I listened and looked. Trouble is, I don't think you do. The second one with the news reporter is just damning if you bothered to watch it. So I'm disappointed, however not surprised.
Let's look at your link to hurricanes. To preface it, have you ever read the book "how to lie with statistics." I still own the copy I bought when I was in college in the 1980s. Lend it out from time to time, however I see it's online as a PDF now. You should read it. You really should read it so you know when you're being lied to. So what does the article say? Really not a whole lot, it also begins in the 1970s. Ok, this is your first major indication you're being lied to. Why just the 1970s? If they go further back, it disproves what they're trying to indoctrinate you with. They'd have you believe that bad storms never happened before. Hogg wash. In fact HOGG Island, NYC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... 1890. Yes, 1890. I can cite plenty of other storms past that. So no, they are not stronger and they are not more frequent, and they know it. If they really were, oh boy - you'd really hear about it I'm sure. They would be in our face.
Your first citation about rising global temperatures. Here's a spot that I think you don't realize or understand. Things are warming up. We're not denying that. In fact, if you go back to Venice, you'll see water was rising up in the 1300s when they were trying to keep the Adriatic out way back then. Then we hit a little ice age - which we're coming out of right now. We are in fact going back to where we used to be before the little ice age. Please consider this article - http://www.livescience.com/143... . So this is showing you that Greenland was MUCH warmer than it is right now, and not that long ago (geologically speaking). At this point you should understand that this Man Man GW is almost certainly just a scam.
As for the fuel companies, do you really think that? You think that they won't adapt? Those guys will make a bunch of money either way. It's a red herring argument to fool people. What I can show you is Al Gore makes a boatload http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new... . I think it's been well documented on/. that in "science" you want to show MMGW - lots of funds. Want to show MMGW is a scam - you'd get tarred and feathered. You won't get a dime. It clearly isn't what a Democratic administration wants. It's all about control and money.
However plenty of real scientists throughout the world are speaking up. That's why they are having such a hard time. There just is no legitimate science behind it. Again, my citations and you can look up what they're saying like I did.
So just because I showed you in an easy to understand video you don't believe it? ok. 1) Algore was a D student in science at Harvard - http://www.cnsnews.com/news/ar... 2) Teacher was Roger Reville, who told him he was wrong - https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Yea, I know, a youtube video, it's actually a transcript from a chemical film based motion picture back in 1980. The citation also goes into Mr. Armstrong, and so on.
There are plenty of other citations about the same thing if for some reason you don't like cnsnews or the youtube transcript.
Could go on. However one thing is very clear to me - if Prof Reville where here today, he's say it's not a factor. That's what the real numbers show. The numbers before they are "adjusted". That other citation I gave you shows that graphically.
So where am I wrong? Algore didn't really have Reville for a professor at Harvard? He didn't really get a D? He hasn't systematically set up condi
Really? Seems like this movie is becoming the joke. How many different formats will they do? VHS, Betamax, Laser disk, dvd, 25 year edition, HD, probably some others that I don't remember and now 4K!
I bet there are some people that have all formats.
I have a feeling you didn't listen to the presentation. He IS a scientist. He explains his credentials in the beginning if you listened, or maybe you don't recognize them? He founded the weather channel. He explains how we've all been lied to. There is no mountain of evidence. There is no scientific consensus. He explains how they came up with the 97% of scientist claim - they are anonymous "scientists" by the way and there weren't even 100 of them. So we have no idea if it was just a number pulled out of someone's mind or not. Probably is just a made up number.
Here's a reporter that looked into this as well. He shows you the game they're playing so no matter what happens, they "predicted" it. - http://vernalutah.org/EnergySu...
To quote you - "Sorry, I can't help anyone so doggedly determined to ignore all the inconvenient parts of reality." - such as the models not working time and time and time again. Einstein put it well - you don't need hundreds of scientists to prove him wrong, you just need one. It only takes one counter example to prove your theory wrong. We've proven Man made GW is wrong, many times and you know it if you've been paying attention. Do I need to send you links to Al Gore's hurricane/weater predictions of 10 years ago? Pull up the laughable predictions from the 1990s? We've had fewer and weaker hurricanes.
You need to know when you're being lied to. That guy lying to you is Al Gore. He's made about 500 million off this lie so far. Not bad for a guy that got this idea from a science class at Harvard that he only earned a D in the class.
