Slashdot Mirror


Duplicating Your Housekeys, From a Distance

Roland Piquepaille writes "Some clever computer scientists at UC San Diego (UCSD) have developed a software that can perform key duplication with just a picture of the key — taken from up to 200 feet. One of the researchers said 'we built our key duplication software system to show people that their keys are not inherently secret.' He added that on sites like Flickr, you can find many photos of people's keys that can be used to easily make duplicates. Apparently, some people are blurring 'numbers on their credit cards and driver's licenses before putting those photos on-line,' but not their keys. This software project is quite interesting, but don't be too afraid. I don't think that many of you put a photo of their keys online — with their addresses." I wonder when I'll be able to order more ordinary duplicate keys by emailing in a couple of photos.

287 comments

  1. wow by EncryptedSoldier · · Score: 5, Funny

    looks like hiding your key in that rock was a good idea after all :)

    1. Re:wow by Yvan256 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not really. The rock was a pet rock and it ran away.

      You are now "key-less". You may go back to Sto-Vo-Kor.

    2. Re:wow by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      Worst. Pun. Ever.

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    3. Re:wow by BronsCon · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know, they can clone you from DNA, no need for a photo.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    4. Re:wow by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      I guess I should have stopped at the first line.

    5. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but can they clone an anus?

    6. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why clone an anus when there is already an unlimited supply of assholes?

    7. Re:wow by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      I think my wife and the police would notice the age difference.

    8. Re:wow by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Worst. Pun. Ever.

      Yeah. I hate when people make "Sto-Vo-Kor" puns!

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    9. Re:wow by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      Just listening to them is pure punishment.

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    10. Re:wow by RincewindTVD · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have got there on my own, but now that you say IN it makes so much more sense. If you'll excuse me, I have to go find a glazer to work on a friends place who told me 'that rock' was his key.

    11. Re:wow by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      No, just assholes like GGP AC poster.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  2. Interesting but pointless by db32 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems to me that the number of incidences where this could possibly be an issue is astronomically slim. Need picture of key, need to know where the key goes, and need the method of duplicating key with picture accurately enough to be of use. Then there has to be a pretty impresive reason why any of the other less complicated and faster ways of breaking in wouldn't be useful.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    1. Re:Interesting but pointless by EncryptedSoldier · · Score: 1

      true but having a key would be a clean, easy, covert break in. It would be easy to get a picture of the key if you think about it, and knowing where it goes. The only thing is how easy and cost effective this technology would be. I still think it's kinda cool, but scary.

    2. Re:Interesting but pointless by thenewguy001 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. As soon as word gets out that this is possible, criminals will find a way of either stealing or duplicating this technology. Then all one has to do is set up a hidden camera near a door and wait for the rightful owner to come and take out their keys and open the door. Then you'd have pictures of the keys to duplicate and you can rob the place at your leisure with minimal effort. With no signs of forced entry, good luck convincing your insurance company that your place was robbed.

    3. Re:Interesting but pointless by Reece400 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure a stalker could get get all except for 'method of duplicating key with picture accurately enough to be of use' without much work, now if the they happen to be reading slashdot today...

    4. Re:Interesting but pointless by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's a story from 2005 about a locksmith who made a copy of a key from an x-ray of some poor guy who somehow swallowed his key:

      http://www.boingboing.net/2005/06/25/locksmith-makes-key-.html

    5. Re:Interesting but pointless by zippthorne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not quite. Depending on the key, of course, all you need to do is get the code and figure out the style. Then you could get replacements sent to you from the manufacturer.

      In fact, some keys (I'm talking to you, cheap schlage locks) print the key code ON THE KEY, so you wouldn't even need to do any kind of fitting if the photo happened to be of the right side.

      But, of course, why bother having a particularly secure lock, when your all-metal steel-bolted door is right next to a 6 foot plate-glass bay window?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:Interesting but pointless by zappepcs · · Score: 3, Informative

      How much more wrong could you be? Got an enemy? Drink in the same bars? Got a camera phone? ... is the idea sinking in?

    7. Re:Interesting but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could sit outside someone's house and take a picture of their keys while they attempt to unlock their door. A good reason to do it like this is silence. Unlocking a door is a lot quieter then smashing a window.

    8. Re:Interesting but pointless by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems to me that the number of incidences where this could possibly be an issue is astronomically slim. Need picture of key, need to know where the key goes, and need the method of duplicating key with picture accurately enough to be of use.

      This wouldn't work for picking someone at random.

      However, if you wanted the keys to a specific place, it sounds like it would be entirely feasible to do a little targeted surveillance and get your key.

      Still, demonstrating that you can do it means someone will find a reason to do it.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Interesting but pointless by torkus · · Score: 1

      I don't rate this as 'zomg the l337 key haxx on my doorz' but for those with evil intent it is a security risk.

      People assume a fancy lock and solid door ensure security. People also assume someone with a key to open a door generally belongs there. If I wanted to commit a 'broad daylight' crime this would greatly simplify things.

      Heck, if a cop shows up and you've got a working key and a reasonable excuse you're pretty likely to be left alone.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    10. Re:Interesting but pointless by JayAitch · · Score: 5, Funny

      But, of course, why bother having a particularly secure lock, when your all-metal steel-bolted door is right next to a 6 foot plate-glass bay window?

      For some new houses use a utility knife cut thru the vinyl siding, foam sheeting, and kick thru the drywall for easy access.

    11. Re:Interesting but pointless by db32 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because breaking in in the hundreds of other ways or just kicking my ass in the parking lot is FAR easier than going through all of that rigamarole. My point is this is probably the most difficult and time consuming method to achieve the goal with minimal benefit. That goes along the same lines of saying that gun control laws stop murder. If the criminal is going to commit murder with the gun, do you think it really matters to him that he is breaking the law by owning the gun?

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    12. Re:Interesting but pointless by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we're talking about someone that might rather like to take your new tv, or perhaps pour a bit of water inside it and not get caught.

    13. Re:Interesting but pointless by PPH · · Score: 1

      This might be pretty pointless with someone's home. But I can think of several instances in which having access to certain facilities using a key will prevent the suspicion of bystanders by making it appear that your access is authorized.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    14. Re:Interesting but pointless by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Variations on that method would work on most frame houses built during the last fifty years but burglars still attack doors and windows. This, of course, is because most are remarkably stupid (intelligent criminals go into politics).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    15. Re:Interesting but pointless by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      true but having a key would be a clean, easy, covert break in. It would be easy to get a picture of the key if you think about it, and knowing where it goes. The only thing is how easy and cost effective this technology would be. I still think it's kinda cool, but scary.

      Think about it and it's actually pretty simple. Let's say you have a burglar who wants to rob a particular house (or group of same). They're probably going to case the neighbourhood beforehand anyways and many of them will use a camera to get specific shots as memory aids. 200 feet away from a front door provides many areas of cover and a telephoto lens could provide the optical accuracy.

      Throw in the fact that many (most?) insurance companies won't pay out in the case of a break-in without signs of forceful entry and it is a pretty scary situation.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    16. Re:Interesting but pointless by mlts · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is what Assa-Abloy's Cliq technology is for. The cylinder has a small chip which gets power from a battery on the key, and if the key is correct (it uses a challenge/response system to validate the key's serial number), it will retract a small solenoid. The rest of the cylinder is mechanical with the same pick resistance as the line its in, be it Abloy Protech, Mul T Lock, or Medeco.

    17. Re:Interesting but pointless by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Cameras are going to be equipped with Geo-Tagging in the not so distant future (some already are)... unsuspecting individuals won't realize that when they upload a photo with all the meta data intact that it will be possible to extract their location and possibly address.

      Still you are correct, even with this it will be rare occurrence: a picture with keys visible, geo-tagging intact and you happen to be at the location where the key is useful.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    18. Re:Interesting but pointless by Syberz · · Score: 1

      Nah, this isn't pointless. I can see this being extremely useful for "homeland security".

      Step 1: Park blacked out van near terrorism suspect's house.
      Step 2: Take multiple pictures of suspect entering and leaving.
      Step 3: Duplicate keys
      Step 4: Use keys to enter house and rifle through stuff looking for "proof". ...
      Step x: Profit!

      --
      ~Syberz
    19. Re:Interesting but pointless by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the number of incidences where this could possibly be an issue is astronomically slim. Need picture of key, need to know where the key goes, and need the method of duplicating key with picture accurately enough to be of use. Then there has to be a pretty impresive reason why any of the other less complicated and faster ways of breaking in wouldn't be useful.

      I dunno, i have a 10 Megapixel SLR camera with a telephoto lens that says otherwise. I could take 20 pictures of you in 3.1 seconds, and zoomed in, with ten megapixels to work with, i could get a good photo of your keys. Sitting in a car on your street doing this, i'd have no problem figuring out where the keys go.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    20. Re:Interesting but pointless by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Ok... but what about the 1/4" plywood on which the vinyl hangs?

    21. Re:Interesting but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Quite a few houses lack that, especially low end ones, like those that H4H puts up. There is a bit of plywood near the corners, but most of the house is vinyl, house wrap, insulation, then dry-wall. If

    22. Re:Interesting but pointless by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Hopefully your key never runs low on juice when it's raining out...

    23. Re:Interesting but pointless by JayAitch · · Score: 1

      People can easily break in and steal your worldly possessions, but at least your R-factor is better!

    24. Re:Interesting but pointless by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's a lot easier to steal shit if no one has any idea you were there in the first place.

      Neighbor: "db32's on vacation... what are you doing here?"
      Thief: "Oh, he gave me a key to watch the house, see?"
      Neighbor: "Oh, alright then."

      Thief proceeds to park in the garage, load up car with everything, and leave, with days (or weeks) of lead time to unload stolen goods.

      It's not a bad idea to keep your keys from being photographed. People will use a much more difficult way of breaking in if it gives them a better chance of not getting caught.

