I read a discussion following the killing of a cyclist in a city near me. One of these comments was extremely enlightening. I don't remember all of it only the part that read: "BICYCLES ARE TOYS." Suddenly it all became clear to me. Many car drivers feel that bicycles are toys for kids and for entertainment and therefore should only be used off-road. Roads are for transportation and in this fellow's comment he said that the (US) government was to blame for encouraging the use of bicycles as a form of viable transportation.
That's how many motorized vehicle drivers feel so it's no wonder they hate having bicycles on the road.
Probably right. There's a good chance that the reason the course was created and made a requirement is because instructors were frustrated by students who didn't know how to write a term paper or use a spreadsheet program to analyse data. They see it as simply getting all students familiar with the tools they will be required to use in later courses.
Maybe it's a dumb idea but this seems like the perfect application for a PC kit that a parent and child could build together. The parent that missed the PC boom and the kid that is just getting old enough to start learning the ropes. A crate with motherboard, hard drive, power supply, DVD drive, chassis, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard with step by step instructions and maybe even a DVD to watch. Video upgrade could be added later on and the OS could be pre-loaded on the HDD already configured to work with the included hardware. Does anyone make something like this?
I suspect it has to do mostly with quantity. If they pulled that with hundreds of thousands of customers with defective computer monitors the effect on their reputation would be catastrophic. The plasma market is microscopic by comparison so they probably feel it's worth the gamble. Particularly when the replacement cost is so high.
I've not personally seen issues with Samsung LCD displays. I was speaking of their plasmas which seem to be poorly engineered compared to their competition. I base this on the fact that no other manufacturer has this issue (spontaneous cracking) and also from the feedback I have received from people who service them.
This is a particularly expensive failure as it requires replacement of televisions costing $1500 or more retail. Like i said they used to pony up and honor their warranty but they did an about face around 2 years ago and have denied everything (so far as I can tell) since then claiming that the customer is essentially lying. I find this attitude particularly offensive so I will take my business and my money elsewhere.
If you are curious google "samsung plasma cracked" and enjoy reading the hundreds of instances of Sammy plasma sets spontaneously cracking due to thermal management issues. This usually happens in warranty and Samsung used to replace the sets. But as time went by it was happening too often so suddenly Samsung policy changed and since then every case I have heard of has ended with them saying "user damage" and denying the claim. The only people I have read about getting their set replaced are those that filed suit in small claims court. Samsung does not want this to go to court!
In my own case my $2100 58" plasma popped and went black while my wife and I were watching a DVD from across the room. In the almost 3 years we have had it the screen has never been touched to my knowledge. Not even to clean it. We have been ridiculously careful and protective of it...to no avail. Closer inspection after the set stopped working revealed a crack about 2 feet long in the lower right corner of the screen. As expected..."user damage."
I'll never buy another Samsung product as long as there's an alternative after seeing how they fraudulently avoid their responsibilities.
There will almost certainly be a waiver for vehicles over a certain GVW. If a vehicle has a capacity over a certain point it will be exempted and can (and will) be made with fuel consumption around 10-15mpg just as they are today...and people will buy them and claim all the same bullshit reasons (big family, safety, etc). Look...the cars are not the problem. It's the attitude that creates the market for the gas guzzlers that is the problem. People across the pond have been happy to drive smaller and more efficient cars for years. What's our hangup?
I work for HP and our enterprise class machines are top shelf. The problem is that HP seems to feel it needs to compete at the low-end of the market. If you want to compare apples to Apples then stack any of our high end desktop or mobile workstations against theirs. I think they will compare pretty favorably. The real issue is that we have sullied our reputation by selling low grade systems to the masses. Gone are the days of HP test and measurement equipment that you bought once and used for 30 years without a hiccup (Agilent still makes great tools). Or what about HP calculators (ending with the HP 48G series - all subsequent ones are junk, IMO)? They were lust objects among engineers then just like iPhones are among hipsters today.
