Slashdot Mirror


Thieves Who Stole Cobalt-60 Will Soon Be Dead

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "The Washington Post reports that the carjackers who set off international alarm bells by absconding with a truckload of highly radioactive cobalt-60, used in hospital radiotherapy machines, most likely had no idea what they were stealing and will die soon from exposure. The robbery occurred as the cobalt-60 was being driven from a public hospital in the border town of Tijuana to a storage facility in central Mexico. While waiting for daybreak at a gas station in the state of Hidalgo the drivers were jumped by two gunmen who beat them and stole the truck. "I believe, definitely, that the thieves did not know what they had; they were interested in the crane, in the vehicle," says Mardonio Jimenez, a physicist with Mexico's nuclear safety commission. The prospect that material that could be used in a radioactive dirty bomb had gone missing sparked an urgent two-day hunt that concluded when the material, cobalt-60, used in hospital radiotherapy machines, was found along with the stolen Volkswagen truck. The cobalt-60 was found, removed from its casing, in a rural area near the town of Hueypoxtla about 25 miles from where the truck was stolen. Jimenez suspects that curiosity got the better of the thieves and they opened the box. So far the carjackers have not been arrested, but authorities expect they will not live long. "The people who handled it will have severe problems with radiation. They will, without a doubt, die.""

923 comments

  1. They will, without a doubt, die... by Spy+Handler · · Score: 5, Funny

    or gain superpowers.

    1. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      and be the syfy movie of the week.

    2. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now that is a fate worse than death

    3. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by alexander_686 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Probably not. Radioactive is a necessary but not sufficient cause for superpowers.

      You are going to need to combine that with spiders, toxic chemicals, a DNA X-factor, experimental drugs, or something else to kick off the process.

    4. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by RevWaldo · · Score: 2

      But it worked for Radioactive Man!

      .

    5. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1

      The super ability to glow in the dark. That's a super power.

    6. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by rossdee · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think it (gamma rays) was all that was needed to turn Bruce Banner green (when angry)
      There was also an 'Invisible Man' series where it was caused by radiation. (starring David (UNCLE) Macallum)

    7. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I mean, barring radical advances in human longevity and changes in the observed effects of entropy on the universe itself, they will, without a doubt, die anyway, but still...

    8. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On a side note, Radioactive Man is the only man on the planet who's immune to Google Glass.

    9. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Ahem, the Hulk begs to differ. Pure gamma radiation exposure.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by kwerle · · Score: 1

      I think they have doomed us all.

      I'm pretty sure we're all gonna die.

    11. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Maybe.
              In some version, yes, it was only gamma radiation.
              In other Banner had a latent mutant which is what allowed him to convert the energy.
              In others it was a medical experiment where a bastard version of the super solider serum was used or the gamma radiation was targeted to specific brain areas.

    12. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by compro01 · · Score: 2

      Nope. In the film continuity, he received a super serum, a la Captain America.

      The Hulk is the result when you add expose a super serum recipient to gamma radiation rather than Vita rays.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    13. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one version. In the original comic book, it was just gamma rays.

    14. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Well played, ArcadeMan. Well played indeed.

      Now get UP and AT THEM!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    15. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Cool. At least now we have someone to blame for our inevitable misfortune.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    16. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's already happened. This was rural Mexico for crying out loud. The odds that they weren't bit by a snake, spider, or donkey are miniscule at best. I'm betting on them being pricked by an Agave cactus. I want to see a superhero (or supervillain, I'm not picky) who attacks by peeing a stream of radioactive tequila and dresses like the Frito Bandito.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    17. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are going to need to combine that with spiders, toxic chemicals, a DNA X-factor, experimental drugs, or something else to kick off the process.

      This is Mexico. They probably had to clear away 'all' those things just to get to the box.

    18. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Justice served!

    19. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then who will cut my grass next summer?

    20. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      or take it to some deserted island and grow huge vegetables.

    21. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the original comic strip, Hulk was exposed to gamma ray radiation from a bomb in a test range.

    22. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, in the film continuity they bollixed things up. Film continuity doesn't apply to the real continuity. Banner was exposed to gamma radiation, no "super serum" involved.

      Don't like Hulk as a reference? How about the Fantastic Four? Exposure to cosmic rays. No super serum involved, not even in the movies.

      How about Doctor Manhattan?

    23. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this rate, white people.

    24. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 5, Funny

      and be the syfy movie of the week.

      Unlikely. Syfy prefers animals as the villains of its Saturday-night original movies, not people.

      Now, if it turns out that a shark or octopus (or, even better, both) stole the cobalt-60, then you'l have the network's attention. Expect Sharktopus II: Nuclear Boogaloo any week now.

    25. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by zarthrag · · Score: 5, Funny
      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
    26. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      And seeing that containers of such materials are heavily marked with warnings, its not unreasonable to imaging that they never actually opened it and directly exposed themselves.

    27. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by plopez · · Score: 1

      All of which Mexican border towns are rife with...

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    28. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

      Beware of Donkey Man! I have no idea what power he possesses, but he's still way cooler than Puma Man!

    29. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by RCGodward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, don't make him mad.

    30. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Goggles!

      They do NOTHING!

    31. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Really? Cuz the summary pretty clearly states "The cobalt-60 was found, removed from its casing" and I'm pretty sure it didn't open itself.

    32. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if we just kick him in the balls with a paper drawing that says "science spider. Do not get on balls under penalty of awesome superpowers"?

    33. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by jason.sweet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Film continuity doesn't apply to the real continuity.

      Do you mean the real continuity described in the excellent historical references published by Marvel Comics?

    34. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by TWiTfan · · Score: 2

      Good, we need more hispanic superheroes. When I was a kid, all we had was El Dorado, and he was pretty lame.

      Of course, they were thieves, so they would probably end up being supervillians.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    35. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Troll
      Wetbackman!!

      Able to cross the Rio Grande in a single stroke!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    36. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good, we need more hispanic superheroes.

      What about Speedy Gonzales?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    37. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by forkazoo · · Score: 2

      A Mexican desert shark that robs trucks? That seems like a syfy movie of the week even before it gets ahold of the radioactive cobalt!

    38. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      That is what seems strange. I assume the container had all sorts of warning labels an tri-foil radiation symbols. Most people are terrified by radiation - why would the thieves have opened it?

      One part of the problem is that our radiation labeling is poor. some smoke detectors have radiation symbols on the parts that have micro-Curi levels of radiatoin, that look very similar to the symbols on kilo-curie radiation sources.That factor of a BILLION is a big deal and the labeling should make it clear.

    39. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Picass0 · · Score: 1

      >> "You are going to need to combine that with spiders, toxic chemicals, a DNA X-factor"

      Not necessarily. They may gain the powers of Dr. Manhattan. He was exposed to radiation in an 'intrinsic fields' experiment, which could really mean almost anything.

      Option #2 - perhaps the thieves will be fused into one character like "Firestorm". One person's body will remain and gain superpowers, the other becomes the voice of reason in his head.

    40. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 3, Funny

      I saw "Sharknado" on SyFy. That isn't just jumping the shark on SyFy the shark jumps you!

      So once you are hit by a tornado with teeth, a mere hybrid Sharktopus is kind of tame in comparison.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    41. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Radioactive is a necessary but not sufficient cause for superpowers.

      You are going to need to combine that with spiders, toxic chemicals, a DNA X-factor, experimental drugs, or something else to kick off the process.

      I think Lucha Libre masks should qualify.

      http://coolmaterial.com/gear/sports-gear/lucha-libre-masks/

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    42. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by geekoid · · Score: 0

      "Film continuity doesn't apply to the real continuity.
      WTF is real continuity?

      You do knwo the Hulk is FIcitonal, right?

      I fnot, go get help.

      The Hulk has been created different ways. Sometimes just a specific GR, sometimes GR mixed with another agent.
      The film bollixed nothing.

      Did you complain that Iron man is powered with an Arc reactor and not the "power of the transistor" that was originally used?

      Twit.

      "Exposure to cosmic rays"
      So not just radiation . Oh, I see you don't know what Cosmic Rays are.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    43. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or at least 93% of us, since 7% of all humans who have ever existed are alive today.

      Past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results.

    44. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by jd2112 · · Score: 3, Funny

      and be the syfy movie of the week.

      Unlikely. Syfy prefers animals as the villains of its Saturday-night original movies, not people.

      Now, if it turns out that a shark or octopus (or, even better, both) stole the cobalt-60, then you'l have the network's attention. Expect Sharktopus II: Nuclear Boogaloo any week now.

      "Atomic Sharktopusnado" Anyone?

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    45. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware the Radioactive Bumble Bee Man!

    46. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one, welcome our newly radiated Mexican overlords.

    47. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by nsuccorso · · Score: 1

      Did you complain that Iron man is powered with an Arc reactor and not the "power of the transistor" that was originally used?

      Twit.

      Oh, come on. The Arc reactor is obviously just a souped up Heathkit.

      Twat.

    48. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by nsuccorso · · Score: 1

      Dead Donald Pleasence agrees.

    49. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      or gain superpowers.

      someone has to fight the giant mutant seagulls

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    50. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Depends on the continuity:
      - Original hulk: Pure gamma, following accidental presence on atomic test site.
      - Movie hulk: Gamma, but gamma only activated preexisting genetic condition inherited from his father's self-experimentation.
      - TV hulk: Gamma, but very targetted gamma administered under laboratory conditions.

    51. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Dr Manhattan wasn't exposed to radiation. He was accidentally present in the 'intrinsic field subtractor' device. It didn't expose him to anything, it took something away: The field holding his material form together. A process that should have been fatal - but instead confirmed the duality many philosophers and theologians speculated about. His mind survived, and no longer had a body to hold it back.

    52. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Expect Sharktopus II: Nuclear Boogaloo any week now

      The second and third Sharktopus movies are already in the works, so this one would be Sharktopus IV: A Nuclear Hope.

    53. Re: They will, without a doubt, die... by Mabhatter · · Score: 2

      A Chupacabra and/or Jackelope offed the original robbers and is feeding this to its babies!!!

      Machete will save us!

    54. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I always preferred "El Kabong!"

    55. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Way to jump into a thread about fictional superheroes and then call someone out for it being fake. No crap it's fictional, but that is the frame of reference for the conversation. I tend to think that, EVEN THOUGH IT IS ALL FICTION, the comics have decades of history and are what more people would think of as the history of the Hulk rather than movies that were made well after the character was created.

      This is all in regards to a comment above claiming that radiation only is not enough to create a superhero.

    56. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Why do they need to change around the cause? Is it to make it more plausible or something?

      You're talking about a superhero. There's nothing you can do to make that plausible. However, there is a lot you can do to screw with your most loyal fanbase, the fanboys who know the story better than you do. So, really. Just don't.

    57. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great, the last thing we require here are super criminals >_!

    58. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Have you seen Mexican Spiders?

    59. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cobaltacabra!

    60. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Low life scum who beat people for a crane listen in school to definitions of "radiation" or how to recognize danger symbols or listen when others try to teach them something? ha.

    61. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Garridan · · Score: 1

      The super ability to die in the dark. That's a super power.

      FTFY.

    62. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by budgenator · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well if you consider projectile vomiting and diarhea a superpower.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    63. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Funny

      the Hulk begs to differ

      The Hulk doesn't beg. "Hulk smash"

    64. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by bondsbw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed, death implies an end. Syfy shows rarely have a proper ending.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    65. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Peristaltic · · Score: 1

      ....However, there is a lot you can do to screw with your most loyal fanbase, the virgins who know the story better than you do. So, really. Just don't.

      Allow me to fix that for you.

    66. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess I should have read the entire FA. My bad.

    67. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Beware of Donkey Man! I have no idea what power he possesses, but he's still way cooler than Puma Man!

      He has the Donkey Punch of course.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    68. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      or Plot

    69. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in the comic continuity it was just a gamma bomb. The films are non-canon.

    70. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Beware of Donkey Man! I have no idea what power he possesses, but he's still way cooler than Puma Man!

      He has the Donkey Punch of course.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donkey_punch

      For those who don't get the joke.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    71. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      El Kabong!

    72. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U.N.C.L.E.

    73. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Speedy Gonzales is sort of like The Swedish Chef.
      Everyone white in the US now considers them racist characterizations of the respective countries.
      But then you meet someone from that country, and they looooove the characters.
      There's nothing like being a room full of drunken Swedes shouting "bork bork bork", or alternately, drunken Mexicans shouting "Arrrrrrriba!Arrrrrriba!"

    74. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will, without a doubt, die...

      I think that's more in the form of a threat than a prediction.

      Sure, the thieves may or may not have radiation poisoning, and may or may not turn themselves in to get medical care for it.
      But either way any of those options go, the police WILL make sure these men are dead, no matter how many times they need to shoot them for it to happen.

    75. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      Really? Cause I think just about everybody has lots of doubts as they die, especially if it's a slow, inevitable, death:
      - Is there a God?
      - Have I been a good person?
      - Will anyone remember me?
      - Should I have stolen that truck full of Cobalt-60?

    76. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ChupaC-obalto (Cobalt-Sucker)
      The real Chupacabras.

    77. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my first reaction to google glasses, "these glasses do Nothing!!!!!!!!"

    78. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ths Cisco Kid shot him by accident. "Oh Pancho!"

    79. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that because the goggles, they do nothing?

    80. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [McBain]: That's the joke.

    81. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1
    82. Re: They will, without a doubt, die... by JDeane · · Score: 1

      After watching his last movie "Machete Kills" I have to agree he is like James Bond and Chuck Norris rolled into one guy. If anyone could stop these Radioactive Mutant Mexican Overlords it would be him!

    83. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can't say with true certainty that everyone will die until everyone is actually dead. You get closer and closer every day as more people die, but with the world birth rate exceeding the death rate, there are an awful lot of people who have not dies yet. Some have proposed that the first human to live to 1000 has already been born. Plus it isn't widely considered likely that the universe has a definitive end point, so eternal life, however unlikely, might be possible. And as a Christian, I know I will someday be granted eternal life in another place - heaven. Thanks Obama, I mean, thanks Jesus.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    84. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Danga · · Score: 0

      haha I just used my last mod point or would have modded this up, good one!

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    85. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by nightsky30 · · Score: 1

      Cobaltnado would just suck. Not enough sharks!

    86. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      The goggles! They do nothing!

    87. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by dpiven · · Score: 2

      You are going to need to combine that with ... something else to kick off the process.

      Tequila?

    88. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Nope. In the film continuity, he received a super serum, a la Captain America.

      The Hulk is the result when you add expose a super serum recipient to gamma radiation rather than Vita rays.

      In film conversions of a media the film is never pure canon.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    89. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      They can nail you no mater which direction you are from them.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    90. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      ...which is why I was clear to mention that 7% of us were still alive and kicking...

    91. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by wallsg · · Score: 1

      or gain superpowers.

      Nah. They'll become ghouls and attack the smooth-skins at Tenpenny Tower.

    92. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the current spate of Marvel movies, they retconned the whole process such that he was working with a variant of Cap's superserum, combined with an exposure to a lethal amount of Gamma radiation on top of it.

    93. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that the person that Retconned it has cameos in the movies and is one of the Executive Producers- and basically came up with these characters...heh...it applies, much to YOUR dismay.

    94. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      geekoid, are you some kind of an angry drunk? You fag?

      I'll start stalking you with chickens like I do harrar...

    95. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect Sharktopus II: Nuclear Boogaloo any week now

      The second and third Sharktopus movies are already in the works, so this one would be Sharktopus IV: A Nuclear Hope.

      Nuclear Booger.. surely.

    96. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by doccus · · Score: 1

      I think it (gamma rays) was all that was needed to turn Bruce Banner green (when angry) There was also an 'Invisible Man' series where it was caused by radiation. (starring David (UNCLE) Macallum)

      Does this mean the've got to be on the lookout for 2 big green men in ripped trousers?

    97. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or gain superpowers.

      In that case, I'm fearful the perpetrators will be female. I, for one, will not welcome our new 50 foot tall amazonian overlords.

    98. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having seen someone projectile vomit, I am almost convinced that it is a superpower. It certainly looks immune to gravity.

    99. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Or the entire summary, at least.

    100. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Nope, summary just says 'box', which could have simply meant one of the outer enclosures. But thanks for following up.

    101. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      max cannon, is that you?

    102. Re:They will, without a doubt, die... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Well played, ArcadeMan. Well played indeed.

      Now get UP and AT THEM!!!

      UP and ATOM. Universal Participation and Atomic Tests On Mankind.

  2. Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Instant Karma is gonna get ya...

    1. Re:Tough luck.. by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The karma in this case seems rather disproportional. Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

    2. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shee-it happens.
      Too bad for them.
      Glad the radioactive material was found and secured.

    3. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The karma in this case seems rather disproportional. Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

      fuck em

    4. Re:Tough luck.. by casings · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I completely and utterly disagree.

      You clearly haven't been the victim of any robberies at gunpoint. It is terrifying and life-changing and most victims usually end up with some sort of PTSD. It takes a sick and depraved mind to commit such acts, and those responsible fully deserve death. There are far too many people in this world to allow people who are willing to kill to continue to breathe the same air as the rest of the population.

    5. Re:Tough luck.. by hubie · · Score: 2

      How badly would the drivers have had to been beaten for it to be more proportional?

    6. Re:Tough luck.. by kirkb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Welcome to Mexico, where the highs and lows in life are disproportionately higher/lower than what first-world countries are used to.

      --
      Slashdot: come for the pedantry, stay for the condescension.
    7. Re:Tough luck.. by KenFury · · Score: 2, Informative

      Forget Karma, this is natural repercussions of actions.

    8. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they die, the whole humanity will be better.

      The problem is that other people, and I guess good people, will die unknowingly.

    9. Re:Tough luck.. by gcmd · · Score: 1

      beaten off?

    10. Re:Tough luck.. by hattig · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Got to hope that they didn't use it as a chair, or look at it for a long time after removing it from the box.

      I don't know what the maximum exposure to Cobalt-60 is before you wished you were dead though. Sounds like it could be minutes?

    11. Re:Tough luck.. by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know a lot of people don't agree with us, but this isn't a case of stealing to feed your starving family; anyone willing to so wantonly disregard the rights of others for personal gain does not belong in our society.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    12. Re:Tough luck.. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      The karma in this case seems rather disproportional. Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

      I don't agree. I think the karma is spot on. The karma is not for what they did but what they could have done with it. They could have been intending to use it to make dirty bomb what could have exposed hundreds, if not thousands to such an ugly death.

      I would agree with you if they had just stolen a truck load of money or just about anything else. Karma is a bitch though. An I'm sure glad that I'm not them.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    13. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The universe doesn't care. They opened a box they didn't understand. Tough. Babies are born every day with defective genes and die too. Tough.

    14. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The karma in this case seems rather disproportional. Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

      you believe in karma? WTH man

    15. Re:Tough luck.. by thunderclap · · Score: 0

      If I could I would mod you up

    16. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the couriers had shot these violent robbers dead at the scene, not too many people would be crying for them.

      In fact, not only did they commit battery and armed robbery, they also created a hazard by opening what was almost certainly a clearly labeled containment case.

    17. Re:Tough luck.. by backdoc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Here goes my karma....

      But, I agree completely, it's just poetic justice. And, it's less scum to worry about.

    18. Re:Tough luck.. by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      I don't agree. I think the karma is spot on. The karma is not for what they did but what they could have done with it.

      That would only make sense if they knew what they were stealing, and they knew the implications of stealing it, and they stole it anyway.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    19. Re:Tough luck.. by chilvence · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which is defined as Karma, for your convenience.

    20. Re:Tough luck.. by Transfinite · · Score: 1

      No! not all, for a fucking crane!. Career thugs, criminals that would conceivably go on to commit murder (if they haven't already) and who knows what else? If they do die, I hope it's painful and agonizing. At least if that does happen they can be immortalized as the winners of the Darwin awards.

    21. Re:Tough luck.. by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Having been jumped and beating unconscious, I still do not wish a painful horrible death on the people who did it.

    22. Re:Tough luck.. by jythie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The best guess right now is that they stole the truck for the crane it was carrying.

    23. Re:Tough luck.. by jythie · · Score: 1

      Personally, no. Just responding within the structure of the OP's karma comment.

    24. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma is people on Facebook hoping that bad things happen to people they don't like.

    25. Re:Tough luck.. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Termed as karma, not defined as karma.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    26. Re:Tough luck.. by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. The act of stealing it and being too stupid to know is why they deserve death. Quit being are squeamish, this society will collapse and the majority will die as horribly as those robbers did. And they will only have themselves to blame. We are no better than Atlantis, Egypt, Babylon, Greece, or Rome.

    27. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was just an integer in a database?!

    28. Re:Tough luck.. by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      These guys wouldn't hesitate to shoot you or your family in the face for the chance to steal a truckload of something.

      They put their hands into the blender of life.

    29. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the real world, messing with things you don't understand can indeed be very, very costly, especially when it comes to industrial equipment.

    30. Re:Tough luck.. by tibit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, you see, but you're being rational about it. Others seem ready to be driven by unabated hate.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    31. Re:Tough luck.. by Quila · · Score: 1

      They assaulted the drivers with guns and beat them. I've always thought that if you rob somebody at gunpoint then death is a proportional response. Usually that happens by getting shot by the intended victim or the police, but in this case the cargo got them instead.

    32. Re:Tough luck.. by Ash+Vince · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How badly would the drivers have had to been beaten for it to be more proportional?

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?

      Didn't Jesus say:

        'You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth". But I say to you, do not resist an evildoer. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.'

      So in other words even though there are shitty people in the world then anyone who considers themselves a christian should strive to not seek revenge against such people by killing them or wishing them to be killed. Instead they should forgive and leave any judgment for the lord. Wishing an agonising death upon them would then surely never be proportional, no matter how harshly they beat their victims.

      But of course nobody in the US seems to actually give a shit about this part of Jesus' teachings or else you would not have the death penalty.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    33. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call it karma, I'd call it evolution.

    34. Re:Tough luck.. by hubie · · Score: 1

      Actually, the structure of the OP's comment was quoting a John Lennon song.

    35. Re:Tough luck.. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Maybe karma knew about some other things they have done with those guns in the past...

    36. Re:Tough luck.. by mlts · · Score: 1

      If this were a theft, I'd say so. However, a gunpoint robbery is a trigger-pull from a murder (and often ends up that way.)

      Not to mention the senseless beating of the people in the truck.

      I wouldn't say death is appropriate, but pointing a gun in someone's face and then assaulting them is a lot more than just hopping into an empty truck that is still running and joyriding off with the cargo.

      Acute radiation is ugly, but so is the long term damage from gunshot wounds, or the damage from being pummeled (the description was vague, but i'm sure it entailed use of some blunt objects as well.)

    37. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?

      Didn't Jesus say:

        'You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth". But I say to you, do not resist an evildoer. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.'

      So in other words even though there are shitty people in the world then anyone who considers themselves a christian should strive to not seek revenge against such people by killing them or wishing them to be killed. Instead they should forgive and leave any judgment for the lord. Wishing an agonising death upon them would then surely never be proportional, no matter how harshly they beat their victims.

      But of course nobody in the US seems to actually give a shit about this part of Jesus' teachings or else you would not have the death penalty.

      As an American Christian, I can assure you what little Christian principles the US have left are not predominate, especially in the IT/scientific community, which is predominantly atheistic.

    38. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The karma in this case seems rather disproportional. Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

      Karma don't give a fuck.

    39. Re:Tough luck.. by Patch86 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you think stealing a van and hitting someone warrants death, you are an unhinged individual (or more likely, an internet tough guy). Even the Old Testament said "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth"- that is, the punishment should match the crime. If someone takes your eye out, you're entitled to take up to one eye- not the whole head.

      And I don't think there are many people who would argue that the Old Testament was too lenient...

    40. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EXTEERMINAAATE!!!

    41. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree, I'm sure the US would prefer this for Anonymous.

    42. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do.

    43. Re:Tough luck.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you ever wonder what motivates people to take such extreme and risky actions? It isn't because they are evil or "bad guys".

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    44. Re:Tough luck.. by Hatta · · Score: 5, Informative

      They could have been intending to use it to make dirty bomb what could have exposed hundreds, if not thousands to such an ugly death.

      The dirty bomb, as a weapon of mass destruction, is a myth. Disperse the radioactive material far enough to affect a large number of people, and you disperse the radiation as well. The concentration of radioactive material decreases as the square of the radius of the area of dispersal.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    45. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      anyone willing to so wantonly disregard the rights of others for personal gain does not belong in our society.

      And yet, this seems to be the very premise of America these days.

    46. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Saying from India: There is no good karma, there is no bad karma. There is just karma.

    47. Re:Tough luck.. by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really no. Caught and punished yes. killed? No.

    48. Re: Tough luck.. by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      Depends on the concentration and distance. It has a 33yr half life. So every 33yrs half of its mass decayed from the previous 33yr. As a thumb rule we say 5 half lives is enough to completely decay away.

      Exposure is an inverse square law. So as you move away the exposure reduces exponentially.

    49. Re:Tough luck.. by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      I looked at a datasheet for cobalt 60 apparently you have to come into physical contact. Looking at it shouldn't do them much harm.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    50. Re: Tough luck.. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Well, radiation does accelerate the process...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    51. Re:Tough luck.. by rwise2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe in karma, which is why, when I do something bad to people, I assume they deserve it.

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    52. Re:Tough luck.. by dosilegecko · · Score: 1

      You are more stoic than I.

    53. Re:Tough luck.. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      It isn't about what kind of person the robber is, or is not. It is about what kind of person you want yourself or our society to be. There are all sorts of people who deserve death by your criteria, is this really the best approach to take for ourselves?

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    54. Re:Tough luck.. by mlts · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being the one beaten is one thing.

      Being a friend or relative of the one attacked usually is far worse. Stuff like having a friend's son whom you grew up with tasered to death (the thieves wanted to know "where the valuables were", and kept pulling the trigger until the victim's heart gave out) makes one not really empathetic with violent criminals who do this sort of stuff.

    55. Re: Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Whoa! Hold on a second, dude. First, you must realize the majority of Christians in the US are only Christians on Sundays or when the dogma serves to back their beliefs. Second, a belief in a religion doesn't equal the existence of morality or empathy. Clearly. Thirdly, and I mean this most sincerely above all other points, though Christianity is the most popular religion in the US, please don't lump all of us under the same religious umbrella. It makes you look like a right wing Christian from the US, and you don't want that, do you?

      Guns and Love,
      An atheist stuck in the southern US.

    56. Re: Tough luck.. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There is no way Jesus said that, my gardener can barely speak two words of English.

    57. Re: Tough luck.. by CrypticLokiOmega · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Whoa! Hold on a second, dude. First, you must realize the majority of Christians in the US are only Christians on Sundays or when the dogma serves to back their beliefs. Second, a belief in a religion doesn't equal the existence of morality or empathy. Clearly. Thirdly, and I mean this most sincerely above all other points, though Christianity is the most popular religion in the US, please don't lump all of us under the same religious umbrella. It makes you look like a right wing Christian from the US, and you don't want that, do you? Guns and Love, An atheist stuck in the southern US.

    58. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you'd be against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    59. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There really aren't that many, but the ones we have are really loud.

    60. Re:Tough luck.. by Ravaldy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think this one was karma but rather Darwinism. I'm sure the containers had plenty of warnings. They were crooked and DUMB.

    61. Re:Tough luck.. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It isn't always because they are evil or "bad guys".

      FTFY.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    62. Re:Tough luck.. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

      'You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth". But I say to you, do not resist an evildoer. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.'

      Yeah, and it did not end well for him.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    63. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if something like that happened here we would think they were after prescription narcotics

    64. Re:Tough luck.. by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's a difference between wanting them killed and finding them dead as a result of their crime a convenient outcome.

      Every time a would-be-criminal ends up killing themselves because of their own stupidity, I smile.

    65. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "unabated hate"

      Check. Any questions douchebag? Keep your hands off my shit and I will do the same for you. Where EXACTLY is the fucking problem there?

    66. Re:Tough luck.. by TubeSteak · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yea, let's just ignore all the systemic factors that lead to crime and write those guys off as "less scum to worry about".

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    67. Re:Tough luck.. by mlts · · Score: 1

      As an aside... I should have stated, "stun gun", as this was done before Tasers were the dominant on the market.

      But there are a lot of cases where the crime hurts the family and friends of the victim more than the victim, especially the time it takes to get the person back to some semblance of a normal life if the beating or attack was brutal enough.

    68. Re:Tough luck.. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you ever wonder what motivates people to take such extreme and risky actions? It isn't because they are evil or "bad guys".

      Really? You're saying that the single best course of action they had available to them was to beat those guys and steal the truck? That, in addition, any rational person put in their situation would choose the exact same course of action?

      Sort of makes you wonder why they chose to beat the two guys instead of just force them at gunpoint to be tied up. They must have had literally no other choice.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    69. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people don't agree with us, but this isn't a case of stealing to feed your starving family; anyone willing to so wantonly disregard the rights of others for personal gain does not belong in our society.

      How can you say that when 1. We don't know who did it. and 2. It happened in one of the most poverty stricken, violent places in the western hemisphere. They are not part of our society or they would not have a need to steal. That is what is so out of touch with people here on slashdot where 80k a year is considered chump change. There are plenty of people actually do have to steal or risk starvation. I refuse to judge someone that lives in a culture where risking your life for a chance at a minimum wage job cleaning toilets in the US seems like a good idea.

    70. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right...death to all who, for whatever reason, steal something. There is a difference between a thief and a murderer. I am not trying to defend the theft, but death is not an appropriate consequence.

    71. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many robbers would go that far though? There are plenty of people who would willingly kill to take what they want, others that would take big risks that might kill people unintentionally, stupid ones that don't realize what risks they are putting people through, and those that are more bark than bite.

    72. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "But of course nobody in the US seems to actually give a shit about this part of Jesus' teachings or else you would not have the death penalty."

      Excuse me Euroweenie. The death penalty is about as direct eye for an eye and you are likely to see. This punishment is reserved for the worst of the worst. At that, it's is almost totally unused in the states, with the exception of a few states. An in the cases where it is applied, this is always after numerous expensive appeals.

      Punishment is supposed to be punishing, I am all for fairness and approproate levels of punishmemt, but we have some evil sick fuckers here in prison for various things. The punishment should fit the crime, fine.

      So we may disagree on this, but to characterize the US as a bunch of death penalty fiends is completely absurd.

    73. Re:Tough luck.. by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it is because they are evil or "bad guys". Granted we don't know anything about these people and they don't have a whole lot of time to tell their story even if they're so inclined but if you do these kinds of things you're buying a ticket for a chance at the kind of death evil bad guys often get.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    74. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least we know know what to seed the Arizona and Texas borders with. Immigration would slow to a trickle and we wouldn't need guards.

    75. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, definitely candidates for the Darwin Award.

    76. Re:Tough luck.. by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      The clue that you're off your meds wasn't your assertion that the thieves deserved death because they were ignorant of the cargo, but that you compare us (whoever "we" are) to an ancient city state, an ancient city, two countries, AND ONE FICTIONAL CITY.

    77. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you know them? How are they doing?

    78. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Justice should not be an eye for eye and a tooth for a tooth. You end up with a lot of blind people and needing a lot of peanut butter.

    79. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw you and your magical transforming zombie son of a sky fairy. I don't require such fairy stories for my morality to tell me it's horrible and a disproportionate sentence for the crime. At the same time these were not innocents and no one sentenced them to death. They are about to die by their own hands. If someone had shot them in commission of the crime no one would be greatly disturbed.

    80. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe GP was already doing this.

    81. Re:Tough luck.. by oodaloop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The karma is not for what they did but what they could have done with it.

