to think all's fair in love, war and searching for jobs, so I'm going to be doing more than applying to jobs on internet boards. But I'm not sure what.

    2. Re:I feel your pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      PS Why doesn't slashdot like paragraphs?

      They like paragraphs but they expect you to put in your own html line breaks. For better or worse, no WYSIWYG here.

    3. Re:I feel your pain by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2

      HTML tags, give them a try.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:I feel your pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Account Preferences -> Posting -> Comment Post Mode -> Plain old text

    5. Re:I feel your pain by Uloi · · Score: 1

      Sweet, I just assumed all comment's screened them out. Lets try

      Hey Blink? marquee?

    6. Re:I feel your pain by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot screens and/or modifies some tags. You may also want to check your posting settings under /my/preferences or click the "settings" gear. You can change your posting mode. And, somewhere there is a list of the "allowed" tags.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  14. Shortage of tech workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is the so called shortage of tech workers?

    There isn't any, not in Seattle, not in SoCal and not in the Bay Area. Nobody told you?

  15. Seattle vs SoCal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seattle is surrounded and consumed by tech and IT. The reason you are likely getting more calls and head hunter response in the LA area than in Seattle is, bluntly, because the talent pool simply isn't as deep. A senior-level MS dude in LA (or San Antonio. Or St. Louis. Or Baltimore. Or Miami. you get where I'm going...) may not even register on the radars in Seattle for anything much more than one-step above entry level, assuming no real networking contacts in the area. Remember - Microsoft itself is headquartered across Lake Washington (and east of Kirkland) from Seattle. Your resume has to be extremely impressive - with 'desirable' employers and skills on it - for employers to look at non-local candidates for MS skilled candidates. They've got 40k to choose from, in the area, just from Microsoft itself!

    The second issue is that you also have to deal with the idea of relocation costs - unless the company can't find a local candidate (which, again, in Seattle isn't as hard as in other areas) that meets their criteria, they're not generally going to go after sucking up 10k in relocation costs for someone.

    Basically - you're trying to get into the one of the hardest to get into IT markets in the country from a MUCH less difficult one. It makes sense that you're hit ratio is going to be worse.

    1. Re:Seattle vs SoCal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah!

      No college degree, spent 9 years at a small company, 4.5 of them as a developer, not using the new company's primary language. My resume looks ... okay. They called me (I didn't apply), flew me out for an interview from the east coast, hired me, paid 100% of my relo costs, and gave me an assload of bonuses. I'm good, but I'm nothing special. I'm involved in the hiring process, and I've never heard anyone say anything about the relative skill levels of LA vs Seattle.

      This company is constantly asking for referrals, and yes, they do hire them, often. I don't meet a lot of out of work software devs around here.

      The guys around here are generally really good, I'll give you that. I wouldn't say I've met any superstar developers, although plenty that are better than me. But it's not like the devs here are magical awesome rockstars, they're just... pretty good in general.

      Fact is, you just get way, way, way lower response rates when you're not local.

  16. Never talk to recruiters by HansKloss · · Score: 1

    Recruiters are waste of time. They have nothing to offer and only collecting resumes.

    Apply directly!

  17. Duh by CatsupBoy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I liked the weather

    Ok, first off i know your lying.

    As a MS Stack software developer in LA, I barely had to do anything

    Thats better

    Something isn't right because I am still getting offers for interviews here in SoCal

    Uh, when you make professional contacts and they begin to know and trust you, word gets around and when positions come up so does your name. Its called networking? Maybe you dont need to know anything about networks as a MS Stack software developer..

    but not much from where I really wanted to be

    Again, networking. Your just some well tanned bum who lives on the beach and thinks its nice that this new place doesnt have sun 95% of the time. Why the heck WOULD they call you?

    Oh yeah, and your like 30 miles from the corporate headquarters of MS, so there are probably a few more MS Stack software developers hanging around.

    1. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow. You would think throwing out so many insults, that you would learn how to spell properly and use basic grammar. As it is, you sound like a semi-literate, drooling moron.

    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you dont need to know anything about networks as a MS Stack software developer..

      Daaaaaayuuum....

    3. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked the weather

      Ok, first off i know your lying.

      Some people like rain...

    4. Re:Duh by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 2

      I liked the weather

      Ok, first off i know your lying.

      I realize it's a weird personal quirk, but I actually prefer gloomy weather to bright sunny days.

    5. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your, you're ---- there is a difference. DUH!!!

    6. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...your lying.

      ...you are lying.
      ...you're lying.

      ...your like 30 miles from...

      ...you are like 30 miles from...
      ...you're like 30 miles from...

      I must ask you if it was worth all those days you ditched English to huff glue behind the cafeteria. Was it?

    7. Re:Duh by Nyder · · Score: 1

      I liked the weather

      Ok, first off i know your lying.

      ...

      Wait, what? I have lived in Seattle my whole life and I LOVE the weather here. I know it's hard to comprehend in your small mind, but some people in this world actually like rain. Grey, overcast weather does not bother me. Sunny, hot days do bother me. I fucking love Seattle weather. It's never too hot, it's never too cold. Rarely snows in the downtown Seattle area, gets lots of rain (which cleans the city). Beautiful out year around. Weed is legal.

      Seriously, I am in heaven living in Seattle. I understand it's not for everyone, but understand how you like to live, isn't how everyone else likes to live.

       

      --
      Be seeing you...
    8. Re:Duh by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Only becasue you haven't lived anyplace with regular sunny weather.
      You have no contrast.Sure it's better weather then the nothing else you have tried.

      You have tricked yourself into thinking you love the weather, just like a slave can trick themselves its not all bad becasue they have no reference.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Duh by Nyder · · Score: 0

      Only becasue you haven't lived anyplace with regular sunny weather.
      You have no contrast.Sure it's better weather then the nothing else you have tried.

      You have tricked yourself into thinking you love the weather, just like a slave can trick themselves its not all bad becasue they have no reference.

      Seriously, what? Is this how you feel about your wife/husband? You got nothing better, so you tricked yourself into loving them, because you have nothing to compare to?

      What the fuck sort of argument are you presenting here? I only like something because it's all I know? That I could not have traveled at all to other places and experienced their weather? That I am so wishy-washy that what I like changes on where I am at?

      I am not you. So if your argument works on you, I'm sorry that you are that weak minded. Me, I know what I like and I know what I accept because that is the way things are, and I don't confuse the two. You might want to see a marriage counselor though.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    10. Re:Duh by anagama · · Score: 1

      I'm not from Seattle -- 90 miles north of it. Anyway, I lived in Santa Barbara for one year and I went absolutely berserk. It rained only in January -- the rest of the time it was totally cloudless, and I hated it. The most boring weather ever. I couldn't get out of there quickly enough.

      Where I live, there is always something happening in the sky and I love it. Besides, without clouds, you can't have interesting sunshine -- the type where the air itself seems to turn gold -- requires the just the right level of recent drizzle, thick cloud cover, sun peeping in from a shallow angle above the horizon -- you get the most amazing super-saturated colors. It's like living inside some special effect.

      In contrast, bright garish light washes every color down to some shade of gray. And gives you cancer.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  18. No Homers by FrogBlastTheVentCore · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're all full-up on Californians. Stop applying here, stop moving here, and for the love of god, stop building Mexican-villa style buildings everywhere you go. It looks terrible next to an evergreen tree.

    1. Re:No Homers by Uloi · · Score: 1

      Prime example, and he isn't kidding. They just hate you up here.

    2. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Northern Californians? You like us better, right? Or at least hate us less?

    3. Re:No Homers by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Stay out of the Midwest, too. The last thing we need is more McMillionaires coming here and driving up the cost of living.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The equity they bring frees up you peasants so you can fuck off elsewhere, and their excess funds soon gets spent by eating out every other day and buying crap filling up your shitty houses.

    5. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get lost

    6. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them come to MN...
      Every one that comes in to MN from CA that I've seen goes back within a couple years...
      In the mean time they spend money here... buying coat after coat after coat finding out there isn't a coat built to handle -40F windchills for folks from SoCal.

      I doubt half of them even make 5 miles from the airport this time of year before they put their rental car in a ditch, and call a tow truck.

      Of course this builds up to my proposed state motto: "Move here, we dare you."

    7. Re:No Homers by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      We're all full-up on Californians.

      You need some more Texans. Here I come, YEEEEEHAAAAAW! [does Yosemite Sam dance]

    8. Re:No Homers by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

      Strange.

      Your proud of living in a shithole?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A Coat? Bah. Layers are the only way.

      Undershirt, t-shirt, collared shirt, sweater, scarf, coat, windbreaker, hat, gloves. That'll do ya for temperatures from -30*C to +30*C.

    10. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're proud of not having mastered English?

    11. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we don't like anyone from south of Federal Way. But keep making that beer. A couple of Old Rasputins, I don't care if I ever work again or if the sun ever shines.

    12. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a life-long Seattle resident and proud NIMBYist, I heartily agree.

      We don't care for your kind 'round here.

      Accept your fate. You can check out any time you like, BUT YOU CAN NEVER LEAVE.

    13. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't blame rats from abandoning a sinking ship.

    14. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not even from the midwest and I would rather live there than California. You libs need to stop abandoning your ships and sink.

    15. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      his praud wat?

    16. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he's proud of knowing how to use an apostrophe.

    17. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be confusing cost of living with standard of living.

    18. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is they don't want to pay palace prices for their shit-hole hovels.

    19. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange.

      Your proud of living in a shithole?

      *not same AC

      You misunderstand. People are proud of their nasty weather in the northern midwest because it keeps vapid assholes away. You call MN weather a shithole creator, I call it asshole repellent. As you don't live there, it must be working.

    20. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every place is secretly a shithole. We just don't pay so much for our midwestern shitholes.

      Well, every place except Seattle. I heard that place is da bomb.

    21. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I've read in various forums, just about everywhere hates Californians from the Mid-West to the East-Coast and North-West. Main reason being that the Californians campaign for gun restrictions, higher taxation to pay for social services, and then encourage illegal immigration because they feel that they are paying too much for services like childcare, hair salons and home repairs. Essentially they end up turning whatever state they have moved to, into the very same conditions that forced them to leave California.

    22. Re:No Homers by tap · · Score: 1

      stop building Mexican-villa style buildings everywhere you go. It looks terrible next to an evergreen tree.

      Don't worry, they cut all the trees down. Got to pack that lot with the biggest mcmansion that will fit.

    23. Re:No Homers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We're all full-up on Californians"
      As a 62 year old native born Californian, Glendale (Next to Los Angeles) in fact, I want clarification. Are you talking about one of me types, or the 50% of Californians who moved here from somewhere else. And we all know who the worst of those are and where they come from. I don't care how politically incorrect it is to complain about these people. All they do is want to take over, turn it into a pale imitation of *that place,* and how arrogant jerks they are, and they talk so fast...as if I could send them all back to New York I would do it in an instant.

      PS. Anyone want to buy a Locals Only sign? I can get all you want from China....

  19. it's a seller's market, that's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seattle-area tech support worker here, pretending to speak on behalf of other sectors: Once upon a time ten to fifteen years ago, Seattle / Redmond / Bellevue was a tech worker haven. Then companies discovered outsourcing in the early 2000's. And then companies discovered economic crisis in the late 2000's. A lot of smart people, hundreds and thousands, lost their jobs in the last decade and would do whatever they could.

    So as a result, if there seems to be difficulty for someone from outside the area to get a job... those of we inside the area have been dealing with this long before you showed up, and some of my bretheren will cut you [not literally] to get at those jobs.

  20. We don't need you - go away by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but we have lots of highly-educated people here already.

    Stay where you are.

    Oh, and stop overdressing - you just look awkward.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:We don't need you - go away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fine to be a yokel in a second-rate "city," but you should know that "over-dressed" is actually "appropriate" in the nicer areas of the country. I wouldn't be surprised if people show up to weddings in head-to-toe North Face up there. It's embarrassing.

    2. Re:We don't need you - go away by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      he was asking about Seattle. I was trying to be informative - overdressing for interviews here is a no-no

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:We don't need you - go away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As somebody from Colorado, what's the problem with showing up to a wedding in north face? I'd rather be comfortable and spend my money on fun toys then be miserable, spend my money on clothes just so I can look a little nicer.

    4. Re:We don't need you - go away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For plenty of weddings in Seattle being dressed in North Face is appropriate, and a suit simply isn't. Though wearing 66 Degrees would mark you out as being cooler.

    5. Re:We don't need you - go away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you look childish and unprofessional in your Casuals. Now I look Damn good in a well cut suit.

    6. Re:We don't need you - go away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is pants ok? Or do you cool Seattle-dudes go full caveman?

