" there's literally nothing to go on in your description"
Incorrect. As stated, it is a UVC camera. That means it's a USB Video Camera universal device which means no drivers are required - it's the same standard that almost every single laptop webcamera uses and has used for a long time, even OSX and Linux support it.
Then I provide information that it works under XP, and half works under 7. I describe what does and does not work (Everything works in XP, only the video feed does not work in 7.)
Mentioning that it is a UVC camera, you would logically think to check for UVC versions, right? This is a UVC 1.0 camera.
Going to the Microsoft site, it shows that UVC 1.0 is fully supported from 2000/XP on up including in Windows 10.
Any other device plugged into that port operates at USB 2.0 speed. Same port under Windows XP sees the camera just fine. Under 7? It sees the camera, it simply refuses to acquire a video feed from it.
There are no consumption applications for the camera. If there were, I'd have mentioned trying them and them not working.
Don't you find it the least fucking bit odd that a camera made in 2015 will work with XP, works under Linux, Even works in OSX 10.4 or higher (I checked) yet it won't work in Windows 7?
I suspect the UVC driver has changed between XP and 7.
We have microfluidics for stacking dies and removing heat. We do it on p-n junctions on some of the latest LEDs (which are fucking MASSIVE at nearly 7mm x 7mm on just the die alone, not including any mount, circuitry, etc.) to keep them very cool.
I don't speak of ideas unless I already know we've got the technology to handle it.
It's that easy as we're doing it to make large linear high-power LEDs run very cool.
Protip for AMD: Start with a thicker wafer, do the underside with your required cooling channels, do the topside with your typical litho. You CAN wick heat from the underside.
Assuming Intel doesn't go Xeon-scale in pricing for this CPU (who am I kidding, of course they will) I wonder how AMD plans to respond to this.
For now, they've got the consoles holding them afloat. And while I am an AMD fan, I see they are rapidly losing out on the desktop space when it comes to performance (despite both companies having rather meager performance gains for the past several years.)
They'd better figure out what the fuck they're doing, and come up with some competing responses, quickly. Hell, I've got ideas for them, all involving that HBM tech.
1. Use a modified version of that HBM tech to stack their CPU cores and load it up with tons of cache memory (for their non-APU line.) And don't forget to drop a process node, for fuck's sake. 2. Use modified HBM tech to create stacked CPU/GPU/RAM/CACHE on the same die (for their APU line.) 3. Use modified HBM to create stacked single-die CrossFire GPUs that don't consume gobs of power (GPU line.) 4. Use modified HBM tech to create a true monolithic SOC package that integrates EVERYTHING, thus eliminating the need for motherboards - at that point and time, it just becomes a breakout board with a socket. They could probably do away with the interposer as well if They were clever enough in the design.
I've never had that waiting problem as my e-cig works directly from USB. No battery required (or even in the unit itself,) just plug that fucker in and hit the switch.
Then I've also got a 120w vaporizer built into my tower as well.
Mine most certainly do Webcameras are susceptible to this. Turn on a fluorescent T5 lamp next to a webcam with a microphone. You won't hear that ballast, but your microphone most certainly will and can create beat frequency oscillations that become audible to the rest of your listeners.
"2. Speakers don't reproduce ultrasonic"
Yes, they do. Piezo-electric speakers do wonderfully at this, in fact, which is why they're used in ultrasonic pest repellent devices.
"3. And even if these somehow did, Nyquist already limits it all"
Not even close. Please retry when you understand more basic physics and signalling.
Still thinks his HOSTs is worth a shit when more and more programs every day are coming with hardcoded stuff to directly bypass HOSTs, even the Operating System itself has bypasses for HOSTs.
Given HOSTs can be BYPASSED, it's NOT FUCKING SECURE.
Do not listen to APK nor purchase or use any AV product he may recommend, or any AV product from companies that recommend his INSECURE HOSTs file.
They are simply untrustworthy.
Virustotal is untrustworthy. Virscan is untrustworthy, any entity APK mentions is not trustworthy.
"And having it be 64-bit gives us the advantage of being able to scale up the number of objects and mods to a complexity level never seen before in a Bethsoft sandbox game."
That's pretty pathetic considering I can get billions of objects easily referenced in a 32-bit address space with proper structuring of code and object storage/calling/instancing with a tiny 2D engine known as BYOND.
You only need 64-bit address space because Bethesda can't program worth a fuck.
Not in that thread, given APK thinks HOSTs works when it's constantly demonstrated that it's fucking useless with programs and OSes having their own hardcoded DNS bypasses.
HOSTs is shit as my fiance learned. 5TB of dead data now on APK's ass, and counting.
Intel GPUs used to not suck, actually. Seriously, stop laughing!
The GMA945 was actually capable despite not having hardware T&L. What was Intel's fuck up was the original reference speed was 400 MHz, and when they shipped it, every single one was either 133 or 166 MHz, which killed its performance dramatically.
