"keep those blinders on, you'll fare well as a peon."
Except I'm a research director for a multi-national corporation. I developed tech to grow plants WITHOUT LIGHT (That's right, bypass photosynthesis.)
Who's wearing the binders, here? Obviously not me. Perhaps your insufficiently-skilled mind has the blinders on.
Re:i posted a story about this a few months ago
on
3D Hurts Your Eyes
·
· Score: 1
There's a reason Sega didn't make a stereoscopic visor set in the 80s, pal. I suggest you actually PAY ATTENTION TO HISTORY instead of simply ignoring it.
Nintendo and Sony ignored Sega's prior attempts at enhanced gaming peripherals, now they're having to put warnings all over their 3D-capable devices.
You really need a new education, the one provided to you is absolute shit.
Re:i posted a story about this a few months ago
on
3D Hurts Your Eyes
·
· Score: 1
He's a shill, duh. His homepage redirects you to Engadget.
Re:i posted a story about this a few months ago
on
3D Hurts Your Eyes
·
· Score: 1
"The reasoning against having kids watch 3D content is because their eyes aren't far enough apart yet."
Provide a source, now. Plenty of other animals have great 3D vision with eye spacing CLOSER than that of a human child.
Are you just being purposely obtuse or are you just that retarded?
Re:i posted a story about this a few months ago
on
3D Hurts Your Eyes
·
· Score: 0
"The problem is your argument doesn't make sense. "
I'm a research director and his words make PERFECT sense.
I suggest you go give your education a steroid shot.
There is no room for approximations in a supposed 'COMPUTATIONAL ENGINE' and if YOU can't understand this then I think you should go back to the fantasy world you live in where exact numbers don't matter.
Analog is garbage for cntrolling circuitry charge and discharge. Sure it's fine for mechanical devices, but for digital devices, you're a damned fool t use analog.
What a moron you are. Come back when you understand the inherent problems of power sources and how digital (not analog) controls make them safer to use.
Actually, fuck that. Let me add another felony to my rap sheet. You're just another AC that won''t be missed. Where do you live?
This isn't entirely true. There is case law, which is part of stare decisis. The Judicial branch can not only effectively make a new law (revoking the old one as unconstitutional during the course of a legal procedure,) it can nullify or amend that law via judicial decisions or precedent.
"If you get busted for manufacturing drugs inside a rental unit, the court does not take the rental unit away from you, because you do not own it. "
Wrong. I suggest you look up court cases involving Tenant's rights that have explicitly stated that for the duration of the rental agreement, you are considered the owner of the property. Without ownership, you have no rights.
I'm dealing with this RIGHT NOW in court - Moreno Valley, CA, case number MVC1103499 if you care to look it up, Mr. I-Think-I-Know-Better than someone that stomped EA's nuts into the ground over Spore DRM.
No, you have a right to privacy in multiple situations, otherwise you couldn't sue other people in civil court for violating your privacy.
Example: Tenant's rights. Landlords are required to give you 24 hour notice before showing up on the property, excepting emergencies that pose immediate threat to the property (such as a busted water line.) To arrive without notice is not only a violation of your privacy but it also constitutes trespassing. Also, if said landlord arrives without notice, and other people are with him, those people are also guilty of violation of privacy and trespassing.
I'm dealing with this right now against my landlord - MVC1103499 is the California Case number in Moreno Valley Court System, if you wish to look it up. I haven't been served any further papers in a while so it's likely the judge dismissed the landlord's case against me outright given my evidence - I'm still waiting for the paperwork to show.
By posting his name so you can read his other comments and moderate those up, duh. Did you even BOTHER reading the post or did you just blindly jump at a perceived chance to bash me?
Electron leakage as you go lower in fab scale processes pretty much ensures that your statement is false.. This is why we're trying to move to OUM/OVM phase-change memory instead.
For all intents and purposes of criminal proceedings, yes, you do. If you are renting an apartment, and you are busted manufacturing drugs, you are considered the owner of the property, not the apartment complex. You lose your rental contract, the apartment complex gets its stuff back (unless it's proven that the apartment complex rented it out with the knowledge that you were going to do something illegal in it in the first place, then they lose their stuff too.)
Slashdot Mirror
"keep those blinders on, you'll fare well as a peon."
Except I'm a research director for a multi-national corporation. I developed tech to grow plants WITHOUT LIGHT (That's right, bypass photosynthesis.)
Who's wearing the binders, here? Obviously not me. Perhaps your insufficiently-skilled mind has the blinders on.
There's a reason Sega didn't make a stereoscopic visor set in the 80s, pal. I suggest you actually PAY ATTENTION TO HISTORY instead of simply ignoring it.
Nintendo and Sony ignored Sega's prior attempts at enhanced gaming peripherals, now they're having to put warnings all over their 3D-capable devices.
You really need a new education, the one provided to you is absolute shit.
He's a shill, duh. His homepage redirects you to Engadget.