    7. Re:We don't need you - go away by RevSpaminator · · Score: 1

      You show up to interviews in a suit around here and you'd better know your stuff. A lot of people will see a know-nothing trying to cover their intellectual inadequacies by a bunch of slick polish. It's one of the few aspects of the Redmond culture that I agree with. Suit and tie are a serious Bozo flag. We care more about results than window dressings.

    8. Re:We don't need you - go away by RevSpaminator · · Score: 1

      You can keep the "nicer" areas. I'll keep the mountains, forests and ocean, all within a couple hours of where I live. Nothing I've seen on earth is nicer than that.

    9. Re:We don't need you - go away by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

      Is pants ok? Or do you cool Seattle-dudes go full caveman?

      that's a good question - a lot of people wear skirts actually, but that's a choice.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    10. Re:We don't need you - go away by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Since I still get regular phone calls form tech companies in Seattle, I don't think you have as many highly-educated peoples s you think you do.

      Stop being slovenly, you all dress like a 3rd world nation.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:We don't need you - go away by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, instead they assume you know everything by dressing like a slob.

      The fact that you seem to think someone can't be great at a job AND like to dress well show you inability to think on any other level than the most simplest. Which explain MS software, now that I think about it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:We don't need you - go away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather than making preposterous assumptions based on the way someone dresses, I think it's better to just... actually interview people.

    13. Re:We don't need you - go away by RevSpaminator · · Score: 1

      I didn't say they COULDN'T be great, I'm just saying too much polish and people see you are unfamiliar with the culture, which lead some to question just how much exposure you've really had. Besides, since when has casual meant you are slob? Just because I don't wear a suit and tie doesn't mean I'm unclean.

    14. Re:We don't need you - go away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's right, you need to dress like a metro-sexual faggot to get interviews in Seattle, at the interview you provide your own lube.

    15. Re:We don't need you - go away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then lucky for me I know enough to to only speak when I know stuff otherwise I keep my mouth shut and if not given that option then to say I will have to investigate that further and get back to you.

      And I still look damn good in that suit.

    16. Re:We don't need you - go away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I currently live in Seattle and previously lived in two major cities on the East Coast. Now whenever I go back and see people wearing cheap suits and ugly ties I laugh at them. You may think jeans & a North Face are embarrassing, but that's only because you don't see how poorly people dress "well" on the East Coast. If you're going to look like you have no sense of style, you might as well be comfortable.

  21. Labor market supply inefficiencies by daemonenwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is, in the city of Seattle, a certain company with a legendary history in the world of computing. It has been known as... The Microsoft.

    Considering the turnover rate for Microsoft employment, Windows stack developers are probably as common there as waitresses with SAG cards are in LA.

    Your problem is that your skills are a rare commodity in LA but common as dirt in Seattle

  22. Maybe... by Nexzus · · Score: 0

    ...Your PC isn't clean. I wonder if there's a product that can clean it. /Seriously. WTH?

    --
    Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
  23. Metric arseload of ex-MSFT people nearby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Redmond is about 10 miles away, so a "MS Stack software developer" isn't exactly hard to find in Seattle.

  24. Demand vs Supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why the question, it's like an actor asking why it is easier to get a job in LA vs Detroit.

    It's as simple as that the Demand vs Supply is higher in SoCal.

  25. Re:Get a local phone number by reedrudy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's hard to imagine that a tech company would screen candidates based on area codes these days. I've been living in Seattle for over five years and still have a 415 (San Francisco) area code. I think people tend not to change their phone numbers when moving anymore.

    That being said, I'm graduating soon with a PhD in bioinformatics, have an MS in computer science, and I'm not getting any interviews with large tech companies in the area. Maybe I do need a local phone number...

  26. "where I live" vs. "where I'm applying" by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've found that same problem before: recruiters look at the place where you currently live, not where you've said you're interested in working. So if I say I live in Los Angeles and am interested in jobs in Seattle, I'd expect to get lots of calls for... Los Angeles. When I switch and use the address of a friend in the area I want jobs in as where I live, suddenly I get calls for the right area. I don't see any way around this as long as the recruiters are ignoring the information in the profile this way.

    1. Re:"where I live" vs. "where I'm applying" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:"where I live" vs. "where I'm applying" by t0qer · · Score: 1

      I've found that same problem before: recruiters look at the place where you currently live, not where you've said you're interested in working.

      Haven't had the same experience myself. For reference, I live in San Jose California. Here's a snippet of what I get.

      Rate $36
      Hi,

      Hope you are doing well !!!
      I have a good position for you with my client; This point of time I don't know whether you are looking for new job or not.But just thought if I can share the details and then confirm from you about your interest level for the opportunity.if you are interested and available send me your most updated resumes in word format and contact details.

      Job Title:Network Support Engineer
      Location:Las Vegas, NV
      Duration: 6-12 Months Contract

      Well, $36 is too low for me, and I live nowhere near Vegas.

    3. Re:"where I live" vs. "where I'm applying" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be an assumption they make regarding relocation assistance. Or, it is Seattle and you're coming from SoCal. Or be a contractor for a bit. Plus, Microsoft. Have you worked for MS? If not...

    4. Re:"where I live" vs. "where I'm applying" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get headhunter spam? Who the fuck doesn't? It's meaningless and does not reflect any actual job or offer.

    5. Re:"where I live" vs. "where I'm applying" by JustNiz · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't consider any agent professional or even trustworthy enough to get my business if they wrote to me using grammar like that.

    6. Re:"where I live" vs. "where I'm applying" by t0qer · · Score: 1

      When you see exclamation points, run :)

      I actually tried talking to one of these clowns once, and as AC said above,

      "You get headhunter spam? Who the fuck doesn't? It's meaningless and does not reflect any actual job or offer."

      When I called them, it sounded like they were in a boilerplate telemarketer center in some far off place in the world.

    7. Re:"where I live" vs. "where I'm applying" by swillden · · Score: 1

      I've found that same problem before: recruiters look at the place where you currently live, not where you've said you're interested in working.

      +1

      I'm quite happy with my job in Colorado, but my family really wants to be in Utah (where we're from and where all the extended family is). So for the last year I've been trying to get various recruiters and jobs sites to look for stuff in Utah for me. There's lots of software in Utah, so it's not like opportunities should be hard to find, but all I get is (a) stuff in the Denver/Boulder metro area, where I live and (b) stuff for random locations everywhere else in the country.

      Maybe I should send out some resumes with my dad's address (I actually still have a Utah area code phone number).

      Actually, as it turns out it looks like I might be able to convince my current employer to let me telecommute (though likely on a different team), even though it's not generally allowed. If that works out it'll be ideal, so maybe all of those recruiters did me a favor by ignoring my requests.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:"where I live" vs. "where I'm applying" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are the Indian call center telerecruiters. They get paid by the email, even if it's poorly targeted. Spending time actually reading resumes for your address actually costs them more money by preventing them from spamming others than it earns them for a successful recruitment.

  27. No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Supply and demand: people refuse to move to California because the taxes and cost of living are sky-high, so there are more openings that go unfilled.

    1. Re:No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're rich, SoCal is just row after row of shitholes, with a couple of nice enclaves for multi-millionaires. I was stuck there for two years. Food is good, though - I'll give them that - but it's not worth having to live there.

    2. Re:No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you get what you pay for.

        Minneapolis might be cheap, but there was a snowstorm last night, Paris was 40 and LA as 70.

      wonder where I wanna go ?

    3. Re:No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet so many people live there that the LA area, alone, would be one of the largest economies on earth if it were its own country.

      Hint: CoL and taxes are high because everyone wants to live there and prices are in accord. If you want to talk about what-the-fuck CoL, downtown Manhattan is a place where professionals making 6-digit salaries have roommates just to make rent... why? Because it's downtown Manhattan.

    4. Re:No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, California has one of the largest economies in the WORLD...

      California's GSP (basically GDP) is something like 1.9 trillion (almost 14% of the US as a whole). Compare that to the list here:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)

      So yeah, it sucks to live in California and market forces are clearly punishing the state for its ungodly high aggregate tax rate. Or not.

    5. Re:No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Wrong, dip shit. More people move from out of state to San Francisco then Seattle.

      Taxes in CA aren't that bad; when compared with what you get. You get a lot of bang for your tax buck.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      The people who most want to move to SoCal are from other countries where for the most part, the COL is also sky-high. They don't know any better than to pay $1M+ for a 3 BDR shack because where they came from they had to pay $1M+ for a 2 BDR apt. LA traffic is nothing compared to where they came from. And the air in SoCal is cleaner, too. And you can usually use the beach without fear of contracting cholera or typhoid. And you can actually get gasoline and it's only $4.50 per gallon! And you can drink the water.

      Of course, if they knew all these things were available at much lower cost in other parts of the US, they might consider going elsewhere, but then there's the movie and TV factor. About 90% of Hollywood's output has historically taken place in SoCal (the other 10% is NYC). People in other countries watch TV and movies from the US and get the impression that living in Cali is paradise. They get to find out the hard truth when they sell their souls and maybe a few family members to get there.

    7. Re:No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      wonder where I wanna go ?

      A place that has real weather instead of tedium?

      Actually experiencing seasons is good for your mental state.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    8. Re:No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      So why wouldn't the So Cal companies pack up and move to Alabama or Mississippi with low taxes and unabridged second amendment rights and FREEDOM? Oh, yes, taxes are low but the quality of the work force is lower. All in all SoCal companies would rather pay high taxes and high salaries than move to these low tax states.

      It really sucks when the politicians sell you "cut taxes, cut services, make the government smaller, unshackle the job creators, prosperity will follow, it has to, it is supply side, rising tide yada yada yada". You believe them and turn around and see only old scoots in riding medicare provided scooters, living on Federal flood insurance properties, carrying huge placards saying, "Get the Government off my medicare" "Get a brain Morans!". And all the high paying jobs are created in high tax places like Mass, CA and NY!

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    9. Re:No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose that explains why, in California, real estate prices are low and employment is high.

      Oh, wait, that's not the case at all.

    10. Re:No one wants to move to SoCal; taxes too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary, I live in San Diego area and finding housing here is a real pain. For a while I was getting offers to buy my place about once a month, typically from real estate people offering me cash incentives to do so. I don't want to move so it does me very little good that my property value is working toward a bubble again.

  28. but there is hope by themushroom · · Score: 2

    There is, outside the city of Seattle, a certain company with a legendary history in the world of tech support. It has been known as... ACS, now a Xerox company.

    Considering the turnover rate for ACS employment, there's always space answering phones for Verizon Wireless through them.

    And half of the people I've worked with in the Internet industry ten years ago passed through their doors in the last five.

    1. Re:but there is hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check with Volt; they might still have phone support or game testing jobs.

    2. Re:but there is hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've known a lot of people that have been through ACS...nobody stayed who had a choice.

  29. Re:Speakee Engrish? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    See exhibits (a), (b).

    That would be a stronger point if not for the fact that they continue the habit of piss-poor grammar throughout the entire summary.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  30. companies prefer local candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most companies prefer local candidates. When they see that you are not local they may be crossing you out. They probably don't even want to pay to bring you up for an interview. You may want to note that you are looking to move at your own expense and like the Seattle area.

    1. Re:companies prefer local candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the "Seattle Freeze".. locals are known for not being friendly. As a local (formerly from somewhere else) I am now one of them and have the same attitude towards newcomers.

    2. Re:companies prefer local candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can second that. I've been a hired gun for 10 years. I'm actually in the process of moving from Denver to LA on my own dime (cost of living and weather reasons) and most of the place I've talked to don't want to extend an offer to me until I'm already local.
      There used to be a time when I was jetsetting across the country on the dime of the company trying to hire me. They just don't seem to want to do that anymore and I challenge you to find a position where relocation benefits are offered for anything less than CxO or VP x positions.

    3. Re:companies prefer local candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a very stupid company named Alltel at one time and it did all it could to hire anyone outside of the state and refused to hire in except for stuff like janitors. It had a terrible time finding people because no one wanted to move here and work for them at that price. Its like "we only like people who aren't from around here but they don't like us." They earned legions of enemies over that time and it was with great joy when Verizon bought out those creeps. Now if some other company would only buy out Acxiom, another stupid company that does the same thing.

  31. I hope someone can point me in the right direction by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    Sure, no problem. Try Linux.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  32. my clean spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Spammers won this thread.

  33. What on earth is "MS Stack"? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 0

    Is this another name for .Net? I've never heard of "MS Stack". Maybe it's too arcane to have much demand for it. Keep in mind that LA is the 2nd biggest metro area in the USA so finding work there using some little in demand technology is a lot different than going to a smaller area and trying to find a job using it. If it's .Net, well, that does have its users, but if anything it seems to me that .Net is dying not thriving.

