Here in Australia there are very few ISPs that have such a restriction.
Australia doesnt count - you have data caps on everything. Including your dream in the sky National fiber network - have a nice local lan with data caps.
If you want high speed net access, and don't want to pay a lot, you have to play nice with others and share. You can be offered 100mbit or gig to your home, with backhaul to more or less support it, for not too much money. However you can't be offered dedicated bandwidth in that amount unless you want to pay a bunch more. Just how it works.
ah, so its the same as limited Unlimited offers then? pay for what we advertise, but dont you dare using it?
What I personally don't get when it comes to these cases is...why? Why would you bother taking the risk of using GPL code when you aren't a FOSS company and risk possible lawsuits like this? If you don't want to be a FOSS company there is BSD and there is plenty of proprietary solutions so there is really no damned point in taking the risk when your company isn't a FOSS based company.
They are not in electronics manufacturing business, they are in relabeling Chinese crap business. They dont care about licenses shmihences until you poke them with a very sharp stick. Chinese also dont care about licenses and WOULD provide all the source code (they already do to their own Chinese partners) if that was the requirement.
that phone they demo UI on is a 2 year old hardware - one of ubuntu people on YT replied about it and then promptly deleted my comment about that UI dropping frames:)
Its fast, but training set is random garbage from YT thumbnails and they have NO PROCESS to assess accuracy. All they can do is measure precision and its ~16% on average. What this means is their algorithm could very well just say FACE every single time and by shear coincidence every sixth image in dataset contains some face - tada, you just reached 16% precision.
now mount that HD7870 inside RC plane, or a quad drone the closest you can get is mali t604 doing 68 GFLOPS or mali t658 at 272 GFLOPS (theoretical numbers, but everyone including amd uses those)
Is Google trying to get out of their way just to acquire every last bit of information for NSA masters? I cant deny information to an app - its an app that decides if it will run on my phone depending on what Im willing to give it. Dont want to share my contact list? wont play half the games. Then Google disables WiFi button because 'gotta have this location data no mater what!' "Let Google's location service and other apps scan for networks, even when Wi-Fi is off" And now they want copy of everything I print? They already have copy of every email ffs.
>David Lubinski, the lead author of the study and a psychologist at Vanderbilt. 'We could be losing some modern-day Edisons and Fords.'
ah yes. Choices choices. Do I want my kid to grow up to be a patent troll? or a slave driver? Its so nice to read that David Lubinski, psychologist no less, knows a thing or two about engineering and innovation when he studies them.
This is theory, reality is you have > half a second of buffer in the cable modem, this manifests in broken congestion control and high latency when buffer is saturated.
Large buffers in cable modems is a proof no one will implement it - they added them to avoid dropping packets at all cost, no matter the spec that tolerates it.
Slashdot Mirror
Here in Australia there are very few ISPs that have such a restriction.
Australia doesnt count - you have data caps on everything. Including your dream in the sky National fiber network - have a nice local lan with data caps.
If you want high speed net access, and don't want to pay a lot, you have to play nice with others and share. You can be offered 100mbit or gig to your home, with backhaul to more or less support it, for not too much money. However you can't be offered dedicated bandwidth in that amount unless you want to pay a bunch more. Just how it works.
ah, so its the same as limited Unlimited offers then? pay for what we advertise, but dont you dare using it?
I never heard of them. Those who can, do; those who can't, teach?
But when you agree to join the military and have a security clearance you make promises to ...
.. to cover up rednecks in a chopper murdering children because MURICA FUCK YEAH!
So your example against GPL is most IP hostile company on the planet? Seems legit.
Shit like this. No wonder everything's going BSD.
so insightful, all those millions and millions of BSD based smartphones.
What I personally don't get when it comes to these cases is...why? Why would you bother taking the risk of using GPL code when you aren't a FOSS company and risk possible lawsuits like this? If you don't want to be a FOSS company there is BSD and there is plenty of proprietary solutions so there is really no damned point in taking the risk when your company isn't a FOSS based company.
They are not in electronics manufacturing business, they are in relabeling Chinese crap business. They dont care about licenses shmihences until you poke them with a very sharp stick. Chinese also dont care about licenses and WOULD provide all the source code (they already do to their own Chinese partners) if that was the requirement.
Good luck suing small Chinese factories :)
that phone they demo UI on is a 2 year old hardware - one of ubuntu people on YT replied about it and then promptly deleted my comment about that UI dropping frames :)
what hardware? there is NO HARDWARE - thats why its on igg and not kickstarter (rules prevent vaporware)
680 grams makes a difference? there are chocolates that weight more
hit the gym or something
They already have access to commercial ones and can decrypt those :)
Dont worry, one of the features of 4.3 this news omitted is disabling WIFI button - you can NEVER turn off wifi :)
Its ok, I didnt even know Gnome had any users left.
Its fast, but training set is random garbage from YT thumbnails and they have NO PROCESS to assess accuracy. All they can do is measure precision and its ~16% on average. What this means is their algorithm could very well just say FACE every single time and by shear coincidence every sixth image in dataset contains some face - tada, you just reached 16% precision.
now mount that HD7870 inside RC plane, or a quad drone
the closest you can get is mali t604 doing 68 GFLOPS or mali t658 at 272 GFLOPS (theoretical numbers, but everyone including amd uses those)
The only problem is you cant run GPU standalone.
There was one project by someone who reverse engineered old Radeon HD2400
http://www.edaboard.com/thread236934.html
http://www.flickr.com/photos/73923873@N05/sets/72157631771354007/
but that guy deleted his git repo before publishing the news blurp and some photos and they quickly shut up about it.
I would love to be able to use GPU cards standalone for Vision projects, or just as a openCL accelerators for embedded systems.
Are you saying they have done this or projecting they will?
I have two Android devices running pretty current versions, and I have a button to disable wifi.
this button will stop working in 4.3, it will still be there, but it wont turn off wifi :) it will be there to make you feel good
Is Google trying to get out of their way just to acquire every last bit of information for NSA masters?
I cant deny information to an app - its an app that decides if it will run on my phone depending on what Im willing to give it. Dont want to share my contact list? wont play half the games.
Then Google disables WiFi button because 'gotta have this location data no mater what!'
"Let Google's location service and other apps scan for networks, even when Wi-Fi is off"
And now they want copy of everything I print? They already have copy of every email ffs.
cant monetize? are you joking? this is pure gold - they scan every print job for keywords and save that data for eternity.
http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~gk/PTAM/
did it 5 years ago
>David Lubinski, the lead author of the study and a psychologist at Vanderbilt. 'We could be losing some modern-day Edisons and Fords.'
ah yes. Choices choices. Do I want my kid to grow up to be a patent troll? or a slave driver?
Its so nice to read that David Lubinski, psychologist no less, knows a thing or two about engineering and innovation when he studies them.
This is theory, reality is you have > half a second of buffer in the cable modem, this manifests in broken congestion control and high latency when buffer is saturated.
Large buffers in cable modems is a proof no one will implement it - they added them to avoid dropping packets at all cost, no matter the spec that tolerates it.
Cube U9GTV
probably 1.6GHz like all the rest
it cost me $200 and 'just works'