Slashdot Mirror


Doctors' Neckties Transmit Germs

bzipitidoo writes "Real geeks don't wear neckties, and maybe the rest of the world wishes they didn't have to. Ties had a minor comeback with the recent bad job market, but hopefully that's behind us. Apart from the obvious that neckties are uncomfortable, useless, in-the-way, and therefore a waste of time and money, too-tight ties constrict blood vessels and raise eye fluid pressure which increases the risk of blindness. Now there's a new study showing that doctors' neckties transmit germs. One suggested remedy from the article is tie condoms."

100 comments

  1. how unfortunate by trs9000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i for one rather enjoy wearing ties -- especially when its for no real reason. i feel it gives my day a sense of importance or note; you know it just spices things up. im fond of the formality which i feel (fear even) is rapidly declining in our culture. what to substitute this with? any ideas?

    1. Re:how unfortunate by globalar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seriously, it's one of the few formal pieces of fashion for men that is widely acceptable. Different shades of suit are nice, but a tie can actually have some character. Even how you make the knot can be a little flavored (knot vs bow-like). Plus, it's a lot cheaper than a whole new outfit. And now that I think about it, I never wash, iron, or fold my ties either (like the doctors in the article, I'm sure). Simplest part of my formal wardrobe.

      I never understood why people associate ties only with the stress of their work (the tying/binding part), their PHB (the requirement to wear a tie), or the rigors of formality (again, required). The tie is one of the few personalized, professional pieces of formal attire a man is allowed. Embrace it!

    2. Re:how unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia... ties embrace YOU!

    3. Re:how unfortunate by obeythefist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I almost always wear a tie. Obviously the poster of this article is profoundly against the wearing of formal clothing, and from the sound of it doesn't know how to tie one without choking himself. A properly tied tie should be comfortable, not constricting.

      Here are some reasons to wear a tie:
      -You'll appear more professional than your workmates who don't wear one
      -You'll appeal more to management types
      -You gain the appearance of having status and importance
      -It's the only safe place in formal workwear for a man to express himself.
      -Ties are a "success indicator", which essentially means that you will be viewed more favourably by persons of the female persuasion (unless your tie has flashing boobies on it).

      If none of those reasons has any appeal to you, then don't wear a tie, dress down. The people climbing upwards on the ladder of success will thank you for getting out of their way.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    4. Re:how unfortunate by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 1

      When wearing ties in parties, specially with people you don't know, be sure to ALWAYS use a safe tie.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    5. Re:how unfortunate by bhima · · Score: 1

      While this probably is the case in most of corporate America it isn't everywhere. In fact I seemed to have accidentally landed the new summer intern who apparently goes for the mostly confused scientist look. And I Know the CEO could care less what anyone in my department wears so long as it meets lab safety requirements. The only variation is when I give presentations or when I go to conferences (And I must admit I find the person in the whole company to ask for fashion advise is his administrative assistant). So I guess I wear foolish clothes when I'm around foolish people (particularly the foolish ones that don't know me) and comfortable clothes when I'm around the people that either, work for me, pay me or sleep with me (the ones that matter). As a footnote my doctor does not wear a tie and I'm glad she doesn't!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    6. Re:how unfortunate by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      My mental keyword extraction from the parent post goes like this:

      -"appear"
      -"appeal"
      -"appearance"
      -"safe place"
      -"indicator"

      Words to live by, I guess.

    7. Re:how unfortunate by Scarblac · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here are some reasons to wear a tie: -You'll appear more professional than your workmates who don't wear one

      And if you work in an environment where the rest of the professionals don't wear a tie, they'll think you have a need to appear this way, you apparently need to mask incompetence.

      -You'll appeal more to management types

      Where I work, management types do not wear a tie except when visiting clients. You'll look ridiculous.

      -You gain the appearance of having status and importance
      -It's the only safe place in formal workwear for a man to express himself.

      I say, fuck that. The only time I care about formal workwear is when making a first impression on a new client, and then I want to appear as a competent professional. I'll express myself on all the other occassions.

      -Ties are a "success indicator", which essentially means that you will be viewed more favourably by persons of the female persuasion (unless your tie has flashing boobies on it).

      This is true, and a good reason for wearing a tie.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    8. Re:how unfortunate by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm not saying that people should have to wear a tie. It's completely optional where I work, too, unless we're expected at a customer meeting (when discussing million dollar contracts one must dress appropriately). Lots of guys don't.

      But what I am saying is that there are these distinct advantages to wearing a tie over not wearing one. It's not just about wearing a tie, it's about grooming and dress sense in general. When you look neat and professional, you tend to garner more respect.

      Let's pretend you're a typical PHB. It's salary rise time, there's only enough budget for one guy. You look at four engineers, and you're a PHB so you don't know what they do and you don't know how competent each one is. One of them is wearing a tie and looks neat, the others are wearing shirts with no ties, have scrabbly facial hair, long ungroomed hair, whatever. Who gets the raise, do you think?

      It's an extreme example, but hopefully you can see what I mean.

      Another way to look at it, quite a few of my friends have decent IT skills, but are unemployed. These friends also refuse to get haircuts, shave, wear a white shirt and a tie and black shoes to an interview. Can you see why they might not be getting anywhere in interviews?

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    9. Re:how unfortunate by Bazzargh · · Score: 4, Funny

      I almost always wear a jewelled codpiece. Obviously the poster of this article is profoundly against the wearing of formal underclothing, and from the sound of it doesn't know how to strap one on without castrating himself. A codpeice should be exaggerating, not constricting.

      Here are some reasons to wear a jewelled codpiece:
      -You'll appear more medieval than your workmates who don't wear one
      -You'll appeal more to codpiece-wearing types
      -You gain the appearance of having status and importance
      -It's the only safe place in formal underwear for a man to express himself.
      -Codpieces are a "success indicator", which essentially means that you will be viewed more favourably by persons of either persuasion (unless your codpiece is extremely small).

      If any of those reasons has any bearing on the job you actually do, you're probably a codpiece salesman or Henry VIII. The people climbing upwards on the ladder of success will wonder why you pay more attention to what you wear than who you are, or how well you did your job.

    10. Re:how unfortunate by martinX · · Score: 1

      When I was working in the Northern Territory (you know Croc Dundee, Alice Springs, Darwin, lotsa beer) in what was considered a professional environment, we used to see how long it would take the newbies to lose the tie. Three days maximum. And these were guys who had worn ties all their adult professional life.