I'm not seeing anything definitive. They specify a few handles, and that the Russians Intelligence Service (RIS) knows about spear phishing and other attacks that are usually taught in the first cybersecurity courses. Most nations know about this stuff to. I think all Federal agencies teach their workers about spear phishing and such. I'm not impressed.
Maybe I missed it? Did something impress you in the report?
For such a lame duck to do this right now, seems like pissing in the wind. It won't help his legacy, probably will end up hurting it as a stupid reaction.
You're ignoring all the other stuff they found. Side from giving Burnie the shaft, there's espionage. There's illegal fund raising by people that don't like us. There's outright lies they had the press publish, such as Trump is against well fill in the blank. Gays, Blacks, Women, foreigners, if they missed something dear to you, just let them know, they'll include it next time. Facts show he came to the aid of the gays in the Pulse club while Obama could barely be dragged off the golf course to even think about it. There is no evidence he's racist, he's married to a foreigner so that's crap, Miss America and so on for women. Yet dumb people believed it. Still believe it. Too stupid to think about it, even if it's pointed out to them. What did he say/do that was racist, against women, gays... and so on? NOTHING.
Never the less, we know Russia had nothing to do with it. Assange told us, he knows. This is stupid from a despot.
Not really. The FBI did a really good job over the decades. So did European governments. Problem is, they're bringing in a lot of people that have been taught from the age of 3 that it's ok to kill infidels. They teach them that every year. A few people they can deal with, 10's of thousands is a lot harder.
It's simple, don't let them into the country. Send 'em back.
The alternative is we won't have a Europe in probably 10 years. Probably won't have a United States either. We'll all be slaves, under Sharia law.
The only thing I can think where this would be a thing would be when Apple comes out with the next super-dooper phone. I know guys that HAVE to have it the moment it comes out. Their old phone is already sold to someone else.
Other than that, I don't see this as a viable business. Weather can doom it as well. Hope I don't have to fly around these things.
Could upgrade to Fedora. You'd probably have an easier time. Don't use the gnome shit though. Install kde/plasma. A real desktop. Then set the cursor so focus follows mouse. Anything else is so 1980s, like Windows.
PICS: Melania Trump Has Appeared In Soft Core Lesbian Porn Modeling
It's the fucking headline.
Don't mean to seem abrasive, did you even read the fucking link yourself? That's just some guy saying it. Hate to break it to you, just because it's on the internet doesn't mean it's true. Look for it in other places like I did. It's no where. Doesn't mean it's not true, however it's looking like BS. Besides, what if it's true? So what? Some people act as if Republicans and sometimes Democrats have no experience with porn or gay people. I think we all have people in our family that are like a door knob. Everyone gets a turn. Someone that is also gay in the family. Happens.
How does this change anything? She's not running the country. I'll probably improve things. People around the world won't think we're so stuffy anymore. She'll certainly have a lot better social skills than the past 7 president's wives (i.e. back to Jacky Kennedy).
Heh... if you believe everything you read on the internet, I'm a French Model. Bon Jour.
That's the same mag, without the supposed soft core porn. I can't find it. Not even mighty google can find it.... Then I remembered that Bing is the porn engine. Found one image, B&W and I'm not sure it's even her. How disappointing. You'd think this day in age we'd have the very best in photography. Even 30 years ago we had a lot better.
Never the less, still doesn't mean she's a tramp. She has a work of art body. See the one with her abs? Man, she could probably beat the ass of most people on slashdot.
That's a model, not a tramp. What a hot model. I didn't see that shoot. No danger of any Hillary pictures like that showing up. Nobody wants to see that.
It is hell on earth. Imagine coming up with goals and being judged against them. Then you have to come up with new goals... repeat until you're either - dead, retired, fired. You're fired because you didn't meet your own goals. Where I'm working they're doing this BS right now. Been done in the past. We have a new way high up guy that thinks he knows about management. Making all the same mistakes as the past managers and won't listen, like the past managers.
Worse, you have a baseball card made of your accomplishments? Great if you're the best guy. Not so good if you're not.
Seems like this is a HR lawyer's wet dream. Ripe for a lawsuit. I'm sure they'll argue it's discriminatory against at least one of the minorities. They may argue since it's modeled after someone it has his sexism, or some other BS.
Imagine if they do a makeup of the judges. That judge may not like where he sits in the pecking order.
They brought back Jobs in the first place because they were failures without him. He really was a super-genius, not like the Wile E Coyote type.