      Good point. And your mom should be charged with prostitution, because she could do it.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    82. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      I think it is delightful, myself. When it's my turn to be ruler of Earth I'm going to decree lethal radiation exposure as the standard punishment for criminal hijackings.

      You can't accidentally point a gun at someone (and physically beat them, as in this case), drag them out of their vehicle and drive off in it. Someone prepared to voluntarily do that to another human being deserves a slow death.

      Yeah, it's extreme.. but so is the punishment the victims themselves have to live with in the form of ongoing trauma. Nobody ever seems to give a shit about the victims of crime, it's all about the criminal and how they had a hard life, boo hoo.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    83. Re:Tough luck.. by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      It wasn't just theft though. It was aggravated robbery and assault.

      the drivers were jumped by two gunmen who beat them and stole the truck

    84. Re:Tough luck.. by drainbramage · · Score: 1

      Suppose the are Coyotes.
      1> Procure large vehicle
      2> Stuff vehicle with people that pay all they have to get into the U.S.A.
      3> !!??!!
      4> Everyone meets their Prophet.
      --
      Now how about wishing a painful horrible death on the people who did it.?

      --
      No brain, no pain.
    85. Re:Tough luck.. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well there is a degree of risk if you are going to perform crime.
      If you try to mug someone, that guy just may have a gun and shoot you.
      If you steal something it just might be too hazardous for you to carry.

      Justice normally become more proportional the longer after the crime is committed.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    86. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The karma in this case seems rather disproportional. Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

      I really don't think cobalt-60 cares.

    87. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course the "IT/scientific" community probably comprises less than 20% of the whole population so what difference does that make. We do predominate on slashdot but that's a lot different then the general population. dfw

    88. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. Karma is not a "reap what you sow" system. That a common misunderstanding of the concept. You are born with your Karma. It's not tit-for-tac.

    89. Re:Tough luck.. by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      I don't think this one was karma but rather Darwinism. I'm sure the containers had plenty of warnings. They were crooked and DUMB.

      The thieves probably assumed the warnings were fake, meant to deter... well, people like them. I know people will ship containers labeled things like "bull semen" and the like so that shippers will handle it carefully. The thieves probably (wrongly, of course) assumed this was something similar: drugs, money, or something else valuable labeled with radioactive symbols to discourage theft.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    90. Re:Tough luck.. by TheCarp · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > Sort of makes you wonder why they chose to beat the two guys instead of just force them at
      > gunpoint to be tied up. They must have had literally no other choice.

      You are likely far smarter and more well educated than them. I have met a few people who were, at one point or another, in the general category of criminal who would commit this kind of crime. It is a somewhat diverse group but.... they tend to be kinda dumb, and often have all sorts of issues.

      People don't just go through a normal well adjusted life and then one day be like "I am a criminal now" I mean... they do for some "crimes" like.... smoking pot; but not stuff like this.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    91. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you think stealing a van and hitting someone warrants death, you are an unhinged individual (or more likely, an internet tough guy).

      Then I stand before you an unhinged individual. There is no rehabilitation for most people like this and it costs a lot of time and money to try.

      This planet's habitable surface is overflowing with humans and yet most of us manage to avoid committing violent crime. Why should we roll over and take it from those people who repeatedly demonstrate their desire to hurt others?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    92. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely their dope dealer.

    93. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is administering a death penalty. The idiots did it to themselves. And I wonder if now they're just warm on the outside, but still frozen on the inside? Kinda like a couple of walking convenience store microwave burritos?

    94. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      won't be starving for long

    95. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the past twenty years or so, Jesus Christ has become an extremely controversial and polarizing figure among American Christians. Many denominations will flat-out tell you they consider several of His key teachings (e.g. the Beatitudes from the Sermon on the Mount) to be hateful, and as such, these passages are explicitly banned from their services.

    96. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what he said just feels right though, doesn't it? Go with the gut, the gut never lies or leads people to dangerously stupid decisions.

    97. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A dirty bomb wouldn't be JUST about damage, or casualties. Look at what 19 lunatics with box cutters have done to the US over the passed decade+.

      I'd imagine its more like giving Superman a bloody nose...

    98. Re:Tough luck.. by twotacocombo · · Score: 1

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?

      We have no official state religion. We have many flavors of christianity, yes, but also jews, muslims, hindus, buddhists, etc. Atheism is a growing segment, as well. Christian faiths make up the majority of those who are religious here, but to peg us as a 'christian country' would be incorrect.

    99. Re:Tough luck.. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      "But of course nobody in the US seems to actually give a shit about this part of Jesus' teachings or else you would not have the death penalty."

      Excuse me Euroweenie. The death penalty is about as direct eye for an eye and you are likely to see.

      Excuse me Anonytestes, but did you read the post you responded to?

    100. Re:Tough luck.. by chaim79 · · Score: 1

      America was founded on the ideals of religious freedom by people who were predominantly Christians, this led to Christianity being the 'popular' religion of this country, but it is in no way the only religion.

      Unfortunately that has led to as many problems for Christians as it has solved. Since Christianity is the 'popular' religion many people say they are a Christian when they really aren't (i.e. 'Sunday Christians'). This has led to many incidents where people who claim to be Christians do something terrible which then gets blamed on Christianity as a whole instead of the individual, this is especially disheartening when their actions go against Jesus' teachings.

      Think of it like sports fans who only follow the team that is currently winning, and as soon as another team comes out on top they switch over and are running around with a whole new set of colors and jerseys. Meanwhile they are starting fights and causing disturbances all of which get blamed on the 'fans' of the team whose jersey they happen to be wearing at that time.

      As for the original sentiment, I agree that as 'punishment' death is far too excessive for assault and armed robbery, however as 'Karma' it works just fine.

      --
      DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
      AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
      Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
    101. Re:Tough luck.. by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      Please recognize the difference between wishing something upon someone and believing someone deserved it. I've never wished death on anyone, but there are people I believe deserved it when it found them.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    102. Re:Tough luck.. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but this isn't a case of stealing to feed your starving family;

      Just curious - how do you know the motives of the thieves? Don't believe I've seen any interviews with them where motive was discussed...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    103. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most justice systems in the world are roughly based on "An eye for an eye," because it embodies the idea of proportional response. Along those lines, the old testament is largely a document that describes how God ran a country. That's why it's so full of laws, do's, and do nots. Any civilized society will attempt to have a swift, sure, and fair justice system, and "an eye for an eye" is a fundamental component of the "fair" concept. Obviously we've gotten beyond the need to meet out literally equal justice (an actual eye if you damage someone's eye), but the idea of proportionality is strongly grounded in our justice concept.

      Jesus said, ""Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them," in addition to the other things you quoted. So how does that work with the apparent contradiction? Well, it mostly has to do with the fact that Jesus was showing people how to conduct their interpersonal relationships. The religious leaders of Christ's time had become obsessed with the law and had forgotten mercy. So while you couldn't run a country on "turn the other cheek," "give him your coat as well," and "he who is without sin may cast the first stone," you also can't expect a country that is full of individual people who DON'T follow these precepts to not quickly fall into corruption and mire. This is an incredibly important distinction to understand.

      So, it's not so much that people in the U.S. don't " give a shit about this part of Jesus' teachings," but rather the situation is a little less simple that you make it out to be. Most of the Christians I know don't have an obvious stance one way or the other on capital punishment, and most that do support it do so because they believe it helps create a safer society, not because they're grossly ignorant of scripture.

    104. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The dirty bomb, as a weapon of mass destruction, is a myth.

      Absolutely correct, however a dirty bomb isn't really a weapon of mass destruction, it's a weapon of terror. Given the fear economy that has been driving the US for the last decade or so, I imagine it would be a highly effective weapon too.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    105. Re:Tough luck.. by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      It's a float. In case you've ever wondered what happened to yours: Rounding error.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    106. Re:Tough luck.. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      You don't steal a truck and beat the drivers to feed your family, because even if that's their end, their means still makes them deserving.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    107. Re:Tough luck.. by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      You are likely far smarter and more well educated than them.

      Why yes, this is why we should pity them instead of revile them. They were obviously too stupid to know that repeatedly striking another human being with their fists and kicking them with their booted feet would cause harm to that other person. And they were obviously too stupid to know that taking the truck away from those two other human beings was wrong. Why, this truck was just sitting there, and how dare those two people stand in the way of them taking what was rightfully theirs because of the universal "finders keepers losers weepers" law. It's the truck driver's fault for existing, not the poor criminal's fault for being too stupid to know better.

      All it would take to solve this problem is to give everyone a free college education so they will all be educated enough to know that beating someone up is wrong and taking their stuff is bad, n'kay?

      Sheesh.

    108. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Going by statistics you're a 20 something white male whose only contact with hoodrats comes from movies and what you see on worldstarhiphop. It's easy from your cozy perch 50 miles away to say what you said. Go live in the hood for a year or two, I guarantee you'll be singing a different tune. ;)

    109. Re: Tough luck.. by FranklinWebber · · Score: 1

      A correction to your terminology:

      Exposure decreases _quadratically_ with distance and _exponentially_ with time.

    110. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am an American. Why would you assume I am Christian?

    111. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean KERMA in this case. Lots of KERMA.

    112. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe poor and desperate.

    113. Re:Tough luck.. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Being able to wipe out a city block, a stadium full of people, or the area around a major landmark would still be pretty devastating, and doing it with radiation would mean that there would be days of media coverage as thousands or tens of thousands of people died a slow and painful death. It seems as if you're attacking a straw man argument that a dirty bomb can wipe out a massive area, but there's nothing mythological about what a dirty bomb can actually do.

    114. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but where else are the robbers in this care going to get a truck full of Cobalt-60? The old regime in Libya tried to pawn off a bunch of pinball machine parts to them...

    115. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The dirty bomb, as a weapon of mass destruction, is a myth. Disperse the radioactive material far enough to affect a large number of people, and you disperse the radiation as well. The concentration of radioactive material decreases as the square of the radius of the area of dispersal.

      True, but grinding it up into a powder and dispersing it inside even a very a large building will probably result in that building being condemned. Sure, you or whatever schmuck you convince to do the dirty work for you will also probably die, but for some people the price would be worth it. Or take a cue from the Anthrax mailer and mail it to enemies -- and just like those letters contaminating every postoffice and mailroom they traversed, the damage would be extensive and require massive remediation to clean up. Be creative, there's lots of places even a little bit of radioactive material would considered unacceptable and result in hysteria, panic, and terror. No bombs required.

    116. Re:Tough luck.. by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This, right here.

      There is no call for capital punishment on a carjacker. However, if a couple of them die painfully after giving a couple of innocent folks a severe beating, doing so at gunpoint, and all because they were too dumbassed to ignore the warnings splayed all over the container?

      I really cannot bring myself to feel bad about the outcome.

      For those who feel otherwise, look at it this way: When you use a lethal weapon to commit a crime, you state to the world that you are willing to kill innocent people in order to get what you want, no matter what. From the moment when you point that gun at someone, your life is automatically forfeit should you die as a result of committing that crime. It doesn't matter if you died instantly because the victim shot back, or because every orifice you have is slowly bleeding out of your swollen body due to radiation exposure... you got what was coming to you.

      Oh, you're dying a painful death from the stuff you stole and some bleeding-heart type on Slashdot says I should show you some sympathy? Okay: you'll find sympathy in the dictionary between "shit" and "syphilis".

      On the plus side, maybe the next person contemplating violent acts to get what they want will think twice because of these two Darwin Award winners?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    117. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do we do with the people willing to kill the people willing to kill?

      What do we do with the people allowing the people-willing-to-kill to die?

      Where do cycles of death end? How many degrees of separation from the first victim?

    118. Re:Tough luck.. by Meyaht · · Score: 1

      my new sig

      --
      I believe in karma, which is why, when I do something bad to people, I assume they deserve it.
    119. Re:Tough luck.. by durrr · · Score: 1

      Now if only all objects of value had such karmic theft protections. The world would be a better place.

    120. Re:Tough luck.. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      How mch dose will kill, say, 50% with cancer wothin 10 years? Or just 20%? What if it is a slow release rather than literally a bomb, and takes days or weeks before detection?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    121. Re:Tough luck.. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Wow, you need to get over it. An experience like that can either drag you down, or you can overcome it and become stronger.

      If you're still wishing death on those people years later, you need to do something.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    122. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      death as punishment for the crime of theft IS wantonly disregarding the rights of others.

    123. Re:Tough luck.. by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sheesh? All I was suggesting is that asking why they choose one method of theft over another is, well.... because they are likely dumb and it didn't even occur to them.

      It might be worth considering that just because a person is wrong doesn't mean that is the end of the story. Criminals are generally a symptom of larger social issues. Morality is nice and all, but, just stopping at the morality of it and deciding they were wrong; is simultaneously correct and useless. You may as well be pointing out that water is wet.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    124. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no "could" about it.

    125. Re:Tough luck.. by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      I not only agree with you, but need to shake my head every time some apologist changes words like "beat" into "hit." They didn't just "hit" the drivers, the drivers were "beaten." I don't wish death on the perpetrators because they stole a truck, but because they beat someone, and that was just completely unnecessarily to commit the theft. Some of these people take pleasure in it, they have demonstrated a complete, selfish lack of regard for others. They simply do not deserve to exist with the rest of us.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    126. Re:Tough luck.. by pezpunk · · Score: 1

      yeah but dude your stance in favor of EXECUTION as punishment for MUGGING is not justifiable to anyone with a shred of human decency. get a grip.

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    127. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. I'm struggling with the moral equivalence of that one. Someone who would jump and beat someone to take something that wasn't theirs. Remove them from society temporarily, or permanently? I'm leaning towards permanently.

    128. Re:Tough luck.. by pezpunk · · Score: 1

      haha thumbs up

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    129. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, his point was that an eye for an eye most certainly isn't Christian.
      Besides that it's true as your explanation shows that there are other reasons that make it plain stupid, starting with the financial cost.

    130. Re:Tough luck.. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 2

      That's the beauty of the situation. We don't know who did it, and we don't need to; the problem will take care of itself.

      And I don't buy the argument that anyone ever has to steal. My income in 2010 was a nice round $0, and I didn't steal anything.

    131. Re:Tough luck.. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Hey, on the positive side...

      At least they won't have to do time in a mexican prison!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    132. Re:Tough luck.. by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I looked at a datasheet for cobalt 60 apparently you have to come into physical contact. Looking at it shouldn't do them much harm.

      Interesting then that the cobalt 60 machines used in medical therapy don't put the patient in direct contact with the stuff. It must be magic. Cancers can detect the boogeyman at the door and die from fright, never getting actually touched by this magical medical miracle.

    133. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was beaten in a strong arm robbery too, although I retained consciousness. Also would not wish horrible death on the fools that did it. But maybe mild radiation sickness requiring a week long hospital stay. Yeah, that'll do.

    134. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because exacting violent retribution brutalizes the punishers too. It also creates a society with less empathy which breeds more violence.

    135. Re:Tough luck.. by pezpunk · · Score: 1

      i'm wondering what the gain is to surgically removing your sense of human compassion. the universe is not itself a caring entity? no shit. doesn't mean people shouldn't be.

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    136. Re:Tough luck.. by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country

      You thought wrong. The US is supposed to be a country without a state religion. Of course that doesn't stop the GOP from shoving its religious views down other people's throats.

    137. Re:Tough luck.. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

      That wasn't the stance they took, and you'd have to be incredibly stupid to interpret it that way.

    138. Re:Tough luck.. by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Then I guess they shouldn't have tried to steal someone else's property.

      It's like when someone tries to steal copper wire and gets electrocuted. It might seem harsh to some (not me), but if they hadn't been trying to steal, they wouldn't be dead.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    139. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This honestly has to be the stupidest thing I've ever read. That's like saying "You know a shot gun can't kill you because because the pellets are each smaller than bullets thus they have less force!" It's true a dirty bomb spread out won't have "as much" intensity, but it can still kill a ton of people.

      Let's look at some numbers " 60 g of pure 60Co, generates a dose of 1 mSv at one meter distance within one hour."* Let's say a minute, so 0.016 over 1 meter per minute. Next let's find a sufficiently large enough area how about 7140 m, the size of a football field, assuming linear deteriation we now have 0.0000022409 mSv per micro gram. And "Doses greater than 1 sievert received over a short time period are likely to cause radiation poisoning, possibly leading to death within weeks."** So 0.0000022409 / 1000 = 0.0000000022 sieverts per minute per micro gram. We have 0.0022 sieverts per gram per minute over a football field and 1 over a short period of time can likely lead to death. Tell me again how a dirty bomb is a myth.

      *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt-60
      **http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sievert

    140. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh cry me a fucking river...those poor misunderstood souls, they have issues! They should be loved and cuddled!!. Yes, people with issues deserve help and sympathy... until they act on their malfunctions and hurt others...

    141. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I want them dead, so I won't be the next victim. Sorry, but I don't care if they beat you up again. I am fine with that. Maybe next time, they will kill you. If you are okay with that, so am I. I don't want them beating me or my family/friends up. I am okay with them dying.

    142. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Don't upmod racists twits.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    143. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, the just response to harm is not greater harm. When harm is repaid with greater harm, it keeps escalating. War is the inevitable end in any such society.

      Justice requires work, but it is worth it.

    144. Re:Tough luck.. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's exactly in balance.

      They started with robbery / assault. Then they took a big heavy box out of the truck that probably had large warning labels all over it, written in Spanish, with a radiation symbol on it. They then proceeded to crowbar it open and dump it out all over the place, and do Jeebus knows what else with it.

      If you're stupid enough to screw around with well labeled and sealed radioactive materials, you're gonna get sick.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    145. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you think YOU had it worse than the one actually beaten? Wow.

    146. Re: Tough luck.. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Depends on the concentration and distance. It has a 33yr half life. So every 33yrs half of its mass decayed from the previous 33yr.

      Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.3 years. That makes it a rather active radionuclide. The decay from Co60 emits beta and gamma radiation, resulting in Ni60.

      Since the density of nickel is hardly zero, the mass of a cobalt 60 source doesn't not decay by 50% in one half life, two half lives, or five. The amount of Co60 does decrease.

    147. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having been jumped and fought back, later to drag my attackers to court and discover that they were career criminals with a disturbing trend of increasingly violent crimes, I can't really applaud your stance.

    148. Re:Tough luck.. by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Christians have no difficulty finding text in the Bible to support just about any position they want. Paul talks about acts "worthy of death" in Acts 25:11. Jesus reinforced the Old Testament punishments in Matthew 5:17-18, "Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass away from the Law, until all is accomplished."

      The resolution to the conflict tends to fall on the side of whatever one is ideologically predisposed to believe. It seems to me that "Turn the other cheek" is a lot clearer and more direct, but then, I'm not Christian, so what do I know?

    149. Re:Tough luck.. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It isn't hate. There is an equally rational side that suggest that painful death as a consequence/punishment of violent crime DOES have a deterrent effect, even if minor. Anyone that commits violent acts, does not deserve the continuing protection from society. However, we, as society, recognize that our judicial system is flawed even at its best and thus, try every means possible to keep people alive, even when it is clear that they have no benefit to our society. And that is also completely rational.

      However, when nature takes over, I have NO sympathies for those about to die a slow painful death. My sympathies are to their families to the extent that they lost a "loved one". Love, is also not rational, which is why people can love and care for people who are so depraved they deserve no such devotion.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    150. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Death for Stealing a truck.
      that's not poetic justice, or poetic, or justice.

      Poetic justice would have been if the truck they stole had been stolen and they got pulled over because of the first theft.

      I"m more worried about the scum that thing Justice for stealing a truck is death then I am about people who steal trucks.

      Please learn to apply critical thinking skills to you're current mode of what I will generously call thinking.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    151. Re:Tough luck.. by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country

      Um, no. That would be Britain. The U.S. is supposed to be secular country populated many people who claim to be christians.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    152. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's from the bible right? Wasn't the moral of the story that even if you are the son of an all powerful God, being a wuss will get your a** crucified.

    153. Re:Tough luck.. by Fesh · · Score: 1

      Crap. Bad moderation. Sorry...

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    154. Re:Tough luck.. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Caught, yes.

      Punished, yes.

      Death, if warranted, yes. The problem is that our judicial system is flawed, and thus we are often not 100% sure it is warranted. WHICH is why I support the concept of the Death Penalty, while opposing it 100% in practice. We (mankind) can rationalize doing all sorts of evil, in the name of good.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    155. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My mother was a drunkard and crazy. I was 12 and had to feed her and my two brothers.
      Yeah, I stole. Robbed bread trucks, soda trucks, I would go into busy pizza places and just grab a pie off the counter and walk out.
      It was always a last resort, it was always about basic survival.
      And if I had to do it again, I would.

      You clearly had other avenues to get food and shelter.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    156. Re:Tough luck.. by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      A dirty bomb with a short range set off in a stadium or a field during a big sports event (think Superbowl) could kill hundreds and wound ten times that, if only from the ensuing panic. Remember, there are circumstances where it's normal for thousands of people to be compacted in a small area.

    157. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OTOH, a Mexican Cartel might have threatened to kill their families if they didn't get a lot of money.
      Like what was said 'Motives unknown' at this time.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    158. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would be absolutely right, if she had used her vagina in the commission of a crime.

    159. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah but dude your stance in favor of EXECUTION as punishment for MUGGING is not justifiable to anyone with a shred of human decency. get a grip.

      This wasn't a simple mugging and it's disingenuous for you to frame it as such. This was a violent hijacking by two sadistic individuals whose actions will have lasting effects on their unfortunate victims. Gfxguy's comment above captures our concerns perfectly - they are dysfunctional, dangerous members of society and statistically speaking these people do not change.

      How do you rehabilitate someone who gets great pleasure in (effectively) torturing innocent people?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    160. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently they haven't given him the thumbs up, yet!

    161. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      IN you case someone was killed.

      It really depends on what happened, and some idiots on /. are too stupid to do anything but break an issue into 2 parts. Don't commit any crime at all/Die of you commit any crime.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    162. Re:Tough luck.. by SlippyToad · · Score: 1

      I was stalked and repeatedly attacked by a bully growing up. I talked to a friend who had known this guy later in life, and he was the kind of guy who would do any stupid thing if he was challenged, or dared to. It was just his thing.

      So yea, I'm sure he ended up the muscle for some petty drug dealer or pimp, and likely has toured the inside of several prison facilities by now. He was on that path at age 10 when I ran into him for the first time. And my friend described this guy as fuckin' dumb. Would do anything, especially if it was DUMB.

      I don't feel any sympathy for these guys. I don't think they deserved death, but death found them anyway because they are ill-considered people without a lot of common sense.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    163. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, that statement was about monetary compensation. Just so you know.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    164. Re:Tough luck.. by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Calling Hidalgo State "one of the most poverty stricken, violent places in the western hemisphere" is a bit of a reach. If you were simply referring to Mexico as a whole, you might want to turn off the news and get out a little more often.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    165. Re:Tough luck.. by xtracto · · Score: 2

      Except that it may be the case that other innocent people may be affected by these people's acts.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    166. Re:Tough luck.. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I saw a couple of pictures of the container, I was surprised they didn't have the yellow and black radiation warning.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    167. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. Family and friends have to bear the consequences too.

      It should have been stated that most people are like this: Someone punches them in the face, that's one thing. Someone punches their daughter in the face... that is completely another item altogether.

      Someone of the family may not have it worse than the victim, but people tend to get a lot more angry at someone who attacked someone around them than themselves.

    168. Re: Tough luck.. by ningeo · · Score: 1

      Neither could Jesus.

    169. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad enough to tell the thieves that it was a couple of kilos of cocaine in the box instead of cobalt-60. (I wouldn't be too surprised.) Payback's a bitch, ain't it?

    170. Re:Tough luck.. by SlippyToad · · Score: 1

      I've always thought that if you rob somebody at gunpoint then death is a proportional response

      Yea, I am kind of not cool with the gun in my face thing either, and if I ever find one there I will take the very first opportunity to end the gunman, and also these idiots stole radioactive waste, which put everyone around them in danger. I'm not cheering on the karma, but they did start the whole chain of events. It's just what is.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    171. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd have to disagree on that point... have you seen his mom?

    172. Re:Tough luck.. by Hobadee · · Score: 1

      > And I don't think there are many people who would argue that the Old Testament was too lenient...
      Challenge accepted!

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    173. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think stealing a van and hitting someone warrants death, you are an unhinged individual (or more likely, an internet tough guy). Even the Old Testament said "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth"- that is, the punishment should match the crime. If someone takes your eye out, you're entitled to take up to one eye- not the whole head.

      And I don't think there are many people who would argue that the Old Testament was too lenient...

      Quoting the bible (fiction book) on slashdot what a dumbass you are

    174. Re: Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would be ordinary justice with a side dish of irony. Poetic justice is always some kind of ridiculously over-the-top ill-fated doom. Nobody writes poetry about boring shit like two thieves getting caught. Okay, nobody writes good poetry about that sort of thing. To make a good epic, it has to be outrageous, not mundane.

    175. Re:Tough luck.. by Hobadee · · Score: 1

      > I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?
      Yes, but /. is also a site where most people refuse to RTFA (hell, the term was INVENTED here!) and generally misquote everything, so the few /.-ers who have *ACTUALLY* read the Bible still probably misquote it.

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    176. Re:Tough luck.. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. I think the karma is spot on. The karma is not for what they did but what they could have done with it.

      That's... a rather interesting definition of karma. And unfortunate for you, considering what you could do with a computer. Not to mention a pair of hands. Or your life, for that matter.

      Do you work in the US judiciary by any chance?

      I would agree with you if they had just stolen a truck load of money or just about anything else.

      No, because they could had used the money to hire someone else to steal the Cobalt and so forth.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    177. Re:Tough luck.. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but this is the same Jesus that made a Scourge (whip with metal bits at the ends) and forcibly evicted money changers in the Temple. He wasn't opposed to violence, he was opposed to revenge violence. Specifically, there is a strong opinion that this has more to do with being a Servant (to G-D) than anything, for a bondservant has no right to revenge, only his master has that right. By giving up that right, you declare yourself the proper bondservant Jesus wanted. This would mean the person "turning the other cheek" was casting a much harsher punishment (hell) on those that perpetrated it, while also allowing for the redemption of the criminal should they repent of their sins.

      Lastly, the eye for eye, tooth for tooth, was about equity of outcome (in the Old Testament). A person harmed by a criminal act, had the right to equity of results upon the perpetrator. This means, that the perpetrator would have to live under the same conditions, for the rest of his life, that he cause upon another. This same provisions also require full restitution for the harm caused (money).

      In truth, it isn't as barbaric as it seems at first glance. And from their (ancient) perspective, our current judicial system seems completely useless, providing little or no justice to victims.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    178. Re:Tough luck.. by smpoole7 · · Score: 3, Informative

      > I looked at a datasheet for cobalt 60 apparently you have to come into physical contact. Looking at it shouldn't do them much harm.

      You need to throw away that datasheet and get a better one. :)

      http://www.bt.cdc.gov/radiation/isotopes/cobalt.asp

      Cobalt 60 emits gamma radiation, fairly energetic, which means you only need to be in proximity to it to suffer ill effects. I saw a chart on another site a while ago that said standing within 1 meter of the Co-60 for longer than a few minutes would result in a serious exposure. Being that close to it, without touching it, for more than 30 minutes to an hour would almost certainly be fatal.

      The sad thing is, the guys probably didn't know what they were handling and are almost certainly dead by now. I'm frankly surprised that they didn't find the bodies near the site, because after about 15-20 minutes of direct exposure to that much Co-60, they would have already begun feeling the effects -- severe headaches, nausea and diarrhea.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    179. Re:Tough luck.. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Necromonger! Gross!

      or

      My Mother is dead, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    180. Re:Tough luck.. by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but as they beat people (the truck drivers, in this case) in order to carry out the theft, I have lost any sympathy that I might have had.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    181. Re:Tough luck.. by splatter · · Score: 1

      Jythie, you are a better person then I.
      Not a day goes by I don't think of that asshole & his friends & how badly I'd like to know something really bad happened to him. Yeah I know turn the other cheek and all that, but I just can't seem to get my heart or head around that even five years later. Even now as I type it makes my blood boil, I try hard to not think about it.

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
    182. Re: Tough luck.. by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Let us sit and thank Jesus for this food. To which Jesus replied, "de nada".

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    183. Re:Tough luck.. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Its not necessarily about sympathy, just that, asking why they did one thing over another likely is missing this fact: They are dumb, they likely didn't even consider many options.

      Its also a question of: Why are people so dumb and reckless? Are they not being produced somehow? Is reducing their numbers not, progress? Is it not worth trying to understand where the problem comes from?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    184. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this funny? I find this an extremely insightful observation about what's dangerous about the concept of Karma.

    185. Re:Tough luck.. by smpoole7 · · Score: 1

      > The karma in this case seems rather disproportional. Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

      Looking at all the comments here (someone even quoted Jesus!), remember, this isn't a binary solution set. We don't know what these guys were like. They may have been dumb mules who were ordered by a drug cartel to steal the truck (and said cartel is essentially holding their families hostage). Or, they just be really bad people. We don't know.

      I will share this true story: guy I knew, worked at a convenient store back in Southern Pines, NC, when I was living there. It was just down the street from WIOZ-FM, which I was maintaining at the time. Nice kid, always had a smile when I'd stop by for my midnight coffee or Gatorade.

      A punk comes into the store, points a gun, says, "gimme the money." The guy does as he was instructed: thank the Lord, the bosses had told him not to be a hero. Just give them the money, let the bad guys leave, then call the cops.

      The guy gives the robber the money ... and the robber shoots him in the face. Out of pure meanness and spite. (They had surveillance cameras.) This poor kid spent months in rehab and will never be the same.

      Now ... this might not be very Christian of me, but just being honest: if that robber had met a bad end on his way from that convenience store, I'm not sure if I would have felt a lot of sympathy for him.

      Just being honest.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    186. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where are you supposed to go if you have these inclinations and don't want to be part of society?

    187. Re:Tough luck.. by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      uh huh... and the Mexican Cartel said "oh, and, by the way, beat the drivers when you steal the truck?" That's why it doesn't even matter in this case.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    188. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really no. Caught and punished yes. killed? No.

      By being locked up in their own 8'x8' cell with cable TV, three square meals a day, educational opportunities, etc., all at a cost of somewhere in the neighborhood of 80,000 (depending on who you ask) of Joe Taxpayer's hard-earned dollars. Nah, the 50 bullet route is just fine with me. But then, I'm a crazy gun-toting Texan, so what do I know?

    189. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually
      > british)?

      The US is (mostly) culturally christian. It does not mean the people really follow the teachings of Christ.

    190. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You demonstrate exactly the sort of traits that you're calling on us to destroy. Is that what you really want?

    191. Re:Tough luck.. by denmarkw00t · · Score: 0

      Woo +5 Funny (but racist) woo! Seriously, I think it's funny, but only in the way that I wouldn't ever say it to anyone ever.

    192. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while I wouldn't advocate death penalty for them if caught (I'm usually against death penalty), them dying on their own 'cause of their acts is kinda... well... karma bites back. I don't feel sorry for them at all.

      e.g. I wouldn't advocate death penalty for car thieves, but then I wouldn't object to people installing killing devices in their car if say it was stolen. When they take their fate into their own hands, well... it's them doing it to themselves. Not society permanently punishing them for a stupid act.

    193. Re:Tough luck.. by pspahn · · Score: 1

      However, a gunpoint robbery is a trigger-pull from a murder (and often ends up that way.)

      Why are there so many people posting that don't understand this? I see all these apologists stating that these guys don't deserve to die for the crimes they committed. Why don't they?

