Triggering is a PTSD-like response to trauma. It is part and parcel of your feminist allies and has nothing to do with watching morons on the internet scream about TEH NAZIS.
I take it from your idiotic panicked screeching that you ideology aligns you with the alt-right ppl recently aware of their homosexuality. Feminist allies? I've never read something so stupid. You are just like all the SJW you complain about.
Telling Americans that they are TEH NAZIS is so cliche today,
I said no such thing. That's your strawman you're burning and I can see you are totally irrational. You must be getting your period sweetie.
and so false, that it makes rational people question the sanity of anyone who does it...
...said the blathering idiot foaming at the mouth. Calm down, you're going to hurt yourself.
Oh God, give the Nazi thing a rest. DURR HURR AMERIkkkA IS TEH NAZIS EVERYBODY PANIC. How do thinking people keep their brains turned on during emotionally motivated ranting like this?
Looks like I triggered you.
Germany wasn't a superpower, America is, and scenarios like these are sociopolitical signals to the state of any Empire. The British Empire, that was spread so far across the world it collapsed. Rome is a good one however I think the USSR, which collapsed under the weight of its own corruption, is a superpower that the US could really learn something from.
I get conniptions when I see people intimate that there are two and only two possible theories to existence and the nature of reality: Big Bang or Creator God. Why not the Tao?
Because they are all the same thing.
Our species is a lot older than we are led to believe. The more you look at all religious works the more you see that they are incredibly complex pieces of literature that describe the human experience, with many similarities to find. As more evidence is uncovered about what happened during the Younger Dryas, we are seeing more evidence of an older human civilization and perhaps our religious systems are fragmented descendants of that. Without a doubt, the oldest of these are the Australian and American Aboriginals, which appear related somehow, and an investigation of their belief system marries Darwinism and Christianity so elegantly it is breathtaking.
The laughable thing is how needy people are, expecting science will provide proof of a God that doesn't want you to know for sure if he exists, can change the laws of the universe (and probably others) at will whilst being able to manipulate time and parallel realities. Faith is supposed to be hard because life is suffering that tests the mettle of an individual until they break. It's a completely separate body of knowledge from science where one explores the soul and the other explores the universe.
Ultimately though science has a materialistic view of our universe, that things arose from matter, that consciousness arose from matter. Whereas a deterministic view turns that on it's head and suggests that matter arose from consciousness, that the universe was created from consciousness.
As science doesn't have an explanation for consciousness, that is the aspect of reality we are forced to consider.
Why get a cs degree? Why go to medical school? Surely you can just figure out how to operate on people by reading some articles on whatever the medical equivalent of stackoverflow is.
That is not the point I am making. I am saying that a student is burdened with a debt for their education, that you are liable for even if you become bankrupt and then told that this career is going to have a limited time to utilize return, let alone value, on that investment how is that an incentive to do that career?
This attitude completely ignores the sheer body of knowledge in Information Technology is still growing. Programming, operating systems, networks, databases, which are all relevant and new knowledge areas like AI and Quantum Computing. It places no value on the business insights a synthesis of those skill sets can produce.
Why would any young person be crazy enough to get into debt for a CS degree only to have the ROI cut short by an ageist churn em and burn em attitude?
As far as I can see the issue is there is a massive disconnect with organizations confusing energy output with efficiency. Deep thinking and focus is hard work that most people can't do, so if you can programming is a massive investment that you vest over time as you keep evolving.
What these people with dubious morals do is manipulate coders sincere enough to make the sacrifices required to be good at it over time. Subsequently they whine about a lack of skills, cry that they need immigrant labor when, in reality, it is a lot more difficult to manipulate people with life skills and that is where all this comes from.
This prevailing attitude about 'old programmers' is a transparent way to get all programmers to be competing against their future selves. It's so incredibly short sighted to attempt to replace enthusiasm with insecurity and joy with regret in the people who can help bring your dreams to life.
It's the 21st century, the world is run on code, I can't see demand decreasing.
that teleports the ship to any known sector, and the technology is based on a network of mushroom spores that permeates the entire universe, and they first were using a GIANT TARDIGRADE as a supercomputer to control the drive
Dilithium crystals are no longer a rare source of plot devices in Starfleet.