Apple has a computer product line of about 10 items, give or take. HP has probably hundreds in just the PC market. We need to cut that back to maybe a dozen and get rid of the low end stuff. We're just fighting over scraps in that market and it just isn't worth it.
I really wonder about the situation most of us have been in where we are driving at a safe distance only to have some clown squeeze in front of us. Most drivers realize that if they leave a safe gap it will happen again and again and they are constantly slowing to open the area in front of them.
So how about an autonomous vehicle? I have to assume they aren't following at 3 feet or something just because they have mind numbingly fast reaction times. So if they are following at something resembling a normal (safe) distance (for a human)...how do they deal with constantly slowing to re-open that gap?
The logical progression of this is that the people behind this automated vehicle will start getting pissed off since it keeps slowing down every time someone pulls in front of it. Their response: go around and pull in front of it...duh. Eventually there won't be anyone behind the automated car. Problem solved...I guess.
Indeed. Calculus is often the first hard math that takes time to solve. In addition to teaching problem solving skills it weeds out a lot of people who just won't grind through the pain. They give up too easily and in my opinion aren't cut out to be engineers/scientists/programmers, etc. Problem solving is hard...if you don't have the determination to get through a fairly complex math problem then you probably should consider other career choices.
It's too bad that most people missed the point of Soylent Green. The book was a warning about overpopulation and the resulting destruction of the planet. The real earthshaking revelation in the movie was that the oceans were dying and that the food source used from there had dried up. Since this article seems to be suggesting we turn to the oceans for food the predictions of the book and movie seem to be coming to fruition.
It could also have been the predecessor - the TC1000. That was a dog because it was based around the slow Transmeta processor. The TC1100 was a real Intel processor and actually worked really well.
Not to mention things like the whole machine only weighed 3.1 pounds with battery and keyboard. Many of the parts of the chassis were magnesium. It was a serious enterprise-class machine. I think that's why HP didn't mass market it. They seem to think the general public isn't "entitled" to the higher grade systems.
That was the TC1100 - one of the only hybrid slate tablets of its day. It started out as a Compaq product and became HP after the merger.
I had one and it got me through 6 years of electrical engineering. I still believe it was the best machine of its day for students because of its weight, size, build quality and versatility. It was very expensive for its performance but to me it was worth it. All said, though, the performance was quite good if you kept it clean. I ran Matlab, did PSPICE simulations, some light CAD (hooked to an external mouse and monitor), not to mention taking hundreds of pages of handwritten notes and running all the standard MS Office crap. Seriously there wasn't a single thing I threw at that machine that it failed to run. Not to mention that in the whole time I used it I don't recall having a single blue screen. My brother lusted over the machine so when I graduated in 08 I gave it to him. He still has it.
I also believe it was one of HP's worst marketing debacles ever. I swear it NEVER failed that when I sat down in a populated area and pulled out that machine and opened it up at least one person if not more would come over and ask what it was...and by that time it was already discontinued. Nobody had ever seen it. HP marketed it to managers and doctors and it ended up being a failure.
I always felt HP should resurrect the TC1100 in slimmed down trim with updated internals and they'd have a winner (if it was done right). But alas...HP has chosen to chase others rather than lead. This was just another opportunity to offer a unique product that would set them apart and they squandered it...again.
There's still a following for the TC1100. I bet when Windows8 comes out people will be slapping that on them...and I bet it will run great.
In December of 2011 a local store had the 4GB console with Kinect for $299 plus a $75 gift card. On top of that there was a stackable $30 off making it $269.99.
Since 4G is not much, I asked about the 250GB. No specials...$399. Ouch.
But the guy said what he's been doing is selling people the 320GB add-on HDD. It goes for $129, had a 15%off coupon ($19.50) and a stackable $20 off coupon getting it down to $90.49. I then applied my $75 gift card making it $15.49.
So, the bottom line was a 324GB Xbox with Kinect for $270 + $15.50 = $285.50. A bit less than the regular $299 for the 4G and a damn sight better than the $399 for the 250G bundle. This was FAR cheaper than anything I found online.