      I fail to see the difference between committing crimes that might kill someone (as these guys did) and committing crimes that do kill someone. Just because they got lucky and nobody died does that mean they should receive a lesser punishment?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    194. Re:Tough luck.. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      They are dumb, they likely didn't even consider many options.

      So giving them a free college education would bring them up to the level of amicusNYCL who could point out that beating someone wasn't likely to be the best course of action no matter what the circumstances were. Problem solved.

      When someone says that beating someone in the act of robbing them isn't necessary, it's pretty silly to try to claim that the robbers just didn't know any better and that having more education would have enlightened them to the other options. Like "not beating someone" is such a difficult thing to think of without a PhD.

      Its also a question of: Why are people so dumb and reckless?

      Did you never consider that maybe these guys weren't dumb, that they maybe enjoy beating people up as a way of proving their control over others? That maybe they don't want to spend the money on ropes or bullets? That maybe they're doing this on a semi-regular basis, and if they beat up a few drivers then others will be less willing to resist when their trucks get stolen?

      Do you think mob-style executions are done because the mobsters who do it are just dumb? Don't you think maybe they are doing more than just killing the guy they're killing, maybe it's a message to everyone else they deal with that resisting is futile and dangerous? Is the beating a loan shark applies to a debtor because the loan shark is dumb, or is it because he sending a message to ALL of his customers that being behind on your payments means more than a harshly worded letter from a lawyer?

      They were unlucky to steal a cargo that might kill them through ignorance, but dumb isn't necessarily the thing they are. Unethical and amoral, yes. Antisocial, yes. Dumb? Well, they know an easy way to get money and how to keep people from stopping them.

      Is it not worth trying to understand where the problem comes from?

      And thus endeth all need for individual responsibility. They did what they did because society forced them to. Jake on his knees in the sewer ... "It wasn't my fault.". That was funny because it was so overplayed and outrageous. Trying to make the same arguments for thugs in real life is not so funny.

    195. Re:Tough luck.. by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      There are 7 billion people on earth. Hundreds of thousands of people die each day, many in violent deaths, and most of those did nothing wrong.

      I may not wish those who commit crimes dead, but I'm sure not going to feel sympathetic when one of them snuffs it. These guys are a waste of skin. If they want to be treated like human beings, they should have acted like it.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    196. Re: Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, remember you're looking at a translation above --- you'll have to check your gardener's fluency in Aramaic and/or Koine Greek.

    197. Re:Tough luck.. by fnj · · Score: 1

      I looked at a datasheet for cobalt 60 apparently you have to come into physical contact. Looking at it shouldn't do them much harm.

      Are you serious? It is a gamma and X-ray emitter. You don't need anywhere near direct contact. The MSDS I am looking at indicates 41,800 GBq/g. I have no idea what the quantity involved in the incident was, but if you postulate 1 kg, that means 41.8*10^15 Bq. The dose rate given in said MSDS is 370 uSv/h/GBq at 1 m. That works out to 370 Sv/h for said 41.8 thousand thousand GBq., or about 6 Sv/min (600 rem/min). Coincidentally, that is LD50 for whole-body radiation. I'm pretty sure that would do the trick, absent heroic and expert medical measures promptly applied (and likely even if they WERE applied), if torso and/or head was placed at 1 m for 1 minute. And these fumb ducks are not likely going to be visiting a hospital which has expertise in massive radiation sickness.

      There is a lot of postulation there, but the take-home is that your assumption is grossly incorrect. Good thing you weren't on scene.

    198. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never died from cobalt-60 exposure before. It will hardly be an instant death.

    199. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing personal vengeance with vengeance executed by those with legitimate authority against evil-doers, to maintain justice and peace in a fallen world. Jesus was speaking about the former, while the Apostle Paul, in Romans 12, said, "For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer."

    200. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case the person died. In this case no one died. I'm troubled that you can't see the difference in the two cases.

    201. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP is Mexican. They have higher standards.

    202. Re:Tough luck.. by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      They could have been intending to use it to make dirty bomb what could have exposed hundreds, if not thousands to such an ugly death.

      That's a bit of a stretch. If they had intended to use it for that purpose, they would have had to have known what they were stealing in the first place--and they wouldn't have opened the damn container and irradiated themselves in the first place. (For that matter, they wouldn't have abandoned the cobalt-60 after the carjacking.)

      While they're probably not nice people, and they may not even be good people, it's not fair or reasonable to assign karmic penalties based on a worst-case what-if scenario. If you're going to play that game, you might as well say that all carjackers deserve slow, painful death because they could use the stolen vehicle to run over kittens and baby seals.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    203. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Some will rob you with a six-gun, And some with a fountain pen"

      The best way to rob a bank is to own it.

      The biggest crooks wear the best suits.

    204. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Political science has advanced a little in 3000 years. Old Testament justice was simply revenge. Wait until someone does something bad, and make them suffer the same bad. In modern political thought, some people would like to lower the risk of a crime BEFORE it happens. Not saying it is possible, or preferable -- just that that is a valid philosophy, and quoting the Old Testament seems outdated. One way to lower crime rate is to make the crime dangerous. "If you steal, you risk getting killed. Don't steal." It acts as a deterrent. Again, I am only discussing the theory, not the practice, and not the soundness of the philosophy. But your characterization of others who disagree with you as "unhinged," is reminiscent of ancient religious zealotry. I personally say that we should shoot them all and let God sort them out.

    205. Re:Tough luck.. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever seems to give a shit about the victims of crime, it's all about the criminal and how they had a hard life, boo hoo.

      Using victims of crime as an excuse for your fascist fantasies is no different than using children as excuse for censorship. It also fails just as hard to actually justify anything. It does, however, go to show that a lot of people would probably benefit from consultation.

      But at least you were honest in the quote: you don't give a shit about the victims.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    206. Re:Tough luck.. by qwe4rty · · Score: 1

      For starters, there is no official religion in the United States. Many people may be Christian, but to say the "US was supposed to be a christian country" is false. Secondly, there is precedent for capital punishment in the Bible. I don't care one way or another about what the Bible says, but your points are flawed/weak.

    207. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are just thieves, people change with time. I've just read this : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-25142557 and this guy seemed much too far gone, but apparently not.
      "roll over and take it from those people who repeatedly demonstrate their desire to hurt others"
      Putting them in jail is not rolling over and taking it.

    208. Re:Tough luck.. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      No actually I didn't consider those; for a couple of reasons:

      1. Smart, organized criminals are rather rare. Its much smarter to assume the general case until there is reason to suspect otherwise.

      2. Smart organized criminals tend to know what they are stealing ahead of time

      3. If I was going to consider this, I would also have to consider that they were smart enough to have colluded with the drivers to steal the truck, and any evidence of a beating may be a cover.

      4. Mob style hitmen are a bad example too, See #1. Very rare. Even more rare than other kinds of smart organized criminals.

      and 5:
      >> "Is it not worth trying to understand where the problem comes from?"
      > "And thus endeth all need for individual responsibility."

      Right so not even worth considering. You get to personal responsibility and thats the full story, you are done. Good for you

      Its like these damned doctors. They know about fever, they know how to treat it. Who the fuck needs to study the disease that causes the fever? Thus endeth all need for superficial treatments.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    209. Re:Tough luck.. by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering what datasheet the poster looked at. The typical decay path from Cobalt 60 to Nickel 60 results in two Gamma rays with total energy (as measured in good old fashioned Watts) nearly 30 times the typical energy for the commonest path of Plutonium decay. Not keeping sufficient track of just a single one of these small medical Co 60 sources has already been the cause of 3 deaths and 7 long term dehabilitating exposures in a single junkyard accident in Thailand

                    In large enough amounts, admittedly much larger than medical uses, it's literally one of the most frightening substances known to man. A jacket of C60 is the stuff that would hypothetically make a 'normal' Plutonium based H-bomb into a "doomsday weapon" that could, at least theoretically, leave a small nation sized area totally uninhabitable for decades, even centuries. It's claimed that everybody who considered building one of these turned away from it when they realized it would most probably destroy the user as thoroughly as the enemy.

                Was this, perhaps, a "datasheet" that only covered the chemical toxicity of regular Cobalt?

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    210. Re:Tough luck.. by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Excuse me Euroweenie. The death penalty is about as direct eye for an eye and you are likely to see. This punishment is reserved for the worst of the worst.

      Do you not remember John 7:53-8:11, the story of the adultress to be stoned? Jesus was not in favor of capital punishment ("Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."), and was in favor of forgiveness as a general principle.

      At that, it's is almost totally unused in the states, with the exception of a few states. An in the cases where it is applied, this is always after numerous expensive appeals.

      The death penalty is still in effect in 32 out of 50 states and at the federal level. 3 of the states which banned it recently have not done so retroactively, leaving prisoners still awaiting their execution. While Texas is an extreme outlier for executions, 10 states have had an average of 1 execution per year or more since the penalty was reestablished in 1976. The South as a whole has executed over 1100 people since then.

      So we may disagree on this, but to characterize the US as a bunch of death penalty fiends is completely absurd.

      And yet we're the only Western country that still has the death penalty; most of the civilized world has given it up. We're also the Western country with (by far) the highest rate of incarceration and the longest prison sentences. We're also one of the few that allows the use of plea bargaining to compel guilty pleas, and many of our states disenfranchise felons, which is also rare in Western democracies. Gallup polls show that 57% of Americans still support the death penalty (down from a peak of around 80% in 1994.)

      Over all, we're a very harsh regime when it comes to law enforcement, and the death penalty is just part and parcel of a nation that believes on some level that criminals aren't human and don't deserve to be treated as such. Punishment is part of our culture, not rehabilitation, and certainly not Christian forgiveness.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    211. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      You demonstrate exactly the sort of traits that you're calling on us to destroy. Is that what you really want?

      You consider lawful state execution and unlawful criminal murder as equally brutal? That is a matter of opinion to which you are completely entitled, however it does limit the potential for interesting debate on the matter.

      As for my demonstration of these traits I think you're waxing a bit lyrical there. I do not own a firearm nor any purpose-built offensive weapon (sure I have kitchen knives) and certainly don't advocate vigilante justice. I'm simply a realist - some people are of more value to society as plant food. If I intentionally commit a crime that puts me in this category, I'll happily plead guilty and offer to push the damn button myself.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    212. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?"
      Serioulsly ?
      Fuck Jesus

      btw I'm french and I don't agree with this guy, but Jesus really ?

    213. Re:Tough luck.. by CMYKjunkie · · Score: 1

      If you think stealing a van and hitting someone warrants death, you are an unhinged individual (or more likely, an internet tough guy).

      Then I stand before you an unhinged individual. There is no rehabilitation for most people like this and it costs a lot of time and money to try.

      This planet's habitable surface is overflowing with humans and yet most of us manage to avoid committing violent crime. Why should we roll over and take it from those people who repeatedly demonstrate their desire to hurt others?

      Well.... that escalated quickly!

    214. Re:Tough luck.. by tftp · · Score: 1

      Jythie, you are a better person then I.

      I disagree with the premise that violent criminals should get a stern talking to and then released to continue the mayhem. I do not insist on a particularly painful execution, though. Any execution will do, as long as it is done in a few hours after sentencing. A good part of justice is intended to give example to others. Treating robbers gently and with respect only breeds more robbers.

    215. Re:Tough luck.. by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, the Code of Hammurabi is not one of the books found in the Old Testament.

      Christians (you didn't call it the Torah, not that that would be any better) once again demonstrating their desire to co-opt everything and anything.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    216. Re:Tough luck.. by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      But of course nobody in the US seems to actually give a shit about this part of Jesus' teachings or else you would not have the death penalty.

      This pretty much sums it up. Religion is used to push for certain policies and behaviors, but certainly not for this kind of pacifist / caring behavior. It's hard to rile up the public to take action about turning the other cheek.

    217. Re:Tough luck.. by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      What, you think you're better than the universe?

      (Yeah, me too...)

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    218. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would be absolutely right, if she had used her vagina in the commission of a crime.

      She did, when she gave birth to you.

    219. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Using victims of crime as an excuse for your fascist fantasies is no different than using children as excuse for censorship. It also fails just as hard to actually justify anything. It does, however, go to show that a lot of people would probably benefit from consultation.

      What's the point of enforcing crime if not to protect the potential victims? It seems perfectly reasonable to me to use this as justification. Perhaps this is a logical fallacy of some kind on my part?

      But at least you were honest in the quote: you don't give a shit about the victims.

      Very deft move there sparky, I like the part where you take my words, rotate 'em 180 degrees then argue your point - I'm pretty sure that is the missing logical fallacy right there.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    220. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no rehabilitation for most people like this and it costs a lot of time and money to try.

      Were you talking about the thief or yourself?

    221. Re:Tough luck.. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      We all die, some from old age, some while attempting hijack, others as a result of successful hijack...

    222. Re:Tough luck.. by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Criminals are generally a symptom of larger social issues.

      I don't disagree that certain criminal acts are products of desperation, for instance a thief stealing to feed himself or a young woman using fake ID to escape an abusive boyfriend, but your proposition assumes that if given the option, people will always do the legal/right thing.** This doesn't account for criminals who commit their crimes in spite of other options. The perpetrators of the giant economic con-job that ended up causing an economic melt-down were, in all likelyhood, quite capable of feeding themselves and their families without financial shennanigans. I have met individuals who financed their lifetstyles with criminal activity because, frankly, it paid better than working a legal job. Now, you could counter that this is an example of a social issue that needs addressing (wage floors, etc) but in doing so you remove some of the agency of the perpetrator, since the criminal is now only capable of taking the path of least resistance.

      Again, I don't disagree that some crimes are products of social issues but saying that criminals generally commit crimes because they have no other choice is problematic at best.

      **Yes, "right" and "legal" are not always equivalent and in several instances can be in direct conflict with one another but that's outside the parameters of our discussion at the moment.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    223. Re:Tough luck.. by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

      This is a Sophists' phrase, and it is an unnecessary constraint. Why would a man who failed to pray on $holy_day be prevented from punishing a rapist? Both men are sinners.

      I, personally, do not worry if the judge is a sinner. The only requirement is that he judges fairly and by the law. I do not care if he has plans on the wife of his neighbor, or that he stole a cookie when he was 5 years old. Some say that it's hard to be honest from 9 to 5 and not so honest from 5 to 9. It may be so. However if a person can do the job, that's the only thing that matters.

    224. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country

      It isn't.

      In any case, I'm not looking to kill or punish anyone. But if they happen to die as a result of their own poor life decisions, well, choices have consequences. They choose poorly.

    225. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Were you talking about the thief or yourself?

      So by your measure I'm now in the same category as these vile individuals; not because I have committed any crime but because I would rather not see society's resources wasted on these people.

      This shame I will simply have to shoulder. A just penance for my thoughtcrime, wouldn't you agree?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    226. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many cranes did you steal to feed your family?

    227. Re:Tough luck.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Instant Karma is gonna get ya...

      Justice, like vengeance is to be served cold - dead cold.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    228. Re:Tough luck.. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      No, you lead a sheltered life, the kind of people who do such things do it again and again, maiming and killing others their whole lives. it's a good thing when they are put down, it saves lives, prevents maimings.

    229. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the original definition of Draconian.

    230. Re:Tough luck.. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you are wrong, the two-legged vermin who do such things don't care if their victims live or die, and they are repeat offenders. they will commit their crimes again and again leaving a trail of broken victims. they are garbage, you are merely spouting romantic ideas that would change in an instant if you saw someone you cared about horribly hurt for someones lust for some minor thing .

    231. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country...

      Absolutely not. There are some (very vocal) loonies in this country that would have you think that, but it is absolutely not the case.

    232. Re:Tough luck.. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      OTHO if they do die they won't jump and beat anyone else. Sometimes it's not just about the victim.

      I'm fine with wishing a horrible death on robbers. I don't fucking rob people. Likewise home invaders. If I invade your home, feel free to give me a "Colombian necktie" for my bad behavior.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    233. Re:Tough luck.. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      in reality, do you realize what would happen to some terrorist dirtbag trying to grind down a metal as hard a cobalt for dispersal? they'd get what they deserve and no dirty bomb would be assembled.

    234. Re:Tough luck.. by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Car theft? Not "horrible" by any stretch of the imagination.

    235. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what is so out of touch with people here on slashdot where 80k a year is considered chump change.

      I make $9000 a year. Median wage here is just under $44k/year.

    236. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be a clever ruse by the cartels to draw police attention away from the border so they could move more important cargo. They thieves may have unshielded the radioactive material so that the truck would be found quicker and things would die down. At least, that would have been the case were Gus Fringe still alive.

    237. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if we're going to get technical, it doesn't really say forgive, it says turn the other cheek, so lets give them more unshielded cobalt-60!

    238. Re:Tough luck.. by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Well yes, there likely won't be any immediate severe effects, but what's it going to do to waterways and crops in the area?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    239. Re:Tough luck.. by Garridan · · Score: 1

      In the US, when cops draw their guns, they're obliged to fire at least 6 rounds before holstering them. Doesn't really seem to matter who they shoot, either. Only a beating with guns drawn? These are the good guys!

    240. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you talking about the thief or yourself?

      So by your measure I'm now in the same category as these vile individuals; not because I have committed any crime but because I would rather not see society's resources wasted on these people.

      This shame I will simply have to shoulder. A just penance for my thoughtcrime, wouldn't you agree?

      I never gave a measure, but feel free to include that in your rhetoric. This is Mexico we're talking about and I'm going to guess you're not Mexican. It's an easy assumption to guess you are from the USA though. Deciding what's 'best' for others seems to be what you like to do the most.

      Personally I think most of the US citizens are a waste of resources(Mexicans too) and should be eliminated. How's that for thoughtcrime. :)

    241. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Before I needed your wallet, I needed a mentor. Please help support me on my path out of hell" -no mugger ever

    242. Re:Tough luck.. by tftp · · Score: 1

      the universe is not itself a caring entity? no shit. doesn't mean people shouldn't be.

      The care and love can be only mutual. Otherwise you will be loving a mass murderer.

    243. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The usual response to this is that your situation, as described, is mostly caused by the breakdown of "community" that occurs in large cities. In smaller towns, there's enough sense of community that people will actually provide other avenues and help each other. These people are acquaintances, if not friends, with their neighbors. They keep an eye on each other. They have family, usually, and those families live relatively close and help each other. You end up being a part of a large social network that's generally populated with helpful people that care about you. You also have a social drive to be a provider rather than a leech on this system, so you only tend to use it in dire need and then you get back on your feet and figure things out. It all works out pretty well. The big city phenomenon is the opposite: neighbors are strangers, family members visit on Christmas Day at best, nobody really cares about anyone. It's easy to see how people "fall through the cracks" in such a sub-society, which is how we end up with large homeless populations, and yes, children having to steal food to care for themselves while the rest of society ignores them and their broken parents. In the other situation, a family member, neighbor, or other community member would've seen the problem with your mother and taken over for her and raised and fed you.

    244. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      Death for Stealing a truck.
      that's not poetic justice, or poetic, or justice.

      Poetic justice would have been if the truck they stole had been stolen and they got pulled over because of the first theft.

      I"m more worried about the scum that thing Justice for stealing a truck is death then I am about people who steal trucks.

      Please learn to apply critical thinking skills to you're current mode of what I will generously call thinking.

      You forgot the bit where they beat the shit out of the drivers. Not saying that evens things out, but this wasn't exactly a harmless little crime.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    245. Re:Tough luck.. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

      Radiation poisoning gives the victim plenty of time to speed up the inevitable.

    246. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      It's an easy assumption to guess you are from the USA though. Deciding what's 'best' for others seems to be what you like to do the most.

      Assumption is the mother of all fuckups.

      Personally I think most of the US citizens are a waste of resources(Mexicans too) and should be eliminated. How's that for thoughtcrime. :)

      Actually as a card-carrying misanthrope I have no problem with that. :)

      In all seriousness though, I don't want to tell others how to live their lives, I just want them to leave myself and other people alone to live theirs. I also happen to think that recidivist violent offenders - those reject rehabilitation - have no place in this picture.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    247. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are far too many people in this world to allow people who are willing to kill to continue to breathe the same air as the rest of the population."

      Er... you might want to recheck this sentence for self-referential implications.

    248. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's always me who deserves welfare or should be allowed to steal but when its someone else their welfare queens/scum......

    249. Re:Tough luck.. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Ok so im walking along and seeing you getting mugged at knifepoint. You dont think i should be able to execute him on the spot?

      --
      Good-bye
    250. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting how other nationals see Americans as a whipping boy for whatever cause they espouse. Such being the case, it's good that they enjoy the comforts of what ever country they reside, and it's benefits. I'm happy for you, wish you no harm, and please that you allow me to tend to my affairs likewise. Please stay there ~ Oh, and leave Christ, Allah, Buddha and the rest out of this.

    251. Re: Tough luck.. by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Hammurabi was pretty awesome, but yea, he wasn't Jesus. He also predated Jesus by nearly two millennia.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    252. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that explains many of your posts.

    253. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. During the cold war there was real concern regarding cobalt bombs. Pack cobalt around your fission weapon and the fallout becomes much much worse.

    254. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to wikipedia (LARGE pinch of salt)

      "In December 2013, a truck carrying a disused 111 TBq 60Co teletherapy source from a hospital in Tijuana to a radioactive waste storage center was hijacked at a gas station near Mexico City. The truck was recovered shortly after, but it was discovered that the thieves had removed the source from its shielding. The source was found abandoned and intact in a field close by, and authorities state that the thieves are "likely doomed"."

      I don't know how to convert that to Sv/min but it certainly sounds like a rather huge amount to be anywhere near without protection. As also mentioned in an parent comment, I am also surprised they were not found nearby in a very bad way!

    255. Re: Tough luck.. by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      Having been robbed twice in the same week recently... Robbers don't give a damn about social order, they mug you over a phone and pocket junk. It's "fitting" when they knowingly rob something under guard and its dangerous as hell.. Society has guards and locked doors for a reason. We're happy you executive yourself because you REFUSE to follow along.

    256. Re:Tough luck.. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but certain dosages, typically in the above 10Gy have a stupifing effect on people, which may mercifully reduce the awareness of the horrendous gastrointestinal reactions to the radiation.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    257. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you beat anyone?

    258. Re: Tough luck.. by Badblackdog · · Score: 1

      Dainbramage, Imaginary virtual mod points for you.

    259. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think stealing a van and hitting someone warrants death, you are an unhinged individual (or more likely, an internet tough guy). Even the Old Testament said "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth"- that is, the punishment should match the crime. If someone takes your eye out, you're entitled to take up to one eye- not the whole head.

      And I don't think there are many people who would argue that the Old Testament was too lenient...

      "Eye for an eye" is for torts, not crimes.

    260. Re:Tough luck.. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What's the point of enforcing crime if not to protect the potential victims? It seems perfectly reasonable to me to use this as justification. Perhaps this is a logical fallacy of some kind on my part?

      Fantasizing about being a supreme dictator and torturing people to death has nothing to do with law enforcement. Go ahead and daydream about it if that's your thing, but if you post such fantasies publicly, expect your issues to be commented on. Get help.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    261. Re: Tough luck.. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      God forbid a nonreligious person be associated with being morally upright...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    262. Re: Tough luck.. by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      They didn't "steal" a truck just sitting around, they beat up (or threatened) the two drivers and removed them from doing their jobs driving the truck. They dust care about who the hurt and left on the side of the road.

      This cargo was locked and guarded for a good reason by "society". If the robbers can't follow along with society's norms we just don't feel sorry when they rob deadly poison. It was locked up for a reason.

    263. Re:Tough luck.. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      'Days'? You remember 9/11, right? Try months.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    264. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      How many cranes did you steal to feed your family?

      Usually about one each week, which is how long the meat would last before going bad.

      They're slender birds so you'd might not think that one could last a family of four (myself, my mother, and my two sisters) that long, but in desperate situations people learn to make do.

    265. Re:Tough luck.. by Nyder · · Score: 1

      The karma in this case seems rather disproportional. Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

      Welcome to life, whom doesn't care if it slaps you with a shitty death.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    266. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, "Turn the other cheek" had a much different meaning in Jesus's time.

      You see, back then, what hand you used actually had political means as well. Using one hand to strike a person would mean as equals while using the other meant you were their superior. For a slave striking back his master, which hand he used to do it could be the difference between a beating and death as punishment.

      Jesus's message wasn't about being passive, it was about being passively defiant. If they hit you, turn the other cheek so that if they wish to hit you again, they must use the other hand that presents you as an equal.

      The true meaning of that quote was lost a long time ago on most.....

    267. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think it is wonderful. Maybe we could have ignitions in cars that expose thieves to a lethal dose if the lock is pried from the steering post. I would prefer a slower and more painful death for thieves but we do need to get them any way we can.

    268. Re:Tough luck.. by Nyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My mother was a drunkard and crazy. I was 12 and had to feed her and my two brothers.
      Yeah, I stole. Robbed bread trucks, soda trucks, I would go into busy pizza places and just grab a pie off the counter and walk out.
      It was always a last resort, it was always about basic survival.
      And if I had to do it again, I would.

      You clearly had other avenues to get food and shelter.

      You know if you sold one of your brothers you would of made enough money to live off for awhile, till you sold the remaining brother.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    269. Re:Tough luck.. by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you see, but you're being rational about it. Others seem ready to be driven by unabated hate.

      He/She might still have a concussion...

      --
      Be seeing you...
    270. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How badly would the drivers have had to been beaten for it to be more proportional?

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?

      Didn't Jesus say:

        'You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth".

      Refers to torts, not crimes.

      But I say to you, do not resist an evildoer. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.'

      Refers to insults, not threats to life and limb.

      So in other words even though there are shitty people in the world then anyone who considers themselves a christian should strive to not seek revenge against such people by killing them or wishing them to be killed.
        Instead they should forgive and leave any judgment for the lord. Wishing an agonising death upon them would then surely never be proportional, no matter how harshly they beat their victims.

      Internal attitude is not the only problem. The "shitty people" might harm or kill non-Christians. I am in no position to say one soul is worth more than another soul. But, If an individual is determined to harm others, I will support punishment. We pay taxes to "Caesar" so that the government discourages intentional harm.

      But of course nobody in the US seems to actually give a shit about this part of Jesus' teachings or else you would not have the death penalty.

      There are more Christians in China than in the US.

    271. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since violence is demonstrably on the decline, you are emotionally resonant but factually incorrect.

    272. Re:Tough luck.. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I was referring specifically to the coverage of them dying, not the ongoing coverage of the event that, as you said, would doubtless last for months (if not years) afterwards.

    273. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too have been attacked and beaten unconscious — one occipital strike. ICU, some frontal lobe sections lost, sense of smell lost, almost died of the hematomas, fear of opening my front door, etc.

      I, however, would wish such a death on the truck-jackers. No need to beat up the drivers.... But, the perpetrators' families will undoubtedly suffer some radiation poisoning and death or sickness.

      The Atlantic reported on a similar case where scrap-yard operators in Thailand found a cobalt-60 source from an abandoned hospital that was somehow left behind, and ended up there in scrap. Maybe 5-10 years ago. Workers took the pretty glowing thing home to show family, or spread it to family by contamination of their clothing. 10 or so innocent people died, many were sickened, and probably many more now have an increased cancer risk.

    274. Re:Tough luck.. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Actually no, the Founding Fathers seemed more Dieist than Christians and there is a constitutional prohibition against the establishment of an official religion in the US. The number of Americans who are Christian by default far exceeds the number of Americans who are Christians by choise, many more Americans are Christians for Baptism, Wedding and Funerals than are continuously practicing.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    275. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I always carry a couple kilos of Cobalt-60 in my wallet. In case anyone steals it, I know justice will be done. On the down side it causes some itching and skin dishevelling "downstairs".

    276. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Fantasizing about being a supreme dictator and torturing people to death has nothing to do with law enforcement. Go ahead and daydream about it if that's your thing, but if you post such fantasies publicly, expect your issues to be commented on. Get help.

      Really, this is all you can manage by way of response?

      My 'supreme dictator' comment was clearly tongue-in-cheek and very obviously a vehicle for getting my actual point across. You don't really need to have it explained to you that no, we don't actually get to have a turn at being ruler of Earth, do you?

      Your debating skills are themselves debatable if the only tool you appear to be able to competently wield is the Straw Man.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    277. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you also beat or kill the people you were robbing? If not, that's a completely different situation.

    278. Re:Tough luck.. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Quite correct... I would bet that the majority of violence is committed with this mindset.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    279. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither of these "robberies" sounds like they were commited at gunpoint. From this description alone, I seriously doubt that the owners of these pizza places had severe PTSD from your actions, and I somehow fail to see the relevance between soda trucks and beating up a person in order to drive away with his cobalt-60.

    280. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that "hate" is not optimal word, but related words would explain it -- "anger" (knee-jerk reaction), for example. Meaning that it is a gut reaction, eye-for-an-eye; and by definition not really rational.

      Of course such feeling can be rationalized; but it isn't rational as much as visceral. Rationally one can think of importance of deterrence and so forth, but that does not explain extreme "no mercy whatsoever" comments.
      Compassion, on the other hand, tends not to be impulsive thing but rather based on capability for empathy, and yes, bit of actual thinking and reflection.

    281. Re:Tough luck.. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I thought that Karma involved supernatural repercussions of actions?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    282. Re:Tough luck.. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Depends who you were, I guess. Most of the people in the old testament I thought most deserved punishment ended up fathering entire races or being selected as God's favourite. Or were God himself, come to think of it.

      The middle of the road types... yeah, they got treated pretty harshly.

    283. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is GREAT weapon for only one group, and that is the Big Brother style government, using dirty bomb as the bogey-/straw-man to scare its citizens. So, yes, kind of effective. But not my those supposedly planning to use them.

    284. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are factually incorrect, since the recidivism rate for theft and armed robbery are both below 100%.

      I'd point out that societies which treat crime as a social problem which can be solved instead of a moral failure which deserves retribution tend to have lower crime rates. Sweden for example.

    285. Re:Tough luck.. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's silly. If they were after radioactive material they wouldn't have opened it, and they certainly wouldn't have abandoned it.

      You attitude that people deserve to be punished for what they could do... that's not silly, it's disturbing.

    286. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The karma in this case seems rather disproportional. Yeah, what they did was horrible, but death, esp such an ugly death, seems a bit out of balance.

      Uh, what? They opened a casket of highly radioactive material and then just let is lay on the ground near a village where it could have easily caused severe harm and death for a bunch of innocents. I fail to see how their deaths are at all out of balance with their actions.

    287. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      You are factually incorrect, since the recidivism rate for theft and armed robbery are both below 100%.

      Where exactly do I mention recidivism? I am talking about recidivists and make no claims to any statistical knowledge of recidivism rates.

      I'd point out that societies which treat crime as a social problem which can be solved instead of a moral failure which deserves retribution tend to have lower crime rates. Sweden for example.

      That is a good point and it certainly bears further investigation. It still doesn't necessarily negate my point that we should just face the truth: some people like to hurt others and can't be changed, so we pay to lock them up forever. I believe they are a net negative in society when they could be a net positive - as fertiliser! :)

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    288. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains why small towns in the US are overrun by meth.

    289. Re:Tough luck.. by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Well, they just need to wait until nightfall then follow the pretty blue glow.

      --
      ~X~
    290. Re:Tough luck.. by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 1

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?

      Didn't Jesus say:

      No. http://www.nobeliefs.com/Tripoli.htm

    291. Re:Tough luck.. by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Agreed when the train driver who was coshed during the great train robbery died his family are sure it was the coshing he got that caused him to die early

    292. Re:Tough luck.. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      2. Smart organized criminals tend to know what they are stealing ahead of time

      They knew what they were stealing. They were stealing a truck. They didn't know what was inside the truck and they probably didn't care. Whatever they found, if it was fencable, was a plus.

