Slashdot Mirror


IBM's Teri-is-a-Girl-and-Terry-is-a-Boy Patent

theodp writes "The USPTO has granted IBM a patent for utilizing naming conventions to assign gender-based avatars for instant messaging. A user named Teri, IBM explains, would be given a girl avatar, while a user named Terry would be provided with a boy avatar. The three IBM 'inventors' were stymied by users named Pat, who as a result will be assigned a 'generic, genderless human figure image as his or her avatar.' Way to honor that significant-technical-content patent pledge, Big Blue!"

277 comments

  1. English names only? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What about odd spellings?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:English names only? by catch23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, what about Xie Hua? Is Xie a male or female?

    2. Re:English names only? by Bieeanda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean like my aunt Terry, who would be categorized as a man by that system?

    3. Re:English names only? by mackyrae · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or my step-mom Terry?

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    4. Re:English names only? by amRadioHed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Xie would be the last name. Unless you mean is Xie Hua male or female. Either way, Hua sounds feminine to me.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    5. Re:English names only? by ozamosi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My name is Robin, which is basically exclusively male here in Sweden (I've never met any females called Robin, but it's among the top ten most common boys names), which is mostly male in England, and which is mostly female in the US.

      Oh, and I run all my software in (US) English.

      I'd like to see the software that figures out the gender of all the Robin in the world!

    6. Re:English names only? by phatvw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why such a narrow patent? Why not patent an algorithm recognizing the patterns in English names in general to be applied in any User-interface rather just in an IM client?
      Also what is this bit about a "database storing anthroponomastic information to perform the anthroponomastic analysis of the username of the first user to determine the probable gender" Is that a table of known names vs gender stats based on public records? Or is it name fragments and endings matched to probability of gender? For example if a name ends in "A" its probably female, but if it ends in "T" its probably male. If they are using an algorithm which decomposes the name, that's kinda cool, but if they are just looking it up in a table of public records, thats pretty lame IMO.

    7. Re:English names only? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Or the character Theresa "Terry" Dolittle from the movie Jumpin' Jack Flash?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:English names only? by Nasajin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was going to say that Marilyn Manson might get annoyed with the automated gender mixup, but then I realised that he probably wouldn't.

    9. Re:English names only? by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Either way, Hua sounds feminine to me.

      You haven't seen many films about US marines, have you?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:English names only? by orclevegam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Likewise Kyle, which although often male, is occasionally used as a female name. Then there are those that come up with entirely new names, or that use nicknames, or handles to contend with. Yeah, sorry, this sounds like it's utterly useless, you've taken what once was a simple question of "Are you male or female?", and turned it into "Based on your name our software thinks you're X, is this correct?". All they've done is taken a simple question and reworked it so that it makes a potentially embarrassing/insulting/annoying assumption about a person, which then needs to have steps put in place to insure that it's made the correct assumption, all for the sake of avoiding a simple binary question.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    11. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Better question, what kind of avatar would xx13g0l4zxx get?

    12. Re:English names only? by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Keep reading. It's about tyranny, not taxes. Why do some people find it so hard to distinguish between symptom and disease?

    13. Re:English names only? by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Funny

      A gay furry.

    14. Re:English names only? by catch23 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why would Xie be the last name? I know someone by this name, and Hua happens to be the family name (I'm Chinese btw). I also know someone by the name of Xie Chen. (obviously Chen is the last name here). In the first case, Xie Hua is a guy, in the second case, Xie Chen is a girl.

    15. Re:English names only? by seanalltogether · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And if its just a table of public records with gender assignments, is the following logic really patentable? "SELECT gender FROM names WHERE name=$name" if(count == 0 || gender == "neutral"){ return neutral.jpg; }else if(gender == "female"){ return female.jpg; }else{ return male.jpg; } I hope my psuedocode isn't breaking the law!

    16. Re:English names only? by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      A blonde gay furry.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    17. Re:English names only? by catch23 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Also I might note that in some cultures, there is less of a male/female oriented names. My sister and I were named off of a variant of the jade stone, which probably has little to do with me being male, or my sister female.

    18. Re:English names only? by bersl2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The application says "anthroponomastic", not "anthropomorphic"! Get it right!

    19. Re:English names only? by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about odd spellings coupled with gender ambiguity...like Jayne Cobb?

    20. Re:English names only? by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Funny

      Doesn't matter. Anyone who calls himself "Legolas", l33t-crypted or not, deserves a gay furry avatar[0], and I'll stand by that assertion until the day I die.

      [0] Unless his parents gave him that name. Then he can be forgiven if he goes Menendez.

    21. Re:English names only? by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out how you can patent something based on facts and statistics...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    22. Re:English names only? by phatvw · · Score: 1

      Nice mix of SQL and C pseudo code there :) Expect to hear from IBM's lawyers about licensing their patent shortly :)

    23. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's about tyranny, not taxes.

      If you want an equal mix of tyranny AND taxes you should come back here to England.

    24. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that like saying a gay gay?

    25. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not patent an algorithm recognizing the patterns in English names in general to be applied in any User-interface rather just in an IM client?

      Algorithms per se are one of the judicial exceptions to the statutory eligibility of process claims. In other words, you can't claim an algorithm directly.

    26. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Declaration of Independence disagrees with you.

      The problem was taxation without representation, not taxation per se.

    27. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hooah" is used in the Army. The Marines say "Ooh-rah".

    28. Re:English names only? by PaulBu · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a little project I did for one of my CS classes: try to predict nationality by last name. Was going along the same lines, take names, enclose in, say, $ and ^ (to mark beginning and end), then chop into up to 5 or so character blocks and accumulate frequencies of different blocks by nationality (learning data pulled from different countries universities phonebooks).

      Worked surprisingly well too...

      Paul B.

    29. Re:English names only? by Brome · · Score: 1

      Actually, it could work really well with french names. The only french unisex name I can think of is Dominique. Except for that one, all names have slight variations, like Frederic for a boy and Frederique for a girl, even if they are pronounced the same. Of course, if the user chooses to shorten his/her name to "Fred", it can be problematic.

    30. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're Chinese you should know better-- we put the family name before the name.

    31. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such as "Vaarsuvius"?

    32. Re:English names only? by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      I don't think Brian would be too upset.

    33. Re:English names only? by risk+one · · Score: 1

      Don't you love it when the Slashdot moderation system cuts off the set up, and leaves only a punchline like this?

    34. Re:English names only? by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      Exactly "Legolas" is an absurd name, and reason for a Menendez... However naming your child Link...

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    35. Re:English names only? by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 1

      Bad news for all the people who use Scottish spellings of their name I guess. A lot of women named Manrika are going to be pretty annoyed.

      --
      I have nothing compelling to say
    36. Re:English names only? by Lazyrust · · Score: 1, Funny

      I always thought the marines were a bit dyslexic.

    37. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the family name comes before the given name, it's not the last name.

    38. Re:English names only? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      A Chinese name would have the family name first as you obviously know, and so I was making the assumption that the proper name order was being used. In that case the name would have to be either a family name of Xie and a given name Hua, or it could be a two character given name "Xie Hua". Either way the rather feminine Hua would be in the given name.

      Of course if the the poster was using western name order and Hua was the family name then yeah, I wouldn't attempt to guess the gender of the person. Xie seems fairly neutral to me and your examples seem to back that up.

      Disclaimer, I'm not Chinese and my Mandarin sucks ;)

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    39. Re:English names only? by ishobo · · Score: 1

      Off the top of my head, unisex names of people I have known from France or Quebec: Jean, Jolie, Jules, Michele, Noel, Patrice, Rene, Sacha, and Sidney.

      --
      Slashdot - The great and glorious cluster fuck of Internet wisdom.
    40. Re:English names only? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Heh, I just noticed you were the original poster, so I guess we can assume that the western name order was intended.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    41. Re:English names only? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Either way the rather feminine Hua would be in the given name.

      Contrary to popular rumour, and "a" ending on a name isn't necessarily feminine in all societies.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    42. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about people like my Mother Her spelling is Terry and she is Defiantly not a guy.

    43. Re:English names only? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Boston Tea Party ring a bell ?

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    44. Re:English names only? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 4, Funny

      Doesn't matter. Anyone who can recognise "Legolas", l33t-crypted like that, deserves a gay furry avatar[0], and I'll stand by that assertion until the day I die.

      [0] Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    45. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there's those guys in america who are named robert but get screwed over by their mom calling them robin. I knew one in highschool. If I remember correctly, he didn't like it much.

