Slashdot Mirror


U.K. Pirate Broadcasters Steal Car Radio Listeners

Ant sent it: A BBC News story about how illegal stations in the U.K. are exploiting the new Radio Data System (RDS) standard that is now used in Europe and South Africa, and is coming soon to Australia, China and the US, by using RDS signals to force nearby motorists's car radios to tune automatically to their stations instead of legitimate ones.

261 comments

  1. When will get RDS in the US? by SuViking · · Score: 0

    RDS has been around for a long time in Europe.

    1. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by Vanders · · Score: 2

      A long time? Ii i remember corectly RDS has been available in Europe for well over 6 years now. The coolest thing i saw with RDS was the Dutch station SkyFM(?) using RDS to do Traffic & Weather reports :) I can't believe the great & all mighty US of A doesn't have RDS yet?

    2. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by linuxci · · Score: 1

      It's not particularly rare that the US doesn't have something that we in Europe consider commonplace.
      Teletext is another example, it's very difficult to buy a TV in Europe that doesn't have Teletext but in the US it's unheard of.

    3. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by SuViking · · Score: 1

      The opposite is also true: how many
      cable modem/DSL subscribers are there
      in Europe vs. the US for example?

    4. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by Vulcana · · Score: 1
      Well it isn't completely unheard of in North America. I just purchased a new Chrysler Cavalier LS 2000. The more expensive radio (the one with CD and tape player) has RDS.

      Unfortunately, I couldn't hold out for it. The reason I was getting a new car was because the old one was rear ended and written off. I couldn't wait the 6-8 weeks for the car I wanted to ship from the factory.

      BTW this is in BC Canada.

    5. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Yep that's true, bloody incompetent UK Cable and Telcos, telewest promised us Cable Modems would be around in 1997 - it's 2000 and they still haven't launched.
      They expect a launch soon, NTL has done a bit better in this respect.
      In the case of ADSL BT seem to be starting to offer services now although it's in very limited areas at the moment.

    6. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by m.o · · Score: 1

      I'm not exactly sure what teletext is, but I do know that all (or almost all) TVs in the US have "CC" - closed caption. How's that different?

    7. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by hornet@ch · · Score: 1

      Teletext is a way to transmit different data over an (analog) TV channel. You can send up to 800 pages with text and some kind of graphics, but this system is mainly text based (there now newer standards which let you send more complex data, but they aren't so widespread). On teletext you can find for example news, weather informations, sport results, timetables of airports and railway stations, tv programmes, closed caption, and so on. Almost every tv station in Europe has now got its own teletext.

    8. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

      RDS is found on a miniscule # of stations in the US, and IIRC there is no 'traffic' feature. In the NYC area for example, IIRC 102.7 WNEW has it, as well as 88.3 WBGO. That might be it.

      I have RDS in a crap home theatre receiver of mine, and was psyched until I discovered how few stations had RDS in this bass ackward country.

      BTW, teletext is just too neat, though when I was in Munich the RDS confused me somewhat as my German is quite rustig.. ;)

      Your Working Boy,

    9. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pray you mean Chevrolet Cavalier LS 2000 =)

    10. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by Saidin · · Score: 1

      I'm not exactly sure what Teletext is, but if it's the same thing that we call Closed Captioning, then every TV which I have seen in the last several years has had it included.

    11. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Austria/Vienna, we have had cable modems for years. In some parts of Vienna even since 1995. Now almost every cable company in austria offers internet services... And since october, there is nationwide ADSL support offered by telecom austria. Also the benelux states started very early..

    12. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..just like a geek. Of course, if I had a Cavalier, I'd try to forget all about it, too.

    13. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not. It's much more advanced than closed captioning. A fullscreen text console you could call it.

    14. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by Titanhead · · Score: 1

      Dutch Teletext (for an example of teletext).

    15. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by jbrw · · Score: 1

      In the UK, we have a company called, suprisingly, Teletext that does the commercial teletext services on ITV (Ch. 3) and Channel 4. They may well do the services on Channel 5, but as anyone from the UK would tell you, no one watches Channel 5, so I can't tell you.

      As well as doing their teletext services, they have a half decent web site, and promises of digital teletext, with, erm, pictures and stuff. Unfortunately, you can't actually get a digital teletext decoder yet, but that's a long (and extremely boring) story. Or maybe you can. I dunno, but these geeks can probably set you straight.

      Do a search on, say, google for "teletext gateway" and you will find some services that provide teletext access via the web, such as this dutch site.

      ...j

    16. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by m3000 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure our '98 Mercury Grand Marquee has RDS in it. A lot of station's don't use it though, so it's not really that helpful.

    17. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by acoopersmith · · Score: 1

      It's starting to show up here. The radio that came in my Chevy Impala last summer supports RDS. Here in the Bay Area, KOIT & KPFA are the only two stations I've found that broadcast it.

    18. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by Windigo+The+Feral+(N · · Score: 3

      M.o. dun said:

      I'm not exactly sure what teletext is, but I do know that all (or almost all) TVs in the US have "CC" - closed caption. How's that different?

      Well, if memory serves, teletext in Europe has a lot more services besides closed captioning--for example, complete program listings, newspaper/news reporting feeds, online shopping on some systems, etc. (Comparing closed captioning in the US to teletext services is a lot like comparing, say, computerised news services to a full-featured BBS system or multimedia-enabled web site. Europe uses it FAR more extensively than we do.)

      This is not to say that teletext-type systems are COMPLETELY unknown in the US (I'll give an example of one in a bit), but part of it is that Europe has dedicated the bandwidth for it for some time. In the US, if memory serves, text services including closed captioning are carried on the 21st or 24th line of the 525-line NTSC signal, which is not a hell of a lot of room to stick stuff.

      SOME teletext-type stuff besides closed captioning does exist in some areas, though. ABC stations carry program schedules sometimes on the text mode of a closed-caption signal (yes, with closed captioning there are two different modes and anywhere from two to four channels in each mode--regular closed caption mode and "text" mode which is essentially stripped-down teletext--yes, Slashdot readers (at least in the US) can test this on any TV made after 1993 or so with a 13" screen or larger--federal law mandates now that all TVs 13" screen or more have closed-captioning built in, and all of 'em have the text mode, even the cheap-arse models :). Some other stations will do this too, and on the other channels of text or regular CC mode may have captioning in other languages (I'd expect most stations in Miami to offer closed-captioning in Spanish too).

      Possibly the neatest use I've seen for "text mode" in US-style closed captioning is how The Kentucky Network or KET, our statewide PBS network, does an agricultural teletext service called AGTEXT in cooperation with the University of Kentucky's agricultural school...basically has weather info, stockyards reports, agricultural hints, agricultural-related weather, etc. In the Louisville area it can be picked up on WKMJ-68 (KET 1; channel 13 on Louisville-area Insight Cable) on channel-1 text mode; I'm pretty darn sure the other KET affiliates statewide (with the exception of KET-2 (WKPC-15) in Louisville, which was formerly an independent PBS affiliate till they were bought out by KET--yes, we actually have TWO public broadcasting channels in Louisville, with different scheduling and double the Britcoms :) also carry the AGTEXT teletext feeds.

      I'm not aware if anyone else is doing the AGTEXT thing or similar feeds like how is done in Kentucky, but it'd be very interesting to find out just what CAN be found on other channels/text mode across the US and Canada...maybe a list ought to be done. :)

      --
      -Windigo The Feral (NYAR!)
    19. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      I've seen teletext systems on some US cable systems, ususally on a public access channel that offers library announcements and school lunch menus and the like. However, I would imagine these things are disappearing as systems are upgraded to digital and they get rid of those giant Zenith (etc.) cable boxes that are apparently needed to support this feature.
      --

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    20. Re:When will get RDS in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital Teletext and BBC Text (the BBC digital teletext service) have been launched, and the software flash has been broadcast for Philips STBs, at least.

      Unfortunately, it's crap. Too damn slow if you ask me.

  2. Is this already happening in the US? by Shoeboy · · Score: 4

    Every time I turn on the radio, within 5 minutes I'm listening to an old navy ad.
    --Shoeboy

    1. Re:Is this already happening in the US? by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      Really? All I seem to get is that damned "Blue" song with the cheap Vox sound effects. I guess I'm in the wrong pirate radio zone :-(
      ---

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    2. Re:Is this already happening in the US? by M.+Piedlourd · · Score: 2

      That's not a problem on public radio. Go, public radio!

  3. Who are the pirates? by Zan+Thrax · · Score: 1

    ... and what are they broadcasting?

    The article seems to be implying that normal radio stations are doing this to get listeners. Of course, that doesn't seem likely. What would pirates want to broadcast anyhow?

    --

    Intolerant people should be shot.
    1. Re:Who are the pirates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Of course, that doesn't seem likely. What would pirates want to broadcast anyhow?

      Views on current events, breaking stories on their enemies, neighbors, local politicians.
      Basically they would/could broadcast anything you'd care to put a web page up about.
      But there can't be many thing like that can there? :)

      Just another AC who hasn't bothered choosing a nick yet....

    2. Re:Who are the pirates? by lbergstr · · Score: 1

      Pirates are just stations that don't have a license to broadcast. I can't give you a good overview of UK pirate radio, but I do know there are a lot of cool techno/jungle/house/etc pirates. Pirates are at least partly responsible for the popularity of electronic music in the UK.

    3. Re:Who are the pirates? by Zan+Thrax · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I figured out that's the type of people they were talking about after a few comments showed up. Only thing that came to mind while reading the article was somebody in a room reading anti-government propaganda...

      --

      Intolerant people should be shot.
    4. Re:Who are the pirates? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

      Usually broadcasters shoveling out anti-government propaganda are referred to as "clandestines," especially if they operate on irregular schedules from uncertain locations and appear to be allied with particular political movements. A few stations could fall into either category; certainly many US pirates are subversive in their point of view, even though they aren't backed by a political organization.

      Pirates can be subversive in their own right as well. I seem to remember visiting an HMV shop in London over Christmas in 1977, and The Sex Pistols were at the top of their charts, even though their music was banned in the UK. I'm not sure exactly how this worked, but I seem to remember pirates had something to do with it.
      --

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    5. Re:Who are the pirates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol!!!

      +5 Funny

    6. Re:Who are the pirates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta love it, AC moderation :) sounds like a better system than the one now employeed :)

  4. Somehow I want one of those.... by Lxy · · Score: 2

    RDS is a somewhat cool idea. I think limiting it to traffic reports is a waste of a really great technology, enter the pirates of radio. I'm a fan of pirate radio just because I have radio experience, and I like the little guys who don't have to worry about sponsors and Arbitron ratings and all that schmuk. Their stations just plain sound better. Hijacking my radio isn't too cool, but more power to the radio pirates :-)

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:Somehow I want one of those.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pirate radio is way better than commercial radio, I just wish my listening pleasure wasn't continually interrupted by traffic reports.

  5. These people are wrong. by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

    These people who are forcing station switching should be dragged into the street and shot. I mean come on, you need traffic information. Suddenly you here "Baby baby, how was I supposed to know..." and end up in a traffic jam that could be avoided if only someone wasn't overriding your radio. True, this whole system is a stupid idea to begin with, so obviously open to abuse, but those who are taking advantage of it are certainly in the wrong.

    1. Re:These people are wrong. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Please a forced switch to hear a traffic report is the lamest use for this tech.

    2. Re:These people are wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Traffic Jam? In Dayton Ohio? I'd rather have the pirate radio stations. At least we wouldn't have to listen to traffic reports... (Besides which that's what ARTEMIS in Cincinnati is for...get with the program --> handy over-the-road signs that update with traffic jam locations :)

  6. I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner by linuxci · · Score: 4

    If this thing is possible with RDS I'm surprised it hasn't happened sooner but I thought it was only the RDS signals from the station you were listening to that could change the frequency.

    For those of you unfamiliar with RDS it is a feature built into most european car radios that allow additional data to be broadcast along with the audio. Most stations broadcast the stations name so if for example you were listening to Metro FM the display would say that rather than it's frequency. It also can transmit other data such as the type of music the station plays and alternate frequencies for the station so if it goes to a weak signal it can try for a better signal as well as the frequencies for related neighbouring stations. It can also interrupt tape or CS's when a traffic announcement is broadcast.

    1. Re:I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner by jedrek · · Score: 1

      If this thing is possible with RDS I'm surprised it hasn't happened sooner but I thought it was only the RDS signals from the station you were listening to that could change the frequency.