      Now that I'm living in Queensland (Croc Hunter, Surfers Paradise, beer) I have given up wearing ties for good. While they do give a professional feel in the colder climes where you wear suit jackets all the time, they don't do diddly here.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    11. Re:how unfortunate by hplasm · · Score: 0
      Here are some reasons to wear a tie:You'll appear more professional

      Isn't this tantamount to fraud - caveat emptor, I suppose...

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    12. Re:how unfortunate by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      "The tie is one of the few personalized, professional pieces of formal attire a man is allowed. Embrace it!"

      From now on, a tie will represent the puke running down the front of my shirt caused by your statement.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    13. Re:how unfortunate by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      maybe that should be cravat emptor.
      haw haw

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    14. Re:how unfortunate by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Thanks to Google images:

      A very fetching pearled codpeice!

      Is John Travolta's codpeice over inflated, or just his ego?

      Batman wouldn't be quite so heroic without his codpeice.

      A George Dubya Bush double play!

      And to finish off, A Briefe History of the Codpiece.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    15. Re:how unfortunate by pqdave · · Score: 1

      Not really--A penguin desktop theme appears more stable than fluffy clouds.

    16. Re:how unfortunate by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think you're wrong, but as always there is the other side to that argument.

      Assume you're one of those four who the PHB has to choose from in an office where the other 3 have a typical crewcut, suit and tie. You, on the other hand are wearing a smart, designer, open collar shirt with some nice plain trousers, spiked hair and a designer jacket. Who looks better there? The corporate drones or the person who really considers his appearance?

    17. Re:how unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason I don't like ties is simple: Tying a noose around my own neck is FUCKING STUPID!

    18. Re:how unfortunate by AS400+Hacker · · Score: 1
      You'll appear more professional than your workmates who don't wear one
      That's circular logic. Professional people wear ties because it looks more professional to wear a tie. Times change.
      You'll appeal more to management types
      Tool.
      You gain the appearance of having status and importance
      "appearance" being the key work here.
      It's the only safe place in formal workwear for a man to express himself.
      Other than, watches a nice shirt, a good haircut
      Ties are a "success indicator", which essentially means that you will be viewed more favourably by persons of the female persuasion (unless your tie has flashing boobies on it)
      Chicks dig ties? Maybe right on this one. But not sluts. Sluts dig leather.
      The people climbing upwards on the ladder of success will thank you for getting out of their way
      If you want to climb up the ladder using the management route that's your choice. Tool.
    19. Re:how unfortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I almost always wear a tie.

      Funny, with a name like obeythefist I'd have bet the other way. I'll bet your cow-orkers never suspect.

  2. Remember folks... by RuneB · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...make sure you always use protection when seeking the advice of a medical professional.

    --
    dtach - A tiny program that emulates the detach feat
  3. I like ties by ScriptGuru · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The artical aside, I love neck ties, I have 17, ranging from Star Trek to the molecular structure of Scotch to a maroon one with a flower embroidered to a portrait of Einstein. Unlike starched shirts and ironed pants, a tie is a chance for self expression in the otherwise bland world of corprate attire. They're especillay cool if they're stolen, as you're then you're flaunting your rebellion through conformity.

    --
    Yet another signature that refers to itself. The irony and humor is dead.
    1. Re:I like ties by turgid · · Score: 1
      They're especillay cool if they're stolen, as you're then you're flaunting your rebellion through conformity.

      So do you like um have to leave the big grey plastic security tag on as a symbol of your out-sized virility?

    2. Re:I like ties by DjReagan · · Score: 1

      > to the molecular structure of Scotch

      So, err.. what exactly does a Scotch molecule look like then?

      --
      "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
    3. Re:I like ties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, pretty much like an Irish one, only wearing a kilt and playing bagpipes.

    4. Re:I like ties by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      it's plaid

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    5. Re:I like ties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was younger I used to be really into ties, because I thought I looked more professional and organized in them. I don't like them much anymore, but people make a good point that ties are the one way that everyone accepts for a man to have some flare.

  4. Well by daeley · · Score: 3, Funny

    One suggested remedy from the article is tie condoms.

    And would those be "ribbed for her pleasure"? My suggested remedy from the article is to close the browser window and try to forget the whole thing. ;)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  5. Useless?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ties had a minor comeback with the recent bad job market, but hopefully that's behind us.

    Clearly, you must be living in India.

    Apart from the obvious that neckties are uncomfortable, useless, in-the-way

    Useless? And what exactly do you plan to cover your shirt buttons with if not a tie? I don't wear ties and I never will. Period. I'll wear a dress shirt on occasion but unless I'm an executive, a tie is really overboard and hints at a tendancy to ass-kiss.

  6. Useless?! by Seumas · · Score: 2

    (Repost in non-anonymous mode -- oops!)

    Ties had a minor comeback with the recent bad job market, but hopefully that's behind us.

    Clearly, you must be living in India.

    Apart from the obvious that neckties are uncomfortable, useless, in-the-way

    Useless? And what exactly do you plan to cover your shirt buttons with if not a tie? I don't wear ties and I never will. Period. I'll wear a dress shirt on occasion but unless I'm an executive, a tie is really overboard and hints at a tendancy to ass-kiss.

  7. How about stethoscopes? by idiot900 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ties? Come on.

    If you're going to needlessly worry about something, worry about the doctor's stethoscope. I'm a medical student, and I've never heard of people cleaning their stethoscopes unless the patient was on contact isolation. I have yet to sterilize mine. Why? It's just not terribly conducive to crap growing on it, and you never put it on open wounds or the like. Skin is a pretty damn good barrier to pathogens.

    Also, if you want to worry about more stuff, worry about doctors washing their hands. It's unprofessional and a health risk not to, but it doesn't happen as much as it should with certain people. (I've shadowed GPs who washed their hands less than once per patient.) Many physicians trust Purell hand sanitizer, but some don't. There's a reason no surgeon would scrub in with Purell - they instead use iodine-based scrubbers, with plenty of mechanical scrubbing. Then two layers of gloves on top.

    There are worse things than ties...

    1. Re:How about stethoscopes? by satanami69 · · Score: 1

      Unless they are applying the stethoscope to a gaping wound on your body, you have nil chance of infection.

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
    2. Re:How about stethoscopes? by Tiro · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You're missing the point. Stethoscopes aren't likely to spead disease because metal doesn't foster pathogens.

