Slashdot Mirror


Moving To a Chromebook (avc.com)

VC Fred Wilson writes: I've been thinking about moving from a Mac to a Chromebook as my primary computing device. I have not used desktop software for probably a decade now. The browser is how I do all of my desktop computing. Paying up for a full blown computer when all I need is a browser seems like a waste. And there are some security things that appeal to me about a Chromebook. I like the ability to do two factor authentication on signing into the device, for example. I am curious what advice those of you who use Chromebooks have for me. In the comments section, Kevin C Tofel, a long time journalist and an ex-Googler writes: I'm all on in Chromebooks, currently using a Pixelbook. Base model is fine for my needs, which sound very similar. I am taking some CompSci classes but even from a programming standpoint, the addition of Linux running in containers -- available in Dev and Beta channels now, coming to Stable v. 69 in the coming weeks -- fills that need easily and securely. I don't do a bunch of video editing but I can do audio edits in Audacity for Linux once audio support arrives for Linux on Chrome OS.

I actually use Google for my password management. It's built in to Chrome / Chrome OS and syncs to all devices. Plus, you can always log in and look up passwords at passwords.google.com. Sure if Google is hacked, someone has my passwords, but same can be said for any cloud-based password manager or (if you run 1Password, etc... locally) if someone gains access to your device. I use Google's 2FA to log in to my Google account and even to log in to my Pixelbook - can be done with an authenticator app, SMS or -- my preferred method -- a Yubikey. I'l be buying a Google Titan Security key to replace my Yubikey once they go on sale.

235 comments

  1. "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The summary begins with the words 'well respected' but the river of garbage immediately below leads me to believe that they're only respected by Google's sales department, and that's only the kind of fawning service a whale receives rather than respect.

    1. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      On Facebook's censorship of conservative views which Slashdot will not cover because it was purchased by the same big group of political interests.
       
      There are no articles on non-liberal shadowbanning here and never will be. What we are seeing right now is the largest push by the shadow governments to destroy free speech, something larger in magnitude than what happened in the USA in the '30s and '40s with pro-socialist or pro-war propaganda, and possibly larger than the Soviets' push, albeit it hasn't been quite as effective.

    2. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On Facebook's censorship of conservative views which Slashdot will not cover because it was purchased by the same big group of political interests.

      Or it's not covered because it's not interesting, not news for nerds, and not stuff that matters.

      If you don't like it you're free to take your business elsewhere.

      There are no articles on non-liberal shadowbanning here and never will be.

      No articles on pixie dust here. Sometimes we talk about unicorns though, so you got us there.

      ZIP

    3. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or maybe the underlying rank algorithms find such described content, overall, less interesting/useful. Less page views, less links, less references, less time on pages, etc. I don't think it's a search engines responsibility to intentionally change to put drivel ("infowars" comes to mind) on a pedestal.

    4. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. Stopped reading after the summary got to "I'm all on in Chromebooks...."
      I think he meant to say "I'm all in on Chromebooks...." ("all in" is an English idiom) but at this point, sorry, I haven't a clue.
      For those who say "It's just a comment" I will remind you that the poster, Kevin C Tofel, is supposed to be "a long time journalist" and should not be given that sort of slack.

    5. Re:"Well respected" by XXongo · · Score: 1

      The summary begins with the words 'well respected'

      Looks like the summary got edited, since it doesn't start with that any more.

    6. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a Nazi.

      captcha: whitest

    7. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fox News is the largest news outlet yet you are far more likely to see CNN content on Google.

      You idiots are sleepwalking into Nazism.

    8. Re:"Well respected" by fisted · · Score: 1

      Oh, that must be why it's just a river of garbage now.

    9. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying he free market is bad thing?

    10. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "metal in elections"

      "metal"

      lol

    11. Re:"Well respected" by butchersong · · Score: 0

      Don't be such a bolshevik. captcha: (((citizen)))

    12. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/study-watching-fox-news-makes-you-less-informed-than-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5

      https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/07/21/a-rigorous-scientific-look-into-the-fox-news-effect/amp/

    13. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww, poor Incel rightard, are you all triggered, awwww.

    14. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Russians installing TRUMP" - YAAFM

    15. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she'd be one of the oldes and frailest presidents ever, if elected in 2020. sh'ell be the new fdr, wheelchair president because we need a vagina in office right? just one that is too old to menstrate, right?

    16. Re:"Well respected" by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the US where we've repeatedly had a choice between two truly awful candidates.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    17. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww, poor Incel rightard, are you all triggered, awwww.

      Can you translate what you said into The Queen's English since Google Translate does not understand you?

      BTW that's UK Queen's English, as in Her Majesty's English, and not that gutter Queens English crap from NYC.....

    18. Re:"Well respected" by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the US where we've repeatedly had a choice between two truly awful candidates.

      If you think there were only two candidates, you are the problem.

    19. Re:"Well respected" by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      not news for nerds, and not stuff that matters.

      TFA is not news for nerds either. A Chromebook is fine if all you want is a browser-in-a-box. But it is inappropriate for almost anyone who wants to create anything digital.

      Also, how dense do you have to be to need 10 years to figure out that a computer at a tenth the price of a MacBook is good enough to meet all your needs?

      Disclaimer: I bought a Chromebook for my kid. When he breaks it, I am only out $149.

    20. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol fag

    21. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucker, conservative viewpoints don't deserve a pulpit

    22. Re:"Well respected" by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      Or it's not covered because it's not interesting, not news for nerds, and not stuff that matters.

      This is the shit that gets +4 insightful...?! No wonder /. is dying.
      It's interesting to people who aren't shills and/or retards.
      It's news to people who don't have their heads firmly lodged up the MSM's fake-news ASS.
      It's stuff that matters to adults.

      ZIP

      This isn't 4chan. you don't get to be anonymous and non-anonymous at the same time.

      If you don't like it you're free to take your business elsewhere.

      YES I FUCKING AM. I remember when this site was *THE* tech website. Now it's just a 1-day-late news discussion forum that only manages to continue to exist because respectable news outlets haven't figured out that people want to discuss things and not have 50 extra logins to remember.

      I'll be downvoting you on reddit (where i don't have to win a mini lottery to voice approval or disapproval), assuming I haven't already.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    23. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Chromebook is fine if all you want is a browser-in-a-box. But it is inappropriate for almost anyone who wants to create anything digital.

      Also, how dense do you have to be to need 10 years to figure out that a computer at a tenth the price of a MacBook is good enough to meet all your needs?

      With all of the hosted services including development environments and VPSs someone could conceivably find all pf their needs met by a Chromebook. If someone is writing blogs or even research papers, a Chromebook might be more than sufficient. If someone only uses web-based email and applications, the Chromebook is likely an optimal choice. There are a wide range of user personas for which the Chromebook is well-suited. Not everyone obviously. The recently announced planned obsolescence of the Chromebook Pixel is a little off putting for what should be basically a web terminal meaning until it physically stops working it should be supported because it is 99% software.

    24. Re:"Well respected" by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you think there were more than two viable candidates, you are the problem (assuming you voted for a 3rd).

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    25. Re:"Well respected" by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      And since the first thing he says is

      I have not used desktop software for probably a decade now

      which makes all that follows perfectly appropriate.

      Why gamers and content producers read "a Chromebook suits my purposes" and are still threatened enough by that to post a rant eludes me.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    26. Re:"Well respected" by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, if you think there were more than two viable candidates ...

      You refuse to vote for them because they are not viable, yet they are not viable because people like you refuse to vote for them. Ergo, you are the problem.

      It is silly to vote for what you don't want, and then complain when you get it.

    27. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't stop working. But it'll stop getting regular security updates, as that's actually a lot of work. Validating a software build for all hardware devices takes a lot of resources.

      Google is way better about regular security fixes than any of the other vendors. But even they have limits as to how many devices they can actively support at any given time

    28. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is older LUL

    29. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wanna hear news that sucks trumps dick goto Fox News. If you want to hear news that calls trump out on his bullshit, watch CNBC or cnn or something.

    30. Re: "Well respected" by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      So what has Queens ever done to you?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    31. Re: "Well respected" by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      And if you wanna hear news that isn't sellout horseshit, oops, too bad, alt news is getting kicked off the internet.....

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    32. Re: "Well respected" by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Google is way better about regular security fixes than any of the other vendors. But even they have limits as to how many devices they can actively support at any given time

      Maybe but the Chromebook Pixel is Google's own device. They wrote all the hardware specs. How hard would it be to backport their drivers to a new kernel (if that's what's necessary)? What else could possibly become obsolete? Are they really saying they see the Chrome browser becoming so bloated that the Pixel doesn't have enough RAM? Or that the CPU is so slow that it won't be able to render web pages?

      This sounds like planned obsolescence, plain and simple. Not only does it encourage current Chromebook users to get a new one ("watch out, your web terminal might be insecure!") but it effectively kills the resale market, too.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    33. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The majority of eligible voters who don't vote is also a problem. Politics doesn't even meaningfully touch the lives of these people, so they don't care which political sports star is currently winning the world cup of leadership or whatever.

    34. Re:"Well respected" by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      Donald Trump is president. If you live in Michigan, Wisconsin or Pennsylvania, you're the problem. Lesser of two evils is less evil.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    35. Re:"Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't news here because even a casual review of the "facts" shows the problem isn't real. The original reports came from people in congress who don't know how the computing machines work and the rest is from people who blatantly violate the terms of service. Apparently some are under the mistaken impression that Twitter, Facebook, et al. have a responsibility to preserve their first amendment rights to an even greater degree than the government. Twitter doesn't have to put up with hate speech any more than the DMV, it has been ruled as non-protected speech by the Supreme Court. Twitter isn't the government in the first place and has no first amendment requirements. If they can be forced to take down content (and they have been) they can take down whatever they want. If you want the government to regulate your social media, I am sure China can produce a how-to guide.