I popped GMABooster on a machine with a GMA945 and cranked it back to reference speeds, and what do you know, despite not having hardware T&L, if your CPU was beefy enough you were hanging with the GeForce 5/6 series of GPUs instead of hanging with GeForce 2/3 series cards in GPU performance. OpenGL actually WORKED once you brought it back up to reference speeds.
Intel just has a history of doing stupid things to their GPU design.
Riverside is right next to a fairly decent-sized river in the Jurupa Valley. It is the upstream diversion and such that makes it so that the river isn't constantly a flood plain.
Lots of gold to find out there. I've gotten plenty from just working black sands directly in the Santa Ana River.
I grew blueberries of many cultivars in South Carolina. I'm well aware of rabbit-eye and highbush and more cultivars.
Jeeze, you'd think a HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH DIRECTOR wouldn't have already thought about this stuff. It's REALLY easy to pick a blueberry. It's really easy to determine when the appropriate harvest time for any given berry has arrived - it's touch and color-based.
A raking machine? Well no fucking wonder so many get damaged. As I said, WE HAVE PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ROBOTICS, hell they've been featured on slashdot HUNDREDS OF TIMES. Yet you seem to have thrown all that prior knowledge away.
And with that, I bid you adieu. Anyone that takes their fruit that 'seriously' while failing to actually address anything I've brought up has some serious mental issues that need to be dealt with first before they should ever be allowed to interact with the general public again.
Slashdot Mirror
Probably NOT my motherboard drivers as all other USB 2.0 devices enumerate properly as such on the exact same system under XP and 7.
I suspect this is Microsoft's issue, not the camera maker.
" there's literally nothing to go on in your description"
Incorrect. As stated, it is a UVC camera. That means it's a USB Video Camera universal device which means no drivers are required - it's the same standard that almost every single laptop webcamera uses and has used for a long time, even OSX and Linux support it.
Then I provide information that it works under XP, and half works under 7. I describe what does and does not work (Everything works in XP, only the video feed does not work in 7.)
Mentioning that it is a UVC camera, you would logically think to check for UVC versions, right? This is a UVC 1.0 camera.
Going to the Microsoft site, it shows that UVC 1.0 is fully supported from 2000/XP on up including in Windows 10.
Any other device plugged into that port operates at USB 2.0 speed. Same port under Windows XP sees the camera just fine. Under 7? It sees the camera, it simply refuses to acquire a video feed from it.
There are no consumption applications for the camera. If there were, I'd have mentioned trying them and them not working.
Don't you find it the least fucking bit odd that a camera made in 2015 will work with XP, works under Linux, Even works in OSX 10.4 or higher (I checked) yet it won't work in Windows 7?
I suspect the UVC driver has changed between XP and 7.
Actually, now that I double-checked the company - it's a USA company and has been around since 2003.
So no, not cheap Chinese crap. Cheap American crap.
Thank you for demonstrating what a fucking racist fool you truly are.
Terrorists don't have a specific means of dressing.
We have microfluidics for stacking dies and removing heat. We do it on p-n junctions on some of the latest LEDs (which are fucking MASSIVE at nearly 7mm x 7mm on just the die alone, not including any mount, circuitry, etc.) to keep them very cool.
I don't speak of ideas unless I already know we've got the technology to handle it.
It's that easy as we're doing it to make large linear high-power LEDs run very cool.
Protip for AMD: Start with a thicker wafer, do the underside with your required cooling channels, do the topside with your typical litho. You CAN wick heat from the underside.
"You can't stack CPU cores because they output waaaaaay too much heat."
Microfluidic cooling to an IHS. Easy-peasy.
Assuming Intel doesn't go Xeon-scale in pricing for this CPU (who am I kidding, of course they will) I wonder how AMD plans to respond to this.
For now, they've got the consoles holding them afloat. And while I am an AMD fan, I see they are rapidly losing out on the desktop space when it comes to performance (despite both companies having rather meager performance gains for the past several years.)
They'd better figure out what the fuck they're doing, and come up with some competing responses, quickly. Hell, I've got ideas for them, all involving that HBM tech.
1. Use a modified version of that HBM tech to stack their CPU cores and load it up with tons of cache memory (for their non-APU line.) And don't forget to drop a process node, for fuck's sake.
2. Use modified HBM tech to create stacked CPU/GPU/RAM/CACHE on the same die (for their APU line.)
3. Use modified HBM to create stacked single-die CrossFire GPUs that don't consume gobs of power (GPU line.)
4. Use modified HBM tech to create a true monolithic SOC package that integrates EVERYTHING, thus eliminating the need for motherboards - at that point and time, it just becomes a breakout board with a socket. They could probably do away with the interposer as well if They were clever enough in the design.
I've never had that waiting problem as my e-cig works directly from USB. No battery required (or even in the unit itself,) just plug that fucker in and hit the switch.
Then I've also got a 120w vaporizer built into my tower as well.
The problem is the word ATOM.
"the basic unit of a chemical element."
Carbon is the basic unit. Graphite is a MOLECULE - comprised of connected carbon atoms.
"These days AA means 2500 mAh NiMH rechargable in under 1 hour."
Physics says no to that when your charger only outputs 1Ah.
