Linking to hardware is annoying since you have to ask for the hardware specs of the person requesting the key. A lot of reviewers wouldn't go through that.
The idea I've seen that looks promising is to have a key be something like "DEMO-ONLY-JFQ2-NG43-KFA4" (and include the expiration like you said). That way it's clear the purpose of the key if it's sold and people won't complain that the game they bought doesn't work anymore.
What do you put the limit at then? What if someone asks for 5 keys so they can try it with their friends? What if it's just someone asking for the game for free?
99% of the people aren't playing or reviewing the game, they're just selling the key on a 3rd party site for cheaper than what the developer is selling it.
I imagine it depends a lot on your news source. If you only get your news from facebook and are friends with lots of gullible idiots, then you're gonna see a lot of fake news
What's your alternative to growing automation and inequality then?
Experiments in the past have shown that people typically stop working to raise children or continue education but will continue working since who doesn't want more money?
I noticed you ignored the reasoning behind what I said - I assume you're pro-climate change? At the very least you're ignorant of its effects.
Unless you've been living under a rock, you've probably noticed that parents often don't know well enough to provide their children with a healthy meal. You're seriously trying to say that the average parent know more about nutrition than nutritional experts? The benefit of the government is that it's made up of multiple people, so even if some of them have passions, flaws, and vices, the combination of them can be better than any of them individually. If they're making the wrong decisions, we can push our representatives to get hem to change.
Individuals cannot be trusted to do the right thing for the greater good - we've seen again and again that people will do what they want.
Additionally, there is a government body that knows what is good and harmful. It's called the FDA. The FDA has been very effective at stopping food borne illnesses and helping people have safe eating habits.
Probably their biggest benefit is not needing to manufacture all the new rocket parts. There are plenty of customers so the more rockets they launch, the more money they make, and if they can refurb old ones faster than build them from scratch, that's going to mean more money coming in.
Probably because there isn't much of a market for payloads that large. The last one was in 2015 and that was likely contracted before SpaceX even was capable.
I agree! We as a civilization should be promoting things that improve our society and discourage things that harm it (though dunno your dating problems...seems like a personal issue).
How about Chrome finally taking my word for it when I tell it I trust a particular cert even if it isn't officially signed by some entity I have never heard of.
The vast majority of users shouldn't be doing that. There are some exceptions (such as for developers), but Chrome should cater to the larger number even if it inconveniences the tiny a minority a little if it means greater security.
Meanwhile, if it's so important, why do they make it a pain in the ass for me to examine the cert used by a site? Shouldn't it be in the menu that drops down when I click on the lock icon?
Click the lock, click "Certificate" works for me
For that matter, why isn't it easy for me to tell Chrome that I do NOT trust a given cert no matter who signed it or that I don't trust a particular CA to sign off on water being wet?
Encrypting the material in transit doesn't make any less freely disseminated or the information less free. The access is suppose to be open, not snooping on other users. Maybe you're still running Lynx or something, but encryption and security are fairly well developed these days and work great!
Voice recognition models are typically trained on normal human speech so saying something word by word or shouting it is likely to reduce your chances of it working
Many chargers and cars support scheduled charging. People will just schedule their car to charge in the middle of the night when electricity is cheaper.
Slashdot Mirror
Yep, I have a Windows desktop for development and gaming, then a chromebook for web browsing on the go
You can use Chrome Remote Desktop to connect to a Windows PC.
Well it should be pretty easy to verify - we'll just look at the logs from the election down in Georgia and..huh
Linking to hardware is annoying since you have to ask for the hardware specs of the person requesting the key. A lot of reviewers wouldn't go through that.
The idea I've seen that looks promising is to have a key be something like "DEMO-ONLY-JFQ2-NG43-KFA4" (and include the expiration like you said). That way it's clear the purpose of the key if it's sold and people won't complain that the game they bought doesn't work anymore.
What do you put the limit at then? What if someone asks for 5 keys so they can try it with their friends? What if it's just someone asking for the game for free?
99% of the people aren't playing or reviewing the game, they're just selling the key on a 3rd party site for cheaper than what the developer is selling it.
They're not interested in the game, they just take the keys and put them on reselling sites for a quick buck. It just ends up in lost sales.
Automotive CO2 is a substantial part of greenhouse gas emissions. Light vehicles make up around 17% of total emissions. Switching to electric would have a huge impact
Just in case all the other backups failed, they could revert back to that one!
I imagine it depends a lot on your news source. If you only get your news from facebook and are friends with lots of gullible idiots, then you're gonna see a lot of fake news
What's your alternative to growing automation and inequality then?
Experiments in the past have shown that people typically stop working to raise children or continue education but will continue working since who doesn't want more money?
Neither proposal pays people not to work.
Guaranteed job pays people that are working
Minimum income pays people regardless if they work or not (so there's the same monetary incentive to work as now)
I noticed you ignored the reasoning behind what I said - I assume you're pro-climate change? At the very least you're ignorant of its effects.
Unless you've been living under a rock, you've probably noticed that parents often don't know well enough to provide their children with a healthy meal. You're seriously trying to say that the average parent know more about nutrition than nutritional experts? The benefit of the government is that it's made up of multiple people, so even if some of them have passions, flaws, and vices, the combination of them can be better than any of them individually. If they're making the wrong decisions, we can push our representatives to get hem to change.
Well we know that global warming has a detrimental effect on the planet.
We also know that livestock contribute around 14% of emissions that cause global warming
Reducing live stock consumption would therefore reduce climate change.
Individuals cannot be trusted to do the right thing for the greater good - we've seen again and again that people will do what they want.
Additionally, there is a government body that knows what is good and harmful. It's called the FDA. The FDA has been very effective at stopping food borne illnesses and helping people have safe eating habits.
Probably their biggest benefit is not needing to manufacture all the new rocket parts. There are plenty of customers so the more rockets they launch, the more money they make, and if they can refurb old ones faster than build them from scratch, that's going to mean more money coming in.
Probably because there isn't much of a market for payloads that large. The last one was in 2015 and that was likely contracted before SpaceX even was capable.
I agree! We as a civilization should be promoting things that improve our society and discourage things that harm it (though dunno your dating problems ...seems like a personal issue).
You'd probably want to install the certificate on the machines connecting to the LAN services
Guess it's a linux thing
How about Chrome finally taking my word for it when I tell it I trust a particular cert even if it isn't officially signed by some entity I have never heard of.
The vast majority of users shouldn't be doing that. There are some exceptions (such as for developers), but Chrome should cater to the larger number even if it inconveniences the tiny a minority a little if it means greater security.
Meanwhile, if it's so important, why do they make it a pain in the ass for me to examine the cert used by a site? Shouldn't it be in the menu that drops down when I click on the lock icon?
Click the lock, click "Certificate" works for me
For that matter, why isn't it easy for me to tell Chrome that I do NOT trust a given cert no matter who signed it or that I don't trust a particular CA to sign off on water being wet?
Not a highly requested feature
Encrypting the material in transit doesn't make any less freely disseminated or the information less free. The access is suppose to be open, not snooping on other users. Maybe you're still running Lynx or something, but encryption and security are fairly well developed these days and work great!
Well if it's the type of site that doesn't need to be encrypted for some reason then it's probably not a big issue that it says it's not secure.
Voice recognition models are typically trained on normal human speech so saying something word by word or shouting it is likely to reduce your chances of it working
You mean the incentives that we provide to encourage clean energy? Maybe we should look at the "handouts" that we're giving dirty energy sources
Many chargers and cars support scheduled charging. People will just schedule their car to charge in the middle of the night when electricity is cheaper.
Paper is one of the more profitable to recycle- at least if it's separated.