Slashdot Mirror


$1.5 Billion Star Trek Theme Park Coming To Jordan

MikeChino writes "King Abdullah of Jordan (who was once an extra in an episode of Star Trek: Voyager) has given the green light to a $1.5 billion Star Trek theme park that will boldly take Jordan where no Gulf state has gone before. While the theme park will not be powered by dilithium crystals, it will utilize green technology in order to lower its carbon footprint — all of its electricity will be generated by renewable sources." Just a few weeks ago Sheikh Hamad Bin Hamdan Al Ahyan carved his name in the desert so it could be seen from space. It looks like Sci-fi has finally made it to the Middle East. I can't wait for them to discover Firefly.

233 comments

  1. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scotty, beam me down ...

  2. And by Konster · · Score: 4, Funny

    ....aaaand the nerds finally get a Mecca to call their own.

    1. Re:And by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      ....aaaand the nerds finally get a Mecca to call their own.

      I thought that was the Star Wars: A New Hope soundstage/hotel in Tunisia?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:And by operagost · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't call it a Mecca while you're there, or your dead body might be sent back in two pieces.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:And by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 0

      Better not mention the Boston (M/m)arathon to the Greeks either.

      --
      My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
    4. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nosense. Mecca is the name of the city. Nothing would happen to you.
      But i dont want to disturb you in your life inside of bubble of prejudices ... so keep on trolling ... :)

    5. Re:And by operagost · · Score: 0

      Nah, the Greeks are pussycats. Just stay away from large cisterns.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:And by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      "marathon. That's a word with a greek base."

      I rather doubt the Greeks mind having things named after them.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:And by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      Riiiight. Are you forgetting this is the SAME religion where they have riots and issue death warrants over cartoons? It isn't prejudice if it is true. If they don't want to be looked at as backward ass primitives, how about allowing differing viewpoints, ending stoning of gays and rape victims, and generally not living like it is 2000 years ago, how about that?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since publishing a mere cartoon image of Mohammed can earn you a death sentence, why do you summarily dismiss "cheapening" the name of the holy city as something that could also be worthy of a death sentence?

    9. Re:And by scubamage · · Score: 0

      You realize that the religion you're talking about consists of between 1.5-2 billion people, right? And if 2 billion people fell under your broad generalization the world as we know it simply would fall into utter anarchy - especially if they had all "gone rioting" as you suggest. Just because a few bad representatives are tainting public opinion doesn't mean that the majority are normal, benevolent folks who just want to enjoy their lives. Stop being such an orientalist.

    10. Re:And by kryliss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Religion: A means to control mass amounts of people using fictional stories and imaginary characters to instill fear and devotion into individuals for the purpose of controlling them and taking their hard earned money.

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    11. Re:And by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you saw anyone else's "statistically insignificant" represenatives rioting over this sort of thing?

      The sh*t's going on. You really can't spin your way around that.

      You could try the same argument on Xian extremists but you would be lacking any video footage that includes riots and burning people in effigy. There are also no equivalents of Death Warrants there either.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    12. Re:And by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 2

      What about the jesushumpers who kill doctors because they feel life is precious? I guess it's not a death warrant so much as cold-blooded murder, but it's the same basic principle.

    13. Re:And by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Hmm, let's see... Christian's have the Westboro baptist church, the Irish Republican Army, just to name two. In Judaism there was Irgun which was so out of control that Britain had to wash its hands of Palastine, setting the state for the modern Israeli/Palastinian conflict. All religions have crazy zealots. Islam is not special.

    14. Re:And by scubamage · · Score: 1
      Oh and here are some more examples of other religions (namely christians) publically rioting over idiotic things:
    15. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because KKK members are Christian, we should just say all Christians are KKK members? I can generalize and use self-serving logic too.

    16. Re:And by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      And one is as bad as the next. I doubt the day will come when all people no longer need religion as a crutch. But with a little education, we can get most of them off the hook. Another thing, why is it that it is NPC, and often illegal, to criticise religion?

    17. Re:And by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Recently I saw some Christians burning a Quaran in effigy. And another Christian, who like any given Muslim terrorist, clearly represents every other person on the planet who claims to follow a religion of the same name, went on a killing spree in Norway a just a few weeks ago. That's why I'm always watching the Christians in my office nowadays to make sure they don't bring in any assault rifles. When I see them praying near government buildings and youth camps it creeps me the fuck out.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    18. Re:And by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Is this the same one that launched the "Holy Crusades", "The Inquisition", that practiced genocide on native populations across all of the Americas, and the Pacific? Yeah, I hear they're real assholes.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    19. Re:And by instagib · · Score: 0

      And take care of your meal. They might eat EVERYTHING!

    20. Re:And by operagost · · Score: 1

      The last time a "Christian"-- and I am being generous in giving the perp that title-- killed an abortion doctor was 2009. Before that, it was in 1998. Murder is murder, but to act like anti-abortion terror is being committed on anything close to the scale of Islamic terrorism is absurd spotlighting.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    21. Re:And by operagost · · Score: 1

      I think it's pretty special in the size and scope.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    22. Re:And by operagost · · Score: 1
      You can't burn a Qur'an in effigy, as it is not a person. And burning a fake Qur'an... well, that's pretty tolerant compared to burning a real one!
      Also, Breivik claimed to be a "cultural Christian" and "myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God." I would like to defuse all "no true Scotsman" accusations by pointing out that the vast majority of those who call themselves Christian would not agree that someone who makes these statements is not Christian.

      That's why I'm always watching the Christians in my office nowadays to make sure they don't bring in any assault rifles.

      And I kill and burn anyone who sneezes, because they might be carrying the Ebola virus.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    23. Re:And by operagost · · Score: 1

      Education? You mean the kind that largely comes from books? Like history books? They're just stories.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    24. Re:And by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      You can't burn a Qur'an in effigy, as it is not a person.

      An effigy doesn't necessarily have to be of a person. A Quaran can be an effigy of Islam.

      I would like to defuse all "no true Scotsman" accusations by pointing out that the vast majority of those who call themselves Christian would not agree that someone who makes these statements is not Christian.

      Either you made a mistake here or you failed to argue against the "no true Scotsman" accusation you rightly saw coming. If I remove the double-negatives in your statement, it's equivalent to "the vast majority of those who call themselves Christian would agree that someone who makes these statements is Christian" or to put it another way, "most Christians would disagree that [someone with Breivik's views] is not Christian." Do I understand correctly?

      And I kill and burn anyone who sneezes, because they might be carrying the Ebola virus.

      Maybe you mistook the whooshing sound for a sneeze.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    25. Re:And by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      the religious leaders or some ass hat who has a blog?

      More like several hundred thousand asshats willing to kill for any perceived affront to their backward-ass religion.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    26. Re:And by Tsingi · · Score: 2

      And.... No one expects the Spanish inquisition.

    27. Re:And by badran · · Score: 1

      You forgot Hitler.

    28. Re:And by Tsingi · · Score: 1

      Maybe you mistook the whooshing sound for a sneeze.

      ROFL!

    29. Re:And by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      And don't you just loooove how I got modded down for daring to speak the truth if it doesn't fit into the left wing PC bullshit? name a SINGLE thing I said that wasn't true. Fatwas issued over cartoons? Hell even South Park made here in the USA, was censored over a Fatwa. Stoning rape victims? How about a 13 year old girl stoned to death for being gang raped?

