Slashdot Mirror


Google Weather Service And GMail Improvements

Philipp Lenssen writes "Google has added US-only weather forecasts to their web search. Type e.g. "weather palo alto, ca" (zip codes work too) and you get a small illustrated weather forecast on top of the search result. (Yahoo has been providing a similar service for quite a while.) You can also send your query as SMS to 46645 (GOOGL), as the official Google blog reports." Relatedly, Shachaf writes "Looking at my GMail account, I see that Google has added two new features: integration with Picasa and plain HTML support. Now you can 'Log in to Gmail directly from Picasa and send the photos from your Gmail account', and view your email from any web-browser."

346 comments

  1. You misunderstand Google Weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google isn't forecasting the weather, they're controlling it.

    1. Re:You misunderstand Google Weather by game+kid · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wouldn't mind that, as long as they have a cache of good weather during storms. Or at least alert GMail users.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:You misunderstand Google Weather by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      Google isn't forecasting the weather, they're controlling it.

      We're not driving anymore...WE'RE RIDING.

    3. Re:You misunderstand Google Weather by hhlost · · Score: 1

      Google's not trying to control anything; they're trying to track everything... Take a look at what they know about you, using the google cookie and their database:

      o What you search for (interests)
      o What you email about (interests)
      o Who you email (networks of people)
      o Who you invite to join GMail (networks of people)
      o What groups you browse/join (interests)
      o Where you live, via maps/weather (interests, networks of people, location)
      o Where you travel, via maps/weather (same as above)
      o What you buy (interests, financial standing?)
      o News you read (interests, location)
      o The list goes on...

      It's a little scary, IMHO

    4. Re:You misunderstand Google Weather by Syre · · Score: 1

      You may be right.

      Google weather said the temperature in San Francisco was 57 degrees at 2:25pm.

      Yahoo said 65 degrees, which is correct.

      Google wants it to be colder in San Francisco!

    5. Re:You misunderstand Google Weather by youknowmewell · · Score: 1

      If they sent me a map to my gmail account with directions to the nearest area with sunshine that would be nice too.

    6. Re:You misunderstand Google Weather by pbaumgar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not anymore scary than what everyone already knows about you already... talk to your bank, your credit card company, your insurance company, your doctor, your mortgage company, your landlord, your employer, your airline of choice, etc.....

    7. Re:You misunderstand Google Weather by hhlost · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, but I think it is a bit scarier. The entities that you listed don't have access to the information that the others have. (e.g. My landlord can't [legally] obtain my bank records.)

  2. Coverage of New Gmail Feature by sammykrupa · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here is a link to screenshots and coverage of the new plain-html-only-view Gmail has gotten:

    http://www.theplaceforitall.com/2005/03/report-on- gmails-basic-html-view.html

    1. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I dislike about the basic HTML version: it doesn't let you choose to use the javascript one. Opera is not a 'fully supported browser', yet it renders the regular Gmail perfectly. Nonetheless, Gmail now serves it the basic HTML version, without features such as keyboard shortcuts and even changing the settings!

    2. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      So how come these funky SMS numbers never work on my phone? I can send SMS to other phones just fine, but these 5 digit services never work, it always says "NUMBER NOT SUPPORTED". I use MetroPCS in Miami.

      Is this a special service outside the normal SMS that providers have to opt into, or what?

      -Z

    3. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does on Mozilla 1.8b2. There are two ways:

      1. click the link at the top with the notice: "You are currently viewing Gmail in basic HTML. Switch to standard view"
      2. click the standard link in the text at the bottom: "Gmail view: standard | basic HTML"

    4. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by game+kid · · Score: 1

      I noticed it just yesterday. I wonder if anyone uses it on Lynx/Links, and how well it works on those? (Not that I use those often...)

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    5. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tried with links and w3m (not the latest versions, anyway) and it reported me that my browser don't support cookies (?). But was a pleasure to read gmail with elinks in a console ssh session.

    6. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      here's an idea, ask MetroPCS in Miami

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by bheckel · · Score: 1

      w3m-0.5.1 jumps around a bunch of redirection links then then gives:

      "JavaScript must be enabled in order for you to
      use Gmail in standard view. However, it seems
      JavaScript is either disabled or not supported by
      your browser. To use standard view, enable
      JavaScript by changing your browser options, then
      try again.

      To use Gmail's basic HTML view, which does not
      require JavaScript, click here."

      But it works well from there, I remember not being able to use text based browsers at all a month or so ago.

      --
      ~
      ~
    8. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      Darn I was hoping it'd work in lynx now, but no such luck :/ It just takes you to the page saying "0 refresh rate" and a link to the other frame which when visited logs you out.
      Regards,
      Steve

    9. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by CowboyMeal · · Score: 1
      w3m -cookie gmail.com
      --
      Your credit card information wants to be free.
    10. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I did; they seemed clueless. I wouldn't stick with them if it weren't for the amazing deal they give me (unlimited monthly minutes for $50/mo.)

      Things like this are only a slight annoyance, but I'm still curious about it...

      -Z

    11. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      The short SMS numbers have to actually be supported by your provider, in this case they arent and thus arent working. Dont worry, a lot of providers currently dont support them, because they really arent covered under the standards, and currently they are governed more through mutual agreements between providers that anything else. The 'best' thing is that each provider can have a different end recipient for the same number - the number isnt unique globally, since its all handled internally on the network.

    12. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I see they finally added a simple "delete" button. About time. Even with a 1 GB mailbox, there's always gonna be email you want to discard.

    13. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange

      European countries don't have interoperability problems. It's funny how your system allows for such incompatibilites

    14. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by zonker · · Score: 0

      continuing on the parents question, and forgive me for knowing very little about sms, if short numbers don't work on some providers, i assume that it is because they don't have a translater (i'm imagining a dns like system) to the longer number. if that is the case, then is there a way to find the longer number and use that instead?

    15. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by zonker · · Score: 0

      yeah, but try going into your spam box and mass deleting all 11661 messages in it. about 6 months ago i have 70,000 spam messages. it was insane. i had used over 33% of my available space. they recently have seemed to changed it so it doesn't count spam as used space.

      also they have done a little better with their spam filtering in that i don't have as much crap ending up in my inbox but there is still too much obvious spam in there. however i have not had a single false positive spam yet and i've had my gmail account since about a month after they launched it.

    16. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by siphi · · Score: 0

      It works in ELinks

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    17. Re:Coverage of New Gmail Feature by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Not really. Short SMS numbers are dealt with by agreement and basically what amounts to static routes to a proper SMS receiving station. There is no resolver as such, and theres no real way to find the long number.

  3. Looks nice by nefele · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But does anyone know how to make it display the temperature in Celsius degrees? Not everyone in the US knows how to interpret this horrible abomination that is the Fahrenheit scale...

    1. Re:Looks nice by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, use google "Convert (degrees)F to C) and it converts it.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Looks nice by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure - open up your phones calculator, subtract 32 and multiply the results by 5/9ths.

      Or to do it on your head - subract the accerleration of gravity and take 1/2 of the result - a good quick and dirty.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:Looks nice by erlenic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but if you're living in the US and you don't know fahrenheit, then there's something wrong. Either the schools you went to growing up were absolutely terrible, or you immigrated here and need to learn more of our culture.

    4. Re:Looks nice by david.given · · Score: 1
      Or to do it on your head - subract the accerleration of gravity and take 1/2 of the result - a good quick and dirty.

      (100 - 9.8) / 2 = 45, which is nowhere near my blood temperature...

    5. Re:Looks nice by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Fahrenheit is an arbitrary scale, for pretty much all scientific uses Celsius is the scale.

    6. Re:Looks nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm a Canadian born and raised and even I understand Fahrenheit. I learned it just from watching TV. You must be a real dumbass.

    7. Re:Looks nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes too long to convert degrees Celsius to Kelvin; sort it out Google.

    8. Re:Looks nice by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You managed to confuse me because of units again lol. In the units used by all physics, the acceleration of gravity is 9.8, commonly rounded to 10.

      So I had to google it and concluded you were using feet/second...

      On the other hand, a bonus to you americans for having a power of 2 as g's value :)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    9. Re:Looks nice by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Check out the other reply to the grandparent post ;)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    10. Re:Looks nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it's widely-used doesn't mean anyone should be encouraged to use such an arbitrary and useless scale.

    11. Re:Looks nice by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe the US could start trying to use standard units. Hey, if it's bad for someone is just you guys, especially the scientists and engineers...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    12. Re:Looks nice by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 0, Troll
      Fahrenheit is an arbitrary scale, for pretty much all scientific uses Celsius is the scale.

      ...and Celsius isn't arbitrary?

      OBTW: ever heard of the Kelvin scale? Or does that not have "scientific uses"?

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    13. Re:Looks nice by randallpowell · · Score: 1

      Kelvin or Celecius should be the standard. I say fuck the old people and idiots and switch to metric now. Who needs Imperial Measurement? Oh wait....

    14. Re:Looks nice by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like when I go to England. Just because they drive on the left doesn't mean I should be encouraged to.

    15. Re:Looks nice by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Just because we should switch doesn't give people an excuse to not know how we currently do things.

    16. Re:Looks nice by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    17. Re:Looks nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      ...and Celsius isn't arbitrary?

      Ooo I'll bite the troll for this one.

      Celsius is in fact, NOT arbitrary. Celsius is a scale where the phase change of water sets the zero (freeing) and 100 (boiling) marks.

      Kelvin and Celsius are the same scale, but Kelvin has the zero set at the absolute point (-273 deg C).

    18. Re:Looks nice by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Celsius is in fact, NOT arbitrary. Celsius is a scale where the phase change of water sets the zero (freeing) and 100 (boiling) marks.

      And Fahrenheit is a scale where the zero point is attained by mixing equal parts of water, ice, and salt, and the phase changes of water are at 32 (freezing) and 212 (boiling). So it is no more arbitrary than Celsius.

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    19. Re:Looks nice by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      were absolutely terrible, or you immigrated here and need to learn more of our culture

      Well, and I thought measuring temperatures has to do with science, not culture. Whatever.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    20. Re:Looks nice by erlenic · · Score: 1

      How a culture expresses the outside temperature when discussing it around the water cooler is much closer to culture than science.

    21. Re:Looks nice by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Isn't that a more stupid and complex measurement, not particularly useful for any kind of scientific reference, than just using pure water?

    22. Re:Looks nice by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Actually as far as temperature scales go, Fahrenheit makes far more sense than you give credit, especially when describing the weather.

      This is due to the fact the the temperature in 'temperate' latitudes - those places on the globe where humans are most comfortable, and therefore populous - typically ranges from around 0 to 100 on Gabriel's oft maligned scale.