      Ties on the other hand aren't made of cold metal. They carry around germs and reinfect the doctor's hands when he adjusts his tie.

      So your argument is a little incoherent in that you first say that stethoscopes are more worrisome than ties, then explain that stethoscopes don't carry disease, while never addressing the point of the article--that ties come in contact with patients and bedding all the time, and carry lots of nasty shit around.

    3. Re:How about stethoscopes? by idiot900 · · Score: 1

      So your argument is a little incoherent in that you first say that stethoscopes are more worrisome than ties, then explain that stethoscopes don't carry disease, while never addressing the point of the article--that ties come in contact with patients and bedding all the time, and carry lots of nasty shit around.

      Yeah, I was a bit unclear. My point was - there are higher-yield things we can do to reduce the incidence of nosocomial infection. I think getting physicians to do a better job washing their hands would be a more beneficial endeavor than getting them to not wear ties. I was being a bit sarcastic with the stethoscope thing.

      I'm sure ties can carry nasty bugs, but there are worse things in the wards.

    4. Re:How about stethoscopes? by idiot900 · · Score: 1

      Unless they are applying the stethoscope to a gaping wound on your body, you have nil chance of infection.

      Well - I could imagine a situation in which spores of some aspirated fungus get transferred to the chest of a immunosuppressed patient. Then the patient touches his/her chest, then wipes his/her nose. Not something to go nuts worrying about, but not "nil" either.

    5. Re:How about stethoscopes? by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A GP who scrubbed as much for each patient as a surgeon would be wasting quite a bit of time. And considering the difference in patient load, I bet the GP would have worn his hands literally to the bone within a week:)

      I hope the study mentioned in the Reuter's article was a bit better than the blurb made it appear. The 'control' was a security guard. I can think of at least a dozen differences between the guard and the medical staff that could account for this. What's more interesting is that ~50% of the docs were clean. Let's hear about the differences in actions (and cases, and etc. ad nauseum) in those two groups.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:How about stethoscopes? by Tiro · · Score: 1
      okay.. yeah, that's kind of what I though you meant.

      it is late at night, at least where I am.

    7. Re:How about stethoscopes? by martinX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should be a politician: "Don't worry about this thing, worry about this other thing over here! Scary scary!"

      While handwashing is indeed numero uno for reducing cross-contamination (and did you point out to these GPs that they didn't wash their hands?), don't dismiss the humble stethosope as a fomite.

      Not everyone has wonderfully intact skin. Though it may not be a gaping wound, there are indeed skin disorders that leave people open to infection. People also have lines in that are always getting damned infected - place a grungy steth near the point of entry and you could be creating the next bacteraemia.

      Pop over to PubMed and search on "stethoscope nosocomial infection".

      Even though stethoscopes may not be as bad as unwashed hands*, it still doesn't mean we can't take simple precautions to protect patients. And take the opportunity to lose the ties as well.

      *note: there hasn't been a double-blind study done of hand-washing versus no handwashing. but you try and get that one past the ethics committee.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    8. Re:How about stethoscopes? by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful


      I'm sure ties can carry nasty bugs, but there are worse things in the wards.


      I guess, but that's hardly the point. Not wearing a necktie is a one time change that's very easy to implement and easy to verify. Getting doctors to wash their hands more is something that requires constant vigilance and is very hard to verify. The fact that there are other things that will reduce hospital disease spreading more effectively is beside the point. It's not as if you can't do both.

      Also everyone knows that hands spread disease, so more education is going to have minimal impact. The necktie disease vector is far less known I'm sure, so educating doctors about this would go a long way.

      --
      AccountKiller
  8. I don't like ties very much. by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    1) Dress clothes suck.
    2) No matter how many times I am taught or teach myself, I cannot remember for the life of me how to tie a damn tie.

    However, if you're going to wear a tie, I would recommend Lee Allison. They have several ties that would interest geeks. And, of course, every tie they make AFAIK has on the inside the words "remove before sex"; what's more geek that that?

  9. Absolutely Useless by wjwlsn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Neckties are an absolutely useless piece of frippery for men who wish they could dress with the elegance and style of a woman, but are afraid to wear pretty dresses in public. Well, I say to all you hidden cross-dressers out there, give up your ties and dress as you truly wish! Just remember to shave your legs.

    --
    Getting tired of Slashdot... moving to Usenet comp.misc for a while.
    1. Re:Absolutely Useless by wjwlsn · · Score: 1

      To whoever modded me down... chill out, don't take it so personally. There's no need to get so defensive.

      --
      Getting tired of Slashdot... moving to Usenet comp.misc for a while.
    2. Re:Absolutely Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ties are a liability. Put on a tie and then go get in a street-fight. 9 times out of 10, your opponent will just pull on your tie and strangle you.

      Wearing a tie simply proves you are not going to get in a fight any time soon. If you WERE likely to get in a fight, you wouldn't be wearing a noose. Nuff said.

  10. Re:How about pens? by skinfitz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can imagine a lot of pen swapping goes on in hospitals between hospital staff who are actively interacting with patients. This must spread germs!

    Pen condoms??!

  11. Dodgy. by sbszine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was going to mod you down, but a lot of people seem to be on your wavelength so I'm going to reply instead. Perhaps someone will enjoy the alternate viewpoint.

    Your reasons to wear a tie seem to be based around a dubious ethic of climbing the corporate ladder based on appearance rather than merit, then picking up the sort of classy lady who is mesmerised by business neckwear. Since I lost the tie I am doing way better in both departments.

    Wouldn't it be better for everyone if success was earned on the basis of merit / quality rather than their shiny veneer? Think of (for example) successful software versus its less successful, higher quality alternatives. Or politicians. Or people in your workplace. Or whatever.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

    1. Re:Dodgy. by DjReagan · · Score: 1

      The problem with the measurement of success being based on merit, is that many geeks work away in a back room doing jobs that nobody else understands. The merit doesn't project because nobody undetstands it.

      People outside the geek world understand ties. They don't understand the subtleties of RFC3056.

      --
      "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
    2. Re:Dodgy. by eunos94 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      While I agree with the idea that merit should be where we derive success from. The fact of the matter is that there are a lot of very qualified, highly skilled individuals out there competing for a much smaller pool of jobs and promotions. Doing quality work should be your first priority. But after that, anything you can do to get an edge on all the other people doing quality work is fair game.

      I say wear a tie. It makes a nice personal statement and shows your coworkers some respect. No one likes to see ratty t-shirts and pit-stained polos.