      I agree with you 100% Jedidiah that they can spin the bullshit ALL they want but the different religions are NOT all the same! While i personally think all religions are consoling BS at best, mind control at worst, the simple fact is a religion of 2 billion plus and growing REFUSES TO GROW UP and is completely and totally incompatible with the west.

      Are there moderate Muslims? i'm sure there are, but they support the Islamists be REFUSING to condemn them, by allowing them to control whole areas (look up what is happening in London, where if you walk through certain neighborhoods IN BROAD DAYLIGHT you WILL be attacked if you refuse to follow Sharia law, on UK soil!) and by creating "Sharia ghettos" and them screaming "That's racist!" if a charity dares to offer women who are abused or sold into marriage under Sharia a way out.

      Like it or not Islam is a thuggish, barbaric, vicious, backward ass religion that has as its whole goal nothing less than the forced subjugation of all under Sharia. Don't take MY word for it, read for yourself. look up the Hadiths, look up the word "Dhimmi" and see what they think OF YOU. you are less than a dog, you apostate. they can lie to you, cheat you, and killing you isn't considered a sin because you are not one of them. To see a similar viewpoint taught to a people one only has to go back to the Empire of the Rising Sun, where they were taught they were above other races and that by divine right they would rule the east. Wasn't real nice for the non Japs on those islands was it?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    30. Re:And by scubamage · · Score: 1

      Or the Salem witch hunts :)

    31. Re:And by scubamage · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and the Talmud says that all gentiles should be slaughtered like livestock. Your point? You are a xenophobic, small minded sheep bleating what your occidental media tells you to. Look at things from all sides before you continue; you're literally saying that 1 in 4 people in the planet is an evil, barbaric killer.

    32. Re:And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, Christianity had a 600 year head start on Islam to get its murder/cruelty/xenophobia on, so by that metric, Islam actually looks quite mature and responsible alongside the Christianity of 1400 A.D.

    33. Re:And by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Regarding burning people in effigy. The British have a national holiday devoted to burning Guy Fawkes in effigy. They've been doing it for 400+ years now. Guy Fawkes was a Catholic zealot who tried to blow up parliament.

    34. Re:And by russotto · · Score: 1

      Your second link was about Christians rioting in retaliation to Muslim rioting, which doesn't really strengthen your case.

      Similarly, your third link has Hindus as the aggressors.

      Your first link was rioting over the destruction of the livelihood of the rioters, which is hardly "idiotic".

    35. Re:And by bigtomrodney · · Score: 1

      The IRA are not a religious organisation, nor do they have any religious affiliation. The convention of referring to nationalists as Catholics is a generalization, as is calling unionists "protestants". If you want to call the IRA religious you'd have to do the same of the UVF. What they both are is scum.

      --
      I never get used to these constant resurrections
    36. Re:And by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      And when was the last time you saw a Jew stone someone? What...1000+ years ago? When was the last time Muslim stoned someone? probably TODAY.

      I'm so damned tired of this left wing PC bullshit! No damned wonder the teabaggers are growing like mad, because the left keeps slinging such unbelievable bullshit that people end up supporting the right trying to get away from it!

      As another posted...last time an Xtian murdered an abortion doc...2009, time before that? 1989. that is TWO in TEN years. Wanna bet if I looked up Muslim suicide bombing I could find one that took place within the last 4 days, hmmm?

      WAKE UP! You are comparing things that happened ONE THOUSAND YEARS AGO with things that are going on RIGHT NOW. tell you what, if it is Xenophobia why don't you exercise your free rights and go walk down the Islamic section of London drinking a beer? You won't do it, you know why? because they WILL crack your dumbass liberal skull open, that's why!

      WAKE UP! They are using your PC bullshit AGAINST YOU. you are free to SUPPORT Sharia but you are NOT free to go AGAINST it. look at Europe who yet again has taken a line of appeasement. Are they living in peace? Are they acclimating to the west? fuck no! they are living in Sharia ghettos and taking whole areas under Sharia law! Do the Jews stomp you if you don't wear a yarmulke? Will the Xtians stone your daughter if she is raped? WAKE UP!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    37. Re:And by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      they can lie to you, cheat you, and killing you isn't considered a sin because you are not one of them.

      Sounds like Scientology has learned something from this camp.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    38. Re:And by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      I think most Muslim would understand the use as an expression of respect for a place. Off course like every religion the fanatic are the loudest voice.

    39. Re:And by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

      No, Star Wars is popular among geeks -- formerly cinema geeks, and now often the trendy rise-of-internet-chic types. Nerds, as in people who are in actual engineering, math and hard sciences, tend to go for Star Trek. No idea why, but it seems to have always been that way (at least as a general rule of thumb, with many individual exceptions either way).

      My wife, a quantum chemist, periodically sternly reminds anybody who makes a Star Wars reference in our home, "This is a Star TREK household".

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  3. But We Are the Chosen Nerds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....aaaand the nerds finally get a Mecca to call their own.

    Unfortunately it is being built right next to the desert where Our Lord and Savior Skywalker was raised. Millennia of death and fighting over this holy land will surely follow.

  4. Good to be a producer ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and earn bucks from such distinguished extras. At least he payed his dues to fans all over. Transgression forgotten.

    1. Re:Good to be a producer ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm, the king -was- the extra.

  5. Scotty is dead Jim by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    Scotty is dead Jim

    1. Re:Scotty is dead Jim by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 3, Informative

      But there may be a trace echo in the pattern buffers.

    2. Re:Scotty is dead Jim by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      But we would need Scotty to get it out.

    3. Re:Scotty is dead Jim by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      Or Geordi.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    4. Re:Scotty is dead Jim by Tr3vin · · Score: 3, Funny

      But you don't have to take Noughmad's word for it.

    5. Re:Scotty is dead Jim by Forge · · Score: 2

      Beam, Shuttle Craft or some primitive transport (Like Jet plane or Camel). I still want to get there.
      BTW: How many TV Series can boast having 2 of the best known "Kings" as Fans (The other being Martin Luther King)

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    6. Re:Scotty is dead Jim by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2

      "I'm a corpse, not a doctor dammit!"

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  6. Indiana Jones Last Crusade theme park done by kmdrtako · · Score: 1

    Just hop on a camel for a day to get to Petra.

    So soon there'll be two reasons to go to Jordan.

  7. The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfilled by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    They will clash in the desert with phasers and lightsabers, and the rumbling of At-ATs will shake the valleys

  8. Location, location, location by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

    What an astoundingly stupid idea. However as an entry in the "whoever dies with the most toys wins" category, I think we may have a winner...

    1. Re:Location, location, location by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Stupid? You mean in making Jewish geeks (and geeks in general) travel to Jordan? Or did you mean something else?

      Wonder if anyone has told Nimoy yet?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Location, location, location by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      It is a perfect place for a solar powered theme park.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    3. Re:Location, location, location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with the location?

      Do you think that all Star Trek geeks live within 100 miles of you?

    4. Re:Location, location, location by timeOday · · Score: 1

      This blows me away, too. Maybe it's as stupid as it sounds. On the other hand, maybe all the action isn't in California and Florida any more? Maybe they know practically no Americans will make the trip and they ran the numbers and found out they don't care?