      If this is true (and I don't know if it is, IANARSNDIPOOTOR [i am not a radio specialist, nor do i play one on tv or radio]) all you would need to do is transmit just the station chaning data on the same freq. as the beeb or sky radio or something.

      But from what I understood from the article, RDS includes an option to change to the station transmiting a traffic report.

      Anyway... time to get that old transmiter out of the basement. =)

    2. Re:I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner by linuxci · · Score: 2

      Well as no radio expert but as someone who drives a lot and listens to the radio and can only guess myself how RDS works but from what I hear I'm sure it's the station you are listening to that has the control.

      For example where I live we have some independent local stations: Metro FM, Century and Galaxy as well as BBC Radio Newcastle. If you're listening to one of the independent stations and have traffic announcements switched on you only hear the announcements made by that particular station.
      If you're listening to a national BBC station (e.g. Radio 1) it'll switch over to the local BBC station when the local station is broadcasting a traffic announcement.

      Therefore the way I see it although it's possible to make an RDS radio switch frequencies for a traffic announcement it has to be the station you're listening to that lets it.

      The pirates have probably just found a loophole in the way the BBC have set up their stations traffic announcements and are exploiting it.
      (Please remember what I say may be wrong and if it is I'd like to know).

    3. Re:I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner by Troed · · Score: 1
      There's a thing called EON that means that traffic announcements etc can get through no matter what channel you're listening in. I assume that's what they use to "hijack" the radios to their frequency.

      Added bonus is that most radios are configured to up the volume when traffic info comes on :)

    4. Re:I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner by Len · · Score: 1
      If this thing is possible with RDS I'm surprised it hasn't happened sooner but I thought it was only the RDS signals from the station you were listening to that could change the frequency.

      So how does your car's radio know whose antenna(e) the radio waves are coming from? It doesn't. The pirates aren't reluctant to broadcast on someone else's assigned frequency. As long as their RDS transmission doesn't collide with a legitimate one from the targeted station, your radio can't tell there's anything wrong.
      --

    5. Re:I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner by linuxci · · Score: 2

      I use it to listen to Metro FM without any problems

  7. More details, please by lildogie · · Score: 2

    Those of you in Europe or UK, how aware have you been of this 'feature' in car radios?

    Are there any laws specifically regarding the abuse of the RDS system (as opposed to just plain unauthorized transmissions)?

    I can see the benefits for civil defense, but the abuse potential is staggering.

    1. Re:More details, please by Ayatola · · Score: 2

      In the 10 year or more that RDS is available in Europe, I have never heard of such abuse.
      For those of who in the US: RDS not only displays traffic and other information, it also has automatic switch-over to stronger frequencies that carry the same radio station. In Europe, country wide radio stations very popular and the automatic switch over is really helpful when driving distances longer than, say 40 miles.

      I assume that the pirates somehow transmit a second signal that overlaps with the frequency of a national radio which causes the redirect. As far as I know, doing this would result in quick reaction to search and shutdown the pirate, though.

    2. Re:More details, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone i know has been very aware of this feature. it is not limited to car radios - my home system has the same capabilities. i hate it and never turn that function on cos it snaps me out of whatever i'm thinking and i normally swerve but my parents think it rocks.

      there are no laws againt it as far as i am aware (ianal)

      the benefits for civil defense... get real.
      and yeah... abuse - just turn the ti function off.

    3. Re:More details, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Disclaimer: This is the first I've ever heard of RDS, so I'm only going by what I've seen here.)

      It seems to me like you wouldn't have to swamp another station's frequency to get the radio to switch to your station. If your, um, prospective audience has their radios set to "switch to another station if it's running a traffic report," seems like all you'd have to do would be to fire up your transmitter with a flag that says, "Hi, I'm a traffic report" and hey presto, everyone is listening to your All Natalie Portman Pouring Hot Naked Petrified Grits Down Her Pants, All The Time station.

      I would also hazard a guess that there's some sort of priority flag you can set that would be used for, oh, say displaying emergency routes out of the city, and that the hijackers are setting that so it would override any legitimate stations sending traffic reports in an attempt to get their listeners back.

      Again, just a guess.

    4. Re:More details, please by Gregg+M · · Score: 1

      In Europe, country wide radio stations very popular and the automatic switch over is really helpful when driving distances longer than, say 40 miles.

      OH MY GOD that we don't need. We have too few good real radio stations now with out them buying up good radio stations to make networks. Jxsxs Fxckxng Chrxst! is there anything these people will not do to force us to hear their god forsaken commercials. I tell people I don't need mp3s or cds because I listen to the radio but now they will ruin that.

      --
      Linux is only free if your time has no value. Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
    5. Re:More details, please by evilandi · · Score: 1
      Little Dogie wrote Those of you in Europe or UK, how aware have you been of this 'feature' in car radios?

      You mean RDS? It's been standard in every car radio costing over US$150 for the last ten years; all new cars in the last five years come with car radios with RDS as standard.

      As for RDS piracy, well that's a new one on me. I get traffic announcements from about five local radio stations (BBC Gloucestershire, BBC Hereford + Worcester, BBC West Midlands, BBC Coventry + Warwickshire, BBC Shropshire). Strangely always BBC. Maybe you only pick up traffic news from the network you're tuned to (in my case, BBC Radio 4).

      Are there any laws specifically regarding the abuse of the RDS system (as opposed to just plain unauthorized transmissions)?

      Speficic laws, no, but if a legitimate station abuses RDS, for instance if it repeatedly leaves the traffic news signal on when it's moved on to other topics, they get their licence to use it revoked. BBC Radio Gloucestershire take note!!! A ten minute local news bulletin about a cat stuck up a tree does NOT count as a traffic bulletin!!!

      In short, quite a few of the more suburban/rural local stations accidentally leave the RDS traffic signal on for a few minutes after they've finished the bulletin. It gets quite annoying sometimes.

      I can see the benefits for civil defense, but the abuse potential is staggering.

      Yeah but in my experience it will only switch away to another station which is part of the same network as the one you were listening to. Hence I suspect it's just pirates stealing listeners off other pirates. I'd be delighted to be proved wrong, but commercial stations outnumber BBC stations by two to one, and I've never heard a commercial traffic announcement whilst tuned to the BBC- I only get BBC ones.

      (The BBC is the UK government-funded broadcasting network; does radio, TV, satellite, cable, digital terrestrial channels, shortwave etc; commercial channels outnumber it 2 to 1 on all forms of broadcasting at *least*).

      --

      --
      Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    6. Re:More details, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BBC is funded by the population, if its government funded does that mean I can stop paying my TV licence ? Anyway, I've had commercial radio traffic reports cut in on me loads of times and I only listen to BBC Radio 1.

    7. Re:More details, please by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Like ClearChannel Communications and Viacom aren't doing that already? What I wouldn't mind would be an option for it to switch to another station that's carrying the same syndicated programming, whether or not the station that it switches to is owned by the same radio network. Truck drivers would love that.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    8. Re:More details, please by ksheff · · Score: 1

      In Europe, country wide radio stations very popular and the automatic switch over is really helpful when driving distances longer than, say 40 miles.

      Forty miles? The radio stations must not broadcast with much power. Heck, where I grew up it was at least 40 miles to a radio station (100+ to a good one) and we didn't have any problems picking up clear signals day or night. A station like WNAX could probably handle all of or at least most of a nation over there. At night, I've had relatives say that they can pick that station up over 1000 miles away.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    9. Re:More details, please by Qube · · Score: 1
      Those of you in Europe or UK, how aware have you been of this 'feature' in car radios?

      Very. My last two cars have had RDS tuners, as does everyone else's in my family. I'm currently sat at home listening to Radio 1 on my home tuner, with "Danny Rampling with The Lovegroove Dance Party on Radio 1" scrolling by on the display (care of Radiotext).

      Can't wait till we get mainstream digital radio tuners - the text services on them are fantastic.

      btw, I can disable the TA (traffic) and News EON switching on all of my tuners. In fact, I'd quite like some RDS service that I can tune to and it'll swtich frequency to the nearest pirate station. It's a bast scanning through for some station that may or may not be on the air..

      qube

    10. Re:More details, please by rking · · Score: 1

      The government fund it by imposing a tax (on the ability to recieve television transmissions), the proceeds of which go to the BBC. Everything "government funded" is also "funded by the population".

    11. Re:More details, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RDS only works on FM transmissions which are, to a first approximation, line of sight only.

  8. Big up Pirate Radio!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 station can not please the nation! -- Shabba Ranks

    1. Re:Big up Pirate Radio!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me that Britain sucks: You don't have decent anti-trust laws (aka Levis can threaten stores for not selling Jeans for high enough prices) You have crappy TV. You have TV tax. You drive boxy shitty looking cars. Your radio sucks so much. Your radio licenses are SO EXPENSIVE it forces pirate radio. You have Tony Blair. I think the british people should really reevaluate your backwards situation and modernize, it's almost a new millenium get into shape.

    2. Re:Big up Pirate Radio!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asa a brit I can only agree with your arguments as they are true. Britain sucks balls.

    3. Re:Big up Pirate Radio!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your country roads are pretty shitty too...

  9. Sounds like a pretty good hack... by Cycon · · Score: 3

    ...though it seems that once a hack is employed by one commercial entity against another (at least for potential econimic gain of any sort), the prack aspect suddenly becomes criminal.

    I more (or less, depending on your point of view) beneign prank would be a "War of the Worlds" style broadcast...

    "We interupt this broadcast to bring you a live broadcast from our new alien overlords..."

    (c:

    --
    Your Brain + EEG + LEGO Robots = Brainstorms
  10. RDS is not new thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm from Finland and I had my first RDS-radio in 1991.

  11. Hmmm... by Cacophony · · Score: 2

    *static*...."I am God and I have taken over your radio you shall now drive through that building up ahead at a very high speed, I will remove it for you" *!crash!*

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Maserati · · Score: 1

      ... later.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a simpsons episode was such a great example of this :)

    3. Re:Hmmm... by Cacophony · · Score: 1

      That's where I got the idea

  12. As soon as its adopted in the US... by ||Deech|| · · Score: 1

    I'll finally be able to find the pirate stations!
    Much better listening then the prefab, spoon fed crap that consistantly spews out of the "legit" choices...

    OB - What is it with the quality of radio nowadays? I heard the word f**k 3 times on my way to work, pity when I can't even listen to morning radio with my kids in the car...Not that I would listen to the pirate stations when my kids were in the car, due to the above, we just enjoy happy disny tunes or *gasp* have "conversations"

    (conversation: to converse, to exchange packets in meatspace)

    --
    Run. I like water. Push My rutabaga.
    1. Re:As soon as its adopted in the US... by Zan+Thrax · · Score: 1

      Where do you live? I moved back to Edmonton from Calgary a few months ago, and was surprised to hear the proper, un-edited versions of songs at 3 in the afternoon. Guess CRTC's been easing off on the censorship some more. DJ type guys still can't swear, but I like not being stuck with "radio-friendly" versions of the music I like.

      --

      Intolerant people should be shot.
    2. Re:As soon as its adopted in the US... by ||Deech|| · · Score: 1

      In the St. Louis area, (smack in the center of the US for non-Merkins)
      And Yes, on a couple of stations they do the unedited versions of several songs... I don't particularly like the *cleansed* versions of the music, but then again, I don't particularly like answering questions from my 5 year old like "Daddy, what does f**k mean? and why does that guy do it to all the b***hes?"

      --
      Run. I like water. Push My rutabaga.
    3. Re:As soon as its adopted in the US... by Zan+Thrax · · Score: 1

      Well then you ought to really enjoy this time next year after your six year old has been learning new words at school...

      --

      Intolerant people should be shot.
    4. Re:As soon as its adopted in the US... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Then don't. It offends me to hear the word fuck bleeped. it offends me more that the word drugs is bleeped as well. If you don't believe me, try listening to that everlast song what its like. half of the lyrics are censored, and half aren't even Bad Words(tm). At any rate, this is probably so parents don't have to work as hard at being parents.

    5. Re:As soon as its adopted in the US... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Honesty is ALWAYS the best policy. Besides just telling them what it means, tell them why some people might consider it inappropriate.