      If you want media to be "fair" mention bringing back the Fairness Doctrine and watch Fox News explode.

    36. Re:"Well respected" by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"You refuse to vote for them because they are not viable, yet they are not viable because people like you refuse to vote for them. Ergo, you are the problem. It is silly to vote for what you don't want, and then complain when you get it."

      The problem is the voting SYSTEM. It is the system that creates a two-party-only system and prevents any real change. So yes, most of us DO end up voting for what we don't want because it end up being the "lesser of two evils". We can't necessarily vote for who we want because that vote is thrown away and we end up essentially handing over power to the more of the two evils. And since it really is nearly impossible in any real election that matters to have more than a D and R count, the other parties either never produce compelling enough candidates or never form as a party to begin with... because.... what's the point?

      Third-parties of ANY type almost always do more harm than good because of the spoiler effect. And it is really sad. We deserve better. We deserve more choice and competition. The only way this will ever change is to have some type of ranked choice voting system.

      http://fairvote.org/
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      And it *is* possible to have such a change, since the handling of voting is primarily a State issue, so getting such a change pushed through is possible. It will be slow and difficult, but it has an almost 100% more likely chance to succeed than repeatedly throwing away votes on 3rd parties (at least in important elections).

    37. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I voted green because I wanted to vote for someone who supports internet freedom and a better world. If you voted Trump or Clinton but you want a free internet you did it wrong.

    38. Re: "Well respected" by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"I voted green because I wanted to vote for someone who supports internet freedom and a better world. If you voted Trump or Clinton but you want a free internet you did it wrong."

      Because of the spoiler effect of our system:

      If you voted Green, you actually voted for Trump.
      If you voted Libertarian, you actually voted for Hillary.
      If you voted Constitution, you actually voted for Hillary.

    39. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did vote for the third, micky mouse of course.

    40. Re: "Well respected" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donald Trump is president.

      No problems here!

    41. Re:"Well respected" by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Hillary Clinton was the problem.

  2. Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It never made any sense to me why you would pay for hardware just to loose your privacy. I do all my computing on my local machine. I'd gladly pay extra to control my data. Now if Google were to pay people to use the Chromebooks, that would be another thing. Then you would go into it with open eyes and as a somewhat equal business partner.

    1. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As he says in the article, there are security aspects that appeal to him. You get tired after a while of hearing about all the Microsoft and Linux vulns.

    2. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's something to be said about security through obscurity. I get tired of hearing about major company data breaches which seem to hold virtually no liabilities. Data on my laptop on the other hand hasn't been compromised pretty much ever. But thanks to the smog model, places like Equifax have leaked information even I didn't have on my laptop.

    3. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      But the guy is already on a freakin' Mac, thus he should be using macOS - why are you bringing up Windows and Linux?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Rent to lose your privacy... Remember that after 5 years it is EOL, and boot locked so you can not change it. https://www.reddit.com/r/chrom...

    5. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by infolation · · Score: 1

      It never made any sense to me why you would pay for hardware just to loose your privacy.

      If you choose the Chromebook c201, it can increase your privacy since it can run libreboot to replace the Intel ME. The firmware is protected by a physical screw so it can be software flashed. Then it can run Debian, Devuan, Parabola etc.

    6. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Data on my laptop on the other hand hasn't been compromised pretty much ever. That you know about.

      You are always one bad URL click, one malicious email, one zero day vulnerability to a compromise. Even if you are using OS X, Linux, even Open BSD.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lose

    8. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Informative

      As he says in the article, there are security aspects that appeal to him. You get tired after a while of hearing about all the Microsoft and Linux vulns.

      My kids all got Chromebooks as their first laptop for that very reason; I don't want them getting spyware and viruses, and whereas that is still possible with a chromebook, it is less likely.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    9. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      But the guy is already on a freakin' Mac, thus he should be using macOS - why are you bringing up Windows and Linux?

      There's about a $1000 difference between a good Mac and a good Chromebook laptop. He would certainly be more familiar with macOS having a Max; and a Mac could certainly do a lot more things. But $1000 is a lot of overhead if you don't need to do those extra things.

      Chromebooks are not for everyone; they can't do everything; but I suspect they do enough for 90% of the population.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    10. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      It never made any sense to me why you would pay for hardware just to loose your privacy. I do all my computing on my local machine. I'd gladly pay extra to control my data. Now if Google were to pay people to use the Chromebooks, that would be another thing. Then you would go into it with open eyes and as a somewhat equal business partner.

      Microsoft- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.
      Google- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.
      Apple- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.

      They're all doing it; pick who you trust raping your privacy the most, or acknowledge there isn't really a safe choice between those three and use some other factor to decide your laptop.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    11. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3

      I don't want them getting spyware

      So, you bought them a computer which comes with spyware preinstalled.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    12. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by claude+j+greengrass · · Score: 1

      I bit of misinformation here. The boot loader is locked if you want ChromeOS and Verified Boot. I don't know of any Chrome OS device where you can't re-flash the firmware. After that, you are free to load any OS your heart desires.

    13. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data on my laptop on the other hand hasn't been compromised pretty much ever. That you know about.

      You are always one bad URL click, one malicious email, one zero day vulnerability to a compromise. Even if you are using OS X, Linux, even Open BSD.

      You can't compromise a systemrunning a live [amnesiac] distro booting from CD [yeah, only CD], without a 'save file'.

    14. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by SisterFister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is a big difference between those three.

      Microsoft and Apple sell a lot of shit, information is not their primary source of income.
      Googles primary source of income is your information.

      They are not all doing the same thing, not even close. Try requesting the information they have collected about you from those 3, the one from Google will be substantially longer and more detailed than the other 2 combined.

    15. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      Data on my laptop on the other hand hasn't been compromised pretty much ever. That you know about.

      You are always one bad URL click, one malicious email, one zero day vulnerability to a compromise. Even if you are using OS X, Linux, even Open BSD.

      I have mod points but I can't let this comment go. This is a comment that I expect from a Twitter, Facebook user. When you have control of your operating system you can take precautions that allow you to navigate to the most hostile environments without a worry that it can compromise your data. This isn't Voodoo or magic. It's called education.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    16. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA already pwned the hardware on which you run your unhackable amnesiac live OS. Your move.

      The rest of us are busy trying to get some work done, so we'll continue using mortal OS's, making regular backups, and not worrying about every possible security threat.

    17. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its cute you think your information is somehow worth any protection

      you're a peon, a pawn, get used to it

    18. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      But the guy is already on a freakin' Mac, thus he should be using macOS - why are you bringing up Windows and Linux?

      He also is stating one of the reasons he is considering a Chromebook (shudder) is 2FA.

      macOS has supported Two Factor Authentication for some time now (since at least macOS El Capitan, now almost THREE major OS versions ago!) :

      https://support.apple.com/kb/P...

    19. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      I don't want them getting spyware

      So, you bought them a computer which comes with spyware preinstalled.

      Exactly!

    20. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      You can be safe, but you need to always be vigilant. However unless you have full understanding of every part of technology that is running, there is a risk. Did you review every line of code in Firefox?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    21. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 2

      Microsoft- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.
      Google- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.
      Apple- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.

      But there's a BIG difference:
      Microsoft: Does ALL sorts of trickery to keep you from "opting out" of Privacy-Stealing and "Telemetry".

      Google: Logs your entire life, EVEN WHEN YOU TELL IT NOT TO!

      Apple: Only DISSEMINATES Differentially-Anonymized Data, states CLEARLY what Data they collect, and ALLOWS YOU TO OPT-OUT.

      https://www.apple.com/legal/pr...

    22. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I don't want them getting spyware

      So, you bought them a computer which comes with spyware preinstalled.

      You mean, as opposed to Microsoft and Apple which also track everything you do? I'm not getting my kids a friggin' Linux- they need to learn real world skills. Once there out at University if they want to dabble with Linux that's fine.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    23. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      They are not all doing the same thing, not even close. Try requesting the information they have collected about you from those 3, the one from Google will be substantially longer and more detailed than the other 2 combined.

      That's because Google does more that is valuable for advertisers to track. Microsoft and Apple will track you just the same if there is incentive. The fact that Google has the #1 search engine, mapping software, e-mail, etc means that they collect more information from more people and have more data. Microsoft and Apple will violate your privacy as much as it is monetarily useful too. Microsoft and Apple also have advertising arms, it's not just Google.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    24. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not getting my kids a friggin' Linux- they need to learn real world skills. Once there out at University if they want to dabble with Linux that's fine.

      You are aware that Android is based on Linux? That Android is the smartphone OS with the most market share right now? (https://www.idc.com/promo/smartphone-market-share/vendor)

      You are aware that most websites run on Linux? There may be a reason why the big companies use Linux... (https://peacocksoftware.com/blog/top-websites-running-linux-2018) You may also find it interesting to know that Slashdot uses Linux. (https://toolbar.netcraft.com/site_report?url=slashdot.org)

      Linux skills _are_ real world skills.

    25. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      I remember when Microsoft's CEO laughed at Chromebooks and asked "Who would want one of those". 2 Years later when they discovered Chromebooks were selling like hot cakes and had replaced Windows in most school computer labs they freaked out. Turns out people did want a simple computer that was secure by default and that scared MS to death. They actually started selling a few laptops heavily subsidized by Microsoft to try to compete.

    26. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't lose any more privacy with ChromeOS vs Windows 10.

      I bought a Chromebook to replace a Windows laptop years ago, and haven't looked back. It's not my main machine, but
      I paid $149, and all these years later it still works and is kept up to date. Granted, I think it will stop being supported soon,
      but the version of Windows that was out back then is no longer supported either...and I can load a different OS if I like.

      But the ease of use hasn't been better!

