For personal: Ubuntu seems to be the most convenient For work: CentOS as it's a very close experience to Redhat Enterprise. This is helpful when testing deployment strategies into work environment.
Discounting remote controlled robotic devices like drones, robots and such, I think compromised devices like google glass, iwatch and other wearable technologies can be very dangerous, if not fatal. Think about driving over a bridge or 2 way traffic when random zombies start loading in google glass, or your phone transmits a virus over to your bluetooth connected car, etc. All plausible scenarios that can take place
They would have had to steal more than just specs. They'd need the operating system, or source code as mentioned in the article, to make it functional.
Looks like his human graphics card was fried. I guess calling yourself math and physics intuitive is a good way of coping with 8th graphics and no 3d driver:)
Correct -- I could imagine that there are lots of "heartbleeds" in closed source software that can and will be exploited. Whether it becomes public and puts pressure on the development staff to fix, is another story.
A well tuned view finder and computerized system will definitely do a better job than most drivers; since it won't succumb to distractions such as rubber necking, cell phones, or hot chick doing her makeup in an adjacent car.
It will also save many lives with all the drunk, medicated, and/or sleep deprived drivers out there.
yes, and input output should be more comfortable. If both items are to take PDAs to the next level, then I think the netbook wins.
Why?
Tilt screen and keyboard. who cares about multitouch and a huge screen if communicating with the device is cumbersome. Maybe the iPad would make an advanced digital photo frame.
Slashdot Mirror
I prefer DKNY yours sounds like a cheap Asian knock off.
Devaluation of the company means cheaper share price.
For personal: Ubuntu seems to be the most convenient
For work: CentOS as it's a very close experience to Redhat Enterprise. This is helpful when testing deployment strategies into work environment.
Discounting remote controlled robotic devices like drones, robots and such, I think compromised devices like google glass, iwatch and other wearable technologies can be very dangerous, if not fatal.
Think about driving over a bridge or 2 way traffic when random zombies start loading in google glass, or your phone transmits a virus over to your bluetooth connected car, etc. All plausible scenarios that can take place
Question: Why would you like to terminate your service?
Answer: Because I will lose my job.
They would have had to steal more than just specs. They'd need the operating system, or source code as mentioned in the article, to make it functional.
This story will yield a jurassic response
*8bit. Auto correct on phone made it an 8th.
Looks like his human graphics card was fried. :)
I guess calling yourself math and physics intuitive is a good way of coping with 8th graphics and no 3d driver
Yes, their exif meta tags are different ;)
Nice, when can we productize this and have those robots refuel our cars while we drive?
Correct -- I could imagine that there are lots of "heartbleeds" in closed source software that can and will be exploited. Whether it becomes public and puts pressure on the development staff to fix, is another story.
Too bad non-profits can't benefit from this ;)
If you look, a lot of their apps are coming out of beta stage as well, with licenses and prices changing.
A well tuned view finder and computerized system will definitely do a better job than most drivers; since it won't succumb to distractions such as rubber necking, cell phones, or hot chick doing her makeup in an adjacent car.
It will also save many lives with all the drunk, medicated, and/or sleep deprived drivers out there.
It's also the code to crack the Canadian blue-ray encryption.
(now it gets censored!)
And on that day, we shall have:
AJAX 2.0!
Girls are now penetrating the industry ;)
I've got my pints of beer!!
Afterall, Modern warfare is lead by lawyers =)
yes, and input output should be more comfortable. If both items are to take PDAs to the next level, then I think the netbook wins.
Why?
Tilt screen and keyboard. who cares about multitouch and a huge screen if communicating with the device is cumbersome.
Maybe the iPad would make an advanced digital photo frame.
You mean its running on EMACS?
I concur, but you have to admit: sheep drive the economy.
And if you're a farmer or wolf, you should appreciate the abundance of sheep.
That is why I will be diving into some apple apps development in 2010.
They love these class action kind of stuff.
Last time I did c++ i used Boost.