Or you can get some computer courses and a business degree. Graduate earlier, start lower pay but end up higher pay, not work holidays, have more parties and dating prospects, play golf with the bosses.
IT is viewed as a sucking hole of money by every company. IT people are viewed as fair to work on sundays and holidays 12 hours a day without extra compensation.
If you are in a publicly held company- you can't write a line of code for production without a non-programmer approving it. You'd be amazed how many things they view as unneeded.
Actually, as I get older, I find i rewatch and reread less and less. It has to be pretty spectacular to warrant watching or reading again.
Music i most just stopped listening too. I think I got fed up with the music industries attitude. If it's not free (add on to cable TV or via ads) I just pass.
I have so many DVD's and CD's which I haven't listened to in years. It would be boring to do so again.
Right now at my desk, I'm not listening to any music and haven't.
When I go skiing- my buds listen to music but i find it ruins my enjoyment of skiing.
The problem I have is they keep returning trivial data from other systems which have no impact on my daily life and do not meet my needs. Who cares "if "Store.RobbedBy(Burgler)" if it isn't local? I don't need global access to trivial information when there is massive corruption locally that I need to know about.
Plus, they lack optimization algorithms due to historical reasons and suffer from massive duplication of data.
I had an incredibly bad customer service situation back in the early 2000's with Sony.
I have not bought a Sony product since. It's never been a challenge to find an equivalent product or do without for a while til one became available.
I know it's a bit irrational- but it's my money and their customer service was unhelpful and then rude. I don't need to give money to a company like that.
It seems to me that in this Angel testing scenario, "Angel" is a placeholder for Electroweak Symmetry Breaking.
mater appears undefined unless you mean matter or "mother" latin slang.
I'd say you need to clearly define more of your terms then we can understand what you are saying.
But more to the point, if a "CERM" large madron detector existed-- what is your prediction? What can be tested?
Could you predict that you would see extremely faint angels as a result of associate neutral and charged supernatural particle production processes? Could anyone who ran the test see such angels? Could you see vapor trails and other measurable artifacts and predict them in advance? Heck, given a random group of researchers, could you predict they would see the same unmeasurable, unrecordable results with reasonable consistency* ?
*" Yes, 7 of 10 of us saw very faint angels in the test chamber! and the angle testing scenario predicted 5 to 8 of us would see faint angels 95%+ of the time! It's proven-- angels exist!"
Ah... so most professors should list "Writing Books" and "Publishing Articles" and "Applying for Grants" as their primary job and "Professor" as their secondary jobs then.
Somewhere below that they can put "actually teaching students instead of letting my grad students do it".
You gather facts, you propose a theory with a test, that tests passes or fails. Others can gather the same facts independently and verify your facts are repeatable by third parties. Others propose other tests.
That's science.
You can have "faith" in the scientific method because you know it's repeatable, independently verifiable (I did the optical slit tests myself and got the same results they got a century ago), and testable.
Since you know these things, you take on "faith" that they are true when a legitimate scientist says something is true. You don't gather all the data and test it yourself. But you know the method was followed. You know, you could verify or disprove statements yourself. And that there are thousands of people out there working to verify or disprove the statements- so why waste time repeating their work. You trust that enough of them would point out problems if there were problems.
Religion is not independently verifiable. Religion is not testable. Religion doesn't make testable predictions.
You can have faith in religion too. It's a little different tho. You believe without any repeatable verifiable testable statements of faith. There is no basis for your belief. You can't prove it. You just have faith.
I distinguish them this way (tho the words are close to synonyms). I trust science. I would have faith in religion.
By raising the generators about 13" when a risk was raised two years ago that a 30' tsunami was possible. (of course 30' wouldn't have been sufficient- I hear that area was hit with a 50' tsunami-- but 13" was classic cost cutting.
Since the majority of governments follow the Soviet model at any given time... When you add time as a Dimension- sooner or later all governments pass through it as a phase.
We have diversity in the south at a neighborhood level. It's not going to be possible to split up. And I agree, we can't even agree on what is reasonable noise levels and reasonable times of day to have loud noise much less school standards, legal standards, and other items.
I suspect its like that in most states at least (so groups of states would still have diverse cultures).
Basically you have a few tons of metallic material at very high temperatures that required liquid to continue cooling down. There wasn't liquid (no pumps) so the liquid boiled off (steam releases) and then the rods melted. Then the reaction starts ramping back up again.