    I've been to the Pacific Northwest in the lengthy rainy season, several times in fact, and all I can say is it's not for everybody. If you've never really experienced it for a week or more at a time, you can't just assume that you'll be OK with it. Having said that, if you can actually put up with it, I do understand why this part of the country appeals to some people.

    1. Re:What on earth is "MS Stack"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSStack: .NET + SQLServer, e.g., WISC (Windows, Internet Information Services, SQLServer, C#). And no, .NET is not dying; VB.NET is dying, but C# is still growing at the expense of Java.

    2. Re:What on earth is "MS Stack"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've never really experienced it for a week or more at a time, you can't just assume that you'll be OK with it.

      A week? I grew up there... one time we had 90 consecutive days of rain. If you can't take a week, and you plan on living there long-term, just shoot yourself... it'll save time.

    3. Re:What on earth is "MS Stack"? by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      .NET isn't dying, it's still by far the best enterprise and commodity business software development platform. Nothing else even comes close.

      As the the MS Stack, being someone who knows something about computers I'd say that means .NET + SQL + Windows Server and associated technologies. Not hard to figure out...

  34. Re:Get a local phone number by tgd · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's hard to imagine that a tech company would screen candidates based on area codes these days. I've been living in Seattle for over five years and still have a 415 (San Francisco) area code. I think people tend not to change their phone numbers when moving anymore.

    That being said, I'm graduating soon with a PhD in bioinformatics, have an MS in computer science, and I'm not getting any interviews with large tech companies in the area. Maybe I do need a local phone number...

    I would bet anything but the real big companies always does. Local hires (and candidates when it comes time to interview) are a lot cheaper. If your cell phone doesn't match where you live, you should indicate where you live on your resume.

    The GPs suggestion of pretending to live in Seattle is a bad idea. I've hired LOTS of people over the years, and if anyone ever pulled that, their resume would be round filed no matter how good they might be.

    IMO, if he wants to live in Seattle, and wants to find a job there, his best bet is to just move.

  35. From a Seattle tech dudes perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Seattle, well really not. I live in a city on the other side of lake Washington. But when people say Seattle, they mean Seattle, Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond, Renton etc 90% of the time.

    Seattle proper kind of sucks for tech jobs. They're there - but not as abundant as the east side. Bellevue and Redmond are quite a bit better in my opinion.

    That said, I've never seen a prejudice for hiring based on where people come from - at least 50% of my coworkers are not native to the Seattle area (or even the United States). However, I have seen an unwillingness to pay for relocation or consider people who aren't already here.

    Now here's your problem: in this area, probably like others, there are two classes of techies: Microsoft Centric and Unix Centric.

    Microsoft Centric folks are a dime a dozen and if you look overqualified they're not going to waste their time - cause they're not willing to pay all the much.

    Unix Centric folks are not rare, but are less abundant. They command a higher dollar figure.

    It may seem counterintuitive that in the land of Microsoft, MS platform skills aren't highly sought after - but in my experience that has been exactly the case.

  36. WA is Washington, LA is Louisiana? wait ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Los Angeles is L.A.

  37. Re: Speakee Engrish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. good comedy there! But do I really need a virus to beat my wife? Can't I do it just because it is fun?

  38. Weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop telling people you like the weather in Seattle. It's a clear red flag: you're either lying, crazy, or a Twilight fan.

    1. Re:Weather by nsaspook · · Score: 1
      --
      In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
  39. Seattle Culture by EricCordian2855 · · Score: 1

    There's an old joke about outsiders versus locals in Seattle. "When you move to Seattle, bring your own friends, because you're not going to make any while you're there." While locals don't control Seattle as much as they used to years ago, Seattle employment is a very insular environment dominated by employment agencies.

  40. You aren't there by jtara · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's pretty simple. It's because you aren't there.

    Move first. Then look for jobs. If you can't do that - forget it.

    Unless you have some very specific and needed skills, you need to already be local. And you won't fool anybody with a PO Box. Companies do not want to make the kind of commitment (if only moral commitment) that would be required, even if they don't pay relocation. It raises the bar for insuring it is a good match, and makes it more difficult for them to let you go if it doesn't work out.

    What it boils down to is your location is a complication to prospective employers. Why introduce a complication when (as others have pointed out) there are likely plenty of people with your skills who already live there? Nobody wants to screw around interviewing somebody who might or might not move to Seattle.

    1. Re:You aren't there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, if your skills are in demand. Big companies (Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Facebook) will hire, relocate candidates, even international ones. That's how I moved to Seattle, was actively recruited from another state. Question, then, would be why companies do not think candidate is hot commodity -- that I do not know. It could be MS Stack part, as others suggest; except for MS, most big companies around here do not do much development on Microsoft platform.

      Relocating yourself may help, but I honestly do not think that is the major problem here.

    2. Re:You aren't there by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      It's pretty simple. It's because you aren't there.

      This, absolutely. I've tried looking for jobs where I don't live, and always failed. So I quit, moved, and had no trouble.

      When I'm on the other side of the interview table, I do admit I am a little skeptical about someone who would need to move. Will he stay for the long-term? Is it possible he'll decide he doesn't like it here, and go back home? And, if we do hire him, how long will it take him to move? I'm not saying I wouldn't hire someone non-local, but given an option between two equally-qualified candidates, I'd absolutely pick the local one.

      Anecdotal evidence: we hired a guy who moved about 1000 miles for this job. He was a fantastic employee, and we made the right choice hiring him, but after about a year, he said he decided to move back home.

    3. Re:You aren't there by swillden · · Score: 1

      Anecdotal evidence: we hired a guy who moved about 1000 miles for this job. He was a fantastic employee, and we made the right choice hiring him, but after about a year, he said he decided to move back home.

      Heh, another anecdote: I moved about 500 miles for my current job, and the company seems pretty happy with me... but after about two years, I'm going to move back home.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  41. SoCal Brain Drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard from many friends that most developers want to work for the more glorious companies of San Francisco, and many of those companies want to move people out of that area, so LA Companies hire anyone interested, if nothing else, just to fill a position. I had an offer like that to work in an area I have 0 experience in just because I'm a competent developer and they had no doubt I could learn the tools/language. Compared to the candidates they were receiving who couldn't explain even the basics of concurrent programming, I am a rockstar. In the end I decided I'd rather stay where I am and work in an area I actually like working (low level C/Assembly) rather than Java/J2EE, but a little digging and networking led me to realize I could probably find a job doing what I want in LA if I wanted to move to LA, paying a decent salary because the reqs go unfilled for so long. Since I don't want to go there, and you're looking to leave though, sounds like the problem isn't getting any better!

  42. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you are currently employed, you find a job before you move. Anything else just shows idiocy.

  43. Re:Get a local phone number by lonechicken · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you should be in the I-270 corridor of Maryland. They can't get enough of your type in the area.

  44. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing this, being that they are doing their best to hire people from outside of the country who will work for half or less of what American programmers require for pay. Thanks a lot, Democrats in congress! We here in America don't really need jobs.

  45. re: out of town candidate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have the inverse problem. Recruiters call me for positions all over the country -- Virginia, North Dakota, Texas, Colorado -- and say they have looked at my resume and think I'd be perfect for the job. Well, if they looked at my resume they would see 25 years of continuous employment, all of it in the San Francisco Bay Area. So I ask them, "What about my resume indicates I have the slightest interest in relocating?"

    I also get calls from out of state recuriters trying to place me in Bay Area jobs. When I ask them about their familiarity with the Bay Area, it's typically little to none. Great, so someone with no clue what it's like to live and work here is going to represent my best interests? I politely tell them that we have recruiters in the Bay Area and not to waste my time.

    OK, so not always politely. If their English is poor, I ask them, "Why the fuck would I want you to represent me?"

  46. Its not what you know by eriklou · · Score: 1

    It's WHO you know... That I'm finding out more and more in the tech industry.

  47. What works in SoCal should stay in SoCal by vinn · · Score: 1

    The Pacific Northwest has reached it's max quota of Californians. Sorry, but we really don't want any more. Please consider reapplying after you've mounted a roof rack on your vehicle, own a kayak, mountain bike and a pair of tele skis (road bikes and snowboards are for pussies and white rappers.) Also, you'll need to complete 6 months working as a barista in order to fully appreciate the nuances of coffee. Finally, if you decide to whine about anything and/or compare it to SoCal, you'll be deported.

    --
    ----- obSig
    1. Re:What works in SoCal should stay in SoCal by Sez+Zero · · Score: 2

      Please consider reapplying after...

      So only hipster douchebags need apply?

    2. Re:What works in SoCal should stay in SoCal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please consider reapplying after...

      So only hipster douchebags need apply?

      Whatever. Seattle was into hipster douchebags before they were even cool.

    3. Re:What works in SoCal should stay in SoCal by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Also, you'll need to complete 6 months working as a barista in order to fully appreciate the nuances of coffee.

      I'm always amused when I'm in Seattle, and I place my usual order at Starbucks: "Grande Nonfat Latte." Then, there's a loooong pause, as the barista waits for me to reel off a whole bunch of customizations, but I don't. Standard temperature, standard coffee/milk ratio, really it's all fine by me.

    4. Re:What works in SoCal should stay in SoCal by Mark+Atwood · · Score: 1

      Why the hell are you drinking Starbucks when you visiting Seattle!?

    5. Re:What works in SoCal should stay in SoCal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, she's waiting for you to say "please."

    6. Re:What works in SoCal should stay in SoCal by anagama · · Score: 1

      Free Cascadia!

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    7. Re:What works in SoCal should stay in SoCal by anagama · · Score: 1

      He doesn't know any better. He probably even carries an umbrella.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    8. Re:What works in SoCal should stay in SoCal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in CT, but I avoid Starschmucks like the plague - don't like their coffee at all really. I think the last time I was there was over 5 yrs ago (and probably 5 before that), the morning after taking a ''spouse just dropped the D-word" friend out to get really drunk. :P She wouldn't drink the perfectly fine home-roasted home-flavored Guatamalan coffee I made, we "had to go to Starbucks".

      Of course, I get an odd look there anyways, because I want my coffee "large, black"... no cream, no sugar, no Grade Non-fat Latte with whipped cream and cinnamon... oh yeah, and I prefer a flavored coffee, but only with flavored beans not those stupid syrups that wind up tasting pretty nasty.

    9. Re:What works in SoCal should stay in SoCal by ulatekh · · Score: 1

      Please consider reapplying after...

      So only hipster douchebags need apply?

      You cracked the code!

      --
      "Once we've identified and embraced our sickness, we'll have strength...and that's when we get dangerous." - John Waters
  48. A new low in interviews by scorp1us · · Score: 1

    Slightly off-topic, but I wonder if others have seen this. I'm pretty senior (15yrs+) and applied for a new job.After submitting a resume, I was invited to take part in a video interview. But here's the catch. The firm is local and no one is at the other end. Best I can describe it, you talk into your webcam while answering questions. I've never felt more de-humanized in a process. And these people expect me to work for them? Maybe for an entry level position but for someone over 10 years?

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:A new low in interviews by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That is fascinating, what kind of questions did they give you? That sucks as an interview process.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  49. It's the global warming by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    Before Global Warming/Climate Change...
    Vancouver/Seattle = ~3 months of summer and the rest rain
    Rest of North America = the regular expected seasonal weather, snow in winter, hot in summer, leaves changing colour in fall, etc.

    Now/After Global Warming
    Rest of North America = OMG Apocalypse BBQ
    Vancouver / Seattle = oh look seasons

    1. Re:It's the global warming by anagama · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's how I like it. The sun just causes cancer and makes you wrinkle. That said,

      Three guys are camping, one from Washington, one from Kentucky, and one from California. They're sitting around chatting when the guy from Kentucky pulls out a bottle of whiskey, takes a big swig, corks it, throws it in the air, whips out a pistol, and shoots the bottle before it hits the ground.

      He then turns to his slightly shocked companions and says "no worries -- we got lots of good whiskey where I'm from."

      The Californian then does the same thing with a bottle of wine -- takes a swig of wine, corks the bottle, tosses it, and shoots it before it hits the ground, remarking "no worries -- where I'm from, we've got lots of good wine."

      The guy from Washington pulls out a bottle of Hales, pops the top, drinks it all, carefully sets the bottle down so it doesn't break, and shoots the Californian dead. The guy from Kentucky is shocked, but the Washingtonian says "no worries, where I'm from we have lots of Californians, but I really do need to recycle this bottle."

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    2. Re:It's the global warming by JustNiz · · Score: 4, Informative

      You should move here to Phoenix, AZ. Blue skies maybe 340 days of the year.

      Before Global Warming/Climate Change...
      F'ing hot but everywhere has good AC, cold beer and most houses have swimming pools.