  13. Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime by d_o_g · · Score: 1

    I can't help but believe that even though there is a legitimate reason to go after these "pirate" radio stations (their broadcast is in effect, a false claim to being a local traffic report) that the reason that will be put forward for arresting them will be "You hacked our proprietary format" or "You need to be licensed to broadcast radio signals" (at least the licensing one is probably a real law.)

    O well...

    1. Re:Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2

      The licencing one is a real law, and for a good reason too. Just above FM radio on the spectrum are the avation bands. If some yutz with a pirate station in Boston starts broadcasting on 124.4 mhz, it is going to cause major problems, that is Boston/Logan Aproach control. Many other frequencies are being used for avation, both for communications and navigation.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    2. Re:Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime by OnyxRaven · · Score: 2

      Um, aren't aviation bands on the AM side? I believe they are because I can set the radio in the cessna to a local station on 850khz. and sure, many other frequencies are being used - most locations have differing frequencies for obvious reasons. but I do believe they're mostly on AM

      --
      --onyx--
    3. Re:Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Radio Licensing laws are extremely important for two reasons.

      (1) Real, important, critical information is passed over radio (police, fire, ambulance instructions for instance) and pirate broadcast can disrupt that information

      There is NOT enough bandwidth in the airwaves for everyone who feels like it to broadcast. Radio bandwidth is a very limited resource.

    4. Re:Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Sure there is, just start multiplexing. Just like how we have everyones data going over the same wire. We share the same bandwidth.

    5. Re:Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they may be AM but an FM signal running on the same freq. will cause interference

    6. Re:Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime by taer · · Score: 1

      True, but most AM are measures in khz, ie 121.5 khz, while FM is in mhz, ie 97.5mhz. I'd imagine its tough to tune an FM transmitter to AM, but that could be igorance talking.

    7. Re:Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime by taer · · Score: 1

      I really don't think Approach is broadcasting on 124.4 mhz. From what I remember on my little radio, the frequencies used for aviation are typically measured in khz, not mhz. More like 124.4 khz. Just a small order of magnitude apart.

    8. Re:Raids Will Be For The Wrong Crime by Mr.+X · · Score: 1

      I'm a private pilot. Aviation uses both AM and FM. AM is generally used for naviation. (ie. NDBs or Non-directional radio Beacons). FM is used for communcation and naviation though. The aviation FM band runs from ~108mhz to 135mhz. This is used for Air Traffic control, weather information, flight plans. VOR naviation systems also use this band.

  14. It happened to me long time ago in Italy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it happened a feq years ago, it was not a pirate radio station but a legitimate station that was doing so! Not the best way to promote themselves, when it happened I wish I could eradicate from the face of the FM world... The countermeasure was to turn off the 'swicth to traffic announcement' feature.

    1. Re:It happened to me long time ago in Italy by B'Trey · · Score: 1
      The countermeasure was to turn off the 'switch to traffic announcement' feature...

      So this is an option, not a requirement? Do all RDS-enabled radios have the option of switching it off?

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

  15. Ha, Ha, Ha! by antizeus · · Score: 2
    That's what happens when you make radios that can be made to switch stations upon receiving a certain signal. I don't think cracking down on these so-called "pirate" radio stations is going to help (one would think that there wouldn't be any "pirate" radio if enforcement was effective). As long as bizarre "features" like this (and, similarly, Javascript in email) exist, then people will exploit them. Nail one exploiter and two will pop up in his place. Probably the most effective solution will be a combination of
    1. Trying to shut down as many hijackers as is cost-effective, and
    2. Making this "feature" optional.
    If I had a radio which forced a station on me, I'd probably rip it out and put an old-fashioned radio in its place.
    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
    1. Re:Ha, Ha, Ha! by kte · · Score: 1

      >2.Making this "feature" optional.

      RDS is optional, you can listen radio stations sending RDS programs without RDS. Many RDS radios have option to turn off RDS.. Some stations use RDS text feature for advertising, that's a another good reason also to turn it off.

      I've found it usefull though, it really helps 'tuning' right channels. You don't have to remember frequencys when you see name of the radio station.

    2. Re:Ha, Ha, Ha! by The+CrapHead! · · Score: 1
      If I had a radio which forced a station on me, I'd probably rip it out and put an old-fashioned radio in its place.

      I don't think there are many radios which forces you to use this system. On all the radios with RDS that I've seen, you can disable the RDS-system.

      --

      Amiga - Back for the future!

    3. Re:Ha, Ha, Ha! by jconley · · Score: 1
      The feature is already optional:


      Because the pirate continually transmits the phoney flag, the radio stays tuned in until the car goes out of range or the driver switches off the RDS feature.

      The listner can turn it off rather easily...



      J

  16. RDS is a pain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really think that RDS could be used that way. In fact it could be sometimes a pain in some regions, seeing your radio receiver trying to decide which signal is the stronger and continuously switching between two different frequencies. But the system is however cool, you can transmit info about the songs you are listening to and other important short data, and of course you always know which radio station it is (I think in Italy they know what I am talking about!)

  17. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd prefer listening to Britney Spears than a traffic report any day. (Or is that looking at her.......)

    1. Re:Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd prefer listening to a traffic report than Britney Spears any day. (Looking at her is another story...)

  18. Clarification please? by dsl · · Score: 1

    This looks to me like yet another example of technology that looks like a panacea to the let's-protect-people-from-themselves nanny governments, who adopt these things as requirements without considering all of the ramifications (cf. GPS-enforced speed limits, earlier this week). I could be way off base here, as the article wasn't really clear about the technology: is this an always-on feature, or something the driver switches on when he wants to know why there's a traffic jam? If it's the latter, I don't see that these pirates are such a huge problem (and as a voluntary thing, I can see where it might be a useful feature); if it's the former, why haven't I heard anyone objecting to the adoption of this technology before now?

    --
    I refuse, on principle, to have a .sig.
    1. Re:Clarification please? by linuxci · · Score: 3

      It's definitely an optional thing although most radios come enabled with it by default.

      You can choose what exactly you want it to do, you may want to turn the traffic announcements off and the auto retuning off but may want to keep the station's name rather than the frequency displayed.

    2. Re:Clarification please? by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2

      It sounds like you have to turn this feature on. And it does sound usefull, when driving having your radio search out trafic reports for you. Even better if it could find the ones for the roads you are actualy going to be using. It does not sound like these pirates are a huge problem, just really annoying.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    3. Re:Clarification please? by m.o · · Score: 1

      Dude, don't be paraniod - this has nothing to do with nanny governments (as much as I hate them); this option is not required, but it's nice to have it to avoid traffic.
      Cool hack, anyway, and yet another proof that security by obscurity doesn't work.

    4. Re:Clarification please? by ThePlague · · Score: 1
      Read the article:

      They appear to have used the published RDS standards to make devices that constantly transmit the signal to switch, thereby grabbing listeners.

    5. Re:Clarification please? by brandond · · Score: 1
      As a computer security buff myself, I completely agree that "security by obscurity doesn't work". However, I'm not sure this is a case of that at all. The article seems to state that the information necessary to make the counterfeit devices was not obscured. "They appear to have used the published RDS standards to make devices that constantly transmit the signal to switch, thereby grabbing listeners."

      It seems to me the designers just thought it would be too tough or impractical to make it secure, or they just didn't think about security at all. The question is how do you authenticate the stations? Ok, so they have a public/private key pair which are used to digitally sign the messages as authentic. If all radio stations have the same key, then it would be simple to embed the corresponding public keys in the radios. But then we have no way of revoking the keys if someone reverse engineers a legitimate RDS transmitter and gets the private key out of it (much like the way DVD was cracked).

      A better way might be to use digital certificates to authenticate. This would allow certificates (keys) to be revoked but would require your car radio to be able to transmit to a certificate authority. Do we really want that? Is it worth wasting the wireless bandwidth to prevent a few pirates from forcing your RDS radio to turn to those stations? And who would manage the CA? It just seems like a lot of trouble to go through when you can just turn the RDS off whenever you're receiving a pirate signal. Granted you might miss out on your traffic report, but who cares really? The radio stations I listen to do traffic reports about every 10 minutes during rush hour.

      -----

    6. Re:Clarification please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as traffic notification goes, RDS is the second or third generation of technology. When I used to live down in Florida 10 years ago I was shocked about the poor traffic service on the radio. I don't know about the other european countries, but here in Germany the car radios were for many years able to switch from casette to radio automatically whenever a traffic report came through on the radio station tuned in. The radio station would transmit a special signal during every traffic report, also indicating the area for which they were broadcasting. You could turn down the volume or listen to cassette or CD, and never miss a trafic report. Since the radio stations are notified by the police (and lately also by their listeners) about traffic jams the information is pretty thorough. (though sometimes out of date...) I once had a car radio that could continuously scan through all stations in search of traffic reports. (Of course that only makes only sense when you are listening to casette.) All these features, including the ones in RDS, are of course optional and can be switched off anytime. BTW, this was the first time I have heared about the problem with the pirate stations. It has so far never happened to me.

    7. Re:Clarification please? by pmc · · Score: 2

      It seems to me the designers just thought it would be too tough or impractical to make it secure, or they just didn't think about security at all.

      The bandwidth for RDS is 37.5 bits per second - so keys and digital certificates are out. Maybe in the days of digital radio, but not for RDS.

  19. It's not limited to car radios. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My stereo-set contains tuner that support RDS, and most new stereo sets also support RDS, so it's not limited to car radios.

    1. Re:It's not limited to car radios. by linuxci · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's true. RDS is starting to appear on other radios these days too, it's still more commonplace in cars though.

      It's particularly useful when you're living away from whereever you normally live. I went down London and without RDS it would have took ages to work out what station was what.

    2. Re:It's not limited to car radios. by steelhawk · · Score: 1

      But does your stereo-set change frequencies on demand (I don't think that's very common)? It probably just shows the additional data broadcasted, such as the name of the radio station and such...

      --
      Ner lbh sebz gur HFN? Gura lbh'ir whfg ivbyngrq gur QZPN!
    3. Re:It's not limited to car radios. by ae · · Score: 1

      Mine does, if I want it to. It's a Sony SA3ES.

      --
      Blog Ho
  20. how do you suppose they'll beat it? by lbergstr · · Score: 1

    Without making everyone buy a new car stereo, that is. Seems like if your radio accepts a certain signal as an order to change to frequency X, the only "countermeasure" would be to jam the signal. And if they could do that, the pirates would be out of business already.

  21. Way Too Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    This is great! I've always dreamed of something like this so I could tell off that bastard in the next car. I gotta get it!

    1. Re:Way Too Cool by isaac · · Score: 2
      This is great! I've always dreamed of something like this so I could tell off that bastard in the next car. I gotta get it!

      Oh gawd yes! Mobile 500mw transmitter, with RDS spoofing. Handsfree mic, so yr not so obvious when talking to the guy in front of you.

      That's even better than the "LED scrolling sign in the windscreen" idea!

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    2. Re:Way Too Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been looking for one of those LED scrollers actually.. I've got a '96 trans am, with the uplevel spoiler, and i'm pretty sure i could fit a scroller right under the spoiler, tucked in a bit, and bolted down so it wouldn't go anywhere, or be taken anywhere course, i kinda lost interest a bit, when i found it'd cost $270 USD, to buy a replacement spoiler, if i didnt' want to hack my existing one up :/

      Voice recognition, with a small 2x40 lcd display up front, to verify before it sends to the back, just in case i was talking to myself and it goes out the back =)

    3. Re:Way Too Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are a sick boy, and that's a sick idea.

      I like you, and your idea!!!

      I'm off to Radio Shack.

  22. Why this might be usefull by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2

    I can see this as being usefull for true emergency broadcasts. Imagine you are driving down the road in your car listening to a CD or tape, normaly I don't want to be bothered, but for example if a tornado had been sighted 10 miles away, there would be a very good reason for letting everyone know *NOW*. but the set of cases in which you would want this to be used would be very limited.

    Mostly things like "A Tornado has been spoted at place X if you are near there get to cover NOW!" ofcourse this is just a more fancy version of the EBS system.

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
    1. Re:Why this might be usefull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even better: "A Tornado has been spoted at place X, err hang on your in place X right now -- Well nice knowing you buddy!!" Heh heh

    2. Re:Why this might be usefull by johnburton · · Score: 1

      I believe that RDS already has an emergency facility but I've never seen it used.