Additionally, I still have yet to pay Microsoft a penny for a membership. I've signed up for Live (which is free) so I get updates and such but so far I haven't played online. Thus far my time has been occupied with Skyrim, Portal and other stand-alone games. I keep getting offers for Live Gold but I just ignore them. I really haven't missed getting my ass kicked online (I'm a crap gamer, btw). That said, I also have a PS3 Slim that I can play online with for free if I feel the need.
You can find bargains if you are willing to wait. And if you've been living without a console for a long time there are plenty of old games available used (I'm playing through the Orange Box right now).
So if you are on a budget and MUST have online play, get a PS3. If you really really want the Kinect do not despair...you can probably keep yourself entertained with single player games for the Xbox for quite a while and avoid the monthly fees like I have.
True. However the company I work for (not a lighting company) is devoting a lot of effort to identifying and eliminating counterfeits because of the damage it does to our reputation and our brand. Not to mention the fact that we have to replace "product" that isn't even ours just to maintain good will with the customer.
It seems from the original Guardian article that as much effort was put into analyzing threat response as was put into understanding the reasons behind that response. As much as we don't trust the Chinese we are learning that they also don't trust us. If we begin to understand what we do that makes them uneasy we may just be able to avoid triggering the events we fear most.
I once contacted a company about a CFL that failed spectacularly (near combustion) shortly after I bought it. They informed me that the market is loaded with counterfeits that are garbage and are sullying the reputation of quality CFLs.
I'd guess that a significant percentage of the early failures are counterfeits. I suspect the same is happening with LED based incandescent replacements.
Slashdot Mirror
I read a discussion following the killing of a cyclist in a city near me. One of these comments was extremely enlightening. I don't remember all of it only the part that read: "BICYCLES ARE TOYS." Suddenly it all became clear to me. Many car drivers feel that bicycles are toys for kids and for entertainment and therefore should only be used off-road. Roads are for transportation and in this fellow's comment he said that the (US) government was to blame for encouraging the use of bicycles as a form of viable transportation.
That's how many motorized vehicle drivers feel so it's no wonder they hate having bicycles on the road.
Probably right. There's a good chance that the reason the course was created and made a requirement is because instructors were frustrated by students who didn't know how to write a term paper or use a spreadsheet program to analyse data. They see it as simply getting all students familiar with the tools they will be required to use in later courses.
Maybe it's a dumb idea but this seems like the perfect application for a PC kit that a parent and child could build together. The parent that missed the PC boom and the kid that is just getting old enough to start learning the ropes. A crate with motherboard, hard drive, power supply, DVD drive, chassis, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard with step by step instructions and maybe even a DVD to watch. Video upgrade could be added later on and the OS could be pre-loaded on the HDD already configured to work with the included hardware. Does anyone make something like this?
I suspect it has to do mostly with quantity. If they pulled that with hundreds of thousands of customers with defective computer monitors the effect on their reputation would be catastrophic. The plasma market is microscopic by comparison so they probably feel it's worth the gamble. Particularly when the replacement cost is so high.
I've not personally seen issues with Samsung LCD displays. I was speaking of their plasmas which seem to be poorly engineered compared to their competition. I base this on the fact that no other manufacturer has this issue (spontaneous cracking) and also from the feedback I have received from people who service them.
This is a particularly expensive failure as it requires replacement of televisions costing $1500 or more retail. Like i said they used to pony up and honor their warranty but they did an about face around 2 years ago and have denied everything (so far as I can tell) since then claiming that the customer is essentially lying. I find this attitude particularly offensive so I will take my business and my money elsewhere.
If you are curious google "samsung plasma cracked" and enjoy reading the hundreds of instances of Sammy plasma sets spontaneously cracking due to thermal management issues. This usually happens in warranty and Samsung used to replace the sets. But as time went by it was happening too often so suddenly Samsung policy changed and since then every case I have heard of has ended with them saying "user damage" and denying the claim. The only people I have read about getting their set replaced are those that filed suit in small claims court. Samsung does not want this to go to court!