      Now/After Global Warming
      F'ing hot but everywhere has good AC, cold beer and most houses have swimming pools.

    3. Re:It's the global warming by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      Can you say haboob?

    4. Re:It's the global warming by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      The sun just causes cancer and makes you wrinkle.

      depression, mold spore, inhalation, and vitamin D deficiency are better?

    5. Re: It's the global warming by Durrik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just moved from Seattle to Phoenix, strangely enough it was because my job in Seattle ended and I couldn't get another job. The tech market for interviewees sucks in Seattle, I knew about the job closing for 6 months and still couldn't find a job there. So in a lark I applied to a job in Phoenix/Chandler. Had a phone call from them in 2 hours, an on-site scheduled 2 hours later. Call the day after the interview saying they're getting an offer together.

      The job turned out to be about 2 levels above what I was applying for in Seattle. Love the weather here and don't regret leaving Seattle at all. They actually appreciate 15+ years of software engineering experience here. In Seattle all they seemed to care about was big O notation, not what you can actually do.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
    6. Re:It's the global warming by anagama · · Score: 1

      Sun makes me depressed, hard contrast light gives me a headache, and bleached out colors are ugly.

      Drizzle and soft light are delightful. And when the sun does slip some light sideways under thick cloud cover, the air turns golden, and all the greens of the trees and reds of the flowers become supersaturated. Love it.

      I also like mold, moss, and mushrooms.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    7. Re:It's the global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After watching both my parents suffer through Valley Fever (nasty fungal infection indigenous to the area) you couldn't pay me enough to go anywhere near Phoenix.

    8. Re:It's the global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite being as californian as they come... that's a good joke.

    9. Re: It's the global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Seattle wants more than code-monkeys.

    10. Re: It's the global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, Northern Virginia resident here. Got an onsite interview at Amazon in Seattle earlier this year and this sums my interview up perfectly: "In Seattle all they seemed to care about was big O notation, not what you can actually do."

      Last time around I landed a job in 2 days local market. Had a very basic programming test and a lot of talk about what I actually delivered in past projects. It rocks to be in the techy market around here.

    11. Re: It's the global warming by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Yeah I like Phoenix too, but there's a large amount of avionics biz around Phoenix. if you enjoy innovative and creative software development with leading edge tech then I strongly advise you don't make the mistake of getting sucked into avionics.

      As a Software Engineer in avionics you wont hardly ever be actually designing or writing any code, instead you'll be mostly doing bureaucratic bullshit based around a clueless FAA-mandated requirements-driven waterfall-based process which is also so obviously and completely ineffective at its intended purpose of ensuring quality, it quickly destroys your will to live.

      Once in, avionics is also a hard industry to leave, because all your tech knowledege and skills relevant to the real world will have turned to mush through disuse/misuse.

    12. Re: It's the global warming by z3r0w8 · · Score: 0

      In Seattle all they seemed to care about was big O notation.

      It's funny because it's true...

      --
      -----
    13. Re:It's the global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, good luck with water prices in 10 years.

  50. Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by Nivag064 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remember that the need for Microsoft developers will soon decline, if it has not already done so.

    Most devices run Linux.

    Mobile phones are dominated by Linux, as are most other mobile devices such as eBooks, and Linux is gaining ground in tables with Android & Chrome O/S. Linux dominates servers: note that essentially all Valve, Dig, and Google servers (I expect that they probably do run the odd Microsoft server, although I have no evidence of this) run Linux - not Microsoft. At least 95% of the top 500 supercomputers run Linux.

    More and more companies and organisations are adopting Linux as their primary O/S on the desktop like the French Gendarmerie (http://www.zdnet.com/french-police-move-from-windows-to-ubuntu-linux-7000021479) and the local Government of a region in Spain (https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/osor/news/spains-extremadura-starts-switch-40000-government-pcs-open-source).

    At home we have 2 Linux workstations (3, if you count my old development box I normally keep powered down), 2 Linux laptops, 2 Android phones, an Apple desktop, and an iPhone - for 2 adults and a teenager. Note no Microsoft boxen.

    So for professional reasons, you should at least be investigating moving your skill base to Linux!

    1. Re:Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Linux does not dominate servers anymore. You are probably assuming that every Unix-like back end on the internet is Linux but this is patently false. Windows Server has gradually grown to beat Linux in the server space by total market share (though not by total traffic, due to the skewing by giant internet mega-corps like Amazon and Google that tend to need to roll their own, which is the great thing about Linux being open source).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Servers

      Note that this will be somewhat skewed, since many companies that require multi-platform support will opt to run some of their Linux services in virtual environments that run on Windows (a big selling point of Windows).

      I agree that it is best to be well versed in Linux these days though. The future will be multi-platform, and developers who have both skills will be at a premium.

    2. Re:Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by ljw1004 · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, for cross-platform development between your two Android phones and your iPhone, maybe Microsoft's C# language is the right choice...
      http://blog.xamarin.com/eight-reasons-c-sharp-is-the-best-language-for-mobile-development/

      (disclaimer: I work on the VB/C# team at Microsoft)

    3. Re:Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by Nivag064 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am now a Java developer. I started with FORTRAN on mini-computers in the 1970's, and later COBOL on mainframes. Now I'm implementing a Java Enterprise (JEE7) application that will use a browser front end and having to come up to speed in JavaScript and associated frameworks like AngularJS.

      Actually one lunch time in the early 1980's I helped someone write a screen saver in VB, it was the first time I'd seen VB. Probably convinced my colleague that I knew a lot more than I did!

      I may be 'forced' into programming an Android tablet for a contract coming up. But if I was targeting mobile phones I would go to Android, Microsoft is way behind Apple, and Apple is way behind Android.

      I have been tracking Linux since the early 1990's. Got heavily into Unix when I went back to university to do a DippAppSci (about half the value of an M.Sc.) in 1991. Taught C to experienced programmers to make a bit of money on the side.

      The future for Microsoft is fairly bleak, in the medium to long term. If you intend still programming in 5 years time, then you should definitely develop your Linux skills.

      I am keeping an eye on Ceylon (http://ceylon-lang.org) as an alternative for Java, as I'm concerned about Oracle's ethics. Ceylon will not only run in a JVM, but also in a JavaScript engine.

      I have a friend who has been developing and supporting software in the Microsoft environment for over 20 years, he only uses Linux at home. He would switch to Linux at work if he saw the opportunity.

      I definite would not advise anyone to go into VB or .Net now.

    4. Re:Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      "At home we have 2 Linux workstations (3, if you count my old development box I normally keep powered down), 2 Linux laptops, 2 Android phones, an Apple desktop, and an iPhone - for 2 adults and a teenager. Note no Microsoft boxen."

      Well, I guess MS should fold up their business and go home. Because nobody anywhere is still using them on the desktop...

    5. Re:Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by Nivag064 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Unless it has changed in the last few years: I recall people where advised to just have one major application per Microsoft box, whereas running multiple apps on Linux was much more common, also Linux tends to have better performance in general and superior security. Plus Microsoft boxen tend to need more work.

      So you generally need more Microsoft boxen to handle a given workload than when using
      Linux. As more companies wake up to that, Linux market share will gain even more.

      I know that a lot of decisions to go with Microsoft are done out of political considerations (I had a friend working at the New Zealand Tax department, who could testify to that!), and ignorance. Changing to Linux for political reasons, or because it is 'fashionable', is a recipe for disaster - Linux is no panacea, one still needs to be competent and have sufficient budget (even if the Linux solution is cheaper than the Microsoft one, as is usually the case) .

      Note that Linux & Unix totally dominate supercomputers. Stock exchange rely on Linux boxen to handle trading, Microsoft boxen simply aren't up to handle the load reliably at the performance levels required.

      I remember a very slick presentation/debate between a Microsoft guy pushing NT and someone representing
      Unix. In terms of presentation, the Microsoft guy won hands down - but NT had a notable limitation of only being able to support 32 concurrent users, whereas Unix boxen had no problems supporting hundreds of users.

      However, as Linux servers increase their market share, there will be added pressure on the Microsoft job market.

      Google is extremely cost conscious, so if Microsoft did really have a far better ROI on Linux, than Google would be using mostly Microsoft boxen.

      I have 35 virtual desktops on my main development box (32GB RAM), currently using a bit over half of them - I've never seen this facility on a Microsoft box. I have 2 highly customised panels that autohide using the Mate Desktop Environment Manager - the Microsoft Desktop Environment Managers are far less customisable. As for Microsoft's Window 8, that is worse than GNOME 3, and is demonstration of leading innovation at pissing off both users and developers.

      When I use a Microsoft box, I feel like I'm flying blind without adequate instrumentation.

      It is easier for teenagers to get in depth experience of Linux, compared to Microsoft. Any one can download the Linux source code and compile it legally, this is generally not possible with Microsoft. So even before the Raspberry Pie, far more younger people were training themselves in Linux than Microsoft. So it is far easier to hire new people with in depth Linux skills, than Microsoft skills. Plus Linux runs on a wider variety of hardware than does Microsoft. So it is not surprising that the overall market share of Linux is already dominating all other operating systems put together!

      So the medium to long term trend on servers, definitely favours Linux.

    6. Re:Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      A major VM website provider switched to Apache on Windows after MS handed them a big pile of money. That's skewed the numbers. It's estimated that 99% of websites that run on VM's are garbage parked websites filled with ad's.

      So yea, Microsoft probably has a corner on the 10,000 VM, ad laden, malware serving, website parking servers that count as an installation but in fact aren't actually doing anything. As a result the numbers you quote are worthless indicators of actual use.

    7. Re:Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a fellow java person for business apps I've been playing with Go (golang.org) on the side. It isn't ready for complex business apps yet, but it is fun to play with :)

    8. Re:Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by swillden · · Score: 1

      note that essentially all [...] Google servers (I expect that they probably do run the odd Microsoft server, although I have no evidence of this) run Linux

      Ah, no. There may, perhaps, be some systems Google got via acquisition which are on Windows boxen, but you can bet the teams' top priority is to get them migrated. Google runs on Linux. You have to get special approval to have Windows on your laptop -- Goobuntu (Google's tweaked Ubuntu), OS X or ChromeOS? No one will even blink. But Windows will get you asked "why"? And if anyone seriously suggested building something on a Microsoft server, I think everyone in the room would pinch themselves.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by maccodemonkey · · Score: 1

      85% of the PC market on Windows still means there is an active need for Windows software. I could see that the Windows development sphere might be saturated with developers (Windows or .Net developers are honestly the most common type of developers I run into, and I'm on the Apple stack side of the fence), but I don't think we're in a climate where most devices are running Linux. And Android is really a Java platform, not a Linux development platform for most.

      You might have 2 Linux workstations, but as of right now, that's not the market. It could be in the future with Windows 8 the way it is, but there is still a lot to be seen if Linux will take the desktop or phone (and again, I'm not really counting Android in since Android development != Linux development generally.)

    10. Re:Demand for Microsoft Skills Declining? by rakslice · · Score: 1

      What are you getting at? OP is a software developer, and so is presumably looking for a job developing software, not setting up servers.

  51. Seattle is Full by lbmouse · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The last thing they need is more Californians. Try Portland or Tacoma.

    1. Re:Seattle is Full by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last thing they need is more Californians. Try Portland

      PDXer here. You can go fuck right off a cliff. We don't need more people whining about how we aren't like home.

    2. Re:Seattle is Full by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Portland is full too.

    3. Re:Seattle is Full by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last thing they need is more Californians. Try Portland or Tacoma.

      +1 for sending them to Tacoma ;)

  52. On second thought... by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

    Given your alternative, that Taco Bell hacienda style isn't *that* bad.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  53. Re:Get a local phone number by puppetman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think companies don't want to bother interviewing and recruiting for someone who's not local. If offered the job, chances are that you'll not actually follow-through with the relocation. I know when we go looking, and we get someone from out of town, they almost always drop out of the running, or can't move in the time-frame required.

    It's a chicken and egg thing. Potential employees don't want to move till they get a job. Employers don't want to hire anyone not local.

  54. Holy spam by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    There is, as of this writing, FOURTY-FUCKING-FOUR posts with the "About six months ago, I was overexerting myself trying to get rid of a terrible virus on a client's PC..." spam. The worst thing is, it's only a few users who posted those and all posted within the same minute of each copy. Isn't there supposed to be a timer to prevent more than X posts per minute? How are these jerks bypassing them?

    1. Re:Holy spam by Teun · · Score: 1

      It's the infamous /. dupe worm, it got in when Timothy decided to check up on a submission.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  55. Re:Get a local phone number by cusco · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've lived in Seattle since 1996 (and 5 years in the '80s) and getting interviews as a techie here has ALWAYS sucked. At times I've had over 200 resumes out and gotten two or three interviews out of it. The OP's experience is not atypical.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  56. Weather Schmether! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have moved several times in my career.