    23. Re:Looks nice by recursiv · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What is so scientific about checking the weather forecast? Even if your dubious claims the Celsius was inherently better suited to scientific use had any merit, what bearing does that have on me checking the weather forecast? That's not exactly a very rigorous scientific pursuit. Furthermore, with integer degrees, Fahrenheit gives more precision. Put that in your pedantic pipe and smoke it.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    24. Re:Looks nice by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2
      But does anyone know how to make it display the temperature in Celsius degrees? Not everyone in the US knows how to interpret this horrible abomination that is the Fahrenheit scale...

      Why is it such an abomination? Because you're not used to it? I use metric all the time (scientist) and live in the US. The Fahrenheit scale is the only imperial scale that doesn't annoy me. The only difference between it and centigrade is 1) the zero point, and 2) the increment density. Centigrade is based on water, which is somewhat arbitrary, and Fahrenheit is density.

      You sound like most of the dimwitted Americans who can't figure out what a liter is.

    25. Re:Looks nice by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 1, Troll
      Isn't that a more stupid and complex measurement, not particularly useful for any kind of scientific reference, than just using pure water?

      I fail to see how the phase changes of water being calibrated to (32,212) degrees is any better or worse than having them at (0,100). They're just arbitrary values in either case (unless you're trying to ascribe some numerological significance to them...).

      Now, if there was a ubiquitous formula that was made simpler by the fact that water freezes at 0 instead of 32 (e.g. you can drop a constant term), then I would buy that Celsius is better for scientific research. But until you can show me one...

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    26. Re:Looks nice by mrak+and+swepe · · Score: 1

      Just because they drive on the left doesn't mean I should be encouraged to

      Of course it does: It you don't, then you're going to collide with oncoming traffic, and seriously piss off some English person who was innocently going about his day.

    27. Re:Looks nice by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny

      What are liters, are they like litres ?

      =)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    28. Re:Looks nice by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 2

      Furthermore, with integer degrees, Fahrenheit gives more precision.

      Those of us who made it far enough in school to use decimal notation are quite pleased with the sensibility and utility of Celsius, thank you.

    29. Re:Looks nice by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      At least the Celsius scale is dependent on the properties of one rather than three things and delivers practical values that don't require too much thought to interpret.

      If it's 0 deg C or lower then it's freezing, if it's above that then it's not. Water boils at exactly 100 deg C. Etc, etc. Not to mention that 1 deg of change in C is equal to 1 deg of change in K, the SI unit for temperature, which makes Celsius far more practical a unit of measurement to any scientist than Fahrenheit will ever be.

      I grew up with both the Celsius and Fahrenheit scales and, frankly, the former is far easier to use and interpret than the latter.

      Having said that, I can understand your resistance to change though: I find it far easier to think about travelling distances (whether by foot, car, boat, train or plane) in miles than kilometres. However, that doesn't mean that I'll be rallying to save the mile for nostalgic reasons when the time comes when metric rather than imperial road distances are adopted here in the UK.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    30. Re:Looks nice by Patik · · Score: 1

      No. Just about the only specific temperatures people care about in their daily lives is when rain turns to snow and ice. Using Celcius is very convenient -- if the temp is negative, it's freezing, if it's positive, it's not. With Fahrenheit positive/negative is meaningless and water freezes at a seemingly random 32 degrees.

    31. Re:Looks nice by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, with integer degrees, Fahrenheit gives more precision. Put that in your pedantic pipe and smoke it.

      Like you can tell the difference between 45 and 46 deg Fahrenheit when you leave your house in the morning? Yeah, right.

      Put that in your pedantic pipe and smoke it, right back atcha, buddy.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    32. Re:Looks nice by erlenic · · Score: 1

      That was my point. I was being sarcastic.

    33. Re:Looks nice by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      The only advantage to the lay person is that farenheit has nearly double the precision (actually 1.8 times) when using solely integers. This may not be significant to you, but a few degrees can indeed be important in some industries. Most people don't deal with decimals (unless your a scientist). Just to make sure the point is clear, if you are at 0 C and 32 F then your at freezing point, if the temperature goes up one degree to 1 C and 33 F , the C measurement is misleading, as the farenheit measurement will show you that it really only went up half (.47) degrees.
      Regards,
      Steve

    34. Re:Looks nice by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      I thought the original motive was to set 0 as the coldest attainable laboratory temperature of the time and 100 as the temperature of the human body.

    35. Re:Looks nice by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Celsius is a scale where the phase change of water sets the zero (freeing) and 100 (boiling) marks.
      We know that, but Celcius is still arbitrary with respect to deciding whether it is comfortable outside. The boiling point has nothing to do with what to wear.

      For the Farenheit challenged: 0 is "darn cold" and 100 is "awfully hot." As it happens 0 to 100 is approximately the range of temperatures encountered each year where I grew up, so to me it seems pretty sensible.

    36. Re:Looks nice by mrak+and+swepe · · Score: 1

      My apologies: I hate it when that happens.

      Note to self: Check awake and alert before posting.

    37. Re:Looks nice by STrinity · · Score: 1

      No. Just about the only specific temperatures people care about in their daily lives is when rain turns to snow and ice. Using Celcius is very convenient -- if the temp is negative, it's freezing, if it's positive, it's not.

      Except that it can snow, and even stick to the ground, when the air temperature is above freezing.

      And if you aren't living at sea-level, things are even more muddled.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    38. Re:Looks nice by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually the reason Fahrenheit has such "odd" numbers, is that the two points you chose have no baring on how it was scaled.

      As I understand it (and there are numerous ides on how it was done), 0 was chosen as the freezing point of salt water (as in what you find in the local ocea). That's fine and all.

      The oddity comes from where he set 100 to be. The natural temperature of a healthy horses blood.

      Now, that's as natural a set of points as night and grass.

      If he had chosen two points on the same items temperature scale, then it'd be a lot simpler. He didn't, so it's not.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    39. Re:Looks nice by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      The reason why we use Celsius rather than Kelvin is convenience and simplicity. Anyone who's vaguely familiar with the Celsius scale can tell you that 0 deg is freezing, 100 deg is boiling, 5 deg is quite cold, 20 deg is pleasantly warm, 30 deg is hot, etc.

      But even a someone with a science background who knows the Kelvin scale and it's relationship to Celsius (K = C + 273) would struggle to quickly apply some of those labels (quite cold, pleasantly warm, hot) if you presented them with the figures 278K, 293K, and 303K.

      Why is this? Well, put simply, it's easier for us to interpret the difference between 5, 20 and 30 than it is for us to interpret the difference between 278, 293 and 303. Stop ten people in the street and ask them for the difference between 5 and 30. See how many get it right and in how much time. Now ask those same people for the difference between 278 and 303. See how many fewer get it right and how much longer they all take to come up with an answer.

      It all boils down to simplicity (if you pardon the semi-intentional pun). That, my friend, is why we don't use K for everyday measurements of temperature, and also why we don't use metres or seconds to measure all but short distances or small intervals of time (in favour of larger measurements, such as km and hours and minutes instead).

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    40. Re:Looks nice by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Google Weather doesn't give it with decimals, though. I believe that was his point.

      On the other hand, a change of a single degree (in either C or F) means nothing to the vast majority of people.

    41. Re:Looks nice by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      I fail to understand why/when we're limited to integer numbers when measuring temperatures...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    42. Re:Looks nice by Dizzle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is such an American-centric view that I feel compelled to comment. Remove the "USA! USA!" from your comment for a second. A minor fraction of the world (5% if google is right) uses a temperature scale. Fine. Now, should the other 95% need an excuse to not know that 5%? I mean seriously, can you not put aside your patriotism and realize that just because the good ol' US of A uses it doesn't mean everyone else should be obliged to use it? If I set up a temperature scale based on how long it takes a lamp to reach a certain temperature, would I be justified in saying "Just because we should switch doesn't give people an excuse to not know how we currently do things." Think about that for a second.

      --
      -Dizzle
      "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
    43. Re:Looks nice by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      You'll see that I specified lay people. Farmer's (which used to constitute one of America's largest workforces), as well as many other areas that may require workers to make certain decisions based on current temperatures, often times a chart of integer values in one column and corresponding value in the next column will be posted. Asking workers to round numbers may be asking too much for uneducated laborers. Honestly, its such a small deviation that it doesn't really matter if you use C or F degrees, but (to put it into computer terms) why right a number in octal notation when hex notation is already commonplace and requires less digits for the same precision?
      Regards,
      Steve

    44. Re:Looks nice by erlenic · · Score: 1

      I don't think I was clear enough in my post. I'm not saying anyone outside of the US should be forced to use it, or even that they should know it. I was talking about when people live in the US. If someone is going to another country for anything more than vacation, they should learn something about that country before hand. If they use a different temperature scale, it's probably a good idea to learn it.

    45. Re:Looks nice by spike2131 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not everyone in the US knows how to interpret this horrible abomination that is the Fahrenheit scale...

      What, did you skip that day in the third grade?

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    46. Re:Looks nice by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I find that I expect scientific data to be expressed in Centigrade (do I sound old or what? :) ...er, I mean Celsius, and everyday life in Fahrenheit. I think it's a matter of the appropriate granularity for the job intended:

      Celsius naturally fits into calculations in chemistry and physics (where water is frequently used as a constant). Why do math involving 32 and 212 when you can do math involving 0 and 100?

      Fahrenheit give more precision for everyday life without having to resort to decimals, but more importantly for everyday use, it divides nicely into blocks of "about that much" for stuff like how hot to set the oven and whether you need an extra sweater.

      And if it involves superconductors or deep space, somehow my brain wants the numbers in Kelvin. It's no damned wonder it had a disk-full error in college; it was keeping all that data in triplicate! :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    47. Re:Looks nice by MMMDI · · Score: 3, Funny

      0F = It's freezing cold outside. Good think you're sitting on your computer with the heater cranked up.

      50F = It's quite nice outside (though you may want to wear a light jacket), but you don't know such since you're sitting on the computer reading /..

      100F = You could fry an egg on the sidewalk. Thankfully, you're inside on the computer with the A/C cranked up.

      There, we now have a foolproof conversion chart.

    48. Re:Looks nice by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Umm, that doesn't change the /weather/ feature. That is their calculator, but it doesn't work automatically do it for the weather. I want to be able to see what the weather is like for the up coming days without having to type each on in again and have it get converted individually.

    49. Re:Looks nice by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Sorry. One of the problems I has as a student of aeronautical engineering was keeping track of units. Aero Eng used US units (mainly because of the vast store of data that is all in US units) while everyone else in engineering and hard science used SI.

      Not to mention the metric and English tools I have to have to work on US and German cars...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    50. Re:Looks nice by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      What are liters, are they like litres ?

      Sort of. I think a liter is (0.1 meter)^3.

