So, no he will not win easily......he likely will not even win.
cc
He has already won. He broke bones in a man's face partially blinding him, got no jail time, kept his job, merely goes on vacation for 45 days and loses a little pay.
I'd not be surprised to see him win his case and put that poor woman in jail.
[..] for investigative or law enforcement officers to violate the provisions of this section for the purposes of ensuring the safety of any law enforcement officer
So, cops can videotape citizens who are beating up cops, but citizens cannot videotape cops who are beating up citizens.
Ahh yes, lets have more blame for people who don't know who to trust, but decline to address the blatantly obvious in your fucking face fact that they don't know who to trust because of the way they are lied to constantly and every day.
This is not their fault. It's the governments fault, and the reason it is the governments fault is that the government does not serve the people, the government serves the money that elects it. A huge portion of that money comes from drug companies.
This is not going to change any time soon. The first thing is that you have to admit that it's a problem rather than blaming people who suffer from the consequences.
My children are grown up, and I was speaking in general terms.
What you say is true, at least I believe it be so. My point is that it is the state of society today that people are lied to, to such an extent, that it is difficult to trust anything anyone says without first hand knowledge.
So who can really blame them for fearing for the safety of their children?
My doctor tried to get me on some cholesterol thingy from Pfiezer, because of my age and family history, and regardless of the fact that my blood pressure is perfect.
People are still reluctant to give their children vaccine shots
When you can't trust the government or media, how do you know? These are your kids.
The people that sit on drug review boards are almost all taking money in some form from drug companies. Similarly, the people who work in government agencies. It's now up to you to decide what is dangerous and what is not. The government no longer serves the people, it serves corporations. You, buddy, are on your own.
But don't you think if you got a little bit of information on a patient--where they lived, when they died, a little bit of info on their history (enough to know what other drugs they might have tried), and a doctor or two of theirs, that you could guess a fair number of patient identities from the numbers?
Considering the huge amount of research that goes into tracking internet footprints, I would say that tracing identities from prescription info in the manner you suggest would be a no brainer.
Frankly, though, none of us know what this charity might want... why doesn't he just ask them? What is he asking us for?
If this was ZiffDavis, I would say to start a flame war. but this is SlashDot, so that is assumed.:)
Or perhaps it's because they don't have the experience to answer that question for themselves?
And one is as bad as the next.
I doubt the day will come when all people no longer need religion as a crutch. But with a little education, we can get most of them off the hook.
Another thing, why is it that it is NPC, and often illegal, to criticise religion?
Slashdot Mirror
doesn't have some fatal, stupid last-minute cost-shaving hardware deficiency that ruins it just to reduce the manufacturing cost by 23 cents
ROFL!! Ain't that the truth.
Yeah, they kicked me off of google+ so I hang out here now.
So, no he will not win easily......he likely will not even win.
cc
He has already won. He broke bones in a man's face partially blinding him, got no jail time, kept his job, merely goes on vacation for 45 days and loses a little pay.
I'd not be surprised to see him win his case and put that poor woman in jail.
I wonder, are most cops psychotic or just some?
[..] for investigative or law enforcement officers to violate the provisions of this section for the purposes of ensuring the safety of any law enforcement officer
So, cops can videotape citizens who are beating up cops, but citizens cannot videotape cops who are beating up citizens.
Fascism marches another step forward.
A fine optimistic outlook; that would in fact, be awesome.
For the rest of the lazy ppls... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyanogenMod
I hope this doesn't mean he is no longer developing Cyanogen.
I use it.
*shrug* Ok, Have it your way.
This is not their fault. It's the governments fault, and the reason it is the governments fault is that the government does not serve the people, the government serves the money that elects it. A huge portion of that money comes from drug companies.
This is not going to change any time soon. The first thing is that you have to admit that it's a problem rather than blaming people who suffer from the consequences.
So you'd rather trust a former D-List actor and Playboy centerfold over people who have spent their entire lives studying this shit?
That makes no sense to me.
When most of the people on drug review boards are compensated by drug companies, it'd difficult to trust their collective objectivity.
So, identify the experts for me. Is it the doctors? Pharmacists? The drug companies? Who?
So you see what a wicked web we weave when we say it's OK to lie to people.
Transparency please.
--
(Who gets Prince Humperdink? You mean he wins?)
What you say is true, at least I believe it be so. My point is that it is the state of society today that people are lied to, to such an extent, that it is difficult to trust anything anyone says without first hand knowledge.
So who can really blame them for fearing for the safety of their children?
And right wing cowards are free to post insults anonymously on SlashDot. Isn't that nice?
I really dislike big pharma and it is part of the reason I do all I can to avoid using their products or services.
I've extended that boycott to ALL corporations. It's tough to do, but I think about where every dollar I spend goes.
It can't be done 100%, but if we all did that, it could in time.
I filed that prescription in the round bin.
People are still reluctant to give their children vaccine shots
When you can't trust the government or media, how do you know? These are your kids.
The people that sit on drug review boards are almost all taking money in some form from drug companies. Similarly, the people who work in government agencies. It's now up to you to decide what is dangerous and what is not. The government no longer serves the people, it serves corporations. You, buddy, are on your own.
Cheers!
But don't you think if you got a little bit of information on a patient--where they lived, when they died, a little bit of info on their history (enough to know what other drugs they might have tried), and a doctor or two of theirs, that you could guess a fair number of patient identities from the numbers?
Considering the huge amount of research that goes into tracking internet footprints, I would say that tracing identities from prescription info in the manner you suggest would be a no brainer.
Frankly, though, none of us know what this charity might want... why doesn't he just ask them? What is he asking us for?
If this was ZiffDavis, I would say to start a flame war. but this is SlashDot, so that is assumed. :)
Or perhaps it's because they don't have the experience to answer that question for themselves?
Maybe you mistook the whooshing sound for a sneeze.
ROFL!
And.... No one expects the Spanish inquisition.
And one is as bad as the next. I doubt the day will come when all people no longer need religion as a crutch. But with a little education, we can get most of them off the hook. Another thing, why is it that it is NPC, and often illegal, to criticise religion?
OK, that's funny.
Or better still, sell it as "Bud Light" and you wouldn't even have to purify it.
You're taking that on faith, not on evidence. That's a poor way to make decisions.
And you know this how exactly?
The thing is, he didn't win, he stole the election. The same thing happened in Florida.
That ass should be in jail for so many reasons.