    It is stressful and expensive. I live in apartments and moving costs a minimum of $5,000. Deposits, fees, and other nickle and diming that one gets. You end up in debt or your savings is clipped severely. That's why kills me about the economists who say people need to move to where the work is. Aside from homeowners in this shit market, it's expensive and even as a well paid software developer, it took me over a year to get even.

    I moved because of money and I wanted a clean slate. I thought that moving would change my life and in my new place, I''d finally find the happiness that I have always wanted. The 100% increase in pay helped too - I was underpaid and it was the mid-90s.

    Doesn't work as far as having a clean slate.

    If you are lonely in your current place of residence, you'll be lonely in your new place, The only exception to that rule is if you are moving to get close to family. But that's a whole other bag of shit....MOTHER!

    The OP is set up in SoCal and he should stay there.

    No. I think it's more than weather.

    1. Re:Weather Schmether! by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 2

      I moved country (from Australia to New Zealand) and it was the best thing I ever did.

      I want to move again (now to SoCal or the Bay Area but visa issues yay) and am really looking forward to it.

      People SHOULD move and experience life in a new area. Especially in a different country where possible.

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    2. Re:Weather Schmether! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, pretty rare for someone to make the move from Oz to NZ, its generally the other way around, a lot of my friends moved to Oz and never looked back. I bailed nearly 2 years ago to live in the US, and its the best thing I ever did.

      I also agree, with experiencing different places by living and working in them - twice I got working holiday visa's once to the UK and recently (3 years ago now) to Canada which lead to meeting my (now) wife from the US.

    3. Re:Weather Schmether! by jemmyw · · Score: 1

      I moved country, from the UK to New Zealand and it was the best thing I ever did.

      I moved again from NZ to the Bay Area, and I'm not regretting it for the experience, but I'm pretty sure I'm going to head back to New Zealand in as short a time as possible. Your sig is pretty accurate.

  57. Re:Get a local phone number by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Huh? Do you know how many recruiters I told "I need information on a the proposed relocation package prior to reviewing the job offer" from in the past 10 years? Repeat offenders are requested "Please go purchase a Globe and review where you are hiring for versus where I live." I have further reported some companies as spammers because they simply fish by regular expression and ignore location.

    Most companies _do_ screen based on area codes these days, and I'm happy for it. The foreign run agencies not so much, but I ignore them even if they get lucky with a local job offer.

    Now this is of course different than me going on line to fill out an application, but I can't see a recruiter treating it any differently. Unless there is a way to make them know ahead of reading the resume "I want to move next door and I won't ask for money from you to do it.".

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  58. Washingtonians HATE Californians... by zzottt · · Score: 1

    If you want a job here, you will have to live here. Sad but true most people in Washington hate when Californians move here. If your resume says you live in California right now, it will be put at the bottom of a list most of the time.

    1. Re:Washingtonians HATE Californians... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      In 2001 I had 3 offers in Seattle, 2 of which offered to move me from Huntington Beach, Ca.
      I ended up taking an offer in Portland, Or.

      Seattle may have a low cost of living, but the pay there sucks. I wont let you kiss my ass for a measly 75K, even if housing in 30% less.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  59. Such elitism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Up here, the only people that should dress up for weddings are the ones getting married. I still haven't recovered from the rented tux I had to wear at my daughter's wedding, and I warned her that she better not get married again 'cause I am definitely not dressing up for another.

  60. Re:Get a local phone number by s.petry · · Score: 2

    I agree with not lying about where you live, but finding a job ahead of time should not be that difficult. Vacation and visit, send lots of emails and most importantly be HONEST about what your plans are. Moving without a job, as the AC points out is a bad idea.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  61. There a reason.... by recharged95 · · Score: 1

    why it's called the Emerald City.

    1. Re:There a reason.... by publiclurker · · Score: 0

      Moss?

    2. Re:There a reason.... by kgfowler · · Score: 0

      Sinusitis...

    3. Re:There a reason.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roy?

  62. Newsflash! by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    No one in the "nice weather" parts of Cali is from there. No one...
    They are from China, India, Mexico, Russia, the UK, and of course the rest of the U.S.
    If you want to find Californians that were born and raised there go inland... Modesto, Bakersfield, Redding.

    I always get a kick out of people who live in Oregon, Washington, et al who bitch about people from Cali. More likely than not, they only lived for for ten or less years and are originally from Poughkeepsie, Hyderabad, Tulsa or Shenzen.
    I'm a Cali native who doesn't live there anymore, but visits often. The only place/attitude I've experienced with a higher snark/sneer factor than the Bay Area is, yep, you guessed, Seattle.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  63. It is cultural. by netsavior · · Score: 1

    It is impossible to get sh!t done in the pacific northwest, which is fine if you are in to that sort of thing. In addition, people in the Pacific Northwest have this idea that unless they band together and only "buy local", that the transformative power of poorly understood economic fallacy will magically create a closed loop utopia.

    I saw upthread people were suggesting Portland and Tacoma, which have the same problem turned up to ELEVEN.

    1. Re:It is cultural. by RevSpaminator · · Score: 1

      What a whiner. I get sh!t done all the time.

    2. Re:It is cultural. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, by Portland standards. Ever try to get and venture capital on Portland? what a nightmare. In CA and NY you know right away, the commit or don't. In Portland it's 2 months of being strung along by some guy who turns out only to have 100G.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:It is cultural. by RevSpaminator · · Score: 1

      Maybe your concept wasn't that great to begin with.

    4. Re:It is cultural. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume he gets sh!t done because he actually works.

  64. It's Hard to land a job if you're not local by Tempest_2084 · · Score: 1

    I've been running into a similar problem trying to land a job in CA (my wife is a native and wants to move back). I'm in MI doing systems admin/project manager work for one of the 'Big Three', and while I get tons of recruiters calling me, they're all for local positions (although not all in the automotive sector which I guess is at least one positive). I've had very little luck landing interviews with any company in CA and I'm fairly sure it's because I'm not already in CA even though I'm not expecting a company to pay for relocation. While my skill set is good (if I do say so myself), it's not unique, so I'm guessing companies would rather look for someone closer by simply because they can.

    Unfortunately I'm a bit risk adverse, so moving to CA without a firm job offer is out of the question (I'm not putting my wife through something like that). The longer the cycle goes on the more depressed I get, but I keep on trying because there's not much else I can do.

    1. Re:It's Hard to land a job if you're not local by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have relocated from Michigan to Indiana in the pre google voice world. I bought a local voicemail account and used my parents address. I didn't lie when interviewing, but the job a snagged was pretty crappy so that might have been a mistake.

      I would suggest you set the bar a little lower for your first job, so you can relocate and have something to bring in some cash. Then you will be a local candidate and you should be able to find something better. One short term stint on a resume is not going to hurt you if you have a history of longer term work.

      Nobody pays relocation anymore.

  65. it's that tech people don't want to be in LA by boguslinks · · Score: 1

    Free your mind. The thing here is probably that it's tougher for tech companies in LA to recruit. I live in Seattle and you'd probably have to pay me 50% more to live in LA. Lots of people'd like to live in Seattle, for the reasons you describe, so there's plenty of job candidates.

    1. Re:it's that tech people don't want to be in LA by RevSpaminator · · Score: 1

      You couldn't pay me enough to live in LA. I'd sooner live in Burien.

    2. Re:it's that tech people don't want to be in LA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I wish I had mod points for that.

  66. Fuck you and go back where you came from. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's already too many fucking californians in Seattle. Get out and stay out.

  67. Really?! by RevSpaminator · · Score: 1

    You don't understand? Really?! Could it be that MS programmers are a dime a dozen around Seattle? Could it be that you are expecting an LA salary? Maybe you should focus on developing skills that are a little more in demand. Non-MS specific skills are a little harder to come by around here. How is your Java? GNU-Linux? etc... Many companies are looking for people who can think outside of the MS-Certified-Box. Those that drank the MS.NET Kool-Aid can pick up cheap talent from the local community colleges and high schools.

  68. Your SoCal experience is partly an issue of scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gave up being a life-long Seattle resident to relocate to the LA area about 3 years ago partly for the reason you cite: tons of jobs here. Southern California is beyond huge compared to Seattle. The number of technology workers here dwarfs that of Seattle including even MS and Amazon. How many large tech companies are between LA and the Mexico border? Medium size? Small? A huge number. Seattle has Microsoft and Amazon, and then a bunch of other smaller companies basically hoping to get bought by one of them.

    To be sure, LA is no Silicon Valley, but bear in mind that every entertainment company also is to some degree a technology company (e.g. Disney, DIRECTV, all the movie studios). Then, you've got Broadcomm, Qualcomm, Toshiba... etc etc. The market here is huge. The same is true in the legal world (my field). There are relatively few jobs in Seattle even for folks with technology backgrounds. You can write your ticket in California.

    I will also echo what some others have said... localism is a factor in Seattle. It really is an insular, strange little place. Outsiders, especially from California, are generally looked at with suspicion if not outright hostility. That has cooled somewhat now that the housing market has cooled. But during the runnup to the bubble, everyone, myself included, was tired of seeing folks sell their 2 bedroom condo in LA or SF, move to Seattle, and positively not give a crap about what a house cost because it was so pitifully cheaper, and often pay with cash to boot. It really stoked the bubble up there... In general, money has not done good things for Seattle. It has lost it's character to a large degree.

    Lastly, the weather does absolutely suck. I lived there for 25 years, and even with the 10% pay cut due to income tax here, it will be hard to get me to go back. If you don't care for June Gloom, you will HATE Seattle. It is June Gloom on steroids there for 9 months a year... in a good year.

  69. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you are currently employed, you find a job before you move. Anything else just shows idiocy.

    If you want to live somewhere bad enough you just move, plain and simple.
    What shows idiocy is complaining about something and never doing it.
    You'll never get anywhere in life without taking chances.

  70. Tech quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As someone who oversees several branch software development offices in SF, LA, and Seattle (along with a few east coast ones) and is hiring developers (I've got 100+ and looking for more) - I can point to three things that are killing you:

    First, as others have said, MS tech skills don't mean much in Seattle, unless you've already worked at Microsoft for a stint. Why should I, as an employer, hire some third-party guy to do MS development, when I can hire a real ex-MS engineer who had a good chance of being the framework developer in the first place. You've got a certification? Great. I can hire the guy who wrote and developed the curriculum instead. They churn enough people through that you're frankly, just not qualified to work on a Microsoft stack, at least in comparison to what I can get up there in the marketplace. You want to work on MS stacks, go work at MS. The little MS maintenance work I need in my environment, I only hire ex-employees to do for me, because I can.

    Second - all the cool kids in town are running Linux. I don't know any major startups or other big players using the MS stack... they're all running cloud based stuff, and a lot of it in AWS. The MS stuff is confined to the drone and drudgery of a corporate IT department. Not that it's bad for that - it's not...stupid simple... but there aren't a lot of major game-changing, startup-like-exciting jobs out there in Seattle for MS developers. Speak Java, Javascript, or have some cool science project in Erlang/Haskell/god-knows-what, and we can talk.

    Third - talent. I can say there's a marked difference between my Seattle and SF crew, and the level of talent that my LA team brings to the table. It's not even close, and when I do find them in LA, it's like a needle in a haystack. Nice guys, good to work with, but I spend 10x the effort in LA to hire one guy with even close to the developer talent and quality I find in the Bay area or Seattle. Of course, I get to pay him a lot less, too, so I keep doing it :)

    You want to play up there, move up there first. And learn Java or Javascript+node.js if you want to be marketable in that environment.

    1. Re:Tech quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep if you don't use a hipster language and/or framework de jure you definitely won't get a job in Seattle.

  71. Re: out of town candidate by RevSpaminator · · Score: 1

    The last time a recruiter tried to call me about a contract position - at MS, orange badge no lessl - I told him I would need at least 97K/year (I picked a prime and added some zeros) and would consider nothing less than permanent employment (blue badge). The guy left me alone after that.

  72. Then, fake being local... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other's have said it too, I know... but it bears repeating. Yes, your current location is a factor. So, fake your location... Use the mailing address of a friend or relative, and get a Google Voice number. It's free, and will forward to your actual phone. You can even set up caller ID so that your Google Voice number appears on your phone, and you then know it is someone calling your GV number instead of your cell phone.

    In job interviews, it is difficult for them to ask too many questions about your personal life since it could open them up to claims of discrimination. If they start asking you where you live, tell them the address of your friend or relative or whatever, and say you just moved back recently. It's not hard to eliminate this factor from the job seeking process.