      Right so not even worth considering.

      The vast majority of people have figured out how not to beat up someone to steal from them, even though they, too, are a part of society. Some of those people who have managed to figure out why "not beating people up" is a good course of action have little to no education. Thus lack of education (your excuse) doesn't have a causal link. So, no. Pretending that "society made me do it" is not worth considering, since "society" seems to have such little force upon reasonable people. In fact, it is only the lack of societal concerns that allows people to consider such violence a reasonable option.

      Its like these damned doctors. They know about fever, they know how to treat it. Who the fuck needs to study the disease that causes the fever?

      It is a shame that the causal links between infections and fever are so well known, and the causal links between "society done me wrong" and "right to beat others up for fun and profit" are so tenuous. Otherwise your analogy would be rational.

    293. Re:Tough luck.. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      t also creates a society with less empathy which breeds more violence.

      Your opinion doth not a truth make.

    294. Re:Tough luck.. by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

      Whoever said Christianity is a religion of peace? Of course this is trite, but the biggest reason for Christianity's spread, especially among the kings and emperors of post-Roman Europe, was the fact that you could maim and kill at will in wars of conquest and still be forgiven for your sins and go to heaven. In addition, it allowed them to subjugate a mass of peasant serfs through the Church, instead of whips and chains. In other words, a religion tailor-made for the United States.

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    295. Re:Tough luck.. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      All I was suggesting is that asking why they choose one method of theft over another is, well.... because they are likely dumb and it didn't even occur to them.

      That is an astonishingly naive view of people. Perhaps, if they were too damned dumb to know any better, you might explain why they used weapons and violence? You know, things people do because they know BEFOREHAND that what they're about to do won't sit with other people.

      I know small children that know better and I would bet any amount of money those guys weren't more ignorant than small children.

    296. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that, you know... sometimes people *actually* ship radioactive materials... and bull semen.

    297. Re:Tough luck.. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      You do understand that "his" words were comprised later by other people who had different agendas, right?

    298. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't hate. There is an equally rational side that suggest that painful death as a consequence/punishment of violent crime DOES have a deterrent effect, even if minor.

      Nope, that is irrational, or at least ignorant.

      The most common way that criminals reason is: I won't get caught or this time I won't get caught.

      Exaggerated punishments doesn't have a more deterrent effect than a far too lenient punishment. That is why states/nations that don't use capital punishment doesn't have more crime than those who do.

    299. Re:Tough luck.. by RobHostetter · · Score: 1

      Vengeance is mine says The Lord. I personally would consider this divine justice.

    300. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But of course nobody in the US seems to actually give a shit about this part of Jesus' teachings or else you would not have the death penalty.

      Welcome to Christianity, the religion of hypocrites and people who love to constantly cherry-pick scripture to suit their needs.

    301. Re:Tough luck.. by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      'You have heard that it was said, "An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth". But I say to you, do not resist an evildoer. If anyone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.'

      So in other words even though there are shitty people in the world then anyone who considers themselves a christian should strive to not seek revenge against such people by killing them or wishing them to be killed. Instead they should forgive and leave any judgment for the lord.

      Funny thing about this quote. I had an evangelical protestant friend who offered a bit of context for that statement, and it doesn't necessarily mean to forgive. Note that it says "strike you on the right cheek". In order to do that, they will have hit you with their left (non-dominant) hand. So that would be a slap or a weak punch, a bullying-type attack. By "turning the other cheek" you wordlessly challenge them to an even fight. With that interpretation it was more a dare to escalate the situation to a full on brawl, a subtle "come over here and say that".

      He also gave me an interesting take on the "walk a mile in another man's shoes" one as well, but that's even less relevant.

    302. Re:Tough luck.. by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      This sounded so, so much worse when I glossed over the second 'and' in that first sentence there.

      I doubt this was a case of last resort, though. At the same time, death as karma for theft? Bit much. On the other hand, in some countries that would mean the thieves would have standing to sue if their lawyer finds the cases were not clearly identifying the substance as hazardous/radioactive, etc. and that's more than a bit much.

    303. Re:Tough luck.. by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      The only requirement is that he judges fairly and by the law.

      That's the point: fairly. Jesus was saying that stoning someone for adultery might be "legal" but it was not fair (nor merciful, nor just). The United States even has the concept in the Eighth Amendement: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

      By its own records, in the last decade (2001-2010) the US legal system had a "known false positive" rate in death sentences of roughly eight percent (551 executions, plus 48 exonerations on appeal). I emphasize, that's the _known_ false positive rate.

    304. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus was referring to a slap on the cheek, which was meant as an insult. So, if someone is insulting you, don't get back at them, just... take it. He wasn't saying not to defend yourself if someone was trying to physically harm you. You're right about his stance on forgiveness and leaving vengeance to God. I think you'll find that most people on this site (at least the most vocal ones) are either agnostic or atheists.

    305. Re:Tough luck.. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      This is a Sophists' phrase, and it is an unnecessary constraint. Why would a man who failed to pray on $holy_day be prevented from punishing a rapist? Both men are sinners.

      That's the point. We are all flawed, and we do not have the moral authority to condemn our peers merely because (in our opinions) our sins are lesser. Even if we are forgiven our sins, judgment is reserved for God, not man.

      A Christian should not seek punishment and retribution in the law. While society needs the law to function, justice should lead to rehabilitation where possible and incapacitation where not, and a Christian should forgive those who sin against them ("turn the other cheek") regardless.

      Even if you are not Christian, seeking retribution from the law is a hollow act that does nothing to undo the damage committed by the criminal. All it does is trade a life for a sense of satisfaction, and no justice comes from that. Two wrongs do not make a right.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    306. Re:Tough luck.. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      If you think stealing a van and hitting someone warrants death

      Carjacking a van from the driver at gun point warrants potential death. Especially a van containing an extremely hazardous payload, such as radioactive material --- or such as a nuclear weapon.

      Had the driver been armed; it may have happened by the robbers dying after being shot in self-defense.

      In this case; they stole something that could be extremely dangerous to the public.

      And in this case inflicted upon themselves.

      I don't cheer their death, but the outcome does fit the crime.

    307. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Therefore, all people I do something to are bad. I have no regrets.

    308. Re:Tough luck.. by tftp · · Score: 1

      This may be counter to your beliefs, but:

      Even if you are not Christian, seeking retribution from the law is a hollow act that does nothing to undo the damage committed by the criminal. All it does is trade a life for a sense of satisfaction, and no justice comes from that. Two wrongs do not make a right.

      A criminal can be convicted to being taken apart. His organs will be sold to the needy patients, and the money will be used to treat the criminal's victim. Many deserving people will live at expense of one defective man being killed.

      The principle of nonresistance to evil is evil in itself. This empowers criminals, and turns you into obedient sheep who meekly takes the punishment. This was valuable when the Bible was written because the ruling classes wanted to have pacified slaves who did not value their earthly life. Today independently thinking people do not want to turn another cheek - they strike back. This way, when a terrorist kills one of your sons you do not offer him another. Instead you offer him every bullet that you have.

      "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

    309. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John 7:53 through 8:11 have been found to have been added to the Bible much later than 96 CE when John penned that book. Early manuscripts don't contain that story, only the ones from the 4th century and later do. It is an apocryphal addition.

      Jesus, being perfect and observing the Mosaic Law perfectly, would not have condoned the adultress' behavior. The law stated that an adulteress should be stoned to death. Jesus would have left it up to the priests and civil authorities to tend to such matters. His ministry on earth focused on teaching, not on judging.

      Christian forgiveness does not extend to preventing the bad consequences of bad actions. It only provides a clear conscience to those who recognize that they have done wrong and sincerely wish to avoid doing it again.

    310. Re:Tough luck.. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The thieves probably (wrongly, of course) assumed this was something similar: drugs, money, or something else valuable labeled with radioactive symbols to discourage theft.

      Probably. This is why it should also be a crime to label shipping containers as hazardous, toxic, or radioactive that are not.

    311. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I recall my Bibleisms, the point is that no one is without sin (because Christianity largely believes in inherited guilt. And since they also believe that Adam and Eve's escape from slavery was itself a sin, everyone becomes a sinner)

    312. Re:Tough luck.. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Here's one, choose:
      1) these guys, who stole the truck, can die from radiation.
      2) Some random person who didn't steal the truck can die from radiation.

      I'm going with #1.
      As they say: Sometimes Karma's a bitch.

    313. Re:Tough luck.. by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      The dirty bomb, as a weapon of mass destruction, is a myth. Disperse the radioactive material far enough to affect a large number of people, and you disperse the radiation as well. The concentration of radioactive material decreases as the square of the radius of the area of dispersal.

      Except of course bombs don't disperse their material with perfect uniformity. Otherwise, would anyone object to standing 50 feet away from the detonation of a US M67 fragmentation grenade? After all, according to the documentation, the "effective range" is only 49.5 feet.

      Oh, wait, there's this warning further down, which for some reason they've put in capitals: "FRAGMENTS CAN DISPERSE AS FAR AWAY AS 230 METERS."

      It might be a firecracker on the WMD scale, but it's still an instant radioactive minefield deployment (that can follow you home) with a bonus "do you feel lucky, punk?" for anyone downwind.

    314. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?

      Nice troll.

    315. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are far too many people in this world to allow people who are willing to kill to continue to breathe the same air as the rest of the population.

      So, if it were up to you, people who are willing to kill should be killed. That's an interesting concept. Have you applied it to your own life yet?

    316. Re:Tough luck.. by tftp · · Score: 1

      because Christianity largely believes in inherited guilt

      Yes, that is yet another unreasonable burden. Nobody can be responsible for (or guilty of) something that he did not do. Anything else would be inhumane and sadistic.

      no one is without sin

      Which, per Jesus, means that nobody on this Earth (modulo Jesus himself, naturally) is permitted to judge others. What a bonanza for criminals! But, of course, every member of the ruling class had no issues with judging and convicting their slaves and serfs and assorted little people to harsh punishments for merely not bowing down fast enough.

      The Church itself led several Crusades, created the Holy Inquisition, and spilled rivers of blood, thus judging people and dispensing the punishment. Apparently, the Pope had a special edition of the Bible where Jesus permits the Church and the aristocracy to act as judges and executioners regardless of their sins.

    317. Re:Tough luck.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You win 2 internets

    318. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Every time a liberal like you expresses the "there ought to be a law" sentiment, yet another bit of freedom dies. Do you have no concept of personal responsibility? If a goddamn container is labeled as hazardous, toxic, or radioactive—even if it's not— then I'm okay with treating it like it is.

      Why do you apparently sympathize with the criminals in this case? Hand-wringing over the fate of some violent criminals who apparently were too greedy and/or stupid to wait and check if the "radioactive" signage was genuine before cracking open the case? Are you for real?

      For the record, I'm also comfortable putting a false "Protected by XYZ Security, Inc" sign outside my house. If burglars ignore that and enter my home, I will have no compunction about killing them. It is their choice to violate my property and they bear all the blame... even if they disbelieve a warning sign just because some of them are fake.

      Also for the record, it's people like you and your twisted theories of liability that will make me more likely to use deadly force protecting my home. I really don't need the irony of having to defend myself in civil court against some injured criminal who is upset he got maimed while robbing me and now wants to finish the job by taking my money via legal judgement.

    319. Re:Tough luck.. by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

      This is a Sophists' phrase, and it is an unnecessary constraint. Why would a man who failed to pray on $holy_day be prevented from punishing a rapist? Both men are sinners.

      I, personally, do not worry if the judge is a sinner. The only requirement is that he judges fairly and by the law.

      It's not meant to be a 'phrase' in this context, it's part of a parable, an argument structured in a story, and you have to understand the story. The law on the books at the time was that adultery was punished by stoning, and so "fair and by the law" judgment being put into effect would mean the adulterous woman would be pommeled with rocks until she died.

      Jesus was not concerned that the wrong sort of person was going to be doing the stoning. His concern was that the woman was being stoned at all. So he reminded her accusers that they were in equal standing with the woman as far as being guilty (in God's sight, if not that of the local officials), and coincidentally made it very difficult for them to carry out their task. (If they threw a stone and the others took it as a serious claim of sinlessness, that person could be in for some unpleasant repercussions themselves.)

      What you are meant to take away from it is insight into Christ's character -- forgiveness, providing redemption, showing compassion -- and the associated moral philosophy. The idea that everyone does wrong, that no one can boast about being better than others, that everyone needs God's forgiveness, and as recipients of that forgiveness it is hypocritical if we don't show that same mercy to others.

      When someone says, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone," they are typically inviting a bit of similar reflection.

    320. Re:Tough luck.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      While I agree that being killed would be excessive for the crime of aggravated robbery, the thief accidentally dying due to stupid actions taken as part of aggravated robbery? There is a certain aesthetic beauty in the poetic justice. They wanted unknown riches, and indeed, they got their hands on rare and valuable property!

    321. Re:Tough luck.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to differentiate between active punishments, and predictable negative results of bad behavior. I find that odd. Perhaps that is why you resort to scripture?

      But even so, their sins are their own, and nobody punished them; the foolishness of their actions prevented the victims from receiving their just revenge.

    322. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There ain't nothing wrong with hatred. Trying to suppress it however will fucking kill you, faggot.

    323. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of us aren't under the illusion that this was the thieves' first heist either. Rarely is that the case and as such they probably deserved what they got. There's a big difference between shoplifting and robbery psychology-wise. Shoplifting doesn't often leave the victims with PTSD to deal with for the rest of their lives.

    324. Re:Tough luck.. by mjwx · · Score: 2

      There's a difference between wanting them killed and finding them dead as a result of their crime a convenient outcome.

      In countries as corrupt as Mexico, this difference can be as cheap as a few hundred dollars.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    325. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not hate, it's fear. Fear is much stronger than hate. Fear creates hate, but the underlying cause is fear. You can see many examples of manipulation through fear in everyday life. Turn on the TV for a good dose of it.

      Dune got it.

      I must not fear.
      Fear is the mind-killer.
      Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
      I will face my fear.
      I will permit it to pass over me and through me.
      And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
      Where the fear has gone there will be nothing.
      Only I will remain

    326. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If true, it sounds like you didn't assault anyone in the process. So there was a line you weren't prepared to cross, even when you were hungry. These guys went a fair bit further than you did. Not that they deserve to die, but they are the victims of their own actions.

    327. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easily said for the guy making a six figure salary.

      It's these people who are in the gutter of society who need our help. Not our scorn.

      It might such to get held up at gun point. It's worse to actually die. Nothing can change that no how warped your reality has become.

    328. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not... which is why we shouldn't give you a say in the matter. We need rational people to pass laws, enforce laws, and maintain the 'justice' system.

    329. Re:Tough luck.. by hjf · · Score: 1

      You are so cute. In my country we have a saying: "Pueblo chico, infierno grande". "Small town, big hell". It means that, in a small town, everything bad you do, everyone will know about it, and it will haunt you for the rest of your life.

      Don't be such a fool. When you're in disgrace, your neighbors won't help you. Your friends won't be there for you. There's just you and, if you're lucky, your immediate family. But don't even think for a minute that if you go bankrupt, your neighbor will let you "crash in their couch". Hell, they will not even let their children play with yours. You will be shunned, you'll be a disgrace to be around. And that guy, who used to invite you to a barbecue on a weekend, will quietly ask you to leave his property or he will call the police.

    330. Re:Tough luck.. by denmarkw00t · · Score: 0

      For shame. I wish I had mod points to mod this down. Shameful, /.. Normally racism is is pushed down but I guess no one said "nigger"

    331. Re:Tough luck.. by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      There are really two elements - individual and state behaviour. Much of Jesus' message was concerned with how an individual should behave under a state that was opposed to a God-led theocracy (this is at a time when the Romans have occupied Israel). The general idea is that you should submit to the state, having a revolution of the heart instead. So you can have state-sanctioned capital punishment while having 'turn the other cheek' personal behaviour .

      The real conflict, in my opinion, is what happened when Christianity gained political power. The personal behaviour was not transferred to the state level, it was business as usual. Perhaps this is sensible, as humans being humans, such a lenient system is unlikely to work.

    332. Re:Tough luck.. by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      This is a very literal reading and not the point at all. Jesus was trying to remove the culture of holier-than-thou moralising by pointing out hypocrisy. The aim was to instil a more tolerant culture of forgiveness. It is in no way meant to be a logical argument against the state administering a justice system.

    333. Re:Tough luck.. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      If you think stealing a van and hitting someone warrants death, you are an unhinged individual (or more likely, an internet tough guy). Even the Old Testament said "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth"- that is, the punishment should match the crime. If someone takes your eye out, you're entitled to take up to one eye- not the whole head.

      And I don't think there are many people who would argue that the Old Testament was too lenient...

      Actually in the bible it says; An eye for and eye, a tooth for a tooth, vengeance is mine saith the Lord

      In other words, you are expressly forbidden to take revenge and, in later proverbs, instructed to seek justice under the laws of man - to which the Lord will agree. Much like other misunderstood, misquoted parts of the bible the proverbs have been twisted to suit whoever wants to convey a particular message.

      However, if you believed in God you may be inclined to think that whatever crimes the thieves had amassed during their lives had led them to a point where this happened to them. You could also call it Karma, fate or coincidence, whatever your personal belief system leads you to.

      Personally, I am not qualified to judge them.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    334. Re:Tough luck.. by washort · · Score: 1

      You're missing the entire point of the story of the woman caught in adultery. Lev 20:10 prescribes the death penalty for _both_ parties, man and woman. The scribes and Pharisees brought Jesus a woman, alone, saying she had been caught in adultery. The obvious question is "With whom?" and also, "How did these super-religious types know where to find an adulterous woman?" It's not unreasonable to suppose one, several, or all of them had slept with her and were under the death penalty as well. Else why would these men, hot on the idea of stoning, be stopped in their tracks?

    335. Re:Tough luck.. by luckymutt · · Score: 1

      And who are you to question Karma?
      Perhaps these gents have done far more horrible stuff to other people and karma is now just catching up.

    336. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who feel otherwise, look at it this way: When you use a lethal weapon to commit a crime, you state to the world that you are willing to kill innocent people in order to get what you want, no matter what. From the moment when you point that gun at someone, your life is automatically forfeit should you die as a result of committing that crime.

      Does that same reasoning apply to law enforcement officers upholding the law?

    337. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having jumped and beaten another unconscious, I tend to wish painful horrible death on just about anyone.

    338. Re:Tough luck.. by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      if they cracked open all the seals thinking they were "getting rich", they probably opened up contained capsules of the stuff. at that point they'll have it on their hands then ingest some of it just by normally touching themselves.

      There's a reason society puts this stuff in locked and sealed boxes on trucks with guards. It's not like there weren't warnings and protections in place. Dumbshits shouldn't commit armed robbery.

    339. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever met a christian?!!!

      These are the folks who committed genocide throughout the globe. Kidnapped children (enslaving, raping, and murdering them-- "for their own good, in an effort to christianize them"), and enslaved their parents. Hell, they are so insecure about their beliefs, they even outlawed food-- christians outlawed aramanth since it wasn't only a staple food of the Aztec, it was also included in their religious ceremonies.

      As the christians were burning alive people in Hispaniola, some preacher asked one of the natives (noose around his neck, just tight enough that he had to stand on his toes to keep from strangling, as the christians lit a fire at his feet). Preacher, "(explains the christian myth about heaven and hell)... this is your last chance for salvation, you can go to heaven if you accept Jesus into your heart." Native, "Do all christians go to heaven?" Preacher, "Yes." Native, "I think I would prefer hell." (documented in Howard Zhin's "A People's History"). From multiple sources, the christians murdered between several million people up to 23 million people in Hispaniola, depending upon the source.

      Christian invaders in Mexico chained a large group of Maya by their necks, and marched them across the country so they would be more vulnerable, and easier to make compliant as slaves. One of the preachers described in his journal, that when any of the chained Maya became too slow, the christians would sever the persons head, and force the rest to march over his body. The ancestors of these Maya now reside in the Lancondon region.

      The crusades were another pinnacle for christians. Take some time to view the inventions of the christian clergy for this campaign. One of many torture implements that came from the minds of these christian clergy was an orifice expander. Doesn't sound so bad? It was inserted into body orifices, and a screw turned until it expanded to the point where it ripped the victim apart.

      Today, christians occupy their time, "hating fags" (godhatesfags.com), and terrorizing women as they try to enter clinics.

      Christians have a myth they tell about themselves, but a more evil buch you will never meet.

      And, yes, it is the christians in this country (US) that disproportionately support capital punishment, and other draconian punishments. Christians are also disproportionately over represented as prisoners in our vast complex of prisons (especially violent offenders)-- another way this is stated is that athiests are disproprotionally under represented in the prisons, especially low for violent acts against others, and, in the US, the majority of religious offenders self identify as christian.

      It seems religion and christianity in particular, teach their adherents something, but that something has nothing to do with kindness, non-violence, nor acceptance.

    340. Re:Tough luck.. by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Does that same reasoning apply to law enforcement officers upholding the law?

      If they pull a gun on an innocent person with the intent of depriving that innocent person of property, yes.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    341. Re: Tough luck.. by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      It's about following along with society. Kind of like when you're at the zoo and somebody steals grandmas purse. The security chases them and they jump into the clearly marked bear cage and get mauled.

      People have time to turn themselves in and do the right thing... Opening a box of deadly poison is just like jumping in a paddock of bears.. You choose to live outside the rules and the rules got you.

    342. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for everything I have - touch any of it, you will die.

      And yes, that even means a sandwich. even if you are starving. Ask, and maybe I'll give you the whole loaf of bread. Try to take it, I'll kill you before you can blink.

      It is not yours to take - worth the risk to you?

    343. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know if you sold one of your brothers you would of

      *PLONK*

    344. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone can call themselves a Christian, and I don't remember the press release appointing you to export your ethics onto everyone else.

      "would surely"?

      Fuck off. Ever happened to you?

    345. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that. Have you seen his mom?

    346. Re:Tough luck.. by ketomax · · Score: 1

      It takes a sick and depraved mind to commit such acts, and those responsible fully deserve death.

      Banks could keep cobalt-60 inside the vault. But then again, how difficult is it to obtain Hazmat suits?

    347. Re:Tough luck.. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      you'll find sympathy in the dictionary between "shit" and "syphilis".

      Quote of the century.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    348. Re:Tough luck.. by tragedy · · Score: 1

      It isn't hate. There is an equally rational side that suggest that painful death as a consequence/punishment of violent crime DOES have a deterrent effect, even if minor.

      If it's pure pragmatism driving the decision, then the question becomes whether the decreased crime from the deterrant effect of painful death as a punishment is greater or less than the _increased_ crime from the same. It's fairly obvious that there will be at least some people who will prevent themselves from committing a crime when the punishment for that crime is horrible. The thing is, there will be plenty of people who will still commit crimes anyway. Some of those criminials will inevitably be witnessed, or will have someone try to stop/capture them. With the prospect of painful death as a punishment, even a small child who happens to glimpse the face of a criminal becomes a deadly enemy who needs to be dealt with. So, inevitably, as punishments get harsher, the people who will committ crimes anyway will committ additional crimes in order to cover up the original crimes. So, once again, we have to ask whether the reduction in crime from one angle is greater or less than the increase in crime from another.

      Another angle to consider is respect for law and order. Some people equate fear and respect. Some people respect others for their displays of dominance, strength and brutality. Many of the supposed fans of law and order seem to fetishize inhumanity towards ciminal undesirables. Just look at, for example, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa county. As far as I can tell, he's corrupt, not actually particularly effective, and costs his constituency far more than he's worth. But many people love him and keep voting him in because he's brutal to the people kept in his jail (which, as a jail, houses a fair number of people who have not yet been convicted). The problem is, there are plenty of people who, rather than being excited by such things, are disgusted by them instead. They lose respect for the "law" because it appears to be just case after case after case of might making right, with actual law and order being ignored by people who think that they _are_ the law. The damage to society that sort of thing can cause shouldn't be discounted.

    349. Re:Tough luck.. by tragedy · · Score: 1

      I not only agree with you, but need to shake my head every time some apologist changes words like "beat" into "hit."

      The terms seem fairly synonymous to me. Not to mention all we know is what we read in news articles. "Beat" probably wasn't used at all in the earliest news stories, because they probably weren't in English. If we want to know if this was a wanton, savage beating, or just a case of stunning and disorienting the drivers (still bad, but not the vicious, bloodthirsty event you're painting from your connotations of "beaten"), we'll have to hope that there's security camera footage that will be released. Otherwise, we just get what are virtually guaranteed to be poor summaries written by desk jockies whose primary job is rewriting copy to say more or less the same thing without actually being identifiable as plagiarism.

    350. Re:Tough luck.. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      This was a violent hijacking by two sadistic individuals whose actions will have lasting effects on their unfortunate victims.

      Do you have a reason to say that they were "violent and sadistic", or are you just saying that because you want to be good and angry about it?

      The Daily Telegraph described the situation like this:

      The driver told authorities he was sleeping in the truck when two men with a gun approached him. They made him get out, tied his hands and feet and left him in a vacant lot nearby.

      Neither the original Slashdot post (which linked to the BBC) nor TFA (Washington Post) in this post imply that this was anything more than a common-or-garden theft. Maybe you've heard something I haven't.

      My sister has been mugged before. I've had friends be mugged. It's horrible, but it's a long way from "sadism" or "torture". Just opportunistic thugs looking to make a little bit of money, who absolutely could be rehabilitated.

    351. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am in Europe, where the death penalty is considered a barbaric thing that was done in the dark ages. And I am very much against it myself.

      Yet, even here in Europe, we still haven't been able to get rid of the death penalty for breaking the laws of physics.

      This falls in the physics category, not the legal category. Even here in Europe they would be dead, and it would be nobodys fault but their own.

    352. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...severe headaches, nausea and diarrhea.

      Nothing to worry about. Always happens to me when I'm south of the border too.

    353. Re:Tough luck.. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Ahem:
      http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2024:17-22&version=KJV

      17 And he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death.

      18 And he that killeth a beast shall make it good; beast for beast.

      19 And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him;

      20 Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again.

      21 And he that killeth a beast, he shall restore it: and he that killeth a man, he shall be put to death.

      22 Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger, as for one of your own country: for I am the Lord your God.

      Unless the King James Version Bible isn't Christian enough for you?

      Not, of course, that it impacts my point. The New Testament specifically disowns this sentiment ("turn the other cheek" etc.) because it's way too brutal. And my point was, even that "way too brutal" sentiment is less brutal than what some of our internet tough-guy friends are spouting off.

    354. Re:Tough luck.. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I love the Darwinistic irony of this story. I'm not trying to come across all bleeding-heart-liberal here.

      What I take issue with is people saying "They're scum, they deserved to die for their crimes, I hope it was slow and painful!". Let me put it another way- if someone put their head into a crocodile enclosure and were promptly decapitated, no-one (including me) would say that they weren't responsible for their own fate- and I think we'd probably have a bit of a chuckle at some people's foolishness. That's completely different to saying "I'm glad they died, people who put their heads into zoo enclosures deserve slow and painful death!".

      For the record, I'm not religious. I only quoted scripture because that passage is a notoriously brutal and oft-derided example of ancient justice- which is considerably less brutal than some of the attitudes being espoused on the internet.

    355. Re:Tough luck.. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      How do you rehabilitate someone who gets great pleasure in (effectively) torturing innocent people?

      You offer them a job at the FBI.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    356. Re:Tough luck.. by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Assuming his beliefs are correct it ended very well for hem.

      That's probably going to be the biggest assumption I am going to do today.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    357. Re:Tough luck.. by ruir · · Score: 1

      I was bullied by a slightly retarded guy who was 2 years old than me and twice my size when I was 14. Ended up striking him so hard in the face after getting tired of the situation I punched him. I ended up with an opened and slightly injured fist, and broke is spectacles. For the whole rest of the year, the group of bullies didnt harass me anymore.

    358. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > On the plus side, maybe the next person contemplating violent acts to get what they want will think twice because of these two Darwin Award winners?

      Ha! If criminals thought like that then capital punishment would work as a deterrent, when statistics show it blatantly does not.

    359. Re:Tough luck.. by fnj · · Score: 1

      A Becquerel is a ridiculously tiny unit. It represents a single nucleus decaying per second. 111 TBq represents a very small amount of Cobalt 60; about 2.7 g or 0.1 oz. That is about the mass of a single penny. What that tells me is (1) my postulated amount of material was wildly overestimated, by a factor of about 300, and (2) the prediction of "doom" for the bad guys is very likely a crazy exaggeration. My postulated one minute of exposure at 1 m would have been only 20 mSv (2 rem). That's not enough to give you even mild nausea and a headache.

      Of course the reality depends on how long the morons played with the material and whether they rubbed it over their skull and torso. If they held it in their hand for a while, they might have gotten local skin burns or even necrosis

      Even at 100 times the whole body exposure I calculate above (not in the original postulation), the acute phase takes several hours after exposure to become apparent, is fairly mild, with a slight headache and no headache and no diarrhea, less than 50% have any vomiting, and is gone within 24 hours. At no time is there any central nervous system impairment. This is followed by a latent period of about a month in which the victim feels pretty much fine. After that there would be some fatique and weakness, but only several % mortality, even if no care is ever received.

      When you go over 100 times the exposure and approach 300 times, the outcome does become markedly worse. At 300 times, you will be at around 50% mortality, but this will still take weeks to take its full toll.

      Remember, this is all highly dependent on duration and proximity of exposure, what parts of the body are exposed, etc, but I see no reason, given that we now understand only a tiny amount of material was involved, for the "likely doomed" hysteria. They might be headed for a demise and they might not. Unless they are not saying something they know about the duration and proximity of exposure (how would they know that?), I see no reason for the hysterical reporting.

      A true description of what they could expect under various scenarios is bad enough, without making it lurid.

      Disclaimer: there might be something wrong with my math or my information on radiation sickness. In no event should anyone be retarded enough to "try this at home". But at least I am making an effort to analyze the situation, which the press is not.

    360. Re:Tough luck.. by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country

      Um, no. That would be Britain. The U.S. is supposed to be secular country populated many people who claim to be christians.

      Touché.

      I am curious, are you actually an american? Most people from the US I know would not know this since it involves knowing something about a country outside your own borders.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    361. Re:Tough luck.. by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      > I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?
      Yes, but /. is also a site where most people refuse to RTFA (hell, the term was INVENTED here!) and generally misquote everything, so the few /.-ers who have *ACTUALLY* read the Bible still probably misquote it.

      Did you read my sig? :)

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    362. Re:Tough luck.. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      The statement surely doesn't apply to a judge. It is not a judge who is "punishing" the sinner/criminal, but the state. The judge is just the medium through which the state chooses to act.

      That is one good reason why institutionalized justice is much less of an "infinite loop" than mob justice. One sees much less of an urge to revenge themselves upon police, lawyers, paralawyers, courtroom staff, judge, jury, because they act according to a system. The whole process is as non-violent and logical as such processes can be, so that baser instincts are in check. And also because there are too many of them.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    363. Re:Tough luck.. by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?

      Nice troll.

      Thanks :)

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    364. Re:Tough luck.. by stdarg · · Score: 1

      I don't think karma requires a guilty mind. I'm no expert but the definition on Google is

      * (in Hinduism and Buddhism) the sum of a person's actions in this and previous states of existence, viewed as deciding their fate in future existences.
      informal
      * destiny or fate, following as effect from cause.

      Cause and effect doesn't require you to do something on purpose or know the consequences in advance, neither does the sum of a person's actions (not thoughts).