    5. Re:Location, location, location by GNious · · Score: 1

      I'm interested - always looking for new places to go, and this could be an excuse (not the only one) for visiting a place like Jordan.... ...googled Jordan, and got a page about someone called Katie Price, who seemingly also have a fun-ride.

  9. odd.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I do not remember the women of Str Trek wearing Bee Keeper outfits. I'm gonna have to watch some reruns now...sigh!

  10. Gulf state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since when is Jordan a "Gulf State"?

    1. Re:Gulf state by Canazza · · Score: 1

      yeah, it's nowhere near Mexico

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    2. Re:Gulf state by magarity · · Score: 1

      Since when is Jordan a "Gulf State"?

      Since it became part of the Arabian peninsula?

    3. Re:Gulf state by belmolis · · Score: 1

      No. The "Gulf States" are the Arab states that border the Persian Gulf: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman. Jordan is landlocked and is therefore not a Gulf State.

    4. Re:Gulf state by belmolis · · Score: 1

      To be precise, Jordan is almost landlocked. It has a little bit of coastline on the Gulf of Eilat, around Aqaba, which provides access to the Red Sea, which is on the other side of the Arabian Peninsula from the Persian Gulf.

  11. Mix attitude by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On the one hand, this is pretty cool, and the general values of Stark Trek (of which free thought and egalitarianism are pretty high on the list) are good things to promote in areas like Jordan. However, the fact that the monarch is already a Trekkie and yet is country is like what it is today doesn't speak highly of how much influence it has really had on him. (Jordan is not nearly as badly off as say Syria, but it is by no means a functioning democracy with human rights. Far from it.) Moreover, the people who go to this will almost certainly be outside tourists, whether Westerners, or rich people from Saudi Arabia and the UAE. So this will probably do very little to directly benefit Jordanians, who have a lot of problems. Again, Jordan's problems aren't nearly as severe as many other countries in the region, the literacy rate is the second highest out of it and its immediate neighbors http://www.indexmundi.com/jordan/literacy.html but there's still a decent chunk of around 10% who can't read. And there's severe unemployment- this project might help with that, but it is tough to tell.

    The fact that they are making the park green is noteworthy. Unlike many of the oil states in the region, Jordan's total oil reserve is comparatively small, but they do have a lot of oil shale http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_shale_in_Jordan which becomes more valuable as people run out of oil. So it isn't completely clear why Jordan would want to promote green tech other than actual ideology (well and self-interest for when everyone else's oil runs out and they still want their stuff to not be insanely expensive. But that's surprisingly far-sighed in the circumstances). It should be interesting to see where this goes in the next few years.

    1. Re:Mix attitude by data2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      10% sounds quite a lot, but according to Adult Literacy in America, Third Edition, (http://nces.ed.gov/pubs93/93275.pdf), "This government study showed that 21% to 23% of adult Americans were not "able to locate information in text", could not "make low-level inferences using printed materials", and were unable to "integrate easily identifiable pieces of information.", which I would define as literacy, but obviously indexmundi uses a different scale, as it states the USA as having a 99% literacy rate.

    2. Re:Mix attitude by jpapon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Literacy in the U.S. is defined as whether you can tell the difference between the signs for McDonalds, Burger King, Walmart, and KFC.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    3. Re:Mix attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The common man could care less about what style of government he has, along as it's "good government". The political parties in a lot of democracies (US, Canada) seem to waste most of their effort fighting each other for power rather than getting things done. I imagine an enlightened monarchy could bypass that.

    4. Re:Mix attitude by epiphani · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd suggest you watch this interview with King Abdullah. While it may be a monarchy, this is a Monarch I can honestly say impressed me. He's well educated, well spoken, and very aware of his own situation. I have no doubt that Jordan is likely to be one of the better middle-eastern states to live in under his leadership.

      http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-september-23-2010/king-abdullah-ii-of-jordan

      --
      .
    5. Re:Mix attitude by Gotung · · Score: 1

      Most of the people in my office would fail your test.

    6. Re:Mix attitude by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      That is what literacy is period. You just want to move the bar to suit your particular agenda today.

      If you decide to move the bar for one measurement, then you have to move it again for the population you don't have an obvious bias against.

      That 10% is not literate enough to avoid buying a pulled pork sandwich.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:Mix attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indexmundi uses the CIA world factbook numbers, not their own. I would guess that the CIA would always make America look better.

    8. Re:Mix attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I can easily discern the differences between those signs, the stuff that comes out of those stores are indistinguishable from one another.

    9. Re:Mix attitude by NanoGradStudent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The (extended) interview with the Jordanian UN Ambassador, Prince Zeid Ra'ad was also quite good (and hilarious):
      http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-march-1-2011/exclusive---zeid-ra-ad-extended-interview-pt--1

      Or if you're Canadian, like me:
      http://watch.thecomedynetwork.ca/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart/exclusive-interviews/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart---prince-zeid-raad-extended-interview/#clip426425

      Abdullah was supposed to show up again to promote his book, but given the situation in the Middle East, he sent the Ambassador instead. Interestingly enough, he's a Pretender to the Throne of Iraq--if they ever brought back the monarchy, I think they could do quite a bit worse than him:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Zeid_bin_Ra'ad

      Let me preface what I'm about to say by saying that from everything I've read and seen, and with the comparative openness of Jordan and Jordanian society, I think King Abdullah (and King Hussein before him) is a good man and leader, and in no way compares to some of the people that follow. I think many foreign dignitaries come off quite well on the Daily Show and the Colbert Report (like Pakistani ex-president Pervez Musharraf, and former Egyptian first lady Suzanne Mubarak)--it's their opportunity to present themselves to a good portion of the American public (and given the international distribution, probably a not-insignificant amount of viewers throughout the western world). I have a feeling that were Asma (Emma) and/or Bashar al-Assad ever to go on, they'd probably be similarly charming and well-spoken. During World War II, Joseph Stalin cultivated the image of Uncle Joe in Allied countries.

      All that said, Jordan hasn't launched invasions of its neighbours, there don't seem to be mass-graves or concentration camps in Jordan, there haven't been brutal and bloody crackdowns (as in Libya or Syria), and Jordan is open enough to the rest of the world that we'd probably be able to tell.

      --
      Just a little guy, y'know?
    10. Re:Mix attitude by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

        The fact that they are making the park green is noteworthy. Unlike many of the oil states in the region, Jordan's total oil reserve is comparatively small, but they do have a lot of oil shale http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_shale_in_Jordan which becomes more valuable as people run out of oil. So it isn't completely clear why Jordan would want to promote green tech other than actual ideology (well and self-interest for when everyone else's oil runs out and they still want their stuff to not be insanely expensive. But that's surprisingly far-sighed in the circumstances). It should be interesting to see where this goes in the next few years.

      Maybe they have come to the conclusion (as many other groups have) that oil shale is so painfully difficult to get usable crude out of that conservation actually makes *sense* despite the promises of fifty trillion barrels "sitting right under our feet"? If we haven't already completely boned the environment with burning off all the light sweet crude we can find in easy to access deposits, the energy consumed and requisite pollution generated in just *gathering* the crude from the oil shale will certainly put us over the top.