      Some old Chromebooks don't support Android apps, but so what. I think the biggest issue is not all printers are supported,
      unless you set them up for Google Print. But I wholehartedly recommend them for those that don't need Microsoft Office installed locally.

    27. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are of course aware that ChromeOS is in fact Linux. Until recently, the command line was hidden from the user. But more recent versions of ChromeOS let you run Linux applications just fine.

      In many ways, if you like Linux, then ChromeOS is the most user-friendly way to run it

    28. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local printing works pretty well these days. Most printers, you just plug in and they work. Cloud printing obviously always is an option. And if you really want to, you can install a local copy of CUPS in the Linux container. Sometimes that's useful if your printer has advanced options that are not exposed to ChromeOS

    29. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and what do you think chromeos is? it's just a slightly better locked down linuxdist at least as long as the device you have it on is supported

    30. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always a risk, but that small risk is worth taking.

    31. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For once, I agree with you.

      He's telling the truth.

    32. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      With Apple, you are the consumer. With Google, you are the product. With Microsoft, you are the consumer and the product, since Windows 10.

    33. Re: Why pay to loose your privacy by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      For once, I agree with you.

      He's telling the truth.

      Thank you. Seriously.

    34. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. apple is a slimy underhanded company that should never be trusted.

    35. Re:Why pay to loose your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does a Chromebook help learn "real world skills" any more than Linux does?

  3. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My windows desktop has 2FA. So does my linux server.

  4. Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're nothing alike. Chromebooks will only replace a Mac or PC in the same way that you might be able to replace them with an iPad. It means you never really need a full fledged operating system, a real CPU/GPU or hard drive and can make do with a mobile device. This may apply to lots of people who only want to do the web and email. I've rarely use my Chromebook unless the power goes out or am traveling. It's way too limiting for my tastes. There are lots of better options among Windows 2-in-1 PCs and older Macs unless you're seeking a dead-simple device or you've got a history of downloading malware.

    1. Re:Apples and Oranges by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 2

      I thought you could install Arch Linux on a Chromebook. Which could indeed be a replacement for a MacBook or WIndows Laptop.

      --
      sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
    2. Re: Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently switched to a "thinner" client (Surface Pro) but I don't think I could go as lean as a Chromebook. My on the go local computational demand is higher than provided by any Chromebooks I've seen.

    3. Re:Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can, but at that point, why would you buy a chromebook and not just an off lease business machine? I have an acer c720 that I got for $80. It is OK, chromeOS seems half finished and I still am not sure what opens as a browser tab vs what opens as its own window.

    4. Re:Apples and Oranges by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Chromebooks actually remind me a bit of Macbooks. You have an "app store" but not a proper official repository which is the primary reason I always seem to be overwriting osx and installing Linux. I could just be biased against osx but to me in a lot of ways... Mac is to Unix as Chromebooks are to Linux.

    5. Re: Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ChromeOS runs both Android and Linux apps. What do you need that isn't covered by that? It also has excellent remote-desktop abilities, and having another OS somewhere in the cloud is dirt cheap, if that's what you need. Finally, Pixelbooks will be able to securely dual-boot Windows later in the year. I personally don't see the point, as I have been all-ChromeOS for a while now, and I don't miss any feature. But some users will appreciate the flexibility

    6. Re:Apples and Oranges by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      They're nothing alike. Chromebooks will only replace a Mac or PC in the same way that you might be able to replace them with an iPad.

      Exactly.

    7. Re:Apples and Oranges by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Chromebooks actually remind me a bit of Macbooks. You have an "app store" but not a proper official repository which is the primary reason I always seem to be overwriting osx and installing Linux. I could just be biased against osx but to me in a lot of ways... Mac is to Unix as Chromebooks are to Linux.

      Macs have the Mac App Store; but you are in NO way limited to installing Applications from that source.
      macOS is a Certified Unix. Something that NO Linux will EVER be.

      As for Chrome, it is nothing more than a data-collection app DISGUISED as a weak-ass "OS".

    8. Re: Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steven king will be contacting you shortly. I heard him mumbling something about gypsies and copyright infringement.

    9. Re: Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steven king will be contacting you shortly. I heard him mumbling something about gypsies and copyright infringement. :/

    10. Re: Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facts.

    11. Re:Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple effectively bought the Unix certification they have for macOS. It doesn't make it more unixy than Linux.

  5. MOD PARENT UP! by User+a++++++ · · Score: 0

    Either you're right, or BeauHD/MissMash spend their afternoons in the loo whiffing inverted rattle cans.

  6. Spyware by default by johnsie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want to use a data collection tool as your main computer then be my guest.

    1. Re:Spyware by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing I thought, as I was laughing about this statement:

      And there are some security things that appeal to me about a Chromebook.

    2. Re:Spyware by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. There is a reason the Chromebook is so much less expensive.

    3. Re:Spyware by default by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      Google collects the exact same amount of data if you are using Google Chrome.

    4. Re:Spyware by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Google collects the exact same amount of data if you are using Google Chrome.

      Which is a great reason to never use Chrome. I certainly don't and honestly don't know why anyone would. There is at least one better alternative (firefox) that respects privacy. There is absolutely nothing about Chrome that justices is use.

    5. Re:Spyware by default by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was wondering about the use of "two factor authentication" when you already handed over all your information.

      Other than as a last-ditch backup, I have no need for cloud-based anything. And if you are doing everything browser-based, then why not get a tablet and add a keyboard and just borrow real computers and login to this browser computing world? It seems like going back to the terminal model like in the1980s.

      I mean, it's good if browsers and these thin clients are good enough to do what you want to do. It just feels like a loss of control for me and not the computing "experience". I suppose for a lot of people this would be fine. I just worry about the long-term effects of computing as a service and everything in a cloud where the EULA can be updated and changed at any time and if anyone hacks all that or subpoena's it, you might get an apology letter.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    6. Re:Spyware by default by tepples · · Score: 1

      Other than as a last-ditch backup, I have no need for cloud-based anything.

      Unless you're collaborating with a co-worker or client or whatever in another city. In that case, would you instead pay to lease a VPS to host your source code repositories, file drops, chat servers, etc.? Is that still "cloud"?

      And if you are doing everything browser-based, then why not get a tablet and add a keyboard

      True, you could buy a tablet, a keyboard, and a case to hold the tablet and keyboard in place while you are using both on your lap. People suggested this sort of workaround back in fourth quarter 2012 when manufacturers discontinued 10" netbooks. But the combination of these can prove more expensive than a laptop form factor.

    7. Re:Spyware by default by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So... what... should they get a Windows 10 system? The non-data-collection tool ecosystem is getting pretty small. You would hope that Linux isn't being used as a data collection tool. I just hope the "many eyes" are taking care of that.

    8. Re:Spyware by default by vandamme · · Score: 1

      I lasted a month on ChromeOS, before I dual booted with Linux. I presume you do the same if you are concerned with spyware.

  7. My views have changed recently by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

    My views on Chomebooks have changed recently. My oldest kid starts middle school this Septermber, and the school recommends that every student gets a Chromebook. They have a deal where you can get a Chromebook and a comprehensive warranty for a good deal, so we got one. I'm a software developer, and I'm pretty impressed with how well it runs. 4GB of RAM and 32 GB of storage plus room for an SD card makes it a reasonably capable machine for most computing tasks.Add to this the news that you'll be able to run full Linux applications on the Chromebook, and I can see this being a very enticing offer for many people. I'm strongly considering getting one when my tablet finally bites the dust. I don' have a laptop, because I still prefer an actual desktop for development and other heavy computing tasks. I think I could meet all my computing needs with just a desktop and a chromebook. I'd never give up a desktop with a real keyboard and large screen, but getting stuff done on the small screen of a laptop, even if it's 17 inches feels like there is never enough space. So I might as well use my desktop for anything that's programming or requires a large screen and then just use a Chromebook with a 11 or 13 inch screen for the basic web browsing and media consumption.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:My views have changed recently by Bongo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The PC era (one personal computer) is over and we can all afford multiple devices and cloud services. These questions around, “is device X a real computer” died like all the arguments about whether iPads were or weren’t for real serious work, also died.

      Every device is potentially useful and it is just a question of one’s life and work habits. For example, I have no interest in wearables. But I do love my little projects in high-end-ish 3D modelling software (and these days a decent desktop with large screen is fine for my small projects). I also sit on the sofa a lot and the desktop is in another room, so a tablet is essential, but I never take it out of the house as, essentially, I do not commute on trains, but if I did, I would take it out a lot. And all work is on a laptop, again, because various reasons.

      IOW, lots of little lifestyle quirks. Every device has potential, and we are way past the day when a computer has to do everything in order to succeed in the market.

    2. Re:My views have changed recently by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      While I personally believe there is room in my life for various levels of compute and limited function devices, I do not know that the hardware makers and the consumers that support them will see things that way.

      There's not a lot of profit in the PC market, whereas the ipad/wearable/consumer toy market is fairly high margin. It wouldn't surprise me if general purpose computers suffered at their hands. And honestly most consumers really don't need or want it, so it probably won't go down with a lot of fight.

      of course engineers, scientists and anyone who truly uses a computer absolutely do need all of that, and more. But they may just end up relegated to "very expensive workstations" down the road.

    3. Re:My views have changed recently by tepples · · Score: 1

      Add to this the news that you'll be able to run full Linux applications on the Chromebook, and I can see this being a very enticing offer for many people.

      But don't buy one until you know that the model you're buying has a new enough kernel to support Crostini (the container allowing what you call "full Linux applications"). Otherwise, you may end up disappointed. (See "Linux Apps Are Not Coming To Many Still-Supported Chromebooks" from last week.)

  8. I use Chromebook for 90% of my needs by randomErr · · Score: 3

    Personally almost all I use is Chromebook. Occasionally I need to tweak a graphic or Word document which I can do via tVNC on my old desktop.