I used to go hunting a lot. Feral pigs (or boars) are super aggressive and destroy the area they are in. You need a reasonably large caliber rifle to kill them, they breed like crazy and are full of worms so you can't eat them. They will attack humans, are smarter than a dog and boars can grow pretty big - you would not want to mess with one unless you had a weapon.
*Anything* that can potentially get into the wild, like a genetically engineered pig that can survive cold, is a really, really bad idea. Expect at least one of these pigs to escape and breed in the wild.
I understand exactly what I am reading. I'm reading the projections of an idealist, who means well and wants the best for everybody however is blinded by a nuclear ideology that relies on social proof. When confronted by the complexity of the subject you shut down and leave it to people who you trust to make up your mind for you. Critical thinking skills aren't your forte. Then you make it personal and political when confronted with the reality, because then you have to confront the complexity.
What you do is use your freedom of speech to bludgeon the truth about this industry and people trying to confront and understand the reality of its danger and complexity. You're flippant with it in an arrogant way that seeks to conceal the facts. You falsify it and therefore make the civilization that supports our culture, weaker because you refuse to confront the awesome power and danger of these materials and their capacity to alter our genome. That's why I use my freedom of speech to confront you so that the reality is out there and we get stronger.
You and your type of nuclear idealism has been around here since the beginning, you think your the first? Unless you're a sockpuppet, you're not even the third generation of advocate who thought they had the energy to to maintain their fallacies, you're just another. Constantly making us weaker, and that's how Fukushima happened according to the report from the Diet. An arrogant ideology about Nuclear power's infallible high technology that bought collusion, falsification and corruption into the system, prevented improvements and created scope for the accident. Your kind of "Fifties" thinking allowed scope for Fukushima because you never call for these systems to be tested and hardened to ensure they perform, you blame NIMBYS and call everything FUD.
Which brings us to the other thing nuclear idealists do: Blame. Because everything is someone else's fault instead of something to confront and use as a reason to make the industrial nuclear processes stronger. When enough people like you corrupt the system, we have nuclear accidents because of weakened standards.
I'm reading that you don't take the subject seriously enough or treat it with any respect.
You completely destroyed the gameplay of Battlefront that made it compelling.
You limited the maps so it was pay pay pay instead of action action action.
Keep the new graphic engine however go back to the fast moving strategy game that made BF1 and BF2 great in their own right, both still highly playable (if I didn't enjoy EAW so much).
I see names come easier to you than actual facts. One liners don't cut it, how about going back to an actual discussion of risk, or is that too hard to twist into FUD?
Your nuclear ideology is fake news. You try to exhaust and lambast people into spending their mental energy diffusing your constructs. That feeling you are experiencing now is what you do to other posters.
Even when you, yourself cited them,you don't accept facts you supplied. Then you accused me of not accepting them in an attempt to re-write your memories of how you humiliated yourself. Which, again, demonstrates how you try to twist circumstances to fit reality, which you were doing then and are doing now. You're not even original enough to use your own words however you are clever enough to present a premise that is easy for people to process by wrapping up your dogmatic skepticism in motherhood statements.
Your comments are like popcorn that puff up to take up space when everyone is looking for a nice steak of facts to chew on. Your constructs are very easy to destroy and I happen to like popcorn while I am entertaining myself making you think and watching the feats of mental gymnastics you have to perform to maintain the falsity of your nuclear ideology when I haven't got something more important to do.
You're not even a tenth as smart as some of the people here who are smart enough to just ignore your ideology. They probably realize you're not interested in an actual discussion of the facts because you are not sincere and all you a looking for is an opportunity to steer the conversation into one of your own pre-packaged thought bubbles so you don't have to think. If I wanted an actual discussion I'd talk to one of them. You don't respect people here because you treat them like fools and the contempt you show is obvious to me. You are very clever.
You will just continue to do what you do, post lists of things that sound scary, which could be done for any number of things we all experience every day.
