...but that it is better to understand a problem before foolishly misapplying a non-working supposed solution. It's great to do the right thing. In the case, it's simply not doing the wrong thing.
While an earlier post mentions that ties are perhaps the least washed article of clothing, the unanswered, and maybe unasked, question is: What about the rest of the suit or whatever else might be worn? Did they swab shirts and jackets to see what those held as well?
If it's just ties with high levels of pathogens, then ditching them makes medical sense. If it's any cloth the physician wears, then just getting rid of ties won't really have any effect. The 'tie condom' sounds silly, but really something like that goes on now with what surgeons wear for each procedure. Would it be that farfetched to have a physician change what would be pretty much an apron between examinations if it meant healthier patients?
I don't want to go through the next 50 years of my life living in an international air of worry and uncertainty.
That is, alas, the usual state of affairs. Nobody wanted the Cold War, either. It was merely the least-worst option. It wasn't pleasant. It wasn't nice. It certainly wasn't cheap, in any way you care to consider - save one. It was better than the alternative.
What's going on now is a response. It is not a response to a single event, but to an accumulation of events. Sitting back and just taking it is no longer happening. It was treid. It didn't work. So something else is being tried.
It isn't pleasant. It isn't nice. It isn't cheap - save that it's better than alternative, which doesn't work at all.
Or the creator or family of the creator of barney Google have to say? After all, the name is even spelled the same in this case. And which came first, the googol or the Googles?
Now if people (the ISPs, not the spammers) would realize this. Some might not not until well after they get bit their self-earned uselessness.
Re:Lindows? I thought it was not Linspire
on
OpenIPO and Lindows
·
· Score: 1
They should have gone with something like "FM Linux" and then said that FM stood for 'Feature Mature' or some such. Then others could expand the FM a bit differently.
Wouldn't the opposite of this be more in line typical *lint programs or scripts? That way it would remove the unneeded extra GNU/ prefixes resulting in more efficient use of resources.
This article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTSC might be enlightening. As I recall from Basic Televison by Grob, the harmonic problem on color sets was something to do with the *17th* harmonic of one signal. Changing the frame rate slightly allowed a phase cancelling to work and take care of that potiential interference.
That to get a bunch of people working on a problem they might not normally even bother with, all you have to do is tell them they aren't supposed to do it.
Whether this is Adobe or someone pushing Adobe, the result is opposite what was intended.
I did the same. First I recorded (or at least thought about) how many cans of Coke or whatever I drank in a day.
First week, I went to one can a day less. Next week, one less can. And so on. Eventually it was down to caffeine only with meals, then not with supper, then not with lunch, and so on.
Actually I did this twice. While I was caffeine-free for a few months, it wasn't total abstinence. After a while I was drinking iced tea with meals, except in the morning when I'd have hot tea. A couple months ago I cut back the same way. It took a couple weeks, and I started getting to sleep earlier - for a while.
I didn't notice any nasty withdrawal by going slow. And since then, I can't say for sure, but I think I get headaches less often.
I feel better overall, don't have problems getting up in the morning, and find that now, several weeks later, I tend to be able to stay up late as ever... if I want to.
For the Windows side of things have a look through the listings at http://www.tinyapps.org and see if anything you might want is listed. The site prefers free stuff, but will list shareware. They're all smaller programs which can mean fewer places for bugs to hide and less resource usage.
Yep, ion drive would make a lousy people transportation system. But if it can lower launch weight and allow fine control at the price of time, it might be worth it. For some things cheap is more important that fast. And while a bigger rockect could send the probe to the moon in a few days, it might well take more than the 15 months to design, build, and test that. This means the launch can happen now and results be obtained without a bigger, more expensive, and less tested launcher. And even if it is slow, well, slow beats not going at all.
It's as useful as Knoppix, or should be. The thing here isn't so much about usefulness, after all Knoppix already does the job, but about preferences. Some people will simply prefer Gnome. Gnoppix gives them that. All the usefulness of Knoppix with the interface they want.
Or someone just thought it'd be a neat idea and acted on it.
Either, there is no loss, only gain. And for the record, I do not use Gnome myself.