    For work I use Citrix to get into my desktop. My storage is 95% in Google Docs. When the Linux windows come out I'll be set there.

    The only things I really want beyond quality desktop office and graphic apps that don't have a huge monthly cost (I'm looking at you Microsoft and Adobe) is better Android support. There's a few apps and games I really wish ran better on my system. Maybe a better gamepad interface. But that's more on the game producers.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:I use Chromebook for 90% of my needs by sdinfoserv · · Score: 2

      What you're really saying is there are 2 kinds of users/ processes... Consumers and Producers. Consumers sit back and consume data via browsing, watching videos, reading....etc.
      However when you actually need to produce something, be non-passive, be a creator, you need something more than a chrome book. By you're own admission, a 20 year old PC running windows 95 is better than a Chromebook when it comes to being a producer..

    2. Re:I use Chromebook for 90% of my needs by Mozai · · Score: 1

      "almost all I use is Chromebook" but then you say "via tVNC on my old desktop" and "I use Citrix to get into my desktop".
      So is "my old desktop" a Chromebook too?

    3. Re: I use Chromebook for 90% of my needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With both Linux and Android support on ChromeOS, I have yet to find something that I can't produce on my Chromebook. Our entire household has switched to ChromeOS. Our old devices are still in some closet, but haven't been touched in months. ChromeOS is simply much more secure, well-polished and reliable

    4. Re: I use Chromebook for 90% of my needs by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

      key word... "household"... writing emails, shopping lists and Netflix ins't producing anything. You're home consumers. my point stands.

    5. Re:I use Chromebook for 90% of my needs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      He said his storage is 90% Google Docs, i.e. he creates documents on Google Docs. For basic video editing you can do it with YouTube. Photo editing can be done online. Some of the online stuff can even be more powerful, e.g. there is no desktop solution for automatic subtitles on videos that is close to what YouTube offers.

      The divide is more between people who want all their stuff stored locally and those who are happy to live in the cloud.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    6. Re: I use Chromebook for 90% of my needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just admit that your point is stupid. Of course people can use web browsers/cloud to create content.

      I guarantee that you are not using a PC to produce things anybody cares about.

    7. Re:I use Chromebook for 90% of my needs by IsoQuantic · · Score: 1

      I have tried mightily to move completely to my Pixel Chromebook. The one thing that prevents a complete migration is actually what Google is claimed to be quite good at: searching. I have a couple of apps on my PC, DTSearch and X1 that index my files and are searchable by a variety of means. Google's own search of my Google Drive comes up very deficient at doing what DTSearch and X1 can do.

      --
      -- I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
  9. Good luck for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems like an ad for Google. But in reality Chromebooks, if you dont install linux on it, and tablets are pretty much the same, but tablets are more portable

  10. The only reason to do it is to save money by captbollocks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did it 4 years ago when my macbook air died and I didn't really have the money to buy a new one. So I switched to a chromebook, and an android phone.

    If you remember that Apple builds computers/phones/systems to profit from and Google builds computers/phones/systems to run more of their ads to profit from, you won't be too shocked by how rough google tech is.

    I lasted 3 years on an android phone before going back to an iphone, I am not sure I want to spend the money on a new macbook, so I will probably get a cheap linux laptop when my chromebook dies and keep everything in the cloud (probably MS with MS office, which is still 10 times better than google apps).

    There is nothing that a Chromebook does better than a mac, it is just a lot cheaper.

    1. Re:The only reason to do it is to save money by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I am not sure I want to spend the money on a new macbook, so I will probably get a cheap linux laptop when my chromebook dies.

      Wait two months to see what the "low cost MacBook Air replacement" rumours are about.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:The only reason to do it is to save money by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      Save money? I am writing this comment on a 10 year old laptop that still works fine. (Admittedly, it was an expensive laptop, and now performs like a average laptop) But a 5 year old Pixel is EOL? https://www.reddit.com/r/chrom... Does not seem like a savings to me.

    3. Re:The only reason to do it is to save money by vandamme · · Score: 1

      I bought one (5 year old Pixel) a few months ago, cheap. Put (updateable) Linux on it, and it's better than a cheap Windows laptop. And WAYYYY cheaper than a Mac.

    4. Re:The only reason to do it is to save money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's at the point to where I"m willing to risk some irritation and buying a used Thinkpad x220 to hackintosh. The new macbooks are frustratingly non-servicable (and fuck a touchpad), but I do enjoy the OS. Unfortunately, as I do lots of video and audio editing, Linux is a joke.

  11. Accidental powerwash by tepples · · Score: 2

    If you don't want to accidentally powerwash your Arch Linux installation off your Chromebook, you'll need to install replacement firmware that lacks the "Press Space then Enter to powerwash" prompt on every boot. This requires, among other things, opening the case and turning a screw. Does firmware replacement void the warranty on the screen, keyboard, power jack, and other parts in the Chromebook?

  12. Out of the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't touch these things for a second.

    My passwords are in an encrypted container, only synced to other computer through a nextcloud that is running on my own server.
    I don't trust google. I don't trust Microsoft. I somewhat trust Apple, but not enough for them to have all my data.

    If you want 2factor-auth, you can implement that in any Windows/macOS/Linux Box, for example with GoogleAuth or many others.
    Other than that, our workloads may be to different, I rely heavily on desktop applikations that are not available as web versions but are vital to my work.
    So, any web only device feels like a castrated version leaving me unable to do most of my work.

    1. Re:Out of the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking idiot if you can't figure out how to select the right tool for the right job. Are Chromebooks a solution for everyone? No.

    2. Re: Out of the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chrome books are consumer devices. They are never the right tool for any job because they aren't a tool.

  13. mynutswon; just don't call it censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    phewww

  14. Ads are getting smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I haven't used desktop software in a decade". Doesn't sound suspicious at all.

    1. Re: Ads are getting smarter by junk · · Score: 1

      Seems realistic to me. Assuming "desktop software" are things like Word and Photoshop and etc, I haven't used much in the way of "desktop software" for most of the last two decades. I need a terminal and a browser and I'm golden. Sure, I use a lot of dev tools and software from the terminal but almost nothing else that belongs in the desktop category (current job uses zoom, which I find unimpressive). As a Linux desktop and laptop user since the 90s, this seems completely normal to me. I've considered a Chromebook for some personal stuff because they're dirt cheap and have the two things I really need. Dumb terminals are smart again.

    2. Re: Ads are getting smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terminal is desktop software. Also all the underlying programs you have are all "desktop software"

      I've never heard anybody call it "desktop software" it's either software or it isn't.

  15. Perfect for spying by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    A Chromebook is perfect for allowing Google to spy on everything you do and sell your data to their corporate and government partners. The software is included with the machine and is updated regularly. You only need to pay around $900 to get this spyware. Definitely a bargain.

    1. Re:Perfect for spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not $900 at all, the vast majority of them are $200-$300. Yes, Google makes Pixelbooks that range up to $1700 even, but those are flagship/tech demo models not really intended as the primary market. Besides Pixelbooks there's a handful (5) in the 400-600 range but that's it.

      The tracking/selling data part is valid enough, but you undermine your validity with the inaccurate criticism of price.

    2. Re:Perfect for spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good one, you fat retard.

  16. Oxymoron? by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Wait two months to see what the "low cost MacBook Air replacement" rumours are about.

    Isn't "low cost macbook" an oxymoron?

    Low cost and value are overlapping on a Venn diagram but are not the same thing. Macbooks are valuable to many people but it's hard to argue they are low cost unless you are merely talking relative cost to their even higher priced offerings. Conversely just because something is low cost doesn't mean it is valuable. Chromebooks are obviously inexpensive but since they don't solve any problems I currently have they aren't valuable to me.

    1. Re:Oxymoron? by StuartHankins · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you consider an employee making $x output per hour, and compare that to 97% $x because someone wanted to save a few dollars, it doesn't take long before the cost of the laptop is a rounding error.

      Take a developer making only $75K per year. Let's say they work 40 hour weeks, 49 weeks per year, that's 1960 work hours at $38.27 per hour ($75000 / 1960).

      Say you shave 10 minutes a day by using a Mac. That's .17 hours at $38.27 per hour, or $6.38 per day. Taking that 49 weeks and assuming 5 days per week that's 245 work days... which totals up to $1563 a year saved. That should pretty much pay for the Mac by itself, especially if you consider a 3-5 year replacement cycle ($4689-$7816).

      It makes even more sense if your salary is higher. At $100K per year, that is $51.02 per hour and $8.50 per day, or $2083 per year saved by buying the Mac. Over the 3-5 year replacement cycle that's $6248-10413.

    2. Re:Oxymoron? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Shh... Apple might read this and raise their prices another $500 "just because."

  17. Voiding warranties by sjbe · · Score: 1

    This requires, among other things, opening the case and turning a screw. Does firmware replacement void the warranty on the screen, keyboard, power jack, and other parts in the Chromebook?

    If you are the sort of person who is comfortable swapping hardware on your devices I doubt voiding warranties is high on your list of concerns.

    1. Re:Voiding warranties by tepples · · Score: 2

      I become more comfortable swapping hardware once the warranty has actually expired. Until then, I want the manufacturer to cover screen, keyboard, and power jack problems for the first 24 months, and I don't want the manufacturer to treat installation of a general-purpose operating system as an excuse to refuse me the service that I had paid for.

    2. Re:Voiding warranties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I become more comfortable swapping hardware once the warranty has actually expired. Until then, I want the manufacturer to cover screen, keyboard, and power jack problems for the first 24 months, and I don't want the manufacturer to treat installation of a general-purpose operating system as an excuse to refuse me the service that I had paid for.