    11. Re:Mix attitude by morcego · · Score: 1

      Most of the "political" literacy rating methods define literacy as being able to read and write your own name. And no, I'm not joking. I wish I was. (In some places, that is called "functional illiterate", which is still worse).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_illiteracy makes for some very interesting reading for anyone interested in the subject.

      --
      morcego
    12. Re:Mix attitude by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      So it isn't completely clear why Jordan would want to promote green tech other than actual ideology (well and self-interest for when everyone else's oil runs out and they still want their stuff to not be insanely expensive. But that's surprisingly far-sighed in the circumstances).

      It's not particularly far sighted at all, in fact Jordan is more a follower than a leader - the oil states have been starting to diversify for some time now. Consider this story from 2010, or this one from just a couple of weeks ago.

    13. Re:Mix attitude by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Perhaps for now. But eventually he will die and thus the monarch will be run by someone else. There's no way to know if the next in line will be a complete asshole or not. Power changes people. That is why monarchs are so unstable and shouldn't be trusted as a viable form of governance.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    14. Re:Mix attitude by belmolis · · Score: 1

      "Jordan hasn't launched invasions of its neighbours" Jordan attacked Israel in 1948, 1967, and 1973, and from 1948-1967 illegally occupied Judea, Samaria, and the eastern portion of Jerusalem. Compared to the leaders of some other Arab countries, King Abdullah does indeed come off as clued-in and moderate, but he cannot afford to allow anything approaching real democracy unless he is willing to give up his crown. Jordan consists of two thirds of the Palestine Mandate and has a population that consists of approximately 30% Bedouin and 70% "Palestinians". His family are Hashemites, transplanted from the Arabian peninsula, and are perceived as alien usurpers by most of the population. His support comes from the Bedouin minority. He has to maintain an oppressive system in order to stay in power.

    15. Re:Mix attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A monarchy is the best for of government - if the monarch is a good one. If he is bad - it is about the same as a democracy.

    16. Re:Mix attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooops! I meant to change that to "Jordan hasn't (recently) launched invasions of its neighbours" prior to submitting. Ah well. 40 years is an awful long time but probably just a depressing blink of an eye for those seeking an eye, tooth, hand, or foot.

      Foreign Policy's take on Abdullah (and other hereditary rulers in the region) is that the populaces don't want regime change--reform, but not regime change à la Tunisia or Egypt. I suppose they have the luxury of being able to insulate themselves to some extent by having Prime Ministers and Cabinets to play 'bad cop' for them. If the economies continue to stagnate, and prices continue to rise the call may come to remove them, rather than just the bureaucrats and politicians (although I imagine that the oil-rich will probably be able to buy off, or continue to buy off their countrymen).
      http://mideast.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/06/17/the_kings_speech

    17. Re:Mix attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      according to Adult Literacy in America, 21% to 23% of adult Americans were unable to "integrate easily identifiable pieces of information."

      100% of 'Adult Literacy in America' writers were unable to hyphenate their phrasal attributives, such as 'easily-identifiable'.

    18. Re:Mix attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The KFC sign is the red and white one, right?

  12. Too Bad. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    With that money and if I was a big Rabid fan. I would have made Life Size models, Inside and out of the Star Trek Ships. Not just some futuristic buildings.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Too Bad. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...at least make the indoor spaces kind of "themed" with different ships in mind so that you feel like you are on one ship or another with accomodations to match.

      If you are cheap, you get a TOS era stateroom.

      If you are more spendy, you get a TNG era stateroom.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Too Bad. by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      I would've made a spin-off series that didn't suck!

    3. Re:Too Bad. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That would require having the original that didn't suck. With all the fans who see so much in star trek... All in all they are just a show that keeps us entertained an hour a week. Then like a lot of entertainment which we valued too much in our youth spin offs just don't seem right as you can watch the new shows without your past emotional baggage.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Too Bad. by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      That would require having the original that didn't suck.

      Nothing inherently prevents a derivative work from being an improvement...

    5. Re:Too Bad. by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Janeway had the best room, Picard should feel cheated. All she did was get lost.

    6. Re:Too Bad. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That is fairly brilliant, actually. Hotel Utopia Planitia. The whole hotel could host one or more murder-mystery-scale adventures at once, sort of like a gigantic magic motion ride. Only some elevators need to be special though, and the bridge.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Too Bad. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Janeway had the best room, Picard should feel cheated. All she did was get lost.

      Meh, she was a woman, and there was nobody to ask for directions.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  13. I would have thought... by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Arabs were more partial to Frank Herbert.

    --
    My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
    1. Re:I would have thought... by Pope · · Score: 1

      I see you are wearing your red Security uniform desert style!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:I would have thought... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      They say Mahdi, we say Kwisatz Haderach, the Jews say Meshiah....whatever.

    3. Re:I would have thought... by jandrese · · Score: 2

      I don't know, if you consider the Spice to be a metaphor for Oil, then the book is about how some dirty nomads overthrow the oppressive resource monopolizing government. Maybe not the message the gulf state monarchs want to convey.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:I would have thought... by EnsilZah · · Score: 2

      Ha, more like a bunch of dirty nomads are used as tools to overthrow an oppressive resource monopolizing government only to enact an expansionist theocracy in its stead.

    5. Re:I would have thought... by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      I remember that at some point, I believe under Leto II's rule Arrakis basically has Fremen-themed reservations/safari/theme-park where descendents of the Fremen reenact their ancestors' nomadic lifestyle.
      So might be a bit too meta.

    6. Re:I would have thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, more like a bunch of dirty nomads are used as tools to overthrow an oppressive resource monopolizing government only to try to enact an expansionist theocracy in its stead, but end up with a giant talking worm who bitchslaps humanity over and over and over again until we at least learn *something* finally.

      Damn the Romans!

  14. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Psh. I see your silly little AT-AT's and raise you 1 galaxy class federation starship. Hell, bring your "death star". I hear they got the fire rate on that up to like three shots per annum, when someone isn't tossing firecrackers in the hvac.

  15. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Deus.1.01 · · Score: 1

    "Morning, gentlemen. This is your wakeup call. *button* "

    --
    My -1 Troll is actually a +1 funny. And my -1 flame is actually a +1 insightfull.
  16. For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2

    That kind of money could buy how many new seasons of Firefly? Wow, what a thought! And more seriously, I don't think it would be a bad idea for rich sheiks who don't know what to do with their money to invest in something cultural and immortal like a smart scifi show. It would generate a whole lot of good will and visibility than some vanity theme park or a sign visible from space.

    1. Re:For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Or they could have invested in "geek things" in ways that aren't purely for entertainment.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      or they could do something slightly more useful and build a technology infrastructure for the time when old demand plummets

    3. Re:For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, *any* Sci-Fi-Series with Summer will do :-P

    4. Re:For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article doesn't indicate who is paying, just that the king gave his okay. It could be outside money.

    5. Re:For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefly is dead because no one wanted to see it. Even the movie afterward, was NOT a money maker. Barely broke even.

      So what is wrong with Star Trek park? Nothing, provided they get a return on investment (I hope they researched it!!). It also means jobs for locals.

    6. Re:For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The same comment still applies.

      You're still paying for a juiced up version of a movie theatre versus a university, a lab, or a fab.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by Fned · · Score: 1

      Firefly is dead because Fox didn't want anyone to see it.