      --
      Sig is taking a break!
  23. Just hilarous. by Inoshiro · · Score: 4

    Step 1: Come out with closed specifications for a "revolutionary" protocol that will allow people to have their radios jump to any "bulliten."
    Step 2: Include no authentication, "ignore traffic broadcasts" buttons, or common sense auto-ignore if > N requests per time slot are made.
    Step 3: Go after "evil radio pirates" who are abusing your "security, what security?" technology.

    Yes, Viriginia, there are stupid beurocrats.
    ---

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Just hilarous. by Vanders · · Score: 1

      Step 2: Include no authentication, "ignore traffic broadcasts" buttons, or common sense auto-ignore if > N requests per time slot are made.

      Who said there was no way to switch the Traffic Update's, that these pirates are using, off? Read the rest of the posts, which pretty much tell you about RDS, then perhaps read about RDS, before having a knee jerk reaction like this.

    2. Re:Just hilarous. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      I read the article. It said nothing about motorists being able to disable this "feature." It did, however, make the pirates out to be the ones in the wrong (and try to make us sympathetic to a pathetic "standard" of security). Dunk your chain.
      ---

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    3. Re:Just hilarous. by MrScience · · Score: 1

      Because the pirate continually transmits the phoney flag, the radio stays tuned in until the car goes out of range or the driver switches off the RDS feature.

      Read the article again.

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

    4. Re:Just hilarous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would slashdot be without kneejerk reactions?

  24. correction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... "by using RDS signals to force nearby motorists's car radios to tune automatically to their stations instead of legitimate ones. "

    "legitimate ones"? You paint a picture of right vs. wrong, when the situation is more like broadcast station(s) that have, by whatever means, gained a "license" from the organization(s) granted jurisdition to give licenses and are emitting signals into our shared environment vs. another set of organizations who also emit signals aforementioned shared environment. However, those "legal" broadcast station(s) don't have *my* permission to broadcast, nor does the government have my permission to give permission for that. (There isn't too much i can do though, so i leave it, and focus on other, more important issues to me... It's a matter of opportunity cost) So illegitamate from the perspective of the government and select individuals only, but not from the rest of us. Even more so, I prefer to have so-called pirate radio stations, as they tend to have superior, commercial-free, actually interesting content.

    1. Re:correction! by choco · · Score: 1

      I agree with your sentiments but not your conclusions. Radio Spectrum is a scarce resource - at least it is at the end of the frequentcy range suitable for Broadcasting to consumers. This may not be a huge problem in countries like the the USA (although I suspect I'm wrong in some of your Urban Areas).

      But here in the UK we're densely packed - and if we want to have usable broadcasting this means that use of frequencies simply must be coordinated somehow - or the result would be a truly appaling service for everyone.

      Our broadcasting system is full of compromises as it is. A significant chunk cannot receieve the fifth of our national TV channels ( larhely on the South coast because signal here would interferece with the French. On the other hand Radio 4 ( The BBC's national speech program) uses up about six channels on vhf AND is also broadcast on Long Wave 198M ) because other wise a significant number of people can't get it on VHF.

      (And every summer when England is being thrashed in some Cricket test match somewhere they grab R4 LW to broadcast a commentary for the duration of the match (3 or 4 days). And then all the people who wanted to hear Radio 4 not the test match moan on and one about it, write letters to the papers etc etc for weeks and weeks afterwards

      Anyway - when Pirates broadcast it usually means they're stopping someone, somewhere from receiving a legitimate station.

      --
      AJB
    2. Re:correction! by linuxci · · Score: 1

      As commercial local radio is losing it's individuality and stations all around the country are starting to sound the same I tend to agree with your point, although if anyone was allowed to broadcast there'd be no room on the airwaves and everything would get confusing, so there is a need for some sort of regulation IMHO. However it should not be so expensive to get a radio licence and short licences should be give to different volunteer groups (the ones likely to set up 'pirate' stations now) so they have their chance to broadcast. If they keep their licences short term it can offer the opportunity of other non profit stations to get their chance and bring more variety back to radio. The cost for these short licences should be minimal, current charges are too much for most people.

    3. Re:correction! by 2sheds · · Score: 2

      First off, if your elected government grants licences for radio stations, then they are by extension giving your, or rather the population's, approval.

      Second, there are only a finite # of frequencies with which you can put together a coherent national broacast system. Without licencing there would be chaos - what if your pirate station picked the police frequency? Ambulance? Fire? It doesn't bear thinking about.

      --

      Absit Invidia
    4. Re:correction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use multiplexing.

    5. Re:correction! by 2sheds · · Score: 2

      co-ordinated by whom?

      --

      Absit Invidia
  25. RDS? news to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Question: How does this work? It seems to me that you have to have a compatible radio that will decode these bits and switch to the appropriate station. Off topic: Arent we supposed to be all digital radio soon?

  26. That would be funny... by Greyfox · · Score: 4
    That would be funny if it wasn't so damn true. And as bad as the Old Navy ads are, the Foley's ones are worse (If you don't have Foley's in your area, be happy.) I need a vehicular MP3 CD player so I can fit a reasonable amount of music in my vehicle and don't have to listen to the damned annoying adverts OR the damned annoying homogenous Dave Mathews Band playing CRAP that defines the FM radio spectrum from one coast to the other these days.

    I woke up to my clock radio today and the DJ's were talking about some list of the top 100 songs this century and complaining about some of the selections of artists in various places, but that same radio station would not deviate from their play list if you beat them with a fucking stick (I know, I've tried.) Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. At least there's one radio station around here that has some semblance of personality. Unfortunately even on that one there's no escape from the Old Navy ads.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:That would be funny... by grem · · Score: 1

      > I need a vehicular MP3 CD player

      Yep, there's one out there; it even plays regular CD's, too. Look at Pine's D'music SM-200C MP3 / CD Player and drool!

      A co-worker is planning to buy one shortly after they're released (January, 2k)

      --
      Murphy's law - "Anything that can go wrong, will." (Actually, this is Finagle's law, which in itself shows that Finagle
  27. Easily solved by meckardt · · Score: 2

    All you need to do to make it impossible to hijack an RDS radio would be put an "off" button to the feature.

    1. Re:Easily solved by Kaptain+Krash · · Score: 1

      I have a nifty little CD player with RDS support even though I am in Australia where we dont have it yet, and I can turn it on or off as i see fit. It's in the manual somewhere :)
      It just defeats the purpose of RDS, the overlays and TRUE emergency information if it's disabled.
      But then again, I have never heard a pirate radio station here in Australia. I have never even heard of one on the news.
      Maybe I just lead a sheltered life.
      Me.

    2. Re:Easily solved by perky · · Score: 1
      there is an off button on the radio in my car, and most of the time the traffic news feature is indeed turned off. The only time I turn it on is when I am in London.

      Given the fact that pirate stations play music that is a lot closer to the stuff that I listen to this could actully be a good feature for finding better music that the crap on "melody FM" or some such. Shame I have never encountered pirate stations doing this.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    3. Re:Easily solved by estranged · · Score: 1

      RDS can be turned off in most radios...

  28. Is really RDS the best solution? by hornet@ch · · Score: 1

    I was just wondering whether there could be a better solution than RDS. I find it a bit too limited, in fact you can just trasmit very few bits of data. Seeing what is now possible with digital TV, I think there could be better solutions and digital radio is now becoming a reality in most parts of europe

    1. Re:Is really RDS the best solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No!! You should get a radio with the new solution. DAB-radio RDS is nothing in compare to DAB!!

  29. DoS attacks spreading? by Colitis · · Score: 1

    Is this the first case of an electronic denial-of-service attack that isn't computer or internet related? :-)

  30. RDS in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I swear a while back I saw RDS working on my friend's aftermarket car stereo. This was in Tampa, FL. Could it be that some stations aren't waiting to deploy RDS? I know it's available in many aftermarket recievers (in the US), from the likes of Blaupunkt, etc.

  31. I just figured out a good use for it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After gps is used to track down us speeders a broadcast message is sent with your tag numbers to any local police car on the same road alerting them to your exact location, speed etc...

  32. Sounds like a job for crypto by David+Price · · Score: 3
    Picture this: Your radio stores the public keys of the legitimate traffic alert agencies out there. When an alert goes out, the agency signs the RDS codes it's about to transmit, and if the signature checks out, your radio switches over. Boom, bye-bye radio pirates.

    This'd probably be really easy to implement in hardware - drive the cost of the radio up a couple bucks, at most.

    1. Re:Sounds like a job for crypto by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you give legitimate broadcasters a public/private key and do authentication. Of course, that's subject to replay attacks. So, you must include timestamping. But then you must have a synchronized timebase in your radio. So you synchronize the clock over the air. But you have to authenticate the time-signal. So you use public key crypto..... etc. ;-)

      Ok ok, so the pirates must use the same frequency as the traffic people, but as long as there are no traffic jams, they won't be broadcasting, so no interference..

      --

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    2. Re:Sounds like a job for crypto by detritus. · · Score: 2

      It's an interesting concept - however I have a feeling this will simply give them a challenge. I could see a distributed.net-like project in the works to crack the encryption.

      While it may be not possible now to successfully crack it quickly, the techonological advancements of computers will make it possible to crack it easily. Standards like RDS would take a long time to fade out - they just can't decide one day "oh - the public key is cracked, time to make a new standard, let everyone buy a new radio".

      I'm waiting for more appliances, car radios in particular to offer flash ROM upgrades, making things like new encryption algorithums and standards prevent obsoletion of the equipment.
      It is absolutely essential - imagine, if the y2k bug could have been patched on devices with embedded, irreplacable chips using a simply flash rom upgrade.

      While this probably isn't the best example, the potential bugs and exploits will only be uncovered with a matter of time, and unlike software where it's a matter of downloading and patching, hardware is definitely a matter of concern.

      - Detritus

      "I never really liked computers, but then the server went down on me"

    3. Re:Sounds like a job for crypto by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. You don't need anything nearly that Baroque.

      Have a single CA with a well-known public key. A valid RDS message will have to be signed and accompanied by a certificate. Optionally, we can have CRLs and so on.

      No timestamps. No time signal. No mutual authentication.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
  33. Re: Teletext? by seoman70 · · Score: 1

    What's that? I'm from the US, so (obviously) I've never heard of it before.

    --

    [Seoman] "A conclusion is simply the place where you got tired of thinking."

  34. What about the listener's rights? by Versalis · · Score: 3
    The last paragraphs grabs my attention...


    The radio investigators say they are
    now close to raiding and seizing the
    equipment of an RDS pirate
    operation. This will allow them to find
    out precisely how the pirates operate
    their listener-stealing trick. They then
    hope to help broadcasters around the
    world develop countermeasures.


    Why just help the broadcasters? How about coming up with countermeasures to help the listeners? Forgive me for sounding like an over-zealous culture-jammer; but does anyone else feel that maybe they should be concerned about the listeners that are having something they didn't ask for forced upon them? Rather than the corporations that are having business stolen from them?

    There seems to be a bias here. More of a concern for businesses then human beings. If a rep from Pepsi stole my Coke and forced me to drink a Pepsi (no offence intended to Pepsi) I'd like to think the police would arrest him and press charges on my behalf rather than Coke's. They sound more concerned that a company is losing business than they are about people's rights being violated.
    1. Re:What about the listener's rights? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2
      Word.

      The government of my country works for the corporations therein. How about yours?

      -jwb

    2. Re:What about the listener's rights? by perky · · Score: 1
      Easy answer to why they don't develop countermeasures for listeners: there are maybe a few thousand commercial licenced transmitters to fix, or 10s of millions of recievers to fix. Which is going to be cheaper?

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    3. Re:What about the listener's rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'd like to think the police would arrest him and press charges on my behalf rather than Coke's.

      To Quote Mike Cross quoting a New Yorker:

      "You're not from around here, are you?"

      You have no money of any significants (relative to a company), therefore you get no legal representation of any significants.

      Welcome to American, baby; the land of the grand illusion. Opt-in or get fscked.

  35. Question! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they can do this for the RDS system, why has no one done it for cell phones? Create a pirate cell that rings the phones of everyone in range and sends some recorded message. I expect it has to do with equipment costs, but does anyone know for sure?

    1. Re:Question! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where would he get the list of numbers to the cellphones in range? It's not like that is being broaadcasted.

  36. Big Up Pirate Radio!!! by Bediako · · Score: 1

    3 station can never please the nation...

    -- Shabba Ranks

  37. There's even a WEB interface for it, too... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5

    Just tune in at Radio Data System(RDS) WWW interface website and enjoy...
    -- ----------------------------------------------
    Vive le logiciel... Libre!!!

