Already have bluetooth headphones eliminating the need for the jack entirely.
A jack for audio. How quaint. How behind Intel and Apple are. At least two years with the watch, looks like about 5 years with this. Anyone want apple stuff anymore?
Methane is barely mentioned because it's not something they can tax people on. Doesn't fit into their get rich scheme. If they couldn't make money on CO2 emissions, they wouldn't care about it either. This isn't that hard to understand. If they could make it so nobody can get rich over carbon credits and such, I think a lot more people would be listening.
Please show me where methane is much less of an effect than CO2. Everything I've read shows me it is MUCH worse. Much much worse. CO2 is in parts per million, methane is in parts per billion. It's a major contributor to warming.
It really sucks when I get the same stupid add over and over again. Do I need to see the "move freight by rail" advertisement about 50 times? I'll probably never move anything that could use rail in my life. At least that I have a choice with. Then there was the one on patent reform. As if I could do something about it. Bunch of other stupid ads. Want to watch something, you're going to see that ad... AGAIN! Feel like I should get to punch someone.
A guy from another country saying a US company sucks. They're behind. They lack vision. I expected him to say - Now look at my stuff. Aren't we great!
However I think we all realize that their stock is way overpriced. Their watch does suck. It was about two years after the Android watch and it's not as good.
Of course Apple has a lot to be proud of. After all compared to the Windows phone that is in free fall, they're great. Compared the the Windows tablet they're great. They'll be great for some time to come. Especially if they get a new visionary in. They probably already have that guy working for them. They just don't know it.
I wish they would pull over texting drivers and then punch them in the face.
there is NO REASON.... to text while driving. NONE... and if you do it you deserve a punch in the face for risking others with your selfish behavior.
Sounds great. Also, talking on the phone when they should be driving the car. Good example at Home Depot. Man that U woman was jabbing away snarling traffic. I said - Drive the car. She said - HUH? I said put down the phone and drive the car before you hit someone or somthing. She said fuck you. Then she hit a police car and the cop was right there. Now I could have saved a lot of trouble if I could have simply (sucker) punched her in the face. Would have been the highlight of my day.
Seriously? Do yourself a really big favor and get into cloud. I'm a 50 year old. I found I was rapidly being rendered obsolete and I'm a guy that thrived in C/C++/Perl/etc. I bought myself a DL380 G5 32G and loaded it up with 300G $30 sas drives, they're dirt cheap on ebay, loaded cloud stuff and dug in. Don't get married to any particular cloud tech. Try esxi, then openstack if you dare. If you can get openstack with ironic working, you still have your talent. If not, you're rusty and not the guy you think you are. Happens to all of us sooner or later. Either get up on the new stuff or they may find you're not useful anymore. Believe me, it's a real bitch to get hired again at 60+ years old. I've seen it over and over again in my career.
Yes, because Greece knows all about finance. They're the last people to listen to on this.
As for his argument, it has to be crap. Just talk to black leaders in American and welfare. No, not Sharpton ass hole, a real leader that knows something about the black community. They often tell you how the Republican welfare to work program really worked. I work with some people that benefited from that program. How Democrats keep them slaves to the government. No hope, no way out if they can help it.
Give people money, they'll be like cats. They'll be there like clockwork to collect that check. It's stupidity from a country full of stupid leaders.
I understand what you're saying. Think about it. Is his platform more like a Dem or a Rep platform? Are his ideas more conservative or crazy leftist?
He's not whacko like Obama and a lot of the Dems are, he's more like what the Dems used to be. Before they became crazy lefty.
Republicans are voting for him because he's not the status quo. He's for getting rid of the PC shit. He's for becoming real people again. This would have happened if he ran as a Dem. In fact, there would be no Hilary or Bernie by now. He would have crushed them. Then he'd be up against one of Reps that would lose to him. Matter of fact, it probably would have been a Reagan like win in 1984 where we all asked - was Mondale even running?
It'll be interesting to see how this shakes out. I don't think Hilary will make it though. Her bad health will catch up with her sooner or later. Multiple strokes so far during this campaign and she's showing signs of Alzheimers. She could also get indicted for the serious government breaches she is responsible for.
Trump isn't a Republican. He's running as one because he felt that was his best bet, however he's not a Republican. Just look at what he was saying in the 1980s. Who he has contributed to. What he has done. He's a Dem.
No. People think that when they look at their side. They were just as critical of Bush. In fact I don't think they've been as hard on Obama. Nobody has.
No question, hand write. Not using cursive though. You need to use Gregg shorthand. I can also splat an illustration if I need to.
Great thing is paper is well paper. Notes I wrote 20 years ago I still have, can still read them, no problem. Tablet, well stuff seems to be good for about 3 years tops. Then I can't either find it or it's simply gone. Paper I can throw in the drawer. I can then come back and by inspection I know about when I wrote it. Paper ages to show the age.
If shooting them down is illegal then running them down with a 747 has to be illegal too.
That's only in the crazy USA. Where people that have absolutely no experience as a pilot or even aviation get to make up rules. It is the stereotypical Federal agency. Paperwork!
Of course the person that owns the drone should be held accountable for their actions. We should be able to shoot it down on our property. I think I even have a box of "drone shot" left. http://www.washingtontimes.com...
So you look at their page where they show that simple demonstrations aren't truly scientific and ignore the page where they present scientifically sound experiments? Really?
Did you see where I mentioned there was one that was close to a scientific method? Maybe that is what you had in mind? Which one did you have in mind?
I expected mighty martian to respond. I guess I didn't read him right, that's too bad.
Thank you so much for taking the time to respond. I'd like to assure you, I'm not lazy. Clearly you don't know me and that's fine. Look at my comments for about the past 10 years or so. You'll find all kinds of discussions.
Do yourself a favor, hit the link you sent to me and look at the results. You didn't look, did you? This one has a rundown of a bunch of them: http://climatechangeeducation.... . They even show why the mythbusters demo wasn't done correctly.
I drilled through the first three pages I think. There was one that was close to a scientific method. Even that one still misses the point of the link above. You don't use the right light, don't expect to get results you can use. I did find one very interesting article done at the Lawrence Berkeley lab, here: http://principia-scientific.or... . They used the correct light and the study was done in the pre-BS era - 1990. If they did it again today I bet they would hook or crook make it work. Their job depends on it now. Always willing to look at their experiment and data, however. Science is about the truth after all.
Once again, let's see something using the scientific method that shows us that this is real. We're betting a great deal of money on it after all. Possibly our lives. Let's get it right. If a politician like Al Gore is trying to convince you that he's trying to save the world, have enough sense to question it.
Hi. I heard there is intelligent life in/. Now I found it. I thought it was a myth. Thanks for the response and the time you took to write it. I mean it. If you were here, I'd offer you a beer. I know about Venus, it rains lead. I think the Russians sent a probe there. It was crushed. That's where we're headed by the way. No matter what we do, we will become Venus eventually.
I wanted to link to the actual 2013 report, however they took it down. No surprise there, they took a beating and had to do a lot of explain'. However there is a BBC story about it here - http://www.bbc.com/news/scienc... . What was indefensible was where they admit there was a pause, yet they were even more sure it was happening than before. That's a very strong indicator there's an agenda, facts be damned. That's basic statistics.. well let's call it what it is - fraud. I'm sure the IPCC has access to real statisticians and they should know the confidence must go down in that situation. Again, unless there's an agenda. Reminds me of a student that knows the outcome of an experiment and fudges numbers to get the correct result. Never mind his actual numbers. Yes, I can tell.
Jail bit - I guess you're not watching the news lately. I see the idea popping up here and there. Not just in the US, other countries like Germany. http://www.washingtontimes.com... http://worldnewsdailyreport.co... well you get the idea, just google "jail global warming deniers" Of course simply questioning if CO2 is the cause wouldn't help you. They don't want any descent or discussion.
