So what you're saying is that it's always acceptable to rape the women around who are wearing the least clothing?
No woman is ever "asking for it" unless they are fucking asking for it, and any argument otherwise is justification of the most offensive and degrading evil ever to walk the face of the earth.
While you're here, how about Slashdot. Since the site is very heavily Libertarian, you're bound to see a balanced view of Republicans and Democrats. we all hate 'em both. But even then, there's an immense feeling of respect towards Barack Obama here because he actually is a decent guy. There's not much more you could ask from a candidate.
All of your questions are highly opinionated, leading questions that seem to suggest that Obama is evil without even outright saying it. You're a victim of groupthink. You need to actually read up on your President from a trustworthy news source. Anything other than Fox News.
This is a specific situation, however, where we already know most of the votes beforehand. there are districts, even states, that will not change color under any circumstances. Essentially, because these states are not battleground states, they don't have a vote. This is a problem that'll have to be fixed at some point in the future.
As of right now, the election isn't decided by party lines but by how close one candidate has to get to the other party to steal the most votes he can. In this case, McCain distanced himself too far from the democratic voters (like he could have won them anyway) and lost. You might say he intended to. Seeing him have to defend Obama against the accusations that he was a terrorist and an "Arab" was at the same time depressing and rewarding. It's sad that there's so much fearmongering out there that people would believe that, and nice to see that McCain was not evil enough to take advantage of their fear for his own gain.
In any event, politics is mostly decided ahead of time, and I'd love to see the day that the whole country decides to change their minds. But there are far too many old people out there who don't understand that they get to choose, that it isn't an "us versus them" game.
Likely Diebold is going to make the case that it's a matter of national security, which any god-fearing judge is going to accept.
Of course we realize it's a stupid argument and shouldn't be accepted but it doesn't change the fact that they can easily use a lot of scary words like "source code" or "open" or "free."
The Diebold machine over at my polling place was actually quite cute. When you fed your paper ballot into the slot, it dinged up a number and said "Your freedom is delicious."
McCain stated that torture was necessary in the war on terror to get Bush's support for the election.
That act alone convinced me that he was willing to sacrifice everything to win, and that he is clearly not fit to lead.
He's not just an ex-soldier, he's an ex-POW. When he said that torture was ok, he turned his back on every soldier he ever served with and disgraced them and their efforts. He has brought shame to everyone who has ever fought for anything they believed in. And the worst part is he doesn't seem to regret it at all.
Slashdot Mirror
Writing "I am in no way suggesting" does not change the fact that you are implying that wearing less MEANS you're trying to be sexual.
Not that programmers are much more sentimental.
What do you do with the sticks of RAM that you no longer need?
What about your old 386's or 486's, or laptops?
Mine are in the junkyard or lying around in much the same state of disrepair as i'm sure Bletchley was.
But in any event, yes, this place needs to be protected.
So what you're saying is that it's always acceptable to rape the women around who are wearing the least clothing?
No woman is ever "asking for it" unless they are fucking asking for it, and any argument otherwise is justification of the most offensive and degrading evil ever to walk the face of the earth.
Not if it makes them money and the army says they will do it anyways and can back it up with executive power/force/etc.
While you're here, how about Slashdot. Since the site is very heavily Libertarian, you're bound to see a balanced view of Republicans and Democrats. we all hate 'em both. But even then, there's an immense feeling of respect towards Barack Obama here because he actually is a decent guy. There's not much more you could ask from a candidate.
Ladies and gentlemen, the plot to next year's summer movie flop.
All of your questions are highly opinionated, leading questions that seem to suggest that Obama is evil without even outright saying it. You're a victim of groupthink. You need to actually read up on your President from a trustworthy news source. Anything other than Fox News.
This is a specific situation, however, where we already know most of the votes beforehand. there are districts, even states, that will not change color under any circumstances. Essentially, because these states are not battleground states, they don't have a vote. This is a problem that'll have to be fixed at some point in the future.
As of right now, the election isn't decided by party lines but by how close one candidate has to get to the other party to steal the most votes he can. In this case, McCain distanced himself too far from the democratic voters (like he could have won them anyway) and lost. You might say he intended to. Seeing him have to defend Obama against the accusations that he was a terrorist and an "Arab" was at the same time depressing and rewarding. It's sad that there's so much fearmongering out there that people would believe that, and nice to see that McCain was not evil enough to take advantage of their fear for his own gain.
In any event, politics is mostly decided ahead of time, and I'd love to see the day that the whole country decides to change their minds. But there are far too many old people out there who don't understand that they get to choose, that it isn't an "us versus them" game.
Details man, details. what programming language?
Likely Diebold is going to make the case that it's a matter of national security, which any god-fearing judge is going to accept.
Of course we realize it's a stupid argument and shouldn't be accepted but it doesn't change the fact that they can easily use a lot of scary words like "source code" or "open" or "free."
What about Kingrames? would they erroneously give me a pharaoh's hat and pimp cane?
The Diebold machine over at my polling place was actually quite cute.
When you fed your paper ballot into the slot, it dinged up a number and said "Your freedom is delicious."
You realize Bush is an idiot lawyer right?
McCain stated that torture was necessary in the war on terror to get Bush's support for the election.
That act alone convinced me that he was willing to sacrifice everything to win, and that he is clearly not fit to lead.
He's not just an ex-soldier, he's an ex-POW. When he said that torture was ok, he turned his back on every soldier he ever served with and disgraced them and their efforts. He has brought shame to everyone who has ever fought for anything they believed in. And the worst part is he doesn't seem to regret it at all.
I got this stuff called Melange that'll fix your headache right up.
How many people have cured cancer by trying to reform it?
Or Prog Farr, the ancient Vulcan programming language.
"that helped to keep Clipper chips out of your computers." So THAT's what happened to Clippy.
You seem to have forgotten that Sarah Palin has "gone rogue." that translates into teamkilling.
I am reminded of the classic line. The best thing about high school girls is that the older you get, they all stay the same age.
Clearly you are unaware that u38cg has taken the Improved Initiative feat.
Everyone knows that GOTO is inferior to COMEFROM.
In this day and age, that is an epic victory to be sung by bards for all of eternity.
In that case, you're so fucked, there's going to be thousands of Lukes running around.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Kwe2fzHXcI&feature=user one step closer.