      FTFY.

    8. Re:For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Countries *love* tourism. They barely have to do anything beyond "Don't kill tourists" and the money comes flowing in.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    9. Re:For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would be a bad idea for rich sheiks who don't know what to do with their money to invest in something cultural and immortal like a smart scifi show.

      Cultural? OK, maybe, for fairly low values of 'culture'.
      Immortal? Wow. I think it's time for some serious Outside for Dr. Spork. No more TV for a month.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:For $1.5B they could do a lot for scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you saying the King of Jordan should fund the sequel to an English-speaking SF series that was barely popular enough to be noticed by most English-speaking public, instead of building a huge tourist attraction in his own country?

      It seems to me that King Abdullah certainly knows better about how to spend his own money than you do.

  17. Oil IS renewable .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it just takes a few hundred million years to renew.

  18. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering their ships can't move at warp 2 a shuttle could decimate a death star.

    Ensign: Captain. Those Star Wars guys have built another death star.
    Captain: Sigh. Alright. Send another shuttle.

  19. Jordan is not a gulf state by qbzzt · · Score: 2

    Most of the Jordanian population lives in the west, close to the Jordan river - not in the east. It is about a thousand miles from Amman (the capital) or Aqaba (the one port and the location of the park) to the Persian Gulf.

    I think this is stimulus spending. Abdullah doesn't want to have the problems of his neighbors to the north (Syria) and south-west (Egypt).

    With luck and really good security, they might be able to get a lot of tourists from Israel.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
    1. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by jpapon · · Score: 1

      With luck and really good security, they might be able to get a lot of tourists from Israel.

      That's the thing... it only takes one idiot with a vest filled with C4 and ball bearings to forever ruin the magic of a theme park.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    2. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by qbzzt · · Score: 2

      It will probably be a bit more difficult. How much do you want to bet there will be explosive sniffing dogs and metal detectors at the entrance? It would be vulnerable, but an attack will be harder.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    3. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by jpapon · · Score: 2

      How is that hard? Just blow the bomb up in the middle of the long lines of people waiting to go through security. I mean... if you've ever been to a theme park you know how the lines to get tickets (nevermind to get through tight security) can be massive...

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    4. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      I have never been in a theme park in a place where the wages are as low as they are in Jordan. I suspect that:

      1. They'll be over staffed by our standards.
      2. Security will be walking around with their sniffing dogs, all the way from the parking lot to the gate.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    5. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by jpapon · · Score: 1
      Besides, I wasn't commenting so much on the difficulty of bombing, because yes, with enough money, security could be made virtually air-tight.

      I was merely saying that it seems like it would only take one incident to bankrupt the park. The thought that you might be killed, or that others were murdered right where you are standing, really takes all the joy out of a theme-park.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    6. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      Good point. What makes things even worse is that the terrorists don't have to actually pull off an attack. Just threatening it might be enough.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    7. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Depends on the degree of attack and coverage - coasters that people have died on in freak accidents are still popular with tourists. Also if Israelis are a heavy source, they try to ignore terrorism and get on with their lives.

    8. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by timeOday · · Score: 1

      These things happen, life goes on, brand names recover...

    9. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it's a red vest, anyway

    10. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Jordan has joined the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf earlier this year. So it is now considered a gulf state by many. And the fact that the king would spend so extravagantly on such low-priority projects is only supporting my point.

    11. Re:Jordan is not a gulf state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you been to a good theme park lately? Even Disneyland and Disney World has found ways to move lines quickly, even through security.

      Nevertheless you raise a good point, and one I've often wondered about, when it comes to long lines and security. Plenty of airports have very long lines and you have to wonder, if, as we're told, a body count is the aim, why aren't attacks in line common?

  20. Gulf state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hadn't heard about Jordan conquering one of its neighbors (Irak or Saudi Arabia) lately to make it a "Gulf state" (otherwise it would be at least 500 miles away from the Gulf), so I'm a bit surprised. Or is it just bad geography?

  21. We will assimilate the Death Star. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2

    Resistance is futile.

    1. Re:We will assimilate the Death Star. by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Call in the Daleks for reinforcements!

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    2. Re:We will assimilate the Death Star. by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Resistance may be futile, but Voltage has some potential!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:We will assimilate the Death Star. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Remember, with great Power comes great current squared times resistance.

  22. Will it be in English? by OutLawSuit · · Score: 1

    I think a lot of the appeal of park would be lost to Trekkies if the park just catered to Arabic speaking tourists. At the same time though, it's in an Arabic speaking country so it seems kind of odd for it be in English.

    I guess it'll have to be bi-lingual in absence of universal translators. This situation just seems kind of odd to me in that American franchise would have a theme park catering to it in another part of the world.

    1. Re:Will it be in English? by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      I doubt it would be any more English than something like Tokyo Disneyland.

    2. Re:Will it be in English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will probably be bilingual, as is every other thing here; English is widely spoken in the Arabic countries, and even people who don't know much can communicate in Goodenuf English. Most schools teach it.

      Also, yes, Jordan is not a Gulf state, if you want to put it in a category it's the Levant, along with Lebanon, Syria, Palestine.

    3. Re:Will it be in English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the Jordan Royal Family were educated in England.
      They speak better English than most Slash Dotters.

    4. Re:Will it be in English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be "Slash Daughters."

    5. Re:Will it be in English? by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      No, Klingon.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:Will it be in English? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      No, Klingon.

      So they'll be doing the original versions of Shakespeare's plays?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  23. man, WTF, the future used to be cool by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    mmmmmm....TOS miniskirt uniforms... even the purple-haired moonbabes at SHADO moonbase come in as a far second

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  24. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by c0mpliant · · Score: 1

    They're still using primitive lasers. Wouldn't even penatrate the shields

    --
    There is no -1 disagree
  25. Enterprise Hotel by gobanjoboy · · Score: 1

    I would have thought for sure that this project would include building a hotel that is a 1:1 scale model of one of the Enterprises.

  26. S-O-S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are those happy days, they seem so hard to find (just like news for nerds)

    Whatever happened to our love
    I wish I understood
    It used to be so nice, it used to be so good

    So when you're near me, darling can't you hear me
    SOS
    The love you gave me, nothing else can save me
    SOS
    When you're gone (when you're gone)
    How can I even try to go on
    When you're gone (when you're gone)
    Though I try how can I carry on

    You seem so far away though you are standing near
    You made me feel alive, but something died I fear
    I really tried to make it out
    I wish I understood
    What happened to our love, it used to be so good

    So when you're near me, darling can't you hear me
    SOS
    The love you gave me, nothing else can save me
    SOS
    When you're gone (when your gone)
    How can I even try to go on
    When you're gone (when your gone)
    Though I try how can I carry on

    So when you're near me, darling can't you hear me
    SOS
    And the love you gave me, nothing else can save me
    SOS
    When you're gone (when you're gone)
    How can I even try to go on
    When you're gone (when you're gone)
    Though I try how can I carry on
    When you're gone (when you're gone)
    How can I even try to go on
    When you're gone (when your gone)
    Though I try how can I carry on

  27. ...I can't wait for them to discover Firefly. by Tmack · · Score: 1
    ..and start a holy war against Fox for cancelling it.