    3. Re:Dodgy. by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what makes you think one can't wear a necktie with a ratty t-shirt or pit-stained polo? While it's nice that ties are a common and simple means of adorning rank upon people, they are still useless. Maybe it'd be appropriate to have wristbands instead which are equally useless? Or maybe everyone in the company should wear ties, even the factory workers. It's most silly because ties only mean a vague "I think I'm important" or "the job demands it". So people will assume the job demands it which it makes it a good job. But it doesn't really convey anything.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    4. Re:Dodgy. by VendingMenace · · Score: 1

      Ok, now you are just being silly. Of couse safty takes precedence over appearence (but not everyone works in a machine shop, do they?) Of course you can wear a tie with a ratty t-shirt or a pit stained polo. THat is not really the point is it? The tie just symbolizes formality, as far as this discussion goes. Now obviously someone who belives in the importance of formality in the work place would not wear a tie with ratty clothes. So we can ingore arguments of this nature.

      The REAL question is whether formality is a good thing to have in the workplace or (secondly) whether it is a valid grounds for promotion.

      So, let me try to adress this question.

      Consider this, if you are having a dinner party. Do you clean up the house some first? (Most people do.) Why? It is not nessesarily functional to have the floor vacumed. Having the bathrooms clean does not make the food taste better. But cleaning the house shows RESPECT for your company. It shows then that you care about them enough to go a little beyond what is absolutely nessesary. IN effect you are saying that "I know you may not really care about athetics while you eat, but this is a way of showing you that i don't mind going a little out of my way for you."

      Formality has the same function in the workplace. It shows those whom you work with that you respect your job and that you don't mind trying to look nice while you are working. It shows your boss that think enough of your work to present what is considered a "professional" appearence. Dressing formally at work is a way to make a constant, passive, outward showing of your attitude about your work. It is so wrong for a boss to take into considerations his employee's attitudes as well as performance when giving a promotion? Esp between two equally (or near equally) skilled people.

      Again, looking at the dinner party example. Lets say that you are invited to two dinner parties on the same night. For the sake of argument, they are both to be catered by the same company. NOw you know that at person A's house you will find a clean house, sparkling bathroons, vacumed carpets, and all that stuff (the suit and tie, if you will). At person B's house, you will find a house that is in disaray. Magzines and newspapers scaattered across the floor. A bathroom that is in disaray stained walls, ect. (ratty t-shirt and stained polo).

      NOw since the dinner is catered, there is no reason to worry about quality or sanitation of food (quality of work is the same). SO which house do you go to? House A or house B? I think most of us would rather go to house A. Even though the presentation has no effect on the taste of the food. WE just feel that that person appreciates us more, cares more about the party, ect. and it is that attitude that we like.

      Similarely, in the workplace, if the quality of work done is nearly the same, it is quite reasonable to take into account the attitude that people chose to present while at work. SOme of the attitude that we have towards our work is the way in which we choose to cloth ourselves.

      I hope that makes at least some sense. Everything you do reflects your view of the world. This includes the idea that the way your dress reflects your view of your job. At least to some extent.

    5. Re:Dodgy. by VendingMenace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      crap. I posted this in the wrong place, just a minute ago. I really ment it to be here. I am terribly sorry for the double post (how embarassing). But now on with the real post...

      Ok so now you are just being silly. Of couse safty takes precedence over appearence (but not everyone works in a machine shop, do they?) Of course you can wear a tie with a ratty t-shirt or a pit stained polo. THat is not really the point is it? The tie just symbolizes formality, as far as this discussion goes. Now obviously someone who belives in the importance of formality in the work place would not wear a tie with ratty clothes. So we can ingore arguments of this nature.

      The REAL question is whether formality is a good thing to have in the workplace or (secondly) whether it is a valid grounds for promotion.

      So, let me try to adress this question.

      Consider this, if you are having a dinner party. Do you clean up the house some first? (Most people do.) Why? It is not nessesarily functional to have the floor vacumed. Having the bathrooms clean does not make the food taste better. But cleaning the house shows RESPECT for your company. It shows then that you care about them enough to go a little beyond what is absolutely nessesary. IN effect you are saying that "I know you may not really care about athetics while you eat, but this is a way of showing you that i don't mind going a little out of my way for you."

      Formality has the same function in the workplace. It shows those whom you work with that you respect your job and that you don't mind trying to look nice while you are working. It shows your boss that think enough of your work to present what is considered a "professional" appearence. Dressing formally at work is a way to make a constant, passive, outward showing of your attitude about your work. It is so wrong for a boss to take into considerations his employee's attitudes as well as performance when giving a promotion? Esp between two equally (or near equally) skilled people.

      Again, looking at the dinner party example. Lets say that you are invited to two dinner parties on the same night. For the sake of argument, they are both to be catered by the same company. NOw you know that at person A's house you will find a clean house, sparkling bathroons, vacumed carpets, and all that stuff (the suit and tie, if you will). At person B's house, you will find a house that is in disaray. Magzines and newspapers scaattered across the floor. A bathroom that is in disaray stained walls, ect. (ratty t-shirt and stained polo).

      NOw since the dinner is catered, there is no reason to worry about quality or sanitation of food (quality of work is the same). SO which house do you go to? House A or house B? I think most of us would rather go to house A. Even though the presentation has no effect on the taste of the food. WE just feel that that person appreciates us more, cares more about the party, ect. and it is that attitude that we like.

      Similarely, in the workplace, if the quality of work done is nearly the same, it is quite reasonable to take into account the attitude that people chose to present while at work. SOme of the attitude that we have towards our work is the way in which we choose to cloth ourselves.

      I hope that makes at least some sense. Everything you do reflects your view of the world. This includes the idea that the way your dress reflects your view of your job. At least to some extent.

    6. Re:Dodgy. by eunos94 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, if you're thinking of wearing a tie with a ratty t-shirt, I think that speaks for itself. As for your other points, a tie is as useless as tattoos, piercings, colors and patterns, snaps, rivets, buttons, cuffs and almost anything else that adorns your clothing. One could argue we should all wear bleached canvas so that the we can all be equal. Then we wake up from our 1984 style dream and realize that people wear cloths in a context. A tie is the current way for men in a professional setting to exhibit some control over their appearance. If wristbands were the current way, I'd be all for wearing them too. I don't feel like men have enough ways express themselves through clothing.