    46. Re:English names only? by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular rumour, and "a" ending on a name isn't necessarily feminine in all societies.

      You're assuming that's the only reason for thinking that "Hua" sounds feminine.

      The fact that, for instance, the Mandarin for "flower" is "hua" is another reason.

    47. Re:English names only? by Brome · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Quebec, but in France most of those names have both a male and a female form: Jean/Jeanne, Jules/Julie, Michel/Michele, Noel/Noelle, Patrice/Patricia, Rene/Renee.
      Jolie is obviously a girl name since it's the feminine form of the adjective "joli". I can't imagine a french speaker calling a boy Jolie.
      Sacha and Sidney are unisex names, but they're not french names so to speak. Sacha is originally a russian name and Sidney an english name.

    48. Re:English names only? by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The sound of the name has nothing to do with it. As ChameleonDave points out, it is usually considered a feminine name in Mandarin because it can mean flower.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    49. Re:English names only? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      um, in the U.S. last name is synonymous with family name. that's just because of western name order conventions.

      when someone says last name they aren't talking about the last word in your name. otherwise appending a Sr., Jr., II, III, etc. to your name would change your last name. but that's not how it works.

      obviously if a Chinese American were to fill out their name in a legal document they would write their family name as their last name, and probably write their name using a western name order. and if a European went to China they would be addressed with their first name in front of their title. so it would be Smith Mister instead of Mister Smith, or Smith Doctor instead of Dr. Smith. you adopt the name order conventions of the culture you travel to, you don't change your given/family name just because you move to a different country.

      you might try to expand your horizons a little instead of acting like a pedant.

    50. Re:English names only? by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      Off the top of my head, unisex names of people I have known from France or Quebec: Jean, Jolie, Jules, Michele, Noel, Patrice, Rene, Sacha, and Sidney.

      No.

      Jean is masculine (you may be thinking of Jeanne, or of the English name Jean, with a totally different pronunciation), Jolie is feminine, Michele is feminine (you may be thinking of Michel), Jules is masculine (you may be thinking of Julie), Noel is masculine (you may be thinking of Noelle), Patrice is common gender (yes, you've found one!), Rene is masculine (you may be thinking of Renee), Sacha is common gender (but it's Russian), and finally, Sidney is masculine and English. I am aware that a few idiots have started misapplying it to their daughters, though, Paris-Hilton-style.

    51. Re:English names only? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      aside from algorithms being non-patentable, you would need a different algorithm for every culture. also, many cultures don't have strict rules for assigning genders to words/names. language is already pretty idiomatic, but names are even more so. a database of common first names would be simpler to implement.

      either way, they shouldn't have been granted a patent on such an obvious/trivial non-invention. this doesn't contribute anything to the body of human knowledge shared by our society. it's like patenting a fridge light. i highly doubt they were the first company to think of this idea, or even the first to implement it. they were just the first people to be dumb enough of a douchebag to think of filing such a petty patent.

      and it's exactly this kind of IP pettiness that has turned our copyright & patent system into a tool for stifling, rather than encouraging, innovation.

    52. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they are pointing to the symptom, but you're too much of a jingoist to consider the possibility that your nation suffers from it?

    53. Re:English names only? by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      I was thinking "whore" with a thick, New Jersey accent. See also The Sopranos.

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    54. Re:English names only? by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      Rick Astley?

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    55. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further proving the point that pinyin does not cut it when it comes to determining gender. It's much easier to determine the gender of a Chinese if you can read the hanzi :-)

    56. Re:English names only? by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

      Or try my nick. Is it "Mdm. Kolbe" or "M.D.M.Kolbe"?

      Frankly I think this falls into the classic UI trap of the computer trying to guess at things it really doesn't have the data to make a good guess about. It's better to have the computer be honest and admit it doesn't know.

    57. Re:English names only? by ishobo · · Score: 1

      All those names I mentioned have been given to both males and females that I have known personally. My wife is French-Candian, her father from Canada and mother from France . Jolie is my brother in-laws name, while my wife is named Jules.

      --
      Slashdot - The great and glorious cluster fuck of Internet wisdom.
    58. Re:English names only? by ishobo · · Score: 1

      The reality is that people will name their children whatever they damn please. I do realize that the language cabal in France (and to a lesser extent in Quebec) frown upon such things, but most people these days do not care.

      --
      Slashdot - The great and glorious cluster fuck of Internet wisdom.
    59. Re:English names only? by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      The reality is that people will name their children whatever they damn please. I do realize that the language cabal in France (and to a lesser extent in Quebec) frown upon such things, but most people these days do not care.

      The "cabal" consists of the vast majority of people who are not jibbering idiots.

      The fact that you don't care that your son is called LaJennifer and your daughter's name is jimBobMan (perhaps with a few creative diacritics added) does not mean that the rest of us aren't going to rightfully find you hilarious.

    60. Re:English names only? by ishobo · · Score: 1

      Cabal meant La Francophonie.

      I never understood they outrage people have over what other's name their children.

      But back to my original point, there are other unisex names used in countries (or regions) that speak French as their primary language.

      --
      Slashdot - The great and glorious cluster fuck of Internet wisdom.
    61. Re:English names only? by happymellon · · Score: 1

      A handle? So what does my kid have to put up? Happymellon, that sounds like either a girl who is well endowed, or a guy who like boobies :) Neither are the reason for picking the name, just saying.

    62. Re:English names only? by stephanruby · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The transsexuals, the transgenders, and the undecided, are going to have a fit about this.

    63. Re:English names only? by stephanruby · · Score: 1


      Yeah, it's time to dump my shares of IBM. I don't have anything against tyranny itself. I just prefer to see tyranny applied to something marginally more useful, like a one-click button, or a two-click mouse, or stealing underwear, certainly not this nonsense...

    64. Re:English names only? by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      Or that lovable trill Jadzia, played by Terry Farrell?

      --
      Be relentless!
    65. Re:English names only? by gykh · · Score: 1

      Are you guys related?

    66. Re:English names only? by gacl · · Score: 1

      Then he can be forgiven if he goes Menendez.

      Yes, it would be a great tragedy to see a fine young person become a lawyer/politician.

    67. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How about Captain Fantastic Faster Than Superman Spiderman Batman Wolverine The Hulk And The Flash Combined?

    68. Re:English names only? by kubrick · · Score: 1

      What about Marion Morrison -- er, John Wayne?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    69. Re:English names only? by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      Take the name Andrew / Andreas (the German variation).
      That would be shortened to Andy (or Drew) in the US, but Andi in German speaking areas. Since Andrea also maps to Andi in German speaking countries, IBM are being just a little bit optimistic.
      That was just one example.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    70. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who have names that are ambiguous are often the subject of teasing and/or ridicule. As a result, they would be more sensitive than normal if software got it wrong.

      Thus when the software gets it wrong, the harm is magnified.

    71. Re:English names only? by phillous · · Score: 1

      french canadian doesn't equal french anymore than people in the US speak "english".

    72. Re:English names only? by phillous · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid I have some news about your mother....

    73. Re:English names only? by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

      I can think about other unisex names such as Claude, Alix or Stéphane (less usual than Stéphanie but at least one famous actress is named like that). I am sure there are others but I cannot find them just now.

      Otherwise, because of Elton John and Luc Besson, Russian male name Nikita has been given to many girls recently.

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    74. Re:English names only? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      A few examples in french:
      Jean is a masculine name, Claude is unisex, Marie is feminine when used alone, but unisex in counpound names (Jean-Marie is a rather common masculine name, even if tainted since a few decades by a vocal xenophobic populist).
      Names like Martin or Justin are masculine, but the english way of speaking them sounds almost exactly like the feminine french version of those names (Martine and Justine).

    75. Re:English names only? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      "Is that a table of known names vs gender stats based on public records?"

      Yes, IRC:
      -Guys are guys
      -Girls are lonely guys
      -Horny preteen girls are FBI agents

      see, it's easy.

    76. Re:English names only? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      If I remember well, that name is a chinese masculine name, so no odd spelling but an obvious opportunity for cheap mispronunciation jokes.

    77. Re:English names only? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      There are many gender-ambiguous forenames, not just Pat. Some examples include Lee, Fran (Francis or Frances), and Les (Leslie or Lesley). And then there are names with different gender associations in different cultures. Examples include Vivian (girl in US, boy in UK) and Carol (girl in UK/US, boy in Nordic).