    51. Re:Looks nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iDisagreeWithYourChoiceOfVariableNames

    52. Re:Looks nice by Tatarize · · Score: 1

      Yeah. "43 Celsius in Fahrenheit" It converts them. It doesn't however do currency exchange. *Hint* "200 Euros in US Dollar"

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    53. Re:Looks nice by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      No problem, it just happens because I'm not from the US, so I've never used 32 as the value of g ;)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    54. Re:Looks nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the Farenheit challenged: 0 is "darn cold" and 100 is "awfully hot." As it happens 0 to 100 is approximately the range of temperatures encountered each year where I grew up, so to me it seems pretty sensible.

      just ZERO for a low? hehe

      the F-challenged folk just just move to north dakota where a typical winter low might be -40 degrees.. no F or C needed.. it's the same thing. :)

    55. Re:Looks nice by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      A site offering only "F" doesn't give a f to users outside of USA.

      Also, whatever they (Google) do, they have some sort of geek lawyers(!) to defend them. Whether they hurt peoples feelings or not. Like some sort of addict or something.

      Google is a publicly traded company which makes millions and uses same tactics (cookies etc) as every company on earth does. Its not some sort of "net prophet" or anything. Did I miss anything sort of that? :)

    56. Re:Looks nice by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Well, hmm, you could always go to www.weather.com, but I understand complaining about something is much easier.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    57. Re:Looks nice by Whafro · · Score: 1

      I'd heard farhenheit wanted 100 to be body temperature, but he had a fever when he made the initial measurement *shrugs*

    58. Re:Looks nice by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe I like Google's interface better and like to be able to access it quickly and easily.

    59. Re:Looks nice by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What temperature is halfway to boiling? With Celsius, it's 50. With Fahrenheit, you have to think about it for a second.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    60. Re:Looks nice by recursiv · · Score: 1

      Heaven forbid anyone should have to think about something so irrelevant to anything.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    61. Re:Looks nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's still a pretty stupid argument. Why not make a superCelsius scale, where water freezes at 0 degrees and boils at 1000. Then you've got even more precision than Farenheit! It must be a much better scale.

    62. Re:Looks nice by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      Now ask those same people for the difference between 275 and 300, and then 2 and 27. I bet those people will have a much easier time with 275 and 300.

    63. Re:Looks nice by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Uh, I'll take that bet. The average person has a lot easier time visualising double digits than they do treble digits, so I doubt that the example you use will show that people in general will have a "much easier time" with your three digit example just because one of the numbers is a multiple of 100. (By the way, when you're dealing with three digit numbers, multiples of 100 aren't that common.)

      To be honest, I think you severely underestimate the number of people who can't take 2 away from 27 and get the right answer. And I think you're also forgetting that, when comparing two temperatures, people most commonly compare a temperature to freezing point than anything else. Hmmm, 27 - 0: that's a real toughie, isn't it?

      Anyhow, the example you give isn't relevant here. Unless you can change the freezing and boiling points of water as they're defined in SI terms relative to absolute zero, those points are still going to be 273K and 373K respectively, which means that someone trying to working out how much above (or below) freezing it is outside is still having to deal with one relatively unwieldy three digit number (and, by unwieldy, I mean one that's not easy for most people to parse quickly, like 300).

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    64. Re:Looks nice by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      Okay, I can see some truth in that. Let's say there were are people who only could tell about temperature whether it's very hot, hot, mild, cold or freezing. To "evolve" to a stage where they can quite exactly tell that the temperature on some scale, tell the difference between today's and yesterday's temperatures, etc. they would need to get to a point where scientific results come down to the level of the people and become integrated into their everyday lives. No matter what the scale used, it all originates from the scientific results.

      So on one hand one could say the expression abilities of temperature come from science. The difference of the scales come from the scientists who propagated the knowledge into the population in question. The latter naturally has closer ties to culture, but the two can not really be that separated.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    65. Re:Looks nice by erlenic · · Score: 1

      I'm simply pointing out that if you expect to be able to communicate with other people in your country about the temperature, you need to understand the temperature scale in use in every day language. Dwelling on where that scale comes from is just semantics.

    66. Re:Looks nice by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Nah, just all the use of Celsius and Kelvin in the real world made him forget.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    67. Re:Looks nice by Dizzle · · Score: 1

      Oh. Ok :)

      --
      -Dizzle
      "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
  4. Microsoft also have one in beta test... by sandstorming · · Score: 5, Funny

    My area is currently blue in the satellite photo... with a combo box error shaped cloud passing over me.

  5. Go Google.. by Masq666 · · Score: 0

    I just found out about the new Gmail features yesterday, have'nt tried them yet, but they seem like nice features. Remember to check out the link below for more news.

    --
    Bits of News Giving you the latest bits.
  6. yes but it pales in comparision to NOAA by bsdpanix · · Score: 5, Informative

    The National Weather Service at noaa.gov is excellent. Detailed local forecasts with NO ads.

    1. Re:yes but it pales in comparision to NOAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:yes but it pales in comparision to NOAA by MoonChildCY · · Score: 1

      Not only that,

      Google weather forecast in my area is exactly the opposite from all local stations and NOAA. Google predicts heavy rain in the following 5 days (and today) while the rest predict mostly sunshine and partly cloudy.

      Hmm... Lets see who gets to be correct this time.

    3. Re:yes but it pales in comparision to NOAA by coyote1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it's the Google icons that are off; the image tag on the icons come up with exactly the same weather forcast as weatherunderground.com does (partly sunny, 3X chance of rain) for Seattle.

      It might be nice to see all the icons they use to depict the weather (I suppose I could zoom around the country and discover them one by one)

      --
      Eat Lamb, 1 million coyotes can't be wrong
    4. Re:yes but it pales in comparision to NOAA by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Weather Underground is nice enough to display them all. That Unknown one worries me... (Are they reserving that one for comet strikes or what?)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:yes but it pales in comparision to NOAA by Nik13 · · Score: 1

      But none of them have ads if you use adblock ;)

      --
      ///<sig />
  7. Polemics ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Does this mean the command line is making a big come back?

    I mean, those retro Windows and Apple fans would be clicking on a spinning a globe and zooming into to a graphics presentation of "rain early, clearing later".

  8. heh Gmail... by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 1

    haven't seen the interface for *months*. Try Thunderbird or Evolution (hell, mutt too) with gmail's pop/smtp service (secure as well if you like). Enjoy the mail interface you wish :)

    1. Re:heh Gmail... by zootm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I prefer GMail's "labels" metaphor for mail to the "folders" metaphor used by most mail clients (and IMAP). I find it easier to organise and find my emails through the GMail interface than through Thunderbird.

    2. Re:heh Gmail... by recursiv · · Score: 1

      It just so happens that GMail itself provides the best email interface I have ever used.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    3. Re:heh Gmail... by say · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then you could use evolutions vfolders, which work pretty much like labels.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    4. Re:heh Gmail... by zootm · · Score: 1

      Nice one, now if they would hurry up with a Windows version...

  9. Wider feature coverage would be nice... by NoMercy · · Score: 1, Informative

    Not living in the US, all these wonderful google features are toally useless, woo google map of... the US, weather information for... the US.

    Meanwhile MSN are putting on TV adverts here for there new search engine.

    1. Re:Wider feature coverage would be nice... by Spodlink05 · · Score: 0

      We should be thankful. Remember, they saved our ass (not sure why saving a mongrel donkey is something to be grateful for, but anyway..) invented money, and democracy and really ugly cars and fat people.

      I think we can overlook the fact they excluded the other 192 countries of the world in their magnificent Google search engine weather map. Remember, the US invented the weather.

      In fact it's thanks to their continued production of massive amounts of pollution that we have such exciting weather in the rest of the world.

    2. Re:Wider feature coverage would be nice... by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      Go download the new ForecastFox plugin and get the weather on your status bar from almost anywhere courtesy of weather.com - it's a really cool plugin - it shows me small icons representing now and the next 5 days in my area (near the coast in UK, West Sussex)

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
  10. so what? by xlyz · · Score: 1

    it's just becoming an other portal

    1. Re:so what? by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think that's quite true. You log into a portal and all that crap is surrounding what it is you really want to get accomplished. Google, on the other hand, is a simple and elegant interface where you only get what you ask for. If you're not looking for the weather, it's not going to clutter your screen with it. Now if only they could make my weather report accurate (it says we're having thunderstorms all day, but it's sunny and clear - typical forecast).

    2. Re:so what? by bdbolton · · Score: 1

      " Google, on the other hand, is a simple and elegant interface where you only get what you ask for.....If you're not looking for the weather, it's not going to clutter your screen with it."

      The myyahoo portal is actually very customizable and it sports a RSS reader that is very handy. If I don't want the weather I dont get it. If I want to link up to the slashdot rss then I can get that too.

      personally, I prefer yahoo's mail over google any day. Besides gmail's excellent search feature, its just playing catch-up to yahoo and other web mails.

  11. Ah Gmail, now if only... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    ...it you could log into GMail without being logged into to Google.... and if only the introduced folders and got of their weird no folder notion.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are folders. They're called labels, and do everything folders do, plus some more things (a message can belong to several labels)...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by birder · · Score: 1

      Yes, except you still see all your mail on the main screen (a page worth anyway). I much perfer to sort my mail into folders (labels) or have a blank "in box" page. I hate having a my screen full of outdated read email.

    3. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by aleclee · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's what the "Archive" feature is for. It'll appear under the label and under "All Mail" but not in your inbox.

      --
      This message composed using 100% recycled electrons.
    4. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      After you label your email, click archive. That'll clean up your inbox.

    5. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by KtHM · · Score: 1

      That's what the "Archive" button is for.

    6. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

      and if only the introduced folders and got of their weird no folder notion..

      Dork. You should go use Hotmail. The notion of labels is why most people LIKE Gmail!

    7. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      and if only the introduced folders and got of their weird no folder notio

      Well, I surely hope they don't, it's one of their best. Even my little sister got used to it in a few days and loves it.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    8. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by jay-be-em · · Score: 1

      What the fuck are you talking about

      --
      "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
    9. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      And how do you create hierarchical labels?

    10. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Easily... You create:

      label1
      label1-label1_1
      label1-label1_2
      label1 -label1_3

      etc

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    11. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=141474&cid=118 55195

      Not to mention that few or none webmail systems have that too, right?

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    12. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Child you need to learn how to behave.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    13. Re:Ah Gmail, now if only... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      There are folders

      Bzzz. No. But thanks for playing.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  12. Here's a cache by imag0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just in case you need it...

    Clickie!

    1. Re:Here's a cache by nsasch · · Score: 1

      Yahoo was also linked, maybe you should have posted that cache...

      --
      Make your computer faster: rm -rf /mnt/windows/
    2. Re:Here's a cache by game+kid · · Score: 1

      No, Yahoo can handle the traffic; they're the site using a massively redun--oh wait...

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  13. Don't blame the US... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... for the Fahrenheit scale because it is a German invention. If you're going to blame the U.S. for something, blame them for being idiots for not adopting the Metric system.