      However, having everyone wear ties is obviously a bad idea. There are safety issues to be concerned with (the point of the article...I would argue maybe doctors should bypass the tie) and there are practicality issues. If someone is sitting at a desk answering phone calls all day or coding, there is no point in be dressed to the nines. However, someone involved with the public should be concerned about their appearance. You should practice good personal hygeine, clean your cloths and wear cloths appropriate to the situation.

      Ties don't adorn rank, they don't say "I'm important". Ties are merely a reflection of your attitude about your workplace. If a tie is appropriate and you chose not to wear one, I think that says a lot about your attitude. There a tons of different ties out there. Find one that reflects your personality and have fun with it. No one ever said a tie had to be black and lifeless. Hell, you can even get ties at ThinkGeek that decry the use of ties. There ya go, the best of both worlds.

    7. Re:Dodgy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporations and women tend to go for the "whole package" when judging someone's merit. Merit in only one aspect of your career (say, the technical side) is only going to advance you towards more and more specialized fields, ie, farther and farther back rooms. Dressing appropriately--such as wearing a tie in more conservative corporate settings--demonstrates the ability to properly assess one's environment, not only the problems that are being set in front of one.

      Would you entrust your money to a bank teller dressed in rags?

      Do you remember how your female relatives kept asking you to dress nicely for the weddings you were invited to? It's the same thing. They're not asking you to create a "shiny veneer," but to act your age and make concessions to propriety. Corporations and women like the idea of men who will act properly in the situations they find themselves in.

      You say that you do better with women and advancement since losing the tie. Well, ties are not appropriate in every situation either. Let me guess: in your corporate environment, everyone else was losing the tie at about the same time, no? If so, it proves my point; otherwise, you've managed to find a company that truly appreciates you, congratulations.

      Successful software? Examples?

    8. Re:Dodgy. by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Consider this, if you are having a dinner party. Do you clean up the house some first? (Most people do.) Why? It is not nessesarily functional to have the floor vacumed. Having the bathrooms clean does not make the food taste better.

      If there's enough beer, wine, and whisky being served at the dinner party, I can guaran-damn-tee you that having the bathrooms clean most assuredly does make the food taste better. The second time around.

    9. Re:Dodgy. by selderrr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      this is pretty difficult to explain in an online forum, but my guess is that a significant percentage of the population (and expecially of the slashdot public) would choose the other house.

      I don't like clean, vacuumed, neat, disinfected, chilling houses. I prefer to go to places where there's still doritos left in the bowl from a previous occasion, where the hall has a bunch of coats and shoes thrown on top of eachother, where the host wears 2 different socks and pants with holes in the pockets. Where the kids scream around me and make a mess of the place.

      Honestly. The house you're talking about would raise expectations and create an atmosphere of sterility that would definitely influence the conversation & the mood. I could never be myself in such an environment (except perhaps after consuming enough alocohol) and would never be able to show my personality in both its agreable and annoying qualities.

      What you call "showing respect" can equally be called "forcing vistitors to show respect". Unless ofcourse you've been raised in such environment, and consider it to be the standard. Which I really don't think is the case among geeks, and not even among the general population. To counter it : when you have diner with your fishing buddies, do you clean up the house after a long day of fishing ? Offcourse not. Respect is somehting that has not to be worked for. It is there, or it is not.

    10. Re:Dodgy. by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you don't see the humor in wearing a tie with a ratty t-shirt, but then I guess you don't realize that while it my be "appropriate" to wear a tie, it's because you associate a rank (aka position) with needing or requiring a tie. Yet a tie has virtually no practical use.

      That doesn't mean not wanting to wear a tie means wanting to wear canvas clothes to be utterly practical. So, maybe you want to wear a wristband or armband instead. The fact is, the tie is an archaic fashion statement, and I'd be more interested in seeing a variety of fashion statements to say "I'm dressing up". Variety is the spice of life, and if anything a suit and tie in a corporate environment is like canvas clothes in the right place in a corporation, for any professional tie you might wear.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    11. Re:Dodgy. by VendingMenace · · Score: 1

      actually, i never said that i associate a tie with rank or privalage or any of that. And i do actually see the humor in wearing a tie with a ratty t-shirt (being a punk and having done it myself). HOwever, i do not fool myself and pretend i don't understand why people wear ties. NOr do i put on blinders and dismiss the whole afair as rediculous. Rather, i try to really eximine WHY ties are considered important. And i do truly belive that is it associated with showing respect to one's job/coworks/boss. Here in the west we have kinda lost the meaning of respect, but all you need do is look to the east (eg Japan) to see how respect is still important and central to a lifestyle. HOwever, just becuase respect is somewhat downplayed here in the west does not mean that it is not impoartant (stupid double negatives!). Nor does it mean that it is not noticed. It is important to show gratitude for where you are and what you do. Dressing up (like, by wearing a tie) is one way (a very easy way) to do this.

      Also, i do not understand what you have against non-practical stuff. SOme of the greatest things in life are non-practical. Like art. And (heaven forbid, sex with no intent on getting pregnent). IN fact, i would say the non-pratical side of life is the side that is worth living for. IF everything had to be pratical, then life would be boaring, and there would be no /.!

      I do understand the desire for variety, and perhaps that is your point. that if you are going to wear one non-practicle thing, then why not another? Well the answer is simple really. Society interprits ties as a sign of respect and formality. FUCK SOCIETY! you cry? Well, Ok. But don't come crying when you don't get the promotion becuase you didn't wear a tie. That is my point.

      You see, you are free to show respect however you want. If you want to show respect by doing a good job. Great. If you think that is enough, and you don't wear a tie (or wear one witha ratty t-shirt) then that is cool too. You have to be cool with yourself first. HOwever, you also have to accept that you live in a larger society than just yourself or your section of pop-culter. As such, you need to realize how the reast of society will view your actions and take that into account when you act. We do not live in a vacume (or any other major appliance, really).

      See, it just so happens that in this society we show respect and fomality by wearing ties. That is the way it is now. Until it changes that is the way it will be (pretty profound, eh?) So, you don't have to follow soceity and waer a tie. You can go counter-culter and try to change it. Just don't expect that there shoulw be no consiquesnes to this. That is just fantasy.

      The point being. If you want to succeed in society, you have to play society's games. If you want to change soceity, that is cool, just don't expect to win alot fo friends along the way. And all that jazz.