      BTW, there are also names which have fallen out of favour due to changes in other associations. One example is Gabriel/Gabrielle which used to be a common name in Ireland for boys or girls, until its contraction "Gay" was appropriated for other purposes. Similarly, Richard is more likely to be truncated to Rich than to Dick nowadays.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    78. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My name is Robin, which is basically exclusively male here in Sweden

      "Robin Miriam Carlsson" is the most famous Robin in Sweden and I don't think she is a boy. She has had top ten hits in the USA and UK and was a UNICEF ambassador.

    79. Re:English names only? by rbnunes · · Score: 0

      If the technology is US based it will suck to other cultures. One more example: Ariel is a male name in Israel (an mostly in all the world, is a angel name like Rafael or Gabriel) But can be a popular female name in US (thanks to Disney)

    80. Re:English names only? by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Hence the word "basically" thrown in there. One exception does not change the general rule.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    81. Re:English names only? by Poltras · · Score: 1

      I think I saw somewhere that romanian has a strict grammar rule around using A or E as the last letter for feminine names, and anything else for male ones.

    82. Re:English names only? by Poltras · · Score: 1

      Nah we're fine with our low taxes high tyranny rates here in USA.

    83. Re:English names only? by Poltras · · Score: 1

      Kim and Alex are the ones that come to my mind right away.

    84. Re:English names only? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I have 2 cow-orkers, both named Terry. Terry M is an old guy, Terry B is a semi-hawt female. IBM's half-wrong on this.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    85. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither have you, have you?

      Hua would be closer to the Army. The Marines are hoo-ra.

    86. Re:English names only? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Hua's on next?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    87. Re:English names only? by pete_norm · · Score: 1

      I know guys and girls that are called Frédérique. I know guys and girls that are called Claude. I know a girl that is called Pierre (even if the usual feminine form is Pier). You have to take into account that sometimes the parent just decide on a name and spelling without really looking around to know the "gender-correct" form of the name (either that or the priest that filled up the baptism papers didn't know how to write...).

      I think it's a stupid idea and a useless patent. I thought the idea of instant messaging was to communicate... Why not use those nice communication skills to actually ask the other person for her gender if you are that interested.

    88. Re:English names only? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Another example would be shortened names - it's common for girls to shorten their names to names that are still often associated with boys' names (e.g., "Alex" might be short for "Alexandra" - I wonder how this software would categorise that).

    89. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter. Anyone who comments on "Legolas", Anonymous or not, deserves a gay furry avatar[0], and I'll stand by that assertion until the day I ... shit.

    90. Re:English names only? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      The software would work just as well for those who identified as the opposite gender to what they were born with, as they'd obviously give whatever names they go by, not the names they were given at birth. Though yes, some people may not like a software program deciding to choose a gender for them.

      And note that non-transgendered people also get offended by an incorrect gender assumption, often far more so.

    91. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or my daughter Sidney?

      Idiots.

    92. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just ask them "What avatar would you like" and present a selection that includes male, female, frog, Gort, baseball....

    93. Re:English names only? by ishobo · · Score: 1

      french canadian doesn't equal french

      It does when you are a citizen of France and Canada. Let me repeat this because it seems you cannot read. My wife is French-Candian, her father from Canada and mother from France. Both my wife (Jules) and her brother (Jolie) were born in Nice. Her father is from Ontario, not Quebec.

      --
      Slashdot - The great and glorious cluster fuck of Internet wisdom.
    94. Re:English names only? by RomanesEuntDomus · · Score: 1

      I found out that Americans think that Vivian is a girl's name.

      My first *cough* WoW avatar had a mohican, and I named HIM Vivian after the punk character from Young Ones. So many people kept referring to him as a female.

    95. Re:English names only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heard. Understood. Acknowledged.

      Army, not marines. Don't ever let a member (former or current) of the marines OR army hear you say that.

      Marines use Oorah.

  2. Don't they watch SNL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pat is a girl.

    1. Re:Don't they watch SNL? by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      Pat's real name is Patrick. Therefore making him a guy

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  3. Uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who-did-what-in-the-what-now?

  4. Oh...yay by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

    I'll be given a genderly ambiguous avatar as my real name also can go either way.

    !!!SPOILER!!!

    MaxwellEdison is not my real name!

    I know! I'll name myself AFGNCAAP!

    --
    -=Bang Bang=-
    1. Re:Oh...yay by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      Naming yourself AFGNCAAP? Wouldn't that mean that you are likely to be eaten by a grue?

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
  5. I know a Terry... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

    who is going to be very irritated when it's assumed she's a boy.

    1. Re:I know a Terry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who is going to be very irritated when it's assumed she's a boy.

      Have you ever considered that maybe he's just gay?

    2. Re:I know a Terry... by SpottedKuh · · Score: 1

      [I know a Terry] who is going to be very irritated when it's assumed she's a boy.

      Yet I imagine that mistake is still preferable to calling her generic and genderless.

    3. Re:I know a Terry... by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      And I have an ex-girlfriend who goes by "Mel" (real name Amelia) who's probably also going to be annoyed at being mis-identified.

    4. Re:I know a Terry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your ex-girlfriend male? Mel is a girls name.

    5. Re:I know a Terry... by NixieBunny · · Score: 1

      Yeah... my wife Terry would agree with that sentiment.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    6. Re:I know a Terry... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I have a friend named Melanie who is known as "Mel", and I suspect that she'd just think it funny if a computer decided she's male.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    7. Re:I know a Terry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your ex-girlfriend male? Mel is a girls name.

      Tell that to Flo's boss...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_(TV_series)

    8. Re:I know a Terry... by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

      Or Mel Gibson (actor/fruitcake), or Mel Martinez (US Senator), or...

    9. Re:I know a Terry... by Poltras · · Score: 1

      Mel Gibson is a GUY???? Damn... after watching 'What Women Wants" I soooo wasn't sure...

  6. Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The filing date is February 28, 2008.

    The only way a patent gets through that quick is 'Accelerated Examination' (decision in 1 year or less).

    1. Re:Strange by eln · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently IBM is in a big hurry to start offending people by misrepresenting their genders.

  7. Standard Behaviour by Nerdfest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Like most companies, IBM is only 'not evil' when it's extremely convenient, or there's some marketing value to be had.

    1. Re:Standard Behaviour by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Geeze, here we go again. Listen, patenting stupid crap isn't evil. *Suing* other people for your stupid crap patents is evil. Countersuing other people for violating your stupid crap patents after they've sued you for violating their stupid crap patents is simply a business reality these days.

      Big companies like Apple, Microsoft, Google, IBM, and Novell have to patent any little thing that floats into their heads that the patent office will let them patent. They all do it, and the purpose is mostly for the sake of maintaining a defensive-patent war chest to keep the other big companies at bay with mutually assured destruction.

      Start complaining about them being evil when they sue someone.

    2. Re:Standard Behaviour by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      If a company wanted to do assign avatar gender based on name in a program, the safe route for them is to avoid it altogether, rather than give IBM the opportunity to sue. But in this case, it's something incredibly obvious and someone else could have come up with independently (and probably did).

      As of today, the situation is that a company like Microsoft with plenty of its own patents can afford to risk it, or easily convince IBM to let them license this for free. A startup does not have that luxury.

      Patenting obvious things removes those obvious things from the pool of useful technology, and hurts the entire tech industry in the USA and in places that respect US patents.

      To use a somewhat silly analogy: if I held a loaded gun to someone's head and told them not to do something, they probably wouldn't do it. If I was telling them not to do something they should, like voting, I'd still be wrong whether or not I pulled the trigger. I'm not going to blame IBM for the USPTO's idiocy here, but I will blame them for actively contributing to this nonsense, and the hypocrisy that results from pledging not to.

    3. Re:Standard Behaviour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. It's Evilâ.

    4. Re:Standard Behaviour by syousef · · Score: 1

      They all do it, and the purpose is mostly for the sake of maintaining a defensive-patent war chest to keep the other big companies at bay with mutually assured destruction.

      So what you're saying is we've learnt NOTHING from the cold war and are all happy to live our lives under the constant threat that someone's going to turn our life to mush at any moment.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    5. Re:Standard Behaviour by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Listen, patenting stupid crap isn't evil. *Suing* other people for your stupid crap patents is evil.