  38. RDS? No thank you. by NYC · · Score: 1
    Why do European countries have RDS? Because most nations have radio stations that transmit throughtout the country, but have different frequencies for different regions.

    The problem is: do you know what type of stations transmit throughout the entire country? Only the big corporate ones. So all RDS gives is to listen to the same Top40 hits as you travel across the country. The only other stations that transmit nationwide of government stations like the BBC in England, RAI in Italy, etc... Those stations are also worthless (hmmm, wait, I actually like BBC!).

    The only good use for RDS in America is to listen to NPR. Other than that always listen 'left of the dial'. That is where all the good music is.

    Peace!

    --Ivan, weenie NT4 user: bite me!

    --
    --weenie NT4 user: bite me!
    "Computers are nothing but a perfect illusion of order" -- Iggy Pop
    1. Re:RDS? No thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      As a DJ for a community alternative radio station (KDVS), I agree, all good music is on the left end of the dial. But it is tough for public radio to survive when corporate stations have armies of lawyers looking for loopholes in the licences of public stations in hopes of stealing their frequencies. Don't think that religious stations are exempt from such trickery, either.

      What's great about freeform radio is that one hour you could be listening to reggae, then the next hour you could hear celtic folk music, and the next you are delighted with hardcore house. It's hard to pin such stations down into a genre like RDS does, so it would be difficult for them to compete (if such a thing should be necessary) with corporate stations for listeners. Open your mind a bit, just take a look at what's on in the 88-92 FM range. You might be suprised. -- Scott Kidder kidder@cs.ucdavis.edu

    2. Re:RDS? No thank you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With RDS you can choose which kind of music to receive for example. If you want to hear only jazz while driving then it can be done.

  39. Commercials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Sweden a lot of stations are using RDS to send small commercials which show up on the radio-screens... wonder who has time to read them while driving :)

    1. Re:Commercials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, try reading them while driving and talking on your GSM and telling the kids on the back seat to shut up... WHAM! Where did that tree come from?!

  40. why bother??? by evil-beaver · · Score: 1

    Why go thru the hassle and risk of heavy fines and conficated expensive equipment by the police, all for a lousy pirate radio station??? Most pirate signals have a lousy signal anyway,i'd try a streaming mp3 server (running linux of course :)) before i went to a pirate radio station

  41. Wireless Internet/MP3 radio - slightly offtopic by m.o · · Score: 1

    What's the current state of wireless Internet? How soon will I be able to have a small monitor/keyboard/trackball in my car so that I could listen to mp3 radio and check out the latest news in traffic? How much does it currently cost/what's the bandwidth? How fast is this changing?

    Once this technology gets wide acceptance, all these "pirate" problems will become obsolete...

    1. Re:Wireless Internet/MP3 radio - slightly offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it costs j00r mama's pussy, faggot.

  42. Re:More details, please (OT) by Vanders · · Score: 2

    I must say, i like the comment Those of you in Europe or UK...

    Last time i checked, the UK was in Europe. Although lately i wish we wern't ;)

  43. Re: RDS Rules! by Tanaka · · Score: 1

    I assume you haven't used RDS. It provides many functions, all of which can be disabled. In it's most basic mode it will simply display the station name your tuned into (and it's content type), which in itself is handy on the ever crowded bandwidth. Switch it into traffic mode (which what this story is about), and it will interrupt whatever your listening too (CD/MD/Tape/Radio/MP3) as soon as another station starts broadcasting a traffic report. If it's not of interest you can press a button, and it cancels, returning you to whatever you had on before (it does this automatically after the broadcast too). Press the button again, and it switches off completely.

    It does other things too, like synchronize your clocks.

  44. No wonder the govt is mad by Gen-GNU · · Score: 1

    I seem to be tragically uninformed about this RDS technology. Before I read this article, I had never before heard about RDS, so this may be a knee-jerk reaction here but....
    This technology seems to be one of the worst ideas I have ever heard of. From the article:

    "When a local traffic announcement is being broadcast, a signal is sent and the car radio switches to it."

    On the surface, this technology seems to be harmless. In the event of an emergency, it can be used to quickly inform the public of important information.
    The problem here is that it does not seem to be optional. (correct me if I am wrong, as I said, my knowledge level on this is VERY limited.) If this 'switching' is not optional, it can very easily be used to control what information is allowed on the radio. If there are any 'incorrect viewpoints' being expressed, well, simply tune all radios to a special frequency that is broadcasting a recording saying that radio services are temporarily unavailable. Then track down whoever is making the unacceptable broadcast.
    No wonder the government is so upset about this break of their (non) security...Imagine, someone other than the govt telling people what it is ok to think!

    1. Re:No wonder the govt is mad by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2
      The problem here is that it does not seem to be optional. (correct me if I am wrong, as I said, my knowledge level on this is VERY limited.)

      Limited, indeed. The BBC News article linked to by the Slashdot article said:

      Because the pirate continually transmits the phoney flag, the radio stays tuned in until the car goes out of range or the driver switches off the RDS feature.

      (emphasis mine). Read carefully first, and only then opine; yes, a radio that can always be forced to listen to station X rather than station Y would be bad, but that's not what RDS radios are.

    2. Re:No wonder the govt is mad by Funky+Green+Alien · · Score: 1

      Its optional :)

      Most car radios have capability to recieve such signals, and most have it enabled by default. (most people want more 'ready' features, right?).

      However, it is quite possible to turn it off.

      If you still want to listen to traffic announcements, if you get an 'unwanted' broadcast you can revert back to the previous station you were listening to by pressing a button.

      Personally, I quite like this option. not only does it make tuning radios a heck of a lot easier, and when driving in London it can make the journey a heck of a lot easier.

      ~FnkyAlien

    3. Re:No wonder the govt is mad by perky · · Score: 1
      Not only are you unaware of the technology, but you seem to have grasped the wrong end of the stick as to its use. Pirate radio in the UK is almost exclusively dance music, rather than anti-government messages. This is to the extent that I have never heard a non-dance music station, and i live in London where there are a lot of pirate stations. RDS is, in fact, very useful though mainly because it gives the name of the station on the readout instead of the frequency, and because it enables stations to give alternative frequencies to allow automatic retuning if the signal fades.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  45. They make "off" buttons for a reason by DrewMIT · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    "the radio stays tuned in until the car goes out of range or the driver switches off the RDS feature."
    So, it's easy to fix this problem:
    Step 1. Notice the signals' been hijacked (hmm... I don't remember my Classic Rock station ever playing 'N Sync before....)
    Step 2. Hit the "RDS Off" button (or equivalent)

    doesn't seem so tough to me....

  46. My car has RDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An audi I got last May. The RDS doesn't do much for me. Some stations make the display say "PUBLIC" then "K..." or "JAZZ" then "K..."

  47. teletext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's an old stlye 4 colour broadcaster provided information service put into the signal... you jump to text mode and enter 3 digit page numbers with your remote.

    i think that the system transmits all the pages in a cycle for when pages have dynamic content... and when you jump to a new page it takes a random length of time to switch.

    it was way cool.. tv info, captioning, recipes, contact details, horoscopes and hideous mazes of advertising on commercial stations.

    fastext had 4 hotbuttons that could be assigned to words on screen and would link to other pages. really primitive but it did have blinking text...

    1. Re:teletext by ToastHaven · · Score: 1

      Eight colours -- black, red, green, blue, yellow, cyan, magenta, white; for foreground and background of the text. It also has flashing text, hidden text (revealed by pressing a button on your controller), double width and double height text. And graphics based on a 2 x 3 matrix per text character. Very cool!

    2. Re:teletext by Quikah · · Score: 1

      I saw this while in the UK, Germany and France last year. It is kind of cool, but after playing with it for a little while, I found it to be kind of archaic.

      All of the ones I tried out were god awful slow, having to flip through a bunch of pages to get to the one I punched in. Is this the TVs fault? crappy hotel TVs.

      It is kind of nice to be able to get weather or sport scores or channel listings, etc. But then in the US we just switch to Weather channel or ESPN or the channel guide station and get the same info in a more entertaining format. (If you have cable or DSS of course). Or just get it from the net.

      --
      Q.
    3. Re:teletext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More modern TVs with Fastext (the 4 coloured buttons, plus an index button) generally cache pages in a small amount of RAM, to allow instant switching to any of the 4 colours or plus/minus one page number.

      I believe there is receiving equipment in existence (probably only on PC teletext/TV cards) which can cache the whole lot, and so you can switch instantly to any page.

    4. Re:teletext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I saw this while in the UK, Germany and France
      > last year. It is kind of cool, but after playing > with it for a little while, I found it to be
      > kind of archaic.

      It is indeed archaic!
      In Austria it started in 1980

      http://www.orf.at/facts/chro_17.htm (in german)

    5. Re:teletext by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a TV a few years ago which can cache
      128 pages.

    6. Re:teletext by Berry · · Score: 1

      All of the ones I tried out were god awful slow, having to flip through a bunch of pages to get to the one I punched in. Is this the TVs fault?

      Unfortunately not. Teletext works by broadcasting each page in turn, continually. When you type in the page number you want to view the TV waits for that page to be broadcast before it can be displayed, hence the wait. If you want page 555 and 556 has just been broadcast then you have to wait ages.

      Teletext does look very dated these days but it can be quite useful, especially if you're already watching TV and just want to look something up.

    7. Re:teletext by QZS4 · · Score: 1

      Just an addendum: Most TV:s have four pages in memory, so if you view page 601 and want to flip to 602, that one is already loaded (mostly).

      There are also (more expensive) TV:s which can cache several hundred pages. With one of those, you seldom have to wait for a page to be broadcast before you can view it.

      And, there are always web gateways to use if you have a web browser handy.

  48. Reminds me of something from the outer limits... by Silicon_Knight · · Score: 1

    :: Sinister voice ::

    "There is nothing wrong with your radio
    Do not adjust your radio set.
    We are in control of this transmission ..."

    -=- SiKnight

  49. I wish they'd do that here by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    Maybe I could finally get the dee-jay to play some Zappa for me...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  50. When will people learn by Otto · · Score: 2

    When will people learn to always think a "feature" through completely?

    Any feature, on any system, can be used and abused. You have to think of the possible aspects of a feature before you design it.

    Example: Macros in MS Office having so much power.
    Reason: you can do some pretty amazing stuff with the right programming in a macro.
    Actual usage (abusage?): Macro Viruses

    This is just another example of someone not thinking ahead.

    ---

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  51. The end of UK pirate radio? by cthdt · · Score: 1

    UK as opposed to Sweden f.ex. has a live and kicking undergrond radio culture, with lots of interesting shows.
    In Sweden radio SUX SUX, even in 'larger' cities. I hope this RDS hijacking doesn't give the UK government an excuse to start a major campain against pirate radio, given this new 'concern'.

    BTW, I own an RDS car-radio, and you can disable traffic-information-override as well as other RDS features. What intrigues me is that in Sweden RDS is extensivley used for broadcasting commercials, like 'TV $999 at SEARS' so I would imagine RDS becoming an instant success in the US, and was very surpriced to hear it wasn't common.

    Moral 1: Pirate radio is probably superior in content to licenced equiv.
    Moral 2: I hope this doesn't lead to a crackdown of stations in the UK.
    Moral 3: Digital radio? well not in the piss poor DAB implementation that we have in europe anyway.

  52. Not much different.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This type of thing isn't much different than the old trick of using a powerful FM modulator and overriding the radio in a nearby car.

    A few years back, a friend of mine had a modified FM modulator that could override anything within 50 yards. Imagine the shocked faces of 4 black guys in a slammed Sentra hearing "I'm a little teapot.." thumping in their system...

  53. Hiaku by thrig · · Score: 1

    Sunny and warm with--
    We interrupt this broadcast
    for sex pistols live!

  54. what I forgot to say by linuxci · · Score: 1

    is whether a station is commercial or pirate they have no right trying to force themselves upon the public in the way being described here. Although then again I can't imagine pirate stations wanting to risk advertising (that's if they could afford it)

  55. *** IT'S OPTIONAL *** Re:No wonder the govt is mad by 2sheds · · Score: 2

    1. RDS and RDS EON (Extended Other Network) is a great system for it's time. ie about 1981. That's why there is no security built-in - it just wasn't a design consideration (should of been, maybe?).

    2. Very limited info is delivered to the user, including:

    Station name
    Station music type (Blues/Jazz etc)
    Station Freq's
    Traffic Flag

    3. 'TP' (Traffic Programme) is OPTIONAL. You just hit the TP button to turn it on or off - it's not totalitarian! We're not that bad!

    The Traffic signal is broadcast by any station delivering traffic info. The radio detects these signals and switches to that station, if you have selected TP 'ON'. The signal is not broadcast by the station you are listening to.



    --

    Absit Invidia
  56. Re:More details, please (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, depends on the point of view. I have often heared british people talking about the "europeans" when they mean the people on the continent.

  57. Duh, read..., you can shut it off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just another option, like Dolby sound. You hit a button, and it shuts off.

  58. RDS is already used in the US by ryder · · Score: 2
    I have a Blaupunkt Nevada reciever in my car, and it has RDS capability. I live in the Boston area, and between that and Providene there's probably about 4-6 stations that use it. Usually they encode their call letters, or popular name of the station. It can also decode the type of broadcaset (talk/rock/country/jazz/news/etc...)


    It's not really useful yet, but hopefully as more stations start using it it will be possible to quickly scan the radio stations for a specific type of programming.

  59. crypt my radio and i hurt you by Yarn · · Score: 2

    I'd rather have something I can still build a reciever for without excessive numbers of chips. I *really* hope that the up-and-coming digital radio doesnt push the old analogue FM & AM stations.

    You can make an AM reciever from some wire, some sheets of tin foil, a plastic bag and a lump of coal. Of course, you need headphones and a verra big antenna.

    --
    -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
    1. Re:crypt my radio and i hurt you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK, MacGyver...

      And you can build a car out of a couple of garbage cans, a stack of newspapers, and two toothpicks, but why the hell would you want to?

    2. Re:crypt my radio and i hurt you by David+Price · · Score: 1

      Something to point out here - your handrolled radio isn't going to receive the RDS codes in the first place, so why would you care if it can't authenticate them? :)

    3. Re:crypt my radio and i hurt you by Yarn · · Score: 2

      During ww2 people in german prison camps built these and listened to the BBC's very powerful shortwave broadcasts.

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  60. Addendum by ryder · · Score: 2

    I also wanted to mention that this feature can easily be turned on and off by one of the buttons on the radio. This would be helpful in avoiding situations like those mentioned in the article.

    I also noticed a bunch of typos in the first message :) Oh well.....

  61. And now it's a war?!? by ender- · · Score: 1
    The radio investigators say they are now close to raiding and seizing the equipment of an RDS pirate operation. This will allow them to find out precisely how the pirates operate their listener-stealing trick. They then hope to help broadcasters around the world develop countermeasures.

    Great, now listening to the radio is turning into a damned war. I don't mind pirate radio stations, but auto-switching my radio to their station is just un-cool...

    And I don't know what body or committee came up with the idea for the RDS, but did they not think if this possibility ahead of time?

    "Ok, we're going to make it so car radios can have their channels changed automatically for emergency broadcasts and such"

    "Cool, but what aboout people taking advantage of this such as radio pirates and evyl [subliminal]microsoft[/subliminal] corporations?

    "Nah...they wouldn't do that..."

    "Ok, lets do it..

    Guess I'll just have to settle for my cd-changer...until I can score an Empeg player anyway :)

    Ender

  62. What were they transmitting? by paranoid.android · · Score: 1

    What I'm curious about is, what were the pirates transmitting? Top 40? Polka? Advertisements? Audio pr0n? Given the sorry repetitive state of most radio stations in the US (I imagine the situation is much the same in the UK, after all, they did give us the Spice Girls) I'd probably thank the radio pirate who let me listen to some off-the-beaten-track tunes. Please, no more Britney Spears!

    1. Re:What were they transmitting? by perky · · Score: 1
      GOOD music - at least an underworld fan like yourself would think so. Speed garage (also known as UK garage) emerged almost entirely from the UK underground radio and club scene. most of the stations I listen to play drum and bass or euphoric house/trance.

      beats the commercial stuff any day

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    2. Re:What were they transmitting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's right! Back when I used to live in London, all I listened to was Pirate Radio, RJR, Lovers, Ragga, Choice (before it went legal). They played the best tunes, way ahead of the comercial stuff.
      Now I live in the wilds of Manchester and can I find a pirate radio station?

  63. RDS *IS* in the U.S. by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

    (sorry if a blank comment got posted before this)

    RDS has been in use for at least two years in Bend, Oregon. A few stations have it, notably KSJJ (a country station, of all things, and had RDS first here). I'm using a Grundig YB 500 world receiver.

    I've seen several other people say that they have RDS in other cities in the U.S., mostly major areas (Boston, L.A.), but Bend is a city with a mere population of 50,000. So, perhaps it's not that you don't have RDS in your area... you just don't have a receiver capable of using it.

    Too bad, because it's kinda cool. Can't wait to hear a pirate radio station hijack the country stations. :)

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  64. Some further information on RDS... by steelhawk · · Score: 1
    Here are some links which may be useful: BBC - Using RDS

    Radio data system info (in german I'm afraid, but it seems very informative... maybe this is a case for babelfish?)

    RDS forum

    --
    Ner lbh sebz gur HFN? Gura lbh'ir whfg ivbyngrq gur QZPN!
    1. Re:Some further information on RDS... by steelhawk · · Score: 1
      I'm terribly sorry for the unbalanced html (the babelfish link never ends)... *slaps myself* Here are some links which may be useful:

      BBC - Using RDS

      Radio data system info (in german I'm afraid, but it seems very informative... maybe this is a case for babelfish?)

      RDS forum

      --
      Ner lbh sebz gur HFN? Gura lbh'ir whfg ivbyngrq gur QZPN!
  65. Add spamblock on the user's radio! by GossG · · Score: 1

    If the end-user has switched on a function that will change frequencies based on the claimed content by the new channel, then the opportunities for abuse are wide-open.

    Did the article really say This will allow them to find out precisely how the pirates operate their listener-stealing trick. Gak! The article says that there is a code you transmit to tell the recipient's radio that you are transmitting an announcement. Is the "how" any more complex than it looks on the surface?

    Whether or not they come up with a spamblock technique at the regulatory level, the radios should have killfiles anyhow. "I want to listen to priority traffic announcements except for those on 102.7 MHz"

  66. without pirate radio... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there'd be nothing to listen to in the uk...

  67. Let's clear thing up: by nordicfrost · · Score: 2

    The RDS TP (Traffic Programme) CAN be turned off. My home tuner has this feature, my car deck and my DTS reciever also has it. It's very standard in Norway. Whenever this feature is turned on, it says TP in the display.

    Also, there's a restriction here, a radio station cannot use this feature, unless it really involves a critical traffic situation.

    There are several other interesting features to RDS, here's an example of what the Norwegian Broadcasting company (NRK) programme 2 contains: FM modulated sound (Duh!), GPS ground beacon time correction signal (For the naval traffic, it's used to adjust the signal from the satelites.), RDS (With RDS Text for displaying what the channel contains, RDS time, RDS PTY Programme Type (It can be Pop, Opera, Talk etc.), Channel ID and other digital control signals for special pagers etc..

    Quite a lot, that is. I'm actually amazed that USA still use AM radio. ...and NTSC for that matter. ;)

    1. Re:Let's clear thing up: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Quite a lot, that is. I'm actually amazed that USA still use AM radio. ...and NTSC for that matter. ;) AM was going out until "talk radio" hit it big. AM *MUSIC* OTOH, is getting rarer. And you still can't hear FM stations from farther than 100 miles(~150 Km) away. NTSC? Dead in 6 years.

  68. RDS is old and been replaced with Digital Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think most people in Europe are aware of this feature, it's been impossible to buy a radio without RDS for around 5-6 years and I think the system has been in place for around 10.

    The traffic reports and retuning the radio to the current station as you wonder the country is useful.

    Another nice feature are station titles and genre's, so you actually know what you're listening too, this feature has made it into home system's too. It also allows radio's to auto configure their own presets, etc.

    A more important system called DABS (Digital Audio Broadcasting System) has also been running since 1993 I believe, I think most of the BBC stations were available on this, however for a number of years the receivers have been horrendously expensive.

    However, a revised version which works on mpeg compression was completed in 98, this also includes a data stream which contains news updates and all kinds of meta data, e.g. the name and artist of the current song playing, it's kind of like RDS + PointCast combined into one. (Remember that old push technology?).

    Anyway, they're really trying to push DABS into the mainstream market now much like they've done with Digital TV. You can find more info at : http://www.bbc.co.uk/digital/html/radio/index.shtm l

    For the people who were asking about TeleText check out http://www.teletext.co.uk , this system has been in place for years now (12 years +) and has been replaced/suplimented with an updated Web based service on Digital stations.

    The government are really backing digital and are hoping to kill off the old analogue systems by 2006 so they can license the ether off to mobile phone networks (GSM) for a pretty penny.

    1. Re:RDS is old and been replaced with Digital Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another (more indepth) Digital Radio site : http://www.bbc.co.uk/digitalradio/

    2. Re:RDS is old and been replaced with Digital Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just a couple of notes about teletext:

      1. The www.teletext.co.uk Web site isn't actually teletext of course and doesn't have a copy of the teletext pages (a chunky 40x25 text standard transmitted in the spare lines at the top of a TV signal). The teletext standard's actually been around since the early 1970's and is still in widespread use in most European TV stations (yes, even on cable, satellite and digital).

      2. I'm not sure digital teletext is "Web-based" as far as I know. It's using some different format that has to have special software in the digital set-top box - software that has barely just made it into OnDigital's UK set-top boxes (and even then only for a particular brand of box) and the current leading UK digital TV provider, BSkyB, doesn't have digital teltext *at all* yet (though it will eventually do so).

      Digital teletext is trying to be a "half-way house" for people who don't have Net connections but regularly use the rather clunky (but still useful) old teletext system.

      Me ? I'd rather use the old text system for quick news and then log in to get more details (*not* from www.teletext.co.uk :-) ) if an article is really important - remember that UK still outrageously pays for local phone calls, so it costs us money to read Web sites whilst online. Digital teletext will be nice, but I suspect you'll still hanker for the Web because of its interactivity and much larger choice of news sources.

    3. Re:RDS is old and been replaced with Digital Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SkyDigital does have a form of digital text, their programme guides and news etc look very nice indeed, kind of blue gradients and anti-aliased text.

  69. Re:More details, please (OT) by GossG · · Score: 1

    Last time i checked, the UK was in Europe. Although lately i wish we wern't ;)

    I heard a preliminary news item about reports of a rumour ... (eg I "heard somewhere)

    suggesting that Britain was opening negotiations to try to get into NAFTA (or whatever we call it these days). Any reports on that side of the Atlantic?

  70. They're better than spammers, at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I saw the title, I thought it'd be an article on how Spamford Wallace had found a way to bug people with commercials without stealing the network bandwidth the victims pay for.

  71. BBC Micro Character set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the character set used for teletext is the one used on the old BBC Micros... infact the resolution/colours was probably the same as one of the text modes on the BBC..

    You also used to beable to receive programs that where transmit over the TV signal with a special piece of kit.

    1. Re:BBC Micro Character set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other way round. The teletext standard predates the BBC micro (I think it dates from the 1970s). The BBC micro had a teletext character generator built into it so that it could display teletext pages.

  72. Are these guys stupid? by segmond · · Score: 1

    They haven't arrested the pirates, and now, they are telling us that they are close to catching them. *hint hint*, pirates move your operations.

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
  73. How can this be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Pioneer deck in my car - model DEH-P835RW to be exact. It does RDS. You can also set it to "listen" for traffic advisories on a given station. The thing is - you set this feature by finding a station that's flying a certain flag, then you just leave it there.

    In this little hick town in Colorado, a few stations do RDS for cheesy call letter IDs, but NONE of them do the TA/TP stuff last I checked. So, I leave it off.

    My point is - how can this hijacking stuff be happening? It must either happen to luser radios that scan the WHOLE band looking for traffic programs, or they are using some other trick.

  74. Re: Teletext? by The+Original+Bobski · · Score: 2

    Actually, it was in limited use here in the states. A station here in Tampa used it some years back to broadcast news and weather blurbs. A very few televisions were built with teletext receivers in them (I think Zenith built one). But you'll never see it again here. The vertical blanking lines that were used by teletext are now allocated to Closed Captioning.

