Grammarly won't help you when you are speaking. Writing is thinking and when you offload that thinking to a machine you are not refining your thinking, you're learning how to use a tool.
The very fact that this has been modded down shows us that the information contained is valuable. The fact that it was posted on April 1st shows us how men are being treated.
Western family law can hold you responsible for the child even if you are not the birth father. Men are in a very precarious position legally because of common law relationships which hold you in the role of a "father figure" especially if the woman is living under your roof. In that circumstance you have less than three months to verify paternity. Any more than that and you are on the hook for child support payments until the child is 18.
There is very little downside for women putting men in this position and it's a big reason why men commit suicide.
Whenever it got to sex (which is not often because I'm no ladies' man), I made super double sure to wear a condom, even though she said she'd be on contraception.
And in my (European) country, you can bet your ass you will pay through the nose for a child that you didn't choose.
It's called "babies rabies". You should flush the condom down the toilet to avoid having your semen used to entrap you into child support payments. This is how some women access men's assets, some are buying fake positive pregnancy tests to trap men into relationships they won't commit to.
Men need to start waking up to the myth of male superiority and exactly how we are being conditioned by society.
This problem disappears when you use Linux style Workspaces. You used to be able to use them in Win 7. Windows 10 workspaces are horrid but still do the job.
Do you think the technologists learned their lesson? No, they double down and created a new technology that's even more distributed.
Criticizing Technologists on a platform created by and for technologists. You never had these free speech option before so instead of complaining about them, you could just say thanks.
Oh they are worried. When banks say they can't see a use can they mean they can. The internet will have a native currency and it won't be regulated or controlled by anything as arrogant as a bank.
Here is a use case, no one likes banks. Some people hate banks. Fees on deposit, fees on withdrawals, fees because the sky is blue. They have been controlling the global economy and people want a way out. Cryptocurrency gives them a way out.
BOA have the patents they have so that they can sue any successful business model developed that uses anything they can vaguely say infringes before they steal that business model. That's because banks don't innovate things they foreclose.
Now people realize that with a crypto wallet they can carry a bank around in their pocket that looks like a USB stick and transfer funds internationally without huge amounts of fees.
South Australa is a relatively poor state, one of whose major industries is a Uranium mine.
They also have a lot of geothermal energy they *could* export to other states and it's also ideally suited to refining aluminum considering how close they are to some of the largest bauxite deposits in the world. Carbon free aluminum would be very valuable to many industries. So that is an alternative to...
There was a proposal to build a waste dump there to initially store the waste that is now stored in suburban Sydney. And then maybe import it.
Can you imagine the money that the USA, Japan etc. would pay?
I doubt there would be any amount of money a country could pay that would be enough. Australia happens to be the last continent free of human made radio-isotopes and the sheer volume of nuclear waste would change that very quickly.
They will continue to output significant amounts of heat for years (About 5 years IIRC). To keep them cool, they are stored in water. The water has the additional benefit of shielding much of the radiation
After the most radioactive elements in the spent fuel have decayed away, and they rate of heat generation is low enough that air cooling is sufficient to keep them from melting, they are removed from the pool and put into dry concrete casks.
Yes, this is indeed correct. I neglected to mention that it is for spent fuel rods that have been stored in a pool for at least 5 years. Thanks for pointing that out.
It's worth noting that the potential for accident is extremely low for the storage pools.
However the impact of such an event is extremely high considering they contain much more than a single core of a nuclear reactor after years of refueling activity. What Fukushima is teaching us that the accident doesn't necessarily have to be in the spent fuel pool to affect it. Power loss or loss of coolant in the pools are a greater threat as the pools don't have the same containment that the reactor itself has.
The pools are large enough (at least in the US) that they do not need to be actively cooled. This is by design.
Which is why I pointed out the fuel packing density, it is beginning to become a serious concern at some facilities. This was the problem at Fukushima when its design basis was exceeded and their fuel packing density is much less that the U.S. They had average 450 tons of water above their spent fuel which should have given them at least a week to sort the situation out. When the gate pair seals failed the reserve disappeared.
It is also worth noting that simply changing how the spent fuel pools are packed, so these elements that are still cooling are more physically separated. I do not believe there is an NRC policy that dictates this at this time. Again, a great way to improve nuclear safety that is a very effective insurance policy for very little cost.
It would be great to see nuclear supporters lobbying for this.