That was part of it. One item not mentioned in the article is that the characters of the character generator used were part of how he was traced - it limited the number of installations to consider. Now imagine if he'd used some other video source...
There have been many missions to Venus and Mars, a few flybys of Jupiter (and Galileo orbiting Jupiter). Saturn and beyond have only flybys so far, but it takes a long time to get to them. Mercury is relatively close, is close to the sun so solar power can be used (avoiding silly controversy over nuclear power sources) and has only had one spacecraft look at it, from mainly one angle. Also, it's not the moon, but a "new" world to explore. All in all, it's a nice place to send a few robots to prove one's technology and show off, and get useful new results in a reasonable amount of time.
And I think you're missing the point. Even if most of the umpires are replaced (always will need a human rules interpreter, I expect) with digital system, it is just to increase or ensure accuracy. I could see circuitry in the bat, in the ball, in the glove, in shoes, and in the bases - all to make measurement easier and more verifiable. Automating a player, however, would be going too far. That is where the human randomness, unpredictability, and skill are desirable.
Now, if we were talking about something actually entertaining, I might agree with you.
That works fine, most of the time. There will times such I experienced recently where I had an old address and got a reply from a new address.
Getting challenged to reply will annoy people.
While C&R seems like a good idea, the resistance it will encounter will be one misplaced burden - the burden falls on non-spammers, who have done nothing wrong. This will cause offense, no matter how well-intended it may be.
...Windows CE-based devices may outsell Windows-based PCs...
I bought a computer this year. I didn't buy it with Windows. Is this a case of me not buying a PC?
If I buy a PDA that doesn't have WinCE, will I not be buying a PDA?
This might be a useful comparison (Windows vs WinCE) within one company's market, but ignores a two things going on in the market as a whole. Now, maybe my PC purchase and purchases like it are small enough to be written off as statistical noise, but are those PDAs? I rather doubt it.
...will simply meet file translation and compression utilities.
...but that it is better to understand a problem before foolishly misapplying a non-working supposed solution. It's great to do the right thing. In the case, it's simply not doing the wrong thing.
While an earlier post mentions that ties are perhaps the least washed article of clothing, the unanswered, and maybe unasked, question is: What about the rest of the suit or whatever else might be worn? Did they swab shirts and jackets to see what those held as well?
If it's just ties with high levels of pathogens, then ditching them makes medical sense. If it's any cloth the physician wears, then just getting rid of ties won't really have any effect. The 'tie condom' sounds silly, but really something like that goes on now with what surgeons wear for each procedure. Would it be that farfetched to have a physician change what would be pretty much an apron between examinations if it meant healthier patients?
I don't want to go through the next 50 years of my life living in an international air of worry and uncertainty.
That is, alas, the usual state of affairs. Nobody wanted the Cold War, either. It was merely the least-worst option. It wasn't pleasant. It wasn't nice. It certainly wasn't cheap, in any way you care to consider - save one. It was better than the alternative.
What's going on now is a response. It is not a response to a single event, but to an accumulation of events. Sitting back and just taking it is no longer happening. It was treid. It didn't work. So something else is being tried.
It isn't pleasant. It isn't nice. It isn't cheap - save that it's better than alternative, which doesn't work at all.
Or the creator or family of the creator of barney Google have to say? After all, the name is even spelled the same in this case. And which came first, the googol or the Googles?
It seems inevitable that SCO would ned up doing something they accuse others of doing.
OT: This post is really just to cancel a moderation error. Oops.
Now if people (the ISPs, not the spammers) would realize this. Some might not not until well after they get bit their self-earned uselessness.
They should have gone with something like "FM Linux" and then said that FM stood for 'Feature Mature' or some such. Then others could expand the FM a bit differently.
I wonder, is --- Chemical still in busines?
Wouldn't the opposite of this be more in line typical *lint programs or scripts? That way it would remove the unneeded extra GNU/ prefixes resulting in more efficient use of resources.
This article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTSC might be enlightening. As I recall from Basic Televison by Grob, the harmonic problem on color sets was something to do with the *17th* harmonic of one signal. Changing the frame rate slightly allowed a phase cancelling to work and take care of that potiential interference.