      MY brand new laptop's Wndows 10 never saw the light of day. I booted a linux distro from USB on the first run, only to make it an ext4.

  18. One click away from data *OOPS BANNED* from goog. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I'll keep all my data locally

    Mainly because time and again, companies/people in them can't be trusted not to go snooping, whatever 'encryption' scheme (which is controlled not by you) is in use.

    And because of the repeated "omg all my data gone/hostage because of asshat at company policy / hacker / take your pick.

    And just wait until there's a war / major disagreement involving countries hosting your data. You think there'll be an online still?

    This is all a big pile of shit waiting to hit the fan.

    Cloud computing has been proven to not be trustable(cite: yahoo scanning your emails earlier this morning) yet people are still trying to peddle that turd and 'webapps'.

  19. Nice advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just kidding, it was actually a really piss poor advertisement and only really advertises you as a fucking idiot who doesn't belong on a tech site.

  20. It's a 'Web Browser In A Box' by Spinlock_1977 · · Score: 2

    I picked up a Asus Chromebook a couple of years ago, and it's been a solid champ up until last month, when the screen started flickering.

    If all you need is a browser in a box, the chromebook is the way to go. For programming tasks I still use my windows and linux desktops. But with Linux coming to Chromebook more fully soon, this need may disappear too.

    I have wished from time to time that my Chromebook had a free Windows Remote Desktop client, a decent free editor, and a few other things. But on the other hand, never worrying about losing your data (it's mostly stored in the cloud), makes it worry-free to take it along with you where ever you go.

    --
    - The Kessel run is for nerf herders. I can circumnavigate the entire Central Finite Curve in a lot less than 12 parse
    1. Re:It's a 'Web Browser In A Box' by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      You can use Chrome Remote Desktop to connect to a Windows PC.

    2. Re: It's a 'Web Browser In A Box' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that Chrome remote desktop works fine for me. But I have also used VNC, and I believe there are a couple of RDP clients as well.

      I regularly use Emacs on my Chromebook. I used to run it in Termux, but these days it works great in Linux containers. LibreOffice also works well enough for my needs. Although it still has a few visual glitches at times

    3. Re:It's a 'Web Browser In A Box' by jerk · · Score: 1

      So.....use two computers instead of just having one?

    4. Re:It's a 'Web Browser In A Box' by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Yep, I have a Windows desktop for development and gaming, then a chromebook for web browsing on the go

    5. Re:It's a 'Web Browser In A Box' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your screen started flickering because the cable that connects the screen to the keyboard is wearing out from opening and closing. Easy fix.

      If you want to run Linux on it, remove and internal screw and install a compatible distro.

  21. Smaller form factor laptop fits in less bulky bag by tepples · · Score: 1

    at that point, why would you buy a chromebook and not just an off lease business machine?

    One reason is physical size. After manufacturers stopped making 10" netbooks, and the third battery for my own netbook stopped holding a charge, I bought a ThinkPad X61 tablet on eBay for $101 shipped and tried carrying it as a replacement. Debian installed and ran fine, but it was physically much larger than the 10" Dell, meaning I needed to carry a bulkier bag. I later ended up buying a 11.6" Dell that fit in a reasonably sized bag.

  22. I tried really hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife's computing needs are simple, and she really doesn't have any interest in technology. She seemed like an ideal candidate for Chrome.

    The first problem was that her work email is Exchange-based. Nothing I can do about that. Chrome doesn't like modal popups, and she had to keep switching back and forth between light and full mode logins to download attachments, use the Global Address Book, and some other things. She was annoyed with me.

    Then there was an online training program she was required to take. The site decideded that she did not have Flash installed. Full stop.

    I gave up. Installed Linux Mint with Enlightenment for her work email. She's now happy.

  23. Some people still claim they can't afford a PC by tepples · · Score: 1

    we can all afford multiple devices and cloud services.

    To which "we [...] all" do you refer, especially prior to tax-funded basic income? I still see people in various chat rooms complaining that they can't do this or that in an application's mobile version and have no way to afford "a computer" to work around it. Granted, many of them are still in high school or college.

    1. Re:Some people still claim they can't afford a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a man in your 50s, why are you in chat rooms with teenagers?

    2. Re:Some people still claim they can't afford a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A linux/Windows computer for a few minutes in AWS/Azure with a remote desktop client is pretty cheap, even for students.

    3. Re: Some people still claim they can't afford a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are in a chat room right now you dolt. Also have you ever heard of twitch?

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. Chrome with Debian by houghi · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use a Chromebook. It is a HP. I run Debian on it using Crouton
    That way I can easily find things I want and know, like terminals and bash and what not.
    As an added bonus I can run it on an encrypted file and if somebody asks to look at my PC and I log in, there will be not much for them to see, unless they know to do CTRL-SHIFT-T, then shell (or pgdwn) and then "sudo startxfce4". And there I can use any browser that I desire with anything that I desire.

    e.g. I use LastPass for logins, but not on the one on Chromebook. That user is not even the same as my 'normal' user that I use. I use Chromium and not Chrome on Linux.

    The device is fast enough for browsing and the price is low enough to make it interesting. More here on various ones

    If I would buy one now, I probably would go for the Acer. That said, I use it as a secondary PC and I absolutely need ssh to servers.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Chrome with Debian by tepples · · Score: 1

      if somebody asks to look at my PC

      And then "somebody" presses Space as prompted and then Enter as prompted. Now what happened to your Crouton?

    2. Re:Chrome with Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I read, houghi doesn't want others to snoop on his/her personal data (encryption, obfuscation) so maybe the self destruct mechanism is actually a feature in this case.

    3. Re:Chrome with Debian by houghi · · Score: 1

      Either I will tell them not to, like if it is a friend. Or I forget to tell them and then it is gone. Obviously there is no reason to forget it, as I have nothing to hide. But if an offical entity deleted data, that is their error, not mine, right?

      And if I am not there, I must asume that the data is stolen and deletion of data is good.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    4. Re:Chrome with Debian by tepples · · Score: 1

      How long in minutes does a daily restore of your working environment onto a Chromebook in developer mode take?

    5. Re:Chrome with Debian by houghi · · Score: 1

      I don't know. How long in minutes does a daily restore of your working environment onto a Chromebook in developer mode take?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  26. Yubikey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whats wrong with the Yubikey? As far as I can tell its more functional than the google one. The yubikey also does PIV so you can use it for logon to AD or Linux directly.

    1. Re:Yubikey by Junta · · Score: 1

      Irrational Google fanboyism....

      I really don't like the 'hey, let's jump from one monopoly to another" in the tech industry rather than foster inter operable norms.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  27. Expensive to VNC from public transit by tepples · · Score: 2

    Occasionally I need to tweak a graphic or Word document which I can do via tVNC on my old desktop.

    For work I use Citrix to get into my desktop.

    But can you work through these remote access methods on your bus/train commute, where you don't have Wi-Fi? If not, then you'd have to include a mobile broadband subscription in the total cost of owning a Chromebook. Furthermore, if all home ISPs in your area use carrier-grade NAT, as Bert64 mentioned is the case in Myanmar, you'll also have to subscribe to a VPN tunnel so your desktop can receive VNC connections while you're away from home.

  28. Some missing features by clarus · · Score: 1

    I've been trying for a solid year to go full chromebook and I've failed for the following reasons. In theory - if I put Linux on it, it should be easier, that's on my todo. It also may be because I went super cheap [$250] for my replacement but here are my issues:

    - GoPro video editing - always go to my Mac for this
    - Managing files on an NFS: I have a NAS running at home and being able to drag and drop files quickly is easy on my Mac - a slow pain in the butt on the chromebook. The NFS and SFTP options are barely supported and cludgy
    - Stability of Apps - VLC crashes on the chromebook, some of them just feel like the lack polish. A lot of the apps I end up using are android apps scalled. Fine for a $250 throw around airplane laptop, but I think I am going to keep the mac as a power user.

  29. Cheap hardware is cheap by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I become more comfortable swapping hardware once the warranty has actually expired.

    Do you really care on a cheap Chromebook? If it's a several thousand dollar piece of kit and/or you are on a tight budget I get it but if you break a Chromebook, so what? That's the entire beauty of the hardware is that it's cheap and that you don't have to care so much of you break it.

    Does anyone actually offer a 2 year warranty on a Chromebook? Given the price of them that would seem foolish of them since most PCs don't carry that long of a warranty. (honest question - I've never really looked)

    1. Re: Cheap hardware is cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to Europe. We have rights. https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees-returns/sweden/index_en.htm

    2. Re: Cheap hardware is cheap by tepples · · Score: 1

      Go to Europe.

      How much does it cost a U.S. citizen to learn the local language (especially post-Brexit), qualify for a work visa, obtain it, and move? A ballpark figure for a couple common scenarios is fine.

    3. Re: Cheap hardware is cheap by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      You can learn a language for free. There are even some businesses on mainland Europe that use English as their default working language.

      The rest of the things on your list will cost a fair penny.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  30. Slashvertizement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, how much do these slashvertizements cost? Id like to run a couple.

  31. Printing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let us know how Google Cloud print works for you, it's the only way to print from a Chrome Book. To be clear, your printing just is uploaded to Google that formats it and then downloads it to your printer. So, you have the advantages of it being slow, and letting Google scan all your print jobs along the way. Definitely a win-win.

  32. I thought the same by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...but after about 2 weeks of dealing with the limitations of vanilla ChromeOS, and then another 2 weeks working around the limitations of ChromeOS + crouton, I wanted a real OS again. So my advice is to pick a Chromebook with the biggest SSD and best hardware support in the mainline kernel you can, that way when living 100% in the cloud doesn't really work you can put a full GNU/Linux distro on it.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  33. Buy Cheap by Deathlizard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Chromebooks are great if all you want to do is browse the web. Just don't spend a lot of money on it.