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    1. Re:...I can't wait for them to discover Firefly. by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      Justifiably so.

    2. Re:...I can't wait for them to discover Firefly. by Wovel · · Score: 1

      My brother seems to be calling for a firefly Jihad.

  28. What a waste of money by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Who seriously believes that nerds are going to fly in sufficient numbers to the middle east and spend enough money to justify spending a billion and a half dollars on a theme park? It's one of those ideas which is so fucking stupid it would take a king to greenlight it.

    1. Re:What a waste of money by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Poeple in the middle east need theme parks as well. It doesn't really mater what the theme is. If it still has roller coasters, water slides, and a reasonalbe ticket price it will do well. Not much added cost in making it trekkie themed. Cheap uniforms, plastic props, and paint will get you 90% there.

    2. Re:What a waste of money by Hipcatjack · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself, the first thing i thought when i read this was, "man now i have a really good reason to vactaion in Jordan!" Assuming you believe the stereotype (and actually Star Trek is famous for breaking this as apparent in the King) most trekies are more finacially secured on account of their higher than average education level (math, Science, ect.. affiliations) than say a construction worker et al.... Not that construction workers aren't star Trek fans, my family for example...

    3. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and a theme that hasn't been done before, and quite popular, at that. Instead of being tacked on to some other theme park as an afterthought, it's the central theme. Heck yeah!

    4. Re:What a waste of money by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't people go? People travel to Dubai all the time. And Jordan is much closer to Europe than the United States is, so Europeans would have an easier time going there than here, especially if the park were in, say, California. And you're also ignoring all the other things that can be staged in and around the park. They could put on the biggest Star Trek convention you've ever seen. And even if the thing only manages to break even, the boost to the local economy could be huge.

      And who ever thought a theme park in the middle of a central Florida swamp would attract any visitors?

    5. Re:What a waste of money by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Who seriously believes that nerds are going to fly in sufficient numbers to the middle east and spend enough money to justify spending a billion and a half dollars on a theme park?

      There are nerds -- and, more relevant to the immediate issue, Star Trek fans, which while the two groups overlap aren't the same thing -- in the Middle East. (Including, incidentally, King Abdullah of Jordan.)

      Plus, from most of the descriptions I can find in news articles, it seems to be only a mildly Star Trek themed park, and more of a park with some Star Trek themed attraction, as well as local history/cultured themed attractions, etc.

    6. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they are smart enough to purchase sufficient surrounding land for the Jordanian version of Epcot et. al. A Star Trek "world" with other worlds added on over time makes a lot more sense than a purely Star Trek themed park in the long term.

    7. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They wanted to build it in the US but had to cancel it since Star Trek is just thinly veiled communist propaganda.

    8. Re:What a waste of money by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Cheap uniforms, plastic props, and paint will get you 90% there.

      Worked for the TV show. Ought to work for the theme park.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its only stupid if you wanted to make any money off it. If you just want it because you're a giant trek nerd, then its money well spent.

    10. Re:What a waste of money by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Money well spent? You could probably build 2 or 3 luxury 5000 passenger Star Trek (or other franchise) themed cruise ships for that price and then you wouldn't have to expect people to fly to Jordan to enjoy them either.

  29. There's no doubt.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's good to be king!

  30. Dune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would make more sense than Firefly.

  31. What about Terrans having no Souls? by Hipcatjack · · Score: 1

    I love that somewhere there will be a Star Trek dedicated site of merit again. However, it will be interesting to see if the Political/Religous context of a Secular Humanist philosphy that is so paramount to the ST Universe will be downplayed on account that it is strictly speaking anathema to Islam (and most of the Big religions for that matter).

  32. Why not save the JWT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool anyway and better than building the worlds largest building (Saudi Arabia) but this money could've saved the JWT. Shame no do-gooding billionairs can fund it... that thing could answer fundamental questions about our universe, never been a project that advanced and now it's going to be scrapped. Having said that the Jordanian monarchy is going to collapse anyway, majority palestinian population who have no citizenship ruled by a british imposed hashemite minority family clan... it's like a south africa that nobody cares about.

    1. Re:Why not save the JWT? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Save the JWT? Why should he want to save an American advertising company?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  33. Subtle geographical humor by Torodung · · Score: 2

    In Jordan, for political reasons, the transporter is just called a porter.

    1. Re:Subtle geographical humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one else got this, but THAT was funny.

    2. Re:Subtle geographical humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice!

    3. Re:Subtle geographical humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a Transjordan joke, yes?

  34. Next Vacation Destination...NOW KNOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course I'd bundle it into a larger trip that has me visiting some of the other winning cultural aspects of such a trip. Yet this is both too funny, and better yet so nerdy cool that there's no way I'd ever avoid all the potential dangers of travelling into such a region. Sign me on and "Beam me over, Scotty! LOL I'm so there - hope they actually do it real justice and have a real working transporting ride! ;)

  35. We wonder why. by kryliss · · Score: 1

    And we wonder why gas is almost $4.00 a gallon..... This is where the money goes.

    --
    --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    1. Re:We wonder why. by NanoGradStudent · · Score: 1

      Hate to burst your narrative, but Jordan doesn't have any significant oil reserves (and is a net oil importer):
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Jordan#Energy

      Depending on how high the speculators drive up the price of oil, the oil shales may or may not become worthwhile to exploit (which will require billions of dollars of additional investment, and probably a decade or two).

      --
      Just a little guy, y'know?
    2. Re:We wonder why. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      As a Star Trek fan, I'm not sure if you are degrading or promoting the fact.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  36. Everything is well in ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a 3 months old story ( see http://www.attractionsmanagement.com//detail1.cfm?pagetype=detail&subject=news&codeid=259883&site=AM).

    What saddens me, is the fact that King Abdullah somehow is the cool guy "yeah he was an extra in ST episode, he is fluent in english and nice to the west". Nothing about his brutal politic to crack down on demonstrators in Jordan, in fact you won't find any news about that in most US/Western MSM. All is good and fine as long as he is good to the US and Israel.

  37. Fanwork ban by tepples · · Score: 1

    Nothing inherently prevents a derivative work from being an improvement...

    Except perhaps having a fanwork-banning copyright owner.

  38. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    A battleship in a land battle? Bad idea. You will probably frag as many of your friendlies as you do the enemy.

    This isn't a siege inside a Chicago office building we would be talking about here.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  39. Better investment. by Nautica · · Score: 1

    You would think that the $1.2 billion would have been better invested into a commercial space company like SpaceX.

    1. Re:Better investment. by Hipcatjack · · Score: 1

      If this site inspires just one kid to be the next Von Braun or Eddison or Tesla or Wright brother (either one), or even Roddenbery!, then it will be worth it by far. By far.

    2. Re:Better investment. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah.... except a billion dollars focused on solid science education is likely to create far more.

      Roddenberry? he was a tv guy who managed to get one mediocre program on the air. One whose best episodes he had nothing to do with. Don't get me wrong I enjoy ST, but to put him in the same league as Edison*? Tesla? the wright brothers? please.

      *note the single 'd'

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Better investment. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Entertainment can be important. A part of why I went into engineering was Star Trek, and from talking to other students it was a popular influence.