  14. Google maps by rbarreira · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This should be even more interesting when they integrate it with Google Maps :)

    Am I the only one who dislikes having to do a search to get some information? Of course it can be bookmarked but it just feels a little weird. Maybe it's just a matter of habit...

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:Google maps by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Nice idea, you really should tell them to do that. I love teh Maps, they're like a free Streets & Trips. Or a less cluttered Expedia map page. Or a slicker Mapquest. But those're just MHOs.

      BTW thanks for reminding me that I can actually bookmark these sorts of pages. *replaces weather.com 'mark with Google weather search since Google's loads far faster*

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Google maps by recursiv · · Score: 1

      Don't want to search, don't want to use bookmarks. The only thing I could think of that might satisfy you is to set it to your homepage, or you could memorize the url, and type it in manually. I must say that you have some very odd specifications. I have never found bookmarks to feel weird, just convenient. Anyway, hope one of these suggestions helps.
      ????

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    3. Re:Google maps by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      What I mean is that google is getting more and more like a command line interface. If you read my post attentively, I didn't say it was necessarily bad, just that it felt a little unusual nowadays, in the context of the www...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    4. Re:Google maps by MyIS · · Score: 1
      Am I the only one who dislikes having to do a search to get some information?

      Before, to get to the desired page you had to manually scan through the choices - e.g. select city. Now you have automated software to do that for you. But yes, as you said elsewhere, it is an odd progression towards doing everything in commandline (although I have zero problem with that).

      --
      http://zero-to-enterprise.blogspot.com/
  15. Yahoo copying Google again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yahoo has been providing a similar service for quite a while.)

    Here we go again, Google innovating and everybody else copying them and claiming to be innovative. As usual.

    1. Re:Yahoo copying Google again! by fmobus · · Score: 1

      Just like microsoft did with several other things. Ergo, Google is the new Microsoft, not Apple. Blue is the new orange

  16. Gmail POP3 suggestion by CdBee · · Score: 1

    It would be useful if Google had an option to log into gmail with a non-encrypted connection - a lot of email devices are left out in the cold by gmail including most POP3-capable mobile phones.

    That said,I can see why their present system is advantageous in terms of security. If they did it it would have to be an option "allow insecure POP3 on this account" rather than default behaviour.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Gmail POP3 suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because surfing the Internet and checking email is becoming too cumbersome with all that security nonsense... you fucking idiot...

    2. Re:Gmail POP3 suggestion by rzebram · · Score: 1

      So create your own proxy POP3 server that you can connect to unsecured, but connects with GMail securely.

  17. Google weather: zip codes work by imag0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks like zip codes work as well. Nice.

    Here's mine, 64119.

    1. Re:Google weather: zip codes work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, I know where you live!

    2. Re:Google weather: zip codes work by spacefight · · Score: 1

      Interesting to note on monday, you're fucked :P

  18. Weather feature is ausome! by JPriest · · Score: 1

    I love you Google.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  19. Not only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...does it work for the US, it also works for selected cities in the Socialist Peoples' Republic of Canada.

    As Dave Letterman might say: pray your city has been selected!

    1. Re:Not only... by MyIS · · Score: 1
      Er, the biggest city of Canada - Toronto - aint working (although it does provide spot-on regular results). Also, Canadian postal codes don't work. But I wish them all the best in making it work...

      And if they do get it done, make it in damn Celsius!

      --
      http://zero-to-enterprise.blogspot.com/
  20. Konqueror by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am happy that Gmail/Google have listened and added support for the Konqueror. Or, is it that the KDE programmers have added support for Gmail? I say this because I am now using KDE's latest Konqueror release candidate (3.4rc1) which works on Gmail just like other browsers do. Any Slashdotter sees this as positive I know.

    1. Re:Konqueror by crow · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Safari use the same engine as Konqueror? That would explain the support--they want the default Apple browser to work, so they only have to do a little extra validation to get Konqueror listed as supported.

    2. Re:Konqueror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They (Konqueror/Safari) use the same engine, and what you are saying about validation could be the case. But this took them 8 months! Can you imagine?

    3. Re:Konqueror by Illissius · · Score: 1

      It's the second. As of right now, I know of two browsers that work with GMail and aren't officially recognized by it, Konqueror 3.4 and Opera 8 -- neither have final versions released yet* (Konq's coming in a week or two, Opera WIR as usual), which is most likely why. This can be rather troublesome, however, when GMail forces you to the basic HTML view because of it. You can override this by using gmail.google.com/gmail?nocheckbrowser, but I had to look in their newgroup thingy to find this, they could at least have added a visible option...

      * this doesn't stop me from using both, however :)

      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    4. Re:Konqueror by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Unfortunetely GMail have decided to not give Konqueror a chance anymore, so we are now treated with the basic HTML-page, even though we support the full featured better than Safari does currently.

    5. Re:Konqueror by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      Yahoo mail does the same. From another browser, email addresses/nicknames are filled in as one types if that email address or nickname is in the address book. For Konqueror, nothing of the sort happens. I have contacted them on this but nothing has changed!

    6. Re:Konqueror by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Sure, Safari and Konqueror both use the KHTML engine. But "a little validation" isn't practical for serious QA work. Somebody has to sit down and design an automated test harness for each configuration you support. That's most of the work, no matter how many tests you actually do.

    7. Re:Konqueror by JimDabell · · Score: 1

      I believe it's a little bit of both. Safari initially had problems, so Google fixed things up a little for them. Konqueror still had difficulties, and the Konqueror developers fixed a couple of bugs their end as well.

      It's definitely an advantage to have Safari using KHTML; I doubt Google would have made these changes for Konqueror alone.

    8. Re:Konqueror by Mishura · · Score: 1

      Konqueror 3.3.2 works now, but still says that it is a "unsupported browser" and gives me the plain HTML interface. Funny how I didn't notice much difference. Good job Google!

      I'm actually glad. I'm still a die-hard Firefox user, but I still love konq. Plus konq loads much quicker than firefox.

  21. lazy cuss that I am... by jpellino · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just sent a suggestion that they make "wx" interchangeable with "weather" as in "wx 02134" or "wx boston, ma"

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:lazy cuss that I am... by l3v1 · · Score: 0

      that they make "wx" interchangeable with "weather"

      Jebus, now that's some crazy sh*t. Why the hell "wx" ? Let's go hex then or navajo. Geez.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    2. Re:lazy cuss that I am... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The mods are about as bright as mr. hex and his reply.

      In the known world of weather bulletins via some text method...

      wx = weather

      So wx isn't "funny", he's correct for suggesting it and hex boy needs to get his weather from somewhere besides the msn home page.

    3. Re:lazy cuss that I am... by dq5+studios · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia

      WX was the common telegraph abbreviation for weather. It was used primarily with Morse code, but its use still continues even today.

    4. Re:lazy cuss that I am... by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      God, it's really bad to be wrong :) I stand corrected but hey, at least I learned something today.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  22. In-line signalling can be bad by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't like the method of well-meaning interference with a search. When you enter "weather east podunk, NY" they first give you the current weather - with very little knowledge that this is what you are looking for. It's just as likely you are looking for historical climate data, or your friend Karl Weather living in Podunk. This clutters up search results, and adds another kind of meaning to the search words. It has all the disadvantages of in-band signalling, and the signalling isn't even defined for the user.

    --
    What keeps me going is my inertia.
    1. Re:In-line signalling can be bad by erlenic · · Score: 1

      When you use this weather service, it displays search results for what you typed in below the weather details. I think they do this for all their special services.

    2. Re:In-line signalling can be bad by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're looking for historical climate data, "weather" is about the vaguest search term you could pick. No sympathy from me (or i suspect google) if you don't get what you were looking for.

      Google, if anyone, is in a position to say "hey when people search for 'weather' and a city they often want weather reports"

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  23. Is it just me... by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...or is Google becoming a jack-of-all-trades and master of none? Remember when Google focused on their search engine? Yeah, me neither.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    1. Re:Is it just me... by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      What the bloody hell? Go to google and what do you see, TEXT and a SEARCH BOX. What do you want, a search box and a little button that doesn't say anything? Is that search-centric enough for you?

      --
      I don't get it.
    2. Re:Is it just me... by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      becoming a jack-of-all-trades and master of none?

      Yup, ignorance is a bliss, unless it is blushingly embarassing.

      What I would like to see from Google is maybe a dictionary or an encyclopedia or something like that. They can search, they do, so let them rule everything that is search-related. Good ideas, good service and speed. Yup, we need that.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    3. Re:Is it just me... by Kaimelar · · Score: 1
      If I understood correctly, this particular feature has been offered ever since Picasa 2 came out.

      You understand correctly. The GMail (and Blogger, and Hello) integration was introduced w/ Picasa 2, and that's been out for months.

    4. Re:Is it just me... by recursiv · · Score: 1

      In my estimatino, they are becoming a jack of all trades, and a master of all trades. Every time they come out with a new feature, it kicks ass. Their old features continue to kick ass.

      May I ask which search engine you use? I'd like to try it out.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    5. Re:Is it just me... by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      I use yahoo because it isn't google.

    6. Re:Is it just me... by kmcneely · · Score: 1

      What an excellent reason...

    7. Re:Is it just me... by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      Indeed..

      Everyone gives google so much credit for what others have been doing fine for YEARS.

      I don't think gmail is the bomb, yahoo works fine and many others are easier to use.

      I don't think google maps is any better than the integration yahoo already offers

      I think its hilarious that google gets credit for being cool and innovative when i have had the features they're struggling to implement for YEARS.

      Sure, it may look different, but it sure as heck isn't something i haven't already BEEN doing.

      Therefore i still use yahoo because it isn't google in the sense i give yahoo credit for being the pioneers they are.

      IF google did something unique, i would give them credit. Searching the web as quickly as they did was unique for about a year or so, but even then there index isn't what it used to be.

    8. Re:Is it just me... by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

      What's funny is that Google was so much better at doing what Yahoo did 'for years' that Yahoo used their technology for their searches and indexing up for a few years up until the latest version of Slurp! started crawling.

      MSN sucked. They had to rewrite their engine.

      Hotbot started to suck. It now uses Google.
      iwon.com sucked. They use Google.
      Dogpile/webcrawler - yep, they primarily use Google to build their own index.

      Google didn't just walk in and do the same thing, they reinvented the way it was done. For everyone!

      In this world, as soon as a company becomes the best at something, people begin to hate them just because they're they best. That's you, dude.

  24. syntax by sometwo · · Score: 1

    I realize that the weather feature was just announced, but I think Google should be smart enough to give weather for the query " weather in palo alto, ca " but it doesn't- only if there are no extraneous words.