    25. Re:Interesting but pointless by QRDeNameland · · Score: 2, Funny

      No wonder they told us not to bring cameras to all those Key Parties in the '70s. They saw this coming.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    26. Re:Interesting but pointless by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Right. Which is why db32 up there was rather intuitive when he said this:

      Then there has to be a pretty impressive reason why any of the other less complicated and faster ways of breaking in wouldn't be useful.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    27. Re:Interesting but pointless by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      What happens if your battery runs down? It seems to me that having a small induction system would be better for getting back into my house.

    28. Re:Interesting but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is a bit of plywood near the corners, but most of the house is vinyl, house wrap, insulation, then dry-wall. If

      What? If what?? Don't leave us hanging, NO CARRIER man!!
      (CAPTCHA is dramatic.)

    29. Re:Interesting but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see a big threat here, if someone wants in they can just smash a window. No algorithm and CNC lathe required.

    30. Re:Interesting but pointless by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Unless you live in the middle of nowhere people tend to notice things like windows being broken and walls being tunneled through.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    31. Re:Interesting but pointless by nsayer · · Score: 1

      People notice car alarms too. Doesn't mean they prevent auto theft.

    32. Re:Interesting but pointless by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this isn't any more of a security issue than it was 20 years ago.

      Computer scientists? Clever? Really?

      A picture of a key (of sufficient quality and detail) provides all the information necessary to operate the lock. This is obvious.

      A description of a key can be used to make a copy. This is obvious.

      I fail to see how this is newsworthy, research money worthy, or slashdot worthy. In reality it's just another load of bullshit that plays off of security fears. Teh hax0rz are a lazy bunch, and do not have access to key blanks or key grinders. Anyone with access to such equipment, and the knowledge to use it, doesn't need a fucking picture of your key to get into your house.

      They have these things called locksmiths.

      Nerds are retards when it comes to any of the industrial crafts, and thus are amazed when they can find some way to simulate, emulate, or just watch one being performed.

    33. Re:Interesting but pointless by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      there has to be a pretty impresive reason why any of the other less complicated and faster ways of breaking in wouldn't be useful.

      #1 - making it look like an inside job

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    34. Re:Interesting but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered the security workers at the airport as a potential risk source?
      They take a X-Ray photograph of your keys. They can set the keys to an easy to read position on the image. They can read your name and home address from the ticket database and they also know the dates when you will be away from home. That is all the data needed for a successful burglary. Plus, they are underpaid and therefore easy to bribe into selling such data to the criminal organisations.

    35. Re:Interesting but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some new houses use a utility knife cut thru the vinyl siding, foam sheeting, and kick thru the drywall for easy access.

      Someone replied to this before with

      "And like most things in life. It is both faster and more fun with a chainsaw"

    36. Re:Interesting but pointless by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      Dude, I think you missed the point 9000 times. If you took a camera to a key party and only took pictures of the key rings... well, I don't even know how to describe that kind of fucked up.

    37. Re:Interesting but pointless by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the number of incidences where this could possibly be an issue is astronomically slim. Need picture of key, need to know where the key goes, and need the method of duplicating key with picture accurately enough to be of use. Then there has to be a pretty impresive reason why any of the other less complicated and faster ways of breaking in wouldn't be useful.

      This has fabulous commercial applications. As it is, now I have to drive down to Home Depot (20 minutes), find a human (5+) have them page someone to the key machine department (5+) have them realize nobody but the manager has been trained on keys (10+), find out there are no blanks for my 'weird key' (from a lock they sell three aisles over), and then have to go to the locksmith's on Monday at lunch to get the key done for $12. Or maybe they do have the blank but from experience they know I ought to my the key in my car door before I leave and after three tries, a working key is produced (actually happened to me at the Manchester NH store).

      Or I can set the key on my desk (0), take a picture (.5), upload it to my computer (1), and order a replacement online (4). Shipped priority mail I probably break even on cost and completely kill on convenience.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    38. Re:Interesting but pointless by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Nerds are retards when it comes to any of the industrial crafts, and thus are amazed when they can find some way to simulate, emulate, or just watch one being performed.

      Yeah, that's what always amazes me whenever anything lock-and-key related comes up. I've been a locksmith for 20-odd years, so I read this article and thought "So what?" I can just look at someone's key and decode the thing by eye with enough accuracy to cut a working key. I've had people fax me photocopies of keys from which I've cut working keys. I've looked through the window of a locked car at 3am with a dim flashlight at a person's keys hanging in the ignition and cut a key to open the door. Amazing feats, to the unskilled, but really just the expected skillset among competent journeyman level locksmiths.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    39. Re:Interesting but pointless by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      there has to be a pretty impresive reason why any of the other less complicated and faster ways of breaking in wouldn't be useful.

      #1 - making it look like an inside job

      Unless you're a spy, you don't give a crap what it looks like.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    40. Re:Interesting but pointless by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Which is why my neighbors know the people authorized to be in my house in my absence - *and* have my contact info.

    41. Re:Interesting but pointless by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      So the lesson is to get your victim into an X-ray machine and make a key using the photo print.

    42. Re:Interesting but pointless by courtarro · · Score: 1

      It's a lot easier to replace a window than it is a wall. Maybe they're just being polite!

    43. Re:Interesting but pointless by plover · · Score: 1

      Not at all pointless. It just depends on the circumstances. I remember taking a picture in a hotel back in the 1980s, catching a photo of the Hollerith punched card key the maids used to open every door on the floor, and thinking "if I were a thief, this would be too easy."

      A professional thief could hang around resort hotels with a camera and completely blend in. A surreptitious photo of the maid's key, a few minutes of filing, test it out in the privacy of your own room's door lock, and let the looting begin. Lather, rinse, head to the next hotel down the strip, and repeat.

      Like I keep saying about every security hole, just because YOU can't think of a malicious use or a way to abuse a security hole doesn't mean someone else can't.

      --
      John
    44. Re:Interesting but pointless by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Throw in the fact that many (most?) insurance companies won't pay out in the case of a break-in without signs of forceful entry and it is a pretty scary situation.

      Read your policy documents. Phone the company if necessary to clarify their position (use the following story as a scenario if necessary - you're checking if you'd be covered in a case similar to "your friend") ; if possible, get them to clarify it in writing, if it's not clear in the policy.
      If you don't like their terms, take your business elsewhere.

      Some years ago I was away from home for a week or two. I suspect the drug dealer living nearby noticed that I wasn't in, and sent some of his customers round to earn their smack money. (Modify the scenario as appropriate to your area ; my drug dealer actually lives in the apartment upstairs. You may not know where all your local drug dealers live, so choose other local demons.) Next day, one of my neighbours noticed that my door was flapping in the breeze, and informed the police. The police could plainly see that I'd been burgled, but couldn't contact me, so they just got a locksmith to repair the damage to the door and make the place secure again. I came back into the country, discovered the burglary, talked to the police, and spent a miserable weekend cataloguing the stolen goods. I then went to the police station with the list of stolen items, serial numbers etc, leaving my laptop locked up inside the house. While I was at the police, someone (from footprints, not the same someone(s), or at least, wearing different shoes) used a set of keys which had been taken in the original burglary but which I'd forgotten about, walked into the house, and walked out with my laptop. They didn't lock the door behind them - there wasn't a lot of point, was there?
      Two separate burglaries ; two distinct crimes ; possibly two (several) separate criminals ; two separate claims. Both claims accepted.

      If you don't like how a company deals with situations, don't buy their product. I understand that they may think that you're likely to defraud them, while there were unusual circumstances in my case. But it's not too incredible. Got a kid with keys, who goes to a party one night and loses his/her/it's keys? Are you going to change ALL the locks under all such circumstances? Yes, as a householder you have to exercise reasonable care, but that is "reasonable" care, not high levels of paranoia.
      (I'm more paranoid now ; whether I'm paranoid enough is another question.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    45. Re:Interesting but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The battery lasts for ca. 3 years. The key will indicate you when the battery is running low.

    46. Re:Interesting but pointless by Quantos · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that they don't already know about this method of duplicating keys?

      --
      Some people are only alive because it's against the law for me to hunt them down and kill them.
    47. Re:Interesting but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about this tied in with other technoloies. Someone at your college posts a Facebook photo with their dorm key in it. Through Facebook not only you also know their dorm #, and their schedule. Send the key in to get copied, and now you have a permanent food / beer supply from their fridge!

    48. Re:Interesting but pointless by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      People set off their own car alarms all the time or they are set off by being bumped into so they get ignored. Windows and walls are rarely smashed by their owners or do so spontaniously.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    49. Re:Interesting but pointless by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      But, of course, why bother having a particularly secure lock, when your all-metal steel-bolted door is right next to a 6 foot plate-glass bay window?

      Most modern houses have double glazing and any window that is big enough to climb through normally uses safety glass which is very hard to break through. Using normal plate glass in large windows is very dangerous as if the window is broken then the pieces can fall from the frame like a guillotine.

      Double glazing and safety glass has massively increased home security by removing the weak link of easily broken windows. As most people also get a uPVC front door along with the windows that makes the house even more secure.

    50. Re:Interesting but pointless by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Quite a few? In what state? I've honestly never come across such a house, and i've helped build a H4H house...

    51. Re:Interesting but pointless by JayAitch · · Score: 1

      In the northeast US I've seen this quite frequently. Though people are pushing their builders to go back to plywood and TYVEK house wrap. However this foam has a better R-Value and moisture barrier than OSB. Some builders put it over OSB too, but that gets pricey.

    52. Re:Interesting but pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a utility knife cuts through plywood how exactly?

  3. Not really that hard by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

    I don't know about M. Piquepaille, but it's not very hard to find my address online. How many places am I going to have keys for? My house, my car, my bike, and my mailbox. That's pretty much it. Besides, I geotag just about every picture I post to flickr. But who takes pictures of keys?

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  4. interesting.... by skywiseguy · · Score: 1

    every time i pull my keys out to use them i have always tried to hide at least one side of them for just such a reason. now my paranoia has finally paid off!

    1. Re:interesting.... by snowraver1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think your efforts are in vain. You are way more likely to have some thug just break the door down or smash a window. Usually the people that break into your house do not have the foresight to plan to this degree.