      If you stacked Tesla or Edison against the combined accomplishments of everyone who was inspired by Star Trek I am not confident the masters would prevail.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  40. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by khr · · Score: 1

    Is this like the Crimson Permanent Assurance?

  41. Vegas ST exhibit closes after lack of new shows by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The Las Vegas Hilton Star Trek mockups, museum and rides were interesting, even with a $16 admission. But interested dwindled in tandem with no TV series and only one movie int he past eight years. And the closed it a few years ago.

    1. Re:Vegas ST exhibit closes after lack of new shows by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      I was lucky enough to visit it a couple of years before it closed. Certainly worth the admission for trekkers, it is unfortunate that it closed. I've marked my calendar though: 2014 trip to Aqaba, Jordan ;)

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  42. Ok new here.. loves every one by Forestwalker · · Score: 0

    Ok.. I have friends that are of Islam.. I'm not. But.. a "play on Moron in a round room.. and tell them Pee in a Corner." I believe many of the Islamic Faith are now growing in Education are Far from Idiots.. and the Extremisms the media likes to constantly look at are not a Fair Estimation of ALL of Islam. This being said.. I can joke with my Islamic Friends Who point themselves toward Mecca .. 5 times a day.. no matter where they are.. To pray. What I wanna see.. is 5 Muslims in a space Craft 5 light years away.. in a Gravity building spin.. and Ask THEM to Pray 5 times a day.. - see's them running every 2 minutes to reposition towards Mecca over and over again. Mooos leems In Space ... Space .. Space.. Space.. Sorry.. doesn't have any parody to Monte Pythons Jahadists in Space.. I was hunting. I refuse to say anything wrong about Allah or Mohomed.. or their book either. I tried reading it.. odd book for westerners.. but has very pretty sections. But before the New Guy gets Flamed or modded or called a Troll or anything..I can joke with those of Islamic background.. because they know I am not against them.. and they Don't like the extremists either. They Give the whole of them a bad name because of the Media. Let's kinda like.. Love one another.. On the Track of the real thread... I would go to the New Theme Park.. Sounds cool. Arabic does look more like Klingon though. Could really work for an Atmosphere thing. I'd like to see what 1.5 Billion would get them in a Sci Fi Theme. Might be worth Visiting.. Jordan is a Beautiful place ! Oh.. Heaven forbid they end up liking DUNE .

    1. Re:Ok new here.. loves every one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've met a number of Musselmen that would find that quite funny. Maybe even volunteer for the ride ..

      I'm off to muse over why your post makes me want to decode something... A nd be jealous of your nick a while.

  43. Not worth risking your life or freedom. by flatcat · · Score: 1

    No way am I going to cross the Neutral Zone to visit a theme park even if it is a E ticket ride.

  44. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Tarsir · · Score: 1

    This issue has been thoroughly settled for years.

    In case you're too lazy to follow the link, published figures have Slave-I substantially out-performing the Enterprise-D. To address the AC GP, Star Wars vessels routinely travel cross-galaxy in a matter of hours, while Star Trek vessels would take decades to travel across a significant fraction of the galaxy. I'm not the site's author, but I was thoroughly impressed with the analysis and technical knowledge brought to bear on the subject.

  45. Nerd Fail by geekoid · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dilithium crystals(radan) do not power anything, it's a regulator for the matter/anti-matter reaction. It's like saying the valves in a nuclear reactor power cities.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Nerd Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also their extra-dimensional properties that helps to generate the warp field.

    2. Re:Nerd Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Huh, what produces the anti-matter?

      I never followed the tech that closely but I had always assumed that the dilithium powered the anti-matter creation and then then anti-matter containment field acted like a capacitor storing the power for when they really needed it.

      That said, anyone else bothered by the fact that all those ships containing anti-matter cores that got blown up near Vulcan in that new movie didn't destroy the planet before the Enterprise even got over there?

    3. Re:Nerd Fail by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      +5 Informative. Yeah, gotta love Slashdot....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  46. I can't wait for them to discover Firefly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But, which side will they be on? Which side naturally fits their ideology?
    {o.o}

  47. Female Captain, Will there be issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will Janeway be portrayed wearing a Tarp? What a waste of 7 of 9 as welll......

    At least that will fix the ugly but on the forehead of B'ellanna Torres.

  48. Only Monarch to be on Star Trek too by dtolman · · Score: 2

    Lesson learned - always find time to cast the Crown Prince to be on your show, you never know when it'll pay off: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kmut6FJ1d4M Now we know what ??? is in step 3: wait for extra to become wealthy king.

    1. Re:Only Monarch to be on Star Trek too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't the Crown Prince at the time. The previous king changed his mind on who was going to be his successor at the last minute.

  49. Try Andromeda by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    No really try watching it. I'm halfway through the last season and like it better than Voyager and Enterprise.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Try Andromeda by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Let me change it a little

      Try Cow Shit
      No really try eating it. I'm halfway through the last pile, and like it better than Dog Shit and Horse Shit.

      And yes, I have watch all 3, and yes it's better.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Try Andromeda by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      If Trance isn't purple, I've got trouble with it.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  50. This is NOT Mecca. This is Jordan. by Benfea · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The previous king was often the only voice of reason on matters pertaining to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. He was the only one to criticize both sides when they deserved it. The current king was not the crown prince, but the previous king changed his choice of successor at the last minute. Thankfully, king Abdullah has continued his father's tradition.

    King Abdullah did things in his youth that he probably would not have done were he the crown prince. Things like appearing as an extra in a Star Trek: TNG episode. I believe that makes him the only monarch on the planet ever to appear in a Star Trek episode. Clearly, he is more of a Star Trek fan than I thought, and good for him.

    1. Re:This is NOT Mecca. This is Jordan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC it was Voyager, not TNG.

  51. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Guspaz · · Score: 2

    While I'd generally agree with some of that (SW ships definitely have the speed advantage), most of the figures cited there are silly. They have the heavy laser gun on a troop transport (a shuttle, basically) putting out enough energy to wipe out all life on the planet in a single shot... Makes the death star kind of redundant, don't it? Their scales are so far off that a single hit from any SW laser or turbolaser should completely incinerates whatever ship it hits if the shields are down, when there's tons and tons of canonical evidence to the contrary (damage is caused, but not as much as the numbers you link to indicate).

    I suspect the reason for this is because when Rick Sternbach and Michael Okuda were coming up with these figures, they probably consulted real-life figures and theory and extrapolated, while the author of Star Wars Episode II Incredible Cross-Sections probably just made up stuff that sounded good.

    That's not a knock against Star Wars, it reflects a different focus. Star Wars was never about the tech.

  52. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by c0mpliant · · Score: 1

    I did go to that site and I'm afraid that's like the politicians saying "our policies are right, check this site for the proof" and then linking to their own site. I could link you to my proof, you can link your proof. I've had this discussion too many times, you've had this discussion too many times, do we really need to go into it?

    --
    There is no -1 disagree
  53. And you'd waste it on Firefly by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

    Which was a boring. I don't know how many times I've tried watching this drivel and ended up rolling my eyes so much, I'd get dizzy.

    1. Re:And you'd waste it on Firefly by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Is that you, Brian?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:And you'd waste it on Firefly by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      I have no idea to what you're referring.