Now for the discussion. Things were warmer, very recently in geological time. We had settlements in Greenland, that are coming back into view due to the snow melting. They date to around 1500s (http://archive.archaeology.org/online/features/greenland/). Before our little ice age. If you look into Venice, you'll find that they were trying to keep out the Adriatic in the 14th century. So let's not be so quick to blame man, it was happening without him. What really gets me is when there is a period that they can't explain, they'll go to whatever they can to try to explain it. If we get an odd hurricane like Katrina or just about anything else happens (too cold, too hot, nothing happened, hurricane, etc) - it's MMGW. No, it's weather. Recently if you look at Mr. Hansen from Goddard Space Flight Center, he said in 2000 that the 1990s was the hottest decade in the 20th century. Then he had to admit it was really the 1930s. He blamed it on a y2k bug - yea, right. IMHO, it was a lie and he got caught.
So how do you explain these things? The 1930s being hotter than every other decade since up to 2000? How do you explain clear indications that prior to the 1600s it was warmer, much warmer? How do you explain with record levels of CO2, it's not a lot warmer to coincide with their predictions from the 2000 time period? You know the scientific method, I think. You come up with a hypothesis and then if something doesn't work out, you're wrong. They've been doing this for years, and there is still no indication they have it right yet. I'm starting to see where they're finally admitting other gases have a role in this. Before, nope - it's only CO2. Again, a clear indication of an agenda.
Having said that, I don't disagree that it's getting warmer. Maybe we can do something about it. Let's find what is really causing it to warm up and go from there. CO2 seems to be a good scape goat. Everyone produces it, let's tax it. As if that'll do anything more than make a few people very rich. It would go a long way towards their credibility if nobody could make money from the carbon tax. It must be spent on fixing it, not making Mr. Gore well beyond rich. It
Bill is clearly a way better speaker than Al Gore is. You know, the guy that created the Internet. Hey, I have to take that barb. Too easy. Down to brass tacks. Yes things are warming up. We see that in earths history as well. What we see is things warm up and then we see an increase in CO2, not the other way around. So to say CO2 causes GW - not so fast. Let's see proof. So far there is no scientific method proof of it. There is plenty of proof it isn't based on the increased CO2 levels and that 15 year period where we didn't warm up. You know, the one that the IPCC says they have no idea how it happened. The one that showed their models don't work, and disproves their theory. You only need one counter example to disprove a hypothesis. We have about 15 years of experimentation to show it's wrong.
Now they want to jail anyone that disagrees with them. They can't have people thinking for themselves. Should be a big sign to everyone that they know they're wrong.
BTW, don't look at the deforestation of the Amazon, and many other things that probably really are heating things up. Can't tax those things so they don't care.
Oh and if you have proof that CO2 traps, warms things, I'll take just about anything that shows it somehow is warming things up - please let me know. I mean actual scientific method type proof. You know, something real.
Most of the critics aren't even real critics; in that they're not attacking any climatological theory, but rather partaking in various forms of fallacious argument, in many cases, like pseudo-scientific purveyors before, simply repeating discredited claims over and over and over again.
Here's the facts. CO2 absorbs and the emits certain frequencies of solar radiation. In other words, CO2 traps energy.
Great. Show me this proof. We have the scientific method and they built models based on it, that don't work. We've been at this for over 20 years now. Recently they're admitting it's more than just CO2, it's also water and methane, deforestation in the amazon, and probably other stuff. No kidding. They can't tax that though. We had a pause for about 15 years and the IPCC said they don't know why, we clearly have way more CO2 than we did 15 years ago. No idea why - there's a clue. Yet they're even more sure they're right than before. Even though science is telling them no. Now they want to put people in prison. There's a very big clue they're wrong right there. If they're on shaky ground, put those who disagree in jail. We can't have people thinking for themselves after all.
Let me sit back and see you try to come up with proof that CO2 traps energy. You're on hot shot. I'll get some popcorn. Either come up with proof or admit you're wrong.
It's not Man Made GW. Things have been warming up for about 10,000 years. Even recently, Venice in the 1300s were trying to keep the Adriatic out. We're discovering villages in Greenland that were under the ice - when the ice came in about 600 years ago. We're really going back to more where we should have been.
http://archive.archaeology.org... Lots of more examples, however if you're not open to facts it won't matter anyhow I've found. Nothing seems to.
Ever take a look at the globe? A real look? The US is green, if you look at a real picture it's the most green in the world. The US actually did conservation. Most of the rest of it looks like desert. So they came out with PC pictures. Show South America, Asia, Africa much greener than they really are They lie to us even there.