    Simply put, stay away from the Pixelbook unless you enjoy lighting money on fire. It's over $1000 and you'll get 5 years tops out of it guaranteed, even with the crazy specs it has. If you're going to spend that much you might as well stick with a Mac. At least you'll get at minimum 7-10 year use out of it. After the Pixel EOL, The only way I would even consider a Pixelbook right now is if Google flat out announces a commitment to a 7-10 year software support strategy for it.

    The HP Chromebook X2 or the Samsung Chromebook Pro would be the highest I would pay for one and only if I was going to use it daily. There are also cheaper alternatives out there. Personally, I wouldn't spend more than $200 for one.

    Printer wise, you need a cloud print enabled printer. Epson's are cheap, are very easy to setup, and their scanners can scan directly to Google Drive out of the box, but it is an inkjet so if you don't print often it will dry up and then it's toss the printer time, so buy an Epson XP-440 all in one for $50 and only if you really need to print. HP and Canon's also have printers that are cloud print capable, but tend to be harder to setup and can be more expensive.

    1. Re:Buy Cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a "google approved printer" any printer that can be installed in windows can do google cloud print. There is a google cloud print service that can be installed in windows and make any printer that can be installed in windows (parallel,USB,network) accessible though the cloud print service. You'll just need an always on windows box to run the service on. I run a windows home server here at home and it has worked flawlessly for years with my basic brother laser printer setup as a network printer on the WHS box.

      Appears *BSD and Linux can do it as well

      [root@freebsd ~]# pkg search cloudprint
      cloudprint-0.14.0.20170128 Google Cloud Print proxy for local CUPS printers
      cloudprint-py36-0.14.0.20170128 Google Cloud Print proxy for local CUPS printers

      pi@raspberrypi:~ $ apt-cache search cloudprint
      cloudprint - Google Cloud Print proxy
      cloudprint-service - provide a service for sharing printers on Google Cloud Print
      pi@raspberrypi:~ $

    2. Re:Buy Cheap by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      I mentioned the printer under the assumption that they wanted to go full on chromebook with no external PC. Any PC with chrome will work as a printer conduit once you add you account to google chrome and setup your printer using the cloud print site.

      If you want to remove the PC completely from the equation, then a cloud ready printer is the only option.

  34. Re:Smaller form factor laptop fits in less bulky b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are off lease business machines that are the same size as Chromebook though.

  35. Never thought Google would stoop so low... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as to let their sock puppets post slashvertisements.

    They must be desperate.

  36. Annualized price if it breaks 2 weeks in by tepples · · Score: 2

    Do you really care on a cheap Chromebook? If it's a several thousand dollar piece of kit and/or you are on a tight budget I get it

    If, say, the power jack breaks two weeks in, then I've paid $200 for a computer that lasted two weeks. How can I prevent its $200 replacement from having, say, a keyboard problem two weeks later? In the limiting case, that is an annualized price of $5,200 per year to own a computer. Does that qualify as "several thousand dollar piece of kit"?

    Does anyone actually offer a 2 year warranty on a Chromebook?

    I don't know whether that's offered for Chromebooks in third quarter 2018. I was referring to the 2-year Dell extended warranty that I bought in March 2010 along with a non-Chromebook netbook. I ended up getting its power jack fixed under warranty.

    1. Re:Annualized price if it breaks 2 weeks in by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      If, say, the power jack breaks two weeks in, then I've paid $200 for a computer that lasted two weeks.

      Coincidentally, the only machine I've owned where the power jack broke was a Chromebook. Cheap plastic case cracked at the same time.

      Otherwise, while it worked, it was a perfectly pleasant device to use. I was expecting it to piss me off with the things it couldn't do, but it turns out that while I'm drinking my coffee in the morning, there's very little that I want to do that doesn't involve a browser.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Annualized price if it breaks 2 weeks in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're someone comfortable swapping hardware out, then a busted power jack is a minor issue. Or just run the power down (so they can check the software/firmware status) and take it back anyway.

      They might found out once they have fixed it, but they'll have already put it on their system as a warranty repair, and it is also obvious that the firmware has no effect on the power jack, so they likely won't make an issue of it if they notice.

  37. BigBroBook So Secure! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it costs you is your privacy and society's future!

    STOP buying EVIL google's bullshit.

  38. Re: You Typical Pussy American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So afraid.
    So pwnd.

  39. Consumers Vs. Producers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you're a content consumer. You shuffle electronic documents for a living and produce literally nothing of value to the world. Fine. Use a Chromebook, or whatever you want.

    Producers, people that create and manufacture things including the electronic content that you consume require local applications and processing power in order to create. They'll be less likely to choose or be able to use a Chromebook.

    Use whatever tool best suits your needs and stop trying to convince everyone to shift to your preferred platform.

    P.S. Good on you for getting paid to shuffle electronic documents while literally producing nothing of value. I'm not skilled enough to convince people to pay me for that. I still have to make and move physical things in order to get paid. It sucks.

  40. Incorrect analysis by sjbe · · Score: 1

    If, say, the power jack breaks two weeks in, then I've paid $200 for a computer that lasted two weeks.

    Right but if your goal is to do something different than what the manufacturer provides what do you gain by keeping it stock? You're basically buying something and not using it the way you want just in case of the (hopefully) unlikely chance a cheap piece of kit breaks. You're comparing apples to oranges. It sounds like you are not the sort of guy who would modify their hardware and that's fine but the economic case for that isn't relevant to someone who wants/needs to modify the gear. For them they simply accept the loss of warranty repairs as part of the deal and get on with it.

    In the limiting case, that is an annualized price of $5,200 per year to own a computer. Does that qualify as "several thousand dollar piece of kit"?

    No. I understand how you arrive at that figure but there is an implicit incorrect assumption in your calculation that any replacement would also break in the same way and in the same amount of time which is unlikely to be true. In reality you are just out $200 plus $200 for a replacement. Not ideal of course but not that bad either. Furthermore if you did break equipment at that sort of pace the company might replace it a few times under warranty but not 26 times. I guarantee the warranty gives them an out long before that happens. Hell you would probably get fed up and buy something else long before you actually were out of pocket even close to that much.

  41. No, use Acme computer instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi I'm a respected long time journalist and an ex-Acme Corporation employee, and I advise Acmebook plus AcmeWords to store all my passwords. Of course, Acme tracks everything and if AcmeWords is hacked, someone has my passwords, but same can be said for Google if someone gains access to your device. End of commercial.

  42. All your computing is done in a browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then it really, really doesn't matter what you use. You're not buying a device at this point; you're subscribing to an ideology and participating in voluntary tribalism. It's like sports teams but signifgicantly less entertaining.

  43. Printer as a 2-factor authentication mechanism by tepples · · Score: 1

    so buy an Epson XP-440 all in one for $50 and only if you really need to print.

    If you want to use 2-factor authentication without using a cell phone, you will "really need to print." Google won't let you use TOTP until you have two of the preferred 2FA methods (SMS, prompts through the Google Search app, FIDO U2F security key, and printed codes) set up, and only U2F and printed codes work without a phone.

    1. Re:Printer as a 2-factor authentication mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to print the codes, you can just write them down on a piece of paper.

  44. Blatantly incorrect information by ilsaloving · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I stopped reading when it talked about having your passwords exposed if someone got to your local copy of 1password. He clearly has no idea what he's talking about.

    Having Google manage your passwords is like having a fox guard the henhouse. 1Password encrypts everything at rest, and you have to put in your master password to access your database. By default it auto-locks again after just a few minutes. The only way someone would be able to get into your 1Password vault would be if you set your master password the same as a previously hacked account. And if you did that, then you missed the entire point of having a password manager.

    If a Chromebook servers the author's needs, then all the power to him. I just can't wait to see him melt down when his internet connection goes down.

    (How the heck do you develop on the web anyway? Unless he works exclusively in Javascript I don't see how that would work)

    1. Re:Blatantly incorrect information by nasch · · Score: 1
      I was going to make the same comment. The same is true of Lastpass and any non-horrible password manager. If someone hacks Lastpass and downloads my vault, congratulations, you have a block of encrypted text. Anyone who can break strong encryption with a long nonsense password has a lot more valuable targets they're going to be attacking.

      (How the heck do you develop on the web anyway? Unless he works exclusively in Javascript I don't see how that would work)

      I've never used them and don't know how they work, but there are online IDEs for a variety of languages. https://github.com/styfle/awes...

    2. Re:Blatantly incorrect information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (How the heck do you develop on the web anyway? Unless he works exclusively in Javascript I don't see how that would work)

      There are a variety of software development hosted services available for going programming apart from creating web applications (web apps). There are VPS providers which offer terminal-level access so you can set-up and configure an equivalent to local software development environment. as well.

    3. Re:Blatantly incorrect information by swillden · · Score: 1

      1Password encrypts everything at rest, and you have to put in your master password to access your database.

      The same is true of Chrome's password database, though it doesn't auto-lock.

      If a Chromebook servers the author's needs, then all the power to him. I just can't wait to see him melt down when his internet connection goes down.

      Many Chrome apps work fine offline.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Blatantly incorrect information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped reading when it talked about having your passwords exposed if someone got to your local copy of 1password. He clearly has no idea what he's talking about.

      I'm not sure what exactly he means, but being generous, if someone gets access to or hacks your computer, they could potentially put a keylogger on it and use that to get your master password for 1password.

  45. Good advice - don't speed a lot of $$$ by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    The only other thing I would say about Chromebooks is that you can do more than browse the web, the basic word processor and spreadsheet apps are adequate for most home users.

    We use them in our company and I've found that the more you spend on them, the less value you get. We've had a lot of luck with Acers that are less than $200 USD. When we've spent more to try out new features, we've been disappointed.