    365. Re:Tough luck.. by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am actually an American. The scary part is that I was born in Alabama and raised in Florida. I truly am an anomaly. Of course, I haver

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    366. Re:Tough luck.. by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      Leviticus dates back to no earlier than 1619 BCE, which is at least a century after the Code of Hammurabi was written. Nice attempt at Christian revisionism though.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    367. Re:Tough luck.. by stdarg · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's useful to compare karma to criminal charges. Karma is helped by good actions, but that doesn't really affect your standing as a criminal (past a certain point). I mean if you routinely save peoples' lives you may have some immunity to things like parking tickets issued by the local cops, but I'm guessing it's not going to save you from criminal charges about cheating on your taxes every year. But in the karmic equivalent I suspect you'd be in positive territory.

    368. Re:Tough luck.. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      So if its not rational, what is the harm in talking about the links?

      Did I ONCE say excuse the behaviour? No, not once.
      Did I ONCE say it was ok because they are victims? No, not once.

      You just seem to leap to that as the only possible result of even wanting to sympathise with the situation that brought them there.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    369. Re:Tough luck.. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      While they're probably not nice people, and they may not even be good people, it's not fair or reasonable to assign karmic penalties based on a worst-case what-if scenario. If you're going to play that game, you might as well say that all carjackers deserve slow, painful death because they could use the stolen vehicle to run over kittens and baby seals.

      Looks like your wrong too. I didn't assign karmic penalties for anything. The fates did. If karma decides that aall car jackers deserve slow, painful deaths to keep them from running over kittens and baby seals, guess what, they do. That is the thing about karma, its always right.

      Maybe karma didn't decide these two where to die for stealing the cobalt-60. Maybe it just decided that was how they where to die for other reasons. But it doesn't matter, they are dead and karma decided that. Just like my karma will decide when its my time and so will yours.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    370. Re:Tough luck.. by ralla_coco · · Score: 1

      Ok, who ordered refried beaners?

      Down right racist. I wonder if you'd replace the word "beaner" with the words "white trash" or "nigger" would have sound as funny to the moderator to warrant a Score of 4.

    371. Re:Tough luck.. by dpiven · · Score: 1

      The dirty bomb, as a weapon of mass destruction, is a myth. Disperse the radioactive material far enough to affect a large number of people, and you disperse the radiation as well. The concentration of radioactive material decreases as the square of the radius of the area of dispersal.

      Forget the bomb part. Think, instead, of some alternative dispersal method, such as the dust in Robert Heinlein's "Solution Unsatisfactory". In that story, radioactive material was dispersed by bombers. Consider a more selective dispersal, like spreading it in the concourses of, say, Penn Station in Manhattan.

    372. Re:Tough luck.. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      I honestly have no idea what you're talking about.

      FYI, I'm not a Christian. I'm a big old atheist. I give not one flying fig who came up with what first or whether religion A took idea from religion B. I'm 100% certain that you are correct that the whole gist of the above comes from Hammurabi.

      However, you said

      As far as I know, the Code of Hammurabi [wikipedia.org] is not one of the books found in the Old Testament.

      And I said- that "eye-for-an-eye" is in the Old Testament. Which it is.

      So what are we arguing about?

    373. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "old" testament, more rightfully known as the Torah, was given to the "Children of Israel", i.e. the descendants of the biblical Jacob-- and ONLY to them. No others are bound by Torah law (except so-called "Noahide law)... and Jews/Children of Israel/Hebrews (take your pick what to call us) NEVER actually exacted a literal "eye for an eye" punishment-- the punishments were court ordered RESTITUTION... i.e. the value of someone's eye if you caused it to be harmed. The death penalties called for as punishments in the Torah were RARELY carried out as the required criterion for judgement was very high (i.e. at least 2 reliable eye witnesses- "reliable" meaning criminal snitches are unacceptable as witnesses in a Jewish court). If this case (i.e. robbery and theft of truck) were before a Jewish court, restitution would indeed be ordered. There are some Torah laws that called for whipping, but that was also rarely invoked.

    374. Re:Tough luck.. by tibit · · Score: 1

      The problem is that your approach is basically "my way or I'm gonna kill you". The "my way" is where the slippery slope is. People endlessly argue that more and more falls under the "shoot at will" umbrella. People being what they are, I sincerely wish you won't ever find yourself at the other end of the gun just because others take the rules you perpetuate to their "logical" conclusion.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    375. Re:Tough luck.. by tibit · · Score: 1

      What is violent crime, according to you? Because "robbery at gunpoint" can pretty much go with zero physical contact. If we redefine violence to mean anything that forces someone to do something against their will, then, well, most corporations are violent criminals (umm, btw, we've decided that we'll just raise your credit card interest rates by a 100% for no good reason, just because we can fuck you, you see). If the robbers have any brains left on them, they will in fact avoid physical contact, for the same reasons pirates from a couple hundred years ago weren't always on the lookout for sea battles either (contrary to fictional popular depictions).

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    376. Re:Tough luck.. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      The Bible is a muddled and contradictory beast. It also says:

      16 And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: as well the stranger, as he that is born in the land, when he blasphemeth the name of the Lord, shall be put to death.

      17 And he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death.

      18 And he that killeth a beast shall make it good; beast for beast.

      19 And if a man cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it be done to him;

      20 Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again.

      21 And he that killeth a beast, he shall restore it: and he that killeth a man, he shall be put to death.

      22 Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger, as for one of your own country: for I am the Lord your God.

      http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus+24&version=KJV

      He that caused blemish to a man shall have it done to him. He that kills a man shall be put to death.

      Seems like a pretty clear instruction to we humans to carry out punishments (and not wait for god to do it) to me. And of course, the New Testament goes off in a different direction on the matter entirely.

      I pity anyone who actually tries to live by that nonsense...

    377. Re:Tough luck.. by tibit · · Score: 1

      Sorry but reality disagrees with you. People who lose their cool end up dead, over and over again, and everyone is lucky if they only kill themselves.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    378. Re:Tough luck.. by jfengel · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting and astute way of looking at it. The historical context has shifted, since democracy blurs the line between individual and state behavior. (Rome had been kinda-sorta nominally a republic, but nobody outside of the City itself would have really seen it that way, and by the time the Gospels were written the Empire was well underway.)

      It's no longer morally feasible to simply submit to the state, since you can (and therefore must) work to change it. Unfortunately, there are those who believe with equal fervor, and equal moral basis, working to keep the status quo or change it in the opposite direction.

    379. Re:Tough luck.. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country and slashdot was supposed to be am mostly american site (I say mostly because I am actually british)?

      ...

      As an American Christian, I can assure you what little Christian principles the US have left are not predominate,...

      So which are you?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    380. Re:Tough luck.. by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Justice should not be an eye for eye and a tooth for a tooth. You end up with a lot of blind people and needing a lot of peanut butter.

      Well that should just inspire people to not go around plucking eyes out, and since very few people get their eyes plucked out, ispo facto, it works.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    381. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing the point.

    382. Re:Tough luck.. by Pope · · Score: 1

      "These days?"

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    383. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point that Jesus was trying to make is that nobody is perfect, and if you are willing to punish someone for their failings, you can just as easily be judged by the same harsh rules. If the roles were reversed, surely you would wish for leniency. Treat others as you would like to be treated.

    384. Re:Tough luck.. by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about "eye-for-an-eye" is about as Christian of a concept as is divine creation [Genesis], trekking through a desert [Exodus], or conducting a census [Numbers]. These are all things that can be found in the Old Testament, but they're in no way distinctly Christian (nor Jewish), and they all predate the inception of the Abraham faiths.

      Yes, the Old Testament said "eye for eye". So did the Torah (which is what you're really talking about when you speak of the first five books of the Old Testament). So have countless research papers that focus on the Code of Hammurabi. So have many posts on slashdot, regarding this story. Why is the Christian Bible any more relevant here than any other set of writing about the concept of justice in the form of proportional retribution? Why did you write "Even the Old Testament said" and not "Even Hammurabi said" or "Even the Torah said" or "Even Dr. Charles F. Horne said"?

      As an atheist, you should be ashamed to be so thoroughly indoctrinated with Christian belief. Christianity has a long tradition of co-opting pre-existing beliefs, practices, and philosophies, and claiming them as Christian. Your original post only furthers this tradition. What we're arguing about amounts to whether the definite article "the" is Christian, since the pages of the Christian Bible are littered with it. When discussing the definite article, it's odd to bring up the Christian Bible, since although it makes heavy use of the definite article, it is neither the originator of the concept nor a particularly interesting instance of its usage. Ditto "eye for eye".

      My point is furthered by the fact that the comments under this story mention "eye for eye" several times, but always in the context of Christianity. One of the threads even devolves into a discussion about a parable written of by John (which is perhaps more relevant or interesting than mentions of the Old Testament). Not a single mention of Hammurabi, the originator of the concept. You don't think Christianity has "claimed" this concept yet? You say you're an atheist, but here you're playing on the Christian team.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    385. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody's saying the mindless elite money-wranglers don't deserve to die.

    386. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make $90,000 a year. Median wage here is just under $44k/year.

      FTFY.

    387. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's really only one reason NOT to make death the punishment for a (any) crime: you have technology that might reasonably be expected to rehabilitate the criminal.

      If you can't cure him you might as well kill him --- it's better than turning him lose to continue as he is. And way cheaper.

    388. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was conflicted about the death penalty until I read about Austin Sigg. Disgusting person whose rehabilitation I would never trust.

    389. Re:Tough luck.. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, this was an interesting reply.

      Neither the original Slashdot post (which linked to the BBC) nor TFA (Washington Post) in this post imply that this was anything more than a common-or-garden theft. Maybe you've heard something I haven't.

      No - more likely I've got my facts wrong. I was under the understanding that they brutalised the occupants of the truck once they had them out of the cab. I might just have to go re-read that article..

      My sister has been mugged before. I've had friends be mugged. It's horrible, but it's a long way from "sadism" or "torture". Just opportunistic thugs looking to make a little bit of money, who absolutely could be rehabilitated.

      Actually I couldn't agree more. Mugging is just awful but it's certainly not what I was upset about; my anger was centred on the unnecessary injury inflicted by the two thieves (which may be hearsay, embarrassingly enough).

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    390. Re:Tough luck.. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I've been robbed at gunpoint (Glen Lakes 8 movie theater in Dallas, since closed). Yawn. He wants the money, not me dead. Hand it all over, watch him run away.

    391. Re:Tough luck.. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There is an equally rational side that suggest that painful death as a consequence/punishment of violent crime DOES have a deterrent effect, even if minor.

      The analysis of realty have determined that the Death Penalty (as used in the US) has no deterrent effect, not even minor. So what was the excuse again?

    392. Re:Tough luck.. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And the problem is with the Christians. They will "accept" and include anyone, without any internal vetting. The only time Christians denounce other Christians is if someone like Amy Grant makes a popular song, "abandoning" her previous Christian works. But the televangelists are supported by "mainstream" Christians, despite selling salvation and preaching hate.

      When the Christians learn to better address their internal issues, they'll be blames less for the actions of those who do it in their name.

    393. Re:Tough luck.. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Where blue laws, and gay laws are formed to force religious beliefs on others. It's not "supposed to be" Christian, but is.

    394. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PTSD from an armed robbery? If they didn't actually shoot, hit, or scream maniacally at someone, and the victim was older than 4, then PTSD an unreasonable expectation. Armed robbery is bad, but not every armed robber is "kill them with radiation poisoning bad." Most of them probably aren't expecting to give anyone PTSD.

    395. Re:Tough luck.. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      if someone put their head into a crocodile enclosure and were promptly decapitated, no-one (including me) would say that they weren't responsible for their own fate- and I think we'd probably have a bit of a chuckle at some people's foolishness. That's completely different to saying "I'm glad they died, people who put their heads into zoo enclosures deserve slow and painful death!".

      First of all, lots of people would say it was the fault of the enclosure that random people who might be Special enough to put their head in were able to do so.

      Second, it is exactly the same to say that it was their own fault, and that they deserved it.

      Third, you admit laughing at somebody for dying due to pure stupidity, without any malicious intent, but you question the morality of others who laugh at somebody who died because of mal intent. You are probably stuck your head into this one the wrong way.

    396. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, and now it becomes apparent why the cops harassed you so much. You're a fucking neurotic. A fag. And I'm zeroing in on your chicken-trigger (reference my post above about harrar's chicken).

      You're criminal scum.

    397. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make 55k a year as a MS server admin, but my wife makes 250k. She weighs 120 lbs and squirts when she orgasms. She's a CFO. I have her because I'm incredibly attractive and very intelligent. She accepts my laziness and pot smoking based on that. It also seems that she likes to come home to a bipolar control freak, because it challenges her and lets her be the submissive (which is necessary after being a dominating C-suite executive all day).

      What do I win?

    398. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I almost starved to death. I'm not talking about 'missed - meal - cramps', I mean internal organs shut down, almost DYING. I didn't rob anyone. I didn't steal from people and I damn sure didn't assault and steal a flippin' truck. Why should MY misfortune be the cause of someone ELSE losing health, money, property, etc? They didn't do it to me. They weren't responsible. These people got EXACTLY what they deserved. People who turn to crime deserve whatever they get by doing something A. stupid, B. criminal. If someone tries to rob or assault me or mine, they will find out if there is life after death. I don't worry about them, I don't worry about their families - I worry about me and mine. Someone doesn't like it? Too bad. You feel sorry for the criminals? YOU take care of them. Leave ME out of it. I won't cry for them, I won't care for them, I damn sure won't PAY for them. TFB

    399. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is refried white trash?

    400. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1, sir.

    401. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but this is the same Jesus that made a Scourge (whip with metal bits at the ends) and forcibly evicted money changers in the Temple.

      The word used in the Greek is flagellum. I don't know how you assume that it's the worst kind of whip from Roman times, as it's not the general meaning of flagellum. Certainly a whip of sorts, but no reason to believe any more than that.

    402. Re:Tough luck.. by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      I don't necessarily advocate the capital punishment. And I support human rights for criminals.
      But
      1) Mexico has a HDI of 0.775, almost tied with Portugal at 0.816.
      2) These guys were not stealing food. They performed an armed robbery. Don't portray them as victims.

    403. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand. The "logical" conclusion of his rules is the same as the stated premise: don't touch his shit and you'll have nothing to worry about. What exactly is so hard about that?

    404. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus was a socialist with a Mexican name. Why do you think Americans would listen to him.

    405. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days? That is America from birth of the country.

    406. Re: Tough luck.. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      One more time: I was mentioning it in the context of "even the boggling idiocy of the old Testament thinks you're going too far"- that even the brutal justice of desert dwelling nomads several millennia ago is less brutal than the the tripe some people spout on the internet. Which particular band of ancient desert dwellers said it first really wasn't germane to my point.

      As to why I said Bible rather than Torah, Hammurabi Code, or anything else. 1) Most people will be familiar with it in the Christian context rather than the ancient Babylonian context. 2) I really wasn't willing to put in the effort of research for such a throwaway point on the internet.

      The fact that the Babylonians said it first is an interesting historical nugget. But it sounds like you have some serious hangups about the religion, my friend. If you don't believe it really is the divine utterings of angels and accept that it's all just the collective myths and fictions of various cultures, I really don't see why you're getting so upset about who said something first. It was a nonsense the first time round, and a nonsense on all subsequent repetitions...

    407. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Being a friend or relative of the one attacked usually is far worse

      I'll remember that if I ever need to do a gunpoint mugging. "Just remember, it'll be far worse for your f&f".

      Are you for real?

    408. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the European culture of shame. In the times of financial misfortune, move on or perish. Although in these day it should be: move along or perish, citizen. Those heart warming, pioneer style communities seem to be found were there is or has been a shared outside threat, like challenging environmental conditions combined with violence of war and relatively homogeneous community with low crime rate.

    409. Re:Tough luck.. by Troed · · Score: 1

      any rational person put in their situation would choose the exact same course of action?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

    410. Re:Tough luck.. by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

      With any luck they'll pad our their psudo-ephadrine supplies to the cartels with some ground colbalt and destroy the entire meth manufacture and distribution network. problem is it probably wont happen fast enough to stop radioactive meth arriving in the states.

    411. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They got almost instant diarrhea and you still expect the bodies to be right there? Rush! No news if they were campesino? Or other?? They would not be trying to test out if something like it was so effective, would they? I cannot believe such deaths cannot be reported or located.

    412. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus was also opposed to divorce, but divorce is legal in the US. Jesus in the US is mostly a get-out-of-jail-free card. Accepting Jesus as one's personal lord and savior is about invoking a spell or charm against "evil". Thing is, you will not find consent of the governed, free speech, the right to a fair and speedy trial and so on anywhere in the Gospels, or "Old Testament" (Torah and Tanakh). The US is not a christian country or a judeo-christian country. The US is a country of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness at most; these things are not the priority of any Abrahamic religion.

    413. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It did not end well for Simon Bar Kochba either. So long as Jews did not try to fight Rome, Rome let the Temple stand.

    414. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In reading the comments:

      This is exactly what I was thinking, beating someone attempting to make a living, working at delivery job, and doing it at gunpoint. No chance to really fight back (gunpoint) without dying. Then being stupid enough to open a container clearly marked as toxic with letters and symbols.

      Harsh? yes. Deserved? yes.
      Sorry to all those that seem to think that this was okay, but no.

      Have fun with the bleeding squirts, you will not be doing that again to an INNOCENT PERSON TRYING TO MAKE A LIVING and the entire human race is better for it.

    415. Re:Tough luck.. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Jesus was also opposed to divorce,

      Jesus was opposed to the kind of divorce that happened back then, which usually left the woman poor, homeless and an outcast from society.

      We don't do this kind of divorce anymore.

    416. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok so im walking along and seeing you getting mugged at knifepoint. You dont think i should be able to execute him on the spot?

      Big difference between execution and using lethal force to protect the victim or potential victim of a crime. The former is deliberate - the intentional, deliberate ending of a life. When I draw my weapon on the mugger, however, as is my duty to my fellow citizen, I'm using force to make him desist. If he chooses discretion, abandons the attempt and runs away, all well. If he bleeds out from the many holes I had to put in him to discourage him, then he chose poorly.

    417. Re:Tough luck.. by Jack+Dixon · · Score: 1

      Way too lenient! If you rape my young daughter, would it be appropriate for me to rape yours since I, not being a sicko, would have no interest? What I would be interested in would be watching you being eaten by wild dogs (tiny ones, that would take a long time).

    418. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no balance. There is reality and it's consequences. Do something stupid like play with a Rattlesnake and get bit, you die. Not wash your hands after wiping your ass can lead to death. Not cleaning your dishes properly, you can die.

      Hijacking a vehicle has lethal consequences like getting shot. In this case, their stupidity and not knowing what radioactive symbols means got them killed.

      Smarter people tend to live longer.

    419. Re:Tough luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, right here.

      There is no call for capital punishment on a carjacker. However, if a couple of them die painfully after giving a couple of innocent folks a severe beating, doing so at gunpoint, and all because they were too dumbassed to ignore the warnings splayed all over the container?

      I really cannot bring myself to feel bad about the outcome.

      For those who feel otherwise, look at it this way: When you use a lethal weapon to commit a crime, you state to the world that you are willing to kill innocent people in order to get what you want, no matter what. From the moment when you point that gun at someone, your life is automatically forfeit should you die as a result of committing that crime. It doesn't matter if you died instantly because the victim shot back, or because every orifice you have is slowly bleeding out of your swollen body due to radiation exposure... you got what was coming to you.

      Oh, you're dying a painful death from the stuff you stole and some bleeding-heart type on Slashdot says I should show you some sympathy? Okay: you'll find sympathy in the dictionary between "shit" and "syphilis".

      On the plus side, maybe the next person contemplating violent acts to get what they want will think twice because of these two Darwin Award winners?

      Somehow, I get the feeling that these two fellows were not thinking about the consequences. Very few criminals or would be/wannabe bad folks do think about the consequences of their actions. True, the justice they will be dealt is harsh and unforgiving. That said, I am a Catholic who takes my religion seriously. When they nailed Jesus to the cross he did not rebuke anyone; what he did was ask his father in heaven to forgive the people who committed this atrocity. Now, crucifixion is a nasty way to die, worse by far than being pistol whipped. Also, I believe that each and every one of us will answer for how we treated our neighbors: those we encounter on a daily basis. I am not soft on crime, however, I believe that Jesus intended that all of us be redeemed by the kingdom to come.

      The two men who stole the truck are indeed guilty of acting badly toward their neighbors, to wit, the lawful drivers of the truck. I submit that if found alive, that they be arrested; and if sick, they should be treated with compassion. My heart goes out to the lawful drivers of the truck and their families. May they have peace and happiness; may they not be embittered by their experience. I was also a victim of a robbery and a sexual assault many years ago. Hating the people who victimized me would take up way too much real estate in my heart.

      --C.M. Irwin

  3. Seems kind of harsh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even by Mexican standards.

    1. Re:Seems kind of harsh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even by Mexican standards.

      Not really. Mexico has been known to shoot at people trying to cross their southern border.

  4. Good to see Justice Prevails by CajunArson · · Score: 0, Troll

    Apparently the "RADIOACTIVE YOU'LL DIE IF YOU OPEN THIS!!!" markings aren't that universal (fortunately).

    Now if only we could put more cobalt 60 into those drug shipments and clean out the cartels in such a tidy manner.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    1. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the story PU-239 where the Russian gangster ends up snorting the plutonium.

    2. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Apparently the "RADIOACTIVE YOU'LL DIE IF YOU OPEN THIS!!!" markings aren't that universal (fortunately).

      Oh, come now, you and I both know that if such a box were shipped to the general Slashdot population, we'd lose around 80% of the posters here, each one a horrible, inconceivably painful death predicated by the thought or outright declaration of "I'm not going to let someone tell me what to do! I know full well that's exactly what I'd do if I had something I didn't want THEM to see, so I'm going to open this up and immediately rub its contents, whatever they are, directly on my genitals just to show the world THEY CAN'T EVAR CONTROL ME!"

    3. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      ISO 21482 is pretty universal. Doesn't solve any of the nastier issues of cross-cultural-communication-without-shared-assumptions; but either that symbol, the old trefoil, or both, are about as iconic as warning labels get.

      Now, as for this 'cobalt 60 in those drug shipments' concept, it might expose the mules (who tend to be low level and treated as expendable anyway) to enough radiation to kill them, slowly; but the major effect would be on the customers: ie. the coke-snorting Americans whining about them. You wouldn't be the first to suggest this... particular approach, the winning the war on drugs; but I bet you'd learn some interesting things about who does drugs once the casualties start to pile up.

    4. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I bet you'd learn some interesting things about who does drugs once the casualties start to pile up.

      Indeed, there have been cops, judges, and prosecuters in the news in Illinois in the last year who were busted for cocaine. There are the mayor of that Canadian city and the ex-mayor of DC. Look at Rush Limbaugh.

      I look at "war on drugs" politicians like I look at right wing politicians who constantly decry homosexuality, how many of them have been kicked out of the closet?

      I don't know if the GP is an idiot, a troll, or a government shill. He advocates a painful death for drug users? I smoke pot and advocate HIS death. Alcohol, tobacco, and coffee are all addictive drugs. Marijuana is not.

      All of society's problems that are attributed to drugs are really problems that stem from the laws against them.

    5. Re: Good to see Justice Prevails by wo1verin3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shhhhh, here have a bowl.

    6. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      The drugs flow to the US so you'd just be killing our suburban teens with those shipments. Also, large parts of south America are supported by the cartels. They are effectively the government in those areas. If the cartels just vanished one day those ares would just devolve further into lawlessness. The majority of south Americas problems revolve around the US's idiotic drug policies and trade practices. Fix those and everything else would follow suit.

    7. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you'd learn some interesting things about who does drugs once the casualties start to pile up.

      Indeed, there have been cops, judges, and prosecuters in the news in Illinois in the last year who were busted for cocaine. There are the mayor of that Canadian city and the ex-mayor of DC. Look at Rush Limbaugh.

      you said: Look at Rush Limbaugh.

      Sorry, but he was addicted to prescription pain killers, not cocaine.

    8. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Idiots like you are why the places you are from are places worth avoiding.

      Planet Earth?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    9. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to open this up and immediately rub its contents, whatever they are, directly on my genitals just to show the world THEY CAN'T EVAR CONTROL ME!"

      That sounds slightly more like 4chan than Slashdot to me.

      Of course, they'd also say "Just received this box of death in the mail, WAT DO?" and possibly a "post ending in 03 decides".

      I expect that the /. crowd would be more apt to test their Geiger counters, and possibly put on a bunny suit first.

    10. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I wish I could keep a box in my car. Fucking crackheads.

    11. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because South America was such an awesome place in the 1800s.

      South America is screwed because the way the Spanish divided the land created permanent lords and peons, and most of the countries never fixed it.

    12. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by LoRdTAW · · Score: 3, Informative

      "ie. the coke-snorting Americans whining about them. You wouldn't be the first to suggest this... particular approach, the winning the war on drugs; but I bet you'd learn some interesting things about who does drugs once the casualties start to pile up."
      Yes, a lot of Americans and Europeans would die. And I bet a lot of Canadians would as well.

      I guess you're too lazy to read up on the subject and instead jump straight to bashing Americans. I know its easy and makes you feel better about yourself. But please try to at least make an effort to sound like a smug, smart ass. Here, I have done the work for you, since you appear to be incapable of doing it yourself:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Drug_War#Effects_internationally
      Improved cooperation of Mexico with the U.S. led to the recent arrests of 755 Sinaloa cartel suspects in U.S. cities and towns, but the U.S. market is being eclipsed by booming demand for cocaine in Europe, where users now pay twice the going U.S. rate.

      OOPS! Bet you didn't see that one coming ... did you?
      http://newamericamedia.org/2013/02/mexican-drug-cartels-eye-spain-as-their-new-home.php
      http://www.mexicogulfreporter.com/2013/04/mexican-drug-cartels-have-strong.html
      http://www.irishexaminer.com/analysis/mexican-drug-cartels-eye-europe-238202.html

      Sorry to be a dick but as an American I am tired of ignorant people outside of the USA painting every American as an ignorant slob.

    13. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just relax dude. I'm not sure what riled you up. The idea that Americans use cocaine? None of your citations refute that concept.

    14. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Gryle · · Score: 1

      All of society's problems that are attributed to marijuana are really problems that stem from the laws against it.

      There, fixed that for you. I'm fairly certain legalizing things like meth and cocaine wouldn't do much to aid the addicted. Just because one drug is harmless doesn't mean they all are.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    15. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't hold back, tell us how you really feel.

      Both people you replied to are trolls, better off flagging then foe, setting foe to -5 and ignore them. Not worth the effort. You, on the other hand, often have really good posts.

    16. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Megane · · Score: 1

      Look at Rush Limbaugh.

      Getting hooked on prescription painkillers is kind of different from getting hooked on completely illegal drugs like FUCKING COCAINE AND HEROIN that you have no business having in the first place.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    17. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Ok, sorry, Mexican cartels have convenient proximity to the US; but are, obviously, pretty willing to do business with anybody who has money and wants drugs.

      Were you to poison the goods, you'd get a few dead drug mules and a somewhat interesting look at the cokeheads of most of the developed world. Happy now?

    18. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Actually, getting hooked on prescription painkillers is frequently pretty similar to getting hooked on heroin, and a not terribly uncommon way to get started. Most of the painkillers worth bothering with are zesty opiates, the user's supply of which will dry up rather suddenly once their medical excuse and/or supply of flexible doctors does. Street opiates have purity issues, and aren't covered by insurance; but dealers can be more accommodating of non-prescription users.

    19. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Glad to see you are level headed enough to say sorry. Again I am sorry to have lashed out.

    20. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain legalizing things like meth and cocaine wouldn't do much to aid the addicted. Just because one drug is harmless doesn't mean they all are.

      It would still help. Particularly for methamphetamines, in general, legalizing them would make treatment more accessible and easier to administer. Plenty of addicts don't ever seek treatment because they're afraid the hospital will inform the police (whether or not the hospital actually has such a policy). Worse, plenty of relatives of addicts don't try to get their addicted relative treated for fear they would be convicted for possession themselves, even though they don't use the drug.

      Legalizing followed by regulation akin to alcohol regulation would also reduce the number of accidental deaths due to overdoses, as well as side effects from products that have been cut with something dangerous. Accurate labeling of known dosages and ingredients would reduce healthcare costs and the rates of injuries and fatalities.

      Alcohol isn't harmless. It killed my cousin earlier this year. It's currently killing my uncle. It killed my friend's mother. Tobacco isn't harmless. It's killing my mother's sister. It reduced her quality of life to near nothing a very long time ago. Harmlessness isn't a criteria already, so what's the problem?

    21. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      I'm fairly certain legalizing things like meth and cocaine wouldn't do much to aid the addicted.

      It's better than sending them to prison, AKA Criminal University. If their drugs were cheaper they wouldn't be stealing from me. I never knew a cigarette smoker or alcoholic stealing to support their addictions.

      Legalization would end the drug violence, just as Prohibition's end ended the violence of the illegal liquor trade. All the arguments for Prohibition as well as against it still apply in today's prohibitions, and history shouldn't be ignored.

    22. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Actually, getting hooked on prescription painkillers is frequently pretty similar to getting hooked on heroin,

      While the chemical addiction mechanisms may be similar in similar kinds of drugs, the issue being discussed was not chemical but societal. In that context, getting hooked on prescription painkillers is very much UNlike getting hooked on heroin. The primary difference being that heroin is not prescribed as a recognized medical treatment for pain. The mechanism for obtaining the two are also vastly different. It is relatively easy for a law abiding citizen to obtain the initial doses of the prescription painkillers that lead to the dependency, while obtaining the initial heroin samples automatically removes the user from the 'law abiding' category.

      Thus, trying to equate a Rush Limbaugh dependence on Oxy that led to illegal purchases with a heroin user is disingenuous. The former starts with "this pill was given to me by a doctor to relieve my pain. I still have pain, so I will take another one." The latter starts with "I enjoy the high that this illegal drug give me, I'll do it again for fun."

    23. Re: Good to see Justice Prevails by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I needed that.

    24. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The only societal differences are artificial. There's no difference between Limbaugh and a junkie with a needle in an alley.

    25. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The only societal differences are artificial.

      Artificial or not, they are real and significant in this context. Were it as easy to fall into a heroin dependence as to fall into a prescription painkiller dependence, then these "artificial" differences would be moot. Since becoming a heroin addict requires use of an illegal compound from the very beginning, and painkiller addiction does not, there is a difference. You can't accidentally become a heroin addict, but you certainly can become a prescription painkiller addict that way.

      There's no difference between Limbaugh and a junkie with a needle in an alley.

      Yes, in the societal context, and in the mechanisms involved in creating the addiction, there are significant differences. You can label the source of the difference "artificial", but calling NutraSweet an artificial sweetener doesn't make it taste any less sweet.

    26. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the U.S. market is being eclipsed by booming demand for cocaine in Europe, where users now pay twice the going U.S. rate.

      That's just the VAT.

      Sorry to be a dick but as an American I am tired of ignorant people outside of the USA painting every American as an ignorant slob.

      USA! USA! USA! USA! Because... 'Murica!

    27. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      You rebutted his "coke snorting Americans" with an article that says most of the Mexican coke is snorted by Americans but the Europeans are catching up? Hm....

    28. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      drugs like FUCKING COCAINE AND HEROIN that you have no business having in the first place.

      How about recreation you fascist dipshit?

    29. Re:Good to see Justice Prevails by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      Not so much; people buy their drugs from one cartel or another. One is state sanctioned, and the other not officially, but still, nonetheless, state sanctioned.

      The ridiculous dog and pony "crime" show that was *created* with government policy and continues to be perpetuated *by* government policy serves it's purpose. The money still flows where everybody wants it to, and it's just business as usual.