    --
    satire, n: 1) witty language used to convey insults or scorn; 2) a form of humor lost on most slashdot moderators.
  75. *crawling from his cave* Ummm RDS ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can some one point me to a resource for more info on RDS ???

  76. Re:More details, please (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    well, Texas is part of the USA, but just try to get anyone to admit to it, on either side :)

  77. More potential for regular joes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've fantasized about this for a long time: sending messages to other cars! Not forcing peoples stations to change, but maybe sending a little "beep" and displaying on their radio display "Your left turn signal has been on for the past 30 miles grandpa"

    E.

  78. WBER 90.5 FM in Rochester, NY (and on the internet by ragnarok · · Score: 1

    http://wber.monroe.edu

    Give 'em a listen. It's listener supported radio, the djs are all volunteer, the music varies pretty widely (mostly alternative/modern rock, but thats what I like so...)

    and they have an 80k real audio feed :)

    --
    Search first, ask questions later.
  79. Pete & Pete? by TypoDaemon · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember that Nickelodeon show, "Pete & Pete"? This story sounds like a bad episode of that. I can just imagine people hooking up walkie-talkies to signal amplifiers and taping down the transmit button...

    Typo Daemon

  80. The article says the standards were published. by Dast · · Score: 2
    They appear to have used the published RDS standards to make devices that constantly transmit the signal to switch, thereby grabbing listeners.

    Not very closed then, eh? So your step one is kinda off.

    Because the pirate continually transmits the phoney flag, the radio stays tuned in until the car goes out of range or the driver switches off the RDS feature.

    So there is an "ignore traffic broadcast" button, huh? Guess that means your step two is off, too.

    *sigh* Try reading the article.

    --

    This sig is false.

    1. Re:The article says the standards were published. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      I did read the article. I admit, I did not do an serious as read as several nitpickers have pointed out.

      However, this does nothing to alay the no authentication or common sense "auto-ignore if > N requests per time period are made" features. Why aren't those present? Your comment adds nothing to my point, it merely detracts.

      It'd be nice if you nitpickers would read other's nitpicking posts before nitpicking yourselves. It's really annoyed to see 4 replies that amount to, "I saw one thing you did wrong which is mentioned in the article. You are stupid, I am not. Read the article next time, stupid head."
      ---

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    2. Re:The article says the standards were published. by Dast · · Score: 1

      It would also be nice if when people criticize some standard, they would get their facts straight.

      You automatically assume the standard is closed, in a typical Slashdot reaction. Danger Will Robinson. Danger from the standards-corrupting, insecure evil-empire.

      How different is it from:

      "Oh woe is the world! Evil-W2KinternutExploder has a 'feature' that makes us autodownload every virus known to man while we are asleep on Tuesdays."

      "But you can turn it off. The button is right there at the top of the window."

      "Well...that is just a nitpick. It's *evil*, I tell you!"

      --

      As for common sense features, you can't get more common sense than an off button.

      And as for authentification, coming up with a truly secure process would be more effort than it is worth, especially when you can just hit the off
      button.

      --

      The reason I criticized you so harshly is because kneejerk comments like yours (esp when moderated up so highly) generate lots of fud feasting (esp when so few people seem to read the articles).

      If you can't stand nitpickers getting on you when you are wrong, then you probably shouldn't make posts in a public geek forum. Anyway, don't take it personaly. The critics are helping you improve your post. It's the opensource way, right? ;)

      --

      This sig is false.

    3. Re:The article says the standards were published. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      Anyway, don't take it personaly. The critics are helping you improve your post. It's the opensource way, right? ;)

      Arg, don't defuse my anger :-P Oh well, too late.

      If you're talking about IE integration, I'd like to not have x * 100mb (where X is >= 1) of IE code on the HD. Oh wait, I use Linux..

      The autoignore feature would be nice, as well as more user controls. IE: control the autoignore level, etc. PGP-style authentication could work, with each user getting a public key from a company they want bullitens from, putting the smart card in their radio, and only gettings bullitens from that company. Just an idea.
      ---

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    4. Re:The article says the standards were published. by Dast · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have an idea there. Perhaps you should think about marketing a car stereo to your specs.

      --

      This sig is false.

  81. Here's the spec by Battra · · Score: 1

    http://www.rds.org.uk/rds98/mainpublications.htm This links to the publications of the RDS standard. After all, it is an open standard. Anyone who wants to can read and find out how they are doing this.

  82. Re:WBER 90.5 FM in Rochester, NY (and on the inter by Quikah · · Score: 1

    Public radio is pretty much all that is worth listening to. for another cool station check out KCRW Los Angeles. Mix of talk and music, but they have a music only stream too, very eclectic mix. Unfortunately it is only a 16k RA stream, they need to upgrade.

    Everybody needs to support your local public radio stations. Or hell just pledge to one of the ones on the net that you like. :)

    --
    Q.
  83. Try reading the article. It has an off button! by Dast · · Score: 2

    Geez. Whats with you people? This "feature" is optional. It has a frickin off button.

    You don't have to turn it on if you don't want to.

    If you're afraid of being sucked into a pirate station, or even a legit station, *you can turn it off*.

    Please return to your normal comment posting.

    --

    This sig is false.

  84. Why would I want to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may be interested in learning, from first principles. Harder for some, but pretty damned effectively learning method.

    And maybe I don't *want* to. Maybe I *NEED* to.
    High power AM transmitters and crude little 'crystal' recievers are freedom's friends. They aid the spread information. Cellphones and faxes and internet also do that - but radio did it first (ok, printing did come earlier, but radio waves don't care about borders).

    China used to (I think they got over it, finally) send people to 're-education' camps if they committed a horrendess act...like making shortwave recievers that worked. That's how scared despots are of crude little receivers.

  85. man m'i ever glad there's state-run radio here by cdlu · · Score: 3

    I'm so happy we have state-run radio in Canada as well as the commercial stations...
    They keep eachother more-or-less honest (ok so both commercial and government radio are inherently biased) and the government radio (CBC) has no advertising. None. No crappy programming to grab listeners (stern) and some of the best people in the radio business (shelagh rogers and peter gzowski)

    the us public stations are public, not state-run, and have those obnoxious we-want-money-from-our-listeners things.
    #include <signal.h> \ #include <stdlib.h> \ int main(void){signal(ABRT,SIGIGN);while(1){abort(-1); }return(0);}

    1. Re:man m'i ever glad there's state-run radio here by cryptwhomp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how DARE they actually get money from the people who USE the service! They should just take it from EVERYONE, whether or not they want to pay for it!

      Hey, how's your socialist health care system working out up there? Nice short lines, services always available; a socialist paradise!

      --
      "Those who would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin,
  86. Ramifications of all this by jigmasterj · · Score: 1

    This may seem silly, but as our vehicles become more computerized in nature, wouldn't it be likely that exploits like this could become even more harmful than changing a radio station? Some cars today can receive satellite signals from the manufacturer to unlock their car doors...what if someone found a way to spoof that? Same with the proposed system to control a car's speed using GPS from government satellites. How hard would it be to hack into it and suddenly make thousands of cars stop? I know very little about the actual technology involved in this sort of thing, so any one who actually has knowledge of this would be doing us laypeople a favor by explaining it all. What are the chances of Very Bad Things happening as a result of computerized cars?

  87. EXCELLENT hack (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (nt) means no text

  88. Re: Teletext? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teletext is pretty lame. You have to wait until the page you want happens to be broadcast. It might have had its day, but the world has long since passed it by.

  89. Why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just drive around with an FM kit from ramsey electronics (or several and a combiner) and use the capture effect to your advantage. Now everybody can not only here the thump from you car, they hear the tune through their radio. Course it helps to have an 88-108 MHz amp (heh heh heh heh heh). Pirate radio forever!!!!

  90. well, by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1

    you just did.

    but then I'll bet you're going to say that you're not from the U.S., right?

    --

    Insert mind here.
  91. U.K. Pirate Broadcasters Steal Car Radio Listeners by kminogue · · Score: 1

    RDS sounds like a great idea. Like all great ideas it will take time for it to sort out. Perhaps by the time it arrives to mainstream America, our European brethren will have debugged the system properly. Regarding Pirates, I would not be overly concerned given the homogenization of commercial radio. In some ways perhaps they would infuse some spontaneity and fun back into radioland.

  92. Mobile Hijacking of radio signal.. by p0d · · Score: 2

    First off, DrewMIT, who would hijack a classic rock station to broadcast nsync? :)

    Anyhow, back when I was incarcerated in high school (jonkatz fodder) a friend of mine rigged up a little transmitter that overrided the signal of FM radio. It cost a whopping $20 to build, it ran off the car battery and was about the size of an 8mm tape, not counting the little antenna he attached to it. We would amuse ourselves by driving on the interstate and scaring little teenyboppers in their VWs listening to (back then) nirvana or butt err pearl jam. The look on their faces when that would cut off for "Hey, you! You in the black VW!..." or something cool like underworld. Though the signal was mono and had a dynamic range worth shit, we mainly kept it to vocal hijinks. Now that you mention it, even "legit" FM has a horrible sound both from a technical and a musical standpoint. Hijacking a signal like this RDS thing isn't all that new, RDS just makes it easier :)


  93. Re:Easily solved- yup "off" is a mandatory feature by evilandi · · Score: 1
    All you need to do to make it impossible to hijack an RDS radio would be put an "off" button to the feature.

    Which unsurprisingly is a mandatory standard feature for any RDS radio. The button is usually marked "TA" (Traffic Announcement). There is usually another button for switching automatic programme tracking on and off; for instance I can set my car radio to seek local news bulletins, classical music, drama, rock music etc. The programme categories are pretty similar to MP3 genres. If you just want to stay tuned to your favourite station, you just switch these two features off and the radio acts like a normal dumb American radio. Normally the radio comes installed with traffic anouncements switched on and programme tracking switched off.

    You can usually also make RDS radios less prone to switching to stations very far away by adjusting the "local" feature; usually this has two or three settings which allow you to adjust the sensitivity of the set, useful if for instance you drive around on the tops of hills and tend to pick up traffic bulletins from a hundred miles away or so (which may be local to Americans, but it sure as hell ain't local to us Brits). In my experience RDS will only switch you between stations on the same network (BBC will only switch to BBC, commercial will only switch to commerical). Therefore I suspect the piracy element of RDS is just pirates stealing listeners off other pirates.

    Frankly the digital backwardness of the USA never ceases to amaze me, for a country that is always thrusting itself down our TV sets at the model of the western world. You don't have RDS, you don't have digital mobile phones in rural areas, you'll be telling me next you don't have digital terrestrial TV through an aerial!

    --

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  94. Read the article again (or for the first time). by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 2

    RDS isn't meant for normal stations to *force* you to listen to their music format - Top40, whatever - but just to zoom you in when they're broadcasting TRAFFIC reports. I doubt any station would get away with constantly broadcasting the RDS signal along with their normal one 24 hours a day, trying to hijack listeners. People would revolt. Transmitters would be torn down, DJs lynched.

    Hmm... there's a thought... :)

    I can't disagree with you on the "left of the dial" comment, though. But consider that many of those stations, who broadcast traffic, will probably also spit out an RDS signal... though I can't think of any stations of that sort in my area that DO broadcast traffic... *shrug*

    --

    "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
  95. Re: Teletext? by Windigo+The+Feral+(N · · Score: 2

    The Original Bobski dun said:

    A very few televisions were built with teletext receivers in them (I think Zenith built one). But you'll never see it again here. The vertical blanking lines that were used by teletext are now allocated to Closed Captioning.

    Actually, if US-based teletext is the same thing as "text mode" on modern closed-captioning equipped TVs (all TVs with diagonal screen measurements of 13 inches or larger built since 1993 must have built-in CC by law; every CC-equipped TV I've ever seen has the "text mode" in CC along with regular mode, and usually two to four channels of both regular and text mode per TV channel at that) then not only is it not dead but has sort of been blended in with CC in general.

    The largest use in most areas for "text mode"/US teletext seems to be in program listings for the hearing impaired (I know ABC occasionally lists these in text mode); in Kentucky, the public broadcast system works with University of Kentucky ag-school and county extension offices in running AGTEXT which is a full system for providing agricultural info (everything from weather to stockyards prices to insect infestation alerts to farming tips) on KET stations. (I discovered it accidentially on Louisville's main KET affiliate when I got a TV with CC [when they were first requiring them by law] and was playing about with the different modes--and was quite suprised to see the teletext in text mode on WKMJ-68 :)

    I don't know if anyone else is doing anything similar to AGTEXT anymore, but I'd imagine so in states which are still largely rural and also have statewide public broadcast networks and/or big ag-schools like UK has. I think AGTEXT is neat as hell, anyways :)

    --
    -Windigo The Feral (NYAR!)
  96. FYI - The Empeg car MP3 player has RDS. by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 1

    I've been considering getting an Empeg of late, and just went and checked on their site - the Empeg has RDS capability. I do hope they set it up as an option and not a required thing - and I figure they did.

    --

    "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
    1. Re:FYI - The Empeg car MP3 player has RDS. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Yay. The Empeg. Let's discuss this...
      NOw, a year and a half ago, I think it was around then.. I thought it was pretty cool, and the price was okay.

      They said by March 1999 they would be in full production.
      It's almost March 2000 and they still aren't in full production. They have shipped beta units.. whee. ANd the price is too much.

      Go look at the price of SBC's, and the price of drives, etc.... it's *NOT* that expensive.
      A chip containing a full stereo mp3 decoder I can pick up for $5. Now, I'm not saying it's cheap, or can be done in 2 days.... but if I can build the exact same thing in my shop for arond $300-$400 bucks, there is no reason for a mass-produced version to cost over a thousand.

  97. Re:WBER 90.5 FM in Rochester, NY (and on the inter by plague3106 · · Score: 1

    I don't ever think i've heard a song i like on this station...but to each his own. The Nerver (95.1/95.5) USED to be a cool station, in 95, but they sucked out when they changed their format last fall. thank god for the cd player in my car :)

  98. Let's Hope We NEVER get RDS in the US? by Professor+Haptic · · Score: 1

    I hope we never get RDS in the US! What has not been mentioned yet is that also interrupts tapes being played on the cassette player. The interruption contains COMMERCIALS of course! When it happend to us in Italy, the "important traffic information" contained a list of all incidents in the northernn half of Italy! It was at least a two or three minute interruption to our tape.

    1. Re:Let's Hope We NEVER get RDS in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can switch it off fairly easily, you know...

  99. RDS vs. DAB by obi · · Score: 3

    I see a lot of people saying something to the effect of "When will RDS be available in the states" (I thought they had it already a long time but hey).

    RDS is pretty cool because you get extra digital info. But wait! DAB (Digital Audio Broadcasting) is already around the corner. DAB is already broadcasting in pilot projects in Europe (and probably in other places too) and has interference free "CD quality" (mpeg layer 2 200kbit/s) audio. Of course, there will be a host of other goodies (and not so goodies) like the ability to incorporate "pay-radio" etc.

    The fun part is this: (taken from the dab faq)

    What are 'additional services'?
    DAB was developed with the aim of improving radio reception. This is why audio transmission was at the forefront of the development process. But DAB, as a digital transmission system, can transmit other data as well as audio. In principle any type of information can be transmitted by DAB, provided simply that it is available in digital form and does not exceed the maximum available DAB data rate (approx. 1.7 Mbit/s). Examples of such additional services are still pictures accompanying radio programmes, digitalised traffic messages (Traffic Message Channel), electronic newspapers, software updates and even animated video. This process leads to 'multimedia broadcasting' in which all forms of information can be conveyed via the common transmission medium DAB. In this context DAB could be described as the 'cordless information highway'. In contrast to multimedia applications via TV/cable, DAB additional services can also be received in-car and with portable equipment.


    I wonder how long it will take for pirates to tap into this flexible resource, full of possibilities :)

    look at http://www.worlddab.org for more

  100. Re: Teletext? by The+Original+Bobski · · Score: 1

    Well, no. CC bears no resemblance to teletext. Teletext in the States followed the same protocols as used in Europe. At its best it looked no better than ANSI graphics in DOS (which, I must say, in its time was pretty cool). At its worst it was just a bunch of colorful text.

    --
    satire, n: 1) witty language used to convey insults or scorn; 2) a form of humor lost on most slashdot moderators.
  101. Re: Teletext? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, i live in tampa too. what TV station was this??

  102. authentication by yosemite · · Score: 1

    Supposing it is a digital medium couldn't they use some type of authentication or encryption? I would think that that would be the most obvious solution.

  103. RDS and Australia by Cef · · Score: 3

    There are a few stations that already support RDS in Australia (eg: TripleJ), and systems are available here that support the RDS standard. It's been running here quite a while, it's just that not many radio stations have picked it up. I have already accidently tuned into one radio station here that was transmitting someone elses RDS signal. It didn't last long though, they vanished pretty quick.

    RDS is a very old technology, and it's a real wonder this hasn't happened before. RDS is carried on a "subchannel" on the FM signal, and digital data such as the station name, time signal, etc, is transmitted. My car syncronises the inbuilt clock with that of the radio station every 2-3 minutes. (It did take TripleJ about a month to adjust to daylight savings however).

    But it's not hard to fake another stations RDS signature. If a station transmits someone elses RDS signature, and your radio is set to tune to the strongest station with the same RDS sig, well.. you can guess the result I think. The original idea is to allow for movement between different locations/states that have the same station broadcasting on a different frequency, and having your car radio follow the signal automatically and seamlessly. It's just an abuse of the system that no one bothered to cater for, and even if they did, it'd be hard to implement, as the data is all one way. You could capture the data and simply re-send it, or even receive their signal and then re-transmit it. It may have even been considered, and deemed simply not worth the trouble of worrying about it.

    If anything, this will lead to more publicity for pirate stations, but that also means that the people designated for tracking down pirate radio stations might hear about it a lot sooner than normal. And if they have a list of authorised frequencies that a particular RDS signal is transmitted on, then it's just a matter of singling out the ones that have a valid RDS signal but the wrong frequency. For the pirates, I'd count this as a two-edged sword.

  104. already in Australia? minor correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd been lead to believe that RDS had been used in Australia for quite some time - though only by TripleJ (an Aussie youth [U/25] oriented station) can anyone confirm/denie?

  105. Re:Easily solved- yup "off" is a mandatory feature by GMontag · · Score: 1

    At least we have toothpaste, soap and hot water and WE use them all.

  106. It's been in the US Since 1996 by up2ng · · Score: 2

    I have had every new Pioneer Unit that they have come out with since '93 (ex-dealer perks), and they were the first in the US to use IDlogic and RDS. Too bad here in NY it really isn't used for what it was designed for, the stations just display call letters and tag lines.

    Pioneer Car Stereo w/ RDS @ pioneerelectronics.com
    BTW: They do have on/off settings

    --
    Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  107. Re: RDS Rules! by johnburton · · Score: 1
    On most "local" stations it doesn't switch to another stations when traffic reports are broadcast but it will turn up the volume or switch from CD to radio when there is a traffic report.

    In the UK if you are tuned to a BBC station it will automatically switch to another BBC local or national station when they broadcast traffic information. This seems to use something called EON but I've no idea what that is.

    --
    Sig is taking a break!
  108. RDS abuse my commercial stations by johnburton · · Score: 2
    Even before I read this article I was thinking of finding out under what terms radio broadcasters are licensed for the use of RDS in the UK and who I could complain to.

    Traffic news is good but there is an increasing amount of advertising and promotion of their other shows creaping into the traffic announcements and I would hope their licenses prohibit this.

    --
    Sig is taking a break!
  109. The BBC is a broadcaster by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    and it was on the BBC news.
    .oO0Oo.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  110. It happens for years by MS · · Score: 1
    The station your radio tuner is set to (you don't have to actually listen to this station, you may well listen to tapes or CDs) emits the RDS-signal for traffic announcements. If your radio is set to receive traffic announcements the CD or tape will be interrupted...

    In Italy it often happens that some stations send the signal quite a lot prior to the traffic news, so YOU HAVE TO listen to their ads, instead of the real traffic message. That's quite annoying, so I always set my radio to not receiving the TP (traffic programme), while other RDS services are still working: transmission of alternate frequencies (AF) or the name of the station.

    But, do Americans really not know about RDS? Is Europe here more "futuristic"? I used it for at least 10 years now! But then, the Web was also invented "here".

    :-)
    ms

  111. already in use in Australia by Sven182 · · Score: 1

    In Perth at least, Triple J is already broadcasting on RDS I believe. My Mum's car radio picks it up.

    --
    harshbutfair: you know it makes sense
    www.harshbutfair.org
  112. Other interesting uses RDS by SuperMux · · Score: 2

    HA! It was bound to happen. Already some stations in the Netherlands use the car radio displays to not only display the station name, but also the weather and ads. These ads even have phone numbers in them! Imagine driving at 100Kph, steering with your knees, eyes fixed firmly on the car radio display and taking down a phone number. Talk about road safety...

    Half a year ago I heard about a related application of RDS: the Dutch police are dicking around with automated speed cameras that can read your license plate. They wanted to combine this with RDS to warn speeders: "Hello RB-VH-97, you were just caught doing 140KPh in a 100Kph zone. The Hfl 450,- fine is in the mail. Have a nice day". Kinda cool isn't it?

    1. Re:Other interesting uses RDS by SgtPepper · · Score: 1

      Intresting? I don't think it's too intrestings, sounds more scary to me...they might has well have the display on the radios say 1984...big brother IS watching, and now he can TELL you he's watching . ah well...rant off....i'm going to go back to work now....*eeeep* we just caught you looking at a non-work related web page, you pink slip is in the mail, have a nice life

      *sigh*

    2. Re:Other interesting uses RDS by detritus. · · Score: 1

      So the speed cameras can identify a car by taking a snapshot and analyzing the license plate within the photo? I could see tons of problems with that including snow over the license plate, etc..
      unless there is some embedded oscillator that is emmiting a identifier signal from the car.

      I've also heard of special sprays that you put over your license plate that purposely will over-expose the picture making the license plate unreadable. Has anyone had any experiences with this and know if it works?

      - Detritus

      "I never really liked computers, but then the server went down on me"

  113. RDS & DVD -- Think this is bad? EAS! by starlingX · · Score: 2

    This news article bears a great resemblance to the current DVD crypto debacle. They're both examples of engineers assuming that no one will figure out their proprietary scheme because they're proprietary, instead of using a good design with strong crypto.

    But if you think that the RDS situation is bad, wait until someone figures out the EAS system. This is the emergency warning system in the US that replaced the old EBS system. Having worked in college radio, I've had a small amount of experience with it. From what I understand of it, the network is basically a big tree structure with the FCC on top. They have a super secret code that can transmit across the network that will allow the President to interrupt all TV and Radio broadcasts and transmit what he wanted. I'm just waiting for a modern-day "Captain Midnight" to figure this out and hijack every single broadcast across the nation. Heh.

    For more info on the EAS check out:

    http://www.fcc.gov/cib/easfact.html

  114. SHABBA!!! by selectap · · Score: 1
    I haven't heard anything from Shabba Ranks in a loooong time.

    Didn't he have another song about this?

    dem a call us pirates
    dem a call us illegal broadcasters
    just because we play
    what the people want...

  115. new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    RDS is new? OK ..... I am never going to belive posts on slashdot about a new kernel or anything again ;)

  116. EON by Qube · · Score: 1
    This seems to use something called EON but I've no idea what that is.

    EON = Extended Other Network. It's what adds the "extra" functionality - stuff like Traffic/News switching, clock signals, Radiotext, and the PTY (programme type) searching.

    qube

  117. dave matthews crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how hard is it to turn off the radio? I like dave.

  118. Re:WBER 90.5 FM in Rochester, NY (and on the inter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats not true. Look for the college radio stations near your area. Especially after about 2:00AM when they let the extra-weird students DJ. Its the most entertaining thing on the air.

  119. More EAS Links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Society of Broadcast Engineers:
    http//www.sbe.org/eas/eas.html

    Risks Digest:
    Emergency Alert System interrupts Hurricane Announcement, and crashes

    Also, a real hoot... after the government mandated the system (and the broadcasters bought the requisite equipment), an outfit named Quad Dimensions announced that they owned a patent that covered the entire system, and sent out royalty requests to all stations(!) Wasn't able to find a link covering this, but maybe someone else can...

  120. Licenses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have worked as a presenter on a UK based RSL (restricted service license) station. We were running the RDS system (unusually for RSLs), and were all told "*never* flick the traffic flag switch unless you are giving traffic info". The license conditions are quite clear about this I think.

    X.