      Yes! Just like driving dangerously!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    6. Re:Standard Behaviour by nine-times · · Score: 1

      You could argue that the cold war taught us that "mutually assured destruction" is an effective deterrent. Neither Russia nor the US used their nukes, did they?

    7. Re:Standard Behaviour by nine-times · · Score: 1

      There are tons of stupid patents, and when you're running your business, it's not your job to proactively ensure that nothing you're doing is violating anyone's patents. Short of reading this news story, there isn't much chance anyone is going to know that this patent was granted. So it's sort of a non-issue.

      To use you're analogy, it's not IBM pointing a gun to your head and telling you not to do something. It's IBM happening to have a gun, and it's unlikely that you even know IBM has a gun. It shouldn't really affect your decisions until IBM starts going out and shooting people.

    8. Re:Standard Behaviour by syousef · · Score: 1

      You could argue that the cold war taught us that "mutually assured destruction" is an effective deterrent. Neither Russia nor the US used their nukes, did they?

      Only if you believe that a sample size of one proves a premise.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    9. Re:Standard Behaviour by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I said "taught", not "proved". You were talking about what was learned from the Cold War, not what the Cold War proved.

    10. Re:Standard Behaviour by syousef · · Score: 1

      I said "taught", not "proved". You were talking about what was learned from the Cold War, not what the Cold War proved.

      Semantics! If what it taught you was incorrect and based on a faulty premise, I can't argue that you learnt otherwise. However I can still successfully argue that only those who take on the wrong premise are going to "learn" that same faulty conclusion.

      In other words you learnt the wrong lesson because you didn't apply critical thinking.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  8. Stymied by "Pat", eh? by bfwebster · · Score: 1

    What, do they watch old Saturday Night Live episodes? ..bruce..

    --
    Bruce F. Webster (brucefwebster.com)
  9. So, what did they decide for... by msauve · · Score: 2, Informative

    the name Bambi?

    It's commonly thought of, and used, as a girl's name, but in one of its most famous uses (the movie) it's a male name.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:So, what did they decide for... by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh deer ... we never thought of that.

    2. Re:So, what did they decide for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      D'oe

    3. Re:So, what did they decide for... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      They'll get the stripper Avatar~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:So, what did they decide for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you hadn't posted anonymously, i'd fawn all over you.

    5. Re:So, what did they decide for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if he's anonymous you could have tipped him a buck.

    6. Re:So, what did they decide for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you shut the buck up!

    7. Re:So, what did they decide for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you tipped him a buck, he could put it in his rack.

    8. Re:So, what did they decide for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      D'oe

      A deer!

  10. Terry? A female coworker of mine is named Terry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's in her fifties.

    The three IBM 'inventors' were stymied by users named Pat

    Obviously some people don't watch SNL.

    And what about Francis? Or all the meaningless new-age names you get these days?

    If you wanted to be cool you would download census data for the user's age, find the user with geolocation, calculate the frequency of male & female names, then use the most likely choice. Oh, and do it in real time.

  11. No one uses boring avatar names by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Give me a break, no one uses names like "Jill" and "Steve" for their avatars! They use names like xXDeath_StalkerXx and KillMurder_415 and awesome stuff like that. This patent ain't worth a case of Bawls.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:No one uses boring avatar names by e9th · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless the names are xXDeath_StalkeretteXx and KillMurderess_415, assigning a male avatar is probably a safe bet.

    2. Re:No one uses boring avatar names by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      They only use names like that because "Jill" and "Steve" were taken a LONG time ago.

      Jill31923913 and Steve12384238432 @aol would tend to disagree with you... :-)

    3. Re:No one uses boring avatar names by dfm3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even then, assigning a male avatar is probably still a safe bet.

    4. Re:No one uses boring avatar names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the most appropriate avatar for those types would be a llama...

    5. Re:No one uses boring avatar names by residieu · · Score: 1
    6. Re:No one uses boring avatar names by dr_d_19 · · Score: 1

      Are there FBI avatars for "Starlet1992" as well? :)

  12. Pub Pat by manastungare · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should ask these guys? May I suggest this as an obvious avatar for Pat?

  13. Pat?!? by insane_membrane · · Score: 1

    Just like the Pat from SNL? Gender-neutral ambiguous is right! Another case of life imitating art?

  14. Have to post anon here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what about african-american names? They are largely made up. IBM can not possibly keep up with that sort of innovation in naming.

    1. Re:Have to post anon here by Dzimas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All names are made up, when you get right down to it. We have traditionally used a fairly small set of Anglicized names in North America, but that's changing. There are lots of kids of all colors with some fairly creative (and occasionally bizarre) names. The most popular male baby names in the USA include Jaxon, Jaden and Xander. Popular girl's names include Alyssa, Ashlyn and Caitlyn. These are hardly traditional. Common "Afro-American" names are merely an evolving sub-set of modern names. Most importantly, many follow fairly predictable patterns... Jada, Tierra and Imani have a and i endings, denoting female. Darnell and Darius have masculine endings, and names starting in De (as in DeShaw) are male while La denotes female (LaToya).

  15. I know A guy by geekoid · · Score: 1

    with the first name Tracy. I wonder what they assign him?

    This is just trouble waiting to happen. When ever you try to assign gender on anything except the Chromosomes it will fail.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I know A guy by MaxwellEdison · · Score: 1

      When ever you try to assign gender on anything except the Chromosomes it will fail.

      Even then you can't be sure. Example? Bill Kaulitz

      --
      -=Bang Bang=-
  16. stupid by uberjoe · · Score: 1

    My mom is named Terry.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    1. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your mother is so Terry, IBM thought she was a man!

  17. "Way to honor that significant-technical-content" by DavidR1991 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe I missed something, but the link in this article shows IBM will "sharply reduce business method patent filings and instead stress significant technical content in its patents". If you actually care to read the patent filing a little bit, it actually does seem to have a technical basis (e.g. repetition of letters used to scan for feminine names). Whether that's 'significant' or not, who knows, but it's still not a business method. Stop hurting big blue for no reason :(

  18. Hmm by Kingrames · · Score: 1

    What about Kingrames? would they erroneously give me a pharaoh's hat and pimp cane?

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    1. Re:Hmm by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'd assume it was a typo of Ving Rhames, in which case you'd get a nice suit, some wire-framed dark sunglasses, and an air of awesomeness onscreen.

    2. Re:Hmm by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'd assume it was a typo of Ving Rhames, in which case you'd get a nice suit, some wire-framed dark sunglasses, and an air of awesomeness onscreen.

      Or an appropriately small, pixelated version of a certain scene from Pulp Fiction. Possibly resized and resampled by (wait for it)....

      Bringing out the GIMP!

  19. Patents by MikeV · · Score: 1

    I have a feeling if they didn't patent it, someone else would have and then trolled for license fees. IBM ain't no saint, but while our patent system is still hopelessly broken, sometimes the only way to ensure freedom is to get the patent application in before the next person does.

  20. Re:Terry? A female coworker of mine is named Terry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Francis is a boy. Frances is a girl. HTH HAND.

  21. Yea but I'm Foxxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I have a tail?

    1. Re:Yea but I'm Foxxy by Maguscrowley · · Score: 1

      I'd be careful about openly stating that you're a fur here. I think that a lot of people here, including I, would be tolerant of your choices, but you're still the Internet's punching bag =/

      Also, take into consideration that there are a lot of encyclopediadramatica readers here.

  22. Male / Female checkboxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that too hard to do? Or has someone already patented that?

    1. Re:Male / Female checkboxes? by jaguth · · Score: 0

      No, that would be too invasive and upset a large number of Mormons.

      A more practical solution would be to have a small flash applet that can take a picture of the user via the user's webcam. Then instruct the user to undress and center their genitalia and take a picture. It would be easy to code an analysis algorithm that can differentiate between a cock (long and hard) and a cunt (round and slimy).

      The only problem, though, would be the occasional false-positive generated from a Chinese man.

  23. Explanation required for this sh#t by unity100 · · Score: 1

    A lot of prominent organizations on the internet are somehow posting in /., clearing doubts about the stuff they do - either openly, like some, or anonymously, like some others.

    i wouldnt even want to think that ibm thinks they are above us. im looking forward to someone explaining the bullshit going on with those patents either openly, or anonymously here.

  24. What about me? by lwsimon · · Score: 1

    My first name is Lyndsy -- its a family name going back generations. I'm a guy.

    I'll be damned if I'm wearing a dress on their IM system.