"The reasoning against having kids watch 3D content is because their eyes aren't far enough apart yet."
Provide a source, now. Plenty of other animals have great 3D vision with eye spacing CLOSER than that of a human child.
Are you just being purposely obtuse or are you just that retarded?
"The problem is your argument doesn't make sense. "
I'm a research director and his words make PERFECT sense.
I suggest you go give your education a steroid shot.
Heard of engineering? Rounding doesn't hold well for most engineering projects when rounded up so grossly.
There is no room for approximations in a supposed 'COMPUTATIONAL ENGINE' and if YOU can't understand this then I think you should go back to the fantasy world you live in where exact numbers don't matter.
And you're a wannabe engineer without a clue.
Analog is garbage for cntrolling circuitry charge and discharge. Sure it's fine for mechanical devices, but for digital devices, you're a damned fool t use analog.
What a moron you are. Come back when you understand the inherent problems of power sources and how digital (not analog) controls make them safer to use.
Actually, fuck that. Let me add another felony to my rap sheet. You're just another AC that won''t be missed. Where do you live?
No, it doesn't have to be set like that to explode.
Just overtask the laptop and make the battery firmware fail. I'm sure thermodynamics will take care of the rest.
"it can't make a new one"
This isn't entirely true. There is case law, which is part of stare decisis. The Judicial branch can not only effectively make a new law (revoking the old one as unconstitutional during the course of a legal procedure,) it can nullify or amend that law via judicial decisions or precedent.
68+68+45=??
Despite it saying 180, the math of the numbers it initially gives works out to 181.
This thing, plain and simple, is not giving a 100% correct answer on what it displays.
Not when they cannot perform simple geometrical calculations.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=triangle+with+sides+0.4592+meters%2C+0.6+meters%2C+0.6+meters
180 degrees, not 181, should be the sum of all internal angles.
"But why would someone bother to read that comment and mod up other comments of his?"
Go to reddit and I think you'll understand very quickly.
"If you get busted for manufacturing drugs inside a rental unit, the court does not take the rental unit away from you, because you do not own it. "
Wrong. I suggest you look up court cases involving Tenant's rights that have explicitly stated that for the duration of the rental agreement, you are considered the owner of the property. Without ownership, you have no rights.
I'm dealing with this RIGHT NOW in court - Moreno Valley, CA, case number MVC1103499 if you care to look it up, Mr. I-Think-I-Know-Better than someone that stomped EA's nuts into the ground over Spore DRM.
No, you have a right to privacy in multiple situations, otherwise you couldn't sue other people in civil court for violating your privacy.
Example: Tenant's rights. Landlords are required to give you 24 hour notice before showing up on the property, excepting emergencies that pose immediate threat to the property (such as a busted water line.) To arrive without notice is not only a violation of your privacy but it also constitutes trespassing. Also, if said landlord arrives without notice, and other people are with him, those people are also guilty of violation of privacy and trespassing.
I'm dealing with this right now against my landlord - MVC1103499 is the California Case number in Moreno Valley Court System, if you wish to look it up. I haven't been served any further papers in a while so it's likely the judge dismissed the landlord's case against me outright given my evidence - I'm still waiting for the paperwork to show.
"I don't play an instrument, but I'd imagine that a violin that works beautifully for one person just doesn't feel right for another person"
Any experienced musician that is familiar with their instrument will be able to tell if it's good or garbage within ten minutes of playing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay-for-pay
Most 'solo' stars are straight men.
By posting his name so you can read his other comments and moderate those up, duh. Did you even BOTHER reading the post or did you just blindly jump at a perceived chance to bash me?
"Doom 3 is the most recent game from id Software"
NOT EVEN CLOSE. Rage HD.
"Okay, have anyone here experienced flash wear out? Hmmm, no hands raised."
That's because you answered yourself without letting anyone speak up, you fucking moron.
I've had multiple flash types fail miserably on me.
Consider this a big raised hand plus a slap to your ignorant mouth.
"NAND doesn't need power to maintain state"
Electron leakage as you go lower in fab scale processes pretty much ensures that your statement is false.. This is why we're trying to move to OUM/OVM phase-change memory instead.
"Modern evolutions of NAND flash make it more durable and reliable than spinning rust in every instance"
Except I have functional hard drives from 1980. Show me an SSD or NAND that's still going strong after that amount of time.
NAND? Replace RAM?
Not until the read-writes are on the order of at least 5 magnitudes higher than they are now, and about 1/10th the access time of where they are now.
"Renting does not mean you own it."
For all intents and purposes of criminal proceedings, yes, you do. If you are renting an apartment, and you are busted manufacturing drugs, you are considered the owner of the property, not the apartment complex. You lose your rental contract, the apartment complex gets its stuff back (unless it's proven that the apartment complex rented it out with the knowledge that you were going to do something illegal in it in the first place, then they lose their stuff too.)
Same should theoretically apply here.