      I think that a more valuable use of resources would be to recyle the tinfoil sitting on your head.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:interesting.... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Usually the people that break into your house do not have the foresight to plan to this degree.

      Then you don't know very many of the people that break into your house.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    3. Re:interesting.... by mlts · · Score: 1

      If a thug breaks down a door, smashes a window, or takes a chainsaw to a wall for entry, there is an obvious signature of forced entry. One takes a picture of this, and when claiming insurance, will have few problems.

      If a lock is picked or bumped, there is no sign of entry, thus an insurance company likely won't pay and probably one will have to obtain their claim in a court of law where they have to prove that the item was there, and it was stolen, not hidden or sequestered somehow.

    4. Re:interesting.... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      No, it's the people who break into your house that he doesn't know.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:interesting.... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Why should the thief care whether or not you are able to collect from your insurance company?

      In any case, it is rarely difficult to convince the insurance company that a burglary ocurred regardless of the means of entry. Burglars are not neat and tidy as they search the house for valuables. A few photos of the trashed interior usually suffice.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:interesting.... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      More likely. But on the off chance there's a smart thief, it doesn't hurt to keep them mostly out of sight.

      A smart thief will want to be able to get in, do his thing, and then leave without leaving a trace, any reason for anyone to get suspicious. The longer it takes to detect someone, the better off they are.

    7. Re:interesting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Additionally, they would want you to collect insurance and replace your stolen items. They'll already know what they'll find on their return visit.

    8. Re:interesting.... by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      That comes with having shit worth stealing, I guess.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  5. People put photos of their keys online? by hcdejong · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The mind boggles.

    1. Re:People put photos of their keys online? by Ma8thew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There was a meme a while back, where people would post a photo of everything in their pockets (or handbag).

    2. Re:People put photos of their keys online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Doesn't anyone remember this one?:

      Diebold key reproduced from key:
      http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/06/1627220

    3. Re:People put photos of their keys online? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      buzzzz, no. but thanks for trying

    4. Re:People put photos of their keys online? by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing about why the fuck people would put pictures of their credit cards--numbers blurred or not--online. Whiskey tango foxtrot?

      --
      If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
    5. Re:People put photos of their keys online? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Especially amusing is that they almost certainly use a reversible blurring algorithm.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:People put photos of their keys online? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doesn't anyone remember this one?:

      Diebold key reproduced from key: http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/06/1627220

      The real astounding thing about the Diebold key that he probably didn't realize was that he likely didn't need to duplicate the key, but rather need only look through his junk drawer. I'm a locksmith, and I can tell just from looking at the picture of the key that it's a National C415A. This is probably the most common cheap cam lock key in the US. The steel drawers in my service truck came keyed to C415A.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  6. As the saying goes... by cjfs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Locks are to keep honest people out.

    1. Re:As the saying goes... by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed; I'd rather they took a picture of my key with a telephoto lens and got in that way than to have them break a window. Unfortunately, thieves are lazy or they'd get a job and it's a hell of a lot asier to break a window or use a crowbar on the door than to go to the trouble of photographing your key.

      That's one thing I hate about my car - the goddamn "open trunk" button. Previous cars I'd leave the doors unlocked and nothing of value inside, and windows down if the weather permitted (because thieves are stupid and don't care about your property, they'll break the window just assuming it's locked).

      With that damned button all they have to do to break into my trunk is break the driver window and push the button. I'm wondering what lazy idiot designed that "feature"? Especially since there's another button to open the trunk on my keychain? Duh!!!!

    2. Re:As the saying goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often, the trunk can be locked so this button doesn't work, try putting the key in your trunk and turning the other way. Then only the key and fob can open your trunk. I actually had a thief break the pull handle off of my car when they didn't know about this feature.

    3. Re:As the saying goes... by jabelli · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My car ('03 Sentra) has a lever inside the trunk by the lock. When flipped down, the electronic trunk release no longer functions, and you must use the key lock to open the trunk. Maybe yours does, too; have you looked?

    4. Re:As the saying goes... by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Locks are to keep honest people out.

      And drunks, or people who are just plain stupid. It doesn't work on someone smart enough, but it usually doesn't need to.

      Random story:
      I lived with my Grandmother for a few years, and I got into an argument with her about locking the screen door. I wanted to know what kind of criminal existed that would be able to tackle the massive heavy dead bolted door, but be completely stymied by the screen door where you could simply rip open the screen and unlock. Even more amusing is that the screen was already ripped, as she had once forgotten to bring the screen door key with her and had to cut it herself to get in.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    5. Re:As the saying goes... by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Two words: wire cutters

      Problem solved.

      Layne

    6. Re:As the saying goes... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      The open trunk is kinda handy... but I've taken to using my trunk as a "hidden from view" place, rather than a secure lockbox. The main thing you don't want to do is give someone a reason to think there is anything in the trunk... don't put your laptop in the trunk when you pull up to the restaurant, put it in before you leave to go there. Don't leave valuable stuff in there overnight if you aren't parking in a garage.

      And if it really bothers you? Those trunk things are all actuated by a physical wire to my knowledge. Some wire clippers will fix the problem once and for all, and a bit more time with some pliers and wrenches might even make it a reversible modification.

    7. Re:As the saying goes... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      That's one thing I hate about my car - the goddamn "open trunk" button. Previous cars I'd leave the doors unlocked and nothing of value inside, and windows down if the weather permitted (because thieves are stupid and don't care about your property, they'll break the window just assuming it's locked).

      With that damned button all they have to do to break into my trunk is break the driver window and push the button. I'm wondering what lazy idiot designed that "feature"? Especially since there's another button to open the trunk on my keychain? Duh!!!!

      Hrm. I've known many vehicles to have an "open trunk" button/lever/pull-handle accessible within the car - this being even before electronic door locks became common. It's usually a mechanical cable linking the trunk release to the control, though. So it's not a particularly new feature since it's been around for over 30-odd years, if not longer.

      The objective being that the driver can pull up, pop the trunk, and the passengers can then load/unload the trunk as they get in/out...

    8. Re:As the saying goes... by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Usually there is a way to manually disable the trunk release. Hopefully it isn't like my old Honda Accord where there was a key lock right on the lever that just put a pin in the way. The a$$hats that broke in just pulled on the thing until the pin broke off.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    9. Re:As the saying goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The saying is stupid.

      Don't see it? Unlock your doors and windows then put a big sign on your front lawn explaining what you've done and why.

    10. Re:As the saying goes... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      A long time ago I had a Mustabg, and somebody ruined my trunk lid with a crowbar; there was a rumor I had a pound of reefer in it.

      All they got was a bald spare tire.

      But the "open trunk" button is pretty redundant when there's a remote of the fob hanging from the ignition switch!

    11. Re:As the saying goes... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Hrm. I've known many vehicles to have an "open trunk" button/lever/pull-handle accessible within the car - this being even before electronic door locks became common.

      Yeah, my sister had one a long time ago. I thought it was dumb then, it's really dumb now that there are remotes for the locks on the key fob. Makes the button redundant.

  7. Who? by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who uploads photos of themselves (or others) holding credit cards or keys? In my entire life, I don't think I've EVER even TAKEN a photo like that, let alone thought about sharing it. Am I just bizarre or is it the people on Flickr? Ok, admittedly it could be both, but still....

    1. Re:Who? by maxume · · Score: 1

      People get obsessed with their pocket paraphernalia. They compare key chains and such.

      Google for 'key chains' or 'every day carry' if this seems unlikely.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Who? by Captain+Spam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not so much holding the cards/keys, it's taking a picture where that's accidentally in the frame, and in fairly readable view. For an example, let's say you're selling something on eBay (insert obligatory Police Squad! joke here). It's not something that their stock pictures will cover, so you need to take a picture of it. Let's also assume that you don't have a photo studio handy, nor do you have an area of your house/apartment specially designed with a stage and neutral backdrop on which to take pictures, so you're taking the picture on your kitchen table, or an end table in the living room. All seem perfectly reasonable?

      That's where your problem might come in. Without even thinking about it, you might have left some clutter on the table. All you needed is space to put your object. It's all that clutter you need to worry about; suddenly, your car keys could show up all over the internet via an honest mistake. Or maybe a credit card bill with your address. Your credit card seems less likely, I'll admit, given most people keep those in their wallets, not in the open on tables, but still, the point stands.

      So it's not so much of stupid/drunk/stupid drunk people thinking it's a good idea to take a picture of them holding credit cards and car keys, it's more of a mistake of leaving things in the scene when taking a picture. And yes, people on Flickr are bizarre, but that's besides the point.

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    3. Re:Who? by zen-theorist · · Score: 1

      For that matter, I've never thought twice about using a credit card at a fastfood restaurant with people in the line behind me using their phones.. this totally opened my eyes today.

    4. Re:Who? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why people leave their keys laying about anyhow. My keys are in pocket, or at night they are in the top drawer of my wife's jewelry armoire...

      Probably my Navy training showing through - a key in its designated stowage, on a lanyard around your neck, in your pocket, or in your hand in use. No exceptions. A key is treated as if it were the thing the key controls access to. (I once narrowly missed Captain's Mast once because I laid a very important set of keys on the console so I could pick up a pen to sign a log...)

    5. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have all the photos of my key you want, its a magstripe.

  8. Eyeballing my Cadillac by pigiron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I locked my Cadillac once and left my keys lying on the drivers seat. The locksmith successfully cut a new door key by hand just by looking at the key through the window.

    1. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by 77Punker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A friend of mine during college used the same technique to duplicate a master key that fit most of the doors in our (somewhat small) school. He's always been an interesting character, though. That was several years ago and today he's a sysadmin but on the weekends he practices blacksmithing.

    2. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by mcgrew · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I call bullshit.

      I've had locksmiths get my key out, and they have a flat piece of metal (cops carry them too) that they can slide down where the window goes and have the door open in five seconds. No need whatever to make a key to open it.

      Twenty bucks to come out to the car, a buck fifty for a new key. Yet he's going to go to that trouble to make a key?