  73. It's simple ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you don't have an H1B visa, are not willing to work for minimum slave wage and cannot be shipped off without notice at the discretion of the employer.

    Have you not got the memo?

  74. It's rainy and cloudy in the tech job market here by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

    The tech job market out here is not great at the moment. There were a lot of layoffs that were publicized in 2008, and companies like Microsoft took some flak for it. They've smartened up and have been slowly downgrading their workforce (basically laying off or firing people, then hiring replacements on contract at lower prices). From personal experience, this has been Microsoft and another company that I worked at.

    This has a left a LOT of people unemployed. I've been unemployed for about two months now, and I've gotten a couple of bites, but nothing that's panned out. It's extremely competitive and even with a top-notch resume you may not get a second look

    Don't just take my word for it, though. Look at this article from The Stranger (http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2013/12/03/new-study-pegs-washington-state-living-wage-at-1604-to-3046-an-hour?fb_action_ids=10201031928110151&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582):

    "in Washington State, there are 22 job seekers for every job opening that would pay a living wage to a one-worker, four-person household, according to the report."

    It doesn't help that the real estate market is insane. Apparently everyone who lives here is expected to be a Microsoft VP if you don't want non-ghetto housing.

    I wish you luck.

  75. Bay Area vs Monterey Peninsula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your problem seems to be the same as the Bay Area vs the Monterey Peninsula - I'm constantly being hounded about jobs in San Jose, Frisco (YES I CALL IT FRISCO!), Cupertino, Mountain View, etc. etc. but I live on the Monterey Peninsula and am not willing to commute that far. There *are* some jobs here, but for whatever reason[s] they seem closed to me.

    At any rate, I am almost 100% sure I'm going to get out of the programming game after 20 years, anyway, so for me it's kind of a moot point. Just telling you LA vs Seattle is not the only "problem" pair.

  76. Hard landing interviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not to be rude but stop winning. try getting an entry level IT job in Washington, D.C. metro area. No one calls me. I just graduated. Maybe recruiters don't call me because I have 0 years of work experience. Or maybe half the postings require a Masters degree and 5 years of experience. other jobs that I found are student internships that I don't qualify for. Be grateful that people are calling you at all. sorry to sound mean but there are places worst than Seattle.

    good luck in your job search.

  77. Re:Get a local phone number by KenFury · · Score: 4, Informative

    Years ago I was in Seattle and had a greater Washington mailing address and Area code. I was getting no responses. After that I changed to a 206 cell and gave a friends mailing address off Cap Hill. It made a huge difference. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal

  78. Forgot something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh yeah, and 75% of the jobs in the D.C. Metro Area require a current/active security clearance, even the entry level jobs. WTF? Northrup Grumman, Department of Defense, L3 communications, IBM, Accenture Federal Services,
    Lockheed Martin, The Boeing Company, AT&T?? really?

    1. Re:Forgot something by paitre · · Score: 1

      Yes, really. You're not their target employee.

      Former military enlistees getting out after the enlistment are their target demographic. That, or you get into a company on the commercial side and talk them into dealing with getting you a clearance so you can work on the good stuff.

  79. Re:Get a local phone number by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Agree completely. You must appear as though you are a local candidate. I did this a number of years ago when I was job hunting in the Atlanta area. Picked up a Google voice number in the 404 NPA.

  80. Re:Market Saturation - commute as reason? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Most of Seattle has short commutes if you bike, skateboard, or walk.

    It's only car drivers that take forever.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  81. Stack ranking by symbolset · · Score: 2

    Microsoft has been kicking the finest programmers they can recruit from around the world off their local Redmond/Bellevue porch at a rate of 10% of their employee population per year, every year for over a decade. Naturally that leads to a local surplus of people with those skills because they tend to not move far if they can avoid it.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  82. Re:Get a local phone number by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    Relocation ain't cheap - cost a Houston company over 30K to move me from Miami, plus whatever the recruiter took.

  83. I get a lot of opportunities from up there by frog_strat · · Score: 1

    The opportunities that come to my email are often from Seattle / Portland. I lived there 6 years while with Microsoft. FWIW I am an embedded / driver guy mostly. It wouldn't kill me to move back (I actually stopped getting depressed and started to like the weather after 3 years), but I really prefer Orange County (CA). IMHO there is not that much difference in the housing costs. I will say most of the opportunities are crap, 3 month contract with of course no benefits (and I suspect a lot of the offers are just gaming the H1 system). I decided to go back into medical, where we are forced to work more slowly and carefully. And most importantly, I just happened to land in a situation where many of the management are good people that want us to work reasonably, but do not abuse us. That is increasingly rare.

  84. Re:Speakee Engrish? by Zaelath · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the inability to understand difficult concepts like "ratio".

  85. Guaranteed interview bait for Seattle by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    At the top of the resume, type these words exactly:

    "Objective: CEO position where I can eliminate Windows RT and Windows Phone from our product offerings."

    1. Re:Guaranteed interview bait for Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget "Was a pretentious douche prior to it being cool".

  86. Re:It's rainy and cloudy in the tech job market he by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The tech market is fine.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  87. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And once you get an in-person interview, they tend to be much more difficult than what I've seen in California. Anecdotal but I've done more than my fair share in both places.

  88. Re:Get a local phone number by atlasdropperofworlds · · Score: 1

    There is a downside to this approach, at least if actually taken "all the way": Tech companies will often pay for full moving expenses. Every company I've been involved with did, and all but one were quite generous about it. If he ends up having to completely hide that fact he's not in Seattle, he won't get that benefit.

  89. All untrue by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    And live in one of the worse educated, most polluted, and more sick people than almost any states in the nation.

    I don't know where you get your info from but I went to school in Houston, and drove all over Texas - none of what you say is true. Texas is a much cleaner state overall than California (which I have also spent a lot of time in and driven though many areas of).

    But hey, it's all about money, fuck everything else, emirate?

    No, it's about quality of life. Thus, Texas > California > Washington

    As a personal addendum, one other thing Texas has going over California and Washington is that it's not as crowded. WAY too many people in California.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:All untrue by NicBenjamin · · Score: 0, Troll

      He's going by actual statistics.

      Texans are sicker then most of the country, worse educated, and (since the state is run by Libertarian leaning Republicans) has very few pollution regulations.

      It is true that in Texas, like most of America, it is trivial for a person making six figures to avoid contact with anyone who is actually measured in those statistics. Which means your personal experience isn't terribly compelling evidence. OTOH it's also true that most of the problem stats in Texas come from rural areas, and you're apparently a city boy. And in Texas cities the college-education rates, health crises (like Diabetes), etc. are much more competitive. They beat most states. But they don't beat the cities within those states.

      That's the price you pay for living in a state with no income tax and very few regulations on businesses.

    2. Re:All untrue by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      He's going by actual statistics.

      Which you and he provide zero links for #dubious.

      Since I've actually driven around the rural areas of both states I can say that hands down California is in worse shape than Texas.

      You sound like the one who spends all their time in cities - and not traveling. Have you even lived in either place? Or are you just going by some bullshit you read on the interwebs somewhere?

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:All untrue by anagama · · Score: 1

      Please please please -- do your level best to convince Californians how great Texas is. I'm sure many Washingtonians would even pay you for your efforts.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  90. Re: Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yea thats a good idea-trick the recruitor.

  91. Re:Get a local phone number by atlasdropperofworlds · · Score: 2

    That's unfortunate, because most bay area companies will pay moving expenses. I actually won't work for a company that doesn't, even if I don't need to move to work for it - it's an indication, to me, of other things that could be wrong.

  92. Wrong Location by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Your proud of living in a shithole?

    I think you misread. He was from Minnesota, not California.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  93. Re:Get a local phone number by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    Actually, Seattle has a lot of local tech people that are employeed by MS and Amazon. Not so many highly qualified . (The company I work for opened up to remote working specifically because it was so hard to find top-tier talent due to MS and Amazon brain-drain, and it's worked out very well for us. )

  94. It's the Darkness... also, try RH recruiting by klek · · Score: 1

    The rainy, drizzly weather here is bad enough, but what most visitors don't realize is that the days from Halloween through the equinox in March are just long DARK days... in addition to grey. We're above the 47th parallel, and we go to work in the dark, and come home in the dark all winter long. If you are out in the "daytime", the clouds minimize the sunlight. Months of this wear on the soul and drive the depression rates in people not habituated or born into this environment. There's a reason the Aurora Bridge was the 2nd most jumped-off bridge in the country (until they constructed the anti-suicide fence two years ago). Sunny SoCal? Good luck, friend. As to getting an interview: I work at a mid-sized, well-funded non-profit here and we find that it's hard to even *find* good tech people, because they get snapped up by even higher-paying large corpos. We're no slouch outfit, but the good candidates usually have a few other interviews lined up already with Aerospace, MS, Amazon, Isilon, any of the biomed facilities, or biomed startups. Also, Amazon chews through it's tech force rapidly, so ex-Amazonians are constantly re-flooding the market. Lasting 3 years there makes you an 'old timer'. I'm not kidding. It's a tough market here on both sides of the fence. Lower your standards, or raise your skillset. Try getting picked up by Robert Half International, the recruiting/staffing-services group. If they like your resume, skills, ethics and story, they will take you on and "present" you to their list of qualified clients. No cost to you; their corporate clients fund them. If you can't get in with Robert Half, ask them for advice. You may need to do more work to flesh out your experience.

  95. Re:It's rainy and cloudy in the tech job market he by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

    If you have evidence that says otherwise, go for it.

  96. Well, there's your problem right there ... by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    MS Stack software developer

    says it all. I almost stopped reading at that. MS stack is going bye-bye. And if there's one thing that is *not* lacking in *Seatle* it's MS 'talent'.
    Try this: Advertise yourself as a Linux stack guy of same skill level, and look how many interviews you get with that. I'd bet measurably more.

    Good luck.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Well, there's your problem right there ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite the opposite up here. Linux stack is highly desirable but not as common. A good MS stack developer in the Seattle area should never have an issue finding work (at least for now).

  97. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's exactly what I did. Moved to Portland, Me from southern US. Been up here roughly a month and am still searching for a job. Have the tech skills, but since I took quite a long vacation, over a year, I'm considered less marketable despite 12 years of IT doing everything short of cluster computing. Oh. And I'm not a programmer or MS Cert. drone. I digress...

    Am going to start looking at Tech. meetups, if they exist, and start working the scene. Apparently the digital front up here isn't worth the salt poured out for ice.

  98. Re:Get a local phone number by james_pb · · Score: 1

    I've lived in Seattle since 1994, and getting interviews and jobs here has always been easy. Today, it's really easy. Just show up at any sort of networking event and announce that you can write code, and you'll be swarmed by people who are hiring. Really. It's not quite the Bay Area (or at least it's not what I think the Bay Area is like now), but it's still booming. I haven't sent out a resume for a long time and I'm constantly getting email from recruiters.

  99. Re:Get a local phone number by james_pb · · Score: 1

    And the counterpoint to this is that, since it's _so_ hard to hire in the Bay Area, many companies from down there have opened engineering offices up here in Seattle.

  100. Re:Get a local phone number by paitre · · Score: 1

    The digital front in Portland, ME is about 110 miles south of you in Boston. Might be able to find something in Concord or Manchester (NH), but those are also pretty hefty commutes from Portland.

    Honestly - if you can bootstrap it, start something up. Write apps, do SOMETHING in addition to pounding pavement. A year 'vacation' can be overlooked if you took the effort to keep your skills up to date, and can prove it.

  101. It's Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    act like you don't give a shit.

  102. More down to the OPs skillset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a .net developer in seattle/bellevue I haven't found any problems finding work, especially contract work.

    I think it's more down to your individual skillset instead of locality.
    No one uses silverlight, local desktop apps are mostly dead outside of internal tools, and even then...
    most modern houses that use .net also use a lot of javascript, which is more of a lateral move, not an either/or like java/ruby vs. .net.

    Amazon is largely a Java/Other Stuff shop.

  103. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No matter how good they might be..."? Wow, that makes you an ass..........

  104. Re:Get a local phone number by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    Or desperation. I've met plenty of people that moved without any idea if they would even find a job but they did it because they were out of options and were going to be homeless either way.

  105. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed.
    I made the short list with a large company, but I was not local. When the hiring manager went on holiday, they hired someone else who was local. I also ran into that a few years later. Several hiring managers said someone moving is a pita so they wouldn't consider anyone even 100 miles away.

    I don't know how difficult it would be to walk the walk if I said I had a Seattle local address. It WOULD mean flying up their on a manager's whim .. which I would not normally want to afford.