Seems like so much of what we get in "news" is really a lie. Doesn't matter which source.
It's really a shame, what man has done. How man won't listen. Collectively humans seem to act about like a 7 year old.
No, guys like Algore think CO2 is a gravy train and they know it's a symptom and not the cause. CO2 ALWAYS follows warming, and they know that too. The real causes are things like destroying the Amazon rain forest, forest in Africa, asia... and on the subject of Asia... well let me stop there. Way too many proven causes to get into here. Can't tackle the real causes, we'd have to go to these places and kick their ass. So let's pretend it's CO2 and make a bunch of money off of it. When/if they ever figure it out, they'll just say oh well and keep the money.
Guy needs to be a life member in the Error Checking is for Chumps club. I've seen very close, a chown/chmod -R/$path/*. Well $path wasn't defined. The guy called it through sudo. I had a record. No more sudo for him. Could still login as root, took an hour or so to fix.
Newton, I remember that. I remember right after the demo he sat down after saying it was a replacement for paper and started to write notes on paper. He didn't even know what he had. No idea how to use it properly. It was a great product. Good days. Good days.
I own a bunch of their products. This one was not ahead of its time. It's way behind, like 2 years behind when it was introduced. Even then, it sucked side of the Android watch. That's why it's not going anywhere, and their sales people aren't helping. Even the Woz has criticized them, sharply. They've lost their way.
If he's that stupid to make a statement like that, he should be replaced. He's clearly not qualified for the position. No matter who gets the job, that should be clear.
Wasn't there a movie about that in the 1980s where guys dressed up in drag for female jobs? Dustin Hoffman I think? Hey, if you fit the part.
I was thinking the same thing when I read your first post. I'm sure that somehow this is different and males that identify as female can't do it. Always is when things aren't they way they want them.
Slashdot Mirror
Already have bluetooth headphones eliminating the need for the jack entirely.
A jack for audio. How quaint. How behind Intel and Apple are. At least two years with the watch, looks like about 5 years with this. Anyone want apple stuff anymore?
Who the hell is going to buy it. Even people with a lot of money don't like to be ripped off like that.
Unfortunately I'm sure there are stupid people out there to buy it.
Methane is barely mentioned because it's not something they can tax people on. Doesn't fit into their get rich scheme. If they couldn't make money on CO2 emissions, they wouldn't care about it either. This isn't that hard to understand. If they could make it so nobody can get rich over carbon credits and such, I think a lot more people would be listening.
Please show me where methane is much less of an effect than CO2. Everything I've read shows me it is MUCH worse. Much much worse. CO2 is in parts per million, methane is in parts per billion. It's a major contributor to warming.
It really sucks when I get the same stupid add over and over again. Do I need to see the "move freight by rail" advertisement about 50 times? I'll probably never move anything that could use rail in my life. At least that I have a choice with. Then there was the one on patent reform. As if I could do something about it. Bunch of other stupid ads. Want to watch something, you're going to see that ad... AGAIN! Feel like I should get to punch someone.
A guy from another country saying a US company sucks. They're behind. They lack vision.
I expected him to say - Now look at my stuff. Aren't we great!
However I think we all realize that their stock is way overpriced. Their watch does suck. It was about two years after the Android watch and it's not as good.
Of course Apple has a lot to be proud of. After all compared to the Windows phone that is in free fall, they're great. Compared the the Windows tablet they're great. They'll be great for some time to come. Especially if they get a new visionary in. They probably already have that guy working for them. They just don't know it.
I wish they would pull over texting drivers and then punch them in the face.
there is NO REASON.... to text while driving. NONE... and if you do it you deserve a punch in the face for risking others with your selfish behavior.
Sounds great. Also, talking on the phone when they should be driving the car. Good example at Home Depot. Man that U woman was jabbing away snarling traffic. I said - Drive the car. She said - HUH? I said put down the phone and drive the car before you hit someone or somthing. She said fuck you. Then she hit a police car and the cop was right there. Now I could have saved a lot of trouble if I could have simply (sucker) punched her in the face. Would have been the highlight of my day.