      How fucking stupid do you think we are?

    3. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by pigiron · · Score: 2, Informative

      I beg your pardon (NOT you rude sonofabitch!) but it took him all of three or four minutes to do it and without damaging my window seals, internal door mechanisms, or setting off any alarm.

    4. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Try that on any '90s/early 2000s Cadillac. You can probably successfully break the window motor or wires, but you won't be getting the door open. The lock mechanism is low, and forward in the doors, slides horizontally, and is behind a metal bar. It's not like the typical car lock which is an actuated metal rod near the top back corner of the door. You would have to know exactly what the inside of the door looked like, and have bends in exactly the right spots on the tool to get the door open, and you'd have to get lucky that you don't short something.

      It only takes a couple minutes to file some notches in brass. Probably less time than it takes to slim jim a Cadillac. And I know if I had the skills to eyeball something like that I'd show it off every chance I got.

    5. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do it the easy way.

      Go to Home Depot and buy a long, skinny steel tape (it's a flat piece of metal).

      Bring the tape and pliers to a car. Look through the window, see where the big lock button is. Usually next to the handle.

      Shape the tape with the pliers, slide the tape in through the back of the window, grab the lock button with the bent end of the tape, and pull.

      Bingo.

      I did that once, in snow, with an old T-square and a leatherman tool, and got into my pickup truck to get my keys back. It only took about ten minutes.

      I wrecked the T-square though.

    6. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly not as stupid as you, sans profanity.

      You seem to be referring to the Slim Jim, but these aren't very effective on more expensive cars from the 90s, and they're not effective on most cars made today. Driver and passender doors are stuffed with wires, airbags, and their lock mechanisms are designed to foil the device.

    7. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      It only takes a couple minutes to file some notches in brass.

      It's even easier than that. There is a tool that looks like a pair of pliers that you put the key blank into, set the depth, and squeeze to cut the key for that pin. The tool is preset with the correct positioning for both the location of the pins and the proper depth of the cuts for that make of car. I know this because I worked as a locksmith for a number of years and used this very technique to open car doors. As long as you have a good view of the key, you can make a good, educated guess about the cuts. It takes a couple of minutes but if it keeps me from having to get inside someone's car door, especially in the winter, then all the better.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    8. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you don't stick the slim metal strip into the door, but rather, into the passenger compartment. You bend the end and use it to grab the actual lock button. Modern ones are big and squarish, and behind the door handle. They're not as easy to grab as the old type, but still... Not hard, either.

      Back in the old days, people used to use wire coat hangers to grab the post-style lock buttons. It's a similar approach.

      The only people I've seen sticking "slim jims" into the doors themselves have been on TV.

      (BTW, this is the kind of thing you learn when you grow up in New York, ha ha).

    9. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by agrounds · · Score: 4, Funny

      I call bullshit.

      I've had locksmiths get my key out, and they have a flat piece of metal (cops carry them too) that they can slide down where the window goes and have the door open in five seconds. No need whatever to make a key to open it.

      Twenty bucks to come out to the car, a buck fifty for a new key. Yet he's going to go to that trouble to make a key?

      How fucking stupid do you think we are?

      Hello, and welcome to the Post-80s world! This is a brave new place where car doors are designed for this absolutely not to work any longer, even if you could get past all the crap and to the mechanisms. Also, we have this thing called the "internet" where you can see naked pictures. Oh, and Molly Ringwald is no longer hot.

      No. We still don't have flying cars.

    10. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My dad cut a key from memory once when he lost the key to his Ford van. This post caught my eye because I am also a system administrator/blacksmith.

    11. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a car I couldn't get into with a screwdriver and wire hanger. Ever.

      Also consider that car probably only had a dozen or so different keys designs.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was Molly Ringwald ever hot?

      Ewwww...

    13. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How fucking stupid do you think we are?

      too stupid to attempt a quick google to research his claim before replying?

      seriously though, locksmiths really know what they're doing when it comes to keys and can do that sort of stuff pretty easily with practice. not so much when it comes to the navigating the insides of a random car door

    14. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit.

      I've had locksmiths get my key out, and they have a flat piece of metal (cops carry them too) that they can slide down where the window goes and have the door open in five seconds. No need whatever to make a key to open it.

      Twenty bucks to come out to the car, a buck fifty for a new key. Yet he's going to go to that trouble to make a key?

      How fucking stupid do you think we are?

      I think you're extremely stupid. Not every car opens with a slim jim like yours does, Einstein. Not all cars have their locking mechanisms arranged identically inside the door. I don't know what it is you think "cops carry", but it ain't the $400 thirty piece set needed to open most lat model cars, and they sure as fuck don't have the time to practice with it such that they'd be able to use it. When the key is visible, it is indeed often easier to cut a key by code than it is to jigger the mechanism with a tool. I've been a locksmith for 20+ years, and given the choice, I will always choose to make a key over risking scratching their paint or breaking some delicate plastic part of the lock mechanism.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    15. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by hughk · · Score: 1

      Newer high-end cars (as well as some mid-range) use deadlocks. Once activated, the interior locks can't be released. As for trying to force the mechanism, again, the higher end ones are much harder to force. Indeed car thieves for the likes of good BMs/Mercs/Etc use remote unlocking device sniffers (it also means less dame to the car).

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    16. Re:Eyeballing my Cadillac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of the things you mentioned would even slow a skilled locksmith down from opening said car, nor should it stop a reasonably motivated thief, and I mean both of them using a slimjim. In case you aren't aware, anyone smart will watch for feedback from the lock "plungers". If they don't see it wiggle while working in one area of the door, they move until they find it.

      There are also other devices besides the slimjim to open door locks.

  9. Fine, go ahead... by TheNecromancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    make copies of my keys. Have fun "playing" with my pitbull waiting for you on the other side of the door.

    --
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
    1. Re:Fine, go ahead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto, the lock is not the part of my house that should concern you. That growling behind the door isn't a joke.

    2. Re:Fine, go ahead... by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Does your pitbull like playing with a well swung crowbar? Dogs are not a panacea, especially against someone who knows what he's doing.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    3. Re:Fine, go ahead... by TheNecromancer · · Score: 1

      Does your pitbull like playing with a well swung crowbar? Dogs are not a panacea, especially against someone who knows what he's doing.

      Haha, you wouldn't get a chance to swing it. The dog would be on you the moment you opened the door, and once he has a lock on your arm/leg/whatever, all thoughts of swinging said crowbar would leave your mind. I'm not saying dogs are a panacea, but it was a tongue-in-cheek response to the fact that most burglars are deterred by other means of home protection (dogs, guns, security systems, etc.).

      --
      Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
    4. Re:Fine, go ahead... by Kingrames · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clearly you are unaware that u38cg has taken the Improved Initiative feat.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    5. Re:Fine, go ahead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in the correct state (California is one I think) you can sue for medical expenses the dog would do to you. So you might want to think twice before purchasing that pit bull for such reasons.

    6. Re:Fine, go ahead... by u38cg · · Score: 1
      True. In general, you don't need to be really secure, you just need to be more secure than your next door neighbour. Generally, planting a rose bush under your window and leaving some lights on accomplishes that.

      Someone who knows what they are doing is a bit more difficult - I speak from experience. I grew up in riding schools, which generally have a lot of very expensive tack sitting in very insecure tackrooms, which often contain a dog. More than once I've seen or heard of an empty tackroom with a dead dog lying on the floor with a stoved-in skull.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    7. Re:Fine, go ahead... by dubner · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm with you.

      I would welcome the opportunity to cleanse the gene pool, however small. My house is insured by Smith & Wesson.

      "Do you feel lucky? Well, do ya punk?" (Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry).

    8. Re:Fine, go ahead... by jcnnghm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yet another reason why California should be cast into the sea.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:Fine, go ahead... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Does your pitbull like playing with a well swung crowbar? Dogs are not a panacea, especially against someone who knows what he's doing.

      Yeah, but dogs and CURTAINS are!!!

    10. Re:Fine, go ahead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully, a lot of people don't live there, where burglars can also get income for life if they fail in their thievery by suing their victims.

      Best defense of a place is a respectable dog (No Paris Hilton lappies). A crowbar isn't going to do much with a dog gnawing on an arm or leg. A would be thief would have to use a firearm to get rid of the dog, and in a lot of places, using a firearm to commit a felony adds 10-20 years to a sentence, not to mention other charges such as wrongful discharging a firearm, etc. Plus the noise involved, and the burglar likely missing the dog.

      Guns are OK, but unless the homeowner knows retention 101 and is able to pull the trigger, the burglar now has a spare sidearm.

      Burglar alarms are great... but few police even bother responding to them in some reasonable time. By the time a patrol car actually goes by, its likely 1-2 hours.

    11. Re:Fine, go ahead... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Dog Are all intimidation. If you know what to do they are easy to deal with, yes even your [Mean dog of the day].

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Fine, go ahead... by Chrono11901 · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      I used to live on a flag lot behind another house.

      The house in front of us and the two next to us were all robbed multiple times over the course of a few years. I believe our good fortune was due to the two German Sheppards we kept as pets.

    13. Re:Fine, go ahead... by hughk · · Score: 1

      Unless you have a very well trained dog, it won't work. Thieves round here know about valium mashed up with fresh meat. They typically throw it into the yard/garden, dog finds and eats, it then goes to sleep for 24Hrs. The break-in occurs in that time. This happened to my mother with a Great Dane.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    14. Re:Fine, go ahead... by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the old joke.

      Man parks car in dodgy neighbourhood, local juvenile delinquents arrive...

      JDs: "We'll look after you car for a fiver mister."
      Man (pointing at large dog in car): "I think my dog can look after the car quite well thank you."
      JDs: "Oh, does he put out fires then ?"

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    15. Re:Fine, go ahead... by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Best defense of a place is a respectable dog

      As has been mentioned above there are a lot of ways to get around a dog, whether that is with drugs/poison, or something like mace. One particularly nasty trick would be feed the dog something with poison in and then come back a couple of days later to break in.