    1. Re:syntax by sarcasticninja · · Score: 1

      If I type: `washington, dc weather' it works just as well as `weather washington,dc'. It's unfortunate the `in' doesn't work. If it did, it would work a bit more intuitively, considering the format for Google Maps.

  25. trolls suck my dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Name me one benefit of the Fahrenheit scale.

    1. Re:trolls suck my dick by erlenic · · Score: 1

      When living in the US (as the guy complaining implied he did,) you'll know what the local weather guy, the weather channel, and just about every single human being in the entire country is talking about when they tell you the temperature. I bet if I went to your country and complained about them not using fahrenheit, you'd bitch me out pretty hard for not learning their culture before coming. Well, that works both ways.

    2. Re:trolls suck my dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Name me one benefit of the Fahrenheit scale.

      I'm used to it. Name me one benefit of switching to Celsius.

    3. Re:trolls suck my dick by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you wouldn't have to think about two scales when you were doing some decent scientific or engineering work...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    4. Re:trolls suck my dick by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that's not a benefit of the Fahrenheit scale.

      That's a benefit of knowing it while living in the US, it says NOTHING about the scale itself...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    5. Re:trolls suck my dick by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Who ever said anything about knowing it outside of the US? This entire thread has been about using it here, nowhere else.

    6. Re:trolls suck my dick by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Why can't fahrenheit be used for scientific research?

    7. Re:trolls suck my dick by Maserati · · Score: 2, Informative

      Scientists use Kelvin so comparisons work. Celsius is pegged to 0 at water's freezing point, Kelvin is pegged at absolute zero - below the freezing points of hydrogen and helium. That way you can compare ratios of temperature: 10 deg. C sounds twice as warm as 5 degrees (and feels that way), but to a scientist the ratio isn't 2:1, it's 283:278 - a much smaller ratio. This comes in play in things like gas pressure, which is proportional to absolute temperature.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    8. Re:trolls suck my dick by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Scientific research is the reason why the SI system was invented. Feel free to use anything else, of course, but virtually all scientists don't...

      This could be a reason too...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    9. Re:trolls suck my dick by erlenic · · Score: 1

      That still doesn't explain why fahrenheit can't be used for research. What is there to prevent me from doing a water heating experiment, and making all measurements in fahrenheit, or for that matter, in any scale I can imagine.

    10. Re:trolls suck my dick by erlenic · · Score: 1
      Wow, I'm surprised that article's still there. I though CNN deleted stuff after two weeks.

      Anyway, just because SI was invented specifically for research doesn't mean nothing else can be used. The facial tissue was invented to remove makeup, but now it's used to collect snot.

    11. Re:trolls suck my dick by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      While Fahrenheit can be used for scientific work, metric is

      • Easier to use by being tens based.
      • Easier to convert to kelvin by being an offshift.
      • Much easier to use around the world, since Fahrenheit is used ONLY in the usa and sometimes Britain.
      • Less error prone, if not converting amongst scales
      .

      Sadly, we were started down the path of switching to metric and reagan stopped it. Big mistake, now that much of manufactuering has moved overseas. The time is coming when we will be the most expensive country to deal with due to our imperical weights (all other countries use metric for packaging).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    12. Re:trolls suck my dick by RevMike · · Score: 1
      That still doesn't explain why fahrenheit can't be used for research. What is there to prevent me from doing a water heating experiment, and making all measurements in fahrenheit, or for that matter, in any scale I can imagine.

      Actually, a scientist who prefered to use Fahrenheit measurements would probably use the Rankine scale. Zero Rankine is, like 0 Kelvin, absolute zero. However, the size of a degree is the same as the Fahrenhiet scale. The freezing point of water (32F) and the boiling point of water (212F) correspond to 491.67R and 671.67R, respectively.

    13. Re:trolls suck my dick by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Of course, but if you're not a scientist who lives in a shell, you should use standard units to communicate with other scientists, in scientific papers or whatever form of communication.

      I'm sorry but your arguments are too weak. And the CNN article shows pretty well what's the advantage of using standard units. Using US units all the time is not an option for scientists nowadays.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    14. Re:trolls suck my dick by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Wow, you learn something new every day. I had never heard of this scale.

    15. Re:trolls suck my dick by erlenic · · Score: 1
      Sorry, that's not a benefit of the Celcius scale.

      That's a benefit of knowing it while communicating with other researchers, it says NOTHING about the scale itself...

      Sound familiar?

    16. Re:trolls suck my dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA!! Looks like rbarreira isn't the only one who can be pedantic.

    17. Re:trolls suck my dick by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      I was already expecting this reply :)

      The problem with it is just one - I wasn't making a point about the advantages of the Celsius scale. Or was I?

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    18. Re:trolls suck my dick by erlenic · · Score: 1
      I was already expecting this reply :)

      Hell, I've been waiting two hours to type it :)

      In regards to Celsius, I do actually wish we would switch to all metric, although temperature would be one of the hard ones. Maybe someday....

    19. Re:trolls suck my dick by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      In case you want me to be more specific... On that discussion, the topic was if there was some advantage in the Fahrenheit scale itself. In this one, I was specifically discussing why SI units are better for scientific research.

      Try again, please.

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    20. Re:trolls suck my dick by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Eheh, maybe we can stop this discussion already then :D

      Peace ;)

      As long as no more ships crash because of units, it's all fine for me :)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    21. Re:trolls suck my dick by erlenic · · Score: 1
      Heh, truce. It's been a nice distraction while trying to motivate myself to get some work done.

      And as long as we're negotiating terms, is it just ships you're worried about, or do cars count too? :)

    22. Re:trolls suck my dick by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Yes, especially if it's mine :)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    23. Re:trolls suck my dick by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      The Celsius scale was built around the chemical change changes of water. The Fahrenheit scale was built around... er... Wikipedia says it's horse blood. Face it, that's just stupid, at least in a scientific context.

    24. Re:trolls suck my dick by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Can you explain why that matters though for current research?

  26. New features and the final frontier by saitoh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One thing I submitted a while ago was the ability to import your POP3 box (say from Outlook, or Apple Mail), thus make that transition to webmail and still have all your stuff which seems to be a real focus for google.

    It seems that nobody really has solved the email transferal problem have they? (please correct me if I'm wrong) And while I'm biased, it would be an interesting marketing ploy for those who wanted to switch, one that Apple has used with Apple Mail.

    --
    We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
    1. Re:New features and the final frontier by Soylent+Beige · · Score: 1
      --
      Everyone hates me because I'm paranoid.
    2. Re:New features and the final frontier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea so guy made a little app that did this... I forget the name but do a google search for gmail and import and you should find what your looking for... I think it was written in python.

    3. Re:New features and the final frontier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are just automated tools to forward yourself the emails. Not only does it take a long time, they lose all the date information in the headers and you'll have to relabel everything, which makes it less useful.

  27. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    technically just because everyone is supposed to speak english in the united states doesnt mean they have to. congress never signed into law that English is the official language. oops!

    but i also agree it should display both F/C. Sooner or later, if you like it or not, the US will be metric country as well.

  28. Good for lynx-users, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Opera 8.0, which actually supported all those fancy dongles is also downgraded to the htmlview... thing. It`s possible to get around it by using ``gmail.google.com/gmail/?nocheckbrowser", but it`s still rather annoying. Hope they get around fixing it. Arf, arf.

  29. Why can't they add it to my home Google? by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's what i'd like to see. Your default google.com page would display your weather, and a check box for a local.google search. I mean you can save your location preference in local.google already. And how hard would a link to gmail be? And news? Why not display the top headline for categories that you choose? Why not put everything you want together? Put some settings in our preferences, and call it what it's becoming - a Portal.

    Then again, i don't consider google a "portal". Wired just had an article about google vs. Yahoo!. It's quite an interesting read.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
    1. Re:Why can't they add it to my home Google? by recursiv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No no no no no.

      One of the reason google has stomped all over the competition is they keep their interfaces simple. Adding that stuff would multiply the size of the front page. Furthermore if you really wanted that feature, it would be pretty simple to hack up some php that use the google apis or just scrape the relevant pages for the data and format it however you want.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    2. Re:Why can't they add it to my home Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wired just had an article about google vs. Yahoo!. It's quite an interesting read.
      That's nice. How about giving us a link?
  30. For Firefox users... by rbarreira · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is quite cool, but I still prefer the ForecastFox extension for now.

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  31. Not only SMS by The+Hobo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can also use a web browser and send your queries to google by visiting them at http://466453.com/

    (GOOGLE on the telephone)

    --
    There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
    1. Re:Not only SMS by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm still disappointed they didn't go with '900913'...

      p

    2. Re:Not only SMS by repvik · · Score: 1

      I thought that Google did no evil, and followed standards :)

      That domainname doesn't comply with RFC 1035. "The labels must follow the rules for ARPANET host names. They must start with a letter, end with a letter or digit, and have as interior characters only letters, digits, and hyphen. There are also some restrictions on the length. Labels must be 63 characters or less."

    3. Re:Not only SMS by jskiff · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be 600613?

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    4. Re:Not only SMS by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      No, that would be this site...

      p

  32. Is it just me... by webcrawler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... or am I the only one who's been logging into gmail through Picasa and sending pics? If I understood correctly, this particular feature has been offered ever since Picasa 2 came out.

  33. GMail Accounts by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 1

    I also noticed with the enahancements that I have like 50 invites. So, for $DIETY's sake, if you want a GMail account, shoot me an email at my username at gmail dot com. I'll send them out this evening.

    1. Re:GMail Accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you good sir. I will e-mail you at Anml4ixoye@gmail.com shortly.

    2. Re:GMail Accounts by Mishura · · Score: 1

      I also have about 50 or so invites that I am not using.

      Same as parent, my username at gmail dot com. I'll get you an invite.

    3. Re:GMail Accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there's any need any more.

      When it was first announced back in April I signed up at the "Tell me more" page.

      Even though I managed to get a gmail account several months back, just a few weeks ago I got an email from them allowing me to sign up (around the same time the invites went up to 50 actually).

      So, it looks like everyone who signs up to get more info is now getting invites from Google themselves :) No need for anyone else to actually have invites.

    4. Re:GMail Accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can just get your invites from http://isnoop.net/gmail/.

  34. google omniscience by Ragica · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's uncanny. It's like google can read all of our minds and somehow, by some magical insight beyond merely mortal, knows what we want... it's like they have some sort of vast complex engine that we can only just barely begin to imagine which is able to tell them everything before anyone else. It's astonishing, unsettling, and and inexplicable... unless... no, it can't be. But what other explanation could there be?

    Is God working for google now?

    1. Re:google omniscience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe Google is the remnants of a giant space probe that collided with God!

    2. Re:google omniscience by game+kid · · Score: 1

      This could explain some of it. They have to get the ideas from someone. Or at least extrapolate from their knowledge. They're not gods...right?

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    3. Re:google omniscience by erlenic · · Score: 1
      They're not gods...right?