Not sure if it's true - Unfortunately from what I hear they are way too more focused on gay issues than making cool stuff anymore. So not Americanism, it's anti-Americanism that's to blame. Americanism works well if we let it. More to life than trying to figure out if every single statement made by someone is somehow anti- whatever so you can take offense. Offense is always taken, never given.
Don't bring up Microsoft. There's always an exception to the rule.
I also don't anticipate purchasing any other Apple product. I have a bunch of their products. Not sure WTF I'm going to do. There's a vacuum for someone to fill. Maybe they'll pull their head out of their ass and fix this. Bring in a new genius. There is probably already one working for them.
You may very well be right about that. But freedom of speech isn't about ensuring that everything done serves a useful purpose. Your proposal to criminalize disrespect of what YOU stand for is fascism, pure and simple. You try to paint it as something else, but you're straight up delusional.
If it isn't for a useful purpose then why do it? It's done to incite. As much as a punch in the mouth. Since the guy doing it often has nothing to lose, kind of a tough situation. More on this later.
Not sure if you realized it or not, please don't put words into my mouth. I know the left loves to tell other people what they think the other person is thinking, stop it. Listen more. Do you even know what fascism is? Clearly not. I'm not a fascist. Did I ever say it should be criminalized? No. Here, find out what fascism is all about - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Bundle of sticks, H - "stronger together"... Humm.... Coincidence? Her Clinton Foundation, Eva Perone's foundation - anther fascist... coincidence?... Just sayin'
The left? Oh boy. Nazis? The Nazi party may have started as a left-wing party, but it ceased to be one on The Night of the Long Knives when every single leftist in it was purged (see: executed) by the Hitler-supporting far-right wing of the party. You don't get to call the Nazi atrocities some kind of left-wing stereotypical behavior... Well, you do, because you're free to do and say anything you like, regardless of how stupid it is, as long as it doesn't infringe on my rights.
Wow. Just wow. Revising history too. Know about communist, socialist and fascist? Clearly not. You have no clue. It's funny you think leftist become right. A lot of people were thrown off by the question to Stalin. They asked him where were the NAZIs compared to Communism. He said the Nazis are to the right, yes, right of Communism. Still plenty far to the left. Redirection.
Reminds me when they tried to make Americans all think in the 1960s that the racist Democrats all became Republicans and the Republicans became Democrats. http://blackrepublican.blogspo... . I still know people that believe that.
You need to get out and see the world. 1%? Not even close. Pretty high up- sure. Nowhere near 1%.
I've done quite well getting around the world. I've seen some real toilets. I rent to people that came from some real toilets in the world. I even have my own airplane. You need to get out more. Here's an article that I think will help - https://www.washingtonpost.com...
So, if you include that top 1% with the other 99% of Americans, we're all in the top 1% of the world. Go ahead, call the Washington Post a fascist/right wing paper. That'll be funny. You need to admit you're wrong. Even our poor have it darn well. To me.. man.. you really don't know. I've seen stuff that I couldn't get out of my head for a year. Still disturbs me, however even if I had a billion dollars to throw their way, it wouldn't change anything. Few things very briefly, however corruption would get probably all of it.
Again- an attack on the things you stand for is not an attack on you. You don't get to censor those who attack your beliefs. That's fucking fascism. You are a fascist. I don't personally burn flags, but I defend the *RIGHT* of asshats to do it.
Wow. Just wow. Really wow. You seem to defend the left. The left/democrats are all about telling us what we can and can't do. Regulations - which carry the power of law. From farms to where we can fish... all kinds of stuff. They even want to tell us what we can think. Anything other than what they
Anyone running with Flash enabled... well that's like walking through the ghetto and flashing $100 bills. You're asking for it. Now that they have a new version, well I might install it again. Up to now, it was just chock full of security holes.
My browser sits on top of a machine with 16 GB of memory, runs Linux and it's still slow because some sites are loading up an incredible amount of crap. Forget about clicking on the click bait anymore. Click on that sucker and it grinds to a halt it can't pull the ads in fast enough. Sometimes I think just from my one click, someone out there just made $500. I know, probably the Russians.
Slashdot Mirror
I listened and looked. Trouble is, I don't think you do. The second one with the news reporter is just damning if you bothered to watch it. So I'm disappointed, however not surprised.
