The control system is a bit more complicated than just charging - it also needs to disconnect from the grid when the grid power goes off and switch to battery power. Typically costs several thousand just for the hardware.
I tend to get my news from a variety of sources so it's not hard to check multiple sources. If you think the journalists at WaPo are anything like the people that collect the crap Breitbart puts out, then you're not very discerning in your news sources.
One of the big drawbacks to going completely off grid is the control systems are very expensive compared to the panels. If it's a choice between doubling the capacity or having a battery backup, well, one has a monetary payback...
Institutional and corporate sources make up more combined (not quite majority), but they only make up more when combined.
What inaccuracies have you seen in the WaPo? Have you compared them to other sources like Breitbart which have knowingly posted fake news stories (and aren't a fan of retractions)?
I use the app "Truecaller" which does a pretty good job identifying spammers. Unfortunately, a lot of robot callers are just taking the number they're calling and picking 4 random digits to spoof the source which makes them all fairly useless. Fortunately, I don't know anyone that would call from a number like that so I can assume they're all spam
However, I believe that the rule of law is more important, so the proper sequence of events is enforce the laws on the books as they stand now so that the executive branch gets to what its like to actually do their jobs
I saw a lot of people speeding on the highway - maybe we should spend $20b to solve that problem because the rule of law is important.
Putting the government solely in charge of health care is probably the worst thing you can do. If you want to see health care get cheaper, allow for more profits which provides natural incentive for people to find better solutions so they can make more money. Get rid of government restrictions that establish protectionist markets for drug companies and prevent people from getting cheaper alternatives. If you want a single payer solution for basic healthcare, I'm fine with that, but healthcare is not something that government is obligated to dole out in infinite amounts to anyone who wants it.
Interesting theory - can you point to somewhere that has better health coverage than the US at a lower price that does this?
Well first of all, the communist manifesto was listed on his favorite books among others such as Animal Farm and Mein Kampf (source), and his videos he posted talked about using the gold standard and anti-government statements. (source). Yes he was nuts, but I think the shooting people is more indicative than this claim.
Because it was totally the free education, free healthcare, massive public works projects, and nationalized entire industries that people complain about when they complain about the Nazis, not the mass-murder, facism, and persecution of minorities.
No, he said "nothing you can do folks, although the 2nd amendment people maybe there is, I don't know" in regards to picking judges if Hillary wins. You give him a lot more credit than he deserves.
I'll take a stab at this since they're easy questions:
calling them Saddam lovers. Establishment types were dumbfuckers back then, too.
No, no one called them that, that was a completely different situation where the US was stepping into a military conflict, not a foreign dictator being viewed negatively for interfering with our politics.
While on the subject of dumbfuckery, got any evidence yet of a Russian invasion that wasn't collected from a Ukrainian neo-nazi Facebook page or twitter feed? It's been years now and not a single U.S. satellite photo or drone footage to be had of Russian forces moving across the border.
It will be more interesting when the amount of evidence against Putin exceeds the amount of evidence that Obama's mom knew 45 years in advance that her son could be president, and got him a fake birth certificate with a fake birth announcement in an Hawaiian newspaper.
So Putin, the guy who got over 99% of the vote in Chechnya was fairly elected? That's not even going into the other reports available...
It's pretty clear who's side you're on and no amount of evidence would sway you since you just called ALL our intelligence agencies "professional liars and propagandists" and I'm sure you'd just call a mainstream investigative news report "fake news"
You sound like you're on board the Trump train, but you're really stretching this one.
Here we have a classified report (not intended for the public) that points fingers at a specific agency (the article didn't say how they learned that, but we can be pretty sure it wasn't by IP), and your only response is to try to discredit the entire government.
There's a point where being skeptical moves into denial.
But they're not really better than the US - just a private corporation rather than a government entity. Not sure what system you're referring to specifically, but Australia is working to restructure their ATC infrastructure.
Slashdot Mirror
The control system is a bit more complicated than just charging - it also needs to disconnect from the grid when the grid power goes off and switch to battery power. Typically costs several thousand just for the hardware.
I tend to get my news from a variety of sources so it's not hard to check multiple sources. If you think the journalists at WaPo are anything like the people that collect the crap Breitbart puts out, then you're not very discerning in your news sources.
One of the big drawbacks to going completely off grid is the control systems are very expensive compared to the panels. If it's a choice between doubling the capacity or having a battery backup, well, one has a monetary payback...
Institutional and corporate sources make up more combined (not quite majority), but they only make up more when combined.
What inaccuracies have you seen in the WaPo? Have you compared them to other sources like Breitbart which have knowingly posted fake news stories (and aren't a fan of retractions)?
Wow so your evidence is that it's still in business and the CEO has "expectations"? Do you approve of NPR because it's funded by listeners?
Looks like a news site covering news. Do you have evidence that Bezos influences what stories get written?
[citation needed]
I use the app "Truecaller" which does a pretty good job identifying spammers. Unfortunately, a lot of robot callers are just taking the number they're calling and picking 4 random digits to spoof the source which makes them all fairly useless. Fortunately, I don't know anyone that would call from a number like that so I can assume they're all spam
However, I believe that the rule of law is more important, so the proper sequence of events is enforce the laws on the books as they stand now so that the executive branch gets to what its like to actually do their jobs
I saw a lot of people speeding on the highway - maybe we should spend $20b to solve that problem because the rule of law is important.
Putting the government solely in charge of health care is probably the worst thing you can do. If you want to see health care get cheaper, allow for more profits which provides natural incentive for people to find better solutions so they can make more money. Get rid of government restrictions that establish protectionist markets for drug companies and prevent people from getting cheaper alternatives. If you want a single payer solution for basic healthcare, I'm fine with that, but healthcare is not something that government is obligated to dole out in infinite amounts to anyone who wants it.
Interesting theory - can you point to somewhere that has better health coverage than the US at a lower price that does this?
See if you can update it yourself: https://www.lineageos.org/
But that's irrelevant since he had plenty of right wing policies which were destructive compared to the left wing ones that helped the country.
Well first of all, the communist manifesto was listed on his favorite books among others such as Animal Farm and Mein Kampf (source), and his videos he posted talked about using the gold standard and anti-government statements. (source). Yes he was nuts, but I think the shooting people is more indicative than this claim.
Suck it, moron.
Because it was totally the free education, free healthcare, massive public works projects, and nationalized entire industries that people complain about when they complain about the Nazis, not the mass-murder, facism, and persecution of minorities.
Well a mass murderer with a knife is a lot less scary than one with a gun. Worst case you can run away across the baseball field.
shootings like Senator Gabby Giffords came from a leftist.
Leftist as in Libertarian supporting ideas from the Tea Party, not pro-government Democrats.
There's no doubt that hate crimes by Trump supporters have gone up (just look at the Quebec mosque shootingfor a prime example).
The "hate machine" comes from both sides, but the huge majority of it comes from the right against minority groups.
No, he said "nothing you can do folks, although the 2nd amendment people maybe there is, I don't know" in regards to picking judges if Hillary wins. You give him a lot more credit than he deserves.
Jeff Bezos? Is that you?
That's like the "I'm not racist, I have friends that are black!" of the alt-right?
And at the same time the alt-right will get disgusted with themselves for meming a gay frog and then it won't be a hate symbol anymore!
... And then was actually used by alt-right in racist memes. The problem with satire is when the crazy people start to take it seriously
Do you park in a public parking spot or something? Even just a driveway could have a charging station
calling them Saddam lovers. Establishment types were dumbfuckers back then, too.
No, no one called them that, that was a completely different situation where the US was stepping into a military conflict, not a foreign dictator being viewed negatively for interfering with our politics.
While on the subject of dumbfuckery, got any evidence yet of a Russian invasion that wasn't collected from a Ukrainian neo-nazi Facebook page or twitter feed? It's been years now and not a single U.S. satellite photo or drone footage to be had of Russian forces moving across the border.
I googled this and the second result shows a comprehensive, broadly sourced list of evidence
It will be more interesting when the amount of evidence against Putin exceeds the amount of evidence that Obama's mom knew 45 years in advance that her son could be president, and got him a fake birth certificate with a fake birth announcement in an Hawaiian newspaper.
So Putin, the guy who got over 99% of the vote in Chechnya was fairly elected? That's not even going into the other reports available...
It's pretty clear who's side you're on and no amount of evidence would sway you since you just called ALL our intelligence agencies "professional liars and propagandists" and I'm sure you'd just call a mainstream investigative news report "fake news"
You sound like you're on board the Trump train, but you're really stretching this one.
Here we have a classified report (not intended for the public) that points fingers at a specific agency (the article didn't say how they learned that, but we can be pretty sure it wasn't by IP), and your only response is to try to discredit the entire government.
There's a point where being skeptical moves into denial.
But they're not really better than the US - just a private corporation rather than a government entity. Not sure what system you're referring to specifically, but Australia is working to restructure their ATC infrastructure.