Low information voters, also known as LIVs or misinformation voters, are people who may vote, but who are generally poorly informed about issues. The phrase is mainly used in the United States, and has become popular since the mid-1990s.
But given the federal government does have the power that it does, it makes sense that everyone should have the same voting power. If we were more like the EU, then it could work, but the economies of the states are so interconnected that it's an outdated concept.
You can find worse videos sampling "rural" or "low information" voters (also known as 'Trump supporters'). Makes sense since you can't have very good critical thinking skills and still believe Trump is they guy America needs
With the popular vote, everyone has exactly the same voting power. A person from California's vote is the same as a person from North Dakota's. No one is "lesser" in that case. What you prefer is for some peoples' votes to count more because they choose to live farther away from other people.
Probably because any one of the scandals surrounding him would have forced other candidates to drop out.
Remember Herman Cain had some women makes some claims about him? Trump actually admitted to sexually assaulting women in a recording!
Remember Ron Paul had some shady racist letters in his past? Trump had to settle a lawsuit because of being racist
Why wouldn't it be fair if 10 million people had their votes counted equally as 10 million other people? As it is, politicians basically spend all their time in swing states. People make a big deal about how they would go to dense population areas, but as it is, they DON'T go to those places because they already have the vote for that state in the bag.
Well that's sort of what stupid people have been doing, but it started out with stories like "Obama is a secret Muslim from Kenya" and "Hillary Clinton running pedophile ring out of pizza joint". Then people that had been spreading those sort of stories got it in their minds that anything they didn't like was "fake news". Honestly, they're not the brightest bunch.
Transparency is good, but let's see what's going on with the RNC as well. Russia clearly influenced the election by showing the dirty laundry from the side they wanted to lose and not the one they wanted to win.
I think the DNC and Hillary know this was her chance and if she couldn't win against Trump, she's never going to win. Similarly, the voters saw what happened and wouldn't vote for her in a primary. I don't think Sanders will get nominated either, but that's another story.
1) There are already readers on the side of the road monitoring everyone everywhere, how fast you're going, etc. All cars already have unique IDs on the back that can be scanned. Many cars also have transponders.
2+3) Probably, but you also "hack" cars with spike strips or plain old rocks. These things are illegal in general.
4) It should have an option to upgrade it then. Pretty simple.
Alternatively, he could just delete/The_Donald and all the people that are angry about it would leave in protest. Really would kill two birds with one stone.
Well Google isn't aiming to fix the first two issues, they're fixing the slow connection to the outside. The US embargo prevented telecom connections to the US so that seems like a pretty good candidate to blame.
Now if the article was about Google installing wifi balloons or something, then you'd have a point, but it seems like you're just trying to distort the issue to make some sort of misguided point.
Hey it doesn't say they're permanent jobs. Maybe 10,000 jobs to construct the factory plus 10,000 jobs that get created from the economy of those construction workers having jobs and then 3,000 temp workers that work for a couple months. After a couple years you've easily got "50,000 new jobs"
Because in return you get cheap consumer products and the consequences of Chinese manufacturing are far away. Manufacturing jobs aren't coming back to what they were a few decades ago. Automation means factories need to employ far fewer people. Do you really care if a factory is physically located in the US or in China if there are (relatively) no people employed at it? Let's assume the factory extorted the government to avoid paying taxes.
Slashdot Mirror
Low information voters, also known as LIVs or misinformation voters, are people who may vote, but who are generally poorly informed about issues. The phrase is mainly used in the United States, and has become popular since the mid-1990s.
Guess you're the "low information" type
But given the federal government does have the power that it does, it makes sense that everyone should have the same voting power. If we were more like the EU, then it could work, but the economies of the states are so interconnected that it's an outdated concept.
I'm not sure "the tyranny of the minority" is an improvement.
You can find worse videos sampling "rural" or "low information" voters (also known as 'Trump supporters'). Makes sense since you can't have very good critical thinking skills and still believe Trump is they guy America needs
That is democracy isn't it? Better than two wolves and three sheep deciding the wolves should get to decide.
With the popular vote, everyone has exactly the same voting power. A person from California's vote is the same as a person from North Dakota's. No one is "lesser" in that case. What you prefer is for some peoples' votes to count more because they choose to live farther away from other people.
Probably because any one of the scandals surrounding him would have forced other candidates to drop out.
Remember Herman Cain had some women makes some claims about him? Trump actually admitted to sexually assaulting women in a recording!
Remember Ron Paul had some shady racist letters in his past? Trump had to settle a lawsuit because of being racist
This list goes on...
Why wouldn't it be fair if 10 million people had their votes counted equally as 10 million other people? As it is, politicians basically spend all their time in swing states. People make a big deal about how they would go to dense population areas, but as it is, they DON'T go to those places because they already have the vote for that state in the bag.
Yeah! Californians are lesser people so their votes shouldn't count. What power does the electoral college provide again?
Has he by any chance purchased an island with an active volcano? Seems like he has all the tools for an underground lair that launches rockets.
But what if the meth head is a spy?
Well that's sort of what stupid people have been doing, but it started out with stories like "Obama is a secret Muslim from Kenya" and "Hillary Clinton running pedophile ring out of pizza joint". Then people that had been spreading those sort of stories got it in their minds that anything they didn't like was "fake news". Honestly, they're not the brightest bunch.
Transparency is good, but let's see what's going on with the RNC as well. Russia clearly influenced the election by showing the dirty laundry from the side they wanted to lose and not the one they wanted to win.
Because it isn't fake news. The white house really is supporting the claim - likely based on evidence supplied by the intelligence services.
I think the DNC and Hillary know this was her chance and if she couldn't win against Trump, she's never going to win. Similarly, the voters saw what happened and wouldn't vote for her in a primary. I don't think Sanders will get nominated either, but that's another story.
But it also means some states have WAY more say (per person) than others and the votes of millions are ignored
But older cars lose out on the safety features, gas millage, reliability, and of course the parts aren't as available.
1) There are already readers on the side of the road monitoring everyone everywhere, how fast you're going, etc. All cars already have unique IDs on the back that can be scanned. Many cars also have transponders.
2+3) Probably, but you also "hack" cars with spike strips or plain old rocks. These things are illegal in general.
4) It should have an option to upgrade it then. Pretty simple.
Alternatively, he could just delete /The_Donald and all the people that are angry about it would leave in protest. Really would kill two birds with one stone.
Not sure why you're so caught up with this (unrelated) private internet connection issue. Maybe RTFA?
Well Google isn't aiming to fix the first two issues, they're fixing the slow connection to the outside. The US embargo prevented telecom connections to the US so that seems like a pretty good candidate to blame.
Now if the article was about Google installing wifi balloons or something, then you'd have a point, but it seems like you're just trying to distort the issue to make some sort of misguided point.
The law and of course it's ethically...aw sorry couldn't finish that with a straight face.
Hey it doesn't say they're permanent jobs. Maybe 10,000 jobs to construct the factory plus 10,000 jobs that get created from the economy of those construction workers having jobs and then 3,000 temp workers that work for a couple months. After a couple years you've easily got "50,000 new jobs"
Because in return you get cheap consumer products and the consequences of Chinese manufacturing are far away. Manufacturing jobs aren't coming back to what they were a few decades ago. Automation means factories need to employ far fewer people. Do you really care if a factory is physically located in the US or in China if there are (relatively) no people employed at it? Let's assume the factory extorted the government to avoid paying taxes.
Looks like it happened a few times: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries...