Complicated answer: Progress is inevitable and we definitely need that kind of speed. Its not only about hard drives but also about Audio visual components. Such as an USB HDTV Dongle which is a bit slow for USB 2.0. It is also one of the reasons why webcams currently max out at 2.0 megapixels. anything more than that the current USB 2.0 cannot handle. It is quite easy to eat through those 600MB/s, Just think of the USB 3.0 replacing 1000mbit ethernet.
this would be useful information if all manufactures actually mounted the USB ports right side up. I know some of the older dell models have that problem.
yea we know its but here are the reasons its needed
1) Backwards compatible
2) Fit more ports in a smaller area, less wasted space
3) Cheaper for manufactures because the mounts are the same thus making it a cheaper industry upgrade to adopt.
"Optimism, pessimism, f-ck that; we're going to make it happen. As God is my bloody witness, I'm hell-bent on making it work."
I can't find a reference to that quote in the wired article or on google.
Technically if there is no sign of break in, such as no broken windows or locks, then it is hard to prove theft and is not covered by insurance. I am not sure how the law works but this is how insurance works.
Slashdot Mirror
Most volunteer organizations on the east coast have more females than males... but don't get your hopes up.
simple answer: yes
Complicated answer:
Progress is inevitable and we definitely need that kind of speed. Its not only about hard drives but also about Audio visual components. Such as an USB HDTV Dongle which is a bit slow for USB 2.0. It is also one of the reasons why webcams currently max out at 2.0 megapixels. anything more than that the current USB 2.0 cannot handle. It is quite easy to eat through those 600MB/s, Just think of the USB 3.0 replacing 1000mbit ethernet.
this would be useful information if all manufactures actually mounted the USB ports right side up. I know some of the older dell models have that problem.
yea we know its but here are the reasons its needed 1) Backwards compatible 2) Fit more ports in a smaller area, less wasted space 3) Cheaper for manufactures because the mounts are the same thus making it a cheaper industry upgrade to adopt.
I prefer the term
MAlware + phiSHING = mashing!
that is not the only one. What happened to Socialism and the idea of everything being free?
according to the interview they have "12 flights ahead of us"
I'm just blind thanks
"Optimism, pessimism, f-ck that; we're going to make it happen. As God is my bloody witness, I'm hell-bent on making it work." I can't find a reference to that quote in the wired article or on google.
Technically if there is no sign of break in, such as no broken windows or locks, then it is hard to prove theft and is not covered by insurance. I am not sure how the law works but this is how insurance works.
OMG it even works with links Links should be the new compatability standard.