And by any sane standards of safety-engineering, we will start to have data of actual worth for the task at hand.
The D.O.E had a specification for achieving this called "Defense in Depth". Essentially the goal was to have a facility whose geology would act in such a way as to slow the flow of groundwater through the facility. From my understanding the specification called for building such a facility in Granite, and then to use bentonite clays to deal with the fractured nature of the granite.
It's not perfect, however it's a lot better than the pumice facility built at Yucca mountain after politics got in the way of the science.
The political story went something like this. From my understanding Nevada only got the facility because one of the states representatives was ill and missed objecting to the matter. To seal Nevada's fate in 1987 Idaho moved for amendments to the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act to:
Sec. 161 (c) Termination of granite research. Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 [enacted Dec. 22,1987], the Secretary shall phase out in an orderly manner funding for all research programs in existence on such date of enactment [enacted Dec. 22,1987] designed to evaluate the suitability of crystalline rock as a potential repository host medium.
So there were a lot of sane people who understood how to engineer such a facility. The political will to build it does not exist.
Nuclear could be made safe, but not by these people. It cannot, at this time, be made both cost-efficient and safe. That will require more research.
As you can see, such research was de-funded and thus will not occur. So far the only non-porus way to store the spent fuel is in crystalline structures which in the 00's, somewhat ironically, the CSIRO discovered form in granite. So politics not only got in the way of the engineering, it also got in the way of the potential benefits of the scientific discoveries that may have been made a decade or two earlier.
Forming these crystals artificially is the obvious goal to complete the uranium fuel cycle as these would be benign and may have industrial applications. Consequently U.S law is the obstacle to making any progress in this area and is unlikely to change until people understand these complex issues enough to lobby politicians appropriately.
This is the unfortunate consequence of the polarization of this debate.
The U.S has an issue with the spent fuel packing density currently in use at reactor facilities. One of the easiest way's to dramatically decrease the possibility of a spent fuel pool accident and, radically decrease the severity of other types of potential nuclear accidents, is to start moving spent fuel rods from pools to dry cask storage.
At an estimated $7 Billion to do this is chump change compared to some other spending that is occurring. I also suspect that injecting that money into the U.S economy to do something good would employ a lot of people.
Considering that this is the step before underground storage, would anyone be against doing such a simple and achievable thing to improve the general safety of the Nuclear Industry?
Since the attackers are allegedly Australian this presents a rather convenient opportunity for NZ to request Australia exercise its newly acquired intelligence laws under the guise of the 2018 Assistance Access bill.
Anywhere 8chan flows, they will be there to collect the information.
You can vape weed if you want to avoid combustion products, such as tar, which is cancerous the same way it is in cigarettes.
While the vast majority of potent carcinogens in tobacco smoke are caused by the hundreds of fucked-up additives,
Indeed.
the "tar" from burning weed has been shown to have beneficial properties. Perhaps it's not best administered through the lungs... but there's still no comparison.
I've heard that it opens up the bronchial tubes. I was a nurse that told me they see a lot of throat cancer patients who used to smoke weed. That was the main reason I went vape, to remove the biggest concern.
Besides, once pot becomes legal, people will forget all about tobacco based products.
Well, you still need cigs to roll your joints.
You can vape weed if you want to avoid combustion products, such as tar, which is cancerous the same way it is in cigarettes. Additionally you can cook the vape products into food, making THC/CBD more effective. Great for painkillers, much better than opiates. I had an Achilles tendon surgery and the doctor suggested this was a better option than from liver failure from too many other types of pain killers. Same with spinal surgery recovery.
As for nicotine a legitimate reason for ingesting it is to relieve schizophrenia symptoms. Vaping seem to be the safest method however my only concern is that when glycol isn't heated properly it produces compounds like formaldehyde and acetaldehyde instead of carbon dioxide and water. Maybe this just means making sure the battery is properly charged before using the device.
I wonder how much nicotine consumption is driven by an unconscious desire to relieve schizophrenic symptoms?
Slashdot Mirror
Grammarly won't help you when you are speaking. Writing is thinking and when you offload that thinking to a machine you are not refining your thinking, you're learning how to use a tool.
The very fact that this has been modded down shows us that the information contained is valuable. The fact that it was posted on April 1st shows us how men are being treated.
This is a really interesting theory.
Yup, trust has sunk that low. And not without very good reasons.