Let's look at your link to hurricanes. To preface it, have you ever read the book "how to lie with statistics." I still own the copy I bought when I was in college in the 1980s. Lend it out from time to time, however I see it's online as a PDF now. You should read it. You really should read it so you know when you're being lied to. So what does the article say? Really not a whole lot, it also begins in the 1970s. Ok, this is your first major indication you're being lied to. Why just the 1970s? If they go further back, it disproves what they're trying to indoctrinate you with. They'd have you believe that bad storms never happened before. Hogg wash. In fact HOGG Island, NYC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... 1890. Yes, 1890. I can cite plenty of other storms past that. So no, they are not stronger and they are not more frequent, and they know it. If they really were, oh boy - you'd really hear about it I'm sure. They would be in our face.
Your first citation about rising global temperatures. Here's a spot that I think you don't realize or understand. Things are warming up. We're not denying that. In fact, if you go back to Venice, you'll see water was rising up in the 1300s when they were trying to keep the Adriatic out way back then. Then we hit a little ice age - which we're coming out of right now. We are in fact going back to where we used to be before the little ice age. Please consider this article - http://www.livescience.com/143... . So this is showing you that Greenland was MUCH warmer than it is right now, and not that long ago (geologically speaking). At this point you should understand that this Man Man GW is almost certainly just a scam.
As for the fuel companies, do you really think that? You think that they won't adapt? Those guys will make a bunch of money either way. It's a red herring argument to fool people. What I can show you is Al Gore makes a boatload http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new... . I think it's been well documented on /. that in "science" you want to show MMGW - lots of funds. Want to show MMGW is a scam - you'd get tarred and feathered. You won't get a dime. It clearly isn't what a Democratic administration wants. It's all about control and money.
However plenty of real scientists throughout the world are speaking up. That's why they are having such a hard time. There just is no legitimate science behind it. Again, my citations and you can look up what they're saying like I did.
So just because I showed you in an easy to understand video you don't believe it? ok.
1) Algore was a D student in science at Harvard - http://www.cnsnews.com/news/ar...
2) Teacher was Roger Reville, who told him he was wrong - https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Yea, I know, a youtube video, it's actually a transcript from a chemical film based motion picture back in 1980. The citation also goes into Mr. Armstrong, and so on.
There are plenty of other citations about the same thing if for some reason you don't like cnsnews or the youtube transcript.
Could go on. However one thing is very clear to me - if Prof Reville where here today, he's say it's not a factor. That's what the real numbers show. The numbers before they are "adjusted". That other citation I gave you shows that graphically.
So where am I wrong? Algore didn't really have Reville for a professor at Harvard? He didn't really get a D? He hasn't systematically set up condi
Really? Seems like this movie is becoming the joke. How many different formats will they do? VHS, Betamax, Laser disk, dvd, 25 year edition, HD, probably some others that I don't remember and now 4K!
I bet there are some people that have all formats.
I have a feeling you didn't listen to the presentation. He IS a scientist. He explains his credentials in the beginning if you listened, or maybe you don't recognize them? He founded the weather channel. He explains how we've all been lied to. There is no mountain of evidence. There is no scientific consensus. He explains how they came up with the 97% of scientist claim - they are anonymous "scientists" by the way and there weren't even 100 of them. So we have no idea if it was just a number pulled out of someone's mind or not. Probably is just a made up number.
Here's a reporter that looked into this as well. He shows you the game they're playing so no matter what happens, they "predicted" it. - http://vernalutah.org/EnergySu...
Here is a site where a guy has methodically documented the fraud - http://realclimatescience.com/...
To quote you - "Sorry, I can't help anyone so doggedly determined to ignore all the inconvenient parts of reality." - such as the models not working time and time and time again. Einstein put it well - you don't need hundreds of scientists to prove him wrong, you just need one. It only takes one counter example to prove your theory wrong. We've proven Man made GW is wrong, many times and you know it if you've been paying attention. Do I need to send you links to Al Gore's hurricane/weater predictions of 10 years ago? Pull up the laughable predictions from the 1990s? We've had fewer and weaker hurricanes.
You need to know when you're being lied to. That guy lying to you is Al Gore. He's made about 500 million off this lie so far. Not bad for a guy that got this idea from a science class at Harvard that he only earned a D in the class.
Listen to this for a little while, from a real scientist - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Listen to this for a little while. Learn.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
I'm not seeing anything definitive. They specify a few handles, and that the Russians Intelligence Service (RIS) knows about spear phishing and other attacks that are usually taught in the first cybersecurity courses. Most nations know about this stuff to. I think all Federal agencies teach their workers about spear phishing and such. I'm not impressed.
Maybe I missed it? Did something impress you in the report?