      Heresy!! How dare you question the authority of the great diety known to us mortals as Google!

    4. Re:google omniscience by joeldixon66 · · Score: 1

      Is God working for google now?

      Nope, he couldn't get past the third interview.

  35. Gmail beta forever by teslatug · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When is Google going to "release" Gmail to the public? I know that for all intents and purposes anyone that wants to can get an account, but I won't consider it open until I see a link on their homepage. It's not like they couldn't have a beta and a released Gmail.

    On an aside, I have a feeling that they will have to redesign their homepage soon as it's starting to get crowded.

    1. Re:Gmail beta forever by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's the "exclusive" "can't come" "insiders only" marketing scheme.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Gmail beta forever by generic-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Google now provides financial information*, weather, news*, mail, product reviews*, movie reviews*, photo-hosting services, maps, directions, instant messaging, and discussion groups. They are rumored to be planning tons of new services, based on highly coagular reports from numerous blogs.

      I hear they're trying a new home page design. It's in beta now. You can find it here.

      * By "provides" I mean "links to others' content about."

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:Gmail beta forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually just got an invitation from google to join gmail. I signed up MONTHS ago for the beta program. Maybe they are starting to open the gates...

    4. Re:Gmail beta forever by GothicX · · Score: 1

      Yahoo just come to work now, because google is getting more and more market. I remember 5 years ago their homepage and now.. we can see a fast one, but I really continue to like more the google's one.

      --
      Music is the sedative for mind...
  36. blah blah. by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

    Google's competency is searching and effective indexing.

    Google maps, Google suggest, Google local, Google movies, Gmail, Google weather - all of that is just searching their indexes and getting results in a more customized template.

    Google hasn't strayed so far from their original aim. Remember they said they wanted to index the entire internet? Well, they are.

    1. Re:blah blah. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *Google maps, Google suggest, Google local, Google movies, Gmail, Google weather - all of that is just searching their indexes and getting results in a more customized template.*

      really? you'd think they need a bit more than that for gmail(and groups too.. and picasa.. and....).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:blah blah. by sethadam1 · · Score: 1

      Not really. The biggest benefit of Gmail is the ability to search, not organize. Same with Groups.

      And Picasa indexes your photos.

      All Google projects tend to make it more practical to search than to organize.

    3. Re:blah blah. by roror · · Score: 1

      So, when are they going to get into real estate in which they build houses with tiny cameras at "right" places and with one more tab in the google.com "search your house". You can type anything in and they will look it up for you. GoogleHouse - it is search and indexing after all :P Just like browser is a part of the OS.

      But, I am sure, GoogleHouse will be pretty :) I don't doubt it.

  37. Google: GUI vs CLI by malarkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's interesting that Google is taking the CLI approach, which gives a lot of functionality without adding clutter to the interface.

    Slashdot users, as a whole, might be more comfortable with that approach than the GUI approach, like Yahoo.

    At what point does Google make a Yahoo-style frontend for the "newbie" users, just as an option, of course.

    1. Re:Google: GUI vs CLI by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Except that Yahoo! supported the "weather city-name" interface for MONTHS before Google rolled it out.

      Google has a guide to their services in much the same way as Yahoo! has a simplified page that solely does search.

      If you'd like more information, please contact me at genericman@corp.yahoo.com.

      Sincerely,
      G. Man
      Yahoo! Customer Relations

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Google: GUI vs CLI by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      I wonder when somebody is going to write a real CLI program to access and display information via google? Imagine:
      $ google "weather 30047"
      39F
      Scattered Clouds
      Wind: NW at 6 mph
      Humidity: 67%

      [search results]
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  38. Re:what? by erlenic · · Score: 1

    That doesn't mean you shouldn't learn English before coming here. If you don't, you won't be able to communicate with an overwhelming majority of people here.

  39. Who cares? by shawn.fox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, this isn't a troll. Why are such trivial features of google search such a big deal that they make the front page of slashdot? The poster even points out that Yahoo! already has this feature.

  40. LINKS!!! by Seraph787 · · Score: 1

    OMG it even works with links Links should be the new compatability standard.

    1. Re:LINKS!!! by yaddayaddaslashdot · · Score: 1
      OMG it even works with links Links should be the new compatability standard.

      lynx, perhaps?

    2. Re:LINKS!!! by Mishura · · Score: 1

      At least you are not using Lynx. You may get arrested for that!

    3. Re:LINKS!!! by ICA · · Score: 1

      No, probably links. Yes, we fully understand that a web browser exists named lynx. Good show.

  41. While we're talking about google... by Roguelazer · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've just noticed something interesting. I'm at a public computer and was browsing google when all of a sudden some text appeared below the searchbox asking me if I'd like a GMail account. When I clicked it, it brought me to a page which mentioned that google was expanding their GMail services and was offering accounts to a "random percentage" of their visitors. Between this and my neverending supply of invites (50 now, 50 before, 50 forever!) I'm starting to think that Google might be going public with GMail pretty soon. Thoughts?

    PS: Is this a new feature too?

    1. Re:While we're talking about google... by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are going public, but very cautiously. I think the "basic HTML" setting will get them there much faster because they can worry about the bugs in the standard version later. I dunno about the movies, I think it's been around for a bit; I do like the "plot detail" searches, especially one for this often-used film gimmick. ("I look like the CRYPTKEEPER!!1! ")

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:While we're talking about google... by mabu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did it ocurr to you that Google has been public since it made invites available? It's a brilliant scheme to offer invites mainly via referrals. This allows Google to build a huge "degree of separation" database between people and use it for data mining. When Google knows who your friends are, and who their friends are, this becomes an extremely powerful markting and research tool.

    3. Re:While we're talking about google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that theres a vast amount of people who gave their away invites through a gmail invite spooler and other places. In other words, it's just a whole bunch of strangers linked together anyway.

    4. Re:While we're talking about google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This allows Google to build a huge "degree of separation" database between people and use it for data mining.

      ...except that giving away invites to people you don't know is very popular, and Google did nothing to discourage it.

      Invites as a method of controlled growth is much more plausible. Think about all the hype over GMail when it was first launched. Not even Google could withstand the load if everybody who wanted to signed up at once.

  42. Wait, what about war-making? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot another unique thing about the U.S. government: They will bomb any country you want. Just send a request to U.S. Army. They've been looking for some serious action. They would prefer to bomb a developed country, the food is better. It's really a drag going to places like Afghanistan and Iraq and Vietnam and Cambodia and Somalia. Also, requests to bomb a country with deep water ports are especially respected, because the U.S. Navy wants action, too.

  43. Re:what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you don't, you won't be able to communicate with an overwhelming majority of people here.
    For what it's worth...
  44. Gmail's forced "basic HTML view" - and a solution by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google's latest changes to Gmail include the introduction of a "basic HTML view" for people who's browsers cannot display the default view properly. This includes MSIE 4.0+ (pre 5.5), Netscape 4.07+ (pre 7.1), and Opera 6.03+, which previously couldn't be used to access Gmail.

    Unfortunately, the new browser detection code they are now using seems to have been put together in a rather sloppy manner, which means (amongst others) Opera 8.0 users are forced to this "basic HTML view" when the fully-featured default view works perfectly well with that version of Opera. (Indeed, one of the many new features of Opera 8.0 is XMLHttpRequest support, which allows Gmail to work in full.)

    Any Opera 8.0 user who logs into Gmail as usual will no longer be able to do some basic things, including create filters, amend their settings, check spelling, access keyboard shortcuts and autocomplete addresses. Fortunately, there is a workaround, which is to use the URL http://gmail.google.com/gmail?nocheckbrowser, which solves the issue.

    This issue doesn't only affect Opera 8.0 users: users of MSIE 6.x, Camino and other browsers have reported the same problem on the relevant Google group. I don't use any of those browsers but I'm fairly sure that the same workaround will work for them too.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  45. Re:what? by erlenic · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Sooner or later, if you like it or not, the US will be metric country as well.

    No we won't. It's not that there's anything wrong with metric, it's just that Carter tried to do it. If a useful president had tried, we'd be done by now.

  46. Google playing catch-up? by GoogleAdvisor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While looking through all of the recent services Google has added, it occured to me that they really haven't come up with anything original - I mean, all these new services, weather included, have already been nearly mastered by Yahoo! It almost seems like Google is playing catch-up with Yahoo!. The question is, are they taking away resources from their foundamental goal of building a simple, powerful search engine, in order to create these fairly unnecessary additions? Google Advisor

  47. Google Maps by hitman200ca · · Score: 1

    I noticed the other day that they have also integrated Google Maps in this way.

    search times square, nyc, ny
    Its a mixture of Google Local and Google Maps.

    Very nice !! :o)

  48. Poor HTML coding by neoform · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i would have thought Google would have better HTML than that.. "" i got 40 errors with the W3 Validator.

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:Poor HTML coding by ceejayoz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google has never shown much interest in validating code.

      Even the Firefox Start page they host doesn't validate.

      They probably save untold gigabytes just by not putting a doctype, type attributes, alt tags, etc.

    2. Re:Poor HTML coding by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well you get 49 errors with www.google.com.

      So 40 errors is an improvement :)

    3. Re:Poor HTML coding by JimDabell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They probably save untold gigabytes just by not putting a doctype, type attributes, alt tags, etc.

      Doubtful; last time I looked, there were plenty of other places they could save on bandwidth easily and they don't bother. Mistakes in HTML are usually due to ignorance or apathy, not bandwidth reduction. You don't have to look very far to find a prime example :).

    4. Re:Poor HTML coding by eyeye · · Score: 2, Funny

      i would have thought Google would have better HTML than that.. "" i got 40 errors with the W3 Validator.

      Tip:
      when you are critisizing some sites lack of HTML validator compliance first ensure your own piss poor (validation wise i mean) site is actually correct!
      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    5. Re:Poor HTML coding by MCZapf · · Score: 1
      Have you looked at Google's HTML? It's definitely deliberately stripped down. Their blatant non-conformance to standards is not a mistake. They also use gzip encoding.

      Where do you see that they could save bandwidth but aren't bothering? Maybe they could probably also use stylesheets to save some, but that might get in the way of the goal of having Google render properly in EVERY browser.

    6. Re:Poor HTML coding by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Doubtful; last time I looked, there were plenty of other places they could save on bandwidth easily and they don't bother.

      Where on http://www.google.com/ can they cut more code?

    7. Re:Poor HTML coding by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And personally, I don't give a damn if it's "valid code" or not, so long as it works in every browser.

      I just checked GMail with my *preferred* Netscape 3.04 (js and images off) and it worked great, plus was much faster -- and considerably more *readable* (the JS version has some annoying width errors that force sidescrolling in Mozilla).