      My issue with you and Limbaugh isn't that either of you may or may not currently still be addicts that are still lying about it. My problem with both of you is that you pretend that your addiction is somehow more acceptable and justifiable.

      Limbaugh was not unaware of the addictive properties of his drug of choice. Simply choosing a "legal" drug over an "illegal" one does not put you or your asshole supporters on any kind of moral high ground.

  5. Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice

  6. Self-solving problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem solved.

  7. isn't it possible to detect by etash · · Score: 0

    with satellites, big doses of uncontained radioactive materials? Shouldn't such materials be "glowing" to sensitive sensors from the space or something ?

    1. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've been watching too much tv

    2. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Pinhedd · · Score: 2

      In some cases yes. The L3 band used by the GPS satellite system is used to detect and report nuclear detonations, but I do not know if a small amount of cobalt-60 would be detected by a satellite 26,000 kilometres away.

    3. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how radioactive space is? This wouldn't be a drop in the bucket.

    4. Re:isn't it possible to detect by etash · · Score: 1

      yeah geostationary orbit sounds like way far way, but maybe could be from satellites oribiting ~500km over the blue dot

    5. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were using satellites to detect high concentrations of radioactivity as far back as the 1960s, when we discovered that spy satellites were excellent at approximating prospects for new uranium mines. So, while we don't officially have any beep-boops in space that can track radioactive trucks in real-time, the idea isn't so far-fetched as to be relegated exclusively to fiction.... it'll probably happen one day.

    6. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You might be able to pick up the gamma, but alpha and beta would be stopped pretty quickly by the air, atmospheric water etc. Co-60 is a beta/gamma emitter, so it's possible in theory, but I'd imagine pretty unlikely. A better bet would be to put out a story that the thieves will be seriously ill or dead within a few days so they panic and "hand themselves in" at a hospital.

    7. Re:isn't it possible to detect by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      The L3 band doesn't detect anything (how would that work?).

      GPS satellites carry optical sensors looking for the very characteristic
      flash of a nuclear explosion. There is no such thing as "radiation detection
      from space" (except, of course, if you are looking for cosmic rays).

    8. Re:isn't it possible to detect by idji · · Score: 1

      In the 1990s when some stuff went missing in Istanbul the International Atomic Energy Agency flew a grid over the city with a helicopter dangling some equiment underneath that could pick up these levels of radiation.

    9. Re: isn't it possible to detect by e3m4n · · Score: 5, Informative

      Geiger-Mueller detectors work on the photoelectric effect. Point source radiation is an inverse square law. You wouldn't detect this stuff even a few miles away. Reactors hardly release any isotopes. It's the thermals that show up on satellites

    10. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Millennium · · Score: 1

      It depends on the exact type of radiation and such, but the big thing is your uncontained. They wouldn't have been able to detect the material until the container was opened, which the thieves didn't do immediately.

      When they found the material, that's exactly what had happened: the thieves had opened the box. But they had also already run away, which is why the thieves still haven't been caught.

    11. Re:isn't it possible to detect by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I was about to look into whether they had ground based sensors for such radioactive materials, I've heard about them being suggested for security purposes. Then I remembered we are talking about an incident where a truck full of pretty radioactive material was stolen in Mexico, so I'm just going to say "Maybe we should just wait for the thieves to turn up dead rather than give them another truck full of expensive equipment to sell for scrap."

    12. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Yew2 · · Score: 1

      I think he put "glowing" in quotes to indicate we should have sensors that they can fly around with to find the stuff...not actual green blob stuff....like in the Peacemaker!

      --
      will work for dragon quest localization
    13. Re:isn't it possible to detect by tibit · · Score: 1

      Sure. If you'd point a space-based gamma ray telescope at Earth, and said telescope be sensitive enough, you'd surely see the "glowing" truck. I'd think the resolution and sensitivity of such telescopes is such that you'd be lucky if it would be a glowing pixel, though. It's a simple enough matter to check how many gamma ray telescopes are pointed down and used for land surveillance. My bet: zero.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    14. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Pinhedd · · Score: 2

      The L3 band is the transmission band used to communicate with the base stations on the ground. The disturbances themselves are detected using the satellite's onboard instruments.

      The GPS satellites are incredibly sensitive to atmospheric disturbances and can detect anything that causes interference with radio transmissions, such as electron emission from a subterranean nuclear test. It is not necessary to detect the emission source itself, just the effects of the emission.

    15. Re:isn't it possible to detect by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Agreed, we are talking something radioactive but it is only dangerous at most 6 years before it decays into nickel.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    16. Re:isn't it possible to detect by T5 · · Score: 1

      The satellites aren't looking for radiation in that manner. There's a characteristic double flash of light from a nuclear detonation that is deemed the signature.

    17. Re:isn't it possible to detect by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Yep, reading on CO60 it's not as volatile as you'd think unless you come into physical contact with it. Hell it's half life is only 5.7 years.

      Besides if it's in the container, designed to contain the radiation, how is a satellite going to detect that radiation not being emitted from that container?

      Best bet to catch them is do what they did and say they will be dead soon, which not knowing if they in fact came into contact with it or not is overstating the facts.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    18. Re:isn't it possible to detect by thunderclap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um thats all fiction. No, radioactive metal looks like normal metal, feels like normal metal and smells like normal metal. It simply kills you in 48 hrs. Violently with lots of hair loss and vomiting blood.

    19. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Pinhedd · · Score: 1

      That's the traditional way, yes. There's a more recent method (which may not involve using the L3 band for communication) that operates by detecting atmospheric disturbances caused by shockwaves and electron emission in the atmosphere. The double flash will not detect subterranean tests, but looking for radio communication interference will. It's a roundabout method but researchers were able to detect North Korea's subterranean tests this way.

    20. Re:isn't it possible to detect by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      There are certainly radiation detectors that are deployed today, but they aren't in "the space". They are on highways and rails and in ports, the places where radioactive materials would have to travel through to reach their intended destination. And they are powerful enough to detect radiation in their immediate area, not tens of miles away.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    21. Re:isn't it possible to detect by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      with satellites, big doses of uncontained radioactive materials? Shouldn't such materials be "glowing" to sensitive sensors from the space or something ?

      Depends on the type of radiation. Alpha decay can be dangerous (as with polonium, definitely not to be taken internally); but alpha particles are pitiful penetrators, so you'd see essentially nothing, even with a theoretically perfect detector, even a few meters, maybe tens of meters, away.

      Beta rays penetrate better; but still aren't terribly punchy, and I'd be surprised if you could see much of anything from space. A low-flying survey aircraft, perhaps; but not orbit.

      Gamma rays are attenuated by the atmosphere, though sometimes you can see the byproducts of those interactions, and some do get through, so that might be viable. No idea how good the resolution on contemporary gamma detectors is, though, trying to find a pinpoint dot against the background chatter of cosmic background and assorted minerals could be pretty hairy unless gamma detectors have resolution approaching that of visible light optics, and I'm not sure that they do.

    22. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      That's certainly what I've read. Am I wrong in thinking that this assumes a thermonuclear weapon design? If so, does that mean the satellite network might miss the detonation if someone managed to cobble together a simple gun-type fission bomb that doesn't need a nuclear primary?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    23. Re:isn't it possible to detect by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Short answer: No. Long answer: What do you mean "big doses"? There are many sources of gamma rays in the atmosphere (when stuff like cosmic rays hit it, you get a nice shower of gamma rays and other neat thingies). Maybe if you have a gamma spectrograph you can filter out just the cobalt-60 gamma rays, assuming they're unique? In that case you just need to worry about the fact that the surface is huge and gamma detectors are non-directional. That means that to scan a point on the surface you need to point straight at it. Unless you have a massive constillation of sats that means each "square" you scan will need to have a pretty high CPM for there to be a statistically significant number of counts during the scan. Due to the inverse square law, your satellite in LEO will only see a few CPS if somebody within 1KM of the source is getting several MILLION CPM. That translates into radiation sickness within a few days. For being 1KM away. Don't even ask about being in the same room as it! And of course the area you're scanning in 1 second is pretty huge so this detector wouldn't be much help locating things. And that's assuming no background radiation on the same order (or higher) CPS.

      This would change if you have a gamma ray vector spectrograph that lets you measure the exact frequency and vector of each gamma ray it detects. But right now I think the filters are pretty fuzzy AND the techniques used are all non-directional. Even assuming perfect filters and vector detectors, the counts have to be huge before they show up in space right when you're looking. And I think the assumption you even can filter so you won't see any background ticks is incorrect, but I have no idea what kind of spectral distribution the Earth's gamma background has.

      The reason you can have satellites that detect and locate the gamma bursts of underground nuclear tests is because of the B word. If it's a burst then you can triangulate between satellites even though their detectors are scalar not vector. That's because the sudden uptick that each satellite sees is tied to the same physical event. If you're looking at decay emissions then the counts are not synchronized so you can't triangulate. Oh, and also the gamma ray burst from an explosion is pretty big compared to the decay from a few kg of cobalt-60.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    24. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Max+Threshold · · Score: 2

      No, it becomes half as dangerous in about six years. That's still pretty dangerous.

    25. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Am I wrong in thinking that this assumes a thermonuclear weapon design?

      Afraid so. The double flash is a result of shockwave/fireball interaction. From Wikipedia:

      At first, this shock wave is inside the surface of the developing fireball, which is created in a volume of air heated by the explosion's 'soft' X-rays. However, within a fraction of a second the dense shock front obscures the fireball, and continues to move past it, now expanding outwards, free from the fireball, causing the characteristic double pulse of light seen from a nuclear detonation, with the dip causing the double pulse due to the shock wave-fireball interaction.

      Also:

      This signature consists of a short and intense flash lasting around 1 millisecond, followed by a second much more prolonged and less intense emission of light taking a fraction of a second to several seconds to build up. This signature, with a double intensity maximum, is characteristic of atmospheric nuclear explosions and is the result of the Earth atmosphere becoming opaque to visible light and transparent again as the explosion's shock wave travels through it.

      (This is from the entry for Bhangmeter, which really is the technical term for nuclear detonation sensors.)

      You'd get the same effect regardless of the source of prompt X-rays, fission or fusion.

    26. Re:isn't it possible to detect by physics101 · · Score: 1

      No way!

      Inverse square law makes it practically impossible. Typical activity of the (fresh!) cobalt teletherapy unit is ~300 TBq. Lets say that your gamma telescope is so efficient that it collects 1/3 of all the gamma rays emitted if placed 1 m from the source (in other words its inlet aperture is about 3.46 m in diameter and the detector has 100% quantum efficiency). That gives you 1,000 billion counts per second. Now put your telescope in a (very low!) orbit, say 500 km. Due to the inverse square law you now detect 4 counts per second. Because you want some spacial resolution to get your "pixels", the detector needs to be segmented. If you want 100x100 matrix, the count rate per segment is now 10 000 times lower. In order for your pixel to emerge from the background (which is orders of magnitude higher), you would have to count for years.

      This is all assuming that your field of view is ideally covering the area you want to search. Your orbit is not geostationary and your telescope is is above the target area only once in a while. Oh, BTW, I completely forgot the atmosphere attenuation for the 1.33 MeV Co60 photons (half value layer for air is about 9 m). That alone kills it completely.

      It would be a nice stunt in a Hollywood movie, but in reality it simply does not work.

    27. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Great reply, thanks! :)

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    28. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Something emitting enough gamma in all directions to be lethal within days at 1 Km plus ranges will generally not have a "same room" around it, unless we are talking a very well armored and solid form of construction and a rather largish minimum sized room, with the walls kept well away from the something. You really couldn't stay in the same room with it once it starts, just in the same rapidly expanding volume of superheated gasses.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    29. Re:isn't it possible to detect by tibit · · Score: 1

      Very informative. The half-value layer for air being 9m just about does it. Alas, what is the background noise of the detectors in typical gamma ray telescopes?

      Alas, I had a good hunch: "you'd be lucky if it would be a glowing pixel" :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    30. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but this stuff is a gamma source, so it would be detectable at a fair distance. (vs. alpha and beta that wouldn't make it out of the truck.)

    31. Re:isn't it possible to detect by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Yep, reading on CO60 it's not as volatile as you'd think unless you come into physical contact with it. Hell it's half life is only 5.7 years.

      The shorter the half-life, the more volatile it is.

    32. Re:isn't it possible to detect by tibit · · Score: 1

      Well, there are imaging gamma ray space telescopes out there, so the imaging part is handled. If you had sufficiently strong terrestrial gamma source, you could image it. Such a source, if omnidirectional, would probably sterilize everything around it for many miles, though. You pretty much need an astronomical gamma ray source in order for a gamma ray telescope to pick it up :)

      Another important snag, as it turns out, is the atmospheric absorption: the half-length for Co60 gamma rays is 10 metres. So, for all intents and purposes, the atmosphere would completely shield anything extraterrestrial from the radiation of this Co60 source.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    33. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      It is interesting that it was lost to the point that they reported it to the media for help finding it, but then found by the roadside immediately after they pulled it out of it's radiation shielding.
       
      A few years ago a guy traveling home from a radiation treatment (prostate thing, not marrow irradiation) was pulled over after a radiation sensor detected his car and police were notified in Seattle along the I-5 corridor. Cobalt 60 might be detectable from space, or at least a low flying airplane with the correct hardware onboard.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    34. Re:isn't it possible to detect by physics101 · · Score: 1

      Depending on the solar cycle, in space,around the earth, one could detect about 10 heavy particles per second per cubic cm. I have no idea how it translates to a number of secondary gammas. This may look like a small fluence, but bear in mind that our imaginary detector has 3,5 m in diameter.

    35. Re: isn't it possible to detect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, if they haven't actually opened the 'pig' or shielded canister that looks helpfully like a car axle in this case (never seen one like that - perhaps they should look at the local wreckers) you'd need to be in the same room to get any reading depending on the type of shielding and thickness of course.

      IOW if they would open it after they realise that they would have no hope of lifting the container - them having opened it and handled the source are really speculation, probably to make the thieves turn themselves or the source in to the authorities.

    36. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's just half as much radioactive material. I'd say it's still as dangerous.

    37. Re:isn't it possible to detect by Zomalaja · · Score: 1

      Volatile is a term used to described substances that evaporate quickly at normal temperatures. Cobalt is a metal that melts at 1500 C, so it is not volatile at all unless you compare it to Tungsten..... Radionuclides with a short half life generally are more active as far as emissions go. From what I read, the thieves removed the Cobalt pellets from the device, so they at least were in close proximity to it. How fast they die / if they die depends on the level of contact as well as how old the Cobalt is.

  8. Evolution in action.... by chalsall · · Score: 3, Funny

    Title says it all.

    1. Re:Evolution in action.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Title says it all.

      Not if they have had a bunch of kids already. Evolution is getting rid of them before they reproduce, not depriving them of a ripe old age.

  9. Super Powers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who knows they might mutate and gain super powers.
    Here comes Taco Man to defeat the evil Gringos and pave the way for the Reconquista.

  10. Good, that makes sure they never steal again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject!

  11. radioactive markings by Danathar · · Score: 5, Funny

    On my lunch bag when I put it in the fridge at work I put

    "Strontium-90 - RADIOACTIVE" on one side

    The other I put

    "LIVE SPECIMEN - BIOHAZZARD"

    1. Re:radioactive markings by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you had Hot Pockets for lunch?

    2. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Way to make sure all your colleagues know what a dork you are...

    3. Re:radioactive markings by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Strontium-90 - RADIOACTIVE"

      "LIVE SPECIMEN - BIOHAZZARD"

      The hell kind of deli do you shop at?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its probably best to leave universal health signs of danger to universal health signs of danger. Its simply not safe to play around with these kinds of things.

    5. Re:radioactive markings by tibit · · Score: 1, Informative

      I don't know what effect would you possibly want to achieve. If someone was serious about it, you'd be in deep trouble. I'm sure there'd be disciplinary consequences for putting hazardous items in a food fridge. If you're, on the other hand, putting food into a hazardous items fridge, then there'll be Darwinian consequences.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    6. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The other I put

      "LIVE SPECIMEN - BIOHAZZARD"

      Was it Bo, or Luke?

    7. Re:radioactive markings by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

      Nice experiment. Which side of the bag is stolen the least often?

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    8. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that make people want to know what's living in there with the strontium-90?

    9. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. In an office this is good fun. Everybody knows this is obviously someones lunch with stickers on it.
      If you work in a laboratory where these type of materials may actually be handled it is of course stupid.

    10. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "BIOHAZZARD", eh? Something you got from Boss Hogg?

    11. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "BIOHAZZARD"

      "Yee haw!"

    12. Re:radioactive markings by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It must be the Church of the Children of Atom equivalent of kosher/halal.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:radioactive markings by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Bo, obviously. He just can't spell.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    14. Re:radioactive markings by istartedi · · Score: 1

      When I see a bag of radioactive or biologically hazardous material being stored improperly, I call the authorities.

      He where's Dan? I dunno. Some guys from Homeland Security took him away shortly after lunch.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    15. Re:radioactive markings by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Funny

      Both sides would have been stolen equally, since they would have been attached to each other.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    16. Re:radioactive markings by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      That's a bit vague. Could you specify who the specimen is from? Bo, Luke, Daisy, Uncle Jesse, Rosco, or Boss Hogg?

    17. Re:radioactive markings by hawguy · · Score: 1

      On my lunch bag when I put it in the fridge at work I put

      "Strontium-90 - RADIOACTIVE" on one side

      The other I put

      "LIVE SPECIMEN - BIOHAZZARD"

      I just write "Urine sample" on mine and no one touches it, not even the cleaning lady.

      Though I do get some funny looks when I start drinking the apple juice that I packed in a specimen cup.

    18. Re:radioactive markings by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That's why instead of poisoning the food, you put huge amounts of wasabi and hot sauce in it.

    19. Re:radioactive markings by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Do you spell biohazard correctly, or is that so when somebody claims you're scaring people you can say they just didn't read carefully?

    20. Re:radioactive markings by qazxswedc · · Score: 1

      So...now the thieves are the Dukes of Biohazzard?

    21. Re:radioactive markings by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      WOULD HAVE been stolen equally? Science without actual experiments is not science, Mr. String Theory!

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    22. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kind that sells sandwiches with cheese, apparently.

      Sr-90 is sometimes found in milk (less now than when they were testing bombs all the damn time) because the fallout from nuclear testing settled on grass, was eaten by cows, then was passed into the milk supply. And certain kinds of cheese still have live bacteria cultures in them. If they're made with milk that contains Sr-90, then you would indeed have a live specimen that contained Sr-90.

    23. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky you don't work with me. I'd swap your juice for a real urine sample one day. It'd be on youtube the next. :)

    24. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until someone reports you for terrorism. Then it'll stop being funny.

    25. Re:radioactive markings by tibit · · Score: 1

      You mean, the way I'd like it? Why, thank you!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    26. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Strontium-90 - RADIOACTIVE"

      "LIVE SPECIMEN - BIOHAZZARD"

      The hell kind of deli do you shop at?

      He gets to-go from the Boar's Nest, the only eating establishment in Hazzard county.

    27. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you had Hot Pockets for lunch?

      Talk about the makings for a 'dirty bomb'...yikes!

    28. Re:radioactive markings by Vegemite_Sandwich · · Score: 1

      Them Dad Durn Duke boys!!!

    29. Re:radioactive markings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "BIOHAZZARD"
      Which of the Dukes did you put in there?

  12. Poor bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure they committed a crime, but nobody deserves to die like that. My condolences to them and their families.

    1. Re:Poor bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which I why I avocate you paying for your share of all those in prison. I, very much, think they should die like that.

    2. Re:Poor bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they committed a crime, but nobody deserves to die like that. My condolences to them and their families.

      Sniff, sniff, waaah, those poor, poor men, all they did was stick a gun in someone's face then beat them for their own sadistic pleasure, the poor wee things..

    3. Re:Poor bastards by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      If they intentionally pry open a big heavy thick box covered in warning labels and radiation symbols and start making a Cobalt-60 sand castle, then YES THEY DESERVE TO DIE LIKE THAT.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  13. I'm getting a sneaking suspicion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that cobalt-60 is used in hospital radiotherapy machines.

  14. Darwin by ableeker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I nominate these guys for the Darwin award!

    1. Re:Darwin by Anon,+Not+Coward+D · · Score: 2

      we need to know if they already have children

      --
      Sometimes it's better not having signature
    2. Re:Darwin by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Being a criminal is not remotely justification for a Darwin Award.
      Being a criminal with really bad luck is not justification for a Darwin Award.

      I haven't seen the truck or the Cobalt container, but the only way these guys might warrant a Darwin Award is if they ignored flagrant radioactive warning labels.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it matter? They won't have any more.

    4. Re:Darwin by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      Have you read the Darwin awards? They seem to be a flimsy excuse to laugh at other people's tragedies, with a little bit of superiority thrown in for good measure. There's quite a bit of questionable entries in there. For example.... And that's even if you accept the idea that only people who are stupid because of heritable characteristics ever do dangerous, dumb things. Plus you kind of have to ignore a bunch of more recent evolutionary theory which suggests that individuals within a species dying or living comes down more to chance and doesn't really drive evolution gradually.

    5. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Regardless of recent rethinking on the theory, can you really say that an idiot lighting a cigarette after spraying gasoline all over himself is not incredibly stupid and unquestionably good that they were purged from the gene pool? And in this particular case can you really say that thieving morons pulling open a no-doubt thick container probably marked with the standard biohazard symbol wasn't also stupid and deserving of the award? Yes it is laughing at other people's tragedies. But I have not seen one entry there yet where the awarded person doesn't fully deserve to be laughed at for their stupidity. This politically correct "oh, so tragic :(" reaction to every death and accident is going to eventually result in more deaths. But no, do go on. Make yourself feel like the bigger person for "taking a stand". I learned about a term recently, called social justice warriors. It's a pretty apt description. Fight on soldier.

    6. Re:Darwin by tempestdata · · Score: 0

      I am sick and tired of this racism against Mexican and latin american people. I do not find your racist joke funny. It is also perpetuating a completely inaccurate stereotype. Google "Mexican fertility rate" and educate yourself.

      US Fertility Rate = 1.89 Births per woman
      Mexican Fertility Rate = 2.28 Births per woman

      US Life expectancy = 78.64 years
      Mexican Life expectancy = 76.89 years

      I am not Mexican or latin american. Mexico, and most of latin america, have a LOT of social, cultural and economic issues. But give them some respect, they aren't backward savages like most american's seem to believe.

      --
      - Tempestdata
    7. Re:Darwin by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      If they've already passed on their genes, then their deaths do not help the human race, so they are ineligible for a Darwin Award.

    8. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but your example is hardly questionable. The guy drank gasoline then lit a cigarette. Take the swig of gas, okay, whatever, you didn't realize it was gas, but surely you're recognize the smell after swigging and think "hmm, maybe an open flame right now is a bad idea"

    9. Re:Darwin by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Informative

      I nominate these guys for the Darwin award!

      These guys are amateurs compared to the Mexican scrappers who sold hospital equipment containing 6,000 pellets of cobalt-60 for scrap. The machinery was then processed into rebar which was in turn was used in god knows how many homes in Mexico and the USA as well as metal furniture that ended ups as far away as Canada. The Mexicans even found pellets of cobalt-60 embedded into the asphalt surface of roads in Sinaloa and 109 houses had to be torn down and disposed of as radioactive waste. All in all some 5000 metric tons of steel were contaminated ... as far as is known. According to a documentary I watched about this incident there is a good possibility that there are still contaminated houses and furniture out there. The incident only came to light when a truck with a load of contaminated rebar drove past a Los Alamos laboratories radiation checkpoint and set of a whole bunch of alarms. One person died of bone cancer, another 4 were injured and least 10 individuals received significant exposures and some scrapyard workers became sterile. There is also a good chance that many more people either will, or already have, developed cancer since it took about a year to discover this snafu and even longer to track down all the contaminated material already in use. This story made me think about how US Homeland security worries about 'dirty bombs'. The only thing that still amazes me about that particular contingency is that it hasn't happened yet because highly radioactive material is apparently very easy to come by. The Juarez incident caused radiation sensors to be installed at all major border crossings but one wonders if this has been extended to every single crossing along the US/Mexican border. Either way, I'd be worried.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    10. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not racism. It's stereotyping. And it's not a stereotype if it's true.

    11. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the fact that most of the people awarded already have kids, so they shouldn't even be eligible.

    12. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still never understood why "chance" was thrown out the window when it comes to evolution.
      There is more chance in surviving JUST BECAUSE OF CHANCE in a wild environment than there is your genes.
      It matters not that you could punch a tree to dust and stare things to death, a super volcano is still going to ruin your day hard.

      The whole "survival of the fittest" thing as well is complete nonsense, it is more a case of "survival of the luckiest" considering Earths horrific history. Fittest comes secondary to those that were lucky to survive not getting lava all over their fur, that can really ruin a good day man, have you seen lava in fur, that stuff does NOT come out.

      And people seriously think we are on a planet tuned for life. Just right in the Goldilocks zone. What utter nonsense. More so because it was thrown out when the habitable zones were re-checked with new data that put us right on the outside edge of it, our planet could have easily ended up like Mars if it was a few extra kilometres out.
      They'll not be saying it is tuned for life when the next supervolcano pops his top. It will be like a Pringles party, but with more death and less living.
      Once you pop, you just can't stop! I need to draw that. That would make a great wallpaper. Pringles Supervolcano coming to a theatre near you.

    13. Re:Darwin by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the truck or the Cobalt container, but the only way these guys might warrant a Darwin Award is if they ignored flagrant radioactive warning labels.

      I haven't seen the truck or the container either, but I would be very, very surprised if the container did *not* have flagrant radioactive warning labels.

    14. Re:Darwin by pezpunk · · Score: 0

      racism, ladies and gentlemen.

      --
      i could live a little longer in this prison
    15. Re:Darwin by cusco · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. If they've had one kid and died it's of considerably less negative impact on human evolution than if they had four kids and died.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    16. Re:Darwin by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      Therefore it must be false. QED

    17. Re:Darwin by plebeian · · Score: 1

      As if, I suppose you are now going to tell me that the posts to damnyouautocorrect are fake.

      --
      "I myself am made entirely of flaws, stitched together with good intentions."
    18. Re:Darwin by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      But give them some respect, they aren't backward savages like most american's seem to believe.

      Or, to phrase it somewhat differently, they're hardly any more backward and savage than most americans.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    19. Re:Darwin by Megane · · Score: 1

      That's why metal recycling places in the US have radiation detectors at the entrance.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    20. Re:Darwin by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Regardless of recent rethinking on the theory, can you really say that an idiot lighting a cigarette after spraying gasoline all over himself is not incredibly stupid and unquestionably good that they were purged from the gene pool?

      "unquestionably good" is a hyperbole no matter the context. In this specific case, I don't think it's even merely good. I doubt he was significantly dumber than the average gene pool, thus we gain no net advancement. He may have reproduced already. We only know how he died, not what he may have contributed to humanity.

      More than that, for fucks sake, NO, one stupid act does not make one stupid. Raise your hand if you haven't almost accidentally killed yourself ever. If you're raising your hand, you're probably a boring person.

    21. Re:Darwin by interkin3tic · · Score: 0

      This politically correct "oh, so tragic :(" reaction to every death and accident is going to eventually result in more deaths. But no, do go on. Make yourself feel like the bigger person for "taking a stand". I learned about a term recently, called social justice warriors. It's a pretty apt description. Fight on soldier.

      Ah, I missed the ad-homenim attack. Nice.

    22. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold down your pessimism! They might yet be alive... in sheer sheer agony...

    23. Re:Darwin by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the case where hobos found a radiation device at an abandoned hospital and proceeded to force the thing open and smear the radioactive goop on their bodies in decorative patterns.

      Remember, kids: If it glows in daylight, STAY THE HELL AWAY.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    24. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you have to account for the fact that a large portion of the birthrate in the US is from the immigrants from Latin America...

      I'm not sure if pointing that makes me racist

    25. Re:Darwin by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Dying because you smoked a cigarette after gulping down some gasoline sounds like it fits the Darwin awards criteria pretty well: removing yourself from the gene pool due to your own stupidity.

      You misunderstand evolution by natural selection, just like many other people. Nobody who knows what they're talking about, from Darwin to now, ever proposed that only organisms who are not fit die. Natural selection requires only that organisms that successful reproduction be correlated with certain heritable features. Of course most survival or death is random. But not all of it. The second part is the magic.

    26. Re:Darwin by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Have you read the Darwin awards? They seem to be a flimsy excuse to laugh at other people's tragedies, with a little bit of superiority thrown in for good measure. There's quite a bit of questionable entries in there. For example.... And that's even if you accept the idea that only people who are stupid because of heritable characteristics ever do dangerous, dumb things. Plus you kind of have to ignore a bunch of more recent evolutionary theory which suggests that individuals within a species dying or living comes down more to chance and doesn't really drive evolution gradually.

      Does that stick interfere much with sitting? Seriously.

      The entire basis of humour is misfortune, either through the actions of others, the environment, or self-inflicted. Try to think of a joke (other than puns, which IMHO don't count) that doesn't involve something bad / embarrassing happening to someone. They are out there, I am sure, but they aren't the ones people typically remember...or elicit more than a brief chuckle. The Darwin Awards are simply a tongue-in-cheek collection of stories regarding one subset of (admittedly darkly) comedic circumstances. We laugh, because otherwise we'd spend all our time crying.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    27. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The evidence is to the contrary. QED.

    28. Re:Darwin by Solandri · · Score: 1

      These guys are amateurs compared to the Mexican scrappers who sold hospital equipment containing 6,000 pellets of cobalt-60 for scrap. The machinery was then processed into rebar which was in turn was used in god knows how many homes in Mexico and the USA as well as metal furniture that ended ups as far away as Canada. [...] One person died of bone cancer, another 4 were injured and least 10 individuals received significant exposures and some scrapyard workers became sterile. There is also a good chance that many more people either will, or already have, developed cancer since it took about a year to discover this snafu and even longer to track down all the contaminated material already in use. This story made me think about how US Homeland security worries about 'dirty bombs'.

      Thus the truism, never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to stupidity or circumstance. While the threat of terrorism is real, it is so small compared to random acts of stupidity that it's hardly worth getting all worked up over it like we have.

    29. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke had to do with the young age, not the average births per woman or life expectancy. But now we are educated on some entirely unrelated statistics. Thanks.

    30. Re:Darwin by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      They're Mexican and older then 14. So yes, they have children.

      And you are officially racist. It is not okay to say things like this about Mexicans or Chinese people, despite the odd acceptance of such racism in America today.

      News stories mentioning Mexicans do not automatically warrant jokes about refried beans, burritos, picking lettuce, border-jumping or fence climbing, being lazy, having 20 kids, or being illegal immigrants. Nor do stories about Chinese people mean it is okay to automatically say something irrelevant about rice, or talk with an offensive "Chinese" accent. If you see something written about an African-American do you think it is okay bring out the same tired old watermelon, fried chicken, barbecue, sambo, welfare comments? That is wrong, and the crap white people say about Mexicans and Chinese is just as bad, even if you can usually get away with it. (And no, it is not okay to call all people of Asian descent Chinese. Everyone knows you are not really joking, even when you say you are.)