And it wasn't graphite (I don't think) this time- graphite was used in Chernobyl and the reason it was so horrible (tons of graphite burning, vaporizing radioactive metallic fuel).
I think it was Boron wrapped around something else this time.
And 40 years ago, a huge number of very smart americans were not allowed to earn a decent living elsewhere and so they went into teaching. You know.. women.
Not happening today. Plus we practically had a mono-culture which made things more efficient. Plus (supporting your point) we were teaching harder material earlier and just failing out people who didn't get it (lots of high school drop outs) so the folks who did get it actually learned something.
Hmmm. More than slips. It's right there on the first page...
My trips to Chernobyl are not like a walk in the park, but the risk can be managed. Sometimes I go for rides alone, sometimes with pillion passenger, but never in company with any other vehicle, because I do not want anyone to raise dust in front of me.
In any case- you are not disputing the photo's or the radiation reading's she displays on the grass or the info about the reactor she has posted on her site, right?
Interesting. If you read her entire site there are slips that indicate she has snuck in there on her bike. For example, she's talking in one section about how some roads are blocked to car traffic but she can get in on her bike.
She's faced political pressure so there may be a legal issue here which made her change her story.
Slashdot Mirror
Taxes out there vary literally at a county level.
However, if the tax on Amazon was set at a simple value "4%" it could work.
I get how Amazon is undercutting merchants. OTH, it's paying road taxes via gasoline taxes and lowering costs to citizens.
If that's your thing-- go ahead.
Or you can get some computer courses and a business degree. Graduate earlier, start lower pay but end up higher pay, not work holidays, have more parties and dating prospects, play golf with the bosses.
IT is viewed as a sucking hole of money by every company.
IT people are viewed as fair to work on sundays and holidays 12 hours a day without extra compensation.
If you are in a publicly held company- you can't write a line of code for production without a non-programmer approving it. You'd be amazed how many things they view as unneeded.
You misspelled "multiple times daily."
Actually, as I get older, I find i rewatch and reread less and less. It has to be pretty spectacular to warrant watching or reading again.
Music i most just stopped listening too. I think I got fed up with the music industries attitude. If it's not free (add on to cable TV or via ads) I just pass.
I have so many DVD's and CD's which I haven't listened to in years. It would be boring to do so again.
Right now at my desk, I'm not listening to any music and haven't.
When I go skiing- my buds listen to music but i find it ruins my enjoyment of skiing.
The problem I have is they keep returning trivial data from other systems which have no impact on my daily life and do not meet my needs. Who cares "if "Store.RobbedBy(Burgler)" if it isn't local? I don't need global access to trivial information when there is massive corruption locally that I need to know about.
Plus, they lack optimization algorithms due to historical reasons and suffer from massive duplication of data.
So do you think this will be reliably reproducible and testable?
Could third parties follow your protocol and get similar resuls?
Cause right now it seems like a slurmed CRN experiment.
I had an incredibly bad customer service situation back in the early 2000's with Sony.
I have not bought a Sony product since. It's never been a challenge to find an equivalent product or do without for a while til one became available.
I know it's a bit irrational- but it's my money and their customer service was unhelpful and then rude. I don't need to give money to a company like that.
Wow...
1.88267327959301E-12 kcal.
That's a pretty faint, extremely low power angel!
I don't see a definition for LHS.
It seems to me that in this Angel testing scenario, "Angel" is a placeholder for Electroweak Symmetry Breaking.
mater appears undefined unless you mean matter or "mother" latin slang.
I'd say you need to clearly define more of your terms then we can understand what you are saying.
But more to the point, if a "CERM" large madron detector existed-- what is your prediction?
What can be tested?
Could you predict that you would see extremely faint angels as a result of associate neutral and charged supernatural particle production processes? Could anyone who ran the test see such angels? Could you see vapor trails and other measurable artifacts and predict them in advance? Heck, given a random group of researchers, could you predict they would see the same unmeasurable, unrecordable results with reasonable consistency* ?
*" Yes, 7 of 10 of us saw very faint angels in the test chamber! and the angle testing scenario predicted 5 to 8 of us would see faint angels 95%+ of the time! It's proven-- angels exist!"