      I can now recommend GMail to my visually-impaired and hardware-challenged users, with every expectation that it will work fine for them.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:Poor HTML coding by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      They could save 400 bytes by converting logo.gif to logo.png

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Poor HTML coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They serve content gzipped. Moreover, many browsers would not be able to view the PNG file.

    10. Re:Poor HTML coding by JimDabell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where do you see that they could save bandwidth but aren't bothering?

      Look at a results page, for example. They could eliminate over 1K per page load simply by moving the CSS and Javascript into external resources.

      I'm sure you're thinking "but the client has to download them anyway". Not from Google. Google is that popular, and the resources change that infrequently, that virtually every shared cache in existence would keep a copy of the resource, meaning Google would effectively cease serving it from their servers almost entirely.

      Even if that weren't the case, Google would still come out ahead in the bandwidth stakes for every visitor that loads more than a single page, as the presentation would be shared across multiple pages, yet only downloaded once.

      Embedding the CSS in the (not publically cachable) HTML documents means that every visitor has to download the unchanging presentation for every page load individually.

      Maybe they could probably also use stylesheets to save some, but that might get in the way of the goal of having Google render properly in EVERY browser.

      They already use CSS. They could save even more bandwidth by dropping the <font> elements, which would mean that Internet Explorer 2 and Netscape Navigator 3 wouldn't be quite so colourful.

    11. Re:Poor HTML coding by JimDabell · · Score: 1

      I can't see those pages easily because they redirect to .co.uk, but see this comment for an example of cutting code.

    12. Re:Poor HTML coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good idea, now folks with really old browsers can't see their logo. yes, there really are folks out there with really old browsers...

    13. Re:Poor HTML coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They serve content gzipped.

      Not the logo. It wouldn't even make sense to gzip a GIF.

      Moreover, many browsers would not be able to view the PNG file.

      Internet Explorer 4 supports enough of PNG to do what Google need it to, and we all know how advanced Internet Explorer's support of PNG is compared with other browsers, don't we?

      Which browsers that support GIF but not PNG are you concerned with?

    14. Re:Poor HTML coding by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      They serve content gzipped.
      Not the logo. It wouldn't even make sense to gzip a GIF.
      Congratulations, you managed to be right and wrong at the same time! You're right in that the gif isn't gzipped (as in becoming .gif.gz), but it is LZW compressed, which is the same thing.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    15. Re:Poor HTML coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right in that the gif isn't gzipped (as in becoming .gif.gz), but it is LZW compressed, which is the same thing.

      No, it isn't. gzip uses Lempel-Ziv (LZ) compression. GIF uses LZW compression, the improved algorithm that Terry Welch came up with, and the subject of the controversial "GIF patent".

      This difference is the very reason that gzip exists - the compress program uses LZW and thus could not be Free Software. From gnu.org:

      It also does not permit at all the use of LZW for other purposes such as compression of files. This is why we had to develop GNU zip as a replacement for compress.

    16. Re:Poor HTML coding by neoform · · Score: 1

      i haven't updated that site in 3 years.. if you want to see something current, try www.happyrave.com (temporary domain)

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    17. Re:Poor HTML coding by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if embedding the stylesheet is actually good Coding Zen -- might be that what bandwidth it eats with every search is more than offset by the number of requests a separate stylesheet might get (even allowing for caching), thus in terms of sheer number of hits on their servers, embedded *might* be more efficient.

      [reference: Abrash's Zen of ASM, where he points out that sometimes performance is much better if you have a big slow routine executed once, rather than a small fast routine executed a million times -- even tho at first glance, the small routine *seems* so much more efficient.]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    18. Re:Poor HTML coding by Reziac · · Score: 1

      To be rapidly offset by the volume of complaints from people whose browsers don't support PNG and don't understand why the logo isn't being displayed.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    19. Re:Poor HTML coding by eyeye · · Score: 1

      ahh I have a few old sites lying around that I try not to talk about..now I am like a reformed smoker telling everyone to quit :-)

      I see you are having fun trying new things currently.
      You could use opacity or moz-opacity css for your loading box, i thought it might give you a better look and more flexibility (you can use a pic if you want).

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    20. Re:Poor HTML coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be rapidly offset by the volume of complaints from people whose browsers don't support PNG

      Exactly which browsers would those be? Internet Explorer 3? Netscape Navigator 3? You think Google are concerned with those browsers, when they happily use CSS and turn away even recent browsers from GMail and Google Maps?

    21. Re:Poor HTML coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're either overestimating the cost of serving a stylesheet separately or underestimating the benefits of caching.

      Firstly, persistent HTTP connections are common. There's no overhead involved in opening up a new TCP connection. This means that the cost of serving a stylesheet instead of embedding the CSS in the HTML document is something on the order of 300 bytes for the headers.

      Secondly, even discounting shared caches, a visitor will incur a 300 byte penalty for the first page load, and then a 1K benefit for each subsequent load. That's a saving on just the second page load per visitor.

      Finally, a shared cache (which practically every ISP uses) can serve copies of popular resources like this literally hundreds of thousands of times without even checking in with the origin server.

  49. What's interesting is the discrepancies by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 1

    You get different results by searching for "weather 99503" & "weather 99517", two ZIP codes that are side-by-side to eachother in the real world, yet the forcast for 99503 for the next two days is overcast & sunny while 99517 is snowing.

    I wonder where they pull their data from...

    1. Re:What's interesting is the discrepancies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      according to google help, weather services are provided by wunderground, inc.
      http://www.google.com/help/features.html#wea ther

    2. Re:What's interesting is the discrepancies by johncel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with Anchorage zip codes will be corrected shortly. That's a good catch.

      --
      Don't violate your system's integrity, choose linux...
    3. Re:What's interesting is the discrepancies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny. Google weather gives me different results than wunderground.com. Google doesn't get my town or any town next to mine, but one across the city. WUnderground OTOH finds it perfectly fine.

  50. Thank God they don't by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    We need more companies/devices to use security no matter what. Far too many have been insecure in the name of convience. MS is by far the worse (that and their incompetience), but many groups and companies have contributed to it. KDE recently allowed the wallet to not have passwords.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  51. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada has been the closest friend that USA has had except possible Britain. They object to the lunatic desicions of one of America's most fasicists leaders, and suddenly Canada is Red?

    1. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also...

      Who is America's largest trading partner? Japan, UK, China? Nope: Canada.

      Who does America buy the most oil from? Saudi? Venezeula? Kuwait? Nope: Canada.

      Who has the largest known oil deposits in the world? Again, Canada (but the oil is in oil sands which is more expensive to mine than just drilling).

  52. Re:what? by RevMike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sooner or later, if you like it or not, the US will be metric country as well.

    No we won't. It's not that there's anything wrong with metric, it's just that Carter tried to do it. If a useful president had tried, we'd be done by now.

    Actually, we're already a metric country in any way that matters. Does miles per hour on a highway sign or measuring a recipe in cups and tablespoons really matter all that much. HELL NO!. What matters is machine tools, and they've been converting over for quite a while now. What matters is that a transmission manufactured in Detroit can be mated to an engine block manufactured in Japan.

  53. Seems to be USA only by GregNorc · · Score: 1

    I tried looking up the weather for Niagara, since I'm leaving for there monday, no dice.

    1. Re:Seems to be USA only by yaddayaddaslashdot · · Score: 1

      weather Niagara Falls, Ontario works just fine. What did you use as your search?

  54. There is a google section. by Ieshan · · Score: 1

    There is a google section.

    Go to preferences. Click it away if you don't want to see it. Just like everything else, and just like you've done with BSD, because BSD is dead.

    That is all.

  55. Opera's M2... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

    You may like Opera's built in e-mail client "M2", then. Gmail was actually modeled after the way M2 works. Gmail is kind of the web equivalent of M2 in a way.

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
    1. Re:Opera's M2... by zootm · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I've used M2 in the past, but could never get the thing to work! It just infuriated me for some reason. I'd give it a second look, but it's integrated into their browser which I don't use (unless there's a standalone version -- I'll look into it).

  56. Re:Gmail's forced "basic HTML view" - and a soluti by JayBlalock · · Score: 1

    Brilliant, you've made my day. Thanks a bunch!

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
  57. Google doesn't focus on their search engine? by hkmwbz · · Score: 2, Informative
    "Remember when Google focused on their search engine?"
    Yeah. They just had a major update, which basically got rid of most spam results when searching for stuff. Try searching for graphics cards. You used to get lots of "buy from..." links. Now, the results show actual reviews and useful information.

    So yeah, I remember when Google focused on their search engine. My short term memory isn't that bad.

    I guess your short term memory is terrible, then?

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  58. Re:what? by erlenic · · Score: 1

    You haven't been listening to the European propaganda enough. Your data is a lie from the Bush Administration, and until we use metric for EVERYTHING, we are evil scum that needs to be purged from the Earth. (sarcasm, in case you're seeing this mrak and swepe)

  59. Not working completely yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately their weather service is far from complete. It does not work for my town, any neighboring towns, nor the previous town I lived in or any of it's neighboring towns. I tried with both zip codes and "town, state". It looks like it's only large towns and cities so far.
    Even kweather can check weather from the nearest "report location", in the next town over.

    1. Re:Not working completely yet by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      My town is 5,000 people, and they had it first try. I don't know if 5,000 is considered a large town or not frankly...the fact that I am close to a large city might factor into it.

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
  60. Ultimately worthless by tdhillman · · Score: 1

    NOAA is the center of virtually all forcasting information. With a simple save of your locality's home page, you've got the forecast that everyone else (including Google) uses.

    In an attempt to everything, some things will be better left undone.

    --
    befuddled (noun) 1. Unable to create a pithy sig
  61. Why has no one told me about Picasa before? by simpsone · · Score: 1

    Seriously. It looks like iPhoto for the PC. Useful editing tools that will do anything my wife or I will need with an attractive interface. Oh, yeah; it's free too. Wow.

    1. Re:Why has no one told me about Picasa before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC != Windows

  62. Bad weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put in my zipcode and it gave me the weather for the wrong town. It's not even a town that is next to mine, but the next incremental number. Bad Gooogle.

  63. A bit odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I tried it for "weather windsor on" and it worked, but it displays the temperatures in fahrenheit. I can't seem to figure out how to make it display in celsius. Of course you can use google to say "36 degrees fahrenheit in celsius" and it tells you, but you think there'd be a way to switch to SI units or something.

    Cool though.

  64. Please Gmail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't like the HTML version, there's a lot of layout problems and they disabled too many things.

    All I want is a version with all the functions intact but with working Back/Forward buttons and ability to middle click a thread to rapid open into new tabs.

  65. Pisses of the Europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It pisses off the Europeans

  66. Re:Gmail's forced "basic HTML view" - and a soluti by JimDabell · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately, the new browser detection code they are now using seems to have been put together in a rather sloppy manner

    They shouldn't be detecting the browser at all. It's fragile, it breaks with unusual browsers, and you have to keep updating the detection routines whenever a new browser comes out. It's Javascript straight out of the 1990s.