      For me personally, Firefly drives deeply into uncanny valley. My mind rejects the Firefly universe because in trying for "realism" in certain aspects, it offends fantasy sense for all the other unrealistic aspects of the show. The result is that my suspension of disbelief is forcefully and unwillingly lifted all the goddamn time with this show.

  54. Can they serve synthehol? by jakedata · · Score: 2

    Might get more Muslim visitors that way.

    1. Re:Can they serve synthehol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, but can I smoke a dubi at Las Vegas's Star Trek hotel?

  55. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit cherry-picked "information" from non-canon publications of guesses somewhere. Movies make star wars looks weak? Use random print material. Print material don't make sense? Cherry pick 3 or 4 things from movies and tv shows. But in all cases, make sure you draw the same conclusion. I guess we could expect as much from StarDestroyer.net.

    Site is a puff piece. PS - Star Wars is gay now. Deal with it.

  56. What happens when........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the other middle eastern countries builds a star wars theme park. They will then be suicide bombing eachother over religion and star wars vs star trek. It will be total chaos over there worse than it is now. George lucas will be on tv begging for peace and obama will invade the middle east again to claim both theme parks so his kids get to use them free of charge and change the names of them to obama land and not let anyone in them but himself.

    But in the end, 1.5billion dollars used in a country like jordan and its to build a theme park? What a waste.

  57. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by operagost · · Score: 1

    I love that article for the F-15 SE II reference. I used to play that on my Turbo XT (!) and loved how the F-15 could take more hits than the A-10 in Tank Killer.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  58. A man, a plan, a canal... by memorycardfull · · Score: 1

    Hamad!

  59. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Tarsir · · Score: 1

    I've actually never had a Star Wars vs Star Trek discussion. I stumbled across the site through some Slashdot posting years ago. If you have a site which is similarly rigorous, I'd love to see it.

  60. Re:Human Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    really no more comment needed if it isn't for the lameness filter.

  61. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by c0mpliant · · Score: 1

    Well I find this site far less biased than any other site that I've seen, one way or the other. Both sides have their advantages

    --
    There is no -1 disagree
  62. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Tarsir · · Score: 1

    I suspect the reason for this is because when Rick Sternbach and Michael Okuda were coming up with these figures, they probably consulted real-life figures and theory and extrapolated, while the author of Star Wars Episode II Incredible Cross-Sections probably just made up stuff that sounded good.

    Star Wars Episode II Incredible Cross-Sections was authored in part by Dr. Curthis Saxton, who holds a doctorate in astrophysics from the University of Sydney. I can't comment on how he came up with the figures. Even if you ignore the books, which is fair, the Empire comes out on top, at least according to the site. I'm not a mechanical engineer, so I have trouble arguing against his analysis.

  63. Lets see... by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the admission charge will be? If they get 1000 visitors each paying $1.5M apiece they'd be able to break even. Likewise if they get 10,000 visitors paying $150,000 each. BTM

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  64. family by __aazsst3756 · · Score: 1

    And yet I would not want to take my family there, even to see Petra. Will this help in their progress toward human rights?

  65. Yeah, uhhh.... by NonFerrousBueller · · Score: 1
    I can't wait for them to discover Firefly.

    I can't wait for them to discover charity.

  66. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you're too lazy to follow the link, published figures have Slave-I substantially out-performing the Enterprise-D

    Pish. Both universes have ships moving at the Speed of Plot.

  67. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Tarsir · · Score: 1

    Yes, but the Speed of Plot required for SW significantly outpaces the Speed of Plot required for ST. A trivial answer to what is ultimately a trivial question :P

  68. Borg... by popeye44 · · Score: 1

    I want to be the first in line on the 7of9 ride..

    --
    Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
  69. Royalty don't wear redshirts by teisho · · Score: 2
  70. I, for one,... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    welcome our oil-rich Middle-Eastern trekkie overlord!

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  71. Re: Middle-East by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>It looks like Sci-fi has finally made it to the Middle East.

    Oh, that's where sci-fi went after it was replaced with syfy...

  72. are you sure? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Tex-ass, Tamaulipas, VeraCruz, Tabasco, Campeche, Yucatan, Quintana Roo and Cuba ?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  73. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    I suspect the reason for this is because when Rick Sternbach and Michael Okuda were coming up with these figures, they probably consulted real-life figures and theory and extrapolated, while the author of Star Wars Episode II Incredible Cross-Sections probably just made up stuff that sounded good.

    Actually I think some of the figures were calculated using evidence from the movies and some basic assumptions and math. Like, there's a scene where you see a Star Destroying shooting asteroids and instantly vaporizing them. Making some reasonable calculations from the frame and the scale and using the asteroid's appearance to approximate it's makeup... you end up with a ridiculous amount of energy required to vaporize it.

    Or take the Death Star -- the amount of energy needed to make an earth-sized planet explode with the chunks flying apart at tremendous velocity making it highly unlikely they would ever coalesce again requires just stupid amounts of energy.

    You can hand-wave the effects on unshielded ships by saying they're using super-alloys or whatever, but really it's just inconsistent. The basic problem is like you said, Star Wars was not about the tech it was about the experience and so things it depicts as normal imply ridiculously powerful weaponry if you try to put them into real terms.

    it's just you kinda have to do that in order to do this ST vs SW thing, and the simple fact is that based on what's depicted on screen Star Wars weapons really are many orders of magnitude more powerful than Star Trek ones.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  74. What, no street view? by mmullings · · Score: 1

    Come on google...mount a camera on a camel.

    --
    I remember when MOD was an audio format, and DOS wasn't a network attack....
  75. I think we may have a winner... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    And it isn't the rest of the civilized world .. those that made those 'people' rich beyond imagination over the last 30 years or so.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  76. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wondered why they never showed the Death Star going into hyperspace. It obviously has hyperdrive, since it zips from system to system pretty quickly.

    For that matter, couldn't the Empire have just jumped within range of the Rebel base after arriving at Yavin? Maybe they were just overconfident that one orbit would be plenty of time to wipe out the Rebels?

  77. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Tarsir · · Score: 1

    I always wondered why they never showed the Death Star going into hyperspace. It obviously has hyperdrive, since it zips from system to system pretty quickly.

    I don't think they showed *anything* going into hyperspace until RotJ, presumably due to budgetary constraints.

    For that matter, couldn't the Empire have just jumped within range of the Rebel base after arriving at Yavin? Maybe they were just overconfident that one orbit would be plenty of time to wipe out the Rebels?

    In books, it's impossible to jump into or out of hyperspace within a gravity well, i.e., too close to a planet. I'm pretty sure this concept is an after-the-fact justification for that plot point

  78. With $1.5 billion, why not a new series!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either he could try to make a series to get onto television. Or he could do the fan series thing like Star Trek Phase II.

  79. Gulf state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jordon is not a Gulf state

  80. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think they showed *anything* going into hyperspace until RotJ

    Sure they did, the Millennium Falcon. That was one of those "whoa!" moments in the first film that blew audiences away!

  81. Re:The S.Trek vs. S.Wars prophecy will be fulfille by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Psh. I see your silly little AT-AT's and raise you 1 galaxy class federation starship. Hell, bring your "death star". I hear they got the fire rate on that up to like three shots per annum, when someone isn't tossing firecrackers in the hvac.

    "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the potential of the Force. "

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon