Slashdot Mirror


User: acoopersmith

acoopersmith's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
90
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 90

  1. Sun always has openings for interns on UNIX Internship Programs? · · Score: 1
    I interviewed several college students for intern positions here at Sun last summer and we're always looking for more. (I'm in the SF Bay Area, but Sun has offices all over the world, including sizable campuses in Colorado, Massachusetts, Ireland, Germany, India, etc.)

    If you're looking for an internship (or a permanent position), check out http://www.sun.com/jobs/

  2. Re:Lets see what a REAL lawyer says.... on Cisco Patents NAT RFC? · · Score: 2

    According to our patent lawyers at work it depends on the bylaws of the organization in question and any agreement the company signed to join the process - some "standards bodies" allow companies to patent their submissions, but most that do so require some sort of licensing scheme that allows other companies to implement the standard (although sometimes at a quite healthy profit to the patent owner).

  3. Re:The X Consortium has released? on X Consortium Announces X11R6.5.1 · · Score: 2

    It was actually released by X.org, a new organization created by the Unix vendors to further the X standard after the Open Group took over. The actual central CVS repository is being maintained by Metro Link, with changes being submitted by all the X.org members, including XFree86.

    www.x.org has more details.

    As for the original X developers, Jim Gettys has been mentioned recently on /. for his work with Compaq's handheld computers, and Bob Scheifler is working for Sun on Jini technology.

  4. Re:differentce between X11R6.5.1 and X4.0.1 on X Consortium Announces X11R6.5.1 · · Score: 3

    XFree86 4.0 was released earlier this year, not X11 4.0. XFree86 4.0 was based on the X.org X11R6.4 sample implementation. This is a new release of the core X code, to which XFree86 adds support for the various video cards, and other additional features.

    Other than X hackers, most users are best waiting for their particular X vendor (XFree86 for most Linux/*BSDs, Xig for some, Sun/IBM/Compaq for users of their Unixes) to incorporate the X.org
    changes into their release.

    As for license differences, the licenses are basically the same, with just the copyright owners
    changed.

  5. Re:X12? on XFree & Rendering · · Score: 1
    Under the X version number model, the number would be updated to X12 only if it was incompatible with X11. X.org (the current replacement for the X Consortium) isn't likely to do that any time soon - they are still working on new extensions and updates to the specs though.


    Besides, leaving non-essential bits as extensions makes projects like putting an Xserver on a handheld easier, because they don't have to support them, and clients can easily check whether or not they do.

  6. Re:Anyone remember on Classic Browsers Given New Life · · Score: 1

    I remember it being on akebono.stanford.edu but don't remember if it was the top level page or /yahoo.

  7. Re:Y Windows on X Windows Must Die! · · Score: 1

    Y windows is already the name of yet another attempt to replace X (which based on the dates on
    their web page, isn't going to be here anytime soon).

  8. Re:$10 for Solaris? How about $75?! on Linux Replaces Sun At Weather.com · · Score: 1

    The $20 Solaris 7 kits included 3 cd's (sparc OS, intel OS, & docs for both) and a boot floppy and was limited to non-commercial use. The $75 Solaris 8 kits include many more CD's including Oracle 8i, StarOffice, precompiled freeware, etc., and are no longer limited to non-commercial use.

  9. Re:Reply from the Open Group on RMS On 'Open' Motif · · Score: 1
    If TOG acknowledges the OpenMotif license does not meet the OSI definition, but changes it to limit OpenMotif to operating systems that do meet the OSI definition, then won't including OpenMotif in an OS distribution then make it an non-OSI-compliant OS and illegal to include OpenMotif?

    (As RMS sort-of points out, "operating system" isn't defined in the license - does StarOffice count as part of the OS if it's bundled in the distribution? If so, add those distributions to the non-OpenMotif-allowed list.)

    Perhaps you should have those lawyers add a definition of OS that doesn't include software like OpenMotif itself and StarOffice as long as they're changing the license.

  10. Re:Doing the math... on A New Rendering Model For X · · Score: 1

    X isn't just for monitors - with the X Printing
    extension, it also handles printers, and with
    a 2400dpi printer, 2^15 pixels is only 13 inches.

  11. Re:good grief on Sci Fi Literature 101? · · Score: 1

    It's fantasy, not SF, but the Running with the Demon trilogy from Terry Brooks is excellent, and the main character/heroine is a teenaged girl. I also think it's his best series (compared to the innumerrable Shannara books and the Landover series) See the publisher's web site for the Demon trilogy for excerpts, reviews, and more info.

  12. Re:When will get RDS in the US? on U.K. Pirate Broadcasters Steal Car Radio Listeners · · Score: 1

    It's starting to show up here. The radio that came in my Chevy Impala last summer supports RDS. Here in the Bay Area, KOIT & KPFA are the only two stations I've found that broadcast it.

  13. Re:Export restrictions suck on Amazon.com switches to Apache · · Score: 1

    c2 was founded in Berkeley, California and their
    headquarters are still here in Oakland. (Yes,
    export restrictions suck, but C2 has found ways
    to work with/around them.)

  14. Re: can you Beowulf it? on Sun introduces the "Sun Ray" · · Score: 1

    The question implies you don't really understand what this is - there's not really any CPU or memory to use for Beowulf. Think of this more like a big server with dozens of monitors, keyboards and mice scattered around, since basically, that's all the SunRay is - another "seat" to use the computer from.

    Instead of Beowulfing together everyone's PC's, this just gives one big multiprocessor machine that they all share without having to distribute jobs over the network.

  15. Re:POSIX to the rescue (the Newton paradigm) on Will Linux have the same fate as Java? · · Score: 1

    Even NT already conforms to POSIX - it's mostly useless though, since POSIX misses many of the important functions many applications use. (For instance, until the recent addition of POSIX.1g, there were no networking calls in POSIX, and there is no GUI at all since X Windows is not part of POSIX.)

    The X/Open standards from the Open Group which are used to determine which products can truly call themselves UNIX(tm) are more complete, but still would not ensure complete compatibility with all Linux apps. (Just look at the problems many apps written for Linux have when they are first ported to other Unixes.)