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
    1. Re:What about me? by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone who implemented this would probably be smart enough to let you change the avatar during the sign-up process. This is a way to placate the ladies who get all upset that the systems tend to default to male avatars which is slightly more accurate than randomly assigning one or the other. A checkbox before the avatar default is chosen I'd think would be even more accurate, though.

    2. Re:What about me? by demonrob · · Score: 1

      Your name ends in a Y, they think you're a male. Do you have a problem with them thinking that? Rename yourself to Lyndsie and then you can be damned in a dress.

  25. Leslie, Tracy, Sam? by camperdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder where that leaves, Leslie Nielson, Tracy Lawrence, Charlie Dore, Alex McKenna, and the like.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Leslie, Tracy, Sam? by dwye · · Score: 1

      > I wonder where that leaves, Leslie Nielson, Tracy Lawrence, Charlie Dore, Alex McKenna, and the like.

      With Michael Learned (Mrs. Walton from "The Waltons" series, for those forgetting).

      BTW, as I read the patent, one of the rules make "Penny" a man's name, as well :-)

    2. Re:Leslie, Tracy, Sam? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Not to mention Sean Young and Stacy Keach

    3. Re:Leslie, Tracy, Sam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the girl who gets called 'Mick' who you need to worry about.

    4. Re:Leslie, Tracy, Sam? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Carroll O'Connor, ya meathead!

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Leslie, Tracy, Sam? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      For one, 'Leslie' is the male spelling, 'Lesley' is the female spelling. Any girl called 'Leslie' has a boy's name.

  26. Some call it innovation by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    I call it worthless.

    1. Re:Some call it innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CREATE TABLE `topsecret` (
          `name` VARCHAR( 255 ) NOT NULL ,
          `gender` ENUM( 'M', 'F' ) NOT NULL ,
      PRIMARY KEY ( `name` )
      )

      Brilliant! Call the lawyers!

  27. What's That? It's Pat. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    The three IBM 'inventors' were stymied by users named Pat, who as a result will be assigned a 'generic, genderless human figure image as his or her avatar.'

    Congratulations! It's a patent!

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  28. Not even that. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Informative

    When ever you try to assign gender on anything except the Chromosomes it will fail.

    Actually it fails pretty spectacularly when you try to determine it based on chromosomes, too. There are XY women with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), and both XXY and XYY men. In many cases, especially those of AIS, they may go their whole lives without knowing that their chromosomes convey something different than their sex organs.

    And using sex organs starts to fail as well when you get into intersexed and transgendered people; someone's sex organs may not match the gender they 'pass' as in social contexts, or that they prefer to be treated as.

    It is anything but a black and white issue.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Not even that. by geekoid · · Score: 0

      A) That is rare
      B) More detailed test sort that out. The real problem comes into play with the low quality tests they use for sports.

      It is anything but a black and white issue.

      true, but genetics is a close to accuracy as we can get, at this time.

      I am speaking for scientific accuracy. If you want to dress like a woman, or add body modification, or whatever I don't care; however be ware that there are good reasons for scientist and medical personnel to be aware of the birth gender.

      None of which addresses the fact that using names is stupid.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Not even that. by shermo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always thought it was a black and white issue.

      You simply refer to people how they want you to refer to them.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    3. Re:Not even that. by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      Screw the prior art argument - just bring this guy along to explain that it simply won't work so why bother. Instant retraction.

    4. Re:Not even that. by syousef · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually it fails pretty spectacularly when you try to determine it based on chromosomes, too. There are XY women with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), and both XXY and XYY men. In many cases, especially those of AIS, they may go their whole lives without knowing that their chromosomes convey something different than their sex organs.

      I agree it's difficult to assign a gender (if you only allow male, female) to an XY woman with AIS since you have external female appears with internal undescended testicles. However XXY and XYY men are as you just said classified as male, so it's just an AIS XY that is the problem.

      Two ways of dealing with the problem, using only chromosomes:
      1) Assign AIS XY individuals a gender based on reasoning and logic instead of allowing them to choose.
      2) Create a 3rd category, androgen.

      So it doesn't fail. The real world just forces you to come up with more complex rules. It's a hell of a lot more reliable and fair than trying to accomodate every fool that says "I feel like a woman trapped in a man's body". Well sometimes I wish I were a dolphin buddy, but I'm not going to lobby for others to recognise me as one. Life's harsh. In practice I'd take a more compassionate stance and not be so crass about it but having some compassion does not mean I have to deal with other people's dillusions and fanciful wishes that don't change reality.

      I wonder how the law deals with this?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    5. Re:Not even that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on. It is a pretty black and white issue. 99.99% of people can be clearly assigned to one of two genders, with their full agreement. Let's not let the .01% upset the boat.

    6. Re:Not even that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh.. until someone gets the bits chopped, they haven't changed genders. I'll call the person whatever gender they'd like.. but seriously, if I shaved my beard and put on a dress, I'm NOT suddenly a female. A woman trapped in a man's body is still a man, until they do something about it.

                As for this patent, what'll it do on the real odd names.. OK Teri and Terry. What about the odd ones like Tear-E or whatever? I think it'd be better to just show two avatars (male and female) and let the user choose.

    7. Re:Not even that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok then, from now on I wish you to refer to me as "The Bishop of Battle, Master of all he surveys".

  29. Umm, sexist? by girlintraining · · Score: 1

    Umm, I can't see this having any practical application. Not only that, but since when was a name a reliable method of gender determination? The TSA can't even get it right when they're looking right at the person -- in real life. And let's not even get started on intersex conditions, cultural differences, etc.

    IBM just patented itself a lawsuit, nothing more. Move along.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  30. What's worse, is that it's done dumbly by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's amazing that they analyze the name so hard. I would just throw a database at the problem. It's inconceivable that IBM doesn't have a shitload of demographic databases around, which already have name-sex pairs. Just select sex, count(*) where name='terry' group by sex. If the ratio is overwhelming in one direction, choose that, and if the margin of error is too high (and I'd set that pretty low to avoid pissing off Miss Pat), pick neutral. That would work with any language, too (assuming IBM has a database for that culture).

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:What's worse, is that it's done dumbly by sexconker · · Score: 1

      You can also quite easily take into account ethnicity.

      "Jean", American. FEMALE
      "Jean", French. MALE

      You can also quite easily take into account age.

      "Sam", 12 years old. GENEREIC
      "Sam", 56 years old. MALE

      You can also quite easily take into account surnames.

      "Mary Valentine" FEMALE
      "Merry Brandibuck" MALE

      You can also quite easily take into account titles and suffixes.

      "Princess Shackba" FEMALE
      "Tam Jr." MALE

      If you've got the data, add in known pseudonyms, or middle names.

      "Chris" AKA "Christopher". MALE
      "Pat" AKA "Patty" AKA "Patricia". FEMALE

      Just about any serious database of people will have all the information except for ethnicity, though public (such as at a university) databases typically have it.

      If you're guessing and only have a first name from a webform, you can fidge about and work the origin IP, email address used, etc. to guess a country of origin. You can also skew the expected age up or down based on the content of your site/service.

      This isn't rocket science, and it's not patent-worthy.

    2. Re:What's worse, is that it's done dumbly by jsiren · · Score: 1

      The first names of one Finnish family: Matti, Merja, Annastiina, Juhana. Task: assign genders. Answers here.

      A success rate of over 50% is rewarded with a dose of instant gratification.

      See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unisex_name

      --
      Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
    3. Re:What's worse, is that it's done dumbly by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      That was easy, 100% (and I'm South American) :P

      Okay, so I've been outside my country (and know some Mattis).

      I worked for the credit-score company in my country, and among the interesting not-restricted information I could find was a cool database of every name in the country... it happens that over 20% of the country is named María (Mary in Spanish :P ) (FYI, I could never make even a single query into the production server. Security was serious stuff there).

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    4. Re:What's worse, is that it's done dumbly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's inconceivable that IBM doesn't have a shitload of demographic databases"

      They have Languageware which does some of what you mention already.

      http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/lrw

  31. I once knew a Teri.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and she assured me at the time that she was a girl too! Cost me $50 to find out that was NOT the case.

    Two years later tho, and woohoo, Teri was finally a girl. Cost me $100 to confirm it - damned inflation !

    I guess the point is, why bother ? Go generic and let people modify their avatars as they choose. In situations where they guess correctly, people wont care, but it will irritate the life out of those people where they get it wrong - and complaints will flow for a situation that was totally avoidable.