      The other problem with guard dogs is that dogs who will attack someone who breaks into your house will unless very well trained also attack any other visitors. I certainly wouldn't want a dog in my house that would attack anyone coming in the front door who it hadn't met before. Especially if I had children.

  10. Not necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use a bump key

  11. It works with Medeco keys too by davidwr · · Score: 2, Informative

    You mean like this, but from 200 feet away?

    It's only a matter of time before Google Maps 0wns your keys.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:It works with Medeco keys too by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but they'll be able to tell you where you left them, too.

    2. Re:It works with Medeco keys too by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see them try with Medeco bi-axial keys

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    3. Re:It works with Medeco keys too by russotto · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see them try with Medeco bi-axial keys

      You'd need a better picture is all. There's nothing magic about angle cuts.

    4. Re:It works with Medeco keys too by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see them try with Medeco bi-axial keys

      You'd need a better picture is all. There's nothing magic about angle cuts.

      Nothing magical, but there is something very 3-Dimensional about them. It certainly throws a spanner in the simple "2D measurement from a photo from any angle" this method uses. You'd need a fairly good picture with both a view of the side AND top of the key in order to correctly discern the angles. The keys they were correctly figuring from 200 feet away with a telephoto lens were crapola Kwikset 6-depth wide cut garbage, which I could decode by eye from across the room unaided.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  12. What am I missing here? by prime_61997851 · · Score: 1

    Why do people post pictures of their keys on Flickr anyway? Or pictures of their credit cards and drivers licenses on Flickr. Why would someone want to do that. Just curious.

    1. Re:What am I missing here? by EncryptedSoldier · · Score: 1

      because they are a moron and deserve their stuff to be stolen. Honestly, I can't think of a legitimate reason for posting pictures of your keys and credit cards on Flickr. Maybe it has to do with having an IQ below room temperature...

    2. Re:What am I missing here? by colesw · · Score: 1

      Well lets say your about to unlock your door (car, house, whatever ...) and someone takes a picture of you and then posts that picture online. Its entirely possible your keys will be in the picture. Of course I did not read TFA so I don't know what kind of picture they need of your keys.

  13. Not really useful or scary, but interesting by ChenLiWay · · Score: 4, Informative

    Keys only serve to keep honest people honest. A lock pick and torsion bar can mimic any (average) key anyways.

    The story is interesting (on the subject of computer vision) but shouldn't scare anyone.

    1. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what I was thinking. The MIT guide to lockpicking and a decent lockpick renders any normal lock useless in about 30 seconds.

    2. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are locks that are designed to break under the strength of a torsion bar. Once broken they just turn freely but do not unlock the door anymore

    3. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      Security is about detouring or slowing down thieves. It's not about stopping them.
      There's no digital function that a person is honest or dishonest. Life is analog, if I'm unemployed and Bill Gates' house in unlocked, then I'll be glad to help myself.

    4. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by Gyga · · Score: 1

      Torsion bars only use the strength of a regular key ... If they broke under that they would be usless for any key.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    5. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Keys only serve to keep honest people honest. A lock pick and torsion bar can mimic any (average) key anyways.

      Add a hollow "pick" attached to a a can of air. Quite a few cylinder locks will allow turning if all the cylinders are pushed all the way up. Instant $5 master key.

      But I'd imagine a crowbar being faster and more reliable, and it doubles as a defensive tool.

    6. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by stephenisu · · Score: 1

      You use a light touch with a torsion bar. You should be exerting less force than a key ever would. It is not a brute force tool. It merely exerts a bit of lateral pressure against the pins so they do not fall when raking.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    7. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Thats a great interviewing technique you've got there.

    8. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by AlexBirch · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Do you think this is fucking my real name?
      I hate this bastard!!!

    9. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not scared, I never remember to lock my door anyway.

    10. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by chewzLife · · Score: 1

      I'm unemployed, does that make me a thief? How could I afford to be in Bill Gate's neighbourhood if I was unemployed anyway?

    11. Re:Not really useful or scary, but interesting by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Life is analog, if I'm unemployed and Bill Gates' house in unlocked, then I'll be glad to help myself.

      There are a lot of grey areas, but taking other people's shit from their homes isn't really one of them - that one's not very "analog" at all.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  14. ATTENTION JANITORS!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are currently broadcasting your keys TO THE WORLD!

    Punch the monkey to learn how to protect yourself.

  15. One Step Ahead by pete-classic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All the pictures of my keys online have been photoshoped. The keys you could make from them set the tumbler combination that looses the killer bees!

    -Peter

    1. Re:One Step Ahead by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Ewe muss bee knew hear!

      This is slashdot; people will think you lost your bees. Cry havoc and loose the bees of war!

  16. Bump keys more practical by TheLink · · Score: 4, Informative

    The keys in the pic seem to be the crappy "2-D" sort that are vulnerable to "bump keys".

    It'll be much easier to just make a bump key and use it to break in covertly, than to bother making the "same key". Google for bump key videos.

    You'd probably need better pics to make duplicates of those "3-D" keys - those with wedges and so on.

    --
    1. Re:Bump keys more practical by mlts · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Chubb (the venerable English lock maker) actually has a prison lock where part of its construction is to make it resistant to eyeballing by inmates, so they can't memorize the cuts on it and create a copy with sheet metal or another source.

      Other than that, a few keys that are eyeball resistant that come to mind are the Shlage Primus, and the Medeco3 key, because someone would have to eyeball the slider, the pin depth cuts, and the angles of the cuts for the pins to rotate.

    2. Re:Bump keys more practical by TheLink · · Score: 3, Informative

      While it's true you can't "bump" Medeco3 locks and you can't "eyeball" them easily, the photo thing works (I'm not sure but the Shlage Primus looks vulnerable too). http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/08/medeco-locks-cr.html

      I wonder how easy it is to copy the Abloy style keys.

      New abloy key: http://www.abloyusa.com/images/execkey.gif

      Old: http://www.abloyusa.com/images/classickey.gif

      I'm guessing that for the classic key there's a small set of possible angles. If that's true you should be able to easily copy it from a photo (if you can see enough of the angles).

      --
    3. Re:Bump keys more practical by Archon-X · · Score: 2, Informative

      Disklock Pros are rather hard to copy.

      Taking eyeballing out of the picture - even if you have the code for the key on hand, your first problem is getting a blank.

      Blanks are restricted, but even if you manage to get your hands on them, they're pre-cut at the abloy factory [usually 2 pins] depending on your account with them - to prevent locksmiths with less scruples than others cutting abloys.

      Then of course, there's the machine to cut them. Even if you're filing by hand, the tolerances are fine, and the key configuration doesn't really take to soldering as regular keys do...

    4. Re:Bump keys more practical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chubb (the venerable English lock maker) actually has a prison lock where part of its construction is to make it resistant to eyeballing by inmates, so they can't memorize the cuts on it and create a copy with sheet metal or another source.

      Actually, many prisons use plastic key covers top of their keys to do the same thing. There have been many cases of inmates copying keys by looking at them. Inmates do have a lot of time on their hands...

    5. Re:Bump keys more practical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Disklock Pros are rather hard to copy.

      Taking eyeballing out of the picture - even if you have the code for the key on hand, your first problem is getting a blank.

      Blanks are restricted, but even if you manage to get your hands on them, they're pre-cut at the abloy factory [usually 2 pins] depending on your account with them - to prevent locksmiths with less scruples than others cutting abloys.

      Nonsense! The laundry machines at my old apartment used an Abloy DiscLock. I made a compatible blank out of a mid-90's Saab key filed down to the shape of the keyway. It's pretty easy. Nothing like trying to duplicate the side milling of a restricted Medeco Biaxial key (though there's a Rolls Royce ignition key that'll pass the common Medeco G3 Biaxial with only minor adjustment). Restricted blanks only stop amateurs, and the Abloy DiscLock is hardly even sophisticated enough to be called "restricted". It's a half moon shape, sometimes with a half moon groove in the flat side.

      Then of course, there's the machine to cut them.

      The laundry key I made I filed by hand. A machine makes it downright simple, a complete no-brainer. Filing by hand if you know the specs is harder, but not prohibitively so. Trying to file a key when you DON'T know the specs will be nigh impossible, but if you don't know the specs, you're an amateur.

      Even if you're filing by hand, the tolerances are fine, and the key configuration doesn't really take to soldering as regular keys do...

      The tolerances aren't THAT fine. It's basically a wafer-class lock with stamped parts. It can't have fine tolerances. Granted, it's tougher if you don't have a sample lock to fit the key to, but it's not rocket science.

    6. Re:Bump keys more practical by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      I said disklock pro - there's a distinct difference [up to 16 cuts more]

      See the differences: http://protectvol.online.fr/abloy.html

    7. Re:Bump keys more practical by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking when I read the summary.

  17. Statistics, I want statistics! by mockeldritch · · Score: 1

    If they work more than half the time I'd be impressed! So far no key cutter in my locale has managed this, even with *the keys themselves* to copy from.

    1. Re:Statistics, I want statistics! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      That's likely because your "original" keys are marginal already from being copies made by the dodos at [Home Depot|the hardware store|*] who never adjust their machine, and then when you ask them to make a bad copy of a bad copy, SURPRISE, it doesn't work. Take it to a locksmith. They cost twice as much but the keys are more likely to work.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  18. Is this not old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apart from the 200 feet bit of course.

    >The Prison Service has been forced to spend £250,000 on changing every lock and key in Feltham young offenders' institution after a TV news crew filmed a prison key during a media visit last week.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2006/jul/05/broadcasting.youthjustice

  19. Duplicating keys from an X-Ray by wfstanle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's nothing! On the Discovery Health channel there was a story about a man that swallowed his friend's car key. They were too drunk to drive home and he wanted to prevent his friend from driving while drunk. To make a long story short, the spare key was lost and they they were able to make duplicate keys from an X-Ray that clearly showed the key.

  20. Hubble's purpose! by line-bundle · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a great idea: use Hubble to get a picture of the key to the universe and ask walmart to make it very cheaply.

  21. Ha! by TinFoilMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get into my house however you want, my wife is going through menopause, she's bi-polar, and she has my shotgun.

    --
    In my other life, I eat cats.
    1. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best excuse to hide in your mom's basement EVAR!

  22. A boon for swingers! by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 5, Funny

    Remember the old days when swingers used to have "key parties?"

    For the young and innocent who have never been exposed to such debauchery -- they would get together and throw all the mens' motel room keys in a hat. Then the ladies would pick them out of the hat and go to that key's room....

    Well, now the possibilities for adultfriendfinder dot com have just been expanded... Just post a picture of your key and wait for your new friends to show up!

    --
    In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
    1. Re:A boon for swingers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the old days when swingers used to have "key parties?"

      For the young and innocent who have never been exposed to such debauchery -- they would get together and throw all the mens' motel room keys in a hat. Then the ladies would pick them out of the hat and go to that key's room....

      Well, now the possibilities for adultfriendfinder dot com have just been expanded... Just post a picture of your key and wait for your new friends to show up!

      I remember those parties. I went to one, threw my keys in the pile, and went home with a beautiful curvaceous toyota.

    2. Re:A boon for swingers! by syousef · · Score: 1

      Well, now the possibilities for adultfriendfinder dot com have just been expanded... Just post a picture of your key and wait for your new friends to show up!

      Hello, is anyone there??? It's Richard. But please call me RMS. Hello???

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:A boon for swingers! by blue+l0g1c · · Score: 1

      Thank you, thank you, thank you. Until this moment, I honestly thought that a key party was where a responsible individual took everyone's car keys so you could get as drunk as you wanted to without being tempted to drive.

      That could've been embarassing, like when I thought "conjugal" meant approximately the same thing as "cordial."

  23. I'll believe it when I see it. by ProppaT · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't even get those chumps at home depot to give me a copy that works when they're using the original, much less a photograph.

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
    1. Re:I'll believe it when I see it. by alxkit · · Score: 0

      try ACE hardware or Orchard Supply

    2. Re:I'll believe it when I see it. by RandomU · · Score: 1

      I can't even get those chumps at home depot to give me a copy that works when they're using the original, much less a photograph.

      Send me a picture of the key and your address and I'll make you one :)

      Random

    3. Re:I'll believe it when I see it. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Why? They all use the same damn "drool-proof" Axxess machines (which they never adjust), and have the same high school dropouts doing the work. Take it to a locksmith and get it done right the first time.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:I'll believe it when I see it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason locksmiths are paid more than the guys at Home Depot!

  24. Bump keys by thestuckmud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well the word is out on bump keys, which are an easier method of entry in most cases, yet burglaries are down. I don't see key photos as a particularly meaningful threat to most of us.

    1. Re:Bump keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AH, but Quikset's new SmartKey doesn't use the Yale lock mechanism, and "bumping" them no longer works. You can still PICK them if you have a lot of time (to master lock picking) and patience (to take an hour or so fiddling with the lock while the neighbors dial 9-1-1) but you can no longer bump them.

      Of course, Schlage locks are still bumpable. What's up with that, Schlage???

    2. Re:Bump keys by GoodNicksAreTaken · · Score: 1

      Your average criminal doesn't read /. and likely hasn't discovered bump keys yet. It will take another year or two for someone to bump a lock in a dorm, witness by a frat boy, who will repeat the trick at a party, witnessed by a high school dropout who will unsuccessfully repeat it for a criminal that will eventually figure it out through trial and error. He'll then go on a crime spree and be caught. The method will be mentioned in a newspaper article on the arrest. The criminals will read it. Their brother-in-laws will look up how to do it online. And then there will be a small rise in crime. I give it two years. But the rise in crime will be small as the risk is in removing stolen items not in gaining entry. Criminals care little about entering without destroying the lock or door because you are going to notice your property missing. It will remain primarily a geek parlor trick like shimming wafer padlocks or the methods used to break combination locks.

    3. Re:Bump keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burglaries are down in the US because everyone is in prison.

    4. Re:Bump keys by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      The way the economy is going and with info on bump keys circulating, expect burglaries to go up. Way up.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    5. Re:Bump keys by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Come on - no crim is going to bother picking a lock. Quite often, locks are just the diversion - open windows, hidden keys, roof, slipping the latch, carding the door, drilling the lock, unscrewing the lock, unmounting the door - the list goes on.

  25. Four Key by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

    I really like the keys that they use in Brazil: Key-four(Chave-Quatro)
    I'd like to see them take a picture of this and reproduce it.

    1. Re:Four Key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as a bonus, they double as a philips head screwdriver in a pinch!

    2. Re:Four Key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does your dick

    3. Re:Four Key by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      This looks easily reproducible. With a lave you could copy it. The key looks to be able to be entered in any rotation - and probably still uses tumblers just on 4 axis - bumpable

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    4. Re:Four Key by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      Actually each of the four keys is different and you have to put in its proper direction (they have a nice arrow so it can be inserted in the proper position.)

    5. Re:Four Key by theun4gven · · Score: 1

      All four blades are identical so you'd only need a picture of one blade and slightly more effort in duplicating. These don't seem like they'd increase the difficulty at all.

    6. Re:Four Key by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      All four blades are different.
      Please see this post.

  26. Haven't we seen this before? by wcbsd · · Score: 1

    Not too surprising following the incident in which Diebold voting machines were hacked using a key image in an advertisement:
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-6153328-7.html

    Oh yeah - I knew that sounded familiar!
    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/06/1627220

  27. It's far, FAR worse than that... by tmosley · · Score: 1

    Who needs the profile of an individual key when you can open any lock of the same type with a simple filed down key?

  28. copy by alxkit · · Score: 0

    the more reasons to keep keys where they belong - in your pockets. you want a copy? fight me for it.

  29. bad idea by TheMCP · · Score: 1

    I wonder when I'll be able to order more ordinary duplicate keys by emailing in a couple of photos.

    Ordering duplicate keys by sending in a photo is a whole lot less secure than doing it in person. If I go in person to get a duplicate key, I can watch and see that they didn't make a copy for themself, I get the original back right away with the copy, I don't have to tell them where I live, and I can pay cash. If I were to order remotely by photo, they know where I live (either from my shipping address or my credit card billing address) and there's nothing preventing them from making a copy I don't know about so they can come rob my house later.

  30. Picking the lock is easier and quicker. by durandal61 · · Score: 1

    It seems to me picking the lock would be a better approach.

    --
    My motorbike travels in Chile.
  31. Who needs keys by Cthefuture · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best antitheft device on my car is the manual transmission. ;)

    --
    The ratio of people to cake is too big
    1. Re:Who needs keys by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

      anybody who wants to steal a car and actually knows how more than likely knows how to drive stick. i know how to hot wire(I've lost my keys too many times to count it was sadly needed.) and i most definitely know how to drive stick, if i were to decide to steal a car the transmission type wouldn't matter at all nor would those stupid steering wheel locks. when i was younger my mother put one on my car so i couldn't go out past 12 5 minutes with a hacksaw and i was cruising. the best cheapest theft deterrent...put a lojack sticker on your car... the best theft deterrent put a lojack on your car AND put a sticker on the car you cant stop them from stealing it if they really want to but you can get it back condition of it after they take it is dependent on what they do >.

      --
      -Noc
    2. Re:Who needs keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like a kenworth, frieghtliner, volvo etc. The clutch has a whole new meaning then ;)

    3. Re:Who needs keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easier to tow a manual. Many can be shifted into neutral without a key in the ignition.

      I have a strange story about mine. Shortly after buying it, the key wouldn't start the car. I pushed started it a dozen times over the course of a week, replaced the starter, and checked the wiring. There was no power to the starter at all... I finally gave up and took it to a shop. They found a 3rd party anti-theft device leftover, by the previous owner. Obviously a piece of junk, which only made starting the car a bit more difficult.

      Only the least resourceful car thieves would be unable to steal a manual.

    4. Re:Who needs keys by philspear · · Score: 1

      anybody who wants to steal a car and actually knows how more than likely knows how to drive stick.

      I've heard of at least one would-be carjacker taking someone's keys, getting in the car, fumbling around for a few minutes, failing to get the car rolling, and then taking off on foot.

      Although it's unlikely that you'll be carjacked, and somewhat more unlikely that you'd be carjacked by someone who didn't know how to drive a manual, it would be damn funny to see that happen. Assuming you didn't get shot out of frustration.

    5. Re:Who needs keys by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

      "actually knows how" that was more to the point. taking someones keys a simple pickpocket could do. however i do agree. that would be HILARIOUS id probably just watch the guy id be laughing too hard imagine him not knowing what "that other pedal" is trying to gas it and instead pressing the brake thinking its the gas and the clutch the brake and wondering whats happening haha...or i could actually see someone mistaking that for an e brake...that would be....funny to say the least...

      --
      -Noc
    6. Re:Who needs keys by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      "The best antitheft device on my car is the manual transmission. ;)"

      Didn't work for me. So far I've had three trucks with manual transmissions stolen. Well OK only two relly as the first truck I got back and was stolen again, so only two trucks gone but three thefts.

      I talked to the cops a few times to ask what to do. They said "insurance". If someone wants to take a car they just get a tow truck.

    7. Re:Who needs keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best antitheft device on my car is the manual transmission. ;)

      There is some truth to that, at least in North America. In Toronto, Canada, about 5 years ago, there was a wave of armed carjackings (which is very unusual for Toronto).

      In one case, the thugs pointed a gun at a driver, ordered him out of the car, and jumped in. After a minute, the thugs jump out of the car and run away. Why? The car had a manual transmission.

      In the rest of the world manual transmissions are very common, so it doesn't work so well.

    8. Re:Who needs keys by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      I see you don't live in Europe... ;)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    9. Re:Who needs keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you can drive a stick and hot wire a car, you can't figure out how to capitalize the first letter of a sentence or recognize a joke.

    10. Re:Who needs keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because I'm a grammar whore my penis is 3.14x repeating the average penis size.

    11. Re:Who needs keys by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > anybody who wants to steal a car and actually knows how more than likely knows how to
      > drive stick.

      That depends very much on the particular stick. You would have had more than a bit of trouble with my old Bronco even if you did realize that the thing lying on the passenger seat was the shift lever.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  32. That's Great But by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

    . . . when will they be able to make a new set on the spot for me after I lock them in my car?

    Can somebody make an iPhone app that does that?

    Please?

    --
    What?
  33. I wonder if it works on European keys by palalonde · · Score: 1

    Europeans keys (Secure keys) are much harder to duplicate and safer then american (US or Canada). I don't think you can bump open a european lock. Anyways this sounds like a good scenario for the next James Bond movie.

    1. Re:I wonder if it works on European keys by WiiVault · · Score: 1

      Not sure exactly what a secure key is, but I think you are talking about "chipped" keys which are current for almost any recent Asian or American car.

    2. Re:I wonder if it works on European keys by palalonde · · Score: 1

      I meant home key. I believe they are called restricted Keys.

    3. Re:I wonder if it works on European keys by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      European keys are the same as US keys. You can bump a European lock, just like a US one. The technology is the same. Hell, the companies are the same. Like half the lock stuff sold in the US is made by Assa-Abloy or its subsidiaries. Most of the other half is made by Ingersoll-Rand. There are restricted keyways in the US as well, but just like in Europe nobody really cares to inconvenience themselves with a lock on their door that takes a key they can't get copied easily.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:I wonder if it works on European keys by hughk · · Score: 1

      In Germany or Switzerland, a lot of people have somewhat more advanced locks with restricted keyways, pins in two planes, etc. Generally, it easier to force the lock than to pick it. However there are still plenty of unrestricted keyways which could be copied on sight.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  34. My root password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think that many of you put a photo of their keys online â" with their addresses

    My root password is "uijepsup". Not telling you what machine.

  35. How is this a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not like a duplicate has to be carved out of bar stock. Most of the key brands are recognizable by their shape, which gives you the proper blank. From this, you can scale the photo to actual size. The cuts of the key are a known length with a discrete depth (out of 7 or so choices). It would be pretty trivial to look at someone's house key and say that it's a Kwikset with cuts 4-1-6-3-3.

  36. I thought this is a good thing by barocco · · Score: 1

    I thought this would just generate a public key for the corresponding private one to form a key pair, and is good for security?

  37. Here's how to do it without software by 328iS · · Score: 1
  38. Re:Not Roland!! by chromeshadow · · Score: 1

    Smidge, I appreciate your factual approach, but you might improve your message if you update it a bit. If RP is getting stories approved in December, I tip my hat to him!

  39. Might work for house keys, but not modern car keys by WiiVault · · Score: 1

    House keys still lack "chips" which are RF encoded to unlock a door. On the other hand most car keys in last batch of years have a radio chip which is required to make the car start. I realized this when I had to spend $80 a key to create dupes of my Toyota keys last week. Ouch!

  40. Rock through window by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

    Even ignoring a bump key or a lock pick or a hundred other things. Houses are not secured via a key. Keys stop opportunity thieves. They keep alzheimer patients from going into the wrong home. This is not a big deal.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  41. Get a better lock by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    Most pin tumbler locks (like the one on your front door) are pathetically easy to break using a set of bump keys that you can make yourself or buy online for $10.

    If you want real security, you need a high security deadbolt. Breaking a good lock like an Abloy Protec is considerably more difficult. The Protec, for example, doesn't use pins. That means that it can't be bumped and it can't be picked (note that I said it can't be picked, not that it can't be manipulated). The end result is that it takes different skills and tools to manipulate a Protec, which means that criminals are far less likely to do so.

    1. Re:Get a better lock by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      We have some very good locks here in the office. They are required because government clasified documents are stored in these rooms. The only locks that can be approaved are high quality combination locks the operate a kind of steel dead bolt. They are nice locks. But now andthen there will be a fire alarm that goes off inside and the local FD comes and they need to get inside. Typically a security guard will walk with the firemen. None of them have the combination. The fireman carry with them a big sledge hammer, about 10 pounds. It does not take long before even these nice locks are broken.

      I've seen the cops use a two man baterning ram. one hit on the lock and that's it. the lock does not break but the side of the door frame splinters.

      All any lock does is keep out people who really don't want in very bad.

    2. Re:Get a better lock by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      I've seen more than one "unbreakable" lock bypassed swiftly and easily by firemen armed with a K-12 rescue saw.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  42. It will only work "Sometimes". by raijinsetsu · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have made thousands of key duplicates (family retail business), so I have a little knowledge in key duplication. Here's two bits of knowledge: 1) When you make a copy from the original key, the copy is, maybe, a hair off on either or both the pin offset and depth. Depending on the age and quality of the lock, this minor deviation can cause the key not to work. Copies from originals work (best guestimate) 99/100 times.
    2) Most people do not have their original keys anymore. They have 2nd, 3rd, or 4th generation keys. Every time you duplicate, the error multiplies just like using a photo-copier on a copy. With so much error, 3rd or later generations work (guestimate) 1 in 3 times.

    So, even if this technology can duplicate your key by photo, unless they bring the key back to a locksmith (who has a special jig for cutting new originals using pins instead of the key -- gets rid of the "signal noise") or the software already adjusts for the "signal noise", there's a good chance the key won't work. It all depends on the source key and the lock.

    I wouldn't be too worried about this.

    1. Re:It will only work "Sometimes". by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Get it close enough, paint the key with a soft paint, let it dry, then stick the key in and try turning it. File off the edges where the paint has been compressed/scratched. Voila!

      You don't need an exact copy. You just need a working copy.

    2. Re:It will only work "Sometimes". by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Except unlike a photcopier, the errors can move back toward accuracy with multi-generational copies, and the fact that most locks a re pretty damn sloppy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:It will only work "Sometimes". by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      That only works if the key is slightly too high, and if it's not a working key after your initial "best guess", you got nuthin.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:It will only work "Sometimes". by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Except unlike a photcopier, the errors can move back toward accuracy with multi-generational copies

      It's not just a fixed +/- error, it's a combination of that, plus key wear (high spots wear faster than low, key tips wear faster than the part at the shoulder), plus inattention to key positioning (placed in jaw crooked), plus the how far off parallel the jaws are. On top of that, from what I've seen come into my shop, 90% of the misadjusted machines at [hardware stores|Home Depot|WalMart|*] are set to cut too deep. I'm not saying a second dodo has never acidentally un-screwed te first dodo's error, but I will say it's highly unlikely.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  43. Fun prank by russotto · · Score: 1

    Modify your lock with a "duress key" which, when it turns, sprays pepper spray at the person in front of the door (and remains locked). Post a photo of that one.
    (using a lock with a core-removal key and then modifying that mechanism might be one place to start; remember you don't actually want the core to come out though)

    Seriously, sight-reading keys is nothing new. Ask a locksmith about cutting a new key based on a car key left on the front seat. I'm pretty sure the idea has even been on slashdot before (shock of shocks), although without the software angle.

  44. Grinch who stole xmas movie by AgentPhunk · · Score: 1

    Despite being quite awful, there's a reference to key parties in the Grinch movie (the remake with Jim Carey, directed by Ron Howard.) As a bunch of Who's enter a who-house for a Christmas party, they all throw their keys into a fishbowl by the window. My kids had no idea why I was laughing my ass off.

    1. Re:Grinch who stole xmas movie by Farmer+Pete · · Score: 1

      Maybe they just didn't want to drive home drunk? A whomobile is a lot harder to drive than a car.

  45. A lesser anecdote by autocracy · · Score: 1

    I had a car key that snapped in half in my hand once. The locksmith who showed up looked at the two pieces of the key, wrote down a series of numbers indicating the pin depth, and then hand-ground a key from those numbers using the grinder wheel in his van.

    Not as cool sounding as using an X-Ray, but the exact same principle. From sight of the key, he made a new key.

    --
    SIG: HUP
    1. Re:A lesser anecdote by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      It's quite common for a good locksmith to sight-read a key in a lockout situation. Many auto locks will have only 3 or 4 pin depths, so it doesn't take a whole lot to interpolate the code.

      A similar trick is to read the wafers in a cylinder lock through the keyhole.

      Foley-Belsaw's locksmith training course is a fun diversion if you're tired of slaving away at your MCP, MCSE, CCNA, CCNP, CCDP, A+, etc. *

      -ellie

      * Yes, I got the lot of them.

  46. Protection from key copying ... by jonhainer · · Score: 1

    As always, if you want to protect your keys from being copied, wrap them in tin foil.

    1. Re:Protection from key copying ... by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

      Then they will be a good accessory for your hat as well.

      --
      If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
  47. House keys merely keep honest people honest by Verdatum · · Score: 1

    Making a key copy that will last for a single use has always been within the capacities of a retarded monkey. Once you realize that, the only think that makes the article interesting is the social blaze, and the image processing. Naming specific distances from the camera is a little silly though. The bigger concerns are focus, pixel count, and lossy compression; to say nothing of the orientation of the key relative to the lens, and color contrast.

    I won a bet once by making a copy of someone's key by pressing it against my arm for a few seconds, and using a trace of the resultant discoloration as a template.

  48. Nothing Astonishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I re-keyed the locks on my house with a kit I got off eBay. The kit merely contains an assortment of six different lengths of pins plus some driver pins. Each pin corresponds to a different key notch depth.

    You can assign sequence of numbers to the key that represents the notch depths. All you need to duplicate the key is the sequence. My locks only had five pins, each of which could be six different lengths. Six possible depths isn't many, and the depths can easily be differentiated by just looking at a key. After re-keying one or two locks, I could just look at a key and instantly know the key's code. I suspect locksmiths are very adept at this.

  49. Summary mentions blurring by systemeng · · Score: 1

    The summary mentions blurring credit card and check number details to post such things on the web. It has been shown, and I believe posted on slashdot that the numbers can still be recovered.

    1. Re:Summary mentions blurring by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Depend on the blurring method.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  50. Problem: To proove the burglary to your insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they enter with a key, there is virtually no trace from anybody entering, so you'll have a hard time getting any compensation.

  51. Covert Photography by CraigoFL · · Score: 1

    I don't think that many of you put a photo of their keys online -- with their addresses.

    Maybe not, but how many of us expose our keys in places where they could be covertly photographed with telephoto lenses and/or cameraphones?

  52. Other applications by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

    I'm very curious as to how far this sort of photometrics can be developed. If you can measure a key well enough to manufacture a duplicate just by viewing a picture with the key in it (not even necessarily a picture *of* they key, just with it in a picture lying there on the table) the capabilities for making precise measurements of complex arrangements of parts aren't that far off. Add the time dimension in, and things get more interesting; instead of having to mount a potentiometer or LVDT or accelerometer to measure the displacement or motion of a part, just film it. That could make a lot of jobs much easier.

  53. oh yeah? That's nothing! by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Once I locked myself out of my DeLorean, and the locksmith was able to make a copy of the key using only two pieces of wood, a knitting needle, and a half gram of coke.

  54. Not to mention... by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    ...that you still need the hardware to cut the key blank.

  55. Re:oh yeah? That's nothing! by pigiron · · Score: 1

    I always thought that those were some of the tools they used on the assembly line!

  56. Broad daylight crimes by grahamsz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've seen it done. Thieves backed a truck up to one of the homes in my neighborhood, opened the garage door, wheeled out the appliances and left.

    I saw it happen as did several other neighbors, but it was one of the showhomes the builder was trying to sell and we figured that they buyer probably wanted a different appliance option and they were just going to switch them out. In retrospect they probably went into the home when it was showing on the weekend and left a window unlatched.

    They did it on a weekday afternoon, broad daylight and wearing somewhat matching uniforms and they just blended in.

    1. Re:Broad daylight crimes by db32 · · Score: 1

      You mean they didn't take pictures of the keys and use a complex process to reproduce the keys to unlock the doors?

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    2. Re:Broad daylight crimes by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      There's a guy with a razor that wants to talk to you

  57. Where does he get his keys made? by nodrogluap · · Score: 1

    When I get a key copy made from the original key, half the time it doesn't work! And it costs more money to drive back to the store to get another one than the copy costs. Grr...

    1. Re:Where does he get his keys made? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Go to a locksmith, not a paint huffing high school jackass at Wal Mart using a maladjusted machine. Quality work comes from people who do that sort of work for a living. You don't go to a gas station convenience store and complain that their grocery selection sucks, right?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  58. Who needs a picture? by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1

    If you think that's creepy, don't worry. It's way easier to get duplicates than taking a photo. My father in law is training to be a locksmith as a retirement hobby, and I'd recently purchased a motorcycle. It was used, and when I got it, it only had the one key. I'm a lazy kind of guy, so I never got around to getting a replacement. I *talked* about getting copies made all the time, but never actually did. Anyhow, my wife sent him the VIN, and a couple weeks later, I got two keys in the mail. Apparently, that's all you needed. And the VIN is a rather public record that anyone can obtain.

    Long story short, anybody could have a key to my motorcycle without even ever having seen it, and with the same information they used to get the key, I have little doubt they could look up the owner and address, where the bike is usually parked. Yay, security!

    -G

    --
    Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    1. Re:Who needs a picture? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's becasue you have the original lock. Change the lock.

      Not the motorcycle locks are really worth a damn anyways.

      Who housing tracks have been built were all the locks are the same. This is why you should always get your locks changes when moving into a new home.

      One time, I even had my apartment lock changed. This was becasue several of us had spied the manager coming and going from people apartments at odd times.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  59. Diebold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A little while ago, diebold posted a picture of the master key that can open any of their voting machines online. And someone made a copy, of course (yet another example of lax diebold security).

  60. or doesn't go... by eleuthero · · Score: 1

    Maybe the lazy but slightly dishonest kid down the street, who upon finding my door locked, comes and finds yours--your hard drive is now on ebay for way less than it is worth by the way.

  61. Re:oh yeah? That's nothing! by MattGWU · · Score: 1

    "What's the half-gram of Bolivian Marching Powder for?"
    "Have YOU ever tried to cut a key with a piece of wood and a knitting needle? I'm surprised it only took two tries!"

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  62. Re:oh yeah? That's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re: the DeLorean. Now that was funny.

  63. 2 words: magnetic key by dindi · · Score: 1

    Even though it does not seem to exist anymore (at least not where I moved), but in good ol' Europe we used to have these all flat keys, that had this magnetic strip inside (sometimes 3 round ones, sometimes a straight line of magnet).

    Not sure if it had a security issue, or it never made it to Latin America, or what the hell, but I cannot see these even online anymore.....

    Well,,.. anyway, duplicate those from a photo taken from 200 meters....

    1. Re:2 words: magnetic key by nsayer · · Score: 1

      I have heard that those magnetic padlocks could be opened (and at the same time ruined) with a gigantic electromagnet. I know, [Citation Needed], but google is failing me right now.

  64. Re:oh yeah? That's nothing! by juan2074 · · Score: 1

    That reminds me of the time we were partying with John DeLorean. Good times.

  65. Don't tell the locksmith! by HardCase · · Score: 1

    I locked my keys in the car about 15 years ago and had to call the locksmith. He didn't bother with a slim jim or any of that crap. He just looked at the key sitting on the seat and cut a new one by hand. It worked on the first try. He said that he figured that I probably needed a spare anyway.

  66. Time to take down my photos by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Looks like I'll have to remove my flickr photo series of "My favorite keys for locking up valuables". This is right after I had to remove "My favorite credit cards".

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  67. One More Thing For Paranoid Family To Worry Over by FrankBlissett · · Score: 1

    a) As noted by others, there are easier ways to break into a person's home/car.

    b) Seems to me that for many apps, metal keys are being displaced by key cards.

    -Frank

  68. I am not afraid by nsayer · · Score: 1

    Here's a photo of my keychain. Knock yourselves out.

  69. Err..photos of your credit card online? by 101010_or_0x2A · · Score: 0

    "People have started blurring photos of their credit cards"..wow. If you're that stupid, you deserve to be screwed over.

  70. I made a duplicate once by Toonol · · Score: 1

    My car key snapped in half, and it was my only copy. I made a pattern out of the two halves, and carved a replacement key out of wood. It worked fine; I drove to a locksmith, and they made a new key out of the pieces.

  71. so stalk em by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    "I don't think that many of you put a photo of their keys online â" with their addresses"
    But many people do reveal thier place of work or study online. If you have that and a photograph you can simply follow them to find out where they live.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  72. The beauty of acadamia by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    You can waste your time doing worthless experiments and get paid for it! Well, at least the full professors.

  73. magnetic keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other than that, a few keys that are eyeball resistant that come to mind are the Shlage Primus, and the Medeco3 key, because someone would have to eyeball the slider, the pin depth cuts, and the angles of the cuts for the pins to rotate.

    Except that all of Medeco's locks can be bumped AFAIK.

    Try eye-balling one of Evva's MCS keys that are simply magnets:

    http://www.evva.com/at/products/mechanische-schliesssysteme/mcs/en/

  74. insurance companies and police need evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Locks are to keep honest people out.

    And to prove to the police and insurance company that there was an actual break in. If someone can get in through your door cleanly (bumping or this technique), then they can make off with stuff with little evidence.

    Now if you prevent someone from walking in the front door, and they're force to go in through a window, at least you'll get some compensation.

    You're not preventing someone from getting in with an unpickable lock, you're making sure it takes some effort to do so.

  75. Typical nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always over thinking the problem, this is totally unnecessary google "key bumping".

  76. Give them your address and a copy of your key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ** I don't think that many of you put a photo of their keys online -- with their addresses. I wonder when I'll be able to order more ordinary duplicate keys by emailing in a couple of photos.**

    Then some scammer would set up a snazzy website and they would have copies of keys - linkled to home addresses.

  77. Big fat BFD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While amazing, as a concept and a process, this really doesn't create much of a "OMGTHESKYISFALLING" security risk. Residential pin-and-tumbler locks exist to keep honest people honest. Anyone with a set of lockpicks and a modicum of skill (or a sledge hammer and a modicum of chutzpah, or $20 and access to a SourthOrd catalog for a pick gun, etc, etc...) can gain entry through any old locked door.

    While the man-in-black in question is at it, after picking your lock he may as well just take it off of the door, pop the cylinder out, and measure the pins so he can cut himself a key and avoid having to pick it next time.

    You don't even need no steeking picture of the key.

  78. Re:Problem: To proove the burglary to your insuran by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    If they enter with a key, there is virtually no trace from anybody entering, so you'll have a hard time getting any compensation.

    Great, that explains why it would be worse. Now explain to me why a burglar would would give a crap whether your insurance would cover what he took, particularly when the procedure for doing so is both more costly (camera + computer + CNC machine) and more time consuming than prying open a window.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  79. Part II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although a twelve foot camera pointed at my retina is kinda hard to miss, I now have the urge to wear sunglasses whenever in public. And gloves.

  80. This is not a new technology in China. by cloverprince · · Score: 1

    As shown on China Central Television (http://www.cctv.com), an experienced lock maker can construct an equivalent key merely after a glance at your key. He was appreciated as one of the Ten Model Workers of the Year.

  81. Post pictures of your keys, with your address? by prometx42 · · Score: 1

    This wouldn't be a problem for a sufficiently motivated photographer who had the time and unsettling desire to follow one home. Stalkers: 7 Stalkees: 0

  82. That's better than Home Depot by KeithH · · Score: 1

    HD has repeated failed to duplicate my bog-standard Weiser house-keys. I'd like to see somebody do it from 200 feet.

  83. FACEBOOK by alabandit · · Score: 1

    wait there people out there who load pictures randomly to the net?!?!?!? i thought you load pictures in some way that you friends could find them... unlucky for you!

    --
    "You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people." by notnAP (846325)