For such a lame duck to do this right now, seems like pissing in the wind. It won't help his legacy, probably will end up hurting it as a stupid reaction.
You're ignoring all the other stuff they found. Side from giving Burnie the shaft, there's espionage. There's illegal fund raising by people that don't like us. There's outright lies they had the press publish, such as Trump is against well fill in the blank. Gays, Blacks, Women, foreigners, if they missed something dear to you, just let them know, they'll include it next time. Facts show he came to the aid of the gays in the Pulse club while Obama could barely be dragged off the golf course to even think about it. There is no evidence he's racist, he's married to a foreigner so that's crap, Miss America and so on for women. Yet dumb people believed it. Still believe it. Too stupid to think about it, even if it's pointed out to them.
What did he say/do that was racist, against women, gays... and so on? NOTHING.
Never the less, we know Russia had nothing to do with it. Assange told us, he knows. This is stupid from a despot.
That's right, they were conquered. They don't have a right to any land.
I'm so tired of that brain dead MEME too!
Not really. The FBI did a really good job over the decades. So did European governments. Problem is, they're bringing in a lot of people that have been taught from the age of 3 that it's ok to kill infidels. They teach them that every year. A few people they can deal with, 10's of thousands is a lot harder.
It's simple, don't let them into the country. Send 'em back.
The alternative is we won't have a Europe in probably 10 years. Probably won't have a United States either. We'll all be slaves, under Sharia law.
Before you mark this troll or respond like an idiot, check it out. European "no go zones"
https://www.gatestoneinstitute...
https://www.gatestoneinstitute...
http://www.thenewamerican.com/...
The only thing I can think where this would be a thing would be when Apple comes out with the next super-dooper phone. I know guys that HAVE to have it the moment it comes out. Their old phone is already sold to someone else.
Other than that, I don't see this as a viable business. Weather can doom it as well. Hope I don't have to fly around these things.
Tell them about it - http://patft1.uspto.gov/netacg...
I wondered if he knew. I know I have one. It's about 30 years old as an applicant file.
Could upgrade to Fedora. You'd probably have an easier time. Don't use the gnome shit though. Install kde/plasma. A real desktop. Then set the cursor so focus follows mouse. Anything else is so 1980s, like Windows.
Did you even read the link I provided?
PICS: Melania Trump Has Appeared In Soft Core Lesbian Porn Modeling
It's the fucking headline.
Don't mean to seem abrasive, did you even read the fucking link yourself? That's just some guy saying it. Hate to break it to you, just because it's on the internet doesn't mean it's true. Look for it in other places like I did. It's no where. Doesn't mean it's not true, however it's looking like BS. Besides, what if it's true? So what? Some people act as if Republicans and sometimes Democrats have no experience with porn or gay people. I think we all have people in our family that are like a door knob. Everyone gets a turn. Someone that is also gay in the family. Happens.
How does this change anything? She's not running the country. I'll probably improve things. People around the world won't think we're so stuffy anymore. She'll certainly have a lot better social skills than the past 7 president's wives (i.e. back to Jacky Kennedy).
Heh... if you believe everything you read on the internet, I'm a French Model. Bon Jour.
That's the same mag, without the supposed soft core porn. I can't find it. Not even mighty google can find it. ... Then I remembered that Bing is the porn engine. Found one image, B&W and I'm not sure it's even her. How disappointing. You'd think this day in age we'd have the very best in photography. Even 30 years ago we had a lot better.
Never the less, still doesn't mean she's a tramp. She has a work of art body. See the one with her abs? Man, she could probably beat the ass of most people on slashdot.
Like Melania Tramp?
That's a model, not a tramp. What a hot model. I didn't see that shoot. No danger of any Hillary pictures like that showing up. Nobody wants to see that.
Of course. I have a machine right over here you can use to access your most important accounts, files and data. Feel at home.
Sure. She's a tramp. Sort of like a door knob. Everyone gets a turn.
It is hell on earth. Imagine coming up with goals and being judged against them. Then you have to come up with new goals... repeat until you're either - dead, retired, fired. You're fired because you didn't meet your own goals. Where I'm working they're doing this BS right now. Been done in the past. We have a new way high up guy that thinks he knows about management. Making all the same mistakes as the past managers and won't listen, like the past managers.
Worse, you have a baseball card made of your accomplishments? Great if you're the best guy. Not so good if you're not.