"Most people can't hear 16kHz. If you are an adult, you can't hear that."
I can still hear the flyback transformers from old CRTs.
I'm 33 years old.
http://onlinetonegenerator.com...
I stopped being able to hear at ~19Khz.
"1. Mics don't pick up ultrasonic"
Mine most certainly do Webcameras are susceptible to this. Turn on a fluorescent T5 lamp next to a webcam with a microphone. You won't hear that ballast, but your microphone most certainly will and can create beat frequency oscillations that become audible to the rest of your listeners.
"2. Speakers don't reproduce ultrasonic"
Yes, they do. Piezo-electric speakers do wonderfully at this, in fact, which is why they're used in ultrasonic pest repellent devices.
"3. And even if these somehow did, Nyquist already limits it all"
Not even close. Please retry when you understand more basic physics and signalling.
Ahh, the delightful sound of a simple yet thorough bitch-slap to the face.
Look at APK as he has serious mental breakdowns.
http://www.thorschrock.com/200...
No wildcards, no NXDOMAIN, nothing that actually works with any actual speed.
APK is a cheap hack that relies upon old outdated technology to try to make himself look like a security expert.
He is not.
He is a failure and so is any company or individual championing him.
Still thinks his HOSTs is worth a shit when more and more programs every day are coming with hardcoded stuff to directly bypass HOSTs, even the Operating System itself has bypasses for HOSTs.
Given HOSTs can be BYPASSED, it's NOT FUCKING SECURE.
Do not listen to APK nor purchase or use any AV product he may recommend, or any AV product from companies that recommend his INSECURE HOSTs file.
They are simply untrustworthy.
Virustotal is untrustworthy. Virscan is untrustworthy, any entity APK mentions is not trustworthy.
"And having it be 64-bit gives us the advantage of being able to scale up the number of objects and mods to a complexity level never seen before in a Bethsoft sandbox game."
That's pretty pathetic considering I can get billions of objects easily referenced in a 32-bit address space with proper structuring of code and object storage/calling/instancing with a tiny 2D engine known as BYOND.
You only need 64-bit address space because Bethesda can't program worth a fuck.
No, you eat your words at 5TB of lost data because your HOSTs doesn't protect against SHIT when a program bypasses HOSTs with its own hardcoded shit.
You complete utter fucking out of date moron, with your insecure out of date almost TWO DECADES OLD USELESS JUNK.
Get the fuck off here and go to Reddit where your bullshit is tolerated by the uneducated masses.
And any AV company espousing your bullshit needs to be avoided as well. It's quite obvious they don't know the first thing about security.
Ain't nobody bitchslapping me.
Not in that thread, given APK thinks HOSTs works when it's constantly demonstrated that it's fucking useless with programs and OSes having their own hardcoded DNS bypasses.
HOSTs is shit as my fiance learned. 5TB of dead data now on APK's ass, and counting.
Real hardware solutions or GTFO, n00b.
" then the natural response from advertisers is to try to create ads that get around the blockers."
At which point they're circumventing my security measures and will get held accountable in court for such.
Intel GPUs used to not suck, actually. Seriously, stop laughing!
The GMA945 was actually capable despite not having hardware T&L. What was Intel's fuck up was the original reference speed was 400 MHz, and when they shipped it, every single one was either 133 or 166 MHz, which killed its performance dramatically.
I popped GMABooster on a machine with a GMA945 and cranked it back to reference speeds, and what do you know, despite not having hardware T&L, if your CPU was beefy enough you were hanging with the GeForce 5/6 series of GPUs instead of hanging with GeForce 2/3 series cards in GPU performance. OpenGL actually WORKED once you brought it back up to reference speeds.
Intel just has a history of doing stupid things to their GPU design.
Riverside is right next to a fairly decent-sized river in the Jurupa Valley. It is the upstream diversion and such that makes it so that the river isn't constantly a flood plain.
Lots of gold to find out there. I've gotten plenty from just working black sands directly in the Santa Ana River.
"If it's so easy, why don't you put a robot where your mouth is, and pick some fucking blueberries with it?"
Because I'm too busy doing LED horticulture, where the REAL money is.
Or do you forget that I can very easily build and program mechanical things to do a fucking given task?
OCR is simple as fuck. Pressure-sensitive motor drive is easy as fuck. Wake me up when you can even do HALF of that.
I grew blueberries of many cultivars in South Carolina. I'm well aware of rabbit-eye and highbush and more cultivars.
Jeeze, you'd think a HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH DIRECTOR wouldn't have already thought about this stuff. It's REALLY easy to pick a blueberry. It's really easy to determine when the appropriate harvest time for any given berry has arrived - it's touch and color-based.
A raking machine? Well no fucking wonder so many get damaged. As I said, WE HAVE PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ROBOTICS, hell they've been featured on slashdot HUNDREDS OF TIMES. Yet you seem to have thrown all that prior knowledge away.
And with that, I bid you adieu. Anyone that takes their fruit that 'seriously' while failing to actually address anything I've brought up has some serious mental issues that need to be dealt with first before they should ever be allowed to interact with the general public again.