That to get a bunch of people working on a problem they might not normally even bother with, all you have to do is tell them they aren't supposed to do it.
Whether this is Adobe or someone pushing Adobe, the result is opposite what was intended.
I did the same. First I recorded (or at least thought about) how many cans of Coke or whatever I drank in a day.
First week, I went to one can a day less. Next week, one less can. And so on. Eventually it was down to caffeine only with meals, then not with supper, then not with lunch, and so on.
Actually I did this twice. While I was caffeine-free for a few months, it wasn't total abstinence. After a while I was drinking iced tea with meals, except in the morning when I'd have hot tea. A couple months ago I cut back the same way. It took a couple weeks, and I started getting to sleep earlier - for a while.
I didn't notice any nasty withdrawal by going slow. And since then, I can't say for sure, but I think I get headaches less often.
I feel better overall, don't have problems getting up in the morning, and find that now, several weeks later, I tend to be able to stay up late as ever... if I want to.
Interesting take. I use KDE, and Nautilus. To each their own.
For the Windows side of things have a look through the listings at http://www.tinyapps.org and see if anything you might want is listed. The site prefers free stuff, but will list shareware. They're all smaller programs which can mean fewer places for bugs to hide and less resource usage.
Yep, ion drive would make a lousy people transportation system. But if it can lower launch weight and allow fine control at the price of time, it might be worth it. For some things cheap is more important that fast. And while a bigger rockect could send the probe to the moon in a few days, it might well take more than the 15 months to design, build, and test that. This means the launch can happen now and results be obtained without a bigger, more expensive, and less tested launcher. And even if it is slow, well, slow beats not going at all.
"Oh, yes, I WILL be sure to help [representative] out... OF OFFICE for this call!"
It's as useful as Knoppix, or should be. The thing here isn't so much about usefulness, after all Knoppix already does the job, but about preferences. Some people will simply prefer Gnome. Gnoppix gives them that. All the usefulness of Knoppix with the interface they want.
Or someone just thought it'd be a neat idea and acted on it.
Either, there is no loss, only gain. And for the record, I do not use Gnome myself.
That was part of it. One item not mentioned in the article is that the characters of the character generator used were part of how he was traced - it limited the number of installations to consider. Now imagine if he'd used some other video source...
There have been many missions to Venus and Mars, a few flybys of Jupiter (and Galileo orbiting Jupiter). Saturn and beyond have only flybys so far, but it takes a long time to get to them. Mercury is relatively close, is close to the sun so solar power can be used (avoiding silly controversy over nuclear power sources) and has only had one spacecraft look at it, from mainly one angle. Also, it's not the moon, but a "new" world to explore. All in all, it's a nice place to send a few robots to prove one's technology and show off, and get useful new results in a reasonable amount of time.
And I think you're missing the point. Even if most of the umpires are replaced (always will need a human rules interpreter, I expect) with digital system, it is just to increase or ensure accuracy. I could see circuitry in the bat, in the ball, in the glove, in shoes, and in the bases - all to make measurement easier and more verifiable. Automating a player, however, would be going too far. That is where the human randomness, unpredictability, and skill are desirable.
Now, if we were talking about something actually entertaining, I might agree with you.
They are including one.
It's about time, too.
...would someone please just include a microscope and look? Even if Mars is dead, the information would be of some value.
That works fine, most of the time. There will times such I experienced recently where I had an old address and got a reply from a new address.
Getting challenged to reply will annoy people.
While C&R seems like a good idea, the resistance it will encounter will be one misplaced burden - the burden falls on non-spammers, who have done nothing wrong. This will cause offense, no matter how well-intended it may be.
I bought a computer this year. I didn't buy it with Windows. Is this a case of me not buying a PC?
If I buy a PDA that doesn't have WinCE, will I not be buying a PDA?
This might be a useful comparison (Windows vs WinCE) within one company's market, but ignores a two things going on in the market as a whole. Now, maybe my PC purchase and purchases like it are small enough to be written off as statistical noise, but are those PDAs? I rather doubt it.