      Wait, that wasn't really the point. The point is, you have to really look at what your actions are and what their consequences will be. Burrying your head the sand doesn't make it go away. that was what i was trying to say. :D

    12. Re:Dodgy. by VendingMenace · · Score: 1

      I understand exactly what you are talking about. And it is a perfect example of how every analogy breaks down at some point. In this case the analogy is broken becuase i failed to mention anything about the preferences of the guests.

      So to fix this lets assume that you are throwing a dinner party (you are a worker) and you know that your guests are rather neat people and would prefer to attend a party at a clean house (your boss likes it when people dress formally). Then it would be reasonalble to expect that more guests will show up (you are more likely to get a promotion) if you clean the house (you wear a tie to work). And if you have another person who is also throwing a party using the same caterer for the same people (a co-worker), but is does not go through the effort to clean the house, then the guests are most likely not going to enjoy the party as much (he won't get the promotion).

      The point of course is that you must be aware are what is expected of you and act accourdingly. If you live in a place in wich dressing formally and wearing a tie is a way of showing respect, then you should not be suprized if people view those who wear ties as more repsectfull (professional?) than those who do not.

      Of course you must always examine where you are working. Perhaps your boss despises it when people wear ties. Then of course it would be unadvisable to wear them. Why? Because he would be less liekly to approve of you and move you up, so to speak. But this is not they way it is the majority of times. And that is why you hear more people complaining about having to wear ties, than complaining about be unable to wear ties. (that and they are sometimes uncomfortable, but you get the point).

      But you are correct, in your analysis. And i would go even farther. If you konw that a clean place makes your guests uncomfortable then you should NOT clean. If you do, you are not only trying to "force" people to show respect, you are not showing them respect by making htem uncomfortable, when you know that is the case.

      Of course for the house party, you are inviting poeople in to your house, so it behoves you to make them comfortable. THis is not quite the case at work -- so hear again the analogy breaks down.

      But i don't want ot beat the "analogy breaking down" to death. I am sure that you get the point (as you seem quite intellegent).

      The main point i am trying to make is that it is impoartant to understand where you are, the type of society that you live in, and act accorndingly. Of couse you don't (and shouldn't!) live up to every expectation society has. But you need to understand the consquences of not living up to them and eb willing to accept them.

      For example, it would be rediculous to know that society values the wearing of ties (however, arbitrary it seems) Then to not wear a tie and become upset when you are passed over promotion for it. I mean, you KNEW that it was valued. If you choose not to do it, more power to you. But be aware that that decision may cost you. ONce you are aware of this and can make decisioins taking this into consideration, you are being very mature and you will understand that you may not get a promotion. But you know that and should be willing to accept it when it happens.

      I think i am staring to ramble now, so i will stop, but i hope that makes some sense.

      Awsome.

    13. Re:Dodgy. by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      First off, I didn't say you said ties were a sign of rank/position. I was the one saying it. Anyone who is likely to get dirty on a daily basis or for which it would be a safety hazard for the person probably won't wear a tie. And then everyone else (male, wise) is at least expected to frequently enough to show respect to a boss or clients. To me, there's a clear rift between those two groups. Only in service businesses or the like where no one gets physically dirty or is daily in chance of physical harm from a tie does a tie not signify rank. At the same time, in such companies even the bottom positions usually pay better than "grunt" work.

      As for not wearing a tie, was the bikini a way to say "Fuck you" to society? You seem to have ignored my whole point about variety. The fact is, ties have meaning because we give meaning to them (yeah, hardly profound). So, there's nothing stopping you from giving meaning to something else that's unique to show your respect. If you work for a company that makes pencils, one way is to wear a pencil themed tie. Maybe another way is to think of something more creative while still showing that respect (and I can't think of anything, but then I don't work for a pencil company so it doesn't matter a lot to me at the moment). A tie is the cookie-cutter approach to showing respect. Maybe that's appropriate for the job, where it's best to not stand out. But, isn't standing out while showing respect one way to gain positive attention? And it's not "burying one's head in the sand" to realize that the tie symbolized something because people giving meaning to it. If one doesn't like the tie because it's unoriginal or it feels "suffocating", that might be a good time to see if something else will do to show the same respect. And if enough people do it, then it'll be recognized by outsiders as well which is a good thing as well.

      In some ways, I'm reminded of the different way cultures approach business partners. Some shake hands while others approach kissing on each cheek. While some people will run away from a different approach to the same thing, most just learn that that's the way some people do things for no apparent logical reason. If businesses are so paranoid about doing "the right thing" in relating to other businesses, it becomes rote which doesn't show respect. I guess, to me at least, it's important to show something more than just some abstract form. Or at least replace one rote form with another one. I hear hot tub orgies are big for sealing deals. :)

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    14. Re:Dodgy. by famebait · · Score: 1

      But cleaning the house shows RESPECT for your company

      The problem with your argument is that real respect for others is not a very typical trait of people who attach great importance to ties. Besides being self-evident (if they did repsect people, as opposed to eppearences, they would respect whatever the person chose to wear), it also fits well with my experience.

      Nothing wrong with wearing them, but requiring others to really does reveal priorities in a not very flattering way.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    15. Re:Dodgy. by eunos94 · · Score: 1
      Sure, I see the humor in wearing a tie with a ratty t-shirt. Ha, ha. Good laugh for all. I however don't see someone wearing a tie and a ratty t-shirt during the mortgage closing for the 100,000 sq. ft. office building being very successful. I don't see Presidents, Vice-Presidents, foreign dignitaries, the local manager of CompUSA, middle managers at IBM, or bank tellers wearing that. Hell, I don't see lackies at the local furniture store wearing that.

      A tie is random. Sure, I agree. But guess what, it's the random that we have now. Deal with it.

      It doesn't suggest any position or rank. If I put a person with a tie in front of you, could you tell us what job they have? No? I didn't think so. If you were to enter a law firm and line up all the people with ties, could you tell by their tie who was the boss and who ran the copy machine? Doubt it. Maybe if you knew good silk from bad and what the lately DKNY tie patterns were. In the end it's what we have to work with. Choose not to wear one, that's great. But understand there are consequences whether you like it or not.

    16. Re:Dodgy. by selderrr · · Score: 1

      I got your point, and agree 100%. The whole discussion of wearing a tie or not basically boils down to "do what suits your needs and your taste".

      which, coincidentally, applies to all things in life :-)

      The problems begin only when you bump into someone who considers HIS needs and taste to be universal or superior. Foruntately, your post proved you not to be one of those.

      Cheers !