      Yeah, I'm white, American, and male, and I'm tired of people who look and talk like me making me look bad in the eyes of everyone else. They know we're not all bad, but the ignorance that goes hand in hand with white racist elitism still makes me sick. If you want to deride someone, don't be lazy -- at least have a reason and make it personal, not based on flawed stereotypes. Otherwise shut the fuck up.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    31. Re:Darwin by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Way to defend racism anonymously. How typical.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    32. Re:Darwin by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      I don't get this birthrate talk. Is having a lower birthrate indicative of a superior race, society, culture or country? If it were, it would mean the societies that became extinct the quickest were the greatest, no? And I have noticed that family sizes in the United States were once much higher. Does moving away from something that helped makes us great now make us greater? Is China's one child policy actually a good idea? People here in the US (and I mean white people) love to talk about the high perceived birthrate among Mexicans and welfare-dependent (a euphemism, usually meaning black) Americans, and consider it a problem. But when my white great grandparents were having 13-child families on their farms from 1900 to 1925, that was good for America? Does that make "the greatest generation" "the worst generation?"

      Get over the racism and stereotypes, folks. It all makes no sense and makes the promoters look utterly stupid.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    33. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They seem to be a flimsy excuse to laugh at other people's tragedies, with a little bit of superiority thrown in for good measure.

      We are all dead in the long run, may as well have some fun when we're here.

    34. Re:Darwin by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      But I like my lightbulbs!

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    35. Re:Darwin by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      s/glows/glows without a power source/g

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    36. Re:Darwin by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Isn't radioactive decay a power source?

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    37. Re:Darwin by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      It can be, but in both the original article and the article I linked to, the radioactive material in question was not powering anything.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    38. Re:Darwin by eyenot · · Score: 1

      And I'm tired of the tired old bullshit about all white people being racists. I'm white -- did I pipe in with racist comments about the Mexicans who are dying (or dead) of radiation poisoning because they stole radioactive samples and are too stupid to read the boxes warning them there's radiation inside? Noooooo!

      So you are also an official racist!

      God, I get so sick of this anti-white liberal bullshit act, always running off at the mouth like all white people deserve to be collectively punished, attempting to justify anti-white racism with every dribbled epithet. It's becoming more and more apparent every day that "anti-racist" is really a code-word for anti-white.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    39. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I nominate these guys for the Darwin award!

      Seconded. Very we'll deserved.

    40. Re:Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before this it was several tambos of cianide or arsenic they *lost* in the same area.

    41. Re:Darwin by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

      Bahahaha! your argument would have stood a chance if not for the hilarious link. Bender says it's best, humans are meatbags, soft and squishy. sure to people who know the meatbags their death would be sad, but if you start thinking about every single death that way you're going to be depressed and crying for the rest of your life. face facts, people die, it's inevitable, some people die in funny ways, is it wrong to admire the humor in someone's passing? or the poetic justice? if I die in a funny way I really hope everyone gets at least a giggle out of it.

  15. Was the truck flagged with radiation placards? by cyn1c77 · · Score: 0

    If so, they deserve to die.

    1. Re:Was the truck flagged with radiation placards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it wasn't the drivers and the company where not following the road code, and should be prosecuted.

    2. Re:Was the truck flagged with radiation placards? by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      If so, they deserve to die.

    3. Re:Was the truck flagged with radiation placards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a heartless, stupid asshole.

    4. Re:Was the truck flagged with radiation placards? by deviated_prevert · · Score: 1

      You're a heartless, stupid asshole.

      Correction, most likely an arm chair redneck wantabee trolling away on slashdot. I am certain if this was the 1950's they would be using terms like "wetbacks". Bigotry and racism is alive and obvious in the US and elsewhere. Certainly these crooks were stupid to ignore the warnings and open the containers IF THE PACKAGE WAS EVEN MARKED.

      I suspect that the containers were not even marked and neither was the truck. In Mexico the transport company and shipper most likely avoided some tariff or transport inspection fee by shipping the containers in an insecure and unmarked way. In most countries the shipment of radioactive materials requires some permits and source to destination confirmation of shipment.

      --
      This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
  16. hmmm... by no-body · · Score: 1

    I wonder, in your car, having some properly shielded container looking precious with that kind of stuff in it would take care of car thieves for good?

    1. Re:hmmm... by VIPERsssss · · Score: 1

      Too much risk for collateral damage. I seem to remember a story about an entire village getting contaminated by cobalt from a scrap X-Ray machine. I'll be damned if I'm going to search for the article, though.

      --
      We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.
    2. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it this one? Goiânia_accident.

    3. Re:hmmm... by the_other_chewey · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here you go: The Goiânia accident.

      It wasn't an X-ray machine though, but a device for radiotherapy.
      Fortunately, X-ray machines are harmless when powered down.

    4. Re:hmmm... by Xylaan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unfortunately, it's happened enough that it's sadly hard to narrow down. Though if I had to guess, you were originally referring to this one.

    5. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The source in the incident you are probably thinking about was cesium chloride, which is much easier to spread. I assume the cobalt sources are metallic.

    6. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to do that with trapped chests in Ultima Online. Thieves would snoop my inventory and kill themselves when they opened the container.

    7. Re:hmmm... by jafac · · Score: 5, Informative

      Goiana was Cesium-137.

      There have been several incidents with Cobalt-60 sources, including one in 2010 in Dehli, India, and another in 2000, in Thailand. And in some cases, the radioactive material has ended up being recycled into new products; for example - incidents which actually happened: water-dishes for pets, and belt-buckles sold from discount websites. In these cases, the radioactivity was detected by random spot-checks. There are probably products out there that have incorporated recycled radioactive substances, which made it through spot-checks and are sitting in people's homes, making them sick - and there is no way for us to know.

      With regard to the cobalt 60 source: Wikipedia says it was 111 Tbq.
      "Example: a 60Co source with an activity of 2.8 GBq, which is equivalent to 60 g of pure 60Co, generates a dose of 1 mSv at one meter distance within one hour."

      A 1 Sv dose in 1 hour, is lethal.

      Extrapolating 111 TBq to 2.8 GBq; (111,000/2.8 = 39,642 ...); so multiply 1 mSv by that, and you get 39.6 Sv per hour.

      If they took it out of it's casing, they'd receive a lethal dose of radiation in less than 2 minutes. (depending on how close they stayed, and how long they stayed near it). Staying at least 400 cm away, would mitigate much of the beta particles, but not the gamma rays. Gamma rays are attenuated by the inverse square law, like any radiant energy. So distance is also your friend, but better still, an inch or so of lead.

      They would not start feeling symptoms, until an hour or two later. Dizzyness, headache, nausea, vomiting. Later - worse symptoms appear. It will probably take a few days for them to die, and they may seek medical treatment, which may save them, depending on how long they were in close proximity to the unshielded source.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    8. Re:hmmm... by VIPERsssss · · Score: 1

      That's it.

      --
      We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.
    9. Re:hmmm... by VIPERsssss · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that's the one. Say "Hi" to the NSA for me. ;)

      --
      We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.
    10. Re:hmmm... by VIPERsssss · · Score: 1

      Yep. Thank you, sir or madam.

      --
      We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.
    11. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of 500+ posts this is literally the only one worth reading. Thanks for working out what I have been trying (and failing) to do for the last 5 mins

    12. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > better still, an inch or so of lead.

      depends. An old friend worked with medical radio-iodine, which emits high energy gammas. Part of her job was introducing new medical staff to the procedures. She would bring in the standard lead drapes and a Geiger counter and ask them all if they understood radiation precautions. They would of course say yes; she was just a little old lady (her own description), after all, and they were Doctors and Nurses.

      She'd hold up the Geiger counter near the patient who had taken the radio-iodine dose, and the Geiger counter would click away steadily.

      Then she'd put the lead drape in between patient and Geiger counter -- and the counter would roar.

      Then she'd smile and say:

      "... I know you all understand secondary radiation, and how gamma rays mostly go straight through tissue like you and me without interacting, but if they hit a really dense material like these lead drapes, they knock off a huge number of electrons that become charged particles that will interact far more readily with tissue, that's one of the reasons we call it ionizing radiation.

      "So who wants a drape?"

    13. Re:hmmm... by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Bremsstrahlung is also a huge deal when working with beta-decaying isotopes or isotopes with beta-decaying daughter isotopes (like the medically used radioiodines). A thin enough lead shield will quickly slow the beta particles and release a huge amount of X-rays. Biological assays that use beta-decaying isotopes like P-32 have to use plexiglass or some other low-density material to block the betas but not irradiate the user with X-rays.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  17. I am reminded of the final scene in by mark_reh · · Score: 2

    "Kiss Me Deadly".

    1. Re:I am reminded of the final scene in by swb · · Score: 2

      ...or several of the scenes in Repo Man!

    2. Re:I am reminded of the final scene in by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

      Bossest. Answering machine. Ever.

      .

    3. Re:I am reminded of the final scene in by JeanCroix · · Score: 1

      "The life of a violent Mexican carjacker is ALWAYS intense."

    4. Re:I am reminded of the final scene in by swb · · Score: 2

      It MUST have been the "goddamn, dipshit, gypsy-dildo" Rodriguez brothers!

    5. Re:I am reminded of the final scene in by TheloniousToady · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there was a little radiation symbol hanging from the rear-view mirror? "Find one in every car. You'll see."

  18. Could Be Worse by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    They could have lived long enough to sell the material to someone nefarious.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Could Be Worse by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      That's not really a transaction that you set up on one day's notice.

      "Hey. I heard that you were a terrorist and I just wanted to give you a call and offer you some radioactive material that I happened to get my hands on. So is that something you would be interested in?"

    2. Re:Could Be Worse by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Right, because it's not like there's a plethora of criminal organizations in Mexico already, that they could have walked the material to. No drug cartels, no corrupt local officials, nope, none, nada.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Could Be Worse by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Despite what your television tells you everyone that is a criminal isn't automatically interested in radioactive material. What the fuck do you think a "corrupt local official" would do with some black market medical grade radioactive material?

    4. Re:Could Be Worse by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      But which of them would want to make a dirty bomb? Not really helpful for a drug cartel or corrupt official - only a terrorist wanting to make an area uninhabitable.

    5. Re:Could Be Worse by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Or collect ransom, based on the threat of making an area uninhabitable.

    6. Re:Could Be Worse by cusco · · Score: 1

      Good if they had, since now you're likely to see the death toll among the nefarious rise as well. They don't normally become thieves or terrorists because they got bored being rocket scientists.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    7. Re:Could Be Worse by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Much worse would've been opening up the container and distributing the cobalt-60 to friends and relatives as a sort of precious mineral. Since they had no idea what they were dealing with, I doubt they'd have any idea of how to actual sell it. You can't just walk over to a terrorist group's front yard and say "I got some cobalt-60 for sale, any takers?"

    8. Re:Could Be Worse by jafac · · Score: 1

      You can probably unload it on Silk Road. :)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    9. Re:Could Be Worse by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Much worse would've been opening up the container and distributing the cobalt-60 to friends and relatives as a sort of precious mineral. Since they had no idea what they were dealing with, I doubt they'd have any idea of how to actual sell it. You can't just walk over to a terrorist group's front yard and say "I got some cobalt-60 for sale, any takers?"

      If the situation is indeed "two dumb criminals knock over the wrong armored truck," then yea.

      However, it's equally plausible that the situation was "two dumb farmers forced by the Zeta cartel to knock over an armored truck, started getting sick while taking the loot back, then dropped it and ran into the desert."

      We don't have enough facts about this story to reach a logical conclusion.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    10. Re:Could Be Worse by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Good if they had, since now you're likely to see the death toll among the nefarious rise as well. They don't normally become thieves or terrorists because they got bored being rocket scientists.

      Sure, and you don't get to be as large and powerful as the drug cartels by being idiots.

      You employ idiots, and make them do all the dangerous, stupid work... like stealing radioactive material.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    11. Re:Could Be Worse by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You're talking about people who, regularly, kidnap whole busloads of people, brutally torture them, then leave the mutilated corpses on public display.

      Do you really think monsters like that wouldn't be able to find a use for a dirty bomb?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    12. Re:Could Be Worse by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Ransom some hostages, try and sell it to terrorist groups, use it as leverage against other politicians, use it to build a dirty bomb and hold an entire population hostage, sell it to their buddies in the cartel, or one of the roving militias...

      Just because you failed to think of any possible circumstances doesn't mean there aren't any.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    13. Re:Could Be Worse by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Because none of those are realistic. What is the point of risking poisoning yourself to ransom hostages with radiation? A gun works much better.

      Leverage as what? A threat? Again- a gun is more effective.

      Who wants to hold a population hostage? And who thinks a bit of medical grade radiation will help them do so?

      Dirty bombs are mostly a myth. Anyone that would want to use one would get much more effective use out of a conventional bomb. Plus it's a lot easier to obtain and has less personal risk. I mean they could kill everyone that went into the bathroom where they hid the material. Or they could blow up the whole building. You might find radiation scary but explosions are far more devastating than a small amount of radiation plus way easier to achieve.

    14. Re:Could Be Worse by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really fit in with their typical evilness. The kidnapping and torture is to scare their enemies and would-be enemies. A dirty bomb would be to attack any area you have no interest in ever going.

    15. Re:Could Be Worse by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I think the threat of using a dirty bomb is more effective than actually deploying it; i.e., "Fuck with us again, and we'll irradiate everything you ever cared about, Federales."

      Sure, an unlikely circumstance, but not impossible.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    16. Re:Could Be Worse by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Dirty bombs are mostly a myth. Anyone that would want to use one would get much more effective use out of a conventional bomb.

      Depends on what your intended use is. If you just want to demolish a building, a regular bomb works fine.

      If you want to terrorize a large number of people, a simple bomb won't do the job. Boom. Ok, that's done. Fix things up and move on. But a dirty bomb -- that leaves behind a silent source of slow painful death that the common person has no way of detecting and has been given every reason to fear. That fear comes from people telling him that "nuclear power is bad and will make you glow if a power station is built in your community", all the way down to "if you irradiate your foodstuffs to preserve them the food will become radioactive and you'll glow at night if you eat it."

      There is a reason why medical equipment manufacturers renamed the process MRI when it is basically NMR. "Nuclear magnetic resonance? I ain't getting into one of those things! Oh, just magnetic resonance? That's ok. I got fridge magnets, I know that's safe."

      You might find radiation scary but explosions are far more devastating than a small amount of radiation plus way easier to achieve.

      For a limited definition of "devastating", perhaps. Blow up a building and you've blown up a building which can be rebuilt. Set off a dirty bomb and watch an entire city flee in panic. That's a much larger scale of devastation than just demolishing a building.

    17. Re:Could Be Worse by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      No, a dirty bomb produces far less actual terror because once it was deployed its incredibly small area of affect would be cleaned up and people would realise that it is not a big threat. The only people that find a "dirty bomb" a good terror device are western governments. A good way to keep their populations terrorised that is.

      Bringing a building down is much more effective. Mostly because it is actually achievable unlike a dirty bomb. Poisoning people is not that difficult; you do not need radiation for it. It is just much easier and more effective to blow them up.

  19. They will, without a doubt, die. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Everyone* will, without a doubt, die.

    Except maybe Sergey Brin.

  20. Who Was in Charge of Security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft?

  21. News Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Every one of us will, without a doubt, die.

  22. "They will, without a doubt, die." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a confirmation that the undead exist and after being exposed to Cobalt-60 you lose all your chances to turn undead?
    Because AFAIK, every one of us - without a doubt - will die.

    1. Re:"They will, without a doubt, die." by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's too bad they found that cobalt. If not, they would have lived forever!

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:"They will, without a doubt, die." by Quila · · Score: 4, Informative

      They probably don't. They felt nausea after first handling it, then after that passed they felt fine. They will continue to feel fine for maybe one to three days during what is called the "walking ghost" phase, after which their bodies will start shutting down and they die a very messy and painful death.

    3. Re:"They will, without a doubt, die." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will be sent to live in Detroit?

    4. Re:"They will, without a doubt, die." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      POOF! How much mylar would you need on you to neutralize such radiations?

  23. What was the make and model of the get away car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    By any chance was it a 1964 Chevy Malibu?

  24. OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    I am going to stencil "Cobalt-60" on every thing that I own that could be of interest to the thieves.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      You will be a hit with the TSA.

    2. Re:OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      And stencil your Cobalt-60 canister "Delicious cupcakes." You know, all this stenciling is making me hungry. I could sure go for some delicious cupcakes.... Uh oh.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just make sure to keep your kids illiterate.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by MikeTheGreat · · Score: 1

      Is that actually going to help? Isn't the whole problem that the thieves didn't understand what they'd stolen? (I guess you better make sure you stencil all sorts of radioactive/biohazard/warning signs over the stuff, too) (Also - please make sure to mention this post 6 months from now when you AskSlashdot "Why don't women want to date me after the first time that I bring them back to my place?")

    5. Re:OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Especially if he writes it on his crotch

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    6. Re:OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      In Cobalt-60

    7. Re:OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might also be hit with the TSA.

    8. Re:OK. This is it. Making stencils right now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer yellow cake.

  25. Too much TV? by Max+Threshold · · Score: 0

    Are you sure about that? We can identify radiation sources in the sky with pinpoint accuracy. It seems unlikely that we don't have radio telescopes pointed in the other direction, considering the geopolitical importance of nuclear materials.

    1. Re:Too much TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We can identify radiation sources in the sky with pinpoint accuracy.

      Yeah, multiple times what the sun will put out in its lifetime against the vast vacuum of cold space. Aside from that you mostly get infrared, radio and visible light. All three useless in this case given the background of where you're looking for it. So, this is a little different. And even at that there are forms of radiation we have a very hard time detecting the origins of with any real accuracy. If you want to dispute this I'll leave it to you to provide the proof.

    2. Re:Too much TV? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      As dangerous as these small pellets are if you handle them, they are putting out such a tiny fraction of the radiation of a star it's (not even) noise. You have to be within a few feet of this Cobalt to get a lethal dose, but a big supernova could fry the whole planet if it occurs in the same arm of our galaxy
       

    3. Re:Too much TV? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      And there's a reason we use space telescopes to watch the sky in X-rays and gamma-rays. That's because they don't travel far in the atmosphere.

  26. Natural Consequenses by rjune · · Score: 1

    Sometimes thieves strike it big and sometimes they get caught, and sometimes they wind up dead. Hopefully they won't suffer for too long.

    1. Re:Natural Consequenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes thieves strike it big and sometimes they get caught, and sometimes they wind up dead. Hopefully they won't suffer for too long.

      Another episode of "1000 Ways to Die!"

  27. Depends on exposure by e3m4n · · Score: 1

    All too aware of Cobalt -60. Iron 59 will undergo neutron proton reaction and become cobalt 60. It's the most common isotope of concern in reactor compartments. It has a long half life but it's decay produces a gamma of 7 MeV (mega electron volts).

    If this is really source material for X-ray equipment, then why wasn't it well marked and locked in a relatively difficult container requiring a blow torch to cut through?

    1. Re:Depends on exposure by koan · · Score: 1

      Mexico... that's why.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    2. Re:Depends on exposure by tibit · · Score: 1

      Because you'd contaminate everything and their mother trying to open the damn container?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    3. Re:Depends on exposure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was in a locked container but the combination was 1234.

    4. Re:Depends on exposure by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It was in a locked container but the combination was 1234.

      No, no, this was radioactive - 0000000.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  28. Re:How to explain minimum wage hikes to an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is basic supply-demand curve dynamics

    This isn't difficult stuff; If a job or task produces $8/hr output, why the fuck would a company pay someone $10/hr to do it? Answer: They won't.

    Furthermore, who is to say that because a job or task doesn't produce $10/hr in output that job or task isn't a perfectly valid and useful job? ...ohh, right, the same government who says that your healthcare plan isn't good enough. Motherfuckers.

  29. "They will, without a doubt, die." by bob_super · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The difference with about 100 Americans on the road today, is that at least they know it in advance.

  30. I'm afraid you've been misinformed. by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Ted Nugent disagrees.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:I'm afraid you've been misinformed. by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Have you *seen* Ted Nugent lately? He's dead already.

  31. It happens sometimes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Whatcha got in the trunk?"

    "Oh, you don't want to look in there."

  32. Re:What was the make and model of the get away car by retchdog · · Score: 1

    Best damn car on the lot.

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  33. CBLI Candidates by PaddyM · · Score: 1

    I know Cleveland BioLabs is working on bacteria which impact acute radiation sickness. Would be interesting if they could try it on these thieves if they would turn themselves in.

    *Disclaimer* I own CBLI stock and would obvioiusly like their stock to rise, but more importantly would like them to succeed as risks to radiation exposure from old nuclear power plants grows.

  34. Laugh by koan · · Score: 1

    But now there's an international news story about cobalt-60, how deadly it is, and how amazingly simple it is to steal from Mexico.
    So we can expect a dirty bomb any minute now.

    Thanks MSM!!!!

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Laugh by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      But now there's an international news story about cobalt-60, how deadly it is, and how amazingly simple it is to steal from Mexico.
      So we can expect a dirty bomb any minute now.

      Thanks MSM!!!!

      Would you rather be kept in the dark about government incompetence so that no one has reason to demand it be corrected? Not only will this news hopefully cause pressure within Mexico to fix the problem, but it will cause pressure from other countries to ensure that private facilities better secure radioactive materials.

      Additionally, during the manhunt for the missing material, it was important to get the message out to warn people and also to hopefully let the criminals know what they stole before something like, well, this happened.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:Laugh by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      At least he didn't call them the "Lamestream Media"

  35. Time for a Repo Man sequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Machete 3 - Repo'death'ed starring Danny Trejo Estevez ...or Repo Man 2 - Dose Dos Muerte!

  36. tragic lack of prevention by nimbius · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the punishment is certainly dire, but mexicos lack of preventative efforts should be called into question. Was the vehicle marked as carrying radioactive cargo? why was there a layover of such dangerous material? were there warnings in multiple languages? pictographs from local health and safety agencies are surely readily available. the GHS is surely used in Mexico
    https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/ghs.html
    two people are dead and numerous others exposed because they either did not know what the truck contained, or could not read the ample warnings. Mexico has a 93% literacy rate. there is no excuse for this accident.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:tragic lack of prevention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      93%? Is that true? Man, the USA has a lot of work to do.

    2. Re:tragic lack of prevention by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Informative
      The US does the same thing. When nuclear material gets shipped across the US it is in unmarked, locked trucks (although I am sure the shipment itself if liberaly marked). Of course, these are government shipments and have heavily armed escorts, in unmarked vehicles as well. You don't want to advertise the fact you are carrying radioactive cargo, both for security and NIMBY reasons. At least, this is what I have been told by my father's cousin, who did security for both nuclear shipments and nuclear sites for the DOE for a number of years (and was even a rangemaster for them at one time-yes, even the DOE has their own firing ranges)

      In this particular case, and especially given the amount of crime in Mexico, it does not surprise me that the truck would be unmarked. And it doesn't really matter if the cargo is marked: carjackers aren't going to rob you at gunpoint and beat you up then take the time to look at the cargo and see if it is worth stealing. They are just going to drive off. I am surprised that the hospital didn't at least hire a security service to escort the shipment; I would assume even(maybe even especially) in Mexico contractable security services are common. Maybe they just aren't trustworthy or capabale enough?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:tragic lack of prevention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've passed trucks in the US with radioactive placards displayed and hauling large cylinder containers with the radioactive trefoil symbol on them. Here's a couple of my own pictures:

      http://imgur.com/B59Z9e5

      http://imgur.com/WC2GMGK

      Maybe it depends on the material?

    4. Re:tragic lack of prevention by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

      Maybe the carjackers were the security service.

    5. Re:tragic lack of prevention by MyHair · · Score: 1

      USDOT requires hazardous materials being transported to be marked. One of many reasons is that if there is an accident first responders are alerted to the presences of hazardous material and can take the correct action. For example, you don't want to hose down a shipment of alkali metals with water if the container catches fire. I used to audit hazmat paperwork for aircraft and trucks. I don't recall the amounts, but radioactive materials had to be declared, and there were handling restrictions and limits on the amounts.

      I find it somewhat unlikely that there are trucks full of radioactive stuff secretly roving unmarked about the U.S. streets.

      OTOH, I know nothing about Mexico's hazmat regulations.

    6. Re:tragic lack of prevention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shipments you are referring to are special nuclear material shipments, that require special escorts. Although DOE has its own rules vs the NRC, they are similar and both follow DOT regulations.

      http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part073/part073-0037.html

      This shipment is different, most radioactive shipment conveyances are unmarked. It takes a dose rate of 10 mrem/hour at one meter, 200 mrem/hour on contact to trigger radioactive placarding. If the cobalt was sufficiently shielded, no markings are required on the outside of the truck (at least in the USA).

      Although, it probably was a RAMQC shipment, which would demand more controls than normal.

      http://www.nrc.gov/security/byproduct/public-meeting.html

      Source: This is what I do for a living.

    7. Re:tragic lack of prevention by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Ah, some of the stuff is coming back to me now. I audited declarations and filled out Form 390 Part A'a and Part B's and ensured dangerous goods were loaded safely. For example, you can't put too much dry ice on a plane lest it suffocate the pilots, and really we kept it out of the main cabin, anyway. Some classes of goods couldn't be placed near others, and there were limits on amounts per vehicle.

      It seems like there were three Radioactive classifications, and we didn't transport the most intense one. I don't think it was required to keep the radioactive stuff away from the pilots, but we did it anyway because pilots are whiny pansies. Same with infectious agents.

      It's all in Title 49 CFR for U.S. domestic transport, and IATA publishes international regulations.

      But that was over 20 years ago I did this stuff.

    8. Re:tragic lack of prevention by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Technically the US Department of Transportation requires external markings in the form of placards on the exterior of the vehicle transporting the material. However, unlike the actual container, the placard is not required to say anything other than "Class 7 Radioactive Material", no specific activity, no quantity, no nothing. DOE material can side-step some of those labeling requirements via DOD regulations. Source: HAZMAT/HAZCOM training about three years ago.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    9. Re:tragic lack of prevention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      93%? Is that true?

      Unfortunately, quite probably yes.

      Man, the USA has a lot of work to do.

      Indeed. It is a lot later than you think...

    10. Re:tragic lack of prevention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe the hospital just can't afford it.

    11. Re:tragic lack of prevention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every fucking US government department has their own fucking SWAT team these days. The Dept of Ed uses theirs on student loan defaulters or whoever happens to be at the address the student lived at 10 years earlier.

  37. Thieves Who Stole Cobalt-60 ... by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

    cured their cancer and save hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills.

  38. Or mutate into Chupacabra! by CQDX · · Score: 1

    Think X-Files did a take on this but it was fungal infection instead of radiation

    1. Re:Or mutate into Chupacabra! by plopez · · Score: 2
      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  39. We could market this... by DeTech · · Score: 2

    The all new 2015 Toyota Camry with nuclear anti-theft aka pandora's box protection (pbp).

  40. Natural consequences by kb1cvh · · Score: 1

    Physics pays no favorites.
    Nature is not a friend.

    Perhaps others will learn by their mistake.

    Unfortunate, but I've little sympathy for them. I am sorry for their families and hope they don't contaminate them.

    --
    Peter AI6PG
  41. Absolutely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too furiously ignore all risks that have a lower death rate than highway traffic.

    Trampolines? IGNORE RISK!
    Asteroids? The same!
    Biking without helmet? I don't need no stinkin' helmet!
    Sharks? Harmless!
    Shady part of town during a blackout? Nice place for a stroll!

  42. "than", NOT "then" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You really shouldn't be talking about stupidity.

    1. Re:"than", NOT "then" by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      You missed the capitalization and didn't use proper punctuation in your comment, so you really shouldn't be telling other people when they should be talking about stupidity. But at least you were lame enough to flame anonymously, loser.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  43. They were stupid.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were stupid - so they died. That is the way. And it is good.

  44. Any chance this is a ploy? by Aleph_Zarro · · Score: 1

    Two guys showing up at a hospital asking for radiation treatments are pretty easy to find.

    1. Re:Any chance this is a ploy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two guys showing up at a hospital asking for radiation treatments are pretty easy to find.

      Yes, highly probable in my estimation.

  45. To give the theives credit... by NanotechLobster · · Score: 1

    This could have been a major heist if they had pulled it off. That would have been a lot of moolah for them for sure along with the kind of lasting infamy they make movies about!... What? They are an instant aesop: Dead men walking, killed by the very treasure they coveted. To ridicule at this point is almost literally beating a dead horse... or theif in this case.

  46. DYI Dirty Bomb? by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    Who needs explosives, for a few weeks at least they can just mix in with crowds and radiate them....

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:DYI Dirty Bomb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Radiation isn't contagious. They would have had to take some with them.

  47. Would have been better by dale.furno · · Score: 1

    If they had strapped it to a quadcopter and flew it to the homes of rival cartel members.

  48. They will, without a doubt, die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of spiders, in Mexico...

  49. As if by wganz · · Score: 1

    it was a 'bad thing'.

  50. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didnt know slashdot had so many racist tards...

    "Refried beaners, mexicans over 14 of course they have children" :/

    Come on I thought we in the tech world are smarter than the lowest common denominator of our society aka trailer trash neo Nazis.

    Do the thieves deserve death? Maybe, but not by the slow and agonizing way that they will be facing..

    1. Re:wow by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

      Dude, having been in the business for over 30 years, I can tell you... the tech world *IS* the lowest common denominator of our society.

      Seriously, you think having code monkey skills make one empathetic, rational, or kind? Guess again.

  51. nice to see them die.. by schlachter · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see these armed thugs die.
    If only all such cases could end this way.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  52. Tijuana by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    A worse punishment would be for them to have to live the rest of their lives in Tijuana. I'd say they got off easy.

  53. Give a man a fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and he will be warm for the night. Give him Cobalt-60, and he will glow the rest of his life!

    1. Re:Give a man a fire by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      If he doesn't die soon he'll stop glowing. Colbalt-60 has a half life of a little over 5 years

  54. it doesn't have to be painful and horrible... by schlachter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they have guns right? It's up to them how painful and horrible it is.
    it can be quick and painless if they like.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    1. Re:it doesn't have to be painful and horrible... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      they have guns right? It's up to them how painful and horrible it is.
      it can be quick and painless if they like.

      Being shot can be quick, but not painless.

      It's not like in the movies, a person who's been fatally shot will continue to flap about and scream if they're still capable of it. This can go on for as long as it takes them to bleed out. So if you're going to use a gun as a method of suicide, be god damn accurate about it and you'll experience only a few minutes of pain. Personally I'd rather just shoot about $300 of heroin up my arm, I'd be out before I realised I'd OD'd but where in Mexico are they going to get drugs.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  55. Re:How to explain minimum wage hikes to an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It gets a bit more complicated when you consider that all minimum wage labor is being subsidized by the government through public transit, housing subsidies, food stamps, and a myriad of other government programs -- not to mention private charity.

    Many people are willing to pay $60/month to take a bus to their minimum wage job, but do you think the same people would be willing to walk 1.5 hours each way or pay $20/day for transit? I doubt it. These subsidies have the effect of reducing costs to workers, making these jobs more appealing than they would otherwise be.

    I have a good job and I don't necessarily mind if some of my tax dollars go to help the poor, but the idea of my tax dollars going to subsidize the sort of jackasses who hire minimum wage workers ("A customer stole something, so it's coming out of your pay cheque." , "Work free overtime or I'll get someone else.", "I'm paying you with a prepaid card instead of a cheque.", etc...) disgusts me. A minimum wage at least has the effect of reducing the amount of worker subsidies that low-wage employers can extract out of the government. Personally, I think a better approach would be a special "subsidy recovery" payroll tax. This would make it cheaper to hire one full-time employee than a few part-timers and would have the effect of reducing the use of handouts by people who have jobs.