  106. Ask Slashdot? by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    And Timmy strikes again by not posting an Ask Slashdot story to the Ask Slashdot section. Hey Timmy! They put those sections there and allow readers to filter by section for a reason. Quit being a fucking tool and post the stories properly. In other words, do your job.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  107. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know that they didn't live in the area? I ended up in Boston because I did something similar.

    They only wanted local candidates, my friend lived here so I used her address.

  108. Where is "SoCal"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Southern California? South Carolina? South Calamazoo?

  109. obvious by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    Because you call it "SoCal"

    That's only ok if you're from Southern California. Say that anywhere else and you sound like a douche.

  110. I agree Nyder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moved from Sacramento CA 15 years ago to Seattle. That is when they really didn't
    like Californians. Contracted at Aldus, Adobe, Microsoft and other tech companies.
    Love the weather, alway mild, compared to the most of the US. (Yes I have lived in many different parts of the US)
    Its green, year around, evergreens don't turn in the fall or winter. For the most part, people
    a pleasant and helpful. The dating scene in Seattle is not that great, strange dynamic.
    They even use to joke about it on Almost live, now called the "206".
    Because that has been a dominant area code prefix in Seattle for many years.

    There are all sort of problems locally like all cities and the cost of living in not
    as low as you might think, its not cheap living up here.
    But i would never move back to CA after being up here. This has been the only
    place i have moved away from and moved back to out of the 22 different placed
    i have lived in my live time.

    Good luck keep trying, make a friend or two up here and when you have a chance
    set up times to come up for an extended period to get the feel of the place and squeeze
    in some job hunting while your at it.

  111. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep your political tourettes to yourself.

  112. I told you not to take the MS track stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm always amazed at how stupid people can be. I warned you in college that going down that road would only end in misery. Microsoft would do something I said to make your life hard, like discontinuing the tool, you learned, and would end up dependent on to get a job. Now that time is here and my advise to learn concepts over tools is showing its ugly head.

  113. Furthermore by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I find it offensive that you claim only someone living on six figures would like Texas more. When I lived there I was a student, paying my own way through college on part time jobs at $10/hour. I had a cheap apartment that was BETTER than the crappy apartments my friends who moved later to California had to endure, even when they had "real" jobs.

    How can you sit there with a straight face and claim you are only better off in Texas being poor, when EVERYTHING is so much cheaper in Texas?? You are a monster who is going to lead someone to their doom through your ignorance.

    I am done listening to your totally uninformed bullshit not based on any way in reality. You can respond how you like but I can't contaminate my brain reading your scrawlings any longer.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Furthermore by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      I didn't say anyone would (or would not) like Texas more. I said that, by the actual numbers, Texas has worse education and healthcare then California. I further pointed out that because it's very easy for a relatively well-off person to avoid the places non-relatively-well-off people live the anecdotal experience of a relatively-well-off person is totally irrelevent to these discussions. The numbers I mentioned aren't particularly controversial.

      http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/new-state-state-college-attainment-numbers-show-progress-toward-2020-goal
      37.9% of Cali residents have college degrees, 32.2% of Texans do. California is (by definition) better educated then Texas.

      http://www.kten.com/story/11532795/oklahoma-texas-among-most-unhealthy-states
      Texas and Oklahoma were ranked as least healthy states in the nation, largely because Texans are fatter then average.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_life_expectancy
      Despite those rankings, Texas life expectancy is about average (78.5 vs. 78.64 nationally), and beats the pants off good old Mississippi (75), but Cali is #4. Californians live to 80.

      Look, there's nothing wrong with low taxes. But if you want low taxes you're gonna get reduced government services, and the major areas state governments service are health care and education. Which means you will be saying "Thank God for Mississippi" whenever health and education rankings come out. Mark Zuckerberg and other wealthy Californians aren't idiots who think that 17% income tax is less then zero income tax, they're smart people who have decided they prefer to live in a state with higher educational attainment, and better general health, in exchange for paying that utterly ridonkulous 17% income tax rate.

  114. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would bet anything but the real big companies always does. Local hires (and candidates when it comes time to interview) are a lot cheaper. If your cell phone doesn't match where you live, you should indicate where you live on your resume.

    I don't know about that. I've interviewed at Microsoft multiple times, and they've always flown me out.

  115. So-Cal cant compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So-Cal blows compared to San Francisco Bay Area,
    The tech talent floats northwards.

    As a result, So-Cal can't attract enough Software Engineering / IT Talent,
    And you'll find that its easy to get a job.

  116. Re:Get a local phone number by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

    Quoting the GP:

    And I'm not a programmer

    That's probably going to make writing apps somewhat more difficult.

    --
    Write failed: Broken pipe
  117. I'm betting Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has all the Microsoft, ex-Microsoft, friends and colleagues of Microsoft, children of Microsoft, students of Microsoft, and pets of Microsoft -job applicants they can handle. Maybe if you were a Mac tech...

  118. relocating .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I think you're probably right, if you're talking about random applicants. I wound up relocating for my current job position, but I was already friends with a couple of people working for the same company when I found out an opening was available. I think they realized I was going to be more serious about actually accepting the position because I already knew people there.

    (I did find out later that they'd been interviewing local candidates for months, and didn't really find anyone they thought was a good fit. So that worked in my favor too, obviously.)

    I will say this much: Don't pay TOO much attention to general hype about how many tech jobs exist in a certain area. If you want to relocate, do it for other reasons besides a generic idea that "it has a lot of work for people who do what I do". The area I moved to was recently voted among the top 10 (or even top 5) in tech jobs, but the truth is -- the vast majority of openings are government and military related, so often requiring active security clearances, and are just as often unstable jobs (govt. agency loses funding for reason X and all of a sudden your job gets terminated indefinitely). It's not the "techtopia" the magazines portrayed it to be, especially with the high cost of living. Many of the private sector tech jobs that remain are available/unfilled because the salary is too low to attract anyone any good at tech, vs. the price to rent or buy housing out here.

    And when I lived in the midwest before this, I'd also read the occasional article promising how successful one could be there in I.T. But those figures were always heavily slanted. For example, we had one large financial firm in town who constantly ran pages of want-ads for all manner of tech positions. The catch? Those positions were almost always already filled. They just liked to collect up resumes to keep on file in H.R. Good bargaining chips if an employee started demanding a raise.... "I've got X number of people right HERE (waves stack of resumes around) who want to do your job right now!" In general, we really only had a hand-full of other firms doing much I.T. hiring, but they were all big corporate HQ's that employed a lot of people. So collectively, they could really push up the statistics and make things look promising -- but many good I.T. workers would never land a job at any of them, if their previous experience was only working in smaller to mid-size companies. "What? You have no experience dealing with Asian character sets on an Exchange server?! Well, our sister company over in China needs support from here so that's a MUST." (Yep, I actually heard that once in an interview with one of them.)

  119. Why Washington by basecastula+ · · Score: 1

    Legal Marijuana too.

  120. second that... by schlachter · · Score: 1

    I don't even have my resume online and I'm getting cold calls from Amazon asking me to move to Seattle to work for them...so it seems like they're looking. I'm not a superstar. I just have my linkedin account updated and network when I'm able.

    Ironically, I was in the opposite situation, I wanted to work for Amazon, but wouldn't consider a move to Seattle.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  121. Get a job first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're not working now, I don't want to bother interviewing you. There's usually some reason you're not working that won't show up in the interview, and it's a waste of my time to go digging for it. It also pisses off the HR people when 'i find it and get you rejected, so it's easy to find an excuse not to bother with you at all.

    Similarly, if you live far away right now, you're likely to need more vacation time to visit family and friends, spend more of your time in contact with distant people, or maybe even marry one and take off again. Not worth my time: if you're coming to the Seattle for a specific reason, such as "my wife just got a job" or "to help take care of my mom", list it so they know you're not a flight risk. People with wanderlust tend to stay people with wanderlust.

    And if you've got medical problems or any chance of getting pregnant, blow the ADA out my brown-rimed orifice. I'm not spending my money, or my company's money, on a high cost medical or flight risk, and I can find a dozen "legal" reasons to cover my ass with.

    1. Re:Get a job first by neminem · · Score: 1

      "And if you've got medical problems or any chance of getting pregnant"... so basically what you're saying is, you only hire guys (or women over 40)? That *seriously* doesn't sound legal.

  122. Re:Get a local phone number by fsterman · · Score: 1

    Please don't do this, I live in Seattle and no one cares what your area code is.

    --
    Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
  123. Seattle Is Rasist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "'Nough said Danno."

    Let's smoke the faggots!

  124. Information and Networking are key by forevermore · · Score: 3, Informative
    As someone who has had no trouble getting interviews in the past (outside of the year or so post-dotcom bust), and more recently as a hiring manager who has just as much trouble finding candidates *worth* interviewing as you seem to be getting those interviews, here's the best advice I can give out:

    1. Be honest about your address and intentions. If someone applies to my "local applicants only" job with an address in CA I don't even bother to read the resume. However, if you mention in your introduction email (cover letter?) that you want to move to the area and plan to be making a trip up in the next couple of weeks ("to visit some friends", "for a couple of interviews", whatever), I'll give your resume the same consideration as I would to a local candidate. I might even fast-track a phone screen if you look good, so I can schedule an interview to take advantage of that time you'd be here. Do your best to make your trip description emphasize how serious you are about looking for a job in the area -- it will bypass the concern a lot of small companies have paying to fly you into town for an interview (not worth it with so many great local candidates), and should hopefully prevent you from sounding presumptuous about expecting an interview.

    2. Find some good recruiters. I don't know a single tech worker who enjoys dealing with recruiters (most put off the same vibe as the stereotypical used car salesman) but there are a lot of VC-funded startups that hire exclusively through recruiting firms. Reach out to big guys like greythorn and volt, and do some searching on linkedin and other sites for smaller firms (which often have much more interesting work). Reaching out directly to them will help you get the message across that you want to move, and in turn they will help convince the hiring manager that you're worth talking to despite currently being out of state.

    3. You mentioned Seattle and MS in the same description. Be aware that there is a giant invisible line down the middle of Lake Washington. Though there is some MS stuff (at least on the web side of things, which is what I know best) in Seattle, there is a lot more of it on the East Side (Bellevue, Redmond) closer to Microsoft itself.

    4. It may help to get a local phone number, but honestly if you mark your non-206 number as "cell" and direct eyes toward your email address, I can't think how it would hurt your chances. FWIW, unless asked on a job application form at a big company, I'm not sure I've ever given my phone number out to a prospective employer until asked for it in order to schedule a phone screen.

    5. Yes, there really are that many good candidates in the area. You're competing with locals who are more readily available for interviews or followup interviews, so you need to stand out more than they do. And it's not just about weighing the costs of bringing a non-local candidate in for an interview -- I personally hate giving video interviews and will do everything I can to avoid them (I get so much more out of the interview if I can actually interact with a candidate; after all, personality-fit is as important as technical competence).

    6. On the other hand, there really are a lot of good jobs here, too (Amazon's hiring spree high pay has made it a pretty competitive market, too). Consider broadening your skill set. I know there is often a wide cultural gap between the kinds of devs who focus on MS vs Linux, but if I'm just looking for a good developer/engineer rather than a language expert, I'll be much more interested in you if your resume has more than just the one stack (Ruby+dotNet, dotNet+Java, etc). You could also take this as a "don't complain about picky companies if you're limiting yourself to a single technology subset".

    7. Be willing to work contracts. Microsoft itself is well-known for preferring to hire people through staffing agencies (corp-to-corp contract) rather than through direct hiring, and they're not alone among the larger companies. The staffing company becomes your employer while you work the contract (avoid 1099 contracts unless you fully understand the tax implications), and you don't have to feel too bad if you leave for a better gig a few months into the contract.

    Anyway, I hope this helps someone.

    --
    Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    1. Re:Information and Networking are key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the insight!

      We're wanting to move from Alaska to anywhere between Bellingham and Portland.

  125. There is a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The job market for professionals in Portland and Seattle is poor because
    so many professionals move there for the environment. It is simple supply
    and demand. A company I was associated with stated as much in a presentation
    they made to prospective investors.

    My ex had a degree in economics. She could not get a satisfying job in Portland.
    She had a choice of jobs suitable for her education in SF.

  126. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said he was constantly approached by recruiters in SoCal. If so, there's little risk jumping into Seattle and, worse case, he has to come home with his tail between his legs a few months later to pick up something in SoCal again when he still fails to score a gig up north.

  127. How much savings first? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Move first. Then look for jobs.

    How much money should one have in the bank before moving from, say, northeast Indiana to greater Seattle?

  128. You got it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You lack the proper connections in a new area.

  129. Re:Get a local phone number by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and your resume will have no local experience on it. It'll be rather obvious you're not local even with a Seattle number, won't it?