    17. Re:Dodgy. by 0x0000 · · Score: 1
      Yet a tie has virtually no practical use.

      It is my understanding that the canonical use of a tie was to clean eye-glasses. I can think of several other uses that are ... interesting ... if not wholly practical. Ties can be used in sex play and as weapons, for instance, but I don't think that's what the boss has in mind when he tells you to wear one to work ... or maybe it is. Hard to say unless you are part of that culture, which I am not.

      Who was is said "I have never seen a programmer doing actual work while wearing a tie?"

      --
      "The Internet is made of cats."
  12. A recent survey of IT shops ... by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... provides startling evidence that developers who wears a ties are 10 times more likely to spreads bugs from one program to another. A sample of ties from a large IT organisation tested positive to a number of potentially dangerous bugs including Bufferium Overflowiae, Memorensis Leakii and Pointeria Danglensis. PC developers were also infected by an insidious Redmondia meme which cause fatal code-bloat in many projects. In contrast, a survey of secretarial staff in the same organisation showed a complete absence of ties ...

    Yet another good reason not to wear a tie to the office :-)

    1. Re:A recent survey of IT shops ... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Well, that finally explains Microsoft software.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  13. Fashion by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Ah Geek fashion so important.

    You aren't asked to know about colour co-ordination all you are asked to do is figure out what a suit means and choose a tie for a simple purpose but geeks neglect this simple thing. Sad really.

    Look at a peacock and think about how much worse things could have gone for you, now spend twenty minutes looking at ties and analysing your emotions, you're done for life andif you know what you are doing you just gained a little power.

  14. Re:How about pens? by E10Reads · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They do. I took a microbio class in college and one assignment was to take a swab of some object in everyday use and see what grows on a petri dish. Well, I chose the pen at the sign-in clipboard to the infermery. When we were looking at the slides we prepared from our cultures, my prof asked me what I had sampled. When I told her she became very upset, especially when she looked at my slide and saw many gram-negative cocci, of which she was afraid that I had grown meningitis. My culture was promptly destroyed.

  15. Washing machine? by acceber · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In Australia, all schools require a uniform. I go to an all girls school and the winter uniform requires a necktie. I personally don't have a problem with wearing it, not only because the school makes me, but it makes you look more sensible (even if you're not) and purposeful.

    It's interesting that the neckties were the cause for concern, but not the shirts or the belts. I'm assuming that's because the neckties are not washed as regularly as another other item of clothing. Why not just throw the necktie into the washing machine along with the rest of the clothes?

    1. Re:Washing machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, negative to that. There is no law saying you must wear a uniform at a public school, its just not worth the bother for most people.

    2. Re:Washing machine? by xoran99 · · Score: 1
      It's interesting that the neckties were the cause for concern, but not the shirts or the belts. I'm assuming that's because the neckties are not washed as regularly as another other item of clothing.

      It might also have to do with the fact that a tie may dangle, and therefore may have more contact with or get closer to patients than a shirt would. Tie tacks to the rescue?

      --

      Karma: Bad (mostly due to all those "In Soviet Russia" jokes)

    3. Re:Washing machine? by travail_jgd · · Score: 1

      Many of the "nicer" ties -- the ones that are higher priced, higher quality, "more professional" -- are dry-clean only. All but the cheapest ties I've seen/bought have been dry-clean only! Also, frequent cleaning can cause the ties to lose their vibrancy.

      I'd wager that most professionals don't think ties get dirty unless something is dropped/spilled on them -- it's not actually in contact with your skin except when being adjusted.

    4. Re:Washing machine? by genericpenguin · · Score: 1

      Female, left handed, tie-wearing geek on Slashdot?

      I got off at the wrong bus stop.

      Sorry about the offtopic comment.

      --
      "Why, Johnny Ringo. You look like somebody just walked over your grave." Doc Holliday, Tombstone.
    5. Re:Washing machine? by CurlyG · · Score: 1

      OT, but all schools in Australia definately do not require uniforms! Some do, indeed most private ones do, but at least here in Melbourne they would be in the minoritory.

      I went to a public school, never had to wear a uniform, and subsequently never learned to tie a tie.

      I'm now nearly 30, have worked for several companies including a very large, very well known European telco and now am a director of a small IT company that I co-founded. I have worn a tie exactly four times in my life. Two times were funerals, two times were job interviews. I'm sure there's a lesson there somewhere.

      --
      You know they call 'em fingers but I've never seen 'em fing. Oh, there they go.
    6. Re:Washing machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What have you got against female, left handed, tie wearing geeks on Slashdot?

    7. Re:Washing machine? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      In Australia, all schools require a uniform.

      I'm pretty sure public schools, while they can have "rules" that require uniforms, can't actually enforce them from a legal perspective. So, if you don't want to wear the uniform, they can't kick you out or suspend you.

      Private schools, of course, can pretty much do whatever the hell they want.

      I went to a public school and always wore the "casual" uniform. Personally, I don't see why people kick up such a fuss about it. It saves parents money and often makes the little blighters easy to identify when they try to sneak out and roam the streets.

  16. Tie Hygiene?? by JGski · · Score: 1
    Ahh, I don't know about other people who wear ties but when I wore them daily some years ago, any given tie was only for a day or two and off to the cleaners it goes. Not cleaning your ties regularly is like not washing your clothes or your hanky regularly - just nasty. With normal hygiene it would seem that this wouldn't be any worse a bacteria problem than a clothe hanky.

    I don't mind ties much. Despite what anyone might wish for or delude themselves about; people make shallow, subjective judgements about you every single minute of the day. You can fight it (to little avail) or you can make it work for you. A "corporate uniform" if anything insulates you from that. If you are really a strong enough person/personality, doing the suit/tie thing isn't going to compromise you as a person - you know who you are and you don't need someone else's approval for it (rrright?).

  17. ties not often washed/cleaned by waterbear · · Score: 3, Informative

    From an almost-ex-tie-wearer (don't often do it these days): Many of the 'best' ties are/were in silk, and were both non-washable and even hard to dryclean without losing shape. So most of them probably didn't/don't get washed or cleaned often, or maybe not at all.

    Many hospital germs, including the most dangerous antibiotic-resistant MRSA, have been found transmitted in/on noses and hands of medical staff.

    Some hospitals now have dispensers for alcohol hand-rub in each ward/department, for everybody to use on their hands when entering and leaving, and some tests seem to have shown these alcohol rubs to be the most effective thing yet against contagion.