If they are only researching-- then go ahead and just put them officially on the corporations payroll.
Pure research is so rare these days anyway. They are really just researching what big corporations provide funding to research.
It's not college. It's a corporate think tank.
No please.. why not post the method for testing angels here.
I have less than a dozen edits. Several are still intact. A few were replaced by more detailed edits. One I disagree with but life goes on.
Ah... so most professors should list "Writing Books" and "Publishing Articles" and "Applying for Grants" as their primary job and "Professor" as their secondary jobs then.
Somewhere below that they can put "actually teaching students instead of letting my grad students do it".
You gather facts, you propose a theory with a test, that tests passes or fails.
Others can gather the same facts independently and verify your facts are repeatable by third parties. Others propose other tests.
That's science.
You can have "faith" in the scientific method because you know it's repeatable, independently verifiable (I did the optical slit tests myself and got the same results they got a century ago), and testable.
Since you know these things, you take on "faith" that they are true when a legitimate scientist says something is true. You don't gather all the data and test it yourself. But you know the method was followed. You know, you could verify or disprove statements yourself. And that there are thousands of people out there working to verify or disprove the statements- so why waste time repeating their work. You trust that enough of them would point out problems if there were problems.
Religion is not independently verifiable.
Religion is not testable.
Religion doesn't make testable predictions.
You can have faith in religion too. It's a little different tho. You believe without any repeatable verifiable testable statements of faith. There is no basis for your belief. You can't prove it. You just have faith.
I distinguish them this way (tho the words are close to synonyms).
I trust science.
I would have faith in religion.
A more obscure ending punchline pun would have been to say, "No their brains are too stringy".
Do you think most parents give their high school children 50 bucks to buy the latest video game?
Or is the typical high school student getting by on $2000 or less per year of personal cash (many under $500 per year).
Given how many students get by on a diet of ramen noodles (30 cents a pack) and lettuce, they are also not rolling in the dough.
"rather than actively trying to engage the local population with reasonably-priced access. "
You mean like high-school and college students without any income?
By raising the generators about 13" when a risk was raised two years ago that a 30' tsunami was possible. (of course 30' wouldn't have been sufficient- I hear that area was hit with a 50' tsunami-- but 13" was classic cost cutting.
Since the majority of governments follow the Soviet model at any given time...
When you add time as a Dimension- sooner or later all governments pass through it as a phase.
We have diversity in the south at a neighborhood level. It's not going to be possible to split up. And I agree, we can't even agree on what is reasonable noise levels and reasonable times of day to have loud noise much less school standards, legal standards, and other items.
I suspect its like that in most states at least (so groups of states would still have diverse cultures).
This is not 100% accurate:
Basically you have a few tons of metallic material at very high temperatures that required liquid to continue cooling down. There wasn't liquid (no pumps) so the liquid boiled off (steam releases) and then the rods melted. Then the reaction starts ramping back up again.
And it wasn't graphite (I don't think) this time- graphite was used in Chernobyl and the reason it was so horrible (tons of graphite burning, vaporizing radioactive metallic fuel).
I think it was Boron wrapped around something else this time.
And 40 years ago, a huge number of very smart americans were not allowed to earn a decent living elsewhere and so they went into teaching. You know.. women.
Not happening today.
Plus we practically had a mono-culture which made things more efficient.
Plus (supporting your point) we were teaching harder material earlier and just failing out people who didn't get it (lots of high school drop outs) so the folks who did get it actually learned something.
It decays into highly radioactive substances. Halflife is 14 years.
Americium is a big problem radiation wise from plutonium.
Hmmm. More than slips. It's right there on the first page...
My trips to Chernobyl are not like a walk in the park, but the risk can be managed. Sometimes I go for rides alone, sometimes with pillion passenger, but never in company with any other vehicle, because I do not want anyone to raise dust in front of me.
In any case- you are not disputing the photo's or the radiation reading's she displays on the grass or the info about the reactor she has posted on her site, right?
Interesting. If you read her entire site there are slips that indicate she has snuck in there on her bike. For example, she's talking in one section about how some roads are blocked to car traffic but she can get in on her bike.
She's faced political pressure so there may be a legal issue here which made her change her story.
My... you sound so naive.
Every company lies.
Hell, I think house is correct- every body lies.
But it is much worse than it used to be. People still have some shame but companies don't any more.