    Dont pigeonhole people - its a generally negative experience for them, even if you get it right. They feel like they've been played.

    And a patent ? My god, what for!?!? Take a name, compare it to a list. Return boy. If its not there, compare it to another list. Return girl. If its not there, Return gender-bender.

    What other whiz-bang algorithmic add-ons can there be.. or is the patent about the way they "source" the names (*cough* troll facebook *cough*) ?

  32. I dare you.... by Atriqus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    IBM, I dare you find a name where there's no one also by that name of the opposite sex.

    --
    Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    1. Re:I dare you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true. My wife's name is Engelbert!

    2. Re:I dare you.... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Superman.

    3. Re:I dare you.... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Batman.

    4. Re:I dare you.... by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but in my experience, I've never met a girl named Jeff, Thomas, or Richard. Still, some parents go out of their way to ruin their children's lives with bad names. On the same vein, I've never met a man named Betty, Julia, or Karen. You might be able to stretch the point by going cross-cultural. Their very well might be names from other parts of the world which sound similar to common North American/European names, but which are gender neutral or gender-reversed from their American/European counterparts.

      One fun observation about names and gender. In the USA, Ashley is almost always a female name, it seems like, but in England (and maybe France?) Ashley is usually a male name. I wonder what the origin of that difference is?

    5. Re:I dare you.... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      He-Man.

    6. Re:I dare you.... by yarbo · · Score: 1

      Dweezil

    7. Re:I dare you.... by taucross · · Score: 1

      Trannyman.

      --
      "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
    8. Re:I dare you.... by Shin-LaC · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder what the origin of that difference is?

      American girls keep stealing boys' names. No, seriously. Check out chapter 6 of Freakonomics.

    9. Re:I dare you.... by everyday17 · · Score: 0

      On the same vein, I've never met a man named Betty...

      You've obviously never seen Kung Pow. Master Betty would like to have a word with you.

    10. Re:I dare you.... by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      A woman named Dick?

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    11. Re:I dare you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John?

    12. Re:I dare you.... by Ogre840 · · Score: 1

      Doug

    13. Re:I dare you.... by Lazyrust · · Score: 0

      Well you are what you eat.

    14. Re:I dare you.... by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention that, I was going to add that I knew a guy named Karen; wiki's explination was that his family was probably Armenian.

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    15. Re:I dare you.... by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      Wow, a Tri-level Touche!

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    16. Re:I dare you.... by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, you know somewhere out there was an asshole couple who had a daughter who said to each other, "Hey, you know what would be hilarious?.."

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    17. Re:I dare you.... by loxosceles · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I had my name yesterday. Today some chick stole it. Someone please give me a name.

      --nameless.

      cc: RIAA, MPAA
      keywords: theft, piracy.

    18. Re:I dare you.... by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Their very well might be names from other parts of the world which sound similar to common North American/European names, but which are gender neutral or gender-reversed from their American/European counterparts.

      How about a nice example: Andrea. Practically everyone from a Northwestern European or derived culture will get that wrong in an Italian context. I know I did at first, and I remember an article about some Italian FOSS programmer getting multiple subthreads with Slashdotters being confused about his gender.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  33. RTFP by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 3, Informative
    The whole point of the patent is that it's for cross-cultural communication, not just for English names only. It's not a totally unreasonable idea. It sounds like it looks the user's gender up based on where they are from and what their name is. Odd spellings would likely be classified as unisex, unless there were a general rule for naming conventions (e.g. In North America, names ending in 'i' are likely to be female.) Furthermore, you could build up your 'odd spelling' database by recording the gender people select for themselves.

    The example ozamosi posted below would be covered fairly well by this patent: Robins in North America would be classified as female, but Robins from Sweden would be classified as male.

    My criticism of the invention's effectiveness is that it's not completely fool-proof, and would inevitably assign the wrong gender for people with the spelling typically adopted by the opposite gender. It might be a worse "faux pas" to address a male as female (or vice versa), than to leave assumptions of their gender out of the picture. Of course this might vary from culture to culture, and I really don't know about that. It might be more effective to just force the user to input their gender, but this would have to be done on every client, which could be problematic.

    Of course, I'm not sure whether we should be assisting the enforcement of "societal conventions" based on differences in gender, but that's a different topic from the invention's effectiveness.

    By the way, here's the relevant part:

    an expansive list of names compiled from those used in many different cultures catalogued according to gender (that is, male, female, or unisex), a list of rules for associating a username not included in the list of names with a particular culture, and a list of rules derived from naming conventions that are employed in many different cultures catalogued culturally, linguistically, nationally, regionally, and/or according to other relevant anthroponomastic criteria.

    1. Re:RTFP by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      I do declare this as a stupid waste of time. If people can sign up for a service, then they can check-mark which sex they are, and they don't need some idiotic algorithm to assume what sex you are based on your name.

      I don't really care whether someone gets offended or not, I just think that the basic paradigm regarding programming is K.I.S.S. and a complex database of names, naming conventions and your geolocation is definitely the stupid part.

      The person themselves already know what sex they are, why not just rely on their ability to insert their gender rather than having to confirm it by figuring it out from their name?

      tag this under "dumbidea" please.

    2. Re:RTFP by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      I do declare this as a stupid waste of time. If people can sign up for a service, then they can check-mark which sex they are

      And if they don't enter their gender? Then most people will make an assumption based on what they know about the user (e.g. their name). But most people won't know all the rules about naming from all the different cultures, so their assumptions might be incorrect. If the computer can be programmed to make better guesses than most users, why shouldn't we use such a system?

      It reminds me of grammar check: sure, there's no real substitute for knowing the rules of grammar yourself, but if the computer can do a better job than most people, it might be useful to have such a feature available.

    3. Re:RTFP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In reading the claims, which it appears most posting here have not, the system performs an anthroponomastic analysis as the user registers for a new account using the username. Now a quick search of anthroponomastic yeilds a wiki definition of anthroponymy which is the study of names of human beings and the study includes: nicknames, sirnames, given names, clan names, patronyms, teknoyms and ethnonyms, etc. The patent states that the analysis uses a list of rules and a list of names and applies the rules for a given name. So, while the user name bigjohn100 might not yield a name on the list, and would receive a gender neutral avatar, the nickname bigjohn100 could be in the list of nick names. The study of nicknames in a given culture, once placed in a database, could be referred to and in combination with the surname, given name and the onomastic origination of a name. The list could be a substantial list and address most all of the suggestions on this board, even superman, batman, etc., because for example: superman is a nickname in the american culture. Finally, the asserted advantage of the invention is to check the gender as they register so as to prevent communication between another where the gender is not known before someone has the chance to IM another. In global chat rooms or message boards the gender of another is not often known and making a determination of the user's gender without account information, profile information, etc is the patents asserted advantage. How about reading the invention before posting on a message board.

  34. Re: New Names by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Yeah, what about all those Dion/Dionne pairs? (Male/Female).

    However, 70% of names with "sh" in the last syllable and 4 vowels are female. (Laetisha, I'm lookin' at you honey!)

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  35. YRO? by dwye · · Score: 1

    How is this about "rights"? Especially since the patent claims that the user can override the selection, later?

    If you ask me, this belongs in Idle

  36. I'll one up that by taucross · · Score: 1

    I have patented a process that assigns an avatar gender to a name with One-Clickâ. The One-Clickâ process trounces the IBM competition with its capacity for user-configurable customisation and laser beams.

    --
    "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
  37. Pic for genderless by WraithCube · · Score: 1

    I dare you not to offend the all the genderless of the world with your depictions of the Pats, you insensitive clods!

  38. This clever invention deserves a patent by cabalamat3 · · Score: 1

    Wow, this is so clever. It never would have occurred to me that someone with a boy's name might be male, and deserving of a male avatar, while someone with a girl's name might be female and get a female avatar.

    This is clearly a breakthrough in technology and IBM fully deserve their patent. It's also a slap in the face to those critics who say USPTO's standards are slipping. Go IBM! Go USPTO!

    1. Re:This clever invention deserves a patent by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear!

      I've read a lot of "stupid patent" stories on /. but this is really such an incredibly obvious and trivial thing.

      As others have said:

      1) "sexing" of names has been happeing in the bulk (postal) mail advertising industry forever

      2) what's wrong with just assigning gender neutral unless the user clicks male or female

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
  39. Blue Blankets for Baby Boys and Pink for Girls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they just patent giving blue blankets to baby boys and pink blankets to baby girls while they're at it. This patent really covers a unique process in no way base on general knowledge or common convention around for a very long time! Thanks USPTO!