    Maybe tie-bags for medics are not such a bad idea to add to that.....

    -wb-

    1. Re:ties not often washed/cleaned by Cade144 · · Score: 1

      Or how about really good looking disposable ties?
      You could make them from Tyvek or Mylar or some other neat, inexpensive material.

      You could even make them out of treated litmus-type paper stuff, so that they would show any liquids that might have contaminated them.

      Better yet, you could make ties from agar, and then culture the tie itself to see what sort of baddies the doctor was exposed to all day. It would be a nice information gathering tool for epidemiologists.

      And for the non-medical geeks, ties could be made from edible materials like beef jerky or fruit roll-ups. That way you could be fashionalbe and have a handy snack!

  18. Re:How about pens? by fcw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In a discussion I had recently with a medical researcher, he claimed that there is solid research that pens are the number one vehicle for spreading germs around in hospitals.

  19. Re:How about pens? by Echnin · · Score: 1

    pwned! The other reply was more interesting, though. Would have modded it up if my mod points hadn't expired today... Still pwned, though.

    --
    Lalala
  20. Re: suits transmit germs. by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
    In other news, blue jeans, swim trunks, and hawaiian shirts are found to be naturally hostile to nasty microbes.

    The study was performed by the highly respected Doctors Who Don't Like to Dress Up Especially In the Summer Association of America.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  21. Rings are also bad news by knobboy · · Score: 1

    My wife is a nurse in a local burn and trauma unit. When she first started nursing, she read an article where the researchers swabbed the wedding rings of nurses and found several kinds of nasties present on the inside of the ring (where it contacts the finger). I don't know if they did any sort of non-nurse ring testing to quantify if this was an issue only in medical environments or not, but ffter she read that, she started leaving her rings at home on workdays.

    1. Re:Rings are also bad news by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      ...yeah that's HER story! ;)

  22. Just ties? by Paul+Neubauer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While an earlier post mentions that ties are perhaps the least washed article of clothing, the unanswered, and maybe unasked, question is: What about the rest of the suit or whatever else might be worn? Did they swab shirts and jackets to see what those held as well?

    If it's just ties with high levels of pathogens, then ditching them makes medical sense. If it's any cloth the physician wears, then just getting rid of ties won't really have any effect. The 'tie condom' sounds silly, but really something like that goes on now with what surgeons wear for each procedure. Would it be that farfetched to have a physician change what would be pretty much an apron between examinations if it meant healthier patients?

    --
    I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
  23. solution by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

    It's called a "bow tie." Solves all those problems except the slow strangulation thingy.

    1. Re:solution by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      There is, however, the unfortunately increased risk of 'looking like a complete ass' syndrome.

    2. Re:solution by martinX · · Score: 1

      Or looking like a paediatrician.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  24. indicator by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

    If you're being strangled by your tie, it's on too tight.

  25. BioChips, Bioelectronics cures cancer, AIDS. by alien24 · · Score: 1

    BioChips, Bioelectronics cures cancer, AIDS. http://www.geocities.com/mathematician99/ Biological computer kills cancer cells http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=15602

  26. The first bite is with the eyes by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    I think the quality of your shiney veneer is often indicative of your merit. If someone doesn't take pride in their appearance, it stands to reason that they might not take pride in their work either. Not always, but often enough.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:The first bite is with the eyes by famebait · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like it stands to reason to assume that a random fashion victim is probably really, really bright...

      --
      sudo ergo sum
  27. Air Vectored Diseases by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    The air in doctors' offices can carry air vectored germs. All medical treatment should therefore be carried out in a vaccuum, preferably in orbit to prevent contamination of uncontaminated atmosphere.

    Except that might infect space. Those germs might be able to survive in a vaccuum, and we'd be infecting the entire universe.

    We are dirty dirty dirty and our planet should be sterilized so we don't kill the universe. Nuke us from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  28. Tie Tacks by Syriloth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some doctors, at least, are already aware of this pitfall and have taken steps against it. My father, for instance, always wears a tie tack in order to keep his tie from dangling down onto (or into) his patients. I had always sort of assumed that this was a basic part of medical hygiene. Apparently not. Given the extremely simple solution (assuming that wearing a tie tack is effective) this could easily become something of a non-issue.

  29. Re:How about pens? by unclelib · · Score: 0

    You grew meningitis??

    Meningitis is a medical condition characterized by inflammation of the meninges of the brain.

    You can't grow meningitis on a petri dish just like you can't grow heart failure in a petri dish.

    I'm guessing you grew a gram-negative bacteria like Hemophilus influenzae or Neisseria meningitidis.

  30. Re:How about pens? by E10Reads · · Score: 1

    Exactly, Neisseria Meningitidis, the bacteria that causes meningitis. If I had said Neisseria Meningitidis most people whould have been at a loss. It probably wasn't Hemophilus (a bacillus) because it was definatly a diplococcus.

  31. Re:How about pens? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
    If I had said Neisseria Meningitidis most people whould have been at a loss.
    You could have said "... I'd grown the bacteria that causes meningitis" and been both accurate and clear. Don't sacrifice accuracy in some ill-conceived attempt to improve clarity. It doesn't work and it makes you look either careless or incompetent.
  32. Re:How about pens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It doesn't work and it makes you look either careless or incompetent.

    Yeah, and his "definatly" didn't help any, either.

  33. The problem with ties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If ties actually looked attractive to me, I would agree with every word you just said. But I see no aesthetic value in them. (I'm also not a jewelry/tattoo/piercing/etc type of person, either.)

    If ties have no utility value (they're too narrow to work as bibs anymore) and no aesthetic value, then all that's left is the message that they transmit. That goes back to your "You'll appear more professional" and related points.

    The problem with that, was famously put into words by Hamlet's mom: "Methinks the lady doth protest too much." Classy people don't say, "I'm classy." Cool people don't say, "I'm cool."

    Unattractive, unutilitarian formalwear just raises my defenses. It doesn't make me think someone is "professional" (whatever that means; if someone wants my money, that's enough to convince me they're professional), it makes me think they're weaselly and trying to hide something.

    To me, ties are just like tattoos and piercings. Those things often make me think, "You're going to an aweful lot of trouble to look 'cool' and nothing can be more uncool than that."

    Maybe tattoos used to be cool. But now they're trendy and show what a sheep you are. Same with ties. The first tie wearers were expressing themselves. The ones that followed them, were followers. Poseurs.