I discovered that a few year ago the Nuclear industry had an outreach program to teach people like you how to post favorable comments about them in forums like this on their behalf, do they pay you for this work or are you just being a useful idiot? When I see some of your posts on this subject I actually find my disgust response being activated, like your attempts to undermine LNT has today.
Today I'm disgusted enough that I had to break down and counteract your entire nuclear ideology. You've demonstrated that counteracting your shilling with the one reputable source of information that you supplied where you disproved your own argument isn't enough. You should realize, when you post your nuclear ideological claptrap is that I maybe waiting to call you out on it and force you into a situation where I make you bend, contort, writhe, squirm and twist around the facts to maintain your ism.
Now that I've shown people how to dismantle your nuclear ideology, I hope it happens a lot more.
BTW, KAOS, you are the one who refused to accept the studies done on Fukushima, where they have determined actual health impacts are much lower than predicted.
Yes, I remember them, however it was about Chernobyl, you were trying to disprove LNT and, in a classic Mr D moment, the data you provided disproved your own argument. I pointed that out and you didn't respond. The irony was hilarious that you say I didn't accept it when I embraced it. It's appropriate here because it shows how you continue to spread ignorance about LNT even when you provided the evidence that found a significant linear dose response for all leukemia two years ago.
That's shows a deliberate, calculated deception you are conducting with your posts here today, trying to twist circumstance so to falsify your own perceptions. That's why your lies are so convincing, you believe them. You know what your saying is wrong, you provided that data to show you are wrong, yet you refuse to accept data you provided because it doesn't fit the narrative of your nuclear idealism that you try to transpose onto reality.
Slashdot Mirror
Triggering is a PTSD-like response to trauma. It is part and parcel of your feminist allies and has nothing to do with watching morons on the internet scream about TEH NAZIS.
I take it from your idiotic panicked screeching that you ideology aligns you with the alt-right ppl recently aware of their homosexuality. Feminist allies? I've never read something so stupid. You are just like all the SJW you complain about.
Telling Americans that they are TEH NAZIS is so cliche today,
I said no such thing. That's your strawman you're burning and I can see you are totally irrational. You must be getting your period sweetie.
and so false, that it makes rational people question the sanity of anyone who does it...
...said the blathering idiot foaming at the mouth. Calm down, you're going to hurt yourself.
Oh God, give the Nazi thing a rest. DURR HURR AMERIkkkA IS TEH NAZIS EVERYBODY PANIC. How do thinking people keep their brains turned on during emotionally motivated ranting like this?
Looks like I triggered you.
Germany wasn't a superpower, America is, and scenarios like these are sociopolitical signals to the state of any Empire. The British Empire, that was spread so far across the world it collapsed. Rome is a good one however I think the USSR, which collapsed under the weight of its own corruption, is a superpower that the US could really learn something from.
It depends on how much you value truth.
I get conniptions when I see people intimate that there are two and only two possible theories to existence and the nature of reality: Big Bang or Creator God. Why not the Tao?
Because they are all the same thing.
Our species is a lot older than we are led to believe. The more you look at all religious works the more you see that they are incredibly complex pieces of literature that describe the human experience, with many similarities to find. As more evidence is uncovered about what happened during the Younger Dryas, we are seeing more evidence of an older human civilization and perhaps our religious systems are fragmented descendants of that. Without a doubt, the oldest of these are the Australian and American Aboriginals, which appear related somehow, and an investigation of their belief system marries Darwinism and Christianity so elegantly it is breathtaking.
The laughable thing is how needy people are, expecting science will provide proof of a God that doesn't want you to know for sure if he exists, can change the laws of the universe (and probably others) at will whilst being able to manipulate time and parallel realities. Faith is supposed to be hard because life is suffering that tests the mettle of an individual until they break. It's a completely separate body of knowledge from science where one explores the soul and the other explores the universe.
Ultimately though science has a materialistic view of our universe, that things arose from matter, that consciousness arose from matter. Whereas a deterministic view turns that on it's head and suggests that matter arose from consciousness, that the universe was created from consciousness.
As science doesn't have an explanation for consciousness, that is the aspect of reality we are forced to consider.
This is what happened in Germany just before the Nazis rose to power - massive wealth inequality.