    The proper way of doing it is to detect objects not browsers. If you need XMLHttpRequest, first check to see if XMLHttpRequest is defined. If so, use it. If not, try instantiating it the Microsoft way. If you get the object, use it. Otherwise, give the user the fallback plain HTML version. You don't need to worry about which browser is being used, so long as it supports the APIs you use, and new browsers, or browsers that you haven't heard of, work automatically without you having to alter your code to accommodate them.

  67. Even better - www.elook.org/weather/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found it to be be better - seems to use various sources for its information.

    Link: eLook.org Weather

  68. Yeah! Gmail in HTML! by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1
    I'm so happy about the new HTML Gmail. Even though I use Firefox (which supports Gmail in its default setting) now I can finally open new messages in a new tab.

    No more "back button, click new message, back button, click new message, etc." for me!

    Now if only Gmail would let you check other POP accounts, I would be in heaven!

    1. Re:Yeah! Gmail in HTML! by stigsen · · Score: 1

      Weeee! With the HTML view I can now navigate GMail in FireFox -with my keyboard!

      I love Google

  69. Weather Underground by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Weather Underground isn't bad. And their HTML isn't hard to parse for my MS Agent talking page reader.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  70. 20% by fm6 · · Score: 1

    This is just one of Googles famous "20% projects". Google develepors can spend 20% of their time on self-assigned special projects (I think it might even be a requirement) and this would appear to be Ben Sigelman's. If you can find his email, send him a feature request.

  71. Blackberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still can't get to gmail from my 7510, so its not too "plain text".

  72. Google's not a small startup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company has something like doubled in size in the past year and raised zillions of dollars. There's no reason to think they're cutting the people and money devoted to search just because they're doing more stuff with the added resources.

  73. Re:woo by hhlost · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up... If enough FP attempts fail so miserably (and so humorously) maybe people will stop trying to make 'em... (Yes, in case you noticed, I learned my lesson too, on a later article.)

  74. How revolutionary! by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Prodigy did this back in like 1989. Google rocks

    Next Google will rollout the next revolution: "keywords"

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  75. Not looking for sympathy by Eternally+optimistic · · Score: 1

    You misunderstand. I am not as dumb as I look, (even though it's called in-band, not in-line signalling), and I am not looking for sympathy, not from NeoSkandranon nor from google. I am simply saying that the query is interpreted partly as a keyword ("weather"), and partly as data ("east podunk"). This however is not know a-priori to the user. This makes it harder to construct queries. I would prefer to specify myself what is a keyword, or syntax, and what is plain uninterpreted data. And no, google is not in a position to tell me what I am looking for. I can think about that myself, thank you. Actually, I suspect that google is using the same technique here as for their advertisements. All that is missing is the identification of their weather service.

    --
    What keeps me going is my inertia.
  76. Re:Gmail's forced "basic HTML view" - and a soluti by GoogleGuy · · Score: 1

    I passed this feedback on the Gmail team. Thanks for mentioning this.

  77. Re:Gmail's forced "basic HTML view" - and a soluti by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Interesting... I just tried your workaround link in NS3 (no js) and wound up at the plain HTML page (which is the one *I* want :) If you get that page and don't want it, following the preferences link might put you back on the js model, since it complains that setting preferences requires a js-enabled browser. Just a thought.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  78. GMail now works on my Zaurus 6000L! by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

    Previously, GMail complained about my use of Opera on the Zaurus (the only browser you can really use on the 6000L for now), and wouldn't let me login.

    Now I can check my email there. :) Still can't change my settings though - they require a "more-supported" browser for that to view GMail in "standard mode", but at least email-checking works.

  79. Gmail lost all of my January email by freelunch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I logged in on January 30 to find that all of my inbox mail for the month of January was gone. It wasn't in my trashcan, etc.

    I exchanged emails at a Very slow rate with gmail staff. Mostly just responding to their form letters and taking whatever action they requested.

    Not until nearly a month later, on Feb 24, did I receive the following pathetic response:

    Hello,

    Thank you for your reply.

    We have completed a thorough investigation of your Gmail account, and can
    confirm that a technical problem did not cause the behavior you reported.
    We apologize for any inconvenience you might have experienced.

    Sincerely,

    The Gmail Team


    I have never lost email on Yahoo or Hotmail.

    The good news? I have 100 gmail invites.

    1. Re:Gmail lost all of my January email by ICA · · Score: 1

      And that is why it is considered in beta still....

    2. Re:Gmail lost all of my January email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Beta" is no excuse for such a lame response and lack of support.

      "Beta" does excuse their giving our 50 more invites to each user when they cannot support the existing user base.

    3. Re:Gmail lost all of my January email by focoma · · Score: 1

      Um, you sure someone who had access to your PC and who knew your password (or was very lucky) didn't delete those messages just for fun? Of course, it might be Google's fault, but it really is odd that no one else seems to have experienced your problem...

      --

      - Francis Ocoma

      Please wait while Sig Request is being processed...

    4. Re:Gmail lost all of my January email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't they have been in the trashcan?

      Why wouldn't gmail support simply say "on Jan 29, someone logged into your account and deleted them"

      Why isn't there a user visible audit log?

  80. HTML interface works in Netscape 4.7 by adpowers · · Score: 1

    This was the first browser I thought about checking in. Here you can see, Gmail running in Netscape 4.7.

  81. Works with Lynx!! by cytoman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nobody seems to have noticed this... gmail now works with text-only browsers like Lynx ! :-).
    Now, that is COOL!

    Neither Yahoo nor Hotmail have this feature!

    1. Re:Works with Lynx!! by limegreen · · Score: 1

      My lynx kept complaining about the SSL certificate. Hmm.

      SSL error:Can't find common name in certificate-Continue? (y)

      Lynx Version 2.8.5rel.1 (04 Feb 2004)
      libwww-FM 2.14, SSL-MM 1.4.1, GNUTLS 1.0.16

  82. Google failed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  83. Re:Gmail's forced "basic HTML view" - and a soluti by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    I think you misread my post. The workaround is designed to provide the fully-functional version of Gmail to users whose browsers support it but for whom the "basic HTML view" version of the service is appearing.

    As Netscape 3 isn't capable of displaying the fully-functional version of Gmail, it's obvious that the workaround URL that I mentioned isn't going to help you or any other Netscape 3 user to access that version.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  84. Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're referring to 9/11, your number is off by 2000.

  85. Weather over SMS, already been done by usTifosi · · Score: 1

    A small SMS search company out of the Bay Area, 4Info.net, has been providing weather over text messaging since 2004. Their service seems to be more powerful, with fewer syntax restrictions and better response times. They also offer more services that Google, including flight status, sports scores, local directory, and stock quotes.

    1. Re:Weather over SMS, already been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I checked it out. "Weather in palo alto" seems to work, unlike Google. Another example of bad planning by the Google machine?

  86. GMail Drive - save from windows explorer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  87. Jesus Christ people - OpenWebMail has all this!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.openwebmail.org

    inconceivable!

  88. Even better, use gmail as a file stash! by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1
    Go here if you have a Gmail account

    http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000640033887/

    and check this out. For windows XP users only last I saw.

    You can transfer files to and fro. Only I think 10 megs max, but still, it's pretty neat.

    --
    Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
  89. You sir, are a packrat. by anakin357 · · Score: 1

    Two things caused me to think this:

    1) Your inbox is full... a full 1GB account!
    2) You have a copy of Netscape 4.7 for MacOS laying around.

    Good luck with the ladies, you'll need it.

    --
    http://www.fsckin.com/
    1. Re:You sir, are a packrat. by adpowers · · Score: 1

      It took me 294 days to fill that inbox up. It helped that I subscribed to the Linux Kernel list and a few other high traffic lists. I also used about 40-60 megs with a script I wrote. The rest came from just a couple of threads where some friends and I were e-mailing large attachments back and forth. It kind of got boring in the end, but I think the payoff was worth it. Now most of the messages are in my trash and in 29 days I'll get my space back.

      Netscape 4.7 just happened to be in my OS 9 Applications folder. I first discovered that when I was at Yahoo!'s Launch music website, which said it needed Netscape 4.7 to work on Mac OS. Grr.

  90. Re:Gmail's forced "basic HTML view" - and a soluti by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Oh no, I understood -- I just found it interesting that the workaround still falls back to the plain HTML version if it encounters a non-JS browser.

    I *want* the plain-HTML version, so I was happy :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  91. Alaska Blues by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

    As USUAL, this doesn't apply to Alaska. Dosent surprise me seeing that most americans think that Alaska isn't part of the US, much less part of the same continent.

    (of note there was a big lawsuit against lower48 retailers who used to say free shipping (or similar) on the continent, but then refused Alaska)

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  92. Re:Gmail's forced "basic HTML view" - and a soluti by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

    Konqueror was affected by this too. Used to work fine a few days ago.

  93. Re:Gmail's forced "basic HTML view" - and a soluti by deep2k · · Score: 1

    2 Things: 1) You might need to clear your cache for this to work (I had to) 2) Some users over on the Opera forums couldn't get this to work even with the cache cleared. In that case, useing the same link but with https seems to do the trick

  94. Beating spam the Gmail way by NaDrew · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I guess this is as good a thread as any to post about how I'm beating spam in my personal inbox using Gmail's powerful filtering, without changing my email address.

    Gmail now offers every member 50 invites. Millions of users and the power of a single spam database have made Gmail's spam filter one of the best. Gmail also offers POP3/SMTP access to the service. Combined, these provide a perfect method to utilize Gmail's powerful spam filtering on my primary email address--without the trouble and fuss of actually changing addresses. Here's how I did it.
    1. Create a new Gmail account, using an invitation from one of my existing accounts.
    2. In the "Forwarding and POP" tab of the "Settings" section, set the following:
      • Disable forwarding (default)
      • Enable POP for all mail
      • When messages are accessed with POP, archive Gmail's copy
    3. Redirect your primary email account to your new Gmail account. Note that this usually requires administrative access to your mail server, or a friendly mail administrator.
    4. Configure your email client (Here are settings for Opera's M2 mail client). Note that I am using my existing SMTP settings, and am only using Gmail for POP3.
    Now mail coming in to your primary account is automatically bounced to your Gmail account, where the Gmail spam filters are applied. Then your mail client downloads your mail from Gmail to your local inbox, just like normal. Since you didn't change your outbound settings, replies and new mail are not affected.

    I set this up a couple of weeks ago and so far Gmail has filtered almost every spam message I would have received. That's spam I didn't download!

    You'll want to log in to the new Gmail account once a week or once a month to check the spam folder. This is just to check for false positives--"good" messages which may have been filtered as spam. It won't happen often but it's worth checking once in a while to make sure.
    --
    Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE