That was my thought as well. After reading the nano review, I was impressed that I could practically thrown the thing down and still have it work. By reading the article, it appears that it will survive the basic wear-and-tear of everyday life, but I would like to see how will it survives under more extreme conditions.
Argh, at my high school so many damn kids listen to iPods during class! It is so freaking annoying. I don't get kids these days, why don't you stop listening to your music and listen to the teacher for an hour. Your music can wait. I can only hope that kids don't watch TV during class or something because if I were the teacher, I would be taking the device away for a long time.
From what I've read, Aperture is different from Photoshop.
Apple downplayed the competitive threat that Aperture potentially poses to Adobe's popular Photoshop software, describing it as "complementary" to Photoshop.
"This is to do a whole different set of things," Schiller said in an interview. "There's been no software that does what aperture does." From CNET
Well I think they were referring to other things. Seriously, if an encyclopedia contained a history of slashdot, I would be very surprised. Heck, the encyclopedia would have to be updated every week with new information, which is completely impractical.
Personally, I've only used wikipedia for a starting point, as suggested before. I don't ever use information from it because I just don't trust it. This summer, one of my teachers used it, and he pointed out many errors. However, it was good for a basic overview of what the subject is.
Probably all ready been asked by now, but how will they distribute them? Just put the file on their servers and see bandwidth fly away? Or will they actually embrace a P2P technology like BT to release the files? Another question, how big would the files be? I know that a 2 hour movie is easily about 700MB - 1.2 GB from what I have downloaded in the past.
However, I doubt I would subscribe to such a service because I assume it would be lacking many of the special features that DVDs have, like directors cuts and deleted scenes.
Blah.. my memory is fading. The REAL quotation is.
Professor: "Would you like to try the smelloscope, Fry?"
Fry: "Hey, as long as you don't make me smell Uranus."
Leela: "I don't get it."
Professor: "I'm sorry, Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all."
Fry: "Oh. What's it called now?"
Professor: "Urectum. Here, let me locate it for you."
Fry: "Hehe, no, no, I think I'll just smell around a bit over here."
"Hehe, I want to smell Uranus."
"Actually Fry, many years ago scientists changed the name to prevent that stupid joke from recurring. It is now called Yourarse."
Are you saying there is something wrong with the graphics? I prefer the older Daleks to the newer ones. The new series Daleks just look too fake. Blah.
(goes back to watching some Peter Davidson)
I just checked this morning and noticed something different looks great. Hell of a lot better then before. Looks a lot cleaner and sleaker. However my only concern is if you included an automated duper-detector. Or is that asking too much?
I remember seeing something like that on TV (OLN if you are interested) and it was pretty dull. I mean it just showed two teams firing at each other. You couldn't see the balls flying through the air and it was pretty boring. No first-person cams or anything.
That was my thought as well. After reading the nano review, I was impressed that I could practically thrown the thing down and still have it work. By reading the article, it appears that it will survive the basic wear-and-tear of everyday life, but I would like to see how will it survives under more extreme conditions.
Argh, at my high school so many damn kids listen to iPods during class! It is so freaking annoying. I don't get kids these days, why don't you stop listening to your music and listen to the teacher for an hour. Your music can wait. I can only hope that kids don't watch TV during class or something because if I were the teacher, I would be taking the device away for a long time.
From what I've read, Aperture is different from Photoshop.
Apple downplayed the competitive threat that Aperture potentially poses to Adobe's popular Photoshop software, describing it as "complementary" to Photoshop. "This is to do a whole different set of things," Schiller said in an interview. "There's been no software that does what aperture does."
From CNET
Well I think they were referring to other things. Seriously, if an encyclopedia contained a history of slashdot, I would be very surprised. Heck, the encyclopedia would have to be updated every week with new information, which is completely impractical.
Personally, I've only used wikipedia for a starting point, as suggested before. I don't ever use information from it because I just don't trust it. This summer, one of my teachers used it, and he pointed out many errors. However, it was good for a basic overview of what the subject is.
This has been avaliable for a while http://www.unit.org.uk/
Is obviously 42
You would not believe how many people posted this on the venganza forums. I've found it at least 6 or 7 times in different topics. Inrefuteable proof!
May the noodly appenedage guide you - Omnieiunium
They at least want something intelligible
Ah, who are you kidding? No one uses realplayer!
Probably all ready been asked by now, but how will they distribute them? Just put the file on their servers and see bandwidth fly away? Or will they actually embrace a P2P technology like BT to release the files? Another question, how big would the files be? I know that a 2 hour movie is easily about 700MB - 1.2 GB from what I have downloaded in the past.
However, I doubt I would subscribe to such a service because I assume it would be lacking many of the special features that DVDs have, like directors cuts and deleted scenes.
alas, still no cure for cancer. Oh yah, Duke Sucks. /slashy //bad attempt at being funny ///not fark
What?? You didn't like it? -sulks away-
Just look at how many people read slashdot.
Blah.. my memory is fading. The REAL quotation is.
Professor: "Would you like to try the smelloscope, Fry?"
Fry: "Hey, as long as you don't make me smell Uranus."
Leela: "I don't get it."
Professor: "I'm sorry, Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all."
Fry: "Oh. What's it called now?"
Professor: "Urectum. Here, let me locate it for you."
Fry: "Hehe, no, no, I think I'll just smell around a bit over here."
"Hehe, I want to smell Uranus."
"Actually Fry, many years ago scientists changed the name to prevent that stupid joke from recurring. It is now called Yourarse."
Pfft, how about giving those hackers a REAL challenge :)
Haha! So it is. Thanks for that.
Are you saying there is something wrong with the graphics? I prefer the older Daleks to the newer ones. The new series Daleks just look too fake. Blah. (goes back to watching some Peter Davidson)
I would mod you up for that comment but...
I just checked this morning and noticed something different looks great. Hell of a lot better then before. Looks a lot cleaner and sleaker. However my only concern is if you included an automated duper-detector. Or is that asking too much?
Finally something that isn't crap on TLC. Oh wait...
1337 930913 |)0|\|'7 |\|33|) 59311(|-|3(|3|25
Linguo: Sentence fragment. Lisa: Sentence fragment is also a sentence fragment.
Ah, what can't you learn from the simpsons?
I remember seeing something like that on TV (OLN if you are interested) and it was pretty dull. I mean it just showed two teams firing at each other. You couldn't see the balls flying through the air and it was pretty boring. No first-person cams or anything.
Praise fellow pastafarian. That is what I tried first.
I checked it out, but I am not that impressed. It could be better.