  130. Climate, not weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't like the weather, you like the climate.

  131. Because you are under qualified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or any other reason for them not to care. Just get over yourself.

  132. Look outside the "tech" sector by Chokai · · Score: 2

    You haven't said anything about *what* kind of company you want to work for? Established? Startup? Tech? Non-Tech?

    There are half a dozen fortune 500 companies that are *not* regular old tech companies that are either head quartered or have major operations within 20 miles of downtown Seattle. Many of these companies have huge IT departments running their ecommerce sites or internal systems (think Nordstrom's, Costco, Starbucks, Expeditors, PACCAR, Boeing). And that doesn't count a dozen or so other major regional companies such as the local hospital systems and insurers. Many of these companies have a multitude of openings and often times opportunities for quick advancement because Amazon and several other local companies have hired away many of their employees over the last 2 - 3 years by throwing gobs of money at them.

    Also as several people have noted the unemployment rate in Seattle is low but not so low that people will pay for your relocations, unless your skills are phenomenal.

  133. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's half the cost of what I'm paying for a house. I think you got F'd in the A, buddy.

  134. Go 4 new skills THEN pick shithole to sink into! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lol I moved to California 11 years ago from Massachusetts (that has the same kind of shitty weather but even more taxes and bullshit) . I've traveled all over the US the past years and I've been to some really bad shit So here's my short list of places where you wont ever see me relocate to All of the East Coast and the South-East Florida possibly being an exception because I've never been there. Massachusetts sucks ass, I grew up there and hate it with a passion. New York is for New World Order vegan nanny nazis sodium and soft-drink limiting pro-Obama retard zombies who would love to stick a gun in your face and pull the trigger .. just because they heard you vaguely approve of the 2nd Amendment.

    Then I'm not moving wherever people drive pickups in ribbed arm-less under-shirts (I swear I've seen it, those yellow stains were either beer or piss or both) . That would be anywhere from Indiana to Nebraska. Finally anything north of San Francisco and that includes Oregon and gloomy depressing rainy Washington (and I'll be dammed if I ever went and got a job in SF itself, what a cold and miserable shithole that city is). Oh and I've been to Colorado, Wyoming and Utah on business.. R.O.F.L.

    So pretty much other than the SF Bay Area that leaves SoCal, Arizona and Texas. One day I was fed up enough so I packed up my shit, quit my job and left Boston one Winter day without having a job lined up and hit the road going WEST. It took me 16 days because I stopped a lot along the way to take in the sights and did about 4 phone screens on the way, the one that eventually landed me my first job in CA I did at an Arby's in Amarillo TX. I love California. I love the food here, I love the weather, and I am mostly okay with the people and the taxes yeah they are fucking high but not any worse than the shithole I'm originally from. Massachusetts is like California in those regards except it is far shittier :-)

    So right now I take it you're living somewhere around LA. I would definitely consider moving to LA. I wonder why you would go live and work in one of the shittiest places I can imagine chock full with sour environmentalists popping pills to stave off the day they'll commit suicide because of the terminally depressing gloom ever-gloom and the fact that the polar bears aren't about to go extinct.. just so you can go kayaking for a week or two in the summer?? What IT jobs are actually in Washington worth going to for a Microsoft-guy besides maybe Microsoft itself? Why get a job where you get $60,000 instead of the $85,000 you could get as a Microsoft dude here in the SF Bay Area?? And finally: Why the fuck are you agonizing over moving to shit-city when your skill-set only gets you ~85K when you could be making $130,000 and up. You should agonize over how you can join the 21st century, you'll probably want to get into Java, Python, Ruby and pick up some serious Linux skill, THEN you can pick the shithole you want to sink into.

  135. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hard to imagine that a tech company would screen candidates based on area codes these days.

    Perhaps they believe that someone who comes from out of town is less likely to stay in town as long. Perhaps that true.

    nut posting as

  136. Holidays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about SOCAL, but here in Seattle hiring happens in waves depending on the time of year/budgets etc. December is a terrible time to find work. I would expect you to get a lot of calls in the Feb/March time frame. Get yourself on Dice and Monster as well. Dice alone should get you a few calls a week, but again December is difficult.

  137. Re:Get a local phone number by antdude · · Score: 1

    Back in 2001 to 2002 at my dotcom company went bust, I applied about 1,000 and only got about 10/ten interviews in Southern, CA. :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  138. OP - Here's your answer by cps42 · · Score: 1

    As someone who oversees several branch software development offices in SF, LA, and Seattle (along with a few east coast ones) and is hiring developers (I've got 100+ and looking for more) - I can point to three things that are killing you:

    Suggestion - Apply to work with this guy from LA. In 6 - 12 months, start making noise about wanting to transfer positions to the Seattle office.

    Once you're in Seattle, with a job, you're not a Californian any more, and you can move to MSFT campus for the experience.

  139. Not Location, Skill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I don't mean this in a mean way but are you sure you have the skills? MS stack developers are not as much in demand here as other places maybe you're just selling yourself wrong. I work for one of the biggies and do interviews for them here in Seattle and they don't care about remote versus local at all it's really just none of the big companies here hire for skills they hire for ability. Ie: if you know c# really well but don't ever want to do something else you're probably going to get passed on a lot.

  140. Liked the weather?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excuse, but is the same Seattle that I've been to where every single time that I've been there it rains at LEAST once a day and is almost continuously overcast and dreary or is it some other Seattle in some alternate universe? Or did you just happen to visit during that, from what I understand, brief 3-4w where it MIGHT actually be sunny and nice?

    Cloudy and dreary here during the nearly half of the year that it's effectively winter(Nov - Mar, possibly snowing in October and through early May in particularly bad years although fortunately not tending to last long) is bad enough. About the only plus is that outside of the foothills/mountains you probably won't see snow...

  141. Try applying at F5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are hiring a boatload of people and it was really easy for me to land an interview here. http://www.f5.com/about/careers/us-openings/

  142. It's you job search technique that is Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you just rely on HR and job engines, the odds of connecting to a job are tantamount to winning the lottery. This is simply foolish but this apparently is the preference of kids today - they just want to have it easy without work like using a web page and then have a job pop out like having Amazon deliver a new toy.

    Jobs are NOT like commodities that Amazon or any other E-commerce system transacts. Jobs entail far more commitment to both parties so using commodity types of negotiation and transaction are simply Epic Fail. Note I've worked in tech for 30 years and have done sales and design marketing/sales/support business processes for Fortune 20 companies so I have a slightly different spin on this. Despite being a techie's techie, I no longer believe technical talent or processes are the center of things (which is what most young nerds chose to believe - myself included at one time). Instead it's about broader factor which are harder to quantify and carry far more risk to money-holding parties than ANY technical problem ever entails. For this reason, and as demonstrated every day in business, high risk negotiations and transactions are primarily handled differently than how you'd handle buying a ton of coffee or wheat or how you'd buy anything off of Amazon. These are commodity E-commerce systems where the transaction risk is TINY compared to many other transactions. So instead for "risky" transactions like committing to hire someone with all the legal and financial obligations that entails for an employer, other means work better.

    These other means include networking, personal referrals, direct interaction and generally traditional "meatspace social networks". Now the ideology on the web and may kids today is that this is obsolete and irrelevant but reality says that ideology is a load of stinky crap. The fact that people have hard times getting jobs exactly as the OP is asking about is proof of that. If the world actually worked in the web ideology sense, this kind of situation could simply never happen because on the net no one knows you are a dog. But if there are risks of getting a dog instead of an engineer/programmer/etc. then suddenly the ideology is simply Epic Fail in practice. 30 years of experience have told me the same thing.

    In general, for instance, if you were face-to-face vs. online, people always have a harder time refusing requests or avoiding spontaneous offering of help. This is simply how meatspace is difference from cyberspace. And this is where cyberspace as a job search technology is fail. All of economics and society is still ultimately a meatspace process. Cyberspace is only meaningful within the ultimate context and limits of Meatspace. So start actively networking to jobs and hiring managers rather than passively waiting to be asked to dance. The latter is exactly like being the wall-flower at the prom without a date that never gets asked.

  143. Re: Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But that's Microsoft.

  144. The punch list by sushihangover · · Score: 1

    1) Seattle has a ton of Microsoft stack devs, the campus pumps them out by the hundreds and hundreds every quarter. 2) Most non-Microsoft "tech" companies lean heavy on *nix/OSS (dev, test, devops, etc.) (Amazon, Google, Nintendo, etc..) 3) Smaller shops that use MS dev and deployment stacks have the pick of the litter in the area (see #1) and can hire local. Options: 1) First get a local address via friend in Seattle and local number via GVoice, etc Don't lie about when asked, but helps not to get circular filed before at least getting the resume read. 2) Work the Microsoft vendor/recruiting companies hard and get into MS as a vendor or contractor and pay your own re-location. They do not care where you currently are but where you will be in two weeks or less, BUT be ready to jump a flight for an in-person interview at the drop of a hat otherwise someone gets the interview. You can look for another job once here. 3) Apply at Microsoft for FTE role if you have the chops, if you are not at the same level as a X years of experience Microsoft FTE/developer and can not pass the interview process, then Seattle is not the place just to move to. Remember all those ex-MS devs got through that process and 'most' can really code and think... Otherwise you will end up in the vendor/contractor saltmine doing grunt style coding. 4) Go for 'smaller' non-tech companies doing in-house corporate style app development (hope you have Salesforce, Dynamics, SAP, etc experience) 5) Apply a local Window stack consulting companies for project work, but you will be in/out of work based on their project pipeline. Make sure you have a portfolio vs a resume to show them. Skills to get hired in Seattle in 7 days or less (well not really, but ALOT faster then most) 1) NON-Microsoft dev work; rich browser based clients and OSS backends (you'll be hired within a week if you can back that resume up and prove it during a phone and in-person interview). 2) NON-Microsoft programming languages; Can you really code in C++ without VisualStudio? Know how to write OO-based Perl? Ruby-on-Rails at any type of internet base scale, can you really crank out the code for a LAMP stack and start taking user input from a site in one work day or less? 3) Work experience at internet scale. Your code taking millions of web hits per day? Startup/small tech companies here need people that know "scale". (MS based or not) 4) You contribute to OOS projects? Name dropping "known" OSS projects that you work on will get you in the door at lots of places here (big and small) 5) DevOps scaling experience. i.e.: Can you actually write python apps that control 1000 cores on AWS, can you really write Chef recipes that control 300 EC2s across 5 data centers and apply rolling security patches with zero user interruption?, etc 6) Real life "Big Data" experience? Hired in 48 hours or less. 7) Mobile development experience with apps actually in the App Stores (Native apps, not HTML5) : Get hire in 24 hours or less :-) 8) Be one of the top 1% of Microsoft stack developers in the world and go work for Microsoft 9) Willing to work really cheap with no benefits? Go the contractor/vendor route and work at Microsoft as an A-/V- (Again work those vendor's recruiters 24/5 as you are just a number to them, apply for 100 roles and you will get an interview on the campus) 10) Game dev experience? Mobile or fat-client including the supporting backends. Tons of game companies here, again mobile devs rule in this space right now.

  145. Are you serious ? Have you applied to MS ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently moved here from Atlanta, am working for Microsoft; we're hiring developers like crazy (I was living in Atlanta, contacted by a recruiter through LinkedIn). The market looks much nicer than Atlanta's.

  146. Re:Market Saturation?? F5 is Hiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, F5 has 82 open headcount in Seattle and 225 open world wide. Try looking at what companies actually need. MS technology is everywhere in Seattle and we have incredibly experienced Microsofties in droves to pick from. We can’t hire Linux/UNIX folks fast enough as they are a tougher breed to source.

  147. Re:Get a local phone number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm graduating soon with a PhD in bioinformatics [...] and I'm not getting any interviews

    I've been advised to "never hire a PhD". My interview dataset of one did not contradict. I found a huge gap between his insistence on his great skill in a topic and his practical application of that knowledge. Have a senior level brutally honest friend outside of academia "interview" you, and make sure you're not similar.

  148. Your Very Best Bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a job with a company in Southern Cal that allows you to work remotely. Then move to Seattle.

  149. Texas weather by ulatekh · · Score: 1

    Texas has hurricanes.

    --
    "Once we've identified and embraced our sickness, we'll have strength...and that's when we get dangerous." - John Waters
  150. I got paid to move by ulatekh · · Score: 1

    I challenge you to find a position where relocation benefits are offered for anything less than CxO or VP x positions.

    Pro: I got relocation benefits to move for my previous job, and I'm not C-level, I'm just a principal software engineer.

    Con: It was to Sierra Vista, Arizona. They really do need to pay people to move there.

    --
    "Once we've identified and embraced our sickness, we'll have strength...and that's when we get dangerous." - John Waters