Why get a cs degree? Why go to medical school? Surely you can just figure out how to operate on people by reading some articles on whatever the medical equivalent of stackoverflow is.
That is not the point I am making. I am saying that a student is burdened with a debt for their education, that you are liable for even if you become bankrupt and then told that this career is going to have a limited time to utilize return, let alone value, on that investment how is that an incentive to do that career?
This attitude completely ignores the sheer body of knowledge in Information Technology is still growing. Programming, operating systems, networks, databases, which are all relevant and new knowledge areas like AI and Quantum Computing. It places no value on the business insights a synthesis of those skill sets can produce.
Why would any young person be crazy enough to get into debt for a CS degree only to have the ROI cut short by an ageist churn em and burn em attitude?
As far as I can see the issue is there is a massive disconnect with organizations confusing energy output with efficiency. Deep thinking and focus is hard work that most people can't do, so if you can programming is a massive investment that you vest over time as you keep evolving.
What these people with dubious morals do is manipulate coders sincere enough to make the sacrifices required to be good at it over time. Subsequently they whine about a lack of skills, cry that they need immigrant labor when, in reality, it is a lot more difficult to manipulate people with life skills and that is where all this comes from.
This prevailing attitude about 'old programmers' is a transparent way to get all programmers to be competing against their future selves. It's so incredibly short sighted to attempt to replace enthusiasm with insecurity and joy with regret in the people who can help bring your dreams to life.
It's the 21st century, the world is run on code, I can't see demand decreasing.
> A CPU isn't intelligent, it only thinks it is.
“Don't anthropmorphize computers—they hate that!”
Well I wouldn't want to hurt its feelings.
It just if you grew up in the 80's, it was beaten into you that a CPU is not intelligent whereas today people claim it is.
A CPU isn't intelligent, it only thinks it is.
Exactly, it just isn't worth the hassle of dealing with it. Surgery would be horrible - must have been a massive worm.
that teleports the ship to any known sector, and the technology is based on a network of mushroom spores that permeates the entire universe, and they first were using a GIANT TARDIGRADE as a supercomputer to control the drive
Dilithium crystals are no longer a rare source of plot devices in Starfleet.
Hm, was that not called Duke Nukem? Forever?
or Duke Nukem, half of forever, perhaps?
It might be just where I was, however they turned me off pork for a while.
I used to go hunting a lot. Feral pigs (or boars) are super aggressive and destroy the area they are in. You need a reasonably large caliber rifle to kill them, they breed like crazy and are full of worms so you can't eat them. They will attack humans, are smarter than a dog and boars can grow pretty big - you would not want to mess with one unless you had a weapon.
*Anything* that can potentially get into the wild, like a genetically engineered pig that can survive cold, is a really, really bad idea. Expect at least one of these pigs to escape and breed in the wild.
This is an extremely short sighted endeavor.
I can see some of this stuff becoming memes.
Half-Life 2X Speed Released
it's twice as funny the second time.
You just can't understand what you are reading.
I understand exactly what I am reading. I'm reading the projections of an idealist, who means well and wants the best for everybody however is blinded by a nuclear ideology that relies on social proof. When confronted by the complexity of the subject you shut down and leave it to people who you trust to make up your mind for you. Critical thinking skills aren't your forte. Then you make it personal and political when confronted with the reality, because then you have to confront the complexity.
What you do is use your freedom of speech to bludgeon the truth about this industry and people trying to confront and understand the reality of its danger and complexity. You're flippant with it in an arrogant way that seeks to conceal the facts. You falsify it and therefore make the civilization that supports our culture, weaker because you refuse to confront the awesome power and danger of these materials and their capacity to alter our genome. That's why I use my freedom of speech to confront you so that the reality is out there and we get stronger.
You and your type of nuclear idealism has been around here since the beginning, you think your the first? Unless you're a sockpuppet, you're not even the third generation of advocate who thought they had the energy to to maintain their fallacies, you're just another. Constantly making us weaker, and that's how Fukushima happened according to the report from the Diet. An arrogant ideology about Nuclear power's infallible high technology that bought collusion, falsification and corruption into the system, prevented improvements and created scope for the accident. Your kind of "Fifties" thinking allowed scope for Fukushima because you never call for these systems to be tested and hardened to ensure they perform, you blame NIMBYS and call everything FUD.