It is time somebody told you about these: https://www.walgreens.com/stor...
Western family law can hold you responsible for the child even if you are not the birth father. Men are in a very precarious position legally because of common law relationships which hold you in the role of a "father figure" especially if the woman is living under your roof. In that circumstance you have less than three months to verify paternity. Any more than that and you are on the hook for child support payments until the child is 18.
There is very little downside for women putting men in this position and it's a big reason why men commit suicide.
Whenever it got to sex (which is not often because I'm no ladies' man), I made super double sure to wear a condom, even though she said she'd be on contraception.
And in my (European) country, you can bet your ass you will pay through the nose for a child that you didn't choose.
It's called "babies rabies". You should flush the condom down the toilet to avoid having your semen used to entrap you into child support payments. This is how some women access men's assets, some are buying fake positive pregnancy tests to trap men into relationships they won't commit to.
Men need to start waking up to the myth of male superiority and exactly how we are being conditioned by society.
April fools day is perpetually in the future.
The police can request any camera information and warrant for that data to be supplied under the Homeland security act (IIRC).
This problem disappears when you use Linux style Workspaces. You used to be able to use them in Win 7. Windows 10 workspaces are horrid but still do the job.
So what. We're only going to be using the thermal energy.
Last I heard we could not even read the cad designs anymore because the media could not be read by anything.
Do you think the technologists learned their lesson? No, they double down and created a new technology that's even more distributed.
Criticizing Technologists on a platform created by and for technologists. You never had these free speech option before so instead of complaining about them, you could just say thanks.
Oh they are worried. When banks say they can't see a use can they mean they can. The internet will have a native currency and it won't be regulated or controlled by anything as arrogant as a bank.
Here is a use case, no one likes banks. Some people hate banks. Fees on deposit, fees on withdrawals, fees because the sky is blue. They have been controlling the global economy and people want a way out. Cryptocurrency gives them a way out.
BOA have the patents they have so that they can sue any successful business model developed that uses anything they can vaguely say infringes before they steal that business model. That's because banks don't innovate things they foreclose.
Now people realize that with a crypto wallet they can carry a bank around in their pocket that looks like a USB stick and transfer funds internationally without huge amounts of fees.
They see their demise and a scared silly.
NASA seems to get flip flopped around until much of their announcements seem like syfy. I think it must drive the passionate people pretty crazy.
SpaceX's approach seems focused, organized and achievable.
Mars^H^H^HMoon^H^H^H^HMars^H^H^HMoon
South Australa is a relatively poor state, one of whose major industries is a Uranium mine.
They also have a lot of geothermal energy they *could* export to other states and it's also ideally suited to refining aluminum considering how close they are to some of the largest bauxite deposits in the world. Carbon free aluminum would be very valuable to many industries. So that is an alternative to...
There was a proposal to build a waste dump there to initially store the waste that is now stored in suburban Sydney. And then maybe import it.
Can you imagine the money that the USA, Japan etc. would pay?
I doubt there would be any amount of money a country could pay that would be enough. Australia happens to be the last continent free of human made radio-isotopes and the sheer volume of nuclear waste would change that very quickly.
True that!
I wonder how many GPL violations the music industry commits?
I wonder what would happen if GPL licenses were enforced for the music industry?
They will continue to output significant amounts of heat for years (About 5 years IIRC). To keep them cool, they are stored in water. The water has the additional benefit of shielding much of the radiation
After the most radioactive elements in the spent fuel have decayed away, and they rate of heat generation is low enough that air cooling is sufficient to keep them from melting, they are removed from the pool and put into dry concrete casks.
Yes, this is indeed correct. I neglected to mention that it is for spent fuel rods that have been stored in a pool for at least 5 years. Thanks for pointing that out.
It's worth noting that the potential for accident is extremely low for the storage pools.
However the impact of such an event is extremely high considering they contain much more than a single core of a nuclear reactor after years of refueling activity. What Fukushima is teaching us that the accident doesn't necessarily have to be in the spent fuel pool to affect it. Power loss or loss of coolant in the pools are a greater threat as the pools don't have the same containment that the reactor itself has.
The pools are large enough (at least in the US) that they do not need to be actively cooled. This is by design.