Seems like this is a HR lawyer's wet dream. Ripe for a lawsuit. I'm sure they'll argue it's discriminatory against at least one of the minorities. They may argue since it's modeled after someone it has his sexism, or some other BS.
Imagine if they do a makeup of the judges. That judge may not like where he sits in the pecking order.
They brought back Jobs in the first place because they were failures without him. He really was a super-genius, not like the Wile E Coyote type.
Not sure if it's true - Unfortunately from what I hear they are way too more focused on gay issues than making cool stuff anymore. So not Americanism, it's anti-Americanism that's to blame. Americanism works well if we let it. More to life than trying to figure out if every single statement made by someone is somehow anti- whatever so you can take offense. Offense is always taken, never given.
Don't bring up Microsoft. There's always an exception to the rule.
I also don't anticipate purchasing any other Apple product. I have a bunch of their products. Not sure WTF I'm going to do. There's a vacuum for someone to fill. Maybe they'll pull their head out of their ass and fix this. Bring in a new genius. There is probably already one working for them.
Ever been caught red handed?
Pass code is 1234.
You may very well be right about that. But freedom of speech isn't about ensuring that everything done serves a useful purpose. Your proposal to criminalize disrespect of what YOU stand for is fascism, pure and simple. You try to paint it as something else, but you're straight up delusional.
If it isn't for a useful purpose then why do it? It's done to incite. As much as a punch in the mouth. Since the guy doing it often has nothing to lose, kind of a tough situation. More on this later.
Not sure if you realized it or not, please don't put words into my mouth. I know the left loves to tell other people what they think the other person is thinking, stop it. Listen more. Do you even know what fascism is? Clearly not. I'm not a fascist. Did I ever say it should be criminalized? No. Here, find out what fascism is all about - https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Bundle of sticks, H - "stronger together"... Humm.... Coincidence? Her Clinton Foundation, Eva Perone's foundation - anther fascist... coincidence?... Just sayin'
The left? Oh boy. Nazis? The Nazi party may have started as a left-wing party, but it ceased to be one on The Night of the Long Knives when every single leftist in it was purged (see: executed) by the Hitler-supporting far-right wing of the party. You don't get to call the Nazi atrocities some kind of left-wing stereotypical behavior... Well, you do, because you're free to do and say anything you like, regardless of how stupid it is, as long as it doesn't infringe on my rights.
Wow. Just wow. Revising history too. Know about communist, socialist and fascist? Clearly not. You have no clue. It's funny you think leftist become right. A lot of people were thrown off by the question to Stalin. They asked him where were the NAZIs compared to Communism. He said the Nazis are to the right, yes, right of Communism. Still plenty far to the left. Redirection.
Reminds me when they tried to make Americans all think in the 1960s that the racist Democrats all became Republicans and the Republicans became Democrats. http://blackrepublican.blogspo... . I still know people that believe that.
You need to get out and see the world. 1%? Not even close. Pretty high up- sure. Nowhere near 1%.
I've done quite well getting around the world. I've seen some real toilets. I rent to people that came from some real toilets in the world. I even have my own airplane. You need to get out more. Here's an article that I think will help -
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
So, if you include that top 1% with the other 99% of Americans, we're all in the top 1% of the world.
Go ahead, call the Washington Post a fascist/right wing paper. That'll be funny. You need to admit you're wrong. Even our poor have it darn well. To me.. man.. you really don't know. I've seen stuff that I couldn't get out of my head for a year. Still disturbs me, however even if I had a billion dollars to throw their way, it wouldn't change anything. Few things very briefly, however corruption would get probably all of it.
Again- an attack on the things you stand for is not an attack on you. You don't get to censor those who attack your beliefs. That's fucking fascism. You are a fascist. I don't personally burn flags, but I defend the *RIGHT* of asshats to do it.
Wow. Just wow. Really wow. You seem to defend the left. The left/democrats are all about telling us what we can and can't do. Regulations - which carry the power of law. From farms to where we can fish... all kinds of stuff. They even want to tell us what we can think. Anything other than what they
Anyone running with Flash enabled... well that's like walking through the ghetto and flashing $100 bills. You're asking for it. Now that they have a new version, well I might install it again. Up to now, it was just chock full of security holes.
My browser sits on top of a machine with 16 GB of memory, runs Linux and it's still slow because some sites are loading up an incredible amount of crap. Forget about clicking on the click bait anymore. Click on that sucker and it grinds to a halt it can't pull the ads in fast enough. Sometimes I think just from my one click, someone out there just made $500. I know, probably the Russians.