Seriously? Do yourself a really big favor and get into cloud. I'm a 50 year old. I found I was rapidly being rendered obsolete and I'm a guy that thrived in C/C++/Perl/etc. I bought myself a DL380 G5 32G and loaded it up with 300G $30 sas drives, they're dirt cheap on ebay, loaded cloud stuff and dug in. Don't get married to any particular cloud tech. Try esxi, then openstack if you dare. If you can get openstack with ironic working, you still have your talent. If not, you're rusty and not the guy you think you are. Happens to all of us sooner or later. Either get up on the new stuff or they may find you're not useful anymore. Believe me, it's a real bitch to get hired again at 60+ years old. I've seen it over and over again in my career.
Good luck!
Yes, because Greece knows all about finance. They're the last people to listen to on this.
As for his argument, it has to be crap. Just talk to black leaders in American and welfare. No, not Sharpton ass hole, a real leader that knows something about the black community. They often tell you how the Republican welfare to work program really worked. I work with some people that benefited from that program. How Democrats keep them slaves to the government. No hope, no way out if they can help it.
Give people money, they'll be like cats. They'll be there like clockwork to collect that check. It's stupidity from a country full of stupid leaders.
I understand what you're saying. Think about it. Is his platform more like a Dem or a Rep platform? Are his ideas more conservative or crazy leftist?
He's not whacko like Obama and a lot of the Dems are, he's more like what the Dems used to be. Before they became crazy lefty.
Republicans are voting for him because he's not the status quo. He's for getting rid of the PC shit. He's for becoming real people again. This would have happened if he ran as a Dem. In fact, there would be no Hilary or Bernie by now. He would have crushed them. Then he'd be up against one of Reps that would lose to him. Matter of fact, it probably would have been a Reagan like win in 1984 where we all asked - was Mondale even running?
It'll be interesting to see how this shakes out. I don't think Hilary will make it though. Her bad health will catch up with her sooner or later. Multiple strokes so far during this campaign and she's showing signs of Alzheimers. She could also get indicted for the serious government breaches she is responsible for.
3 ring circus.
Trump isn't a Republican. He's running as one because he felt that was his best bet, however he's not a Republican. Just look at what he was saying in the 1980s. Who he has contributed to. What he has done. He's a Dem.
No. People think that when they look at their side. They were just as critical of Bush. In fact I don't think they've been as hard on Obama. Nobody has.
We'd all be better off if we got rid of 'em all.
No question, hand write. Not using cursive though. You need to use Gregg shorthand.
I can also splat an illustration if I need to.
Great thing is paper is well paper. Notes I wrote 20 years ago I still have, can still read them, no problem. Tablet, well stuff seems to be good for about 3 years tops. Then I can't either find it or it's simply gone. Paper I can throw in the drawer. I can then come back and by inspection I know about when I wrote it. Paper ages to show the age.
If shooting them down is illegal then running them down with a 747 has to be illegal too.
That's only in the crazy USA. Where people that have absolutely no experience as a pilot or even aviation get to make up rules.
It is the stereotypical Federal agency. Paperwork!
Of course the person that owns the drone should be held accountable for their actions. We should be able to shoot it down on our property. I think I even have a box of "drone shot" left.
http://www.washingtontimes.com...
So you look at their page where they show that simple demonstrations aren't truly scientific and ignore the page where they present scientifically sound experiments? Really?
Did you see where I mentioned there was one that was close to a scientific method? Maybe that is what you had in mind? Which one did you have in mind?
I expected mighty martian to respond. I guess I didn't read him right, that's too bad.
Thank you so much for taking the time to respond. I'd like to assure you, I'm not lazy. Clearly you don't know me and that's fine. Look at my comments for about the past 10 years or so. You'll find all kinds of discussions.
Do yourself a favor, hit the link you sent to me and look at the results. You didn't look, did you? This one has a rundown of a bunch of them:
http://climatechangeeducation.... . They even show why the mythbusters demo wasn't done correctly.
I drilled through the first three pages I think. There was one that was close to a scientific method. Even that one still misses the point of the link above. You don't use the right light, don't expect to get results you can use. I did find one very interesting article done at the Lawrence Berkeley lab, here:
http://principia-scientific.or... . They used the correct light and the study was done in the pre-BS era - 1990. If they did it again today I bet they would hook or crook make it work. Their job depends on it now. Always willing to look at their experiment and data, however. Science is about the truth after all.
Once again, let's see something using the scientific method that shows us that this is real. We're betting a great deal of money on it after all. Possibly our lives. Let's get it right. If a politician like Al Gore is trying to convince you that he's trying to save the world, have enough sense to question it.
I know a few guys that have to have the very latest phone they make the day it comes out. Their old phone is already sold to someone else.
OTOH, My watch is over a decade old. My backup watch was made in the 1930s. Still works.
Hi. I heard there is intelligent life in /. Now I found it. I thought it was a myth.
Thanks for the response and the time you took to write it. I mean it. If you were here, I'd offer you a beer.
I know about Venus, it rains lead. I think the Russians sent a probe there. It was crushed. That's where we're headed by the way. No matter what we do, we will become Venus eventually.
I wanted to link to the actual 2013 report, however they took it down. No surprise there, they took a beating and had to do a lot of explain'. However there is a BBC story about it here - http://www.bbc.com/news/scienc... . What was indefensible was where they admit there was a pause, yet they were even more sure it was happening than before. That's a very strong indicator there's an agenda, facts be damned. That's basic statistics.. well let's call it what it is - fraud. I'm sure the IPCC has access to real statisticians and they should know the confidence must go down in that situation. Again, unless there's an agenda. Reminds me of a student that knows the outcome of an experiment and fudges numbers to get the correct result. Never mind his actual numbers. Yes, I can tell.
Jail bit - I guess you're not watching the news lately. I see the idea popping up here and there. Not just in the US, other countries like Germany.
http://www.washingtontimes.com...
http://worldnewsdailyreport.co...
well you get the idea, just google "jail global warming deniers" Of course simply questioning if CO2 is the cause wouldn't help you. They don't want any descent or discussion.
Now for the discussion. Things were warmer, very recently in geological time. We had settlements in Greenland, that are coming back into view due to the snow melting. They date to around 1500s (http://archive.archaeology.org/online/features/greenland/). Before our little ice age. If you look into Venice, you'll find that they were trying to keep out the Adriatic in the 14th century. So let's not be so quick to blame man, it was happening without him. What really gets me is when there is a period that they can't explain, they'll go to whatever they can to try to explain it. If we get an odd hurricane like Katrina or just about anything else happens (too cold, too hot, nothing happened, hurricane, etc) - it's MMGW. No, it's weather. Recently if you look at Mr. Hansen from Goddard Space Flight Center, he said in 2000 that the 1990s was the hottest decade in the 20th century. Then he had to admit it was really the 1930s. He blamed it on a y2k bug - yea, right. IMHO, it was a lie and he got caught.
So how do you explain these things? The 1930s being hotter than every other decade since up to 2000? How do you explain clear indications that prior to the 1600s it was warmer, much warmer? How do you explain with record levels of CO2, it's not a lot warmer to coincide with their predictions from the 2000 time period? You know the scientific method, I think. You come up with a hypothesis and then if something doesn't work out, you're wrong. They've been doing this for years, and there is still no indication they have it right yet. I'm starting to see where they're finally admitting other gases have a role in this. Before, nope - it's only CO2. Again, a clear indication of an agenda.
Having said that, I don't disagree that it's getting warmer. Maybe we can do something about it. Let's find what is really causing it to warm up and go from there. CO2 seems to be a good scape goat. Everyone produces it, let's tax it. As if that'll do anything more than make a few people very rich. It would go a long way towards their credibility if nobody could make money from the carbon tax. It must be spent on fixing it, not making Mr. Gore well beyond rich. It
Bill is clearly a way better speaker than Al Gore is. You know, the guy that created the Internet. Hey, I have to take that barb. Too easy.
Down to brass tacks. Yes things are warming up. We see that in earths history as well. What we see is things warm up and then we see an increase in CO2, not the other way around. So to say CO2 causes GW - not so fast. Let's see proof. So far there is no scientific method proof of it. There is plenty of proof it isn't based on the increased CO2 levels and that 15 year period where we didn't warm up. You know, the one that the IPCC says they have no idea how it happened. The one that showed their models don't work, and disproves their theory. You only need one counter example to disprove a hypothesis. We have about 15 years of experimentation to show it's wrong.
Now they want to jail anyone that disagrees with them. They can't have people thinking for themselves. Should be a big sign to everyone that they know they're wrong.
BTW, don't look at the deforestation of the Amazon, and many other things that probably really are heating things up. Can't tax those things so they don't care.
Oh and if you have proof that CO2 traps, warms things, I'll take just about anything that shows it somehow is warming things up - please let me know. I mean actual scientific method type proof. You know, something real.
Most of the critics aren't even real critics; in that they're not attacking any climatological theory, but rather partaking in various forms of fallacious argument, in many cases, like pseudo-scientific purveyors before, simply repeating discredited claims over and over and over again.
Here's the facts. CO2 absorbs and the emits certain frequencies of solar radiation. In other words, CO2 traps energy.
Great. Show me this proof. We have the scientific method and they built models based on it, that don't work. We've been at this for over 20 years now. Recently they're admitting it's more than just CO2, it's also water and methane, deforestation in the amazon, and probably other stuff. No kidding. They can't tax that though. We had a pause for about 15 years and the IPCC said they don't know why, we clearly have way more CO2 than we did 15 years ago. No idea why - there's a clue. Yet they're even more sure they're right than before. Even though science is telling them no. Now they want to put people in prison. There's a very big clue they're wrong right there. If they're on shaky ground, put those who disagree in jail. We can't have people thinking for themselves after all.
Let me sit back and see you try to come up with proof that CO2 traps energy. You're on hot shot. I'll get some popcorn. Either come up with proof or admit you're wrong.
It's not Man Made GW. Things have been warming up for about 10,000 years. Even recently, Venice in the 1300s were trying to keep the Adriatic out. We're discovering villages in Greenland that were under the ice - when the ice came in about 600 years ago. We're really going back to more where we should have been.
http://archive.archaeology.org...
Lots of more examples, however if you're not open to facts it won't matter anyhow I've found. Nothing seems to.
Ever take a look at the globe? A real look? The US is green, if you look at a real picture it's the most green in the world. The US actually did conservation. Most of the rest of it looks like desert. So they came out with PC pictures. Show South America, Asia, Africa much greener than they really are They lie to us even there.
Seems like so much of what we get in "news" is really a lie. Doesn't matter which source.
It's really a shame, what man has done. How man won't listen. Collectively humans seem to act about like a 7 year old.
No, guys like Algore think CO2 is a gravy train and they know it's a symptom and not the cause. CO2 ALWAYS follows warming, and they know that too.
The real causes are things like destroying the Amazon rain forest, forest in Africa, asia... and on the subject of Asia... well let me stop there. Way too many proven causes to get into here.
Can't tackle the real causes, we'd have to go to these places and kick their ass. So let's pretend it's CO2 and make a bunch of money off of it. When/if they ever figure it out, they'll just say oh well and keep the money.
Guy needs to be a life member in the Error Checking is for Chumps club. /$path/*. Well $path wasn't defined. The guy called it through sudo. I had a record. No more sudo for him. Could still login as root, took an hour or so to fix.
I've seen very close, a chown/chmod -R
Newton, I remember that. I remember right after the demo he sat down after saying it was a replacement for paper and started to write notes on paper. He didn't even know what he had. No idea how to use it properly. It was a great product. Good days. Good days.
I own a bunch of their products. This one was not ahead of its time. It's way behind, like 2 years behind when it was introduced. Even then, it sucked side of the Android watch. That's why it's not going anywhere, and their sales people aren't helping. Even the Woz has criticized them, sharply. They've lost their way.
If he's that stupid to make a statement like that, he should be replaced. He's clearly not qualified for the position. No matter who gets the job, that should be clear.
Wasn't there a movie about that in the 1980s where guys dressed up in drag for female jobs? Dustin Hoffman I think?
Hey, if you fit the part.
I was thinking the same thing when I read your first post. I'm sure that somehow this is different and males that identify as female can't do it. Always is when things aren't they way they want them.