  56. slashdot is the anti-christian refuge by schlachter · · Score: 0

    USA might be Christian, but Slashdot is most likely Atheist, Agnostic, Spiritual and Humanist. You know, full of rational people who seek refuge from those who not only imagine wizards in the sky doing shit for them...but want everyone else to do the same. In any case, this seems like a suitable death for these fools.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    1. Re:slashdot is the anti-christian refuge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please look up the word "agnostic." It isn't a weaker form of atheism. You can be a agnostic theist just as well as an agnostic atheist.

    2. Re:slashdot is the anti-christian refuge by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, if you are agnostic, and then go on to believe in magical wizards in the sky or someone named jesus who isn't your gardner, than yea, you're not really in my rational human being category...but you're at least thinking.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  57. They will, without a doubt, die... by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They will, without a doubt, die...

    ...eventually. Like everyone else on the planet.

    Or at least 93% of us, since 7% of all humans who have ever existed are alive today.

  58. Re:What was the make and model of the get away car by hAckz0r · · Score: 3, Funny
    No, I think it was a DeLorean DMC-12. No idea why they needed all that radioactive stuff.

    Seen leaving the scene of the crime here: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-bI0WbLHBXyY/Tix4ZFMCZ_I/AAAAAAABoSM/1YqK064jHsY/s640/back+to+the+future+whitewalls.jpg
    and I think they need to get their engine checked.

  59. And the Darwin Award goes to... by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

    Those two idiots.

  60. But it was a failure of the system! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys who knowingly broke the law and stole the truck deserve to die of radiation poisoning, along with any leftist faggots who think it was someone else's responsibility for not providing adequate warnings against unlawful behavior.

  61. Theiving Rule #341 by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the loot starts to glow, just say "No"

    1. Re:Theiving Rule #341 by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you've never seen Pulp Fiction.

    2. Re:Theiving Rule #341 by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      The loot starts to glow, say "holy shit!!!" and run like a motherfather.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  62. That is no excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am just a simple Computer Science Engineer, but for my experience in the English-speaking world, I'd say not even that is an excuse not to return what has been stolen. Obviously the way they return it could be a matter for a different discussion. And I don't think any twin towers could be interested at all in being involved.

    By the way, (un)fortunately I have experience working in COBOL, but I can assure I have nothing to do with that theft. Though I could probably have to agree that in fact in the English-speaking world (Rome 2.0) it does kill...

  63. Radioactive Man by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    Just not in the Simpsons anymore

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  64. Re:How to explain minimum wage hikes to an idiot by DexterIsADog · · Score: 1

    This is typical straw man garbage. Paying fast food workers a living wage would not require Burger Death to pay more for labor than they get for their burgers. And it won't cost jobs either. Raising the minimum wage always helps the economy - look it up.

  65. Three Dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know the dangers of radiation, but with the right precautions, you can prevent accidental death, or even... ugh... Ghoulification. Keep your eyes on those Geiger Counters, kids. "Tick-tick-tickity" means "run your ass outta there", and pop some RadAway for good measure. If you do need to head into the heat, be smart: give yourself a nice boost of Rad-X first. Remember: only you can prevent human flesh fires.

    (sorry)

  66. Re:How to explain minimum wage hikes to an idiot by Valdrax · · Score: 0

    Furthermore, who is to say that because a job or task doesn't produce $10/hr in output that job or task isn't a perfectly valid and useful job?

    People who are forced to live on $10/hr. The minimum wage ensures that people who work hard for a living aren't forced into poverty just because competition for work turns wages into a "crab bucket" situation where people undercut each other just to have *something*.

    You can see this especially today in the wake of the 2007 financial collapse. Poor people used to be able to / have to work multiple jobs to make ends meet. They might end up working 50-60 hour weeks, but they could make ends meet. Today, however, with labor oversupplied and jobs in high demand, employers are able to demand "continuous availability." Not only will you not get a job if you want to have a specific day off or not to work on holidays, but you also can't get a job if you have another job that might want to schedule you at the same time. So people are forced to get by on single jobs that won't schedule them for full time and won't let them fill the hours at another job. You think minimum wage is somehow generous? Try living on it with only 30 hours a week. It's a large part of why the economy isn't recovering.

    Besides, if a job is worth less than minimum wage, then it will be replaced with a solution that allows one person to do multiple people's jobs (aka increased productivity), or it will be brought up in value by charging more to the customers. Before you jump on the latter as making minimum wage hikes pointless, note that labor isn't the only factor in any goods' or services' costs, so the effect of raising wages isn't negated by raising the costs of goods and services, and this is a net benefit to the poor.

    In other words, the minimum wage is possibly the single most important tool in ensuring that the income gap doesn't generate civil unrest and violence, like it did in the 19th century.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  67. Serves them right by shentino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They stole a truck with no idea of the cargo's value or importance, and probably didn't even care if someone else could die if they stole it. It might have been medical supplies, vaccines, food rations, anything. And if they'd gotten involved in a high speed pursuit they could have killed someone just running away. Not to mention their willingness to threaten deadly force in the act, which would have given the driver grounds to use the same in self defense, even without the cargo being lethal.

    Which would itself only increase any self defense fatality in being justified if the thieves had gotten shot.

    They jacked a rig, had no concern for the value of human life, and it bit them in the ass. To be blunt, they had it coming.

    The fact that the authorities aren't even going to be responsible for punishing them means they have nobody to blame but themselves.

    1. Re:Serves them right by ddt · · Score: 2

      If they had no concern for human life, they would have killed the drivers instead of beating them up. And it is safe to assume that one or more of thieves was doing it because of peer pressure, which can be intense amoung criminals, where your buddy can suddenly turn judge and executioner if you say or do the wrong thing.

      While we're on the subject, let's talk about what white collar criminals "deserve" for the crimes they do that can hurt millions instead of just a handful.

    2. Re:Serves them right by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're going to die a horrific, slow, and painful death. While I agree they brought it upon themselves, the picture of what they're likely to go through brings me no pleasure or satisfaction.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Serves them right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're going to die a horrific, slow, and painful death.

      Someone took away their guns after the robbery?

    4. Re:Serves them right by Oligonicella · · Score: 1
      People die later from beatings. No, they had no concern.

      And it is safe to assume that one or more of thieves was doing it because of peer pressure

      No, that would be no more than an opinion to justify an opinion.

    5. Re:Serves them right by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

      Wow, so there are intelligent, compassionate humans alive today. Good comment, hey!. I sure don't mourn criminals who die because of their follies, but I take no joy in their deaths.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    6. Re:Serves them right by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      Assuming that they are/were what we're being told by the media.

      On the other hand, ALL the material hasn't been accounted for, has it ?

      The material is/was incredibly dangerous. It was improperly secured and transported. Proper security precautions were not taken. That is another part of the significance of this story people aren't talking about, but should be.

  68. curiosity killed the beaners! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess they are getting what they deserve. It does not pay to commit crimes. It is just unfortunate that curious thieves are going to die from it instead of murderers....

  69. Getting the news... by baKanale · · Score: 1

    It sucks enough hearing your doctor say you're going to die, but to hear it on the worldwide news? Damn.

    I'll also bet that all the truck thieves in Mexico is getting a call from their mothers today, worried sick, wanting to know if they're OK.

  70. There's a new super hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He's called Captain Mexico.
    You can see him shouting and flying here
    http://bit.ly/1d1KsAL
    Disclosure: I'm also Mexican

  71. If the material is mobilized in dust, by Marrow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    doesnt the danger remain? The total rads you get is not as important is not as important as how you get those rads. If you inhale a particle, your body cannot dispel it and it will mutate your genes and kill you with cancer. Even minimal radiation, if constantly directed at you by an internalized particle will still kill you.

    1. Re:If the material is mobilized in dust, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The total rads is the most important thing. You can mitigate that somewhat by extending the time over which you accumulate those rads (ie, 100 rads over 50 years is probably not that bad, but 100 rads during dinner is probably going to make you puke) In fact, most people will accumulate a whole body dose around 10 rads over 50 years. The reason internal contamination is worse than external contamination is because 1) you can't wash it off and 2) there is not even a layer of dead skin separating the radiation from live cells. Because you can't wash it off, you will receive a higher dose from the same quantity of contamination. It may even get concentrated in specific organs (eg, iodine in the thyroid). That means the specific organ may receive a much higher dose (energy/volume) than your whole body. Because it's in direct contact, or even inside, living cells, there is no distance or shielding attenuation.

    2. Re:If the material is mobilized in dust, by Marrow · · Score: 1

      Ok, thanks for your reply.

    3. Re:If the material is mobilized in dust, by tibman · · Score: 1

      Spot on. You can brush beta-emitting particles off your hands and be fine. If you inhaled those same particles, you are boned.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  72. Legal punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have any sympathy for those thieves. Nor I believe their motives was starvation.
    However, sometimes I wish Mexico could enact legislation for capital punishment for certain crimes...
    I know certain comments are sarcastically fun, and as a joke that's ok.
    BUT, can't never understand another society if you have never set foot out of your comfort zone, speak another language, much less If you never traveled to those places. May I suggest watch less FOX NEWS.
    Minds are like parachutes: they need to be open for it to work.
    Just saying...

  73. Holy misread word Batman by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I know Cleveland BioLabs is working on bacteria which impact acute radiation sickness.

    I initially read that as

    I know Cleveland BioLabs is working on bacteria which impart acute radiation sickness.

    I thought "WTF? Biological+radiological warfare in America AND it's not a state secret? WTF?"

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Holy misread word Batman by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      He didn't say it would impact it positively.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  74. Or slo-mo bio-warfare??? Re:Tough luck.. by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Slow-motion biological warfare may be more plausible.

    Sooner or later some hostile country is going to figure out how to modify the flu or common cold so it sets the stage for massive (10%+ fatalities) cancer over a 10-20 year time frame, and combine it with a "trigger" so the cancer part only affects people with certain gene markers, such as a particular family, clan, or ethnic group.

    Imagine if North Korea figured out a way to make and distribute a cold virus that killed 10% of infected people of European descent within 10-20 years? Or what if, instead of causing fatal cancer in 10% of victims with certain genes, it causes infertility or loss of sexual desire in 50% of that group or (by manipulating egg cells and sperm-generating cells) the future children of that group, resulting in a greatly reduced population a generation or two down the road?

    The hard part will be 1) getting it right, 2) making sure it doesn't mutate and kill you or others you hope will survive 3) make sure you don't get caught, and 4) make sure it's not easy enough to copy-and-modify that one of your enemies uses it to create a cold that will kill "you and yours."

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  75. Re:What was the make and model of the get away car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a DeLorian. Needed fuel.

  76. Brits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do you think we learned it?

  77. Re:How to explain minimum wage hikes to an idiot by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    Don't just eat the taco: be the taco?

  78. that was what they said about the seagulls by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    but recently there have been lots of Giant Mutant Seagulls cropping up in all the traffic video cameras in Seattle recently. ... maybe they're hungry?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:that was what they said about the seagulls by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      We're just mutant apes.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  79. If I'm gonna die of Cobalt poisoning... by EmagGeek · · Score: 2

    I'm at least going to want to do it... On the Beach.

  80. Live And Let Live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with hate for such a transgression? Are you one of these pussies that thinks the world would be fine if everyone rolled over and took it in the ass? Screw them and screw you. Hate is a natural and reasonable emotion for such an event. Deal with it.

    I say, live and let live. Violently assault me without provocation and I say; DIE!

    These fuck nuts when where they should not have. They stole. They robbed at gunpoint. They brutally beat the drivers. Pure delicious karma now rains down on them.

    1. Re:Live And Let Live by tibit · · Score: 1

      My comment was general, not targeted at this particular situation. Hate implies irrationality, and you precisely do not want on emotion when dealing with crime of any sort. You end up with the mess we currently have. Because people don't fucking think but simply act like animals without higher cognitive functions would.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  81. Or are they just trying to scare the thieves? by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that the device itself had to be relatively harmless unless you managed to actually crack it open and get directly at the cobalt. Maybe this was a very old device, but after previous deadly incidents of ignorant people getting their hands on such things, I would think they would be manufactured such that it would be REALLY difficult to get at the cobalt inside. Maybe if you stare into the bore of the thing for a while though?

    If the cobalt had actually been accessed/exposed then I would expect them to have a nasty hot clean-up exercise on their hands, but the Mexican authorities seem awfully unconcerned.

    I suspect they are just trying to scare the shit out of the thieves, perhaps to motivate them to turn themselves in hoping for some sort of treatment.

    G.

  82. Re:What was the make and model of the get away car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ra-di-a-tion. Yes, indeed. You hear the most outrageous lies about it. Half-baked goggle-box do-gooders telling everybody it's bad for you. Pernicious nonsense! Everybody could stand a hundred chest X-rays a year! They oughta have 'em, too.

  83. Re:How to explain minimum wage hikes to an idiot by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    You still don't get it.

    Minimum wage == minimum skill. Why do you hate the unskilled?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  84. Exposure by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    I am no nuclear scientist, but I thought radiation sickness and death was a factor of emission of the source and well as time exposed and distance.
    The exact details of the source can be found here(111 TBq):
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt-60#Safety

    However all they did was find the material, unshielded. They don't know how long the thieves had been exposed to it. Unless the level was high enough that any unshielded exposure would lead to insta-death (which I find hard to believe). It could be that their exposure was reduced to opening it, discarding it, and leaving, so on the magnitude of minutes. Anyway they seem to be missing 2 or 3 variables to make such a assured claim.

    I don't know how to calculate a lethal dose from the indicated source strength to figure out the amount of time needed. Looking into it, calculating TBq (or Curie) into Gy/h (or rads/h) looks pretty complicated. Found an online tool, but it doesn't seem to work.

    Anyway far from "They will, without a doubt, die.", unless it is of that insta-gib variety.

    Here is a mortality chart:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acute_radiation_syndrome#Signs_and_symptoms

    2-6 Gy seems bad but possibly treatable, while 6+ means you are probably going to die regardless of what you do.

    1. Re:Exposure by Ihlosi · · Score: 2
      Anyway far from "They will, without a doubt, die.", unless it is of that insta-gib variety.

      Cobalt-60 sources are like that, kinda. Look for some "radiological accident" reports on the IAEA webpage. It's stuff like people entering industrial sterilizers with the radiation source in the active position ... deadly exposure in 30 seconds or so.

  85. Numb3rs s1e10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds a lot like Numb3rs s1e10 (first aired 2005-04-22).

  86. Said Emporer Palpatine... by flargleblarg · · Score: 1

    “And now, young cobalt-60 thieves...... You will die.”

  87. Truckload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truckload sound like a lot of Cobalt 60 ...until you read that there were only 40 grams of that stuff in the box.

    1. Re:Truckload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually for an amount of 60Co that has the activity for the quantity found (111TBq) it seems there was barely over 2.5g of material.

      From wikipedia: "Corresponding to its half-life the radioactive activity of one gram of 60Co is 44 TBq (about 1100 curies)"

      Or enough to provide lethal exposure (LD50) at 1m in approx 2 mins. Scary shit!

  88. Cry me a river by YoureGoingToHell · · Score: 1

    I"m more worried about the scum that thing Justice for stealing a truck is death then I am about people who steal trucks.

    Take it up with God, you bleeding heart idiot.

  89. The stupid asshole is you by YoureGoingToHell · · Score: 1

    It really depends on what happened, and some idiots on /. are too stupid to do anything but break an issue into 2 parts. Don't commit any crime at all/Die of you commit any crime.

    Try to steal from me, and I will personally ensure your pathetic, worthless life comes to a violent and ugly end, you god damn parasite. You are a piece of shit.

    1. Re:The stupid asshole is you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internet Tough Guy Talks Tough On Internet

      Film at 11

  90. Casing had radiation warning symbol, lettering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope that would be the case.

  91. Re:Look in the mirror: you are the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He was twelve, you sociopathic git. Do you really expect him to know what resources are available to him at that age given his background? What the fuck is wrong with you?

  92. Awesome Security System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want one. Steal my car, get curious about what's in the box, die.

  93. Re:Look in the mirror: you are the problem by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2

    What the fuck is wrong with you?

    With that user id? It's a troll account.

  94. stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wait, I found some cobalt paint at the home improvement store. So the paint is radioactive?? Or maybe cobalt is just the name of the color?

    Serious question: doesn't the case that has the cobalt have any warnings or labels on it? Just wondering.

  95. "Oh - You don't want to look in the trunk"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foooom!!!!!

    And a pair of smoking boots......

  96. Watching Jose Glow by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1
    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  97. Nice bloodthirst you got there. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    and probably didn't even care if someone else could die if they stole it

    They had no idea what they were stealing. Otherwise, they wouldn't have opened the cargo and given themselves a lethal dose of radiation poisoning.

    And if they'd gotten involved in a high speed pursuit they could have killed someone just running away.

    Guilty of crimes not even committed. Gotcha.

    Not to mention their willingness to threaten deadly force in the act

    They beat up the drivers, not shot them.

    They jacked a rig, had no concern for the value of human life, and it bit them in the ass. To be blunt, they had it coming.

    To be blunt, you're a bloodthirsty authoritarian thinking with his lizard brain. No, people who commit assault and grand theft cargo do not deserve to die. You wouldn't be from Texas by any chance, would you?

    1. Re:Nice bloodthirst you got there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, people who commit assault and grand theft cargo do not deserve to die.

      They must be close to deserving death. I'd go with life in prison since I'm not a fan of the death penalty. There is certainly no way they should ever be free to play in society again - there is no way to recover trust after something like that.

  98. Curiosity? by qazxswedc · · Score: 1

    What's in the booooooox?!?!?!

  99. Re:How to explain minimum wage hikes to an idiot by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Minimum wage == minimum skill. Why do you hate the unskilled?

    Kind of a ridiculous question. I don't. I just want better opportunities for them.

    You might as well ask me why I hate children for not supporting their ability to work for a living.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  100. It wouldn't feel like normal metal... by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    It would not feel like normal metal...perhaps curiously warm normal metal.

  101. Die soon? by bmomjian · · Score: 1

    Uh, everyone is going to die. I assume they meant the thieves will die "soon".

  102. To quote Larry Niven by jacobsm · · Score: 1

    Think of it as evolution in action.

  103. Who found it? by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    The cobalt source is said to have been found in a rural area. What about the exposure of the people who found it?

  104. Re:Tough luck.. no good luck.....for us........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I thought the US was supposed to be a christian country" Suppose to and "is" are not the reality.
    And this outdated idea that just leave the bad guys alone and let them do as they will, because God will punish them in the end, is child like in its understanding of human nature.
    At some point a persons actions will determine if they have right to live in a society.
    If you wish we could start shipping all of our serial killers, rapist, murders, degenerates to your country so you can handle them in a truly Christian way.
     

  105. Re:What was the make and model of the get away car by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    "The life of a repoman is always intense."

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  106. Re:How to explain minimum wage hikes to an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously should qualify your statement. "Always helps" is provably false, given the unbounded nature of numbers.

    So, what is the maximum level to which it should be raised? Somewhere between its current rate and "the GDP of the United States per hour"... but that's uselessly imprecise.

    And no, I'm not going to do this research myself because I am instead choosing to call you on your incorrect statement. Your call whether you want to redeem your error.

  107. punishing a rapist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The punishment for a rapist of an unmarried young girl (from infancy to adolescence the word describes) is he keeps her as a little woman of his (bride) and pays her father. Pedophile rape = marry adorable young girl.

    Deuteronomy 22 28-29 (hebrew)

    That is good because the man gets a nice sweet pretty young girl he wanted. It is bad for feminists.

  108. Reminds me of the movie PU-239 by Demonantis · · Score: 2

    Where they snort the isotope thinking its coke. You are dead and there is fuck all they can do about it. Tylenol overdose does the same thing too though if its not treated in time. You get mildly ill first. Then you get better and suddenly deteriorate since your liver is cooked. Very freaky shit.

  109. Looks like the Duque boys' goose is about cooked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys wouldn't hesitate to shoot you or your family in the face for the chance to steal a truckload of something.

    Nonsense. They are local heroes, fighting against the corrupt officials who run the hospital, and their crooked minions who are stealing much needed medicine from the people.

    Why, my own daughter would be dead were it not for them stealing insulin back from old Patrón Puerco.

  110. ...Ghandi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ghandi said "An eye for an eye and soon we will all be blind." meaning you should forgive, not even measured revenge is worth it. However I am pretty sure Ghandi was a Pussy and I prefer to side with Judge Dredd, you break the law, you will be Judged.

    1. Re:...Ghandi by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Ghandi came around nicely once he was in charge and had to deal with West Indian (Pakistani) muslims.

      Eye for an eye? No, Ghandi believed in preemptive blinding of his enemies. Pacifisim was when he didn't have power.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  111. Nuclear Bumperstickers by Barryke · · Score: 1

    Mexico is going to see a whole lot of trucks with a nuclear sticker soon, if this proves to help being stolen.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  112. This is why we use rem, not rad. by postermmxvicom · · Score: 1

    That is why you analyze things in rem (or Sv) not rads. Google ALI (annual limit on intake) and you will get a chart for each nuclide. It will tell you how many rem you get over your lifetime (50 years) from inhaling or ingesting a radionuclide. 1 rem gotten from an external gamma emmitter is the same as 1 rem from ingesting an alpha emmitter. There are some subtle nuances beyond that, but this is an accurate way to conservatively assess your health risk.

    --
    One last thing: Sometimes I wonder; "Is that someone's signature? Or do they type that at the end of each post?"
  113. The most disturbing thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For me, the most disturbing thing about this incident was the number of commentators on the various blogs and websites joking about how we'd just need to find the glowing people to solve the crime.

    Radioactive things almost never glow. Looking for a glow is a useless measure of whether something or someone is safe or not and would just mislead people into thinking no glow=safe.

    Things glow in movies and TV because it looks good. It has nothing to do with reality.

  114. Re:How to explain minimum wage hikes to an idiot by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    You want them to never have a job.

    Someone without the minimum skill is unemployable.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  115. Thieves Who Stole Cobalt-60 Will Soon Be Dead by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    This is a tragedy about to occur.

    When you live in poverty, and have no work to earn money, you do what is required to feed your family. You may not have much education, or understanding of the dangers, so, ....
    You bring the cobalt home, or to a friend's place, or even to a crowded church where you hide it. The secondary effects of the theft will be the large number of innocent deaths or illnesses.

    Sad, sad, sad.
    Already, the plans are underway to insure that there is a safer way to transport hazardous material. Why learn what to do with this theft by ignorant people.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  116. They will be super easy to find... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    Just look for glowing corpses!

  117. Wrongful death by johnpc831 · · Score: 2

    Good thing this didn't happen in the U.S.A. Otherwise the families of the robbers would be suing the hospitals for wrongful death.

  118. The real criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are the authorities who allowed this to be shipped without sufficient protection and oversight.

    The thieves are scum, and will probably die. I'm ambivalent about that. It's a horrible way to go, but they brought it upon themselves. C'est la vie, or perhaps C'est la mort.But it's just luck that (we hope) the only victims of radiation exposure were the thieves themselves.

    What if, as has happened way too often, innocent bystanders had also been exposed? With the thieves down, the people who need to be punished are the owners and regulators who endangered the public by allowing dangerous cargo to be shipped without guards, or at least a relief driver who could take over when the first guy needed a nap in the middle of a bad neighborhood.

  119. And The Winners Are ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No need to vote. The winners of the 2013 Darwin Award (every last one of them) are these two criminal geniuses.

  120. not true history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Behind this issue It may lay the excuse for performing a country deep scan in search of radioactivity.
    Pehaps inorder to check hidden atomic lab, or similar.

  121. Re:How to explain minimum wage hikes to an idiot by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    You want them to never have a job.

    Someone without the minimum skill is unemployable.

    Odd. It sounds like you think people are entitled to never learn new skills, but aren't entitled to be able to support themselves through work. It's a strange world you propose that values ignorance more than life.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  122. Dirty Bombs are not practical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dirty Bombs are not practical for exactly the same reasons why these knuckleheads will be dead soon: it's not practical to construct and deliver a dirty bomb IN PRACTICE exactly because it's simply Epic Fail in a lethal sense to do so. Even if you use sacrificial "sponges" do the work, you can't practical achieve the goal without being noticed or killing the messenger/deliverer.

  123. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Darwin Award winners

  124. Don't bother me none. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fitting reward for their stupidity.

  125. Idiotic Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They wont be dead. The true story when it broke about the theft was that these people may be in danger and exposed to radiation. Please come forward so we can treat you before you die.

    US Law enforcement is quite remarkable to ask some twit to come forward that according to news reports is about to suffer a painful death.

  126. Radioactivity rubs off on stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radioactivity rubs off on stuff -- including people. They will not be the only ones to die.

    Everyone seems to be rejoicing that justice will be served or whatever, but depending on actual exposure, whether they change their clothes, etc., their families, friends, people in the stores or bars they visit, etc. will also sicken or die.

  127. Jaime, he sido y siempre será tu amigo. by Noginbump · · Score: 1

    As they touch hands between the trucks window.

    --
    He who questions training, only trains himself at asking questions. -- The Sphinx, Mystery Men
  128. WTF... +5 insightful for the lazy? by tomxor · · Score: 1

    Do you think every crime is as black and white as the premise... don't you have the slightest bit of imagination?

    Their motive is unknown, and their apparent ignorance of the target's value suggests they are very unlikely to be professional criminals... hmm, petty criminals jacking a truck, how many sorry stories could possibly fit that picture. But by all means feel free to stick with your 3 year old perception of the through and through evil "bad guy" living it up in his evil layer with all the mountains of monies he stole. Or is it the ignorant degenerate that deserves to die? who's morals are we judging again?

    For those who feel otherwise, look at it this way: When you use a lethal weapon to commit a crime, you state to the world that you are willing to kill innocent people in order to get what you want, no matter what.

    According to whom?... you have no knowledge of the perpetrator's intent, and as a matter of probability the majority of "lethal weapon" wielding criminals will not only lack intent or willingness to kill but also hot have a lethal weapon at all... All that is needed is the appearance of a threat, most people are not willing to bet their life on the higher probability of a false threat... that's why it works, how do you know they weren't using toy guns? can you kill someone with a toy gun or a banana under a jacket? are you still certain that they deserve to die for wielding a "lethal weapon"?

    I don't know who they are or why they did it or if there was a real potential to cause lethal harm... and my point is that nether do you. Unknown motives should not default to "Super Villain" and breaking the law or being ignorant !== "morally bankrupt moron that deserves to die", not all crime is committed out of greed..."

    1. Re:WTF... +5 insightful for the lazy? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Do you think every crime is as black and white as the premise... don't you have the slightest bit of imagination?

      You make the mistake of focusing on motivation instead of the action. There is no justifiable motivation for what they did, period.

      Let me make it very simple for you: You forfeit your life the moment you directly threaten death upon any innocent person, no matter the reason or motivation. If you manage to get away with your act, but get yourself killed for reasons directly related to that act, then I hold no sympathy for you.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:WTF... +5 insightful for the lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to whom?... you have no knowledge of the perpetrator's intent, and as a matter of probability the majority of "lethal weapon" wielding criminals will not only lack intent or willingness to kill but also hot have a lethal weapon at all... All that is needed is the appearance of a threat, most people are not willing to bet their life on the higher probability of a false threat... that's why it works, how do you know they weren't using toy guns?

      Until I see credible statistics proving this... you're wrong. The "lethal-weapon" wielding criminals I've had the displeasure to meet professionally were... (surprise) wielding lethal weapons, not toys or bananas. That, in turn, required the use of my lethal weapon on behalf of the state to protect the innocent and their property. In a couple of cases, they even used their quite real guns with murderous intent - hard to pick a slug out of your vest and interpret that as an attempt to just scare you.

      Furthermore, threatening an armed and clearly identified officer of the law (or any potentially armed citizen, for that matter) with a toy or a banana would, regardless of moral issues, have to rank among the more foolish stunts known to man. Occasionally, it's self-correcting.

      Would I feel bad about killing someone who threatened me and then turned out to be armed with nothing more than a pointed finger under a jacket? Yes. But I'd get over it a lot faster than they would.

  129. Re:Look in the mirror: you are the problem by YoureGoingToHell · · Score: 0

    He was twelve, you sociopathic git. Do you really expect him to know what resources are available to him at that age given his background?

    He is a direct offspring of his parents, right? And wasn't it his parents who utterly failed to raise him in any decent way? And now here he is as an adult, bitching and moaning and complaining and crying a fucking river about these POOR, POOR thieves who stole a truck, beat the drivers half to death, then ended up getting a fatal dose of Cobalt-60 for their trouble. And I'm the one who's "sociopathic" ? Let's face facts: this guy is a total piece of shit. He started that way the day he was born.

  130. The government is lying to us! by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

    Absolutely correct, however a dirty bomb isn't really a weapon of mass destruction, it's a weapon of terror.

    Unfortunately it would be a very effective weapon. The more the government tried to explain that the radiation was relatively mild, the more people would say "the government is lying to us to avoid a panic, and to cover up their incompetence" and panic. Many people would flee, but they would be labeled as "radioactive" and would be violently expelled from wherever they tried to settle in. And general lawlessness. It would be ugly.

  131. Wow are you off base! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole point of dirty bomb is that the radioactive material is distributed as dust.

    The dust particles are radioactive enough that having them on your skin, inhaled into your lungs or ingested through contaminated water and food... your radiation exposure is significant.

    Go back to the library and check out the right books this time.

  132. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  133. AND IN OTHER NEWS... They're still alive by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    "Six people tested for possible radiation exposure have been released from hospital but remain under detention as suspects in the theft of a truck carrying highly radioactive cobalt-60, officials said Friday. Of the detained men, ages 16 to 38, only the 16-year-old showed signs of radiation exposure and he was in good health

    [...] Hidalgo state Health Minister Pedro Luis Noble said earlier Friday the men suffered from skin irritations and dizziness, but that none were in serious condition. Only one was vomiting, a sign of radiation poisoning.

    [...] "It's quite an operation and it is in the process of being planned," he said. "It's highly radioactive, so you cannot just go over and pick it up. It's going to take a while to pick it up."

    With nothing inhaled or ingested and with proper treatment, even the 16-year old is likely to be fine. So long as the free radicals are mopped up, the infection is cured, the gut bacteria brings out its dead and recovers... and (remote possibility) some bone marrow is transplanted, it is completely survivable.

    As to the real chances of this fellow developing a long term cancer or anemia, Marie Curie died in 1934 from radiation induced anemia some 15 years after WWI where she stood at the business end of many mobile X-ray units (invented by her). Some 30 years after she and her husband had stared experimenting with the properties of radioactivity, even hosting "radium lawn parties" at home. The life long exposure Madam Curie received was immeasurably immense, and yet to survive to the age of 66... well, it should put things in perspective about the resilience of the human body AND the remote possibility of fatal cancers.

    Much of our data is based on the health effects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors and those who succumbed soon after. While these poor souls' conditions were very well recorded, it is impossible to accurately gauge the total rad-count received as it was a combination of exposure, inhalation and ingestion, their total dose could have been a magnitude higher than was ascribed to their condition, which leads to over-estimation of radioactive danger.

    Chernobyl amazed medical science by the number of people who received intense exposures, and survived.

    Madam Curie's husband did not succumb to radiation, he was killed when he was run over by a horse drawn cart. So the moral of the story is, don't go nuts worrying about radiation. Watch out for spooked horses.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  134. On a philosophical note: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure karma is just for this lifetime but it certainly seems to be when there's irony involved. Irony seems to be one of the pillars of the human experience - maybe it's the limitations of the human mind - we tend to be too sure and jump to conclusions, and constantly get schooled on this mistake, but never truly leaner from it, or can we?? Nothing is certain. These guys were probably sure it was the authorities that would get the better of them. Instead it's the very material they stole. I hope they're sorry they stole it!