In my own case my $2100 58" plasma popped and went black while my wife and I were watching a DVD from across the room. In the almost 3 years we have had it the screen has never been touched to my knowledge. Not even to clean it. We have been ridiculously careful and protective of it...to no avail. Closer inspection after the set stopped working revealed a crack about 2 feet long in the lower right corner of the screen. As expected..."user damage."
I'll never buy another Samsung product as long as there's an alternative after seeing how they fraudulently avoid their responsibilities.
There will almost certainly be a waiver for vehicles over a certain GVW. If a vehicle has a capacity over a certain point it will be exempted and can (and will) be made with fuel consumption around 10-15mpg just as they are today...and people will buy them and claim all the same bullshit reasons (big family, safety, etc). Look...the cars are not the problem. It's the attitude that creates the market for the gas guzzlers that is the problem. People across the pond have been happy to drive smaller and more efficient cars for years. What's our hangup?
Absolutely.
I work for HP and our enterprise class machines are top shelf. The problem is that HP seems to feel it needs to compete at the low-end of the market. If you want to compare apples to Apples then stack any of our high end desktop or mobile workstations against theirs. I think they will compare pretty favorably. The real issue is that we have sullied our reputation by selling low grade systems to the masses. Gone are the days of HP test and measurement equipment that you bought once and used for 30 years without a hiccup (Agilent still makes great tools). Or what about HP calculators (ending with the HP 48G series - all subsequent ones are junk, IMO)? They were lust objects among engineers then just like iPhones are among hipsters today.
Apple has a computer product line of about 10 items, give or take. HP has probably hundreds in just the PC market. We need to cut that back to maybe a dozen and get rid of the low end stuff. We're just fighting over scraps in that market and it just isn't worth it.
I guess the Office2007 ribbon is a great example of epic shit from Microsoft. Sounds like there's more to come.
I really wonder about the situation most of us have been in where we are driving at a safe distance only to have some clown squeeze in front of us. Most drivers realize that if they leave a safe gap it will happen again and again and they are constantly slowing to open the area in front of them.
So how about an autonomous vehicle? I have to assume they aren't following at 3 feet or something just because they have mind numbingly fast reaction times. So if they are following at something resembling a normal (safe) distance (for a human)...how do they deal with constantly slowing to re-open that gap?
The logical progression of this is that the people behind this automated vehicle will start getting pissed off since it keeps slowing down every time someone pulls in front of it. Their response: go around and pull in front of it...duh. Eventually there won't be anyone behind the automated car. Problem solved...I guess.
Indeed. Calculus is often the first hard math that takes time to solve. In addition to teaching problem solving skills it weeds out a lot of people who just won't grind through the pain. They give up too easily and in my opinion aren't cut out to be engineers/scientists/programmers, etc. Problem solving is hard...if you don't have the determination to get through a fairly complex math problem then you probably should consider other career choices.
It's too bad that most people missed the point of Soylent Green. The book was a warning about overpopulation and the resulting destruction of the planet. The real earthshaking revelation in the movie was that the oceans were dying and that the food source used from there had dried up. Since this article seems to be suggesting we turn to the oceans for food the predictions of the book and movie seem to be coming to fruition.
Thank you for making my day. I can't stop laughing at this!
They also make sweet temporary tongue studs! Try it! Freak out your parents! Then freak out the ER doctor!
Because someone will have filed patents on any ideas based on it and nobody will do R&D as a result.
It could also have been the predecessor - the TC1000. That was a dog because it was based around the slow Transmeta processor. The TC1100 was a real Intel processor and actually worked really well.
Not to mention things like the whole machine only weighed 3.1 pounds with battery and keyboard. Many of the parts of the chassis were magnesium. It was a serious enterprise-class machine. I think that's why HP didn't mass market it. They seem to think the general public isn't "entitled" to the higher grade systems.