  40. Jayne is a girl's name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...or so I hear.

  41. USPTO ... Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How about you stop giving out patents to these useless companies who are clearly just "investing" in patents in the hopes of making a profit from future lawsuits. This is an abhorrent abuse of the patent system which is intended to protect real inventors with real products. Not some schmo who decided to make a database that correlates name to gender. Way to go breaking new ground there IBM.

  42. what the hell is wrong with ibm?? by nimbius · · Score: 1

    one mouth says it supports open source, and freely rewards its code to the community

    the other crafts junk patents for software that may never be written, magical ideas, and imaginary property..

    is there some kind of intervention for this shit?

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:what the hell is wrong with ibm?? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      a) IBM wrote the book on patenting. They have been in patents much longer than they have been in "open source" and there are lots of bits of the company which do almost nothing with open source. Thinking that just because they start working in one area they can completely change the whole company in a few years, let alone overnight is unrealistic.

      b) If you have a patent that means nobody else can have one. Just as the GPL guarantees a long term existence for some form of free software, having your own patents guarantees your ability to continue to produce software. Even RedHat gets patents. Having many trivial, stupid patents means that when you are sued you are more likely to be infringing. E.g. the patents IBM has on being a patent troll means that any time a patent troll sues IBM they risk their, and their parent companies, entire existence.

      What matters most is not what patents IBM gets; it's what they do with them. If you find your FOSS project infringing an IBM patent, then ask them about it. If they refuse you a free license; then we can get angry.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    2. Re:what the hell is wrong with ibm?? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      Oh, (sorry to reply to my own post) one more thing. Patent trolls are ridiculously vulnerable to stupid patents that can't get anyone else. The reason is that they have to argue for the validity of patents before they can sue. This means that many arguments they could use to destroy such patents go out of the window through their own legal point of view.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  43. You insensitive clod! by PPH · · Score: 1

    What about a boy named Sue?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  44. Wouldn't it be easier..... by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...to just ASK the user during the sign up?

    Are you [ ]Male [ ]Female

    Would you like to use a avatar that is
    [ ] Male
    [ ] Female
    [ ] Generic Genderless
    [ ] Tentacle Monster
    [ ] Cowboyneal

    1. Re:Wouldn't it be easier..... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

      Or, leave it .... you know .... BLANK! (is that the cowboyneal choice?)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Wouldn't it be easier..... by egr · · Score: 1

      That's ingenious! You must file a patent on this!

  45. This has been done for at least a decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Postal Software has been doing this for a long time. Some software called PostalSoft was doing this back in the 1990's.

    How in the world could the USPTO even consider this.

  46. So.... by Lazyrust · · Score: 0

    What about transgendered people and hermaphrodites? I mean, really how exactly do you classify a hermaphrodite?

  47. I wonder by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    Would that software return an appropriate avatar for ssj4chan?

      And because I don't know if I want to be modded funny or interesting.

      Would it return a brown skinned guy I say Raul? what about Abdul, Cole or Hiro? Do I smell a lawsuit?

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  48. Why not just ASK?!? by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My friends Gail and Carol might have a problem with this method, since both of them are male... Sam and Mel might have problem too, since Sam is short for Samantha and Mel is short for Melonie.
    I prefer the solution used in the interactive game "Leather Goddesses of Phobos": at the start of the game, you have a sudden urge to use the restroom. Your gender for the rest of the game depends on which restroom door you choose.
    Really, I think arbitrarily guessing people's gender is just going to alienate them when you guess wrong.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Why not just ASK?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now that's just neat (the game).

      I also know a mel, but she's pretty tomboyish anyway..

      lol, carol...

  49. WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had no idea their system was that accurate...

  50. It's to help you guess others' genders by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sorry, this sounds like it's utterly useless, you've taken what once was a simple question of "Are you male or female?", and turned it into "Based on your name our software thinks you're X, is this correct?".

    I don't think it tries to guess your gender, I think it tries to guess the gender of the user you're talking to. So instead of you thinking, "I wonder if this person is male or female?" it suggests: "Kyle is from North America and this is usually a boy's name." Of course, "Kyle" is a bad example because you probably already know that. But if the other user were from a different culture, you might not be familiar with the naming conventions, or you might erroneously assume they coincide with your culture's naming conventions.

    I think the idea is that people are going to make these assumptions anyway, so maybe a computer can help them be more accurate. This is why the invention is useful.

    1. Re:It's to help you guess others' genders by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      erm... how about "Kyle is a name of Scottish origin and from the Gaidhlig(gaelic language).. and means handsome, near the chapel, narrow, narrow channel, strait. In Scotland it's never given to a girl and the closest you get here is an old english name of "kyla" for females. i AM Scottish and this annoys me a bit!! Another thing that annoys me is the people who make up name spellings as they are just too plain dumb to either check using a book of names or google it! i mean FFS! "laetisha"?? WTF shouldn't that be "LETITIA".. and let me tell you YES IT BLOODY WELL IS!!!!!

    2. Re:It's to help you guess others' genders by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it tries to guess your gender, I think it tries to guess the gender of the user you're talking to. ... I think the idea is that people are going to make these assumptions anyway, so maybe a computer can help them be more accurate. This is why the invention is useful.

      I think that makes it worse though. People aren't going to read an avatar as being "An educated guess at someone's gender", they're going to read it as something that the user themselves has set (either directly, or via a male/female option), since that's how avatars have traditionally been set.

      Although I wonder why it matters. If someone is that bothered about someone's sex, they could take a moment to maybe ask them. Or use the old fashioned method of letting people set it on their profile when they sign up.

  51. I should have been born in Sweden or England by fuego451 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see the software that figures out the gender of all the Robin

    I'd like to see bureaucracies and creditors here in the US that could remember that I'm a Mr Robin and not a Ms. I was born during WW II and named after Robin Olds, an ace pilot, so it's not as if I haven't been here a while.

    A lovely little clerk once teasingly asked me if I was sure I was male. An offer to have a look at my genitals was declined (dammit!) but she was a good sport.

  52. Two wrongs make one right? by syncopated · · Score: 1

    Now, suppose I guess from the username the opposite gender (e.g. for Alice, I guess that its gender is male), and then for displaying the avatar, I intentionally display a gender that in the code is described as male/female, but in reality (the picture), looks like the opposite, i.e. female/male. Two wrongs make one right, and the effect is the same, but by the letter of the patent, I haven't infringed their patent, right?

  53. Offended by a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Anyone who gets offended by a computer program misinterpreting their gender doesn't have enough sense for me to care about anyways. I say assign EVERYONE asexual jellyfish avatars.

  54. I am Yu. by bronney · · Score: 1

    and he is Mi! I support you bro, Hua can totally be a last name.

  55. Punctuate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why didn't they patent gender assignment by semicolon detection?

  56. "sexing"? Will this patent be prosecutable? by EDinNY · · Score: 1

    It is called "sexing" a name in the direct mail business.

    Nothing new here. My brother's company had software on a SCO machine that ran a Pick Operating System variant that sexed names back in the '90s.

    They used the program to examine a name and decide if they should put a "Mr." or "Ms." as the salutation in automatic letters. The hard part about this was generating the database.

    The only difference here is that ibm software assigns an avatar based on the sex of a name instead of assigning a salutation.

  57. I did this 3 years ago for an chat bot by deksza · · Score: 1

    I made such a function for my chat bot, Ultra Hal, about 3 years ago. When you tell it your name it looks up in a database (based on social security name database) how likely it is male or female and comes up with different greetings depending on the data. See http://www.zabaware.com/webhal/index.html

  58. Have you been living under a rock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you've missed one of Sweden's most famous artists over that past 15 years:

    http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robyn

    Her first name is actually "Robin".

  59. Not all English names by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    I often have people asking me whether I am M or F, Chris seems to be used for both with the same spelling, as are Sam, Kim, and so om. And then there are the oddities; Marion Morrison (John Wayne's real name), Shirley Crabtree (the British Wrestler "Big Daddy"), and probably more

  60. Wouldn't it just be easier to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wouldn't it just be easier to look at the browser cache to see if the user is male...?

  61. Terry & Terry by BHS_Turf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Both my wife and I are named Terry, and yes, she took my last name. The running joke is that I get all the bills, and she gets all the cheques.

    1. Re:Terry & Terry by rootooftheworld · · Score: 0

      Isn't that always the case, regardless of gender? *ducks*

      --
      I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
    2. Re:Terry & Terry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THE PORTABLE NIGGER LYNCHER - BROUGHT TO YOU BY AFN TECHNOLOGIES

      The original and still the best! The PNL assembles in minutes and will provide you and your family a lifetime of worry-free service, unlike your nigger.

      Our dual-pulley galvanized frame is guaranteed to 1600 pounds and will never rust or crack

      Our heavy-duty reel contains 500 yards of high-quality rope easily double-rigged for two jobs at once.

      Our platform provides dual trap doors easily dropped with a pull of the lever.

      We carry models for any make pickup. Call now for our free catalog!

      Call PNL Mike Now!

      1-800-HANG-EM-HIGH

  62. Randy? by jandersen · · Score: 1

    How about names that are ambiguous, like "Randy"? Which I understand is a male name in the US, but means "sexually aroused" in UK - should the icon depend on which part of the world you live in? And if so, what should the UK avatar be like?

  63. I just *have* to point out by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    "Leather Goddesses of Phobos"

    That games sounds like it's definitely NSFW. Do the leather goddesses offer... "on-site" services, and what are the rates?

    You were thinking it too ;)

    1. Re:I just *have* to point out by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Actually, being a text-based Infocom adventure, it was pretty tame. See the walk-through

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  64. kids today... by allgoodnamesaretaken · · Score: 0

    what ever happened to good old fashioned radio buttons??

  65. In today's "politically correct" society... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

    ...I'm not even allowed to assume that someone is a male or female by looking at them. Because sometimes I'd be quite wrong, and then I'd "offend" them, and then it'd be a big mess.

    This seems like an example of software that would only work for the most basic group of the population, and would just annoy a whole another chunk of it. Even if it did work, why is it needed? Just let the person choose. That way if "Josh" is super-flaming, he can pick the girl avatar if he wants. Also, people who have unisex names are annoyed enough by folks not being sure of their gender across the internet, etc. Why add to that when it's so completely unnecessary?

    --
    10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
    20 DRINK COFFEE
    30 GOTO 10
  66. Re:"sexing"? Will this patent be prosecutable? by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

    Hehe. That sounds dirty.

    --
    10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
    20 DRINK COFFEE
    30 GOTO 10
  67. Re:What's That? It's Pat. by joedoc · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this one feels legitimized. Finally.

    --
    Joe Dougherty, Florida, USA
    The words I thought I brought, I left behind. So, never mind.
  68. Spanish names easier by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    Maria is female, Mario is male. Can't get easier than that.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  69. deciding gender based on names by VAXcat · · Score: 1

    Many years ago, I was a bit of a high school prodigy. My SAT scores & grades were very very good. Apparently, based solely on my SAT scores and my first name, which in my region of the country is given to males & females, but is more usually considered to be a woman's name, I received a generous full scholarship offer to a prestigious Ivy Leage women only university. As I am not female, I turned it down. On reflection, looking back, I've been kicking myself over that decision ever since...

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    1. Re:deciding gender based on names by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      These are the things that sit-coms are made of :-).

  70. And Where's SNL's Credit? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    Saturday Night Life gets no credit at all, for their androgynous "Pat" ???

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_(Saturday_Night_Live)

    Tch. Shame on IBM.

  71. So... this is "Pat pending" ? by cjstaples · · Score: 1

    'Nuff said.

    --
    =cjs
  72. What is wrong with the old fashioned technique? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    What is wrong with simply having a "male/female" option when creating a profile?

    This sounds like an invention that is looking for a problem to solve.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  73. Chinese Name order in America Varies by billstewart · · Score: 1

    If you're speaking Chinese, you probably do that. But what I've seen of Chinese name usage in English in American business contexts is that the names often get reversed to more American-style name orders, especially if they're using European individual-names (sorry for the awkward construction - I'm not aware of a useful English term for "first name" other than "first name", though the term "Christian name" is occasionally used) or if they're more-than-first-generation immigrants. That's especially true if you're taking those names and putting them into a database like Microsoft Exchange email system's user database, or also if you're abbreviating names. So my friend K.C. Liu is obviously Liu K-something C-something in Chinese, and in spoken English he's either KC or Dr. Liu. And Fu-Li Betty Wang is Wang Fu-Li in Chinese.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Chinese Name order in America Varies by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Another term for "first name", as it applies to a unique name identifier within a family is also a "given name", although "christian name" is appropriate as well in some contexts.

      The "last name" is also called "sir name" or "surname" is also an appropriate term for the family name.

      Otherwise, you got the gist of this whole thing correctly.

    2. Re:Chinese Name order in America Varies by billstewart · · Score: 1

      I suppose "given name" is as useful a term as any. "Surname" is still a positional term rather than a functional one, so it means "last name" rather than "family name", and is therefore not helpful.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  74. English Name Orders, not "Western" by billstewart · · Score: 1

    There's more than one Western naming convention. Spanish naming conventions aren't the same as English - for instance, José LÃpez Portillo y Pacheco was usually referred to in English as "President Lopez Portillo", or sometimes "President Lopez", and Vicente Fox Quesada was "President Fox". And then there's the concept of "middle name" being something you only have one of...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  75. Names Marion vs. Marian, and Clare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mom's name is Marion, spelled like the Duke and Mayor Barry and Pat Robertson spell their first names.

    My father's first name was Clare. Most years he was "CA" at work, my mom called him "Clare", and my older cousins call him "Uncle Gus", because he was called Gus as a kid to differentiate from his father who was also named Clare.

    They frequently got mail with the wrong title on it - "Mrs. Clare [Lastname]" could be for either of them, "Ms. Clare [Lastname]" was obviously for him, mail for her was often to "Marian". And of course of you were going to put a title on his mail, the proper title was "Dr.", not that he used it except on formal paperwork (he was a PhD, not an MD, and worked at a technology company where lots of people had PhDs so nobody used the title at work either.)

  76. Choose your Avatar, not just your gender by billstewart · · Score: 1

    If you've got a shared database between sender and recipient, then rather than having the recipient's software guess the avatar, or having the sender indicate the gender to use, you could have the sender pick the avatar. So yeah, I agree with your "dumbidea" tag.

    And the conventions for avatar choice are very scenario-dependent. You might choose a rather different avatar for work than for gaming, for instance...

    Of course, here in San Francisco, not only did which gender the law thinks you are just become more important, but gender is a rather more flexible construct. I don't know if my friend who's XXY is allowed to marry *anybody* now.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  77. Rene as an ambiguous name. by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I had a friend in college whose name was Rene (female, but IIRC she spelled it like that, not like Renee.) She got married, and at one point they received some paperwork for Mr. Rene Lastname. She tried to deal with it, and they told her that no, they needed to speak to MR Rene Lastname, not Mrs. Rene Lastname. ("Dammit, there *is* no Mr. Rene Lastname, he's Mr. Bruce Lastname"....)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  78. Coworkers Terry and Lee by billstewart · · Score: 1

    We had no problems picking gender-neutral names to use for text examples that should be politically correct - we'd add Pat if we needed to. In this case, Terry was male and Lee was female.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  79. Bell Labs Initial Intial Lastname convention by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Back when I was at Bell Labs, the convention for names to put on technical papers was to use initials and last name. I don't know how long that had been going on, but it was viewed as allowing work to be seen without the filter of gender (plus it was unambiguous about whether to use your nickname vs. formal name, for those of us like me who are only addressed with our formal first name by bureaucrats who are pretending to be familiar but don't actually know us...)

    On the other hand, there were fewer applications using avatars in those days, and the default avatar was usually a Peter Weinberger logo-face.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  80. My mother is named Terry... by Yossarian45793 · · Score: 1

    ...you insensitive clod!

  81. Female names by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    In French, most nouns that end in ie, ce, ion are feminine. One can presume the others are for males.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  82. So lemme get this straight... by Jaazaniah · · Score: 1

    The second this gets marketed to the world, IBM will 'sell' content of a back-end that will contain lists and assignments. Migration becomes a concern here. Some middle-eastern names that are perfectly masculine or feminine there can easily be mistaken for their opposite in the USA.

    Besides that, I have not read the patent, but couldn't this just be a simple lookup similar to SELECT GenderIconHash FROM Names WHERE Name LIKE UserFirstName? Can they seriously expect to win patent lawsuits against a single line of SQL generated by someone who isn't even a real DBA?!