Your point is? Nobody needs to load content from one website at 20mbit. If you want to max your connection, learn what a torrent is and download yourself some legal content.
Even though plots may be similar, the new and interesting part is seeing how different characters react (or overreact) in those situations. It can be completely new and unique!
I wouldn't have any problem putting on my CV that I quit celebrity team X because of poor working conditions. It tells the prospective employer that you won't let them push you around.
Because groups of individuals are are much more powerful than individuals. That power should not be wielded to run our government 'of the people' (hah).
Yes, because "responsible" goes both ways. They're being responsible by notifying the vendor before going public. If the vendor is not fixing the issue, it's time to go public.
As far as I'm concerned a public release is still a responsible one. At least in that case everyone knows about it.
Irresponsible is selling unknown vulnerabilities to private parties that will use them for their own gain. The vendor's customer's get screwed and the vendor has no idea that it's even happening.
I favor this as well. The disincentive of using stores of carbon as an energy source will push the development of cleaner (and now cheaper) ways of harvesting energy.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually the fire department would be able to afford their stuff, because it's base rate is already covered by the taxes of the city they're based in.
Don't do it. If you do, double major in math. If you can't, you can't do professional game dev either.
Do I smell a butthurt fanboy?
And the GP responds to AC as AC. Amazing!
I hear the market for these jobs is great in Italy.
My G1 runs 2.1 and opengl apps run great... where have you been?
That is the strongest anti-FCC anti-net neutrality site that I've seen yet. But thanks for the letters anyway.
It's both?
Strange, because I know a several people with Wiis and 360s but no one with a PS3. Well, not anyone who would admit to it, I suppose.
Your point is? Nobody needs to load content from one website at 20mbit. If you want to max your connection, learn what a torrent is and download yourself some legal content.
Fail. I use a dynamic DNS service. The reverse lookup of the IP does not match the hostname that I connect to, and SSH does not complain.
The only protection you have is to verify the key fingerprint.
Even though plots may be similar, the new and interesting part is seeing how different characters react (or overreact) in those situations. It can be completely new and unique!
The only thing we can do is remove their reasons for wanting to do so in the first place.
Thank you! This is the only way to prevent terrorism. Our current methods of 'war on terror' only serve to create more terrorists.
Google and Wikipedia tell me that you're wrong, not him. You shouldn't criticize people when it's going to make you look like the dumbass.
Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease
Link? I would love to believe this!
I wouldn't have any problem putting on my CV that I quit celebrity team X because of poor working conditions. It tells the prospective employer that you won't let them push you around.
Is that so? For some reason the teabaggers never mention that. Link?
They can't force you to pay taxes either, so I suggest you stop. Teabaggers unite! (somewhere far far away)
Because groups of individuals are are much more powerful than individuals. That power should not be wielded to run our government 'of the people' (hah).
Yes, because "responsible" goes both ways. They're being responsible by notifying the vendor before going public. If the vendor is not fixing the issue, it's time to go public.
As far as I'm concerned a public release is still a responsible one. At least in that case everyone knows about it.
Irresponsible is selling unknown vulnerabilities to private parties that will use them for their own gain. The vendor's customer's get screwed and the vendor has no idea that it's even happening.
It just sucks for them a little bit!
So you're saying maybe it isn't a money grab after all?
I favor this as well. The disincentive of using stores of carbon as an energy source will push the development of cleaner (and now cheaper) ways of harvesting energy.
Accept it for the session then delete it. Some modern browsers even have an option to do this automatically.
I predict this will be the year of Kari Bryon on the desktop!