    1. Re:Good advice - don't speed a lot of $$$ by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      They can use Google's web based office suite as a chrome app, so they have an office suite, and I think the chrome app even allows for offline use that will sync to drive once it goes online. Never tried offline mode with mine. It will do about 90% of what most home users do with a PC.

      In the end however, it's a $200 web browser that can now emulate an android tablet and soon run Linux apps. Anything you can do online you can do on a chromebook assuming that you're online and it doesn't need a third party plugin like Java (or very soon, Flash) Android support works but you better have a touchscreen to really take advantage of it (it does work with mouse and keyboard though). Linux support will really open this platform wide. If it's easy to install apps through a storefront it will pretty much be the Linux Distro of choice for desktop use.

  46. Enjoy feeding the devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is the devil amongst us.
    Everything you do on a chromebook unless you nuke it and install a bog standard Linux will be sent to Google.
    Don't even use chrome if you install Linux.

    Welcome to the Google feeding machine.

  47. Different Chromebooks, different faults by tepples · · Score: 1

    If, say, the power jack breaks two weeks in [...] How can I prevent its $200 replacement from having, say, a keyboard problem two weeks later?

    there is an implicit incorrect assumption in your calculation that any replacement would also break in the same way and in the same amount of time which is unlikely to be true.

    In this scenario, the replacement broke in the same amount of time but in a different way.

    Hell you would probably get fed up and buy something else

    Bingo. I'm trying to skip to that step by finding something other than a Chromebook that's warranted as fit for purpose the first time.

  48. Chromebooks are great, but .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chromebooks are great, but not for everyone.
    If you earn less than $20K/month, forget any pixel-google-crap.

    Most people should get the sub-$200 chromebook, see how they like it. Be certain to compare passmark benchmarks for the CPU. For $200, you should get at least 1500 passmarks. Anything less will make you sad, constantly, always, forever.

    A $199 Acer C720 used a CPU with 1490 passmarks. It was nice, except all cheap chromebooks have not-so-great keyboards. Mine totally wore out after 18 months. I'm on a 2nd chromebook, with a dying keyboard after 24 months. 4 keys don't work at all anymore. My normal desktop has an IBM 101M keyboard, which could explain things. Replacing a keyboard on any chromebook is a $100+ cost due to the way they are made cheaply and that everything has to be removed, including the motherboard for the replacement. Beware.

    ChromeOS provides great security but terrible privacy.
    Crouton is ok, but expect to refresh it weekly or anytime google forces a new chromeOS update out. Google is a little better than MSFT with pushing patches, but not much.
    I found crouton lacking, so after about a month, I broke the warranty, removed the hardware protection for the BIOS, flashed a new BIOS and loaded up Ubuntu Mate. The machine can never run ChromeOS again.
    My current chromebook has an i3 CPU with 3000+ passmark rating and 1080p screen. If it weren't for the failing keyboard, it would be the perfect laptop for my needs. I run multiple virtual machines using KVM + virt-manager. I swapped out the 16G SSD for a 120G SSD.
    The battery pack has been expanding the last year, so it needs to be replaced.
    Sadly, a replacement chromebook with similar capabilities is $450+ these days, so repairing this one is still more cost effective.

    I don't use cloudy services much. I self-host most cloudy things and access them all through a VPN/ssh.

    And don't get me started about the missing keys. I miss the DELETE, PgDn/Up, Home, End and F11/F12 keys greatly. F12 is how I switch VMs. It has been 5 yrs since I switched to chromebooks, but I still miss the DELETE key. About once a month, I till press it - which if the FUCKING power key on chromebooks. Fuckers.
    I won't have a laptop without these things:
    * 1500+ passmark CPU
    * 1080p screen 13+inches - smaller than 15inch
    * 4G of RAM, but 8G would be nice
    * replaceable SSD, avoid eMMC.
    * SDHC slot, USB3 ports (needed for camera data)
    * sub-3 lbs

    But for a first chromebook, go cheap. See how it works for you.

  49. Still not enough in OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could probably deal with a good quality Chromebook 90% of the time. But itâ(TM)s that other 10% where I have issues. Iâ(TM)ve tried Chomebooks and still find them not good enough.

  50. typical "conservative" hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't want to make gay cakes?
    Facebook doesn't want to post content for NAZIs.

    Same goddamned thing.

    No shoes, no shirt, no service. Read it, learn it, live it.

    1. Re: typical "conservative" hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are literally thousands of bakeries, owned by people of all walks of life across the political, sexual, and social spectrum. It's probably easier to find a gay-friendly bakery than it is to go out of your way to find the *one* that doesn't support your lifestyle.

      There are a handful of big tech companies, I can count them on one hand, and they are today's gatekeepers of online speech and expression.

      And it gets better! All of those major players hold the same political views, sexual and religious biases, and social "values" as one another. Any straying from their accepted dogma and you're banned.

      The town square is privately owned, and pointing to some small niche communities on the web where no one will ever see your speech is the equivalent of the 10'x10' "free speech zone" at your local college campus.

      Conflating the two is wholly disingenuous. An you know it. Just because the town square is digital now and privately owned changes nothing. Besides, private ownership of the town square has already been settled in Marsh v. Alabama in the 1940s. Hint: it doesn't give them the right censor anything.

    2. Re: typical "conservative" hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of those major players hold the same political views, sexual and religious biases, and social "values" as one another.

      Good, that should tell you that your backwater retard views aren't worthy you stupid fuck

    3. Re: typical "conservative" hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent! Show your colors bright and true!

    4. Re: typical "conservative" hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not scared of these backwater ideas. It's time we let them shine out in the open rather than banning them so we can defeat them publicly for all to see!

      Why would you want to ban things that are such obvious garbage, anyway? It's clear that there's only one true path forward and everyone gets it except for a smattering of inbred hicks out in the countryside, we shouldn't be so afraid to knock down their ideas publicly so our side gets the visible wins that scare the hicks into submission.

      You're not seriously afraid to have a logical battle of wit with a toothless redneck from the mountains, are you?

    5. Re: typical "conservative" hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that Nazi isn't an acronym, right? It is a portmanteau of "National" and "Socialism". There is no need to capitalize the entire word.

      I don't know what's wrong with nations having socialism enforced upon them at gunpoint, that seems to be what everyone's clamouring for these days, right?

    6. Re: typical "conservative" hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even with a republican president you repubtards still aren't happy.

    7. Re: typical "conservative" hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you prefer the government regulate speech? Sure! What could go wrong?

    8. Re: typical "conservative" hypocrites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you willfully ignorant buffoon, I'd prefer NO one regulate speech.

  51. Bad Advertisment for Chromebooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just a poorly done slashdotvertisment for chrome books. And nobody I know wants to use them because of googles spying and how that would harm a companies competitive nature while also creating the risk of IP issues.

    The last thing a software company of any kind wants is Google getting their internal documents or IP.

  52. Behavior by sjbe · · Score: 1

    In this scenario, the replacement broke in the same amount of time but in a different way.

    I understand but you aren't going to go through that 24 more times nor is the company that sold you the product. Your calculation was correct but based on a faulty premise about how all the parties involved would behave.

    Bingo. I'm trying to skip to that step by finding something other than a Chromebook that's warranted as fit for purpose the first time.

    Fair enough but that's a different issue altogether. Nobody is going to bust out the proverbial (or literal) soldering iron if they truly need the warranty protection. More importantly if you need the warranty more than the modification then you didn't really need the modification in the first place. Modifying equipment that you cannot afford to lose is generally a poor idea. The nice thing about Chromebooks is precisely the fact that they are inexpensive so tinker with so it keeps the opportunity cost of losing one relatively modest.

  53. Re:Holding out for Project Crostini by claude+j+greengrass · · Score: 1

    You can always use Crouton until Crostini is stable. It's my go to for CLI work and development.

  54. My wife uses a Chromebook, I run Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife switched to a Chromebook when the first Samsung Chromebook came out, and she has been a happy Chromebook user since then. At the time, her then-current Linux laptop was very old, but when she made the decision about how to replace it, she realized that everything she did she did in a web browser. Email and Facebook were probably (and probably still are) most of her day-to-day usage. For home stuff (writing Christmas letters, etc) she had already moved to Google Docs. She doesn't do gaming on her laptop.

    So the Chromebook made a lot of sense for her. And oh by the way, it was cheap. Like $250 for the first-gen Samsung Chromebook. She replaced that about a year or more ago with a new Samsung Chromebook for about $350.

    Meanwhile, I do a lot of work using desktop apps. I live in LibreOffice and GIMP and Inkscape, and developer tools. So I run Linux. But I've been thinking about a Chromebook for travel.

  55. vi emacs bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do Chromebooks have vi, emacs, and bash?

    1. Re:vi emacs bash by swillden · · Score: 1

      Do Chromebooks have vi, emacs, and bash?

      Yes, as mentioned in the summary.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re: vi emacs bash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they have all 3 installed by default?

  56. Why Linux inside Chrome when you can have Linux by freq301 · · Score: 2

    Do you really need a computer that signs you into a corporate social network every time you want to read the news or talk to friends? Do you really trust companies that keep getting caught for not enforcing the privacy that their Terms promise? Using a Chromebook as your main machine is like trusting your brother with your girlfriend; you might be okay and then again, you might never know what really happened.

  57. Don't do it by discowriter · · Score: 2

    I had a first-generation Chromebook for five years. Google did not honour its promise for "Fast Web" when it changed to the Aura desktop interface, which seemed to cut the performance in half. I've also been using a variety of Chromebooks at Best Buys, but mostly the Pixelbook, which is very overpriced for what you get. I know the typical laptop or desktop computer has its annoyances, especially with Windows updates or just a lot of extra stuff you might not think you need, and there are some obvious advantages with Chromebooks like quick updates, great security, and simplicity of the operating system... but you shouldn't trust Google with everything. Nor should you be stuck with the Chrome web browser as your central operating system. Just run Linux, run whatever browser you want, and stay in control of your own computer. You should be more concerned with privacy than you are with convenience. Chromebooks are okay, don't get me wrong. I just wouldn't want to use one as my primary computing device again. I'd rather get a cheap, used laptop, install Linux, and have it my way... NOT Google's.