That was the TC1100 - one of the only hybrid slate tablets of its day. It started out as a Compaq product and became HP after the merger.
I had one and it got me through 6 years of electrical engineering. I still believe it was the best machine of its day for students because of its weight, size, build quality and versatility. It was very expensive for its performance but to me it was worth it. All said, though, the performance was quite good if you kept it clean. I ran Matlab, did PSPICE simulations, some light CAD (hooked to an external mouse and monitor), not to mention taking hundreds of pages of handwritten notes and running all the standard MS Office crap. Seriously there wasn't a single thing I threw at that machine that it failed to run. Not to mention that in the whole time I used it I don't recall having a single blue screen. My brother lusted over the machine so when I graduated in 08 I gave it to him. He still has it.
I also believe it was one of HP's worst marketing debacles ever. I swear it NEVER failed that when I sat down in a populated area and pulled out that machine and opened it up at least one person if not more would come over and ask what it was...and by that time it was already discontinued. Nobody had ever seen it. HP marketed it to managers and doctors and it ended up being a failure.
I always felt HP should resurrect the TC1100 in slimmed down trim with updated internals and they'd have a winner (if it was done right). But alas...HP has chosen to chase others rather than lead. This was just another opportunity to offer a unique product that would set them apart and they squandered it...again.
There's still a following for the TC1100. I bet when Windows8 comes out people will be slapping that on them...and I bet it will run great.
In December of 2011 a local store had the 4GB console with Kinect for $299 plus a $75 gift card.
On top of that there was a stackable $30 off making it $269.99.
Since 4G is not much, I asked about the 250GB. No specials...$399. Ouch.
But the guy said what he's been doing is selling people the 320GB add-on HDD. It goes for $129, had a 15%off coupon ($19.50) and a stackable $20 off coupon getting it down to $90.49. I then applied my $75 gift card making it $15.49.
So, the bottom line was a 324GB Xbox with Kinect for $270 + $15.50 = $285.50. A bit less than the regular $299 for the 4G and a damn sight better than the $399 for the 250G bundle. This was FAR cheaper than anything I found online.
Additionally, I still have yet to pay Microsoft a penny for a membership. I've signed up for Live (which is free) so I get updates and such but so far I haven't played online. Thus far my time has been occupied with Skyrim, Portal and other stand-alone games. I keep getting offers for Live Gold but I just ignore them. I really haven't missed getting my ass kicked online (I'm a crap gamer, btw). That said, I also have a PS3 Slim that I can play online with for free if I feel the need.
You can find bargains if you are willing to wait. And if you've been living without a console for a long time there are plenty of old games available used (I'm playing through the Orange Box right now).
So if you are on a budget and MUST have online play, get a PS3. If you really really want the Kinect do not despair...you can probably keep yourself entertained with single player games for the Xbox for quite a while and avoid the monthly fees like I have.
Google will have at least 5G of data on most of us that Apple can't touch.
True. However the company I work for (not a lighting company) is devoting a lot of effort to identifying and eliminating counterfeits because of the damage it does to our reputation and our brand. Not to mention the fact that we have to replace "product" that isn't even ours just to maintain good will with the customer.
It seems from the original Guardian article that as much effort was put into analyzing threat response as was put into understanding the reasons behind that response. As much as we don't trust the Chinese we are learning that they also don't trust us. If we begin to understand what we do that makes them uneasy we may just be able to avoid triggering the events we fear most.
I once contacted a company about a CFL that failed spectacularly (near combustion) shortly after I bought it. They informed me that the market is loaded with counterfeits that are garbage and are sullying the reputation of quality CFLs.
I'd guess that a significant percentage of the early failures are counterfeits. I suspect the same is happening with LED based incandescent replacements.
I like the quote but I can't find a reference to it. Maybe Google is blocking it from the search results?
How long did this page take to load on dial up? ;)
Good reminder though. I just today canceled my cable TV/phone. I will be a lot happier with the money in my pocket.
There's an app for that!