Which is why I pointed out the fuel packing density, it is beginning to become a serious concern at some facilities. This was the problem at Fukushima when its design basis was exceeded and their fuel packing density is much less that the U.S. They had average 450 tons of water above their spent fuel which should have given them at least a week to sort the situation out. When the gate pair seals failed the reserve disappeared.
It is also worth noting that simply changing how the spent fuel pools are packed, so these elements that are still cooling are more physically separated. I do not believe there is an NRC policy that dictates this at this time. Again, a great way to improve nuclear safety that is a very effective insurance policy for very little cost.
It would be great to see nuclear supporters lobbying for this.
And by any sane standards of safety-engineering, we will start to have data of actual worth for the task at hand.
The D.O.E had a specification for achieving this called "Defense in Depth". Essentially the goal was to have a facility whose geology would act in such a way as to slow the flow of groundwater through the facility. From my understanding the specification called for building such a facility in Granite, and then to use bentonite clays to deal with the fractured nature of the granite.
It's not perfect, however it's a lot better than the pumice facility built at Yucca mountain after politics got in the way of the science.
The political story went something like this. From my understanding Nevada only got the facility because one of the states representatives was ill and missed objecting to the matter. To seal Nevada's fate in 1987 Idaho moved for amendments to the 1982 Nuclear Waste Policy Act to:
So there were a lot of sane people who understood how to engineer such a facility. The political will to build it does not exist.
Nuclear could be made safe, but not by these people. It cannot, at this time, be made both cost-efficient and safe. That will require more research.
As you can see, such research was de-funded and thus will not occur.
So far the only non-porus way to store the spent fuel is in crystalline structures which in the 00's, somewhat ironically, the CSIRO discovered form in granite. So politics not only got in the way of the engineering, it also got in the way of the potential benefits of the scientific discoveries that may have been made a decade or two earlier.
Forming these crystals artificially is the obvious goal to complete the uranium fuel cycle as these would be benign and may have industrial applications. Consequently U.S law is the obstacle to making any progress in this area and is unlikely to change until people understand these complex issues enough to lobby politicians appropriately.
This is the unfortunate consequence of the polarization of this debate.
The U.S has an issue with the spent fuel packing density currently in use at reactor facilities. One of the easiest way's to dramatically decrease the possibility of a spent fuel pool accident and, radically decrease the severity of other types of potential nuclear accidents, is to start moving spent fuel rods from pools to dry cask storage.
At an estimated $7 Billion to do this is chump change compared to some other spending that is occurring. I also suspect that injecting that money into the U.S economy to do something good would employ a lot of people.
Considering that this is the step before underground storage, would anyone be against doing such a simple and achievable thing to improve the general safety of the Nuclear Industry?
Since the attackers are allegedly Australian this presents a rather convenient opportunity for NZ to request Australia exercise its newly acquired intelligence laws under the guise of the 2018 Assistance Access bill.
Anywhere 8chan flows, they will be there to collect the information.
You can vape weed if you want to avoid combustion products, such as tar, which is cancerous the same way it is in cigarettes.
While the vast majority of potent carcinogens in tobacco smoke are caused by the hundreds of fucked-up additives,
Indeed.
the "tar" from burning weed has been shown to have beneficial properties. Perhaps it's not best administered through the lungs... but there's still no comparison.
I've heard that it opens up the bronchial tubes. I was a nurse that told me they see a lot of throat cancer patients who used to smoke weed. That was the main reason I went vape, to remove the biggest concern.
Besides, once pot becomes legal, people will forget all about tobacco based products.
Well, you still need cigs to roll your joints.
You can vape weed if you want to avoid combustion products, such as tar, which is cancerous the same way it is in cigarettes. Additionally you can cook the vape products into food, making THC/CBD more effective. Great for painkillers, much better than opiates. I had an Achilles tendon surgery and the doctor suggested this was a better option than from liver failure from too many other types of pain killers. Same with spinal surgery recovery.
As for nicotine a legitimate reason for ingesting it is to relieve schizophrenia symptoms. Vaping seem to be the safest method however my only concern is that when glycol isn't heated properly it produces compounds like formaldehyde and acetaldehyde instead of carbon dioxide and water. Maybe this just means making sure the battery is properly charged before using the device.
I wonder how much nicotine consumption is driven by an unconscious desire to relieve schizophrenic symptoms?
Anything you say may be used against you. Once said it cannot be used to defend you.
For anyone else wondering:
Elasticsearch is developed in Java.
I sense Larry.