Which brings us to the other thing nuclear idealists do: Blame. Because everything is someone else's fault instead of something to confront and use as a reason to make the industrial nuclear processes stronger. When enough people like you corrupt the system, we have nuclear accidents because of weakened standards.
I'm reading that you don't take the subject seriously enough or treat it with any respect.
You completely destroyed the gameplay of Battlefront that made it compelling.
You limited the maps so it was pay pay pay instead of action action action.
Keep the new graphic engine however go back to the fast moving strategy game that made BF1 and BF2 great in their own right, both still highly playable (if I didn't enjoy EAW so much).
I see names come easier to you than actual facts. One liners don't cut it, how about going back to an actual discussion of risk, or is that too hard to twist into FUD?
Your nuclear ideology is fake news. You try to exhaust and lambast people into spending their mental energy diffusing your constructs. That feeling you are experiencing now is what you do to other posters.
Even when you, yourself cited them,you don't accept facts you supplied. Then you accused me of not accepting them in an attempt to re-write your memories of how you humiliated yourself. Which, again, demonstrates how you try to twist circumstances to fit reality, which you were doing then and are doing now. You're not even original enough to use your own words however you are clever enough to present a premise that is easy for people to process by wrapping up your dogmatic skepticism in motherhood statements.
Your comments are like popcorn that puff up to take up space when everyone is looking for a nice steak of facts to chew on. Your constructs are very easy to destroy and I happen to like popcorn while I am entertaining myself making you think and watching the feats of mental gymnastics you have to perform to maintain the falsity of your nuclear ideology when I haven't got something more important to do.
You're not even a tenth as smart as some of the people here who are smart enough to just ignore your ideology. They probably realize you're not interested in an actual discussion of the facts because you are not sincere and all you a looking for is an opportunity to steer the conversation into one of your own pre-packaged thought bubbles so you don't have to think. If I wanted an actual discussion I'd talk to one of them. You don't respect people here because you treat them like fools and the contempt you show is obvious to me. You are very clever.
I discovered that a few year ago the Nuclear industry had an outreach program to teach people like you how to post favorable comments about them in forums like this on their behalf, do they pay you for this work or are you just being a useful idiot? When I see some of your posts on this subject I actually find my disgust response being activated, like your attempts to undermine LNT has today.
Today I'm disgusted enough that I had to break down and counteract your entire nuclear ideology. You've demonstrated that counteracting your shilling with the one reputable source of information that you supplied where you disproved your own argument isn't enough. You should realize, when you post your nuclear ideological claptrap is that I maybe waiting to call you out on it and force you into a situation where I make you bend, contort, writhe, squirm and twist around the facts to maintain your ism.
Now that I've shown people how to dismantle your nuclear ideology, I hope it happens a lot more.
And its MrKaos to you.
Ignore facts even when they are cited from reputable sources
Continue to shill as if you have an agenda
Refuse to accept the work of Ukrainian scientists studying Chernobyl
Minimize the apparent harm
Claim everything is FUD
BTW, KAOS, you are the one who refused to accept the studies done on Fukushima, where they have determined actual health impacts are much lower than predicted.
Yes, I remember them, however it was about Chernobyl, you were trying to disprove LNT and, in a classic Mr D moment, the data you provided disproved your own argument. I pointed that out and you didn't respond. The irony was hilarious that you say I didn't accept it when I embraced it. It's appropriate here because it shows how you continue to spread ignorance about LNT even when you provided the evidence that found a significant linear dose response for all leukemia two years ago.
That's shows a deliberate, calculated deception you are conducting with your posts here today, trying to twist circumstance so to falsify your own perceptions. That's why your lies are so convincing, you believe them. You know what your saying is wrong, you provided that data to show you are wrong, yet you refuse to accept data you provided because it doesn't fit the narrative of your nuclear idealism that you try to transpose onto reality.
If you have sufficient special qualifications that you can stay busy while being a complicated hire, more power to you.
Yeah, it's not often they get someone with an actual set of testicles.