  58. Been There Done That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a MacBook Pro is better than having savings because you can always hock it on Craigslist for a month's rent or a mortgage payment.

    The thing about iOS is it won't download a pem file from AWS using Chrome or Safari... that would make sessions possible.

    Crouton? Sure, I guess for all of those times you need a real linter, just want to run VIM, or want to write some Ansible playbooks.

    As much as I love the cloud, there are those times when I want to use Vagrant to spin up a VirtualBox.

    As an AirBNB Host & an Uber Driver, I am tired of being rubbed by The Sharing Economy & that includes my desktop / I can not wait until I can afford to buy a new MBP (hey, it's a savings account too!)

  59. You can have my Chromebook by Proudrooster · · Score: 2

    Hi...
    I have all six devices:
    1. iPhone
    2. iPad
    3. Yoga Laptop Running Win10
    4. MacBook Pro
    5. Chromebook
    6. Multibook Desktop WIndows or OS/X

    Out of all the devices, the Chromebook is the most useless device. It reminds me of the modern dumb terminal that needs to connect back to the mainframe to get any work done. I seldom use it.

    If you are just a consumer user: surf the web, use web services, and have a good WIFI connection, the Chromebook could be the device for you. If you are planning to create, possibly make a video, music, program, or do anything CPU intensive, it is a lost cause. Working as a school consultant, the #1 request I get every year is how do to shoot and edit video on a Chromebook, short answer is, you don't.

    Ranking my computing devices in order of usefulness:
    1. Desktop
    2. MacBook Pro (love the retina display and trackpad, best, period, not in love with the keyboard)
    3. Yoga (Whoever designed this keyboard should never be allowed to design again, trackpad ok, lacking useful ports, touchscreen and tablet mode are mostly useless)
    4. iPad (I can use it as a computer in a pinch, it is just harder)
    5. iPhone (Like an iPad only smaller)
    6. Chromebook (In your right hand you have nothing, in your left hand you have a Chromebook, the Chromebook is slightly better than nothing)

    The only time I ever use the Chromebook is when I have to train others how to use a Chromebook. Usually the limitations of the device surface quickly.

  60. I am really surprised by this... by gosand · · Score: 1

    I cannot imagine ever needing to move to a Chromebook. Or really, even a laptop. Sure, I use one at work, but it's docked most of the time and I have 3 monitors hooked up to it. When I do need it in a meeting I hate using one tiny screen and I feel so inefficient using it. At least I take my mouse with me, I can't stand watching people in meetings fumble around with their trackpads. (I hate them so much) Even at home I have 2 monitors for my linux desktop.
    There is a now a Chromebook in our house now, my daughter has one issued to her at school. They are expected to do all of their work from it, and it integrates right in with her school account.

    I will say that Google is much smarter and smoother at their sleaziness than Microsoft EVER was. They put real engineering effort behind their software/hardware offerings to make them desirable and usable for their products. (us)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  61. too limiting by orgelspieler · · Score: 1
    We got my son a Chromebook for classwork. It's fine as long as you don't mind being limited to online versions of everything. There's only so much you can do in I can't imagine not being able to use "real" Excel or 3DCAD software. Once the features of online "cloud" apps match that of their desktop counterpoints, it might be worth it. But for now, it's just not flexible enough. And forget gaming.

    That being said, the new version of Windows really sucks; I'm putting off upgrading as long as possible. If you're ok with Mac's foibles, I recommend just sticking with that.

  62. Moving To a Abacaus by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Stopped reading at "I have not used desktop software for probably a decade now. "

  63. Even better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get an iPad.
    I have ( and love) a Mac, but use my work iPad primarily due to speed of use. Itâ(TM)s faster to get to what I need to do.

  64. Cloud-based password managers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sure if Google is hacked, someone has my passwords, but same can be said for any cloud-based password manager"

    Actually, that's not true. I use Dashlane and (according to them), they don't store the master password remotely:

    "Dashlane does not store your Master Password anywhere on our servers, and it is never transmitted over the internet. That means the key to your castle cannot be taken from you and your scrambled data stored on our servers is useless to hackers."

    I'm sure the same is true of other password managers aswell.

  65. Ex-Googler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "ex-Googler" not only promoted the Chromebook, but marketed Google's password keeper, too!

  66. iPad Pro by 2ms · · Score: 1

    How about an iPad Pro? I've basically switched to an iPad Pro. The battery life is insane, the portability and weight are insane, and believe it or not, the speed is insane as well. It's much faster than my 10x as expensive desktop workstation at Lightroom and Photoshop, for example. I'm frankly flabbergasted by its performance every single day. Never going back to traditional computers.

  67. but why???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apps, games, limited storage, RAM, development all stink, I mean if you like Fisher-Price stuff, then a Chromebook is perfect for you. Look a the top model for 1k, it's still a pos in comparison to other kinds of notebooks in its class. If you prefer remote-desktop style work flows then i suppose it's a good fit, but when I need power:

    1) vbox
    2) docker
    3) k8
    4) games
    5) 4k pr0n vids
    6) multi-monitor support (without lag)

    I dont see CB as a contender or even close to replacing my MBP, I might revisit once they stuff them w/ A12 processors.

  68. Chromebooks can run real linux, too! by schweini · · Score: 1

    What I do is buy a 150$ refurbished Chromebook online, and side-install Debian or Ubuntu on them via crouton. Highly recommended!

    For web browsing and other stuff done in Chrome, ChromeOS is great. But if I need something more specialized, I can have a full-fledged (if admittedly a bit, but not too, slow) Linux system running in seconds.

  69. print to PDF by bingoUV · · Score: 1

    Why not print to a PDF and store the PDF safely ?

    --
    Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  70. There are two types of users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    type 1: Serious users who need a real computer and are careful with their personal data and the data of others. They need a full PC (or Mac) with full capabilities and without built-in software that is constantly spying on them and phoning home.

    type 2: Casual users who don't care about their personal privacy/security and are even less concerned with the privacy and security of others. They are happy to use a Chromebook and do everything "in the cloud". They'll' happily let Google see and use all their personal info and all the personal info of anybody else that they happen to get access to. They don't see a problem with the idea of letting Google manage all their passwords and watch them login to their bank, their employer's systems, and anything else (like their homes, their email accounts, their medical records, etc).

    If your computing requirements boil down to watching YouTubes, playing some casual games, and using Twitter/Facebook/Instagram then a Chromebook will probably simplify your life (as long as you do not care about your privacy - which you probably don't if you use Facebook) but anybody else should think very seriously before entering The Matrix, no matter how good the juicy steaks smell.

  71. Step functions and head count by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Say you shave 10 minutes a day by using a Mac. That's .17 hours at $38.27 per hour, or $6.38 per day. Taking that 49 weeks and assuming 5 days per week that's 245 work days... which totals up to $1563 a year saved. That should pretty much pay for the Mac by itself, especially if you consider a 3-5 year replacement cycle ($4689-$7816).

    Full disclosure: I'm a certified accountant so I'm the guy you'd have to justify this to. I actually agree with you but I'm telling you what the counter argument will be.

    The problem with your argument is that costs don't actually work like that in the real world. Minor savings tend to matter little because they are step functions from the company's perspective. Let me explain. Let's say for argument's sake buying a macbook will indeed shave the 10 minutes you propose. That isn't a cost savings to the company UNLESS it actually results in either additional billable revenue or a reduction in headcount. Either an increase in revenue or a decrease in costs. Reductions in head count are step functions because you cannot typically hire just 10 minutes of labor. You have to save the better part of 40 hours of labor per pay period for it to start to matter. 10 minutes "saved" for one employee doesn't change the bottom line of the company meaningfully. (not to say it isn't worth doing but we're trying to justify purchasing hardware here to bean counters) You have to have to have enough minutes saved to affect head count and that means you need to at minimum save tens of hours. Furthermore then the value of the productivity savings has to outweigh the extra cost of the hardware on top of the labor cost. So you would need dozens if not hundreds of macbooks under your scenario to actually result in a measurable change to the bottom line. Remember that the company can just ask you to work 10 minutes longer at the end of the day and if you are salaried there is no marginal cost to the company.

    Alternatively you have to have some means of increasing billable revenue from the 10 minutes saved which simply isn't the case in most jobs. Will that 10 minutes saved result in extra sales? Maybe, but for most jobs you're going to have a REALLY hard time proving a causal relationship. And if you bill by the hour it actually could hurt the bottom line in the short run. You might be able to show how it will prevent you from missing a deadline or how it will keep staff from getting pissed off and leaving for greener pastures. For example my workstation at my desk has three monitors. Strictly speaking I'd have a hard time quantifying the productivity improvement but it keeps me from getting frustrated and I can show that I can get jobs done at least marginally quicker so the purchase got approved because if I'm slow in my particular job so is our cash flow.

    1. Re:Step functions and head count by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      Thank you for sharing the detail on this. It's interesting to see how an accountant views this situation.

      In my world we have more work than can be completed during the day by our current employees so there is an additional opportunity cost to wasted time. It's a teakettle situation, over the years as work has expanded well beyond capacity and pressure to complete certain tasks in a shorter timeframe has increased, the teakettle boiled over and each time we have been permitted to grow the department a little. I expect the cycle to repeat... I guess it works the same way in many businesses. We realize that "the list" won't ever be completed for many reasons, and that helps keep us at least partially sane.